Tachedjian et al.indd


Drug Target Insights 2007: 2 159–182 159

REVIEW

Correspondence: Gilda Tachedjian, Ph.D., Molecular Interactions Group, The Macfarlane Burnet Institute for 
Medical Research and Public Health, GPO Box 2284, Melbourne, Victoria, 3001, Australia. 
Tel: 61 3 9282 2256; Fax: 61 3 9282 2100; Email: gildat@burnet.edu.au
Please note that this article may not be used for commercial purposes. For further information please refer to the copyright 
statement at http://www.la-press.com/copyright.htm

Targeting Human Immunodefi ciency Virus Type 1 Assembly, 
Maturation and Budding
Johanna Wapling1,2, Seema Srivastava1, Miranda Shehu-Xhilaga3,4 
and Gilda Tachedjian1,2,3
1Molecular Interactions Group, Macfarlane Burnet Institute for Medical Research and Public Health, 
Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia. 2Department of Microbiology, Monash University, Clayton, 
Victoria 3168, Australia. 3Department of Medicine, Monash University, Prahran, Victoria 3181, 
Australia. 4Infectious Diseases Unit, Alfred Hospital, Prahran, Victoria 3181, Australia.

Abstract: The targets for licensed drugs used for the treatment of human immunodefi ciency virus type 1 (HIV-1) are confi ned 
to the viral reverse transcriptase (RT), protease (PR), and the gp41 transmembrane protein (TM). While currently approved 
drugs are effective in controlling HIV-1 infections, new drug targets and agents are needed due to the eventual emergence 
of drug resistant strains and drug toxicity. Our increased understanding of the virus life-cycle and how the virus interacts 
with the host cell has unveiled novel mechanisms for blocking HIV-1 replication. This review focuses on inhibitors that 
target the late stages of virus replication including the synthesis and traffi cking of the viral polyproteins, viral assembly, 
maturation and budding. Novel approaches to blocking the oligomerization of viral enzymes and the interactions between 
viral proteins and host cell factors, including their feasibility as drug targets, are discussed.

Keywords: HIV-1, antiretroviral drugs, drug targets, assembly, maturation, budding, protease dimerization, reverse 
transcriptase dimerization.

Introduction
HIV-1 is a major public health problem affecting an estimated 40 million individuals worldwide (www.
unaids.org). Although it has been over 20 years since HIV-1 was identifi ed as the etiologic cause of 
acquired immune defi ciency syndrome (AIDS) an effective vaccine is not available. Thus, apart from 
public health measures that aim at HIV-1 prevention, the only effective strategy for controlling HIV-1 
infections and lowering HIV-1 transmission is the use of antiretroviral drugs either for the treatment or 
prevention of infections.

Current antiretroviral drugs belong to four classes, the nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase 
inhibitors (NRTIs), nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), protease (PR) inhibitors 
(PI) and fusion inhibitors (Vivet-Boudou et al. 2006; De Clercq, 1998; Abdel-Rahman et al. 2002; 
Manfredi and Sabbatani, 2006). NRTIs and NNRTIs are respectively, competitive and allosteric 
inhibitors of the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) and act early in the viral life-cycle by blocking the 
conversion of the viral RNA genome into a double stranded proviral DNA precursor (Shehu-Xhilaga 
et al. 2005). Fuzeon (enfuvirtide or T20) is a peptide that also acts early in the virus life-cycle by 
preventing viral entry through interaction with the gp41 transmembrane protein (Shehu-Xhilaga 
et al. 2005). In contrast, PIs inhibit the late stage of virus replication by blocking the specifi c cleavage 
of Gag and Gag-Pol polyproteins to mature structural proteins and enzymes (Shehu-Xhilaga et al. 
2005). Early antiretroviral regimens consisted of one or two RTIs, which were delivered as sequen-
tial monotherapy and led to treatment failure (Piacenti, 2006). The advent of combination therapy, 
or highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) since 1996 has been responsible for a dramatic 
decrease in AIDS mortality (Palella et al. 1998). Current HAART regimens generally comprise three 
antiretroviral drugs, usually two NRTIs and either a PI or an NNRTI (Yeni et al. 2002). While an 
armoury of agents is available for the treatment of HIV-1 patients, new drugs and drug targets need 
to be identifi ed due to drug toxicity and the eventual emergence of drug resistant strains to current 
antiretroviral inhibitors (Clavel and Hance, 2004). Moreover, resistance to one drug normally results 



160

Wapling et al

Drug Target Insights 2007: 2

in cross-resistance to inhibitors of the same class, 
rendering a large number of agents to limited 
clinical use (Clavel and Hance, 2004). Therefore, 
the development or availability of new drugs such 
as Fuzeon, the HIV-1 integrase inhibitor ralte-
gravir (MK-0518) (Grinsztejn et al. 2007) and the 
CCR5 antagonist maraviroc (Stephenson, 2007) 
that remain active against drug resistant virus is 
essential for the continuing success of HAART 
(Yeni, 2006).

The increased understanding of how HIV-1 
reproduces and interacts with the host cell 
machinery has resulted in the identifi cation of 
potential drug targets, which can be exploited for 
the development of new classes of inhibitors. Here 
we describe strategies and agents that block the 
late stages of HIV-1 replication including the 
synthesis and traffi cking of viral polyproteins, 
viral assembly, maturation and budding. Novel 
approaches to blocking the oligomerization of 
viral enzymes and the interactions between viral 
proteins and host cell factors are discussed 
including their feasibility as drug targets. While 
peptidomimetic PIs act at the late stage of HIV-1 
replication to block viral maturation, this 
review will deal with agents that inhibit HIV-1 
PR by novel mechanisms that are distinct to 
these transition state mimetics that are competi-
tive inhibitors of the HIV-1 PR.

Late Stages of the HIV-1 Life Cycle
Following virus attachment, fusion and uncoating 
the single stranded positive sense RNA genome 
of HIV-1 is reverse transcribed by the viral RT 
into a proviral DNA precursor in a reverse tran-
scription complex (RTC) containing viral and 
possibly host cell factors (Fig. 1). The RTC 
matures into a preintegration complex (PIC) and 
traffi cs to the nucleus where the viral cDNA is 
inserted into the host cell chromosome by the 
HIV-1 integrase (IN) (Telesnitsky A. and Goff, 
1997). The processes from entry up to and 
including integration are defi ned as the early 
steps in the viral life cycle. The late stage of 
virus replication begins with transcription of the 
viral mRNAs from the integrated provirus 
(Fig.1). Singly and multiply spliced mRNAs 
encode the HIV-1 envelope proteins and regula-
tory/accessory proteins, respectively (Rabson 
and Graves, 1997). Pr55gag (Gag) and Pr160gag-pol 
(Gag-Pol) polyproteins are translated from 

unspliced mRNAs (Swanstrom, 1997). Formation 
of two types of polyproteins from the same 
unspliced mRNA is mediated by a ribosomal 
frameshifting mechanism that brings the pol 
sequence in the same reading frame as gag. 
Perturbation of ribosomal frameshifting leads to 
changes in the Gag and Gag-Pol ratio that is 
detrimental to virus assembly, morphogenesis 
and release (Swanstrom, 1997). 

Gag encodes the viral structural proteins 
matrix (MA), capsid (CA), nucleocapsid (NC), 
p6 and two spacer peptides, p1 and p2. Gag-Pol 
also encodes MA, CA and NC in addition to the 
three viral enzymes, PR, RT and IN. After trans-
lation, Gag and Gag-Pol are targeted to the host 
cell plasma membrane, a process that is depen-
dent on the myristoylation of the N-terminus of 
Gag (Fig. 1) (Swanstrom, 1997). Inhibition 
of myristoylation disrupts the proper targeting of 
Gag and Gag-Pol to the plasma membrane 
(Swanstrom, 1997). 

Gag-Gag, Gag/Gag-Pol and Gag-RNA interac-
tions are also essential for the proper assembly 
and maturation of infectious virions. Gag and 
Gag-Pol assemble at the plasma membrane along 
with viral envelope glycoproteins gp120 and gp41 
to form immature viral particles (Fig. 1). Gag is 
necessary and suffi cient for virus particle forma-
tion (Freed, 1998; Swanstrom, 1997). The viral 
genomic RNA is also packaged into virions 
through interactions with the NC of Gag and a psi 
packaging signal in the genome (Swanstrom, 
1997). As the newly assembled virions bud from 
the cell it is believed that Gag-Pol polyproteins 
oligomerize in order to activate the HIV-1 PR by 
forming an active PR homodimer. This results in 
the sequential cleavage of Gag and Gag-Pol into 
the mature structural proteins and enzymes 
(Kaplan et al. 1994; Pettit et al. 1998). Agents that 
bind to domains in Gag or Gag-Pol and modulate 
their oligomerization are likely to have a negative 
effect on virus assembly, maturation and budding 
(Fig. 1). Agents that interfere with HIV-1 PR 
mediated cleavage of Gag and Gag-Pol result in 
the production of immature viral particles that are 
non-infectious (Kohl et al. 1988). 

Virus particle budding and egress is mediated 
by interactions of viral proteins such as the p6 late 
domain with components of the endosomal sorting 
machinery. Ion channels formed by viral protein 
U (Vpu) also facilitate viral particle egress from 
the host cell. Below we describe in more detail the 



161

Targeting the late stages of HIV-1 replication

Drug Target Insights 2007: 2

specifi c processes required for viral assembly, 
maturation and budding and agents that have been 
described that block these steps.

Inhibitors of Gag and Gag-Pol 
Expression: Targeting Ribosomal 
Frameshifting
HIV-1 Gag and Gag-Pol polyproteins are encoded 
by overlapping open reading frames on the same 
unspliced mRNA. During translation Gag-Pol is 
synthesized by a -1 ribosomal frameshifting 
mechanism that occurs at a frequency of 5 to 10% 

of Gag translation events (Jacks et al. 1988b). 
Similar frameshifting mechanisms are also 
used by other retroviruses including Rous 
sarcoma virus and Mouse mammary tumor 
virus in order to regulate expression of Gag-Pol 
(Jacks and Varmus, 1985; Jacks et al. 1987; 
Jacks et al. 1988a). The HIV-1 frameshift site is 
a heptanucleotide  AU-rich sequence (UUUUUUA) 
found at the 3′ end of the NC coding sequence 
and is conserved amongst HIV-1 isolates. This 
slippery sequence and a downstream RNA stem 
loop structure stall the ribosome during the 
synthesis of Gag, allowing the ribosome to slip 

Figure 1. Overview of the HIV-1 life-cycle. Early events in virus replication include attachment, fusion and uncoating of the virus followed 
by reverse transcription in the cytoplasm of the cell, nuclear import of the preintegration complex and integration of the proviral DNA precur-
sor into the host cell chromosome. Late events begin with transcription of unspliced and spliced RNA from the provirus and export of the 
mRNAs to the cytoplasm, resulting in the translation of Gag, Gag-Pol, Env and the accessory and regulatory proteins of HIV-1. Regulation 
of Gag-Pol synthesis is mediated by a ribosomal frameshifting mechanism from unspliced mRNA that also expresses Gag. Myristoylation 
of Gag is necessary for traffi cking of Gag and Gag-Pol to the site of viral assembly. Assembly is driven by interactions between Gag-Gag, 
Gag/Gag-Pol, Gag-RNA. Viral budding and egress involves host cell factors. During or shortly after budding the HIV-1 PR cleaves the Gag 
and Gag-Pol polyproteins resulting in a mature and infectious viral particle. 

Late Event Targets

Frameshifting Myristoylation
& Trafficking

Assembly Budding & Egress Maturation

Early Events
Late Events

Recognition
& Attachment

Fusion
Uncoating &

Reverse Transcription

Nuclear
Import

 mRNA
export

Translation

Myristoylation
& Trafficking

Maturation

Integration

Transcription
& Splicing

Assembly
Budding
& Egress

RTCPIC

Gag/Gag-Pol ratio Myristoylation Gag/Gag interactions
Gag/Gag-Pol interactions

Gag/RNA interactions

 VPU
p6 PTAT motif

PR dimerization
RT dimerization
IN dimerization
Gag cleavage



162

Wapling et al

Drug Target Insights 2007: 2

back one nucleotide and enable synthesis of the 
Gag-Pol fusion protein (Jacks et al. 1988b). This 
sequence, the stem-loop structure and its stability 
and adjacent interacting sequences are believed 
to be the key components of the frameshifting 
signal (Jacks et al. 1988b; Kollmus et al. 1994; 
Hill et al. 2005). Details of a recently reported 
NMR structure and an analysis of current HIV-1 
frameshifting models have recently been reviewed 
(Brierley and Dos Ramos, 2006). 

Studies demonstrate that perturbation of the 
Gag/Gag-Pol ratio result in major defects in virus 
replication, suggesting that interfering with ribo-
somal frameshifting represents a viable drug 
target. Alteration of the Gag/Gag-Pol ratio, by 
engineering vectors with gag and pol genes in the 
same open reading frame, results in major defects 
in assembly and budding (Karacostas et al. 
1993; Park and Morrow, 1991). The block in virus 
assembly is partially overcome by inhibition 
of the HIV-1 PR, suggesting that increased HIV-1 
PR activity is responsible for the defect (Karacostas 
et al. 1993). A later study, in which the impact of 
decreasing the ratio of Gag/Gag-Pol on virion 
production was determined by co-transfection of 
plasmids expressing Gag and Gag-Pol alone 
demonstrate that the maintenance of this ratio is 
not only important for HIV-1 replication but also 
for virion RNA dimer formation and stability 
(Shehu-Xhilaga et al. 2001a). Furthermore, a 
decrease in Gag-Pol translation results in major 
defects in virus maturation and HIV-1 infectivity 
(Dulude et al. 2006). The small molecule, 1,4-
bis-[N-(3-N,N-dimethylpropyl)amidino]benzene
 tetrahydrochloride (RG501, Table 1), is thought 
to enhance ribosomal frameshifting of HIV-1 by 
binding to the RNA stem loop structure of the 
ribosomal frameshifting signal resulting in 
increased ribosomal pausing (Hung et al. 1998). 
The imbalance in the resulting Gag/Gag-Pol 
ratio is associated with inhibition of acute and 
chronic HIV-1 infection in CCRF-CEM cells and 
peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

Targeting Gag and Gag-Pol 
Traffi cking
During the late phase of the viral life cycle, Gag 
polyproteins are targeted to the plasma membrane, 
where they are believed to colocalise to lipid raft 
microdomains for assembly into immature virions 
(Morikawa et al. 1996; Bryant and Ratner, 1990; 

Bouamr et al. 2003; Ding et al. 2003; Holm et al. 
2003; Tang et al. 2004). Membrane targeting of 
Gag is mediated by the N-terminal myristoyl group 
in concert with conserved basic amino acids at the 
N-terminus of the MA domain of Gag (Bryant and 
Ratner, 1990; Facke et al. 1993; Ono and Freed, 
1999; Ono et al. 2000). Myristic acid is a saturated 
14-carbon fatty acid, post transationally attached 
to the N-terminal glycine of both Gag and Gag-Pol 
(Veronese et al. 1988). Myristoylation of Gag but 
not Gag-Pol is critical for targeting these polypro-
teins to the plasma membrane (Park and Morrow, 
1992; Smith et al. 1993). Mutations that interfere 
with Gag myristoylation inhibit viral budding and 
misdirect virion assembly to the cytosolic fraction 
(Gottlinger et al. 1989; Bryant and Ratner, 1990). 
However, complete inhibition of Gag myris-
toylation is necessary to block HIV-1 budding 
(Morikawa et al. 1996).

Myristoylation is a two-step process involving 
activation of myristate to myristoyl-CoA by acyl-
CoA synthetase and transfer of the myristoyl 
moiety from the myristoyl-CoA substrate to the 
N-terminal glycine of Gag by the enzyme 
N-myristoyltransferase (NMT) (Morikawa et al. 
1996; Veronese et al. 1988). This pathway has been 
utilized to deliver alternate myristoylation 
substrates that perturb viral assembly.

The myristic acid analogue 12-azidododeca-
noic acid is a potent inhibitor of HIV-1 produc-
tion in acute and chronically infected T-cell lines, 
exhibiting a maximum inhibitory effect between 
10–50 µM at noncytotoxic concentrations, 
however the mechanism of action is not defi ned 
(Devadas et al. 1992). Another analogue, 
4-oxatetra-decanoic acid, reduces HIV-1 replication 
in a T-cell line at 18 µM (Langner et al. 
1 9 9 2 ) .  Heteroatom-substituted analogs of 
myristic acid such as 12-methoxydodecanoate 
(13-oxamyristate or 13-OxaMyr), 5-octyloxypen-
tanoate (6-oxamyristate or 6-OxaMyr), 11-ethyl-
thioundecanoic acid and 12-thioethyldodecanoic 
acid act as alternate substrates for Gag myris-
toylation (Bryant et al. 1989; Bryant et al. 1991; 
Parang et al. 1997) and can prevent membrane 
binding of the modifi ed Gag proteins (Bryant et al. 
1989; Bryant et al. 1991). Of the heteroatom substi-
tuted analogs, 13-OxaMyr is the most potent 
inhibitor. 13-OxaMyr is added to Gag with an 
effi cacy similar to that of myristate and alters 
viral polyprotein processing, which is suggested 
to be a consequence of inhibiting Gag and 



163

Targeting the late stages of HIV-1 replication

Drug Target Insights 2007: 2

Table 1. Inhibitors of the late stages of HIV-1 replication.

