


































Economics, Law and Policy 
ISSN 2576-2060 (Print) ISSN 2576-2052 (Online) 

Vol. 7, No. 2, 2024 

www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/elp 

64 
 

Original Paper 

Reflections on the Comprehensive Improvement of Juvenile 

Delinquency Criminal Policy 

Hanyu Li
1
 

1
 School of Political Science Law, Tibet University, Lhasa, Tibet, China 

 

Received: July 15, 2024        Accepted: July 26, 2024        Online Published: August 1, 2024 

doi:10.22158/elp.v7n2p64               URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.22158/elp.v7n2p64 

 

Abstract 

The issue of juvenile delinquency is increasingly attracting attention due to its complex and varied 

legal, social, and psychological dimensions. While current criminal policies address juvenile 

delinquency to some extent, challenges remain in the form of an incomplete legal framework, 

inconsistent policy implementation, and inadequate social support. This paper aims to conduct a 

comprehensive assessment of existing juvenile delinquency criminal policies, examine their 

shortcomings in practical application, and draw on international experiences to propose improvements. 

By systematically analyzing the current state of juvenile delinquency, the effectiveness of existing 

policies, and international practices, the paper outlines pathways to enhance criminal policies for 

juveniles to achieve more effective prevention and intervention, promoting healthy development for 

juveniles and social harmony and stability. 

Keywords 

juvenile delinquency, criminal policy, legal framework, policy evaluation, international experience 

 

1. Introduction 

Juvenile delinquency poses a significant challenge to society, impacting not only the legal realm but 

also the stability of families and communities. As societal environments evolve and juvenile 

delinquency types diversify, current criminal policies appear inadequate in addressing these complex 

issues. The lag in the legal system, differences in policy implementation, and lack of social support 

make juvenile delinquency increasingly difficult to effectively resolve. This study aims to 

systematically explore the current status and shortcomings of juvenile delinquency criminal policies 

and propose improvements based on international experiences. By analyzing the definition, current 

state, and social impact of juvenile delinquency and evaluating the effectiveness of existing criminal 

policies, this paper seeks to uncover practical deficiencies and suggest feasible improvement measures. 



www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/elp                   Economics, Law and Policy                        Vol. 7, No. 2, 2024 

65 
Published by SCHOLINK INC. 

The research will delve into the current status of juvenile delinquency, provide a comprehensive 

assessment of existing policies, and draw on international experiences to propose specific 

recommendations for improving juvenile delinquency criminal policies, thereby promoting effective 

prevention and intervention, and enhancing overall social stability. 

 

2. Current Status and Challenges of Juvenile Delinquency 

2.1 Definition and Classification of Juvenile Delinquency 

Juvenile delinquency refers to behaviors by individuals within the legally defined age range that violate 

legal provisions and result in criminal responsibility. Definitions of juvenile delinquency vary across 

countries and regions, but they generally include special legal procedures and policies for juveniles. In 

China, juveniles typically refer to individuals under 18 years old, with primary legal bases for handling 

juvenile delinquency including the “Law on the Protection of Minors” and the “Criminal Law”. These 

laws define criminal behaviors of juveniles and outline corresponding legal procedures and measures. 

Juvenile delinquency can be categorized by the nature of the crime. Violent crimes include behaviors 

with evident violent characteristics, such as intentional injury, robbery, and rape, causing significant 

physical or psychological harm to victims. Property crimes involve actions like theft, fraud, and 

vandalism, primarily aimed at illegally obtaining others’ property. Drug-related crimes involve 

activities such as drug trafficking, use, or possession, which harm juveniles’ health and severely impact 

the social environment. Sexual crimes, including rape, molestation, and luring minors into sexual acts, 

have profound negative effects on the physical and mental health of juveniles. Other crime types, such 

as public safety crimes and crimes endangering national security, though less common, also require 

legal intervention and sanctions. In terms of behavior, juvenile delinquency can be divided into direct 

and indirect criminal behaviors (Lattimore, 2022, pp. 1071-1098). Direct criminal behaviors directly 

violate legal provisions, such as violent attacks and theft. Indirect criminal behaviors indirectly lead to 

illegal outcomes, such as juveniles’ involvement in certain fraud schemes. From the perspective of 

crime frequency, juvenile delinquency can be divided into first-time and repeat offenses. First-time 

offenses refer to juveniles committing crimes for the first time, usually treated with educational and 

corrective measures considering their age and motives. Repeat offenses refer to juveniles committing 

crimes again after their first offense, which may be treated more severely to prevent recidivism. Finally, 

considering motivation and background, juvenile delinquency can be categorized into economically 

motivated crimes, emotionally motivated crimes, and crimes influenced by the social environment. 

