E-Journal of Tourism Vol.10. No.1. (2023): 1-12 http://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/eot 1 e-ISSN 2407-392X. p-ISSN 2541-0857 Real Demand Survey (RDS) on The Development Plan of Jogya Agro Techno Park (JATP) in Kulon Progo Regency Purwanto Widodo1, Faizi2* 1 Department of Economic Development, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta 2 Department of Islamic Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta *Corresponding Author: faizi.feb@upnvj.ac.id DOI: https://doi.org/10.24922/eot.v10i1.89877 Article Info Submitted: July 27th 2022 Accepted: March 1st 2023 Published: March 30th 2023 Abstract Agrotechnopark is the idea of the Ministry of Agriculture, which com- bines the concept of educational tourism based on agriculture, animal husbandry and fisheries. Agrotechnopark is expected to become a centre for developing agricultural products managed as entrepreneurial growth and a service centre for agricultural science technology. The purpose of this study is to find out what factors need to be carried out by the manager of JATP (Jogya Agro Techno Park) so that it will be visited by domestic and foreign tourists, where Real Demand Survey (RDS) is carried out. Meanwhile, JATP is located in Wijilan Village, Nanggulan, Kulonprogo, Yogyakarta. The type of research is explanatory with a quantitative ap- proach. The purposive sampling technique was carried out the sampling method. Data collection techniques in the implementation of RDS through primary data and secondary data. The number of samples (n) us- ing a 95% confidence level and 5% sampling error, the respondents ob- tained for visitors/prospective visitors to JATP tourism were 360 re- spondents. The survey was conducted from August – September 2019. As a result, the type of tourism has a significant effect on the interest in tourist visits to JATP; the types of tourism that are of particular interest are nature tourism, culinary tourism, and recreational park tourism, at- tracting potential tourists to JATP. The type of tourism desired by tourists is the type of tourism that does not exist elsewhere and is enjoyable. Hence, the concept of JATP, which is agro-tourism, attracts tourists to visit, mainly since it is located far from the crowds of Yogyakarta so that tourists can momentarily relieve fatigue from routine activities. Keywords: Real Demand Survey; tourists; logistic regression. INTRODUCTION Background Jogya Agro Techno Park (JATP) is a priority program for the governor of the Special Region of Yogyakarta, based on the Governor's Decree Number 163/Kep/2017 concerning Development Priority Programs. JATP is located in Wi- jilan Village, Nanggulan, Kulonprogo, Yogyakarta. JATP is an integrated agricul- tural area with various agricultural support http://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/eot E-Journal of Tourism Vol.10. No.1. (2023): 1-12 http://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/eot 2 e-ISSN 2407-392X. p-ISSN 2541-0857 activities, such as agricultural areas, live- stock areas, plantation areas, and post-har- vest processing areas. JATP is designed as a centre for applying agriculture technol- ogy and as a container for processing crops. In addition, in terms of innovation to disseminate technology in agriculture. JATP is directed as an area that can make an independent village, get positive values from the community, and increase the community's economic income (Rahayu, 2019). JATP is planned to function as a training place, apprenticeship, technology dissemination centre, and community busi- ness advocacy centre following the policy directions in the 2015-2019 Science Park and Techno Park Planning Guidelines (Pri- hatin, Widyawati & Kusumoarto, 2019). The concept of Agro Technopark shows the integration of activities, including: (1) Education and Training. The building that accommodates this activity is used to broaden visitors' insight into the agricul- tural sector. (2) Research and Develop- ment. A facility that accommodates agri- culture research, research and development activities is equipped with a laboratory room. (3) Exhibition. A building that ac- commodates the introduction of tools or machines used in agriculture, both tradi- tional technology and modern technology and (4). Greenhouse/Green House. The Yogyakarta government plans to develop JATP, so that it becomes a tourist destination and can compete with the tour- ist destinations of the Borobudur temple in Magelang, Central Java. The Yogyakarta government conducted a Real Demand Survey (RDS). Real needs are needs that do reflect what is needed. The term real needs arises because there are different views in describing the actual conditions of the needs at the community level. Gener- ally, there are differences in opinions be- tween policy makers (government) and policy recipients (society). Real needs usu- ally describe the actual conditions of community needs, in the sense of