This is a title EAI Endorsed Transactions on Smart Cities Research Article 1 Balancing Efficiency and Equity: Ethical Considerations for Automation in Urban Planning A. Raisinghani1,* and V. Mehta2 1,2 Department of Urban and Regional Planning, School of Planning and Architecture Bhopal, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India Abstract The integration of automation into urban planning introduces a complex dynamic where efficiency often clashes with equity, especially for marginalized communities. This necessitates a delicate balance between these two aspects. This article investigates the ethical principles and equity considerations in urban planning decisions, revealing a historical and contemporary bias towards efficiency, marginalizing certain groups. Automation, while beneficial in sectors like transportation, land use, and infrastructure, can perpetuate existing inequities and pose ethical challenges such as algorithmic bias and data privacy concerns. The article explores the impacts of automation on plan execution and monitoring, highlighting the need for current best practices to address these challenges. It provides an overview of automation in urban planning and calls for continuous research, collaboration, and improvement to ensure efficiency and equity are mutually reinforced. Keywords: Automation, Efficiency, Equity, Ethics, Urban Planning Received on 31 May 2024, accepted on 13 February 2025, published on 21 February 2025 Copyright © 2024 A. Raisinghani and V. Mehta, licensed to EAI. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, which permits copying, redistributing, remixing, transformation, and building upon the material in any medium so long as the original work is properly cited. doi: 10.4108/eetsc.6208 1. Introduction 1.1. Growing Role of Automation in Urban Planning Urban planning is undergoing a profound transformation with the integration of automation, marking a significant departure from traditional methodologies [1]. This shift is driven by the pressing need to address challenges arising from rapid urbanization and the imperative for sustainable development [2]. The increasing role of automation in urban planning offers unprecedented opportunities to build more liveable, sustainable, and resilient cities [3]. The growing adoption of automation in urban planning implementation and monitoring is highlighted by the emergence of smart city initiatives [4]. These efforts utilize data-driven technologies such as Internet of Things (IoT) *Corresponding author. Email: abhi90raisinghani@gmail.com devices and artificial intelligence (AI) to gather live data, oversee urban infrastructure, and improve decision-making procedures. [5]. From optimizing traffic management to monitoring environmental quality, automation is revolutionizing urban functionality and resilience. Furthermore, automation is reshaping conventional approaches to urban design and land use planning [1]. Advanced modelling and simulation tools, empowered by automation algorithms, enable planners to forecast trends, assess the impact of different development scenarios, and optimize spatial layouts for efficiency and sustainability [6]. Utilizing data-driven methods enables decision-making based on evidence, with a focus on prioritizing environmental conservation, social equality, and economic sustainability. Automation also facilitates greater public participation and engagement in the urban planning process [7]. Interactive digital platforms, augmented reality, and virtual reality simulations empower stakeholders to visualize proposed projects, offer feedback, and collaborate with planners in real time [4]. This inclusive approach promotes transparency, EAI Endorsed Transactions on Smart Cities | Volume 7 | Issue 4 | 2023 | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ mailto:abhi90raisinghani@gmail.com A. Raisinghani and V. Mehta 2 accountability, and community ownership in urban development initiatives. However, the rapid adoption of automation in urban planning raises ethical, social, and regulatory concerns [8]. Addressing concerns like data privacy, algorithmic bias, and digital inequality is essential to guarantee equitable access and involvement in smart city initiatives [9]. Moreover, the potential displacement of jobs and exacerbation of socio- economic disparities underscore the necessity for proactive policy interventions and workforce development strategies [10]. 1.2. Ethical dilemma of balancing efficiency and equity The ethical dimension of balancing efficiency and equity in urban planning amid the increasing integration of automation is a critical aspect that requires careful consideration. While automation holds the promise of optimizing urban processes and improving overall efficiency, it also poses significant challenges in terms of ensuring fairness, inclusivity, and social justice. The pursuit of efficiency through automation must not come at the expense of equity and social justice. There is a risk that automation technologies may exacerbate existing inequalities, particularly for marginalized communities with limited access to digital resources and technological skills. The phenomenon known as the "digital divide" highlights the disparities in access to technology and digital literacy, which can further widen socio-economic gaps in urban areas [2]. Moreover, automation algorithms might unintentionally perpetuate biases and discrimination, resulting in unequal outcomes in domains like housing, employment, and public services [8]. The use of predictive analytics in decision- making processes, for instance, may reinforce systemic inequalities by favouring certain groups over others based on historical data patterns. Additionally, concerns about data privacy and surveillance raise ethical questions regarding the use of personal information for urban planning purposes [10]. Through the utilization of technology, data, and automation, planners can address intricate challenges and enhance the quality of life for inhabitants in urban areas [9]. Yet, realizing this potential requires a balanced approach that integrates technological innovation with ethical considerations and community engagement. This paper will delve into specific case studies to illustrate the multifaceted impact of automation on urban planning practices and outcomes, it aims to elucidate the growing role of automation in urban planning and its implications for shaping future cities. 1.3. Purpose and structure of the paper The objective of this paper is to examine the ethical implications of integrating automation technologies into urban planning execution and monitoring, focusing on the tension between efficiency-driven approaches and the imperative of ensuring equity and social justice. Beginning with an introduction to the growing role of automation in urban planning, it outlines the ethical framework for urban planning, analysing principles such as transparency, fairness, and accountability. Subsequent sections delve into how automation enhances efficiency in implementation and monitoring across various urban planning domains while considering equity considerations such as access to resources and environmental justice. The paper then addresses the ethical challenges associated with automation, including algorithmic biases and data privacy concerns, and discusses strategies for balancing efficiency and equity through case studies and best practices. Ultimately, it concludes with a call to action for prioritizing ethical considerations in automation adoption and underscores the ongoing need for research and collaboration in this evolving field. 