E-Journal of Tourism Vol.8. No.2. (2021): 207-214 207http://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/eot e-ISSN 2407-392X. p-ISSN 2541-0857 Impact of Job Crafting to Work Engagement: Mediating Role of Per- son-Job Fit and Job Resources on The Tour Guide Siti Nur Azizah*, Harini Abrilia Setyawati Universitas Putra Bangsa, Indonesia *Corresponding Author: sitinuraziz@yahoo.com DOI: https://doi.org/10.24922/eot.v8i2.73046 Abstract This research was conducted to examine the effect of job crafting to work engagement with person-job fit and job resources ad mediating variables. The population of this study is a tour guide in Jogjakarta, Indonesia with a sample of 125 people in This research was carried out in early January 2020. We used convenience sampling as the sampling technique. A 5-level Likert scale is used to measure respondents’ at- titudes. Smart PLS (Partial Least Square) for windows processed the results were obtained with. Research showed that job resources act as a full mediation between the relationship between job crafting and work engagement. And person-job fit variable also has a fully mediating role in the relationship between job crafting and work engagement. The con- clusion of this study is that the job resources owned by employees will balance the needs of workers and show a mediating effect so that em- ployees can increase their involvement in work. Likewise, person job fit refers to the relationship between employee characteristics and job characteristics, which is a variable that can increase the job involvement of tour guides. Various practical implications are described in this paper. Keywords: Person-job Fit, Tour Guide, Job Resources, Job Crafting, Work Engagement Article Info Submitted: May 20th 2021. Accepted: September 18th 2021. Published: September 30th 2021 ka and Bakker, 2016). We believe that more job crafting employees are more tied to their jobs than employees with low job crafting. Job crafting has a positive influen- ce on work engagement (Tims, Bakker and Derks, 2014). Employees can be tied to the compa- ny and their work because they feel com- fortable at work, and it’s can be obtained if there is a match between themselves and the work they are doing or so-called person-job fit. Kristof‐Brown, Zimmerman and John- son (2005), states that person-job fit refers to the relationship between employee cha- INTRODUCTION Schaufeli et al. (2002) stated that work engagement is defined as a positive mental condition, providing job-related sa- tisfaction which is defined as vigor, dedi- cation, and absorption. Employees will do everything they can without any coercion because they are already immersed in the work they are doing. Work engagement can be shaped well by many factors, one of which is employee job crafting. Job craf- ting is a modification of tasks or job cha- racteristics on one’s initiative (Roczniews- E-Journal of Tourism Vol.8. No.2. (2021): 207-214 208http://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/eot e-ISSN 2407-392X. p-ISSN 2541-0857 a tourist destination favored by both local and foreign tourists. Natural potential in the form of beautiful beaches and cultural heritage such as the Yogyakarta Palace has become a world tourist attraction. Jogjakar- ta is also unique as a city of education in Indonesia so that it is a special attraction in addition to its unique culture. People keep visiting other than be- cause of the tourism potential as well as the good service from the tour guide. Tour guides have to make any modifications to their work and must be able to do creati- ve services. Their job demands will have a good collaboration with their skills. They must also be able to resolve complaints from tourists. This study aims to analyze effect of job crafting on work engagement and examine the role of job resources and the mediation role of person-job fit on the effect of job crafting on work engagement on tour guides in Jogjakarta, Indonesia. LITERATURE REVIEW Work engagement Work engagement refers to a positive and satisfying psychological state (Harju, Hakanen and Schaufeli, 2016). This defini- tion is in line with Wingerden, Derks and Bakker (2018), who argues work engage- ment is a positive work-related activity characterized by vigor, dedication & ab- sorption. Bakker, Demerouti and Sanz-Ver- gel (2014) added with workers who have high engagement and involvement with their work indicate that these workers have quite sensible personal innovation compa- red to alternative employees. Previous ana- lysis has shown that there’s an associate in- fluence between person-job work and work engagement. The study was conducted by Chen, Yen and Tsai (2014) on twenty-five hotels in Taiwan expressed that person-job work contains a positive result