Educare 5-2 2013.indb


EDUCARE:
International Journal for Educational Studies, 5(2) 2013

173

Dr. Ramli Ismail is a Lecturer at the Social Studies Department, Institute of  Teachers Training, 
Sultan Mizan Campus, Besut, Terengganu, Malaysia; and Norwaliza Abdul Wahab is a Counsellor 
at the SMK (State Senior High School) Seri Pagi, Seremban, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia. They can be 
reached at: rameysyis@gmail.com and lyzaalogan@gmail.com

Teachers’ Education Curriculum 
towards Establishment of Patriotism 

in Malaysia

Ramli Ismail & Norwaliza Abdul Wahab

ABSTRACT: This study aims to identify and analyse the elements contained in the objectives of  
academic curriculum and co-curricular content in terms of  differences, relationships, influences, 
and understanding of  learning skills, thinking skills as a mediator to the confidence to apply the 
elements of  patriotism among students of  Post-Graduate Teaching Course for Primary School 
(PGTC PS) and Bachelor of  Teaching for Primary Schools (BT PS) in Institute of  Teachers 
Education (ITE) in Malaysia. This survey study used questionnaires on 289 PGTC PS and BT 
PS students of  the North Zone and East Zone ITE in Peninsular Malaysia. The t-test results 
showed that there was a significant difference between PGTC PS and BT PS students in terms of  
understanding on learning skills and thinking skills, but do not have any significant difference in 
terms of  confidence to implement the elements of  patriotism. Pearson correlation analysis shows 
that there was a moderate relationship between the variables of  learning skills, thinking skills, 
academic curriculum, co-curriculum, and the confidence to apply the elements of  patriotism among 
PGTC PS and BT PS students. These findings serve as evidence to the Ministry of  Education 
(MOE) in Malaysia to make recommendations to the ITE to serve as a guide in improving the 
confidence of  trainee students in applying the elements of  patriotism.
KEY WORDS: Teaching the patriotism, learning skills, thinking skills, mediator, students, and 
Institute of  Teachers Education in Malaysia. 

Introduction

The global-natured education of  Malaysia could cross locations and ideologies 
because the characteristics of  nationhood, nationalism, culture, and spirituality are 
embodied within it. According to Abd Rahim Abd Rashid (2005), globalization that 
swept over the world now has a big impact on the world educational development, 
including in Malaysia. In this case, the Ministry of  Education in Malaysia will 
need to shift and make changes in the teachers training as a preparation for 
implementing the Education Development Master Plan (EDMP) and the success 
of  Vision 2020.

This current shift is to support the implementation of  EDMP and Vision 2020 
so that people are prepared to face the globalization, which will destroy the country 



RAMLI ISMAIL & NORWALIZA ABDUL WAHAB,
Teachers’ Education Curriculum

174

that was built through consensus for sustainable progress and development. The 
education system practiced in Malaysia is believed to be able to build physical 
strength, cognitive, spiritual, and productivity-oriented attitude. Cognitive and 
spiritual strength, that is applied and incorporated in education, is believed to change 
the attitude of  Malaysia’s population from the negative to the positive attitude to 
increase the economic development and performance-oriented education system 
and quality improvement which could be transformed through human capital 
programs.

Division of  Teachers Education introduced the Bachelor of  Teaching (Primary 
School) is to improve the quality of  teaching and learning as envisioned in the 
EDMP. Aspirations and recommendations of  this development are in line with the 
Cabinet Committee Report of  1979 which suggested that the teachers have academic 
and higher professional qualifications as well as the personal characteristics that 
are appropriate to the functions and their role as teachers (Hussain, 2004).

The growth of  the teachers’ quality is determined by the teachers training 
program provided by the Teachers Education Division (TED). According to 
Abu Bakar Nordin and Ikhsan Othman (2008), the lecturers in ITE (Institute 
of  Teacher Education) should transform the skills and techniques of  thinking, 
various intelligence, and learning techniques to install patriotism and love towards 
the country. According to Abd Rahim Abd Rashid (1997) and Bar-Tal and E. 
Staub eds. (1997), patriotism is not only referring to the feelings of  deep love 
for the country but also the aspects of  awareness, loyalty, idealism, nationalism, 
citizenship, responsibility, sacrifice, endurance, commitment, and contribution to 
the country. 

Some researchers interpreted that patriotism, the trainee teachers should have, 
is in relation to their confidence to integrate elements of  patriotism such as feelings 
of  pride (Doob, 1963; Mac Intyre, 1994; Gordon, 2000; and Kay Kim, 2002) as a 
Malaysian, sacrifice or loyalty (Hollis, 1996; Abd Rashid, 1997; Reykowski, 1997; 
and Berns, 2001), confidence (Feshbach,1987; Viroli, 1995; and Parker, 2002), 
spirit of  belonging (Tajfel, 1981; and Tamir, 1997), and efforts and worship (Bar-Tal 
& Staub eds., 1997) once they become a teacher. These patriotism elements are 
contained in the Buku Panduan Program Pengukuhan Pemupukan Patriotisme Sekolah 
Rendah or Handbook of  Patriotism Nurturing Program for Primary Schools (MOE 
Malaysia, 1994). 

Problem Statement, Aims, and Objectives of the Research

Patriotism is an important element in the implementation of  curriculum and co-
curriculum. Elements of  patriotism should be preached to students, particularly 
through the teaching and learning in schools. The younger generation should be 
inculcated with the concept of  compassion and love for the country more than 
anything else, because it is here where they were born and this is where they 
expressed the life and death for the country. The younger generation must be guided 



EDUCARE:
International Journal for Educational Studies, 5(2) 2013

175

by teachers who have the courage and patriotism of  high value in serving a lesson 
to their students through Primary School Integrated Curriculum / Primary School 
Standard Curriculum and Secondary School Integrated Curriculum. Therefore, 
teachers have a greater significant responsibility to ensure the application of  
patriotism values to achieve the goals of  holistic human formation as described in 
the National Education Philosophy (MOE Malaysia, 2001). 

Country’s education system emphasizes the construction of  patriotism. This 
value is transmitted to teachers through teachers training provided to trainees 
before being sent to serve directly throughout Malaysia. Teachers will use the 
techniques and strategies of  adoption and assimilation to reinforce the elements of  
patriotism as envisaged in the national education goals and vision. In this regard, 
the Ministry of  Education Malaysia has developed several strategic implementations 
to incorporate the value of  patriotism among students through curricular and 
co-curricular activities, especially at the teachers’ training level. The elements of  
patriotism should be incorporated gradually starting from pre-schools to primary 
schools (Yusuf, 2005). 

