







































 
 

  
 
  

 
EDUCATIO : Journal Of Education 
Volume 9 , Number 1, May 2025 

 ISSN : 2579-8383 (Print) ISSN : 2579-8405 (Online) 

 

  

Exploring the Causes and Physical Manifestations of 

Glossophobia among University Students  

 
 Peter Babajide Oloba, Andani Tshidzumba, Lineo Nkabane-Sekopo   

Department of Languages, Cultural Studies and Applied Linguistics, Faculty of Humanities University of 

Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa  

olobapeter4u@gmail.com 

 

Accepted: 
Jan 28th 2025 

Reviewed: 
March 18th 2025 

Published: 
May 30th 2025 

 

Abstract  
This study investigates the causes and physical manifestations of glossophobia among university 

students, with a focus on the University of Johannesburg. The aim is to identify the underlying 

causes of glossophobia and explore its physical symptoms in students. Adopting a qualitative 

research design within a constructivist paradigm, the study uses a phenomenological approach to 

capture the lived experiences of students. Ten participants with self-reported glossophobia were 

selected through purposive sampling, and data were collected via semi-structured interviews. The 

data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. The results indicate that glossophobia is 

primarily triggered by factors such as inadequate preparation, fear of judgment, fear of failure, 

perfectionism, and xenoglossophobia. These factors lead to physical symptoms, including hand 

shaking, voice trembling, increased heart rate, sweating, and shortness of breath, which 

significantly impair students' public speaking abilities. Based on these findings, the study 

recommends several interventions to mitigate glossophobia, such as organizing public speaking 

workshops, creating peer support networks, promoting relaxation and mindfulness techniques, 

encouraging gradual exposure to public speaking, offering professional counseling, and raising 

awareness about glossophobia and mental health. These measures aim to alleviate anxiety, boost 

confidence, and create a supportive environment for students. Addressing glossophobia can 

enhance students' academic experiences, improve communication skills, and promote overall well-

being. 

Keywords: Anxiety, Glossophobia, Mental Health, Peer Support, Public Speaking, University Students, 

Xenoglossophobia 

 

 By Authors 
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International 
License. 

 

Introduction 

Public speaking is a crucial skill in both academic and professional settings, enabling 

individuals to express ideas, share knowledge, and participate in important discussions. Despite its 

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/


 
 

  
 
  

Volume 9, Number 1, May 2025| 66 

 

  

significance, many individuals experience significant anxiety when required to speak before an 

audience. This condition, known as glossophobia or speech anxiety, manifests as an intense fear 

of public speaking, often accompanied by both physical and psychological discomfort 1. 

Glossophobia is a specific type of communication apprehension, a broader concept that refers to 

any fear or anxiety associated with real or anticipated communication 2. 

For university students, public speaking is an essential part of academic life, with activities 

such as oral presentations, debates, group discussions, and classroom participation forming a 

critical part of their learning process. These activities are designed to enhance students' 

communication skills, foster critical thinking, and develop their ability to articulate ideas effectively. 

However, despite regular exposure to these public speaking opportunities, many students continue 

to struggle with glossophobia, often avoiding participation due to fear and anxiety 3. This phobia 

not only affects students' academic progress but also hinders their professional development and 

social interactions. While glossophobia has been widely studied in psychology and linguistics, its 

specific impact on university students remains under-explored. Given the importance of effective 

verbal communication in higher education and professional life, understanding the causes and 

manifestations of glossophobia in university students is crucial for developing targeted 

interventions. 

Effective verbal communication is a fundamental skill that plays a vital role in academic, 

professional, and personal life. Public speaking enables individuals to express their thoughts, 

engage with others, and demonstrate leadership capabilities, making it a critical skill for university 

students 4. However, glossophobia can negatively impact students' academic performance by 

preventing them from participating in class discussions, avoiding oral presentations, or 

experiencing intense anxiety when asked to speak publicly 5. The phobia disrupts students’ ability 

to communicate their thoughts and ideas effectively, which not only hampers their academic 

success but also undermines their confidence and preparation for professional environments, 

where public speaking is often a valued skill. 

 
1 S A Dansieh  Owusu, E. & Seidu, G.A., “Glossophobia: The Fear of Public Speaking in ESL Students in 

Ghana,” Language Teaching, 1(1), 22-35 (n.d.); Shagufta Perveen, Gul Jabeen, and Hafsa Khan, “Health-Related Quality 
of Life and Distress among Insulin-Dependent Diabetics,” Research Journal of Social Sciences and Economics Review 4, no. 
1 (2023): 193–200. 

2 Kaileigh A Byrne et al., “Risk-Taking Unmasked: Using Risky Choice and Temporal Discounting to Explain 
COVID-19 Preventative Behaviors,” PloS one 16, no. 5 (2021): e0251073; Mary C Toale and James C McCroskey, 
“Ethnocentrism and Trait Communication Apprehension as Predictors of Interethnic Communication Apprehension 
and Use of Relational Maintenance Strategies in Interethnic Communication,” Communication quarterly 49, no. 1 (2001): 
70–83. 

