Microsoft Word - 7. Panzavecchia_DONE_108-123 (1) (1) (1).docx EuroAmerican  Journal  of  Applied  Linguistics  and  Languages   Special  Issue,  Volume  7,  Issue  1,  February  2020,  108-­‐123   ISSN  2376-­‐905X     DOI  http://dx.doi.org/10.21283/2376905X.11.184   www.e-­‐journall.org     © Panzavecchia 2020. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.       Language  use  in  the  primary  classroom:  Maltese  teachers’  views  on   multilingual  practices         MICHELLE  PANZAVECCHIA  &  SABINE  LITTLE   University  of  Sheffield         Received  27  April  2019;  received  in  revised  form  9  July  2019;  accepted  29  September  2019   ABSTRACT EN Recent global migration trends and an increase in worldwide human mobility are currently contributing to unparalleled challenges in the area of literacy and education within multicultural and multilingual societies (Leikin, Schwartz, & Tobin, 2012). Malta, a small island in the Mediterranean, is one country currently seeking ways in which to adapt to the realities of today’s diverse classrooms. This paper details original research into Maltese teachers’ perceptions and practices in multilingual classrooms. Following a brief overview of Malta's language history and educational system, we draw on the experiences of eight bilingual primary school teachers through in-depth, semi-structured interviews. Recent demographic changes in Malta necessitate a paradigm shift in education. With Malta’s challenges mirrored at global level, this study makes an important contribution to understanding the issues faced by educators and children, exploring pathways towards an equitable and socially just education for all. Key words:   MULTILINGUAL EDUCATION, MULTILINGUAL TEACHING PRACTICES, TRANSLANGUAGING, PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT, INITIAL TEACHER EDUCATION ES Las tendencias migratorias recientes y el aumento de la movilidad en todo el mundo están contribuyendo al desafío sin paralelo en el área de la educación y la alfabetización dentro de sociedades multiculturales y multilingües (Leikin, Schwartz, & Tobin, 2012). Malta, una pequeña isla en el Mediterráneo, busca formas de adaptarse a las realidades de las diversas aulas de clases de la actualidad. Este estudio detalla investigación original en la percepción y las prácticas de maestros malteses relacionadas con las aulas de clase multilingües. Después de una breve descripción de la historia lingüística de Malta y su sistema educativo, nos basamos en las experiencias de ocho maestros de escuela primaria bilingües por medio de entrevistas profundas, presenciales semiestructuradas. Los cambios demográficos recientes en Malta requieren un cambio de paradigma en la educación, y con los desafíos de Malta reflejados a nivel mundial, la investigación proporciona una contribución importante para comprender el problema al que se enfrentan los educadores y los niños, explorando caminos hacia una educación equitativa y socialmente justa para todos. Palabras clave: EDUCACIÓN MULTILINGÜE, PRÁCTICAS DE ENSEÑANZA MULTILINGÜES, TRANSLENGUAR, DESARROLLO PROFESIONAL, FORMACIÓN INICIAL DEL PROFESORADO IT Le recenti tendenze migratorie e l’aumento della mobilità a livello globale pongono sfide senza precedenti in termini di alfabetizzazione e istruzione nelle società multiculturali e multilingue (Leikin, Schwartz, & Tobin, 2012). Malta, una piccola isola nel Mediterraneo, è in cerca di soluzioni per adeguarsi alle realtà scolastiche di classi eterogenee. Questo articolo descrive in dettaglio una ricerca su percezioni e pratiche di insegnanti maltesi nelle classi multilingue. Dopo una breve panoramica della storia linguistica e del sistema educativo di Malta, attingiamo alle esperienze di otto insegnanti bilingui della scuola primaria attraverso interviste in profondità, semi-strutturate, faccia a faccia. I recenti cambiamenti demografici a Malta richiedono un cambio di paradigma nell'istruzione e, con le sfide di Malta, riflesse a livello globale, questo studio offre un contributo importante alla comprensione delle questioni affrontate da educatori e bambini, esplorando percorsi per un'istruzione equa e socialmente giusta per tutti. Parole chiave: ISTRUZIONE MULTILINGUE, PRATICHE DI INSEGNAMENTO MULTILINGUE, TRANSLANGUAGING, SVILUPPO PROFESSIONALE, FORMAZIONE INIZIALE DEGLI INSEGNANTI *    Michelle  Panzavecchia,  University  of  Sheffield                    mpanzavecchia1@sheffield.ac.uk LANGUAGE  USE  IN  THE  PRIMARY  CLASSROOM   E-­‐JournALL  7(1)  (2020),  pp.  108-­‐123 109   1.  Introduction     The  world   is  presently  undergoing   an  unparalleled   rise   in   global   immigration,   leading   to   a   shift   in   societies  towards  more  cultural,  ethnic  and  linguistic  diversity.  Human  mobility  reached  258  million  in  2017   (United   Nations,   Department   of   Economic   and   Social   Affairs,   Population   Division,   2017),   with   migrants   comprising   14%   of   the   population   residing   in   high-­‐income   countries,   an   increase   of   almost   5%   since   the   beginning  of  the  millennium  (United  Nations,  Department  of  Economic  and  Social  Affairs,  Population  Division,   2017).   The   past   decade’s   global   demographic   shifts   have   led   to   populations   becoming   increasingly   linguistically  and  culturally  diverse.  This  diversity   is   increasingly  represented   in   the  classroom,  with  global   figures   showing   that  multilingualism   in   schools   is   on   the   rise.   In   England,   for   example,   21.2%   of   primary   school  pupils  are  exposed  to  a  language  other  than  English  in  the  home  (UK  Department  for  Education,  2018).   In  the  US,  the  most  recent  census  in  2014  revealed  similar  numbers,  with  22%  of  the  school  population  (5-­‐17   years  old)  speaking  a   language  other  than  English  at  home  (Camarota  &  Ziegler,  2015).  While  these   figures   illustrate  an  increasing  trend  within  individual  countries,  gaining  a  holistic,  international  overview  is  difficult,   since   countries   adopt   diverse   reporting   and   tracking   strategies.   For   instance,   some   countries   track   first-­‐ generation  migrants  only,   leading  to   issues  with  respect  to  the  reporting  of  multilingual  children,  due  to  an   oversight  of  children  born  in-­‐country  to  migrant  parents  (European  Commission,  2019).     Beyond  counting  students,  the  recent  developments  regarding  diversity,  both  in  the  classroom  and  in   society,   have   led   to   a   call   for   an   increased   understanding   of   and   engagement   with   multilingualism   in   education.   Language   ideologies  which   advocate   the   strict   separation  of   languages   are  now  making  way   for   more   flexible  practices   including   translanguaging,  which  supports   the  concept  of   fluid   language  repertoires   that  human  beings  naturally  utilize  as  a  communicative  tool,  depending  on  context  or  circumstances  (García   &  Kleyn,  2016;  Sabino,  2018).  Within  the  classroom,  however,   these  practices  are  still   in  their   infancy,  with   many   teachers   reporting   insecurity   when   it   comes   to   the   teaching   of   multilingual   students   (Tinsley   and   Board,   2016).   A   look   at   the   international   figures   highlights   the   need   to   understand   more   about   the   complexities  of  multilingualism  in  the  classroom,  in  particular,  the  need  for  research  with  practising  teachers   who  are  called  upon  to  implement  national  education  policies,  which  are  frequently  operating  on  insufficient   or   unclear   data   (European   Commission,   2019;   Tinsley   and   Board,   2016).   This   study   uses   Malta   as   one   example  of  the  larger  global  trend  of  diversity,  addressing  the  following  research  questions:     -­‐ In  which  ways   are  Maltese   primary   school   teachers   supporting  multilingual   students  within   their   classroom  environments?     -­‐ What   are   these   teachers’   current   practices   and   perceptions   of   using   flexible   language   pedagogies   such  as  translanguaging  in  bilingual  and  multilingual  classrooms?       The   present   study   focuses   on   participants’   perceptions   of   bilingual   and   multilingual   classrooms,   together  with  their  views  and  practices  related  to  translanguaging  pedagogies.  Findings  from  the  study  aim  to   contribute  to  the  growing  understanding  of   teachers’  practices  and  requirements  related  to  diversity   in  the   classroom,   highlighting   the   need   for   more   qualitative   research   to   explore   necessary   changes   to   both   educational  policy  and  practice.     2.  The  Maltese  context   Malta   is   a   small   island  nation   in   the  middle   of   the  Mediterranean   Sea,  with   an   area   of   246   square   kilometres.  Neighboured   by   Italy   and   Libya,   the  Maltese   islands   boast   of   a   rich   history   that   has  witnessed   many   a   foreign   rule.   As   part   of   their   historical   legacy,   the  Maltese   people   have   lived  within   the   reality   of   multilingualism   for  many  centuries  as   the   linguistic   traits  of   the   island’s   inhabitants  were   influenced  by  an   assortment  of  different  languages,  with  Arabic,  Latin,  Sicilian,  Italian,  French,  English  and  Maltese  spoken  on   the   island   throughout   the   years.   As   part   of   Malta’s   British   colonial   heritage,   the   English   language   was   introduced   in  schools   in  1833,  eventually  replacing   Italian  as   the  country’s  official   language,  whilst  Maltese   was   recognized   as   an   official   language   alongside   English   in   1934   (Brincat,   2011;   Camilleri   Grima,   2013b;   Frendo,   1988).   Notwithstanding   its   Semitic   origins,   the   Maltese   language   is   written   in   Latin   script   and   is   essentially  a  hybrid  of  Arabic,  English  and  Italian  (Vella,  2012).  