75 | P a g e THE PLACE OF WOMEN IN THE FOURTH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION AND THE POST COVID-19 PANDEMIC IN NIGERIA By Amaka Theresa Oriaku Emordi Lecturer, Department of Political Science, Obafemic Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria Email: amakaemordi@gmail.com Abstract The United Nations' celebration of the International Women's Day in 1975 was an occasion to stand together to advance gender equality around the world. This equality is yet to be evident in STEM and technological applications than any other area. Women are more analog than their male counterparts. Most of the new technological equipment such as phones, remote control, laptops, and other technological appliances women use are managed by their digital children and their male relatives. Today, technology has advanced from quantum physicists to artificial intelligence yet women are still grappling to understand the use of basic personal technological equipment. The increase in the number of women academics over the past 60 years has increased these gender differences in the used tech but much is yet to be achieved for women to be relevant in the technological ecosystem of the fourth industrial revolution. The dawn of this new dispensation of the fourth industrial revolution is presenting technology as a tool for solving human problems amidst unpredictable socio-economic and political quagmires of our new world. From a frustrated youth who set himself ablaze thereby igniting the Arab springs of 2011, to the ousting of an incumbent president to install an opposition president in 2019 Nigerian elections, to the black life matters revolutions in the USA precipitated by the murder of George Floyd amongst others. All these point to the new realities of the fourth industrial revolution as new mode of production for goods, services, war or peace in the hands of the youths. Applying the ecosystem theory, and online quantitative research design, this paper seeks to answer the following questions: What is the place of women in the fourth industrial revolution? To what extent can women be crucial in the use of technology as a tool for peace? How can women's technological know-how in the fourth industrial revolution bridge the gender gap? To sustain and increase their presence in this new mode of production as the invasion of the COVID-19 pandemic has proven to be an eye-opener for all, women must either latch in this emerging era and be mainstreamed or widen the gender gap by being lethargic to technology. KEYWORDS: INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION, POST-COVID, NIGERIA mailto:amakaemordi@gmail.com 76 | P a g e Introduction Mainstreaming a gender perspective is the process of assessing the implications for women and men of any planned action, including legislation, policies or programs, in all areas and at all levels. The essence of mainstreaming gender is to ensure that men and women benefit in all political, economic and social spheres and that gender equality is achieved and sustained especially in STEM and that inequality is not perpetuated. In recent times, technology has become a powerful tool for peace and war. Technology today is used as a political tool for peace and war, exposing sensitive political and governmental information to the benefit of the public (www.acquia.com). Traditionally, women have been found to play an important role in the prevention and resolution of conflicts and in peace-building (Nwolise 2014). Paradoxically, women are very marginal in STEM than any other sphere of life. The UN has made efforts for the maintenance and promotion of peace and security, and the need to increase the role of women in decision-making with regard to conflict prevention and resolution (peacewomen.org/scr-1325). The big question then is; since women have continued to lag behind in science and technology how is this very tall ambition of the UN going to be realized in a world that is technologically driven? The Covid-19 pandemic has opened the eyes of the world especially Nigeria that technology and perhaps artificial intelligence is the way to go for the production of goods and services, peace, and war. The aftermath of this evolving change in the mode of production of goods and services is that social positions would change again as in other previous industrial revolutions. In this industrial revolution those who do not own the means of production (technology and technological know-how) would become modern slaves and serfs of those who own property and means of production of goods and services hence the bourgeoisie would always in every history dominate the nagging and irritant proletariat. The Covid-19 invasion of the world has further changed the world and proved that technology is as a means of production is inevitable. Our world has and we are also changed but if the change is not balanced, if the change is skewed towards the men then it may be counterproductive. As Albert, (2014) maintained that every society is like an aircraft having two wings, “male and female wings”. Any society that fails to include women in development processes can be said to be flying on one wing (male wing) and such a society could easily crash (Albert 2014). Confirming this assertion Emordi, (2018) conceded that the world without women will be like the Hobbesian State of nature while planning development and managing situations like insecurity without women could mean effort in futility. http://www.acquia.com/ 77 | P a g e In line with the above argument biodiversity as we understand it is the processes of disturbance and succession and that the ecosystems provide a variety of goods and services upon which people depend. For the circle of the ecosystem to be complete there is a