3 Dansieh  Owusu, E. & Seidu, G.A., “Glossophobia: The Fear of Public Speaking in ESL Students in Ghana.” 
4 D Herumurti  Yuniarti, A., Rimawan, P. & Yunanto, A.A., “Overcoming Glossophobia Based on Virtual 

Reality and Heart Rate Sensors,” In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Industry 4.0, Artificial Intelligence, and 
Communications Technology (IAICT): 139-144). IEEE (n.d.); Keetha Kathirvel and Harwati Hashim, “The Use of Audio-
Visual Materials as Strategies to Enhance Speaking Skills among ESL Young Learners,” Creative Education 11, no. 12 
(2020): 2599–2608. 

5 Mella Sahara and Ivan Achmad Nurcholis, “The Causes Of Glossophobia In The Students Speaking 
Classroom,” Teaching English and Language Learning English Journal (TELLE) (2022); Vladimir T. Tamayo and Jonalyn 
T. Caber, “Glossophobia: Fear of Public Speaking Among Senior High School Students of Aliaga National High 
School,” Journal of Humanities and Education Development (2022); Joaquín Marqués-Pascual and Miguel Ángel Violán, 
“Glossophobia in Postgraduate Degrees. Online Public Speaking in Times of Covid-19,” Doxa Comunicacion (2022). 



 
 

  
 
  

Volume 9, Number 1, May 2025| 67 

 

  

Although research on the causes and consequences of glossophobia has been conducted, 

much of it has focused on the general population, with limited attention paid to the unique 

challenges faced by university students 6. Furthermore, existing studies have predominantly 

explored gender differences in speech anxiety, revealing that females generally report higher levels 

of public speaking anxiety than males 7. While strategies to manage glossophobia, such as 

cognitive-behavioral techniques and relaxation methods, have been explored, there remains a 

limited understanding of the lived experiences of university students dealing with this condition. 

Moreover, there is a notable gap in studies that focus specifically on glossophobia in the South 

African higher education context. Given that public speaking is integral to both academic success 

and career readiness, it is essential to explore how university students in South Africa experience 

and navigate glossophobia in their academic environments. 

This study aims to fill this gap by examining the causes and physical manifestations of 

glossophobia among university students, with a focus on understanding the challenges faced by 

students in South Africa. By investigating the root causes and physical symptoms of glossophobia, 

this research will contribute to existing literature by offering insights into how students cope with 

speech anxiety and how universities can support them. The findings of this study are expected to 

inform lecturers, university administrators, and mental health professionals on effective strategies 

to assist students struggling with glossophobia, including public speaking workshops, 

psychological counseling, and curriculum adjustments that foster a supportive learning 

environment. Ultimately, this research seeks to enhance students' academic experiences and overall 

well-being by providing practical recommendations for minimizing the impact of glossophobia in 

higher education settings. 

 

Method 

This study adopts a constructivist paradigm, which emphasizes how individuals construct 

meaning based on their social, cultural, and historical contexts. Constructivism focuses on the 

subjective nature of reality, asserting that individuals’ experiences and perspectives shape their 

understanding of the world. This paradigm was essential for interpreting participants' experiences 

with glossophobia in a contextual and meaningful manner. The research employs a qualitative 

approach to facilitate a deeper exploration of how university students perceive and experience 

glossophobia, utilizing interviews and content analysis 8. A qualitative approach is particularly 

suited for this study as it enables an in-depth understanding of the personal and lived experiences 

of individuals 9. 

 

 
6 Diane J Lees‐Murdock et al., “Assessing the Efficacy of Active Learning to Support Student Performance 

Across Undergraduate Programmes in Biomedical Science,” British Journal of Biomedical Science 81 (2024). 
7 Perveen, Jabeen, and Khan, “Health-Related Quality of Life and Distress among Insulin-Dependent 

Diabetics.” 
8 Muhammad Imran and Norah Almusharraf, “Qualitative Research Methods, by Monique Hennink, Inge 

Hutter, and Ajay Bailey, 2020, Pp. 376, £ 36.99 (Paperpack), ISBN: 9781473903913, London: SAGE Publications,” 
Quality & Quantity (2023). 

9 Sharan B Merriam and Elizabeth J Tisdell, Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation (John Wiley 
& Sons, 2015). 



 
 

  
 
  

Volume 9, Number 1, May 2025| 68 

 

  

Research Design 

The study employs a phenomenological research design, which aims to explore how 

individuals understand and interpret a shared experience 10. Specifically, hermeneutic 

phenomenology was chosen for its focus on both describing and interpreting participants’ lived 

experiences . This design was selected to uncover the meanings behind students' experiences with 

glossophobia, particularly within the context of university life, allowing for a detailed 

understanding of the emotional and psychological effects of this condition. 

 

Participants 

The target population for this study consisted of students at the University of Johannesburg 

who experience glossophobia. A purposive sampling technique was employed to select participants 

who met the inclusion criteria of self-reported glossophobia. Purposive sampling was chosen 

because it allows for the selection of participants who can provide rich, relevant, and meaningful 

insights into the research problem 11. Participants should possess direct experience with the 

phenomenon under investigation, demonstrate verbal communication skills, and be willing to 

share their experiences. 

In total, ten students with self-reported glossophobia were selected for this study. The 

participants were chosen to provide a diverse range of experiences while ensuring that the data 

collected would be rich and detailed. 

 

Data Collection Methods 

To collect data, semi-structured interviews were conducted with the selected participants. 

