Microsoft Word - 35-3160_s_ETASR_V9_N6_pp5062-5065


Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research Vol. 9, No. 6, 2019, 5062-5065 5062  
  

www.etasr.com Memon et al.: Controlling the Defects of Paint Shop using Seven Quality Control Tools in an … 

 

Controlling the Defects of Paint Shop using Seven 

Quality Control Tools in an Automotive Factory 
 

Imdad Ali Memon 

Department of Mechanical Engineering 
Quaid-e-Awam University of 

Engineering, Science & Technology 

Nawabshah, Pakistan 
engineerimdad@yahoo.com 

Ahmed Ali 

Department of Electrical Engineering 
Sukkur IBA University 

Sukkur, Pakistan 

ahmed.shah@iba-suk.edu.pk 

Munawar Ayaz Memon  

Department of Electrical Engineering 
Quaid-e-Awam University of 

Engineering, Science & Technology 

Nawabshah, Pakistan 
engr.mam@gmail.com 

Umair Ahmed Rajput 

Department of Mechanical Engineering 
Quaid-e-Awam University of 

Engineering, Science & Technology 

Nawabshah, Pakistan 
engr.umair@quest.edu.pk 

Saeed Ahmed Khan Abro 

Department of Electrical Engineering 
Sukkur IBA University 

Sukkur, Pakistan 

saeed.abro@iba-suk.edu.pk 

Ahsan Ali Memon 

Department of Mechanical Engineering 
Quaid-e-Awam University of 

Engineering, Science & Technology 

Nawabshah, Pakistan 
15el06@quest.edu.pk 

 

 

Abstract—Seven quality control (7QC) tools are used for 

reducing defects during manufacturing. These tools are highly 

effective in productivity and quality improvement. In this case, 

the study of the 7QC tools was applied in an automotive factory 
in order to reduce paint shop defects. Within four months the 

production line was inspected, defects were categorized and the 

7QC tools were successfully applied, reducing the overall defect 

rate by 70%. Although every tool was important, the cause and 

effect diagram was responsible for finding the root causes of the 
defects.  

Keywords-defects reduction; productivity improvement; paint 

shop; 7QC tools 

I. INTRODUCTION  

The Seven Quality Control (7QC) tools are highly useful 
for improving productivity, resolving problems in the quality 
operational process and delivery [1, 2]. The 7QC tools are 
applied for improving the performance of the production 
processes, solving problems at any stage [3, 4]. Solving 
problems by the 7QC tools reduces cost, while they cannot be 
replaced by any other complex decision-making support system 
[5]. The level of defects or problems in the product is 
associated with the process conditions. If the process is under 
control limit then the product is useful, while when the process 
is out of control the product has demerits resulting to rejection, 
rework or scrap [6]. These problem solving tools are directly 
beneficial for customers too, as quality products entail the vast 
reduction of defects, while this process reduces cost. Improving 
the quality of the product is very important for any company 
and its endurance in the market. The 7QC tools can be used in 
the production processing line ensuring the reduction of defects 
while suggesting improvements [7]. Statistical Process Control 
(SPC) tools used to hold the position of 7QC tools. These tools 
have played an important role in the reduction of variations in 

many industries [8]. Many studies focused on these tools which 
were found very effective regarding problem solving in many 
industries. A comparative study was conducted between them 
and the new 7QC tools [8]. It has been reported that there are 
more than two SPC techniques, namely the Ishikawa diagram 
(cause and effect diagram) and the SPC control charts which 
were also applied in automotive industry. The study in [9] 
focused on the defects in shocker seals of the automotive 
industry. The rejection level was reduced from 9.1% to 5% and 
95% process capability was achieved. The control chart alone 
was applied to automotive components and monitored process 
capability. It was reported that the defect level has been 
reduced using a data acquisition system. The automated 
inspection method was adopted and offline SPC method was 
converted into the online method in [10]. In many companies, 
more complex quality tools were used, but they were not highly 
effective and also they were not able to examine defects at a 
proper level [11].  

In today’s challenging environment, every organization 
should apply proper productivity improvement tools. This 
paper presents a case study of the application of the 7QC tools 
in an automotive factory. Initially, the factory used partially 
some of the tools without getting fruitful results. A goal to 
apply all the 7QC tools and understand their implementation 
mechanism was set, focusing on the identification and 
reduction of the defects occurring in the paint shop. An 
inspection point of the paint shop was used in order to collect, 
assess and analyze data. 

