Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology ISSN: 2576-8484 Vol. 8, No. 5, 271-277 2024 Publisher: Learning Gate DOI: 10.55214/25768484.v8i5.1685 ยฉ 2024 by the authors; licensee Learning Gate ยฉ 2024 by the authors; licensee Learning Gate * Correspondence: tomader.sayed2013m@csw.uobaghdad.edu.iq On some covering properties via a- open sets Tamadher Waleed Said Ghani1*, Jalal Hatem Hussein2 1,2Department of Mathematics, College of Science for Women, University of Baghdad, Baghdad-Iraq; tomader.sayed2013m@csw.uobaghdad.edu.iq (T.W.S.G.) Jalalintuch@yahoo.com (J.H.H.). Abstract: In this paper the notion of a-open set used as a tool to introduce certain types of covering properties which is similar to the familiar property of Hurewicz, and prove that we can use a-open sets instead of open sets in the definition of a-compact and a-Hurewicz space and investigated. Some properties and counter examples are given, also the relationship between these spaces was considered. Keywords: A-compact space, A-Hurewicz space, A-open set, Covering property. 1. Introduction The classical Hurewicz property has a long history from the paper [1]. A topological space ๐‘‹ has Hurewicz property if for each sequence (๐‘ˆ๐‘›)๐‘›โˆˆโ„• of open covers of ๐‘‹ there exists a sequence (๐‘‰๐‘›)๐‘›โˆˆโ„• where for each ๐‘› โˆˆ โ„• ๐‘˜, ๐‘‰๐‘› is a finite subset of ๐‘ˆ๐‘› such that for each ๐‘ฅ โˆˆ ๐‘‹, ๐‘ฅ โˆˆ โ‹ƒ ๐‘‰๐‘› for all but finitely many ๐‘›. Recently, several weak variants of Hurewicz property have been studied after applying the interior and the closure operators in the definition of a Hurewicz Property. Also, the other ways have been examined when the sequence of open covers are replaced with generalized open sets. For the study of the variants of Hurewicz spaces, the readers can see [2, 3, 4, 5]. Some types of sets play an important role in the study of various properties in topological spaces. Many authors introduced and studied various generalized properties and conditions containing some forms of sets in topological spaces. In this paper, we investigate some properties of ๐’ถ-open sets. Moreover, the relationships among open sets, ๐‘Ž-open sets and the related classes of sets are investigated. In this paper, spaces ๐‘‹ and ๐‘Œ mean topological spaces. For a subset ๐ด of a space ๐‘‹, ๐‘๐‘™(๐ด) and ๐‘–๐‘›๐‘ก(๐ด) represent the closure of ๐ด and the interior of ๐ด, respectively. In this paper, we examine the covering properties namely: ๐’ถ-Hurewicz, which is a like to the classical Hurewicz property by using ๐’ถ-open sets see [6, 7, 8, 9]. The following generalizations of open sets will be used for definitions of variations on the Hurewicz property: The paper is organized in such a way that after this introduction in section two we give information about terminology and notation. In section 3and 4 we show that we can replace open sets with ๐’ถ-open sets in the definition of ๐’ถ-Hurewicz spaces. Also, we investigate the behavior of ๐’ถ-Hurewicz properties with respect to subspaces, products and ๐’ถ-continuous image. 2. Background Material The interior and closure operators in topological spaces play a vital role in the generalization of open sets and closed sets. The relations on the interior and closure operators motivate the point set topologists to introduce several forms of ๐’ถ-open sets and ๐’ถ-closed sets. Some of them are given in the next definition. 