




































Putri Anggraeni, et al / Journal of English Language Teaching 6 (1) (2017) 

165 

 

 
ELT FORUM 6 (2) (2017) 

 

Journal of English Language Teaching 

 
http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/elt 

 
 

THE ANALYSIS OF UNIT-SHIFTS IN A SUBTITLE 

OF THE HOBBIT THIRD SEQUEL 

 

Rita Zoraya, Djoko Sutopo, Yuliati 
 

English Department, Faculty of Languages and Arts, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia  

 

Article Info 
________________  
Article History: 

Received in October 

2017  
Approved in November 

2017 Published in 

December 2017 
________________  
Keywords: translation, 
unit-shift, subtitle english to 
indonesian. 
  
____________________ 

 
Abstract  
___________________________________________________________________ 
This final project is about the analysis of unit-shifts that occur in the translation of subtitle a film entitled 

The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies. Various subtitles were already created to make it easier for 

audience to understand this film. The result of this study shows that there are 14 unit-shifts that occur with 

various frequencies. With 144 of total unit-shifts that occur in this study, the detail of each unit-shift type 

as follow: 2 unit-shifts for Morpheme into Phrase type; 8 unit-shifts for Morpheme into Word type; 5 unit-

shifts for Phrase into Sentence type; 9 unit-shifts for Sentence into Phrase type; 12 unit-shifts for Clause 

into Sentence type; 14 unit-shifts for Sentence into Clause type; 23 unit-shifts for Clause into Word type; 1 

unit-shift for Word into Clause type; 35 unit-shifts for Phrase into Word type; 5 unit-shifts for Word into 

Phrase type; 22 unit-shifts for Sentence into Word type; 6 unit-shifts for Word into Sentence type; 1 unit-

shift for Phrase into Clause type; and 1 unit-shift for Clause into Phrase type. 

 
 © 2017 Universitas Negeri Semarang 

  


 Correspondent Address: ISSN 2252-6706 
B3 Building FBS Unnes  

Sekaran, Gunungpati, Semarang, 50229  

E-mail: unnes_english@yahoo.com   

 

 

 

 

 



R. Zoraya & D. Sutopo & Yuliati / Journal of English Language Teaching 6 (2) (2017) 

166 

 

INTRODUCTION 

Language as a means of communication has been used by human for thousands of years. It 

will be very hard to imagine if we do not have language as a means of communication since the role 

of language is very important for human being in order to help them in conveying thoughts, ideas, 

and even to do transactions, commerce and international cooperation.  

To get the idea about what actually a language is, we need to take a look at some definitions 

which are offered by language experts. The first definition is as said by Chomsky (1957) that 

“Language is a set (finite or infinite) of sentences, each finite in length, and constructed out of a 

finite set of elements”, then we can conclude that each languages in the world will have their own 

length and constructed out of a finite set of different elements. We can agree that there is a vast 

diversity between these languages which takes form of pronunciation, grammar, vocabulary etc. The 

diversity as mentioned before are only if we take a look at diversity in language from oral languang 

point of view. We do not yet talk about diversity in language from written point of view. However, 

to simplify the problem, this study only take a look at the oral language. Nevertheless, this diversity 

can be a barrier to maintain a good communications between 2 or more different languages. The 

most common technique to overcome this barrier is by using translation. 

Munday (2001: 4) stated that the term translation itself has several meanings: it can refer to 

the general subject field, the product (the text which has been translated) or the process (the act of 

producing the translation), otherwise known as translating. Scholars have many opinions about the 

translation meaning. However they can agree that the purpose of translation remains the same, 

which is to transfer equivalent message from one language to another language. 

Similar with the other things that happen around the human evolution, languages will also 

change and improve throughout human development. New words are invented, or even sometimes 

they are forgotten. This fact creates a challenge for the study of translation to keep developing also, 

in order to maintain its purpose as a bridge to connect one language to another. 