The elements of  patriotism can be applied directly in the subject of  Local Studies 
(MOE Malaysia, 2005) and the subject of  Civic Education starting from standard 
four, standard five, and standard six (MOE Malaysia, 2006). While at secondary 
school level, this patriotism element is merged directly into History subject (MOE 
Malaysia, 2002) and Civic Education (MOE Malaysia, 2004). Thus, the element of  
patriotism to be cultivated in the primary level will be the foundation of  students’ 
character building, especially in terms of  leadership, culture, national pride, and a 
willingness to sacrifice for the progress and prosperity of  the country. Inculcation 
of  patriotism begins with patriotism towards self-confidence and ability which 
then moves to the patriotism of  the families, schools, communities, and leads to 
progress and prosperity. 

At the secondary level, the elements of  patriotism expands to a broader element, 
including pride in being Malaysian, vibrant loyalty to country, passionate sense 
of  belonging, discipline, and productive. Ministry of  Education Malaysia in 2001 
gave a different perspective to the usual assumptions of  a segment of  society that 
the understanding of  the community related to patriotism is confined to only a 
deep love for the country. The value of  the ideal patriotism should be developed 
and embedded earlier in the souls of  Malaysians to become dynamic and resilient 
citizens to enable the development of  the country (MOE Malaysia, 2001).

Construction of  patriotism among the people, especially students, need a 
strategic and systematic planning. Hence, a conceptual model of  patriotism 
construction in Malaysia was developed by Ishak Ramly, Mohd Daud Hamzah 
and Zakaria Kassim (2004), and Mohamad Noor Mohamad Taib (2006) which 
describes briefly about the strategic construction of  patriotism and weltanschauung, 
especially among people living in urban and rural areas. Ministry of  Education 
Malaysia, through the school agencies and teachers training, should coordinate and 
provide more effective and innovative strategies to implement the action plan for 



RAMLI ISMAIL & NORWALIZA ABDUL WAHAB,
Teachers’ Education Curriculum

176

the construction and strengthening of  patriotism among the younger generation in 
Malaysia. In this case, the function and role of  educational institutions and other 
institutions are very important and should be ready to fulfil the responsibilities to 
ensure loyalty and devotion for the progress and prosperity of  the nation. 

Patriotism passed through the educational institutions need to start with 
understanding and practice of  positive cultural thinking and productive and efficient 
and smart learning skills to meet the needs of  mastering the knowledge and achieve 
success in education. These two key elements are the cores of  the National Education 
Philosophy applied to the students through the curriculum, co-curriculum, the 
culture of  school or institute, and environmental elements. Institutions other 
than educational institutions also play an equal role in cultivating the elements of  
patriotism through socio-cultural activities, economy, and politic.

Malaysian Ministry of  Education, through the Institute of  Teachers Education 
(IPG, Institut Pendidikan Guru), provides Post-Graduate Teaching Course for 
Primary Schools (PGTC PS) and Bachelor of  Teaching for Primary Schools (BT 
PS) since 2007. These programs provide generic skills, especially learning skills 
and thinking skills; and the elements of  patriotism to the trainee teachers through 
the process of  teaching and learning (MOE Malaysia, 2007). So far, there are no 
studies on the learning and thinking skills and   associated with values of  patriotism, 
especially in terms of  effectiveness and contribution of  these elements to the 
construction and development of  teacher education to convey the elements of  
patriotism among the trainees. 

A study on the level of  understanding of  patriotism among the trainees 
conducted by Nadarajan Marimuthu (2006) in the Raja Melewar ITE (Institute 
of  Teacher Education), Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia which found that the trainee 
teachers’ understanding of  patriotism was very low. Among the justifications 
given by the trainee teachers on why they are not confident to apply the elements 
of  patriotism was due to lack of  emphasis on some elements of  patriotism in the 
curriculum area being studied, disturbance in time and learning strategies that 
are not focused on elements of  patriotism, does not have clear guidelines to plan 
the application of  the elements of  patriotism during learning session, and limited 
resources on patriotism references. According to Abd Rahim Abd Rashid (1999), 
the factor of  individual self-confidence in doing something is related to the process 
of  affective-cognitive reasoning process and converted into generic skills. Studies 
on understanding and confidence to apply the elements of  patriotism in the areas 
of  curriculum and academic co-curriculum are very limited at the level of  teacher 
service and pre-service teacher training colleges. 

Based on the above discussion, there is a need to conduct a comprehensive study 
to identify and analyze the elements contained in the objectives of  the academic 
curriculum and co-curricular activities in the Institutes of  Teachers Training based 
on the understanding of  generic skills (learning skills and thinking skills) and 
confidence to implement the patriotic elements from the aspects of  difference, 
relationships, and influences. This study also aims to identify whether aspects of  



EDUCARE:
International Journal for Educational Studies, 5(2) 2013

177

the understanding of  learning skills and thinking skills serve as a mediator to the 
confidence to apply elements of  patriotism among the trainee students in six ITE 
(Institute of  Teachers Education) in the East Coastal Zone and North Zone in 
Peninsular Malaysia. 

Among the aims and objectives of  this study are as follows: (1) Identify and 
analyze the mean differences between PGTC PS, Post-Graduate Teaching Course for 
Primary Schools, and BT PS, Bachelor of  Teaching for Primary Schools, students in 
terms of  understanding of  factor to incorporate elements of  the teaching patriotism 
in six ITE; (2) Identify and analyze the relationship between the understanding 
of  learning skills and thinking skills with confidence to incorporate the elements 
of  patriotism among the PGTC PS and BT PS trainees in six ITE; (3) Analyze 
the extent to which academic curriculum and extra-curricular activities, learning 
skills and thinking skills affect the confidence to apply the elements of  patriotism 
among the PGTC PS and BT PS trainees in six ITE; and (4) Analyze the extent to 
which aspects of  understanding of  the learning skills and thinking skills function 
as a mediator in the relationship between academic curriculum and co-curriculum 
with the confidence to apply the elements of  patriotism among the PGTC PS and 
BT PS trainees in six ITE.

The Concept of Patriotism

The word “patriots” comes from the Greek word referring to “a fellow countrymen”, 
while the word “Patrice” referred to the “fatherland” or “country” from the “pater” 
which means “father”. But the term “fellow countrymen” refers to the group, and 
the word “country” refers to those regions and units within the group (Bar-Tal & 
Staub eds., 1997). The term “patriot” was first used in the English Dictionary in 
Europe in 1676 with reference to the importance of  a country’s political influence 
(Putman, 1998). 

The concept of  patriotism is defined and discussed in various forms depending 
on the situation of  time and place of  a person such as a generation that was in the 
days before independence has a different spirit of  patriotism by the generation after 
independence. However, the purposes are the same which are unequivocal loyalty 
and love for the country. There are only mission statements in different contexts, 
to Khoo Kay Kim (2002), loyalty to the country includes the aspects of  politics, 
economics, and sports. Meanwhile, according to Idris Mohd Nor (2003), patriotism 
does not refer to only the country but also as an opportunity to obtain freedom of  
worship, fun, freedom to express opinions, and to make choices about things. 