272 Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology ISSN: 2576-8484 Vol. 8, No. 5: 271-277, 2024 DOI: 10.55214/25768484.v8i5.1685 ยฉ 2024 by the authors; licensee Learning Gate Definition 2.1: [6,7, 8] A subset ๐‘ˆ of a ๐‘‡. ๐‘  (๐‘‹ , ๐’ฏ) is called: i. regular open (๐‘Ÿ-open), if ๐ด = ๐‘–๐‘›๐‘ก(๐‘๐‘™(๐ด)). ii. ๐›ฟ-interior of a subset ๐ด of ๐‘‹ is the union of all ๐‘Ÿ-open set of ๐‘‹ contained in ๐ด and it is denoted by ๐›ฟ- ๐‘–๐‘›๐‘ก(๐ด). iii. ๐›ฟ-open if ๐ด = ๐›ฟ-๐‘–๐‘›๐‘ก(๐ด). iv. The ๐›ฟ-closure of a set ๐ด in ๐‘‹ denoted ๐›ฟ-๐‘๐‘™(๐ด) and defined by: { ๐‘ฅ โˆˆ ๐‘‹ โˆถ ๐ดโ‹‚๐‘–๐‘›๐‘ก(๐‘๐‘™(๐ต)) โ‰  โˆ… , ๐ต โˆˆ ๐’ฏ and ๐‘ฅ โˆˆ ๐ต}. iv. ๐’ถ-open, if ๐ด โІ ๐‘–๐‘›๐‘ก(๐‘๐‘™(๐›ฟ-๐‘–๐‘›๐‘ก(๐ด))). Example 2.2: i. In (โ„ , ๐’ฏ๐‘ˆ) a subset (0 , 1) is an ๐’ถ-open. ii. Let ๐‘‹ = {๐‘Ž, ๐‘, ๐‘} with ๐’ฏ = {โˆ…, ๐‘‹, {๐‘Ž}, {๐‘}, {๐‘Ž, ๐‘}}. A subset {๐‘} is not ๐’ถ-open. Theorem 2.3: [6] A subset ๐‘ˆ of a ๐‘‡. ๐‘  (๐‘‹ , ๐’ฏ) is an ๐’ถ-open, if and only if for each ๐‘ฅ โˆˆ ๐‘ˆ there exists ๐›ฟ- open set ๐‘ƒ of ๐‘‹ such that ๐‘ฅ โˆˆ ๐‘ƒ โІ ๐‘ˆ. Remark 2.4: [6] i. The family of all ๐’ถ-open sets of a ๐‘‡. ๐‘  (๐‘‹ , ๐’ฏ) forms a topology on ๐‘‹, denoted by ๐’ฏ๐’ถ. ii. For any subset of a ๐‘‡. ๐‘  (๐‘‹ , ๐’ฏ), we conclude the following diagram: Definition 2.5: For any subset ๐ด a ๐‘‡. ๐‘  (๐‘‹ , ๐’ฏ), the following symbols denote: i. ๐‘๐‘™๐’ถ(๐ด) is the intersection of all ๐’ถ-closed subsets of ๐‘‹ containing ๐ด. ii. ๐‘–๐‘›๐‘ก๐’ถ(๐ด) is the union of all ๐’ถ-open subsets of ๐‘‹ contained in ๐ด. iii. ๐ด is said to be ๐’ถ-dense, if ๐‘๐‘™๐’ถ(๐ด) = ๐‘‹ . Recall that A mapping ๐‘“: (๐‘‹, ๐’ฏ) โ†’ (๐‘Œ, ๐’ฏโ€ฒ) is said to be ๏ค -continuous, if ๐‘“โˆ’1(๐‘ˆ) is ๐›ฟ-open set of ๐‘‹ for every open set ๐‘ˆ of ๐‘Œ, [9]. Definition 1.6: Let (๐‘‹ , ๐’ฏ) and (๐‘Œ , ๐’ฏโ€ฒ) be two ๐‘‡. ๐‘  's. Then a mapping ๐‘“: (๐‘‹, ๐’ฏ) โ†’ (๐‘Œ, ๐’ฏโ€ฒ) is said to be: i. ๐’ถ-continuous, if ๐‘“โˆ’1(๐‘‰) is ๐’ถ-open set of ๐‘‹ for every open set ๐‘‰ of ๐‘Œ. ii. ๐’ถ-irresolute continuous, if ๐‘“โˆ’1(๐‘‰) is ๐’ถ-open set of ๐‘‹ for every ๐‘Ž-open set ๐‘‰ of ๐‘Œ. Example .2.7: Let ๐‘“ โˆถ (โ„• , ๐’ฏ๐‘–๐‘›๐‘‘) โŸถ (โ„•, ๐’ฏ๐‘๐‘œ๐‘“) be a mapping which is defined by ๐‘“(๐‘ฅ) = ๐‘ฅ for all ๐‘ฅ โˆˆ โ„•. Then ๐‘“ is ๐’ถ-continuous. 3. ๐“ช-Compact Space In this section, we introduce the concept of ๐’ถ-compact spaces along with some basic properties of it. Begin this section by giving some properties of ๐’ถ-irresolute continuous and ๐’ถ-continuous mappings. The prove of the following propositions is obvious and so omitted Definition 3.1: Let ๐‘“: (๐‘‹, ๐’ฏ) โ†’ (๐‘Œ, ๐’ฏโ€ฒ) be a mapping. Then ๐‘“ is said to be ๐’ถ-open (๐’ถ-closed, resp.) mapping, if ๐‘“(๐‘ˆ) is ๐’ถ-open (๐’ถ-closed) set of ๐‘Œ for every open (closed , resp.) set ๐‘ˆ of ๐‘‹. Proposition 3.2: Let ๐‘“: (๐‘‹, ๐’ฏ) โ†’ (๐‘Œ, ๐’ฏโ€ฒ) be a mapping. Then the following statements are equivalent: i. ๐‘“ is ๐’ถ-irresolute continuous. ii. ๐‘“โˆ’1(๐น) is ๐’ถ-closed set of ๐‘‹ for every ๐’ถ-closed set ๐น of ๐‘Œ. iii. ๐‘๐‘™๐’ถ(๐‘“โˆ’1(๐ต)) โІ ๐‘“โˆ’1(๐‘๐‘™๐’ถ(๐ต)) for all ๐ต โІ ๐‘Œ. iv. ๐‘“(๐‘๐‘™๐’ถ(๐ด)) โІ ๐‘๐‘™๐’ถ(๐‘“(๐ด)) for all ๐ด โІ ๐‘‹. ๐‘Ÿ-open โŸน ๐›ฟ-open โŸน ๐’ถ-open โŸน open 273 Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology ISSN: 2576-8484 Vol. 8, No. 5: 271-277, 2024 DOI: 