II. RELATED WORK 

The 7QC tools are applicable to any kind of industry 
regardless of size and capacity [11, 12]. These techniques (flow 
chart, Pareto diagram, check sheet, control chart, histogram, 

Corresponding author: Imdad Ali Memon



Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research Vol. 9, No. 6, 2019, 5062-5065 5063  
  

www.etasr.com Memon et al.: Controlling the Defects of Paint Shop using Seven Quality Control Tools in an … 

 

scatter plot, cause-and-effect diagram) aim to control quality 
parameters such as methods, machine, equipment, and 
products. Hence, these tools reduce the loss and give more 
profit [13]. In [7], the 7QC tools were used for reducing the 
rejection of shift fork. The total rejection was reduced from 
16.66% to 0.65%, saving Rs 303.000 per year. In [14] the cost 
impact of the application of real time SPC in hardwood 
sawmills was investigated. In [15], some of the basic statistical 
tools were selected, such as Pareto diagram, control chart and 
histogram, studying their impact on the overall process 
performance, cost and product quality. In [16], the importance 
of the 7QC tools was examined, showing a continuous quality 
improvement process in an automotive industry, while in [17] 
those tools were used for productivity improvement. Many 
companies adopted SPC tools and continued the 
implementation of process control in manufacturing industries. 
These techniques fulfill the customer requirements for high-
quality products at low price. Manufacturing firms use SPC to 
analyze their impact, isolate problems, monitor the outcome 
and process parameters for achieving quality goals [18, 19]. 
Moreover, the SPC process can enhance problem solving and 
performance [9, 20]. 

Paint is a dispersion of pigments. It is used as filler in a 
fluid vehicle. The fluid vehicle includes a liquid binder that 
was solidified during cure. It has the capability to serve as a 
liquid carrier, viscosity reducing aid, and also provide healthy 
application distinctive [21]. Drying oil, volatile thinner, and 
paint have been developed by mixing, grinding, thinning, 
straining operations [22] 

III. MATERIALS AND METHODS 

Data collection started from the assessment of the 
automotive factory, through frequent visits. After visual 
inspection, defects were categorized in four types: dust, 
floatation, scratch, and improper paint. Then, defects having a 
direct impact on the car body were focused. Therefore, a check 
sheet was developed for finding the root cause of paint defects, 
applying the cause and effect diagram technique. This 
technique is very useful for the reduction of body section 
defects [23, 24]. Data were collected through the check sheet 
for four months, using the same pattern. These data can be 
simulated, as reported in [25]. 

IV. RESULTS ΑND DISCUSSION 

A. Application of the 7QC Tools 

• Flow chart (QC Tool 1): It was developed for collecting 
data from the paint shop. The defects observed at paint shop 
are of four types: scratch, dust, improper paint and 
floatation. 

• Check sheets (QC tool 2): After identifying the defects, the 
next step is data collection. The check sheets were 
developed for collecting defect data for further analysis, 
and were designed focusing on attributted data, providing 
simple checkmarks, where check inspectors marked defect 
occurences. The check sheets mentioned different types of 
defects in the paint shop. Data were collected from 
November 2015 to February 2016. 

• Histograms (QC tool 3): Histograms were created using 
Excel. The histograms display variation levels and process 
capability. Occurrence frequency of each defect was 
displayed in a monthly histogram between November 2015 
to February 2016, as shown in Figure 1. 

 

 
Fig. 1.  Histogram for paint shop defects 

• Pareto diagrams (QC tool 4): A Pareto diagram shows the 
defects in descending order of occurrences. The Pareto 
diagram is also monitoring the defects cumulative 
frequency level occurrences on its secondary axis. The red 
trend line shows the defect cumulative percentage level. 
Defects occurring at a high level should be given priority. 
The Pareto diagrams are displayed in Figure 2. 