2. Ethical Principles in Urban Planning Planning profession is guided by principles encompassing public interest, equity, environmental sustainability, and professional integrity, navigating through a labyrinth of complex challenges including urbanization and climate change. These ethical principles not only provide a framework for decision-making and code of conduct but also serve as a guiding light, illuminating the path toward a future characterized by inclusivity, sustainability, and justice for all members of society. Some of the principles of urban planning are: 2.1. Public Interest Prioritizing the public interest involves valuing diversity, fostering public engagement, offering transparent information on planning issues, and advocating for conservation efforts. It also entails striving for spatial justice by ensuring equitable opportunities [11,12]. Planners must engage respectfully with marginalized communities, facilitating their active involvement in the planning process to achieve inclusivity and fairness. 2.2. Equity and Social Justice Planners are tasked with confronting and addressing systemic inequalities, including disparities in housing, transportation, healthcare, and economic opportunities. Through an equity- centred approach, planners’ endeavour to create communities that are inclusive and just, enabling every individual to thrive. Essential to this approach is the adaptation of existing plans and policies to dismantle historical barriers to racial and social equity [13]. By monitoring progress using metrics and accountability mechanisms, sustained advancements toward achieving more equitable outcomes are ensured. This comprehensive strategy underscores planners' commitment to fostering environments where fairness and opportunity prevail, signalling a concerted effort to address deep-rooted EAI Endorsed Transactions on Smart Cities | Volume 7 | Issue 4 | 2023 | Balancing Efficiency and Equity: Ethical Considerations for Automation in Urban Planning 3 disparities and cultivate a society where every member has the chance to prosper. 2.3. Transparency and Accountability Planners should uphold the principles of transparency and accountability in their decision-making processes. This includes providing clear and accessible information to stakeholders, soliciting feedback from the public, and being accountable for the outcomes of planning initiatives [14]. Planners must consider the long-term consequences of decisions and incorporate equity principles to promote social justice. They should analyse ethical issues systematically, establishing procedures to uphold ethical behaviour. 2.4. Environmental Sustainability In response to unparalleled environmental challenges, ethical planning necessitates a proactive commitment to sustainability, ensuring present decisions prioritize the well- being of future generations and the environment. Planners play a pivotal role in advancing environmental sustainability by safeguarding ecological systems, addressing climate change impacts, and enhancing resilience against environmental threats [15]. This involves integrating principles of conservation, resource efficiency, and resilience into planning decisions across all facets of practice, encompassing land use, transportation, infrastructure design, and resource management. By emphasizing green infrastructure, renewable energy, and sustainable development practices, planners contribute to the creation of communities that are more resilient, liveable, and environmentally sustainable. Their efforts resonate in the establishing a sustainable future that meets the requirements of present and future generations, while also preserving the environment for the prosperity of everyone [16]. 2.5. Digital Ethics The digital age poses new complexities. Data privacy concerns, algorithmic biases in decision-making, and the potential for online anonymity to fuel unethical behaviour demand new considerations [17]. Adapting ethical frameworks to these evolving landscapes requires constant vigilance and innovation. Professional organizations play a crucial role in developing and enforcing ethical codes, while individual responsibility remains paramount in navigating these uncharted territories [18]. Figure 1. Ethical Principles in Urban Planning 3. Efficiency and Automation in Urban Planning Efficiency stands out as a significant advantage and motivator for automation in urban planning. By automating repetitive tasks and processes, urban planners can achieve more within shorter timeframes. Automated tools excel at handling tasks like data collection, analysis, and visualization, outperforming manual methods in speed and accuracy. It facilitates the collection of vast datasets from diverse sources such as sensors, satellites, and social media. This data undergoes analysis using machine learning algorithms and EAI Endorsed Transactions on Smart Cities | Volume 7 | Issue 4 | 2023 | A. Raisinghani and V. Mehta 4 Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to uncover insights into urban trends, patterns, and challenges. Furthermore, predictive models assist urban planners in anticipating future scenarios concerning population growth, infrastructure requirements, transportation demands, and environmental changes. 3.1. Cases of Automation in Urban Planning Few cases of how automation has enhanced the efficiency in various fields of urban planning are given below: 3.1.1. Transportation and Mobility Automation technologies, such as intelligent traffic signals and traffic monitoring systems, play a crucial role in optimizing traffic flow, alleviating congestion, and enhancing overall transportation efficiency [19] . For instance, the Sydney Coordinated Adaptive Traffic System (SCATS) dynamically adjusts signal timings based on real-time traffic conditions, effectively reducing congestion and travel times at intersections [20]. Efficient and reliable public transportation is achieved through automated fare collection systems, real-time passenger information, and transit scheduling software. Notably, the Oyster card system in the London Underground automates fare collection [21], and Smart Bus and Traffic Infrastructure, Bhubaneswar [22] streamlining the passenger experience and boosting revenue collection for transport authorities. The rise of Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) holds the potential to transform transportation by optimizing road capacity, minimizing accidents, and reshaping urban mobility patterns. AVs can seamlessly integrate into existing transportation networks, providing efficient and convenient mobility options. Notably, companies like Google have achieved significant milestones, with over 1 million miles covered by their driverless cars in June 2015 [23]. Additionally, Bengaluru-based startup Minus Zero introduced the first self-driving car in India, the "zPod," in 2023 [24]. 