10.55214/25768484.v8i5.1685 ยฉ 2024 by the authors; licensee Learning Gate v. ๐‘“โˆ’1(๐‘–๐‘›๐‘ก๐’ถ(๐ต)) โІ ๐‘–๐‘›๐‘ก๐’ถ(๐‘“โˆ’1(๐ต)) for every ๐ต โІ ๐‘Œ. Proposition 3.3: i. Every continuous mapping is ๐’ถ-continuous . ii. Composition of two ๐’ถ-irresolute continuous mappings is ๐’ถ-irresolute continuous. iii. Composition of ๐’ถ-irresolute continuous and ๐’ถ-continuous mappings is ๐’ถ-continuous. Definition 3.4: A space ๐‘‹ is said to be ๐’ถ-compact(resp. ๐’ถ- Lindelof ), if every ๐’ถ-open cover of ๐‘‹ by ๐’ถ- open subset of ๐‘‹ has a finite (resp. countable) subcover. Proposition 3.5 : The intersection of ๐›ฟ - open and an ๐’ถ- open sets is an ๐’ถ-open . Proof: Let A is ๐›ฟ-open and B is an ๐’ถ - open sets in ๐’ฏ๐‘ฅ. To show that A โ‹‚ B is an ๐’ถ-open in ๐’ฏ๐‘ฆ. A โ‹‚ B โІ ๐›ฟ- ๐‘–๐‘›๐‘ก (A) โ‹‚ ๐‘–๐‘›๐‘ก (๐‘๐‘™ (๐›ฟ- ๐‘–๐‘›๐‘ก (B))). โІ ๐‘–๐‘›๐‘ก๐ด(๐›ฟ- ๐‘–๐‘›๐‘ก(A) โ‹‚ ๐‘–๐‘›๐‘ก (๐‘๐‘™ (๐›ฟ- ๐‘–๐‘›๐‘ก (B))) . โІ ๐‘–๐‘›๐‘ก๐ด( ๐‘๐‘™ ( ๐›ฟ- ๐‘–๐‘›๐‘ก(A) โ‹‚ ๐‘–๐‘›๐‘ก (๐‘๐‘™ (๐›ฟ- ๐‘–๐‘›๐‘ก (B))). โІ ๐‘–๐‘›๐‘ก๐ด(๐‘๐‘™(๐›ฟ- ๐‘–๐‘›๐‘ก (A โ‹‚ B ))) . โІ ๐‘–๐‘›๐‘ก๐ด(๐‘๐‘™(๐›ฟ- ๐‘–๐‘›๐‘ก๐ด(A โ‹‚ B ))) . Since ๐‘–๐‘›๐‘ก๐ด(๐‘๐‘™(๐›ฟ- ๐‘–๐‘›๐‘ก๐ด(A โ‹‚ B))) is ๐’ถ-open set in ๐’ฏ๐‘ฆ,so ๐‘–๐‘›๐‘ก๐ด(๐‘๐‘™(๐›ฟ- ๐‘–๐‘›๐‘ก๐ด(A โ‹‚ B))) = ๐‘–๐‘›๐‘ก๐ด(๐‘๐‘™(๐›ฟ- ๐‘–๐‘›๐‘ก๐ด(A โ‹‚ B) โ‹‚ B ))). Thus A โ‹‚ B โІ ๐‘–๐‘›๐‘ก๐ด(๐‘๐‘™๐ด (๐›ฟ- ๐‘–๐‘›๐‘ก๐ด(A โ‹‚ B ))) . Theorem 3.6: A ๐›ฟ -open subset ๐‘Œ of a space X is ๐’ถ-compact if and only if every ๐’ถ-open cover of ๐‘Œ by the ๐’ถ-open subset of ๐‘‹ has a finite subcover. Proof: Let ๐‘Œ be ๐’ถ-compact subset of ๐‘‹. Let {๐บ๐œ† โˆถ ๐œ† โˆˆ ๐›ฌ} be ๐’ถ-open cover of ๐‘Œ, where each ๐บ๐œ† is ๐’ถ- open set in ๐‘‹ for all ๐œ† โˆˆ ๐›ฌ. Then, ๐‘Œ โІ โ‹ƒ ๐บ๐œ†๐œ†โˆˆ๐›ฌ that is ๐‘Œ โІ โ‹ƒ ๐บ๐›พ๐œ†โˆˆ๐›ฌ โ‹‚๐‘Œ , where each ๐บ๐œ†โ‹‚๐‘Œ is ๐’ถ-open in TY by the Theorem (3.5). Therefore, by ๐’ถ-compactness of ๐‘Œ, there is a finite subcollection ๐›ฌ0 of ๐›ฌ with ๐‘Œ โІ โ‹ƒ ๐บ๐œ†๐œ†โˆˆ๐›ฌ0 โ‹‚๐‘Œ , so ๐‘Œ โІ โ‹ƒ ๐บ๐œ†๐œ†โˆˆ๐›ฌ0 . Thus, if ๐‘Œ is ๐’ถ-compact then every ๐’ถ-open cover of ๐‘Œ by the ๐’ถ- open set of ๐‘‹ has a finite subcover. Conversely, let {๐‘Œ๐œ†: ๐œ† โˆˆ ๐›ฌ} an ๐’ถ-open cover of ๐‘Œ by the ๐’ถ-open sets of ๐‘Œ.Thus, ๐‘Œ โІ โ‹ƒ ๐‘Œ๐œ†๐œ†โˆˆ๐›ฌ . Since ๐‘Œ is open, ๐‘Œ๐œ† is ๐’ถ-open set in ๐‘‹ for all ๐œ† โˆˆ ๐›ฌ. So, {๐‘Œ๐œ† โˆถ ๐œ† โˆˆ ๐›ฌ} is ๐’ถ-open cover of ๐‘Œ by the ๐’ถ-open sets of ๐‘‹. Then by the given condition, there is a finite subcover ๐›ฌ0 of ๐›ฌ such that ๐‘Œ โІ โ‹ƒ ๐บ๐œ†๐œ†โˆˆ๐›ฌ . So by the definition of ๐’ถ-compact space, ๐‘Œ is ๐’ถ-compact. Hence, this completes the proof. Theorem .3.7: An ๐’ถ-closed subset of an ๐’ถ-compact space is ๐’ถ-compact. Proof: Let (๐‘‹ , ๐’ฏ) be a ๐’ถ-compact topological space and let ๐‘Œ be an ๐’ถ-closed subset of ๐‘‹. Now we have to show that, ๐‘Œ is ๐’ถ-compact. Let {๐บ๐œ† โˆถ ๐œ† โˆˆ ๐›ฌ} be an ๐’ถ-open cover of ๐‘Œ , where each ๐บ๐œ† is ๐’ถ-open set in (๐‘‹ , ๐’ฏ) for all ๐œ† โˆˆ ๐›ฌ. Then ๐‘Œ โІ โ‹ƒ ๐บ๐œ†๐œ†โˆˆ๐›ฌ . So, ๐‘‹ โІ (๐‘‹ \ ๐‘Œ )โ‹ƒ(โ‹ƒ ๐บ๐œ†๐œ†โˆˆ๐›ฌ ). Since ๐‘‹ is ๐’ถ-compact, there exists a finite collection ๐›ฌ0 of ๐›ฌ such that ๐‘‹ โІ (๐‘‹ \ ๐‘Œ )โ‹ƒ(โ‹ƒ ๐บ๐œ†๐œ†โˆˆ๐›ฌ0 ) and so ๐‘Œ โІ โ‹ƒ ๐บ๐œ†๐œ†โˆˆ๐›ฌ0 . Hence every ๐’ถ-open cover {๐บ๐œ† โˆถ ๐œ† โˆˆ ๐›ฌ} of ๐‘Œ has a finite subcover. Then ๐‘Œ is an ๐’ถ-compact. Hence, the theorem is done. Theorem 3.8: Let ๐‘“ be ๐‘Ž-continuous