Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology ISSN: 2576-8484 Vol. 8, No. 5, 1151-1163 2024 Publisher: Learning Gate DOI: 10.55214/25768484.v8i5.1818 © 2024 by the authors; licensee Learning Gate © 2024 by the authors; licensee Learning Gate * Correspondence: noe.rievan@gmail.com Strategic design to ensure the sustainable productivity of military division government organization Rini Mulyani Sari1, Evan Nugraha2* 1,2Jenderal Achmad Yani University, Indonesia; rini210283@gmail.com (R.M.S.) noe.rievan@gmail.com (E.N.) Abstract: This study aims to analyze the impact of the balanced scorecard and good corporate governance on the productivity of military government organizations and develop strategies to ensure their sustainability. This research implements a mixed-methods strategy utilizing a sequential explanatory research plan. This process is followed by a Mapping strategy, culminating in the presentation of conclusions. One hundred individuals who worked in military government agencies were surveyed as part of this study. This analysis comprises quantitative and qualitative data collected from 100 personnel of the government agency within the military division. This study determined that the environment is the primary factor in guaranteeing the long-term productivity sustainability of government organizations within military divisions. The implication is that leaders need to conduct in- depth research and be aware of environmental changes, both internal and external, that occur in military departmental government organizations. Keywords: Balanced scorecard, Good corporate governance, Military division, Organization productivity, Strategy mapping. 1. Introduction The public's perception of a company plays a vital role in shaping its reputation. To bolster their public image, major corporations have adopted Good Corporate Governance (GCG) principles (Suhartadi, 2021). Essentially, corporate governance emphasizes the interests of both shareholders and stakeholders, as specified in Article 3 of Regulation Per-01/MBU/2011. These principles encompass Transparency, Independence, Accountability, Responsibility, and Fairness. Implementing Good Corporate Governance (GCG) provides firms with various advantages and benefits. These abilities encompass minimizing agency costs, reducing the cost of capital, making optimal decisions, enhancing efficiency and promoting a healthier work culture, mitigating instances of authority abuse, increasing the value of the organization, improving organizational performance, elevating the organization's image and productivity, improving the quality of the organization's financial reports, and sustaining the organization's existence through strengthened competitiveness (Purwanto, 2021). Despite the considerable advantages of adopting GCG by Indonesian enterprises, a deficiency in knowledge and adequate GCG execution persists (Suhartadi, 2021; Kristanus, 2021). In Indonesia, Good Corporate Governance (GCG) norms have seen an improvement in recent years, as evidenced by the country's 2017 rating on the ASEAN Corporate Governance Scorecard (ACGS) which increased from 62.88 in 2015 to 70.59. The ASEAN CG Scorecard evaluation is based on OECD principles that encompass (1) shareholder rights, (2) fairness to shareholders, (3) shareholder participation, (4) transparency and disclosure of information, and (5) the responsibilities of the board of directors/commissioners (Siregar, 2018). However, a survey conducted by the ASEAN Corporate Governance Association (ACGA) in 2018 on corporate governance practices in 12 nations yielded varying results, with Indonesia ranking last. While this is not a reason for celebration, it provides an 1152 Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology ISSN: 2576-8484 Vol. 8, No. 5: 1151-1163, 2024 DOI: 10.55214/25768484.v8i5.1818 © 2024 by the authors; licensee Learning Gate incentive to rise to the challenge and attain a better understanding of the right and ideal implementation of GCG (Suhartadi, 2021). 2. Literature Review Good Corporate Governance, including the proportion of independent board commissioners, audit committees, management ownership, and influential ownership, has a favorable and significant impact on a company's financial success, both individually and collectively, according to research ((Siffiana et al., 2020). Another study found that Good Corporate Governance has a positive and significant impact on organizational performance when it is mediated by organizational culture (Darmayanti et al., 2020). Additionally, both legislative size and Good Corporate Governance have favorable and considerable effects on the financial success of local governments, both separately and when used in combination (Yusniar, 2020). However, a study conducted by (Hutapea & Widyaningsih, 2017) found that Good Corporate Governance has a positive and significant effect on the financial performance of local governments as a proxy for poverty rate, while legislative size has a positive and significant impact on the financial performance of local governments as a proxy for self-sufficiency. Foreign ownership, board of directors, board of