Microsoft Word - 1-665-ed.doc Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research Vol. 6, �o. 3, 2016, 976-981 976 www.etasr.com Demirdelen et al.: Modeling and Analysis of a Multilevel Parallel Hybrid Active Power Filter Modeling and Analysis of a Multilevel Parallel Hybrid Active Power Filter Tugce Demirdelen Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Cukurova University, Turkey tdemirdelen@cu.edu.tr R. Ilker Kayaalp Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Cukurova University, Turkey ikayalap@cu.edu.tr Mehmet Tumay Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Cukurova University, Turkey mtumay@cu.edu.tr Abstract—This paper introduces a new control approach for the Multilevel Parallel Hybrid Active Power Filter (M-PHAPF) which can compensate harmonics and variable reactive power demand of loads by controlling the DC link voltage adaptively in medium voltage applications. By the means of this novel control method, M-PHAPF obtains a better and more efficient performance in the compensation of harmonics and reactive power compared to when using conventional control methods. The performance and stability of the proposed method are verified with a simulation model realized in PSCAD/EMTDC with different case studies. The simulation results demonstrate that harmonic compensation performance meets the requirements of the IEEE-519 standard. Keywords- Harmonics; Parallel Hybrid Active Filter; reactive power compensation; simulation; PSCAD/EMTDC. I. INTRODUCTION In power transmission/distribution systems, the intensive use of nonlinear loads causes several power quality problems. The grid voltage and currents become non sinusoidal and harmonic distortion appears. The use of passive filters is one of the traditional solutions to reduce current harmonics. However, it provides a low filtering performance and its filtering performance depends on the changing conditions of power systems. With the remarkable development of semiconductor switching devices, active power filters (APF) have gain interest and have been put into practical use as they have the ability to overcome the disadvantages of passive filters. APF are more effective in harmonic compensation and provide superior filtering performance [1–7]. Although APF are an accomplished compensation system, the cost of APF significantly increases with increasing power ratings. To overcome this contradiction, passive and active filters are used together as a single device called a Hybrid Active Power Filter (HAPF). In the literature, different HAPF topologies which are the combination of the series and/or parallel APF and passive filters are proposed [7–21]. The main purpose of the development of HAPF topologies is to provide the compensation requirements of dominant harmonics and reactive power demand of nonlinear loads with passive filters and decrease the ratings and also costs of APF. PHAPF which is formed from series connection of passive filter and APF come forward in HAPF topologies. The most significant advantage of the PHAPF topology is that the passive filter capacitor holds the major part of fundamental voltage across its terminals and APF part holds only the required voltage for harmonic compensation on the DC link with the help of series connection of passive filters and inverters. This advantage provides reduction in power ratings and switching losses of APF. The controller design of PHAPF is a significant and challenging task due to its impact on the performance and stability of the overall system. For this reason, different reference generation and control methods such as pq theory [12, 19, 21], fast fourier transform [19], dq theory [22–27], fuzzy controller [14, 16], proportional resonant current controller [17] etc. have been applied to PHAPF. The current controller, responsible for producing reference currents, is an important part of the PHAPF controller. According to the current control strategy, direct and indirect current controllers can be applied to PHAPF. A direct current controller uses only source currents to compensate harmonics and/or reactive power. An indirect current controller uses both load and filter currents to maintain harmonics and/or reactive power compensation. The indirect current control method is preferred in many of PHAPF studies [22–28] and direct current control method is applied and investigated in fewer studies [12, 19, 29– 32]. In indirect current control, the grid voltage and the impedance of the passive filter must be taken into account for