



































 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unveiling L'objet petit a in Anaïs Nin’s “The Veiled Woman”: 

A Lacanian Reading of Femininity in Erotica  

Rosemary Ho, Barnard College ‘27 

 

 

Abstract: The similarities between the works of French-born Cuban writer Anaïs Nin and 

French psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan suggest a novel avenue to interpret Erotica as a literary 

genre. I hypothesize that by reading Nin through Lacan—more specifically by applying the 

Lacanian gaze as an instance of objet petit a to Nin’s short story “The Veiled Woman”—we 

subversively perceive Nin’s female characters as the more active and dominant agents, thus 

reconsidering themes such as power, femininity, and sexuality in Erotica. Analyzing the gaze as 

a thematic agent in Nin’s erotica can also provide new insight into psychoanalysis that 

encompasses a wider range of subjects. Possible gaps that this paper hopes to bridge include the 

overlooked and misunderstood value of psychoanalytic theories in literary criticism as well as 

Lacan’s own elusive seminars and repeatedly remodeled theories. I attempt to put forth possible 

explanations for and reconsiderations of Lacan’s gaze as exemplified in “The Veiled Woman.”  

 

  



 

 

"The sexual life is usually enveloped in many layers, for all of us – poets, writers, artists. It is a 

veiled woman, half-dreamed." 

         – Anaïs Nin, Little Birds 

 

Despite its marginalization within literary criticism, psychoanalysis offers a powerful 

framework for analyzing erotic literature, as it uncovers the psychological and symbolic 

dimensions underlying sexual fantasies and imagery. More specifically, erotic texts have 

historically been written for male consumption, which begs a critical reexamination of how 

gendered dynamics shape both the production and reception of such texts especially when it 

comes to erotica written by female authors. This raises important questions about whose desires 

are being represented, whose voices are marginalized, and how female-authored erotica—such as 

that of Anaïs Nin—challenges or reconfigures dominant narratives of sexuality. The similarities 

between the works of French-born Cuban writer Anaïs Nin and French psychoanalyst Jacques 

Lacan suggest a novel avenue to interpret Erotica as a literary genre.  

Frappier-Mazur (1988) characterizes erotica authored by women and minorities as 

forming a “marginal canon,” a view that mirrors the broader neglect of Nin’s writing. This 

marginalization is deeply rooted in the historical and cultural biases of a literary canon that 

remains both arbitrary and inherently patriarchal (Hakim, 2010; Patthey-Chavez et al., 1996; 

Pulis, 1994). Nin’s exclusion from the canon can largely be attributed to the core focus of her 

work (Pulis, 1994). Nin herself acknowledged the unconventional origins of her erotic writing in 

the preface to Little Birds, her second posthumously published collection of erotica. She recounts 

how, alongside Henry Miller, she was hired to produce erotic content for an anonymous private 

collector, a task she described as “writing pornography for a dollar a day” (Nin, 1979). What 

began as a financial necessity in the 1940s evolved into a groundbreaking literary career, 

positioning Nin as a pioneering voice in female erotica (Salvatore, 2011).  

At first glance, the female figures in Nin’s stories may appear homogeneous—highly 

sexualized, passive, objectified, and almost caricature-like (Nalbantian, 1997, p. xiii–xvii). Yet 

beneath these surfaces, Nin continues to refine her craft, weaving her narratives with poetic 

language and subtle references to philosophy, culture, and psychoanalytic theory. As a result, her 

works transcend conventional pornography, offering richly layered portrayals of femininity and 

sexuality that challenge the norms of 20th-century Western discourse (Hakim, 2010). Through a 

psychoanalytic lens, erotica can be interpreted as a reflection of unconscious desires, anxieties, 

and internal conflicts. This approach also sheds light on how such fantasies are shaped by 

personal experiences and the broader social and cultural environment. 

The paper introduces the role of the eye and Lacan’s gaze as a mechanism to interpret 

Nin’s short story “The Veiled Woman.” Through identifying the subject’s encounter with the 

gaze and the consequences thereafter, I argue that Nin’s Erotica subverts the deep-rooted 

phallocentrism that saturates the genre. In bridging gaps between psychoanalysis and literature, 

the paper aims to use Lacanian psychoanalysis to reclaim the inherent power in femininity 

expressed in Nin’s works. I posit that such a reassessment elucidates importance in Nin’s Erotica 

otherwise neglected.  