commissioners' size, number of independent commissioners, and capital adequacy ratio have a significant and advantageous effect on the financial performance of the banking sector (Listyawati & Kristiana, 2018). PT. Jasindo has successfully implemented the principles of Good Corporate Governance. PT. Jasindo promotes its values and culture through the acronym RAISE (Resourceful, Agile, Integrity, Synergy, and Excellence). However, there are issues, including a lack of an ownership culture and customer misconceptions about PT. Jasindo (Suwandi et al., 2019). Transparency and accountability substantially and positively impact the personal and collective performance of PT. Pupuk Kujang (Syah et al., 2018). This study examines the effect of utilizing the balanced scorecard and implementing good corporate governance on the productivity of military government organizations. Moreover, this research aims to formulate measures to ensure their sustainability. The Balance Scorecard (BSC) is a work results measurement method utilized by companies and often referred to as a management strategy. Unlike generally simplistic management strategies, the BSC method takes an integrated approach by transforming the organization's mission and strategy into more tangible goals and measures. Not only does the Balance Scorecard (BSC) method determine financial measures, but it also determines non-financial measures, particularly in the public service sector (Overbey and Gordon, 2019; Yap, 2020; Krause and Arora, 2019; Camilleri, 2021). Good corporate governance is the strategic employment of appropriate structures, systems, and processes by an organization, aimed at enhancing value to the organization in a sustainable manner over the long term. This is achieved through consideration of stakeholder interests in line with relevant laws and norms (Afsharipour and Gelter, 2019; Javier Reyes, 2018; Fogarty and Rezaee, 2019; Anheier and Baums, 2020). Productivity has two dimensions: effectiveness and efficiency. Effectiveness is the attainment of maximum performance, measured by the achievement of targets relating to quality, quantity, and time. Efficiency, on the other hand, concerns efforts to compare inputs with their actual use or how the work is performed (Holbeche, 2017; Imbrogiano, 2022; Örtenblad, 2019; Hughes, 2019). The hypothesis of this study is as follows: 1. H1: The balanced scorecard enhances organizational productivity (Situmorang et al., 2019; Grabowska & Saniuk, 2022; Ruli & Kristanto, 2021; Abdurrachman et al., 2022; Sharaf-Addin & Fazel, 2021). 2. H2: Effective corporate governance has the capability to enhance organizational productivity (Affes & Jarboui, 2023; Guluma, 2021; Ledi & Ameza – Xemalordzo, 2023; Mahrani & Soewarno, 2018; Syofyan and Putra, 2020). 3. H3: Implementation of a balanced scorecard and effective corporate governance practices can enhance organizational productivity ((Dao & Nguye, 2020) ; Sibarani, 2023; Damianus et al, 2022; Oliveira et al., 2021; Ta et al., 2022). 1153 Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology ISSN: 2576-8484 Vol. 8, No. 5: 1151-1163, 2024 DOI: 10.55214/25768484.v8i5.1818 © 2024 by the authors; licensee Learning Gate 4. H4: Implementation of a balanced scorecard can enhance organizational productivity by fostering Good Corporate Governance practices (Erawan et al., 2022; Oktavida & Lestari, 2023;; Huang et al., 2023; Rehman et al., 2019). Figure 1 depicts the research paradigm Figure 1. The research paradigm. 3. Methods This study utilized a mixed methods approach with a sequential explanatory design. The sample included 100 government agency employees from military divisions who acted as respondents. The independent variable was the balanced scorecard and the intervening variable was effective corporate governance, while the dependent variable was organizational productivity. The collected data will be reviewed and assessed for reliability and validity. The traditional assumption test is conducted, involving a Glejser test for heteroscedasticity, a normality test, an autocorrelation test, and a multicollinearity test. Path analysis will be employed for data analysis, and the hypothesis will be tested using both the t-test and the F-test. After analyzing the survey results, the next crucial step is to devise a plan for enhancing organizational productivity. This includes evaluating research findings that have the least effect on the dimensions of the balanced scorecard prior to implementing improvement techniques using Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) tools. The ultimate outcome is sustainable productivity, achieved through a strategic mapping approach. Figure 2 depicts the research design. Figure 2. The research design. 4. Results and Discussion 4.1. Results The descriptive statistical data regarding the balanced scorecard, strong corporate governance, and organizational productivity factors will be compiled in this section. Table 1 presents the tabulated descriptive statistical data for the three research variables. 