need for the biotic and abiotic components to synthesize to produce a healthy environment and to improve the quality of both biotic and abiotic components involved (Chapin, Stuart, Pamela, Matson, Peter & Vitousek (2011) The exclusion of any of the two components would lead to environmental degradation and negative climatic conditions that would spell disaster to humans and the environment. In Political science, David Easton system the theory sees the political system as the interaction of all the elements involved in policymaking. In it, he believes that any defect in any of the elements involved in the political system will affect the holistic function of the political system (Hauss 2006) Consequently, there is need for components of a system to be actively involved in the maintenance of the system, be it in the ecosystem or the political system or transition from one mode of production to another. The negation of any of the elements’ or components of the system will alter the comprehensive and healthy function of the whole. This is because the elements in a cyclic manner impact each other and together through nutrient cycles and energy maintain and sustain the system. Therefore, negating women as important elements in STEM in Nigeria and elsewhere in the emerging fourth industrial revolution will not benefit the county in her quest to succeed in the use of technology as the next mode of production. Industrialization has changed man and have impacted the environment positively and negatively but the vital and very crucial role of women in the fourth industrial revolution cannot be over-emphasized and neglected. Consequently, this survey research on the place of women in the fourth industrial revolution interrogated the extent women can be crucial in the use of technology as a tool for peace in the new mode of production. How women's technological know-how in the fourth industrial revolution would bridge the gender gap, and what can be done to sustain and increase the presence of women in science and technology that is evolving like a specter around the world as the new mode of production. Women must either latch in this emerging era and be mainstreamed or widen the gender gap by being lethargic to technology. The paper is, however, divided into sessions which starts with understanding the concept of the industrial revolution, data analysis where quantitative data was analyzed using inferential and descriptive statistics, then the revelation which buttresses the findings of the data was followed by the summary and recommendation for the way forward. Understanding Concept of Industrial Revolution There are three industrial revolutions that transformed our modern society. Each of these three advancements signified a change in the mode of production. The First Industrial https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disturbance_(ecology) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecological_succession https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecosystem_services https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecosystem_services 78 | P a g e Revolution from 1760 to sometime between 1820 and 1840, now also known as the First Industrial Revolution, was the transition to new manufacturing processes in Europe and the United States. The revolution caused the growth of industries, such as coal, iron, railroads, and textiles. The Second Industrial Revolution the 1870s witnessed the expansion of electricity, petroleum, and steel (David, 1969)). The third industrial revolution, the cyber revolution 1950s-2019 brought us to the fourth industrial revolution. The revolution fundamentally changed our world and thereby changing our ecosystem. Each change that occurred had to do with new products simply replacing old ones and a shift in the mode of production (Horn, Jeff; Rosenband, Leonard; Smith & Merritt 2010). Consequently, the industrial revolution which began in England in the second half of the eighteenth century spread in due course to Belgium, France, and other parts of Western Europe (Appadorai, 2004). In the economic sphere, the revolution substituted machine production for hand production. The small –scale production of goods in private homes was supplanted by mass production in factories. With the new mode of production women had their loved ones- children and husbands; migrate from farm to factories, from country to city, from agriculture to industry while women kept the homes. Following this philosophers such as Hegel and Rousseau stressed that the natural and spontaneous division of labor within the family also naturally paved the way for the social position of men and women in society (Bryson, 2003). Marx on the other hand, stressed that the changes in the mode of production and the industrial revolution birthed capitalism which divided the society into two hostile camps- the protectorate and the bourgeoisie. To him, the proletariat grew larger and larger with their miseries and pauperization attenuated while the bourgeoisie becomes numerically smaller, prosperous, and well-off with wages pushed lower and lower. Unfortunately, women who were neither the bourgeoisie nor the proletariats in that industrial epoch kept the home while men worked either as bourgeoisie or the proletariat. This resonated in women been some kind of cartel for men where he regarded his wife and children as his property and slaves. The man had power over them and could do with their labor as he chooses. Women were rather properties of either the bourgeoisies (men) or proletariats (men) as wives (heir breeders) or slaves. The home position women occupied made them lose out in the changing mode of production and the subsequent industrial revolutions. The two social classes, the