focusing on the community's views, not the views of policymakers (USAID, 2008). A Real Demand Survey (RDS) is successful if it can attract tourists or poten- tial tourists to visit tourist attractions. This interest is influenced by several factors, in- cluding tourist attraction (attractions), ac- cessibility, tariffs, facilities, and infor- mation in a package called tourism prod- ucts, all of which must follow market de- mand. Initially, attractive products are get- ting lower in quality and become less at- tractive. Therefore quality must always be maintained (Andina & Aliyah, 2021). This study is intended to determine the real needs of the factors that influence tourist interest in visiting JATP and to see what factors most influence tourist interest in visiting JATP. While the independent variables used are a). Types of tours to be held in JATP, b). What tourist attractions should be in JATP, c) What facilities should be provided in JATP and d) Accom- modation desired by respondents in JATP. The significance of this research is to use the Real Demand Survey (RDS), be- cause the use of RDS in a survey is still rarely done, especially in Indonesia. In ad- dition, the measurement of the variables to be studied uses a nominal measurement scale to reduce perceptual bias due to the use of a Likert scale. This research is ex- pected to contribute to similar research, es- pecially RDS. LITERATURE REVIEW Tourism in a destination will de- velop rapidly if there is the involvement of stakeholders who are often referred to as Pentahelix. Pentahelix is five parties that must be involved in tourism development, namely: (1). The central government and local governments, (2) The community or tourism community that acts as the host. (3) Academics who foster the competence http://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/eot E-Journal of Tourism Vol.10. No.1. (2023): 1-12 http://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/eot 3 e-ISSN 2407-392X. p-ISSN 2541-0857 of human resources in tourist destinations. (4) Media that publish and disseminate in- formation about tourism destinations, and (5) Tourism businesses, namely private parties that provide services and products based on the needs and desires of tourists. Tourism is an interrelated cross-sectoral, and cross-regional activity (Ismayanti, 2020; Kusuma & Arifien, 2020). Tourism interest is a travel activity carried out by someone with the aim of rec- reation and entertainment. It has prepared for this travel activity according to Law No. 10 of 2009 concerning tourism, namely various tourist activities supported by different facilities and services the com- munity provides. The existence of tourist attractions in tourist destinations, both in the form of natural attractions, cultural at- tractions, and cultural attractions (Sondakh & Tumbel, 2016). Nuraeni (2014) states that satisfied tourists tend to make repeat visits and will recommend their friends or acquaintances. Furthermore, the factors that influence tourist interest in a destina- tion include tourist attraction (attractions), accessibility, rates, facilities, The tourist attraction is the main fo- cus of driving tourism in a destination. In a sense, tourist attraction is the primary driver that motivates tourists to visit a place (Ismayanti, 2020). Tourist attractions can be in the form of tourist objects and tourist attractions. A tourist attraction is a tourist attraction that is static and tangible, so there is no need for any prior preparation to enjoy it. A tourist attraction is a tourist attraction that can be seen through perfor- mances and requires practice and even sac- rifices to enjoy it (Aprilia, Sunarti & Pangestuti, 2017). In Law Number 10 of 2009 concerning Tourism, a tourist attrac- tion is anything that has uniqueness, beauty, and value in the form of a diversity of natural, cultural, and artificial products that are the target or purpose of tourist vis- its. The tourist attraction must be managed in such a way so that its sustainability and sustainability are guaranteed. Attractions in the form of tourism objects generally consist of: (a) nature tourism, (b) cultural tourism and (c) special interest tourism. Furthermore, Setiawan (2015) states that an area will have a high tourist attrac- tion if it has 4 (four) components: attrac- tion, amenity, accessibility, and ancillary. Tourist attractions are a significant compo- nent in attracting tourists. An area can be- come a tourist destination if the conditions support it to be developed into a tourist at- traction. An attractive tourist attraction is called the capital or source of tourism. Three capital attractions attract tourist arri- vals, namely 1) Natural Resources (natu- ral), 2) Cultural tourism attractions, and 3) Man-made attractions themselves. Amenity amenities are all kinds of facilities and infrastructure tourists need while in tourist destinations. The facilities and infrastructure