This method was chosen for its flexibility, as it allows the researcher to explore emerging themes 

while maintaining a structured framework 12. The semi-structured format encouraged participants 

to elaborate on their experiences with glossophobia, enabling the researcher to capture a deeper 

understanding of the phenomenon. Interview questions were designed to guide the conversation 

while allowing for the organic emergence of new topics as participants shared their personal 

experiences. 

The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim to ensure the accuracy of the 

data. Each interview lasted approximately 30-45 minutes, providing ample time for participants to 

express their thoughts and feelings about their experiences with glossophobia. 

Data Analysis 

A qualitative content analysis approach was used to analyze the data, following the guidelines 

outlined by Creswell et al. 13. This iterative process allowed for the identification, coding, and 

 
10 John W. Creswell, Educational Research Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research 

(Boston: Pearson Education, 2012). 
11 John W Creswell and Cheryl N Poth, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches (Sage 

publications, 2016). 
12 O A & Olenik Adeoye‐Olatunde  N.L., “Research and Scholarly Methods: Semi‐structured Interviews,” Journal 

of the American college of clinical pharmacy, 4(10), 1358-1367 (n.d.). 
13 John W Creswell and J David Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches 

(Sage publications, 2017). 



 
 

  
 
  

Volume 9, Number 1, May 2025| 69 

 

  

categorization of relevant themes and patterns in the interview transcripts. The steps involved 

reading and reviewing the transcripts multiple times to gain an understanding of the participants’ 

perspectives. Relevant data were coded and categorized according to emerging themes, with each 

theme being analyzed in the context of glossophobia’s causes and manifestations. 

The process of content analysis involved several stages: 

1. Reading and reviewing the interview transcripts to familiarize the researcher with the data. 

2. Coding the text to identify key themes, words, and phrases that are relevant to the research 

questions. 

3. Categorizing the themes into broader categories based on contextual significance. 

4. Interpreting the data by connecting the identified themes to the research questions and 

theoretical framework. 

This systematic approach allowed for a comprehensive understanding of glossophobia 

among university students, capturing both the individual and collective experiences of the 

participants. The researcher interpreted the findings within the constructivist paradigm, ensuring 

that the lived experiences of participants were central to the analysis. 

 

Limitations of the Study 

While this study provides valuable insights into the experiences of university students with 

glossophobia, it has several limitations. The use of a small sample size (N = 10) limits the 

generalizability of the findings to a broader student population. The sample was also limited to a 

single university, which may not fully represent the experiences of students in different 

geographical or cultural contexts. Furthermore, as the study employed a qualitative approach, the 

findings are based on subjective experiences and may not be easily replicated in quantitative terms. 

 

Reliability and Validity 

The reliability and validity of this study were ensured through several measures. First, 

member checking was employed, allowing participants to review the interview transcripts and 

interpretations to confirm the accuracy of the data. Additionally, the use of peer debriefing 

involved discussions with colleagues to verify the consistency and credibility of the analysis. The 

use of established methodologies, such as content analysis and phenomenology, also adds to the 

study’s validity by aligning with widely accepted research practices in qualitative studies 14 . 

 

Results and Discussion 

The findings of this study on the causes and physical manifestations of glossophobia among 

university students provide valuable insights into the various factors contributing to speech anxiety 

and its physical impact. Through the in-depth interviews conducted with ten participants, several 

key themes emerged regarding the causes of glossophobia, and the study also highlighted the 

various physical discomforts experienced by students in public speaking situations. 

 

 

 
14 Ibid. 



 
 

  
 
  

Volume 9, Number 1, May 2025| 70 

 

  

Causes of Glossophobia 

1. Lack of Preparation 

A significant cause of glossophobia identified by participants was inadequate preparation for 

public speaking. The lack of sufficient preparation led to a lack of confidence and heightened 

anxiety when facing an audience. As Participant 1 noted, "I'm often not very confident in what I'm saying 

because I'm usually not prepared. I feel like my fear stems from this lack of preparation." Similarly, Participant 

3 echoed the same sentiment, "When I'm not adequately prepared, I panic. It's like, 'Oh my God, I haven’t 

prepared as well as I should have,' and that fear creeps in, making me feel like I'm going to mess up in front of 

everyone." This reveals that the lack of preparation not only affects students' ability to present but 

also triggers anxiety and a fear of failure in public speaking situations. This finding is consistent 

with previous research that has emphasized preparation as a critical factor in mitigating public 

speaking anxiety . Participants expressed that when they felt underprepared, their confidence 

declined, and their fear of failure became more pronounced. 

 

2. Fear of Judgment 

Fear of judgment was another significant cause of glossophobia. The participants described 

how the perception of being judged by an audience—especially peers—exacerbated their anxiety. 

Participant 5 described their experience, stating, "I feel exposed and uncomfortable. It feels like everyone 

is watching me and judging everything, like what I am wearing and my physical appearance." Participant 7 also 

emphasized how the judgment from peers added a layer of pressure, "The fear of being judged is always 

from being judged by your peers. They make you feel small and insignificant if you ever make a mistake in front of 

them." This highlights how the fear of negative evaluation, particularly from familiar individuals 

like classmates, can make the experience of public speaking even more intimidating. The fear of 

judgment often causes students to feel self-conscious, intensifying their anxiety. This finding aligns 

with existing literature that highlights how negative evaluation by others can increase public 

speaking anxiety 15. 