Another challenge, which occurs in translation, is the realization that even the best translator 

will not able to provide the perfect translation. As explained by Nida (1964) in Venuti (2000: 126) 

that there can be no absolute correspondence between languages since no two languages are 

identical. As the result, since there are no two identical languages, then the shifts in translation 

cannot be avoided.   

Catford (1965) in Venuti (2000: 141) stated that shifts mean the departures from formal 

correspondence in the process of going from source language (SL) to target language (TL). Catford 

said that there are two major types of shifts that occur, namely level shifts and category shifts. 

Level shift is a shift from grammar to lexis. It means that a grammatical unit in English, such 

as noun, affix, etc, has a lexical unit in Indonesian as its translation equivalent (Machali, 1998: 14). 

For example, “Jakarta is the biggest city in Indonesia” which is translated as “Jakarta merupakan 

kota terbesar di Indonesia”. The form “is” as a unit in English grammar is translated into 

Indonesian by the lexis “merupakan”. 

This final project focuses on category shifts. However, we should know that there are four 

kinds of category shifts: structure shifts; class shifts; unit shifts; and intra-system shifts.  

Structure shifts grammatically occur at any ranks of language where words, phrase, clauses, or 

sentences in SL has its translation equivalent with the same rank in TL so only their structures are 

different. Catford (1965:77) gave an example of structure shifts in phrase rank from 'A beautiful 

woman' with adjective + noun in English to 'wanita yang cantik' with noun + adjective in 

Indonesian.  

Class shifts occur when the translation equivalent of a SL item is a member of a different class 

from the original item. An example given by Catford (1965:79) clearly showed a change of class 



R. Zoraya & D. Sutopo & Yuliati / Journal of English Language Teaching 6 (2) (2017) 

167 

 

English clause 'They insist on higher wages' is translated into an Indonesian clause 'Mereka 

menuntut kenaikan gaji'. The example shows that the English adjective of comparative 'higher' 

changes to Indonesian noun 'kenaikan'. 

Unit shifts occur when the translation equivalent of a unit at one rank in the SL is a unit at 

different rank in the TL. An example comes from the translation of English clause 'My father is very 

nice' to Indonesian clause 'Ayahku sangat baik' where a phrase in SL 'my father' has a word 'ayahku' 

in TL as its equivalence. Based on the combination between rank in English, there will be 14 kinds 

of unit-shifts that are possible to occur during translation. They are  Morpheme into Phrase 

type;Morpheme into Word type; Phrase into Sentence type; Sentence into Phrase type; Clause into 

Sentence type; Sentence into Clause type; Clause into Word type; Word into Clause type; Phrase 

into Word type; Word into Phrase type; Sentence into Word type; Word into Sentence type; Phrase 

into Clause type;and Clause into Phrase type. 

The last shifts, intra-system-shifts, are the shifts occurring internally within the system of the 

language concerned. The system involves a selection of a non-corresponding word in the system of 

TL. An example of this is: 

 SL: They need a pair of weapons. 

 TL: Mereka membutuhkan sebuah senjata. 

It is obviously seen from the example above that though we have a corresponding plural form 

of „weapons‟ (e.g. through repetition of the word „senjata‟  in  Bahasa Indonesia), system in Bahasa 

Indonesia needs the use of the singular form of „a pair‟. 

Catford (1965: 79) said that unit shift is simply defined as changes of rank. It is about 

departures from formal correspondence where in the translation equivalent of a unit at one rank in 

the source language (SL) is a unit at a dissimilar rank in the target language (TL). For instance, 

adjective in the source language (SL) is translated into a clause in the target language (TL). 

Some examples of unit shifts are:   

1. SL (English)     

We watched some unsportmanlike decisions from the referee. 

TL (Bahasa Indonesia) 

Kita menyaksikan beberapa keputusan-keputusan yang tidak adil oleh sang wasit. 

From the examples above, it is clearly seen that there is a change of rank in unit shifts, namely 

the morpheme “un” turning into a word “tidak”.  

