untitled European Journal of Chemistry 3 (2) (2012) 172‐178 European Journal of Chemistry ISSN 2153‐2249 (Print) / ISSN 2153‐2257 (Online)  2012 EURJCHEM DOI:10.5155/eurjchem.3.2.172‐178.582 European Journal of Chemistry Journal homepage: www.eurjchem.com An efficient cyclocondensation reactions, antimicrobial activity and molecular orbital calculations of α‐benzopyrone derivatives Hafez Mohamed El‐Shaaer*, Salah Sayed Ibrahim, Wafaa Ramzy Abd‐Elmonem and Christine Gamal Ibrahim Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Education, Ain Shams University, Roxy, 11711, Cairo, Egypt *Corresponding author at: Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Education, Ain Shams University, Roxy, 11711, Cairo, Egypt. Tel.: +2.02.0112627069; fax: +2.02.2581243. E‐mail address: elshaaer@hotmail.com (H.M. El‐Shaaer). ARTICLE INFORMATION ABSTRACT Received: 15 October 2011 Received in revised form: 11 December 2011 Accepted: 26 December 2011 Online: 30 June 2012 KEYWORDS An efficient synthesis of 4,6,8‐trimethyl‐2‐oxo‐2H‐chromene‐3‐carbonitrile (2) via Claisen condensation of 3,5‐dimethyl‐2‐hydroxyacetophenone with ethyl cyanoacetate in the presence of sodium metal is reported. Cyclocondensation reactions of compound (2) with ethyl acetate or with ethyl cyanoacetate in the presence of ethoxide gave sodium salt of 7‐amino‐9‐hydroxy‐2,4‐dimethyl‐6H‐benzo[c]chromen‐6‐one derivatives (3) and (4) respectively, which upon neutralization with 10 % hydrochloric acid gave 7‐amino‐9‐ hydroxy‐2,4‐dimethyl‐6H‐benzo[c]chromen‐6‐one (5). Hydrolysis of compound (2) with ethanolic sodium hydroxide solution gave 4,6,8‐trimethyl‐2‐oxo‐2H‐chromene‐3‐carboxylic acid (6). Treatment of compound (2) with Vilsmier reagent using excess POCl3 gave 4‐(chloro(formyl)methyl‐6,8‐dimethyl‐2‐oxo‐2H‐chromene‐3‐carbonitrile (7). Also, conden‐ sation of compound (2) with DMF‐DMA in xylene or with POCl3/DMF in pyridine gave the same product 4‐((E)‐2‐(dimethylamino)vinyl)‐6,8‐dimethyl‐2‐oxo‐2H‐chromene‐3‐carbo‐ nitrile (8). The cyclocondensation reactions of compound (8) with hydroxylamine hydrochloride, urea, and with hydrazinecarbodithioic acid gave 3,4‐dihydro‐3‐hydroxy‐4‐ imino‐7,9‐dimethylchromeno[3,4‐c]pyridin‐5‐one (9), 4‐imino‐7,9‐dimethyl‐5‐oxo‐4H‐chro‐ meno[3,4‐c]pyridine‐3(5H)‐carboxamide (10) and 3‐amino‐3,4‐dihydro‐4‐imino‐7,9‐dimethyl chromeno[3,4‐c]pyridin‐5‐one (11), respectively. Also, acid hydrolysis of compound (8) gave 7,9‐dimethyl‐3H‐chromeno[3,4‐c]pyridine‐4,5‐dione (12). Structures of the products were established on the basis of elemental analysis, IR, 1H and 13C NMR, mass spectra and semi‐ empirical AM1‐MO calculations. The antimicrobial activities of the synthesized products were also studied. Synthesis α‐Benzopyrone Cyclocondensation Antimicrobial Activity Chromeno[3,4‐c]pyridinones Molecular orbital calculations 1. Introduction ‐Benzopyrone derivatives constitute an important class of oxygenated heterocycles [1]. Many compounds containing the benzopyrone nucleus, both naturally occurring and synthetic, are known to exhibit pharmacological activity such as antifungal [2‐4], antibacterial [5], anti‐mycobacterial [6,7], anticoagulants [8,9], inhibitors of some enzymes [10,11], and antitumor [12‐14]. With the expectations to find biological activity, we decided to investigate the synthesis of some novel systems of ‐benzopyrone derivatives bearing