





































Education, Language and Sociology Research 

ISSN 2690-3644 (Print) ISSN 2690-3652 (Online) 

Vol. 5, No. 1, 2024 

www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/elsr 

31 
 

Original Paper 

Enhancing IELTS Speaking Skills through Blended Learning: A 

Pedagogical Action Research 

Thi Kieu Anh NGUYEN1 

1 Department of Foreign Languages, Trade Union University, Hanoi, Vietnam  

* Thi Kieu Anh NGUYEN, Email: kieuanhnt@dhcd.edu.vn 

 

Received: November 24, 2023   Accepted: December 19, 2023   Online Published: January 8, 2024 

doi:10.22158/elsr.v5n1p31    URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.22158/elsr.v5n1p31 

 

Abstract 

This pedagogical action research aimed to assess the impact of a blended learning approach on 

improving IELTS speaking skills among students. Traditional teaching methods in IELTS courses often 

faced limitations regarding insufficient practice time, inadequate feedback, and a lack of community and 

interactivity among students. 

Results indicated a significant improvement in participants’ speaking performance based on pre-test and 

post-test scores. The blended learning environment garnered positive feedback from most participants, 

enhancing engagement, interaction, and satisfaction levels. However, challenges with asynchronous 

online feedback surfaced, signaling areas for refinement. 

This study underscores the value of blended learning in overcoming traditional teaching limitations, 

offering insights into its potential for fostering improved IELTS speaking skills through enhanced 

engagement and comprehensive feedback mechanisms. 

Keywords 

blended learning, IELTS speaking skills, pedagogical action research, student engagement, feedback 

mechanisms 

 

1. Introduction 

The mastery of speaking skills holds a pivotal place in language education, especially concerning 

assessments like the International English Language Testing System (IELTS). Proficiency in spoken 

English is not only an essential communication tool but also a crucial determinant in achieving academic 

and professional goals, making it a cornerstone of language education. Within the context of IELTS, 

where language competency is evaluated across various aspects, the speaking component stands as a 

significant determinant of language fluency, coherence and communicative effectiveness. 



www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/elsr              Education, Language and Sociology Research              Vol. 5, No. 1, 2024 

32 
Published by SCHOLINK INC. 

However, traditional teaching methods employed in IELTS courses often encounter inherent limitations 

in adequately nurturing and evaluating speaking skills. One prevalent issue lies in the restricted time 

allocated for students to engage in meaningful practice, reflection, and interaction during speaking 

lessons. Limited opportunities for students to exchange thoughts, receive comprehensive feedback, and 

engage in reflective practices with both teachers and peers contribute to dissatisfaction and hindered skill 

development. Furthermore, the lack of a strong sense of community and interactivity among students 

within IELTS classes poses a considerable challenge to fostering a conducive learning environment for 

spoken English proficiency. 

To combat these challenges, blended learning emerges as a promising pedagogical approach in language 

education. Blended learning, the amalgamation of traditional face-to-face instruction with online learning 

elements, presents an innovative avenue to address the shortcomings of conventional teaching 

methodologies. By integrating digital platforms and online activities, blended learning endeavors to offer 

a dynamic and comprehensive learning experience that extends beyond the limitations of the physical 

classroom. The incorporation of online tools and resources allows for increased engagement, 

asynchronous interaction, and the provision of additional learning materials, enabling a more 

personalized and holistic learning environment. 

This research aims to delve into the realm of blended learning specifically tailored to enhance IELTS 

speaking skills. The primary objectives revolve around designing and implementing a blended IELTS 

speaking course within an on-ground IELTS class. Through this course, the study aims to gauge the 

effectiveness of the blended learning model in improving the overall course efficacy and enhancing 

students’ IELTS speaking performance. Furthermore, the research endeavors to evaluate the satisfaction 

levels of students regarding the course’s impact on their speaking abilities. 

By delving into the realm of blended learning in the context of IELTS speaking skills, this study seeks to 

contribute meaningful insights into the potential of innovative pedagogical approaches. It aims to bridge 

the gaps observed in traditional teaching methodologies, offering a pathway to not only elevate language 

proficiency but also enrich the overall learning experience within IELTS education. 

