







































English Language Teaching Educational Journal   ISSN 2621-6485 

Vol. 4, No. 3, 2021, pp. 199-212  

       10.12928/eltej.v4i3.4974                               http://journal2.uad.ac.id/index.php/eltej/index            eltej@pbi.uad.ac.id 

Identifying English language needs among administrative 

support staff in a Malaysian Public University: A preliminary 

study 

Mohd Zulfadli Mat Husin a,1,*, Noor Raha Mohd Radzuan b,2 

a Registrar Office, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, 16310 Bachok, Malaysia 
b Centre for Modern Languages, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 26600 Pekan, Malaysia 
1 zulfadli.mh@umk.edu.my *; 2 nraha@ump.edu.my  

* corresponding author 

 

A R T I C L E  I N F O 

 

ABST RACT   

 

 

Article history 

Received 08 October 2021 

Revised 28 October 2021 

Accepted 09 December 2021 

 English skills particularly in conversation are essential in workplace 
situations especially in the context of higher learning institutions. Little 
attention is being given to examining the needs of English 
communication skills and issues related to administrative support staff at 
their workplace particularly at public universities. A questionnaire was 
adopted to gauge the English language needs of support staff, their 
English skills perception as well as usage at the workplace. Data were 
collected from a group of 40 support administrative staff from Universiti 
Malaysia Kelantan (UMK) involving three administrative departments. 
The findings were gathered using survey and analyzed using content 
descriptive analysis. The results of the study revealed that the majority of 
the respondents strongly agreed that having a good English ability will 
increase their chance of being promoted to a higher position. Data also 
revealed that staff use English mostly during interaction with foreign staff 
and students. In addition, staff perceived that they need to improve their 
English writing skills the most. This study hopes to give better insight 
towards English proficiency among administrative support staff and 
explicit policy on English language at workplace. Therefore, English 
continuous professional development programmes should be developed 
and introduced to assist in improving their English language abilities. 

This is an open access article under the CC–BY-SA license. 

    

 

 
Keywords 

ESP 

need analysis 

English workplace 

communication English 

 

 

 

How to Cite: Mat Husin, M.Z. & Radzuan, N.R.M. (2021). Identifying English language needs among 
administrative support staff in a Malaysian Public University: A preliminary study. English Language Teaching 
Educational Journal, 4(3), 199-212. 

1. Introduction  

English has been known to be one of the main important elements towards the development in 
terms of education and business especially in the South East Asian countries. English is used as a 
lingua-franca of the business world and has been assigned to be the “working language of ASEAN 
countries” (Kluensuwan et al., 2019). In Malaysia, English has been recognized as the second 
language in Malaysia beside Malay as the official language (Afip et al., 2019). English language has 
been taught since preschool and has become a compulsory subject for students to pass both in primary 
and secondary school (Afip et al., 2019). Due to this early exposure to English language, employers 
expect their employees to be able to communicate in English effectively to serve in different 
communicative tasks. The role of the English language in the employment sector, whether in public 
or private, is very significant as organizations rapidly embrace more and more foreign stakeholders 
into their environment (Hassan & Ong, 2019).  

http://journal2.uad.ac.id/index.php/eltej/index
mailto:zulfadli.mh@umk.edu.my
mailto:nraha@ump.edu.my
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
https://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=0.12928/eltej.v4i3.4974&domain=pdf
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7418-6360


200 English Language Teaching Educational Journal   ISSN 2621-6485 

Vol. 4, No. 3, 2021, pp. 199-212 

 Mat Husin, N.Z. & Radzuan, N.R.M. ( Identifying English language needs) 

Based on the importance of English language at the workplace, numerous studies were conducted 
on the needs for Malaysian students to have good English communication ability (Jalleh et al., 2021; 
Diana & Su-Hie, 2017; Isarji et al., 2013; Miskam & Saidalvi, 2018; Ngah et al., 2011; Singh & Harun, 
2020; Singh et al., 2021; Su-Hie et al., 2017; Talif & Noor, 2009; Vicky et al., 2016). These studies 
concluded that a Malaysian graduate’s employability is being influenced by academic performance as 
well as their communicative competence, especially using the English language effectively. However, 
as higher education institutions develop their programmes on employability and providing the 
necessary platforms for undergraduates to have good English competencies, little attention is paid on 
its administrative staff’s English language needs. The staff in higher education institutions such as in 
public universities need to have a better grasp on using English as communication tools so that 
together with academic staff, they can create a blended and conducive environment that encourages 
the use of English language inside and outside the workplace as well as attracting outstanding overseas 
talents. 

Universiti Malaysia Kelantan (UMK), the 19th public university in Malaysia established in the 
year 2006 under the Ninth Malaysia Plan proposal. Its first campus was situated in Pengkalan Chepa, 
Kota Bharu and UMK focused on entrepreneurship and enterprise education. Currently, UMK has 
three (3) campuses situated in Kota Bharu, Bachok and Jeli with an estimated 1300 staff from 
academic and administrative. Out of those administrative staff, 450 are support staff who are placed 
in various schemes such as N for administrative, F for information technology and W for finance. The 
Administrative Support Staff can be considered as one of the backbones behind the implementation 
and ensuring the general management and human resource management of UMK up and running 
smoothly. Hence for UMK, not only the graduates need to be proficient in English with the purpose 
of employability, the staff who are part of the ecosystem of tertiary education also need to be able to 
converse in English. As the internationalization process rapidly takes place in UMK, the university 
starts to employ more foreign staff and students. Consequently, UMK has started to focus on ensuring 
all staff are able to communicate in English effectively. The institutional policies have been put forth 
by UMK top management such as introducing and implementing English as the medium of instruction 
in all academic and research settings. However, little attention has been given towards improving 
administrative staff English communication skills and this internationalization issue can be regarded 
as an important issue which will influence higher education institutions significantly (Yonezawa, 
2018).  

