Microsoft Word - ETASR_V11_N5_pp7624-7627 Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research Vol. 11, No. 5, 2021, 7624-7627 7624 www.etasr.com Nguyen et al.: A Study of State Parameters for Road Construction of MSWI Bottom Ash A Study of State Parameters for Road Construction of MSWI Bottom Ash Thi Kieu Vinh Nguyen Faculty of Construction Vinh University Vinh City, Vietnam kieuvinhkxd@vinhuni.edu.vn Thi Thuy Huong Doan Faculty of Construction Vinh University Vinh City, Vietnam doanhuongkxd@vinhuni.edu.vn Thi Hao Cao Faculty of Construction Vinh University Vinh City, Vietnam caohaokxd@gmail.com Hong Son Pham Faculty of Construction Vinh University Vinh City, Vietnam hongsonkxd@vinhuni.edu.vn Abstract-The current work tries to valorize the bottom ash from Municipal Solid Waste Incineration (MSWI). The bottom ash from waste incineration consists of atypical granular materials. They are industrial by-products resulting from the incineration of domestic waste and the way of the considered valorization is road gravel. In this paper, we present the state parameters of bottom ash taken from a recycling company in the North of France. These features can help us evaluate our bottom ash according to the technical guide of realization of embankments and subgrades. Keywords-bottom ash; compaction characteristics; valorization; incineration; road gravel I. INTRODUCTION Municipal solid waste management technologies include landfilling, recycling/recovery, and incineration. In many countries such as France, Sweden, Denmark, and Taiwan, Municipal Solid Waste Incineration (MSWI) for energy recovery represents the most common waste management technology [1]. The incineration reduces the mass and volume of the solid waste dramatically, thus the requirement for landfilling is decreased [2-7]. However, there is still a considerable amount of solid incineration residue, generated after the combustion, typically bottom ash, fly ash, boiler ash, etc. of which bottom ash accounts for about 80% [8]. In the past, MSWI bottom ash was mostly treated by sanitary landfilling. Possibilities other than landfilling have been sought since MSWI started, and reutilization of incinerator bottom ash has already been considered many years ago. In civil engineering, the road field consumes a significant quantity of aggregates [9]. However, the aggregate reserves are not always exploitable for various reasons: they are often inaccessible, they must be integrated into an urban area, in classified or protected sites, and they have too expensive exploitation and risks of environmental impact. In this context, the valorization of the bottom ash in road field is an interesting alternative. Bottom ash is mainly used in civil engineering for constructing embankments, road layers, and parking areas [9, 10]. In France, about 3 million tons of bottom ash are produced annually [11]. The use of bottom ash began during the late '50s. The expansion of its use throughout the country occurred in the late '80s-'90s [12]. This article presents the state parameters by particle size distribution, moisture content, absolute density, Proctor compaction and bearing capacity index tests. These tests results are evaluated according to the technical guide of realization of embankments and subgrades. II. THE MATERIAL The MSWI bottom ash used in this study originated from the platform of recycling of the PréFerNord Company located in Fretin, France. PréFerNord recovers "slag" resulting from the combustion of 5 incineration plants. To calibrate the materials, pre-treatment of this bottom ash like sifting, removal of ferrous, and non-ferrous elements, was carried out on site. After, the bottom ash was left to mature for 3 months (Figure 1). The particle sizes range from 0 to 20mm and approache the size range of natural aggregates which are usually used in the road field. Fig. 1. Bottom ash. Corresponding author: n Thi Hao Cao Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research Vol. 11, No. 5, 2021, 7624-7627 7625 www.etasr.com Nguyen et al.: A Study of State Parameters for Road Construction of MSWI Bottom Ash III. THE EXPERIMENTAL METHOD The particle size distribution was obtained by sieving at 80µm of diameter three samples that were taken after quartering and washing. Moisture content, absolute density and compaction characteristics are the state parameters of bottom ash. The moisture content is equal to the ratio of the mass of water contained in the sample and the dry mass of the sample and is expressed in %. The samples were dried in an oven for 3 days at a temperature of 105oC. The moisture content corresponds to the natural moisture content of the collected bottom ash. The absolute density of bottom ash was determined by using a helium pycnometer of AccuPyc 1330 type. This test is to measure the volume of solid grains from the change of helium pressure by applying the perfect gas law: PV = nRT. By knowing the mass of the sample, the absolute density is determined by the ratio between the mass of the solid grain and volume. The measurement was carried out on ground and dried bottom ash. The compaction is the densification of the soil by applying pressure to it. It contributes in particular to translate or eliminate compaction risk, increase the resistance of soil and slope stability, improve the bearing capacity of road, limit unwanted volume changes, for example, by the action of frost, swelling, or