fused and isolated moiety. Recently, the synthesis [15], photochemical [16] and theoretical [1,2,17] properties of ‐benzopyrone derivatives were investigated. The aim of the present paper is to investigate an efficient synthesis of coumarin derivatives containing active methyl and cyano groups and study their cyclocondensation reactions with ethyl acetate, ethyl cyanoacetate, hydroxylamine hydro‐ chloride, urea, and with hydrazine carbodithioic acid. The condensations of 4‐methyl group of coumarin derivatives with Vilsmier reagents at different conditions and with DMF‐DMA were also studied. The antimicrobial activities for the prepared compounds were investigated. Also, semi‐empirical AM1 and Ab Initio (STO‐3G) molecular orbital calculations for the new compounds were performed and compared with their experimental data. 2. Experimental 2.1. Instrumentation The uncorrected melting point was determined in an open capillary tube on a digital Stuart SMP‐3 apparatus. 1H NMR/13C NMR spectra were obtained on a 300 MHz/75.46 MHz Varian Mercury VX‐300 NMR spectrometer in DMSO‐d6 with tetramethylsilane as an internal standard. Elemental analyses were performed on Vario El Elementar apparatus. IR spectra were recorded on FTIR Nicolet IS10 spectrophotometer (cm‐1), using KBr disks. Mass spectra recorded on a Gas Chromatographic GCMSqp 1000 ex Shimadzu instrument at 70 eV. The chemicals were purchased from the suppliers as the highest purity grade. The theoretical data which were obtained from molecular mechanical calculations on the basis of the semi‐empirical AM1 and Ab Initio (STO‐3G) methods of HyperChem 8.03 computer program. El‐Shaaer et al. / European Journal of Chemistry 3 (2) (2012) 172‐178 173 OH COCH3 O O CN + O ONa NH2 O R O O NH2 ONa R O O NH2 O O OH NH2 O 21 3a R = H 4a R = CN 3b R = H 4b R = CN dil. HCl R = H 5b 5a RCH2CO2C2H5 NCCH2CO2C2H5 EtONa Na Scheme 1 2.2. Synthesis 2.2.1. 4,6,8‐Trimethyl‐2‐oxo‐2H‐chromene‐3‐carbonitrile (2) Sodium metal (2 g, 8.6 mmol) was added in small portion to a solution of 3,5‐dimethyl‐2‐hydroxyacetophenone (1) (4 g, 2.4 mmol) in ethyl cyanoacetate (30 cm3). The reaction mixture was heated on water‐bath for 3 h, and then cooled to room temperature, treated with ethanol (10 cm3) and refluxed for 1 h. The solid obtained was filtered, and crystallized from ethanol to give (2) as pale green crystals (Scheme 1). Yield: 62%. M.p.: 200‐202 °C. FT‐IR (KBr, cm‐1): 3072 (CHarom.), 2921, 2953 (CHaleph.), 2230 (CN), 1721 (C=O), 1608 (C=C). 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO‐d6, δ, ppm): 2.26 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.31 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.61 (s, 3H, CH3), 7.42 (s, 1H, H‐7), 7.49 (s, 1H, H‐5). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO‐d6, δ, ppm): 24.2, 27.7, 29.6, 109.9, 123.5, 126.7, 133.6, 134.9, 143.6, 146.7, 158.3, 165.9, 172.9. MS (EI, m/z (%)): 212.4 (M‐1, 86.9), 212.8 (M+, 100), 213.8 (M+1, 14.5). Anal. calcd. for C13H11NO2: C, 73.23; H, 5.20; N, 6.57. Found: C, 73.10; H, 5.00; N, 6.60%. 