Nationalism is seen as a brain-based action, while patriotism is behaviour 
based and often reactive in nature. This statement was supported by J.L. Machia 
(2000) summarizing that the concept of  patriotism is related with the feelings of  
patriotism, race, and religion with a sense of  responsibility in order to uphold the 
dignity, honour the survival of  the nation. This spirit also forms the basis of  an 
individual capacity that gives the loyalty to the country, having given citizenship 
in a modern country. 



RAMLI ISMAIL & NORWALIZA ABDUL WAHAB,
Teachers’ Education Curriculum

178

According to D. Bar-Tal and E. Staub eds. (1997) and Uzi Arad and Gal Alon 
(2006), patriotism began with the presence of  a patriotic person in the group through 
an appreciation of  local values   and characteristics of  the feeling in the group. Thus, 
emerged the sense of  belonging in the group and became a symbol of  strength that 
can influence human behaviour and become the basis of  the value of  patriotism. 

Patriotism to be inculcated to the people of  Malaysia, especially to the students 
would need to be taken into account the situation, is in an area and refers to the 
time setting. The significance of  patriotism for the generation before independence 
is not the same as post-independence generation (1957). This position can be 
distinguished by the classification of  patriotism on five areas, as described by 
Hurwitz and Peffley, which are: 

(1) Iconoclastic Patriotism refers to an individual’s love for the country through positive actions 
such as a persistent attitude, courage, discipline, knowledge, and vision to move forward and 
develop the country; (2) Symbolic Patriotism refers to the level of  patriotism which is symbolized 
by respect for national symbols such as flags, anthems, and national principles; (3) Capitalistic 
Patriotism emphasis on involvement in developing the competitiveness of  the country’s economy 
and being proud of  the achievements attained; (4) Instinctive Environmental Patriotism focuses on 
the spirit to preserve and protect the environment so that it remains preserved to be enjoyed by 
future generations; and (5) Nationalistic Symbolic Patriotism is the high level of  individual loyalty 
to a certain race and willing to sacrifice for the country (cited in Embi, 2009). 

Based on the five aspects of  patriotism that has been discussed, it is clear that 
the concept of  patriotism is so broad by definition and can cover all aspects of  life. 
Iconoclastic Patriotism aspect is suitable for discussion at the educational institution 
level because it involves the inculcation of  patriotism through the change of  
attitude, discipline, and students’ commitment. The Symbolic Patriotism refers to 
the patriotism of  a person described by the respect and appreciation of  national 
symbols like the flag, national song, and the national principles that can lead to a 
sense of  pride of  the country so as to arouse patriotism and unity among students. 
According to Abd Rahim Abd Rashid (1999), patriotism itself  is an abstract concept 
that needs to be translated through writing, reading materials, curriculum, co-
curricular activities, and learning environment. These abstract messages require 
students to use cognitive and effective reasoning to understand it. 

Literature Reviews

Social Identity Theory. The spirit of  patriotism in a person begins with the process 
of  identity formation and, then, expanded to the formation of  social identity. This 
development occurs in accordance with the cognitive development of  children 
and finally evolves into patriotism. One’s social identity development process was 
explained theoretically by H. Tajfel and J.C. Tunner (1986) which states one’s social 
identity were derived based on the individuals or members within each group will 
seek to achieve and maintain a positive social identity by looking at the internal 
elements of  his/her own group compared with the group outside. Naturally, human 



EDUCARE:
International Journal for Educational Studies, 5(2) 2013

179

like to think positively about themselves and their group. A person will contribute 
positively to the group and, hence, bring the sense of  belonging to the group and 
raise his/her self-esteem and the country in general. 

Teaching the Patriotism. The sense of  belonging towards one’s self  and can be 
channeled through the field of  education. Based on the discussion presented by 
Mohd Janib Johari (2001), Esah Sulaiman (2003), Yahya Buntat and Zainuddin 
Masran (2003), Sufean Hussain (2004), Abd Rahim Abd Rashid (2005), Foo Say 
Fay (2005), Mohamad Noor Mohamad Taib (2006), and Noriah Mohd Ishak and 
Mohammed Sani Ibrahim (2007), it can be concluded that feelings of  love and 
responsibility towards the profession is an element of  patriotism and should be 
practiced by all teachers. This can be implemented if  a teacher has a high degree of  
confidence to implement the elements of  patriotism so that people can develop the 
feeling of  proudest in being citizens of  a country, loyalty, passionate comradeship, 
discipline, and productive in every student. High confidence and understanding of  
the elements of  patriotism will produce teachers who can bring changes in society 
towards a more democratic, fair, liberal, and scientific (Fat, 2004). Therefore, 
according to Omar Hisham Mohd Baharin (2005), greater confidence to apply 
the elements of  patriotism among the trainees can be achieved if  they have a 
good understanding of  the theory and the importance of  cultivating these values   
in teaching and learning.

Element of  patriotism should be instilled in children before entering school; and 
for this, the family should play an important role in preaching the understanding 
to the child. The above statement was in accordance with the findings of  the study 
which was carried out by Abu Bakar Yusuf  (2005). He felt that the factor family 
is a main distributor of  information to students compared to the mass media and 
schools. When children are at school, the value of  patriotism applied directly in the 
subjects, particularly the subject of  Local Studies and Civics, while at the secondary 
level subjects like History, Geography, and other subjects also has elements and 
values   and patriotism (Yusuf, 2005). According to Mohamad Noor Mohamad 
Taib (2006), direct application in the teaching and learning in the classroom can 
improve the understanding of  patriotism among students.

A study on the understanding of  patriotism at the level of  Public Higher 
Education Institutes (PHEI) was carried out by Asmadi Mohamed Naim et al. 
(2003) and found that PHEI students of  religious background at all levels of  primary 
and secondary school education have a high level of  patriotism compared with the 
students from national or vernacular schools. Their study covered the ideological 
aspects (which are commitment to the nation, in terms of  attitude measure of  
cognitive, effective, emotional state towards elements such as history, religion, 
and the National Principles); practical aspects (appreciation of  national events such 
as celebration of  independence, the Sultan’s birthday); aspects of  continuity and 
consistency (the practice of  daily life, speech, language, clothing or art activities); 
and aspects of  the understanding (of  the feelings and concerns on issues affecting the 
country, conflict, and intervention of  foreign countries).



RAMLI ISMAIL & NORWALIZA ABDUL WAHAB,
Teachers’ Education Curriculum

180

The awareness of  the application of  understanding the value of  patriotism 
among students should be given to teachers first and this process should begin 
at ITE (Institute of  Teacher Education) or universities that train future teachers. 
Accordingly, the trainee teachers must establish compact teaching techniques so 
that the message of  patriotism to be cultivated in the students can be accepted 
significantly, because referring to Ku Hasnita Ku Samsu and Mohd Haizan Mohd 
Nor (2009) that the younger generation already have basic knowledge about 
patriotism. 