3.1.2. Land Use and Zoning Automated zoning tools streamline the analysis of land use regulations, zoning ordinances, and development standards, aiding planners in evaluating proposed projects and ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) combined with data analytics enhance the efficiency of analysing land use patterns, demographics, and spatial data, facilitating informed decision-making [25]. The adoption of online building plan approval systems is growing in India, aiming to streamline the construction approval process, minimize corruption, and enhance transparency. For instance, 379 urban bodies in Madhya Pradesh utilize the automated building plan approval system (ABPAS) and 107 utilize Automated Layout Process Approval and Scrutiny System (ALPASS) as of 2022 (ABPAS) [26], [27]. Automation empowers planners to develop virtual simulations of urban environments, enabling stakeholders to visualize and assess various land use scenarios and development proposals. Digital twin technology, recognized globally, represents physical entities, processes, or systems, enabling real-time monitoring, analysis, and simulation. TwinBy, for example, plans to create 18 urban digital twins in Bavaria by March 2024 [28]. Moreover, the 'Digital Twin Strategy for Indian Infrastructure' report, released in 2023, aligns with the 'National Geospatial Policy 2022,' envisioning a transformative National Digital Twin for major towns and cities in India by 2035 [29]. 3.1.3. Infrastructure Management Automation technologies play a pivotal role in monitoring and optimizing energy distribution, water management, and waste disposal systems, thereby enhancing resource efficiency and sustainability. Automated energy management systems can optimize energy consumption across buildings, streetlights, and municipal facilities, resulting in cost savings and reduced environmental impact. For instance, the Smart MCCB Distribution Management solution is implemented in Maharashtra to monitor and mitigate energy leakage and faults in energy distribution [30]. The utilization of Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems facilitates the implementation of effective water management strategies in water supply networks in cities like Navi Mumbai, Nagpur, and Ahmedabad [31]. Automated systems leverage sensors and data analytics to forecast infrastructure failures and plan maintenance proactively, thereby minimizing downtime and lowering repair expenses. For instance, the Netherlands' Rijkswaterstaat employs automated bridge monitoring systems to identify structural defects and prioritize maintenance tasks [32]. Similarly, the New York City Department of Environmental Protection utilizes predictive analytics to optimize sewer inspection and maintenance activities, reducing the likelihood of sewer failures and backups [33]. 3.1.4. Environmental Management Automated sensor networks provide real-time monitoring of air and water quality, noise levels, and other environmental parameters, enabling prompt interventions to address pollution and environmental hazards. For instance, the City of Copenhagen utilizes air quality sensors to monitor pollution levels and guide air quality management policies. Copenhagen Solutions Lab partnered with Google to evaluate the city's air quality, aided by Satellite Navigation technology [34]. Automation technologies are pivotal in advancing and implementing green infrastructure projects, such as green roofs and permeable pavements, aimed at enhancing resilience and sustainability. For example, Building Automation Systems (BAS) [35] are employed in the Indira Paryavaran Bhawan, which is India’s inaugural on-site Net Zero Building [36]. Automated environmental modelling tools simulate the effects of land use changes, transportation policies, and EAI Endorsed Transactions on Smart Cities | Volume 7 | Issue 4 | 2023 | Balancing Efficiency and Equity: Ethical Considerations for Automation in Urban Planning 5 infrastructure projects on environmental quality and natural ecosystems. For instance, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's BASINS tool aids planners in evaluating the environmental impacts of land use decisions and water management strategies [37]. 3.2. Benefits and Challenges of Automation in Urban Planning Table 1. Benefits and Challenges of Automation in Urban Planning Benefits Challenges Efficiency and Resource Optimization: • Simplifies Repetitive Tasks • Optimizes Resource Allocation • Reducing Waste • Enhancing efficiency Data Quality and Availability: • Incomplete or inconsistent data Enhanced Resilience: • Swift Responses to Emergencies • Predictive analytics for Crisis management Privacy and Security: • Data Privacy • Data Protection • Cybersecurity Cost Savings: • Workflow streamlining • Reduced dependence on manual labour Public Engagement: • Reduced human judgment and intuition Improved Decision Making: • Real-time data access • Automated Analytical tools • Elevate Decision- making Processes Digital Divide: • Disparities in Access to Services • Organizational change • Stakeholder Resistance Table 1 outlines the benefits and challenges of automation in urban planning. It underscores the potential of automation to enhance efficiency, precision, and decision-making in urban planning. However, it emphasizes the importance of tackling challenges related to data quality, equity, privacy, and organizational transformation to fully capitalize on its benefits. 4. Equity Considerations in Urban Planning Urban planning plays a crucial role in shaping the lives of city dwellers. However, achieving equitable outcomes for all residents remains a significant challenge. This paper explores four key equity issues in urban planning: access to re-sources, distribution of benefits and burdens, social inclusion, and environmental justice with appropriate examples to illustrate the issue and highlight potential solutions. 4.1. Access to Resources Access to resources in urban planning involves ensuring that essential services such as water, sanitation, healthcare, and education are equitably distributed among urban populations, regardless of socioeconomic status or geographical location. This entails addressing disparities in infrastructure provision and ensuring that marginalized communities have adequate access to basic amenities necessary for their well-being and development. • A significant barrier lies in the digital divide, as highlighted by GSMA Intelligence in "The Mobile Economy India 2023." People in underserved areas often lack access to smartphones and internet connectivity, rendering them unable to order goods through apps used by self-driving delivery vehicles. This could further marginalize them and widen the existing digital divide. • Autonomous waste collection systems in developed cities might raise concerns about equity in service provision, potentially neglecting low-income areas due to economic considerations. This could lead to environmental injustice and health risks for marginalized communities [38]. 4.2. Distribution of Benefits and Burdens Distribution of benefits and burdens focuses on the fair allocation of advantages and disadvantages associated with urban development. It entails preventing marginalized communities from bearing disproportionate negative impacts such as pollution, gentrification, or lack of access to public services. • Urban renewal projects: While aimed at revitalizing areas, they often led to gentrification, displacing low- income residents and businesses who cannot afford rising rents. This creates a "displacement burden" where vulnerable communities lose their homes and livelihoods [39]. • Climate change adaptation: While coastal cities invest in seawalls and other protective measures, low-lying communities might be neglected, creating an "adaptation burden" where they face increased vulnerability without adequate support [39]. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Smart Cities | Volume 7 | Issue 4 | 2023 | A. Raisinghani and V. Mehta 6 • Data gaps and lack of disaggregated data: Planning decisions often rely on incomplete or inaccurate data that fails to capture the specific needs and vulnerabilities of different groups, leading to unequal outcomes. 