







































 

100 
© 2025 by the author; licensee Asian Online Journal Publishing Group 
 

Economy 
Vol. 12, No. 2, 100-107, 2025 

ISSN(E) 2313-8181/ ISSN(P) 2518-0118 
DOI: 10.20448/economy.v12i2.6904 

© 2025 by the author; licensee Asian Online Journal Publishing Group 

 
 

 
 
 
A study of role of trust in blockchain technology on influence of decentralized 
finance application on financial springiness 

 
Syed Mohammad Faisal   

 

  
Department of Management, Jazan University, Saudi Arabia. 
Email: dfaisal@jazanu.edu.sa 

 
Abstract 

Financial resilience is influenced by Decentralized finance (DeFi) adoption only if individuals 
possess financial literacy and have limited risk perception, while the intermediary of trust in 
blockchain technology also influences DeFi adoption. Through quantitative research, the study 
investigates the positive role that DeFi adoption plays in improving financial resilience via 
superior liquidity management, asset diversification, and enhanced absorption of adverse economic 
shocks. It demonstrates the critical role trust plays in a technology such as blockchain, which uses 
its transparency, security, and immutability to gain users' trust. Fifth, findings demonstrate how 
financial literacy is a bridging link in the relationship between DeFi take-up and financial 
resilience, while risk perception weakens the encouraging effects of trust in blockchain 
technology. To uncover direct, mediating, and moderating relationships, structural equation 
modeling will be utilized to analyze results from individuals and organizations involved with 
DeFi platforms. The research findings provide policymakers, academics, and practitioners with 
insights into potential solutions to promote a safe and inclusive DeFi ecosystem. The study 
fosters financial resilience and inclusion in an increasingly evolving decentralized financial 
landscape by addressing the trust, financial literacy, and risk perception of two distinct groups. 

 
Keywords: Blockchain, Decentralized finance, Financial literacy, Financial resilience, Risk. 

 
Citation | Faisal, S. M. (2025). A study of role of trust in blockchain 
technology on influence of decentralized finance application on 
financial springiness. Economy, 12(2), 100–107. 
10.20448/economy.v12i2.6904 
History:  
Received: 21 May 2025 
Revised: 21 June 2025 
Accepted: 4 July 2025 
Published: 15 July 2025 
Licensed: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons 

Attribution 4.0 License  
Publisher:  Asian Online Journal Publishing Group 
 

Funding: This study received no specific financial support. 
Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable. 
Transparency: The author confirms that the manuscript is an honest, 
accurate, and transparent account of the study; that no vital features of the 
study have been omitted; and that any discrepancies from the study as planned 
have been explained. This study followed all ethical practices during writing. 
Competing Interests: The author declares that there are no conflicts of 
interests regarding the publication of this paper. 
 
 

 

 

Contents 
1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................................... 101 
2. Literature Review .......................................................................................................................................................................... 102 
3. Research Methodology ................................................................................................................................................................. 103 
4. Conclusion ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 105 
References ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 106 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

mailto:dfaisal@jazanu.edu.sa
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
https://www.doi.org/10.20448/economy.v12i2.6904
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6341-8816


Economy, 2025, 12(2): 100-107 

101 
© 2025 by the author; licensee Asian Online Journal Publishing Group 

 

 

Contribution of this paper to the literature 
This study is unique in the field of Decentralized Finance (DeFi) applications concerning financial 
springiness in blockchain technology. An extensive literature survey revealed that very few research 
studies have been conducted in the area of Decentralized Finance (DeFi) applications. 

 
1. Introduction 

Decentralized finance, frequently abbreviated to DeFi, is an emerging modality of finance that, thanks to 
blockchain technology, eliminates the traditional intermediation mechanisms found in financing (Asl & Jabeur, 
2024). DeFi means decentralized finance, and it functions beyond central financial institutions. A lot of work needs 
to be done to build a more transparent and secure financial system. Decentralized crypto-assets, financial resilience, 
attestation processes, inter-office entangling stranglehold, mediating the effect of faith in blockchain technology 
pursuit. This paper explores the concept of interdependencies in financial behavior and technology adoption 
(Hidayat-ur-Rehman, 2024). 

Decentralized finance (DeFi) is one such pillar of a nascent financial framework. This provides a decentralized 
solution to conventional banking and financial services. By leveraging smart contracts running on blockchain 
technology, DeFi transforms the financial services sector by lowering transaction fees, removing intermediaries, 
and providing new opportunities to access financial instruments (Ozcan, 2021). It offers many services, from 
lending to borrowing to trading to asset management, making it a one-stop shop for users to help them reach their 
financial goals safely and transparently. Decentralized finance is nascent but gaining serious traction. The boom in 
blockchain technology has made such growth possible, and the market needed decentralized solutions (Fosso 
Wamba, Kala Kamdjoug, Epie Bawack, & Keogh, 2020). The debate on personal versus system-wide financial 
stability has gained momentum, and financial resilience, the ability of businesses and households to absorb and 
recover from economic shocks, has become a central component of economic model development. Lessons learned 
from the economically chaotic world have informed proposed reforms for financial systems capable of withstanding 
increasing volatility in the 21st century, with the COVID-19 pandemic serving as an example (Stephan, Al-
Turjman, Ravishankar, & Stephan, 2022). DeFi is a distinctive enabling force of greater financial resiliency through 
its decentralized architecture and sophisticated techniques. These options include liquidity management, asset 
diversification, and financial independence (Najam, Abbas, Álvarez-Otero, Dogan, & Sial, 2022). 