2.2.2. Sodium salt of 7‐amino‐9‐hydroxy‐2,4‐dimethyl‐6H‐ benzo[c]chromen‐6‐one derivatives (3) and 7‐amino‐9‐ hydroxy‐2,4‐dimethyl‐6H‐benzo[c]chromen‐6‐one (5) A solution of compound (2) (2.0 g, 0.93 mmol) in ethoxide (1.0 g sodium, 40 cm3 absolute ethanol), and then ethyl acetate (24 cm3) was added and the mixture was refluxed on water‐ bath for 3 h, cooled to room temperature, treated with diethyl ether (40 cm3). The solid obtained was filtered, and crystallized from diethyl ether to give (3) as pall‐yellow crystals (Scheme 1 and 2). Yield: 89%. M.p.: 168‐170 °C. The compound (3) (0.5 g, 0.18 mmol) was acidified with 10% HCl and the solid obtained was filtered, and crystallized from water to give (5) as pall‐ yellow crystals (Scheme 1 and 2). Yield: 89%. M.p.: 166‐169 °C. 7‐Amino‐9‐hydroxy‐2,4‐dimethyl‐6H‐benzo[c]chromen‐6‐one derivatives (3): FT‐IR (KBr, cm‐1): 3309, 3489 (br., NH2), 2921 (CHaleph.), 1721 (w, C=Ocoumarin), 1655 (s, C=Ocyclic ketone). 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO‐d6, δ, ppm): 1.63 (s, 2H, NH2, exchangeable with D2O), 2.22 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.28 (s, 3H, CH3), 6.23 (s, 1H, H‐8), 7.09 (s, 1H, H‐3), 7.19 (s, 1H, H‐1), 7.31 (s, 1H, H‐10). 7‐Amino‐9‐hydroxy‐2,4‐dimethyl‐6H‐benzo[c]chromen‐6‐one (5): FT‐IR (KBr, cm‐1): 2922, 3455 (br., OH, NH2), 1725 (m, C=Ocoumarin), 1666 (s, C=Ocyclic ketone). 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO‐ d6, δ, ppm): 2.29 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.33 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.83 (s, 2H, NH2, exchangeable with D2O), 6.22 (s, 1H, OH, exchangeable with D2O), 7.21 (s, 1H, H‐8), 7.26 (s, 1H, H‐3), 7.28 (s, 1H, H‐1), 7.37 (s, 1H, H‐10). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO‐d6, δ, ppm): 24.5, 25.3, 27.7, 29.8, 52.5, 53.8, 123.4, 127.8, 132.1, 132.7, 134.3, 142.7, 143.3, 143.9, 157.9, 166.8, 175.5. MS (EI, m/z (%)): 255.7 (M+, 6.5). Anal. calcd. for C15H13NO3: C, 70.58; H, 5.13; N, 5.49. Found: C, 70.30; H, 4.90; N, 5.40%. 2.2.3. Sodium salt of 7‐amino‐9‐hydroxy‐2,4‐dimethyl‐6‐oxo‐ 6H‐benzo[c]chromene‐8‐carbonitrile (4) A solution of compound (2) (2 g, 0.93 mmol) in ethoxide (0.8 g sodium, 40 cm3 absolute ethanol), and then ethyl cyanoacetate (9 cm3) was added and the mixture was refluxed on water‐bath for 3 h, cooled to room temperature. The solid obtained was filtered, and crystallized from ethanol to give (4) as white crystals (Scheme 1 and 2). Yield: 31%. M.p.: 183‐185 °C. FT‐IR (KBr, cm‐1): 3397 (br., NH2), 2976 (CHaleph.), 2263 (CN), 1623 (br., C=O). MS (EI, m/z (%)): 301.0 (M‐1, 16.7). Anal. calcd. for C16H11N2NaO3: C, 63.58; H, 3.67; N, 9.27. Found: C, 63.10; H, 3.20; N, 9.10%. 2.2.4. 4,6,8‐Trimethyl‐2‐oxo‐2H‐chromene‐3‐carboxylic acid (6) A solution of compound (2) (0.5 g, 0.23 mmol) in ethanol (2 cm3), sodium hydroxide solution (0.09 g sodium hydroxide, 2 cm3 water) was added and the mixture was refluxed for 2 h, cooled to room temperature. The solid obtained was filtered, and crystallized from ethanol to give (6) as dark brown crystals (Scheme 3). M.p.: 206‐207 °C. Yield: 87%. FT‐IR (KBr, cm‐1): 3081 (br., OH), 2920, 2959 (CHaleph.), 1742 (s, C=Oacid), 1660 (br., C=Ocoumarin). 174 El‐Shaaer et al. / European Journal of Chemistry 3 (2) (2012) 172‐178 Scheme 2 Scheme 3 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO‐d6, δ, ppm): 2.19 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.25 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.31 (s, 3H, CH3), 6.17 (s, 1H, OH, exchangeable with D2O), 7.18 (s, 1H, H‐7), 7.28 (s, 1H, H‐5). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO‐d6, δ, ppm): 24.3, 25.3, 29.8, 127.5, 130.8, 132.7, 134.3, 142.7, 144.1, 157.8, 158.3, 166.6, 175.3. MS (EI, m/z (%)): 231.0 (M‐1, 32.6), 232.0 (M+, 42.7), 233.0 (M+1, 14.6). Anal. calcd. for C13H12O4: C, 67.23; H, 5.21. Found: C, 67.20; H, 5.50%. 2.2.5. 4‐(Chloro(formyl)methyl‐6,8‐dimethyl‐2‐oxo‐2H‐ chromene‐3‐carbonitrile (7) Phosphorusoxy chloride (2.4 cm3) was added dropwise to DMF (6 cm3) with stirring at 30‐35 °C, after the addition was completed, the solution was stirred at 50‐60 °C for 30 min. A solution of compound (2) (1 g, 0.46 mmol) in dry pyridine (6 cm3) was added to the above mixture dropwise at 30‐35 °C and after the addition was completed, the mixture was stirred at 50‐60 °C for 3 h, cooled to room temperature. The mixture was poured over cold water. The solid obtained was filtered, and crystallized from DMF to give (7) as yellow crystals (Scheme 3). M.p.: 268‐270 °C. Yield: 85%. FT‐IR (KBr, cm‐1): 3422 (enolic OH), 2930, 2958 (CHaleph.), 2722 (CHaldehde), 2224 (CN), 1723 (s, C=Oaldehyde), 1661 (w, C=O coumarin), 1621 (exocyclic C=C). 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO‐d6, δ, ppm): 2.28 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.32 (s, 3H, CH3), 7.14 (s, 1H, CH‐Cl), 7.44 (s, 1H, H‐7), 7.69 (s, 1H, H‐5), 9.01 (s, 1H, CHO). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO‐d6, δ, ppm): 24.4, 29.7, 55.8, 113.8, 124.0, 128.0, 135.1, 143.6, 146.7, 158.7, 166.4, 169.6, 170.5, 194.4. MS (EI, m/z (%)): 275.05 (M‐1, 0.31), 276.05 (M+, 0.20), 277.15 (M+1, 0.59), 278.25 (M+2, 2.49). Anal. calcd. for C14H10ClNO3: C, 60.99; H, 3.66; N, 5.08. Found: C, 60.80; H, 3.40; N, 5.30%. 2.2.6. 4‐((E)‐2‐(Dimethylamino)vinyl)‐6,8‐dimethyl‐2‐oxo‐ 2H‐chromene‐3‐carbonitrile (8) Method A: A solution of compound (2) (0.5 g, 0.23 mmol) in dry xylene (10 cm3), and then DMF‐DMA (0.35 cm3, 0.29 mmol) was added and the mixture was refluxed for 0.5 h, cooled to room temperature. The solid obtained was filtered, and crystallized from DMF to give (8) as green crystals (Scheme 4). M.p.: 271‐272 °C. Yield: 63%. FT‐IR (KBr, cm‐1): 3438 (br., OH), 2935, 2999 (CHaleph.), 2202 (CN), 1676 (C=O), 1618 (C=C). 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO‐d6, δ, ppm): 2.28 (s, 6H, CH3), 2.35 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.49 (s, 3H, CH3), 5.71 (d, J = 12.6 Hz, 1H, H‐9), 7.31 (s, 1H, H‐7), 7.73 (s, 1H, H‐5), 8.45 (d, J = 12.3 Hz, 1H, H‐10). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO‐d6, δ, ppm): 18.4, 24.8, 29.8, 46.7, 55.3, 97.6, 108.8, 126.4, 129.3, 132.3, 135.0, 142.4, 144.8, 164.3, 238.5. El‐Shaaer et al. / European Journal of Chemistry 3 (2) (2012) 172‐178 175 O O CN 2 O O CN H N H 8 POCl3 / DMF XylenePyridine DMF-DMA Scheme 4 Scheme 5 MS (EI, m/z (%)): 266.0 (M‐2, 8.3), 267.0 (M‐1, 26.1), 268.0 (M+, 100). Anal. calcd. for C16H16N2O2: C, 71.62; H, 6.01; N, 10.44. Found: C, 71.20; H, 6.20; N, 10.50%. Method B: A mixture of DMF (5 cm3), phosphorusoxy chloride (0.5 cm3) and a solution of compound (2) (0.5 g, 0.23 mmol) in dry pyridine (6 cm3) was stirred at 70‐80 °C for 3 h, cooled to room temperature. The mixture was poured over cold water and neutralized with sodium carbonate solution. The solid obtained was filtered, and crystallized from DMF to give (8) as green crystals, M.p.: 272 °C. Yield: 60%. 2.2.7. 