 

On the Gaze in Stade du miroir (the Mirror Stage) 

Psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan complicated his theory of the gaze throughout his clinical 

career and seminars (Rabaté, 2014; Scott, 2015). Lacan originally conceived the notion of the 

gaze as a counterpart to his other notable theory, Stade du miroir1. The gaze in the mirror stage 

refers to the moment of recognition infants experience when staring into a mirror and seeing that 

first image of an autonomous being (Gallop, 1983). This led to Lacan’s original conclusion that 

the relationship between the focal point of the eye and the mirror was the subject’s “gaze” of 

elusive mastery and control (McGowan, 2007). Not only do infants recognize themselves in the 

image, what is more significant about the mirror stage is the false sense of mastery that comes 

with this recognition (Lacan, 1949). The infant, according to Lacan (1949), begins constructing 

 
1
 Translates to “the mirror stage” in English 



 

 

an ideal version of its ego at this moment. Lacan speculates that the infant who sees itself in the 

mirror begins associating certain attributes to its body even when the infant has not yet 

developed full mobility or motor independence. This tendency marks the earliest sign of 

narcissism and initiates the subject’s entry into the Imaginary Order, the first register of the 

Lacanian Triad. The Imaginary is characterized by identification with images and illusions of 

wholeness, where the ego begins to form through misrecognition—a foundational moment in 

which the infant sees an idealized, unified image of itself that conceals its actual fragmentation 

and dependency. This misrecognition shapes the subject’s relationship to both itself and others, 

grounding its future desires in illusion and idealization (Lacan, 1966). The Imaginary Order, in 

short, represents a narcissistic and false completeness of one’s “Ideal-I,” or ideal ego. This ideal 

then becomes asymptotic—approachable, but never reachable—in the subject’s later 

development. When an infant recognizes the image in the mirror as the ideal-I, the subject (i.e., 

the infant) becomes fragmented. The subject’s bodily reality (one that is fractured and not yet 

full-formed) deviates from this model image in the mirror (one that is complete, the “Ideal-I”).  

The mirror stage, as theorized by Lacan, marks the moment when the subject forms a 

libidinal attachment to their own body image. In this phase, the reflection in the mirror becomes 

the ideal ego—a fantasized, coherent image situated within the Imaginary register 

(Canellopoulos, 2010). This foundational moment of subjectivity arises from a misrecognition, 

as the mirrored image offers a false sense of unity that the fragmented, material body cannot 

truly embody. The resulting dissonance between the ideal ego and the physical self which begins 

a cycle of identification, gaze, and narcissism.  

A similar dynamic is observed by feminist film critics such as Laura Mulvey, who 

applies Lacanian theory—particularly the gaze—to the analysis of classical narrative cinema in 

critiquing specific camera angles, mise-en-scene, and other visual elements that derive from 

scopophilia, the pleasure in looking at another person who is oblivious to the spectatorship as an 

erotic object. Mulvey interrogates how femininity is constructed and consumed in mainstream 

film, proposing that cinema is structured by scopophilic drives and patriarchal ideology (Mulvey, 

1973). Central to her argument is the idea of woman as “lacking”—a subject defined by the 

absence of the phallus. According to Mulvey, phallocentrism organizes cinematic pleasure by 

positioning the female body as the object of both visual desire and narrative control: “It is her 

lack that produces the phallus as a symbolic presence; it is her desire to make good the lack that 

the phallus signifies” (Mulvey, 1973).  

Just as the infant misrecognizes its reflection as a complete version of itself, the 

(primarily male) spectator is invited to identify with this phallocentric structure. The gaze 

directed at the eroticized female body on screen serves a dual function: it both objectifies the 

woman and reaffirms the male viewer’s imagined mastery through identification with the 

camera’s perspective. Mulvey further argues that the female figure is haunted by a “maternal 

memory” that exists only in relation to castration and can never transcend it—thus reinforcing 

the dominance of the male gaze and the marginalization of female subjectivity in film. 