Over the years, needs analysis has been identified by researchers as well as educators to be one of 
the important elements to be considered in improving learners’ competence or performance either in 
the context of education or workplace (Jalal, 2016; Singh & Harun, 2020). In defining the term needs, 
three (3) elements should be looked into which are necessities, lack and wants (Hutchinson & Waters, 
1987). Within the context of the workplace, what staff need to know in order for them to communicate 
better in English are necessities. The gap that exists between the English proficiency of the staff and 
their employer’s or superior’s target are defined as lacks. Administrative staff's subjective needs such 
as to improve their English writing skills are known as wants. 

In addition to that, Berwick (1989) gave definition to the term needs as “the gap between the 
current situation and the anticipated future state” (p. 52). Brown (1995) defined needs analysis as the 
activities involving collecting information that will cater the needs of identified learners. Needs can 
also be defined as the gap that is required to be filled which refers to the knowledge that learners know 
or do not know about a certain language (Robinson, 1991). Hutchinson and Waters (1987) explained 
that need analysis include the target and learning needs. Considering those definitions and concepts, 
needs in the workplace in this study can be referred to as the gap between an employee's current 
English competency level and the employer’s expectations. Furthermore, target English needs can be 
viewed as the employees’ needs and what they should do in certain English communicative contexts 
within workplace environment. In addition, learning needs in this study can be described as actions 
that employees need to do in their English learning process at workplace.  

Several studies on English language needs at the workplace have been conducted, for instance, in 
banking sectors (Muthiah, 2003), supply chain (Puteri Zarina et al., 2020), engineering industry 
(Hiranburana, 2017; Kassim & Ali, 2010; Kluensuwan et al., 2019; Ngah et al., 2011; Subramaniam 
et al., 2020; Tinh, 2018) and graduates’ employability (Lee & Koo, 2015; Singh & Harun, 2020). In 
order to design English for Specific purposes courses within the context of occupational context, 



ISSN 2621-6485 English Language Teaching Educational Journal 201 
Vol. 4, No. 3, 2021, pp. 199-212 

  

Mat Husin, N.Z. & Radzuan, N.R.M. ( Identifying English language needs) 

 

several studies which were conducted within the south East Asian countries were worth to be 
considered although the employees were in different fields. 

A study by Karachedee (2017) explored the needs of English communications skills of Thai 
employees as perceived by their superiors who were at management level in a selected Thailand’s 
multinational company. The findings suggested that as most of the employees were perceived to have 
insufficient English communication skills and, their unsatisfactory performance in dealing with 
foreign customers, suppliers and visitors due to low level of English proficiency, would negatively 
affect not only themselves but also the company’s reputation. Listening and speaking skills in English 
were found to be the most needed skills by those diploma-holder employees as perceived by their 
superiors, however, based on the data from the employees themselves, it was reported that listening 
skill was the skill that they needed to improve the most. Nevertheless, it was highlighted that the 
English communication skills needed differ according to several factors such as the employee’s 
working experiences, education levels and job description (Karachedee, 2017). The scope of the 
current study is different from a study by Karachedee (2017). The current study focuses on 
administrative staff of a Malaysian public university whereas Karachedee (2017) focuses on selected 
Thailand’s multinational employees. The difference in English requirements at the respective 
population’s workplace between Thailand and Malaysia greatly influence their perceptions of English 
usage at the workplace.  

A study conducted by Jusoh et al. (2018) examined the level of apprehension in four (4) settings 
which were during group discussion, meeting, interpersonal and public speaking among non-academic 
officers at a Malaysian public university. They found out that public university non-academic officers 
showed moderate levels of apprehension and the highest level of apprehension was found in English 
public speaking context. The study also concluded that female officers were more apprehensive in all 
those four communicative settings compared to men (Jusoh et al., 2018). In contrast to the study by 
Jusoh et al. (2018) which focused mainly on the four settings, the current study expanded the 
communicative settings at the workplace to 15 tasks that administrative support staff may involve in 
and use English. In addition to that, Jusoh et al. (2018) proposed to have continuous in-house training 
to reduce the level of anxiety among staff, especially the non-academic staff. 

A study by Hee and Zainal (2018) which was conducted in a Malaysian pest control industry shared 
some insights on the understanding of communication requirements of employees at the workplace. 
The study focused on English communication needs of service technicians and it was found that those 
technicians were often involved in communication activities in their working life especially in giving 
suggestions, providing advice to customers, making and answering phone calls, and writing and 
replying to emails (Hee & Zainal, 2018). Therefore, the study suggested that speaking, listening and 
writing skills were the essential skills to be considered as part of the proposed syllabus for English 
courses for these service technicians. In addition, the study highlighted that having good English 
communication skills may bring a positive impact on customers which eventually improves the 
business.   

A qualitative case study was carried out by Gaspar and Hartanto (2019) to identify the English 
training program design, implementation and evaluation among administrative staff at the University 
of Surabaya. The program was conducted starting from January until August 2017 with the aim to 
equip administrative staff with English communication competency (Gaspar & Hartanto, 2019). The 
study concluded that the English language training program which had been modelled based on the 
ADDIE course design was successful. The study justified that finding based on the participants' 
satisfaction level and level of attendance which were above the target. Other findings from the study 
suggested that university administrative staff showed positive perceptions towards the implementation 
of English language training courses. One noticeably limitation from this study was that the testing 
instrument needed to be improved in order to measure the progress of the participants as the study’s 
measurement tool using pre and post-test was not consistent thus unreliable.  