 

3. Audience Size 

Audience size was another factor that contributed to glossophobia. Several participants noted 

that their anxiety increased when speaking to larger groups, which they perceived as more 

intimidating. Participant 1 stated, “I think I fear people. For example, if there are a large number of audiences, 

the fear increases. However, when there is a small group of people, the fear is still there, but it is not as much.” This 

illustrates how the number of people in the audience can amplify the fear of public speaking. 

Although some participants acknowledged that even smaller audiences could trigger anxiety, the 

consensus was that larger audiences heightened the intensity of their fear. This is consistent with 

previous research, which suggests that public speaking anxiety increases as the size of the audience 

grows 16. 

 

 

 
15 J M Baartmans  van Steensel, F. J., Mobach, L., Lansu, T. A., Bijsterbosch, G., Verpaalen, I., ... & Klein, A. 

M., “Social Anxiety and Perceptions of Likeability by Peers in Children,” British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 38(2), 
319-336 (n.d.). 

16 Marlon S. Pontillas, “Reducing the Public Speaking Anxiety of ESL College Students through Popsispeak,” 
3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature 26, no. 1 (2020): 91–105. 



 
 

  
 
  

Volume 9, Number 1, May 2025| 71 

 

  

4. Fear of Failure 

The fear of failure emerged as a prominent cause of glossophobia among the participants. 

Many expressed concern about making mistakes in front of others, which increased their anxiety. 

Participant 5 articulated this fear, stating, “I have a fear of failure. I fear failing in front of people. I am 

afraid of saying the wrong things and being laughed at.” The fear of making mistakes and being negatively 

evaluated for them was frequently linked to heightened anxiety in public speaking scenarios. This 

fear was particularly tied to concerns about how peers would perceive any errors or missteps during 

their presentations. Research supports the idea that the fear of failure is a key factor influencing 

performance anxiety in public speaking 17. 

 

5. Perfectionism 

Perfectionism was also identified as a significant factor contributing to glossophobia. Several 

participants noted that their drive for flawless performance in public speaking heightened their 

anxiety. Participant 4 explained, “I am someone who has always adhered to a mindset of being perfect, 

constantly seeking positive evaluations from others. As a result, I am terrified that people may have a negative 

reaction to what I say, which heightens my anxiety when speaking in public.” The desire for perfection made 

public speaking more anxiety-inducing, as the fear of making mistakes or not meeting high 

standards was overwhelming. This finding resonates with studies that have explored the link 

between perfectionism and anxiety, suggesting that the constant pressure to perform flawlessly can 

lead to greater public speaking anxiety 18. 

 

6. Xenoglossophobia 

A significant cause of glossophobia identified in this study, particularly among non-native 

English speakers, was xenoglossophobia—the fear of speaking in a foreign language. Participant 

2 shared their experience, stating, "The major trigger is the language barrier. The language of teaching and 

learning is English in almost all schools or higher education. Since English is not my mother tongue, I struggle very 

much to express myself." The pressure of speaking in a second language, especially in an academic 

setting, contributed to heightened fear of judgment and language-related anxiety. This finding 

aligns with previous studies that highlight how non-native speakers often experience increased 

anxiety when required to speak in a foreign language . The fear of making mistakes in 

pronunciation or grammar added to the stress of speaking in front of others, leading to avoidance 

behaviors and reduced participation in class discussions. 

 

Physical Manifestations of Glossophobia 

1. Shaking Hands and Voice Trembling 

Physical discomforts such as shaking hands and voice trembling were commonly reported by 

participants. Participant 3 explained, "Sometimes my hands and voice shake, making it hard for me to speak 

properly." Participant 2 elaborated, "I will start by feeling my voice cracking, and then I will sweat. I will have 

a dry mouth, and my hands will shake." These physical symptoms were identified as significant barriers 

to effective communication, as they undermined students' ability to speak confidently and 

 
17 O Flanagan and K Jackson, “Justice, Care and Gender: The Kohlberg-Gilligan Debate Revisited,” Ethics 97, 

no. 3 (1987): 622–637. 
18 Achmad Fajar Angga Pamungkas and Abdul Muhid, “Perfectionism, Shame, Social Support and Fear of 

Failure in High School Students,” EDUTEC: Journal of Education And Technology 4, no. 2 (2020): 276–288. 



 
 

  
 
  

Volume 9, Number 1, May 2025| 72 

 

  

coherently. The presence of these physical signs of anxiety often amplified the fear of public 

speaking, reinforcing the cycle of anxiety. These findings are consistent with the literature on 

performance anxiety, which identifies trembling hands and voice alterations as common 

manifestations of glossophobia 19. 

 

2. Increased Heart Rate 

An increased heart rate was another prominent physical symptom experienced by participants. 

Participant 4 described, "My body's temperature increases as well as my heart rate, and I end up speaking too 

fast at a rate where the audience cannot even hear what I am trying to say." This physiological response is 

commonly linked to the body’s fight-or-flight reaction to perceived threats, such as public speaking 

(Chu et al., 2024). The increased heart rate not only contributed to physical discomfort but also 

impaired participants' ability to speak clearly, often causing them to rush through their 

presentations. This result is consistent with findings , which suggest that heightened physiological 

responses like an elevated heart rate can lead to cognitive overload, hindering effective 

communication during public speaking. 