1154 Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology ISSN: 2576-8484 Vol. 8, No. 5: 1151-1163, 2024 DOI: 10.55214/25768484.v8i5.1818 © 2024 by the authors; licensee Learning Gate Table 1. Responses to balanced scorecard, good corporate governance, and organizational productivity factors by participants. Balanced scorecard (X) No. Dimensions Category Learning & growth Customer Financial Business process internal 2.233 → Fairly good 1 2.551 2.192 2.170 2.019 Good corporate governance (Y) 2 Independence Fairness Accountability Responsibility 2.035 → Fairly good 2.151 1.889 2.381 1.717 Organizational productivity (Z) 3 Financial Learning & growth Business process internal Customer 2.402 → Fairly good 2.739 2.579 2.302 1.987 Table 2 displays the results of the validity and reliability tests performed on the factors of the Balanced Scorecard, Good Corporate Governance, and Organizational Productivity. Table 2. Validity and reliability testing of balanced scorecard, good corporate governance, and organizational productivity variables. Balanced scorecard (X) Validity Reliability 0,208 – 0.737 > 0.195 Valid 0.857 > 0.6 Reliable Good Corporate Governance (Y) Validity Reliability 0,212 – 0.435 > 0.195 Valid 0,632 > 0.6 Reliable Organizational Productivity (Z) Validity Reliability 0,231 – 0.697 > 0.195 Valid 0.768 > 0.6 Reliable The normality test, heteroscedasticity test, autocorrelation test, and multicollinearity test are integral components of the standard assumption test for assessing the balanced scorecard, robust corporate governance, and organizational productivity factors, presented in Table 3. Table 3. Normality test, heteroscedasticity test, autocorrelation test, and multicollinearity test for balanced scorecard, good corporate governance, and organizational productivity. No Variables Standard assumption test Normalcy test Heteroscedasticity test Multicollinearity test Autocorrelation test 1 BSC (X) 0.119 > 0.05 Normal 0.173 > 0.05 Neg. 1.019 < 10 Neg 2.565 In range Neg 2 GCG (Y) 0.115 > 0.05 Normal 0.508 > 0.05 Neg. 1.019 < 10 Neg 3 OP (Z) 0.117 > 0.05 Normal This section presents three regression models: one for the balanced scorecard's impact on good corporate governance, one for the impact of good corporate governance on organizational productivity, and one for the combined impact of the balanced scorecard and good corporate governance on organizational productivity. The tables displaying the results -- Tables 4 through 8 -- are included. 1155 Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology ISSN: 2576-8484 Vol. 8, No. 5: 1151-1163, 2024 DOI: 10.55214/25768484.v8i5.1818 © 2024 by the authors; licensee Learning Gate Table 4. Summary of the model: Balanced scorecard, good corporate governance, and organizational productivity Model R R square Adjusted R square Std. error of the estimate 1 0.894a 0.799 0.834 0.01121 Note: a. Predictors: (Constant), BSC, GCG b. Dependent variable: OP Table 5. Balanced scorecard coefficients and organization productivity. Model Unstandardized B Coefficients std. error Standardized coefficients beta t Sig. 1 (Constant) 52.662 40.102 120.838 0.000 BSC 0.068 0.038 0.137 30.373 0.013 Note: a. Dependent variable: OP Table 6. Good corporate governance coefficient and organizational productivity. Model Unstandardized B Coefficients std. error Standardized coefficients beta t Sig. 1 (Constant) 48.396 4.965 9.748 0.000 GCG 0.007 0.104 0.067 2.664 0.008 Note: a. Dependent variable: OP Table 7. ANOVA on balanced scorecard, good corporate governance, and organizational productivity. Model Sum of squares df Mean squares t Sig. 1 Regression 2730.984 2 1365.492 37.789 0.000b Residual 3505.056 97 36.135 Total 6236.040 99 Note: a. Predictors: (Constant), BSC, GCG b. Dependent variable: OP Table 8. Balanced scorecard coefficient, corporate governance, and organizational productivity. Model Unstandardized B Coefficients std. error Standardized coefficients beta t Sig. 1 (Constant) 16.340 5.272 3.099 0.003 BSC 0.674 0.078 0.665 8.649 0.000 CGC 0.005 0.079 0.024 2.316 0.032 Note: a. Dependent variable: OP The indicators with the lowest values for the Balanced Scorecard, Good Corporate Governance, and Organizational Productivity variables are listed in table 9. Improvements will be made to the root cause of the problem after analyzing it using Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA). FMEA includes severity, occurrence, and detection values for the balanced scorecard, good corporate governance, and organizational productivity variables. The results are presented in tables 10. 