 

2. Methodology 

The methodology employed in this study centers around a pedagogical action research design, aiming to 

actively engage in the process of improving teaching practices and educational outcomes within the 

context of IELTS speaking skills. This approach involves a systematic inquiry into teaching and learning 

practices, with a focus on enhancing the effectiveness of the blended learning model in an on-ground 

IELTS speaking course. 

The blended learning model integrated into the IELTS speaking course is a strategic combination of 

traditional face-to-face instruction and online learning elements. The course structure entails students 

meeting face-to-face every two weeks for two-hour sessions within a physical classroom. The remaining 

course activities are conducted online through a dedicated platform. These online components encompass 



www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/elsr              Education, Language and Sociology Research              Vol. 5, No. 1, 2024 

33 
Published by SCHOLINK INC. 

various instructional activities, such as discussion boards, audio recording assignments, and interactive 

tasks related to IELTS speaking topics. 

The participant demographic comprises 30 ELT (English Language Teaching) students enrolled in a 16-

week IELTS course at the Institute of Equest Education in Hanoi, Vietnam. The course duration allows 

for a comprehensive exploration of the effectiveness of the blended learning model in enhancing IELTS 

speaking skills within a substantial timeframe. The participants’ experiences and perspectives form the 

central focus of the research, facilitating a thorough assessment of their satisfaction levels and 

performance improvements. 

Data collection methods encompass a multifaceted approach to gather comprehensive insights. These 

methods include participant satisfaction surveys, standardized open-ended interviews, classroom 

observations, and pre-and post-tests. The surveys and interviews are designed to capture participants’ 

perceptions, experiences, and satisfaction levels regarding the blended learning environment and its 

impact on their IELTS speaking performance. Classroom observations provide qualitative data on the 

dynamics of face-to-face interactions, while pre-and post-tests offer quantitative measures of speaking 

performance improvements. 

Qualitative data gathered through interviews and observations undergo thematic analysis, allowing for 

the identification of recurring patterns, themes, and perceptions among participants. This analysis method 

involves systematically coding and categorizing qualitative data to derive meaningful insights. The open-

ended nature of interviews and observational notes allows for a nuanced exploration of participants’ 

experiences within the blended learning environment. 

Quantitative data derived from surveys and pre-and post-tests are subjected to statistical analysis. 

Statistical tools such as descriptive statistics, paired-sample t-tests, or analysis of variance (ANOVA) 

may be utilized to assess the significance of improvements in speaking performance before and after the 

implementation of the blended learning course. These quantitative measures offer empirical evidence of 

the effectiveness of the intervention in enhancing students’ IELTS speaking skills. 

The combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis methods provides a comprehensive 

understanding of the multifaceted aspects of the blended learning approach in IELTS speaking education. 

By triangulating data from various sources, this research aims to offer robust findings and insights into 

the efficacy of blended learning models in improving language education outcomes. 

 

3. Results and Discussion  

• Improvement in speaking performance 

The study’s pre-test and post-test comparison revealed a statistically significant improvement in 

participants’ IELTS speaking performance following the implementation of the blended learning course. 

Quantitative analysis of the test scores indicated a notable enhancement in speaking abilities, highlighting 

the efficacy of the blended approach. Participants exhibited a more substantial command of language, 



www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/elsr              Education, Language and Sociology Research              Vol. 5, No. 1, 2024 

34 
Published by SCHOLINK INC. 

fluency, coherence, and lexical resource post-course, demonstrating the tangible benefits of the 

pedagogical intervention. 

• Participant satisfaction levels 

Participant satisfaction surveys and interviews yielded overwhelmingly positive responses regarding the 

blended learning environment. A majority of students expressed high levels of contentment and 

appreciation for the course structure. They valued the opportunities for both teacher and peer feedback 

through online platforms, indicating a preference for this multifaceted approach over traditional methods. 

Participants noted increased engagement, improved interaction with peers and instructors, and a 

heightened sense of community within the class. 