 

3. Sweating 

Sweating was reported by many participants as a significant physical symptom of glossophobia. 

Participant 6 noted, "When I know I am about to speak in front of other people, I get nervous and start 

sweating until I am done talking." The physical discomfort associated with sweating exacerbated 

students' anxiety, leading to further distress during public speaking engagements. This symptom is 

consistent with the literature that links anxiety with physiological responses like excessive sweating, 

which often intensifies during high-pressure situations like public speaking 20. 

 

4. Shortness of Breath 

Shortness of breath was another commonly reported physical symptom, often accompanied 

by dizziness and a sensation of faintness. Participant 2 described, "I experience shortness of breath and 

feel like I am dizzy and about to pass out." This symptom was identified as a major barrier to effective 

communication, as it interfered with students’ ability to focus and speak coherently. These findings 

align with research on the physiological impacts of anxiety, which often includes shortness of 

breath as a symptom of performance-related anxiety 21. The experience of breathlessness can 

escalate the fear of public speaking, creating a feedback loop where the awareness of physical 

symptoms leads to increased anxiety, further impairing performance . 

 

 

 

 

 

 
19 Marqués-Pascual and Violán, “Glossophobia in Postgraduate Degrees. Online Public Speaking in Times of 

Covid-19.” 
20 P Henningsen  Zimmermann, T., & Sattel, H., “Medically Unexplained Physical Symptoms, Anxiety, and 

Depression: A Meta-Analytic Review,” Psychosomatic medicine, 65(4), 528-533 (n.d.). 
21 Marina Joubert, Lloyd Davis, and Jenni Metcalfe, “Storytelling: The Soul of Science Communication,” Journal 

of Science Communication, 2019. 



 
 

  
 
  

Volume 9, Number 1, May 2025| 73 

 

  

Discussion 

The findings from this study offer valuable insights into the causes and physical 

manifestations of glossophobia among university students. This discussion aims to critically 

analyze the results, compare them with existing literature, and explore their implications for 

educational practices, psychological interventions, and future research. The discussion is organized 

around the key causes of glossophobia and its physical symptoms, with reference to the relevant 

theoretical frameworks and established research in the field. 

1. Causes of Glossophobia 

Lack of Preparation 

The study found that inadequate preparation was one of the primary causes of glossophobia. 

This finding aligns with existing literature that emphasizes the importance of preparation in 

reducing public speaking anxiety. Participants in the study expressed that not feeling adequately 

prepared for a public speaking task triggered feelings of insecurity and anxiety, which is consistent 

with the cognitive-behavioral perspective on performance anxiety 22. The link between preparation 

and confidence is well-established in speech anxiety research, where preparation is often cited as 

a key factor in enhancing self-efficacy and reducing cognitive load during speech delivery 23. By 

being more familiar with their material, speakers are able to focus more on delivery and less on 

fear of mistakes, which helps reduce anxiety levels. This reflects the idea that the more prepared a 

speaker feels, the less they are likely to experience cognitive and physiological disruptions 24. 

The experiences of the participants underscore the critical role that preparation plays in 

managing public speaking anxiety. Participant 1 and Participant 3 emphasized that lack of 

preparation led directly to fear, panic, and a decline in self-confidence. To address this, educational 

institutions could provide students with additional resources to improve preparation skills, such as 

guidelines for organizing content, strategies for rehearsing effectively, and support for overcoming 

performance-related anxiety. 

 

Fear of Judgment 

The fear of judgment from the audience, particularly from peers, was another significant 

cause of glossophobia identified in the study. This finding is consistent with the literature that 

identifies fear of negative evaluation as a core component of public speaking anxiety 25. 

Participant 5 highlighted how feelings of being scrutinized not only for content but also for 

appearance contributed to heightened anxiety. This aligns with theories of self-consciousness and 

social evaluation, which suggest that public speaking anxiety is exacerbated by the fear of negative 

judgment from others, particularly when one’s social standing is at stake . 

 
22 Nenagh Kemp and Rachel Grieve, “Face-to-Face or Face-to-Screen? Undergraduates’ Opinions and Test 

Performance in Classroom vs. Online Learning,” Frontiers in psychology 5 (November 12, 2014): 1278, 
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25429276. 

23 Ana Gallego et al., “Measuring Public Speaking Anxiety: Self-Report, Behavioral, and Physiological,” Behavior 
Modification 46, no. 4 (2022): 782–798. 

24 W Coker, “Exploration of Public-Speaking Anxiety among Novice Instructors at a Ghanaian University,” The 
African Journal of Information and Communication, 2022(29), 1-15 (n.d.). 

25 Baartmans  van Steensel, F. J., Mobach, L., Lansu, T. A., Bijsterbosch, G., Verpaalen, I., ... & Klein, A. M., 
“Social Anxiety and Perceptions of Likeability by Peers in Children.” 



 
 

  
 
  

Volume 9, Number 1, May 2025| 74 

 

  

The findings suggest that the fear of judgment from peers, more than from strangers, 

significantly amplifies anxiety. This is consistent with research by Baartmans et al. 26, which found 

that peer evaluation can be more anxiety-inducing due to the perceived impact on social 

relationships. This fear is particularly pertinent in academic settings, where students are constantly 

interacting with peers, and a mistake during public speaking can be perceived as a social failure. 