1156 Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology ISSN: 2576-8484 Vol. 8, No. 5: 1151-1163, 2024 DOI: 10.55214/25768484.v8i5.1818 © 2024 by the authors; licensee Learning Gate Table 9. The minimum value of balanced scorecard, good corporate governance, and organizational productivity. Balanced scorecard (X) No Dimensions Indicators 1 Business Process Internal The government conducts research and development activities Adaptation of government service procedures to new technologies Government service operations are frequently adjusted to align with targeted cost, time, and quality objectives Each service activity is evaluated and improved continuously Value 1.809 2.597 1.687 1.982 Good corporate governance (Y) 2 Responsibility Government agencies have certain social responsibilities, including community care and providing comfort and security, especially in the service sector. This can be achieved by carefully designing and implementing appropriate measures. Government agencies must follow the precautionary principle and guarantee compliance with rules and legislation, articles of association, and government regulations Government agencies must adhere to the precautionary principle and ensure compliance with relevant laws, regulations, and government guidelines, as well as their own articles of association Value 2.401 1.911 2.557 Organizational productivity (Z) 3 Customer People are satisfied with the services provided by government agencies. Customers may readily obtain information about the services supplied Government agencies' services align with the expectations of society as a customer Public complaints are promptly handled by government agencies Value 1.842 1.726 1.731 2.649 1157 Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology ISSN: 2576-8484 Vol. 8, No. 5: 1151-1163, 2024 DOI: 10.55214/25768484.v8i5.1818 © 2024 by the authors; licensee Learning Gate Table 10. BSC, GCG, and OP failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA). Business process internal perspective (BSC) No Factors Failure mode Severity Cause of failure Occurrence Control Detection RPN (S x O x D) 1 Man Have not created high- quality service that are constantly improved 7 Abilities are insufficient 7 Priorities for competitive development 4 196 Lack of knowledge 2 Method Hasn't mastered the ability to give high- quality. 7 A lack of communica- tion. 6 6 252 A lack of cooperation 3 Money Ignoring the psychological benefits of the services provided. 8 Restricted budget 5 Growth of services 7 280 Allotment of cash from various activity posts 4 Environment Has not consistently developed new strengths. 7 Insufficient research. 6 A plan led by the community 6 252 Less aware of environmental changes. Responsibilities Perspective (GCG) 1 Man Monitoring and assessment of the National Legislation Program for Drafting Laws has not yet been incorporated. 7 Abilities are insufficient 8 Integrating monitoring and evaluation with the National Legislation Program for Preparing Annual Priority Laws 5 280 Lack of knowledge 2 Method There are currently no assessment priorities. 7 A lack of communica- tion. 8 Subject selection criteria are determined 6 336 A lack of cooperation 3 Money Failure to collaborate with specific community media. 7 Restricted budget 5 Encouraging citizen participation 4 140 Allotment of cash from various activity posts Table 10. 1158 Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology ISSN: 2576-8484 Vol. 8, No. 5: 1151-1163, 2024 DOI: 10.55214/25768484.v8i5.1818 © 2024 by the authors; licensee Learning Gate Continue… Responsibilities perspective (GCG) No Factors Failure Mode Severity Cause of Failure Occurrence Control Detection RPN (S x O x D) 4 Environment There are currently no operational collaborations with non- governmental organizations. 8 Insufficient research. 8 Encouraging citizen participation 6 384 Less aware of environmental changes. Customer perspective (OP) 1 Man Poor content quality. 8 Abilities are insufficient 4 Originality and quality content creation. 6 192 Lack of knowledge 2 Method Inadequate Search Engine Optimization. 8 A lack of communica- tion. 7 Search Engine Optimization 3 168 A lack of cooperation 3 Money No new services have been developed. 6 Restricted budget 7 Diversification of Budgets 6 252 Allotment of cash from various activity posts 4 Environment Doesn't reply to audience feedback. 7 Insufficient research. 6 Social media usage. 7 294 Less aware of environmental changes 1159 Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology ISSN: 2576-8484 Vol. 8, No. 5: 1151-1163, 2024 DOI: 10.55214/25768484.v8i5.1818 © 2024 by the authors; licensee Learning Gate This section will create a suitable strategy map for the variables of Balanced Scorecard, Good Corporate Governance, and Organizational Productivity, consisting of five elements: variables, dimensions, factors, strategy, and programs, as illustrated in Figures 3. Figure 3. Strategy mapping. 4.2. Discussion The study findings depict positive responses from participants pertaining to balanced scorecard factors, good corporate governance practices, and organizational efficacy within the category. The observed values vary from 2.035 to 2.402, with the good corporate governance variable receiving the lowest rating. Findings from the data quality assessments indicate the acquisition of valid data with scores ranging from 0.208 to 0.737 and reliable data with scores ranging from 0.632 to 0.857. Based on the results of the classical assumption test, the data was found to be normally distributed and free from heteroscedasticity, multicollinearity, and autocorrelation. Table 4 shows that the Balanced Scorecard variable and the Good Corporate Governance variable have an effect of 79.9% on the Organizational Productivity variable. The remaining 20.1% is affected by other factors not explored or included