Economically motivated crimes, like theft and robbery, are often related to financial difficulties and life 

pressures. Emotionally motivated crimes, such as violence triggered by emotional disputes, are linked 

to personal emotional issues. Crimes influenced by the social environment involve behaviors impacted 

by negative social or family environments, typically involving complex social backgrounds. 

Understanding these categories helps to formulate targeted prevention and intervention measures. 

 



www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/elp                   Economics, Law and Policy                        Vol. 7, No. 2, 2024 

66 
Published by SCHOLINK INC. 

2.2 Social Impact of Juvenile Delinquency 

Juvenile delinquency has extensive and profound social impacts, affecting individuals, families, and 

society at large. At the individual level, juvenile delinquency significantly impacts the mental and 

physical health and future development of the offenders themselves. Criminal behaviors can lead to 

legal sanctions and criminal records for juveniles, harming their psychological state and affecting their 

future education and career development. The experience of crime often results in social exclusion and 

isolation, further exacerbating psychological problems and social adaptation difficulties. At the family 

level, juvenile delinquency similarly impacts family dynamics. The family is the fundamental 

environment for juvenile growth, and delinquency often exposes issues in family education and 

environment. Criminal behaviors can strain family relationships and increase economic burdens, 

particularly in legal procedures and compensation costs. Additionally, juvenile delinquency can 

damage a family’s social reputation, affecting social interactions and psychological well-being of 

family members. At the societal level, juvenile delinquency poses a threat to social stability and safety. 

Increasing juvenile delinquency may deteriorate public security, heighten fear and anxiety, and reduce 

overall social trust. Inadequate handling of juvenile delinquency can exacerbate public concerns about 

social safety. Furthermore, juvenile delinquency can lead to the reallocation of social resources, such as 

increased police and judicial system resources for prevention and handling, impacting the efficiency of 

social resource utilization. Overall, the social impact of juvenile delinquency is multifaceted, affecting 

individual health, family stability, and societal safety. Understanding these impacts is crucial for 

developing effective policies and measures to reduce juvenile delinquency, protect the healthy growth 

of juveniles, and maintain social harmony (Elliott, 2022, pp. 1-19). 

 

3. Evaluation of Existing Criminal Policies on Juvenile Delinquency 

3.1 Legal Framework for Juvenile Delinquency 

The legal framework for juvenile delinquency is the foundation for addressing juvenile criminal issues, 

involving multiple legal documents and provisions. Countries typically have legal frameworks for 

juvenile delinquency, including laws on minor protection, criminal law, criminal procedure law, and 

relevant administrative and local regulations. These documents collectively form the basic legal system 

for handling juvenile delinquency. In China, the primary legal framework for addressing juvenile 

delinquency includes the “Law on the Protection of Minors”, the “Criminal Law”, the “Criminal 

Procedure Law”, and the “Law on the Prevention of Juvenile Delinquency”. The “Law on the 

Protection of Minors” is the fundamental law protecting the legal rights of minors, covering education, 

life, health, and safety aspects, providing a legal basis for handling juvenile delinquency. The 

“Criminal Law” stipulates specific criminal responsibilities for juvenile behaviors, including treatment 

of juveniles over 14 years old who commit crimes, while those under 14 are generally not held 

criminally responsible. The “Criminal Procedure Law” outlines special procedures for juvenile cases, 

emphasizing consideration of juveniles’ physical and mental characteristics and educational correction 



www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/elp                   Economics, Law and Policy                        Vol. 7, No. 2, 2024 

67 
Published by SCHOLINK INC. 

needs during trial and execution. Additionally, the “Law on the Prevention of Juvenile Delinquency” 

focuses on crime prevention, detailing government, societal, and familial responsibilities and measures 

in preventing juvenile delinquency (Yang & Qin, 2021, p. 105475). 