Trust in blockchain, which underlies DeFi and its effect on financial resilience, is built in by design. 
Immutability, transparency, and decentralization are the essence of blockchain technology, making the system 
more trustworthy among users. However, perceived risks, regulatory uncertainty, and technological challenges can 
slow trust-building. This study concluded that belief in blockchain technology serves as a key mediator in the 
pervasive realization of decentralized finance and advances its evolution toward precise fiscal resilience (Mothafar 
et al., 2024). This paper examines the relationship between decentralized finance adoption and financial resilience. 
It considers several variables: trust in blockchain technology, financial literacy, perceived ease of use, and risk 
perception. DeFi adoption refers to the frequency and scale of interaction with decentralized applications. In 
financial terms, resilience involves managing liquidity, building asset diversity, and absorbing shocks (Arnone, 
Costantiello, Leogrande, Naqvi, & Magazzino, 2024). How trust comes into play is very important: it serves as a 
bridge between the two aspects, allowing for dependency on the security and transparency of the blockchain. The 
current study explores financial literacy and perceived ease of use as antecedents and moderators to better inform 
about contextual factors that increase financial resilience from decentralized finance adoption (Abdelwahed, Al 
Doghan, Saraih, & Soomro, 2024). This study examines how DeFi contributes to increased financial resilience 
through the mediating variable of trust built into blockchain technology. It focuses on factors such as financial 
literacy and risk perception that reinforce or undermine trust. The study aims to contextualize and develop theory-
driven constructs and practical techniques that promote financial resilience by leveraging decentralized finance. 
This will be the first time this approach is implemented in a large establishment (Jiang, Mintah Ampaw, Asante, 
Wu, & Essilfie, 2024). 

The results of this study are relevant to various stakeholders, from academics to legislators to the finance 
sector. The findings offer suggestions for legislative and infrastructural needs to create a secure, fair DeFi 
ecosystem for policymakers. These conclusions assist finance professionals in developing user-centric solutions that 
address issues related to trust and usability. The background provided offers a comprehensive foundation for 
scholarship on the socio-economic impacts of decentralized finance, particularly concerning enhanced financial 
inclusion and resilience (Zumbansen, 2023). As much as DeFi holds immense potential, its real-world application 
faces many challenges. The key issues are the lack of established regulatory frameworks, cybersecurity threats, and 
market volatility. This complex underlying architecture can be overwhelming for inexperienced individuals in the 
financial or technology sectors, creating entry barriers for such users (Atieh, Cooke, & Osiyevskyy, 2023). Despite 
its shortcomings, DeFi has unparalleled potential to democratize currency and foster resilience. Implementing 
appropriate interventions and building trust in blockchain technology can address these challenges and maximize 
DeFi's full potential (Aoun, Ilinca, Ghandour, & Ibrahim, 2021). This research contributes to our understanding of 
financial resilience at the household level when the industry is increasingly dependent on trust in institutions 
rather than trust in the blockchain and investigates how DeFi will shape financial resilience in the future. It 
enhances theory while providing policy implications for the effective adoption and efficacy of decentralized financial 
systems (Mohammed, De-Pablos-Heredero, & Montes Botella, 2023).  

The study is organized into sections that progressively delve into the comprehensive impact of DeFi adoption 
on financial resilience, starting with an introduction that establishes the research context, aims, and importance. 
Then, a literature review examines key topics, including DeFi, trust in blockchain technology, financial resilience, 
financial literacy, and risk perception. Research methodology describes the structure, data collection, and analytical 
approaches used to examine the proposed relationships. The results and discussion section reports the findings, 
illustrating the variables' direct, mediating, and moderating effects. In closing, a concluding section highlights the 
implications of this study's contributions to practice and areas of future work, while also calling attention to the 
need for trust and access to financial literacy in building a resilient and inclusive DeFi ecosystem. 



Economy, 2025, 12(2): 100-107 

102 
© 2025 by the author; licensee Asian Online Journal Publishing Group 

 

 

2. Literature Review 
DeFi and its ability to be a new paradigm shift through a new-release revolution, creating an ethereal shift 

towards a positive transformation of financial resilience and adopting alternative routes that offer innovative, 
secure, and transparent financial solutions based on the blockchain while bypassing traditional banking 
infrastructures (Baptista, Januario, & Cruz, 2023). As another added feature, DeFi makes smart contracts and 
blockchain its foundation, promoting transparency and security through immutable and cryptographically secured 
transactions. It significantly minimizes the potential for fraud and error while enhancing the inherent 
trustworthiness of financial transactions. This not only democratizes the range of bank-like services available to a 
new clientele but also disintermediates the entire process, allowing those who are lending, borrowing, and trading 
to do so free from burdens imposed by intermediaries. The inclusion provides access to many more people, 
equipping them with the tools to manage their financial risks. Furthermore, integrating relevant sustainability 
principles into financial risk management through decentralized finance (DeFi) engenders environmentally 
conscious solutions and enhances resilience by addressing economic and ecological threats before they arise 
(MacCarthy & Ivanov, 2022). 