The  Maltese  vernacular  includes  a  plethora  of   English   vocabulary   and   expressions,   whilst   code-­‐switching   is   a   ubiquitous   and   natural   part   of   local   communication   (Camilleri   Grima,   2013b).   Most   Maltese   people   are   bilingual   to   some   extent,   however   the   level   of   proficiency   varies   considerably   amongst   individuals,   depending   on   their   language   backgrounds,   PANZAVECCHIA  &  LITTLE   E-­‐JournALL  7(1)  (2020),  pp.  108-­‐123 110   preferences  and  contexts  (Farrugia,  2016).  The  Maltese   language   is  spoken  by  over  95%  of  Maltese  people,   whilst  over  85%  speak  English  (Camilleri  Grima,  2016).  Italian  is  also  spoken  by  many  Maltese  people,  albeit   to  varying  degrees  of  fluency.  This  is  due  to  the  countries’  geographical  proximity  and  the  influence  of  Italian   television  stations,  which  are  popular  amongst  Maltese  households  (Caruana,  2013).     In  spite  of  the  small  size  of  the  island,  there  appears  to  be  a  linguistic  divide  according  to  locality,  as   inhabitants   of   certain   parts   of  Malta   such   as   Sliema,   St.   Julian’s,   and   the   surrounding   areas   tend   to   speak   English  more  fluently,  whilst  those  hailing  from  Southern  areas  are  usually  perceived  to  be  more  proficient  in   Maltese.  The  Constitution  of  Malta  recognizes  both  Maltese  and  English  as  official   languages,  and  Maltese  is   also  one  of  the  official   languages  of  the  European  Union.  The  population  of  Malta  stood  at  475,700  in  2017,   signifying   the   largest   relative   increase   in  population   in  Europe  during   this  year   (+32.9  per  1000  residents)   (Eurostat,   2017).   Paradoxically,   in   the   same   year,   the  Maltese   islands   had   the   lowest   birth   rate   in   Europe   (Eurostat,   2017).   This   indicates   that   globalization   and   intensifying   migration   trends   are   seeing   asylum   seekers   and   refugees   entering  Malta   in  unprecedented  numbers,   since   the   island   is   presently   considered   a   symbolic   gateway  between  Africa  and  Europe.  Moreover,  Malta’s   accession   to   the  European  Union   in  2004   has   also  brought   about  many  EU  citizens  benefitting  of   their   free   right  of  movement  within  other  member   states   (International   Organization   for   Migration,   2016).   Despite   Malta’s   multilingual   and   multicultural   history,   this   sudden  and  rapid  demographic   shift   is  nonetheless  giving   rise   to  unprecedented  challenges  as   the   island’s   inhabitants   are   striving   to  welcome   and   provide   for   the   ever-­‐increasing   number   of   foreigners   within   their   society   and   educational   settings.   As   a   result,   classrooms   that   were   previously   bilingual   are   increasingly  multilingual  (Farrugia,  2017;  Scaglione  &  Caruana,  2018).  This   transformation   is  proving  to  be   positive   and   enriching   on   many   levels,   though   educators   are   also   struggling   with   issues   pertaining   to   language  use,  for  which  they  do  not  feel  sufficiently  trained.         3.  Malta’s  multilingual  classrooms   Malta’s   educational   system   is   an   integral   part   of   its   British   colonial   legacy,   and   hence   built   on   the   British  Educational  system.  Maltese  families  have  the  choice  of  enrolling  their  children  into  state,  parochial,   or  private   schools,  where  both  Maltese  and  English   languages  are   taught   concurrently   from  pre-­‐school.  All   other   subjects  are   taught   in  English,  Maltese,  or  a  variety  of  both   (depending  on  school  policy),  with   code-­‐ switching   featuring   regularly   during   the   majority   of   lessons.   The   large   part   of   reading   and   writing   is   conducted   in  English,   due   to   the   greater   availability   of   English   textbooks   over   those   in  Maltese.  A   third   or   fourth  language  is  introduced  to  students  during  the  end  of  their  primary  school  years  or  in  their  first  year  of   senior   school.   Malta’s   language   policy   endorses   bilingual   and   multilingual   development   as   it   encourages   young  students  to  adopt  positive  attitudes  towards  English,  Maltese,  and  other  languages  (Malta  Ministry  of   Education  and  Employment,  2015).     The  population  of  non-­‐Maltese  students  in  schools  has  doubled  over  a  span  of  4  years,  from  1,890  in   2012   to  4,289   in  2016  ((NSO,  National  Statistics  Office   -­‐  Malta,  2018).  This  means   that  Maltese  schools  are   witnessing  a  rapid  and  inevitable  transformation  from  bilingualism  to  multilingualism,  which  is  mirrored  in   other  countries  across  Europe,  particularly  higher-­‐income  nations  (European  Commission,  2019).  Since  this   demographic  shift  is  a  rapid  and  unprecedented  one,  Maltese  teachers  do  not  feel  sufficiently  equipped  with   the   necessary   skills   required   to   meet   the   challenges   which   multilingualism   and   multiculturalism   in   the   classroom   inevitably   create.   Teachers   are   presently   faced   with   students   in   class   who   are   required   to   comprehend   and   communicate   in   both  Maltese   and   English   in   order   to   access   the   curriculum,  whilst   also   striving  to  preserve  their  mother  tongue,  which  is  an  integral  part  of  their  identity  (Micallef  Cann  &  Spiteri,   2014).  This   is  proving   to  be  problematic   for   teachers  and  students  alike,  especially   in  cases  where  migrant   children   do   not   speak   any  Maltese   or   English   at   all.   Additionally,   this   predicament   is   also   contributing   to   family  pressures,  as  many  are  faced  with  the  intricacies  of  negotiating  language  use  within  their  host  country   (Little,  2017).     Another  challenge  is  a  shift  in  educational  paradigms  within  teacher  training  for  which  Malta  is  not   yet  sufficiently  prepared.  Language  education  needs  to  respect   linguistic  heritage  whilst  preparing  children   for  a  globalised  world,  and  there  seems  to  be  a  gap  in  research  and  professional  training  in  the  field  at  a  local   level.   As   a   result   of   this,   initial   teacher   education   programmes,   together   with   continuous   professional   development  sessions  for  experienced  educators,  are  still  not  adequately  addressing  these  issues,  and  hence   teachers  are  striving  to  meet  the  needs  of  the  linguistically  and  culturally  diverse  pupils  in  their  classrooms   through   personal   empathy,   rather   than   professional   skill   (Scaglione   &   Caruana,   2018).   This,   again,   is   representative   across   Europe,   with   teacher   training   for   the   integration   of   migrant   students   being   LANGUAGE  USE  IN  THE  PRIMARY  CLASSROOM   E-­‐JournALL  7(1)  (2020),  pp.  108-­‐123 111   comprehensively   monitored   in   Spain,   France,   Cyprus,   Latvia,   Luxembourg   and   Serbia   only   (European   Commission,   2019).   Educators   need   to   be   trained   to   maximise   the   potential   of   multilingualism   and   multiculturalism   for   the   benefit   of   all   their   students   alike.   This   can   be   achieved   through   innovative   pedagogies   including   translanguaging,   programmes   that   support   the   conservation   of   the  Maltese   language,   programmes   that   promote   the   universal   value   of   English,   and   structures   offering   ample   support   for   the   children’s  own  cultural   identity  and   linguistic  heritage.   Involving   families   in   their   children’s  education  may   also  be  a  way  of  celebrating  and  valuing  student  diversity.  Moll  (2015)  states  that  in  today’s  globalised  world   we   need   to   “[engage]   teachers   strategically   with   their   cultural   environments   for   teaching   –   an   absolute   necessity  in  today’s  rapidly  changing  sociocultural  contexts  of  schooling”  (p.  114).     4.  Translanguaging   One   theoretical   lens   that   is   helpful   in   supporting   these   shifts,   both  within   classrooms   and   teacher   training,   is   translanguaging.   A   theory   of   translanguaging   views   the   aim   of   language   as   primarily   as   a   communicative  tool,  and  therefore  sees  shifts  in  language  use  as  a  natural  part  of  globalization  and  migration   trends.  This  challenges  the  concept  of  societally  labelled  languages,  replacing  them  with  linguistic  ideologies,   approaches   to   research,   and   understandings   of   speakers’   practices   which   view   languages   as   uncompartmentalized   and   fluid.   The   idea   of   translanguaging  was   coined   in  Wales  where   it   originated   as   a   pedagogical  practice  whereby  bilingual  students  were  provided  with   input   in  one   language  and  were  asked   for   output   in   the   other   language   (Williams,   2002).   It   was   subsequently   researched   in   depth   by   language   scholars   such   as   García,   Cenoz,   Baker   and   Wei,   amongst   others.   Translanguaging   refers   to   the   naturally   occurring   language  practices  employed  by  bilingual  and  multilingual  speakers  which  consider   languages  as   hybridized   repertoires   into   which   speakers   may   delve   as   necessary,   as   opposed   to   the   idea   of   formally   separated  and  societally  constructed  systems  (Baker,  2011;  García,  2009;  Otheguy,  García,  &  Reid,  2015).  Gort   and  Sembiante   (2015)  point   out   that   translanguaging   is  not  distinct   or  unusual,   but   rather   is   the   standard   manner   in  which   bilinguals   communicate  within  multilingual   communities,   since   “bilinguals   pragmatically   draw  on   their  entire   linguistic   repertoires   to  maximize  understanding  and  performance  across  a  variety  of   contexts,  to  shape  experiences,  and  to  make  sense  of  the  world”  (p.  8).   