fundamental and harmonic frequencies in order to generate a proper voltage reference for the compensation. This approach can cause complexity in control method. Because of that, instead of using the grid voltage and the impedance of passive filter, a linear proportional controller is preferred for the calculation of reference voltage. However, the linear proportional controller presents moderate performance in the compensation of harmonics. In direct current control, PHAPF can present a faster dynamic compensation performance and the current reference is generated by comparing the reference current extracted from the load current and the filter current, so grid voltage has no direct effect on the control loop. However, the second order impedance characteristic of series connected Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research Vol. 6, �o. 3, 2016, 976-981 977 www.etasr.com Demirdelen et al.: Modeling and Analysis of a Multilevel Parallel Hybrid Active Power Filter passive filters causes oscillations in the step response changes of low frequency components so, complex controller methods must be preferred for the control of fundamental frequency components which are used for the dc link control and reactive power compensation. Furthermore, the reactive power demand of the load is considered constant and reactive power compensation requirements are supplied by the constant reactive power capacity of the passive filter in a major number of PHAPF studies [12, 19, 22–32]. However, the reactive power demands of loads show variable reactive power characteristics in most industrial applications and PHAPF can be one of the effective solutions for harmonics compensation and variable reactive demand of industrial loads. The dynamic reactive power compensation is investigated in [29, 33]. In [21, 29, 33], the adaptive dc link voltage control is employed and the dc link voltage is changed according to the dynamic reactive power compensation requirements. In [29], adaptive dc link voltage control is achieved according to both harmonic currents and reactive power requirements of the load by using the selective harmonic extraction method. In these studies, direct current control approach is preferred for harmonics and dynamic reactive power compensation so both active and reactive parts of PHAPF currents must be controlled with different controllers for the dc link control in order to maintain the dc link voltage in step response changes of load. Also, the dynamic reactive power compensation performance of 10 kVA PHAPF is investigated with only a few hundred of Var reactive power which is relatively low for investigating the performance of 10kVA PHAPF. On account of the limitations in the above mentioned literature, the purpose of this paper is the following: 1. A new control approach is proposed in order to ensure ac current shaping, reactive power dynamical compensation, and dc voltage regulation. 2. This control method is applied in medium voltage levels. 3. Theoretical analyses and simulation results are obtained from an actual industrial network model in PSCAD. 4. The simulation results are presented for a proposed system in order to demonstrate that the harmonic compensation performance meets the requirements of the IEEE-519 standard. 5. To apply dynamic load changes and observe the system response. II. PARALLEL HYBRID ACTIVE POWER FILTER To explain both harmonics and reactive power compensation characteristics of the PHAPF, the single phase equivalent circuit is shown in Figure 1(a). Zs presents the source impedance and Zf presents the passive filter impedance. The nonlinear load is indicated as an ideal current source (IL), and the APF is shown as a voltage source. If the terminal voltage does not have a fundamental component, the voltage across the PWM inverter can be presented as K ⋅ Ish at harmonic frequencies where ‘h’ shows the harmonic components and K shows the feedback gain. Therefore, the source voltage can become pure 50 Hz and presenting the current directions as in Figure 1(b), the following equations can be obtained by applying Kirchhoff’s voltage law: sh sh sh fh fh af (1)V -I Z -I Z -V =0 where, sh af sh (2)V =0, V =K I⋅ sh Lh fh (3)I =I +I fh sh Lh fh sh (4) Z I = I Z +Z +K ⋅ Zs C L (a) +- Vaf Zf Vs Is IL IF Zsh C L (b) Zfh Ish ILh IFh K Fig. 1. (a) Single phase equivalent circuit, (b) Harmonic equivalent circuit Equation (4) shows that the active part of the filter is connected to the system and feedback gain K acts as a damping resistor. K protects