mapping from (๐‘‹, ๐’ฏ) to (๐‘Œ, ๐’ฏโ€ฒ) and ๐‘‰ be a ๐‘Ž-open set in ๐‘Œ. Then ๐‘“โˆ’1(๐‘‰ ) is an ๐’ถ-open in ๐‘‹. Proof: Let ๐‘“: (๐‘‹, ๐’ฏ) โ†’ (๐‘Œ, ๐’ฏโ€ฒ) be ๐‘Ž-continuous mapping. We show that, ๐‘“โˆ’1(๐‘‰ ) is ๐’ถ-open in ๐‘‹. Since ๐‘‰ be a ๐›ฟ-open set in ๐‘Œ, then from ๐›ฟ-continuity of ๐‘“, we must have ๐‘“โˆ’1(๐‘‰ ) is an open set of ๐‘‹. That is, for every ๐‘ฅ โˆˆ ๐‘“โˆ’1(๐‘‰ ), there exists a a-open set ๐‘Š in ๐‘‹ with ๐‘ฅ โˆˆ ๐‘Š โІ ๐‘“โˆ’1(๐‘‰ ).Let ๐‘ฅ โˆˆ ๐‘“โˆ’1(๐‘‰ ). Then ๐‘“(๐‘ฅ) โˆˆ ๐‘‰ , since ๐‘‰ is a-open, there exists a a-open set ๐‘ˆ in Y such that ๐‘“(๐‘ฅ) โˆˆ ๐‘ˆ โІ ๐‘‰ . So, ๐‘ฅ โˆˆ ๐‘“โˆ’1(๐‘ˆ) โІ ๐‘“โˆ’1(๐‘‰ ). Now since ๐‘ˆ is ๐‘Ž-open in ๐‘Œ and ๐‘“ is ๐‘Ž-open, ๐‘Ž-continuous mapping, Then, ๐‘“โˆ’1(๐‘ˆ) is ๐‘Ž-open set in ๐‘‹. Hence ๐‘“โˆ’1(๐‘‰) is ๐‘Ž-open in ๐‘‹, therefore ๐‘“โˆ’1(๐‘‰ ) is an ๐’ถ-open in ๐‘‹. Theorem 3.9: Let ๐‘“: (๐‘‹, ๐’ฏ) โ†’ (๐‘Œ, ๐’ฏโ€ฒ) be an ๐’ถ-open, ๐’ถ-continuous mapping, ๐‘‹ is an ๐’ถ-compact. Then ๐‘“(๐‘‹) is an ๐’ถ-compact subset ๐‘Œ. 274 Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology ISSN: 2576-8484 Vol. 8, No. 5: 271-277, 2024 DOI: 10.55214/25768484.v8i5.1685 ยฉ 2024 by the authors; licensee Learning Gate Proof: Let {๐‘‰๐œ† โˆถ ๐œ† โˆˆ ๐›ฌ} be an ๐’ถ-open cover of ๐‘“(๐‘‹) in ๐‘Œ, so ๐‘“(๐‘‹) โІ โ‹ƒ ๐‘‰๐œ†๐œ†โˆˆ๐›ฌ and hence equality is hold, ๐‘‹ โІ ๐‘“โˆ’1(โ‹ƒ ๐‘‰๐œ†๐œ†โˆˆ๐›ฌ ) = โ‹ƒ ๐‘‰๐œ†๐œ†โˆˆ๐›ฌ ๐‘“โˆ’1(๐‘‰๐œ†). Since ๐‘“ is ๐’ถ-open and ๐’ถ-continuous by the previous Theorem (3.8), each ๐‘“โˆ’1(๐‘‰๐œ†) is ๐’ถ-open in ๐‘‹. Thus {๐‘“โˆ’1(๐‘‰๐œ†) โˆถ ๐œ† โˆˆ ๐›ฌ} is a ๐’ถ-open cover of ๐‘‹. Consequently, and from ๐’ถ-compactness of ๐‘‹, there exists {๐‘“โˆ’1(๐‘‰๐œ†๐‘– ) ๐‘– = 1, 2 , โ€ฆ , ๐‘š } of {๐‘“โˆ’1(๐‘‰๐œ†) โˆถ ๐œ† โˆˆ ๐›ฌ which also covers ๐‘‹. Thus ๐‘‹ โІ โ‹ƒ ๐‘“โˆ’1(๐‘‰๐œ†๐‘– )๐‘š ๐‘–=1 . So, ๐‘“(๐‘‹) โІ โ‹ƒ ๐‘‰๐œ†๐‘– ๐‘š ๐‘–=1 . Therefore, {๐‘‰๐œ†๐‘– โˆถ ๐‘– = 1, 2, . . . , ๐‘š} is a finite subcollection of {๐‘‰๐œ† โˆถ ๐œ† โˆˆ ๐›ฌ} which covers ๐‘“(๐‘‹). so, ๐‘“(๐‘‹) is ๐’ถ-compact in (๐‘Œ, ๐’ฏโ€ฒ). Definition 3.10: Let (๐‘‹, ๐’ฏ) be a T. ๐‘  and ๐’œ be a family of subsets of ๐’ฏ๐’ถ. Then ๐’ถ-star of ๐ท โІ ๐‘‹ with respect to ๐’œ is the set: ๐‘†๐‘ก๐’ถ(๐’œ ุŒ ๐ท) = โ‹ƒ{๐‘„ โˆˆ ๐’œ โˆถ ๐‘„โ‹‚๐ท โ‰  โˆ…}. Remark 3.11: A ๐’ถ-star of a singleton set {๐‘ฅ}, ๐‘ฅ โˆˆ ๐‘‹ with respect to ๐’œ is said to be a ๐’ถ-star of a point and defined as: ๐‘†๐‘ก๐’ถ(๐’œ , {๐‘ฅ}) = โ‹ƒ{๐‘„ โˆˆ ๐’œ โˆถ ๐‘„โ‹‚{๐‘ฅ} โ‰  โˆ…}. Example 3.12: For any non-empty set ๐‘‹. Then: i. In (๐‘‹, ๐’ฏ๐‘‘๐‘–๐‘ ), it follows that ๐’ฏ๐’ถ = ๐’ฏ๐‘‘๐‘–๐‘  and ๐‘†๐‘ก๐’ถ(๐’œ ุŒ {๐‘ฅ}) = ๐‘‹ for any ๐‘ฅ โˆˆ ๐‘‹. ii. In (๐‘‹, ๐’ฏ๐‘–๐‘›๐‘‘), it follows that ๐’ฏ๐’ถ = ๐’ฏ๐‘‘๐‘–๐‘  and ๐‘†๐‘ก๐’ถ(๐’œ ุŒ ๐‘‹) = ๐‘‹. Theorem 3.13: Let (๐‘‹, ๐’ฏ) be a T. ๐‘  and ๐‘ˆ be an ๐’ถ-open of ๐‘‹. For every ๐’ถ-dense subspace ๐‘Œ โІ ๐‘‹ there exists a subset ๐ท โІ ๐‘Œ such that ๐‘†๐‘ก๐’ถ( ๐ท, ๐‘ˆ) = ๐‘‹. Proof: From ๐’ถ-density of ๐‘Œ, we have ๐‘†๐‘ก๐’ถ( ๐ท, ๐‘ˆ) = โ‹ƒ{๐’ช โІ ๐‘Œ โˆถ ๐ทโ‹‚๐’ช โ‰  โˆ…}. That is, for any ๐‘ˆ an ๐’ถ-open of ๐‘‹, we have ๐‘†๐‘ก๐’ถ( ๐ท, ๐‘ˆ) = ๐‘‹. Remark 3.14: For every T. ๐‘  (๐‘‹, ๐’ฏ) and ๐ท is a ๐’ถ-open cover of ๐‘‹. It follows that ๐‘†๐‘ก๐’ถ( ๐ท, ๐‘ˆ) is an ๐’ถ- open set of ๐‘‹. Definition 3.15: A T. ๐‘  (๐‘‹, ๐’ฏ) is said to be : โฆ ๐’ถ-star- compact , if for every ๐’ถ-open covering ๐’ฐ of ๐‘‹, there exists a