This parallax—between the gaze and the objet petit a—ultimately extends into the 

subject’s entry into the Symbolic Order (Lacan, 1966). The Symbolic, comprising structures 

such as language, law, culture, and social norms, represents the collective framework that 

governs desire and behavior. In the context of erotica, the Symbolic Order functions as both a 

constraint and a field of expression: it defines what is permissible, taboo, or unspeakable in the 

articulation of sexual desire. While the Imaginary is concerned with self-image and the illusions 

of wholeness, the Symbolic imposes societal codes that regulate identity, gender roles, and 

sexuality. Erotica, then, becomes a unique literary space where the tension between these two 

registers plays out—where private fantasies intersect with the public rules of representation. In 

this sense, Nin’s Erotica exposes desire as a site of entanglement in which the subject is 

destabilized through contradicting cultural and linguistic systems that structure our reality. 

In a broader context beyond the specialized field of psychoanalysis, a “gaze theory” 

coalesced in mainstream media studies (Smelik, 1998). Mulvey’s essay relates the effects of 

spectatorship with the amalgamation of each individual’s background—such as gender, class, 



 

 

race, social class— resembling the Lacanian Symbolic. Contemporary scholarship2 indicates the 

gaze theory continues to gain traction in academic disciplines such as critical race theory, 

feminist theory, film theory, and art critique. Despite her controversial interpretation of Lacan, 

Mulvey shifted the orientation of film studies to include concepts from both Lacanian 

psychoanalysis and feminist theories (Mcgowan, 2003).  

 

The Gaze as Objet Petit a and Desire 

However, scholars have argued that Mulvey’s seminal essay—though foundational to 

feminist film theory—misinterprets Lacan’s concept of the gaze as derived from the Stade du 

miroir (Manlove, 2007; McGowan, 2003; Smelik, 1998). Mulvey applies Freudian and Lacanian 

terms such as “scopophilic instinct” and “the gaze” in a literal and visual sense, aligning them 

with a gendered dynamic of viewer and object in cinema. Yet this reading, rooted in the mirror 

stage, overlooks Lacan’s later theoretical revisions, which reposition the gaze not as an active, 

controlling look but as something far more unsettling. In Lacan’s mature theory, the gaze is not 

what the subject exerts, but rather an intrusive moment when the object of desire appears to 

return the look—an uncanny encounter that disrupts the illusion of mastery. Within the erotic 

register, this reformulation is particularly significant: the gaze becomes a site of vulnerability, 

where the subject is caught in a moment of exposure and fascination, confronted by the objet 

petit a—that elusive, seductive kernel that sparks desire precisely because it can never be fully 

possessed or understood (McGowan, 2003; Scott, 2015; Žižek, 1989). In this light, the erotic 

experience is not simply visual pleasure but a destabilizing interplay between fantasy, lack, and 

the gaze that looks back.  

Lacan alludes to Hans Hobein’s 1533 painting The Ambassadors to better illustrate the 

concept of the gaze. Upon one’s first glance at the painting, one sees the two ambassadors 

standing in luxurious textiles and delicate instruments. Yet the seemingly glorious sight soon 

betrays an uncanniness as one notices an indistinguishable mass, uncoordinated with the rest of 

the painting, in the foreground. The mass flirts with decipherability before it “humiliates the 

viewers” (Scott, 2015), unraveling itself, when viewed from the side, as a skull staring back at its 

audience. The angled skull becomes visible only through the viewers’ skewed vision: it quietly 

retreats as a pale, inaccessible shadow as soon as the viewers look straight at the painting. Some 

scholars interpret this intentional distortion as a memento mori (Bowie, 1987, p. 150), yet to 

Lacan, one is simultaneously enveloped by the painting the moment one perceives the gaze: the 

subject is absolved from subjectivity. Between the eye and the gaze “there is no coincidence, but, 

on the contrary, a lure” (Lacan, 1994, p. 102). The painting’s anamorphism also exemplifies the 

subject’s encounter with objet petit a (Scott, 2015). Not only does this gaze exemplify the 

unattainable object-cause of desire, it furthermore embodies Lacan’s third register in the 

Borromean knot—the Real.  