in question include lodg- ing, restaurants, transportation, and travel agents. Accessibility is an essential thing in tourism activities. All kinds of transporta- tion or transportation services are critical access in tourism. On the other hand, this access is identified with transferability, namely the ease of moving from one area to another. Suppose an area is not provided with good accessibility, such as airports, ports, and roads. In that case, there will be no tourists who will affect the development of accessibility in the area. If a site has tourism potential, it must provide adequate accessibility so that the area can be visited. Ancilliary (Additional Services). Additional services must be provided by the local government of a tourist destina- tion, both for tourists and tourism actors. The services provided include marketing, physical development (roads, railroads, drinking water, electricity, telephone, etc.), and coordinating all kinds of activities with all laws and regulations on highways and in tourist attractions. Ancillaries are also things that support tourism, such as http://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/eot E-Journal of Tourism Vol.10. No.1. (2023): 1-12 http://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/eot 4 e-ISSN 2407-392X. p-ISSN 2541-0857 management agencies, Tourist Infor- mation, Travel Agents, and stakeholders who play a role in tourism. Aprilia, Sunarti & Pangestuti (2017) stated that the existing facilities at a tourist spot are one the tourist attractions. Tourists will visit again if there are facilities that can meet all their needs while enjoying the tourist attraction. These facilities are also expected to make tourists feel more com- fortable and stay longer and give a good impression of their tourist attractions. To support this, providing facilities is also necessary to provide services that can pro- vide convenience and comfort to tourists. Tourist facilities are complementary to tourist destinations needed to meet the needs of tourists enjoying a tour. Tourist facilities are made to support the concept of existing tourist attractions. Therefore, in addition to a tourist attraction, tourist activ- ities carried out by tourists require tourism facilities that support these tourism activi- ties. So that in the end, each component is interrelated in a series of travel tours rang- ing from tourist attractions and activities to tourist facilities, which are an inseparable unit (Salim & Wiyana, 2017). According to Yoeti (2008), the forms of service facilities within a destina- tion include accommodation, transporta- tion at the destination, restaurants, sports and activity facilities, other facilities, and retail outlets. Tourist facilities directly or indirectly provide services to tourists in a tourist destination where its existence is very dependent on the presence of tourist travel activities. Sasmita (2017) states that the facilities are grouped into three parts: first, the main facilities are the facilities most needed and felt by visitors while in a tourist attraction, such as lodging, places to eat, souvenir shops, and others. Second, supporting facilities are facilities whose proportions are complementary to the main facilities so that tourists will feel more at home. Salim & Wiyana (2017) state that the facilities needed in a tourist area are as follows: (a) Accommodation, (b) Restau- rant, (c) Shopping and (d) Public Facilities. Furthermore, Sasmita (2017) stated that ac- commodation is a critical facility in tour- ism activities. Accommodation is every- thing that is provided to meet one's needs when travelling. In more detail, tourist ac- commodation can be a place where visitors can rest, stay, bathe, eat and drink, and en- joy services such as entertainment facili- ties. This facility will encourage tourists to visit and enjoy tourist objects and attrac- tions for a relatively long time. Accommo- dation consists of (a) hotels/inns, (b) places to eat and drink, and (c) entertainment fa- cilities. Supporting facilities: (a) parking lots, (b) souvenir shops, (c) cleaning facil- ities, (d) public toilets, (e) prayer rooms, and (f) security and order facilities. They are supporting facilities: (a) signposts, (b) information centre and (c) visitor services. METHODS This type of research is explanatory with a quantitative approach. The purpos- ive sampling technique carried out the sampling method. The purposive sampling technique is a sampling technique with specific considerations (Sugiyono, 2010). Data collection techniques in the imple- mentation of RDS through primary data and secondary data. The number of sam- ples (n) used Paul Leedy's formula (Arikunto, 2006) using a 95% confidence level and sampling error, the respondents, obtained for visitors/prospective visitors to JATP tourism were 359.09 rounded to 360 respondents. Respondents are tourists on tour visits to all tourist sites in Yogyakarta