shrinkage [13]. The compaction capacity of the material is assessed through the Normal Proctor and the Modified Proctor tests. Both trials are identical in principle, apart from the difference of the parameters defining the applied compaction energy. The principle of the test is to compact the material at varying moisture content and process energy. For every moisture content, wet and dry masses were determined and compaction characteristics (dry density and optimum moisture content) were determined. The Bearing Capacity Index is the quantity used to assess the capacity of a material to bear directly on its surface the movement of construction equipment. In conjunction with Modified Proctor testing, punching action on compacted specimens was performed to estimate the Bearing Capacity Index. IV. RESULTS A. Particle Size Distribution The results of the particle size distribution presented in Figure 2 show that the bottom ash is characterized by a spread out size distribution (coefficient of uniformity Cu = 35.5) along with the too many coarse elements which generate much vacuum (coefficient of curvature Cc = 2,3). The Cu and Cc are defined by: 2 30 10 60 u D C D * D = (1) 60 10 c D C D = (2) where Dx is the diameter of particles for x% of cumulative passing. Table I represents the useful parameters for the classification of the acquired bottom ash. The tested bottom ash is a granular material with continued grain size distribution and low proportions of non-plastic fine (< 63µm,) and coarse (> 20mm) fractions. Therefore, this may be easily compacted to obtain a higher resistance. Bottom ash could be considered a well-graded material. The obtained remarks are similar to those obtained by [14, 15]. Fig. 2. Particle size distribution by sieving. TABLE I. PARTICLE SIZE NECESSARY FOR CLASSIFICATION Dmax 20mm Passing to 80µm 6.3% Passing to 2mm 33.2% B. Moisture Content Table II represents the moisture content of the studied bottom ash. The main cause of this high moisture content is the influence of rain before samples were taken from storage. TABLE II. MOISTURE CONTENT VALUES Wet mass (g) Dry mass (g) Moisture content (%) Sample 1 643 542 18.6 Sample 2 697 602 15.8 Sample 3 810 675 20 Average 18.1 C. Absolute Density The obtained value of the absolute density of the studied bottom ash is about 2.70t/m3 (Table III). This value is similar to that of quartz-based sand. The obtained density lies in the range of values measured by [16, 17]. This value classifies bottom ash as an aggregate that is lighter than natural ones like sand and gravel. The density is an added benefit that may reduce settlement in use, due to the lower normal stresses caused by the self-weight [18]. TABLE III. ABSOLUTE DENSITY Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Average Absolute density (g/cm3) 2.70 2.70 2.69 2.70 D. Proctor Compaction Figures 3 and 4 show the Normal and Modified Proctor compaction curves. Table IV shows the obtained characteristics with Optimal Normal Proctor (OPN) and Optimal Modified 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0,01 0,1 1 10 100 Particle size (mm) P e rc e n ta g e p a s s in g ( % ) Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research Vol. 11, No. 5, 2021, 7624-7627 7626 www.etasr.com Nguyen et al.: A Study of State Parameters for Road Construction of MSWI Bottom Ash Proctor (OPM). The obtained values of compaction characteristics of bottom ash fall within the variability of the field defined by information note of SETRA on the use of bottom ash in road construction. Based on Proctor test results, bottom ash may be considered as a highly compactable material, which is desirable for preventing future settlements and for increased strength and stability of the layer. Fig. 3. Normal Proctor compaction curve. Fig. 4. Modified Proctor compaction curve. TABLE IV. COMPACTION CHARACTERISTICS OPN OPM Optimal moisture content (%) 15.0 12.5 Optimal dry density (g/cm3) 1.78 1.87 E. Bearing Capacity Index Fig. 5. Bearing Capacity Index curve. Figure 5 shows the variation of the Bearing Capacity Index with moisture content. According to the recommendations of the French standard (NF P 98 115) [19], to ensure the normal circulation of the machines on a construction site, the desirable values of the Bearing Capacity Index are at least 45 for the base layers and 35 for the foundation layers. This standard also defines the minimum values that must not be less than 35 for the base layers and 25 for the foundation layers. With Bearing Capacity Index of 102 (Figure 5), bottom ash can be considered stable. V. CONCLUSIONS The state parameters of the studied bottom ash were analyzed and presented in this paper. From the analysis, the following conclusions can be drawn: • The bottom ash is characterized by spread out size distribution. Bottom ash can be considered a well-graded material. • The main cause of its high moisture content is the influence of rain. • Bottom ash is lighter than natural ashes like sand and gravel. The density is an added benefit that may reduce settlement in use, due to the lower normal stresses caused by the self-weight. • The obtained values of compaction characteristics of bottom ash fall within the variability of the field defined by information note of SETRA on the use of bottom ash in road construction. Based on Proctor test results, bottom ash may be considered as a highly compactable material, which is desirable in order to prevent future settlements and to increase the strength and the stability of the layer. • With Bearing Capacity Index of 102, bottom ash can be considered stable. REFERENCES [1] C.