• Feedback Impact on Student Performance 

Instructors’ feedback was generally well-received, considered valuable in guiding students through 

speaking tasks and providing constructive criticism. However, peer feedback faced challenges, with 

many participants expressing dissatisfaction due to perceived inadequacies in quality and depth. Weak 

peer feedback hampered the learning experience for some students, underscoring the importance of 

refining peer review processes within the blended model. Nonetheless, the act of reviewing others’ 

recordings positively impacted self-assessment skills and encouraged reflective learning. 

• Challenges in implementation 

The study unearthed several challenges in implementing blended learning. One significant issue 

pertained to the asynchronous nature of online feedback. Weaknesses in the online platform’s feedback 

mechanisms, particularly in peer-to-peer interactions, posed a hurdle in maximizing the potential benefits 

of collaborative learning. Technical glitches and variations in internet access further compounded these 

challenges, affecting the timely delivery and reception of feedback. 

• Discussion and implications 

The findings underscore the immense potential of blended learning in enhancing language education, 

particularly in improving speaking proficiency. The statistically significant improvement in speaking 

scores aligns with existing literature emphasizing the benefits of technology-integrated learning 

environments. However, the nuanced nature of peer feedback, although crucial for holistic learning, 

requires careful structuring and monitoring to ensure its effectiveness. 

The study’s results highlight the critical role of feedback in shaping students’ speaking skills. While 

instructor feedback was generally well-received, enhancing peer feedback mechanisms emerges as a key 

area for improvement. Strategies to train students in providing constructive criticism and fostering 

meaningful interactions on online platforms could substantially elevate the quality of peer feedback, 

enhancing its impact on learning outcomes. 

Comparing these findings with existing literature emphasizes the importance of a balanced approach to 

blended learning. Successful implementation requires addressing technical challenges and refining 

feedback mechanisms to maximize its benefits. Theoretical frameworks advocating for socio-

constructivist learning align with the study’s emphasis on collaborative learning through peer interactions. 



www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/elsr              Education, Language and Sociology Research              Vol. 5, No. 1, 2024 

35 
Published by SCHOLINK INC. 

The results emphasize the positive impact of blended learning on IELTS speaking skills, showcasing its 

potential in addressing the limitations of traditional teaching methods. While challenges exist, the overall 

satisfaction levels and performance improvements signal the promise of this pedagogical approach. 

Refinements in peer feedback mechanisms and technological enhancements stand as essential pathways 

for optimizing the blended learning experience in language education. 

 

4. Conclusion 

The study’s findings showcase the efficacy of blended learning in enhancing IELTS speaking skills. The 

results revealed a significant improvement in speaking performance, as demonstrated by the marked 

advancement in participants’ pre-test and post-test scores. This improvement underscores the 

effectiveness of the blended learning model, affirming its role in augmenting language acquisition, 

especially in oral proficiency. 

Moreover, the research illuminated participants’ satisfaction with the blended learning environment. 

Despite initial skepticism, students exhibited contentment and appreciation for the increased engagement 

facilitated by blended learning. The ability to receive feedback from both instructors and peers through 

online platforms was perceived as highly beneficial. However, challenges were noted, primarily 

regarding the quality and timeliness of online feedback from peers, signaling an area for improvement in 

future implementations. 

The significance of blended learning in IELTS speaking courses is evident from the positive impact on 

student engagement, interaction, and overall learning experience. This model effectively bridges the 

limitations observed in traditional teaching methods, offering a comprehensive approach that integrates 

face-to-face interactions with online learning, fostering a more holistic learning environment. 

Moving forward, future research endeavors could delve deeper into refining the online feedback system 

within blended learning setups. Addressing the challenges faced, particularly enhancing the quality and 

timeliness of peer feedback, would further optimize the effectiveness of this approach. Additionally, 

expanding the study’s scope to include a more diverse participant pool across various educational 

contexts could yield insights into the applicability and adaptability of blended learning in diverse 

linguistic settings. 