from August to September 2019. To make the reliability of the re- search instrument, the validity and reliabil- ity of the instrument were tested. Testing the validity using the Pearson Product http://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/eot E-Journal of Tourism Vol.10. No.1. (2023): 1-12 http://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/eot 5 e-ISSN 2407-392X. p-ISSN 2541-0857 Moment formula and the reliability of the Cronbach Alpha coefficient (Ghozali, 2001). The variables used are Tourist Inter- ests, Types of Tourism, Tourist Attrac- tions, Tourist Facilities, Tourism Accom- modations and Tourism Access, all of which are nominal. While the analytical tool used is Logistic Regression analysis. The logistic regression model used is: 𝐿𝑛 ( 𝑝𝑖 1 βˆ’ 𝑝𝑖 ) = π›½π‘œ + 𝛽1π½πΈπ‘π‘ŠπΌπ‘† + 𝛽2π΄π‘‡π‘ŠπΌπ‘† + 𝛽3πΉπ΄π‘†π‘ŠπΌπ‘† + 𝛽3π΄πΎπ‘‚π‘ŠπΌπ‘† + 𝛽4π΄πΎπ‘†π‘ŠπΌπ‘† Where: Pi = tourism interest proba- bility GENWISE = The type of tourism that the respondent will visit ATWIS = Tourist attractions de- sired by respondents. FASWIS = Tourist facilities de- sired by respondents. AKOWIS = Tourist accommoda- tion desired by re- spondents. RESULT AND DISCUSSION Based on the questionnaire results, from 360 respondents, 194 or 53.9% were men, 53.72% were married, 88.98% were from Yogyakarta, 4.96% were from Cen- tral Java, and the rest were from other provinces. Regarding age, 36.09% are be- tween 17-25 years old, 26-30 years old, 14.60%, 31-40 years old 18.46%, and the rest are above 41 years old. Most of the re- spondents had a high school education (53.44%). Based on the question, do re- spondents feel interested in the JATP de- velopment plan? A total of 52.80% ex- pressed interest and would visit JATP. The results of the validity test of the type of tourism variable can be seen in Ta- ble 1. Table 1. Test the Validity of the Type of Tourism Tourist Type Questionnaire Item Pearson Correla- tion Sig. (2- tailed) Infor- mation Natural tourism 0.338 0.000 Valid Culture tour 0.471 0.000 Valid Children's game tour 0.539 0.000 Valid Culinary tour 0.573 0.000 Valid Recreational park tour 0.515 0.000 Valid Educational tour 0.650 0.000 Valid Zoo tour 0.550 0.000 Valid Shopping tour 0.467 0.000 Valid Other 0.147 0.005 Valid Source: Processed data There are 9 question items for the type of visitor tourism variable. The analy- sis results show that all question items have a sig value. 2 tailed is smaller than 5%, meaning that the question items from the tourism type variable are all valid. The re- liability test, which obtained Cronbach's Alpha value equal to 0.637, is included in the criteria of moderate reliability because it is between 0.50 to 0.70, so it is declared reliable. The results of the validity test on the tourist attraction construct what visitors would be seen in Table 2. Table 2. Test the Validity of Tourist Attractions Tourist Attrac- tions Question- naire Items Pearson Correla- tion Sig. (2- tailed) Infor- mation Adult game rides 0.482 0.000 Valid Children's play 0.544 0.000 Valid 3D Cinema 0.451 0.000 Valid Educational tour 0.452 0.000 Valid http://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/eot E-Journal of Tourism Vol.10. No.1. (2023): 1-12 http://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/eot 6 e-ISSN 2407-392X. p-ISSN 2541-0857 Tourist Attrac- tions Question- naire Items Pearson Correla- tion Sig. (2- tailed) Infor- mation Fishing pond 0.416 0.000 Valid Swimming pool 0.611 0.000 Valid Bird Park 0.541 0.000 Valid Flower garden 0.478 0.000 Valid Vegetable gar- den 0.498 0.000 Valid Agricultural museum 0.553 0.000 Valid Instagramable photo spots 0.577 0.000 Valid Outbond 0.599 0.000 Valid Jogging track 0.597 0.000 Valid Source: Processed data There are 13 question items for the Tourist Attractions variable favored by vis- itors, based on the analysis showing that all question items have a sig value. 2 tailed is smaller than 5%, meaning that all question items from the tourist attraction construct are entirely valid. Then tested, the reliabil- ity and obtained Cronbach's Alpha value equal to 0.788 was included in the high-re- liability criteria because it is between 0.70 to 0.90, so it is declared reliable. The results of the validity test on what tourist facilities visitors would desire variables can be seen in Table 3. Table 3. Test the Validity of Tourist Facil- ities Tourist Facilities Questionnaire Item Pearson Correla- tion Sig. (2- tailed) Infor- mation Archipelago Culi- nary 0.390 0.000 Valid Local Cuisine 0.286 0.000 Valid International Culi- nary 0.286 0.000 Valid Meeting hall 0.431 0.000 Valid Souvenir Center 0.553 0.000 Valid Agricultural product sales center 0.543 0.000 Valid Minimarket 0.505 0.000 Valid Parking 0.640 0.000 Valid ATM center 0.664 0.000 Valid Rubbish bin 0.605 0.000 Valid Tourist Facilities Questionnaire Item Pearson Correla- tion Sig. (2- tailed) Infor- mation Worship place 0.518 0.000 Valid Toilet 0.521 0.000 Valid Tourism infor- mation center 0.624 0.000 Valid Security service 0.212 0.000 Valid Source: Processed data There are 14 question items for the Tourist Facilities variable desired by visi- tors, based on the analysis showing that all question items have a sig value. 