This statement is consistent with the findings of  Jaizah Mahamud (2001) that 
during a practicum, trainee teachers cannot plan the appropriate activities to apply 
the elements of  patriotism, although they are aware of  its importance. However, 
quite in contrast with the results of  the study by Nadarajan Marimuthu (2006) which 
states the understanding of  the elements of  patriotism among trainee teachers at 
the Institute of  Teachers Education in Raja Melewar was low and moderate, while 
attitudes toward elements of  patriotism was positive. This research also found 
that the influence of  peers and mass media have a positive relationship with the 
appreciation of  the elements of  patriotism, but gender factor did not show any 
difference in the appreciation of  the elements of  patriotism among those trainee 
teachers.

The study of  patriotism is not only limited within a country but also at the 
international level, where Uzi Arad and Gal Alon (2006) studied on Israeli Jewish 
citizens who showed that only 77 percent Israeli felt proud in being an Israeli as 
compared to other countries. Instead, they are more proud of  the achievements of  
the country in terms of  scientific and technological progress (97%), defense systems 
(86%), 38 percent towards the democracy works, and only 22 percent towards the 
social welfare system. For the Arab descent Israel citizens, only 56 percent were 
proud to be the people of  Israel and 73 percent were ready to defend the country 
compared to 85 percent for the Jewish Israeli citizens. It was clear that technological 
and scientific achievements are the main pride of  the country rather than the urge 
to defend Israel, their own country. Following this, in order to face the challenges 
of  21st century, Israel focused on education as a platform to inculcate ideologies 
that can enhance the spirit of  patriotism among the people. 

The findings of  L. Huddy and N. Khatib (2007) on the citizens of  United States 
of  America showed a good correlation between the four constructs used which were 
the national identity, symbolic patriotism, constructive patriotism, and uncritical 
patriotism (r = .744). This study described national identity has a good correlation 
with the symbolic patriotism r = .74 in 2004 compared to r = .68 in 2002, but poor 
correlation between the factor of  national identity with uncritical patriotism r = 
.51 in 2004 and r = .56 in 2002. This means there is a good relationship between 
factors of  national identity and symbolic patriotism for being complementary in 
the process of  increasing the spirit of  patriotism. 

Result of  the discussion that has been described by local and foreign researchers, 
it can be concluded that the elements of  patriotism can be applied to individuals in 



EDUCARE:
International Journal for Educational Studies, 5(2) 2013

181

different ways. That includes through teaching and learning, highlighting the aspects 
of  economic progress, achievements in technology, the integrity of  national defense, 
and superior appreciation of  local culture. This application aims to produce a host 
of  enthusiastic loyal citizens, proud of  being Malaysian, vibrant sense of  belonging, 
discipline, and working and productive. All these elements were made into the main 
constructs in the construction of  the questionnaire items in this study. 

Research Method

This study used a survey method to obtain information about the relationship 
between the independent variables with the dependent variable. Next, it will identify 
whether the two variables are mutually influence to each other. The data collected 
through the questionnaire used to gather information from overall respondents. 
The research framework is briefly described in figure 1.

 Mediator 
Variables: 

Learning & 
Thinking Skills 

Independent Variables: 
Curriculum & Co-

Curriculum 

Dependent Variables: 
Confidence  

& Cultivation of Elements of 
Patriotism 

Figure 1:  
Research Framework

Overall, the t-test was used to find the difference between dependent and 
independent variables. The correlation analysis was used to identify the relationship 
between all variables in this study, but not to explain the relationship of  cause 
and effect (Gravetter & Wallmau, 2002). Apart from that, the correlation analysis 
method is used to identify the relationship between the variables. Subsequently, the 
hierarchical multiple regression models taken as a statistical procedure to identify 
the influence of  independent variables through mediators on the dependent variable. 
Procedures done in stages where independent variables included in the regression 
for step one (block 1 in the regression), while step two (block 2 in the regression) 
included an independent variable and the mediators (Ndubisi & Jantan, 2003).

Multi-stage sampling method used in selecting samples for this study based on 
three levels. In the first stage, the researchers classified the 27 ITE (Institute of  
Teachers Education) according to zones such as Zone of  Sabah and Sarawak, East 
Coast Zone, South Zone, Central Zone, and North Zone of  Peninsular Malaysia. 
Of  the six zones, two zones were randomly selected as samples which are the 



RAMLI ISMAIL & NORWALIZA ABDUL WAHAB,
Teachers’ Education Curriculum

182

East Coast Zone and North Zone of  Peninsular Malaysia. The total number of  
students of  both zones are 817 trainee teachers whom doing full time PGTC PS 
(Post-Graduate Teaching Course for Primary Schools) in June 2009 intake and 
BT PS (Bachelor of  Teaching for Primary Schools) in January 2007 intake (MOE 
Malaysia, 2009). 

This sampling method has taken into account factors such as time, cost 
savings, and easy access for researchers. This statement is consistent with the 
recommendations of  K. Leahy (1988), W.R. Borg and M.D. Gall eds. (1989), and 
J. Cohen (1992). At the third level, the trainee teachers from six ITEs (North Zone 
and East Coast Zone of  Peninsular Malaysia) was randomly selected through a list 
of  students from various fields to determine the sample size based on the formula 
recommended by R.V. Krejcie and  D.W. Morgan (1970). Based on the calculation, 
the number of  samples needed for this study was 261 trainee teachers. This sample 
size is almost exactly the amount found in the determination of  sample size table 
given by R.V. Krejcie and D.W. Morgan (1970) that for a population of  850 people, 
the sample size required is 265 people only. 

Findings and Discussions

Practically, all the hypotheses and objectives of  the study have been answered clearly 
based on statistical analysis procedures that have been identified through appropriate 
research questions. The results showed a difference of  understanding on the concept 
of  learning skills and thinking skills between students of  PGTC PS (Post-Graduate 
Teaching Course for Primary Schools) and BT PS (Bachelor of  Teaching for Primary 
Schools). The mean difference indicates PGTC PS trainees understand the concept 
of  learning skills and thinking skills, even though only one year at ITE (Institute of  
Teacher Education) compared with trainees of  BT PS who are almost five and a 
half  years, including one year and a half  in preparation class. The result indicated 
that there is a consistency with the objectives of  teacher education curriculum 
to produce graduate teachers who have knowledge of  pedagogy, learning skills, 
thinking skills, highly valued interpersonal skills comparable to the trainee teachers 
produced by other educational institutions (MOE Malaysia, 2007/2008).

The PGTC PS trainees, although have underwent the training for a year in ITE, 
their learning and experience in the universities before studying in ITE has made 
them matured and enabled them to easily understand the concept of  learning skills 
and thinking skills. However, for trainees pursuing BT PS for five and a half  years 
has provided an avenue for them to understand the concepts of  learning skills and 
thinking skills on par with PGTC PS who are older and have experience in various 
fields before applying as a trainee teacher. 