in the regression equation. Table 5 indicates that the significance level of less than 0.05 supports H1, proving that the Balanced Scorecard has a positive and significant impact on Organization Productivity. This hypothesis is also supported by the improvement of raw water supply performance at Sei Gesek Reservoir through the 1160 Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology ISSN: 2576-8484 Vol. 8, No. 5: 1151-1163, 2024 DOI: 10.55214/25768484.v8i5.1818 © 2024 by the authors; licensee Learning Gate implementation of the Balanced Scorecard approach ((Situmorang et al., 2019). The incorporation of innovation processes and open innovation into the comprehensive measurement system for open business models constitutes the primary divergence between the proposed balanced scorecard and traditional performance and competitiveness measurement systems (Grabowska & Saniuk, 2022). The Balanced Scorecard has been found to have a positive impact on the configuration of performance management systems in both corporate and non-profit organizations. This approach serves as an effective tool for assessing organizational performance, offering valuable insights for both practical business evaluations and academic research (Ruli & Kristanto, 2021). The balanced scorecard is a valuable means of gauging organizational performance as it facilitates a thorough assessment, enhances strategic planning, control, and decision-making, and promotes the achievement of the company's overarching objectives and mission (Abdurrachman et al., 2022). The Balanced Scorecard framework and strategy map can evaluate and monitor the University's advancement in obtaining the position of 'Educational and Research Excellence' through translating strategic objectives into actionable strategies (Sharaf-Addin & Fazel, 2021). Table 6 shows that the sig. < 0.05 indicates that H3, which states that good corporate governance has a positive and significant impact on organizational productivity, is proven. This hypothesis is also supported by Effective corporate governance standards enhance a company's financial performance, as evidenced by an increase in return on equity (Affes & Jarboui, 2023). This finding carries significant management implications for practitioners and is essential for policymakers seeking to boost corporate governance in emerging market economies (Guluma, 2021). The synergy and convergence between Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and corporate governance interfaces offer valuable insights into the concerns of developing economy corporate governance and CSR (Ledi & Ameza – Xemalordzo, 2023). GCG and CSR governance mechanisms positively impact financial performance, with CSR also contributing to positive outcomes (Mahrani & Soewarno, 2018). The objectives behind Indonesian enterprises' implementation of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) principles remain unclear, and organizational culture in Indonesia further complicates GCG implementation (Syofyan & Putra, 2020). Table 7 illustrates that the significance level of less than 0.05 supports H3, which proposes that the implementation of Balanced Scorecard and Good Corporate Governance has a favorable and substantial impact on Organizational Productivity. This hypothesis is also supported by the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) facilitates the improvement of organizational performance, achievement of organizational goals and vision, implementation of strategy, assessment of performance, management of risks, and decision- making (Sibarani, 2023). Corporate governance has a significant impact on individual work performance. Enhancing company governance is necessary to enhance individual work performance and reduce unproductive behavior (Damianus et al, 2022). Top-level executives in companies should communicate the company's vision and strategy to their entire staff. Simultaneously, they need to motivate their personnel to meet the company's performance goals (Oliveira et al., 2021), The implementation of BSC should commence with an inclusive study and evaluation of the current position and size of the corporation. To withstand heightened market competition, it is essential for companies to improve their understanding and assimilate new information (Ta et al., 2022). Corporate governance is a crucial matter for all governments in an era of globalization and integration. Vietnam is currently in the initial stages of implementing corporate governance. Thus, it is imperative for the country to emulate other nations that have already adopted successful corporate governance methods for achieving better performance outcomes (Dao & Nguye, 2020). Table 8 shows that a significance level of less than 0.05 supports H4, which asserts that the Balanced Scorecard, implemented through effective Good Corporate Governance practices, has a sizeable and positive impact on Organizational Productivity. This hypothesis is also supported by government leaders have a crucial responsibility as progressive role models for their staff. Government leaders have a crucial responsibility as progressive role models for their staff. They should promote a strategic and holistic approach towards company processes. Employees, in turn, should create a culture that enhances their understanding of performance management at all levels and facilitates organizational goals. 