2 tailed is smaller than 5%, meaning that all question items from the tourism facility construct are all valid. Then tested the reliability and obtained Cronbach's Alpha value equal to 0.766, included in the high-reliability crite- ria, because it is between 0.70 to 0.90. The results of the validity test on what visitors would desire tourist accom- modation variables can be seen in Table 4. Table 4. Test the Validity of Tourist Accommodations Questionnaire Item Pearson Correla- tion Sig. (2- tailed) Infor- mation Guesthouse 0.365 0.000 Valid Budget Hotels 0.305 0.000 Valid 3 Star Hotel 0.252 0.000 Valid 4 and 5 Star Hotel 0.441 0.000 Valid Camping Ground 0.521 0.000 Valid Villa 0.641 0.000 Valid Source: Processed data There are 6 question items for the Tourist Accommodation variable desired by visitors, based on the analysis showing that all question items have a sig value. 2 tailed is smaller than 5%, meaning that all question items from the tourist accommo- dation construct are entirely valid. Then tested the reliability and obtained Cronbach's Alpha value equal to 0.678, in- cluded in the criteria of moderate reliabil- ity because it is between 0.50 to 0.70. http://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/eot E-Journal of Tourism Vol.10. No.1. (2023): 1-12 http://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/eot 7 e-ISSN 2407-392X. p-ISSN 2541-0857 The results of respondents' answers to the type of tourism variable can be seen in Figure 1. Figure 1. Type of Desired Tourism in JATP Around 86.39% of respondents want natural tourism facilities in JATP, while 56.94% of culinary tourism and 51.39% of recreational park tourism. The results of respondents' answers to the Tourist Attractions variable can be seen in Figure 2. Figure 2. Desired Tourist Attractions in JATP As many as 68.61% of respondents want 3D Cinema tourist attractions in JATP, 56.39% Bird Park and 50.83% Ag- riculture Museum and Flower Garden. The results of respondents' answers to the Tourism Facilities variable can be seen in Figure 3. Figure 3. Desired Tourist Facilities in JATP As many as 70.28% of respondents want local Culinary and Toilets, 62.22% for Souvenir Centers and 61.39% for large parking spaces. The results of respondents' answers to the tourism accommodation variable can be seen in Figure 4. Figure 4. Desired Tourist Accommoda- tion in JATP 86,39% 35,00% 22,22% 56,94% 51,39% 38,61% 22,78% 21,94% 0,83% 0,00% 20,00%40,00%60,00%80,00%100,00% Natural tourism Culture tour Children's game tour Culinary tour Recreational park tour Educational tour Zoo tour Shopping tour Other Percentage of Interest in Types of Tourism in JATP 52,78% 28,89% 68,61% 23,61% 41,39% 35,00% 56,39% 50,83% 24,17% 50,83% 44,72% 20,56% 17,78% 0,00% 20,00% 40,00% 60,00% 80,00% Adult game rides 3D Cinema Fishing pond Bird Park Vegetable garden Instagramable… Jogging track Percentage of Interest in Tourist Attractions in JATP 57,78% 70,28% 9,44% 35,83% 62,22% 43,89% 32,78% 61,39% 51,94% 56,11% 60,00% 70,28% 41,11% 6,67% 0,00% 20,00% 40,00% 60,00% 80,00% Archipelago Culinary Local Cuisine International Culinary Meeting hall Souvenir Center Agricultural product… Minimarket Parking ATM center Rubbish bin Worship place Toilet Tourism… Security service Percentage of Interest in Tourist Facilities in JATP 15,83% 11,11% 8,06% 4,44% 31,11% 14,44% 0,00% 10,00% 20,00% 30,00% 40,00% Guesthouse Budget Hotels 3 Star Hotel 4 and 5 Star Hotel Camping Ground Villa Percentage of Interest in Tourist Accommodation in JATP http://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/eot E-Journal of Tourism Vol.10. No.1. (2023): 1-12 http://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/eot 8 e-ISSN 2407-392X. p-ISSN 2541-0857 31.11% of respondents want a camping ground, 15.83% wisma and 14.44% villas. For the results of the logistic regression analysis to be used correctly, it is necessary to carry out several tests be- fore interpreting them (Widarjono, (2010), Ghozali (2006)), namely: 1. Omnibus Test The Omnibus test is used to deter- mine whether the independent variable or independent variable used in the model sig- nificantly affects visitor interest in JATP. The results of the Omnibus test can be seen in Table 5. Table 5. Results of the Tourist Visitor Om- nibus Test Table 5 shows that the Chi-Square value is 328,356 with df = 4, a significance value of 0.000. This value is much smaller than 5%, and it is concluded that the inde- pendent variables used in this model have a significant effect on interest in visiting JATP tourism. 