The developments in fintech and digital currencies are equally important in stabilizing financial markets. They 
reduce risks such as exchange rate fluctuations and oil price volatility and promote economic stability and 
resilience (Li & Umair, 2023). Inclusive digital finance catalyzes digital enterprise transformation as it relaxes 
financing constraints and prompts TIEs, mass production, and innovation while optimizing general business risk 
reduction, leading to enhanced business profitability and economic resilience. However, the growing DeFi 
ecosystem raises challenges and concerns, such as security risks and regulatory uncertainties, that can be addressed 
using the Secure Decentralized Finance Framework. Risk exposures need to be understood and measured so DeFi, 
which drives the resiliency of the financial and economic system, can scale sustainably (Wiklund, 2023). 

H1: DeFi adoption (DFA) positively influences financial resilience (FR). 
DeFi utilizes the characteristics of transparency, security, and decentralization of online blockchain 

technologies to create financial services that do not require intermediaries, thereby increasing trust in the 
blockchain. DeFi employs open and transparent blockchain networks based on consensus mechanisms, enabling 
users to independently verify and ensure the validity of transactions, thus reducing dependency on intermediaries 
to establish trust (Curry, 2025). Transactions are permanent; users are confident in their systems as the blockchain 
is cryptographically protected. DeFi encourages financial inclusion worldwide through financial services and 
platforms using the technology of smart contracts and blockchains, concepts unimaginable where banks were 
unavailable in a nation. Such a shift towards this paradigm is a step forward for social equality and the aspiration of 
blockchain-decentralized technology (Ramasamy & Khan, 2024). DeFi creates a platform for users to be more 
confident about their assets through peer-to-peer transactions and smart contracts, further increasing blockchain 
technology's decentralization and equality. 

As a result, in this new development model, financial solutions can interact between blockchains, creating space 
for innovation and informal relationships. An integral element of the near-infinite potential of the blockchain, this 
open-source, transitory sphere pushes the boundaries of what financial applications on the blockchain are already 
capable of Nain, Pattanaik, and Sharma (2022). Over USD 100 billion in security has been accrued on DeFi smart 
contracts without any protocol hack. Seeing consumers recognize blockchain as a legitimate replacement for 
traditional financial systems is tremendous validation. The progress has been significant, but regulatory 
uncertainty, safety concerns, and weaknesses in smart contracts are some of the usual drawbacks referred to by the 
experts. Such issues must be addressed if trust in blockchain is to be maintained and strengthened as DeFi remakes 
the financial system (Wronka, 2023). 

H2: DeFi adoption positively influences trust in blockchain technology (TBT). 
The rise of Decentralized Finance, the core strengths of blockchain transparency, security, and immutability 

have been its building blocks, and confidence in numerous regions of blockchain technology is once again 
established upon the birth of DeFi (Schueffel, 2025). DeFi allows users greater control over their assets, and deals 
eliminate intermediaries, reducing the risk of fraud and error. Data written on the blockchain is almost tamper-
proof thanks to the technology's transparency feature and consensus mechanism, which enables users to verify 
transactions independently. Simultaneously, its cryptographic security offers an additional layer of protection, 
safeguarding users from fraud and providing access to confidential (sensitive) information (Almuzaini et al., 2022). 
These elements and attributes are foundational for a safe, credible environment for DeFi environments. 

By disrupting those intermediaries, DeFi is making crypto even more trustless, eradicating human error and 
superfluous costs to unlock the potential for peer-to-peer transactions. Smart contracts define an agreement that 
can be executed automatically once certain conditions are fulfilled; such contracts reduce the need for a middleman 
and shift the trust towards a developed blockchain ecosystem with security and reliability (Bruel & Godina, 2023). 
In particular, the borderless and permissionless properties of DeFi enable financial inclusion for uninsured or 
underbanked users neglected by traditional financial institutions, positioning blockchain as a universal and trusted 
financial system. The programmability and interoperability of DeFi solutions further drive innovation and 
blockchain is rapidly emerging as a trusted, go-to infrastructure for financial services. However, regulatory clarity, 
the potential for hacks, and the implementation of various security measures are needed to ensure this trust and, 
ultimately, the continued growth of DeFi platforms (Wronka, 2023).  

H3: Trust in blockchain technology (TBT) positively influences financial resilience. 
 