Inhibitor Description Reference
Ribosomal frameshifting   
1,4-bis-[N-(3-N,N  Small molecule (Hung et al. 1998).
dimethylpropyl)amidino]benzene   
tetrahydrochloride   
(RG501)  

Myristoylation and Traffi cking  
12-azidododecanoic acid  Myristic acid analogue (Devadas et al. 1992)
4-oxatetra-decanoic acid  (Langner et al. 1992) 
12-methoxydodecanoate Heteroatom-substituted  (Bryant et al. 1989)
5-ocytl-oxypentanoate myristic acid analogues (Bryant et al. 1991)
11-ethylthioundecanoic acid   (Parang et al. 1997)
12-thioethyldodecanoic acid  
5-cis-tetradecenoic acid  Unsaturated 14-Carbon (Lindwasser and Resh, 2002).
(physeteric acid) fatty acids 
5-cis,8-cis-tetradecenoic acid   
(goshuyic acid)  

Assembly—Gag/Gag Interactions
CAP-1 Small molecule (Tang et al. 2003)
PAATLEEMMTA CA derived peptide (Niedrig et al. 1994).
GPG-NH2 CA derived tripeptide amide (Hoglund et al. 2002)
CAI Peptide (Sticht et al. 2005)
  (Ternois et al. 2005)

Maturation—Gag processing
3-0-(3′-3′-dimethylsuccinyl)-betulinic  Small molecule (Li et al. 2003)
acid   (Zhou et al. 2004)
(PA-457/bevirimat)  (Sakalian et al. 2006)
electrophilic disulfi de-substituted  NC Zn fi nger inhibitor (Rice et al. 1995)
benzamides (DIBAs)  (Turpin et al. 1996)
1,2-dithiane-4,5-diol,1,1-dioxide  NC Zn fi nger inhibitor (Rice et al. 1997)
(NSC 624151)  
S-acyl 2-mercaptobenzamide thioester  NC Zn fi nger inhibitor (Schito et al. 2006).
(SAMT)  

Maturation—PR dimerisation
Ac-TLNF-OH PR C-terminal tetrapeptide (Zhang et al. 1991)
Pal-YDL-OH  Modifi ed PR C-terminal  (Schramm et al. 1999) 
Pal-YD-(biphenylalaine)-OH lipopeptides 
Pal-YDT-OH  
Apam(2)-YD-thyroxine-OH  (Dumond et al. 2003)
PQITL(GGG)CTLNF Glycine linked PR interface  (Babe et al. 1992)
 tetra-peptides 
HO-FNLTS-NH-(CH2)n-N-PQITLW-OH Alkyl linked PR interface  (Zutshi et al. 1997)
 peptides (Ulysse and Chmielewski, 1998)
  (Zutshi and Chmielewski, 2000)

(Continued)



164

Wapling et al

Drug Target Insights 2007: 2

Molecular tongs Scaffold constrained PR  (Bouras et al. 1999)
 interface peptides (Breccia et al. 2003)
  (Merabet et al. 2004)
  (Hwang and Chmielewski, 2005)
  (Bannwarth et al. 2006) 
β-sheet peptide/peptidomimetic PR interface derived  (Song et al. 2001)
 peptidomimetics 
PQITL-RKKRRQRRRPPQV-SFNF- PR C-terminal fusion  (Davis et al. 2006)
C/ATLN (P27/P27A) peptide 
BocFψ[CH2NH]FEF-NH-CH2-CO- Linked PR C-terminal  (Uhlikova et al. 1996)
TLNF-OH tetrapeptide—active site  (Skalova et al. 2003)
 inhibitor
Pentaester 13e Didemnaketal A analogue (Fan et al. 1998)
Ursolic Acid Triterpene (Quere et al. 1996)
NHGRNLLTQI (S8) PR LES peptide (Broglia et al. 2005)
  (Broglia et al. 2006)
IVQVDAEG (p51) Random peptide (Park and Raines, 2000).
Vpr-(spacer)-TLNF-OH  Vpr, PR C-terminal fusion peptide (Cartas et al. 2001). 

Maturation—RT dimerisation 
[2′,5′-bis-O-(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)-β- Small molecule (Sluis-Cremer et al. 2000)
D-ribofuranosyl]-3′-spiro-5″-(4″-amino-  (Rodriguez-Barrios et al. 
1′,2″-oxathiole-2″,2″-dioxide)  2001)
thymine (TSAO-T)
N-(4-tert-Butylbenzoyl)-2-hydroxy-1- Small molecule (Arion et al. 2002)
naphthaldehyde hydrazone) (BBNH)  (Sluis-Cremer and 
  Tachedjian, 2002)
  (Himmel et al.)
KETWETWWTE (Pep-7) RT connection subdomain peptide (Morris et al. 1999)
  (Depollier et al. 2005)
TLMALELKGKLLLAGLAPSAFLPLSFP Designed peptide targeting  (Campbell et al. 2002)
EGL (TLMA2993) RT connection subdomain (Hosokawa et al. 2004)

Maturation—IN Dimerisation
INI 1 Host cell factor (Yung et al. 2001)
  (Sorin et al. 2006)
  (Ariumi et al. 2006)
  (Kalpana et al. 1994)

Budding and Egress
5-(N,N-hexamethylene)amiloride (HMA) Amiloride analogue (Ewart et al. 2002)
5-(N,N-dimethyl)amiloride (DMA)  (Ewart et al. 2004)
Vpu Binding protein (UBP) Host cell factor (Callahan et al. 1998)
  (Handley et al. 2001)
  (Harila et al. 2006)
  (Neil et al. 2006)
TSG101 Host cell factor (Garrus et al. 2001)
  (Demirov et al. 2002)
  (Goila-Gaur et al. 2003)
zLLL/MG-132 Lactocystin Proteosome inhibitor (Schubert et al. 2000)
  (Ott et al. 2003)

Abbreviations: Ac: acetylation; Pam: palmitoyl; Apam: 2-aminopalmitic acid

Table 1. (Continued)

Inhibitor Description Reference



165

Targeting the late stages of HIV-1 replication

Drug Target Insights 2007: 2

Gag-Pol traffi cking (Bryant et al. 1991). In an 
acutely infected T-cell line 13-OxaMyr reduces 
HIV-1 replication in the 40–80 µM range (Bryant 
et al. 1989). 13-OxaMyr also inhibits viral 
production in chronically infected H9/IIIB cells, 
which is consistent for an inhibitor that targets 
the late stage of HIV-1 replication (Bryant et al. 
1991). 13-OxaMyr exhibits a synergistic anti-
HIV-1 effect with AZT suggesting its potential 
for use in combination therapy (Bryant et al. 
1991). The therapeutic effi cacy of 13-OxaMyr 
can be further enhanced by conjugation with 
glycerophospholipid L-∝-phosphatidylethanol-
amine (Pidgeon et al. 1993). The selectivity of 
these heteroatom analogs for the target protein 
is dependent on the position of the substituted 
heteroatom, thus they can be exploited as a 
therapeutic antiretroviral strategy. Nevertheless, 
heteroatom-substituted myristic acid analogs are 
still expected to adversely affect a substantial 
range of cellular processes that depend on protein 
N-myristoylation (Lindwasser and Resh, 2002).

An alternative strategy for targeting Gag myris-
toylation is the exogenous treatment of cells with 
unsaturated 14-carbon fatty acids including 5-cis-
tetradecenoic acid (14:1n-9, physeteric acid) and 
5-cis,8-cis-tetradecadienoic acid (14:2n-6, goshuyic 
acid) (Lindwasser and Resh, 2002). As lipid rafts 
have preference for saturated fatty acids, treatment 
with unsaturated analogs interferes with membrane 
targeting of Gag and consequentially viral assembly 
and production (Lindwasser and Resh, 2002). 
These inhibitors also interfere with certain Src-
kinase mediated cellular pathways, although they 
appear to have no effect on cell proliferation 
(Campbell and Vogt, 1995). It is suggested that 
direct dietary intake of physeteric acid and goshuyic 
acid could be a useful therapeutic strategy for the 
treatment of HIV-1 infections. However, the effect 
of long term intake of these unsaturated fatty acids 
and their effect on N-myristoylated signaling 
proteins such as Src, G-proteins, Arf and heteroge-
neously N-acylated retinal proteins needs to be 
assessed (Lindwasser and Resh, 2002). 

Recent studies also indicate a role for phospha-
tidylinositide 4,5-bisphosphate [PI(4,5)P2] in 
regulating Gag localization (Ono et al. 2004). 
In HIV-1, binding of PI(4,5)P2 to the MA 
domain in Gag activates the “myristyol switch” 
and also acts as the point of membrane attachment 
(Saad et al. 2006). The binding site of PI(4,5)P2 
on MA is highly conserved amongst HIV-1 strains 

and therefore represents an attractive antiviral 
target (Shkriabai et al. 2006; Saad et al. 2006).

Targeting HIV-1 CA 
CA plays an important role in the HIV-1 life-cycle 
by promoting Gag-Gag interactions during virion 
maturation. The N- and C-terminal domains of this 
protein serve distinct functions. As shown by 
mutational analysis, the N terminal domain of CA 
(N-CA), otherwise known as the NTD, is respon-
sible for maintaining the proper conformation of 
CA during the assembly process (Worthylake et al. 
1999; Li et al. 2000). The C-terminal domain of 
CA (C-CA) or the CTD, is critical for Gag-Gag 
interactions during assembly and maturation 
(Gamble et al. 1996; Gamble et al. 1997) and 
described mutations in this region have major 
consequences on virion maturation and infectivity 
(von Schwedler et al. 2003; Ganser-Pornillos et al. 
2004). The NMR structure of CA has demonstrated 
that the protein consists mainly of seven α-helices, 
two β-hairpins and a loop structure (Momany et al. 
1996; Gitti et al. 1996). Five of the α-helices form 
a coiled-coiled structure while one of the 
β-hairpins is located on the surface of the N-terminal 
domain of the protein (Momany et al. 1996). The 
second β-hairpin is predicted to be formed after 
cleavage by the HIV-1 PR (Tang et al. 2002). 
Cleavage of CA from its neighbouring proteins is 
necessary for core condensation and conical capsid 
shell formation (Vogt, 1996; Wiegers et al. 1998). 
Compounds that bind to these regions would be 
expected to disrupt proper CA shell formation and 
virion infectivity making CA an important and 
attractive target for the development of antiretro-
viral agents. 

A proof of concept study, demonstrating the 
potential of inhibiting CA-CA interactions as an 
antiretroviral target has been published (Tang et al. 
2003). Computational high throughput screening 
of a small molecule library and NMR analysis for 
binding specifi city resulted in the identifi cation of 
CAP-1 and CAP-2 which bind to an apical site on 
the NTD of both immature and mature CA (Tang 
et al. 2003). While CAP-2, is toxic to U1 cells, 
CAP-1 reduces viral infectivity by 95% at 
100 µM. The released virions lack cone shaped 
cores and resemble viral particles that have been 
observed in HIV-1 expressing mutations that 
disrupt CA-CA interactions (Dorfman et al. 1994; 
Reicin et al. 1996; von Schwedler et al. 2003; 



166

Wapling et al

Drug Target Insights 2007: 2

Lanman et al. 2003). Despite aberrant viral 
morphology CAP-1 does not affect viral particle 
release or proteolytic processing (Tang et al. 
2003). CAP-1 and CAP-2 bind to a common site 
within the NTD thus preventing CA-CA interac-
tions and proper Gag assembly.

Peptides derived from HIV-1 CA have also 
been described to affect viral morphogenesis by 
interfering with capsid formation (Niedrig et al. 
1994). The synthetic peptide, PAATLEEMMTA, 
inhibits HIV-1 replication in cell culture assays 
at 20–200 µg/ml and results in the production 
of immature and aberrant viral particles (Niedrig 
et al. 1994). Tripeptide amides derived from 
the carboxyl terminus of CA inhibit HIV-1 
replication, with the three most potent peptides 
interacting with CA as demonstrated by capillary 
electrophoresis analysis (Hoglund et al. 2002). 
Glycyl-prolyl-glycine-amide (GPG-NH2) inter-
feres with the formation of HIV-1 particles 
with a normal conical core structure (Hoglund 
et al. 2002). G-NH2 is an active metabolite of 
GPG-NH2 indicating that the latter acts as a 
pro-drug (Andersson et al. 2005). However, the 
development of HIV-1 resistance to either G-NH2 
or GPG-NH2 has been elusive suggesting that the 
peptides mediate their effects through a host cell 
or other factor (Andersson et al. 2004).

CAI, a small peptide selected by phage display 
screening, acts as an inhibitor of the assembly of 
immature Gag in vitro (Sticht et al. 2005; Ternois 
et al. 2005). CAI binds to the C-terminus of CA 

(Kd ~ 800 µM), thus preventing the necessary 
conformational changes in CA that lead to the 
formation of mature cores (Sticht et al. 2005). 
The structure of CAI complexed with CA has 
revealed that the CAI binding region is a highly 
conserved hydrophobic pocket within the C 
terminus of CA where the peptide forms an extra 
α-helix, which binds to the four α-helices of CA 
(Ternois et al. 2005). The resulting protein-
peptide complex is therefore a fi ve α-helix bundle 
with reduced CA-CA dimerization contacts that 
destabilizes the dimer interface. Binding of CAI 
to the C-CA not only affects the assembly of the 
immature capsid particles but also reduces 
the amount of correctly assembled mature capsids 
in vitro, thus acting as a promising two-step 
inhibitor (Sticht et al. 2005). 

The C-terminal domain of Gag in the context 
of Gag-Pol is essential for its interaction with Gag 
and its incorporation into the virion (Srinivasakumar 

et al. 1995; Chiu et al. 2002; Chien et al. 2006). 
This sequence includes a highly conserved “major 
homology region” (MHR) in the CA domain of 
Gag and the adjacent CA-SP1 (Srinivasakumar 
et al. 1995; Chien et al. 2006). These sequences 
are also critical for HIV-1 Gag assembly as they 
drive Gag oligomerization. However, the magni-
tude of the virion incorporation defect of Gag-Pol 
MHR deletion mutants varies between different 
studies making the value of targeting this region 
of Gag-Pol unclear with respect to inhibition of 
the late stages of HIV-1 replication (Mammano 
et al. 1994; Srinivasakumar et al. 1995; Chiu et al. 
2002; Chien et al. 2006). 

Sequences involved in Gag and Gag-Pol 
interactions are assumed to be similar to those 
involved in Gag-Gag interactions. However, 
virions generated in the presence of CAP-1 are 
unlikely to affect Gag/Gag-Pol interactions as 
defects in proteolytic processing in the virus or 
virion associated RT activity were not observed 
(Tang et al. 2003). The proline rich region of p6 
has also been implicated in the packaging of cleaved 
Pol proteins into virions, which is suggested to be 
mediated by host cell proteins (Dettenhofer and 
Yu, 1999; Cen et al. 2004). Identifying the host 
cell factor implicated in the virion incorporation 
of cleaved Pol will be necessary for establishing 
this process as a viable drug target.

Targeting HIV-1 NC
The HIV-1 NC (NCp7) contains two highly 
conserved zinc fi nger motifs C-X2-C-X4-H-X4-C 
(X, any amino acid). The zinc fi ngers of NC are 
critical in the early and late stages of HIV-1 
replication with mutations in the zinc chelating 
amino acids resulting in formation of non-
infectious virus (Aldovini and Young, 1990). 
The zinc fi ngers of NCp7 are required for initi-
ation, elongation and effi cient template switching 
d u r i n g  r e v e r s e  t r a n s c r i p t i o n  ( R o d r i g u e z -
Rodriguez et al. 1995; Tanchou et al. 1995). 
NCp7 is also involved in HIV-1 genomic RNA 
dimerization, IN cleavage activity and coats the 
viral RNA genome protecting it from nucleases 
(Lapadat-Tapolsky et al. 1993). 

Given the critical role of NCp7 zinc fi ngers in 
HIV-1 replication it is not surprising that agents 
that covalently modify the zinc chelating residues 
of NCp7 have been described as inhibitors of HIV-1 
replication (Rice et al. 1995). The electrophilic 



167

Targeting the late stages of HIV-1 replication

Drug Target Insights 2007: 2

disulfi de-substituted benzamides (DIBAs) inactivate 
cell free virus and inhibit the early and late stages 
of HIV-1 replication by interfering with reverse 
transcription and viral particle maturation (Rice 
et al. 1995; Turpin et al. 1996). In the U1 cell 
line treatment with DIBAs results in the inhibition 
of virus particle release, processing of Gag, and 
the production of virions with reduced infectivity 
(Turpin et al. 1996). The defect in viral particle 
release and maturation was attributed to the 
formation of intermolecular cross-linkages 
between the zinc fi ngers of adjacent Gag mole-
cules, thereby preventing effi cient cleavage by the 
HIV-1 PR (Turpin et al. 1996). 

T h e  n o n - d i s s o c i a b l e  t e t h e r e d  d i t h i a n e 
compound 1,2-dithiane-4,5-diol,1,1-dioxide, 
(NSC 624151) also mediates similar defects in 
Gag processing (Rice et al. 1997). Although 
cellular proteins also contain zinc fingers, these 
inhibitors appear to preferentially target retro-
viral zinc fingers. This may be explained by the 
inaccessibility of these inhibitors to the appro-
priate cellular compartments where zinc finger 
containing cellular proteins are located. The 
in vivo anti-HIV-1 activity of zinc finger 
inhibitors has been demonstrated in a transgenic 
murine model where infectious HIV-1 is induced 
from an integrated provirus (Schito et al. 2003). 
A recent study in a nonhuman primate model 
demonstrated a reduction in the levels of SIV/
DeltaB670 in peripheral blood mononuclear 
cells during therapy with the zinc finger inhib-
itor, S-acyl 2-mercaptobenzamide thioester 
(SAMT), although there was no effect on viral 
load (Schito et al. 2006). Further studies are in 
progress to optimise the bioavailability and 
pharmacokinetics of this promising inhibitor.

Targeting HIV-1 PR
Much of our understanding of how the PR domain 
in Gag-Pol is activated and the processing cascade 
of Gag and Gag-Pol are due to the contributions 
of Kaplan and colleagues (Kaplan et al. 1994; Pettit 
et al. 2005). Strict regulation of PR function is 
critical for effi cient production of mature viral 
particles. Premature activation, partial inhibition, 
or over-expression of HIV-1 PR leads to major 
defects in viral assembly and the production of 
non-infectious viral particles (Krausslich, 1991; 
Kaplan et al. 1993; Karacostas et al. 1993). Hence 
novel inhibitors designed to prevent or perturb PR 

dimerization could potentially inhibit the mature 
PR homodimer and the immature Gag-Pol 
embedded PR.

Targeting the PR Dimer Interface 
with Interface Peptides
HIV-1 PR is a homodimeric aspartyl protease 
formed by the symmetrical association of two 99 
amino acid subunits. The crystal structure reveals 
a compact, predominantly β-strand structure with 
a short α-helix region near the C terminus 
(Wlodawer et al. 1989). Dimerization of the PR 
monomers generates both the substrate-binding 
pocket and the catalytic centre and is essential for 
PR activity (Cheng et al. 1990). The PR dimer has 
a dissociation constant of 50 nM and Gibbs free 
energy of dimer stabilisation of 10 kcal/mol (25 oC, 
pH 3.4). Nearly 75% of the binding energy is 
contributed by the four-stranded β-sheet formed 
by the N- and C-termini (Todd et al. 1998).The 
four-stranded β-sheet comprising the N- and 
C-termini from each PR monomer represents an 
attractive drug target for the following reasons: 1. 
It is the major stabilising region of the active dimer, 
2. The region is relatively free of known PR resis-
tance mutations, 3. The sequence is highly 
conserved in most HIV-1 and HIV-2 isolates and 
4. It provides a unique target minimising potential 
toxicity issues for eukaryotic aspartyl proteases 
(Gustchina and Weber, 1991). 

A standard methodology for analysing potential 
PR inhibitors that prevent PR dimerization (disso-
ciative inhibition) or target and bind to the PR 
active site (competitive inhibition) has been 
described (Zhang et al. 1991). An example of a 
dissociative inhibitor is the C-terminal tetrapeptide, 
Ac-T-L-N-F, which exhibits activity in the micro-
molar range (Ki 45 µM) (Zhang et al. 1991). Other 
studies have also shown the capacity of N- and 
C-terminal peptides, or ‘interface’ peptides, to bind 
to PR monomers and thus prevent PR dimerization 
and activity (Babe et al. 1991; Franciskovich et al. 
1993; Schramm et al. 1991; Schramm et al. 1996). 
The identifi cation of these lead peptides provides 
proof of concept that targeting the PR β-sheet 
region constitutes a viable strategy for the develop-
ment of novel inhibitors of HIV-1 PR.

The potency of C-terminal tetrapeptides are 
increased by truncation to a core tripeptide, amino 
acid modifi cation, and the addition of a linear 
hydrophobic moiety such as palmitoyl to the amino 



168

Wapling et al

Drug Target Insights 2007: 2

HIV-1 PR monmer

N-terminal

C-terminal

peptide

peptide

scaffold

‘molecular tong’

terminus of the peptide. The lipid moiety is thought 
to increase the dissociative activity of the peptides 
by directing it to the hydrophobic PR interface 
(Schramm et al. 1999). However, despite their 
capacity to inhibit PR activity at low nanomolar 
concentrations, these lipopeptides are poorly 
soluble and susceptible to protein degradation. 
Further modifi cations have been made to the lipo-
peptides by making them less peptide-like 
(Cafl isch et al. 2000) and by modifying the lipid 
moiety to increase their solubility while retaining 
potency (Dumond et al. 2003). 

Cross-linking interfacial peptides represent 
another strategy, with the aim to increase the 
affi nity of the peptides by presenting them in a 
conformation similar to a PR monomer. The fi rst 
interface tetrapeptides tethered with a glycine 
linker display greater potency (PF1, IC50= 40 µM) 
compared to free tetrapeptides (IC50 ≥ 150 µM) 
(Babe et al. 1992). This approach has evolved to 
linking peptides with fl exible alkyl tethers (Zutshi 
and Chmielewski, 2000) and semirigid alkyl based 
tethers (Ulysse and Chmielewski, 1998), which 
increase the distance between the peptides to 
approximate that of the PR termini in the dimer 
(~10 Å). The conformational freedom of these 
linked peptides was addressed by the use of 
pyridinediol and naphthalene based molecu-
larly constrained scaffolds (Bouras et al. 1999; 
Song et al. 2001; Merabet et al. 2004; Bannwarth 
et al. 2006). Known as ‘molecular tongs’, these 
compounds are designed to position the interface 
peptides to clamp the termini of a PR monomer 
(Fig. 2). These studies have culminated in a set of 
optimised tongs with symmetrical peptidomimetic 
sequences based on an optimised PR C-terminal 
sequence. The tongs inhibit the activity of HIV-1 

PR that are either sensitive or resistant to PIs with 
Ki values from 0.4–4.8 µM in cell free assays 
(Bannwarth et al. 2006). 

Other variations on the theme of interface 
peptides include combining the advantages of 
lipopeptides and molecular tongs. Interface 
peptides have been linked to lipophilic groups by 
a rigid bicyclic guanidinium scaffold (Breccia et al. 
2003). The most potent compound demonstrates 
PR inhibitory activity similar to tethered peptides 
and molecular tongs. Cross-linked interfacial 
peptides have been designed to irreversibly inhibit 
HIV-1 PR by formation of a disulfi de bond between 
the peptide and the conserved PR residues C-95 
and C-67, and demonstrate a Ki in the low micro-
molar range (Zutshi and Chmielewski, 2000). The 
C-terminal tetrapeptide has also been tethered to 
a peptidic PR active site inhibitor, combining both 
dissociative and competitive methods of inhibition 
in one molecule (Uhlikova et al. 1996). 

Random peptides that are dissociative inhibitors 
of HIV-1 PR have been described. The bacterio-
phage lambda repressor protein was utilised to 
develop a powerful two-hybrid PR dimerization 
assay. From a library of 5 × 108 random peptides, 
300 were identifi ed as potential PR dimerization 
inhibitors. The most potent peptide identifi ed, p52, 
was a pure dissociative inhibitor with low Ki

 of 
780 nM (Park and Raines, 2000). 

Ultimately, one of the major hurdles in devel-
oping peptidic inhibitors is to obtain a biologically 
stable compound that can be delivered inside the 
cell. One mechanism to achieve this is to fuse the 
peptide to amino acid sequences that promote 
either encapsidation into viral particles or entry 
into the host cell. Virus protein R (Vpr) is a HIV-1 
accessory protein packaged into virions by its 
trans association with the Gag p6 motif. Both 
viral and cellular proteins have been successfully 
delivered into viral particles as Vpr fusion 
proteins (Wu et al. 1997). Inhibition of HIV-1 
replication has been reported by the fusion of Vpr 
to viral PR recognition sequences (Serio et al. 
2000). Expression of the PR C-terminal tetrapep-
tide as a Vpr fusion [Vpr-(spacer)-T-L-N-F-OH] 
attenuates HIV-1 replication in chronically 
infected cells and in single-round replication 
assays (Cartas et al. 2001). 

Most recently, inhibition of HIV-1 replication 
has been demonstrated by delivering PR interface 
peptides as a fusion peptide utilising the HIV-1 Tat 
derived cell permeable protein transduction domain 

Figure 2. A molecular tong bound to the C-terminus of the 
HIV-1 PR monomer.



169

Targeting the late stages of HIV-1 replication

Drug Target Insights 2007: 2

(Davis et al. 2006). Peptides P27/A are PR 
dimerization inhibitors that inhibit the activity of 
wild-type and drug resistant PR in cell free assays 
with IC50 values in the 0.28–0.58 µM range. These 
peptides are successfully delivered into chronically 
HIV-1 infected cells and reduce viral particle 
production. This was observed by a reduction in 
p24, rather than inhibition of Gag processing which 
suggests that the peptide may interact with the 
Gag-Pol embedded PR and disrupt the ordered 
processing of Gag-Pol leading a decrease in viral 
particle production (Davis et al. 2006).

PR Folding Inhibitors
Local elementary structures (LES) are comprised 
of strongly interacting, highly conserved amino 
acids that are usually hydrophobic. These amino 
acids are suggested to direct the folding of a protein 
into its native conformation. Short peptides corre-
sponding to or mimicking the LES are hypothesised 
to act as folding inhibitors, preventing the protein 
achieving its native conformation (Broglia et al. 
2005). A peptide has been identifi ed from a LES 
in the HIV-1 PR (peptide S8, amino acids 83–93) 
that inhibits PR activity with a Ki of 2.58 µM and 
results in disorganisation of the PR secondary 
structure by reducing the β-sheet content from 30% 
to 14% (Broglia et al. 2005; Broglia et al. 2006). 
Current efforts are directed towards developing a 
shorter less hydrophobic peptide or mimetic based 
on the S8 lead peptide.

Catalytically Inactive PR Subunits 
as Dominant Negative Inhibitors 
of PR activity
Catalytically inactive PR monomers act in a 
dominant negative fashion to inhibit wild-type 
HIV-1 PR by forming inactive heterodimers in 
recombinant protein assays (Babe and Craik, 
1991). When virus expressing a PR active site 
mutation is co-transfected with wild-type HIV-1, 
both viral replication and virus infectivity are 
reduced (Babe et al. 1995). Computer modelling 
has been used to successfully design an optimised 
dominant-negative PR expressing D25K, G49W 
and I50W (KWW) (McPhee et al. 1996), which 
also reduces viral replication and infectivity 
(Junker et al. 1996). Biochemical studies on recom-
binant dominant negative PRs confi rm that the 
mechanism of action is by formation of inactive 

heterodimers (Rozzelle et al. 2000). Interestingly, 
the mutant PRs cannot homodimerize and they fold 
only when expressed with wild-type PR. PR 
heterodimers are also more stable that the wild-type 
homodimer (Rozzelle et al. 2000). Hence inactive 
PR heterodimers form the dominant species. Such 
a dominant negative strategy for the inhibition of 
HIV-1 PR would require in vivo delivery by a gene-
therapy system, the therapeutic use of which is 
unlikely in the near future.

Non-Peptide Inhibitors of HIV-1 PR
A screen of a crude extract from the marine 
organism magenta ascidian didemnum identifi ed 
two didemnaketals, A (a bicyclic ketal) and B 
(a linear heptaprenoid), that inhibit HIV-1 PR 
activity with IC50 values of 2 µM and 10 µM, 
respectively (Potts et al. 1991). These compounds 
are unsuitable drug candidates, but have given rise 
to a novel class of pentaesters, the most potent of 
which is a dissociative inhibitor of PR with a Ki 
of 2.1 µM (Fan et al. 1998). 

A novel class of PR dimerization inhibitors were 
identifi ed by searching the Cambridge structural 
database for pharmacophores that mimic the action 
of previously identified inhibitory interface 
peptides (Quere et al. 1996). Several triterpene 
structures were identifi ed, of which ursolic acid 
acts as a dissociative inhibitor of PR with an IC50 
of 2 µM. It has been suggested that triterpene could 
provide another basic scaffold for building more 
effective peptidomimetics. Interestingly, another 
member of the triterpene family, PA-457, acts as a 
novel inhibitor of HIV-1 maturation which is 
discussed later in this review. A β-sheet mimetic 
was tested for its ability to inhibit PR homodimer-
ization by perturbation of β-sheet formation (Song 
et al. 2001). The β-sheet mimetic had a relatively 
high IC50 of 30 µM and the method of inhibition 
appears to be complex, however the structure 
provides a non-peptidic lead compound for PR 
inhibitors. 

Targeting Gag Processing
The rate and the specifi city of Gag cleavage by the 
HIV-1 PR is dependent on the amino acid 
composition of the different cleavage sites 
recognized by the viral PR (Swanstrom, 1997). 
Based on the order of proteolysis by HIV-1 PR, 
these sites are classified as primary (p2/NC), 
secondary (MA/CA and p1/p6) or tertiary (CA/p2 



170

Wapling et al

Drug Target Insights 2007: 2

or CA/SP2) cleavage sites. The lack of processing 
of any of these sites by PR results in the formation 
of aberrant particles (Swanstrom, 1997). In 
particular, inhibition of cleavage at the CA/p2 site 
has severe consequences for core formation, 
stability and virion infectivity (Pettit et al. 
1994; Wiegers et al. 1998; Pettit et al. 1998; Shehu-
Xhilaga et al. 2001b). The α-helical structure that 
stretches between the C-terminus of CA and the 
N-terminus of SP1 is critical for virion assembly 
and p2 function (Accola et al. 1998). Clearly, these 
PR cleavage sites are potential targets for 
antiretroviral drug design. 

In this regard, a compound that interferes with 
viral maturation by blocking CA/p2 cleavage has 
been identifi ed. 3-O-(3′,3′-Dimethysuccinyl) 
betulinic acid (PA-457 or bevirimat) potently 
inhibits HIV-1 maturation and infectivity 
(Li et al. 2003; Zhou et al. 2004). PA-457 
specifi cally blocks the cleavage of CA/p2 in cell 
based (Li et al. 2003) and in cell free assays 
(Zhou et al. 2005; Sakalian et al. 2006), thus 
inhibiting core condensation and virion matura-
tion. Inhibition of Gag processing at the CA/p2 
junction results in the generation of the uncleaved 
p25 product in transfected cells at 0.1 µg/ml of 
PA-457 (Li et al. 2003). Consistent with the 
proposed mechanism, PA-457 resistant HIV-1 
selected in long term cultures in the presence of 
betulinic acid contain mutations in the regions 
that fl ank the P-P’ scissile bond (Adamson et al. 
2006; Zhou et al. 2006). These mutated sites in 
Gag are recognized by the viral PR during 
proteolysis. In addition, other single amino acid 
substitutions have been identifi ed that confer 
resistance to PA-457 and are exclusively located 
either at the C terminus of CA or within the fi rst 
three amino acids of the p2 spacer peptide 
(Adamson et al. 2006). Interestingly, they all 
conferred resistance independently and were 
located within the boundaries of the CA/p2 
proteins, a region well known to promote Gag 
multimerization (Adamson et al. 2006). These 
data suggest that there is more than one mechanism 
by which these mutants have acquired resistance 
to PA-457. PA-457 has successfully undergone 
Phase 1 and 2 clinical trials and is currently in a 
Phase 2b trial to test the effi cacy of different doses 
of PA-457 in combination with approved HIV-1 
inhibitors as part of an optimised regimen in 
patients failing therapy due to the emergence of 
drug resistant virus.

Targeting the RT Domain in Gag-Pol 
Like other HIV-1 enzymes, RT subunits must 
oligomerize to form an active enzyme. The 
biologically relevant form that is present in the 
virion is an asymmetric heterodimer comprised 
of the p66 (66 kDa) and the p51 (51 kDa) subunits 
(Jacobo-Molina et al. 1993; Kohlstaedt et al. 
1992). The RT heterodimer is extremely stable 
and has an extensive protein surface area (4800 Å2) 
that is buried upon subunit dimerization. Ther-
modynamic measurements of the association 
between the p66 and p51 RT subunits have esti-
mated Gibbs free energy of dimer stabilization of 
approximately 10–12 kcal/mol–1, corresponding 
to a dissociation constant of approximately 
3 × 10–7 M (Venezia et al. 2006). For an extensive 
review on HIV-1 RT dimerization see Srivastava 
et al. 2006. 

Regions both upstream and downstream of the 
PR region in Gag-Pol have been investigated for 
effects on PR activation (Bukovsky and Gottlinger, 
1996; Partin et al. 1991; Louis et al. 1999). Large 
deletions within or C-terminal truncations of RT 
in the context of Gag-Pol result in an increase in 
virion associated Gag processing intermediates, 
suggesting a defect in PR activity (Cherry et al. 
1998; Liao and Wang, 2004; Quillent et al. 1996). 
These studies suggest that modulating RT dimer-
ization in the context of Gag-Pol may have a 
negative impact on PR activation and HIV-1 
maturation.

The importance of the RT region in Gag-Pol 
for both RT maturation and viral particle produc-
tion has been demonstrated by the study of RT 
point mutations that prevent RT heterodimeriza-
tion and p66 homodimerization. Mutations at 
W401, a component of the highly conserved 
tryptophan repeat motif in the connection subdo-
main, blocks RT dimerization in vitro (Tachedjian 
et al. 2003; Tachedjian et al. 2005b). When 
expressed in HIV-1 it manifests as defects in 
reverse transcription, aberrant processing of RT, 
and low levels of infectivity (Wapling et al. 2005). 
The L234A mutation, located in the RT primer 
grip region, prevents RT dimerization and 
decreases Gag-Pol stability (Tachedjian et al. 
2000; Yu et al. 1998). This mutation reduces PR 
incorporation into virions, increases the accumu-
lation of Gag processing intermediates, and 
results in the production of non-infectious virus 
particles (Tachedjian et al. 2000; Yu et al. 1998). 
These examples demonstrate the potential for 



171

Targeting the late stages of HIV-1 replication

Drug Target Insights 2007: 2

targeting the Gag-Pol embedded RT for blocking 
HIV-1 maturation.

Inhibitors that Modulate HIV-1 RT 
Subunit Interaction
Apart from classical NNRTIs, there exists a class of 
unconventional NNRTIs that bind to HIV-1 RT and 
inhibit enzyme activity by decreasing the overall 
stability of the heterodimer without dissociating the 
complex (Sluis-Cremer et al. 2000; Sluis-Cremer and 
Tachedjian, 2002; Sluis-Cremer et al. 2006; Camarasa 
et al. 2006). The TSAO-T derivatives ([2′,5′-bis-O-
(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)-β-D-ribofuranosyl]-3′-
spiro-5″-(4″-amino-1″,2″-oxathiole-2″,2″-dioxide) 
thymine) destabilise both RT heterodimers and p66 
homodimers by inducing changes at the RT dimer 
interface (Sluis-Cremer et al. 2000; Rodriguez-
Barrios et al. 2001). The putative binding site is at 
the RT dimer interface and overlaps in part with the 
NNRTI binding pocket (Rodriguez-Barrios et al. 
2001). Resistance mutations to the TSAO drugs are 
readily generated in cell culture indicating that these 
drugs are specific inhibitors of the HIV-1 RT 
(Balzarini et al. 1993). While TSAO represent the 
fi rst class of small molecules that destabilize the RT 
heterodimer, preclinical studies demonstrate that the 
pharmacological profile of TSAO inhibitors is 
unfavourable for further clinical development 
(Camarasa et al. 2006).

The N-acylhydrazone derivative N-(4-tert-
Butylbenzoyl)-2-hydroxy-1-naphthaldehyde 
hydrazone (BBNH) binds to both the DNA poly-
merase and RNase H domains of RT and inhibits 
both enzymatic activities of the RT (Arion et al. 
2002). Similar to TSAO, BBNH prevents RT 
activity through destabilizing, but not dissociating 
the subunits. BBNH derivatives that bind to the 
DNA polymerase domain alone are suffi cient to 
induce dimer destabilization (Sluis-Cremer and 
Tachedjian, 2002). The recently resolved structure 
of HIV-1 RT bound to a BBNH derivative has 
confi rmed that the binding site is in close proximity 
to, but distinct from both the polymerase active 
site and NNIBP. It is thought that BBNH destabi-
lizes the RT heterodimer by inducing changes in 
the primer-grip motif, which is an important region 
for RT dimer stability (Himmel et al. 2006; 
Srivastava et al. 2006). 