4.3. Social Inclusion Social inclusion in urban planning aims to establish environment where every individuals have equitable opportunities to engage in decision-making processes and avail urban amenities and services [40]. This involves designing inclusive spaces that accommodate diverse needs and preferences, fostering social cohesion, and promoting dialogue and collaboration among different social groups. • Automation in public services like healthcare in India could create barriers for marginalized communities with limited digital literacy or access to technology. This could exclude them from essential services and widen the gap in healthcare equity [41]. • Increased reliance on automation in urban spaces, like automated security systems or facial recognition technology, might lead to concerns about privacy and discrimination against individuals based on ethnicity, race, or other factors. This could create social tensions and undermine inclusive community development [42]. 4.4. Environmental Justice Environmental justice in urban planning addresses the unequal distribution of environmental risks and benefits, seeking to rectify historical injustices and empower communities to advocate for environmental protection and sustainability [43]. It involves recognizing and mitigating environmental disparities, promoting environmental awareness and education, and involving affected communities in decision-making processes related to environmental policies and projects. • Automated waste management systems in India, while potentially improving efficiency, might raise concerns about data privacy and potential misuse of collected information. This could disproportionately impact vulnerable communities whose data is collected without proper consent or safeguards [44]. • Over 70% of India's surface water is contaminated according to Central Pollution Control Board in 2023, disproportionately impacting marginalized communities relying on polluted sources for drinking and sanitation. A 2022 report by WaterAid [45] revealed that 42% of rural households lacked access to safe drinking water, compared to only 7% in urban areas. • Open dumpsites and inadequate waste collection disproportionately affect marginalized communities living in proximity. A 2023 report of Techiman municipality of Ghana, assessing solid waste management practices [46], found that 58% of open dumpsites in India are located near informal settlements, exposing residents to health hazards from waste burning and leachate contamination. 5. Ethical Challenges of Automation in Urban Planning While automation holds promise for efficiency in urban planning, its implementation in India raises concerns about exacerbating existing inequities and marginalizing vulnerable communities. 5.1. Algorithmic Bias Smart city initiatives: Algorithms used for traffic management, waste collection, or resource allocation in smart cities can perpetuate biases if not carefully designed. For example, algorithms trained on historical data might reinforce existing inequalities in resource distribution or policing, disproportionately impacting marginalized communities [47]. In India, the introduction of automated facial recognition systems for law enforcement purposes in cities like New Delhi has raised ethical concerns regarding privacy and discrimination. These systems, if not properly regulated, could worsen biases against certain demographic groups, potentially leading to wrongful targeting or surveillance of marginalized communities [48]. The use of automated waste management systems in cities like Mumbai has faced criticism for perpetuating socio-economic disparities. These systems often prioritize waste collection and disposal services in affluent areas, where residents can afford to pay for premium services while neglecting informal settlements and slum areas, where waste management infrastructure is lacking, and residents are left to deal with inadequate sanitation facilities [49]. 5.2. Digital Divide Limited access to technology and the Internet: Marginalized communities in India often lack access to digital tools used for data collection and participatory planning processes. This can exclude their voices and needs, leading to solutions that do not address their concerns [50]. The adoption of digital platforms for citizen engagement in urban planning processes in New York City has highlighted the digital divide. While affluent neighbourhoods with high internet penetration rates can effectively participate in online consultations and decision-making processes, low- income neighbourhoods with limited access to digital infrastructure and technology are often excluded, resulting in their interests and concerns being marginalized in urban development decisions [51]. In cities like Hyderabad, the introduction of automated systems for online payment of utility bills and property taxes has widened the digital divide. While tech-savvy residents with access to smartphones and internet connectivity can EAI Endorsed Transactions on Smart Cities | Volume 7 | Issue 4 | 2023 | Balancing Efficiency and Equity: Ethical Considerations for Automation in Urban Planning 7 conveniently use these platforms. However, residents from low-income or rural areas may face challenges due to limited digital literacy and online payment accessibility, resulting in their exclusion from crucial services and potential penalties for non-compliance [52]. 5.3. Job Displacement and Skills Gap Automation in sectors like sanitation or transportation: While potentially improving efficiency, automation might displace low-skilled workers, primarily concentrated in marginalized communities. Without adequate reskilling and upskilling programs, these individuals risk job losses and economic hardship [53]. In Chennai, the implementation of automated systems in the textile industry has resulted in job displacement among garment workers. Automated textile manufacturing processes, such as computerized knitting and robotic sewing, have reduced the demand for manual labour, leading to layoffs and unemployment in the garment manufacturing sector. However, many displaced workers lack the technical skills required to transition to other industries or higher- skilled positions, leading to economic hardships, and social inequalities [54]. In cities like Detroit, the introduction of automated systems in the manufacturing and transportation sectors has led to job displacement and a widening skills gap. Automation in automotive manufacturing plants, for instance, has reduced the demand for low-skilled labour, resulting in unemployment and economic hardship for affected workers. Moreover, the skills required for new tech-intensive jobs often do not match the qualifications of displaced workers, exacerbating inequalities and contributing to social unrest [55]. Informal vendors: Automated delivery services, while promising convenience, could significantly disrupt the livelihoods of millions of informal vendors reliant on traditional delivery methods. This could worsen economic insecurity and social unrest among marginalized communities heavily dependent on the informal sector [56]. Waste pickers: Automation in waste management might lead to job losses for informal waste pickers, often from disadvantaged backgrounds, pushing them further into poverty and jeopardizing their access to necessities [57]. Skill mismatch and affordability: Even if new jobs are created through automation, marginalized communities might lack the skills or financial resources to access training and compete for these positions, widening the skills gap and perpetuating inequalities [58]. 