3,4‐Dihydro‐3‐hydroxy‐4‐imino‐7,9‐dimethylchromeno [3,4‐c]pyridin‐5‐one (9) A mixture of compound (8) (0.5 g, 0.19 mmol), hydroxylamine hydrochloride (0.13 g, 0.19 mmol), absolute ethanol (15 cm3), and drops of acetic acid was refluxed for 3 h, cooled to room temperature. The solid obtained was filtered, and crystallized from DMF to give (9) as yellow crystals (Scheme 5). M.p.: 315‐316 °C. Yield: 85%. FT‐IR (KBr, cm‐1): 3414 (br., OH), 3223 (br., NH), 2920 (CHaleph.), 1702 (C=O), 1625 (exocyclic C=N). 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO‐d6, δ, ppm): 2.34 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.50 (s, 3H, CH3), 7.31 (s, 1H, H‐8), 7.52 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H, H‐1), 7.92 (s, 1H, H‐10), 8.00 (s, 1H, NH, exchangeable with D2O), 8.30 (s, 1H, OH, exchangeable with D2O), 8.50 ((d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H, H‐2). MS (EI, m/z (%)): 256.0 (M+, 4.5), 256.8 (M+1, 2.7). Anal. calcd. for C14H12N2O3: C, 65.62; H, 4.72; N, 10.93. Found: C, 65.30; H, 4.60; N, 11.1%. 2.2.8. 4‐Imino‐7,9‐dimethyl‐5‐oxo‐4H‐chromeno[3,4‐c] pyridine‐3(5H)‐carboxamide (10) A mixture of compound (8) (0.5 g, 0.19 mmol), urea (0.11 g, 0.19 mmol), and glacial acetic acid (10 cm3) was refluxed for 3 h, cooled to room temperature. The solid obtained was filtered, and crystallized from DMF to give (10) as green crystals (Scheme 5). M.p.: >300 °C. Yield: 47%. FT‐IR (KBr, cm‐1): 3452, 3161 (br., NH, NH2), 2919 (CHaleph.), 1731 (C=Ocoumarin), 1669 (C=Oamide). MS (EI, m/z (%)): 280.0 (M‐3, 18.8), 281.0 (M‐2, 2.6). Anal. calcd. for C15H13N3O3: C, 63.60; H, 4.63; N, 14.83. Found: C, 63.40; H, 4.20; N, 14.60%. 2.2.9. 3‐Amino‐3,4‐dihydro‐4‐imino‐7,9‐dimethylchromeno [3,4‐c]pyridin‐5‐one (11) A mixture of compound (8) (0.5 g, 0.19 mmol), hydrazinecarbodithioic acid (0.2 g, 0.19 mmol), and glacial acetic acid (10 cm3) was refluxed for 3 h, cooled to room temperature. The solid obtained was filtered, and crystallized from DMF to give (10) as yellow crystals (Scheme 6). M.p.: >300 °C. Yield: 73%. FT‐IR (KBr, cm‐1): 3359, 3096 (br., NH, NH2), 2970, 2919 (CHaleph.), 1728 (C=Ocoumarin), 1626 (exocyclic C=N), 1605 (C=C). 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO‐d6, δ, ppm): 2.36 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.46 (s, 3H, CH3), 4.03 (s, 2H, NH2, exchangeable with D2O), 7.35 (br. S, 1H, H‐1), 8.00 (s, 1H, H‐8), 8.06 (s, 1H, H‐ 10), 9.20 (br. S, 1H, H‐2). MS (EI, m/z (%)): 254.0 (M‐1, 1.0), 255.0 (M+, 27.9), 256.0 (M+1, 37.9), 257.0 (M+2, 6.4). Anal. calcd. for C14H13N3O2: C, 65.87; H, 5.13; N, 16.46. Found: C, 65.60; H, 5.00; N, 16.10%. 176 El‐Shaaer et al. / European Journal of Chemistry 3 (2) (2012) 172‐178 8 H2N N H S SH O NH O O O N O N NH2 H 12 11 O O CN H N H HCl EtOH Scheme 6 2.2.10. 7,9‐Dimethyl‐3H‐chromeno[3,4‐c]pyridine‐4,5‐dione (12) A mixture of compound (8) (0.4 g, 0.15 mmol), and conc. hydrochloric acid (3 cm3), was stirred at 60‐70 °C for 0.5 h, cooled to room temperature and diluted with water (5 cm3). The solid obtained was filtered, and crystallized from DMF to give (12) as yellow crystals (Scheme 6). M.p.: 303‐304 °C. Yield: 82%. FT‐IR (KBr, cm‐1): 3166 (br., NH), 1732 (s, C=Ocoumarin), 1667 (w, C=Oamide), 1620 (C=C). 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO‐d6, δ, ppm): 2.29 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.33 (s, 3H, CH3), 7.10‐7.20 (m, 2H, H‐1, H‐8), 7.80 (s, 1H, H‐10), 9.40 (S, 1H, H‐2). MS (EI, m/z (%)): 241.0 (M+, 100), 242.0 (M+1, 21.7). Anal. calcd. for C14H11NO3: C, 69.70; H, 4.60; N, 5.81. Found: C, 69.50; H, 4.50; N, 5.60%. 