finite subset ๐น of ๐’ฐ such that ๐‘†๐‘ก๐’ถ(โ‹ƒ ๐น , ๐’ฐ ) = ๐‘‹. โฆ strong ๐’ถ-star- compact , if for every ๐’ถ-open covering ๐’ฐ of ๐‘‹ , there exists a finite subset ๐น of ๐‘‹ such that ๐‘†๐‘ก๐’ถ( ๐น, ๐’ฐ) = ๐‘‹. โฆ ๐’ถ - star- Lindelof , if for ๐’ถ โ€“open cover ๐’ฐ of ๐‘‹ ,there exists countable subset ๐น of ๐’ฐ such that ๐‘†๐‘ก๐’ถ(โ‹ƒ ๐น , ๐’ฐ ) = ๐‘‹. โฆ strong ๐’ถ - star- Lindelof , if for ๐’ถ โ€“open cover ๐’ฐ of ๐‘‹ ,there exists countable subset ๐น of ๐’ฐ Such that ๐‘†๐‘ก๐’ถ( ๐น , ๐’ฐ ) = ๐‘‹. Theorem 3.16: Let (๐‘‹, ๐’ฏ) be a ๐’ถ-compact space and ๐’ช any ๐’ถ-open covering of ๐‘‹. Then there exists a finite subset ๐น of ๐‘‹ such that ๐‘†๐‘ก๐’ถ( ๐น, ๐’ฐ) = ๐‘‹ and hence (๐‘‹, ๐’ฏ) is ๐’ถ-star compact. Proof: Suppose that for each finite set ๐น of ๐‘‹ such that ๐‘†๐‘ก๐’ถ( ๐น, ๐’ฐ) is a proper subset of ๐‘‹, such that ๐น = {๐‘ฅ1, ๐‘ฅ2, , โ€ฆ . , ๐‘ฅ๐‘›}. Suppose that a set ๐ต = {๐‘ฅ1, ๐‘ฅ2, , โ€ฆ . , ๐‘ฅ๐‘›, โ€ฆ } โІ ๐‘‹ and for each ๐‘› โ‰ฅ 1, it follows that ๐‘ฅ๐‘›+1 โˆ‰ ๐‘†๐‘ก๐’ถ( ๐น, ๐’ฐ). Let ๐‘ฆ โˆˆ ๐‘๐‘™๐’ถ(๐ต). Then ๐ตโ‹‚๐‘ˆ โ‰  โˆ… for some ๐‘ˆ โˆˆ ๐’ฐ, where ๐‘ฆ โˆˆ ๐‘ˆ. Let ๐œ‚ be with ๐‘ฅ๐‘› โˆˆ ๐‘ˆ such that ๐‘ฆ โˆˆ ๐‘†๐‘ก๐’ถ({๐‘ฅ1, ๐‘ฅ2, , โ€ฆ . , ๐‘ฅ๐œ‚}, ๐’ฐ). Then {๐‘†๐‘ก๐’ถ( {๐‘ฅ1, ๐‘ฅ2, , โ€ฆ . , ๐‘ฅ๐‘›}, ๐’ฐ) โˆถ ๐‘› โ‰ฅ 1} is a ๐’ถ-open cover of ๐‘๐‘™๐’ถ(๐ต). Consequently, ๐‘๐‘™๐’ถ(๐ต) is a ๐’ถ-compact set. But, by construction of a set ๐ต, and so {๐‘†๐‘ก๐’ถ( {๐‘ฅ1, ๐‘ฅ2, , โ€ฆ . , ๐‘ฅ๐‘›}, ๐’ฐ) โˆถ ๐‘› โ‰ฅ 1} has no finite ๐’ถ-cover. This contradiction establishes the theorem. Theorem 3.17: Every ๐’ถ-compact topological space is strong ๐’ถ-star- compact space . Proof: Let ๐’ฒ be ๐’ถ-open cover of ๐’ถ- compact space ๐‘‹ . Then there exists a finite subset ๐’ฒโ€ฒ = {๐˜ž1, ๐˜ž2, , โ€ฆ . , ๐˜ž๐‘›, โ€ฆ } โІ ๐’ฒ such that โ‹ƒ ๐’ฒโ€ฒ= โ‹ƒ ๐˜ž๐‘– ๐‘˜ ๐‘–=1 = ๐‘‹ . Now take ๐‘ฅ๐‘– โˆˆ ๐˜ž๐‘– for each i=1,2,โ€ฆ,k and from a finite set ๐น={๐‘ฅ1, ๐‘ฅ2, , โ€ฆ . , ๐‘ฅ๐‘˜}, then ๐‘‹ = ๐‘†๐‘ก๐’ถ( ๐น , ๐’ฒ ) โІ ๐‘†๐‘ก๐’ถ( ๐น , ๐’ฒโ€ฒ ) = ๐‘‹ , There for ๐‘‹ is a strong ๐’ถ-star- compact space . Example 3.18: Converse of the above theorem may not be true . 275 Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology ISSN: 2576-8484 Vol. 8, No. 5: 271-277, 2024 DOI: 10.55214/25768484.v8i5.1685 ยฉ 2024 by the authors; licensee Learning Gate Consider ๐‘‹ the set of natural numbers and the topology ๐œ ={1,2,3,โ€ฆ, ๐‘› } :โˆˆ ๐‘› โˆˆ โ„•} โ‹ƒ{๐‘ฅ, โˆ…} on ๐‘‹ ,Then for a finite subset F = {1} โІ ๐‘‹ and ๐’ฒ be an arbitrary ๐’ถ- open cover of ๐‘‹,We have ๐‘†๐‘ก๐’ถ( ๐น , ๐’ฒ ) = โ‹ƒ ๐’ฒ = ๐‘‹ .Hence ๐‘‹ is strong ๐’ถ-star- compact space. On the other hand , let ๐’ฒ ={ ๐’ฒ๐‘› ={1,2,3,โ€ฆ, ๐‘› } :๐‘› โˆˆ โ„•} is an ๐’ถ โ€“ open cover of ๐‘‹. Suppose ๐’ฒโ€ฒ is a finite subcover of it . By the construction of ๐‘‹, we can find a largest set ๐’ฒ๐œ† โˆˆ ๐’ฒโ€ฒ,where ๐œ† โˆˆ โ„•,so โ‹ƒ ๐’ฒ=๐’ฒ๐œ†={1,2,3,โ€ฆ, ๐œ† }. Then{ ๐œ† +1, ๐œ† + 2, ๐œ†+3,โ€ฆ}remains without cover .Thus, there is no finite subcover for ๐’ฒ ,so ๐‘‹ is not ๐’ถ- compact space. 