 

The Encounter with the Real 

The third register of the Lacanian-Borromean knot—the Real—disturbs the Imaginary-

Symbolic through small eruptions of the “uncanny.” The Real, in short, disrupts the subject’s 

notions acquired through images and signifiers about itself and the world (Žižek, 1992). The 

Real is, as Joël Dor (1998), describes, a “shattering enigma,” disrupting the otherwise smooth 

functioning of the other two registers. As Lacan points out, one’s relation to the Real is always in 

discordance— “what I look at is never what I wish to see [... the] moment of losing the gaze is 

the initial moment of seeing” (Lacan, 1997, p. 103). The moment one perceives the skull in 

Holbein’s painting is the closest encounter one has with the Real (Scott, 2015). Lacan describes 

encounters with the Real as traumatic and eruptive as it disrupts one’s subjectivity constructed 

upon the Imaginary-Symbolic (McGowan, 2003). The gaze reveals itself to the subject, subverts 

the subject’s false sense of autonomy, and, in that instance, obliterates subjectivity. English-

speaking Lacanians popularized a paronomasia to illustrate this phenomenon: “The gaze is, in 

other words, irretrievably lost to the eye and ‘I’ of the subject” (Scott, 2015). Not only is the 

 
2
 Manlove (2007) claims that “Mulvey’s essay might well be considered a historical document by many in feminist film theory and  film studies, 

and her ideas about the pleasurable and controlling aspects of vision have been highly influential in several academic disciplines.” 



 

 

gaze obscured in the field of vision (in that one does not instantly recognize the gaze upon first 

glances; the “eye”), it is moreover lost to the subject (“I”). Similarly, Nin’s erotica despite its 

apparent conformity to its genre, remains particularly transgressive and surreal. Nin stages 

encounters with the Real by disrupting the viewer’s symbolic understanding of desire and 

subjectivity. When erotic imagery bypasses mere visual pleasure and provokes discomfort, 

fascination, or a disquieting sense of exposure, it gestures toward the Real. The viewer is no 

longer a sovereign voyeur but becomes the object of an enigmatic gaze, like in Holbein’s 

painting, that returns from the image, threatening to undo the boundaries of the self.  

Lacan characterizes this objective gaze also as an instance of objet petit a—the cause of 

desire. Objet petit a is not to be confused with the object of one’s desire; rather, it is what 

sustains the process of desiring (Dean, 2005). In order for desire to sustain its existence, the 

cause of desire must be seemingly at-reach but perpetually absent from the subject. Because the 

Lacanian gaze is an object (McGowan, 2003)—one that involves not the active agency of the 

subject, but the instance where the object looks back at the subject—the subject can never truly 

possess such a gaze. The gaze therefore springs from an objective, rather than subjective, point 

of view. In Mulvey’s—as well as numerous other scholars’—contentions, the gaze is simply an 

action done by the spectator (Manlove, 2007). Todd Mcgowan (2003) provides an insightful look 

into Lacan’s gaze in Looking for the Gaze: Lacanian Film Theory and Its Vicissitudes. Mcgowan 

argues that the “loss of the gaze as an object is at once the moment of its emergence – the subject 

can never truly ‘satisfy’ their desire through obtaining the object [...] the gaze would cease to be 

the gaze once recognized by the subject” (p. 29). In other words, because both the gaze and the 

objet petit a are unattainable objects, there exists no possibility for the subject to ever possess the 

gaze, let alone utilizing it in certain ways as exemplified in Mulvey’s argument.  

It is in the register of the Real where one finds the unconscious and desire (Felluga, 

2011). Yet according to Lacan, individuals escape the Real through constructing a fantasy-

reality—one that is shaped by the Imaginary-Symbolic Orders. One’s desire therefore relies on 

lack. When one eventually reaches the supposed “heart” of desire, one discovers that it is merely 

a misrecognition of fullness, of completeness—and upon this realization the cycle of desire 

ensues. Arriving too close to objet petit a threatens to uncover the inherent lack necessary to 

sustain desire, which is why in spite of objet petit a’s lure—the gaze in Hobein’s painting is 

always there, beckoning the viewers to notice it—the subject cannot recognize it within the rigid 

networks of the Imaginary-Symbolic (McGowan, 2016). Yet when the subject does encounter 

the gaze, the seemingly stable matrix of “reality” becomes distorted (the viewers witness the 

skull’s gaze only when looking askew). Similarly, just as how one easily traverses the registers 

of the Imaginary-Symbolic but not the Real, the subject can maintain a stable relationship to the 

network of objects but not to the gaze.  