A recent study related to administrative staff use of English language in a northern Malaysian 
public university was conducted by Jassim (2020). The study used questionnaires and interviews in 
investigating the English language use and needs among the public university administrative staff and 
international students. Based on the findings, Jassim (2020) concluded that administrative staff used 



202 English Language Teaching Educational Journal   ISSN 2621-6485 

Vol. 4, No. 3, 2021, pp. 199-212 

 Mat Husin, N.Z. & Radzuan, N.R.M. ( Identifying English language needs) 

English language in both administration and non-administration related tasks. From the interviews 
with two international students, it was reported that effective communication occurred between them 
and the administrative staff. Even though sometimes hiccups did occur during the interaction, the 
administrative staff claimed that they applied a variety of pragmatic strategies such as repetition, 
pronunciation adjustment, and clarification to ensure successful communication. The study also 
highlighted that administrative staff put high priority on the needs to improve their English grammar 
and enrich vocabulary repertoire. Administrative staff also expressed that more chances should be 
given to them to practice their conversation skills in English (Jassim, 2020).  

Hassan and Ong (2019) carried out a study with the aim of investigating English usage and sources 
of difficulties in using English among island tourism staff at hotels situated in Perhentian and Redang 
Islands. The study revealed that respondents perceived English is very important as they need to 
communicate with international tourists. The findings also showed that respondents agreed that their 
two main sources of difficulties in using English were tourist’s accents and English grammar (Hassan 
& Ong, 2019).  

Based on those studies mentioned, it is notable that only a few studies are being conducted to 
explore English usage within the context of Malaysian public universities. To date, only a few studies 
(Abdullah, 2014; Jassim, 2020; Jusoh et al., 2018; Yuit & Imm, 2009) were carried out focusing on 
English usage among Malaysian administrative staff of public university, thus it is essential to conduct 
a needs analysis on the use of English language among administrative support staff especially in the 
context of UMK. The findings of this study will provide insights among administrative staff who are 
also involved in interaction with foreign stakeholders. Furthermore, this study will yield data on the 
language needs, particularly by the administrative support staff and may be useful in designing a 
syllabus for a professional development course, focusing on enhancing their English communication 
skills. The following research questions were formulated to achieve the objectives below; 

1. What are the perceptions of the administrative support staff towards the use of English at their 
workplace? 

2. Which communicative workplace tasks do administrative support staff use English language 
the most and the least? 

3. What skills do staff require in an English competency course at workplace? 

2. Method 

The present study aims to obtain the perceptions of the administrative staff on the use of English 
of certain communicative events at their workplace. The selection of a quantitative approach for 
answering the research objectives in this study is due to its benefits of replicability and generalization 
(Daniel, 2016). Taking into account the samples, objectives and pattern found in this study, the results 
can reflect a wider population. Moreover, taking into account examples of the use of samples, 
instruments, procedures and data analysis procedure in this quantitative method study, other 
researchers can replicate the study in different time and place but still will get the same data 
interpretation. 

Non-probability convenience sampling was adopted in this study and a total of 40 respondents out 
of 168 administrative support staff (from Grades N19 to N36) was selected. Convenience sampling 
method was selected for this current study as it is uncomplicated and economical to gather data from 
the respondents. It is costly in term of expenses and time to adapt systematic or stratified sampling 
towards the whole populations (168 administrative support staff) (Cohen et al., 2018). Other than that, 
the use of convenience sampling in this study was based on the availability of the respondents to take 
part in the survey. As such, out of 168 administrative support staff, 40 of them were available and 
took part in this study. 

 All respondents were currently working with 3 different departments, namely Registrar Office, 
Academic Department and Students Affairs and Alumni Department. Differences between N19 and 
N29-N36 staff are as presented in Table 1.  

 

 



ISSN 2621-6485 English Language Teaching Educational Journal 203 
Vol. 4, No. 3, 2021, pp. 199-212 

  

Mat Husin, N.Z. & Radzuan, N.R.M. ( Identifying English language needs) 

 

Table 1.   Differences between N19 and N29-N36 staff 

Grade Minimum education requirement Job Description 
N19 (Administrative 

Assistant) 

 

Malaysian Certificate of Education or Sijil 

Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM). Malaysian 

Certificate of Education or SPM is a public 

examination that students take at the end of 

11 years of schooling (primary and 

secondary) 

Responsible for clerical work involving 

filing systems, preparing and mailing 

letters and assisting officers or other staff 

with administrative tasks 

N29 – N36 (Assistant 

Officer) 

Malaysian Higher School Certificate or Sijil 

Tinggi Pelajaran Malaysia (STPM) / 

Matriculation Certificate or Diploma 

certificate 

Responsible to assist Administrative 

Officers in respective departments to 

complete any tasks related to human 

resource, administrative, research, finance 

and academic 

 

To gather participants’ level of English proficiency, they are required to key in their Malaysian 
University English Test (MUET) results in the survey too. MUET is administered by the Malaysian 
Examination Council and regarded as one of the predictors to check on one’s English language 
proficiency (Othman & Nordin, 2013). MUET consists of tests in four (4) skills which are listening, 
speaking, reading and writing. MUET results are mostly being used for university entrance for 
Malaysian students with a minimum score of Band 3 depending on the course applied (Othman & 
Nordin, 2013). For Malaysian University undergraduate courses, the differences can be referred in 

the Table 2. 

Table 2.  MUET Score Requirement 

Malaysia University Undergraduate Courses Minimum MUET Score 
Arts and Social Science Band 2 

Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics  Band 3 

Law and Medicine  Band 4 

 

Five, Four and Three-point Likert-scale questionnaire was employed to measure the respondents’ 
English language needs and different items used different scale ranges. Item 6 used a 5-point Likert 
scale which ranges from 1 – very weak to 5 – very proficient, item 7 and 11 used a 4-point Likert scale 
which ranges from 1-Sometimes to 4- Always. Item 8 also used a 4-point Likert scale ranges from 1-
Little to 4 – tremendous and item 12 used a 3-point Likert scale ranges from 1-Low to 3-High. 

