Microsoft Word - 16-2440_s Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research Vol. 9, No. 1, 2019, 3757-3761 3757 www.etasr.com Siyal et al.: Assessment of Air Pollution by PM10 and PM2.5 in Nawabshah City, Sindh, Pakistan Assessment of Air Pollution by PM10 and PM2.5 in Nawabshah City, Sindh, Pakistan Asif Ali Siyal Department of Energy and Environment Engineering, Quaid-e-Awam University of Engineering, Science and Technology, Nawabshah, Pakistan asifsiyal2007@quest.edu.pk Saleem Raza Samo Department of Energy and Environment Engineering, Quaid-e-Awam University of Engineering, Science and Technology, Nawabshah, Pakistan Zafar Ali Siyal Department of Energy and Environment Engineering, Quaid-e-Awam University of Engineering, Science and Technology, Nawabshah, Pakistan zafarsiyal@quest.edu.pk Kishan Chand Mukwana Department of Energy and Environment Engineering, Quaid-e-Awam University of Engineering, Science and Technology, Nawabshah, Pakistan Shakeel Ahmed Jiskani Department of Energy and Environment Engineering, Quaid-e-Awam University of Engineering, Science and Technology, Nawabshah, Pakistan Abdullah Mengal Department of Mechanical Engineering, Balochistan University of Engineering and Technology, Khuzdar, Pakistan ahmengal@yahoo.com Abstract—Increased traffic density due to urbanization is a major cause of air quality deterioration. Atmospheric particulate matter (PM) constitutes one of the most challenging issues in environmental research. This study was designed to assess PM10 and PM2.5 pollution at ten main locations in Nawabshah. Analysis of PM10 and PM2.5 pollution was carried randomly at different selected locations of the city. The highest concentration of PM10 was found at Mohini bazar (MB) and the highest concentration for PM2.5 was found at New Naka (NN). The mean concentration of PM10 was 78.3% higher than world health organization (WHO) standards and 35% than Pakistan’s National Environmental Quality Standards (NEQS). The mean concentration of PM2.5 was 47.3% and 26.3% higher respectively. Mean concentrations of PM2.5 on day-2 and day-10 were found lower than those set by NEQS, while mean concentrations of PM10 on all days exceeded the WHO and NEQS standards indicating that the city was heavily polluted more with PM10 than with PM2.5. Re-suspension of dust particles due to traffic flow, open burning of unmanaged solid waste on the sides of the road and in the street, and improper handling of construction and demolition waste were identified as the main sources for PM pollution in the city. Exposure to higher levels of PM10 and PM2.5 can cause health problems. High levels of PM10 and PM2.5 are a call for the implementation of strict measures to control PM pollution at Nawabshah in order to protect public health and the environment. Keywords-particulate matter; pollution; environmental deterioration; human health; strict measures I. INTRODUCTION Potential threats to human health and the environment mainly due to air pollution have now become an increasing concern, attracting attention [1]. Air pollution is one of the most critical global issues. Urban air pollution epitomizes a global problem with a substantial effect on public health, primarily in major cities where the daily mass concentration of airborne particulate matter (PM) exceeds the permissible levels set by the WHO and NEQS [2]. Airborne PM comprises a complex mixture of different solid and liquid particles suspended in the air either for a long or short time depending upon their size and chemical composition in space and time [3, 4]. According to [5], PM is a heterogeneous mixture of organic, inorganic and biological compounds (e.g., dust, soot, metals, salts, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), aromatic amines, bacterial products (endotoxins) and fungi). PM pollution is mostly described in terms of particle size. Aerodynamic diameter is one of the most important criteria to classify PM into different categories. Transportability of PM in the atmosphere and inhaling ability can be described according to its aerodynamic diameter [6]. PM size fractions range from PM1, PM2.5, PM4, PM7, to PM10. PM with an aerodynamic diameter ≤10 microns is known as coarse particles (PM10) and PM with an aerodynamic diameter ≥2.5 microns is termed as fine particles (PM2.5) [5, 7-9]. PM (e.g., PM2.5 and PM10) are generated from a variety of sources including natural and human sources. Natural sources include windblown surface soils, sea sprays and pollutants from forest fires [10, 11]. Man-made sources for PM2.5 include motor vehicles and fossil fuel combustion. Sources for PM10 include construction and demolition