Although  translanguaging  is  a  naturally  occurring  practice  amongst  multilingual  speakers,  educators   need  to  be  competent  in  utilizing  it  strategically.  They  must  also  be  aware  of  the  importance  of  distinguishing   between   language   as   a   learning   and   communicative   tool,   and   language   which   is   used   for   assessment   purposes.  Translanguaging  encourages  the  strategic  shifting  between  these  two  languages  during  instruction   time,   depending   on   the   circumstances   and   the   requirements   of   the   task   involved.   Teachers   may   thus   encourage   students   to   draw   from   their   entire   linguistic   repertoire   during   brainstorming   sessions,   discussions,  debates  or  oral  presentations,  whilst  the  use  of  the  target   language  would  be  promoted  for  the   publishing,   presentation   or   a   final   written   product,   or   for   assessment   purposes.   Merging   and   extending   naturally  occurring   language  practices  such  as  translanguaging  into  pedagogical  strategies  may  thus  be  one   way   forward  within   our   ever   increasing   linguistically   and   culturally   diverse   societies,   in   order   to   ensure   a   truly  inclusive  and  equitable  education  for  all  (Cenoz,  2017;  García,  2005;  Scaglione  &  Caruana,  2018).   Using   translanguaging   pedagogies   may   hence   help   to   mitigate   challenges   within   multilingual   and   multicultural   classrooms,   and   the   judicious   use   of   language  mixing  may   enable   children   to   reach   their   full   potential  as  they  feel  free  to  naturally  think,  feel,  discuss  and  communicate  in  the  language  or  languages  they   feel  most   comfortable   in   (Beres,   2015;   García   &  Wei,   2014).   Translanguaging   practices   in   class   encourage   children   to   participate   and   interact   further   during   lessons,   since   they   may   feel   less   self-­‐conscious   when   drawing   on   their   entire   linguistic   repertoire   as   a   resource   (Park,   2013).   Translanguaging   also   enables   students   to   tap   into  both   their   creative  and  critical   skills,  whilst  bending   the  norms  of   traditional   language   use,   as   they   make   use   of   all   their   linguistic   resources   to   inquire,   discuss   or   express   views   (Wei,   2011).   Additionally,   translanguaging   pedagogy   can   facilitate   curriculum   access,   whilst   also   supporting   students’   mastery  of  language  (Durán  and  Henderson,  2018).      Mifsud   and  Vella   (2018,   p.   94),   advocate   a   flexible   approach   to   language   use   in   class,   particularly   within  the  early  years,  rather  than  employing  a  “one  size  fits  all”  model.  They  believe  that  the  specific  needs  of   the   children   in   class   need   to   be   addressed   and   go   as   far   as   recommending   that   “a   clearly   agreed   learning   contract  could  be  established  between  teachers  and  pupils,  and  their  parents,  relating  to  a  more  systematic   alternation   of   languages   in   the   classroom”   (p.   93).   Palviainen,   Protassova,   Mård-­‐Miettinen,   and   Schwartz   (2016)  also  promote  the   idea  of   flexible   language  practices   in  the  classroom,  and  state  that  these  are  many   times  developed  naturally,   through  experience  and  over   time,   rather   than  being   formally   taught.  They  also   PANZAVECCHIA  &  LITTLE   E-­‐JournALL  7(1)  (2020),  pp.  108-­‐123 112   state  that  traditional  language  practices  which  advocate  the  strict  separation  of  languages  are  making  way  for   more  flexible  approaches  as  a  result  of  increasingly  diverse  classroom  populations.   As  a  pedagogical  tool,  using  multiple  languages  for  learning  is  actively  encouraged  in  many  European   countries,  such  as  Finland  and  Germany,  but  although  fostering  plurilingual  education  is  actively  encouraged,   the  term  translanguaging  does  not  feature  in  the  most  recent  European  report  (European  Commission,  2019).   Notwithstanding  similarities  among  these  two  concepts,  the  terms  are  not  interchangeable,  since  they  are  “at   times   […]   seen   as   oppositional   and   other   times,   seemingly   fused   into   one   similar   framework”   (Vallejo   &   Dooly,   2019   p.   3).   García   and   Otheguy   (2019)   also   state   that   plurilingualism   and   translanguaging   have   different  socio-­‐political  roots  which  contribute  to  many  divergences  in  educational  practices.     5.  The  present  study   The  current  paper  forms  part  of  a  larger  study  which  focuses  on  bilingual  teachers’  identities  and  the   ways   in  which   their   backgrounds   impact   their   perceptions   and   pedagogical   practices.   According   to   García   (2009),   “bilingual   education   is   the   only   way   to   educate   children   in   the   twenty-­‐first   century”   (p.   5).   She   advocates   the  development  of   “an   integrated  plural   vision   for  bilingual   education,  by  which  bilingualism   is   not  simply  seen  as  two  separate  monolingual  codes”  (p.  5),  for  the  benefit  of  children  and  adults  worldwide.   In  this  respect  this  study  aimed  to  explore  to  what  extent  Maltese  teachers  share  this  vision  and  put   it   into   practice.   The   impetus   for   the   study   came   about   as   a   result   of   the   researchers’   own   interest   in   bilingual   teachers’   philosophies   and   pedagogies,   and   in   innovative   fluid   language   practices   such   as   García’s   (2009)   concept   of   translanguaging   and   transglossia,   where   different   languages   are   not   separated   but   interrelate   dynamically   within   globalised,   multilingual   communities.   The   research   questions   to   be   addressed   in   the   current  study  concern  how  Maltese  primary  teachers  support  bilingual  and  multilingual  students  within  their   classroom   environments,   together   with   their   current   practices   and   perceptions   of   using   flexible   language   pedagogies  such  as  translanguaging.  Teachers’  voices  can  be  empowering  and  emancipatory,  as  their  insights   are  often  the  catalyst  to  effect  changes  to  social  policy  and  practice  (Goodson  &  Sikes,  2001).  Hence,  the  main   aim  of  this  study  is  to  shed  more  light  on  several  lacunae  in  current  translanguaging  practices,  as  well  as  on   educators’  viewpoints  about  Malta’s  specific  bilingual  status  and  its  educational  system,  in  light  of  migration   trends,  and  about  the  presence  of  additional  languages  in  the  classroom.  These  perspectives  add  significantly   to   our   understanding   of   multilingual   pedagogy,   whilst   having   implications   for   the   improvement   of   professional   practice   and   for   the   design   of   professional   development   and   initial   teacher   education   programmes.       5.1.  The  participants   Data   from   eight   primary   school   teachers,   each   with   over   ten   years   teaching   experience   were   collected   through   in-­‐depth   semi-­‐structured   interviews   (two   per   participant).   Three   teachers   were   chosen   from  state  schools,  another  three  from  church  schools,  and  two  from  private  independent  schools  (of  which   there  are   fewer   in  Malta).  Choosing  state,  church  and  private   independent  schools  enabled  the  gathering  of   teachers’   perspectives   as   they   might   vary   by   school   context,   which   differ   significantly   in   Malta   (Camilleri   Grima,   2013a).   The   teachers   also   had   diverse   language   and   schooling   backgrounds,   in   order   to   be   able   to   compare  patterns  related  to  home  and  educational  backgrounds.  Participants  also  taught  at  different  ends  of   the  primary   spectrum,   i.e.   early  and   junior  years,   to  gain   insight  on  how   teaching  methods  and  viewpoints   may   or   may   not   vary   depending   on   age   group   taught.   Participants   included   seven   females   and   one   male   teacher,  a  ratio  that  is  representative  of  the  gender  imbalance  within  the  teaching  profession,  where  female   teachers  are  largely  over-­‐represented  in  primary  education  in  the  EU  (Eurostat,  2017).  Ages  ranged  from  late   thirties  to  late  fifties,  and  participants  hailed  from  different  parts  of  Malta,  which  also  influenced  their  spoken   language  of  preference.  Despite  diverse  backgrounds  and  school  contexts,  the  participants  were  nonetheless   relatively   homogeneous   in   that   they   were   all   experienced   and   all   directly   involved   in   the   topic   being   researched  (Goodson  &  Sikes,  2001).  Table  1  offers  an  overview  of  the  teachers,  each  of  whom  has  been  given   a  pseudonym  to  protect  their  identity.   For  the  purpose  of  the  current  paper,  key  quotes  were  selected  from  the  interviews  and  excerpts  will  be   provided   in   the   Results   section   (section   6)   in   order   to   highlight   the   perceptions   and   practices   of   the   participants  in  the  study.       LANGUAGE  USE  IN  THE  PRIMARY  CLASSROOM   E-­‐JournALL  7(1)  (2020),  pp.  108-­‐123 113   Table 1 Participants’ information Participant Age Education Teaching Experience Year Group Diana 37 BA, MA Church school, 13 years Early years (years 1 and 2) Elaine 48 BA, MA Church school, 13 years Junior years (years 4, 5, and 6) Jonathan 36 BA State school, 12 years Junior years (year 6) Laura 43 BA Various state schools, 11 years Early years (year 2) Liliana 59 BA Private school, 24 years Early years (years 1 and 2), year 3 for past 10 years Mandy 40 BA, MA Church school, 14 years Early years (years 1 and 2); currently subject teaching (English) in junior school (year 6) Maria 40 BA, MA Private school, 16 years Junior years (year 6) Ingrid 42 BA, MA in progress TEFL, 4 years; state school, 10 years Junior years (year 4)   5.2.  