2. Hosmer and Lemesshow's Test The Hosmer and Lemesshow test is used to determine the suitability of the em- pirical data with the model or, in other words, to determine the difference between the model and the data, it is hoped that in this test, there is no difference between the model and the data so that it is said that the model is fit. If the probability of Hosmer and Lemesshow is greater than the actual level (in this case, it is set at 5%), then it is considered that the model is fit; otherwise, if it is smaller, then the model is not or does not fit. The results of the Hosmer and Le- messhow test are: Table 6. Test Results of Hosmer and Le- messhow Tourist Visitors Hosmer and Lemesshow's is used to test with the null hypothesis that the obser- vational data match or fit the model (there is no difference between the model and the data, so the model is said to be fit). If the value of Hosmer and Lemesshow's test sta- tistics is equal to or less than 0.05 (5%), then the null hypothesis is rejected, mean- ing that there is a significant difference be- tween the observed data and the model. The table above shows that the Chi-Square value of the Hosmer and Lemesshow test is equal to 5.285 with a sig of 0.727; this sig value is greater than 5%, and it can be concluded that the model is fit. 3. Cox and Snell's R Square Cox and Snell's R Square is a meas- ure similar to R Square in OLS multiple re- gression). However, it is different from OLS, for logistic regression using the Like- lihood estimation technique. Nagelkerke's R Square is a modification of Cox and Snell's R Square so that it can be inter- preted the same as R Square. The values of Cox and Snell's R Square and Nagelkerke's R Square can be seen in Table 7. Table 7. Values of Cox and Snell's R Square and Nagelkerke's The Nagelkerke R Square value is equal to 0.799, meaning that the variability of the variable interest in visiting JATP, which the independent variable can ex- plain, is 79.9%. In comparison, the remain- ing 20.1% is influenced by other independ- ent variables that are not included in the model. Chi-square df Sig. Step 328.356 4 0.000 Block 328.356 4 0.000 Model 328.356 4 0.000 Chi-square df Sig. 5.285 8 0.727 -2 Log likelihood Cox & Snell R Square Nagelkerke R Square 169.598 a 0.598 0.799 http://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/eot E-Journal of Tourism Vol.10. No.1. (2023): 1-12 http://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/eot 9 e-ISSN 2407-392X. p-ISSN 2541-0857 4. Parameter Estimation and Its Interpre- tation The results of the logistic regression analysis can be seen in table 8. Table 8. Logistics Regression Analysis Results All variables used have a significant effect on interest in visiting JATP. The interpretation of Table 8 is: a. Suppose the type of tourism provided by JATP is increased by 1 unit. In that case, there will be a tendency to in- crease the probability of tourist inter- est in JATP being 2,485 times greater in visitors who are interested in JATP than those who are not. The types of tourism that visitors most favour are: nature tourism, then culinary tourism and recreation park tours. b. Suppose tourist attractions in JATP are increased by 1 unit. In that case, there is a tendency to increase the probability of tourist interest in JATP being 1,633 times greater than those not interested in visiting JATP tour- ism. Tourist attractions visitors like are: 3D Cinema, Bird Park, Agricul- tural Museum and Flower Garden. c. Suppose the tourist facilities in JATP are increased by 1 unit. In that case, there is a tendency to increase the probability of tourist interest in JATP being 1,877 times greater than those not interested in visiting JATP tour- ism. Tourist facilities most expected by visitors are local culinary, souvenir centre, sample parking and culinary of the archipelago. d. Suppose tourist accommodation in JATP is increased by 1 unit. In that case, there is a tendency to increase the probability of tourist interest in JATP being 1,618 times greater than those not interested in visiting JATP tourism. The tourist accommodations most expected by visitors are Camp- ing Ground, Wisma and villas. The type of tourism has a significant effect on the interest in tourist visits to JATP; the types of tourism that are of par- ticular interest are nature tourism, culinary tourism, and recreational park tourism, at- tracting potential tourists to JATP. The type of tourism desired by tourists is the type of tourism that does not exist else- where and is enjoyable. The concept of JATP, which is agro-tourism, attracts tour- ists to visit, mainly since it is located far from the crowds of Yogyakarta so that tourists can momentarily relieve fatigue from routine activities. Suppose JATP wants to attract as many tourists as possi- ble. In that case, it must have: a) its level of uniqueness, this uniqueness includes simi- larity in type, quality, condition, and im- pression, and b) The level of beauty is an attraction that is constantly increasing; beauty is usually associated with rejection. Other