Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research Vol. 8, No. 3, 2018, 3084-3087 3084 www.etasr.com Laghari et al.: Delignification of Rice Husk by Microwave Assisted Chemical Pretreatment Delignification of Rice Husk by Microwave Assisted Chemical Pretreatment S. M. Laghari M. M. Tunio A. Q. Laghari A. J. Laghari Z. M. Ali Civil Engineering Dpt, Universiti Teknologi Petronas, Malaysia shuaiblaghari@ gmail.com Energy & Environment Dpt, Quaid-e-Awam University of Engineering, Science and Technology, Pakistan mureed.tunio@gmail.com Chemical Engineering Dpt, Mehran University of Engineering & Technology, Pakistan engrchemi@gmail.com Dr. M. A. Kazi Institute of Chemistry, University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Pakistan aj_balouch@ yahoo.com Chemical Engineering Dpt, Mehran University of Engineering & Technology, Pakistan zeenat.ali@ faculty.muet.edu.pk Abstract—Rice husk has the potential to be used as a source of alternative energy e.g. as biofuel. Its high lignin content, however, poses difficulty to this use. This study investigates the use of microwave assisted acidic and alkaline pretreatment methods to improve the characteristics of rice husk for energy production. The use of microwave assisted 3.5% NaOH provided optimum pretreatment of rice husk; the lignin content was reduced from 17.8 to 10.2%, the cellulose content increased from 38.6 to 59.3% and the C/N ratio was within the optimum range of 25-35. The results showed enhanced potential of biofuel production from rice husk by this pretreatment. Keywords-chemical pretreatment; microwave; rice husk; lignocellulose biomass I. INTRODUCTION Fossil fuels have been a main energy source in modern world. Their continuously diminishing reserves, however, have raised concerns about their sustainability. Pollutants from the derivation and usage of these fuels are also detrimental to the environment. These concerns stipulate an energy source, that is economical, abundantly available, sustainable, and environment friendly [1,2]. Agricultural wastes (biomass) are viewed as good candidates for alternative energy sources. With an estimated worldwide annual production of 140 billion metric tonnes, agricultural wastes have the potential to produce energy approximately equivalent to 50 billion tonnes of oil. Biomass derived energy contributes to energy security and clean climate change mitigations, and is environment friendly and carbon neutral [3]. Producing biogas by anaerobic digestion of different solid wastes and residues, like municipal solid wastes and agricultural solid wastes, has been experimentally investigated and due to its economic feasibility, it is considered one of the best future options available [4, 5]. Agricultural biomass waste along with holocelluloses also contains lignin. The holocelluloses are tightly packed by the lignin layers, these lignin layers limit digestion by acting as a protective wall in plant materials. Thus the lignocellulose biomass pretreatment is necessary for an effective and rapid biodegradation or anaerobic digestion. Pretreatment causes delignification and results in increased surface area and porosity of biomass, while decreasing the holocelluloses crystallinity and reducing the degree of polymerization. Pretreatments are classified as:  Mechanical or Physical pretreatment: In this pretreatment the lignocellulose biomass waste is pretreated by different physical techniques like milling, grinding, irradiation, thermal, and hydrothermal.  Chemical and Physico-Chemical pretreatment: in this pretreatment the lignocellulose biomass waste is mixed with chemicals, or soaked in chemical solutions, like acid, alkali, or oxidizing agents. This pretreatment also includes gas treatment, steam explosion, and solvent extraction techniques.  