 
Fig. 2.  Pareto charts of paint shop defects for (a) Nov-15, (b) Dec-15, 

(c) Jan-16 and (d) Feb-16 

• Cause and effect diagram (QC Tool 5): The cause and 
effect diagram helps in discovering the root causes of the 
problem. This tool can point out the defects and their 
reasons. The preliminary data collected through check 
sheets showed a high frequency of defects in November and 
December 2015. Cause and effect diagrams were developed 
and applied in the paint shop. Using check sheets the data 
were collected for January 2016 and February 2016, 



Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research Vol. 9, No. 6, 2019, 5062-5065 5064  
  

www.etasr.com Memon et al.: Controlling the Defects of Paint Shop using Seven Quality Control Tools in an … 

 

showing considerable reduction in paint defects, due to 
control on root causes as pointed out in Figure 3. 

• Scatter diagram (QC tool 6): This tool was used for the 
study and evaluation of the impact of each parameter to 
another. Fig. 4 shows the scatter diagram of the paint shop. 
This diagram shows time in weeks and the number of 
defective bodies. In the first eight weeks, the defect rate 
was too high, while after finding the root cause of defects 
through cause and effect diagram, it was observed that the 
occurrence rate of defective bodies was reduced. 

 
Fig. 3.  Cause and effect diagram for paint shop of: (a) improper paint, 

(b) floatation, (c) scratch, and (d) dust 

 
Fig. 4.  Scatter diagram  

• p-chart (QC tool 7): The p-chart was based on the number 
of paint defect occurrences using binominal distribution. 
The process, running either in statistical control or not, can 
be pointed by the P-chart. It also pointed out that the 
changes occurred in the defective items when process 
measurement took place. 

B. Overall Defect Reduction 

Figure 5 shows the NP control chart for the paint shop, 
where the blue line shows the defect rate, the green line shows 
the upper control limit, the red line shows the center and the 
purple line shows the lower control limit. Nine weeks after the 
implementation of the 7QC tools, the defections were 
drastically reduced. Figure 6 shows the impact on the defect 
rate before and after the implementation of 7QC tools in the 

paint shop. 122 defects occurred during the first month and 155 
occurred during the second. After using the 7QC tools the 
defects were reduced to 83 during the third month and to 47 
during the fourth.  

 

 
Fig. 5.  NP control chart  

 
Fig. 6.  Reduction of defects after the application of the 7QC tools 

V. CONCLUSION 

This research investigated the application of the 7QC tools for 
the reduction of defects it an automotive factory. The initial 
flow chart was developed and check sheets were designed for 
data collection on inspection points. It was observed that the 
highest frequency defects were seen in November and 
December, 2015. After using the cause and effect diagram, the 
defects reduced substantially. During the fourth month 
(February 2016) total defects reduced by 70%, comparing to 
the first month, from 155 to 47. Every tool played an important 
role in the defect reduction, but the cause and effect diagram 
was very useful for finding the cause and its effect. The main 
contribution of this study is to highlight all the possible defects 
or errors affecting production in manufacturing industries. 

REFERENCES 

[1] J. C. Benneyan, “The design, selection, and performance of statistical 
control charts for healthcare process improvement”. International 

Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage, Vol. 4, No. 3, p. 209-
239, 2008 

[2] P. Kuendee, “Application of 7 quality control (7 QC) tools for quality 

management: A case study of a liquid chemical warehousing”, 4th 
International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications, 

Nagoya, Japan, April 21-23, 2017 

[3] H. Hailu, H. Tabuchi, H. Ezawa, K. Jilcha, “Reduction of excessive 
trimming and reject leather by integration of 7 QC tools and QC story 

formula: The case report of Sheba Leather PLC”, Industrial Engineering 
& Management, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2017 



Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research Vol. 9, No. 6, 2019, 5062-5065 5065  
  

www.etasr.com Memon et al.: Controlling the Defects of Paint Shop using Seven Quality Control Tools in an … 

 

[4] B. Neyestani, “Seven basic tools of quality control: The appropriate 
techniques for solving quality problems in the organizations”, SSRN, 

available at: https://zenodo.org/record/400832#.XdPBdJMzaUl, 2017 

[5] N. Visveshwar, V. Vishal, V. Venkatesh, R. V. Samsingh, P. Karthik, 
“Application of quality tools in a plastic based production industry to 

achieve the continuous improvement cycle”, Calitatea, Vol. 18, No. 157, 
pp. 61-64, 2017 

[6] P. S. Parmar, T. N. Desai, “Reduction of rework cost in manufacturing 

industry using statistical process control techniques: a case study”, 
Industrial Engineering Journal, Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 40-46, 2017 