3. Results and discussion 3.1. Chemistry The Claisen condensation of 2‐hydroxyacetophenone derivatives with ethyl acetate in the presence of sodium metal gave β‐dicarbonyl compound derivatives which were cyclized under the effect of concentrated sulfuric acid to give 2‐ methylchromone derivatives [17]. In our recent work [2], we described the Claisen condensation of 3,5‐dichloro‐2‐hydroxyacetophenone and unsubstituted 2‐hydroxyacetophenone with ethyl cyanoacetate in the presence of sodium metal gave 7‐amino‐2,4‐dichloro‐9‐ hydroxy‐6‐oxo‐6H‐benzo[c]chromene‐8‐carbonitrile and a mixture of 4‐methyl‐2‐oxo‐2H‐chromene‐3‐carbonitrile and 7‐ amino‐9‐hydroxy‐6‐oxo‐6H‐benzo[c]chromene‐8‐carbonitrile, respectively. The present work describes the Claisen condensation of 3,5‐dimethyl‐2‐hydroxyacetophenone with ethyl cyanoacetate in the presence of sodium metal to give 4,6,8‐trimethyl‐2‐oxo‐ 2H‐chromene‐3‐carbonitrile (2) (Scheme 1). The presence of cyano group in a position 3 activates the methyl group in a position 4 of compound (2) which facilitates the cyclo‐ condensation reactions with ester derivatives containing active methylene group, so the reaction of compound (2) with ethyl acetate or with ethyl cyanoacetate in the presence of ethoxide gave sodium salt of 7‐amino‐9‐hydroxy‐2,4‐dimethyl‐6H‐ benzo[c]chromen‐6‐one derivatives (3) and (4) respectively (Scheme 1). When the sodium salt of compound (3) was neutralized with 10% hydrochloric acid gave 7‐amino‐9‐ hydroxy‐2,4‐dimethyl‐6H‐benzo[c]chromen‐6‐one (5) (Scheme 1). The formation of compounds 3a, 4a and 5a proceeded via Claisen condensation on active methyl group of compound (2) followed by nucleophilic cyclization (Scheme 2). The hydrolysis of cyano group of 4,6,8‐trimethyl‐2‐oxo‐2H‐ chromene‐3‐carbonitrile (2) in ethanolic sodium hydroxide solution gave 4,6,8‐trimethyl‐2‐oxo‐2H‐chromene‐3‐carboxylic acid (6) (Scheme 3). Also, the Vilsmier reaction of compound (2) in excess POCl3 gave 4‐(chloro(formyl)methyl‐6,8‐ dimethyl‐2‐oxo‐2H‐chromene‐3‐carbonitrile (7) (Scheme 3). The presence of carbonyl group in a position 2 and cyano group in a position 3 of coumarin moiety facilitate the condensation reactions of 4‐methyl group of coumarin, so the reaction of DMF‐DMA with compound (2) in dry xylene gave 4‐((E)‐2‐(dimethylamino)vinyl)‐6,8‐dimethyl‐2‐oxo‐2H‐ chromene‐3‐carbonitrile (8). Also, compound (8) was formed by condensation with dimethylformamide in the presence of POCl3 (Scheme 4). The compound (8) was formed in the form of E‐isomer from 1H NMR spectra which showed JCH=CH = 12.3 Hz at  = 5.71 and 8.45 ppm. The cyclocondensation reactions of 4‐((E)‐2‐(dimethyl amino)vinyl)‐6,8‐dimethyl‐2‐oxo‐2H‐chromene‐3‐carbonitrile (8) with primary amines in ethanol gave 4‐imino‐7,9‐ dimethylchromeno[3,4‐c]pyridine derivatives. The cyclo condensation reactions of compound (8) with hydroxylamine hydrochloride, urea, and with hydrazinecarbodithioic acid gave 3,4‐dihydro‐3‐hydroxy‐4‐imino‐7,9‐dimethylchromeno[3,4‐c] pyridin‐5‐one (9), 4‐imino‐7,9‐dimethyl‐5‐oxo‐4H‐chromeno [3,4‐c]pyridine‐3(5H)‐carboxamide (10) (Scheme 5) and 3‐amino‐3,4‐dihydro‐4‐imino‐7,9‐dimethylchromeno[3,4‐c] pyridin‐5‐one (11) (Scheme 6) respectively. Also, the cyclocondensation reaction of compound (8) by acid hydrolysis of cyano group, followed by cyclization to give 7,9‐dimethyl‐ 3H‐chromeno[3,4‐c]pyridine‐4,5‐dione (12) (Scheme 6). The formation of cyclocondensation products (9‐11) proceeded via the nucleophilic replacement of NH2 group of amine derivatives to ‐N(CH3)2 group of compound 8 to give the intermediate products 13, which can be cyclised by nucleophilic addition of NH group to C≡N group (Scheme 7). 