bourgeoisie, and the proletariat being owners of the mode of production one way or the other. The proletariats having women in their homes wives, breeders of their heirs, and maintainers of the proletariat private property. On the other hand, the bourgeoisie owns both- their wives, children, and the proletariat. The class difference between the bourgeoisie and proletariats was sharply differentiated in function 79 | P a g e and interest. Appadorai (2004) explained that the industrial revolution destroyed forever, the preponderance weight of the agricultural classes in the community, and brought into being a new middle class who generally and year by year become more insistent in their demand for political recognition (Appadorai 2004). Again, the Second Industrial Revolution in 1870 the century which was the Age of Science and Mass Production. With it, things started to speed up and a number of key inventions were recorded. Owners of means of production now richer started thinking of gasoline engines, airplanes, chemical fertilizer,s and inventions that helped them go faster and do more. Scientific principles were brought right into the factories. Most notably, the assembly line effectively powered mass production. By the early part of the 20th century, Henry Ford’s company was mass-producing the groundbreaking Ford Model T, a car with a gasoline engine built on an assembly line in his factories. People follow the jobs, and in the early 1900s large number of workers left their rural homes behind to move to urban areas to work in factories. By 1900, 40% of the people in the rural areas especially in the US lived in cities, compared to just 6% in 1800. Cities were getting more and more urbanized. Inventions such as electric lighting, the radio, and telephones transformed the way people lived and communicated and this ushered in the modern world- the third Industrial revolution. The Third Industrial revolution beginning in the 1950s fundamentally changed with the discovery of electricity and mass production ushering in the Digital Industrial Revolution. With the third industrial the revolution came the magical internet which replaced the steam engines and the Ford Mainframe computers with some kind of miniature mobile and handy devices that lets you access both the cloud (soft) and the( earth hard copies)- that was the wonders of the digital internet cloud. The third industrial revolution brought semiconductors, mainframe, and personal computers. Things that used to be analog moved to digital technologies, like an old television you used to tune in with an antenna (analog) being replaced by an Internet-connected tablet that lets you stream movies (digital). The move from analog electronic and mechanical devices to pervasive digital technology dramatically disrupted industries, especially global communications and energy. Electronics and information technology, internet commerce, and trade eclipse the cloud. The third industrial revolution provided access to gargantuan information explosion and knowledge consumption thereby exacerbating good and bad information consumption especially in the hand of the youth. Each of these (first -third industrial revolutions) represented profound change with the major societal transformation of the way people lived and work and communicated. The discovery in the Third industrial revolution advanced profoundly and has equally launched us into the fourth industrial revolution. At the moment, many of the 80 | P a g e technologies people dreamed of in the 1950s and 60s have become a reality in the emerging fourth of the industrial revolution and we are going to be more changed as the fourth industrial revolution completely emerged. With it, we may have flying cars as we already have robots. Full-blown genetic sequencing and editing, artificial intelligence, miniaturized sensors, and 3D revolutions (printing, to name a few (trailhead.salesforce.com 2020). What then will be the fate of women who are still grappling with the mastering the use of basic personal technological equipment? Philosophical perspective of Women marginalization in Industrial Revolutions For Rousseau men and women differed in virtues. While a man’s virtue was his rational capacity, a woman‘s virtue was her sexuality which meant chastity, gentleness, and obedience. Since the functions of men and women differed, their education would also have to be different (Rousseau) Disagreeing with Rousseau, Wollstonecraft argued that the fulfillment of maturity and the eventual emancipation of women would come only when women are treated as persons and not merely as sexual beings. Contending that women like men were endowed with reason enabling them to make rational decisions and were entitled to natural rights. She stretches further that men and women should be given equal education. Analyzing the origin of the family, private property and state and drawing heavily on the work of the 19th-century anthropologist Lewis Morgan, Engels traced the supposed evolution and subordination of women in the family and society from the earliest savage society to the present day (Mukherjee, & Sheila 2011). According to him, primitive societies differed from modern society in that relations between the sexes were based on equality. Then he argued that there was a sexual division of labor whereby women were responsible for domestic work and men for agriculture and animal husbandry and there was the practice of paring family (which was not the same as strict monogamy) From the account of Engel in the primitive society this did not involve subordination; the women reigned supreme in the home and decent was calculated through the female line.) Engels called this mother- rights). The egalitarian situation was, however, changed by