Biological pretreatment: in this pretreatment the fungi and/or actinomycetes are used to pretreat the lignocellulose biomass waste biologically [4,6]. All the pretreatment techniques are useful in treating lignocellulose biomass, but the effectiveness of any pretreatment varies widely and is determined by the method selected. Researchers have reported that chemical or physico- chemical pretreatment provides better results in treating lignocellulose feed stocks as compared to other treatments [6]. There are several treatment techniques classified as chemical or physico-chemical pretreatment, but acidic and alkaline pretreatments are considered most effective and useful for lignocellulose disruption. Different acidic or the alkaline concentration solutions are used for pretreatment, but mostly dilute acid and alkaline concentrations are preferred so that the chemical concentration must only be sufficient to disrupt the lignin content, as high concentrations may result in the loss of holocelluloses, which is to be degraded into biofuels. Authors in [7] reported increase in cellulose content to more than 50 % using 0.5 to 1% sulphuric acid pretreatment on rice straw. Authors in [8] compared various alkaline pretreatments to evaluate their effects on lignin disruption and enzymatic digestibility of various lignocellulose biomass (Eucalyptus residue, Larixleptolepis, Pinups rigida, rice straw and barley Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research Vol. 8, No. 3, 2018, 3084-3087 3085 www.etasr.com Laghari et al.: Delignification of Rice Husk by Microwave Assisted Chemical Pretreatment straw); they found that alkaline pretreatments were effective in lignin degradation. Authors in [9] studied the time reaction of alkaline pretreatment on rice husk and found that alkaline pretreatment caused lignin degradation. Microwave irradiation is also a useful physical pretreatment and has been shown to be very effective over conventional thermal treatment for waste sludge [10]. In [11] microwave assisted alkali pretreatment was used for rice straw and reported increase in cellulose content from 38.9% to 69.3% with lignin reduction from 13.6 to 5%. In [12] sugarcane baggase lignocellulose disruption was studied by using microwave assisted sulphuric acid, and reported increase in cellulose content from 52.25% to 67.31%. Rice husk is one of the most abundant agricultural wastes. The worldwide annual husk output is about 140 million tonnes [13]. It has good potential for bioethanol production [14], however like other lignocellulosic biomass it also contains high lignin content. Rice husk has been successfully pretreated for enhancing energy generation as a result of delignification and sachrification. Authors in [15] studied the pretreatment of rice husk with various acidic and alkaline solutions, and found that hydrochloric acid produced best results by increasing cellulose content to 65.1%. Authors in [16], investigated wet air oxidation pretreatment, and found that under optimized conditions it is possible to decrease lignin from 19.4% to 4.46% and increase cellulose content from 42.2% to 65.33%. Authors in [17] studied the ultrasonic pretreatment for increasing bio-oil yield, and reported that yield of bio-oil increased from 37.1% to 42.8%, as a result of delignification and increased exposure of cellulose. In [18], the comparative effects of pretreatment using dilute sulphuric acid and sodium hydroxide on rice husk for bioethanol production and enzymatic hydrolysis were studied, and it was reported that 3% sodium hydroxide was successful in reducing lignin content from 19.2% to 9.6% and increasing cellulose content from 37.6% to 54.2%. II. MATERIALS AND METHODS A. Materials Rice husk was obtained locally at Tronoh, and was milled and ground to the size of 1 mm or less by using a Rocklabs mortar grinder type BTRM Model 1A. The ground rice husk was then subjected to the soxhlet extraction overnight by NREL extractives removal procedure [19, 20] to remove extractives in order to get accurate lignin values, after extractives removal the rice husk sample was placed in the air tight containers for use later. B. Chemical Solutions A total of 12 solutions using four chemicals viz., Sulphuric Acid, Sodium Hydroxide, Hydrogen peroxide, and Sodium carbonate, each at 3 different concentrations i.e. 2%, 3.5%, and 5% were prepared. Strong solutions of Sodium Hydroxide and Sodium Carbonate were prepared using solid pellets, and then they were diluted to the desired strength. 