The scale had a high level of internal consistency as determined by a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.95 
(George & Mallery, 2003). This questionnaire was adapted from Kluensuwan et al. 's (2019) study 
because it explored the English needs for Thai engineering workers which is similar to the objectives 
of this current study. The questionnaires used in the current study consist of 12 items (which are 
relevant to the aim of the study) out of 38 items from the questionnaires used in Kluensuwan et al.’s 
(2019) study. In addition, the words in the items used in the questionnaires were also replaced from 
engineering discourse to human resource discourse to fit the context of this study. Examples of the 
replacement items were “explain problems(faults) of machines/equipment” changed to “assisting in 
interview sessions”, “customers/professionals” changed to “foreign staff and students” and “Work in 
overseas plants” changed to “work at another place/university”. The questionnaires were divided into 
3 parts: Part A on demographic information, Part B on perception towards English use at the 
workplace and Part C on English proficiency, self-rating and suggestion toward areas of improvement.  

The questionnaires were distributed via email to 40 respondents through Google Form. However, 
only 34 respondents answered and returned the questionnaire. The data were analyzed and presented 
in the forms of frequency and percentage. Table 3 illustrates the respondent's demographic 
background. Majority of the respondents were female (76%) and most of the respondents aged 
between 30 to 39 years old (68%). Respondents for the current study mostly are from N19 (41%) and 



204 English Language Teaching Educational Journal   ISSN 2621-6485 

Vol. 4, No. 3, 2021, pp. 199-212 

 Mat Husin, N.Z. & Radzuan, N.R.M. ( Identifying English language needs) 

N29 until N36 (50%). Surprisingly, most of the respondents in the current study hold bachelor degrees 
(56%) even though the academic requirements for the support staff job entry are SPM and 
STPM/Matriculation or Diploma certificates. It is also worth noting that the majority of the 
respondents scored MUET within the range of Band 3 and below, with Band 1 (6%), Band 2 (35 %) 
and Band 3 (23%). Only 15% of the respondents scored Band 4 and 3% achieved Band 5 in the MUET 
test. 

Table 3.  Demographic Information 

Profile Categories Frequency Percentage (%) 

Gender Female 26 76 

 Male 8 24 

 Total 34 100 

Age 20 and below 0 0 

 21 – 29 6 18 

 30 – 39 23 68 

 40 – 49 4 12 

 50 and above 1 2 

 Total 34 100 

Jobs Grade N19 14 41 

 N22 – 26 3 9 

 N29 – 36 17 50 

 Total 34 100 

Education 
Background 

SPM 2 6 

 STPM/Matriculation/Diploma 12 35 

 Bachelor Degree 19 56 

 Master Degree 1 3 

 PhD 0 0 

 Total 34 100 

MUET Results Band 1 2 6 

 Band 2 12 35 

 Band 3 8 23 

 Band 4 5 15 

 Band 5 1 3 

 Band 6 0 0 

 Never Took 6 18 

 Total 34 100 

3. Findings and Discussion 

Descriptive analysis was carried out with the purpose of answering research questions in this 
current study. The data of administrative support staff’s English language usage at the workplace was 
analyzed using Minitab Software Version 19. The data is then being presented in table form and 
arranged accordingly to answer the research questions of this study. 

 



ISSN 2621-6485 English Language Teaching Educational Journal 205 
Vol. 4, No. 3, 2021, pp. 199-212 

  

Mat Husin, N.Z. & Radzuan, N.R.M. ( Identifying English language needs) 

 

3.1. Research Question 1: What are the perceptions of the administrative support staff 

towards the use of English at their workplace?  

Table 4 shows the Mean and SD on respondents’ perceptions towards their estimated English usage 
in daily life. The mean score which is 2.38 indicates that most respondents seldom use English in their 
daily life. This illustrates that respondents are reluctant to use English in their daily conversation either 
at the workplace or at home. One possible reason behind the low usage of English in administrative 
support staff was the dominance of Malay which is the official language of the university 
administration. Support staff mostly speak and write in Malay which is also the national language of 
Malaysia.  

Table 4.  Perception on Estimated use of English in daily life 

Items M SD 

Estimated use of English in Daily life 2.38 0.49 

 

Furthermore, ethnic Malays comprise the majority of the administrative support staff in most 
universities thus creating a monolingual environment at work (Yuit & Imm, 2009). On the contrary, 
Jalal (2016) reported that managers from several industries (i.e. Law, Plantation, Telecommunication, 
Broadcasting, Finance and Engineering) claimed they always used English on communicating and 
interacting inside and outside of their workplace. In addition, the study reported only a small 
percentage of managers rated seldom used English in their daily life. One possible explanation was 
that being at the management levels, those respondents needed to deal and communicate with their 
respective company’s stakeholders from various countries and cultural backgrounds in which English 
is mostly being used as the main medium. As such they heavily used English compared to 
administrative support staff who heavily used Malay in daily life. 