4. ๐“ช-Hurewicz Spaces Definition 4.1: Let (๐‘‹, ๐’ฏ) be a T. s. and ๐ด โІ ๐‘‹. Then ๐ด is said to have the ๐’ถ-Hurewicz property, if for any sequence (๐‘ˆ๐‘› )๐‘›โˆˆโ„• of ๐’ถ-open covers of ๐ด, there is a sequence (๐‘‰๐‘›)๐‘›โˆˆโ„• for any ๐‘› โˆˆ โ„•, ๐‘‰๐‘› is a finite subset of ๐‘ˆ๐‘› and for each ๐‘ฅ โˆˆ ๐ด for all but finitely many ๐‘›, with ๐‘ฅ โˆˆ โ‹ƒ ๐‘‰๐‘›. We say that ๐‘‹ is ๐’ถ- Hurewicz space, if the set ๐‘‹ is ๐’ถ-Hurewicz. Example 4.2: Every ๐’ถ-compact space is ๐’ถ- Hurewicz space. The convers is not true . Let X = R with the topology ๐’ฏ= { ๐‘ˆ โІ ๐‘‹ : ๐‘ˆ = โˆ… or ๐‘‹\๐‘ˆ is countable } is a ๐‘‡1 ๐’ถ-Hurewicz space which is not ๐’ถ- compact. In the following theorem ,we put a condition to show that a subspace of the ๐’ถ- Hurewicz space is also satisfied . Theorem 4.3: Let ๐‘‹ be the ๐’ถ-Hurewicz space and ๐‘Œ is ๐’ถ-clopen subspace of ๐‘‹ ,then ๐‘Œ is the ๐’ถ- Hurewicz space . Proof : suppose that ๐‘Œ is ๐’ถ-clopen subspace of the ๐’ถ- Hurewicz space and let (๐’ฐ๐‘›)๐‘›โˆˆโ„• be a sequence of ๐’ถ-open covers of ๐‘Œ. It easy to see that every ๐’ถ-open subset of ๐‘Ž โˆ’ ๐‘๐‘™๐‘œ๐‘๐‘’๐‘› ๐‘Œ is the intersection of ๐’ถ-open subset of ๐‘‹ with ๐‘Œ. Then, for each n โˆˆ ๐‘ and each ๐’ฐ โˆˆ ๐’ฐ๐‘› there exists an ๐’ถ-open set ๐’ข๐‘ข in ๐‘‹ such that ๐’ฐ = ๐‘Œ โ‹‚ ๐’ข๐‘ข . Let ๐”ˆ๐‘› = { ๐’ข๐‘ข: ๐’ฐ โˆˆ ๐’ฐ๐‘› }โ‹ƒ { ๐‘‹ \ ๐‘Œ} , ๐‘› โˆˆ ๐‘. Then( ๐”ˆ๐‘› ) ๐‘›โˆˆ๐‘ is a sequence of ๐’ถ-open covers of ๐‘‹ . The ๐’ถ- Hurewiczness property of ๐‘‹ , implies The existence of a sequence ( ๐’ฒ๐‘› ) ๐‘›โˆˆ๐‘ with ๐’ฒ๐‘› is a finite subset of ๐”ˆ๐‘› for each ๐‘› โˆˆ ๐‘ and ๐‘‹=โ‹ƒ๐‘›โˆˆ๐‘ โ‹ƒ๐’ฒ๐‘› . If we put for each n ,๐’ฑ๐‘›= { ๐’ฐ โˆถ ๐’ข๐‘ข โˆˆ ๐’ฒ๐‘›} , we obtain the sequence ( ๐’ฑ๐‘› ) ๐‘›โˆˆ๐‘ is a finite subset of ๐’ฐ๐‘›and each ๐‘ฅ โˆˆ ๐‘Œ for all but finitely many ๐‘› , with ๐‘ฅ โˆˆ โ‹ƒ๐’ฑ๐‘› ,That is ๐‘Œ an ๐’ถ- Hurewicz space. The a-Hurewiczness is an a-topological property, as evidenced by the following theorem. Theorem 4.4 : An ๐’ถ- irresolute image of an ๐’ถ-Hurewicz space is a Hurewicz space . Proof : Let ๐‘‹ be an ๐’ถ-Hurewicz space and ๐‘Œ = f (๐‘‹) its image under ๐’ถ- continuous mapping ๐‘“ โˆถ ๐‘‹ โŸถ ๐‘Œ. Let ( ๐’ฑ๐‘› ) ๐‘›โˆˆ๐‘ be a sequence of ๐’ถ- open covers of ๐‘Œ and ๐‘ฅ โˆˆ ๐‘‹ . Since ๐‘“ is ๐’ถ- irresolute, Setting ๐’ฐ๐‘› =๐‘“โˆ’1( ๐’ฑ๐‘› ) , ๐‘› โˆˆ ๐‘ ,we get the sequence ( ๐’ฐ๐‘› ) ๐‘›โˆˆ๐‘ of ๐’ถ- open covers of ๐‘‹ .Use the fact ๐‘‹ is ๐’ถ- open covers and for each ๐‘› , find a finite subset โ„‹๐‘› of ๐’ฐ๐‘› with for each ๐‘ฅ โˆˆ ๐‘‹. For all but finitely many ๐‘› โˆˆ ๐‘, such that ๐‘‹=โ‹ƒ๐‘›โˆˆ๐‘ โ‹ƒโ„‹๐‘›.Let ๐’ฒ๐‘› = ๐‘“(โ„‹๐‘›), ๐‘› โˆˆ ๐‘. Then the sequence ( ๐’ฒ๐‘› ) ๐‘›โˆˆ๐‘ verifies for ( ๐’ฑ๐‘› ) ๐‘›โˆˆ๐‘ that ๐‘Œ is ๐’ถ-Hurewicz space. A-topological property is a property maintained by a-homeomorphisms. Theorem 4.5 : If ๐‘‹ is an ๐’ถ- Hurewicz space and Y ๐’ถ- compact space , then ๐‘‹ ร— ๐‘Œ is ๐’ถ-Hurewicz space . Proof : Let ๐‘‹ = โ‹ƒ{๐‘‹๐‘˜: ๐‘˜ โˆˆ ๐‘},where each ๐‘‹๐‘˜ is ๐’ถ- Hurewicz . Let { ๐’ฐ๐‘›: ๐‘› โˆˆ ๐‘} be a sequence of ๐’ถ - open covers of ๐‘‹. For each ๐‘˜ โˆˆ ๐‘, take the sequence {๐’ฐ๐‘› โˆถ ๐‘› โ‰ฅ ๐‘˜} .For each ๐‘˜ โˆˆ ๐‘, since ๐‘‹๐‘˜ is ๐’ถ- Hurewicz ,there are a dense subset S๐‘˜ of ๐‘‹๐‘˜ and a sequence(๐’ฑ๐‘›,๐‘˜ : ๐‘› โ‰ฅ ๐‘˜) such that for each ๐‘› โ‰ฅ ๐‘˜, (๐’ฑ๐‘›,๐‘˜ is a finite subset of ๐’ฐ๐‘›and for each ๐‘ฅ โˆˆ S๐‘˜, ๐‘ฅ โˆˆ โ‹ƒ๐’ฑ๐‘›,๐‘˜ for all but finitely many ๐‘› โ‰ฅ ๐‘˜. Let S = 276 Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology ISSN: 2576-8484 Vol. 8, No. 5: 271-277, 2024 DOI: 10.55214/25768484.v8i5.1685 ยฉ 2024 by the authors; licensee Learning Gate โ‹ƒ๐‘˜โˆˆ๐‘S๐‘˜.Then S is a dense subset of ๐‘‹ . For each ๐‘› โˆˆ ๐‘, let โ‹ƒ{(๐’ฑ๐‘›,๐‘— : ๐‘— โ‰ค ๐‘›}.Then each ๐’ฑ๐‘› is finite subset of ๐’ฐ๐‘›.The dense subset S of ๐‘‹ and the sequence (๐’ฑ๐‘›: ๐‘› โˆˆ ๐‘) witness that ๐‘‹ is an ๐’ถ- Hurewicz space ;If for each ๐‘ฅ โˆˆ S, there exists some ๐‘˜ โˆˆ ๐‘ such that ๐‘ฅ โˆˆ S๐‘˜,then ๐‘ฅ โˆˆ โ‹ƒ๐’ฑ๐‘› for all but finitely many ๐‘› โ‰ฅ ๐‘˜. Remark 4.6 : The product of ๐‘Ž- Hurewicz space and ๐‘Ž- compact is ๐‘Ž- Hurewicz space, as demonstrated by the previous theorem. Proposition 4.7: ๐’ถ-int (A) โІ int (A). Proof: Let x โˆˆ ๐’ถ-int (A) , there is ๐’ถ - open set B such that x โˆˆ B โІ A. So, there is open set B such that x โˆˆ B โІ A . Then x โІ int (A) .Hence, (A) โІ int (A). Proposition 4.8: Every ๐’ถ-open set is open. Proof: Let A is ๐’ถ-open set . Suppose x โˆˆ A . Then, there exists ๐›ฟ โ€“ open set B such that x โˆˆ B โІ A. Since B is open. Then, for every x โˆˆ A there exists an open set B such that x โˆˆ B โІ A. Hence A is open set. Proposition 4.9: If A = ๐’ถ-int (A) then A is an ๐’ถ-open set. Proof: ๐’ถ-int (A) = { โˆช B:B โІ A, B is an ๐’ถ-open set}. Let A = ๐’ถ-int (A) to show A is ๐’ถ-open set. It is clearly that ๐’ถ-int (A) โІ A. Conversely, suppose A โІ int (cl(๐›ฟ-int(A))) such that B= cl(๐›ฟ-int(A)). Then A โІ int (B). Then, ๐’ถ-int (A) โІ int (B). So, A โІ int (cl(๐›ฟ-int(A))) . Hence A is ๐’ถ โ€“ open set. A mapping ๐‘“ โˆถ ๐‘‹ โŸถ ๐‘Œ is called contra ๐’ถ- continuous if the preimage of each ๐’ถ-open set in ๐‘Œ is ๐’ถ- closed in ๐‘‹ .A mapping ๐‘“ is called pre- ๐’ถ- continuous if ๐‘“โˆ’1(๐‘ˆ)โŠ‚ ๐’ถ- Int (๐’ถ-cl(๐‘“โˆ’1(๐‘ˆ)) whenever ๐‘ˆ is ๐’ถ-open in ๐‘Œ. Theorem .4.10 : A contra - ๐’ถ- continuous , pre- ๐’ถ- continuous image of ๐‘Œ of an ๐’ถ- Hurewicz space ๐‘‹ is an ๐’ถ- Hurewicz space. Proof: Let ( ๐‘ˆ๐‘›: ๐‘› โˆˆ ๐‘) be a sequence of ๐’ถ-open covers of ๐‘Œ. Since f is contra - ๐’ถ- continuous ,for each ๐‘› โˆˆ ๐‘ and for each ๐‘ˆ โˆˆ ๐‘ˆ๐‘› the set ๐‘“โˆ’1(๐‘ˆ) is ๐’ถ-closed in ๐‘‹ . Since ๐‘“ is pre- ๐’ถ- continuous ๐‘“โˆ’1(๐‘ˆ)โŠ‚ ๐’ถ- Int (๐’ถ-cl(๐‘“โˆ’1(๐‘ˆ)),so that ๐‘“โˆ’1(๐‘ˆ)โŠ‚ ๐’ถ- Int(๐‘“โˆ’1(๐‘ˆ)) .On the other hand, ๐’ถ- Int(๐‘“โˆ’1(๐‘ˆ)) โŠ‚๐‘“โˆ’1(๐‘ˆ),hence๐‘“โˆ’1(๐‘ˆ)= ๐’ถ - Int (๐’ถ-cl(๐‘“โˆ’1(๐‘ˆ)). Therefore, for each ๐‘› , the set ๐‘‰๐‘›={๐‘“โˆ’1(๐‘ˆ): ๐‘ˆ โˆˆ ๐‘ˆ๐‘›} is a cover of ๐‘‹ by ๐’ถ-open sets. Since ๐‘‹ is ๐’ถ- Hurewicz space there is a sequence( ๐‘”๐‘›: ๐‘› โˆˆ ๐‘) such that for each ๐‘›, ๐‘”๐‘› is finite subset of ๐‘‰๐‘› and each ๐‘ฅ โˆˆ ๐‘‹ belongs to โ‹ƒ{ ๐’ถ-cl(G): G โˆˆ ๐‘”๐‘›}.Hence ๐’ฒ๐‘›= { ๐‘“(G): G โˆˆ ๐‘”๐‘› } is a finite subset of ๐‘ˆ๐‘› for each ๐‘› โˆˆ ๐‘ and each ๐‘ง โˆˆ ๐‘Œ belongs to ๐’ถ-cl(โ‹ƒ๐’ฒ๐‘› ) for all but finitely many ๐‘› . This just means that ๐‘Œ is an ๐’ถ- Hurewicz space . Definition 4.11: A topological space ๐‘‹ is: โฆ star ๐’ถ- Hurewicz space if it satisfies: For each sequence of elements of ๐’ถ-open cover (๐‘ˆ๐‘›: ๐‘› โˆˆ ๐‘) there is sequence (๐‘‰๐‘›: ๐‘› โˆˆ ๐‘) such that for each ๐‘› โˆˆ ๐‘ , ๐‘‰๐‘› is finite subset of ๐‘ˆ๐‘› ,and each ๐‘ฅ โˆˆ ๐‘‹ belong to ๐‘†๐‘ก๐’ถ(โ‹ƒ ๐‘‰๐‘› , ๐‘ˆ๐‘› ) for all but finitely many in. โฆ strong star ๐’ถ- Hurewicz space if it satisfies: For each sequence of elements of ๐’ถ-open cover (๐‘ˆ๐‘›: ๐‘› โˆˆ ๐‘) there is sequence (๐ด๐‘›: ๐‘› โˆˆ ๐‘) such that for each ๐‘› โˆˆ ๐‘ , ๐ด๐‘› is finite subset of ๐‘‹ ,and each ๐‘ฅ โˆˆ ๐‘‹ belong to ๐‘†๐‘ก๐’ถ(๐ด๐‘› , ๐‘ˆ๐‘› ) for all