the development of new sources of wealth in the male sphere of activity through the domestication of animals and the breeding of herbs. As some men gained property and power over others, their position within the family was strengthened, and they wanted to pass their property to their children. To do this they have to overthrow the traditional order of inheritance and ensure strict monogamy on the part of each woman, who became the mere oppression of her husband, the means of producing an heir. In Eagles’ vivid phrase, the overthrow of the 81 | P a g e mother right was the world’s historical defeat of the female sex (Mukherjee, & Sheila 2011). Consequently, the man took command in the home, the woman was degraded and reduced to servitude, and she became the slave of his lust and a mere instrument for the production of children. This account of Engels can be inferred that the subordination of women coincided with the first private property and class society, for it was then that women lost control in the home and became economically dependent upon men; it also means that female oppression has no other material cause-- it is a part of class society, but not necessarily a permanent feature of human relationships. Therefore, the abolition of private property will mean an end to sex oppression. For men will no longer have any motive to exploit women; the supremacy the man in marriage is a simple consequence of his economic supremacy and with the abolition of the later, it disappears of itself Engels in Bryson (2003) argued that good equality in the society could not be achieved by will but only at a particular state of historical and economic development. Following the account of Engels women marginal representation in societies started from the transition from agrarian to the acquisition of private property and animal husbandry through the overthrow of mother-right. From the first phase of change of production to the industrial revolution up to the third, women have remained stocked in the family and are hardly represented in governance, science and technology. Mill (1806-1873) argued that women were marginalized because women acquiesced themselves to the situation and also police their own marginalization by fighting women who try to live outside the gender norm. For example, the widows’ right are performed and executed by women. Invectives are usually hurled on women by women who live outside of expected cultural and patriarchal norms for women. Consequently, the United Nations' celebration of International Women's Day in 1975 was an occasion to stand together to advance gender equality around the world but this equality is yet to be evident in STEM and technological applications than any other area. According to Mayanja (2020), this year marks ten years the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325 which anchored mainly on the mainstreaming of women in peace and conflict issues yet women are still marginalized in that sector at the dawn of the fourth industrial revolution when previously unimaginable technological productions is staring at the world. It has presented itself to substitute the third industrial revolution of internet and electricity (Mayanja 2020). Do women stand a chance of being mainstreamed in this new era? What is the place of women in the fourth industrial revolution? To what extent can women be crucial in the use of technology as a tool for peace? How can women's technological know-how in the fourth industrial revolution bridge the gender gap? 82 | P a g e DATA ANALYSIS Quantitative data from an online survey for this paper were analyzed using inferential and descriptive statistics are hereby revealed below. Starting Table1.1: with an array of questions aimed at showing the place of women in the fourth industrial revolution. This is followed by two other tables according to the research questions for this paper. Table1.1: The place of women in the fourth industrial revolution Statement AG SA DA SD U D SU M Women still trying to understand the use of basic personal technologies such as laptops and phones 30.3% 13.2% 10.1% 43.3 % 3.1 % 10 0 Do women have equal representation in sciences and technology 32% 29.3% 12.3% 17.2 % 9.2 % 10 0 Who helps women solve their technological equipment problems-sons, husbands , male relatives , sons - 30.3% Male- relativ es 32.4% Daugh ters 18% wom en 12% 7.3 % 10 0 Do you think women have distractions? multiple task 50% husba nds 20% Marria ge, 14% Inter est 10% 6% 10 0 Total Source: online survey by Amaka T.O. Emordi 2020 Are women still trying to understand the use of basic personal technologies such as laptops and phones? 30.3% of the respondents strongly agreed that many women are still trying to understand the use of basic personal technologies such as laptops and phones while 32.4% agreed to make it a total of 62.7% of the respondents that are in agreement that women are still are trying to understand the use of basic personal technologies such as laptops and phones. 18% strongly disagreed while 12% agreed while1 7.2 was undecided on the issue. However, the result showed that more of the respondents 62.7% were of the opinion that women are can conveniently use their basic technological equipment at the dawn of the fourth Industrial Revolution. Again to the question do women have equal representation in sciences and technology? 32% agreed while 29.3% strongly agreed. 12.3% disagreed as 17.2% disagreed. While 9.2% were undecided. The report revealed that 29.5 % disagreed while 61.3% are in agreement. To unveil who helps women solve their technological equipment problems -sons, male relatives daughters or women? The respondents 30.3% said that the women are helped by their sons while 32.4% stressed that women’s male relatives help women help women 83 | P a g e in solving their technical problems but 18% confirmed that it was the female children (daughters) while 12% maintained that women fix their minor technological problems by themselves. 