Key characteristics of these legal frameworks include: 

1) Adaptability: Legal frameworks address the special needs and characteristics of juveniles, 

establishing corresponding principles and procedures. For instance, the “Criminal Law” specifies 

mitigated or alternative penalties for juvenile offenders, such as educational correction and community 

service, aimed at promoting behavior correction and social reintegration. 

2) Procedural Guarantees: The “Criminal Procedure Law” emphasizes procedural guarantees in 

juvenile cases, ensuring full consideration of juveniles’ physical and mental development during trial to 

avoid unnecessary harm. The law requires specialized judges and psychological experts to participate 

in juvenile case trials, employing measures like closed trials to protect juveniles’ privacy and rights. 

3) Educational Correction: Legal frameworks prioritize education and correction for juvenile 

offenders, emphasizing educational, psychological counseling, and social services to help them correct 

behaviors and avoid repeating offenses. For example, the “Law on the Protection of Minors” mandates 

the establishment of correction and rehabilitation institutions for minors, providing professional 

counseling and social services. 

4) Social Participation: Legal frameworks encourage active participation from various societal 

sectors in preventing and intervening in juvenile delinquency, including schools, families, communities, 

and social organizations. Laws require societal support and assistance, forming a diversified prevention 

and intervention network. 

However, existing legal frameworks also face problems and challenges. Firstly, the scope and standards 

of legal application may be inconsistent or ambiguous, leading to difficulties in practical operations. 

Secondly, resource allocation and professional personnel shortages during law implementation affect 

policy effectiveness and fairness. Furthermore, as society evolves and juvenile delinquency patterns 

change, existing legal frameworks may not timely adapt to new demands and challenges. Overall, the 

legal framework for juvenile delinquency provides fundamental legal guarantees for addressing 

juvenile criminal issues, but continuous refinement and adjustment are needed in practical application 

to better protect juveniles' rights and promote their healthy growth and social integration (Cavanagh, 

Jennifer & Thomas, 2022, p. 151). 

3.2 Policy Measures for Juvenile Delinquency 

Policy measures for juvenile delinquency are a series of concrete plans developed by the state and 

society to prevent and address juvenile delinquency, involving education, legal, and social support 

aspects. Education is a core measure for preventing juvenile delinquency. The government and societal 

sectors implement various educational projects to enhance juveniles’ legal awareness, moral standards, 

and self-protection abilities. Schools incorporate legal regulations and moral education into their 

curriculum, utilizing classroom teaching, lectures, and interactive activities to help students understand 



www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/elp                   Economics, Law and Policy                        Vol. 7, No. 2, 2024 

68 
Published by SCHOLINK INC. 

legal consequences and strengthen self-discipline. Community organizations and social service 

institutions also conduct legal publicity and preventive education activities, especially in 

youth-gathering areas, promoting legal knowledge and healthy lifestyles. Family education is 

encouraged, with parents receiving guidance on family education, parent-child communication skills 

training, and other methods to improve educational abilities and enhance the family environment, 

thereby reducing negative impacts of family problems on juveniles. In legal and judicial aspects, policy 

measures focus on effectively curbing juvenile delinquency through legal means and ensuring fair 

treatment of criminal behaviors. Criminal policies tailor principles and measures to juvenile 

delinquency characteristics. For example, for juveniles over 14 who commit crimes, laws allow 

probation, community service, and other non-custodial measures to promote behavior correction and 

social reintegration. Judicial procedures mandate special protections for juvenile cases, such as 

establishing juvenile courts, equipping professional judges and psychologists, and employing protective 

measures like closed trials to safeguard juveniles’ privacy and rights. Additionally, legal frameworks 

require educational and corrective measures for juvenile offenders, including compulsory education, 

psychological counseling, and community service, aiming to help juveniles recognize errors, correct 

behaviors, and receive societal support. Social support and service measures focus on providing 

comprehensive social services to assist juvenile offenders and their families in addressing problems and 

promoting social integration. Key services include psychological counseling and treatment, with 

professional psychologists and social workers providing counseling to help juveniles resolve 

psychological issues, improve behavior patterns, and reduce recidivism risk. Family support services 