activities, traffic-related resuspension of particles, abrasion of brakes and tires and industrial process related emissions [4, 12]. In the current study, the major sources of PM emissions were associated with road traffic. Authors in [13] reported that major sources for the release of PM were related to traffic. Presently the world’s most considerable health risks are primarily associated with air pollution, Corresponding author: Zafar Ali Siyal Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research Vol. 9, No. 1, 2019, 3757-3761 3758 www.etasr.com Siyal et al.: Assessment of Air Pollution by PM10 and PM2.5 in Nawabshah City, Sindh, Pakistan particularly PM pollution [14, 15]. Like other air pollutants, PM is also considered as one of major concern [2, 4]. The presence of PM poses more danger to human health than that of ground-level ozone and other common air pollutants (like carbon monoxide) [8]. Particle size is one of the significant features which stimulus the accumulation rate of particles in the respiratory system. The severity of health problems depends upon the size of PM. The smaller the PM size, the more deeply it will enter the body and affect the respiratory tract [16-19]. The health effects can be acute or chronic respiratory disorder (e.g., cardiovascular and lung cancer), depending upon the particle size [20, 21]. Exposure to PM pollution may also cause increase in hospital admission, respirational symptoms, exacerbation of prolonged respiratory, decrease lung function and premature death [22- 25]. Authors in [9] reported that an estimated 4.2 million people died worldwide mainly due to exposure of PM2.5 in 2015. Authors in [26] elucidated that PM≤10 increased the prevalence of respiratory and cardiovascular disorders. Air pollution, particularly PM pollution, became a major issue in Nawabshah as it is expanding rapidly due to population growth, vehicle number, urbanization, and industries like Habib Sugar Mill (HSM) and Bandhi Sugar Mill (BSM). This study was designed to assess air quality deterioration by PM10 and PM2.5 pollution and to identify PM10 and PM2.5 sources in Nawabshah, which has not been done previously by any study. The objectives of the current study are: • To survey the city areas and determine the sensitive points where PM concentration is significant. • To assess the concentration of PM in the ambient air of Nawabshah. • To visit the hospitals and assess the health impacts associated with PM pollution. Findings of the current study will be helpful for the government and environmental protection agencies to take strict measures for monitoring and control of PM pollution and to bring the levels according to standards provided by the local and international environmental agencies. II. MATERIALS AND METHODS A. Site Description and Selection Nawabshah is located in Shaheed Benazirabad district and is the central city of Sindh province. Nawabshah has latitude 26.25 o N and longitude 68.4 o E. Being located at the center of district Sindh, Pakistan, Nawabshah is considered as one of the most important and rapidly expanding cities. HSM is also located in Nawabshah and during operation time of HSM, many pollutants are released in the atmosphere, including PM which can travel over a long/short distance depending upon the seasonal variation. A research study was conducted to assess and identify the current situation of pollution associated with PM and sources from which these particles were originated. Significant health impacts, which may be caused by PM pollution, were also assessed by visiting various hospitals. Health impact information was based on consulting with doctors, and it was assumed that respiratory diseases could be caused by exposure to PM pollution. In addition, the locations selected for carrying out this research work were categorized as (a) highly dense commercial and (b) residential areas. Selecting the locations for PM pollution assessment required comprehensive study and the selection of the sites was based upon the criteria of increasing urban population growth, rapidly increasing quantities of transportation and the development level of the city. In order to get information about PM2.5 and PM10 in Nawabshah, 10 main locations with different characteristics were selected for assessment. Assessment of PM2.5 and PM10 pollution was carried out at different times and days. Data were collected at each location for later analysis. Table I shows the locations and their labels in Nawabshah city, selected for data collection. TABLE I. CITY LOCATIONS Location names Labels New Naka NN Hospital Road HR Masjid road MR Mohini bazar MB Sakrand road SR Railway station RS