7.3% were undecided on who helps on who help women solve their problems. To discover if women have things that distracts women from science and technology 50% of the respondents agreed that women are distracted by multiple tasks and 20% believed that women are distracted by their husbands. On the other hands, 14% of the respondents argue that women are distracted by marriage while 10% argue that women are not interested in science and technology while 6% were undecided about what distracts women. Table 1.2: Women be crucial in the use of technology as a tool for peace? Statement AG SA DS SD UD SUM The fourth industrial revolution present technology as a tool for peace and war? 47.1% 21.2% 20.1% 6.5% 5.1% 100 Women stand a chance of bridging the gender gap using technology 35% 29% 15% 13% 8% 100 It is very crucial for women to advance in technology to be mainstreamed in the fourth IR. 44.2% 26% 10.6% 13% 6.2% 100 Technology can be a veritable tool in solving unpredictable social political and gender problems 35.2% 30.3% 10.3% 14.2% 10% 100 Technologically poor women will be left behind in the wheel of progress in the IR 38.3% 32.1% 15.5% 9.1% 5% 100 Source: online survey by Amaka T.O. Emordi 2020. How crucial are women in the use of technology as too for peace and war? Responding to this question 47.1% agreed that women will be useful in using technology as a tool for peace than war. 21.2% strongly supported this statement. On the contrary, 20.1% disagreed while 6.5% strongly disagreed while 5.1 were undecided. Therefore 68.3 % were of the opinion that women could be useful in the use of technology as an instrument of peace. The result showed that 68.3% maintained that women will be very useful using technology as an instrument for peace in the fourth industrial revolution. 84 | P a g e To uncover if women stand a chance of bridging the gender gap using technology? The respondents 35% agreed and 29% strongly supported the statement while 15% strongly disagreed and 13% disagreed while 8% were undecided. Their responses revealed that 64% were of the opinion that women could bridge the gender gap using technology or widen it without efforts to latch in on the emerging fourth industrial revolution. If women as revealed in the findings are competent in the use of their personal technological equip they can be explored and improved upon. To discover how crucial it is for women to advance in technology so as to be mainstreamed in the fourth IR. 44.2% of the respondents responded by agreeing that it is very crucial for women to be mainstreamed in the fourth industrial revolution. 26% strongly support the statement while 10.6% disagreed and 13% strongly disagreed while 6.2 were undecided. However, the total of 70.2 that affirmatively in the fact that women mainstreaming in the fourth industrial revolution is very crucial. In using technology as a veritable tool in solving unpredictable social political and gender problems 35.2% agreed while 30.3% strongly agreed 10.3% disagreed while 14.2% strongly disagreed while 10% was undecided on the statement. The respondents 65.5% agreed that technology will a veritable tool in the fourth industrial revolution and it will be better used by women to bridge the gender gap. To uncover the fate of technologically poor women in the fourth industrial revolution: the findings revealed that technologically poor women will be left behind in the wheel of progress in the IR as 38.3% agreed while 32.1% strongly agreed to make it a total of 70.4% of them confirmed the statement. While 15.5% disagreed and 9.1% strongly disagreed. 5% of the respondents were not able to decide but were undecided. Table. 1.3: How women’s technological know-how in the fourth industrial revolution bridge the gender gap? Statement AG SA DA SD UD SUM Women will play a positive role in gendering peace in our society using technology 38 % 25.6% 13.7% 12.4% 10.3 100 The emerging technology of the fourth IR will further marginalize women? 25.5% 18.6% 35.2% 10.3% 10.4 100 Women marginalization in science and technology is due to women’s lack of interest? 21.4% 16.2% 38.3% 12.1% 12% 100 85 | P a g e Women’s poor representation in science and technology is because of their nature? 20.1% 19.1% 40% 12.8% 8% 100 Women’s inability to embrace technology in the new era will widen the gender gap 29.8% 32.2% 20.8% 12.1% 5.1 100 Source: online survey by Amaka T.O. Emordi 2020. To discover if women will play a positive role in gendering peace in our society using technology? To this question, 38 % were in agreement and 25.6% strongly supported the statement. However, 13.7% disagreed while 12.4% strongly disagreed that women will play a positive role in gendering peace in our society using technology while 10.3 was undecided. The statement showed 64.6% of the respondents agreeing that women playing a positive role to engender peace in the fourth industrial revolution. The emerging technology of the fourth IR will further marginalize women? Respondents 25.5% of them agreed that the emerging technology of the fourth IR will further marginalize women and widen the gender gap and 18.6% strongly agreed to the assertion. 35.2% disagreed and 10.1% of the respondents strongly disagreed while 12% was undecided. This infers that 44% conceded that the gender gap could be widened in the fourth industrial revolution if women do not embrace technology 45.2% however, disagreed. Women marginalization in science and technology is due to women’s interest? In answering this question the respondents 21.4% agreed and 16.2 strongly agreed. 