By targeting the RT dimerization interface, it is 
possible that unconventional NNRTIs may have 
an affect on the late stage of virus replication. 

In particular, the TSAO drugs that destabilize the 
p66 homodimer, may also perturb the process of 
RT maturation to the heterodimer, and arguably 
even target the RT domain in Gag-Pol and interfere 
with PR activation. However, these possible effects 
have not been described. Further elucidation of the 
impact of nonclassical NNRTIs on RT maturation, 
and the mechanism of destabilization would be 
advantageous for designing more potent inhibitors 
of both RT function and RT maturation.

Classical NNRTIs as RT Inhibitors 
Acting at the Late Stage 
of Viral Replication
Interestingly, several classical NNRTIs have been 
shown to confer a concentration dependant 
increase in RT heterodimer formation, corre-
sponding with a loss of RT polymerase function 
(Tachedjian et al. 2001; Venezia et al. 2006). Efavi-
renz (EFV) is a strong enhancer of RT dimeriza-
tion, and also enhances the formation of p66 and 
p51 homodimers (Tachedjian et al. 2005a). The 
exact mechanism for increasing RT subunit inter-
actions is unknown but it is suspected that the 
binding of EFV to the RT mediates conformational 
changes in the p66 subunit that promotes interac-
tion with p51 (Tachedjian et al. 2001). EFV has 
also demonstrated the capacity to enhance the 
homodimerization of p66 in vitro, and a 90kDa 
model Pol protein in an inducible bacterial expres-
sion system (Sluis-Cremer et al. 2004; Tachedjian 
et al. 2005a). It has recently been demonstrated 
that NNRTIs enhance Gag-Pol dimerization, 
resulting in premature PR activation and a decrease 
in viral particle release (Figueiredo et al. 2006). In 
HIV-1 transfected cells, EFV, TMC120 and 
TMC125 increased Gag and Gag-Pol processing, 
and caused up to 45% decrease in viral particle 
production. Similar effects were not observed for 
NNRTIs that do not signifi cantly enhance p66 
homodimerization and NRTIs (Figueiredo et al. 
2006). Hence, NNRTIs that are potent enhancers 
of RT dimerization also affect the late stage of viral 
replication, which represents a novel inhibitory 
mechanism for these drugs. However, the concen-
trations required to mediate this effect are two to 
three orders of magnitude higher then concentra-
tions that block RT function. This is likely due to 
reduced binding affi nity of the NNRTIs to the 
proposed target which is the RT domain of Gag-Pol. 
Strategies to identify drugs that are more potent 



172

Wapling et al

Drug Target Insights 2007: 2

inhibitors of this late stage in the viral life-cycle 
could be identifi ed by screening for molecules that 
enhance Gag-Pol dimerization. Such a screen could 
be enhanced by incorporating mutations in the RT 
that are known to confer decreased susceptibility 
to current NNRTIs in order to select for drugs that 
have the potential to block NNRTI resistant strains 
of HIV-1.

Peptide Based Inhibitors 
of RT dimerization
Two strategies have been utilised to generate peptides 
designed to target the RT dimer interface in order to 
block HIV-1 RT function, including peptides corre-
sponding to regions that are known to have an impor-
tant role in RT dimerization (Debyser and De Clercq, 
1996; Depollier et al. 2005; Divita et al. 1994; Morris 
et al. 1999b; Morris et al. 1999a). The most successful 
of these peptides, Pep-7, corresponds to RT residues 
395–404, derived from the highly conserved trypto-
phan repeat motif (W398–W414) (Depollier et al. 
2005). Pep-7 interacts with p51, and destablizes both 
the RT heterodimer and the p66 homodimer. Similar 
to unconventional NNRTIs, Pep-7 is unable to induce 
RT dissociation (Depollier et al. 2005). Pep-7 based 
peptides are potent suppressors of HIV-1 replication 
at noncytotoxic concentrations (Morris et al. 1999b). 
The method of inhibition in HIV-1 infected cells has 
not been elucidated. However, given that Pep-7 cannot 
induce RT subunit dissociation, it has been suggested 
that it acts at the late stage of virus replication by 
preventing the formation of an active RT heterodimer 
(Morris et al. 1999b).

Rational strategies utilising the available RT 
structures to direct the design and manufacture of 
mimetic peptides targeting subunit interaction is a 
recent development (Campbell et al. 2002; 
Hosokawa et al. 2004). These studies have led to 
the synthesis of a peptide, TLMA2993, which also 
targets the RT connection subdomain. TLMA2993 
inhibits RT activity at micromolar concentrations 
(Campbell et al. 2002). Cells stably transfected with 
this peptide are protected from HIV-1 infection in 
a concentration dependant manner due to inhibition 
of reverse transcription, as observed by a decrease 
in HIV-1 DNA (Hosokawa et al. 2004). 

Targeting the IN Domain in Gag-Pol 
IN catalyses the insertion of viral DNA into the 
host chromosome and thus inhibits an early crucial 
step in the virus life cycle. IN is also implicated in 

reverse transcription, nuclear import of the 
pre-integration complex, viral assembly and 
budding (Engelman et al. 1995; Hehl et al. 2004). 
Despite the numerous roles of IN in HIV-1 replica-
tion, new approaches for inhibiting viral replication 
have focused on targeting the catalytic activity of 
IN that is required for proviral DNA integration. 
Two IN inhibitors, MK-0518 and GS-9137 
(JTK-303) have entered clinical trials (Cotelle, 
2006; Makhija, 2006) and have shown effi cacy in 
Phase III clinical trials (Stephenson, 2007).

Since IN is expressed as part of Gag-Pol, 
agents that bind to the IN domain in this polypro-
tein are likely to impact on the late stages of 
replication. Consistent with this notion, mutations 
in IN have been reported to effect virion formation 
(Shin et al. 1994). Truncations of IN at the 
C-terminus of Gag-Pol result in aberrant virion 
core structures, with a reduction in the overall 
levels of cell-associated viral Gag, suggesting a 
defect in Gag-Pol processing (Engelman et al. 
1995; Bukovsky and Gottlinger, 1996).

IN requires oligomerization for activity. 
Therefore, inhibitors of IN function that mediate 
their effects through negating IN subunit 
interactions are also likely to interfere with viral 
assembly. This would be manifested by interfering 
with Gag-Pol/Gag-Pol interactions leading to 
subsequent effects on HIV-1 PR activation 
(Muriaux et al. 2004). In this regard peptide 
inhibitors of IN dimerization have been reported, 
however their effects on the late stages of the virus 
life-cycle remains to be determined (Maroun et al. 
2001; Zhao et al. 2003). 

Certain host cell factors are incorporated into 
the virion by interaction with the IN domain of 
Gag-Pol. A cellular factor that has been implicated 
in affecting the late stage of the virus life cycle is 
integrase interactor 1 (INI1). INI1 was identifi ed 
in a yeast two-hybrid screen for host cell proteins 
interacting with HIV-1 IN (Yung et al. 2001;Yung 
et al. 2004; Kalpana et al. 1994). INI1 mutants that 
abrogate interaction with IN or cells defi cient in 
INI1 exhibit a substantial reduction in viral produc-
tion (Yung et al. 2001). INI1 affects several steps 
during HIV-1 replication (Ariumi et al. 2006; Sorin 
et al. 2006; Yung et al. 2001) and is also packaged 
into HIV-1 particles (Kalpana et al. 1994). A 110-
amino-acid fragment of INI1 (S6) with a minimal 
IN-interaction domain inhibits viral production 
(Yung et al. 2001; Yung et al. 2004). The inhibitory 
effect of S6 on HIV-1 production is mediated by 



173

Targeting the late stages of HIV-1 replication

Drug Target Insights 2007: 2

binding of the ectopically expressed S6 to the 
Gag-Pol embedded IN. Furthermore, stable 
expression of a transdominant S6 mutant inhibits 
infection in T-cells. S6 represents a potential lead 
for the development of inhibitors of the late stage 
of HIV-1 replication (Yung et al. 2001). 

Proteosome Inhibitors
Intracellular degradation of misfolded, damaged 
or unwanted proteins is mediated by the proteo-
some, which is a multisubunit proteolytic complex 
of 26S (Schubert et al. 2000). Proteins are tagged 
for proteolytic destruction by the covalent attach-
ment of a chain of ubiquitin polypeptides on lysine 
residues of the protein (Schubert et al. 2000). 
Proteosome inhibitors inhibit the late stages of the 
HIV-1 life-cycle by interfering with viral particle 
release and maturation (Schubert et al. 2000). 
Decreased budding has also been demonstrated for 
retroviruses expressing the PPPY- or PTAP 
containing late domains but not those that use the 
YPDL type late domain (Schubert et al. 2000; Ott 
et al. 2003). The effect is not dependent on the viral 
particle assembly site (i.e. cytoplasm or plasma 
membrane) or on monoubiquitination of Gag (Ott 
et al. 2003). In addition to a decrease in viral 
particle release (4-fold), virions released from cells 
treated with proteosome inhibitors have approxi-
mately a 10-fold decrease in infectivity (Schubert 
et al. 2000). The impact of proteosome inhibitors 
is dependent on an active HIV-1 PR and the pres-
ence of the p6 late domain but is independent of 
Vpu function. Inhibition of HIV-1 maturation and 
budding is observed with reversible (zLLL also 
known as MG-132) and irreversible (lactocystin) 
proteosome inhibitors (Schubert et al. 2000). 

Proteosome inhibitors also interfere with the 
activity of the HIV-1 viral infectivity factor (Vif) on 
the antiviral function of apolipoprotein B mRNA-
editing enzyme catalytic polypeptide-like 3G 
(APOBEC3G) in virus producing cells (Stopak et al. 
2003; Sheehy et al. 2003; Mehle et al. 2004; Yu et al. 
2003). Wild-type viruses expressing Vif are able to 
prevent incorporation of APOBEC3G into the virion 
by promoting its degradation in the cytoplasm of 
the producer cell. Inhibition of APOBEC3G incor-
poration in the virus prevents hypermutation in 
newly synthesized viral DNA following infection 
of target cells due to C to U modifi cations during 
minus stand DNA synthesis mediated by 
APOBEC3G. Proteosome inhibitors interfere with 

Vif dependent degradation of APOBEC3G 
suggesting that these inhibitors can impede the 
mechanisms used by the virus to evade the innate 
defences of the host cell (Stopak et al. 2003; Sheehy 
et al. 2003; Mehle et al. 2004; Yu et al. 2003).

Targeting an essential cellular process like the 
proteosome is anticipated to be cytotoxic and not 
well tolerated in vivo. Nevertheless, the highly 
specifi c proteosome inhibitor epoxomicin, which 
also inhibits HIV-1 maturation, is well tolerated in 
mice (Meng et al. 1999). The proteosome inhibitor, 
PS-341, is approved as a last resort treatment of 
multiple myelomas and is associated with adverse 
effects (Kane et al. 2006). The use of proteosome 
inhibitors in HIV-1 infected individuals needs to 
be considered in the context of the potential risk 
benefi t and the net effect on inhibition of HIV-1 
replication as proteosome inhibitors also enhance 
the early step of the virus life-cycle by preventing 
degradation of the reverse transcription complex 
mediated by TRIM5α (Schwartz et al. 1998; Wu 
et al. 2006; Wei et al. 2005).

Targeting HIV-1 Egress Mediated 
by Vpu
The HIV-1 accessory protein, Vpu is a 16 kDa type 1 
integral membrane protein that is indispensable 
for viral pathogenesis (Li et al. 2005). Vpu plays 
two distinctive roles in the viral life-cycle that 
include down regulating host cell CD4 receptors 
(Willey et al. 1992) and enhancing viral particle 
release from the cell surface, the latter associated 
with its ion channel forming properties (Schubert 
et al. 1996a). Vpu is unique to HIV-1/SIVcpz 
viruses (Binette and Cohen, 2004). Interestingly 
the two closely related retroviruses HIV-2 and SIV, 
which lack Vpu, are less pathogenic (Bour and 
Strebel, 2003).

The role of Vpu in the viral budding process is 
coupled to its ion channel forming properties, 
which is predicted to be a pentameric structure 
composed of fi ve transmembrane domains (Grice 
et al. 1997). The Vpu ion channel is thought to 
function by altering the electric potential at the 
plasma membrane or alternatively by overcoming 
host restriction factors for viral release (Neil et al. 
2006). The HIV-1 Vpu is a member of viral ion 
channel proteins called viroporins and is structur-
ally similar to the M2 ion channel protein of 
infl uenza (Gonzalez and Carrasco, 2003; Hout et al. 
2006). An interesting feature of Vpu is its role in 



174

Wapling et al

Drug Target Insights 2007: 2

viral particle release from nondividing cells such 
as macrophages (Deora and Ratner, 2001). In this 
regard the rate of host cell proliferation is a deter-
mining factor for Vpu mediated viral particle 
release (Deora and Ratner, 2001). 

Analogues of amiloride (a sodium channel 
blocker) inhibit Vpu ion channel activity. The 
amiloride analogues, 5-(N,N-hexamethylene) 
amiloride (HMA) and 5-(N,N-dimethyl)amiloride 
(DMA) inhibit Vpu mediated virus budding and 
viral replication in macrophages (Ewart et al. 2002;  
Ewart et al. 2004). The inhibitory effects are 
observed in the absence of cytotoxicity. Both 
analogs exhibit strong inhibition of HIV-1 replica-
tion as measured by viral p24 levels in culture 
supernatants (Ewart et al. 2004). HMA at 4 µM 
suppresses viral p24 in culture supernatants to unde-
tectable levels for more than 10 days in culture 
(Ewart et al. 2004). While amiloride analogues 
demonstrate activity in macrophages, they fail to 
inhibit HIV-1 replication in T-cells (Ewart et al. 
2002). Nevertheless, Vpu ion channel inhibitors 
have the potential for use in combination therapy, 
targeting viral reservoirs and drug-resistant variants. 
An amiloride derivative, BIT225, is currently being 
pursued for drug development (Biotron Limited, 
Sydney, NSW, Australia). BIT225 represents a 
promising antiretroviral therapeutic although the 
evaluation of its in vivo effi cacy will present a 
challenge since inhibition of HIV-1 replication 
appears to be restricted to nonproliferating cells.

Recent studies also suggest that rimantadine, 
an ion channel blocker of infl uenza A viruses, can 
be a useful lead compound for designing Vpu 
inhibitors. Rimantadine and amantadine belong to 
class of polycyclic amines that are active against 
the M2 ion channel of infl uenza A but not against 
HIV-1 Vpu (Hout et al. 2006). Studies indicate that 
mutating histidine at residue 19 to alanine results 
in a rimantadine sensitive Vpu ion channel demon-
strating the potential of this class of inhibitor as 
HIV-1 ion channel blockers (Hout et al. 2006). 

Vpu is also implicated to interact with certain 
host cell restriction factors that interfere with viral 
particle egress. The host cell protein, Vpu-binding 
protein (UBP), is suggested to be a negative factor 
for virus assembly (Callahan et al. 1998; Bour 
and Strebel, 2003). UBP is a 34-kDa protein 
that exhibits competitive binding with Vpu 
and Gag (Callahan et al. 1998; Handley et al. 2001). 
Overexpression of UBP has been reported to 
significantly suppress viral particle release 

suggesting that UBP is a negative factor that 
requires displacement by Gag or Vpu (Callahan 
et al. 1998). It is suggested that Vpu mediates its 
effect on viral egress by facilitating membrane 
targeting of Gag precursors (Handley et al. 2001; 
Harila et al. 2006; Neil et al. 2006). Supporting 
this notion, Vpu-defective particles appear in 
internal membrane-bound compartments suggesting 
a Gag targeting defect (Klimkait et al. 1990). 

Another host cell restriction factor implicated 
in viral release is an acid-sensitive potassium 
channel-forming protein, TASK-1, which is down 
regulated during viral infection (Hsu et al. 2004). 
Due to the structural homology of TASK-1 and 
HIV-1 Vpu, TASK-1 has been suggested to form 
hetero-oligomers with Vpu which interferes with 
both TASK-1 mediated conductance and Vpu ion 
channel function (Hsu et al. 2004). Further delinea-
tion of the how these host cell factors interact with 
Vpu is required in order to design small molecule 
inhibitors that inhibit viral particle release. 

Targeting HIV-1 Egress Mediated 
by the p6 Late Domain
In the recent years, major advances have been made 
in our understanding of how HIV-1 and other 
retroviruses are released from infected cells. In the 
early 1990s it was reported that mutations in the 
p6 late domain inhibit virion particle release 
(Gottlinger et al. 1991). Moreover, a PTAP sequence, 
encompassing amino acids 7 to 10 of p6, is critical 
for virus particle production (Huang et al. 1995). 
The PTAP motif binds specifi cally to the host cell 
protein, tumor suppressor gene 101 (TSG101), 
resulting in the recruitment of components of the 
endosomal sorting complex required for transport-I 
(ESCRT-I) (VerPlank et al. 2001; Martin-Serrano 
et al. 2001; Garrus et al. 2001; Demirov et al. 2002). 
Deletion of the PTAP motif results in approximately 
80% reduction in HIV-1 particle release. Similarly, 
overexpression and silencing of TSG101 abolish 
viral egress (Garrus et al. 2001; Demirov et al. 
2002; Goila-Gaur et al. 2003). 

NMR structure analysis of a 14 amino acid 
peptide derived from p6 encompassing the PTAP 
motif complexed with the UEV domain of TSG101 
has revealed that the PTAP motif binds to a groove 
in TSG101. This binding creates two main pockets: 
the “A-P” pocket through contact of amino acids 
7–10 and the “P” pocket through the binding of 
amino acids 9–10 of the peptide (Pornillos et al. 



175

Targeting the late stages of HIV-1 replication

Drug Target Insights 2007: 2

2002a; Pornillos et al. 2002b). Interruption of 
this viral host protein-protein interaction with 
compounds that bind to this pocket in TSG101 and 
compete with Gag would potentially inhibit viral 
particle release and the rate of cell-cell HIV-1 
transmission (Bieniasz, 2006). 