2.1. Relationship between Trust in Blockchain Technology (TBT), DeFi Adoption and Financial Resilience  
More importantly, the interactions between DeFi adoption and financial resilience are affected by the nature of 

confidence that society's people place in the benefits of blockchain technology. The foundation of DeFi is 
blockchain, a decentralized and open technology that enables secure transactions of various types without relying 
on traditional intermediaries (Auer, Haslhofer, Kitzler, Saggese, & Victor, 2024). The need for decentralized trust, 
supported by the immutability and transparency of blockchain transactions, is essential to inspire confidence in 
DeFi platforms, ensuring that financial transactions are legitimate. This all comes thanks to the trust in blockchain 



Economy, 2025, 12(2): 100-107 

103 
© 2025 by the author; licensee Asian Online Journal Publishing Group 

 

 

technology that gave us DeFi, where rules are enforced via smart contracts so that human error and fraud seem 
significantly reduced, and financial services are, for instance, more accessible (Chen & Bellavitis, 2020). 

The risk capacity allows for greater resiliency in prosperity and social arrangements through the financial 
services enabled by DeFi, which are less susceptible to systemic failures that plague traditional financial systems. 
Breaking it down further, cover the digital business strategies that lead to enhanced financial performance and 
operational innovation, and finish with a use case of how they can drive the implementation of capabilities that lead 
to improved outcomes through blockchain (Bag, Rahman, Gupta, & Wood, 2023). However, unlocking the power of 
this ecosystem could depend on overcoming a host of challenges, including regulatory ambiguity and potential 
fragility such as bugs and scams in DeFi systems. As a credit market ecosystem based on trust architecture forms 
the foundation of the blockchain, appropriate governance, antifraud protocols, and regulatory frameworks should 
be adopted, thereby promoting a secure, resilient, and reliable financial ecosystem (Rawhouser, Vismara, & Kshetri, 
2024). 

H4: Trust in blockchain technology (TBT) influences between DeFi adoption and financial resilience. 
FL improves FR and also boosts the positive effect of DFA on FR. Greater financial literacy equips individuals 

with the tools to navigate financial risks, make informed decisions, and optimize the use of intricate DeFi products 
and services. Financial literacy is important for a stable economy, supporting national economic health (Goyal & 

Kumar, 2021). In Montenegro, for instance, better financial practices (e.g., saving money and using credit 
responsibly) were associated with higher financial literacy, and in China, socioeconomic development was 
associated with lower exposure to household financial risk, allowing households to recover more quickly from 
economic shocks. Similarly, a recent study out of Cyprus demonstrates that financial literacy is a strong predictor 
of financial resilience, as literates are more likely to be prepared for financial shocks (Roszko-Wójtowicz, Deep 

Sharma, Dańska-Borsiak, & Grzelak, 2024). 
It thus indirectly feeds DeFi adoption, as these financial literacy components directly contribute to a user's 

financial resilience, and users make more informed decisions when entering the DeFi space. However, the issue 
with many DeFi products is that they exist at a fairly high level of sophistication many people have limited 
financial literacy, which limits their ability to harness DeFi's potential to widen resilience (Xu, Zhu, Yang, Lu, & 
Xu, 2024). This makes user financial education a critical area of focus to maximize the benefits that DeFi adoption 
can provide to those who access the sector, and the solutions it offers will only add profit and value to their 
experience (Remund, 2010).  

H5: Financial literacy (FL) strengthens the positive relationship between DeFi adoption and financial resilience. 
Risk perception (RP) might be a potential moderator in the relationship between trust in blockchain 

technology (TBT) and financial resilience. Privacy concerns, technology maturity, and individual risk perception 
contribute to a lack of confidence in blockchain and blockchain-based financial solutions, which can reduce their 

financial sustainability (Hassani, Avdiu, Unger, & Mazinani, 2023). High perceived risks undermine trust and 
optimism in the cryptocurrency space; however, these factors are also essential for the perceived value and efficacy 
of such technologies in increasing the financial resilience of the population. 

Therefore, controlling the effect of risk perception can help maintain a more robust TBT-FR nexus. Education 
and financial literacy are essential in mitigating perceived risks, enhancing trust, and promoting blockchain 
technologies. Furthermore, these more professional and security-focused companies will decrease risk perceptions 
and increase trust and willingness for blockchain solutions by addressing governance and awareness measures 
(Singh et al., 2022). High-risk perception remains a challenge, yet it is surmountable; effective measures that 
address these concerns can help pave the way for building trust in blockchain and unleash its transformative 

potential for enhancing financial resilience (Kumar, 2024). 
H6: Risk perception (RP) weakens the positive relationship between trust in blockchain technology (TBT) and financial 

resilience. 
The integration of DeFi into existing paradigms has enormous potential to increase access to financial tools 

and, ultimately, strengthen financial resilience, with notable gaps in the literature; notably, studies examining the 
mediating impact of trust in Blockchain Technology (TBT), the moderating role of Financial Literacy (FL), and 
Risk Perception (RP) on financial resilience (FR) have yet to be conducted. Few studies have considered these 
factors and their relevance to DeFi adoption. To address these shortcomings, the researcher selected the topic of 
his study to be "The Impact of DeFi Adoption on Financial Resilience: The Mediating Role of Trust in Blockchain 
Technology," aiming to explain how trust, literacy, and risk perception can affect DeFi adoption and, in turn, 
provide actionable insights to policymakers to promote financial inclusion and the sustainability of DeFi 
ecosystems. 