Methods     We  used  a  narrative   inquiry  approach,   through  semi-­‐structured   life  history   interviews,  which  were   analysed   thematically,   as   this   approach   gave   the   participants   the   opportunity   to   relate   the   untold   stories   pertaining   to   their   bilingual   identities,   which   in   turn   affected   their   perceptions   and   pedagogical   practices   (Goodson   &   Sikes,   2001).   The   semi-­‐structured   interview   comprised   a   set   of   32   questions.   The   first   part   focused  on   the   teachers’  own   identities  and   life  histories,  whilst   the  second  part   focused  on   their  views  on   language  pedagogies  within  bilingual  and  multilingual  educational  settings.  Richness  of  the  in-­‐depth  data  was   favoured  over  quantity  or  broadness,  since  the  aim  of  the  study  was  to  gain  insight  into  teachers’  perspectives   about  language  use,  while  learning  about  their  teaching  experiences  that  currently  underpin  their  philosophy   of   education   (Goodson   &   Sikes,   2001).   In   the   words   of   Goodson   (1981),   “in   understanding   something   so   intensely  personal  as  teaching,  it  is  critical  we  know  about  the  person  the  teacher  is”  (p.  69).   Data  were  collected  through  semi-­‐structured,  one-­‐to-­‐one  interviews,  which  were  held  over  a  period   of  six  months.  Each  participant  was  interviewed  twice  with  a  break  of  several  weeks  in  between  interviews.   Participants  were  made  aware  of   the  confidential  nature  of   the   interview.  Despite  being  a   small   island,   the   information   provided   is   generic   enough   to   facilitate   anonymity,   and   the   EU   General   Data   Protection   Regulation  (GDPR)  was  strictly  adhered  to  when  conducting  this  study.  The  interviews  were  audio  recorded   and   transcribed.   Member   checking   allowed   for   a   level   of   both   validation   and   further   engagement   of   participants  with  the  study  (Birt,  Scott,  Cavers,  Campbell,  &  Walter,  2016;  Lincoln  &  Guba,  1985).  Participants   were  invited  to  read  and  comment  on  transcripts  between  and  after  each  set  of  interviews.  This  verified  that   the   researcher’s   interpretation   of   the   participants’   perspectives   was   truthful   and   accurate,   and   further   facilitated  clarification  of  any  parts  of  the  interview  transcripts  which  were  inaudible  or  unclear.       A  thematic  analysis  approach  was  chosen  in  order  to  gain  insight  into  the  participants’  personal  and   professional  lives,  as  to  better  understand  their  views,  their  pedagogical  practices  and  the  motives  preceding   them.  Collated  data  was  organised   according   to   similarities,   differences   and  other   issues   and   colour   coded   accordingly.   Overlapping   themes   were   reviewed   and   refined   whilst   emerging   ones   were   divided   into   sub   themes.   The   main   themes   emerging   in   view   of   the   current   paper   included   the   demographic   changes   in   Maltese   classrooms,   challenges   experienced   by   teachers   in   view   of   rapidly   shifting   student   populations,   attitudes  towards  multilingual  and  multicultural  classrooms,  teacher  training  needs,  language  use  in  class  and   recommendations   for   change.   For   the   purpose   of   the   present   paper,   we   focus   only   on   data   pertaining   to   participants’  perceptions  and  pedagogical  practices  related  to  multilingual  classrooms.     The   four   criteria   identified  by  Lincoln   and  Guba   (1985)—credibility,   transferability,   dependability,   and  confirmability—were  pivotal  during  the  design  of  this  study  in  order  to  ensure  that  the  results  were  both   reliable   and   credible.   Credibility   was   ensured   through   an   honest   and   precise   account   of   the   participants’   experiences,  whilst  transferability  was  achieved  as  findings  may  be  applied  within  other  similar  educational   contexts.  Dependability  was  sought  through  member  checking,  and  confirmability  was  attained  through  being   fully  aware  of  researcher’s  own  biases,  assumptions  and  beliefs  which  may  taint  the  research  process.           PANZAVECCHIA  &  LITTLE   E-­‐JournALL  7(1)  (2020),  pp.  108-­‐123 114   6.  Results   All   the   educators   teaching   in   state   and   private   schools   voiced   their   concerns   about   the   ever-­‐ increasing  number  of  foreign  children  in  class.  As  Ingrid  explains,       Excerpt  1.  Ingrid  -­‐  Number  of  foreign  children  in  class   …  the  intake  is  changing.  Every  year  we  see  a  larger  number  of  foreign  children.  We  have  children  from  Africa,   Bulgaria,  Russia,  Serbia,  Italy,  the  UK  for  example.  Sometimes  they  are  not  even  fluent  in  English  and  can  just   string  a  few  phrases  together  …  it’s  not  easy  to  teach  these  children.     Teachers   in   church  schools  also  described   facing   this   reality  but   somewhat   to  a   lesser  extent.  This   may   be   because   children   are   enrolled   in   church   schools   through   a   ballot   system,   which   is   predominantly   applied  for  by  Maltese  parents  who  wish  to  give  their  children  a  Catholic  education.  Asylum-­‐seeking  migrant   children  are  generally  educated  in  state  schools  by  law.  Children  of  foreign  workers,  who  typically  come  from   families  with   a   higher   socio-­‐economic  background,   are  usually   enrolled   in  private   schools.  Diane,   a   church   schoolteacher,  explains   that   so   far   there  are   few   foreign  children  being  enrolled   in  church  schools,   and   the   majority  of   these   children  usually  possess   at   least   a  basic   knowledge  of  English.  However,  Diane   feels   that   church   schools   do   face   similar   issues   to   private   and   state   schools  when   it   comes   to  working  with  migrant   children.     In  the  rest  of  our  findings,  we  focus  on  four  themes  emerging  from  the  data,  which  are  particularly   pertinent   to   the   scope   of   this   paper:   Attitudes   towards   multilingualism,   strategies   used   in   class,   training   needs,  and  recommendations  for  policy  and  practice.     6.1.  Attitudes  towards  multilingualism   All   teachers   had   complex   and   interlaced   views   on   the   use   of  multiple   languages   in   the   classroom.   Some   of   these   views  were   based   on   personal   as  well   as   professional   experience.   For   example,   Liliana,   the   oldest  participant  at  59,  appeared  to  be  adamantly  in  favour  of  full  immersion  programmes  in  class,  especially   for  the  Maltese  children.  However,  witnessing  the  shift  from  bilingual  to  multilingual  classrooms,  she  felt  that   alternative  pedagogies  may  nonetheless  be  appropriate  for  foreign  students.       Excerpt  2.  Liliana  –  Alternative  pedagogies  for  foreign  students   I’m  not  in  favour  of  mixing  languages  …  my  grandson  is  two  years  old.  He  goes  to  playschool.  They  speak  to   him  in  Maltese.  My  son  speaks  to  him  in  Maltese  and  his  mother  in  English.  I  can  already  see  how  mixed  up  he   is  in  his  language  …  he  tells  me,  “il-­‐man  qiegħed  fil-­‐car”  [the  man  is  in  the  car]  …  he’s  not  really  speaking  in   English  or  Maltese.   It’s   the  product  of  him  being  exposed   to   two   languages.  Foreigners  are  different.  When   they  go  home  their  parents  are  going  to  speak  to   them  in   their  mother   tongue.   It  makes  more  sense  to  use   different  languages  with  the  foreigners  in  class.     Liliana’s  perception  highlights  both  a  desire  to  maintain  distinct   languages,  whilst  at  the  same  time   acknowledging   related   complexities,   particularly   for   non-­‐native   speakers   of   either  Maltese   or   English.   For   three  participants,  the  maintenance  of  the  Maltese  language  in  and  of  itself  was  a  genuine  concern.  Due  to  an   increasing  proportion  of  foreign  children  in  class,  there  was  a  general  feeling  that  this  may  eventually  lead  to   the  extinction  of  Maltese,  as  it  would  no  longer  be  a  necessary  form  of  communication  within  an  increasingly   globalised  society.       Below,   another   teacher,  Maria   refers   to   a   situation   in  which   half   of   the   students   have   at   least   one   parent  who  is  foreign.  The  other  half  consists  of  Maltese  children,  many  of  whom  consider  English  to  be  their   L1  and  are  not  proficient  in  Maltese.       Excerpt  3.  Maria  –  the  role  of  Maltese   I  use  in  English  at  school  and  when  I’m  teaching,  many  times  because  of  the  number  of  foreigners  we  have,   unfortunately  I  can  only  use  Maltese  during  Maltese   language  lessons  you  know.   .   .  Maltese   is  not  given  the   importance   it  deserves.   I  mean,  we  expect   them   to   learn   through  a  one   lesson  a  day   slot   and   that’s   it.  And   unfortunately,  some  teachers  will  speak  English  to  the  children  during  a  Maltese  lesson  trying  to  explain  it  in   English  because  it’s  a  grammar  point  they’re  trying  to  put  across.   .   .    children  will  learn  a  grammar  point  by   rote  but  they’re  not  really  learning  the  language.  They’re  not  exposed.   LANGUAGE  USE  IN  THE  PRIMARY  CLASSROOM   E-­‐JournALL  7(1)  (2020),  pp.  108-­‐123 115   Ingrid  spoke  of  a   time  when   the   language  used   in  class  was  mainly  Maltese,  except   for   the  English   lesson.  This  is  now  changing  due  to  the  greater  proportion  of  English  speakers,       Extract  4.  Ingrid  –  the  role  of  Maltese   …the  policy  seems  to  be  changing.  Qisu  [it  seems  as  though]  English  has  become  more  important.  In  a  way  it   worries  me  because  I  feel  we  may  be  losing  our  language…  our  identity.      