So far there has been one report that describes the 
synthesis and selection of small molecules with up to 
fi ve fold better binding capacity than a peptide that 
contains the sequence of the wild type PTAP motif in 
the L domain of HIV-1 (Liu et al. 2006). In this study, 
the authors describe an approach previously employed 
to obtain peptoids in which a key proline residue is 
substituted with glycine at the N-terminus of the parent 
Pro-rich sequence in order to improve binding 
specifi city to Src homology 3 (SH3) domains (Nguyen 
et al. 2000). Similarly, the proline rich PTAP domain 
in p6 was considered a good candidate for the 
N-substituted glycine residue approach. In this study, 
the Tsg101 binding affi nity (Kd) of the 9-mer wild-type 
PTAP containing peptide was 50 µM (Liu et al. 2006). 
Binding constants for the highest affi nity peptoid-
hydrazones (designated 11q and 11p) were 17.5 and 
9.8 µM, respectively. The highest affi nity peptoid 
hydrazone was found to be the n-butyl-containing 11p 
peptide, with a fi ve-fold increase in binding affi nity 
compared to the wild-type 9-mer PTAP peptide. The 
capacity of these peptides to compete with HIV-1 Gag 
for TSG101 binding and their effect on HIV-1 egress 
in vitro and in vivo remains to be determined.

Although disruption of viral-host cell interac-
tions is a very attractive approach to abolish virion 
release and infectivity, interfering with the host cell 
machinery could have major consequences for the 
host (Bieniasz, 2006). TSG101 is a multifunctional 
protein and plays a critical role in cell proliferation 
as shown by studies conducted in TSG101 defi cient 
mice (Ruland et al. 2001). TSG101 is involved in 
cellular transcription and plays a central role in 
endosomal sorting of cargo protein that is destined 
for degradation by the proteasome. TSG101 is 
recruited to the endosomal sorting pathway by a 
specifi c interaction with the host cell protein, hepa-
tocyte growth factor-regulated tyrosine kinase 
substrate (Hrs), which binds to TSG101 through a 
PSAP motif (Lu et al. 2003). Disruption of this 
interaction inhibits delivery of epidermal growth 
factor receptor (EGFR) to the late endosomes. In 
recruiting TSG101, it is believed that HIV-1 mimics 
Hrs in order to enter the endosomal sorting pathway 
and negotiate its release from the infected cell 
(Pornillos et al. 2003). Thus, targeting TSG101 

would result in the accumulation of proteins at the 
plasma membrane and the disruption of protein 
sorting within the infected cell. Specifi c inhibition 
of HIV-1 budding by targeting the late domain 
binding site on TSG101 will require preferential 
inhibition of p6 binding compared to Hrs.

Conclusion
Considerable progress has been made in under-
standing the late steps of the viral life-cycle leading 
to the production of infectious viral particles. Many 
of these processes rely on protein:protein interac-
tions either between viral proteins or viral proteins 
and host cell factors. The interactions between the 
host and viral proteins have either a role in facili-
tating virus replication, as is observed for the viral 
p6 and Tsg101, or are necessary to overcome nega-
tive effects of the host on virus replication, as 
mediated by Vif. HIV-1 also relies on posttransla-
tional modifi cations mediated by the host cell 
machinery in order for viral polyproteins to be 
traffi cked to the appropriate compartment of the 
cell for viral assembly and budding. Arguably, one 
of the most effective drugs used to treat HIV-1 
infected individuals are the HIV-1 PR inhibitors 
that block viral maturation. This underscores 
the effectiveness of targeting the late stage of 
virus replication. Nevertheless, while some of the 
strategies described in this review inhibit virus 
replication in cell culture assays, they require 
improvements in potency, specifi city and delivery 
before being viable for use in the clinic.

Acknowledgements
J.W. is supported by an Australian Postgraduate 
Award, S.S. and M. S-X are supported by funding 
from the Australian Centre for HIV and Hepatitis 
Virology Research and G.T. is supported by 
funding from NHMRC R.D.  Wright Biomedical 
Career Development grant 235102 and NHMRC 
Project Grant 381703.
Johanna Wapling and Seema Srivastava made 
equal contribution to the review.

References
Abdel-Rahman, H.M., Al-Karamany, G.S., El-Koussi, N.A., Youssef, A.F. 

and Kiso, Y. 2002. HIV protease inhibitors: peptidomimetic drugs 
and future perspectives. Curr. Med. Chem., 9:1905–1922.

Accola, M.A., Hoglund, S. and Gottlinger, H.G. 1998. A putative alpha-
helical structure which overlaps the capsid-p2 boundary in the human 
immunodefi ciency virus type 1 Gag precursor is crucial for viral 
particle assembly. J. Virol., 72:2072–2078.



176

Wapling et al

Drug Target Insights 2007: 2

Adamson, C.S., Ablan, S.D., Boeras, I., Goila-Gaur, R., Soheilian, F., 
Nagashima, K., Li, F., Salzwedel, K., Sakalian, M., Wild, C.T. and 
Freed, E.O. 2006. In Vitro Resistance to the Human Immunodefi -
ciency Virus Type 1 Maturation Inhibitor PA-457 (Bevirimat). 
J. Virol., 80:10957–10971.

Aldovini, A. and Young, R.A. 1990. Mutations of RNA and protein 
sequences involved in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 
packaging result in production of noninfectious virus. J. Virol., 
64:1920–1926.

Andersson, E., Horal, P., Jejcic, A., Hoglund, S., Balzarini, J., Vahlne, A. 
and Svennerholm, B. 2005. Glycine-amide is an active metabolite of 
the antiretroviral tripeptide glycyl-prolyl-glycine-amide. Antimicrob. 
Agents Chemother., 49:40–44.

Andersson, E., Horal, P., Vahlne, A. and Svennerholm, B. 2004. No cross-
resistance or selection of HIV-1 resistant mutants in vitro to the antiretro-
viral tripeptide glycyl-prolyl-glycine-amide. Antiviral Res., 61:119–124.

Arion, D., Sluis-Cremer, N., Min, K.L., Abram, M.E., Fletcher, R.S. and 
Parniak, M.A. 2002. Mutational analysis of Tyr-501 of HIV-1 reverse 
transcriptase. Effects on ribonuclease H activity and inhibition of this 
activity by N-acylhydrazones. J. Biol. Chem., 277:1370–1374.

Ariumi, Y., Serhan, F., Turelli, P., Telenti, A. and Trono, D. 2006. The inte-
grase interactor 1 (INI1) proteins facilitate Tat-mediated human 
immunodefi ciency virus type 1 transcription. Retrovirology, 3:47.

Babe, L.M. and Craik, C.S. 1991. Time dependent heterodimer formation 
leads to inhibition of HIV protease activity. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., 
306:543–547.

Babe, L.M., Pichuantes, S. and Craik, C.S. 1991. Inhibition of HIV protease 
activity by heterodimer formation. Biochemistry, 30:106–111.

Babe, L.M., Rose, J. and Craik, C.S. 1992. Synthetic “interface” peptides 
alter dimeric assembly of the HIV 1 and 2 proteases. Protein Sci., 
1:1244–1253.

Babe, L.M., Rose, J. and Craik, C.S. 1995. Trans-dominant inhibitory human 
immunodefi ciency virus type 1 protease monomers prevent protease 
activation and virion maturation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 
92:10069–10073.

Balzarini, J., Karlsson, A., Vandamme, A.M., Perez-Perez, M.J., Zhang, H., 
Vrang, L., Oberg, B., Backbro, K., Unge, T., San-Felix, A. et al. 1993. 
Human immunodefi ciency virus type 1 (HIV-1) strains selected 
for resistance against the HIV-1-specific [2′,5′-bis-O-(tert-
butyldimethylsilyl)-3′-spiro-5″-(4″-amino-1″,2″-oxathiole-
2″,2″-dioxide)]-beta-D-pentofurano syl (TSAO) nucleoside analogues 
retain sensitivity to HIV-1-specifi c nonnucleoside inhibitors. Proc. 
Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 90:6952–6956.

Bannwarth, L., Kessler, A., Pethe, S., Collinet, B., Merabet, N., Boggetto, N., 
Sicsic, S., Reboud-Ravaux, M. and Ongeri, S. 2006. Molecular tongs 
containing amino acid mimetic fragments: new inhibitors of wild-
type and mutated HIV-1 protease dimerization. J. Med. Chem., 
49:4657–4664.

Bieniasz, P.D. 2006. Late budding domains and host proteins in enveloped 
virus release. Virology, 344:55–63.

Binette, J. and Cohen, E.A. 2004. Recent advances in the understanding of 
HIV-1 Vpu accessory protein functions. Curr. Drug. Targets Immune 
Endocr. Metabol. Disord., 4:297–307.

Bouamr, F., Scarlata, S. and Carter, C. 2003. Role of myristylation in HIV-1 
Gag assembly. Biochemistry, 42:6408–6417.

Bour, S. and Strebel, K. 2003. The HIV-1 Vpu protein: a multifunctional 
enhancer of viral particle release. Microbes Infect., 5:1029–1039.

Bouras, A., Boggetto, N., Benatalah, Z., De Rosny, E., Sicsic, S. and Reboud-
Ravaux, M. 1999. Design, synthesis, and evaluation of conformation-
ally constrained tongs, new inhibitors of HIV-1 protease dimerization. 
J. Med. Chem., 42:957–962.

Breccia, P., Boggetto, N., Perez-Fernandez, R., Van Gool, M., Takahashi, M., 
Rene, L., Prados, P., Badet, B., Reboud-Ravaux, M. and De Mendoza, J. 
2003. Dimerization inhibitors of HIV-1 protease based on a bicyclic 
guanidinium subunit. J. Med. Chem., 46:5196–5207.

Brierley, I. and Dos Ramos, F.J. 2006. Programmed ribosomal frameshift-
ing in HIV-1 and the SARS-CoV. Virus Res., 119:29–42.

Broglia, R.A., Provasi, D., Vasile, F., Ottolina, G., Longhi, R. and Tiana, G. 
2006. A folding inhibitor of the HIV-1 protease. Proteins, 
62:928–933.

Broglia, R.A., Tiana, G., Sutto, L., Provasi, D. and Simona, F. 2005. Design 
of HIV-1-PR inhibitors that do not create resistance: blocking the 
folding of single monomers. Protein Sci., 14:2668–2681.

Bryant, M. Ratner, L. 1990. Myristoylation-dependent replication and as-
sembly of human immunodefi ciency virus 1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 
U.S.A, 87:523–527.

Bryant, M.L., Heuckeroth, R.O., Kimata, J.T., Ratner, L. and Gordon, J.I. 
1989. Replication of human immunodefi ciency virus 1 and Moloney 
murine leukemia virus is inhibited by different heteroatom-containing 
analogs of myristic acid. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. U.S.A., 86:8655–
8659.

Bryant, M.L., Ratner, L., Duronio, R.J., Kishore, N.S., Devadas, B., Adams, 
S.P. and Gordon, J.I. 1991. Incorporation of 12-methoxydodecanoate 
into the human immunodefi ciency virus 1 gag polyprotein precursor 
inhibits its proteolytic processing and virus production in a chroni-
cally infected human lymphoid cell line. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 
88:2055–2059.

Bukovsky, A. and Gottlinger, H. 1996. Lack of integrase can markedly 
affect human immunodefi ciency virus type 1 particle production in 
the presence of an active viral protease. J. Virol., 70:6820–6825.

Cafl isch, A., Schramm, H.J. and Karplus, M. 2000. Design of dimerization 
inhibitors of HIV-1 aspartic proteinase: a computer-based combina-
torial approach. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des., 14:161–179.

Callahan, M.A., Handley, M.A., Lee, Y.H., Talbot, K.J., Harper, J.W. and 
Panganiban, A.T. 1998. Functional interaction of human immunode-
fi ciency virus type 1 Vpu and Gag with a novel member of the tet-
ratricopeptide repeat protein family. J. Virol., 72:5189–5197.

Camarasa, M.J., Velazquez, S., San-Felix, A., Perez-Perez, M.J., Bonache, 
M.C. and De Castro, S. 2006. TSAO derivatives, inhibitors of HIV-1 
reverse transcriptase dimerization: recent progress. Curr. Pharm. 
Des., 12:1895–1907.

Campbell, S. and Vogt, V.M. 1995. Self-assembly in vitro of purifi ed CA-NC 
proteins from Rous sarcoma virus and human immunodefi ciency 
virus type 1. J. Virol., 69:6487–6497.

Campbell, W., Kleiman, L., Barany, L., Li, Z., Khorchid, A., Fujita, E., 
Okada, N. and Okada, H. 2002. A novel genetic algorithm for design-
ing mimetic peptides that interfere with the function of a target 
molecule. Microbiol. Immunol., 46:211–215.

Cartas, M., Singh, S.P., Serio, D., Rizvi, T.A., Kalyanaraman, V.S., Goldsmith, 
C.S., Zaki, S.R., Weber, I.T. and Srinivasan, A. 2001. Intravirion 
display of a peptide corresponding to the dimer structure of protease 
attenuates HIV-1 replication. DNA Cell Biol., 20:797–805.

Cen, S., Niu, M., Saadatmand, J., Guo, F., Huang, Y., Nabel, G.J. and 
Kleiman, L. 2004. Incorporation of pol into human immunodefi -
ciency virus type 1 Gag virus-like particles occurs independently of 
the upstream Gag domain in Gag-pol. J. Virol., 78:1042–1049.

Cheng, Y.S., Yin, F.H., Foundling, S., Blomstrom, D. and Kettner, C.A. 
1990. Stability and activity of human immunodefi ciency virus pro-
tease: comparison of the natural dimer with a homologous, single-
chain tethered dimer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 87:9660–9664.

Cherry, E., Liang, C., Rong, L., Quan, Y., Inouye, P., Li, X., Morin, N., 
Kotler, M. and Wainberg, M.A. 1998. Characterization of human 
immunodefi ciency virus type-1 (HIV-1) particles that express prote-
ase-reverse transcriptase fusion proteins. J. Mol. Biol., 284: 43–56.

Chien, A.I., Liao, W.H., Yang, D.M. and Wang, C.T. 2006. A domain di-
rectly C-terminal to the major homology region of human immuno-
defi ciency t-ype 1 capsid protein plays a crucial role in directing both 
virus assembly and incorporation of Gag-Pol. Virology, 348:84–95.

Chiu, H.C., Yao, S.Y. and Wang, C.T. 2002. Coding sequences upstream of 
the human immunodefi ciency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase 
domain in Gag-Pol are not essential for incorporation of the 
Pr160(gag-pol) into virus particles. J. Virol., 76:3221–3231.

Clavel, F. and Hance, A.J. 2004. HIV drug resistance. N. Engl. J. Med., 350: 
1023–1035.



177

Targeting the late stages of HIV-1 replication

Drug Target Insights 2007: 2

Cotelle, P. 2006. Patented HIV-1 integrase inhibitors (1998–2005). Recent 
Patents on Anti-Infective Drug Discovery, 1:1–15.

Davis, D.A., Brown, C.A., Singer, K.E., Wang, V., Kaufman, J., Stahl, S.J., 
Wingfi eld, P., Maeda, K., Harada, S., Yoshimura, K., et al. 2006. 
Inhibition of HIV-1 replication by a peptide dimerization inhibitor 
of HIV-1 protease. Antiviral Res., 72:89–99.

De Clercq, E. 1998. The role of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase 
inhibitors (NNRTIs) in the therapy of HIV-1 infection. Antiviral Res., 
38:153–179.

Debyser, Z. and De Clercq, E. 1996. Chemical crosslinking of the subunits 
of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase. Protein Sci., 5:278–286.

Demirov, D.G., Ono, A., Orenstein, J.M. and Freed, E.O. 2002. Overexpres-
sion of the N-terminal domain of TSG101 inhibits HIV-1 budding 
by blocking late domain function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 99: 
955–960.

Deora, A. and Ratner, L. 2001. Viral protein U (Vpu)-mediated enhancement 
of human immunodefi ciency virus type 1 particle release depends on 
the rate of cellular proliferation. J. Virol., 75:6714–6718.

Depollier, J., Hourdou, M.L., Aldrian-Herrada, G., Rothwell, P., Restle, T. 
and Divita, G. 2005. Insight into the mechanism of a peptide inhibi-
tor of HIV reverse transcriptase dimerization. Biochemistry, 44: 
1909–1918.

Dettenhofer, M. and Yu, X.F. 1999. Proline residues in human immunode-
fi ciency virus type 1 p6(Gag) exert a cell type-dependent effect on 
viral replication and virion incorporation of Pol proteins. J. Virol., 
73:4696–4704.

Devadas, B., Lu, T., Katoh, A., Kishore, N.S., Wade, A.C., Mehta, P.P., 
Rudnick, D.A., Bryant, M.L., Adams, S.P., Li, Q. et al. 1992. Substrate 
specifi city of Saccharomyces cerevisiae myristoyl-CoA: protein 
N-myristoyltransferase. Analysis of fatty acid analogs containing 
carbonyl groups, nitrogen heteroatoms, and nitrogen heterocycles in 
an in vitro enzyme assay and subsequent identifi cation of inhibitors 
of human immunodefi ciency virus I replication. J. Biol. Chem., 267: 
7224–7239.

Ding, L., Derdowski, A., Wang, J.J. and Spearman, P. 2003. Independent 
segregation of human immunodefi ciency virus type 1 Gag protein 
complexes and lipid rafts. J. Virol., 77:1916–1926.

Divita, G., Restle, T., Goody, R.S., Chermann, J.C. and Baillon, J.G. 1994. 
Inhibition of human immunodefi ciency virus type 1 reverse transcrip-
tase dimerization using synthetic peptides derived from the connec-
tion domain. J. Biol. Chem., 269:13080–13083.

Dorfman, T., Bukovsky, A., Ohagen, A., Hoglund, S. and Gottlinger, H.G. 
1994. Functional domains of the capsid protein of human immuno-
defi ciency virus type 1. J. Virol., 68:8180–8187.

Dulude, D., Berchiche, Y.A., Gendron, K., Brakier-Gingras, L. and 
Heveker, N. 2006. Decreasing the frameshift effi ciency translates 
into an equivalent reduction of the replication of the human immuno-
defi ciency virus type 1. Virology, 345:127–136.