[7] A. Jaware, K. Bhandare, G. Sonawane, S. Bhagat, R. Ralebhat, 
“Reduction of machining rejection of shift fork by using seven quality 

tools”, International Journal of Engineering and Technology, Vol. 5, No. 
4, pp. 4323-4334, 2018 

[8] S. M. Ahmed, R. T. Aoieong, S. L. Tang, D. X. Zheng, “A comparison 

of quality management systems in the construction industries of Hong 
Kong and the USA”, International Journal of Quality & Reliability 

Management, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 149–161, 2005 

[9] D. R. Prajapati, “Implementation of SPC techniques in automotive 
industry : a case study”, International Journal of Emerging Technology 

and Advanced Engineering, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 227-241, 2012 

[10] T. V. U. K. Kumar, “SPC tools in automobile component to analyze 
inspection process”, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 624–630, 2013 

[11] C. Fotopoulos, E. Psomas, “The use of quality management tools and 

techniques in ISO 9001:2000 certified companies: The Greek case”, 
International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 

Vol. 58, No. 6, pp. 564–580, 2009 

[12] R. H. Fouad, A. Mukattash, “Statistical process control tools : a practical 
guide for Jordanian Industrial Organizations”, Vol. 4, No. 6, pp. 693–

700, 2010 

[13] R. Srinivasu, G. S. Reddy, S. R. Rikkula, “Utility of quality control tools 

and statistical process control to improve the productivity and quality in 
an industry”, International Journal of Reviews in Computing, Vol. 5, pp. 

15-20, 2011 

[14] T. M. Young, B. H. Bond, J. Wiedenbeck, “Implementation of a real-
time statistical process control system in hardwood sawmills”, Forest 

Products Journal, Vol. 57, No. 9, pp. 54–62, 2007 

[15] N. Afzaal, A. Aftab, S. Khan, M. Najamuddin, “To analyze the use of 
statistical tools for cost effectiveness and quality of products”, IOSR 

Journal of Humanities and Social Science, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 47–57, 
2015 

[16] G. Paliska, D. Pavletic, M. Sokovic, “Quality tools: systematic use in 

process industry”, Journal of Achievements in Materials and 
Manufacturing Engineering, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 79–82, 2007 

[17] M. Sokovic, J. Jovanovic, J. Krivokapic, A. Vujovic, “Basic quality 

tools in continuous improvement process”, Journal of Mechanical 
Engineering, Vol. 55, No. 5 pp. 333-341, 2009 

[18] G. Patidar, D. D. S. Verma, “Implimantation of statistical process 

control in small scale industries- a review”, International Journal of 
Technologies and Engineering, Vol. 2, No. 7, pp. 121-124, 2015 

[19] V. Parkash, D. Kumar, R. Rajoria, “Statistical process control”, 
International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, Vol. 

2, No. 8, pp. 70–72, 2013 

[20] P. S. Parmar, V. A. Deshpande, “Implementation of statistical process 
control techniques in industry : a review”, Journal of Emerging 

Technologies and Innovative Research, Vol. 1, No. 6, pp. 583–587, 2014 

[21] J. V. Koleske, “Mechanical properties of solid coatings”, in: 
Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry: Applications, Theory and 

Instrumentation, John Wiley and Sons, 2006 

[22]  A. E. Bryson, The control of quality in the manufacture of paint, PhD 
Thesis, Masachusetts Institute of Technology, 1950 

[23] P. Bhangale, R. Dhake, G. Gambhire, “Reduction in defects of car body 

panel using 7QC tools approach”, National Conference on Modelling, 
Optimization and Control, Pune, India, March 4-6, 2015 

[24] I. A. Memon, Q. B. Jamali, A. S. Jamali, M. K. Abbasi, N. A. Jamali, Z. 

H. Jamali, “Defect reduction with the use of seven quality control tools 
for productivity improvement at an automobile company”, Engineering, 

Technology and Applied Science Research, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 4044–
4047, 2019 

[25] M. L. Chew Hernandez, L. Viveros Rosas, R. F. Retes Mantilla, G. 

Espinosa Martínez, V. Velazquez Romero, “Supply chain cooperation 
by agreed reduction of behavior variability: a simulation-based study”, 

Engineering, Technology and Applied Science Research, Vol. 7, No. 2, 
pp. 1546–1551, 2016