Table 5.  Perceived impact of English on career advancement 

Impact  Frequency Percentage (%) 

Little 1 3% 

Fair 10 29% 

Strong 18 53% 

Tremendous 5 15% 

 

53 percent of respondents believed that English proficiency strongly impacts staff career 
advancement (refer to Table 5). 15 percent of them agreed that English proficiency has a tremendous 
impact on work advancement while only 3 percent said little impact and 29 percent claimed it was 
fair. The English language is being considered to be one of the critical aspects that can help staff in 
their career advancement particularly in the context of higher learning institutions such as UMK. 
Career advancement can be defined as the ascending movement of an individual’s career wherein an 
individual can advance by moving from support level to an officer level or change jobs scheme from 
administrative into academia within the same university or with another university. For example, a 
support staff can apply or get hired into higher grades (from N19 to N29) or a higher level such as 
officer level (from N19 to N41). Referring to the findings, a significant high percentage of respondents 
perceived that English competencies strongly impacts career advancement. It is likely that the reason 
behind this high percentage is that the UMK top management constantly highlighted the needs for 
staff to master the English language and due to the emphasis, several human resource policies have 
been implemented in relation to the English language issues in UMK. Similar results had been found 
in engineering sectors (Kluensuwan et al., 2019; Tinh, 2018), Thailand’s multinational companies 
(Karachedee, 2017), pest control industry (Hee & Zainal, 2018) and supply chain industry (Puteri 
Zarina et al., 2020). 

 



206 English Language Teaching Educational Journal   ISSN 2621-6485 

Vol. 4, No. 3, 2021, pp. 199-212 

 Mat Husin, N.Z. & Radzuan, N.R.M. ( Identifying English language needs) 

Table 6.  Perceptions on work opportunities from having good English ability 

Work Opportunities Frequency Percentage (%) 

Promoted to Higher Position 10 29% 

Attend Overseas Training 7 21% 

Work at Other Place 8 24% 

Study Abroad 6 18% 

Earn Better Paid 2 6% 

Others 1 3% 

 

Table 6 above showed the frequency and percentage of respondents’ perceptions on work 
opportunities resulting from good English ability. Work opportunities in this study refers to the chance 
of being promoted to a higher position, chance to attend overseas training with the aim of improving 
productivity, earning better pay grade, chances to get better jobs at another organization and chances 
to further study abroad. 29 percent of respondents perceived that by having good English ability, they 
may have better chances to be promoted to a higher position and another 24 percent claimed that they 
can apply for work at other companies or institutions, while 21 percent suggested they will have better 
opportunities to attend training abroad. 18 percent of respondents said with good English, they should 
be able to further their study abroad and another 6 percent said they can earn better pay as a result they 
have good English ability. Only 1 percent mentioned they can communicate better. Overall, 
administrative support staff agreed that by having good ability in English they can be promoted to 
higher positions. This finding is consistent with Clement and Murugavel’s (2018) survey which 
focused on Indian corporate employees from IT companies such as IT administrators, project 
managers, system administrators and analysts. They found that the majority of respondents perceived 
that poor English communication skills can harm individuals’ chances of getting promoted (Clement 
& Murugavel, 2018). It is likely that from an administrative support staff point of view, those who 
have good ability in English will have more interaction and better engagement with foreign staff and 
students and eventually that ability can significantly assist in their promotion. 

 

3.2. Research Question 2: Which communicative workplace tasks do administrative support 
staff use English language the most and the least? 

Table 7 displayed the respondents’ mean scores towards the frequency of using English in the 
communicative workplace tasks. The highest mean score indicates high frequency of English use 
whilst the lowest mean score indicates low frequency of English use. The highest mean score was 
revealed to be ‘Socializing and Entertaining Foreign Staff/Students’ with 2.53 indicating that high 
frequency of English use in this communicative task at their workplace.  This was followed by ‘Giving 
and Receiving Explanations Over the Phone’ (M = 2.29, SD = 0.84) and ‘Assisting in interview 
sessions’ (M = 2.00, SD = 0.95). The lowest mean score was ‘Describing Statistics/Performance’ (M 
=1.59, SD = 0.70). Majority of the tasks scored below average (M = 1.84). In relation to 
communicative workplace tasks, the findings found that most UMK administrative support staff used 
English when they had to socialize and entertain foreign staff and students. Human Resource support 
staff, for example, need to be able to use English effectively in their communication with those foreign 
staff as they are going to interact with foreign staff regularly to explain about human resource 
procedures, benefits, performance and service. As UMK is rapidly growing, there is an increasing 
number of international staff and students’ recruitment. As such the need for all UMK staff, especially 
the administrative support staff to master the English language, particularly in speaking skill is 
becoming more significant. This finding is consistent with the claim by Jusoh et al. (2018) that 
university administrative staff mainly use English when dealing with foreign staff or students. 
Similarly, Hassan and Ong (2019) reported that within the tourism context, English is being used the 
most during inquiring about international tourist’s information and needs. In contrast, Karachedee 
(2017) reported that most Thai multinational employees required training in listening skills as they 
mostly used English during telephone communication with both internal and external customers. 

 



ISSN 2621-6485 English Language Teaching Educational Journal 207 
Vol. 4, No. 3, 2021, pp. 199-212 

  

Mat Husin, N.Z. & Radzuan, N.R.M. ( Identifying English language needs) 

 

Table 7.  List of communicative workplace tasks using English 

Tasks M SD 

Socialize and Entertain Foreign Staffs/Students 2.53 0.90 

Give and Receive Over the Phone 2.29 0.84 

Assisting in an interview session 2.00 0.95 

Give Instructions 1.85 0.78 

Give Advices to Staffs/Students 1.82 0.76 

Describe Causes and Effects of Problem 1.82 0.80 

Describe Job Responsibility/Scope 1.82 0.76 

Make an Appointment 1.76 0.74 

Explain Procedures and Guidelines 1.74 0.75 

Attending Meeting 1.71 0.80 

Express Opinions 1.71 0.72 

Define and Clarify Meaning 1.71 0.76 

Discuss Problems 1.65 0.69 

Make an Oral Presentation or A Report 1.62 0.74 

Describe Statistics/Performance 1.59 0.70 

 

3.3. Research Question 3: What skills do staff require in an English course? 

 