 

3. Research Methodology 
This study adopts a multi-method research approach to explore the relationship between DeFi adoption and 

financial resilience, the mediating effect of trust towards blockchain technology, and the moderating effects of 
financial literacy and risk perception. The research takes a quantitative approach, including model 
conceptualization from individuals and organizations actively engaging with DeFi platforms. A structural equation 
modeling (SEM) methodology reflected in the model will investigate the hypothesized relationships between 
proposed variables such as DeFi adoption, trust in blockchain technology, financial resilience, financial literacy, and 
risk perception. The majority of the data-collection instruments were designed to measure these constructs using 
scales already established in the literature, ensuring validity and reliability. The sample selection aims to gather 
survey participants’ views on the practical aspects of DeFi adoption and its consequences. It utilizes robust 
statistical tools to measure direct, mediating, and moderating effects and provides detailed comparative evidence on 
the drivers behind financial resilience within the DeFi context. The findings are intended to inform theoretical 
development, practical implementation, and regulatory recommendations concerning confidence and resilience in 
trustless financial infrastructures. 

 
 



Economy, 2025, 12(2): 100-107 

104 
© 2025 by the author; licensee Asian Online Journal Publishing Group 

 

 

3.1. Research Objectives 

• To examine the role of decentralized finance adoption as a financial resilience factor based on liquidity, asset 
diversification, and economic shocks. 

• To explore blockchain technology trust as a mediator between DeFi adoption and financial resilience. 

• To investigate the moderating effect of financial literacy on DeFi adoption and financial resilience. 

• To investigate the effect of risk perception as a moderator on the relationship between trust in blockchain 
technology and financial resilience. 

• To explore how financial literacy and perceived ease of use increase financial resilience in adopting the DeFi 
context. The findings on trust, risk perception, and financial literacy will inform the formulation of policy 
recommendations for creating an environment conducive to a secure, fair, and inclusive DeFi ecosystem. 

•  

 
Figure 1. Conceptual framework showing the mediating role of trust in Blockchain technology and 
the moderating role of financial literacy in DeFi adoption and financial resilience. 

 

3.2. Interpretation and Discussion of the Model 
This activity diagram in Figure 1 illustrates the presumed relationships between all constructs concerning 

DeFi adoption, financial resilience (FR), and trust in blockchain technology (TBT), as well as the moderating 
variables. The reason is that DDA is the independent variable, and the diagram is set to DeFi adoption as the 



Economy, 2025, 12(2): 100-107 

105 
© 2025 by the author; licensee Asian Online Journal Publishing Group 

 

 

reference value. Focus mainly on the question of whether DFA has any effects on other constructs in the model. A 
decision node clarifies if the DFA has any effects. In case of no influence, the process ends, but if DFA shows 
significant effects, it moves the flow towards two constructs: FR (financial resilience) and TBT (trust in blockchain 
technology). 

As shown in the figure, DFA positively directly affects FR, consistent with H1, which argues that people who 
embrace DeFi are more financially robust. At the same time, H2 aligns with the observed positive relationship 
between DFA and TBT, implying that attending DeFi platforms improves individuals' trust in blockchain 
technology as an underlying mechanism. 

Then, the model examines whether TBT mediates the relationship between DFA and FR, as posited in H4. 
First, create a decision node that determines if there is mediation. If the mediating effect is not established, the 
process stops here. However, if there is a mediator, the flow continues, recognizing that TBT is a bridge by which 
DFA indirectly contributes to FR. This mediating effect highlights the important function of trust in blockchain 
technology in converting the benefits of adopting DeFi into real financial survival. 

The model also incorporates moderating variables to account for conditional effects. A second decision node 
(2a) inquires whether moderators influence the connections within the model. If no moderators are present, the 
process concludes. However, if moderators exist, the flow proceeds to the moderating effects. Based on H5, 
financial literacy (FL) is identified as a positive moderator because it enhances the relationship between DFA and 
FR. This suggests that individuals with higher financial literacy are more likely to benefit from DeFi adoption. 
Conversely, risk perception (RP) acts as a negative moderator (H6), reducing the TBT-FR relationship. This 
indicates that individuals perceiving greater risk may experience lower gains from blockchain trust when pursuing 
financial resilience. 

The flow concludes after demonstrating all paths in the proposed model. The activity diagram generally 
encapsulates the theoretical framework, including direct effects, mediating effects, and moderating influences. This 
clearly communicates the logical progression of relationships and interactions and provides a strong visual 
representation of the conceptual model underlying the research. This method allows for a better interpretation of 
how DeFi adoption, trust in blockchain technology, financial literacy, and risk perception act together to support 
financial resilience. 