The study’s findings emphasize the need for universities to create environments where students 

feel supported and less scrutinized by their peers. Faculty members and student groups could 

implement initiatives aimed at fostering a more supportive atmosphere during public speaking 

activities, reducing the perceived judgment that fuels anxiety. 

 

Audience Size 

Audience size was also identified as a contributing factor to glossophobia. Participants, 

including Participant 1, reported that their anxiety increased when speaking to larger groups. This 

finding aligns with McCroskey’s 27 research, which posits that individuals often perceive larger 

audiences as more intimidating, leading to increased anxiety levels. The fear of being negatively 

evaluated by a larger group is a central concern in the literature on performance anxiety . While 

some participants also reported experiencing anxiety in smaller groups, the general consensus was 

that the fear escalated with the size of the audience. 

This suggests that the anxiety triggered by larger audiences is likely due to a perceived greater 

risk of negative evaluation. The findings point to the importance of gradually exposing students 

to public speaking in varying audience sizes, starting with smaller, less intimidating groups. 

Hofmann (2020) found that exposure to smaller, familiar audiences often reduces the anxiety 

experienced in larger settings. Therefore, universities could implement strategies to gradually 

increase the size of the audience in public speaking tasks, allowing students to acclimate to larger 

groups over time. 

 

Fear of Failure 

The fear of failure was another prominent cause of glossophobia among the participants. 

This finding supports research by Jackson 28, which identifies fear of failure as a critical factor in 

performance anxiety. The participants in this study feared making mistakes, particularly in front of 

their peers, and expressed anxiety about their performance being judged negatively. Participant 5 

reflected this fear, stating, “I am afraid of saying the wrong things and being laughed at.” This fear of failure 

is particularly potent in high-stakes environments where performance is directly linked to 

evaluation and future opportunities. 

This finding underscores the need for universities to address the psychological factors 

contributing to glossophobia. Interventions, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), which 

help students reframe their fears and perceptions of failure, could be valuable in helping students 

 
26 Ibid. 
27 Pontillas, “Reducing the Public Speaking Anxiety of ESL College Students through Popsispeak”; Marlon 

Pontillas and Frederick Talaue, “Levels of Oral Communication Skills and Speaking Anxiety of Educators in a 
Polytechnic College in the Philippines,” Journal of Education, Management and Development Studies (2021). 

28 Flanagan and Jackson, “Justice, Care and Gender: The Kohlberg-Gilligan Debate Revisited.” 



 
 

  
 
  

Volume 9, Number 1, May 2025| 75 

 

  

overcome the fear of making mistakes in public speaking. 

 

Perfectionism 

The relationship between perfectionism and glossophobia was highlighted in the study, with 

several participants expressing how their desire for flawless performance exacerbated their public 

speaking anxiety. Participant 4 shared how their need for positive validation and the fear of 

making mistakes heightened their fear of speaking. This finding aligns with the research by 

Pamungkas and Muhid 29, which connects perfectionism with performance anxiety. The pressure 

to meet self-imposed high standards creates a cycle of anxiety, where any perceived imperfection 

is magnified, further intensifying glossophobia. 

This finding suggests that addressing perfectionistic tendencies in students could be a key 

strategy in alleviating glossophobia. Psychological interventions that focus on reducing 

perfectionism, such as mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT), could help students focus 

on the process of speaking rather than fearing judgment for imperfections. 

 

Xenoglossophobia 

Finally, xenoglossophobia, the fear of speaking a foreign language, was a significant 

contributor to glossophobia for non-native English speakers. Participant 2’s experience illustrates 

how language barriers can increase anxiety, particularly in academic settings where English is the 

primary language of instruction. This finding is supported by Maher and King 30, who note that 

non-native speakers often experience heightened anxiety when required to speak in English. The 

fear of making mistakes in pronunciation or grammar adds to their distress, leading to avoidance 

behaviors and limited participation in academic settings. 

This suggests that universities need to be more mindful of the language barriers faced by 

non-native English speakers and provide additional support, such as language proficiency 

workshops and peer mentoring, to help these students overcome xenoglossophobia. Reducing the 

pressure to perform perfectly in a second language can help alleviate glossophobia among non-

native speakers. 

 

2. Physical Manifestations of Glossophobia 

The physical symptoms of glossophobia reported by participants, including shaking hands, 

voice trembling, increased heart rate, sweating, and shortness of breath, align with existing 

literature on performance anxiety 31. These physiological responses can significantly impact 

students' ability to speak confidently and clearly. As evidenced by Participant 3 and Participant 

2, the physical discomfort caused by anxiety can undermine the speaker's performance, reinforcing 

 
29 Pamungkas and Muhid, “Perfectionism, Shame, Social Support and Fear of Failure in High School Students.” 
30 Kate Maher et al., “Enhancing Emotional Engagement in Speaking Tasks: A Cognitive-Behavioural Theory 

Approach,” Researching language learning motivation: A concise guide (2022): 135–152; Kate Maher and Jim King, “‘The 
Silence Kills Me.’:‘Silence’as a Trigger of Speaking-Related Anxiety in the English-Medium Classroom,” English 
Teaching & Learning 46, no. 3 (2022): 213–234. 