38.3% disagreed. 12.1 strongly disagreed and 12% was undecided. 37.6% argued that women marginal present in science and technology is because women lack interest while 50.4% disagreed, arguing that women marginal presence in science and technology is not because women lack interest. While 12.1% strongly disagreed while 5.1% was undecided on why women are not duly represented in science and technology. Women’s poor representation in science and technology is because of their nature? 20.1% agreed and 19.1 strongly agreed 40% disagreed 12.8% strongly disagreed and 8% was undecided. This revealed that women little presence in science and technology is not naturally determined but environmentally determined since 52.8% of the respondents disputed the statement that nature is the reason women are marginal in science and technology. The reason for women’s poor representation in technology is due to women’s inability to embrace technology in the new era will widen the gender gap 29.8% agreed and was supported by 32.2% this made it a total of 62% of the respondents stressing that women 86 | P a g e need to embrace technology in the fourth industrial revolution or be further marginalized.20.8% disagreed as 12.1% strongly disagreed and 5.1% was undecided. The Revelation The result of the survey based on 62.7% of the respondents is that women can conveniently use their personal basic their basic technological equipment though theoretically and could have equal representation in sciences and technology but they are not able to solve their technological problems by themselves.61.3% believe that women still depend on their male relatives (sons or husbands) to solve their technological minor issues. Women were discovered to be distracted by a lot of factors which in reality affect both imputes and outputs of women in science and technology. Women are engaged in multiple tasks such as marriage, husbands, and children but there is also the women factor which is a lack of interest. Many of these factors are germane and therefore hinder women from benefiting in science and technology. Although a few women have made inroads in STEM, Lisa (2003) argued that the reason women are marginal in politics and STEM by extension is not the historical context and economic imperative of women participation in politics. No, according to her the reason is women’s lack. Women lack skills, drive, charisma, and political savvy all of which are symbolized by having a penis. As women lack this important piece of political equipment, being male seems to be a key criterion for growing up to occupy an important social position in the society such as becoming the president in the USA. Consequently using this as a political strategy, the state as a neutral referee approach and recommends women changing to become more like normative political actors, presumptively masculine. Women are required women to accept androcentric political priorities and standards to become like men (Lisa 2003). In our contemporary time, most women who go beyond the glass ceiling are either not married or are divorced and often times without children. If they remain married and with children, they must fight thrice as hard as the men worked to combine all of that to make headway. Sarah (2005) upholds Lisa’s position that either through nature or nurture women and men experience different treatments and outcomes when they run for office, lobby for policy, claim benefits, seek protection, compete for government contracts, join the military, call for, or run from the cops or otherwise, bump up against state institutions (Sarah 2005). Differences in treatment and outcome result because people are already divided into masculine and feminine lines in the society and in their perception. The findings from the survey also revealed that women can bridge the gender gap easily with the use of technology when they are mainstreamed in it. This confirmed why 64% were of the respondents in this survey maintained that women could bridge the gender 87 | P a g e gap using technology or widen it without efforts to latch in on the emerging fourth industrial revolution. If women as revealed in the findings can be competent in the use of their personal technological equip they can explored and improved upon. This is very crucial for women to occupy an enviable place in the fourth industrial revolution. 70.2% of the research respondents argue that for women to advance in technology so as to be mainstreamed in the fourth IR that affirmatively in the fact that women mainstreaming in the fourth industrial revolution is very crucial. Furthermore, 65.5% stressed that with technology women can find solutions to unpredictable social-political, and gender problems. The respondents agreed that technology is a veritable tool in the fourth industrial revolution and it will be better used by women to bridge the gender gap. Consequently, 70.4% of them confirmed of technologically poor women in the fourth industrial revolution. This shows that without the majority of women been techy in the fourth industrial revolution which is the way the world is going then the gender gap will be further widened and women will be left behind again in the fourth industrial revolution as in the previous industrial revolutions. Therefore, technologically poor women will be left behind in the wheel of progress in the IR as the statement. Exclusion, on the other hand, is referred to as an extension of gender inequality which expresses the roles the society and culture ascribes to male and female in social situations and institutions needs to be revisited by those interested in peace and security issues in our contemporary times based on biological determinism. It is on this kind of the biological