 

4. Conclusion 
In summary, the activity diagram serves not only as a pictorial representation of their hypothetical interaction 

but also illustrates the possible representations and interactions between DeFi adoption, financial resilience, and 
Trust in Blockchain Technology (TBT) as moderating variables of Financial Literacy (FL) and Risk Perception 
(RP). These immediate impacts are then built upon a base, depicted in the chart, where DFA is a main contributing 
factor to fiscal health, not to mention merchant trust in blockchain technology. The relationship between DFA and 
FR (H1) shows that decentralized finance positively affects people's ability to make transactions. Today, even if one 
does not discuss extreme DFA (H2), the role of TBT is emphasized. DeFi demystifies trust in underlying 
technological information; one must effectively be fairly pressured or incentivized for adoption alone. 

Recent theoretical developments could also benefit from understanding how TBT, as indicated in H4, mediates 
the relationship between DFA and FR, thus indirectly providing a mechanism by which DFA can enhance FR. 
This mediation suggests that trust in blockchain technology is necessary to transform Fi adoption into greater 
economic resilience. It indicates that establishing trust in blockchain platforms amplifies the benefits of DeFi 
adoption, offering useful implications for practitioners seeking to boost user confidence in decentralized systems. 

This is valuable due to the addition of moderating variables, which enhance the model by recognizing 
individual difference variables that affect these relationships. Results: Financial literacy (H5) is a significant 
positive moderator, implying its magnifying role in the relationship between DFA and FR. This indicates that our 
conclusion aligns with the literature that people with higher financial literacy would be better prepared to 
understand and leverage DeFi platforms, leading to better economic resilience. In contrast, risk perception (H6) is 
a negative moderator, weakening the relationship between TBT and FR. This highlights the difficulty arising from 
high-risk perception, which can neutralize the positive effect of blockchain trust on financial outcomes. 

The activity diagram captures the direct, mediating, and moderating effects illustrated in this table and 
integrates them into a cohesive theoretical model. It also provides practical implications for researchers, 
policymakers, and practitioners by pinpointing important mediation mechanisms for strengthening financial 
resilience through DeFi adoption. By removing barriers such as risk perception and focusing on financial literacy, it 
accelerates the positive potential of DeFi and blockchain technologies, moving towards more inclusive and 
sustainable financial systems, thus presenting a model with implications for society to use DeFi and trust for better 
financial resilience. 

Expanding the scope of future research in this field is significant, as DeFi, trust, financial resilience, and 
personal moderating factors continue to develop at a rapid pace. Several potential areas for future exploration 
emerge from this framework: 

1. Contextual and Regional Variations: Further research could explore the hypothesized relationships in 
different geographic, cultural, and economic contexts. A more refined approach to financial governance, 
which integrates DeFi, is probable, although its specific adoption and effects on financial resilience will 
depend on the regulatory environment, technological infrastructure, and cultural attitudes toward financial 
innovation. Additionally, cross-country studies (e.g., between developed and developing economies, or 
between regions with differing levels of blockchain adoption) could be very informative. 

2. Longitudinal Analysis: This approach offers a longitudinal perspective, enabling researchers to evaluate how 
DeFi adoption, trust in blockchain technology, and financial resilience change over time. It may facilitate a 
better understanding of how these relationships develop, particularly in response to technological evolution, 
market conditions, or regulatory initiatives. 

3. Expanded Constructs and Variables: Incorporating additional constructs, including perceived ease of use, 
social influence, and safe economic shocks, would further strengthen the model. Examining other possible 



Economy, 2025, 12(2): 100-107 

106 
© 2025 by the author; licensee Asian Online Journal Publishing Group 

 

 

mediators (e.g., perceived financial empowerment) or moderators (e.g., age, gender, and income level) would 
provide a richer understanding of the effects of DeFi. 

4. Role of Behavioral and Psychological Factors: The role of behavioral and psychological factors such as risk 
tolerance, technology anxiety, and financial self-efficacy remains largely unexplored. Furthermore, 
understanding the interaction of these factors with other parameters, such as trust and adoption, may assist 
in developing targeted strategies to promote DeFi and blockchain adoption. 

5. Impact on Financial Inclusion: DeFi is frequently lauded as a means of improving financial inclusion. Future 
work could explore how it uniquely affects underserved populations such as rural areas, women, or people 
without formal banking systems. More research is needed on the role of financial literacy as an enabler in 
these contexts. 

6. Dynamic Risk Perception: Investors, on the other hand, may see a further divergence of opinion as to how 
risky crypto is depending on sudden shifts in the crypto space such as lack of confidence in the market, acts of 
fraud, or a number of technological advancements. Research that examines how perceptions of risk evolve 
over time and how they, in turn, influence trust and financial resilience would yield practical guidance for 
stakeholders. 

7. Integration with Emerging Technologies: Exploration of the intersection of DeFi with other emerging 
technologies such as AI, machine learning, and IoT is also ripe for exploration. Clarifying the design criteria 
for how these technologies can facilitate or, conversely, constrain trust and adoption will help chart a course 
for how the field can make progress. 