3.2. Molecular orbital calculations The experimental IR frequencies of C=O groups of coumarin derivatives were compared with theoretical bond lengths of C=O groups which were obtained from molecular mechanical calculations on the basis of the semi‐empirical AM1 and Ab Initio (STO‐3G) methods of HyperChem 8.03 computer program after geometrical optimization of the structures for compounds (2‐12) (Table 1). El‐Shaaer et al. / European Journal of Chemistry 3 (2) (2012) 172‐178 177 Scheme 7 Table 1. Calculated bond lengths of C=O of coumarin derivatives by Semi‐empirical AM1 and Ab initio (STO‐3G) methods and their experimental IR C=O values for compounds (2‐12). Compound Bond lengths of C=O (Å) (by Semi‐empirical AM1) Bond lengths of C=O (Å) [by Ab Initio (STO‐3G)] Experimental C=O values, cm‐1 2 1.22839 1.22747 1721 3a 1.22773a 1.22604a 1721 3b 1.24427b 1.23136b 1655 4a 1.23752a 1.22672a 1623 4b 1.24197b 1.22866b 1623 5b 1.22443a 1.22461a 1725 5b 1.2416b 1.22477b 1666 6 1.24879a 1.21852a 1660 6 1.22183c 1.21744c 1742 7 1.24793a 1.21722a 1661 7 1.22641d 1.22441d 1723 8 1.23984 1.2181 1676 9 1.22692 1.22684 1702 10 1.22807a 1.22699a 1731 10 1.24126e 1.21657e 1669 11 1.22723 1.22662 1728 12 1.22718a 1.21812a 1732 12 1.24092e 1.22168e 1667 a COcoumarin b C=Ocyclic ketone c C=Oacid d C=Oaldehyde e C=Oamide The calculated bond lengths of C=O groups (Å) on the basis of semi‐empirical AM1 method are linearly related to the measured IR νC=O groups (cm‐1) for compounds (2‐12) and from the linear relation bond length (C=O) = 1.699‐2.743 νC=O, r = 0.913 except 4a, 4b (br. band of νC=O), where r is regression coefficient. The negative slope reveals indirect proportionality of the calculated bond lengths with measured νC=O values, which agreement with Hooke’s law and these support the proposed structures for the prepared compounds. On the other hand, when Ab initio (STO‐3G) method was used, the linear relation between bond length (C=O) and νC=O not agreement which is less efficient method than the semi‐empirical AM1 method. 3.3. Antimicrobial activity The newly synthesized compounds were screened against Gram‐positive bacteria: Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) and Bacillus subtilis (ATCC 6635), Gram‐negative bacteria: Salmonella typhimurium (ATCC 14028) and Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922), Yeast: Candida albicans (ATCC 10231) and Fungus: Aspergillus fumigatus. The standardized disc‐agar diffusion method [18] was followed to determine the activity of the synthesized compounds against the tested microorganisms. The tested compounds were dissolved in dimethyl formamide (DMF) solvent and prepared in two concentrations 2 and 1 mg/mL. The antibiotic chloramphencol was used as standard reference in the case of Gram‐negative bacteria, Cephalothin was used as standard reference in the case of Gram‐positive bacteria and cycloheximide was used as standard reference in the case of yeasts and fungi. Compound 9 showed high activities against Aspergillus fumigates at