The results showed that the period of  study is sufficient for PGTC PS trainees in 
order to understand the concept of  learning and thinking skills because they have 
experience of  studying at an university. Results of  analysis are consistent with the 
results of  a study conducted by Chee Kim Mang (2008) on the quality of  beginner 



EDUCARE:
International Journal for Educational Studies, 5(2) 2013

183

teachers between PGTC PS trainees and Diploma in Teaching Course Malaysia 
(DTCM) trainees. It was found that PGTC PS teachers have performed better in 
terms of  personal qualities and teaching and learning in the classroom from the 
perspectives of  school administrators. 

The research result 1 showed that there was a difference in terms of  confidence 
to implement the elements of  patriotism among students of  PGTC PS and BT PS. 
Finding is in line with recommendations made   by Nadarajan Marimuthu (2006) 
who found no significant differences in confidence to apply the elements of  moral 
values and patriotism between the PGTC PS and BT PS trainees in several ITE 
in the North Zone.

The findings also clarify that the factors of  age, location, location of  ITE, and 
early educational background does not help a group to have a higher confidence of  a 
particular concept in question related to patriotism. The results showed that all PGTC 
PS trainees graduated from the Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) from local or 
overseas have the same level in terms of  confidence to implement the elements of  
patriotism to the student when they were appointed as teachers soon. 

Confidence of  PGTC PS trainees to apply the elements of  patriotism shows 
local universities produce graduates with a good sense of  patriotism and have the 
capability to cultivate it in others. Results showed that ITE can fulfill part of  the 
Ministry of  Education’s wish to produce BT PS students who have high confidence 
to incorporate elements of  patriotism. Greater confidence to apply the elements of  
patriotism among the trainees to be backed by a good understanding of  the theory 
and the importance of  values   in teaching and learning (Mohd Baharin, 2005).

The next finding shows that there is no difference between students of  PGTC PS 
and BT PS on students’ understanding of  what is contained in the objectives of  the 
curriculum and co-curriculum courses in their respective programs. This finding is 
quite different from the views expressed by Lam Kah Kei et al. (2007) which states 
that the PGTC PS students are less able to appreciate and understand in depth the 
content of  the curriculum and co-curriculum implemented to their students while at 
the ITE. BT PS students, who spent five and a half  years in the institute, understand 
and appreciate the content of  the curriculum and co-curriculum effectively. It is 
clear that different curriculum and co-curricular contents for four and a half  years 
between PGTC PS and BT PS students gives a positive impact to understand, 
interpret, and translate the curriculum and co-curriculum content as a teacher.

The research result 2 showed a moderate correlation between students’ understanding 
of  curriculum and co-curriculum with the understanding of  learning skills and thinking 
skills. This moderately positive correlation indicates changes in the understanding of  
the curriculum and co-curriculum of  PGTC PS and BT PS students. This medium 
response resulted in a parallel change in the understanding of  learning skills and 
thinking skills. 

The findings also support previous studies associating a logical relationship 
to the curriculum and co-curriculum content in a program of  study undertaken 
with the understanding of  thinking skills and learning skills in generic skills 



RAMLI ISMAIL & NORWALIZA ABDUL WAHAB,
Teachers’ Education Curriculum

184

components (OOA, 2006; and Leonard, 2007). Although the relationship is at a 
moderate level, but it reflects that the desire of  MOE (Ministry of  Education) and 
ITE (Institute of  Teacher Education) to implement and integrate the elements 
of  the generic skills such as thinking skills and learning skills through curricular 
and co-curricular activities can be achieved at an average level even though it was 
introduced in 1993. 

The achievement of  a moderate relationship is related to the research findings of  
Rajendran Nagapan (2000) who found that only 60 percent of  teachers in schools 
are directly exposed to the elements on how to cultivate thinking skills among 
students during the teaching and learning session. The trainee teachers should 
master these skills because it will be used to integrate the knowledge of  pedagogy, 
theoretical teaching with other knowledge in the areas of  specialization in order 
to reach students more effectively (Mohd Yasin & Rahman, 2009). 

Meanwhile, A. Woolfork (2004) pointed out that to achieve effective learning 
skills needs appropriate meta-cognitive strategies in order to stimulate the 
development of  students’ knowledge. The study also found that there was moderate 
correlation to changes in the understanding of  the objectives of  the curriculum and 
co-curriculum between PGTC PS and BT PS students. This finding is in line with 
changes to the confidence of  students to apply the elements of  patriotism when 
they are in the actual environment.

This finding shows that there is consistency with the study by Jaizah Mahamud 
(2001) and Mohamad Noor Mohd Taib (2006) which identified several reasons 
on why ITE students are not able to appreciate and understand the elements of  
good patriotism while at the institute. One of  the reasons was that emphasis on 
cultivation of  elements of  patriotism was not highlighted during lectures, instead, 
according to Ku Hasnita Ku Samsu and Mohd Haizan Mohd Nor (2009), our 
younger generation actually have a basic national knowledge and understanding of  
the elements of  patriotism. Therefore, this group has a good potential in increasing 
their patriotism from time to time. 

The findings revealed a moderate positive relationship between the variables of  
learning skills and thinking skills, and this moderate relationship bring the same 
changes to the confidence to cultivate the elements of  patriotism among PGTC PS 
and BT PS students in ITE. These findings emphasize that individuals or students 
with a good understanding of  thinking skills and learning skills would be more 
confident to apply the elements of  patriotism. 

This finding supports the research findings and assumptions made   by E.D. 
Putman (1998), Abd Rahim Abd Rashid (1999), and L.R. Williams, L.M. Foster 
and R.K. Krohn (2008). However, this finding is quite in contrast with the views 
expressed by Rajendran Nagapan (2000) that some of  the teachers admitted they 
are confident to teach the subject content but not confident to teach and apply 
critical thinking skills during classroom sessions. 

The research result 3 shows both the variables which are academic curriculum and 
co-curriculum, thinking skills, and learning skills are the factors that influence the 



EDUCARE:
International Journal for Educational Studies, 5(2) 2013

185

confidence to apply the elements of  patriotism among PGTC PS and BT PS students in 
ITE. This result was consistent with the views of  Abd Rahim Abd Rashid (1999), 
Idris Mohd Nor (2003), Mohamad Noor Mohd Taib (2006), and L.R. Williams, 
L.M. Foster and R.K. Krohn (2008) that the aspects of  thinking skills, learning 
skills, curriculum and co-curriculum are the factors that serve as comprehensive 
channels in cultivating values   and patriotism to students.

This research also found that aspects of  thinking skills and learning skills 
influence the student more compared to understanding of  the academic curriculum 
and co-curriculum in terms of  confidence to implement the elements of  patriotism. 
This result is related to thinking skills and learning skills significantly that the 
relationship is stronger than understanding of  the academic curriculum and co-
curriculum in the aspects of  confidence to apply the elements of  patriotism among 
PGTC PS and BT PS students in ITE. 