5.4. Lack of Community Engagement Top-down planning approaches: Overreliance on data and technology can overshadow community engagement, particularly in marginalized areas with limited access to digital platforms or skills. This can lead to solutions that are not culturally appropriate or responsive to their needs [38]. In New York City, the implementation of automated decision-making systems for public housing allocation has been criticized for the lack of community involvement. The application of algorithms to assess housing eligibility and allocation without meaningful engagement with affected residents has led to inequalities and complaints. Many residents, particularly those from marginalized communities, feel that their voices are not being heard and that the automated systems fail to consider their unique circumstances and needs [59]. 5.5. Inadequate Regulatory Framework Lack of ethical guidelines for using automation: The absence of clear ethical frameworks and data privacy regulations could lead to discriminatory practices and misuse of data, further marginalizing vulnerable groups [60,61]. In Singapore, the deployment of autonomous vehicles (AVs) has outpaced the development of regulatory frameworks. It was revealed that, while Singapore had one of the highest rates of Autonomous Vehicle (AV) testing globally, with over 1,000 AVs operating on public roads, there were notable gaps in regulatory supervision. The study found that only 30% of AVs had undergone safety assessments, and there were no standardized guidelines for AV testing or operation. This lack of regulation resulted in safety concerns, with a reported 25 accidents involving AVs in the past year, highlighting the urgent need for comprehensive regulatory frameworks [62]. In Bengaluru, the emergence of automated systems for urban governance has revealed gaps in the regulatory framework. Revisiting the implementation of online licensing systems for commercial establishments in the city, the study found that while 70% of commercial establishments had adopted the online licensing system, there were inconsistencies in the application process and data management. Furthermore, only 40% of establishments reported satisfaction with the system's efficiency and transparency, citing difficulties in navigating complex regulations and obtaining timely approvals. This underscores the need for stronger regulatory oversight to ensure the effectiveness and integrity of automated systems in urban governance [63]. Data privacy concerns: Concerns around data privacy and ownership in automated systems could disproportionately impact marginalized communities with limited access to legal resources and awareness of their rights, potentially excluding them from the benefits of data-driven solutions [64]. 5.6 Complicating Informal Sector Vulnerabilities Unequal distribution of burdens and benefits: Automation might lead to increased energy consumption and e-waste generation, disproportionately impacting marginalized communities living near landfills or lacking access to proper e-waste disposal facilities [65]. As discussed previously, the focus on climate change adaptation measures like seawalls in coastal cities leaves low- EAI Endorsed Transactions on Smart Cities | Volume 7 | Issue 4 | 2023 | A. Raisinghani and V. Mehta 8 lying communities vulnerable, creating an "adaptation burden." Marginalized groups face environmental inequities with increased risks and inadequate support, exacerbating socio-economic disparities. 6. Strategies for Balancing Efficiency and Equity Up till now it is evident that automation has brought efficiency to the planning process but at the cost of equity. Therefore, balancing efficiency and equity in automated urban planning processes requires thoughtful consideration and implementation of strategies that prioritize fairness and inclusivity while maximizing effectiveness. Here are some key strategies and best practices: 6.1. Policy Frameworks for Equity To ensure development of policies that explicitly address equity concerns related to automation in urban planning is crucial for ensuring that technological advancements benefit all members of society, regardless of socioeconomic status or demographic characteristics. Also, ensuring that data utilized for automation remains representative and impartial. It aims to mitigate potential disparities by emphasizing equity in the design and implementation of automation technologies. This involves considering the needs and viewpoints of marginalized communities to ensure fairness and inclusivity. The Digital India initiative, launched by the Government of India in 2015 [66], aims to transition India into a digitally empowered society and a knowledge economy. The government’s increased focus on establishing a digitally empowered economy is projected to yield benefits across all sectors, particularly in key digital domains such as information technology & business process management, digital communication services, and electronics manufacturing. Amsterdam's Digital Inclusion Strategy is a digital inclusion strategy that focuses on providing access to digital technologies, digital skills training, and support services for residents who are digitally marginalized. The strategy includes initiatives such as digital literacy programs, community technology centres, and affordable internet access programs [67]. 6.2. Community-Centred Planning These strategies involve engaging communities in the planning process. Involving diverse stakeholders, including marginalized communities in the planning and implementation of automation projects to ensure that their needs and concerns are addressed. The Quantified Cities Movement (QCM), initiated and managed by the Centre for Development Studies and Activities (CDSA) in Pune, seeks to enhance urban planning and foster resilient cities by promoting transparency and accountability. It empowers all citizens to engage in local decision-making processes [68]. At its centre is the iNagrik mobile application, which empowers citizens to report issues and suggest solutions [68]. This real-time, location-based feedback system enables communities and implementing partners to exchange information regarding various multi- sectoral needs and grievances. Community-Centred Urban Sensing (CCUS) is a participatory urban sensing initiative developed by a team at the University of Virginia. This team includes urban planners, designers, architects, landscape architects, and information technologists. The goal of CCUS is to address the need for practical information about the urban environment through community-driven data collection and analysis. This approach empowers residents and community-based organizations to engage in urban planning and design activities within their neighbourhoods [69]. 6.3. Inclusive Access to Data and Technology This includes encouraging equal availability of technology and digital resources to all, preventing the creation of a technology gap. Foster transparency in data utilization and decision-making procedures, ensuring stakeholders are answerable. Guarantee fair access to data while safeguarding individuals' privacy through the enforcement of comprehensive data governance policies and transparent protocols. Under Digital India, initiatives like Aadhaar, Digilocker, MyGov, BharatNet, Smart Cities AAINA [66,70], and many others. As of 2022, approx. 