31 Marqués-Pascual and Violán, “Glossophobia in Postgraduate Degrees. Online Public Speaking in Times of 
Covid-19.” 



 
 

  
 
  

Volume 9, Number 1, May 2025| 76 

 

  

the cycle of fear. 

These physical symptoms, including increased heart rate and sweating, are consistent with 

the fight-or-flight response identified in the literature on anxiety . The fact that these symptoms 

exacerbate anxiety and hinder effective communication suggests that interventions addressing 

both the physical and psychological aspects of glossophobia are crucial. Relaxation techniques, 

such as deep breathing and progressive muscle relaxation, could be effective in helping students 

manage these physical symptoms before and during public speaking tasks. 

 

Implications for Educational Practice 

The findings of this study have significant implications for how universities can support 

students who experience glossophobia. The identified causes—lack of preparation, fear of 

judgment, and perfectionism—indicate that targeted interventions focused on improving 

preparation, reducing fear of judgment, and addressing perfectionistic tendencies could be highly 

effective. Additionally, the physical manifestations of glossophobia call for strategies to manage 

anxiety, such as relaxation exercises and breathing techniques, which can help reduce the 

physiological symptoms that hinder performance. 

Future research should focus on evaluating the effectiveness of specific interventions, such 

as public speaking workshops, mindfulness training, and cognitive-behavioral techniques, in 

reducing glossophobia. Longitudinal studies could provide insights into how these interventions 

impact students over time, particularly regarding the long-term reduction in anxiety and 

improvement in public speaking confidence. Furthermore, research examining the intersection of 

xenoglossophobia and glossophobia among non-native speakers would provide valuable insights 

into how language barriers contribute to public speaking anxiety in multilingual academic settings. 

 

Conclusion 

This study provides a comprehensive examination of the causes and physical manifestations 

of glossophobia among university students, offering insights into how this anxiety affects students’ 

public speaking abilities and, consequently, their academic and professional success. The findings 

reveal that glossophobia is primarily driven by factors such as lack of preparation, fear of judgment, 

audience size, fear of failure, perfectionism, and xenoglossophobia. These causes were found to 

trigger significant physical symptoms, including shaking hands, voice trembling, increased heart 

rate, sweating, and shortness of breath. These physical discomforts compound students' anxiety, 

further hindering their ability to effectively engage in public speaking situations. 

The results underscore the complex nature of glossophobia, indicating that it is not merely 

an issue of psychological distress but also a physiological response that disrupts students' academic 

performance. This dual impact—psychological and physical—necessitates a multifaceted 

approach to addressing glossophobia in educational settings. Interventions such as public speaking 

workshops, peer support groups, and relaxation techniques are critical in mitigating the impact of 

this condition. Additionally, addressing underlying causes such as perfectionism, the fear of failure, 

and xenoglossophobia can further help alleviate anxiety among students, particularly in a 



 
 

  
 
  

Volume 9, Number 1, May 2025| 77 

 

  

multicultural academic environment where language barriers may exacerbate public speaking 

anxiety. 

Future research should explore the effectiveness of these interventions in reducing 

glossophobia, particularly focusing on longitudinal studies to assess long-term outcomes. Studies 

comparing different types of interventions, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy versus peer 

support groups, would help identify the most effective strategies for managing glossophobia. 

Furthermore, future research should expand the scope to include students from diverse academic 

and cultural backgrounds to understand how factors like language proficiency and cultural context 

contribute to glossophobia. It would also be valuable to explore the role of technology in 

mitigating glossophobia, especially as digital platforms become increasingly integrated into 

educational settings. 

In practical terms, this study highlights the need for universities to incorporate strategies 

that specifically target glossophobia in their curricula. By creating a supportive learning 

environment and providing resources for students to overcome their anxiety, universities can help 

students build confidence in their public speaking abilities. Such efforts will not only improve 

students' academic performance but also equip them with essential communication skills that are 

crucial for success in both higher education and the professional world. 

 

Reference 

Adeoye‐Olatunde  N.L., O A & Olenik. “Research and Scholarly Methods: Semi‐structured 
Interviews.” Journal of the American college of clinical pharmacy, 4(10), 1358-1367 (n.d.). 

Baartmans  van Steensel, F. J., Mobach, L., Lansu, T. A., Bijsterbosch, G., Verpaalen, I., ... & Klein, 
A. M., J M. “Social Anxiety and Perceptions of Likeability by Peers in Children.” British Journal 
of Developmental Psychology, 38(2), 319-336 (n.d.). 

Byrne, Kaileigh A, Stephanie G Six, Reza Ghaiumy Anaraky, Maggie W Harris, and Emma L 
Winterlind. “Risk-Taking Unmasked: Using Risky Choice and Temporal Discounting to 
Explain COVID-19 Preventative Behaviors.” PloS one 16, no. 5 (2021): e0251073. 

Coker, W. “Exploration of Public-Speaking Anxiety among Novice Instructors at a Ghanaian 
University.” The African Journal of Information and Communication, 2022(29), 1-15 (n.d.). 

Creswell, John W. Educational Research Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative 
Research. Boston: Pearson Education, 2012. 

Creswell, John W, and J David Creswell. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods 
Approaches. Sage publications, 2017. 