Subsequently, the results of  this study allow the ITE to plan for activities and 
teaching methods that can be applied towards enhancing the ability of  thinking 
skills among students. This has been proven through research that the learning 
skills and thinking skills are the elements of  cognitive, affective, and spiritual that 
is so important to generate students’ thinking ability.

The research result 4 proves that the aspect of  understanding the learning skills and 
thinking skills function as mediators in the understanding of  the relationship between 
aspects of  the curriculum and co-curriculum with the dependent variable, namely the 
confidence to apply the elements of  patriotism among PGTC PS and BT PS students in 
ITE. But these mediators are only partial mediators when tested by the method of  
Hierarchical Multiple Regression and supported by software decisions MedGraph by 
P.E. Jose (2008). This finding is correlated with what was discussed by Abd Rahim 
Abd Rashid (1999) and L.R. Williams, L.M. Foster and R.K. Krohn (2008) which 
refers to the students’ mastery of  cognitive skills as the main channel to receive 
the moral values,   particularly patriotism. This finding fits the aim contained in the 
curriculum and co-curriculum objectives of  PGTC PS and BT PS that includes 
elements of  thinking skills and learning skills as a means to implement the elements 
of  patriotism (MOE Malaysia, 2007). But it is not easy to stimulate and train 
students to expand and enhance their cognitive ability, particularly in critical skills. 
This difficulty was described by Rajendran Nagapan (2000) that some teachers 
claim they are confident to teach the content of  a subject, but not confident to 
teach thinking on the critical thinking. 

Conclusion

Overall, this study provided significant implications for PGTS PS (Post-Graduate 
Teaching Course for Primary Schools) and BT PS (Bachelor of  Teaching for 
Primary Schools) students, lecturers, ITE (Institute of  Teacher Education), and 
towards research. The findings may be an indicator that the level of  understanding 
of  learning skills and thinking skills are at low and moderate levels among the PGTS 



RAMLI ISMAIL & NORWALIZA ABDUL WAHAB,
Teachers’ Education Curriculum

186

PS and BT PS students in ITE. Therefore, PGTS PS and BT PS students should 
have massive skills in handling learning skills and thinking skills so that teaching 
and learning would be more effective. 

In addition, to an overview of  the level of  learning skills and thinking skills 
results show that the trainee students in six ITEs have fairly high confidence to 
cultivate the elements of  patriotism among their students when they start to teach. 
The hopes and confessions given by the students of  these institutions can at least 
be the initial measurement that values   and the teaching patriotism elements can 
be inculcated to the students. 

Research questions did not focus on the ITE lecturers, but in reality, they are 
the communicators of  knowledge and the key informant to the students. The 
comprehensively designed curriculum, that was meant to be implemented on the 
students, needs to be interpreted by the lecturers more accurately so that the real 
meaning can be understood clearly. 

Understanding of  learning skills and thinking skills among teacher educators 
can become a bridge to the ability to implement the moral values   and patriotism. 
These studies have shown that to implement the values   and patriotism, one must 
have substantial learning skills and thinking skills as it is connected with the 
thinking process. 

The desire of  MOE (Ministry of  Education) and ITE (Institute of  Teacher 
Education) in Malaysia is to see students have self-esteem and a high level of  
patriotism could be achieved, if  the prospective teachers produced by the institutions 
have a high ability and confidence to implement the spirit of  patriotism. High spirit 
of  patriotism should be planted as early as the school students hoping to accelerate 
the process towards the achievement of  the concept of  “One Malaysia” in nurturing 
self-esteem and unity of  all Malaysians. 

The following statements are suggestions for future research based on the aspects 
of  the limitations of  this study: (1) the Period of  data collection may be extended, 
so that the respondents have the opportunity to answer the questionnaire properly 
and not in a rush to complete it. These factors may affect the results produced; (2) 
Data collection methods can be varied and not limited to the questionnaire, but 
may be made   in interviews, observations, and documents reviewed. This method 
of  triangulation is expected to produce more accurate and reliable results; (3) Apart 
from survey studies, researchers can do researches by quasi-experiments or complete 
experiments. May be this will produce more consistent results with higher reliability 
and validity; (4) In this study, population and sample selection method was through 
the cluster and simple random sampling method based on a list of  the institutes and 
the list of  selected students in the institute. Simple random sampling method was 
used to select samples. Researchers suggest other methods as well, such as strata 
sampling and purposive sampling which ever would be consistent with the objectives 
of  the study; (5) In this study, only three major variables have been studied which 
were independent variables i.e. academic curriculum and co-curriculum, mediator 
variables i.e. learning skills and thinking skills, and the dependent variable i.e. the 



EDUCARE:
International Journal for Educational Studies, 5(2) 2013

187

confidence to apply the elements of  patriotism. In the future, other aspects like ICT 
or Information and Communication Technology’s skills, communication skills, 
facilitating skills, and the elements of  professionalism such as expertise in teaching 
and learning can be studied. The findings are expected to bring a new dimension 
within the scope of  the study; and (6) Researchers’ expertise is also a limitation 
because the researchers are merely practitioners, not full-time researchers. Thus, 
many things and research procedures cannot be met wholly in terms of  research 
ethics and discipline. Researchers felt that if  this study scope was carried out by 
full-time researchers, they might have received more accurate and higher quality 
results because they have the expertise and high professionalism.

Based on the recommendations above, the researchers believe that the quality 
of  a study could be improved so as to enrich and expand the existing body of  
knowledge related to the theory and methodology in research. Conclusions from 
the study results showed that PGTC PS and BT PS students have different level 
of  understanding about learning skills, thinking skills, the content of  academic 
curriculum and co-curriculum. Moderate relationship between the variables depicts 
that the academic curriculum developed by the ITE can still be improved in order to 
place it on par with the aim of  Teachers Education Philosophy Model. The aspects 
of  knowledge, skills, and values   need to be more detail for it to be comprehensive 
and easily understood.

Significantly, the understanding aspect of  learning skills and thinking skills are 
more dominant compared to the understanding of  curriculum and co-curriculum 
in influencing PGTC PS and BT PS students’ confidence to incorporate elements 
of  patriotism. It also shows that the understanding aspects of  learning skills 
and thinking skills function as mediators between the academic curriculum, co-
curriculum, and the confidence to apply the elements of  patriotism among PGTC 
PS and BT PS students.

It is supported by statistical results which showed learning skills and thinking 
skills to function as partial mediators, but still have an effect in influencing students’ 
confidence to apply the elements of  patriotism. These results provide greater 
confidence to researchers that learning skills and thinking skills strongly influence 
the confidence PGTC PS and BT PS students in the process of  implementing 
elements of  patriotism and related to other research questions.