-L. Lin, M.-C. Weng, and C.-H. Chang, "Effect of incinerator bottom- ash composition on the mechanical behavior of backfill material," Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 113, pp. 377–382, Dec. 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.09.013. [2] F. Becquart, "Comportement mécanique au triaxial d’un mâchefer d’incinération d’ordures ménagères," European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 673–686, Jun. 2008, https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2008.9693038. [3] N. H. Le, N. E. Abriak, C. Binetruy, M. Benzerzour, and S. Chaki, "The study of behavior of bottom ash under homogeneous stresses. Determination of parameters for Nova behavior models," in Euromediterranean Symposium on Advances in Geomaterials and Structures, Djerba, Tunisia, 2010, pp. 653–660. [4] L. Ngoc, N.-E. Abriak, C. Binetruy, M. Benzerzour, I. Shahrour, and I. Shahrour, "Finite element modeling of the mechanical behavior of municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash with the Mohr-Coulomb model," International Journal of Environmental, Chemical, Ecological, Geological and Geophysical Engineering, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 1315–1321, Dec. 2015. [5] V. T. Phan and T. T. H. Nguyen, "Elastic and Deformation Characteristics of MSWI Bottom Ash for Road Construction," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 6389–6392, Dec. 2020, https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.3817. [6] A. A. Mahessar, S. Qureshi, A. L. Qureshi, K. Ansari, and G. H. Dars, "Impact of the Effluents of Hyderabad City, Tando Muhammad Khan, and Matli on Phuleli Canal Water," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 5281–5287, Feb. 2020, https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.3269. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research Vol. 11, No. 5, 2021, 7624-7627 7627 www.etasr.com Nguyen et al.: A Study of State Parameters for Road Construction of MSWI Bottom Ash [7] N. Radwan and S. A. Mangi, "Municipal Solid Waste Management Practices and Opportunities in Saudi Arabia," Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 4516–4519, Aug. 2019, https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.2870. [8] J. M. Chimenos, M. Segarra, M. A. Fernández, and F. Espiell, "Characterization of the bottom ash in municipal solid waste incinerator," Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 211– 222, Feb. 1999, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(98)00246-5. [9] ADEME, BRGM, Mâchefers d’incinérations des ordures ménagères - États de l’art et perspectives: États de l’art et perspectives. Paris, France: Dunod, 2008. [10] R. Forteza, M. Far, C. Seguı,́ and V. Cerdá, "Characterization of bottom ash in municipal solid waste incinerators for its use in road base," Waste Management, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 899–909, Jan. 2004, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.wasman.2004.07.004. [11] ITOM: Les installations de traitement des ordures ménagères en France. Paris, France: ADEME, 2008. [12] R. Badreddine and D. François, "Assessment of the PCDD/F fate from MSWI residue used in road construction in France," Chemosphere, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 363–369, Jan. 2009, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. chemosphere.2008.09.028. [13] F. Bernard and N.-E. Abriak, "Etude physique, géotechnique et mécanique d’un mâchefer d’incinération d’ordures ménagères," Journal of Catalytic Materials and Environment, vol. 1, pp. 9–18, Jan. 2003. [14] M. Izquierdo, Á. López-Soler, E. V. Ramonich, M. Barra, and X. Querol, "Characterisation of bottom ash from municipal solid waste incineration in Catalonia," Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 576–583, 2002, https://doi.org/ 10.1002/jctb.605. [15] I. Maria, E. Vázquez, X. Querol, M. Barra Bizinotto, L. Ángel, and P. Felicià, "Use of bottom ash from municipal solid waste incineration as road material," in International Ash Utilization Symposium, 2001. [16] C. J. Lynn, G. S. Ghataora, and R. K. Dhir Obe, "Municipal incinerated bottom ash (MIBA) characteristics and potential for use in road pavements," International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 185–201, Mar. 2017, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijprt.2016.12.003. [17] B. Muhunthan, R. Taha, and J. Said, "Geotechnical engineering properties of incinerator ash mixes," Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995), vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 985–991, Aug. 2004, https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2004.10470959. [18] M. Arm, "Variation in deformation properties of processed MSWI bottom ash: results from triaxial tests," Waste Management, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 1035–1042, Jan. 2004, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman. 2004.07.013. [19] M. Izquierdo, X. Querol, and E. Vazquez, "Procedural uncertainties of Proctor compaction tests applied on MSWI bottom ash," Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 186, no. 2, pp. 1639–1644, Feb. 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.12.045.