Lacan’s gaze places significant emphasis on the subject’s lack and desire. This contrasts 

with Mulvey’s (1975) argument in “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema.” Whereas Mulvey 

contends that pleasure dictates erotic expressions in art, Lacan sees the cause of desire—and 

more importantly, the void of desire—as the driving force behind the subject’s action. In light of 

Lacan’s theories, one can then analyze Nin’s Erotica in an object3-centered perspective and 

reconsider subjectivity in Nin’s Erotica.  

Although Lacanian theory has gained popularity in various academic disciplines, 

McGowan (2003) argues that “Lacan’s conception of the gaze has been almost completely 

absent from the world of film theory and film studies” (p. 5). Aside from gaps existing in the 

peer-reviewed literature, Lacan’s own elusive seminars and theories is a gap in itself. Scholars 

have contended that the four seminars from “Of the Gaze as Objet Petit a” are extremely 

difficult, if not impossible, to comprehend and fully understand. Martin Jay claims that “the gaze 

is a … cryptic assertion,” and concludes his explication: “it is impossible to summarize Lacan’s 

complicated dialectic of the eye and the gaze in any simple formula” (Jay, 1993, p. 362). 

Likewise, Michel Thévoz (1996)—a Swiss author and the curator of the Cantonal Fine Arts 

Museum of Lausanne from 1960 to 1975—argues to take Lacan’s first seminar on the gaze as the 

 
3
 as in objet petit a  



 

 

primary reference point for the Mirror Stage. Certain challenges involved in interpreting Lacan’s 

elusive notion of the gaze. Taking into account the complexities and nuances of Lacan’s theories, 

the paper therefore does not seek to assert a novel, definite reading of Lacan, but rather to utilize 

existing interpretations as a method to reassess Nin’s Erotica, thus contending the intertextuality 

between Nin’s Erotica and Lacanian psychoanalysis. 

The strikingly frequent appearance of words relating to seeing, sight, and vision in “The 

Veiled Woman” invites a close examination of the gaze as a central thematic thread and 

theoretical element. allows us to closely examine the gaze as a thematic concept within the story. 

Drawing on Lacan’s theory, the gaze is not merely an action performed by a spectator, but rather 

a disruptive encounter in which the subject is made aware of being seen—what Lacan identifies 

as the moment when the object returns the gaze (Krishner, 2005). This understanding of the gaze 

underpins my analytical approach, which draws from Lacanian psychoanalysis while also 

critiquing the simplifications often made by traditional Lacanian film theorists. Rather than 

treating the gaze as a stable mechanism of power or voyeurism, I examine how “The Veiled 

Woman” stages moments of visual disorientation and reflexivity that align more closely with 

Lacan’s notion of the gaze as an encounter with the Real. To illustrate the gaze as an objet petit 

a, I identified the point in which the veiled woman, who embodies the Real, gazes back at the 

subject George, the male protagonist whose actions we follow as readers. Towards the climax of 

the story, Nin (1986, p. 84) leaves a paragraph solely to the line: 

“She looked at him.”  

Here Nin makes the gaze abruptly, violently apparent. Just as the instantaneous 

obliteration of subjectivity when the skull gazes back at its viewers, the emotion erupted within 

George (and by extension, us as the readers) as the veiled woman (as objet petit a) looks back 

him is one that strikingly resembles the “traumatic encounter with the Real” (McGowan, 2007). 