2. SL (English)  

Last night, the storm was really terrible. 

TL (Bahasa Indonesia)  

Semalam, badainya benar-benar buruk.  

From the examples above, it is clearly seen that there is a change of rank in unit shifts, namely 

the phrase “last night” turning into a word “Semalam”.  

According to Larson (1984: 15) translation is classified into two main types, namely form-based 

and meaning-based (idiomatic) translation. Form-based translation attempts to follow the form of the 

source language (SL) and it is known as literal translation, while meaning-based translation makes 

every effort to communicate the meaning of the SL text in the natural forms of the receptor 

language. Such translation is called idiomatic translation. A literal translation sounds like nonsense 

and has little communication value (Larson, 1984: 15). The literal translation can be understood if 

the general grammatical form of the two languages is similar. Larson (1984: 16) said that idiomatic 

translations use the natural forms of the receptor language both in the grammatical constructions 

and in the choices of lexical items. A truly idiomatic translation does not sound like translation. 

The example of form-based translation and meaning-based translation as below: 



R. Zoraya & D. Sutopo & Yuliati / Journal of English Language Teaching 6 (2) (2017) 

168 

 

No SL (English) 

TL (Bahasa Indonesia) 

Form Based Translation 
Meaning-Based 

Translation 

1. Who has he been living 

with? (Margono, 1999: 4) 

Siapa telah dia tinggal 

dengan? (Margono, 1999: 

4) 

Dengan siapa dia tinggal? 

(Margono, 1999: 4) 

2.  They've brought an 

apocalypse upon our 

heads! 

Mereka telah membawa 

kehancuran di atas kepala 

kita! 

Mereka telah membawa 

kehancuran pada kita! 

Table 1.1 Example of Form-Based and Meaning-Based Translation 

Based on the purposes of translation, Brislin in Choliludin (2007: 26-30) categorized 

translation into four types, namely: 

1) Pragmatic translation: it refers to the translation of a message with an 

interest in accuracy of the information that was meant to be conveyed in the 

SL form and it is not conveyed with other aspects of the original language 

version. Example: the translation of the information about repairing a 

machine. 

2) Aesthetic-poetic translation: it refers to translation in which the translator 

takes into account the affect, emotion, and feeling of an original version, the 

aesthetic form used by the original author, as well as any information in the 

message. Example: the translation of sonnet, rhyme, heroic couplet, 

dramatic dialogue, and novel. 

3) Ethnographic translation: its purpose is to explicate the cultural context of 

the SL and TL versions. Translators have to be sensitive to the way words 

are used and must know how the word fits into cultures. Example: the use 

of the word „yes‟ versus „yeah‟ in America. 

4) Linguistic translation: is concerned with equivalent meanings of the 

constituent morphemes of the SL and grammatical form. Example: 

language in a computer program and translation machine. 

Meanwhile, the other language expert, Catford (1978: 21) had different preference for a more 

linguistic-based approach to translation and this approach was based on the linguistic work of Firth 

and Halliday. His main contribution in the field of translation theory was the introduction of the 

concepts of types and shifts of translation. Catford proposed very broad types of translation in terms 

of three criteria: 

The extent of translation (full translation vs partial translation); 

The grammatical rank at which the translation equivalence is established (rank-bound 

translation vs. unbounded translation); 

The levels of language involved in translation (total translation vs. restricted translation). 

In this study, I analyze deeper about the second type as explained by Catford. Rank-bound 

translation, it means that the selection of TL text equivalent is limited at only one rank, such as word-

for-word equivalence, morpheme-for-morpheme equivalence, etc. Unbounded translation, it can move 

freely up and down the rank-scale. 

Here is some example for the rank-bound translation and unbounded translation: 



R. Zoraya & D. Sutopo & Yuliati / Journal of English Language Teaching 6 (2) (2017) 

169 

 

No SL  

(English) 

TL (Bahasa Indonesia) 

Bound Translation  Unbounded Translation 

1. Never mind the books. Jangan pikirkan buku-

bukunya 

Lupakan buku – bukunya. 