1161 Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology ISSN: 2576-8484 Vol. 8, No. 5: 1151-1163, 2024 DOI: 10.55214/25768484.v8i5.1818 © 2024 by the authors; licensee Learning Gate Overall, successful execution of the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) requires engagement in strategic management by all members of a government organization, from senior leaders to operational personnel (Erawan et al., 2022). The implementation strategy for the company could entail two actions: (1) mapping attained GCG indicators against the perspective of a balanced scorecard to allow for analysis of the relationship between achievements; and (2) modifying PT Holding X's KPI form to assume a Balanced Scorecard form (as done in previous years) to achieve consistent overall performance evaluations on GCG quality. (Oktavida & Lestari, 2023). A balanced scorecard promotes alignment of healthcare staff and strategy cascade. Additionally, it demonstrates the potential to reduce turnover and enhance reputation. Huang et al., 2023 suggest that the BSC is a sustainable and effective communication management method. In the Pakistani textile industry, planning controls, cultural controls, organizational skills, and organizational performance remain crucial. This issue has been overlooked in Pakistan and warrants an investigation of MCS as a comprehensive solution in both the industrial and service sectors Rehman et al., 2019). The study's findings indicate that both balanced scorecard and good corporate governance have a positive and significant impact on the productivity of military division government organizations, both independently and simultaneously. Additionally, implementing good corporate governance through balanced scorecard has a positive and significant impact on the ongoing productivity of these organizations. Good corporate governance has a greater impact than the balanced scorecard in guaranteeing the sustainable productivity of government organizations responsible for military divisions. The environment plays a vital role in promoting sustainability and enhancing the productivity of military division government organizations, particularly when utilizing the Encouraging Citizen Participation Program. Leaders must conduct comprehensive research and remain cognizant of internal and external environmental changes within military departmental government organizations to achieve these outcomes. 5. Conclusions and Implications 5.1. Conclusions The findings of the study suggest that both the balanced scorecard and good corporate governance have a positive and significant influence on the productivity of governmental military divisions. Moreover, adopting good corporate governance practices by employing the balanced scorecard system has a positive and significant effect on the sustained productivity of these organizations. Effective corporate governance has a more significant impact than the use of the balanced scorecard in ensuring the sustainable productivity of government organizations that manage military divisions. The environment plays a crucial role in promoting sustainability and improving the productivity of such organizations, especially when utilizing the Encouraging Citizen Participation Program. Leaders must conduct thorough research and stay aware of the internal and external environmental changes within governmental military departments to attain the desired results. 5.2. Recommendations It is recommended that managers integrate good corporate governance practices with the balanced scorecard system in order to enhance overall productivity. This integration ensures that strategic objectives are aligned with governance standards, thereby providing a comprehensive framework for decision-making and performance measurement. It is incumbent upon leaders to be aware of any changes to the internal and external environments, including policy adjustments, technical breakthroughs, and sociopolitical factors. Regular environmental scanning and risk assessments can assist in modifying methods to preserve productivity and sustainability. In order to respond proactively to environmental changes, managers must possess the ability to adapt their leadership style. This necessitates adaptability, ingenuity, and the capacity to oversee the organisation through periods of uncertainty and change. 