The veiled woman—who remains passive and object-like—beckons the subject, George, to 

advance towards the void of desire. Through Nin’s minimalist syntactical usage, the veiled 

woman serves as a paradigm of the Lacanian gaze—one’s encounter with the gaze can be as 

simple and serendipitous as is. Furthermore, George’s reaction to this instance is not pleasure, 

but doubt. Like objet petit a, the veiled woman does not “satisfy” George’s desire. Her gaze 

brings the subject into the objective realm and disrupts the Symbolic order’s illusive network of 

safety. George “became obsessed with the idea that all the women who invited him to their 

houses are hiding a spectator” (Nin, 1986, p. 86). The denouement of the story also strikes at the 

heart of Lacan’s philosophy on desire. Desire, according to Lacan, is the remnants from the 

infant stage— “by its infantile origins as the remainder when satisfaction of physiological needs 

is subtracted from the child’s demands for its mother’s attention” (Krishner, 2005, p. 2). 

George, like many others that find themselves trapped in the loop of desiring, eventually 

reaches what Lacan calls Jouissance. It is what a subject seeks in repetition beyond the possible 

gratification of physical needs. Jouissance, despite its literal meaning in French, which translates 

to “enjoyment,” is different from pleasure or satisfaction. Lacan differentiates Jouissance and 

pleasure: whereas one experiences pleasure when a need is fulfilled (and thus a reduction of 

tension), one experiences Jouissance when excessively engaging in actions that fulfill a need. 

For instance, pleasure derives from consuming an adequate amount of food to reduce hunger; 

Jouissance arises when one obsessively devours food to a point where physical discomfort 

becomes evident. Jouissance therefore lies beyond the pleasure principles and is taken as 

“superabundant vitality” (Canellopoulos, 2010). 

In Seminar X, Lacan distinguishes between drive and desire—whereas drive is only a 

particular representation of desire, desire encompasses the entirety of desiring. All drives are 

partial and incomplete. Desire, in other words, is an independent, autonomous slippage. As drive 

shifts from one object to another, desire remains whole and present. Drives are the manifestation 

of desire, and because of this, the subject can never be fully satisfied upon a fulfillment of a 

drive.  

The path of the drive forms around objet petit a (denoted by “a”). The elliptical orbit 

suggests the perpetual desiring of objet petit a. As Žižek (2007) explains in his book Enjoy Your 

Symptom!: Jacques Lacan in Hollywood and Out, the space of the drive is a “paradoxical, curved 



 

 

space: the object is not a positive entity existing in space… but a certain curvature of the space 

itself which causes us to make a bend precisely when we want to get directly at the object.” Once 

again, Kirshner (2011) points out that even Lacan himself leaves the essence of desire 

unanswered—the objet petit a is a hypothetical cause that drives individuals to circle around 

such an “object” devoid of any concrete form or substance. And when the object is at a moment 

closest to objet petit a, it swings right back around the curved path of desire (Žižek, 2007). As 

aforementioned, the actual object of desire does not equate the cause of one’s desire. And 

through the networks of the Imaginary and Symbolic, subjects find temporary fulfillment to their 

drives and indulge in fleeting pleasures (McGowan, 2007). Yet the instance one acquires the 

object of desire (whether a materialistic fulfillment or a temporary satisfaction), one loses the 

desire to desire—and the cycle ensues (Felluga, 2011; McGowan, 2003). Likewise, the moment 

where George confronts the veiled woman’s gaze, his experience of their intercourse shifts from 

pleasurable to disorienting. In an attempt to make the analogy more lucid: when George (the 

subject) discovers—though not consciously—that his constant search for “an interesting event… 

or an interesting women” (Nin, 1986, p. 52) is not fulfilled by his encounter with the Veiled 

Woman (gaze as an objet petit a), he becomes distraught and is driven to a point of obsession 

beyond physical pleasure (Jouissance).  

The veiled woman disrupts the cycle of desire by revealing that there is no ultimate secret 

behind the objet petit a. In doing so, she invites the reader to reconsider themes of power, 

sexuality, and femininity within Nin’s erotica. While a Mulveyan reading might reduce “The 

Veiled Woman” to a pornographic spectacle crafted for the male gaze, a Lacanian approach 

opens up multiple interpretive paths, revealing how the Imaginary and Symbolic registers are 

distorted, reconfigured, and ultimately transformed. This reading encourages a deeper 

exploration of power, desire, and female sexuality as they emerge in more abstract and implicit 

forms. As Lacan asserted in Seminar XII (1964–65), “The unconscious is structured like a 

language.” From this perspective, applying psychoanalysis to literature becomes not only valid 

but essential—particularly in marginalized genres such as female-authored erotica. The goal of 

this research is not to undermine Mulvey’s foundational contributions to feminist and film 

theory, but rather to extend the ongoing dialogue at the intersection of psychoanalysis, art, and 

eroticism. 