2.  Open this door!  Buka pintu ini! Buka pintunya! 

3.  I can see him! Aku bisa melihat dia! Aku bisa melihatnya!  

Table 1.2 Example of Bound and Unbounded Translation 

The source of data in this final project is the subtitles of a movie entitled The Hobbit: The 

Battle of the Five Armies. The source language (SL) of the movie subtitles is English and the target 

language (TL) is Bahasa Indonesia. The unit shifts which occur in the movie will be analyzed in this 

final project. 

As stated by Christina (2002: 7), subtitles are textual versions of the dialog in films and 

television programs, usually displayed at the bottom of the screen. They can either be a form of 

written rendering of the dialog in the same language, with or without added information to help 

viewers who are deaf and hard-of-hearing to follow the dialog, or people who cannot understand the 

spoken dialogue or who have accent recognition problems. 

It is common to find some subtitle which  the meaning is not equivalence, because as 

explained before that there are no two identical languages, so if the source language is bluntly 

translated into the target language then the result will be not quite communicative. However, a good 

subtitle will provide the equivalence meaning which minimize the wrong impression from the 

audience about what is truly happening in the movie.  

This study has a purpose to analyze the types of shifts which exist in the translation of 

Indonesian subtitle of The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies. It will also find out the translation 

level in Indonesian subtitle of The Hobbit: the Battle of the Five Armies is good enough or not, since 

the occurrence of the shifts found in translations will also indicate the smoothness of the translations 

themselves. 

METHODOLOGY OF THE RESEARCH  

This study used descriptive qualitative method. It means that an analysis explanation in a 

form of descriptive text will be used to explain the result of this study. However , there is also a 

simple formula which is going to be used in this study either. Even though the formula will only be 

used to support the analysis the data. The formula is not going to be the main focus on the research.  

According to Huberman and Miles (1994: 45), “Qualitative data is usually in the form of 

words rather than numbers. The qualitative data were the sources of well-grounded, rich 

descriptions and explanations of processes in identifiable context of words, sentences, utterances and 

dialogues”. 

The definition clarifies that qualitative research does not use enumeration or counting. It deals 

to describe, analyze, and interpret an object that is observed.  

Creswell, as cited by Sugiono (2011:31), states that qualitative research is a means for 

exploring and understanding the meaning individuals or groups ascribe to a social or human 

problem. The process of research involves emerging questions and procedures; collecting data in 

participants‟ setting; analyzing the data inductively, building from particulars to general themes; and 

making interpretation of the meaning of data. The final written report has a flexible writing 

structure.”   



R. Zoraya & D. Sutopo & Yuliati / Journal of English Language Teaching 6 (2) (2017) 

170 

 

Bogdan and Biklen, as quoted by Sugiono (2011), formulate the characteristics of qualitative 

research as follows:  

 Qualitative research has the natural setting as the direct source of data and the key 

of instrument.  

 Qualitative research is descriptive. The data collected is in the form of words of 

pictures rather than number.  

 Qualitative research is concerned with process rather than simply with outcomes or 

products.  

Qualitative research tends to analyze their data inductively. 

In conducting this study, I used some observation sheets to get the data. First of all, I created 

comparison sheet between the subtitle in source language (English) and target language (Indonesian). All 

the translation in each subtitle will be listed in this sheet, including them which do not have unit shifts. 

The example of the comparison sheet as below: 

The Example of Comparison Sheet 

English Subtitle Indonesian Subtitle 

00:01:13,490 --> 00:01:14,573 

I warned you. 

 

 

00:01:14,824 --> 00:01:17,701 

Did I not warn you what would comeof dealing with 

Dwarves? 

 

 

00:01:17,952 --> 00:01:19,036 

Now they've done it. 