on work en- gagement. racteristics and job characteristics. When employees have suitability with their job, they will work to the best of their ability. Person-job fit is a condition that describes an employee’s suitability or ability with job demands, individual needs, and what the job can provide to employees (Cable and DeRue, 2002). Chen, Yen and Tsai (2014) states that person-job fit has a positive ef- fect on work engagement. However, we found a difference from the results of research conducted by Cifre et al. (2013) that person-job fit does not have a significant effect on work engagement. And we found that there is a positive effect of job crafting on a person-job fit (Chen, Yen and Tsai, 2014). This result is different from Tims, Derks and Bakker (2016) that job crafting does not affect person-job fit. We believe that these findings allow modi- fication of some of the above studies, such as making work engagement as the depen- dent variable, job crafting an independent variable, and person-job fit as a mediating variable. Van den Heuvel, Demerouti and Pee- ters (2015) stated that job crafting affects job resources. Job resources are important for employees because they provide flexi- bility and provide opportunities to develop their skills. Whereas at work, employees who have work engagement need sufficient resources when they work. A profession as a tour guide requires high job crafting. When doing work as a guide for tourists who are enthusiastic about their tour and demand satisfaction from their tour, the role of a tour guide is very meaningful in the next tour visit to an area. Jogjakarta, Indonesia is a province that has natural and cultural potential that is interesting to visit. Based on data from the Central Statistics Agency for the Special Region of Yogyakarta, the number of visits by both local and foreign tourists exceeds 4 million visits in 2019 (BPS DIY, 2019). This shows Jogjakarta as E-Journal of Tourism Vol.8. No.2. (2021): 207-214 209http://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/eot e-ISSN 2407-392X. p-ISSN 2541-0857 Person-job fit Person-job fit could be a condition that describes the existence of a match between associate workers’ abilities with job de- mands, individual needs, and what the duty will give to employees (Cable and DeRue, 2002). Meanwhile, Newton et. al. in Julia et. al. (2015) argue that the person-job fit involves the suitableness of individuals and requirements that are directly involving a selected job. The suitableness of the indivi- dual with the duty can profit the individual as a result of the individual can work to the simplest of his ability and will feel happy and happy as a result of the works by his / her field of work. once workers have inte- raction in job crafting, they expertise that means in their work, that will increase their job work (Bakker, Tims and Derks, 2012). Tims and Bakker (2010) in Chen, Yen and Tsai (2014) additionally show that job craf- ting will increase someone’s job fit. Kira et al., (2010) in Chen, Yen and Tsai (2014) found that job crafting job collaboration incorporates a positive result on workers’ property workability. Research from Chen, Yen and Tsai (2014) that job crafting will increase person-job work and in turn will increase their job involvement. In different words, someone’s job work mediates the result of job crafting on job involvement. Job Resources Bakker, Demerouti and Sanz-Vergel (2014) defines job resources like physical, psychological, social, or structural aspects of labor that not solely have the potential to cut back the negative effects of job de- mands and facilitate to attain work goals, however additionally stimulate personal growth & learning and develop a positive state of labor engagement. Job resources accommodate 3 components, namely ta- lent variety, autonomy & organic process opportunities which will increase work en- gagement as a result of these factors each in and of itself and extrinsically will encoura- ge employees. Schaufeli and Bakker (2004) state that work engagement is influenced by job resources. Job resources are capital for employees to be able to build job modi- fications and creativity. Besides, job craf- ting has the potential to extend work enga- gement from job resources closely held by staff Job resources become a sort of help after they face job demands and obstacles. Job resources are physical, social, psycho- logical, or organizational aspects of labor which will cut back job demands concer- ning the psychological sacrifices provided by employees. Job resources additionally influence achieving goals. staff who are engaged in their work pays additional at- tention to the job, however, it additionally depends on the number of obtainable job resources. Job