 

 

  



 

 

References 

Abdul Hadi, N. H., & Asl, M. P. (2021). The objectifying gaze: A Lacanian reading of Viet 

Thanh Nguyen’s the refugees. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 21(1), 62–

75. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2021-2101-04 

Allen, C. (1969). A textbook of psychosexual disorders. Oxford University Press. 

Bair, D. (1996). Anaïs nin: A biography. Penguin Books. 

Bowie, M. (1987). Freud, Proust and Lacan theory as fiction. Cambridge University Press. 

Canellopoulos, L. (2010). The bodily event, jouissance and the (post)modern subject. Recherches 

En Psychanalyse, n° 10(2). https://doi.org/10.3917/rep.010.0141 

Cochet, A. (1998). Lacan Géomètre. Anthropos. 

Dawson, S. J., Bannerman, B. A., & Lalumière, M. L. (2014). Paraphilic interests. Sexual Abuse, 

28(1), 20–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063214525645 

Dean, J. (2005). Zizek against democracy. Law, Culture and the Humanities, 1(2), 154–177. 

https://doi.org/10.1191/1743872105lw012oa 

Dor Joël, Gurewich, J. F., & Fairfield, S. (2004). Introduction to the reading of Lacan: The 

unconscious structured like a language. Other Press. 

Duff, S. (2018). Voyeurism, 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97160-5_3 

Elsässer T., & Hagener, M. (2015). Film theory: An introduction through the Senses. Taylor and 

Francis. 

Felluga, D. (2011). Modules on Lacan: On the Gaze. Introduction to Jacques Lacan, module on 

the gaze. Retrieved March 27, 2023, from 

https://cla.purdue.edu/academic/english/theory/psychoanalysis/lacangaze.html 

Felluga, D. (2011, January 31). Modules of Lacan: On Psychosexual Development. Introduction 

to Jacques Lacan, module on psychosexual development. Retrieved March 27, 2023, 

from 

https://www.cla.purdue.edu/academic/english/theory/psychoanalysis/lacandevelop.html 

Felluga, D. (2011, January 31). Modules on Kristeva: On the Abject. Introductory Guide to 

Critical Theory. Retrieved March 27, 2023, from 

https://cla.purdue.edu/academic/english/theory/psychoanalysis/kristevaabject.html 

Fitch, N. R. (1993, January 1). Anaïs: The Erotic Life of Anaïs Nin. Internet Archive. Retrieved 

March 27, 2023, from https://archive.org/details/anaiseroticlifeo0000fitch 

Franklin, B. (1996). Recollections of anaïs nin: By her contemporaries. Ohio Univ. Press. 

Frappier-Mazur, L. (1988). Marginal Canons: Rewriting the erotic. Yale French Studies, (75), 

112. https://doi.org/10.2307/2930310 

Furman, A. C., & Levy, S. T. (2018). Influential papers from the 1950s: Papers from the 

decades in International Journal of Psychoanalysis. Routledge. 

Gallop, J. (1983). Lacan's "Mirror stage": Where to begin. SubStance, 11(4), 118. 

https://doi.org/10.2307/3684185 

Hakim, C. (2010). Erotic Capital. European Sociological Review, 26(5), 499–518. 

https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcq014 



 

 

Hewitson, O. (2011). Lacan at the scene. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society, 16(1), 109–111. 

https://doi.org/10.1057/pcs.2010.40 

Jarczok, A. (2017). Writing an icon: Celebrity culture and the invention of Anaïs Nin. Swallow 

Press. 

Kirshner, L. A. (2005). Rethinking desire: The objet petit a in Lacanian theory. Journal of the 

American Psychoanalytic Association, 53(1), 83–102. 

https://doi.org/10.1177/00030651050530010901 

Kirshner, L. A. (2011). Between Winnicott and Lacan: A clinical engagement. Routledge. 