Dumond, J., Boggetto, N., Schramm, H.J., Schramm, W., Takahashi, M. 
and Reboud-Ravaux, M. 2003. Thyroxine-derivatives of lipopeptides: 
bifunctional dimerization inhibitors of human immunodefi ciency 
virus-1 protease. Biochem. Pharmacol., 65:1097–1102.

Engelman, A., Englund, G., Orenstein, J.M., Martin, M.A. and Craigie, R. 
1995. Multiple effects of mutations in human immunodefi ciency 
virus type 1 integrase on viral replication. J. Virol., 69:2729–2736.

Ewart, G.D., Mills, K., Cox, G.B. and Gage, P.W. 2002. Amiloride deriva-
tives block ion channel activity and enhancement of virus-like par-
ticle budding caused by HIV-1 protein Vpu. Eur. Biophys. J., 31: 
26–35.

Ewart, G.D., Nasr, N., Naif, H., Cox, G.B., Cunningham, A.L. and Gage, 
P.W. 2004. Potential new anti-human immunodefi ciency virus type 
1 compounds depress virus replication in cultured human macro-
phages. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 48:2325–2330.

Facke, M., Janetzko, A., Shoeman, R.L. and Krausslich, H.G. 1993. A large 
deletion in the matrix domain of the human immunodefi ciency virus 
gag gene redirects virus particle assembly from the plasma membrane 
to the endoplasmic reticulum. J. Virol., 67:4972–4980.

Fan, X., Flentke, G.F. and Rich, D.H. 1998. Inhibition of HIV-1 protease 
by a subunit of didemnaketal A. Journal of the American Chemical 
Society, 120:8893–8894.

Figueiredo, A., Moore, K.L., Mak, J., Sluis-Cremer, N., De Bethune, M.P. 
and Tachedjian, G. 2006. Potent Nonnucleoside Reverse Transcriptase 
Inhibitors Target HIV-1 Gag-Pol. PLoS Pathog., 2: e119.

Franciskovich, J., Houseman, K., Meuller, R. and Chmielewski, J. 1993. A 
systematic evaluation of the inhibition of HIV-1 protease by its C- and 
N-terminal peptides. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 765–768.

Freed, E.O. 1998. HIV-1 gag proteins: diverse functions in the virus life 
cycle. Virology, 251:1–15.

Gamble, T.R., Vajdos, F.F., Yoo, S., Worthylake, D.K., Houseweart, M., 
Sundquist, W.I. and Hill, C.P. 1996. Crystal structure of human 
cyclophilin A bound to the amino-terminal domain of HIV-1 capsid. 
Cell, 87:1285–1294.

Gamble, T.R., Yoo, S., Vajdos, F.F., Von Schwedler, U.K., Worthylake, D.K., 
Wang, H., Mccutcheon, J.P., Sundquist, W.I. and Hill, C.P. 1997. 
Structure of the carboxyl-terminal dimerization domain of the HIV-
1 capsid protein. Science, 278:849–853.

Ganser-Pornillos, B.K., Von Schwedler, U.K., Stray, K.M., Aiken, C. and 
Sundquist, W.I. 2004. Assembly properties of the human immuno-
defi ciency virus type 1 CA protein. J. Virol., 78:2545–2552.

Garrus, J.E., Von Schwedler, U.K., Pornillos, O.W., Morham, S.G., Zavitz, 
K.H., Wang, H.E., Wettstein, D.A., Stray, K.M., Cote, M., Rich, R.L., 
Myszka, D.G. and Sundquist, W.I. 2001. Tsg101 and the vacuolar 
protein sorting pathway are essential for HIV-1 budding. Cell, 107: 
55–65.

Gitti, R.K., Lee, B.M., Walker, J., Summers, M.F., Yoo, S. and Sundquist, 
W.I. 1996. Structure of the amino-terminal core domain of the HIV-
1 capsid protein. Science, 273:231–235.

Goila-Gaur, R., Demirov, D.G., Orenstein, J.M., Ono, A. and Freed, E.O. 
2003. Defects in human immunodefi ciency virus budding and endo-
somal sorting induced by TSG101 overexpression. J. Virol., 77: 
6507–6519.

Gonzalez, M.E. and Carrasco, L. 2003. Viroporins. FEBS Lett., 
552:28–34.

Gottlinger, H.G., Dorfman, T., Sodroski, J.G. and Haseltine, W.A. 1991. 
Effect of mutations affecting the p6 gag protein on human immuno-
defi ciency virus particle release. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 88: 
3195–3199.

Gottlinger, H.G., Sodroski, J.G. and Haseltine, W.A. 1989. Role of capsid 
precursor processing and myristoylation in morphogenesis and in-
fectivity of human immunodefi ciency virus type 1. Proc. Natl. Acad. 
Sci. U.S.A., 86:5781–5785.

Grice, A.L., Kerr, I.D. and Sansom, M.S. 1997. Ion channels formed by 
HIV-1 Vpu: a modelling and simulation study. FEBS Lett., 405: 
299–304.

Grinsztejn, B., Nguyen, B.Y., Katlama, C., Gatell, J.M., Lazzarin, A., 
Vittecoq, D., Gonzalez, C.J., Chen, J., Harvey, C.M. and Isaacs, R.D. 
2007. Safety and effi cacy of the HIV-1 integrase inhibitor raltegravir 
(MK-0518) in treatment-experienced patients with multidrug-resistant 
virus: a phase II randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 369:1261–1269.

Gustchina, A. and Weber, I.T. 1991. Comparative analysis of the sequences 
and structures of HIV-1 and HIV-2 proteases. Proteins, 10:325–
339.

Handley, M.A., Paddock, S., Dall, A. and Panganiban, A.T. 2001. Associa-
tion of Vpu-binding protein with microtubules and Vpu-dependent 
redistribution of HIV-1 Gag protein. Virology, 291:198–207.

Harila, K., Prior, I., Sjoberg, M., Salminen, A., Hinkula, J. and Suoma-
lainen, M. 2006. Vpu and Tsg101 regulate intracellular targeting of 
the human immunodefi ciency virus type 1 core protein precursor 
Pr55gag. J. Virol., 80:3765–3772.

Hehl, E.A., Joshi, P., Kalpana, G.V. and Prasad, V.R. 2004. Interaction 
between human immunodefi ciency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase 
and integrase proteins. J. Virol., 78:5056–5067.

Hill, M., Tachedjian, G. and Mak, J. 2005. The packaging and maturation 
of the HIV-1 Pol proteins. Curr. HIV. Res., 3:73–85.



178

Wapling et al

Drug Target Insights 2007: 2

Himmel, D.M., Sarafi anos, S.G., Dharmasena, S., Hossain, M.M., Mccoy-
Simandle, K., Ilina, T., Clark, A.D., Jr., Knight, J.L., Julias, J.G., 
Clark, P.K. et al. 2006. HIV-1 reverse transcriptase structure with 
RNase H inhibitor dihydroxy benzoyl naphthyl hydrazone bound at 
a novel site. ACS Chem. Biol., 1:702–712.

Hoglund, S., Su, J., Reneby, S.S., Vegvari, A., Hjerten, S., Sintorn, I.M., 
Foster, H., Wu, Y.P., Nystrom, I. and Vahlne, A. 2002. Tripeptide 
interference with human immunodefi ciency virus type 1 morphogen-
esis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother., 46:3597–3605.

Holm, K., Weclewicz, K., Hewson, R. and Suomalainen, M. 2003. Human 
immunodefi ciency virus type 1 assembly and lipid rafts: Pr55(gag) 
associates with membrane domains that are largely resistant to Brij98 
but sensitive to Triton X-100. J. Virol., 77:4805–4817.

Hosokawa, M., Imai, M., Okada, H. and Okada, N. 2004. Inhibition of 
HIV-1 infection in cells expressing an artifi cial complementary 
peptide. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 324:236–240.

Hout, D.R., Gomez, L.M., Pacyniak, E., Miller, J.M., Hill, M.S. and Stephens, 
E.B. 2006. A single amino acid substitution within the transmembrane 
domain of the human immunodefi ciency virus type 1 Vpu protein 
renders simian-human immunodefi ciency virus (SHIV(KU-1bMC33)) 
susceptible to rimantadine. Virology, 348:449–461.

Hsu, K., Seharaseyon, J., Dong, P., Bour, S. and Marban, E. 2004. Mutual 
functional destruction of HIV-1 Vpu and host TASK-1 channel. Mol. 
Cell, 14:259–267.

Huang, M., Orenstein, J.M., Martin, M.A. and Freed, E.O. 1995. p6Gag is required 
for particle production from full-length human immunodefi ciency virus 
type 1 molecular clones expressing protease. J. Virol., 69:6810–6818.

Hung, M., Patel, P., Davis, S. and Green, S.R. 1998. Importance of ribo-
somal frameshifting for human immunodefi ciency virus type 1 par-
ticle assembly and replication. J. Virol., 72:4819–4824.

Jacks, T., Madhani, H.D., Masiarz, F.R. and Varmus, H.E. 1988a. Signals 
for ribosomal frameshifting in the Rous sarcoma virus gag-pol region. 
Cell, 55:447–458.

Jacks, T., Power, M.D., Masiarz, F.R., Luciw, P.A., Barr, P.J. and Varmus, 
H.E. 1988b. Characterization of ribosomal frameshifting in HIV-1 
gag-pol expression. Nature, 331:280–283.

Jacks, T., Townsley, K., Varmus, and H.E. Majors, J. 1987. Two effi cient 
ribosomal frameshifting events are required for synthesis of mouse 
mammary tumor virus gag-related polyproteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. 
Sci. U.S.A., 84:4298–4302.

Jacks, T. and Varmus, H.E. 1985. Expression of the Rous sarcoma virus pol 
gene by ribosomal frameshifting. Science, 230:1237–1242.

Jacobo-Molina, A., Ding, J., Nanni, R.G., Clark, A.D., Jr., Lu, X., Tantillo, C., 
Williams, R.L., Kamer, G., Ferris, A.L., Clark, P. et al. 1993. Crystal 
structure of human immunodefi ciency virus type 1 reverse transcrip-
tase complexed with double-stranded DNA at 3.0 A resolution shows 
bent DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 90:6320–6324.

Junker, U., Escaich, S., Plavec, I., Baker, J., Mcphee, F., Rose, J.R., Craik, 
C.S. and Bohnlein, E. 1996. Intracellular expression of human 
immunodefi ciency virus type 1 (HIV-1) protease variants inhibits 
replication of wild-type and protease inhibitor-resistant HIV-1 strains 
in human T-cell lines. J. Virol., 70:7765–7772.

Kalpana, G.V., Marmon, S., Wang, W., Crabtree, G.R. and Goff, S.P. 1994. 
Binding and stimulation of HIV-1 integrase by a human homolog of 
yeast transcription factor SNF5. Science, 266:2002–2006.

Kane, R.C., Farrell, A.T., Sridhara, R. and Pazdur, R. 2006. United States 
Food and Drug Administration approval summary: bortezomib for the 
treatment of progressive multiple myeloma after one prior therapy. 
Clin. Cancer Res., 12:2955–2960.

Kaplan, A.H., Manchester, M. and Swanstrom, R. 1994. The activity of the 
protease of human immunodefi ciency virus type 1 is initiated at the mem-
brane of infected cells before the release of viral proteins and is required 
for release to occur with maximum effi ciency. J. Virol., 68:6782–6786.

Kaplan, A.H., Zack, J.A., Knigge, M., Paul, D.A., Kempf, D.J., Norbeck, 
D.W. and Swanstrom, R. 1993. Partial inhibition of the human 
immunodefi ciency virus type 1 protease results in aberrant virus 
assembly and the formation of noninfectious particles. J. Virol., 67: 
4050–4055.

Karacostas, V., Wolffe, E.J., Nagashima, K., Gonda, M.A. and Moss, B. 
1993. Overexpression of the HIV-1 gag-pol polyprotein results in 
intracellular activation of HIV-1 protease and inhibition of assembly 
and budding of virus-like particles. Virology, 193:661–671.

Klimkait, T., Strebel, K., Hoggan, M.D., Martin, M.A. and Orenstein, J.M. 1990. 
The human immunodefi ciency virus type 1-specifi c protein vpu is required 
for effi cient virus maturation and release. J. Virol., 64:621–629.

Kohl, N.E., Emini, E.A., Schleif, W.A., Davis, L.J., Heimbach, J.C., Dixon, 
R.A., Scolnick, E.M. and Sigal, I.S. 1988. Active human immuno-
defi ciency virus protease is required for viral infectivity. Proc. Natl. 
Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 85:4686–4690.

Kohlstaedt, L.A., Wang, J., Friedman, J.M., Rice, P.A. and Steitz, T.A. 1992. 
Crystal structure at 3.5 A resolution of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase 
complexed with an inhibitor. Science, 256:1783–1790.

Kollmus, H., Honigman, A., Panet, A. and Hauser, H. 1994. The sequences 
of and distance between two cis-acting signals determine the effi -
ciency of ribosomal frameshifting in human immunodefi ciency virus 
type 1 and human T-cell leukemia virus type II in vivo. J. Virol., 
68:6087–6091.

Krausslich, H.G. 1991. Human immunodefi ciency virus proteinase dimer 
as component of the viral polyprotein prevents particle assembly and 
viral infectivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 88:3213–3217.

Langner, C.A., Lodge, J.K., Travis, S.J., Caldwell, J.E., Lu, T., Li, Q., 
Bryant, M.L., Devadas, B., Gokel, G.W., Kobayashi, G.S. et al. 1992. 
4-oxatetradecanoic acid is fungicidal for Cryptococcus neoformans 
and inhibits replication of human immunodefi ciency virus I. J. Biol. 
Chem., 267:17159–17169.

Lanman, J., Lam, T.T., Barnes, S., Sakalian, M., Emmett, M.R., Marshall, 
A.G. and Prevelige, P.E., Jr. 2003. Identifi cation of novel interactions 
in HIV-1 capsid protein assembly by high-resolution mass spectrom-
etry. J. Mol. Biol., 325:759–772.

Lapadat-Tapolsky, M., De Rocquigny, H., Van Gent, D., Roques, B., 
Plasterk, R. and Darlix, J.L. 1993. Interactions between HIV-1 
nucleocapsid protein and viral DNA may have important functions 
in the viral life cycle. Nucleic Acids Res., 21:831–839.

Li, F., Goila-Gaur, R., Salzwedel, K., Kilgore, N.R., Reddick, M., Matallana, C., 
Castillo, A., Zoumplis, D., Martin, D.E., Orenstein, J.M., Allaway, G.P., 
Freed, E.O. and Wild, C.T. 2003. PA-457: a potent HIV inhibitor that 
disrupts core condensation by targeting a late step in Gag processing. 
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 100:13555–13560.

Li, L., Li, H.S., Pauza, C.D., Bukrinsky, M. and Zhao, R.Y. 2005. Roles of 
HIV-1 auxiliary proteins in viral pathogenesis and host-pathogen 
interactions. Cell Res., 15:923–934.

Li, S., Hill, C.P., Sundquist, W.I. and Finch, J.T. 2000. Image reconstruc-
tions of helical assemblies of the HIV-1 CA protein. Nature, 
407:409–413.

Liao, W.H. and Wang, C.T. 2004. Characterization of human immunodefi -
ciency virus type 1 Pr160 gag-pol mutants with truncations down-
stream of the protease domain. Virology, 329:180–188.

Lindwasser, O.W. and Resh, M.D. 2002. Myristoylation as a target for 
inhibiting HIV assembly: unsaturated fatty acids block viral budding. 
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 99:13037–13042.

Liu, F., Stephen, A.G., Adamson, C.S., Gousset, K., Aman, M.J., Freed, E.O., 
Fisher, R.J. and Burke, T.R., Jr. 2006. Hydrazone- and hydrazide-
containing N-substituted glycines as peptoid surrogates for expedited 
library synthesis: Application to the preparation of Tsg101-directed 
HIV-1 budding antagonists. Org. Lett., 8:5165–5168.

Louis, J.M., Clore, G.M. and Gronenborn, A.M. 1999. Autoprocessing of 
HIV-1 protease is tightly coupled to protein folding. Nat. Struct. Biol., 
6:868–875.

Lu, Q., Hope, L.W., Brasch, M., Reinhard, C. and Cohen, S.N. 2003. TSG101 
interaction with HRS mediates endosomal traffi cking and receptor 
down-regulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 100:7626–7631.

Makhija, M.T. 2006. Designing HIV integrase inhibitors--shooting the last 
arrow. Curr. Med. Chem., 13:2429–2441.

Mammano, F., Ohagen, A., Hoglund, S. and Gottlinger, H.G. 1994. Role of 
the major homology region of human immunodefi ciency virus type 
1 in virion morphogenesis. J. Virol., 68:4927–4936.



179

Targeting the late stages of HIV-1 replication

Drug Target Insights 2007: 2

Manfredi, R. and Sabbatani, S. 2006. A novel antiretroviral class (fusion 
inhibitors) in the management of HIV infection. Present features and 
future perspectives of enfuvirtide (T-20). Curr. Med. Chem., 13: 
2369–2384.

Maroun, R.G., Gayet, S., Benleulmi, M.S., Porumb, H., Zargarian, L., Merad, 
H., Leh, H., Mouscadet, J.F., Troalen, F. and Fermandjian, S. 2001. 
Peptide inhibitors of HIV-1 integrase dissociate the enzyme oligo-
mers. Biochemistry, 40:13840–13848.

Martin-Serrano, J., Zang, T. and Bieniasz, P.D. 2001. HIV-1 and Ebola 
virus encode small peptide motifs that recruit Tsg101 to sites of 
particle assembly to facilitate egress. Nat. Med., 7:1313–1319.

Mcphee, F., Good, A.C., Kuntz, I.D. and Craik, C.S. 1996. Engineering 
human immunodefi ciency virus 1 protease heterodimers as macro-
molecular inhibitors of viral maturation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 
93:11477–11481.

Mehle, A., Strack, B., Ancuta, P., Zhang, C., McPike, M. and Gabuzda, D. 
2004. Vif overcomes the innate antiviral activity of APOBEC3G by 
promoting its degradation in the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. 
J. Biol. Chem., 279:7792–7798.

Meng, L., Mohan, R., Kwok, B.H., Elofsson, M., Sin, N. and Crews, C.M. 
1999. Epoxomicin, a potent and selective proteasome inhibitor, ex-
hibits in vivo antiinfl ammatory activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 
96:10403–10408.