In conclusion, this study underscores the transformative potential of blended learning in augmenting 

IELTS speaking skills. The integration of face-to-face interactions with online platforms not only 

enhances speaking proficiency but also fosters a more interactive, engaging, and satisfactory learning 

environment. As technology continues to evolve, further exploration and refinement of blended learning 

methodologies promise to revolutionize language education, catering to the evolving needs of language 

learners in diverse educational settings. 

 

 

 



www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/elsr              Education, Language and Sociology Research              Vol. 5, No. 1, 2024 

36 
Published by SCHOLINK INC. 

References 

Brown, H. D., & Abeywickrama, P. (2004). Language assessment. Principles and Classroom Practices. 

White Plains, NY: Pearson Education. 

Ellis, R. (2008). The Study of Second Language Acquisition (4th ed.). Oxford: UK: Oxford University 

Press. Retrieved from https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/handle/2292/8021  

Ellis, R. (2010). Second language acquisition, teacher education and language pedagogy. Language 

Teaching, 43(2), 182-201. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444809990139  

Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. Taylor & 

Francis. 

Ginaya, G., Rezeki, M., & Astuti, S. (2018). The Effects of Blended Learning to Students’ Speaking 

Ability: A Study of Utilizing Technology to Strengthen the Conventional Instruction. IJLLC 

(International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture), 4(3), 1-14. 

https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v4i3.661 

Ginns, P., & Ellis, R. (2007). Quality in blended learning: Exploring the relationships between on-line 

and face-to-face teaching and learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), 53-64. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.10.003 

Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. 

J. Bonk, & C. R. Graham, The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives. San Francisco, 

CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.  

Handbook, I. E. L. T. S. (2007). Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge, Local Examinations 

Syndicate. 

Hoic-Bozic, N., Mornar, V., & Boticki, I. (2009). A blended learning approach to course design and 

implementation. IEEE transactions on education, 52(1), 19-30. 

https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2007.914945 

Launer, R. (2010). Five assumptions on blended learning: What is important to make blended learning a 

successful concept? Hybrid Learning Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6248, 9-15. 

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14657-2_2 

Masie, E. (2002). Blended learning: The magic is in the mix, The ASTD e-learning handbook. New York: 

Mc Graw-Hill. 

Nation, P., & Newton, J. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL listening and speaking. In ESL Applied Linguistics 

Professional Series (Vol. 15). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.11.002 

Oliver, K., & Stallings, D. (2014). Preparing teachers for emerging blended learning environments. 

Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 22(1), 57-81. 

Poon, J. (2013). Blended learning: An institutional approach for enhancing students’ learning experiences. 

Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2). Retrieved June, 15, 2013 from 

http://jolt.merlot.org/vol9no2/poon_0613.htm 

https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v4i3.661
https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2007.914945
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14657-2_2


www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/elsr              Education, Language and Sociology Research              Vol. 5, No. 1, 2024 

37 
Published by SCHOLINK INC. 

Pramila, K., & Thomas, J. (2019). Impact of Blended Learning on the Speaking Skills of English as a 

Foreign Language (EFL) Learners at Sohar University. Anthropologist, 35(1-3), 47-56. 

https://doi.org/10.31901/24566802.2019/35.1-3.2039 

Sharma, P. (2017). Blended learning design and practice. In Digital Language Learning and Teaching 

(pp. 167-178). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315523293-14 

Staker, H., & Horn, M. B. (2012). Classifying K-12 blended learning. Innosight institute. 

Tomlinson, B., & Whittaker, C. (2013). Blended Learning in English Language Teaching. London: 

British Council. 

Wang, L., Huang, Y., & Omar, M. (2021). Analysis of blended learning model application using text 

mining method. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(1), 172-

187. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i01.19823 

Wang, M. J. (2010). Online collaboration and offline interaction between students using asynchronous 

tools in blended learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(6). 

https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1045 

Yang, Y. T. C., Chuang, Y. C., Li, L. Y., & Tseng, S. S. (2013). A blended learning environment for 

individualized English listening and speaking integrating critical thinking. Computers & Education, 

63, 285-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.012 

 

https://doi.org/10.31901/24566802.2019/35.1-3.2039
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315523293-14
https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i01.19823
https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1045
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.012