127.76 crore live Aadhaar are registered. As of 2021 6.01 crore DigiLocker user are there. As of [66] As of 2024, there are about 2.1 lakh gram panchayat are connected through BharatNet Project. London's City Data Trust initiative focuses on responsible and transparent data sharing practices for the benefit of the public [71]. Often involving collaboration between government agencies, businesses, academic institutions, and community organizations to ensure that data is used ethically, securely, and in ways that respect individual privacy rights. 6.4. Capacity Building and Training This involved investing in training programs to empower communities and officials to make the most of automation technologies. Through targeted training initiatives, organizations and governments can foster innovation, enhance productivity, and address complex challenges across diverse sectors, ultimately driving sustainable development and prosperity. Pradhan Mantri Gramin Digital Saksharta Abhiyaan (PMGDISHA) is an initiative launched by the Government of India aimed at making citizens in rural areas digitally literate. The program concentrates on delivering digital literacy training to rural individuals, enabling them to effectively utilize digital technologies and engage in the digital economy EAI Endorsed Transactions on Smart Cities | Volume 7 | Issue 4 | 2023 | Balancing Efficiency and Equity: Ethical Considerations for Automation in Urban Planning 9 [66]. It aims to reach out to around six crore rural households, making them digitally literate. As of July 2019, 6.15, crore beneficiaries have been registered; of these, 3.89 beneficiaries were certified [72]. The Singapore's Smart Nation Initiative aims to utilize technology and innovation for economic and societal advancement. The government collaborates with industry and educational partners to offer training programs in digital skills, cybersecurity, and data analytics [73]. Citizens and businesses are encouraged to participate in these initiatives to enhance their digital literacy and integrate smart technologies into daily life and business operations. 6.5. Urban Pilots and Testbeds Urban pilots and testbeds assess automation's impact on diverse communities, identifying disparities early. Active community involvement aids in recognizing unintended consequences. Policymakers can then address inequities, ensuring fair urban development. Through inclusivity, these initiatives promote equitable distribution of automation benefits among residents. Microsoft, Andhra Pradesh's government, and the International Crop Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) collaborated on an AI-based sowing app for Indian farmers. Using AI and historic data, the app predicts optimal sowing times and other farming stages, transmitted to farmers via SMS[74] . Pilot results showed a remarkable 30% increase in average yield per hectare, showcasing its effectiveness. The Amsterdam Smart City Living Lab functions as a dynamic hub where novel solutions undergo testing and assessment to ascertain their beneficial impact on urban surroundings and communities [67]. For instance, the IoT Living Lab initiative explores and experiments with interactive solutions enabled by IoT, actionable open data, and user-friendly platforms, fostering the development of upcoming IoT innovations [75]. 6.6. Equity Impact Assessment Performing equity impact assessments is a strategic method to analyse the potential social, economic, and environmental effects of automation projects on various communities. This process will aid in guaranteeing that automation projects contribute to inclusive and sustainable development, fostering fairness and social justice throughout the process. There have been limited studies conducted to assess the impact of AI on employment in India. NITI Aayog's "Responsible AI" [76] report acknowledges the importance of considering job impact as part of broader societal concerns in defining the Principles of Responsible AI. Additionally, policy brief by the Research and Information System for Developing Countries (RIS) [77] discusses the potential negative effects of AI on jobs in India. However, it suggests that while there may be short-term job losses, there is potential for new job opportunities to emerge across different sectors in the medium to long term, potentially compensating for initial losses. The Sidewalk Toronto project, a collaboration between Waterfront Toronto and Sidewalk Labs (a subsidiary of Alphabet Inc.), aimed to develop a smart neighbourhood in Toronto, Canada, leveraging automation and digital technologies for urban planning [78]. The assessment raised many concerns about use of personal data in the smart neighbourhood, privacy rights and data ownership. It also raised questions about digital inclusion and accessibility and lack of presence of data governance [79]. 7. Conclusion In navigating the complexities of automation in urban planning, our exploration has underscored the critical need to balance efficiency with equity. The tension between optimizing resource allocation and ensuring equitable access, social inclusion, and environmental justice cannot be ignored. To move forward responsibly, we must adopt a holistic approach that integrates ethical frameworks, addresses equity concerns, and navigates ethical challenges effectively. Recognizing this tension, we acknowledge the imperative to prioritize equity considerations alongside efficiency gains. Automation's potential benefits in optimizing transportation, land use, infrastructure, and environmental management must be tempered with a commitment to avoiding widening existing disparities. This requires a conscious effort to ensure that automation serves the needs of all communities, particularly the most vulnerable. 7.1. Ethical Frameworks Matter Ethical frameworks serve as our guiding light in this journey towards responsible automation. Principles such as transparency, fairness, privacy, and accountability must underpin the design, implementation, and monitoring of automated systems. By upholding these principles, we can build trust and ensure ethical conduct in urban planning processes. 7.2. Efficiency's Double-Edged Sword While efficiency-driven approaches offer optimization opportunities, we must remain vigilant of potential downsides. Standardization and neglecting diverse needs can lead to unintended consequences. Therefore, we must actively involve communities in planning processes, ensuring that automation aligns with their specific needs and values. 7.3. Equity: Beyond Efficiency EAI Endorsed Transactions on Smart Cities | Volume 7 | Issue 4 | 2023 | A. Raisinghani and V. Mehta 10 Exploring equity concerns like access to resources, distribution of benefits and burdens, social inclusion, and environmental justice highlighted the importance of addressing historical and contemporary inequities. Automation shouldn't further disadvantage vulnerable communities. We must actively involve these communities in planning processes and mitigate potential biases through diverse data sets and regular bias audits. Navigating ethical challenges requires proactive measures such as diverse data sets, regular bias audits, and community- driven data governance. Building robust safeguards through clear guidelines, regulations, and oversight is essential to prevent bias, protect privacy, and address unintended consequences. Figure 2. Ethical Principles to Strategies, Automation in Urban Planning 7.4. Way Forward Moving forward, governments must continue to prioritize transparency, accountability, and community engagement in the development and execution of auto-mated systems in urban planning. Open dialogue and collaboration among urban planners, policymakers, technologists, and community members are essential for identifying and addressing potential biases and unintended consequences. By centring community voices, mitigating biases, and building robust safe-guards, governments can pave the way towards more equitable and efficient urban spaces for all. This requires a commitment to continuous research, learning and improvement of planning, with a focus on ensuring that automation serves the needs and interests of all residents, particularly those from marginalized and underserved communities. References [1] Batty M. The New Science of Cities. The MIT Press; 2013. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9399.001.0001. [2] Caragliu A, Del Bo C, Nijkamp P. Smart Cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology 2011;18:65–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2011.601117. [3] Kitchin R. The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal 2014;79:1–14. [4] Albino V, Berardi U, Dangelico RM. Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology 2015;22:3–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2014.942092. [5] Ahvenniemi H, Huovila A, Pinto-Seppä I, Airaksinen M. What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities? Cities 2017;60:234–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.009. [6] ICTS AND THE DECOUPLING OF EVERYDAY ACTIVITIES, SPACE AND TIME: INTRODUCTION - SCHWANEN - 2008 - Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie - Wiley Online Library n.d. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467- 9663.2008.00489.x (accessed February 24, 2024). [7] Nam T, Pardo TA. Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government EAI Endorsed Transactions on Smart Cities | Volume 7 | Issue 4 | 2023 | Balancing Efficiency and Equity: Ethical Considerations for Automation in Urban Planning 11 Innovation in Challenging Times, New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2011, p. 282–91. https://doi.org/10.1145/2037556.2037602. [8] Townsend AM. Smart Cities: Big Data, Civic Hackers, and the Quest for a New Utopia. W. W. Norton & Company; 2013. [9] Harrison C, Donnelly I. A Theory of Smart Cities, 2011. [10] Hollands RG. Will the real smart city please stand up? City 2008;12:303–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810802479126. [11] AICP Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct. American Institute of Certified Planners; 2021. [12] Code of Professional Conduct. ITPI; 2020. [13] South African Council for Planners. CODE OF ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT FOR THE URBAN AND REGIONAL PLANNING PROFESSION. South African Council for Planners; 2011. [14] Marcuse P. Professional Ethics and Beyond: Values in Planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 1976. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944367608977729. [15] Canadian Institute of Planners. Professional Codes of Conduct & Ethics. Canadian Institute of Planners; 2004. [16] ISOCARP. The Code of Professional Conduct of the International Society of City and Regional Planners. ISOCARP; 2019. [17] Cornejo-Montoya Y-A, García-Cornejo S-A. Ethics in the Digital Age as a Principle of Professional Conduct. 3rd International Congress on Ethics of Cuenca, IntechOpen; 2023. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.112338. [18] Hendler S. Planning Ethics. Encyclopedia n.d. https://www.encyclopedia.com/science/encyclopedias- almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/planning-ethics (accessed February 12, 2024). [19] Bihari A, Sudhakar Tripathi. Automated Traffic Management using Image Processing 2019. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3350326. [20] Kustija J. SCATS (Sydney Coordinated Adaptive Traffic System) As A Solution To Overcome Traffic Congestion in Big Cities. INJURATECH 2023;3:1–14. [21] JIN. Designing an Automatic Fare Collection System Architecture for Modern Transportation Networks. Medium 2023. https://jinlow.medium.com/designing-an-automatic- fare-collection-system-architecture-for-modern- transportation-networks-f18937a914b3 (accessed February 23, 2024). [22] NIUA. 75+ Case Studies of Innovative Projects of Smart Cities Mission. NIUA; 2023. [23] Protalinski E. Google’s self-driving cars have autonomously driven over 1 million miles. VentureBeat 2015. https://venturebeat.com/business/googles-self-driving-cars- have-driven-over-1-million-miles/ (accessed February 23, 2024). [24] Khare S. Bengaluru-based Minus Zero unveils zPod autonomous driving concept. Autocar India 2023. [25] Zudilin SN, Iralieva YS. Automation of Land Use Planning Based on Geoinformation Modeling. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 2021;720:012039. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/720/1/012039. [26] Government of Madhya Pradesh. Supporting Information Document for State Reforms Action Plan 2020 - 21. 2021. [27] Government of Madhya Pradesh. Madhya Pradesh Economic Survey 2022-23. Government of Madhya Pradesh; 2023. [28] Julian Hörndlein. Digital twins: Duplicate city. VDE Dialog 2023. https://dialog.vde.com/en/vde-dialog- editions/transport/digital-twins-duplicate-city (accessed February 23, 2024). [29] Geospatial World. Non-Executive Think Tank on Digital Twin Strategy for Indian Infrastructure. Geospatial World 2023. https://www.geospatialworld.net/consulting/reports.html (accessed February 23, 2024). [30] Spectrum. Smart Power Distribution Management – a case study 2020. http://www.sivpl.com/smart-power- distribution-management/ (accessed February 23, 2024). [31] Urban Management Centre. Study Tour to Maharashtra on SCADA and 24x7 Water Supply Initiatives. 2013. [32] Bridge Monitoring. Mistras Group, Inc n.d. https://www.mistrasgroup.com/how-we- help/monitoring/bridges/ (accessed February 23, 2024). [33] NYC’s Municipal Water Network, the Nation’s Largest, Launches Environmental Tech Competition. Environmental Tech Lab 2023. https://envirotechlab.nyc/news/nyc-s- municipal-water-network-the-nation-s-largest-launches- environmental-tech-competition (accessed February 23, 2024). [34] Copenhagen Solutions Lab. Copenhagen: Rethinking the urban space by mapping air pollution. Eurisy 2021. https://www.eurisy.eu/stories/copenhagen-mapping-air- pollution/ (accessed February 26, 2024). [35] Bhatt JG, Jani OK, Bhatt CB. Automation Based Smart Environment Resource Management in Smart Building of Smart City. In: Vinod Kumar TM, editor. Smart Environment for Smart Cities, Singapore: Springer; 2020, p. 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6822-6_3. [36] Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change. Prime Minister Inaugurates “Indira Paryavaran Bhawan.” Press Information Bureau 2014. https://pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=104214 (accessed February 23, 2024). [37] US EPA O. Better Assessment Science Integrating Point and Non-point Sources (BASINS) 2019. https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2022- 02/basins4.5coremanual.2019.03_partial_508c.pdf (accessed February 23, 2024). [38] World Cities Report 2020: The Value of Sustainable Urbanization | UN-Habitat. UN Habitat 2020. https://unhabitat.org/world-cities-report-2020-the-value-of- sustainable-urbanization (accessed February 24, 2024). [39] Narain S. Poverty and environmental inequality in India. UNESCO Inclusive Policy Lab 2019. https://en.unesco.org/inclusivepolicylab/analytics/poverty- and-environmental-inequality-india (accessed February 24, 2024). [40] Villamayor-Tomas S, García-López G. Social movements as key actors in governing the commons: Evidence from community-based resource management cases across the world. Global Environmental Change 2018;53:114–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.09.005. [41] The State of the World’s Children 2021. UNICEF 2021. https://www.unicef.org/reports/state-worlds-children-2021 (accessed February 24, 2024). [42] Trafficking in Persons. United Nations n.d. https://www.unodc.org/unodc/data-and- analysis/glotip.html (accessed February 24, 2024). [43] Bullard RD. The quest for environmental justice: human rights and the politics of pollution. First edition. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books; 2005. [44] Comparative Analysis of India’s Digital Personal Data Protection Bill, 2022 and 2023. The Dialogue; 2023. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Smart Cities | Volume 7 | Issue 4 | 2023 | A. Raisinghani and V. Mehta 12 [45] WaterAid Global. WaterAid India’s 2021-22 annual report 2023. https://www.wateraid.org/publications/wateraid- indias-2021-22-annual-report-0 (accessed February 24, 2024). [46] Awafo EA, Amankwah E, Agbalekpor I. Assessing solid waste management practices in the Techiman municipality of Ghana and the potential of recycling for revenue mobilization and reduction of waste menace. Cogent Social Sciences 2023;9:2182867. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2182867. [47] Kordzadeh N, Ghasemaghaei M. Algorithmic bias: review, synthesis, and future research directions: European Journal of Information Systems: Vol 31 , No 3 - Get Access n.d. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0960085X.2 021.1927212 (accessed February 24, 2024). [48] Jain A, Tripathi GP. Explained | Delhi Police’s use of facial recognition technology. The Hindu 2022. [49] Dutta A, Jinsart W. Waste generation and management status in the fast-expanding Indian cities: A review. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 2020;70:491– 503. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2020.1738285. [50] Kenechi Okeleke, Harry Fernando, James Joiner, Aquije Ballon. The Mobile Economy 2023. GSMA; 2023. [51] Strover S. Public libraries and 21st century digital equity goals. Communication Research and Practice 2019;5:188– 205. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2019.1601487. [52] Shin S-Y, Kim D, Chun SA. Digital Divide in Advanced Smart City Innovations. Sustainability 2021;13:4076. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13074076. [53] International Labour Organization. World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2023. 2023. [54] Vashisht P, Rani N. Automation and future of garment sector jobs: A case study of India. Working Paper; 2019. [55] Abeliansky AL, Algur E, Bloom DE, Prettner K. The future of work: Meeting the global challenges of demographic change and automation. International Labour Review 2020;159:285–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/ilr.12168. [56] Decent Work In India. International Labour Organization; 2021. [57] World Resources Report: Towards a More Equal City. World Resources Institute 2022. https://www.wri.org/initiatives/cities-all-towards-more- equal-city (accessed February 25, 2024). [58] Shah A, Mehrotra P, Aniruddha Marathe. India Insurance: Going from Teens to Twenties. BCG Global 2020. https://www.bcg.com/india-insurance-going-from-teens-to- twenties (accessed February 25, 2024). [59] Whittaker M, Crawford K, Dobbe R, Fried G. AI Now 2018 Report. AI Now Institute 2018. https://ainowinstitute.org/publication/ai-now-2018-report-2 (accessed February 25, 2024). [60] Suri I, Shankar N, Mohandas S, Kharbanda V. Comments to the Telecommunications Bill, 2023. The Centre for Internet and Society 2023. https://cis-india.org/telecom/blog/cis- comments-to-the-telecommunications-bill-2023 (accessed February 24, 2024). [61] Caplan R, Donovan J, Hanson L, Matthews J. Algorithmic Accountability: A Primer. Digital Benefits Hub 2018. https://www.digitalbenefitshub.org/resources/algorithmic- accountability-a-primer (accessed February 24, 2024). [62] Fagnant DJ, Kockelman K. Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 2015;77:167–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.003. [63] Menon S, Hartz-Karp J. Institutional innovations in public participation for improved local governance and urban sustainability in India. Sustainable Earth 2019;2:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42055-019-0013-x. [64] Algorithmic transparency and accountability in the world of work. International Trade Union Confederation; 2023. [65] Electronic Waste n.d. https://toxicslink.org/electronic-waste (accessed February 25, 2024). [66] IBEF. Digital India. India Brand Equity Foundation n.d. https://www.ibef.org/government-schemes/digital-india (accessed February 23, 2024). [67] Bosch H van den. A closer look at Amsterdam’s digitization agenda. Amsterdam Smart City 2022. https://amsterdamsmartcity.com/updates/news/a-closer- look-at-amsterdams-digitization-agenda (accessed February 24, 2024). [68] CDSA. Quantified Cities Movement. Centre for Development Studies and Activities n.d. https://cdsaindia.org/qcm/ (accessed February 23, 2024). [69] Mondschein A, Zhang Z, El Khafif M. Community- Centered Urban Sensing: Smart Engaged Planning and Design in a Dysfunctional Urban Context. International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR) 2019;8:1–16. [70] Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs. 'AAINA Dashboard for Cities’ portal launched. Press Information Bureau 2023. https://pib.gov.in/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=197 6720 (accessed February 24, 2024). [71] Collinge A. A ‘New Deal’ for City Data? – London Datastore 2018. https://data.london.gov.uk/blog/a-new- deal-for-city-data/ (accessed February 23, 2024). [72] Ministry of Electronics & IT. DIGITAL LITERACY IN RURAL AREAS. Press Information Bureau 2022. https://pib.gov.in/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=184 3061&ref=static.internetfreedom.in (accessed February 24, 2024). [73] Smart Nation: Strategies, Opportunities and Cybersecurity Management. SCP 2021. https://scp.gov.sg/startpublic/#!/courses/Courses/CLS_6/81 10/Smart%20Nation:%20Strategies,%20Opportunities%20 and%20Cybersecurity%20Management/5/CLS_6 (accessed February 24, 2024). [74] Microsoft Stories. Microsoft and ICRISAT’s Intelligent Cloud pilot for Agriculture in Andhra Pradesh increase crop yield for farmers. Microsoft Stories India 2017. https://news.microsoft.com/en-in/microsoft-and-icrisats- intelligent-cloud-pilot-for-agriculture-in-andhra-pradesh- increase-crop-yield-for-farmers/ (accessed February 24, 2024). [75] Veen E van der. IoT Living Lab. Amsterdam Smart City 2016. https://amsterdamsmartcity.com/updates/project/iot- living-lab (accessed February 24, 2024). [76] NITI Aayog. Responsible AI. 2022. [77] Kumar DrA. Artificial Intelligence and Its Impact on Jobs in India. Research and Information System for Developing Countries 2021. [78] Loewen E. Preliminary Human Rights Impact Assessment for Quayside Project 2019. https://www.waterfrontoronto.ca/news/preliminary-human- rights-impact-assessment-quayside-project (accessed February 24, 2024). [79] Goodman EP. Sidewalk Toronto Goes Sideways: Five Lessons for Digital Governance. Medium 2020. https://ellgood.medium.com/sidewalk-toronto-goes- sideways-five-lessons-for-digital-governance- 573f2f108024 (accessed February 24, 2024). EAI Endorsed Transactions on Smart Cities | Volume 7 | Issue 4 | 2023 |