Bucheri road BR Habib Sugar Mills HSM Society Chowk SC Quaid-e-Awam University of Engineering, Science and Technology QUEST B. Equipment and Data Collection Hourly concentrations of PM10 and PM2.5 were taken for a month. The selection of sites was based on traffic oriented areas and on the occurrence of highest concentrations to which the population is likely to be directly or indirectly exposed. AEROCET 531 was used to assess the concentrations of PM10 and PM2.5. This equipment can be used for testing/measuring PM size fractions PM1, PM2.5, PM4, PM7, PM10 and total suspended particles (TSP). AEROCET 531 is a portable battery-operated unit which counts small particulates, calculates their mass profile per cubic foot of air samples and provides real time information. The equipment tests particle size of PM2.5 and PM10. The real time count information is displayed on LCD in two channels. The stored particle count data is used for 8 particle sizes and an algorithm derives the mass concentration for the sample. III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION A. Assessment of PM10 and PM2.5 Pollution in Nawabshah Urbanization and growth in energy use leads to significant impacts on air quality. Polluted air is considered as a severe problem globally, affecting the quality of life and environment to a greater extent. The selected city for the survey is passing from this serious issue, particularly PM pollution which is affecting public health, the value of life and the environment. The assessment of PM10 and PM2.5 pollution was carried out at various locations of Nawabshah. Random sampling at each location was carried out. Statistical analysis of PM data was carried out by daily average concentrations of PM10 and PM2.5 using Origin Pro 9.0 software. Table II shows the daily mean, maximum and Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research Vol. 9, No. 1, 2019, 3757-3761 3759 www.etasr.com Siyal et al.: Assessment of Air Pollution by PM10 and PM2.5 in Nawabshah City, Sindh, Pakistan minimum concentrations of PM2.5 and PM10. The obtained results were compared with other national researches regarding PM pollution in other cities of Pakistan. PM pollution was assessed at these locations at different times and dates, and Figure 1(a)-(j) represents the levels of PM10 and PM2.5 on various days in the selected locations of Nawabshah city. The trend in the assessment of PM10 and PM2.5 pollution in the selected sites was different depending upon the traffic density, domestic and commercial activities, and industry presence like Habib Sugar Mills Limited. Each location of the city was assessed 10 times. During different assessment, observations were made on the concentration of PM10 and PM2.5 and the sources due mainly to which the concentrations were elevated. From Figure 1(a), it seemed that the highest concentration (277µg/m 3 ) of PM10 was found at MB, indicating a higher level of PM pollution at the particular site. Some of the locations (e.g., SR, RS, SC, and QUEST) at day-1 were found with PM2.5 pollution below the NEQS (Figure 1(a)). HSM was found more polluted with PM10 on day-2 (Figure 1(b)). The reason could be the storage and transport of bagasse, produced from the sugar mill resulted in the release of particles in the atmosphere and hence elevated concentration. For PM2.5, the highest concentration of 41µg/m 3 was found at NN on the same day. Many of the locations excluding NN, BR, HSM, and SC were found with PM2.5 levels below NEQS Pakistan (Figure 1(b)). On day 3-5, it seemed from Figure 1(c)-(e), the highest concentrations were observed at HSM. The lowest concentrations of the same particles were found at QUEST. In the case of PM2.5, elevated levels on the same days were noted at HSM, HR and NN respectively (Figure 1(c)-(e)). From Figures 1(f) and 1(g)), higher levels of PM pollution were found at NN. The lowest concentration for PM2.5 was found at QUEST on day-7 (Figure 1(g)). Concentrations of PM2.5 at some locations were below NEQS, and some were very near to NEQS (Figure 1(a)-(j)). However, in the case of PM10, it was evaluated that most of the locations were heavily polluted and concentrations were very much higher than NEQS. Some locations such as QUEST on days 3-6 were found having less PM10 concentration than NEQS, possibly due to low traffic density in the current area. There is a link road connecting Nawabshah and Hyderabad via Sakrand. On these days the traffic density over there was lower. Some other locations (e.g., HR on day-5, RS on day-6 and MB, BR and HSM on day-7) were also found with less PM10 concentration than NEQS. The highest and lowest concentrations were