References

Abd Rashid, Abd Rahim. (1997). “Cultivation of  Patriotism and Vision in the Curriculum of  History 
Education”. Paper presented in the ISSC (Integrated Secondary School Curriculum) History 
Teaching Course for History Resources Teachers, PPK KPM, Air Keroh, Melaka, Malaysia: 10-
14 March.



RAMLI ISMAIL & NORWALIZA ABDUL WAHAB,
Teachers’ Education Curriculum

188

Abd Rashid, Abd Rahim. (1999). History Education: Philosophy, Theory, and Practice. Kuala Lumpur: 
Utusan Publications & Distributors. 

Abd Rashid, Abd Rahim. (2005). Teachers’ Professionalism: Prospect and Challenges. Kuala Lumpur: 
Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Arad, Uzi & Gal Alon. (2006). Patriotism and Israel’s Nation Security: Herzliya Patriotism Survey 2006. Tel 
Aviv, Israel: Institute for Policy and Strategy. Available also at: http://www.herzliya.comference.
org/Eng_uploads/1388pat-e.pdf  [accessed in Besut, Malaysia: 15th January 2013]. 

Bar-Tal, D. & E. Staub [eds]. (1997). Patriotism in the Lives of  Individuals and Nations. Chicago: Nelson-
Hall Publishers.

Berns, W. (2001). Making Patriots. Chicago: University of  Chicago Press.
Borg, W.R. & M.D. Gall [eds]. (1989). Educational Research: An Introduction. New York: Longman Inc., 

5th edition.
Buntat, Yahya & Zainuddin Masron. (2003). “The Practice of  Teaching Profession Ethics among 

Kampung Melayu National School, Kulai, Johor: An Overview” in Jurnal Teknologi UTM, 38(E), 
June, pp.65-74.

Cohen, J. (1992). “Statistical Power Analysis” in American Psychological Society, 1(3), pp.98-101.
Doob, L.W. (1963). Patriotism and Nationalism: Their Psychological Foundation. London: Yale University 

Press. 
Embi, Muhammad Ali. (2009). Patriotism and Believe of  Malaysia Citizens. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan 

Publications & Distributors. 
Fat, Beh Ah. (2004). National Principles: General Knowledge Series. Kuala Lumpur: Department of  

Information Service of  Malaysia.
Fay, Fooi Say. (2005). Ethics of  Teaching: A Guarantee to Improvement of  Professionalism. Serdang, Selangor: 

UPM (Putra University of  Malaysia) Publisher. 
Feshbach, S. (1987). “Individual Aggression, National Attachment, and the Search for Peace” in 

Aggressive Behaviors, 5, pp.315-326.
Gordon, R.H. (2000). ”Modernity, Freedom, and the State: Hegel’s Concept of   Patrotism” in The 

Review of  Politic, 62 (Spring), pp.295-325.
Gravetter, F.J. & L.B. Wallmau [eds]. (2002). Essentials of  Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Pacific 

Grove: Wadsworth, 4th edition.
Hollis, M. (1996). Machiavelli, Milton, and Hobbes on Liberty in the Textual Introduction to Social and Political 

Theory. Manchester: Manchester University Press, edited by Richard Bellamy & Angus Ross.
Huddy, L. & N. Khatib. (2007). “American Patriotism, National Identity, and Political Involvement” 

in American Journal of  Political Science, Vol.51(1), January, pp.63-77.
Hussain, Sufean. (2004). History, System, and Philosophy of  Education in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan 

Bahasa dan Pustaka.  
Johari, Mohd Janib. (2001). Professional Ethics. Skudai, Johor: UTM (Technology University of  Malaysia) 

Publisher.
Jose, P.E. (2008). MedGraph-I: A Programme to Graphically Depict Mediation among Three Variables, the 

Internet Version, Version 2.0. Wellington, New Zealand: Victoria University of  Wellington. Available 
also at: http://www.victoria.ac.nz/psyc/paul-jose-files/medgraph/result.php [accessed in Besut, 
Malaysia: 8th November 2012].

Kah Kei, Lam et al. (2007). “Post-Degree Teaching Course for Primary School: Assessment of  Suitability 
and Effectiveness of  Program” in Jurnal Penyelidikan Pendidikan Guru, Jilid 3. Kuala Lumpur: MOE 
[Ministry of  Education] Malaysia.

Kim, Khoo Kay. (2002). “Philosophy of  History: Towards Expanding the Element of  Patriotism 
and Nationhood”. Paper presented in the National Seminar of  Education Philosophy towards 
Strengthening the Nationhood Ideas and Vision at UM (University of  Malaya), Kuala Lumpur, 
Malaysia: 6-7 July.

Kim Mang, Chee. (2008). “The Quality of  Beginner Teachers of  a Teaching Institute: An Overview 
from the Perspective of  school Administrators” in Jurnal Pendidikdan Pendidikan, Vol.23. Pulau 
Pinang: Published by USM [University of  Science Malaysia], pp.49-67.

Krejcie, R.V. & D.W. Morgan. (1970). ”Determining Sample Size for Research Activities” in Educational 
and Psychological Measurement, 30, pp.607-610. 



EDUCARE:
International Journal for Educational Studies, 5(2) 2013

189

Ku Samsu, Ku Hasnita & Mohd Haizan Mohd Nor. (2009). “Spirit of  Patriotism among Non-Malay 
Students in Higher Education Institutions around Klang Valley” in Akademika, 75 [Jan-April], 
pp.85-100.

Leahy, K. (1988). “Testing Methodology: Statistical Power and Sample Size Determination” in Direct 
Marketing, 50(11), pp.28-32.

Leonard, M. (2007). “Teaching Critical Thinking in a Community-College Art-History Learning 
Environment: A Comparison of  Implicit Instruction versus a Combination of  Implicit and Explicit 
Instruction”. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. San Francisco, USA: University of  San Francisco. 
Available also at: ProQuest Imformation and Learning Company, UMI Microform 3280031.

Mac Intyre, A. (1994). ”Is Patriotism a Virtue?” in  M. Daly Belmont [ed]. Communitarian. CA: 
Wadsworth.

Machia, J.L. (2000). So, What is Patriotism Anyway. New York: The Rosen Publishing Group Inc.
Mahamud, Jaizah. (2001). “An Overview on Cultivation of  Element of  Patriotism through the Subject 

of  Local Studies among Trainee Teachers during Practicum”. Paper presented in the Research 
Seminar of  MPKB, on 14-15 August.

Marimuthu, Nadarajan. (2006). “A Survey on the Understanding of  Patriotism among the Students of  
Teacher Institute: Case Study in IPRM”. Paper presented in the National Level Teachers’ Research 
Seminar, Organised by TED/IPTI.

MOE [Ministry of  Education] Malaysia. (1994). Guidelines of  Reinforcement of  Primary School Patriotism 
Cultivation Program. Kuala Lumpur: CDC [Curriculum Development Center].