Creswell, John W, and Cheryl N Poth. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five 
Approaches. Sage publications, 2016. 

Dansieh  Owusu, E. & Seidu, G.A., S A. “Glossophobia: The Fear of Public Speaking in ESL 
Students in Ghana.” Language Teaching, 1(1), 22-35 (n.d.). 

Flanagan, O, and K Jackson. “Justice, Care and Gender: The Kohlberg-Gilligan Debate Revisited.” 
Ethics 97, no. 3 (1987): 622–637. 

Gallego, Ana, Louise McHugh, Markku Penttonen, and Raimo Lappalainen. “Measuring Public 
Speaking Anxiety: Self-Report, Behavioral, and Physiological.” Behavior Modification 46, no. 4 
(2022): 782–798. 

Henningsen  Zimmermann, T., & Sattel, H., P. “Medically Unexplained Physical Symptoms, 
Anxiety, and Depression: A Meta-Analytic Review.” Psychosomatic medicine, 65(4), 528-533 



 
 

  
 
  

Volume 9, Number 1, May 2025| 78 

 

  

(n.d.). 
Herumurti  Yuniarti, A., Rimawan, P. & Yunanto, A.A., D. “Overcoming Glossophobia Based on 

Virtual Reality and Heart Rate Sensors.” In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Industry 4.0, 
Artificial Intelligence, and Communications Technology (IAICT): 139-144). IEEE (n.d.). 

Imran, Muhammad, and Norah Almusharraf. “Qualitative Research Methods, by Monique 
Hennink, Inge Hutter, and Ajay Bailey, 2020, Pp. 376, £ 36.99 (Paperpack), ISBN: 
9781473903913, London: SAGE Publications.” Quality & Quantity (2023). 

Joubert, Marina, Lloyd Davis, and Jenni Metcalfe. “Storytelling: The Soul of Science 
Communication.” Journal of Science Communication, 2019. 

Kathirvel, Keetha, and Harwati Hashim. “The Use of Audio-Visual Materials as Strategies to 
Enhance Speaking Skills among ESL Young Learners.” Creative Education 11, no. 12 (2020): 
2599–2608. 

Kemp, Nenagh, and Rachel Grieve. “Face-to-Face or Face-to-Screen? Undergraduates’ Opinions 
and Test Performance in Classroom vs. Online Learning.” Frontiers in psychology 5 (November 
12, 2014): 1278. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25429276. 

Lees‐Murdock, Diane J, David A Khan, Richard S Irwin, James M Graham, V Hinch, Bridget 
O’Hagan, and Stephen McClean. “Assessing the Efficacy of Active Learning to Support 
Student Performance Across Undergraduate Programmes in Biomedical Science.” British 
Journal of Biomedical Science 81 (2024). 

Maher, Kate, and Jim King. “‘The Silence Kills Me.’:‘Silence’as a Trigger of Speaking-Related 
Anxiety in the English-Medium Classroom.” English Teaching & Learning 46, no. 3 (2022): 
213–234. 

Maher, Kate, Jim King, A H Al-Hoorie, and F Szabó. “Enhancing Emotional Engagement in 
Speaking Tasks: A Cognitive-Behavioural Theory Approach.” Researching language learning 
motivation: A concise guide (2022): 135–152. 

Marqués-Pascual, Joaquín, and Miguel Ángel Violán. “Glossophobia in Postgraduate Degrees. 
Online Public Speaking in Times of Covid-19.” Doxa Comunicacion (2022). 

Mella Sahara, and Ivan Achmad Nurcholis. “The Causes Of Glossophobia In The Students 
Speaking Classroom.” Teaching English and Language Learning English Journal (TELLE) (2022). 

Merriam, Sharan B, and Elizabeth J Tisdell. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. 
John Wiley & Sons, 2015. 

Pamungkas, Achmad Fajar Angga, and Abdul Muhid. “Perfectionism, Shame, Social Support and 
Fear of Failure in High School Students.” EDUTEC: Journal of Education And Technology 4, no. 
2 (2020): 276–288. 

Perveen, Shagufta, Gul Jabeen, and Hafsa Khan. “Health-Related Quality of Life and Distress 
among Insulin-Dependent Diabetics.” Research Journal of Social Sciences and Economics Review 4, 
no. 1 (2023): 193–200. 

Pontillas, Marlon S. “Reducing the Public Speaking Anxiety of ESL College Students through 
Popsispeak.” 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature 26, no. 1 (2020): 91–105. 

Pontillas, Marlon, and Frederick Talaue. “Levels of Oral Communication Skills and Speaking 
Anxiety of Educators in a Polytechnic College in the Philippines.” Journal of Education, 
Management and Development Studies (2021). 

T. Tamayo, Vladimir, and Jonalyn T. Caber. “Glossophobia: Fear of Public Speaking Among 
Senior High School Students of Aliaga National High School.” Journal of Humanities and 
Education Development (2022). 

Toale, Mary C, and James C McCroskey. “Ethnocentrism and Trait Communication Apprehension 
as Predictors of Interethnic Communication Apprehension and Use of Relational 



 
 

  
 
  

Volume 9, Number 1, May 2025| 79 

 

  

Maintenance Strategies in Interethnic Communication.” Communication quarterly 49, no. 1 
(2001): 70–83. 

 