measures, such as function, and effi- ciency, give satisfaction and have their characteristics (Widyaningrum, 2016). These results align with Nurbaeti's (2021) research, namely that there is a positive and significant relationship between tourist at- traction and tourist interest in visiting. Tourist attractions have a significant effect on interest in visiting JATP; specifi- cally, the expected tourist attractions are the 3D Cinema, Bird Park, Agricultural Museum and Flower Garden. These results align with research (Jushendriawati, 2021; Suwena & Widyatmaja, 2010), where there is a positive and significant influence be- tween tourist attractions and interest in tourist visits. Aprilia et al. (2021) show that Variabel B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) JENWIS 0.910 0.175 26.994 1 0.000***) 2.485 ATWIS 0.491 0.100 24.034 1 0.000***) 1.633 FASWIS 0.630 0.106 35.098 1 0.000***) 1.877 AKOWIS 0.481 0.282 2.912 1 0.088*) 1.618 Constant -10.814 1.311 68.077 1 0.000 0.000 Keterangan : ***) signifikan pada level 1% **) signifikan pada level 5% *) signifikan pada level 10% http://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/eot E-Journal of Tourism Vol.10. No.1. (2023): 1-12 http://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/eot 10 e-ISSN 2407-392X. p-ISSN 2541-0857 a well-maintained and managed tourist at- traction will make it attractive so that tour- ists want to visit the attraction, satisfy it for recreational purposes, and enjoy the trip. Tourist facilities have a significant effect on interest in visiting JATP. In par- ticular, the expected tourist facilities are lo- cal culinary, souvenir centres, ample park- ing and culinary of the archipelago. These results align with research by Nurbaeti (2021) and Wardani (2018), where there is a positive relationship between tourist fa- cilities and tourist interest. The provision of facilities at JATP needs to pay attention to a) Completeness, cleanliness, and neat- ness of the facilities offered. b). The condi- tions and functions of the facilities that will be offered are facilities that function cor- rectly and are not damaged. c). Ease of us- ing the facilities offered and d) Complete- ness of the tools used are tools used by tourists according to their specifications (Kiswanto (2011)). Tourist accommodation signifi- cantly affects the interest of tourist visits to JATP; the specifically expected accommo- dation is Camping Ground, Wisma and vil- las. Where accommodation/lodging is where tourists can stay or rest by providing suitable facilities with food and beverage services or without waiters, the existence of accommodation facilities in JATP will encourage tourists to visit and enjoy tourist objects and attractions for a relatively long time. This accommodation information af- fects tourists' assessment of the choice of accommodation type to be selected, such as the type of facilities and services, price level, number of rooms available and so on. Tourists who come and visit a tourist attraction want to be able to enjoy their tour. CONCLUSION Based on the results of the discus- sion, it can be concluded as follows: 52.80% expressed interest in the JATP development plan and intended to visit. The independent variables used are a type of tourism, tourist attractions, and tourism facilities that jointly or partially affect re- spondents' interest in visiting the JATP de- velopment plan. While the most influential variable is the type of tourism, it is neces- sary to plan carefully about the kind of tourism that will be displayed. Based on the survey, the types of tourism desired by respondents include nature tourism in JATP, culinary tourism and recreation park tourism. Tourist attractions desired by re- spondents include 3D cinema, bird park, agricultural museum, and flower garden. tourist facilities: local culinary, souvenir centre, ample parking, and cuisine of the archipelago. tourism accommodation: camping ground, wisma and villas. SUGGESTION Based on the findings, the researcher has suggestions from the conclusions con- veyed previously, which are as follows. Most of the RDS respondents came from the Yogyakarta area itself, so further RDS needs to be expanded to include tourist at- tractions in Yogyakarta and other nearby areas, for example, Central Java, East Java and West Java. The variables used in this study are still not standardized, meaning they are used by other researchers with dif- ferent names and content. Therefore, it is necessary to standardize the variables used. REFERENCES Andina, SA and Aliyah, I. 2021. Factors Influencing Tourist Interests in Visit- ing Borobudur Temple Cultural Tour- ism. Chakra Travel. Journal of Tour- ism and Culture. E-ISSN: 2745-9403. Volume 22 Volume 1 No 3 (2021). http://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/eot E-Journal of Tourism Vol.10. No.1. (2023): 1-12 http://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/eot 11 e-ISSN 2407-392X. p-ISSN 2541-0857 Aprillia, ER; Sunarti and Pangestuti, E. 2017. The Effect of Tourist Attrac- tions and Service Facilities on Tourist Satisfaction at Balekambang Beach, Malang Regency. Journal of Business Administration (JAB), Vol. 51 No. October 2, 2017 Arikunto. 