Notwithstanding  the  participants’  concerns  related  to  the  preservation  of  the  Maltese  language,  they   still  mention  the  value  of  English  as  lingua  franca  and  acknowledge  that  students  in  Malta  are  fortunate  to  be   given  to  the  opportunity  to  learn  the  language.  These  views  reflect  Malta’s  sociolinguistic  situation  of  societal   bilingualism  without  diglossia,  where  the  two  official  languages  are  used  in  most  domains  and  are  viewed  as   equally  important  (Camilleri  Grima,  2013b).  As  Jonathan  put  it,  English  allows  students  to  travel  and  to  study;   “…  they  can  become  whatever  they  want.  So  many  opportunities  nowadays!”     6.2.  Strategies  used  in  class   One   common   concern   amongst   participants   was   that   they   feel   unsure   of   the   strategies   they   are   employing   in   order   to   support   their  multicultural   students.   The  word   “guilty”  was  mentioned   by   different   educators  in  relation  to  their  code-­‐switching  or  language  mixing  during  lessons.  This  may  be  a  legacy  of  past   education  programmes  and  policies  such  as  the  National  Minimum  Curriculum  (1999),  which  advocated  the   strict  separation  of  languages.  This  is  in  contrast  with  more  positive  views  on  plurilingual  strategies  such  as   those  expressed  in  the  National  Literacy  Strategy,  which  refers  to  code-­‐switching  as  “an  essential  element  of  a   bilingual  country,”  as  it  promotes  access  to  different  languages  and  to  a  “wide  and  varied  linguistic  heritage”   (National  Literacy  Strategy  for  All   in  Malta  and  Gozo,  Ministry   for  Education  and  Employment,  Malta,  2014,   pp.  28-­‐29).  Moreover,  the  Council  of  Europe  promotes  the  concept  of  a  plurilingual  society,  where  individuals   have  competence  in  more  than  one  language  and  can  switch  between  languages,  according  to  circumstances   (Language  Education  Policy  Profile  for  Malta,  Language  policy  unit.  Council  of  Europe,  Strasbourg,  2015).   Some  teachers  were  in  favour  of  language  mixing  during  certain  activities,  such  as  brainstorming  and   discussion,  if  the  end  focus  is  on  the  target  language.  Elaine  thought  that  her  opinions  on  language  mixing  are   changing  over  time  in  order  to  be  in  line  with  the  requirements  of  today’s  classrooms,  and  she  expressed  this   view:     Extract  5.  Elaine  –  Language  of  instruction     it  was  understood…  me  included   ‘jiġifieri’   [that   is]...   that  total   immersion  in  a   language  was  the  best  way  to   learn  it.  Even  I  used  to  feel  very  strongly  about  this.  But  I’m  not  sure  now.  You  see...  based  on  my  experience  I   have  come  to  believe  that  it  is  okay  to  use  one  language  to  teach  another...  I  think  it  is  easier...  for  the  student...   and  the  teacher.  Better  understanding...  less  frustration.     Ingrid   spoke   of   a   time   when   she   used   to   have   a   Maltese   speaking   and   an   English-­‐speaking   doll   present  in  class  during  language  lessons:     Extract  6.  Ingrid  –  Code-­‐switching  while  teaching   These  dolls  did  not  understand  the  other  language  allura  [so]  this  meant  that  the  children  could  not  speak  in   the  other  language.  So,  I  strongly  believed  in  this  and  that’s  how  I  used  to  teach.  Now  I  think  the  situation  is   changing.   We   need   to   adapt.   I   think   switching   between   languages   is   not   so   harmful   really   if   it   helps   the   children  understand  better.  I  mean  even  for  the  foreigners  …  thing  is  where  do  you  draw  the  line  then?  Is  this   causing  confusion?     Although   Diana   tried   to   use   visuals   as   much   as   possible   during   language   lessons,   she   did   use   code-­‐ switching   or   translating   with   children   “who   look   at   [her]   blankly.”   She   also   mentioned   using   what   she   considered  to  be  her  third  language  in  class  when  the  need  arose:             PANZAVECCHIA  &  LITTLE   E-­‐JournALL  7(1)  (2020),  pp.  108-­‐123 116   Extract  7.  Diana  –  Using  any  language  as  a  resource   Last  year  I  had  an  Italian  boy.  They  did  not  understand  Maltese  or  English.   I  used  to  communicate  with  the   parents   in   Italian.  With   the   child   I   used   to  use   Italian   just   to  make  him   feel   at   ease.   For   example,  when  he   walked  in,  I  used  to  tell  him  “buon  giorno  come  stai  oggi?”[good  morning  how  are  you  today?]  but  only  so  that   he  feels  at  ease  and  he  settles  down  in  class.     Elaine   believed   that   when   students   are   free   to   use   their   native   language,   this   engages   them   academically,   as   “using   their   native   language   as   a   tool   to   learn   a   second   language   helps   them   learn  more   effectively”.   She   recalled   her   own   schooling   years   when   students   were   made   to   learn   foreign   languages   through  full  immersion  practices,     Extract  8.  Elaine  –  When  I  was  a  student   .  .  .  I  found  it  extremely  difficult  to  cope.  Instead  of  trying  to  use  the  cues  to  learn  it,  I  completely  switched  off   when   it   came  to   that   lesson.  For  me,   it  was  as  good  as  nothing…  perhaps  even  worse,  because   I   remember   being  very  frustrated…  not  to  mention  that  I  barely  learnt  anything  in  three  years!     Participants  also  reported  drawing  on  digital  literacy  and  technology  in  order  to  overcome  language   barriers.   Jonathan   was   one   of   several   participants   highlighting   the   use   of   technology   to   mitigate   communication  problems  in  the  classroom:     Extract  9.  Jonathan  –  Multimodal  communication   We  use  signs  and  pictures,  visuals,  Google  translate…  I  think  it’s  easier  nowadays  with  the  Internet.  I  also  ask   the   children   themselves   to   help   me.   Children   have   this   special   gift   of   communication.   They   manage   to   communicate  with  each  other  in  spite  of  the  language  barriers.  It  is  amazing.     Ingrid  stated   that   in  a   rapidly  changing  digital  world   teachers  need   to  keep  abreast  with   the   latest   developments  and,     Extract  10.  Ingrid  –  Digital  literacy   work   on  ways   to   leverage   [children’s]   amazing   technology   skills.   I  mean   digital   literacy   is   very   important   today.  Perhaps  we  are  not  channelling  the  children’  skills  in  the  right  direction.  It’s  not  easy.  Sometimes  they   know  more  than  us.  Plus,  things  are  constantly  changing.  It’s  difficult  to  keep  up.     Maria  also  mentioned  the  use  of  technology,  particularly  the  internet,  in  order  to  enable  all  children   to   access   the   curriculum.   She   also   highlighted   the   need   for   teachers   to   be   creative   in   order   to  meet   their   students’  diverse  needs:     Extract  11.  Maria  –  Non-­‐verbal  communication   You   simplify   instructions,   you   use   the   board,   power   points,   you   use   pictures   you   know  …   you   try   and  use   actions,   there  are   times  when  you  have   to  change   if   the  book  gives  you  verbs   for  example  which  are  really   difficult   to   conjugate   I  might   change…   instead  of   “to  whatever…”   I  use   “to  drink”  …   “to  write”,  where   I   can   mime.  Something  that  is  more  tangible  for  them.     The  teachers  interviewed  displayed  creativity  and  innovation  in  their  strategies,  sharing  their  unique   perspective  on  multilingual  development.  The   fact   that,   in   such  a  historically  multilingual   context,   teachers   still  felt  uncertain  about  their  teaching  demonstrates  the  need  for  greater  attention  to  teacher  training  in  this   context.     6.3.  Training  needs     The  participants  in  this  study  demonstrated  a  willingness  to  implement  the  practices  required  within   today’s  rapidly  changing  sociocultural  contexts.  However,  their  responses  held  an  element  of  uncertainty  and   they  all  voiced   the  need   for   further  guidance.  Diane  strongly  believed   that   teacher   training  and  continuous   development  programmes  do  not  adequately  address  teachers’  needs  in  the  area  of  multilingual  classrooms,   and  hence  educators  are  often  in  a  dilemma.  She  told  us,   LANGUAGE  USE  IN  THE  PRIMARY  CLASSROOM   E-­‐JournALL  7(1)  (2020),  pp.  108-­‐123 117   Extract  12.  Diane  –  Code-­‐switching  while  teaching   We  were  taught  that  if  we  used  another  language  it  was  a  huge  mistake,  we  would  confuse  the  children.  That   is  the  general  perception,  I  think.  As  a  teacher,  I  do  allow  it  sometimes,  but  I  do  question  it.  I  feel  guilty.  I  ask   myself   is   it   ok?   I   think  we  need   to   be   told   that   it   is   ok.   Even   for   the   new   teachers   following   the   course   at   university.  We   need   to   tell   them   that   it   is   ok   to   use   different   languages   sometimes   to   a   certain   extent.   In   practice  if  you  think  about  it,  it  is  what  we  really  do.  We  do  code-­‐switch,  although  we  do  encourage  the  use  of   one  language…  it  is  instinctive  to  use  both  sometimes.     Laura   also   stated   that   she   wished   to   learn   more   about   innovative   teaching   methods   before   implementing  them  in  class,     Extract  13.  Laura  –  Innovative  methods   I  feel  I  do  not  know  enough  about  these  new  methods.  I  follow  what  I  feel  is  right  …  I  think  the  fact  that  more   children  are  coming  to  school  with  different  language  backgrounds  might  require  some  changes  really  but  I’m   not  quite  sure  what   is  allowed  and  what   isn’t  …  what  works  and  what  doesn’t.  There  are  so  many  different   opinions  on  this  and  things  are  constantly  changing.  