exclusion which has implications on the number of women in policy making circles especially in the security sector ((Danjibo 2013), and (Nwolise 2014). This may be inevitable in the fourth industrial revolution According to Nona (2013) around the globe the potentials of mothers have thus far been neglected in counter-terrorism strategy for peace Women have their roles to play because they are more peaceful in nature but the fact that they are not equal with men in governance, peace, and security development cumulate in insecurity around the world and Nigeria (Nwolise 2014). Summary In traditional African society, it is not in the best interest of women to be childless, or widows, or fugitives, or refugees, or captives of war because the society dehumanizes in some extreme cases ostracized such women. For this reason, African women play significant roles in nurturing societies aside from their caring nature. This largely informs their commitment to peace and conflict, yet women are rarely opportune to contribute to peace initiatives in their society due to cultural practices and gender conjectures Emordi 2018). 88 | P a g e However, the struggle for gender equality has been one of the hallmarks of the 20th c feminists and women empowerment stakeholders. Since the first wave of feminism to date much has been achieved but a lot still remained undone as the agenda remains unfinished especially in Nigeria Much is yet to be achieved in mainstreaming women in science and technology. The United Nations' celebration of the International Women's Day in 1975 was an occasion to stand together to advance gender equality around the world. This equality is yet to be evident in STEM and technological applications than any other area. Women are more analog than their male counterparts. Most of the new technological equipment such as phones, remote control, laptops, and other technological appliances women use are managed by their digital children and their male relatives. Today, technology has advanced from quantum physicists to artificial intelligence yet women are still grappling to understand the use of basic personal technological equipment. The increase in the number of women academics over the past 60 years has increased these gender differences in the used tech but much is yet to be achieved for women to be relevant in the technological ecosystem of the fourth industrial revolution. The findings of this survey expressly revealed that in the fourth industrial revolution women will be marginalized further if they are not mainstreamed in science and technology and will be left behind if urgent and effective action is not taken to mainstream women in science and technology in Nigeria. Furthermore, 65.5%stressed with technology women can find solutions to unpredictable social political and gender problems. The respondents agreed that technology will a veritable tool in the fourth industrial revolution and it will be better used by women to bridge the gender gap. Consequently, 70.4% of them confirmed technologically poor women in the fourth industrial revolution will be left behind in the wheel of progress. This shows that without the majority of women been techy in the fourth industrial revolution which is the way the world is going then the gender gap will be further widened. o Way forward o Since women can conveniently use their personal basic their basic technological equipment o The government need to create means of managing those things that distract from science and technology to enable them concentrate on techy needs. o Women have been found to multiple tasks and this is also one of the banes of women in STEM. To this end, women need to be trained to focus a few things and be encouraged by their husbands even as they space the birth of their children and train to be independent o Engaging women in science and technology will help to solve many of the peace and security quagmires the world especially Nigeria is facing today. Everything must be done to have women mainstreamed in STEM now. 89 | P a g e o Women, must as a matter of necessity encourage their female children to go into science related courses. o Government, and stakeholders making efforts to bridge the wide gap in STEM should endeavor to train young female children to compete favorably in STEM, o Women who are already empowered should encourage fellow women in the lower rung of the ladder to in science o Women, stakeholders of women mainstreaming in science and technology should make use effectiveness of technology to connect millions and millions of women all over the world to be involved in STEM. As we saw it happen with the black life matters’ campaign in the wake of police brutality and death of George Floyd in the USA. o Women were discovered to be distracted by a lot of factors which in reality affect both imputes and outputs of women in science and technology. o The UN through UNDP should ensure to reduce multi tasks for women moving towards STEM without the society shaming them. Women are engaged in multiple tasks such as marriage, husbands, and children sometimes because culture and society pressure them to do so and this in turn reduce their interest in STEM. o The effectiveness of legislation cannot be over-emphasized for Nigeria and other states to achieve positive improvement in STEM. Therefore there is need for legislation to support and encourage women to embrace technology in the emerging fourth industrial revolution. REFERENCES Albert 2014) quoted in Emordi A.T.O. (2018) Gender Inequality, the Exclusion of Women in Governance and Security Issues: Establishing the Cost and Role of Women in Inequality: A Journal of Opinion on World Affairs, Nigerian Institute of International Affairs ( NIIA). Appadorai A. (2004) the Substance of Politics India Oxford university Press New Delhi Chapin, F. Staurt Pamela A., Matson, Harold A. Mooney (2002) the Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology, (Second ed.) New York: Springer Chapin, F. Staurt Pamela A., Matson, Peter M. Vitousek (2011) Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology, (Second ed.) New York: Springer David S. Landes (1969). The Unbound Prometheus. Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge Universty Press. Desai & Potter (2008) The Third World, Developing Countries, the South, Poor Countries in the Companion to Development studies 90 | P a g e Emordi A.T.O. (2018) Gender Inequality, the Exclusion of Women in Governance and Security Issues: Establishing the Cost and Role of Women in Inequality: A Journal of Opinion on World Affairs, Nigerian Institute of International Affairs ( NIIA) Emordi A.T.O. (2018) Gender Inequality, the Exclusion of Women in Governance and Security Issues: Establishing the Cost and Role of Women in Inequality: A Journal of Opinion on World Affairs, Nigerian Institute of International Affairs ( NIIA). Hauss Charles comparative politics fifth Edition domestic responses to global challenges . Thomson Wadsworth Henry Heller (2020) the Industrial Revolution: Marxist Perspectives: Birth of Capitalism a 21st Century Perspective Book Published by: Pluto Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.com/stable/j.ctt183p671.10. This content downloaded from 197.210.84.113 on Mon, 24 Aug 2020 https://about.jstor.org/terms Horn, Jeff; Rosenband, Leonard; Smith, Merritt (2010). Reconceptualizing the Industrial Revolution. Cambridge MA, London: MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-51562-7. In Desai, V., & Potter, R. B. (2013). The Companion to Development Studies. New York, Routledg In Eagles’quoted in Subrata, M. & Sushila, R.2007.A History Of Political Thought:Plato Tomarx. Prentice Hall John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) quoted in Bryson V., Feminist Political Theory an Introduction Palgrave Macmillan New York Klaus (2008) The Third World, Developing Countries, the South, Poor Countries in the Companion to Development studies. Klaus in Desai, V., & Potter, R. B. (2013). The Companion to Development Studies. New York, Routledge Lawal, O. O. (2011). Democratic Corruption, Good Governance and Development: The Prospect and Challenges of Institution building in Nigeria. A paper presented at the IPSA mid-term international Conference in Abuja. Lisa D. Brush (2003) Gender and governance, AltaMira, division of Rowman and Littlefield publishers UK Lisa D. Brush (2003) Gender and governance, AltaMira, division of Rowman and Littlefield publishers UK Mona Lena Krook and Fiona Mackay (2011) Gender, politics and institutions towards a feminist institutionalism Palgrave Macmillan Mayanja R., (2020) Special Adviser to the United Nations Secretary-General on Gender Issues and Advancement of Women the Johns Hopkins University Press, USA. Nah Liang Tuang S. Rajaratnam 2018the Fourth Industrial Revolution’s Impact On Smaller Militaries: Boon or Bane? School of International Studies (2018) Nwolise , quoted in Emordi, A.T.O., (2018) Gender Inequality, the Exclusion of Women in Governance and Security Issues: Establishing the Cost and Role of Women in Inequality: A Journal of Opinion on World Affairs, Nigerian Institute of International Affairs (NIIA) https://about.jstor.org/terms https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISBN_(identifier) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0-262-51562-7 https://www.jstor.org/publisher/jhup https://www.jstor.org/publisher/jhup 91 | P a g e Odum, Eugene P., (1971) Fundamental of Ecology (http://archive .org/details/ fundamentalsoffec0000odum) third ed) New York Saunders. Onah, F.O. (2006). Managing Public Programmes and Projects. Nsukka: Great AP. Express Publishers Ltd. Onah, V. C. (2005). Democratic Governance and Crisis of Development in Nigeria. American Journal of International Politics and Development Studies, 1(1): 129- 137 Sarah, Quoted In Lisa Osatergaard, Gender and Development; A Practical Guide2.(Usa: Routledge 1997) Schwab, K., 2017. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. United Kingdom: Penguin Random House Subrata, M. & Sushila, R.2007.A History Of Political Thought:Plato Tomarx. Prentice Hall Tansley, A.G. (1939) the British Island and their vegetation (http://books.google.com/books?id=1ioBAAAAJAAJ&pg=PP1). Cambridge University Press. Todaro, M. P. (1979). Economics for Developing Nations. London: Longman Group Limited. UNDP, (2013). Sudan Country Programme Action Plan. Vaisekauskaite, Z.M., 2017. Security Strategies of Small States in a Changing World. Journal on Baltic Security, 3 (2), 7–15 Walter R., (2009) How Europe Underdeveloped Africa, Panaf publishing Inc. Nigeria Women, women’s history and and the industrial revolution 1994 Vol. 61, No. 1 pp. 115-137 (23 pages) ECOSOC, A/52/3, Chapter IV, Concepts and Principles (1997/2). (peacewomen.org/scr-1325) https://www.acquia.com/blog/how-does- technology-impact-politics https://study.com/academy/lesson/the-second- industrial-revolution-timeline inventions.html#:~:text=Historians%20have%20labeled%20the%20years,of%20e lectricity%2C%20petroleum%20and%20steel. https://www.peacewomen.org/SCR-1325 https://trailhead.salesforce.com/en/content/learn/modules/learn-about-the-fourth- industrial-revolution/meet-the-three-industrial- revolutions#:~:text=Beginning%20in%20the%201950s%2C%20the,the%20Inter net%E2%80%94the%20digital%20revolution. http://books.google.com/books?id=1ioBAAAAJAAJ&pg=PP1 https://www.acquia.com/blog/how-does-technology-impact-politics https://www.acquia.com/blog/how-does-technology-impact-politics https://www.peacewomen.org/SCR-1325