Merabet, N., Dumond, J., Collinet, B., Van Baelinghem, L., Boggetto, N., 
Ongeri, S., Ressad, F., Reboud-Ravaux, M. and Sicsic, S. 2004. New 
constrained “molecular tongs” designed to dissociate HIV-1 protease 
dimer. J. Med. Chem., 47:6392–6400.

Momany, C., Kovari, L.C., Prongay, A.J., Keller, W., Gitti, R.K., Lee, B.M., 
Gorbalenya, A.E., Tong, L., Mcclure, J., Ehrlich, L.S., Summers, 
M.F., Carter, C. and Rossmann, M.G. 1996. Crystal structure of di-
meric HIV-1 capsid protein. Nat. Struct. Biol., 3:763–770.

Morikawa, Y., Hinata, S., Tomoda, H., Goto, T., Nakai, M., Aizawa, C., 
Tanaka, H. and Omura, S. 1996. Complete inhibition of human im-
munodefi ciency virus Gag myristoylation is necessary for inhibition 
of particle budding. J. Biol. Chem., 271:2868–2873.

Morris, M.C., Berducou, C., Mery, J., Heitz, F. and Divita, G. 1999a. The 
thumb domain of the p51-subunit is essential for activation of HIV 
reverse transcriptase. Biochemistry, 38:15097–15103.

Morris, M.C., Robert-Hebmann, V., Chaloin, L., Mery, J., Heitz, F., Devaux, 
C., Goody, R.S. and Divita, G. 1999b. A new potent HIV-1 reverse 
transcriptase inhibitor. A synthetic peptide derived from the interface 
subunit domains. J. Biol. Chem., 274:24941–24946.

Muriaux, D., Darlix, J.L. and Cimarelli, A. 2004. Targeting the assembly 
of the human immunodefi ciency virus type I. Curr. Pharm. Des., 
10:3725–3739.

Neil, S.J., Eastman, S.W., Jouvenet, N. and Bieniasz, P.D. 2006. HIV-1 Vpu 
promotes release and prevents endocytosis of nascent retrovirus 
particles from the plasma membrane. PLoS Pathog., 2:e39.

Nguyen, J.T., Porter, M., Amoui, M., Miller, W.T., Zuckermann, R.N. and 
Lim, W.A. 2000. Improving SH3 domain ligand selectivity using a 
non-natural scaffold. Chem. Biol., 7:463–473.

Niedrig, M., Gelderblom, H.R., Pauli, G., Marz, J., Bickhard, H., Wolf, H. 
and Modrow, S. 1994. Inhibition of infectious human immunodefi -
ciency virus type 1 particle formation by Gag protein-derived 
peptides. J. Gen. Virol., 75:1469–1474.

Ono, A., Ablan, S.D., Lockett, S.J., Nagashima, K. and Freed, E.O. 2004. 
Phosphatidylinositol (4,5) bisphosphate regulates HIV-1 Gag 
targeting to the plasma membrane. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 
101:14889–14894.

Ono, A. and Freed, E.O. 1999. Binding of human immunodefi ciency virus 
type 1 Gag to membrane: role of the matrix amino terminus. J. Virol., 
73:4136–4144.

Ono, A., Orenstein, J.M. and Freed, E.O. 2000. Role of the Gag matrix 
domain in targeting human immunodefi ciency virus type 1 assembly. 
J. Virol., 74:2855–2866.

Ott, D.E., Coren, L.V., Sowder, R.C., Adams, J. and Schubert, U. 2003. 
Retroviruses have differing requirements for proteasome function in 
the budding process. J. Virol., 77:3384–3393.

Palella, F.J., Jr., Delaney, K.M., Moorman, A.C., Loveless, M.O., Fuhrer, 
J., Satten, G.A., Aschman, D.J. and Holmberg, S.D. 1998. Declining 
morbidity and mortality among patients with advanced human 
immunodefi ciency virus infection. HIV outpatient study investigators. 
N. Engl. J. Med., 338:853–860.

Parang, K., Wiebe, L.I., Knaus, E.E., Huang, J.S., Tyrrell, D.L. and Csizmadia, 
F. 1997. In vitro antiviral activities of myristic acid analogs against human 
immunodefi ciency and hepatitis B viruses. Antiviral Res., 34:75–90.

Park, J. and Morrow, C.D. 1991. Overexpression of the gag-pol precursor 
from human immunodefi ciency virus type 1 proviral genomes results 
in effi cient proteolytic processing in the absence of virion production. 
J. Virol., 65:5111–5117.

Park, J. and Morrow, C.D. 1992. The nonmyristylated Pr160gag-pol poly-
protein of human immunodefi ciency virus type 1 interacts with 
Pr55gag and is incorporated into virus like particles. J. Virol., 66: 
6304–6313.

Park, S.H. and Raines, R.T. 2000. Genetic selection for dissociative 
inhibitors of designated protein-protein interactions. Nat. Biotechnol., 
18:847–851.

Partin, K., Zybarth, G., Ehrlich, L., Decrombrugghe, M., Wimmer, E. and 
Carter, C. 1991. Deletion of sequences upstream of the proteinase 
improves the proteolytic processing of human immunodefi ciency 
virus type 1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 88:4776–4780.

Pettit, S.C., Lindquist, J.N., Kaplan, A.H. and Swanstrom, R. 2005. Process-
ing sites in the human immunodefi ciency virus type 1 (HIV-1) 
Gag-Pro-Pol precursor are cleaved by the viral protease at different 
rates. Retrovirology, 2:66.

Pettit, S.C., Moody, M.D., Wehbie, R.S., Kaplan, A.H., Nantermet, P.V., 
Klein, C.A. and Swanstrom, R. 1994. The p2 domain of human 
immunodefi ciency virus type 1 Gag regulates sequential proteolytic 
processing and is required to produce fully infectious virions. J. Virol., 
68:8017–8027.

Pettit, S.C., Sheng, N., Tritch, R., Erickson-Viitanen, S. and Swanstrom, R. 
1998. The regulation of sequential processing of HIV-1 Gag by the 
viral protease. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., 436:15–25.

Piacenti, F.J. 2006. An update and review of antiretroviral therapy. 
Pharmacotherapy, 26:1111–1133.

Pidgeon, C., Markovich, R.J., Liu, M.D., Holzer, T.J., Novak, R.M. and 
Keyer, K.A. 1993. Antiviral phospholipids. Anti-HIV drugs conju-
gated to the glycerobackbone of phospholipids. J. Biol. Chem., 268: 
7773–7778.

Pornillos, O., Alam, S.L., Davis, D.R. and Sundquist, W.I. 2002a. Structure 
of the Tsg101 UEV domain in complex with the PTAP motif of the 
HIV-1 p6 protein. Nat. Struct. Biol., 9:812–817.

Pornillos, O., Alam, S.L., Rich, R.L., Myszka, D.G., Davis, D.R. and Sun-
dquist, W.I. 2002b. Structure and functional interactions of the Tsg101 
UEV domain. EMBO J., 21:2397–2406.

Pornillos, O., Higginson, D.S., Stray, K.M., Fisher, R.D., Garrus, J.E., Payne, 
M., He, G.P., Wang, H.E., Morham, S.G. and Sundquist, W.I. 2003. 
HIV Gag mimics the Tsg101-recruiting activity of the human Hrs 
protein. J. Cell Biol., 162:425–434.

Potts, B.C.M., Faulkner, D.J., Chan, J.A., Simolike, G.C., Offen, P., 
Hemling, M.E. and Francis, T.E. 1991. Didemnaketal A and B, 
HIV-1 Protease Inhibitors from the Accidian Didemnum sp. Journal 
of the American Chemical Society, 113:6321–6322.

Quere, L., Wenger, T. and Schramm, H.J. 1996. Triterpenes as potential 
dimerization inhibitors of HIV-1 protease. Biochem. Biophys. Res. 
Commun., 227:484–488.

Quillent, C., Borman, A.M., Paulous, S., Dauguet, C. and Clavel, F. 1996. 
Extensive regions of pol are required for effi cient human immuno-
defi ciency virus polyprotein processing and particle maturation. 
Virology, 219:29–36.

Rabson, A.B. and Graves, B.J. 1997. Synthesis and processing of viral RNA. 
In Coffi n, J.M., Hughes, S. H. & Varmus, H.E. ed. Retroviruses. New 
York, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

Reicin, A.S., Ohagen, A., Yin, L., Hoglund, S. and Goff, S.P. 1996. The role 
of Gag in human immunodefi ciency virus type 1 virion morphogen-
esis and early steps of the viral life cycle. J. Virol., 70:8645–8652.



180

Wapling et al

Drug Target Insights 2007: 2

Rice, W.G., Baker, D.C., Schaeffer, C.A., Graham, L., Bu, M., Terpening, S., 
Clanton, D., Schultz, R., Bader, J.P., Buckheit, R.W., Jr., Field, L., 
Singh, P.K. and Turpin, J.A. 1997. Inhibition of multiple phases of 
human immunodefi ciency virus type 1 replication by a dithiane 
compound that attacks the conserved zinc fingers of retroviral 
nucleocapsid proteins. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 41:419–426.

Rice, W.G., Supko, J.G., Malspeis, L., Buckheit, R.W., Jr., Clanton, D., Bu, 
M., Graham, L., Schaeffer, C.A., Turpin, J.A., Domagala, J., Gogliotti, 
R., Bader, J.P., Halliday, S.M., Coren, L., Sowder, R.C., Arthur, L.O. 
and Henderson, L.E. 1995. Inhibitors of HIV nucleocapsid protein 
zinc fingers as candidates for the treatment of AIDS. Science, 
270:1194–1197.

Rodriguez-Barrios, F., Perez, C., Lobaton, E., Velazquez, S., Chamorro, C., 
San-Felix, A., Perez-Perez, M.J., Camarasa, M.J., Pelemans, H., 
Balzarini, J. and Gago, F. 2001. Identifi cation of a putative binding 
site for [2′,5′-bis-O-(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)-beta-D-ribofuranosyl]-
3′-spiro-5″-(4″-amino-1″,2″-oxathiole-2″,2″-dioxide)thymine 
(TSAO) derivatives at the p51-p66 interface of HIV-1 reverse tran-
scriptase. J. Med. Chem., 44:1853–1865.

Rodriguez-Rodriguez, L., Tsuchihashi, Z., Fuentes, G.M., Bambara, R.A. 
and Fay, P.J. 1995. Infl uence of human immunodefi ciency virus 
nucleocapsid protein on synthesis and strand transfer by the reverse 
transcriptase in vitro. J. Biol. Chem., 270:15005–15011.

Rozzelle, J.E., Dauber, D.S., Todd, S., Kelley, R. and Craik, C.S. 2000. 
Macromolecular inhibitors of HIV-1 protease. Characterization of 
designed heterodimers. J. Biol. Chem., 275:7080–7086.

Ruland, J., Sirard, C., Elia, A., Macpherson, D., Wakeham, A., Li, L., De 
La Pompa, J.L., Cohen, S.N. and Mak, T.W. 2001. p53 accumulation, 
defective cell proliferation, and early embryonic lethality in mice 
lacking tsg101. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 98:1859–1864.

Saad, J.S., Miller, J., Tai, J., Kim, A., Ghanam, R.H. and Summers, M.F. 
2006. Structural basis for targeting HIV-1 Gag proteins to the plasma 
membrane for virus assembly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 
103:11364–11369.

Sakalian, M., Mcmurtrey, C.P., Deeg, F.J., Maloy, C.W., Li, F., Wild, C.T. 
and Salzwedel, K. 2006. 3-O-(3′,3′-dimethysuccinyl) betulinic acid 
inhibits maturation of the human immunodefi ciency virus type 1 Gag 
precursor assembled in vitro. J. Virol., 80:5716–5722.

Schito, M.L., Goel, A., Song, Y., Inman, J.K., Fattah, R.J., Rice, W.G., 
Turpin, J.A., Sher, A. and Appella, E. 2003. In vivo antiviral activity 
of novel human immunodefi ciency virus type 1 nucleocapsid p7 zinc 
fi nger inhibitors in a transgenic murine model. AIDS Res. Hum. 
Retroviruses, 19:91–101.

Schito, M.L., Soloff, A.C., Slovitz, D., Trichel, A., Inman, J.K., Appella, 
E., Turpin, J.A. and Barratt-Boyes, S.M. 2006. Preclinical evaluation 
of a zinc fi nger inhibitor targeting lentivirus nucleocapsid protein in 
SIV-infected monkeys. Curr. HIV Res., 4:379–386.

Schramm, H.J., Boetzel, J., Buttner, J., Fritsche, E., Gohring, W., Jaeger, 
E., Konig, S., Thumfart, O., Wenger, T., Nagel, N.E. and Schramm, 
W. 1996. The inhibition of human immunodefi ciency virus prote-
ases by ‘interface peptides’. Antiviral Res., 30: 155-170.

Schramm, H.J., De Rosny, E., Reboud-Ravaux, M., Buttner, J., Dick, A. 
and Schramm, W. 1999. Lipopeptides as dimerization inhibitors of 
HIV-1 protease. Biol. Chem., 380:593–596.

Schramm, H.J., Nakashima, H., Schramm, W., Wakayama, H. and Yama-
moto, N. 1991. HIV-1 reproduction is inhibited by peptides derived 
from the N- and C-termini of HIV-1 protease. Biochem. Biophys. Res. 
Commun., 179:847–851.

Schubert, U., Ferrer-Montiel, A.V., Oblatt-Montal, M., Henklein, P., 
Strebel, K. and Montal, M. 1996a. Identifi cation of an ion channel 
activity of the Vpu transmembrane domain and its involvement in 
the regulation of virus release from HIV-1-infected cells. FEBS Lett, 
398:12–18.

Schubert, U., Ott, D.E., Chertova, E.N., Welker, R., Tessmer, U., Prin-
ciotta, M.F., Bennink, J.R., Krausslich, H.G. and Yewdell, J.W. 2000. 
Proteasome inhibition interferes with gag polyprotein processing, 
release, and maturation of HIV-1 and HIV-2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 
U.S.A., 97:13057–13062.

Schwartz, O., Marechal, V., Friguet, B., Arenzana-Seisdedos, F. and Heard, 
J.M. 1998. Antiviral activity of the proteasome on incoming human 
immunodefi ciency virus type 1. J. Virol., 72: 3845–3850.

Serio, D., Singh, S.P., Cartas, M.A., Weber, I.T., Harrison, R.W., Louis, J.M. 
and Srinivasan, A. 2000. Antiviral agent based on the non-structural 
protein targeting the maturation process of HIV-1: expression and 
susceptibility of chimeric Vpr as a substrate for cleavage by HIV-1 
protease. Protein. Eng., 13:431–436.

Sheehy, A.M., Gaddis, N.C. and Malim, M.H. 2003. The antiretroviral 
enzyme APOBEC3G is degraded by the proteasome in response to 
HIV-1 Vif. Nat. Med., 9:1404–1407.

Shehu-Xhilaga, M., Crowe, S.M. and Mak, J. 2001a. Maintenance of the 
Gag/Gag-Pol ratio is important for human immunodefi ciency virus type 
1 RNA dimerization and viral infectivity. J. Virol., 75:1834–1841.

Shehu-Xhilaga, M., Kraeusslich, H.G., Pettit, S., Swanstrom, R., Lee, J.Y., 
Marshall, J.A., Crowe, S.M. and Mak, J. 2001b. Proteolytic process-
ing of the p2/nucleocapsid cleavage site is critical for human 
immunodefi ciency virus type 1 RNA dimer maturation. J. Virol., 75: 
9156–9164.

Shehu-Xhilaga, M., Tachedjian, G., Crowe, S.M. and Kedzierska, K. 2005. 
Antiretroviral compounds: mechanisms underlying failure of HAART 
to eradicate HIV-1. Curr. Med. Chem., 12:1705–1719.

Shin, C.G., Taddeo, B., Haseltine, W.A. and Farnet, C.M. 1994. Genetic 
analysis of the human immunodefi ciency virus type 1 integrase 
protein. J. Virol., 68:1633–1642.

Shkriabai, N., Datta, S.A., Zhao, Z., Hess, S., Rein, and A. Kvaratskhelia, 
M. 2006. Interactions of HIV-1 Gag with assembly cofactors. 
Biochemistry, 45:4077–4083.

Sluis-Cremer, N., Arion, D., Abram, M.E. and Parniak, M.A. 2004. Proteo-
lytic processing of an HIV-1 pol polyprotein precursor: insights into 
the mechanism of reverse transcriptase p66/p51 heterodimer forma-
tion. Int. J. Biochem. Cell. Biol., 36:1836–1847.

Sluis-Cremer, N., Dmitrienko, G.I., Balzarini, J., Camarasa, M.J. and Parniak, 
M.A. 2000. Human immunodefi ciency virus type 1 reverse transcrip-
tase dimer destabilization by 1-[Spiro[4″-amino-2″,2″-dioxo-1″,2″ -
oxathiole-5″,3′-[2′, 5′-bis-O-(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)-beta-D-ribofu-
ranosyl]]]-3-ethylthy mine. Biochemistry, 39:1427–1433.

-Cremer, N., Hamamouch, N., San Felix, A., Velazquez, S., Balzarini, J. 
and Camarasa, M.J. 2006. Structure-activity relationships of [2′,5′-
bis-O-(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)-beta-D-ribofuranosyl]- 3′-spiro-5″-
(4″-amino-1″,2″-oxathiole-2″,2″-dioxide)thymine derivatives as 
inhibitors of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase dimerization. J. Med. Chem., 
49:4834–4841.

Sluis-Cremer, N. and Tachedjian, G. 2002. Modulation of the oligomeric 
structures of HIV-1 retroviral enzymes by synthetic peptides and 
small molecules. Eur. J. Biochem., 269:5103–5111.

Smith, A.J., Srinivasakumar, N., Hammarskjold, M.L. and Rekosh, D. 1993. 
Requirements for incorporation of Pr160gag-pol from human 
immunodefi ciency virus type 1 into virus-like particles. J. Virol., 
67: 2266–2275.

Song, M., Rajesh, S., Hayashi, Y. and Kiso, Y. 2001. Design and synthesis 
of new inhibitors of HIV-1 protease dimerization with conformation-
ally constrained templates. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 11:2465–
2468.