crafting Redesigning work has long been seen as a top-down approach, which is outlin- ed because the actions that organizations go for improve employee motivation and structure performance (Tims & Bakker in Roczniewska & Bakker, 2016). However, it’s progressively recognized that emplo- yees may additionally amend sure aspects of their job so the work higher fits their ta- lents and preferences (Wrzesniewski and Dutton, 2001). This perspective changes workers from staff who are reactive to the work that has been created by the organiza- tion to become additional active in coming up with the reality of their work, creating workers chargeable for their work (Tims & Bakker in Roczniewska & Bakker, 2016). This customization is named job crafting. Wrzesniewski & Dutton (2001) out- line job crafting because the physical and psychological feature changes that peop- le build in their work to align work with their preferences, motives, and interests. Chen, Yen and Tsai (2014) that is, each job crafting is completely relating to work en- gagement, this shows that the bigger the E-Journal of Tourism Vol.8. No.2. (2021): 207-214 210http://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/eot e-ISSN 2407-392X. p-ISSN 2541-0857 worth of job crafting, the upper the extent of employee work involvement is additio- nally high. Hypothesis Studies The current study uses the literature review as a basis to formulate the following hypotheses: H1: Job crafting affects work engagement H2a: Job crafting affects job resources H2b: Job resources affect work engagement H2c: Job resources mediate the effect of job crafting on work engagement H3a: Job crafting affects person-job fit H3b: Person-job fit affects work engage- ment H3c: Person job fit mediates the effect of job crafting work engagement Figure 1. Study Framework. METHOD Sample Data from the Yogyakarta Special Region Tourism Office in 2019 shows that there are more than 500 tour guides in Jog- jakarta. This study distributed 250 questi- onnaires to travel agents in Jogjakarta by email and 125 questionnaires can be pro- cessed during November 2019-January 2020. Measurement The main source of this research was developed with a questionnaire, measured using a 5 Likert scale, with a range from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). Work engagement is a positive and satis- fying state related to thinking in work as measured by vigor, dedication, and absorp- tion (Schaufeli et al., 2002), consisting of 9 items. Job crafting is defined as physical and cognitive changes made by individu- als in their work to align work with their preferences, motives, and interests (Wrzes- niewski & Dutton, 2001), measured by task crafting, relational crafting, and cognitive crafting with 9 statement items. Job resour- ces are physical, psychological & social as- pects that are functional in achieving work goals, reducing work demands related to physiological and psychological costs, and stimulating personal growth and develop- ment (Bakker, Demerouti and Sanz-Vergel, 2014), measured by social support, auto- nomy, quality of relationships with supe- riors. and performance feedback with a 10 item statement. Meanwhile, a person-job fit is a condition that describes the existence of a match between an employee’s ability with job demands, individual needs, and what the job can provide to employees (Cable and DeRue, 2002), measured by need supply fit and demand ability fit me- asured by 6 statements. The data analysis tool uses variance-based Structural Equati- on Modeling with tools such as SmartPLS version 3.2.8. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Demographic data Demographic data in table 1 shows that most respondents in this study have a young age of 20-30 years as much as 52%. Most of the respondents were male as much as 82% with good education, namely 77% from higher education. Validity Test The validity of the instruments of work engagement, job crafting, job resour- ces, and person-job fit variables in table 2-5 shows that all pass the validity test marked with a loading factor of > 0.7 (Ghozali and E-Journal of Tourism Vol.8. No.2. (2021): 207-214 211http://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/eot e-ISSN 2407-392X. p-ISSN 2541-0857 Table 1. Demographic Data Demographic Amount % Age (years) 20 - 30 64 0,52 31 - 40 41 0,33 41 - 50 19 0,15% Sex Male 102 0,82 Female 23 0,18 Education Bachelor 77 0,62 High school 48 0,38 Table 2. Validity Test Variable Item Loading factor Work engagement I feel full energy at work 0,823 I feel strong when I work 0,877 I feel like working when I wake up in the morning 0,855 I am enthusiastic about the work that I have 0,914 My work inspires me 0,751 I am proud of the work I do 0,839 I feel good when I work