We  are  told  to  do  it  one  way  then  all  of  a  sudden,  we  are   told  to  scrap  the  whole  idea  and  do  something  completely  different.  It’s  mind  boggling.     Jonathan  also  felt  that  further  training  is  necessary,  especially  in  the  realm  of  language  use,       Extract  14.  Jonathan  -­‐  Additional  training     I   think   that  we   should   also   be   informed   better   about   the   benefits   of   these   practices   perhaps   through   CPD   sessions.  We  were  never  taught  about  this  at  university  …  anzi  [on  the  contrary]  we  were  always  told  never  to   mix  languages     The   teachers’   uncertainty   and   struggles   highlight   the   need   for   a   more   organised   approach   to   continued  professional  development,  ensuring  that  not  only  newly  trained  teachers  gain  adequate  skills   for   working   in  multilingual   settings,   but   that   currently   practising   teachers   can   update   their   skills   in   line  with   global  changes.     6.4.  Participants’  recommendations  for  policy  and  practice   All   participating   educators   stated   that   Malta   is   currently   undergoing   a   major   paradigm   shift   in   education,  mainly   as   a   result   of   the  demographic   changes  on   the   island.  They  were   all   in   agreement   about   how  inadequate  their  own  teacher  training  was  in  view  of  these  challenges,  and  that  they  were  “winging  it”  on   many  levels.  They  all  felt  that  most  of  the  experienced  teachers  in  class  were  trained  during  a  time  when  the   demographic  situation  in  Malta  was  very  different,  and  that  they  were  not  being  offered  the  right  support  or   further   training   to  meet   the   needs   of   students   today.  Moreover,   they   believed   that   initial   teacher   training   programmes   needed   to   be   restructured   in   order   to   train   future   teachers   appropriately   in   the   area   of   multilingualism   and   multiculturalism,   regardless   of   teachers’   own   backgrounds.   Training   programmes   for   both  initial  and  experienced  teachers  need  to  be  more  culturally  relevant  in  ways  that  reflect  the  sociocultural   changes  within  our  educational  settings.     Participants  mentioned  different  positive  educational  initiatives  currently  being  introduced,  such  as   the   introduction   of   “Ethics”   class   as   an   alternative   to   “Religion”   course,   in   order   to   embrace   multi-­‐ethic   Maltese   classrooms.   Together   with   the   formation   of   the   Migrant   Learners’   Unit   within   the   Ministry   of   Education  and  Employment,  these  initiatives  focus  on  promoting  the  inclusion  of  migrant  learners.  However,   the  teachers  all   felt   that   there  should  be  more   focus  on  programmes  that  value  and  celebrate  diversity  and   more  resources  and  adequate  training,  together  with  further  local  research  on  the  subject.  As  Mandy  put  it,   “we   are   still   in   the   process   of   learning   through   trial   and   error,   rather   than   solid   research   and   empirical   evidence.”     Maria   felt   that   human   resources   should   be   viewed   as   a   priority   and   that   language   maintenance   programmes  should  be  offered  in  all  schools  in  order  to  celebrate  diversity  and  to  protect  heritage  languages.   Diana   also   shared   this   view,   as  differentiation   requires   teaching   smaller   groups,   necessitating   the  need   for   more  assistance  in  class.  In  this  regard,  Jonathan  believed  that  parental  involvement  may  also  be  one  way  to   tap   into   the   community   as   an   invaluable  human   resource.  Additionally,   he   advocated   the   employment  of   a   more  diverse  teacher  workforce  in  order  to  be  in  line  with  the  rapidly  shifting  classroom  demographics:   PANZAVECCHIA  &  LITTLE   E-­‐JournALL  7(1)  (2020),  pp.  108-­‐123 118   Extract  15.  Jonathan  –  Heterogeneous  workforce   I   also   think   that  we  need  more  multilingual   teachers  …  native  speakers  …   this  would  help   to   include   these   children  in  this  multicultural  era.  I  mean,  if  we  have  children  who  are  speaking  different  languages  in  class,  it   makes  sense  to  have  other  people  who  can  cater  for  their  needs.     All  participants   felt   the  need   to  narrow  down  syllabi,   to  move  away   from   the   idea  of   standardized   testing   and   to   focus   more   on   play-­‐based   activities,   in   order   to   foster   a   love   of   learning,   especially   in   the   primary   years.   Maria   highlighted   the   importance   of   exposure   and   fostering   positive   attitudes   towards   language:     Extract  16.  Maria  -­‐  Exposure   A  lot  of  it  is  about  getting  them  to  love  the  language…  stories,  singing  etc.  Grammar  is  boring.  A  lot  of  teachers   think   that  because   they’re  seeing  blank   faces   they’re  not   retaining.  But   they’re  being  exposed…  we  need   to   apply  grammar  in  context.     She  also  felt  the  need  to  move  away  from  focusing  on  formal  writing  in  the  early  years,  saying  “[we   should]  not  focus  on  every  word,  every  grammar  point,  every  full  stop,  capital  letter  …  testing  everything.  Let   them  try  to  express  themselves  and  write  freely  especially  in  the  younger  years.”   Ingrid  also  thought  that  making  the  lessons  interesting  and  play-­‐based,  especially  within  the  primary   sector,   was   fundamental.   She   highlighted   the   importance   of   teaching   functional   language   use   in   order   to   prepare   children   for   the   future.   Mandy   echoed   these   views,   stating   that   providing   children   with   more   opportunities  to  apply  concepts  is  imperative,  “…to  actually  provide  children  with  an  education  that  would  be   practical,  where  they  can  actually  put  the  language  into  use.”   Diana  believed  that  the  system  needs  to  prioritise  differentiation  methods  which  are  in  line  with  the   diverse  student  population  of  today’s  classrooms:     Extract  17.  Diana-­‐  Differentiation  methods   We  need  more  resources.  We  need  less  content.  You  set  limits  and  standards  yes  …  but  not  grouped  by  age.   Everyone  gets  there  in  their  own  time.  Within  say  these  10  years  the  children  need  to  get  to  this…  they  need   to  master  such  and  such  skills  but  over  a  span  of  time.  Each  child  at  their  own  pace.     She   felt   that   teachers  need   to  be  given  more  opportunities   to   target  different  needs  within  diverse   classrooms,   and   that   compressed   and   rigid   syllabi   do   not   lend   themselves   to   differentiated   teaching.   She   explained  that  language  teaching  needs  to  be  restructured  according  to  level:     Extract  18.  Diana-­‐  Differentiation  methods   If  you  have  a  child  who  is  very  fluent  in  English  and  you  keep  on  teaching  her  the  same  things.  .  .  If  you  have  a   Maltese  speaking  student,  you  need  to  start  from  the  basics.  So  even  though  the  children  have  the  same  age   they  are  at  completely  different  levels.     Jonathan  voiced  his  concerns  about  a  language  policy  that  encourages  bilingual  practice,  but  which  is   not  always  viable  due  to  the  growing  number  of  foreign  students  in  school:     Extract  19.  Jonathan  –  Bilingual  practice   . . . this   is   so  difficult   to  do  with   children  who   can  only   speak   their   own   language.  We   tend   to  use   a   lot   of   visuals  and  resources  and  signing  with  these  children.  But  it’s  very  spontaneous.  Some  of  these  children  have   so  many  difficulties.     Jonathan  mentioned  the  recently  established  Migrant  Learners’  Unit,  within  the  Ministry  of  Education   and  Employment,  which  seeks  to  promote  the  inclusion  of  newly  arrived  learners  into  the  education  system,   while   focusing   on   the   acquisition   of   linguistic   and   sociocultural   competences.  While   Jonathan   felt   that   this   was   a   positive   initiative,   he   also   thought   that   it   operated   on   a   deficit   model   and   does   not   truly   celebrate   linguistic   diversity.   These   concerns   are   mirrored   across   Europe,   where   multiple   levels   of   integration   for   newly   arrived   learners   exist,   ranging   from   full   initial   separation,   to   partial   separation,   to   immediate,   full   integration  into  all  mainstream  classes  (European  Commission,  2019).  Each  of  these  models  highlights  issues   LANGUAGE  USE  IN  THE  PRIMARY  CLASSROOM   E-­‐JournALL  7(1)  (2020),  pp.  108-­‐123 119   linked   not   only   to   language   acquisition,   but   also   to   integration,   with   students   separated   from   their   peers   sometimes  struggling  to  access  the  main  curriculum,  if  too  much  emphasis  is  placed  on  language  acquisition   above  content  acquisition  (Nilsson  &  Bunar,  2016).     7.  Conclusions,  pedagogical  implications,  and  limitations    Due   to   its  strategic  position,  Malta  was   immersed   in  a  variety  of   languages  as  part  of   its  historical   legacy.  Most  Maltese  teachers  are  hence  naturally  adept  at  and  open  to  hybridising  languages,  as  it  is  a  part  of   their  history  and  a  natural  way  of  communicating  (Panzavecchia,   in  preparation).  Sciriha  (2001)  states  that   multilingualism  and  multiculturalism  are  natural  to  the  Maltese  and  that,  “what  is  essentially  ‘natural’  for  the   Maltese  themselves  is  very  surprising  to  visitors  who,  as  soon  as  they  land  in  Malta,  immediately  perceive  the   multicultural  component  to  life  in  Malta”  (pp.  36  –  37).   As   in  many  other  bilingual  societies,  code-­‐switching   is  common  practice  within  Maltese  classrooms   and  Maltese  teachers  already  engage  in  natural  translanguaging  practices  to  support  Maltese-­‐born  bilingual   students  who  are   less  proficient   in  one  of   the   two  official   languages.  