 

 

00:01:19,287 --> 00:01:20,454 

They've woken the dragon! 

 

 

00:01:20,705 --> 00:01:22,748 

They've brought an apocalypse 

upon our heads! 

00:01:12,391 --> 00:01:13,725 

Sudah kuperingatkan kau ! 

 

00:01:13,726 --> 00:01:16,604 

Bukankah sudah kuberitahu 

akibat berurusan dengan Kurcaci ? 

 

00:01:16,854 --> 00:01:18,188 

Sekarang merekatelah melakukannya ! 

 

00:01:18,189 --> 00:01:19,606 

Mereka membangunkan sang Naga ! 

 

00:01:19,607 --> 00:01:21,650 

Membawa kehancuran pada kita. 

 

 

As we can see in the table 3.1, each sentence in English subtitle will have its pair in 

Indonesian. I also put the time marker on each sentence to ease the analyzing process. The time 

markers are slightly different, because the creator of those subtitles are not the same person. 



R. Zoraya & D. Sutopo & Yuliati / Journal of English Language Teaching 6 (2) (2017) 

171 

 

There is another observation sheet that I use in conducting this study, which is the analyzing 

sheet. In this sheet, the unit shifts between ST and TT will be elaborated thoroughly. We can see the 

example of analyzing sheet as below: 

 

The Example of Analyzing Sheet 

U
n

it
 S

h
if

ts
 

M
o

rp
h

em
e 

in
to

 w
o

rd
 

T
im

e 

0
0

:0
1

:1
3

,4
9
0

 -
-

>
 0

0
:0

1
:1

4
,5

7
3

 

E
x

p
la

n
at

io
n
 

T
h

e 
E

n
g

li
sh

 

m
o

rp
h

em
e 

-e
d
 i

s 

tr
an

sl
at

ed
 i

n
to

 t
h

e 

w
o

rd
 s

u
d

a
h

 i
n

 

B
a

h
a

sa
 I

n
d

o
n

es
ia

. 

T
h

er
e 

is
 a

 c
h

an
g

e 

fr
o

m
 m

o
rp

h
em

e 
in

to
 

w
o

rd
. 

B
ac

k
 

T
ra

n
sl

at
io

n
 

I 
d

id
 

w
ar

n
 

y
o

u
! 

T
ar

g
et

 T
ex

t 

S
u

d
ah

 

k
u

p
er

in
g

at
k

an
 k

au
! 

S
o

u
rc

e 
te

x
t 

I 
w

ar
n

ed
 

y
o

u
! 

N
o

. 

1
 

 

Below is the sequence of methods that I use in this study. 

1) Observing.  

First of all, I observed my data by watching carefully the film several times both with 

Indonesian and English subtitles. This step is crucial since we know that the translations sometimes 

depend on the situtation like how the source language is spoken, who is the speaker, who is the 

listener etc. 

2) Collecting.  



R. Zoraya & D. Sutopo & Yuliati / Journal of English Language Teaching 6 (2) (2017) 

172 

 

Second step was to collect the data by downloading the subtitles and then turned them into 

the comparison sheet as explained before. This step must be done carefully. For subtitle in source 

language, I think there is not so much different between one subtitle and others. In other hand, it is 

better if we choose a subtitle with good translation quality for target language. Since it willbe easier 

to detect the unit-shifts that may occur if compared with bad translation in a subtitle which uses 

literal translation. 

3) Identifying.  

I identified the data in the comparison sheet carefully and then deleted all the sentences in the 

sheet except for those which had the unit shifts.  

4) Analyzing.  

I analyzed the simplified data to know which unit shifts occur in each pair of sentences and 

then rewrite them into the analyzing sheet. 

RESULT AND DISCUSSION 

As we know, there are no 2 same languages in this world. As the result, there must be shifts 

which would occur in the translation process from Source Language into Target Language. It is been 

clear that translation deals about meaning. As long as the core meaning is maintained, it is 

acceptable to involve any shifts in the translation. 