intensely 0,830 I was dissolved in the work I had 0,856 I get carried away while working 0,758 Job crafting I propose a new way to improve performance 0,866 I change the scope of the job assignment 0,887 I have a choice of work assignment according to my work expertise 0,886 I try to get to know other people well 0,924 l make friends with colleagues who share the same interest 0,858 I attended a job evaluation 0,885 I think that my job provides a purpose in life 0,913 I think that my job has a positive impact on my life 0,849 I thought about how important my job is to the company 0,840 Job Resources I got help from my co-workers 0,820 I have freedom at work 0,872 My boss shared an important issue regarding the company 0,802 I can discuss work problems with superiors 0,887 I get compliments from my superiors for doing well 0,728 I received sufficient information about the work 0,895 Person job fit The attributes I look for in work are fulfilled 0,820 My current job gives me everything I want 0,872 There is a match between what the job offers and what you want 0,802 The job demands are comparable to my skills 0,887 My skills match the job requirements 0,728 The education I have is by my job 0,895 E-Journal of Tourism Vol.8. No.2. (2021): 207-214 212http://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/eot e-ISSN 2407-392X. p-ISSN 2541-0857 Latan, 2015). Reliability Test Table 6 below shows the results of the reliability test against 4 instruments show reliable results because each instrument has a Cronbach’s alpha & composite reliabili- ty value of more than 0.60 and an AVE of more than 0.50 (Ghozali and Latan, 2015). Thus, the interpretation of the correlation coefficient shows a strong relationship with the coefficient interval > 0.60. Hypothesis testing The results of the research in Figure 2 and Table 4 show t-values 2.045> 1.96 and p-values 0.007 <0.050, this shows that job crafting variables have a positive and significant effect on work management (H1 accepted). The results of this study indicate an at-value of 3.279> 1.96 and a p-value of 0.001, this indicates that the job craf- ting variable has a positive and significant effect on job resources (H2a is accepted). The results of this study show 5,748> 1.96 and p-values of 0,000 <0.050, this indicates that the job resources variable has a positi- ve and significant effect on work manage- ment (H2b is accepted). The results of this study indicate that the t-values are 4.569> 1.96 and p-values 0.000, this shows that the job crafting variable has a positive and significant effect on the person-job fit (H3a is accepted). The results showed that the- re was an effect of person-job fit on work engagement with t-values 7,636> 1, 96, and p-values 0,000 <0, 050, this indicates that the person-job fit variable has a signi- ficant effect on work engagement (H3b is accepted). Figure 2. The empirical direct effect model The table 4 shows the results of the reliability test on all instruments showing reliable results because each instrument has a Cronbach’s alpha & composite reliabili- ty value of more than 0.60 and an AVE of more than 0.50. Based on table 5, it can be seen that all independent variables have a significant influence on the dependent variable except Table 3. Reliability Test Variable Cronbach’s alpha Composite reliability AVE Work engagement 0,933 0,944 0,651 Job crafting 0,928 0,937 0,501 Person-job fit 0,852 0,890 0,576 Job resources 0,926 0,938 0,605 Table 4. Path coefficients direct effect Direct effect O Mean STDEV T values P Values Job crafting -> Work engagement 0,462 0,503 0,226 2,045 0,007 Job crafting -> Job resources 0,516 0,519 0,157 3,279 0,001 Job resources -> Work engagement 0,587 0,611 0,102 5,748 0,000 Job crafting -> Person-job fit 0,642 0,654 0,145 4,569 0,000 Person-job fit -> Work engagement 0,699 0,684 0,088 7,636 0,000 E-Journal of Tourism Vol.8. No.2. (2021): 207-214 213http://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/eot e-ISSN 2407-392X. p-ISSN 2541-0857 the job crafting variable on work engage- ment. This shows the role of job fit media- tion on the effect of job crafting on work engagement (H2c accepted). It is proven that job resources can mediate the effect of job crafting on work engagement partially (H3c accepted). CONCLUSION The results showed that job crafting that is outlined as dynamic the boundaries and conditions of labor tasks and work re- lationships and also the that means of work needs corporations to search out out what percentage skills their employees have, and might be applied to their jobs or in things outside of his job. Job crafting can have a giant influence on workers to become addi- tional involved with their company. Also, therefore that workers will bond with the company, they