2006. Research Procedures A Practical Approach. Jakarta : PT. Rineka Cipta. Erlangga, RE and Arifien, M. 2020. Fac- tors Influencing Tourist Interests in Tourist Attractions at Jatibarang Res- ervoir, Gunungpati District, Sema- rang City. Geo Image 9 (2) (2020) Ghozali, I. 2006. Advanced Multivariate Analysis With SPSS Program. Diponegoro University Publishing Agency. ISBN 979,704,387.8 Ismayanti. 2020. Fundamentals of Tour- ism. An Introduction. Sahid Univer- sity. Jushendriawati. 2021. The Influence of Tourist Attractions, Destination Im- ages and Tourist Attractions on Inter- est in Visiting Amassangan Floating Warung (Water) Tourism, Malangke Barat District. Department of Man- agement, Faculty of Economics and Islamic Business, Alauddin State Is- lamic University, Makassar. Kiswanto, AH 2011. The Influence of Price, Location and Facilities on Tourist Visiting Decisions at Dampo Awang Beach Rembang Tourism Ob- ject. Print: UNNES. Nuraeni, BS 2014. Analysis of Factors Af- fecting Interest in Revisiting Tourists at the Ranggawarsita Museum Sema- rang. Journal of Business Strategy Vol. 23 No. July 1, 2014. Prihatin, E, Widyawati, K and Kusumoarto, A. 2019. Design Con- cept of Jogja Agro Technopark With Ecological Architecture Approach in Kulonprogo Yogyakarta. Proceedings of the NATIONAL SEMINAR 'Sus- tainability Communities and Cities' e- ISSN : 2715-7091. Transition in City Space, September 9, 2019 Purwanggono, GD and Aikiriningsih, T. 2015. The Effect of Ecotourism Po- tential, Environment, Accommoda- tion, Tour Guides on Tourist Interests to Visit Again (Case Study on Tour- ism Areas in Nglanggeran Village, Patuk, Gunung Kidul). Indonesian Tourism Journal. Vol. 10 No.2, 2015. ISSN : 1907-2457 (Print). ISSN : 2581-2688 (Online). Rahayu, M P. 2019. Agro Techno Park in Kulon Progo Regency, DIY with a Tropical Architecture Approach. 2019 Ramadhan N. 2016. Development of At- tractions at Lake Bandar Khayangan Lembah Sari Tourism Object, Pek- anbaru. Department of Tourism Tour- ism Destination Management Study Program. College of Tourism. Ban- dung. 2016 Sarim and Tri Wiyana. 2017. The Effect of Tourist Facilities on Tourist Visita- tion Motivation (Case Study of Tour- ist Visits in Solo). Journal of Hospi- tality and Tourism. Vol.3(No.2) : 294- 374. Th. 2017. ISSN : 2442-5222 Sasmita, A. 2017. Study of Tourism Facil- ities Aspects Based on Geotourism Concepts in the Tourism Area of Sila- lahi Village, Toba Caldera. Depart- ment of Architecture, Faculty of Engi- neering, University of North Sumatra, Medan. 2017 Setiawan, IBN. 2015. Identification of Tourism Potential with 4A (Attrac- tion, Amenity, Accessibility, Ancil- liary) in Sumber Wangi Hamlet, Pem- uteran Village, Gerokgak District, Buleleng Regency, Bali. Faculty of Tourism. Udayana University. Denpasar. 2015. http://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/eot E-Journal of Tourism Vol.10. No.1. (2023): 1-12 http://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/eot 12 e-ISSN 2407-392X. p-ISSN 2541-0857 Sondakh; PMN and Tumbel, A. 2016. Ser- vice, Security and Attractiveness Af- fect Tourist Interests Who Visit Natu- ral Tourism Objects of Mount Ma- hawu, Tomohon. Scientific Journal of Efficiency. Volume 16 No. 01 of 2016. Sugiyono. 2010. Educational Research Methods Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Approaches. Bandung: Al- phabeta Supraptini, N and Supriyadi, A. 2020. The Effect of Facilities, Transportation and Accommodation on Tourist Satis- faction in Semarang Regency. JMD: Dewantara Journal of Management and Business. Vol 3 no 2, July 2020 Suradnya, IM 2006. Analysis of Bali Tour- ism Attractive Factors and Their Im- plications for Bali Regional Tourism Planning. SOCA: Journal of Agricul- tural Socio-Economic, Udayana Uni- versity. Suwena, I Ketut and Widyatmaja, I Gst Ngr. 2010. Basic knowledge of Tour- ism Science. First print. Udayana Uni- versity Press. USAID, 2008. Real Demand Survey (RDS) Guide. Jakarta Publisher, USAID Environmental Services Pro- gram (ESP), October 2008. Wardani, F H. 2018. Analysis of Factors Influencing Interest in Religious Tourists in Demak Regency (study on the Great Mosque of Demak). Faculty of Economics, University of Muham- madiyah Yogyakarta Widarjono, A. 2010. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. UPP STIM YKPN. Widyaningrum, DR 2016. Potential and Development of Tourism Objects in Selogiri District, Wonogiri Regency in 2015”. Thesis. Faculty of Teacher Training and Education. Sebelas Maret University. Yoeti, Oka A. 2008. Tourism Economics: Introductions, Information, and Ap- plications. Jakarta: Compass. http://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/eot