Table 8 showed respondents’ self-rated proficiency based on English language skills. Most 
respondents rated their best English skill was Reading with a mean score of 3.65 followed by Listening 
(M =3.44), Writing (M =3.18), Conversation (M =3.15) and Public Speaking (M =3.06). Moreover, 
most respondents rated their overall English skills scores above average (M =3.21). This indicates that 
although respondents were confident with their English ability in skills such as reading, listening and 
writing, they were still weak in public speaking. This overall score was in contrast with Kluensuwan 
et al. (2019) study who reported that Thai employees rated their English self-rating scores below 
average. Administrative support staff rated their public speaking skills in English to be the lowest, 
indicating that they encountered problems whenever they needed to do public speaking in English at 
the workplace. The reasons behind this might be because of the lack of confidence and fear of making 
mistakes in front of other people. This public speaking skill finding was consistent with the results 
from studies by Abdullah et al. (2017), Hee and Zainal (2018) and Kluensuwan et al. (2019). The 
current study strongly suggests that support staff need to improve their English-speaking skills 
especially involving conversation and public speaking. 

Table 8.  The self-rated proficiency in English language skills 

Skills M SD 

Reading 3.65 0.77 

Listening 3.44 0.66 

Overall 3.21 0.69 

Writing 3.18 0.67 

Conversation 3.15 0.74 

Public Speaking 3.06 0.65 

 

 



208 English Language Teaching Educational Journal   ISSN 2621-6485 

Vol. 4, No. 3, 2021, pp. 199-212 

 Mat Husin, N.Z. & Radzuan, N.R.M. ( Identifying English language needs) 

Table 9.  Recommendations for English course contents 

Contents Frequency Percentage (%) 

General English Such as Greeting and Socializing 12 35% 

Technical English Relating to Human Resource and Administration 11 32% 

Business English Such as Discussion, Negotiation, Giving Oral 

Presentation, Attending Meetings 
11 32% 

 

Table 9 displayed respondents’ recommendations for the contents they wished to have in their 
English course. 35 percent of them required general English contents and 32 percent suggested both 
technical English and Business English. Most respondents agreed on proposing ‘General English Such 
as Greeting and Socializing’ contents in their English training courses. The recommendation 
corroborates the earlier claim in which respondents mostly used English when they socialize and 
entertain foreign staff. As such, they perceived the best content for the English training course is 
‘General English’ in which the course will involve enhancing their skills in reading, writing, listening 
and speaking. Furthermore, the General English course usually aims to assist staff to increase their 
vocabulary such as in socializing and greeting people as well as to increase their confidence in using 
English at the workplace (Yunus et al., 2012). With these suggestions, the syllabus designers and 
course developers will be able to create the most relevant activities for the English courses. 

Table 10. Perceived English skills that need improvement 

Skills M SD 
Writing  2.59 0.56 

Speaking 2.56 0.66 

Listening 2.32 0.64 

Reading 2.29 0.63 

 

From Table 10, it was revealed that UMK administrative support staff mostly need English Writing 
skill with a mean score of 2.59, followed by Speaking (M =2.56), Listening (M =2.32) and Reading 
(M =2.29). Most UMK administrative support staff claimed that they need to improve on their English 
writing skills. In contrast, Karachedee (2017) reported that Thailand employees perceived listening 
skills to be the skill most needed for improvement. However, the findings from the current study was 
consistent with Saleh and Murtaza (2018) study in which their respondents perceived the need to 
master English writing skills the most as most companies use English in written documents. The same 
explanation can also be interpreted towards public university administrative staff who need to write 
emails, reports and letters in English, besides communicating verbally with foreign staff and students. 
Possible areas of improvement related to English writing skills would be structuring sentences, finding 
ideas, grammar and vocabulary (Kluensuwan et al., 2019; Singh & Harun, 2020). 

4. Conclusion 

This paper has put some attention on the feedback from administrative support staff on the 
significance of English language use at higher learning institutions, particularly in UMK and also their 
needs for the English language to perform effectively in their workplace. These administrative support 
staff strongly believed that being competent in English language may help them in career advancement 
and they acknowledged that their current English skills are not at an acceptable level which needs 
proper enhancement. Furthermore, they agreed that they need to use English mostly with foreign staff 
and students at their workplace. It is also found that administrative support staff highlighted the needs 
to improve their English writing skill more than other skills. These findings could benefit the ESP 
syllabus designers and materials developers to produce relevant training or course contents and 
materials for human resource staff in general and administrative support staff of UMK specifically.  

There are several implications from this study and one of those is in terms of the language policy 
of the university. The top management of Malaysian public universities should give priorities in 
introducing a policy to encourage more English usage among administrative staff at the workplace 
with the purpose of giving more opportunities for staff to practice their English language skills among 
themselves as well as to serve the international staff and students. Furthermore, the human resource 



ISSN 2621-6485 English Language Teaching Educational Journal 209 
Vol. 4, No. 3, 2021, pp. 199-212 

  

Mat Husin, N.Z. & Radzuan, N.R.M. ( Identifying English language needs) 

 

development department of Malaysian public university also needs to put forth a comprehensive 
English continuous professional development curriculum to develop and assist all university staff to 
enhance their English competencies and eventually support the university’s internationalization 
agenda.  

The sample selected for this study was specifically administrative support staff who are currently 
working in UMK; thus, the results obtained in this study may not be applicable to administrative 
support staff in other Malaysian public universities. It is recommended that future studies to get better 
and deeper understanding of the English communication needs through observations on the interaction 
between administrative support staff interaction and their co-workers, students as well as lecturers. In 
addition, focus group discussion with supervisors made up of the officers and academicians to see 
their views on the use of English by the support staff at the workplace could also be used as one of the 
data collection methods in future studies. 

Acknowledgment   

We would like to thank all participants and individuals who contributed to this study. 