are also crucial, offering family counseling, financial assistance, and social service support to help 

family members address issues and educational difficulties, improving the family environment and 

reducing negative impacts on juveniles. Community intervention measures, such as establishing 

community correction centers, vocational training projects, and volunteer services, aim to help juvenile 

offenders reintegrate into society and receive support and assistance. Legislation and policy 

improvement are foundational for effectively addressing juvenile delinquency. Regular reviews and 

revisions of juvenile delinquency-related laws help address emerging crime patterns and social 

demands, ensuring law effectiveness and adaptability. Policy innovation is also essential, introducing 

new policy tools and measures like social experiment projects and cross-departmental collaboration 

mechanisms to explore more effective juvenile delinquency prevention and handling strategies. 

Comprehensive application of these policy measures can effectively reduce juvenile delinquency, help 

juvenile offenders correct behaviors, restore normal life and learning, and promote social harmony and 

stability (Wong & Cindy, 2023, pp. 113-132). 

3.3 Problems and Deficiencies 

Despite providing legal guarantees and support for addressing juvenile delinquency, existing policy 

measures face numerous issues and deficiencies in practical application, affecting their effectiveness 

and fairness. Firstly, inconsistencies or ambiguities in the scope and standards of legal frameworks 



www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/elp                   Economics, Law and Policy                        Vol. 7, No. 2, 2024 

69 
Published by SCHOLINK INC. 

pose operational challenges. For example, the “Criminal Law” may lack clear standards for different 

age groups of juveniles, leading to inconsistent legal applications and affecting legal outcomes. Lag in 

legal and policy frameworks is another significant issue, as existing frameworks may not timely adapt 

to emerging crime patterns and societal changes, resulting in policy execution inadaptability. Secondly, 

resource allocation deficiencies during policy execution limit the implementation of various 

educational and corrective measures. Although legal frameworks specify multiple educational and 

corrective measures, actual implementation often suffers from insufficient funding and professional 

personnel. Particularly at grassroots units and community levels, resource shortages restrict the conduct 

of education and correction work, impacting policy effectiveness. Professionalism and protective 

measures in judicial procedures are also often constrained by resource limitations, affecting the trial 

and handling of juvenile cases. Moreover, deficiencies in social support systems are a crucial issue. 

While policies encourage societal participation in preventing and intervening in juvenile delinquency, 

practical operations often lack robust social support networks, making it difficult for juveniles and their 

families to receive effective assistance. For instance, psychological counseling and family support 

services may be inadequate in some areas, hindering juvenile offenders’ behavior correction and social 

integration. Lastly, monitoring and evaluation mechanisms for policies also face deficiencies. Despite 

existing policies and measures, lack of systematic monitoring and evaluation mechanisms hampers 

accurate assessment and feedback of policy execution effectiveness. Changes in the status and trends of 

juvenile delinquency may not be timely reflected in policy adjustments, affecting policy scientificity 

and adaptability. Establishing effective monitoring and evaluation mechanisms helps timely identify 

issues, optimize policy measures, and enhance policy targeting and effectiveness. In summary, despite 

providing certain guarantees for addressing juvenile delinquency, existing policies and measures face 

numerous practical issues and deficiencies. Improving policy effectiveness requires adjusting and 

refining legal frameworks, increasing resource input, enhancing social support systems, and 

establishing robust monitoring and evaluation mechanisms. These improvements will better prevent 

and handle juvenile delinquency, safeguard juveniles’ legal rights, and promote social harmony and 

stability (Lee, Lung-Fei et al., 2021, pp. 849-857). 

 

4. International Experiences in Juvenile Delinquency Criminal Policy 

Globally, policies and practices for juvenile delinquency vary widely, with different countries and 

regions formulating diverse measures based on their legal systems and societal needs. These 

international experiences provide valuable references for improving juvenile delinquency policies and 

practices. Below are some experiences and practices from major countries and regions in handling 

juvenile delinquency. The United States emphasizes a balance between punishment and correction in 

its juvenile delinquency policies. Through the “Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act” 

(JJDP Act), the US has established a basic framework for handling juvenile delinquency, focusing on 

prevention and correction. The US implements a “Juvenile Court System” specifically for juvenile 



www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/elp                   Economics, Law and Policy                        Vol. 7, No. 2, 2024 