The shifts themselves are various. There are level shifts, category shifts, and meaning shifts. 

This study is concerned with one aspect of category shifts, which is unit-shifts. Unit-shifts occur 

when the translation equivalent of a unit at one rank in the SL is a unit at different rank in the TL. 

We know already that there are 5 rank in language. They are morpheme, word, phrase, clause and 

sentence. In this study, I analyze the unit-shifts that occur in the translation of subtitles from English 

(Source Language) into Indonesian (Target Language) of a Hollywood film entitled The Hobbit: The 

Battle of the Five Armies. This film is the last chapter of The Hobbit Trilogy.  

I found all types of unit-shifts occur in the translation of this film‟s subtitle. It is 

understandable, since English and Indonesian are so different in their unit ranks. 

In order to make it clearer, I make a summary for the result of this study. The table which 

shows the summary can be seen as below. 

 

Type of the Unit shifts 
Findings 

Number Total 

1 Morpheme into Phrase 113, 134 2 

2 Morpheme into Word 28, 44, 46, 66, 70, 99, 112, 118 8 

3 Phrase into Sentence 12, 77, 95, 98, 124 5 

4 Sentence into Phrase 5, 24, 36, 63, 82, 106, 136, 142, 143 9 

5 Clause into Sentence 
79, 92, 94, 96, 102, 115, 119, 135, 138, 139, 

140, 141 
12 

6 Sentence into Clause 
3, 7, 38, 87, 89, 91, 103, 104, 108, 116, 117, 

120, 125, 130 
14 



R. Zoraya & D. Sutopo & Yuliati / Journal of English Language Teaching 6 (2) (2017) 

173 

 

7 Clause into Word 

11, 33, 37, 51, 52, 59, 60, 72, 73, 74, 76, 78, 

81, 86, 88, 90, 97, 101, 123, 126, 128, 132, 

133 

23 

8 Word into Clause 114 1 

9 Phrase into Word 

2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 13, 15, 18, 19, 21, 23, 26, 27, 29, 

32, 35, 39, 41, 45, 47, 48, 49, 50, 57, 61, 67, 

69, 75, 80, 83, 84, 85, 109, 122, 129 

35 

10 Word into Phrase 53, 54, 68, 71, 100 5 

11 Sentence into Word 
9, 14, 16, 17, 20, 22, 25, 31, 34, 40, 42, 43, 55, 

56, 58, 64, 65, 105, 111, 121, 137, 144 
22 

12 Word into Sentence 1, 30, 93, 107, 127, 131 6 

13 Phrase into Clause 110 1 

14 Clause into Phrase 62 1 

 
TOTAL 144 

 

There are 144 unit-shifts findings in the translation of subtitle of the film entitled The Hobbit: 

The Battle of the Five Armies from SL English to TL Indonesian. Each findings have been analyzed 

thoroughly and carefully to avoid any mistake in identifying the unit-shifts which occur in it. 

The „number‟ indicates the number of order which is also shown in the Appendix. I have 

made the list of findings in the Appendix in order of its appearance in the film itself.  

Furthermore, below is the result of Bungin‟s formula for the findings of unit-shifts in the 

translation of subtitle of the film entitled The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies. 

Bungin‟s Formula: 

   
 

  
       

With: 

P = Number of percentages 

F = Frequency of a certain unit shifts occurance 

N = Total number of unit shifts found 

 

Type of the Unit shifts Total Findings Percentage 

1 Morpheme into Phrase 2 2% 

2 Morpheme into Word 8 5% 

3 Phrase into Sentence 5 4% 



R. Zoraya & D. Sutopo & Yuliati / Journal of English Language Teaching 6 (2) (2017) 

174 

 