MOE [Ministry of  Education] Malaysia. (2001). Description of  Form 1 ISSC History Syllabus. Kuala 
Lumpur: CDC [Curriculum Development Center].

MOE [Ministry of  Education] Malaysia. (2002). Description of  Integrated Secondary School Curriculum 
Syllabus: History Form 1, 2, & 3. Kuala Lumpur: CDC [Curriculum Development Center].

MOE [Ministry of  Education] Malaysia. (2004). Integrated Secondary School Curriculum: Description of  
Form 1 Civic and Nationality Education Syllabus. Kuala Lumpur: CDC [Curriculum Development 
Center].

MOE [Ministry of  Education] Malaysia. (2005). Integrated Secondary School Curriculum: Description of  
Standard 5 Local Studies Syllabus. Kuala Lumpur: CDC [Curriculum Development Center].

MOE [Ministry of  Education] Malaysia. (2006). Description of  Standard 5 Civic and Nationality Education 
Syllabus. Kuala Lumpur: CDC [Curriculum Development Center].

MOE [Ministry of  Education] Malaysia. (2007). Bachelor of  Teaching with Honours Program: Academic 
Handbook January 2007. Besut, Terengganu, Malaysia: Teacher Education Institute, Sultan Mizan 
Campus. 

MOE [Ministry of  Education] Malaysia. (2007/2008). Bachelor of  Teaching with Honours Program 
Handbook Session 2007/2008. Kuala Lumpur: Teacher Education Institute Malaysia, Teacher 
Education Division.

MOE [Ministry of  Education] Malaysia. (2009). Basic Enrolment Quick-Facts of  Pre-Service and In-Service 
Students Teacher Education Institute. Kuala Lumpur: Teacher Education Division.

Mohamed Naim, Asmadi et al. (2003). “Building Students’ Patriotism through Islamic Education: An 
Empirical Study on PHLI” in Proceeding of  Strengthen the Education System National Seminar at 
UTM (Technology University of  Malaysia), Johor: 19-21 October, pp.38-50.

Mohd Baharin, Omar Hisham. (2005). “A Research on the Elements of  Value as One of  the Elements 
Cultivated in T&L among Trainee Teachers During Teaching Training (Practicum)” in Proceeding 
of  JPPG Education Seminar, pp.437-442.

Mohd Ishak, Noriah & Mohammed Sani Ibrahim. (2007). “Ethics in Teaching Profession” in Norzaini 
Azman & Mohammed Sani Ibrahim [eds]. Teaching Profession. Bangi: Faculty of  Education UKM 
(National University of  Malaysia), pp.161-182.

Mohd Nor, Idris. (2003). Independence, Identity, and Patriotism: Understanding, Challenges, and Obstacles. 
Kuala Lumpur: National Civics Bureau, Prime Minister’s Department.

Mohd Taib, Mohamad Noor. (2006). “Cultivation of  Core Value of  Patriotism in Teaching and Learning 
of  History” in Proceeding of  JPPG Education Seminar Year 2005.

Mohd Yasin, Fatimah & Saemah Rahman. (2009). “ICT Integration Training Strategic and Thinking 
Skills in the Teachers’ Education Program” in Reformasi Pendidikan Serantau. Bangi, Selangor Darul 



RAMLI ISMAIL & NORWALIZA ABDUL WAHAB,
Teachers’ Education Curriculum

190

Ehsan: Faculty of  Education NUM [National University of  Malaysia], pp.153-165.
Nagapan, Rajendran. (2000). “Teaching Higher-Order Thinking Skill in Classrooms: Learning from 

the Experiences of  Malaysia”. Paper presented in the Thinking Qualities Initiative Conference at 
the Centre of  Educational Development, Hong Kong Baptist University, 23-24 January. 

Ndubisi, Nelson Oly & Muhamad Jantan (2003). “Evaluating IS Usage in Malaysian Small and Medium-
Sized Firms Using the Technology Acceptance Model” in Logistics Information Management, 16(6), 
pp.440-450. Available also at: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/0957-6053.htm [accessed in Besut, 
Malaysia: 26th November 2012].

Nordin, Abu Bakar & Ikhsan Othman. (2008). Education Philosophy and Curriculum. Tanjung Malim, 
Malaysia: Quantum Book, 2nd edition.

OOA [Office of  Outcomes Assessment]. (2006). Critical Thinking as a Core Academic Skill: A Review of  
Literature. Maryland, USA: University of  Maryland, University College.

Parker, R.D. (2002). “Homeland: An Essay on Patriotism” in Harvard Journal of  Law and Public Policy, 
25(2), Spring, pp.407-428.

Putman, E.D. (1998). “Teaching about Patriotism: An Assessment of  Teacher Attitudes and Classroom 
Practices”. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. USA: University of  Tennessee Knoxville.

Ramly, Ishak, Mohd Daud hamzah & Zakaria Kassim. (2004). “Patriotisms Research and 
Weltanschauung: An Approach to Development of  Rural Communities”. Unpublished Research 
Project in collaboration between INFRA (Institute for Rural Advancement), Projek Penyelidikan 
antara Institut Kemajuan Desa, Ministry of  Rural and Regional Development, and USM (Science 
University of  Malaysia). 

Reykowski, J. (1997). “Patriotism and the Collective System of  Meaning” in D. Bar-Tal & E. Staub 
[eds]. (1997). Patriotism in the Lives of  Individuals and Nations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall Publishers, 
pp.108-128.

Sulaiman, Esah. (2003). Teaching Professionalism Practice. Skudai, Johor: UTM (Technology University 
of  Malaysia) Publisher.

Tajfel, H. (1981). Human Groups and Social Categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tajfel, H. & J.C. Tunner. (1986). ”The Social Identity Theory of  Intergroup Behaviour” in S. Worchel 

& W. Austin [eds]. Psychology of  Intergroup Relations. Chicago: Nelson Hall.
Tamir, Y. (1997). “Reflection on Patriotism” in D. Bar-Tal & E. Staub [eds]. (1997). Patriotism in the 

Lives of  Individuals and Nations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall Publishers, pp.23-41.
Viroli, M. (1995). For Love of  Country: An Essay on Patriotism and Nationalism. Oxford: Oxford University 

Press.
Williams, L.R., L.M. Foster & R.K. Krohn. (2008). “Relationship of  Patriotism Measures to Critical 

Thinking and Emphasis on Civil Liberties versus National Security” in Analyses of  Social Issues and 
Public Policy, Vol.8, No.1, pp.139-156.

Woolfork, A. (2004). Educational Psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 9th edition.
Yusuf, Abu Bakar. (2005). “Patriotism in the Implementation of  the Primary School Curriculum” 

in Proceeding of  the Educational Seminar JPPG in Pulau Pinang: USM (Science University of  
Malaysia), pp.810-818.