1 g of rice husk was mixed with 10 ml of each solution for 48 hours, the sample was then heated by microwave irradiation for 5 min. Each experiment and analysis was at least repeated three times. C. Microwave Faber Microwave Oven Model FMO 7020 with input power 1050 W and output power of 700 watt was used. This Microwave oven has 5 settings as Low, Medium Low, Medium, Medium High, and High, with the output of 17%, 33%, 55%, 77%, and 100% microwave energy respectively [21]. In this pretreatment Medium Low setting with 33% output microwave energy was used. D. Analytical methods The elemental analysis was performed using Leco CHN- 900/CHNS-932/VTF-900 elemental analyzer before and after pretreatment. Rice husk samples were analyzed for composition, to determine the quantity of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin content before and after pretreatment by standard procedure according to [22]. In this process lignin was analyzed by two stage acid hydrolysis and the carbohydrates were examined by HPLC. The HPLC system consisted of Agilent HiPlexpb column and refractive index (RI) detection system. The isocratic mobile phase selected was deionized water at a flow rate of 0.6ml/min and 80°C. and the moisture content was obtained by drying overnight in oven at 105°C by the procedure specified in [23], while the ash content was analyzed by using a benchtop muffle furnace in accordance with [24]. III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION A. Elemental Composition Table I shows elemental composition with C/N ratios obtained by different microwave assisted chemical pretreatment methods. C/N ratio of 22.7 was observed for untreated rice husk, while the pretreated rice husks gave a range of C/N ratios varying from 10.4 to 40.7. TABLE I. ELEMENTAL COMPOSITION OF RICE HUSK BEFORE AND AFTER PRETREATMENT Serial No. Sample Carbon % Hydrogen % Nitrogen % 01. Untreated Rice Husk 40.60 5.06 1.79 NaOH MW Treated Rice Husk 2% 32.94 3.84 0.81 3.5% 36.72 3.33 1.20 5% 38.81 4.51 1.39 Na2CO3 MW Treated Rice Husk 2% 29.02 2.53 1.17 3.5% 25.07 4.38 1.38 5% 22.12 2.43 1.69 H2O2 Treated Rice Husk 2% 24.32 2.99 1.07 3.5% 23.77 3.50 1.38 5% 22.37 1.97 1.64 H2SO4 MW Treated Rice Husk 2% 21.30 1.97 0.95 3.5% 18.13 1.85 1.27 5% 14.69 1.59 1.41 The minimum and maximum C/N ratios were obtained for pretreatments with 5% sulphuric acid and 2% sodium hydroxide respectively. C/N ratio range of 25 to 35 is considered suitable for optimum biogas production by ana pre hy lev B. cel lig pre ric con So eff mi sod ric Ta in S Engineerin www.etasr aerobic dige etreatments by droxide, incre vel as shown in Chemical Co Table II sho llulose, hemic gnin data sho etreatments ap ce husk. Figu ntent of micr odium hydrox fective among icrowave assis dium hydroxid ce husk was ob able II shows all microwav S. No. 1 U Fig. 3. Per ng, Technology r.com estion [25]. y 3.5% sodiu eased the C/N n Figure 1. Fig. 1. C/N omposition ows the comp cellulose, ligni ows that all pplied were ab ure 2 shows th rowave assiste ide pretreatm gst the pretr sted alkali pre de, the percent btained as 36. that cellulose ve assisted che Sample Untreated Rice Hu 2% 3.5% 5% 2% 3.5% 5% 2% 3.5% 5% 2% 3.5% 5% rcentage of cellulo y & Applied Sci It was o um hydroxide ratio of rice h N ratio of sample mposition of ri in, ash and mo microwave ble to reduce th he percentage ed pretreated ment was foun reatment met etreatment usi tage decrease i .5, 42.7 and 3 content incre emical pretrea TABLE II. Cell usk ose increased in p ience Research Laghari et a observed that e, and 5% so husk to the opt es ice husk base oisture conten assisted che he lignin cont e decrease of rice husk sam nd to be the thods studied ing 2, 3.5, an in lignin level 30.3 % respect ement was obs atment of rice CHEMICAL COMP lulose % 38.6 51.6 59.3 57.4 N 40.3 42.6 44.5 44.3 47.2 48.3 44.7 54.2 49.3 pretreated rice hus h V al.: Delignificat t the odium timum ed on nt. The emical tent of lignin mples. most d. For nd 5% in the tively. served husk. Fig mic per sod 5% and C. has etha cell gra 710 wit per reco Fig. verti POSITION OF RICE Hemicellulos 19.7 NaOH MW Trea 13.7 10.5 9.3 Na2CO3 MW Trea 18.9 18.4 17.6 H2O2 MW Treat 17.8 16.1 13.6 H2SO4 MW Trea 15.9 11.4 13.8 sk lim acid wer hus wer beh ach Vol. 8, No. 3, 20 tion of Rice Hu gure 3 shows t crowave assist