Moreover,  many  Maltese   teachers  are   proficient   in   at   least   one   other   foreign   language   apart   from   their   two   official   languages,   and   thus   find   themselves  naturally  shifting  between  two  or  more  languages  daily.     Multilingual   classrooms  are  on   the   increase  on   the   island,   and   therefore  Maltese   children   are  now   being  exposed  to  several  different  languages,  other  than  English  and  Maltese.  This  is  enriching  on  many  levels   as   educational   settings   which   value   multilingualism   have   been   proven   to   improve   children’s   self-­‐esteem,   encourage   the   integration  of  migrant   students,   shape   cultural   identities  and  empower  all   children   to   reach   their   full   potential.   Children   whose   home   languages   are   not   valued   and   supported   are   found   to   be   disadvantaged   both   socially   and   academically   (OECD,   2012).   The   situation   thus   clearly   necessitates   more   fluid   and   flexible   linguistic  practices,   such  as  García’s   (2009)   concept  of   transglossia,  which   focuses  on   the   way   different   languages   interrelate   within   a   globalised   society.   Paradoxically,   Maltese   educators   still   feel   unsure   about   how,   when   and   if   they   should   utilise   this   as   a   pedagogical   strategy.   In   this   regard,   the   participants  in  this  study  all  expressed  the  need  to  be  given  more  formal  guidelines  on  how  to  deal  with  their   increasingly  multilingual   and  multicultural   classrooms,   and   how   to   further   explore   their   spontaneous   and   naturally  occurring  translanguaging  practices,   in  order  to  reach  out  to  migrant  students  who  are  struggling   with   the   country’s   two  official   languages.  They  also   felt   the  need   for  more   research   in   the  area   in  order   to   support   the   development   of   initial   teacher   education   programmes   and   specialised   training   sessions   for   established  teachers.       The   participants   also   advocated   for  more   emphasis   on   preserving   the  Maltese   language  within   an   ever-­‐increasing   multilingual   community.   Moreover,   there   is   a   need   for   further   investment   in   language   maintenance  programmes,  mother-­‐tongue  instruction  and  culturally  inclusive  and  multicultural  curricula  for   immigrant  students,  so  that  every  child’s  linguistic  identity  would  be  valued  and  celebrated.  The  educators  in   this  study  also  recognised  the  need  for  more  human  resources  which  would  enable  these  ideas  to  be  put  into   practice,   together  with  more   focus   on   parental   involvement,  which  may   prove   to   be   an   interesting  way   in   which  to  value  and  celebrate  migrant  children’s  diverse  identities  through  capitalising  on  families  as  valuable   resources.  The  participants  also  felt  a  need  for  revising  course  syllabi,  and  for  educational  settings  to  offer  a   more  play-­‐based,  fun  approach  in  order  to  foster  positive  attitudes  towards  language  learning.  They  felt  that   in  mainstream  schools,   curricula,  and  school   syllabi  do  not  adequately   reflect   the  urgent  need   to  support  a   diverse  student  population.     Malta  serves  as  an  example  of  a  global  trend,  with  countries  becoming  increasingly  multi-­‐ethnic  and   multilingual.  The  need  for  a  paradigm  shift  in  education  is  becoming  more  pressing.  It  is  thus  imperative  that   educational  institutions  support  today’s  diverse  students  through  viewing  linguistic  and  cultural  diversity  as   an  enrichment  rather  than  a  deficit.  Although  Maltese  educators  are  naturally  predisposed  to  making  use  of   two  or  more  languages  in  their  personal  and  professional  lives,  they  still  feel  they  need  to  be  provided  with   formal   guidelines   and   training   programmes  which   could   support   and   further   explore   these   practices.   This   could  be   the  catalyst   required   for   changes  within  educational   systems  which  would  meet   the  challenges  of   today’s  diverse  schools.   Although  there  is  a  vast  body  of  research  dedicated  to  multilingual  classrooms  and,  more  recently,  to   translanguaging  practices,   there  seems  to  be  a  gap   in   literature  concerning   language   teachers’  perspectives   and   thoughts   about   language   pedagogy,   which   we   aim   to   bridge   within   the   limitations   of   our   study.   The   overall   findings   of   this   inquiry   offer   valuable   insights   into   teachers’   views   on   language   practice   within   multilingual  classrooms,  however,  due  to  time  constraints  and  the  restricted  sample  size  of  our  participants,   PANZAVECCHIA  &  LITTLE   E-­‐JournALL  7(1)  (2020),  pp.  108-­‐123 120   the  conclusions  drawn  from  this  study  are  not  representative  of  all  Maltese  teachers.  The  unique  views  and   professional  practice  of  the  participants  in  this  study  may,  however,  be  used  as  a  resource  for  further  studies   and   to   make   suggestions   for   future   practice.   A   more   comprehensive   perspective   and   further   research   on   translanguaging,   both   in   the  Maltese   context   and   beyond,  would   provide   further   insights   into  multilingual   practices  in  educational  settings.         References     Baker,   Colin   (2011).   Foundations   of   bilingual   education   and   bilingualism   (Vol.   79).   Bristol,   England:   Multilingual  Matters.     Beres,  Anna.  M.  (2015).  An  overview  of  translanguaging:  20  years  of  “giving  voice  to  those  who  do  not  speak”.   Translation  and  Translanguaging  in  Multilingual  Contexts,  1(1),  103–118.     Birt,  Linda,  Scott,  Suzanne,  Cavers,  Debbie,  Campbell,  Christine,  &  Walter,  Fiona  (2016).  Member  checking:  a   tool   to  enhance  trustworthiness  or  merely  a  nod  to  validation?  Qualitative  Health  Research,  26(13),   1802-­‐1811.   Brincat,  Joseph  M.  (2011).  Maltese  and  other  languages:  A  linguistic  history  of  Malta.  St.  Venera,  Malta:  Midsea   Books.     Camarota,  Stephen,  &  Ziegler,  Karen  (2015).  One  in  Five  US  residents  speaks  foreign  language  at  home.  Centre   for   Immigration   Studies.   Retrieved   from   https://cis.org/sites/cis.org/files/camarota-­‐language-­‐ 15.pdf.     Camilleri   Grima,   Antoinette   (2013a).   A   select   review   of   bilingualism   in   education   in   Malta.   International   Journal  of  Bilingual  Education  and  Bilingualism,  16(5),  553-­‐569.   Camilleri   Grima,   Antoinette   (2013b).   Challenging   code-­‐switching   in  Malta.  Revue   Française   de   Linguistique   Appliquée,  18(2),  45–61.     Camilleri  Grima,  Antoinette  (2016).  Young  children  living  bilingually  in  Malta.  Lingwistyka  Stosowana,  17(2),   1–13.     Caruana,   Sandro   (2013).   Italian   in  Malta:  A   socio-­‐educational  perspective.   International   Journal  of  Bilingual   Education  and  Bilingualism,  16(5),  602–614.   Cenoz,   Jasone   (2017).   Translanguaging   in   school   contexts:   International   perspectives.   Journal   of   Language,   Identity  &  Education,  16(4),  193–198.     Council   of   Europe   (2015).   Language   education   policy   profile:   Malta.   The   Language   Policy   Unit,   Council   of   Europe.   Retrieved   from   http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/Profile-­‐ Malta_final2015_EN.pdf.     Durán,  Leah  &  Henderson,  Kathryn  I.  (2018).  Pockets  of  hope:  Cases  of  linguistic  flexibility  in  the  classroom.   E-­‐JournALL,  EuroAmerican  Journal  of  Applied  Linguistics  and  Languages,  5(2),  76  -­‐  90.   European  Commission/EACEA/Eurydice  (2019).  Integrating  students  from  migrant  backgrounds  into  schools   in   Europe:   national   policies   and  measures.   Eurydice  Report.   Luxembourg:   Publications  Office   of   the   European  Union   Farrugia,   Marie   Therese   (2016).   Frequency,   significance   and   clarity:   Factors   supporting   the   learning   of   mathematical  vocabulary  in  bilingual  classrooms.  Malta  Review  of  Educational  Research,  10(2),  223– 240.     Farrugia,   Marie   Therese   (2017).   Young   children’s   appropriation   of   mathematical   discourse:   Learning   subtraction  in  a  plurilingual  classroom.  In  Thérèse  Dooley  &  Ghislaine  Gueudet    (Eds.),  Proceedings  of   the  Tenth  Conference  of  the  European  Society  for  Research  in  Mathematics  Education  (pp.1268  -­‐  1275).   Dublin,  Ireland:  DCU  Institute  of  Education  and  ERME.     Frendo,  Henry   (1988).  Maltese   colonial   identity:   Latin  Mediterranean  or  British  Empire?   In  Mallia-­‐Milanes,   Victor  (Ed.),  The  British  colonial  experience,  1800–1964:  The  impact  on  Maltese  society  (pp.  185–214).   Msida,  Malta:  Mireva.     García,  Ofelia  (2005).  Positioning  heritage  languages  in  the  United  States.  Hispania,  89(4),  601–605.     García,   Ofelia   (2009).  Bilingual   education   in   the   21st   Century:   A   global   perspective.   Malden,  Massachusetts:   Wiley-­‐Blackwell.     LANGUAGE  USE  IN  THE  PRIMARY  CLASSROOM   E-­‐JournALL  7(1)  (2020),  pp.  108-­‐123 121   García,   Ofelia,   &   Kleyn,   Tatyana   (2016).   Translanguaging   theory   in   education.   In   Ofelia   Garcia   &   Tatyana   Kleyn  (Eds.),  Translanguaging  with  multilingual   students:  Learning   from  classroom  moments   (pp.  9– 33).  New  York,  New  York:  Routledge.     García,  Ofelia,  &  Wei,  Li  (2014).  Translanguaging  and  education.  In  Translanguaging:  Language,  bilingualism   and  education  (pp.  63–77).  Houndsmills,  United  Kingdom:  Palgrave  Macmillan.     García,   O.,   &   Otheguy,   R.   (2019).   Plurilingualism   and   translanguaging:   commonalities   and   divergences.   