70 
Published by SCHOLINK INC. 

cases, equipped with professional judges, psychologists, and social workers to provide legal-compliant 

and developmental-need-sensitive handling solutions. The US also employs a “graduated sanctions” 

system, offering different treatment measures based on the severity and history of juvenile crimes, such 

as probation and community service, allowing individualized corrective measures based on specific 

circumstances. The United Kingdom centers its policies on “protection and support”, emphasizing 

education and social integration for juvenile offenders. The UK’s “Children and Young Persons Act” 

provides a legal framework for handling juvenile delinquency, focusing on prevention and community 

intervention. Preventive measures include community support networks, legal and moral education 

projects, and psychological counseling, aiming to reduce juvenile delinquency through early 

intervention. The UK uses the “Youth Offending Service” (YOS) model, a comprehensive correctional 

service combining law, social work, and psychological counseling to offer individualized corrective 

plans for juvenile offenders. The UK also values community participation and restorative justice 

programs, encouraging juvenile offenders to take responsibility and compensate victims, promoting 

social reconciliation. Germany prioritizes the “education first” principle in juvenile delinquency 

handling, focusing on education and social adaptation for juvenile offenders. Germany’s “Youth 

Criminal Law” stipulates treatment principles for juvenile offenders, emphasizing behavior correction 

through education, psychological counseling, and social services. Specialized juvenile courts handle 

juvenile cases, with judges, prosecutors, and lawyers undergoing specialized training to ensure 

measures meet juveniles’ needs. Germany’s “Social Integration Program” provides vocational training, 

education, and social support to help juvenile offenders reintegrate into society and reduce recidivism. 

Japan emphasizes family and community support in handling juvenile delinquency. Under the 

“Juvenile Law”, Japan adopts a lenient attitude towards juvenile delinquency, prioritizing education 

and correction over punishment. Social workers and psychologists play crucial roles in handling 

juvenile cases, providing professional counseling and social support. Japan’s “Juvenile Training 

School” system offers specialized education and correction services, helping juveniles correct 

behaviors and undergo social adaptation training. Japan encourages community involvement, 

promoting juvenile delinquency prevention through community support and family education. Overall, 

these international experiences highlight the importance of comprehensive management and 

educational correction for juvenile offenders. The US “Juvenile Court” system, the UK’s “Youth 

Offending Service” model, Germany’s “education first” principle, and Japan’s family and community 

support all offer valuable references for improving juvenile delinquency policies. Integrating these 

experiences provides new perspectives and strategies for enhancing the effectiveness and adaptability 

of domestic juvenile delinquency handling policies (Wells, Timothy et al., 2022, pp. 21-44). 

 

 

 

 



www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/elp                   Economics, Law and Policy                        Vol. 7, No. 2, 2024 

71 
Published by SCHOLINK INC. 

5. Reflections and Recommendations for Improving Juvenile Delinquency Criminal Policy 

To enhance the effectiveness of juvenile delinquency prevention and handling, further improvement of 

related policies is essential. Firstly, refining the legal framework is a necessary step. Existing laws may 

have inconsistent or ambiguous standards for different age groups of juveniles. It is recommended to 

revise relevant laws to clarify treatment principles for juveniles above and below 14 years old, ensuring 

consistent and fair legal application. The legal framework should be updated regularly to adapt to 

societal changes and emerging crime patterns, through periodic evaluation and revision, ensuring law 

effectiveness and adaptability. Specific requirements for educational and corrective measures should be 

added to ensure juvenile offenders receive necessary education and counseling, promoting behavior 

correction. Secondly, policy implementation should be effectively ensured. Addressing resource 

allocation deficiencies requires increased government funding and resource support for juvenile 

delinquency handling and prevention, especially at grassroots and community levels. Funding for 

educational and correctional institutions should be increased to ensure effective implementation of 

measures. For example, increased funding for community correction centers and counseling institutions 

can enhance service quality and coverage. Policy measures should focus more on personalization and 

comprehensiveness, developing individualized correction plans based on specific circumstances of 

juvenile offenders, and combining education, counseling, vocational training, and social services to 

form a comprehensive support system. Enhancing social support systems is also crucial. Establishing 

robust social support systems can effectively promote juvenile delinquency prevention and handling. 