rcentage increa dium hydroxid % sodium hydr d 2% sodium h Energy Poten Cellulose has s been successf anol or bioga lulose can pro ams of CO2 [2 0 ml of biogas th 51 to 56 rformed in th overy from ric 2. Percentag ical lines shows t HUSK BEFORE AN se % Li ated ated ted ated The use of ri mited by its h dic and alkalin re able to enha sk. The study re effective i havior of the hieved with m 018, 3084-3087 usk by Microwa the percentage ted pretreated ase in cellulos de pretreated roxide (48.7% hydroxide (33. ntial s a very high p fully used for as. It has bee oduce up to 5 26]. It has also can be recove 6% methane his study is ce husk by incr ge decrease of lig the standard error ND AFTER PRETREA ignin % A 17.8 11.3 10.2 12.4 16.4 15.7 14.5 15.2 14.6 14.1 16.5 14.8 14.2 IV. CO ice husk as a high lignin co ne pretreatmen ance the poten has shown th in changing rice husk sa microwave assi ave Assisted Ch e increase of c rice husk sam se content was rice husk (53 %), 3.5% sulph 7%). potential of en biofuel genera en reported t 51.4 grams of o been reporte ered from each [27]. Thus, capable of reasing the cel gnin content in pr s ATMENT Ash content % 12.5 13.6 9.4 11.2 14.9 13.3 13.7 12.8 11.2 13.3 12.9 10.3 12.8 ONCLUSION a source of alt ontent. The m nt methods ap ntial of energy hat the pretre the chemical amples. Optim isted alkaline 3086 hemical Pretrea cellulose conte mples, a signif s observed in .6%), followe huric acid (40 nergy recovery ation in the for that 100 gram f ethanol and ed that theoreti h gram of cellu the pretreat enhancing en llulose content retreated rice hus Moisture % 7.9 6.3 6.9 6.4 6.1 6.7 6.2 7.2 7.4 7.2 6.5 6.4 6.2 ternative ener microwave ass pplied in this recovery from atments perfo l composition mum results pretreatment u atment ent of ficant 3.5% ed by 0.4%) y, and rm of ms of 48.6 ically ulose, tment nergy t. k. The % rgy is sisted study m rice ormed n and were using Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research Vol. 8, No. 3, 2018, 3084-3087 3087 www.etasr.com Laghari et al.: Delignification of Rice Husk by Microwave Assisted Chemical Pretreatment 3.5% NaOH solution. The lignin content was reduced from 17.8 to 10.2%, whereas the cellulose content increased from 38.6 to 59.3%; the C/N ratio was within the optimum range of 25-35. The increase in cellulose content will be effective in enhancing production of biofuels like bioethanol, biomethane or biohydrogen by fermentation or anaerobic digestion. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Financial assistance in the form of Graduate Assistantship to the first author by the Universiti Teknologi Petrona, Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia is acknowledged. The authors are thankful to the Institute of Advanced Research Studies in Chemical Sciences (IARSCS), University of Sindh, and Jamshoro, Pakistan for the assistance in sample analyses. REFERENCES [1] M. Fatih Demirbas, M. Balat, H. Balat, “Biowastes-to-biofuels”, Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 52, No. 4, pp. 1815-1828, 2011 [2] C. Escamilla-Alvarado, E. Ríos-Leal, M. T. Ponce-Noyola, H. M. Poggi-Varaldo, “Gas biofuels from solid substrate hydrogenogenic– methanogenic fermentation of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste”, Process Biochemistry, Vol. 47, No. 11, pp. 1572-1587, 2012 [3] UNEP, Converting Waste Agricultural Biomass into a Resource, United Nations Environmental Programme, Osaka/Shiga, Japan, 2009 [4] R. Chandra, H. Takeuchi, T. Hasegawa, “Methane production from lignocellulosic agricultural crop wastes: A review in context to second generation of biofuel production”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 1462-1476, 2012 [5] K. Starr, G. Villalba, X. Gabarrell, “Upgraded biogas from municipal solid waste for natural gas substitution and CO2 reduction–A case study of Austria, Italy, and Spain”, Waste Management, Vol. 38, pp. 105-116, 2015 [6] A. T. W. M. Hendriks, G. Zeeman, “Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass”, Bioresource Technology, Vol. 100, No. 1, pp. 10-18, 2009 [7] T. -C. Hsu, G. -L. Guo, W. -H. Chen, W. –S. Hwang, “Effect of dilute acid pretreatment of rice straw on structural properties and