4 Sentence into Phrase 9 6% 

5 Clause into Sentence 12 8% 

6 Sentence into Clause 14 10% 

7 Clause into Word 23 16% 

8 Word into Clause 1 1% 

9 Phrase into Word 35 24% 

10 Word into Phrase 5 3% 

11 Sentence into Word 22 15% 

12 Word into Sentence 6 4% 

13 Phrase into Clause 1 1% 

14 Clause into Phrase 1 1% 

Total 144 100% 

 

 I can conclude that the unit-shifts from bigger rank unit to smaller one are more commonly 

found in the translation from English to Indonesian subtitle of a film entitled The Hobbit: The Battle 

of the Five Armies. As example there are 35 unit-shifts from Phrase into Word, meanwhile only 5 

unit-shifts from Word into Phrase. The reason is probably because the language in the SL is actually 

an “old” English like in the Elizabethan era. We know that British English is different if compared 

to American or Australian English which are simpler. The complexity in the SL make it harder to 

translator to find the equal translation in TL. Thus, he/she simplified the translation into smaller 

rank unit. As example is the finding number 2. In the SL, it said “Never mind the books.”, and it is 

translated as “Lupakan buku - bukunya!”. The literal translation would be “Jangan pernah pikirkan 

buku-bukunya!”, however it will be rather odd to use it in Indonesian conversation. The closest 

translation will be “Jangan pikirkan buku-bukunya”, and even though it is acceptable to say it in 

Indonesian, I agree that it will be more suitable to say “Lupakan buku-bukunya” instead since it has 

the same meaning and it is proper to use in such a hurry situation. 

CONCLUSIONS 

Based on the result of this study, and my experience in conducting this study, I would like to 

recommend some suggestions as below: 

1) For similar studies in the future, it is better to analyze the subtitle a film from British 

English than American/Australian English. Since the British English is commonly 



R. Zoraya & D. Sutopo & Yuliati / Journal of English Language Teaching 6 (2) (2017) 

175 

 

more complicated compared to American/Australian ones. This way, it is more 

likely that the study will find more unit-shifts in the translation from SL to TL. 

2) For the translators, we must realize and accept that there are no 2 same languages in 

the worlds. When I was searching for the subtitle of the film The Hobbit: The Battle 

of the Five Armies, I find there are a lot of bad subtitles created by other translators. 

Almost all of them are due to the translators tried to use literal translation from SL to 

TL which make the core meaning is slightly or sometimes badly damaged. 

REFERENCES 

Catford, John C. 1965. A Linguistic Theory of Translation: an Essay on Applied Linguistics. London: Oxford 

University Press. 

Indrawan, Rully and Yaniawati, Poppy. 2014. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif & Campuran. Bandung: 

Refika Aditama. 

Mason, Jennifer.2002. Qualitative Researching. London: Sage Publication Ltd. 

Sugiyono. 2015. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, & R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta 

Central Institute of Indian Languages. Anukriti Net  

Available at http://www.anukriti.net/pgdts/course411/index.html 

Accessed on June 12, 2017 

Ordudari, Mahmoud. Translation procedures, strategies and methods 

Available at http://translationjournal.net/journal/41culture.htm 

Accessed on June 15, 2017 

Vanilla. Translation Shifts  

Available at http://transvanilla.blogspot.co.id/2010/04/translation-shifts.html 

Accessed on June 13, 2017 

Alzuhdy, Yosa Abduh. 2014. ANALISIS TRANSLATION SHIFT DALAM PENERJEMAHAN 

BILINGUAL BAHASA INGGRIS – BAHASA INDONESIA 

Available at: http://staff.uny.ac.id/sites/default/files/penelitian/yosa-abduh-alzuhdy-ss-mhum/artikel-diksi-

yosa-catford.pdf 

Accessed on June 13, 2017 

Herman. 2014. Category Shifts In the English Translation of Harry Potter and the Philosopher‟s Stone Movie 

Subtitle into Indonesia (An Applied Linguistics Study) 

Available at: http://iosrjournals.org/iosr-jhss/papers/Vol19-issue12/Version-5/F0191253138.pdf 

Accessed on June 14, 2017 