8. Policy and Regulatory Frameworks: A key priority is to understand how policy interventions or regulatory 
frameworks can influence DeFi adoption and trust. Further research could analyze how different regulatory 
frameworks enable a secure and diverse DeFi environment. 

Future research can further elaborate upon the insights generated primarily in this study for a better 
understanding of mechanisms and contextual reasons for DeFi adoption and how that relates to broader 
socioeconomic outcomes by mapping along the domains addressed here. These investigations then reward 
developing and articulating even more powerful and actionable strategies for unblocking DeFi and fortifying 
global economic resilience. 

 

References 
Abdelwahed, N. A. A., Al Doghan, M. A., Saraih, U. N., & Soomro, B. A. (2024). The predictive robustness of  organizational and 

technological enablers towards blockchain technology adoption and financial performance. Kybernetes, 54(6), 3383-3409. 
https://doi.org/10.1108/k-09-2023-1655 

Almuzaini, K. K., Sinhal, A. K., Ranjan, R., Goel, V., Shrivastava, R., & Halifa, A. (2022). Key aggregation cryptosystem and double 

encryption method for cloud‐based intelligent machine learning techniques‐based health monitoring systems. Computational 
Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022(1), 3767912.  

Aoun, A., Ilinca, A., Ghandour, M., & Ibrahim, H. (2021). A review of  industry 4.0 characteristics and challenges, with potential 
improvements using blockchain technology. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 162, 107746. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107746 

Arnone, M., Costantiello, A., Leogrande, A., Naqvi, S. K. H., & Magazzino, C. (2024). Financial stability and innovation: The role of  non-
performing loans. FinTech, 3(4), 496-536. https://doi.org/10.3390/fintech3040027 

Asl, M. G., & Jabeur, S. B. (2024). Tail connectedness of  DeFi and CeFi with accessible banking pillars: Unveiling novel insights through 
wavelet and quantile cross-spectral coherence analyses. International Review of  Financial Analysis, 95, 103424. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103424 

Atieh, A. M., Cooke, K. O., & Osiyevskyy, O. (2023). The role of  intelligent manufacturing systems in the implementation of  Industry 4.0 by 
small and medium enterprises in developing countries. Engineering Reports, 5(3), e12578. https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.12578 

Auer, R., Haslhofer, B., Kitzler, S., Saggese, P., & Victor, F. (2024). The technology of  decentralized finance (DeFi). Digital Finance, 6(1), 55-
95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42521-023-00088-8 

Bag, S., Rahman, M. S., Gupta, S., & Wood, L. C. (2023). Understanding and predicting the determinants of  blockchain technology adoption 
and SMEs' performance. The International Journal of  Logistics Management, 34(6), 1781-1807. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-01-
2022-0017 

Baptista, N., Januario, J. F., & Cruz, C. O. (2023). Social and financial sustainability of  real estate investment: evaluating public perceptions 
towards blockchain technology. Sustainability, 15(16), 12288. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612288 

Bruel, A., & Godina, R. (2023). A smart contract architecture framework for successful industrial symbiosis applications using blockchain 
technology. Sustainability, 15(7), 5884. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075884 

Chen, Y., & Bellavitis, C. (2020). Blockchain disruption and decentralized finance: The rise of  decentralized business models. Journal of  
Business Venturing Insights, 13, e00151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2019.e00151 

Curry, D. (2025). Limitations of  trust and legitimacy in blockchain: exploring the effectiveness of  decentralisation, immutability and 
consensus mechanisms in blockchain governance. International Journal of  Public Sector Management, 38(1), 98-117. 
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-12-2023-0368 

Fosso Wamba, S., Kala Kamdjoug, J. R., Epie Bawack, R., & Keogh, J. G. (2020). Bitcoin, Blockchain and Fintech: A systematic review and 
case studies in the supply chain. Production Planning & Control, 31(2-3), 115-142.  

Goyal, K., & Kumar, S. (2021). Financial literacy: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis. International Journal of  Consumer Studies, 
45(1), 80-105.  

Hassani, H., Avdiu, K., Unger, S., & Mazinani, M. T. (2023). Blockchain in the smart city and its financial sustainability from a stakeholder’s 
perspective. Journal of  Risk and Financial Management, 16(9), 393. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16090393 

Hidayat-ur-Rehman, I. (2024). The role of  financial literacy in enhancing firm’s sustainable performance through Fintech adoption: a 
moderated mediation analysis. International Journal of  Innovation Science. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-03-2024-0056 

Jiang, Y., Mintah Ampaw, E., Asante, D., Wu, H., & Essilfie, G. (2024). Green innovation dynamics in Chinese manufacturing enterprises: a 
new institutional and stakeholder theory inquiry. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-31. 
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05024-3 

Kumar, D. (2024). From tradition to technological advancement: embracing blockchain technology in family businesses. Journal of  Family 
Business Management, 15(2), 278-296. 

