id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
ecj-13736	Stuby, Loric; Simonet, Sylvain; Bourgeois, Laurent; Thurre, David; Suppan, Laurent	Feedback devices may not improve chest compression depth during simulated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a multicenter randomized controlled trial	2025	7	.pdf	application/pdf	5536	361	53	Feedback devices may not improve chest compression depth during simulated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a multicenter randomized controlled trial Loric Stuby,1 Sylvain Simonet,2 Laurent Bourgeois,2 David Thurre,3 Laurent Suppan4,5 1Genève TEAM Ambulances, Emergency Medical Services, Geneva; 2École Supérieure de Soins Ambulanciers, College of Higher Education in Ambulance Care, Geneva; 3Fire Rescue Centre, Martigny; 4Division of Emergency Medicine , Department of Acute Care Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals; 5Department of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of GenevaSwitzerland way management likely leads to increased rates of Return Of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC) and faster time to airway place- ment, while its effect on longer-term survival outcomes or aspira- tion events may be limited.10 One of our previous studies suggests that early i-gel® use significantly improves CCF and ventilatory parameters but may reduce compression depth,11 an important determinant of survival and functional outcome.12 Additionally, research highlights a discrepancy between perceived and actual CPR performance, underscoring the value of real-time feedback to bridge this gap.13,14 By guiding providers in maintaining compres- sions within optimal depth and rate ranges, feedback devices could enhance CPR quality. Studies indicate contradictory impacts of CPR feedback devices.	cache/ecj-13736.pdf	txt/ecj-13736.txt