enzymatic hydrolysis”, Bioresource Technology, Vol. 101, pp. 4907-4913, 2010 [8] Y. C. Park, J. S. Kim, “Comparison of various alkaline pretreatment methods of lignocellulosic biomass”, Energy, Vol. 47, pp. 31-35, 2012 [9] L. S. Monte, V. A. Escócio, A. M. F. de Sousa,C. R. G. Furtado, M. C. A. M. Leite, L. L. Y. Visconte, E. B. A. V. Pacheco, “Study of time reaction on alkaline pretreatment applied to rice husk on biomass component extraction”, Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, Vol. 8, No. 189, 2018 [10] C. J. Chang, V. K. Tyagi, S. –L. Lo, “Effects of microwave and alkali induced pretreatment on sludge solubilization and subsequent aerobic digestion”, Bioresource Technology, Vol. 102, pp. 7633-7640, 2011 [11] S. Zhu, Y. Wu, Z. Yu, J. Liao, Y. Zhang, “Pretreatment by microwave/alkali of rice straw and its enzymic hydrolysis”, Process Biochemistry, Vol. 40, pp. 3082-3086, 2005 [12] W. H. Chen, Y. –J. Tu, H. –K. Sheen, “Disruption of sugarcane bagasse lignocellulosic structure by means of dilute sulfuric acid pretreatment with microwave-assisted heating”, Applied Energy, Vol. 88, pp. 2726- 2734, 2011 [13] Y. Chen, Y. Zhu, Z. Wang, Y. Li, L. Wang, L. Ding, X. Gao, Y. Ma, Y. Guo, “Application studies of activated carbon derived from rice husks produced by chemical-thermal process--a review”, Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, Vol. 163, No. 1, pp. 39-52, 2011 [14] A. Abbas, S. Ansumali, “Global potential of rice husk as a renewable feedstock for ethanol biofuel production”, BioEnergy Research, Vol. 3, pp. 328-334, 2010 [15] T. N. Ang, G. C. Ngoh, A. S. M. Chua, “Comparative study of various pretreatment reagents on rice husk and structural changes assessment of the optimized pretreated rice husk”, Bioresource Technology, Vol. 135, pp. 116-119, 2013 [16] S. Banerjee, R. Sen, R. Pandey, T. Chakrabarti, D. Satpute, B. S. Giri, S. Mudliar, “Evaluation of wet air oxidation as a pretreatment strategy for bioethanol production from rice husk and process optimization”, Biomass Bioenergy, Vol. 33, pp. 1680-1686, 2009 [17] W. Shi, J. Jia, Y. Gao, Y. Zhao, “Influence of ultrasonic pretreatment on the yield of bio-oil prepared by thermo-chemical conversion of rice husk in hot-compressed water”, Bioresource Technology, Vol. 146, pp. 355- 362, 2013 [18] M. Nikzad, K. Movagharnejad, G. D. Najafpour, F. Talebnia, “Comparative studies on effect of pretreatment of rice husk for enzymatic digestibility and bioethanol production”, International Journal of Engineering, Vol. 26, pp. 455-464, 2013 [19] R. R. Sluiter, C. Scarlata, J. Sluiter, D. Templeton, Determination of Extractives in Biomass. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2005 [20] M. P. da Rosa, P. H. Beck, D. G. Müller, J. B. Moreira, J. S. da Silva, A. M. M. Durigon, “Extraction of organosolv lignin from rice husk under reflux conditions”, Biological and Chemical Research, pp. 87-98, 2017. [21] Faber, FABER Microwave Oven Instruction Manual, Model: FMO 7020 [22] A. Sluiter, B. Hames, R. Ruiz, C. Scarlata, J. Sluiter, D. Templeton, D. Crocker, Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U. S. Department of Energy, 2012 [23] A. Sluiter, B. Hames, D. Hyman, C. Payne, R. Ruiz, C. Scarlata, J. Sluiter, D. Templeton, J. Wolfe, Determination of total solids in biomass and total dissolved solids in liquid process samples, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U. S. Department of Energy, 2008 [24] A. Sluiter, B. Hames, R. Ruiz, C. Scarlata, J. Sluiter, D. Templeton, Determination of ash in biomass laboratory analytical procedure (LAP), National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U. S. Department of Energy, 2008 [25] W. Mussoline, G. Esposito, A. Giordano, P. Lens, “The anaerobic digestion of rice straw: a review”, Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 43, No. 9, pp. 895-915, 2013 [26] P. C. Badger, “Ethanol from cellulose: a general review” in: Trends in New Crops and New Uses, ASHS Press, Alexandria, 2002 [27] A. W. Khan, T. M. Trottier, G. B. Patel, S. M. Martin, “Nutrient requirement for the degradation of cellulose to methane by a mixed population of anaerobes”, Journal of General Microbiology, Vol. 112, pp. 365-372, 1979