but finitely many in. Now, we can form the following diagram. Strong star ๐’ถ- compact โŸน Strong star ๐’ถ-Hurewicz โŸน Strong star ๐’ถ- Lindelof โ‡“ โ‡“ โ‡“ star ๐’ถ- compact โŸน star ๐’ถ-Hurewicz โŸน star ๐’ถ- Lindelof A space X is said to be ฯƒ-strongly star ๐‘Ž-compact if it can be expressed as the union of countably many ฯƒ-strongly ๐‘Ž-compact spaces. Theorem 4.12: Every ฯƒ-strongly star ๐’ถ- compact space is strong star ๐’ถ- Hurewicz space. Poof : Let ฯƒ-strongly star ๐’ถ- compact space .suppose that ๐‘Œ= โ‹ƒ๐‘›โˆˆ๐‘ ๐‘Œ๐‘›, where each ๐‘Œ๐‘› is strongly Star ๐’ถ- compact . Let ๐‘Œ1 โŠƒ ๐‘Œ2 โŠƒ . . . โŠƒ ๐‘Œ๐‘› โŠƒ . . . , since the union of finitely many strongly star ๐’ถ- 277 Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology ISSN: 2576-8484 Vol. 8, No. 5: 271-277, 2024 DOI: 10.55214/25768484.v8i5.1685 ยฉ 2024 by the authors; licensee Learning Gate Compact spaces remains strongly star ๐’ถ- compact . Let (๐‘Œ๐‘›: ๐‘› โˆˆ ๐‘) be a sequence of ๐’ถ-open cover of ๐‘Œ .For each ๐‘› โˆˆ ๐‘ let ๐ด๐‘› be a finite subset of ๐‘Œ๐‘› such that ๐‘†๐‘ก๐’ถ(๐ด๐‘› , ๐‘Œ๐‘› ) โŠƒ ๐‘Œ๐‘›.It follows that each point of ๐‘Œ belongs to all but finitely many sets of ๐‘†๐‘ก๐’ถ(๐ด๐‘› , ๐‘Œ๐‘› ).By the sequence (๐ด๐‘›: ๐‘› โˆˆ ๐‘) we have ๐‘Œ is strong star ๐’ถ- Hurewicz space. Copyright: ยฉ 2024 by the authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). References [1] Miller A. and Fremlin D., "On some properties of Hurewicz, Menger, and Rothboerger", Fundamental Math., Vol. 129 (1), 1988, 17-33. [2] Sumit S. and Kocinac L., "Star versions Hurewicz spaces", Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and statistics, Vol. 50(5), 2021, 1325-1333. [3] Memet K., "๐›ฝ-Menger and ๐›ฝ-Hurewicz spaces", Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, Vol. 51 (1), 2022, 1-7. [4] Alexander V., "A Functional Characterization of the Hurewicz Property", Iranian Journal of Mathematical Sciences and Informatics, Vol. 17(1), 2022, 99 -109. [5] Kumar G., Mittal S. and Brijk T., "On ๐œƒ-Hurewicz and ๐›ผ-Hurewicz topological spaces", arXiv:2307.00487 [math.GN], 2023, 1 -14. [6] Njastad O., "A note on ๐’ถ-open sets and ๐‘’โˆ—-open sets", Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, University of Nis, Serbia, Vol. 22(1), 2008, 89-96. [7] Ekici E., "On ๐’ถ-open sets", ๐’œโˆ—-sets and decompositions of continuity and super-continuity, submitted, 2008. [8] Ekici E., " On ๐‘’โˆ—-open sets and (๐’Ÿ, ๐’ฎ)โˆ—-sets" Math. Moravica, Vol. 13(1), 2009, 29-36. [9] Mohammad R., "Delta-open sets and Delta -continuous functions", International Journal of Pure and Mathematics, Vol. 8(1), 2021, 1- 23. [10] Jacobson N., "Basic algebra", (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nathan_Jacobson) , vol. 2 (2nd ed.), Dover, ISBN (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISBN_(identifier)) 2009. [11] Ameen ZA, Asaad BA, Muhammed RA. On superclasses of $\delta $-open sets in topological spaces. International Journal of Applied Mathematics. 2019;32(2):259. [12] Kocinac LD, Sabah A, Khan MU, Seba D. Semi-hurewicz spaces. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics. 2017 Jan 1;46(1):53-66. [13] Bal P, De R. On strongly star semi-compactness of topological spaces. Khayyam Journal of Mathematics. 2023 Jan 1;9(1):54-60. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/