International  Journal  of  Bilingual  Education  and  Bilingualism,  1-­‐19.   Goodson,   Ivor  F.,  &  Sikes,  Patricia   J   (2001).  Life  history  research   in  educational   settings:  Learning   from   lives.   London,  United  Kingdom:  Open  University  Press.   Goodson,  Ivor  F.  (1981).  Life  histories  and  the  study  of  schooling.  Interchange,  11(4),  62-­‐75.   Gort,   Mileidis,   &   Sembiante,   Sabrina   F.   (2015).   Navigating   hybridized   language   learning   spaces   through   translanguaging   pedagogy:   Dual   language   preschool   teachers’   languaging   practices   in   support   of   emergent  bilingual  children’s  performance  of  academic  discourse.  International  Multilingual  Research   Journal,  9(1),  7-­‐25.   International   Organization   for   Migration.   (2016).   Migration   in   Malta:   Country   profile   2015.   Geneva,   Switzerland:  IOM.     Leikin,  Mark,  Schwartz,  Mila,  &  Tobin,  Yishai  (2012).  Current  issues  in  bilingualism:  A  complex  approach  to  a   multidimensional  phenomenon.  In  Leikin,  Mark,  Schwartz,  Mila,  &  Tobin,  Yishai  (Eds.),  Current  issues   in  bilingualism  (pp.  1–18).  Dordrecht,  The  Netherlands:  Springer.     Lincoln,  Yvonna  S.,  &  Guba,  Egon  G  (1985).  Naturalistic  inquiry.  Newbury  Park,  California:  Sage.   Little,   Sabine   (2017).   Whose   heritage?   What   inheritance?:   Conceptualising   family   language   identities.   International  Journal  of  Bilingual  Education  and  Bilingualism,  1–15.   Malta  Ministry   of   Education   and   Employment.   (2014).  National   literacy   strategy   for   all   in  Malta   and   Gozo.   Floriana,  Malta:  Malta  Ministry  of  Education  and  Employment.     Malta  Ministry  of  Education  and  Employment.  (2015).  A  language  policy  for  the  early  years  in  Malta  and  Gozo.   Floriana,  Malta:  Malta  Ministry  of  Education  and  Employment.     NSO,  National  Statistics  Office  -­‐  Malta  (2018).  (Statistical  information  supplied  on  demand).   Micallef  Cann,  Sharon,  &  Spiteri,  Doreen  (2014).  Through  their  eyes  and  with  their  words:  An  exploration  of   the  immigrant  students  in  Malta  and  their  perceptions  of  Malta’s  two  official  languages.  Malta  Review   of  Educational  Research,  8(1),  1–32.     Mifsud,   Charles.   L.,   &   Vella,   Lara   Anne   (2018).   To  mix   languages   or   not?   Preschool   bilingual   education   in   Malta.  Preschool  Bilingual  Education  (pp.  57-­‐98).  Cham,  Switzerland:  Springer.   Moll,  Luis  C.   (2015).  Tapping   into   the  “hidden”  home  and  community  resources  of  students.  Kappa  Delta  Pi   Record,  51(3),  114-­‐117.   Nilsson,   Jenny,   &   Bunar,   Nihad   (2016).   Educational   responses   to   newly   arrived   students   in   Sweden:   Understanding   the   structure   and   influence   of   post-­‐migration   ecology.   Scandinavian   Journal   of   Educational  Research,  60(4),  399-­‐416.   OECD,   Organisation   for   Economic   Co-­‐operation   and   Development   (2012).   Equity   and   quality   in   education:   Supporting   disadvantaged   students   and   schools.   Retrieved   from   www.oecd.org/education/school/equityandqualityineducationsupportingdisadvantagedstudentsand schools.htm.       Otheguy,  Ricardo,  García,  Ofelia,  &  Reid,  Wallis  (2015).  Clarifying  translanguaging  and  deconstructing  named   languages:  A  perspective  from  linguistics.  Applied  Linguistics  Review,  6(3),  281–307.     Palviainen,  Åsa,  Protassova,  Ekaterina,  Mård-­‐Miettinen,  Karita,  &  Schwartz,  Mila  (2016).  Two  languages  in  the   air:   A   cross-­‐cultural   comparison   of   preschool   teachers’   reflections   on   their   flexible   bilingual   practices.  International  Journal  of  Bilingual  Education  and  Bilingualism,  19(6),  614-­‐630.   Panzavecchia,  Michelle  (in  preparation).  The  best  of  both  worlds?  Maltese  primary  school  teachers’  perceptions   and  use  of  translanguaging  in  bilingual  English  language  classes  (Unpublished  doctoral  dissertation).   University  of  Sheffield,  Sheffield,  United  Kingdom.     Park,   Mi   Sun   (2013).   Code-­‐switching   and   translanguaging:   potential   functions   in   multilingual   classrooms.   Teachers  College,  Columbia  University  Working  Papers  in  TESOL  &  Applied  Linguistics,  13(2),  50-­‐52.   PANZAVECCHIA  &  LITTLE   E-­‐JournALL  7(1)  (2020),  pp.  108-­‐123 122   Sabino,  Robin  (2018).  Languaging  without  languages:  Beyond  metro-­‐,  multi-­‐,  poly-­‐,  pluri-­‐  and  translanguaging.   Leiden,  The  Netherlands:  Brill.     Scaglione,   Stefania,  &  Caruana,   Sandro   (2018).  Migration   and  plurilingualism   in   Southern  European  homes   and  schools.  In  Van  Avermaet,  Piet,  Slembrouck,  Stef,  Van  Gorp,  Koen,  Sierens,  Sven  &  Maryns  Katrijn   (Eds.),   The   multilingual   edge   of   education   (pp.   139–164).   London,   United   Kingdom:   Palgrave   Macmillan.     Sciriha,   Lydia   (2001).   Trilingualism   in   Malta:   Social   and   educational   perspectives.   International   Journal   of   Bilingual  Education  and  Bilingualism,  4(1),  23-­‐37.   Eurostat  (2017).  https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-­‐explained/index.php/Main_Page.       Tinsley,   Theresa   &   Board,   Kathryn   (2016).   Language   trends   2015/16:   The   state   of   language   learning   in   primary   and   secondary   schools   in   England.   London,   United   Kingdom:   British   Council/Education   Development  Trust.   UK   Department   for   Education   (2018).   Schools,   pupils   and   their   characteristics.   Retrieved   from   https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/schools-­‐pupils-­‐and-­‐their-­‐characteristics-­‐january-­‐2018   United   Nations,   Department   of   Economic   and   Social   Affairs,   Population   Division   (2017).   International   migration  report  2017:  Highlights.  New  York,  New  York:  United  Nations,  Department  of  Economic  and   Social  Affairs.     Vallejo,   Claudia,   &   Dooly,   Melinda   (2019).   Plurilingualism   and   translanguaging:   Emergent   approaches   and   shared  concerns.  International  Journal  of  Bilingual  Education  and  Bilingualism,  23(1),  1-­‐16.   Vella,   Alexandra   (2012).   Languages   and   language   varieties   in   Malta.   International   Journal   of   Bilingual   Education  and  Bilingualism,  16(5),  532–552.     Wei,   Li   (2011).   Moment   analysis   and   translanguaging   space:   Discursive   construction   of   identities   by   multilingual  Chinese  youth  in  Britain.  Journal  of  Pragmatics,  43(5),  1222-­‐1235.   Williams,   Cen   (2002).  Ennill   iaith:   Astudiaeth   o   sefyllfa   drochi   yn   11–16   oed   [A   language   gained:   A   study   of   language  immersion  at  11–16  years  of  age].  Bangor,  United  Kingdom:  School  of  Education.  Retrieved   from  https://www.bangor.ac.uk/addysg/publications/Language_Gained%20.pdf.                                               LANGUAGE  USE  IN  THE  PRIMARY  CLASSROOM   E-­‐JournALL  7(1)  (2020),  pp.  108-­‐123 123   Michelle Panzavecchia, University of Sheffield mpanzavecchia1@sheffield.ac.uk EN Michelle Panzavecchia is an educator with many years of teaching experience in the early and middle years. She is also a University of Malta Visiting Lecturer with the Faculty of Education. Michelle holds a MSc in Language and Communication Impairment in Children from the University of Sheffield, UK and a B. Ed (Hons.) from the University of Malta. She is currently reading for a PhD in Bilingualism and English Language Teaching through the University of Sheffield, UK. ES Michelle Panzavecchia es una educadora con muchos años de experiencia docente en los años iniciales y de educación media. También es Catedrática visitante de la Universidad de Malta, en la Facultad de Educación. Michelle tiene una Maestría en Ciencias en Discapacidad del Lenguaje y Comunicación Infantil de la Unievrsidad de Sheffield, en el Reino Unido y una Licenciatura en Educación (con honores) de la Universidad de Malta. Actualmente está cursando un Doctorado en Bilingüismo y Enseñanza del Inglés de la Universidad de Sheffield, en el Reino Unido. IT Michelle Panzavecchia è un'educatrice con molti anni di esperienza nell'insegnamento negli anni iniziali ed intermedi. È anche docente in visita presso la Facoltà di Scienze della Formazione della University of Malta. Michelle ha conseguito un Master in Language and Communication Impairment in Children presso la University of Sheffield, nel Regno Unito, e una Laurea presso la University of Malta. Attualmente sta studiando per un dottorato in Bilinguismo ed Insegnamento della Lingua Inglese presso la University of Sheffield, Regno Unito.         Sabine Little, University of Sheffield s.little@sheffield.ac.uk EN Sabine Little is a Lecturer in Languages Education at the University of Sheffield. Her research focuses on multilingual families, how they experience emotional and practical links to their various languages, and how these are involved in each family member’s identity construction process. Her work explores the home-school nexus and the status that various languages receive within local and national contexts. ES Sabine Little es profesora en el área de educación lingüística en la Universidad de Sheffield. Su investigación se enfoca en las familias multilingües, cómo experimentan los vínculos afectivos y prácticos con los distintos idiomas y su relación con el proceso de la construcción de la identidad de cada miembro de la familia. Su trabajo explora el nexo entre el hogar y la escuela y el estatus que reciben los varios idiomas dentro de los contextos locales y nacionales. IT Sabine Little è docente di Educazione Linguistica alla University of Sheffield. La sua ricerca si concentra su famiglie multilingue, su come vivono i collegamenti emotivi e pratici con le varie lingue e su come questi sono coinvolti nel processo di costruzione dell'identità di ciascun membro della famiglia. Il suo lavoro esplora il nesso tra scuola e casa e analizza lo status che le varie lingue acquisiscono nei contesti locali e nazionali.