Lacan, J., & Grigg, R. (1997). The seminar of Jacques Lacan. W. W. Norton. 

Licitra Rosa, C., Antonucci, C., Siracusano, A., & Centonze, D. (2021). From the imaginary to 

theory of the gaze in Lacan. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. 

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.578277 

McGowan, T. (2007). The real gaze: Film theory after Lacan. State University of New York 

Press. 

McGowan, T. (2015). Psychoanalytic film theory and the rules of the game. Bloomsbury 

Academic, An imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Inc. 

Metz, C. (2000). The imaginary signifier: Psychoanalysis and the cinema. Indiana Univ. Press. 

Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. Screen, 16(3), 6–18. 

https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/16.3.6 

Mulvey, L. (2013). Fetishism and Curiosity: Cinema and the Mind's Eye. Palgrave Macmillan. 

Nalbantian, S., & Nalbantian, S. (1997). Preface. In Anaïs Nin, literary perspectives (pp. xiii-

xvii). Macmillan. 

Nin Anaïs, & DuBow, W. M. (2011). Conversations with anaïs nin. University Press of 

Mississippi. 

Nin Anaïs, & Pollak, F. (1998). Arrows of longing: The correspondence between anaïs nin and 

Felix Pollak, 1952-1976. (G. H. Mason, Ed.). Swallow Press. 

Nin Anaïs. (1981). The diary of anais nin: Volume Seven 1966-1974. (G. Stuhlmann, Ed.). 

Harcourt Brace & Co. 

Nin Anaïs. (1993). Little Birds. Quality Paperback Book Club. 

Nin, A. (1986). Delta of Venus. Harvest/HBJ. 

Oropeza, C. (2019). Anaïs Nin: A myth of her own. Routledge. 

Palmquist, M. (2023, March 30). Content analysis. Columbia University Mailman School of 

Public Health. Retrieved April 25, 2023, from 

https://www.publichealth.columbia.edu/research/population-health-methods/content-

analysis 

Patthey-Chavez, G. G., Clare, L., & Youmans, M. (1996). Watery passion: The struggle between 

hegemony and sexual liberation in erotic fiction for women. Discourse & Society, 7(1), 

77–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926596007001004 

Rabaté, J.-M. (2014). The Cambridge Introduction to Literature and Psychoanalysis. Cambridge 

University Press. 



 

 

Rivers, C. (1995). Forbidden texts: Erotic literature and its readers in eighteenth-century France 

by Jean-Marie Goulemot. L'Esprit Créateur, 35(2), 105–106. 

https://doi.org/10.1353/esp.1995.0043 

Salvatore, A. T. (2001). Anaïs Nin's narratives. University Press of Florida. 

Scott, M. (2008). Lacan's ‘Of the Gaze as Objet Petit a’ as Anamorphic Discourse. Paragraph, 

31(3), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.3366/e0264833408000308 

Scott, M. (2008, December 25). Lacan's 'of the gaze as Objet Petit a' as anamorphic discourse. 

Project Muse. Retrieved March 27, 2023, from https://www.muse.jhu.edu/article/255390 

Scott, M. (2015, August 5). Deciphering the gaze in Lacan's 'of the gaze as Objet Petit. The DS 

Project. Retrieved March 27, 2023, from http://thedsproject.com/portfolio/deciphering-

the-gaze-in-lacans-of-the-gaze-as-objet-petit-a/ 

Skelton, R. (1995). Is the unconscious structured like a language? International Forum of 

Psychoanalysis, 4(3), 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/08037069508409542 

Slovenko, R. (1975). Sexual behavior and the law. University Microfilms. 

Weinsheimer, J. (1991). Philosophical hermeneutics and literary theory. Yale University Press. 

Yaguchi, Y., & Roux, L. B. (2021). Anaïs Nin's Paris revisited: Le paris d'anaïs Nin revisité. 

Wind Rose-Suiseisha/rose des vents-suiseisha. 

Zizek, S. (1992). Looking awry: An introduction to Jacques Lacan through popular culture. MIT 

Press.  

 