Sorin, M., Yung, E., Wu, X. and Kalpana, G.V. 2006. HIV-1 replication in 
cell lines harboring INI1/hSNF5 mutations. Retrovirology, 3:56.

Srinivasakumar, N., Hammarskjold, M.L. and Rekosh, D. 1995. Character-
ization of deletion mutations in the capsid region of human 
immunodefi ciency virus type 1 that affect particle formation and 
Gag-Pol precursor incorporation. J. Virol., 69:6106–6114.

Srivastava, S., Sluis-Cremer, N. and Tachedjian, G. 2006. Dimerization of 
human immunodefi ciency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase as an 
antiviral target. Curr. Pharm. Des., 12:1879–1894.

Stephenson, J. 2007. Researchers buoyed by novel HIV drugs: will expand 
drug arsenal against resistant virus. JAMA, 297:1535–1536.

Sticht, J., Humbert, M., Findlow, S., Bodem, J., Muller, B., Dietrich, U., 
Werner, J. and Krausslich, H.G. 2005. A peptide inhibitor of HIV-1 
assembly in vitro. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 12:671–677.



181

Targeting the late stages of HIV-1 replication

Drug Target Insights 2007: 2

Stopak, K., De Noronha, C., Yonemoto, W. and Greene, W.C. 2003. HIV-1 
Vif blocks the antiviral activity of APOBEC3G by impairing both its 
translation and intracellular stability. Mol. Cell., 12:591–601.

Swanstrom, R., and J.W. Wills. 1997. Synthesis, assembly, and processing 
of viral proteins. In Coffi n, J. M., Hughes,  S. H. and Varmus H. E. (ed.), 
Retroviruses. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring 
Harbor, N.Y., p. 263–334.

Tachedjian, G., Aronson, H.E., De Los Santos, M., Seehra, J., Mccoy, J.M. 
and Goff, S.P. 2003. Role of residues in the tryptophan repeat motif 
for HIV-1 reverse transcriptase dimerization. J. Mol. Biol., 326:381–
396.

Tachedjian, G., Aronson, H.E. and Goff, S.P. 2000. Analysis of mutations 
and suppressors affecting interactions between the subunits of the 
HIV type 1 reverse transcriptase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 97: 
6334–6339.

Tachedjian, G., Moore, K.L., Goff, S.P. and Sluis-Cremer, N. 2005a. Efa-
virenz enhances the proteolytic processing of an HIV-1 pol polypro-
tein precursor and reverse transcriptase homodimer formation. FEBS 
Lett., 579:379–384.

Tachedjian, G., Orlova, M., Sarafi anos, S.G., Arnold, E. and Goff, S.P. 2001. 
Nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors are chemical enhanc-
ers of dimerization of the HIV type 1 reverse transcriptase. Proc. 
Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 98:7188–7193.

Tachedjian, G., Radzio, J. and Sluis-Cremer, N. 2005b. Relationship between 
enzyme activity and dimeric structure of recombinant HIV-1 reverse 
transcriptase. Proteins, 60:5–13.

Tanchou, V., Gabus, C., Rogemond, V. and Darlix, J.L. 1995. Formation of 
stable and functional HIV-1 nucleoprotein complexes in vitro. J. Mol. 
Biol., 252:563–571.

Tang, C., Loeliger, E., Kinde, I., Kyere, S., Mayo, K., Barklis, E., Sun, Y., 
Huang, M. and Summers, M.F. 2003. Antiviral inhibition of the HIV-1 
capsid protein. J. Mol. Biol., 327:1013–1020.

Tang, C., Loeliger, E., Luncsford, P., Kinde, I., Beckett, D. and Summers, 
M.F. 2004. Entropic switch regulates myristate exposure in the HIV-1 
matrix protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 101:517–522.

Tang, C., Ndassa, Y. and Summers, M.F. 2002. Structure of the N-terminal 
283-residue fragment of the immature HIV-1 Gag polyprotein. Nat. 
Struct. Biol., 9:537–543.

Telesnitsky A. and Goff, S. 1997. Reverse transcriptase and the generation of 
retroviral DNA. In Coffi n, J.M., Hughes, S. H. and Varmus, H.E. (ed.), 
Retroviruses. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York.

Ternois, F., Sticht, J., Duquerroy, S., Krausslich, H.G. and Rey, F.A. 2005. 
The HIV-1 capsid protein C-terminal domain in complex with a virus 
assembly inhibitor. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 12:678–682.

Todd, M.J., Semo, N. and Freire, E. 1998. The structural stability of the 
HIV-1 protease. J. Mol. Biol., 283:475–488.

Turpin, J.A., Terpening, S.J., Schaeffer, C.A., Yu, G., Glover, C.J., Felsted, 
R.L., Sausville, E.A. and Rice, W.G. 1996. Inhibitors of human 
immunodefi ciency virus type 1 zinc fi ngers prevent normal process-
ing of gag precursors and result in the release of noninfectious virus 
particles. J. Virol., 70:6180–6189.

Uhlikova, T., Konvalinka, J., Pichova, I., Soucek, M., Krausslich, H.G. and 
Vondrasek, J. 1996. A modular approach to HIV-1 proteinase inhibitor 
design. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 222:38–43.

Ulysse, L.G. and Chmielewski, J. 1998. Restricting the fl exibility of cross-
linked, interfacial peptide inhibitors of HIV-1 protease. Bioorg. Med. 
Chem. Lett., 8:3281–3286.

Venezia, C.F., Howard, K.J., Ignatov, M.E., Holladay, L.A. and Barkley, 
M.D. 2006. Effects of efavirenz binding on the subunit equilibria of 
HIV-1 reverse transcriptase. Biochemistry, 45:2779–2789.

Veronese, F.D., Copeland, T.D., Oroszlan, S., Gallo, R.C. and Sarngadharan, 
M.G. 1988. Biochemical and immunological analysis of human im-
munodefi ciency virus gag gene products p17 and p24. J. Virol., 62: 
795–801.

Verplank, L., Bouamr, F., Lagrassa, T.J., Agresta, B., Kikonyogo, A., Leis, J. 
and Carter, C.A. 2001. Tsg101, a homologue of ubiquitin-conjugating 
(E2) enzymes, binds the L domain in HIV type 1 Pr55(Gag). Proc. 
Natl. Acad. Sci., U.S.A., 98: 7724–7729.

Vivet-Boudou, V., Didierjean, J., Isel, C. and Marquet, R. 2006. Nucleoside 
and nucleotide inhibitors of HIV-1 replication. Cell. Mol. Life. Sci., 
63:163–186.

Vogt, V.M. 1996. Proteolytic processing and particle maturation. Curr. Top. 
Microbiol. Immunol., 214:95–131.

Von Schwedler, U.K., Stray, K.M., Garrus, J.E. and Sundquist, W.I. 2003. 
Functional surfaces of the human immunodefi ciency virus type 1 
capsid protein. J. Virol., 77:5439–5450.

Wapling, J., Moore, K.L., Sonza, S., Mak, J. and Tachedjian, G. 2005. 
Mutations that abrogate human immunodefi ciency virus type 1 reverse 
transcriptase dimerization affect maturation of the reverse transcrip-
tase heterodimer. J. Virol., 79:10247–10257.

Wei, B.L., Denton, P.W., O’neill, E., Luo, T., Foster, J.L. and Garcia, J.V. 
2005. Inhibition of lysosome and proteasome function enhances 
human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. J. Virol., 79: 
5705–5712.

Wiegers, K., Rutter, G., Kottler, H., Tessmer, U., Hohenberg, H. and 
Krausslich, H.G. 1998. Sequential steps in human immunodefi -
ciency virus particle maturation revealed by alterations of individu-
al Gag polyprotein cleavage sites. J. Virol., 72:2846–2854.

Willey, R.L., Maldarelli, F., Martin, M.A. and Strebel, K. 1992. Human 
immunodefi ciency virus type 1 Vpu protein induces rapid degradation 
of CD4. J. Virol, 66:7193–7200.

Wlodawer, A., Miller, M., Jaskolski, M., Sathyanarayana, B.K., Baldwin, E., 
Weber, I.T., Selk, L.M., Clawson, L., Schneider, J. and Kent, S.B. 
1989. Conserved folding in retroviral proteases: crystal structure of 
a synthetic HIV-1 protease. Science, 245:616–621.

Worthylake, D.K., Wang, H., Yoo, S., Sundquist, W.I. and Hill, C.P. 1999. 
Structures of the HIV-1 capsid protein dimerization domain at 2.6 A 
resolution. Acta. Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr., 55:85–92.

Wu, X., Anderson, J.L., Campbell, E.M., Joseph, A.M. and Hope, T.J. 2006. 
Proteasome inhibitors uncouple rhesus TRIM5alpha restriction of 
HIV-1 reverse transcription and infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 
103:7465–7470.

Wu, X., Liu, H., Xiao, H., Conway, J.A., Hunter, E. and Kappes, J.C. 1997. 
Functional RT and IN incorporated into HIV-1 particles indepen-
dently of the Gag/Pol precursor protein. EMBO J., 16:5113–5122.

Yeni, P. 2006. Update on HAART in HIV. J. Hepatol., 44:S100–103.
Yeni, P.G., Hammer, S.M., Carpenter, C.C., Cooper, D.A., Fischl, M.A., 

Gatell, J.M., Gazzard, B.G., Hirsch, M.S., Jacobsen, D.M., Katzen-
stein, D.A., et al. 2002. Antiretroviral treatment for adult HIV infec-
tion in 2002: updated recommendations of the International AIDS 
Society-USA Panel. JAMA, 288:222–235.

Yu, Q., Ottmann, M., Pechoux, C., Le Grice, S. and Darlix, J.L. 1998. 
Mutations in the primer grip of human immunodefi ciency virus type 
1 reverse transcriptase impair proviral DNA synthesis and virion 
maturation. J. Virol., 72:7676–7680.

Yu, X., Yu, Y., Liu, B., Luo, K., Kong, W., Mao, P. and Yu, X.F. 2003. Induc-
tion of APOBEC3G ubiquitination and degradation by an HIV-1 
Vif-Cul5-SCF complex. Science, 302:1056–1060.

Yung, E., Sorin, M., Pal, A., Craig, E., Morozov, A., Delattre, O., Kappes, 
J., Ott, D. and Kalpana, G.V. 2001. Inhibition of HIV-1 virion produc-
tion by a transdominant mutant of integrase interactor 1. Nat. Med., 
7:920–926.

Yung, E., Sorin, M., Wang, E.J., Perumal, S., Ott, D. and Kalpana, G.V. 
2004. Specifi city of interaction of INI1/hSNF5 with retroviral inte-
grases and its functional signifi cance. J. Virol., 78:2222–2231.

Zhang, Z.Y., Poorman, R.A., Maggiora, L.L., Heinrikson, R.L. and Kezdy, 
F.J. 1991. Dissociative inhibition of dimeric enzymes. Kinetic char-
acterization of the inhibition of HIV-1 protease by its COOH-termi-
nal tetrapeptide. J. Biol. Chem., 266:15591–15594.

Zhao, L., O’reilly, M.K., Shultz, M.D. and Chmielewski, J. 2003. Interfacial 
peptide inhibitors of HIV-1 integrase activity and dimerization. 
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 13:1175-1177.

Zhou, J., Chen, C.H. and Aiken, C. 2004. The sequence of the CA-SP1 
junction accounts for the differential sensitivity of HIV-1 and SIV to 
the small molecule maturation inhibitor 3-O-{3′,3′-dimethylsucci-
nyl}-betulinic acid. Retrovirology, 1:15.



182

Wapling et al

Drug Target Insights 2007: 2

Zhou, J., Chen, C.H. and Aiken, C. 2006. HIV-1 Resistance to the Small 
Molecule Maturation Inhibitor 3-O-{3′,3′-dimethylsuccinyl}-betu-
linic acid is conferred by a variety of single amino acid substitutions 
at the CA-SP1 cleavage site in Gag. J. Virol., 80:12095–12101. 

Zhou, J., Huang, L., Hachey, D.L., Chen, C.H. and Aiken, C. 2005. Inhibi-
tion of HIV-1 maturation via drug association with the viral Gag 
protein in immature HIV-1 particles. J. Biol. Chem., 280:42149–
42155.

Zutshi, R. and Chmielewski, J. 2000. Targeting the dimerization interface 
for irreversible inhibition of HIV-1 protease. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 
Lett., 10:1901–1903.

















<<
  /ASCII85EncodePages false
  /AllowTransparency false
  /AutoPositionEPSFiles true
  /AutoRotatePages /None
  /Binding /Left
  /CalGrayProfile (Dot Gain 20%)
  /CalRGBProfile (sRGB IEC61966-2.1)
  /CalCMYKProfile (U.S. Web Coated \050SWOP\051 v2)
  /sRGBProfile (sRGB IEC61966-2.1)
  /CannotEmbedFontPolicy /Error
  /CompatibilityLevel 1.4
  /CompressObjects /Tags
  /CompressPages true
  /ConvertImagesToIndexed true
  /PassThroughJPEGImages true
  /CreateJDFFile false
  /CreateJobTicket false
  /DefaultRenderingIntent /Default
  /DetectBlends true
  /ColorConversionStrategy /LeaveColorUnchanged
  /DoThumbnails false
  /EmbedAllFonts true
  /EmbedJobOptions true
  /DSCReportingLevel 0
  /EmitDSCWarnings false
  /EndPage -1
  /ImageMemory 1048576
  /LockDistillerParams false
  /MaxSubsetPct 100
  /Optimize true
  /OPM 1
  /ParseDSCComments true
  /ParseDSCCommentsForDocInfo true
  /PreserveCopyPage true
  /PreserveEPSInfo true
  /PreserveHalftoneInfo false
  /PreserveOPIComments false
  /PreserveOverprintSettings true
  /StartPage 1
  /SubsetFonts true
  /TransferFunctionInfo /Apply
  /UCRandBGInfo /Preserve
  /UsePrologue false
  /ColorSettingsFile ()
  /AlwaysEmbed [ true
  ]
  /NeverEmbed [ true
  ]
  /AntiAliasColorImages false
  /DownsampleColorImages true
  /ColorImageDownsampleType /Bicubic
  /ColorImageResolution 300
  /ColorImageDepth -1
  /ColorImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000
  /EncodeColorImages true
  /ColorImageFilter /DCTEncode
  /AutoFilterColorImages true
  /ColorImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG
  /ColorACSImageDict <<
    /QFactor 0.15
    /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1]
  >>
  /ColorImageDict <<
    /QFactor 0.15
    /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1]
  >>
  /JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict <<
    /TileWidth 256
    /TileHeight 256
    /Quality 30
  >>
  /JPEG2000ColorImageDict <<
    /TileWidth 256
    /TileHeight 256
    /Quality 30
  >>
  /AntiAliasGrayImages false
  /DownsampleGrayImages true
  /GrayImageDownsampleType /Bicubic
  /GrayImageResolution 300
  /GrayImageDepth -1
  /GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000
  /EncodeGrayImages true
  /GrayImageFilter /DCTEncode
  /AutoFilterGrayImages true
  /GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG
  /GrayACSImageDict <<
    /QFactor 0.15
    /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1]
  >>
  /GrayImageDict <<
    /QFactor 0.15
    /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1]
  >>
  /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict <<
    /TileWidth 256
    /TileHeight 256
    /Quality 30
  >>
  /JPEG2000GrayImageDict <<
    /TileWidth 256
    /TileHeight 256
    /Quality 30
  >>
  /AntiAliasMonoImages false
  /DownsampleMonoImages true
  /MonoImageDownsampleType /Bicubic
  /MonoImageResolution 1200
  /MonoImageDepth -1
  /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000
  /EncodeMonoImages true
  /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode
  /MonoImageDict <<
    /K -1
  >>
  /AllowPSXObjects false
  /PDFX1aCheck false
  /PDFX3Check false
  /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false
  /PDFXNoTrimBoxError true
  /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [
    0.00000
    0.00000
    0.00000
    0.00000
  ]
  /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox true
  /PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [
    0.00000
    0.00000
    0.00000
    0.00000
  ]
  /PDFXOutputIntentProfile ()
  /PDFXOutputCondition ()
  /PDFXRegistryName (http://www.color.org)
  /PDFXTrapped /Unknown

  /Description <<
    /JPN <FEFF3053306e8a2d5b9a306f30019ad889e350cf5ea6753b50cf3092542b308030d730ea30d730ec30b9537052377528306e00200050004400460020658766f830924f5c62103059308b3068304d306b4f7f75283057307e305930023053306e8a2d5b9a30674f5c62103057305f00200050004400460020658766f8306f0020004100630072006f0062006100740020304a30883073002000520065006100640065007200200035002e003000204ee5964d30678868793a3067304d307e305930023053306e8a2d5b9a306b306f30d530a930f330c8306e57cb30818fbc307f304c5fc59808306730593002>
    /FRA <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>
    /DEU <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>
    /PTB <FEFF005500740069006c0069007a006500200065007300740061007300200063006f006e00660069006700750072006100e700f5006500730020007000610072006100200063007200690061007200200064006f00630075006d0065006e0074006f0073002000500044004600200063006f006d00200075006d00610020007200650073006f006c007500e700e3006f00200064006500200069006d006100670065006d0020007300750070006500720069006f0072002000700061007200610020006f006200740065007200200075006d00610020007100750061006c0069006400610064006500200064006500200069006d0070007200650073007300e3006f0020006d0065006c0068006f0072002e0020004f007300200064006f00630075006d0065006e0074006f0073002000500044004600200070006f00640065006d0020007300650072002000610062006500720074006f007300200063006f006d0020006f0020004100630072006f006200610074002c002000520065006100640065007200200035002e00300020006500200070006f00730074006500720069006f0072002e00200045007300740061007300200063006f006e00660069006700750072006100e700f50065007300200072006500710075006500720065006d00200069006e0063006f00720070006f0072006100e700e3006f00200064006500200066006f006e00740065002e>
    /DAN <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>
    /NLD <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>
    /ESP <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>
    /SUO <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>
    /ITA <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>
    /NOR <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>
    /SVE <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>
    /ENU <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>
  >>
>> setdistillerparams
<<
  /HWResolution [2400 2400]
  /PageSize [612.000 792.000]
>> setpagedevice