noted for both PM10 and PM2.5. It was noted that the overall highest mean concentration of PM (e.g. PM10) was found as 230.8µg/m 3 on day-1. Simultaneously the highest mean concentration of PM2.5 was reported as 47.5µg/m 3 on day-6. The PM levels were exceeding WHO guidelines set for PM2.5 (see Table III [31]). The PM levels also exceeded the permissible levels set by NEQS. The mean concentrations of PM10 were 69.96-79.06% and 9.9-37.18% higher than those of WHO and NEQS. Meanwhile, the mean concentrations of PM2.5 were 24.9-47.36% and 5.66-26.3% higher than the guidelines set by WHO and NEQS. On day-2 and day-10 the mean concentration of PM2.5 was below the NEQS, and on day-1, day-4 and day-9 were very near to the NEQS, indicating lower PM2.5 pollution in the city. Fig. 1. Concentrations of PM10 and PM2.5 at different days in various locations of Nawabshah city. The mean concentrations of PM10 were found higher than the NEQS, indicating that the city was heavily polluted with PM10 (Table IV). It is important to mention that the city was more polluted with PM10 than with PM2.5. It was observed that concentrations of PM2.5 and PM10 at most of the locations of Nawabshah city exceeded the WHO and NEQ standards established by the government indicating that the city was heavily polluted with both PM10 and PM2.5. These exceeded levels of PM pollution urged the environmental protection agencies to take strict remedy measures for the control of PM pollution. B. Sources of PM Pollution in Nawabshah The population is increasing rapidly and consequently demands and lifestyle are changing. The increasing number of vehicles led to exceeded PM levels. Further, it was observed that the main sources for the release of PM were Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research Vol. 9, No. 1, 2019, 3757-3761 3760 www.etasr.com Siyal et al.: Assessment of Air Pollution by PM10 and PM2.5 in Nawabshah City, Sindh, Pakistan associated with burning activities e.g. HSM and automobiles. Dust storms usually take place in the surroundings and in the city and significant movement of the particles via wind from one place to another contributed to the suspension of a large amount of dust and sand particles in the environment. Movement of these particles from heavily polluted to less polluted areas caused the deterioration of air quality in the city. It was observed during the assessment that transportation was one of the main sources of re-suspension of PM in the city. Re-suspension of dust particles due to traffic flow, burning of unmanaged solid waste, improper handling of construction, and demolition waste were the main identified sources of PM pollution in the city. TABLE II. PM MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM CONCENTRATIONS Days Particulate matter types PM10 (µg/m 3 ) PM2.5 (µg/m 3 ) Min. Max. Min. Max. Day-1 155 277 31 55 Day-2 183 255 27 41 Day-3 137 227 39 50 Day-4 140 235 30 44 Day-5 140 218 31 51 Day-6 121 205 40 62 Day-7 131 199 22 57 Day-8 165 220 36 49 Day-9 150 249 31 41 Day-10 183 255 27 41 TABLE III. MEAN VALUES OF PM10 AND PM2.5 COMPARED WITH WHO AND NEQ STANDARDS Days Particulate matter PM10 (µg/m 3 ) PM2.5 (µg/m 3 ) Obtained WHO NEQ Obtained WHO NEQ Day-1 230.8 50 150 37.8 25 35 Day-2 224.7 50 150 33.3 25 35 Day-3 174.9 50 150 43.4 25 35 Day-4 199.5 50 150 38.7 25 35 Day-5 177.1 50 150 42.4 25 35 Day-6 172.4 50 150 47.5 25 35 Day-7 166.5 50 150 45.4 25 35 Day-8 192.4 50 150 43.4 25 35 Day-9 210.5 50 150 37.1 25 35 Day-10 224.7 50 150 33.3 25 35 C. Health Impact Associated with PM Pollution Air pollutants, if not managed appropriately may have adverse health, and environmental impacts and PM is one of the air pollutants posing serious health impacts to humans. It is recognized that an increase in respiratory diseases is often associated with PM pollution, mainly due to PM10 and PM2.5 air pollution. According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) short-term and long-term exposure of humans to high concentrations of PM10 and PM2.5 can cause numerous health impacts and even deaths [27-30]. People of the city were suffering from various health problems like asthma, chronic bronchitis respiratory symptoms, weakened lung function, and cardiovascular diseases. Several hospitals were visited during the research. Table IV shows the hospitals visited and some patients who were possibly affected by PM pollution. In the National Medical Center, Zohaib Medical Centre, Civil Hospital, and Jinnah Medical Center, respectively about 20-30, 15-20, 40-60 and 15-25, patients were hospitalized per day out of which 15-25, 10-12, 20-30 and 10-12 people were possibly suffering from the diseases