Firstly, psychological counseling and family support services should be improved to ensure juvenile 

offenders and their families receive effective assistance. For instance, establishing more counseling 

centers can provide professional counseling and treatment for juveniles; family counseling and 

education training can help parents improve educational methods and family environments, reducing 

negative impacts of family issues on juveniles. Secondly, community participation and support should 

be strengthened, encouraging community organizations and social service institutions to actively 

participate in juvenile delinquency prevention and intervention. Community support can include 

volunteer services, community activities, and educational resources to increase community attention 

and support for juvenile delinquency. Finally, monitoring and evaluation mechanisms for policies must 

be strengthened. Establishing robust policy monitoring and evaluation mechanisms ensures effective 

policy implementation. It is recommended to establish specialized monitoring institutions for regular 

evaluation of juvenile delinquency-related policies. Collecting and analyzing data can timely identify 

issues and deficiencies in policy implementation, providing improvement suggestions. Strengthening 

feedback mechanisms ensures evaluation results are promptly fed back to decision-making departments, 

allowing for timely policy adjustments and optimization. Regularly publishing policy evaluation 

reports transparently demonstrates policy effects and improvement directions, enhancing scientificity 

and fairness in policy implementation. In summary, improving juvenile delinquency criminal policies 

requires efforts from legal frameworks, policy measures, social support, and implementation 



www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/elp                   Economics, Law and Policy                        Vol. 7, No. 2, 2024 

72 
Published by SCHOLINK INC. 

mechanisms. Clarifying legal standards, increasing resource input, enhancing personalized and 

comprehensive policy measures, establishing robust social support systems, and building effective 

monitoring and evaluation mechanisms can improve policy targeting and effectiveness, reduce juvenile 

delinquency, help juveniles correct behaviors, and promote social harmony and stability (Huntington & 

Elizabeth, 2020, pp. 1371-1457). 

 

6. Conclusion 

Improving juvenile delinquency criminal policies requires comprehensive enhancements in legal 

frameworks, policy measures, social support systems, and implementation mechanisms. Clarifying 

legal standards, increasing resource input, strengthening personalized and comprehensive policy 

measures, establishing robust social support systems, and building effective policy monitoring and 

evaluation mechanisms are essential for enhancing policy effectiveness. Through these improvements, 

juvenile delinquency can be more effectively prevented and handled, promoting healthy development 

and social integration for juveniles, thereby fostering social harmony and stability. 

 

References 

Cavanagh, C., Jennifer, P., & Thomas, G. (2022). The developmental reform in juvenile justice: Its 

progress and vulnerability. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 28(2), 151. 

https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000326 

Elliott, D. S. (2022). Reflections on six decades of research. Annual Review of Criminology, 5(1), 1-19. 

https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-030920-122540 

Huntington, C., & Elizabeth, S. S. (2020). Conceptualizing legal childhood in the twenty-first century. 

Michigan Law Review, 1371-1457. https://doi.org/10.36644/mlr.118.7.conceptualization 

Lattimore, P. K. (2022). Reflections on criminal justice reform: challenges and opportunities. American 

journal of criminal justice, 47(6), 1071-1098. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-022-09713-5 

Lee, Lung-Fei, et al. (2021). Who is the key player? A network analysis of juvenile delinquency. 

Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 39(3), 849-857. 

https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2020.1737082 

Wells, Timothy, et al. (2022). Exploring Communities of Practice to Break down silos in Juvenile 

Justice. Journal of Correctional Education (1974-), 73(2), 21-44. 

Wong, Dennis SW, & Cindy SY Fung. (2023). Juvenile Community Corrections in China: The Quest 

for a Restorative Approach. Asian Journal of Criminology, 18(2), 113-132. 

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-022-09381-8 

Yang, L., & Qin, Z. (2021). The evolution and development of the value orientation of juvenile 

delinquency correction in China. Children and youth services review, 122, 105475. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105475 

 

https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000326
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-030920-122540
https://doi.org/10.36644/mlr.118.7.conceptualization
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-022-09713-5
https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2020.1737082
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-022-09381-8
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105475