 

Declarations  

Author contribution : The main author carried out the study with the guidance from the co-
author. Both authors discussed the results of the study and contributed 
to the final version of the manuscript.  

Funding statement : The research is non-funded 

Conflict of interest : The authors declare no conflict of interest. 

Additional information : No additional information is available for this paper. 

 

REFERENCES 

 Abdullah, A. T. H. (2014). Communication apprehension in using English language among non-academic 

officers at a Public University in Malaysia. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(12), 

361–370. 

Abdullah, N. S., Zainal Abidin, A. A., Zaini, Z., & Wahab, P. (2017). The English language needs of 

employees in selected islamic institutions in Malaysia. Jurnal Sultan Alauddin Sulaiman Shah, 4(2). 

Afip, L. A., Hamid, M. O., & Renshaw, P. (2019). Common European framework of reference for languages 

(CEFR): Insights into global policy borrowing in Malaysian higher education. Globalisation, 

Societies and Education, 17(3), 378–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2019.1578195  

Berwick, R. (1989). Needs assessment in language programming: From theory to practice. In R. K. Johnson 

(Ed.), The Second Language Curriculum (pp. 48–62). Cambridge University Press. 

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524520.006    

Brown, J. D. (1995). The elements of language curriculum : A systematic approach to program development. 

Heinle & Heinle. 

Clement, A., & Murugavel, T. (2018). English for the Workplace: The Importance of English language skills 

for effective performance. The English Classroom, 20(1), 41–50. 

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. 

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539  

Daniel, E. (2016). The usefulness of qualitative and quantitative approaches and methods in researching 

problem-solving ability in science education curriculum. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(15), 

91–100. https://doi.org/2222-288X  

https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2019.1578195
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524520.006
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539
https://doi.org/2222-288X


210 English Language Teaching Educational Journal   ISSN 2621-6485 

Vol. 4, No. 3, 2021, pp. 199-212 

 Mat Husin, N.Z. & Radzuan, N.R.M. ( Identifying English language needs) 

Diana, P.-Y. L., & Su-Hie, T. (2017). Parents’ perceptions of selecting language of instruction for their 

children’s primary education in Malaysia. LSP International Journal, 2(1), 49–61. 

https://doi.org/10.11113/lspi.v2n1.18  

Gaspar, B., & Hartanto, Y. (2019). Assessing the design and implementation of English Training Program 

for the University of Surabaya administrative staff. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 9(1), 

69–79. ojs.pnb.ac.id/index.php/SOSHUM/%0A  

George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step : a simple guide and reference 11.0 update. 

Allyn and Bacon. 

Hassan, N. S. I. C., & Ong, R. L. T. (2019). Island tourism employees’ perceived importance and challenges 

of English communication. LSP International Journal, 6(1), 39–53. 

https://doi.org/10.11113/lspi.v6n1.83  

Hee, S. C., & Zainal, A. Z. (2018). Analysing the english communication needs of service technicians in the 

pest control industry. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 26(2), 1079–1096. 

Hiranburana, K. (2017). Use of English in the Thai workplace. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(1), 

31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2015.10.002  

Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for Specific Purpose (p. 188). 

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733031 

Isarji, S., Noor, Z. M., Zubairi, A. M., Ahmad, T. B. T., & Nordin, M. S. (2013). Needs assessment of 

workplace English and Malaysian graduates’ English language competency. World Applied Sciences 

Journal, 21(SPECIAL ISSUE4), 88–94. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.21.sltl.2141  

Jalal, T. S. T. (2016). Workplace english: An analysis of communication needs. Proceedings of the 

International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 1379–1388. 

Jalleh, C. M., Mahfoodh, O. H. A., Singh, M. K. M. (2021). Oral communication apprehension among 

Japanese EFL international students in a language immersion program in Malaysia. International 

Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 155–178. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14210a  

Jassim, L. L. (2020). Administrative staff’s use and learning of English to communicate with international 

students. Research Journal of English, 5(4), 169–188. 

Jusoh, Z., Engku Atek, E. S., Syed Omar, S. N. M., & Abdullah, A. T. . (2018). Investigation into non-

academic staff communication apprehension in using English language. International Journal of 

Asian Social Science, 8(9), 677–685. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.1.2018.89.677.685  

Karachedee, P. (2017). Needs for English communication skills of Thai employees in a multinational 

company [Burapha University, Thailand]. http://digital_collect.lib.buu.ac.th/dcms/files/55921456.pdf  

Kassim, H., & Ali, F. (2010). English communicative events and skills needed at the workplace: Feedback 

from the industry. English for Specific Purposes, 29(3), 168–182. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2009.10.002  

Kluensuwan, P., Chaisiri, T., Poomarin, W., & Rungruangsuparat, B. (2019). Needs analysis of English for 

engineering staff in the Electronics Industry in Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya and Pathum Thani, 

Thailand. NIDA, 24(36), 64–90. 

Lee, S. S., & Koo, Y. L. (2015). Examining linguistic proficiency in the multilingual glocal workplace: a 

Malaysian case study. Language and Intercultural Communication, 15(1), 46–61. 

https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2014.985305  

Miskam, N. N., & Saidalvi, A. (2018). Investigating English language speaking anxiety among Malaysian 

undergraduate learners. Asian Social Science, 15(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v15n1p1  

Muthiah, P. (2003). English language proficiency at the workplace: Expectations of bank officers in 

Malaysia. Asian Englishes, 6(2), 64–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2003.10801119  

Ngah, E., Radzuan, N. R. M., Fauzi, W. J., & Zainal Abidin, N. A. (2011). The need for competent work 

ready English language learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 1490–1499. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.389  

https://doi.org/10.11113/lspi.v2n1.18
https://doi.org/10.11113/lspi.v6n1.83
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2015.10.002
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733031
https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.21.sltl.2141
https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14210a
https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.1.2018.89.677.685
http://digital_collect.lib.buu.ac.th/dcms/files/55921456.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2009.10.002
https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2014.985305
https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v15n1p1
https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2003.10801119
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.389


ISSN 2621-6485 English Language Teaching Educational Journal 211 
Vol. 4, No. 3, 2021, pp. 199-212 

  

Mat Husin, N.Z. & Radzuan, N.R.M. ( Identifying English language needs) 

 

Othman, J., & Nordin, A. B. (2013). MUET as a predictor of academic achievement in ESL teacher 

education. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 13(1), 99–111. 