have comfort in working, and this can be obtained if there’s a match between themselves and also the work they do. Person job match refers to the link bet- ween worker characteristics and job cha- racteristics (Kristof‐Brown, Zimmerman and Johnson, 2005). Chen, Yen and Tsai (2014) stated that job crafting will increase person-job fit, and successively increases their job involvement. In different words, a persons’ job match mediates the impact of job crafting on job engagement. This analy- sis shows that job crafting includes a posi- tive and vital impact on job resources. Job resources owned by employees can balance the wants of the task (Demerouti, Bakker and Gevers, 2015) and show the impact of mediation so workers will increase their in- volvement in work. The world of business enterprise requires human resources who will modify numerous aspects of labor and match the skills possessed by workers so employees (tour guides) are more and more involved. much organizations equivalent to business enterprise agents should build ef- forts therefore that workers recruited have adequate talents and skills and still make coaching efforts to enhance worker skills with a decent approach between superiors and subordinates. REFERENCES Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E. and Sanz- Vergel, A. I. (2014) ‘Burnout and work engagement: The JD–R approach’, Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., 1(1), pp. 389–411. Bakker, A. B., Tims, M. and Derks, D. (2012) ‘Proactive personality and job performance: The role of job crafting and work engagement’, Human rela- tions, 65(10), pp. 1359–1378. Cable, D. M. and DeRue, D. S. (2002) ‘The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions.’, Journal of applied psychology, 87(5), p. 875. Chen, C.-Y., Yen, C.-H. and Tsai, F. C. (2014) ‘Job crafting and job engage- ment: The mediating role of person- job fit’, International Journal of Hos- pitality Management, 37, pp. 21–28. Cifre, E. et al. (2013) ‘Job-person fit and well-being from a gender perspective’, Table 5. Path Coefficient Indirect effect Path O Mean STDEV T values P Values Person-job fit -> Work engagement 0,592 0,599 0,174 3,409 0,001 Job resouces -> Work engagement 0,413 0,397 0,163 2,527 0,015 Job crafting -> Work engagement -0,163 -0,166 0,240 0,677 0,485 Job crafting -> Person-job fit 0,665 0,662 0,129 5,171 0,000 Job crafting -> Job resouces 0,519 0,507 0,163 3,183 0,001 E-Journal of Tourism Vol.8. No.2. (2021): 207-214 214http://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/eot e-ISSN 2407-392X. p-ISSN 2541-0857 Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 29(3), pp. 161– 168. Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B. and Gevers, J. M. P. (2015) ‘Job crafting and extra- role behavior: The role of work en- gagement and flourishing’, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 91, pp. 87–96. Ghozali, I. and Latan, H. (2015) ‘Partial least squares konsep, teknik dan ap- likasi menggunakan program smartpls 3.0 untuk penelitian empiris’, Sema- rang: Badan Penerbit UNDIP. Harju, L. K., Hakanen, J. J. and Schaufeli, W. B. (2016) ‘Can job crafting reduce job boredom and increase work en- gagement? A three-year cross-lagged panel study’, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 95, pp. 11–20. Van den Heuvel, M., Demerouti, E. and Peeters, M. C. W. (2015) ‘The job crafting intervention: Effects on job resources, self‐efficacy, and affective well‐being’, Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 88(3), pp. 511–532. Kristof‐Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D. and Johnson, E. C. (2005) ‘Conse- quences OF INDIVIDUALS’FIT at work: A meta‐analysis OF person–job, person–organization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit’, Personnel psychology, 58(2), pp. 281–342. Roczniewska, M. and Bakker, A. B. (2016) ‘Who seeks job resources, and who avoids job demands? The link be- tween dark personality traits and job crafting’, The Journal of psychology, 150(8), pp. 1026–1045. Schaufeli, W. B. et al. (2002) ‘The mea- surement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor ana- lytic approach’, Journal of Happiness studies, 3(1), pp. 71–92. Tims, M., Bakker, A. B. and Derks, D. (2014) ‘Job crafting and job perfor- mance: A longitudinal study’, Europe- an Journal of Work and Organization- al Psychology, 24(6), pp. 914–928. Tims, M., Derks, D. and Bakker, A. B. (2016) ‘Job crafting and its relation- ships with person–job fit and meaning- fulness: A three-wave study’, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 92, pp. 44–53. Wrzesniewski, A. and Dutton, J. E. (2001) ‘Crafting a job: Revisioning employ- ees as active crafters of their work’, Academy of management review, 26(2), pp. 179–201.