the resonance between the supply and the passive filter. Theoretically, as K goes to infinity, the harmonic content of the source current goes towards zero. However due to stability problems in the control loop, the gain K should be limited to certain values [34]. Hence the design procedure of PHAPF can be divided into two groups as the design of the passive filter and the design of the active filter part. The design of the passive filter is mainly identifying the Lf, Cf parameters considering the harmonic content of the load. It is clear that, the tuning frequency of the passive filter is chosen to be the most dominant harmonic component of the nonlinear load. Today’s industrial loads generally use three phase diode rectifiers as AC/DC converters, instead of PWM converters, due to their low cost and efficiency. As a result, in the case of a diode rectifier, the passive filter should be adjusted to eliminate the 5th or 7th harmonic current content. The 5th harmonic current content of a diode rectifier is higher than its 7th harmonic components, so it is more reasonable to tune passive filter around 250Hz. LC filter for this work is tuned at 250 Hz. III. PROPOSED CONTROL METHOD The proposed system is represented in Figure 2. The control scheme of the M-PHAPF is based on the synchronous reference frame method which presents easy implementation and low computational cost. The proposed controller of the proposed system consists of four main parts. These parts are the harmonic compensation controller, the reactive power compensation controller, the dc link reference voltage calculation and controller and finally, the reference calculation and gate signal generation. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research Vol. 6, �o. 3, 2016, 976-981 978 www.etasr.com Demirdelen et al.: Modeling and Analysis of a Multilevel Parallel Hybrid Active Power Filter Fig. 2. The proposed system A. Harmonic Current Controler The harmonic control of M-PHAPF is shown in Figure 3. The first step is to isolate the harmonic components from the fundamental component of the grid currents. This is achieved through the dq transformation (6), synchronized with the PCC voltage vector, and a first order low pass filter (LPF) with a cut off frequency of 10 Hz. Then the dq inverse transformation (8) produces the harmonic currents in the abc referential frame. Ia_harmonic_ref Ic_harmonic_ref Ib_harmonic_ref Σ Σ - - + + Iq Id d q �� PLL Id_lpf Iq_lpf Isa Isc Isb abc d q abc �� E a E b E c Fig. 3. Harmonic current control The conversion matrix is p p p 123 dq p p p 2π 2πcosθ cos(θ - ) cos(θ + ) 3 3 2 2π 2πT = -sinθ -sin(θ - ) -sin(θ + ) (5) 3 33 2 2 2 2 2 2                      d Sa 123 q dq Sb o Sc i i i =T i (6) i i                         And the inverse conversion matrix is p p dq 123 p p p p 2 cosθ -sinθ 2 2 22π 2πT = cos(θ - ) -sin(θ - ) (7) 3 33 2 22π 2πcos(θ + ) -sin(θ + ) 3 3 2                          a_harmonic_ref d_lpf dq b_harmonic_ref 123 q_lpf c_harmonic_ref o_lpf (8) i i i =T i i i                            B. Reactive Power Compensation Control When the loading reactive power QLxf is greater than QcxfPF, in order to generate a larger Icxf, the inverter should output a negative inverter fundamental active voltage (Vinvxf<0) [12]. The reactive power equivalent circuit is shown in Figure 4. The related equations are as follows: C L Vinvxf ZPPFf Vsx Isxf ILxf Icxf x=a,b,c +- Fig. 4. Reactive power equivalent sircuit invxf sx PFFf cxf (9)V =V -Z I invxf sx cxf PPFf (10) V -V I = Z PPFf cf Lf (11)X =- X -X The reactive power provided by the passive part 2 sx cxfPF cf Lf (12) V Q =- <0 X -X Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research Vol. 6, �o. 3, 2016, 976-981 979 www.etasr.com Demirdelen et al.: Modeling and Analysis of a Multilevel Parallel Hybrid Active Power Filter C. DC Link Voltage Reference Calculation and Controller The reference dc link voltage is determined with (15) by using (13) and (14). Moreover, a proportional-integral controller is used to control the PHAPF dc bus voltage shown in Figure 5. �� PLL Calculation of Reference DC Link Voltage Calculation of Reactive Power QLoad=VdIq + VqId E a E b E c Ea Eb Ec Isa Isb Isc Id Iq Eq Ed V*DC abc dq Σ - + ∫+ ip kk Vcappi_a Limitter Vcappi_b Vcappi_c d q abc 0 V*DC VDC VERROR �� PLL E a E b E c Fig. 5. DC link voltage controller (a) calculation of adaptive DC link voltage (b) DC link PI controller For harmonic compensation only, the required DC link voltage value is: n F,h filter,h DC(harmonic) h¹1 (13)Z I