Puteri Zarina, M. K., Rosly, S., Nurain, J., Ismail, A., & Khalid, N. (2020). The use of English among supply 

chain workers in Malaysia. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring 

Engineering, 9(3), 2001–2005. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.c9227.019320  

Robinson, P. C. (1991). ESP today : a practitioner’s guide. Prentice Hall. 

Saleh, N. S., & Murtaza, S. F. (2018). English language use in Malaysian Government and private civil 

engineering workplaces. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 6(3), 84. 

https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.3p.84  

Singh, A. K. J., & Harun, R. N. S. R. (2020). Industrial trainees learning experiences of English related tasks 

at the workplace. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(1), 22–42. 

https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i1.16064  

Singh, M. K. P., Jo, Y. L., & Ching, S. S. (2021). Urban English learners' perceptions towards the influence 

of second language identity on employment opportunities in Malaysia. Pertanika Journal of Social 

Sciences and Humanities, 29(1), 7-45. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.1.02 

Su-Hie, T., Marzuki, E., Kee-Man, C., Jecky, M., & Jerome, C. (2017). Employers’ views on the importance 

of English proficiency and communication skill for employability in Malaysia. Indonesian Journal of 

Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 315–327. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i2.8132  

Subramaniam, G. K. J., Abdullah, F. P., & Portorajo, H. M. (2020). In-house English communication skills’ 

needs for Engineering workplace : Feedback from Human Resource Development. International 

Journal of Computational Engineering Research (IJCER), 08(August), 40. 

Talif, R., & Noor, R. (2009). Connecting language needs in the workplace to the learning of English at tertiary 

level. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 17(2), 65–77. 

Tinh, L. C. (2018). Needs analysis of English for mechanical engineers in the Vietnamese context [Victoria 

University of Wellington]. http://researcharchive.vuw.ac.nz/handle/10063/6973  

Vicky, C., Ting, H. L., & Yeo, J. Y. (2016). Investigating English language anxiety among UiTM Sarawak 

undergraduates. Journal of Creative Practices in Language Learning and Teaching (CPLT), 4(1), 50–

62. 

Yonezawa, Y. (2018). Management of internationalization in japanese universities: Towards the 

development of collaborative relationship between academic and administrative staff. Higher 

Education Forum, 15, 39–62. https://doi.org/10.15027/45646   

Yuit, C. M., & Imm, L. G. (2009). Needs versus wants: Comparing job-related and personal needs of non-

academic university employees for english language training. Pertanika Journal of Social Science 

and Humanities, 17(2), 187–203. 

Yunus, M. Z. M., Raof, A. H. A., Rahman, R. A., & Amin, A. M. M. (2012). The need of English Language 

Training Programs in continuing education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 56(Ictlhe), 

396–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.668  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.c9227.019320
https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.3p.84
https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i1.16064
https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.1.02
https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i2.8132
http://researcharchive.vuw.ac.nz/handle/10063/6973
https://doi.org/10.15027/45646
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.668


212 English Language Teaching Educational Journal   ISSN 2621-6485 

Vol. 4, No. 3, 2021, pp. 199-212 

 Mat Husin, N.Z. & Radzuan, N.R.M. ( Identifying English language needs) 

Supplementary Material 

PROPOSED COURSE SYLLABUS 

By the end of the course, participants will be able to  

● Write clear and concise emails, memos and letters in English 

● Converse with co-workers, students, foreigner in English  

● Understand the meaning and application of work-related vocabulary 

 

The language components that will be taught by instructors in this proposed course design are as 

follow; 

● Reading 

● Writing 

● Speaking 

● Listening 

● Grammar (embedded) 

● Vocabulary 

 

The proposed course structure along with the topics are as follow; 

 

Proposed Course Structure 

Unit Content Task Tools 

1 Ice Breaking 
Small Introduction 
Small talk 

 

2 Socialization Giving Introduction / Farewell speech Youtube 

3 
Talking about Favourite 

Hobbies 

Speaking 

Small Group Interaction 

Youtube, 

Google Translate 

4 Spell it Right 
Pronunciation 

Vocabulary Learning Strategies 

Online Dictionary, 

Kahoot! 

5 Superstar 
Speaking 

Acting 

Google Translate, 

Youtube 
6 Reading at Work Reading report, notices, emails and memos Technical texts on website, 

7 Business Visit 
Presentation of job description, department, 

future work 

Youtube, 

UMK Website, 

Chart 

8 
Email and Letters 

Correspondence 
Writing emails and letters 

Email templates, Letter 

templates 

 
In terms of assessments, after completion of each unit, learners will be assigned with a 

written/speaking task based on the contents that they learned. These tasks will then be collected and 

analyzed by instructors and being compiled toward the end of the course. From these completed 

assignments, instructors will be able to monitor the progress of learners. Aside from that, instructors 

will collaborate with the Human Resource Department in determining the supervisor for each learner 

taking the course. Each supervisor for each learner who comes from support staff will then be asked 

to rate or give some assessment toward their staff' performance related to English communication 

ability.  

  