Li, Y., & Umair, M. (2023). The protective nature of  gold during times of  oil price volatility: An analysis of  the COVID-19 pandemic. The 
Extractive Industries and Society, 15, 101284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2023.101284 

MacCarthy, B. L., & Ivanov, D. (2022). The digital supply chain—emergence, concepts, definitions, and technologies. In The digital supply 
chain (pp. 3-24). Amsterdam: Elsevier. 

Mohammed, M. A., De-Pablos-Heredero, C., & Montes Botella, J. L. (2023). Exploring the factors affecting countries’ adoption of  
blockchain-enabled central bank digital currencies. Future Internet, 15(10), 321. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15100321 

Mothafar, N. A., Zhang, J., Alsoffary, A., Aslam, M. A., Abdo, A.-B., Alhady, O. S., . . . Kone, S. D. (2024). Effecting the adoption of  blockchain 
technology enablers in supply chain sustainability with green hydrogen acceptance role as a mediator: Evidence from complex 

https://doi.org/10.1108/k-09-2023-1655
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107746
https://doi.org/10.3390/fintech3040027
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103424
https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.12578
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42521-023-00088-8
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-01-2022-0017
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-01-2022-0017
https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612288
https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075884
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2019.e00151
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-12-2023-0368
https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16090393
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-03-2024-0056
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05024-3
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2023.101284
https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15100321


Economy, 2025, 12(2): 100-107 

107 
© 2025 by the author; licensee Asian Online Journal Publishing Group 

 

 

decarbonization industries in the United Arab Emirates. International Journal of  Hydrogen Energy, 84, 1085-1100. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.08.243 

Nain, G., Pattanaik, K., & Sharma, G. (2022). Towards edge computing in intelligent manufacturing: Past, present and future. Journal of  
Manufacturing Systems, 62, 588-611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.01.010 

Najam, H., Abbas, J., Álvarez-Otero, S., Dogan, E., & Sial, M. S. (2022). Towards green recovery: Can banks achieve financial sustainability 
through income diversification in ASEAN countries? Economic Analysis and Policy, 76, 522-533. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2022.09.004 

Ozcan, R. (2021). Decentralized finance. In Financial Ecosystem and Strategy in the Digital Era: Global Approaches and New Opportunities (pp. 57-
75). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. 

Ramasamy, L. K., & Khan, F. (2024). Blockchain for global education. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. 
Rawhouser, H., Vismara, S., & Kshetri, N. (2024). Blockchain and vulnerable entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship & Regional 

Development, 36(1-2), 10-35.  
Remund, D. L. (2010). Financial literacy explicated: The case for a clearer definition in an increasingly complex economy. Journal of  

Consumer Affairs, 44(2), 276-295.  

Roszko-Wójtowicz, E., Deep Sharma, G., Dańska-Borsiak, B., & Grzelak, M. M. (2024). Innovation-driven e-commerce growth in the EU: An 
empirical study of  the propensity for online purchases and sustainable consumption. Sustainability, 16(4), 1563. 
https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041563 

Schueffel, P. (2025). What colors are the bricks? Unboxing the DeFi model-A literature survey, empirical study, and taxonomy of  
decentralized finance. Journal of  Banking and Financial Technology, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42786-024-00054-x 

Singh, P., Elmi, Z., Lau, Y.-Y., Borowska-Stefańska, M., Wiśniewski, S., & Dulebenets, M. A. (2022). Blockchain and AI technology 
convergence: Applications in transportation systems. Vehicular Communications, 38, 100521. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vehcom.2022.100521 

Stephan, T., Al-Turjman, F., Ravishankar, M., & Stephan, P. (2022). Machine learning analysis on the impacts of  COVID-19 on India’s 
renewable energy transitions and air quality. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(52), 79443-79465. 
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20997-2 

Wiklund, S. (2023). Evaluating physical climate risk for equity funds with quantitative modelling–how exposed are sustainable funds? Journal 
of  Sustainable Finance & Investment, 13(2), 893-918.  

Wronka, C. (2023). Financial crime in the decentralized finance ecosystem: new challenges for compliance. Journal of  Financial Crime, 30(1), 
97-113. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-09-2021-0218 

Xu, R., Zhu, J., Yang, L., Lu, Y., & Xu, L. D. (2024). Decentralized finance (DeFi): A paradigm shift in the Fintech. Enterprise Information 
Systems, 18(9), 2397630.  

Zumbansen, P. (2023). Runaway train? Decentralised finance and the myth of  the private platform economy. Transnational Legal Theory, 
14(4), 413-452. https://doi.org/10.1080/20414005.2023.2299156 

 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Asian Online Journal Publishing Group is not responsible or answerable for any loss, damage or liability, etc. caused in relation to/arising out of the use of the content. 
Any queries should be directed to the corresponding author of the article. 
 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.08.243
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.01.010
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2022.09.004
https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041563
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42786-024-00054-x
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vehcom.2022.100521
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20997-2
https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-09-2021-0218
https://doi.org/10.1080/20414005.2023.2299156