1162 Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology ISSN: 2576-8484 Vol. 8, No. 5: 1151-1163, 2024 DOI: 10.55214/25768484.v8i5.1818 © 2024 by the authors; licensee Learning Gate Conduct studies to assess the long-term impact of citizen involvement initiatives on military division production and public perception. Compare several types of engagement programmes to determine which tactics are most effective in developing community participation and increasing public confidence. It is recommended that the usage of new technologies, such as AI and big data analytics, be investigated with a view to generating more complex and responsive feedback systems. Furthermore, it would be beneficial to examine the impact of citizen feedback on policy choices and strategic modifications within military divisions, as well as the most effective techniques for incorporating public input into governance procedures. Copyright: © 2024 by the authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). References [1] Abdurrachman, A., Bryan Givan, B. G., Rizky Amalia, R. A., Ninuk Riesmiyantiningtias, N. R., Alan Budi Kusuma, A. B. K., & Syah Putra, A. (2022). Implementation of the Balanced Scorecard as a measuring tool for company performance ( Case Study at PT. ARS Maju Sentosa). International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences, 3(2), 1049–1058. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v3i2.358 [2] Affes, W., & Jarboui, A. (2023). The impact of corporate governance on financial performance: a cross-sector study. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 20(4), 374–394. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-023-00182-8 [3] Afsharipour, A., & Gelter, M. (Eds.). (2019). Comparative Corporate Governance. Edward Elgar Publishing. [4] Anheier, H. K., & Baums, T. (Eds.). (2020). Advances in Corporate Governance Comparative Perspectives. Oxford University Press. [5] Ari Erawan, I. G., Putra, F., & Sentanu, I. G. E. P. S. (2022). The Roles of Balanced Scorecard in Improving Performance Accountability System in Indonesian Government Organizations. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 18(2), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v18i2.1001 [6] Camilleri, M. A. (Ed.). (2021). Strategic Corporate Communication in the Digital Age. Emerald Publishing Limited. [7] Damianus et al. (2022). The effect of corporate governance on the individual work performance of employees under responsibility of Center for Strategic Studies in Business and Finance The effect of corporate governance on the individual work performance of employees: The case of. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ [8] Dao, T. T. B., & Nguye, P. H. C. (2020). Analysis of Corporate Governance Index Using ASEAN Balanced Score Card and Firm Performance. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 11(6), 11–20. [9] Darmayanti, N. P. G., Dwi Ratnadi, N. M., Aryista Dewi, A., & Wirawan Yasa, G. (2020). The Influence of Good Corporate Governance on LPD Performance with Team-Oriented Organizational Culture as a Mediating Variable. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 30(10), 2471. https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2020.v30.i10.p03 [10] Fogarty, T., & Rezaee, Z. (2019). Business Sustainability, Corporate Governance, and Organizational Ethics. Wiley. [11] Grabowska, S., & Saniuk, S. (2022). Assessment of the Competitiveness and Effectiveness of an Open Business Model in the Industry 4.0 Environment. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010057 [12] Guluma, T. F. (2021). The impact of corporate governance measures on firm performance: the influences of managerial overconfidence. Future Business Journal, 7(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-021-00093-6 [13] Holbeche, L. (2017). Influencing Organizational Effectiveness A Critical Take on the HR Contribution. Routledge. [14] Huang, Y. S., Ito, K., & Nemoto, M. (2023). Sustainable Communication Management Using the Balanced Scorecard: Evidence from a Japanese Hospital Based on Corporate Communication Theory. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310111 [15] Hughes, C. (Ed.). (2019). Strategies for Attracting, Maintaining, and Balancing a Mature Workforce. IGI Global. [16] Hutapea, F. L., & Widyaningsih, A. (2017). The Influence of Good Government Governance and Legislative Measures on Regional Government Performance (Study of Provincial Governments in Indonesia). Jurnal Aset (Akuntansi Riset), 9(1), 173–186. [17] Imbrogiano, J.-P. (2022). Understanding Sustainability Performance in Business Organizations Implications for the Sustainability Service Industry. Routledge. [18] Javier Reyes. (2018). Reframing Corporate Governance Company Law Beyond Law and Economics. Edward Elgar Pub., Incorporated. [19] Krause, H.-U., & Arora, D. (2019). Key Performance Indicators for Sustainable Management A Compendium Based on the “Balanced Scorecard Approach.” De Gruyter. [20] Kristanus, A. (2021). Airlangga Hartarto: Good GCG Implementation Can Avoid Crisis. Www.Beritasatu.Com. https://www.beritasatu.com/economy/779165/airlangga-hartarto-good-GCG-implementation-can-avoid-crisis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 1163 Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology ISSN: 2576-8484 Vol. 8, No. 5: 1151-1163, 2024 DOI: 10.55214/25768484.v8i5.1818 © 2024 by the authors; licensee Learning Gate [21] Kumar, S., Lim, W. M., Sureka, R., Jabbour, C. J. C., & Bamel, U. (2023). Balanced scorecard: trends, developments, and future directions. In Review of Managerial Science (Issue 0123456789). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00700-6 [22] Ledi, K. K., & Ameza – Xemalordzo, E. (2023). Rippling effect of corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergy on firm performance: The mediating role of corporate image. Cogent Business & Management, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2210353 [23] Listyawati, I., & Kristiana, I. (2018). Analysis of the Effect of Good Corporate Governance on the Performance of Banking Companies in Indonesia. Maksimum Media Akuntansi, 8(2), 86–94. [24] Mahrani, M., & Soewarno, N. (2018). The effect of good corporate governance mechanism and corporate social responsibility on financial performance with earnings management as mediating variable. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 3(1), 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-06-2018-0008 [25] Oktavida, A., & Lestari, Y. D. (2023). The Evaluation of The Impact of Improving GCG Quality on PT Holding X’s Performance. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 06(01), 711–714. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/v6-i1-77 [26] Oliveira, C., Martins, A., Camilleri, M. A., & Jayantilal, S. (2021). Using the Balanced Scorecard for Strategic Communication and Performance Management. Strategic Corporate Communication in the Digital Age, February, 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80071-264-520211005 [27] Örtenblad, A. (Ed.). (2019). The Oxford Handbook of the Learning Organization. OUP Oxford. [28] Overbey, J. A., & Gordon, P. A. (Eds.). (2019). Advances in the Technology of Managing People Contemporary Issues in Business. Emerald Publishing Limited. [29] Purwanto, D. (2021). Series of Corruption Cases Remind Us of the Importance of Implementing GCG. Pratamaindomitra.Co.Id. https://pratamaindomitra.co.id/series-of-corruption-cases-remind-us-of-the-importance-of- implementing-GCG.html [30] Rehman, S., Mohamed, R., & Ayoup, H. (2019). The mediating role of organizational capabilities between organizational performance and its determinants. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40497-019-0155-5 [31] Ruli, C., & Kristanto, H. (2021). Implementation of balance scorecard and key performance indicator on customer service employee productivity. EUREKA: Social and Humanities, 4, 26–32. https://doi.org/10.21303/2504- 5571.2021.001988 [32] Sharaf-Addin, H. H., & Fazel, H. (2021). Balanced Scorecard Development as a Performance Management System in Saudi Public Universities: A Case Study Approach. Asia-Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation, 17(1– 2), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/2319510X211048591 [33] Sibarani, B. E. (2023). What Do We Know About Balanced Scorecard and Its Benefit? A Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 10(1), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.24815/jdab.v10i1.29351 [34] Siffiana, A. J., Septiana, W., & Hana, K. F. (2020). The Influence of Corporate Governance on Gudang Garam Company Performance. POINT, 2(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.46918/point.v2i1.507 [35] Siregar, B. P. (2018). Corporate Governance Practices in Indonesia are Improving. Wartaekonomi.Co.Id. https://wartaekonomi.co.id/read186845/corporate-governance-practices-in-Indonesia-are-improving [36] Situmorang, W., Anwar, N., & Sidharti, T. S. (2019). Evaluation of the raw water supply performance of Embung Sei Gesek using the Balanced Scorecard approach. Jurnal Manajemen Teori Dan Terapan | Journal of Theory and Applied Management, 12(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.20473/jmtt.v12i1.12322 [37] Suhartadi, I. (2021). The Importance of GCG Implementation to Create a Healthy and Superior Corporation. Investor.Id. https://investor.id/business/242269/the-importance-of-GCG-implementation-to-create-a-healthy-and- superior-corporation [38] Suwandi, I., Arifianti, R., & Rizal, M. (2019). Implementation of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) Principles AT PT. Indonesian Services Insurance (JASINDO). Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, 2(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.24198/jmpp.v2i1.21559 [39] Syah, D. N., Hasbullah, R., & Solehudin, S. (2018). The Influence of Good Corporate Governance on PT Employee Performance. Cikampek Kujang Fertilizer. JBMP (Jurnal Bisnis, Manajemen Dan Perbankan), 4(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.21070/jbmp.v4i1.1899 [40] Syofyan, R., & Putra, D. G. (2020). The Role of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) Implementation in Indonesian Company. 124, 819–825. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200305.148 [41] Ta, T. T., Doan, T. N., Tran, H. N., Dam, T. A., & Pham, T. M. Q. (2022). Factors affecting the application of balanced scorecard to enhance operational efficiency of listed companies: The case of Vietnam. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2149146 [42] Yap, W. Y. (2020). Business and Economics of Port Management An Insider’s Perspective. Taylor & Francis. [43] Yusniar, I. (2020). The Influence of Good Government Governance on Regional Government Performance (Study at the Palopo City DPRD Secretariat Office). Repository Universitas Muhammadiyah Palopo. http://repository.umpalopo.ac.id/313/