mentioned above. This study was conducted in 2015, so the current situation might be worse. TABLE IV. HOSPITALS VISITED DURING THE SURVEY Hospital Name Total patients visiting per day No of possibly affected patients National Medical Centre 20-30 15-25 Zohib Medical Centre 15-20 10-12 Civil Hospital Nawabshah 40–60 20- 30 Jinnah Medical Centre 15-25 10-12 IV. CONCLUSION In this paper, assessment of PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations in Nawabshah was carried out, and the obtained results were analyzed and compared with air quality standards. Mean concentration of PM10 was 78.3% higher than WHO standards and 35% than NEQS. Similarly, the mean concentration of PM2.5 was 47.3% and 26.3% higher than the respective standards. These concentrations indicated that the air quality was deteriorated with the rapid growth of urbanization and transportation, and the public health was significantly affected. Poor air quality monitoring, open burning of trash in the environment, improper management and handling of all types of solid waste, devastation of the paving material by road traffic and the release of PM from HSM were the main causes of elevated concentrations of PM2.5 and PM10 in Nawabshah. PM10 and PM2.5 levels in Nawabshah exceeded national and international air quality standards and adversely affected the public health. The adverse health effects of PM have provoked the government to progressively set strict regulations and policies to control environmental pollution of various emission sources, particularly PM2.5 and PM10. Government and other environmental agencies may focus on regulating pollutants released from vehicles and industries and may grow more plants along the roadsides which can reduce the re- suspension of PM in the air. It is also their responsibility to bring PM pollution to an acceptable level as recommended by WHO and NEQS to protect the public health and the environment in general. REFERENCES [1] H. Khreis, K. M. Warsow, E. Verlinghieri, A. Guzman, L. Pellecuer, A. Ferreira, I. Jones, E. Heinen, D. Rojas-Rueda, N. Mueller, P. Schepers, K. Lucas, M. Nieuwenhuijsen, “The health impacts of traffic-related exposures in urban areas: Understanding real effects, underlying driving forces and co-producing future directions”, Journal of Transport & Health, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 249-267, 2016 [2] M. Santibanez-Andrade, E. M. Quezada-Maldonado, A. Osornio- Vargas, Y. Sanchez-Perez, C. M. Garcia-Cuellar, “Air pollution and genomic instability: The role of particulate matter in lung carcinogenesis”, Environmental Pollution, Vol. 229, pp. 412-422, 2017 [3] WHO, Health Effects of Particulate Matter: Policy implications for countries in eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia, World Health Organization, 2013 [4] B. Srimuruganandam, S. M. Shiva Nagendra, “Source characterization of PM10 and PM2.5 mass using a chemical mass Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research Vol. 9, No. 1, 2019, 3757-3761 3761 www.etasr.com Siyal et al.: Assessment of Air Pollution by PM10 and PM2.5 in Nawabshah City, Sindh, Pakistan balance model at urban roadside”, Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 433, pp. 8-19, 2012 [5] R. M. Harrison, J. Yin, “Particulate matter in the atmosphere: Which particle properties are important for its effects on health?”, Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 249, pp. 85-101, 2000 [6] R. Esworthy, Air Quality: EPA’s 2013 Changes to the Particulate Matter ( PM ) Standard, Congressional Research Service, 2013 [7] E. Chalvatzaki, I. Kopanakis, M. Kontaksakis, T. Glytsos, N. Kalogerakis, M. Lazaridis, “Measurements of particulate matter concentrations at a landfill site (Crete, Greece)”, Waste Management, Vol. 30, No. 11, pp. 2058-2064, 2010 [8] K. H. Kim, E. Kabir, S. Kabir, “A review on the human health impact of airborne particulate matter”, Environment International, Vol. 74, pp. 136-143, 2015 [9] S. Hasheminassab, N. Daher, J. J. Schauer, C. Sioutas, “Source apportionment and organic compound characterization of ambient ultrafine particulate matter (PM) in the Los Angeles Basin”, Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 79, pp. 529-539, 2013 [10] M. Chandan, M. D. Geller, P. Shah, C. Sioutas, P. A. Solomon, “Development and Evaluation of a Continuous Coarse (PM10–PM25) Particle Monitor”, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, Vol. 51, No. 9, pp. 1309-1317, 2001 [11] D. D. Cohen, E. Stelcer, D. Garton, “Trace Elements in Street and House Dust: Source and Speciation”, Nuclear Instrumental Methods in Physics Research B, Vol. 190, pp. 466-470, 2002 [12] S. Police, S. K. Sahu, G. G. Pandit, “Chemical characterization of atmospheric particulate matter and their source apportionment at an emerging industrial coastal city, Visakhapatnam, India”, Atmospheric Pollution Research, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 725-733, 2016 [13] T. M. C. M. de Kok, H. A. L. Driece, J. G. F. Hogervorst, J. J. Briede, “Toxicological assessment of ambient and traffic-related particulate matter: A review of recent studies”, Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research, Vol. 613, No. 2-3, pp. 103-122, 2006 [14] Q. Di, L. Dai, Y. Wang, A. Zanobetti, C. Choirat, J. D. Schwartz, F. Dominici, “Association of Short-term Exposure to Air Pollution With Mortality in Older Adults”, JAMA, Vol. 318, No. 24, pp. 2446-2456, 2017 [15] P. J. Landrigan, “Air pollution and health”, Lancet Public Health, Vol. 2, pp.e4-e5, 2017 [16] K. Vellingiri, K. H. Kim, C. J. Ma, C. H. Kang, J. H. Lee, I. S. Kim, R. J. C. Brown, “Ambient particulate matter in a central urban area of Seoul, Korea”, Chemosphere, Vol. 119, pp. 812-819, 2015 [17] T. Kanabkaew, P. Nookongbut, P. Soodjai, “Preliminary assessment of particulate matter air quality associated with traffic emissions in Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand”, Procedia Engineering, Vol. 53, pp. 179-184, 2013 [18] A. P. Sharma, K. H. Kim, J. W. Ahn, Z. H. Shon, J. R. Sohn, J. H. Lee, C. J. Ma, R. J. C. Brown, “Ambient particulate matter (PM10) concentrations in major urban areas of Korea during 1996–2010”, Atmospheric Pollution Research, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 161-169, 2014 [19] J. Antonel, Z. Chowdhury, “Measuring ambient particulate matter in three cities in Cameroon, Africa”, Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 95, pp. 344-354, 2014 [20] C. A. Pope III, D. W. Dockery, “Health effects of fine particulate air pollution: Lines that connect”, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, Vol. 56, No. 6, pp. 709-742, 2006 [21] WHO, Global Health Risks: Mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks, World Health Organization, 2009 [22] R. Guaita, M. Pichiule, C. Linares, J. Diaz, “Short-term impact of particulate matter (PM2.5) on respiratory mortality in Madrid”, International Journal of Environmental Health Research, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 260-274, 2011 [23] J. I. Halonen, T. Lanki, T. Yli-Tuomi, P. Tiittanen, M. Kulmala, J. Pekkanen, “Particulate air pollution and acute cardiorespiratory hospital admissions and mortality among the elderly”, Epidemiology, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 143-153, 2009 [24] L. Perez, A. Tobias, X. Querol, J. Pey, A. Alastuey, J. Diaz, J. Sunyer, “Saharan dust, particulate matter and cause-specific mortality: A case-crossover study in Barcelona (Spain)”, Environment International, Vol. 48, pp. 150-155, 2012 [25] E. Samoli, R. Peng, T. Ramsay, M. Pipikou, G. Touloumi, F. Dominici, R. Burnett, A. Cohen, D. Krewski, J. Samet, K. Katsouyanni, “Acute effects of ambient particulate matter on mortality in Europe and North America: Results from the APHENA study”, Environmental Health Perspectives, Vol. 116, No. 11, pp. 1480-1486, 2008 [26] E. Padoan, M. Malandrino, A. Giacomino, M. M. Grosa, F. Lollobrigida, S. Martini, O. Abollino, “Spatial distribution and potential sources of trace elements in PM10 monitored in urban and rural sites of Piedmont Region”, Chemosphere, Vol. 145, pp. 495- 507, 2016 [27] S. Qin, F. Liu, J. Wang, B. Sun, “Analysis and forecasting of the particulate matter (PM) concentration levels over four major cities of China using hybrid models”, Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 98, pp. 665-675, 2014 [28] M. Woody, B. Haeng Baek, Z. Adelman, M. Omary, Y. Fat Lam, J. J. West, S. Arunachalam, “An assessment of Aviation’s contribution to current and future fine particulate matter in the United States”, Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 45, pp. 3424-3433, 2012 [29] C. Borrego, J. Valente, A. Carvalho, E. Sa, M. Lopes, A. I. Miranda “Contribution of residential wood combustion to PM10 levels in Portugal”, Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 44, pp. 642-651, 2010 [30] L. W. Stanek, J. D. Sacks, S. J. Dutton, J. J. B. Dubois, “Attributing health effects to apportioned components and sources of particulate matter: An evaluation of collective results”, Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 45, pp. 5655-5663, 2011 [31] WHO, WHO Air Quality Guidelines for Particulate Matter, Ozone, Nitrogen Dioxide and Sulfur Dioxide. Global Update 2005. Summary of Risk Assessment, World Health Organization 2006