concentration of 2 mg and 1 mg, while it showed intermediate activities against Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli and Candida albicans (Table 2). Acknowledgements I am particularly gratitude to Dr. Ibrahim Hassan, Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Al‐ Azhar University, for his kind cooperation in carrying out the antimicrobial screening throughout this work. 178 El‐Shaaer et al. / European Journal of Chemistry 3 (2) (2012) 172‐178 Table 2. Antimicrobial activities data of compounds (2‐12). Sample Gram‐positive bacteria Gram‐negative bacteria Yeastsb Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) Bacillus subtilis (ATCC 6635) Salmonella typhimurium (ATCC 14028) Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) Candida albicans (ATCC 10231) Aspergillus fumigatus Concentrationg Concentrationg Concentrationg Concentrationg Concentrationg Concentrationg 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Mean of zone diametera, mm 2 ‐c ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 3 3 Ld ‐ 2 L ‐ 2 L ‐ 2 L ‐ 3 L ‐ ‐ ‐ 4 4 L ‐ 2 L ‐ 5 L 3 L 2 L ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 L ‐ 5 ‐ ‐ 3 L ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 L ‐ 5 L 2 L 6 4 L ‐ 6 L 3 L 4 L 2 L 5 L 2 L 3 L ‐ ‐ ‐ 7 2 L ‐ 4 L 2 L 3 L ‐ ‐ ‐ 4 L ‐ ‐ ‐ 8 2 L ‐ 3 L ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 9 8 L 4 L 15 Ie 11 L 6 L ‐ 18 I 14 I 20 I 17 I 29 Hf 21 H 10 ‐ ‐ 3 L ‐ ‐ ‐ 3 L ‐ 2 L ‐ 2 L ‐ 11 2 L ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 4 L ‐ ‐ ‐ 12 ‐ ‐ 2 L ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Controlh 42 28 38 30 36 25 38 30 40 28 40 31 a Calculate from 3 values. b Identified on the basis of routine cultural, morphological and microscopical characteristics. c ‐ : No effect. d L: Low activity = Mean of zone diameter ≤ 1/3 of mean zone diameter of control. e I: Intermediate activity = Mean of zone diameter ≤ 2/3 of mean zone diameter of control. f H: High activity = Mean of zone diameter > 2/3 of mean zone diameter of control. g Concentration, mg/mL. h Chloramphencol in the case of Gram‐positive bacteria, Cephalothin in the case of Gram-negative bacteria and cycloheximide in the case of fungi. References [1]. El‐Shaaer, H. M.; Abdel‐Aziz, S. A.; Hanafy, F. I.; Ali, T. E.; El‐Fauomy, A. Z. Eur. J. Chem. 2011, 2(2), 158‐162. [2]. El‐Shaaer, H. M. Eur. J. Chem. 2012, 3(1), 51‐56. [3]. Ali, T. E.; Abdel‐Aziz, S. A.; El‐Shaaer, H. M.; Hanafy, F. I.; El‐Fauomy, A. Z. Phosphorus, Sulfur, and Silicon 2008, 183, 2139‐2160. [4]. Ali, T. E.; Abdel‐Aziz, S. A.; El‐Shaaer, H. M.; Hanafy, F. I.; El‐Fauomy, A. Z. Turk. J. Chem. 2008, 32, 365‐374. [5]. El‐Sayed, A. M.; Abdallah, O. A. Phosphorus, Sulfur, and Silicon 2001, 170, 75‐86. [6]. El‐Shaaer, H. M.; Foltinova, P.; Lacova, M.; Chovancova, J.; Stankovicova, H. Il Farmaco 1998, 53, 224‐232. [7]. Gasparova, R.; Lacova, M.; El‐Shaaer, H. M.; Odlerova, Z. Il Farmaco 1997, 52, 251‐253. [8]. Manolov, I.; Maichle‐Moessmer, C.; Danchev, N. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 41, 882‐890. [9]. Manolov, I.; Maichle‐Moessmer, C.; Nicolova, I.; Danchev, N. Arch. Pharm. 2006, 336, 319‐326. [10]. Jackson, S. A.; Sahni, S.; Lee, L.; Luo, Y.; Nieduzak, T. R. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2005, 13, 2723‐2739. [11]. Choudhary, M.; Fatima, N.; Khan, K.; Jalil, S.; Iqbal, S.; Rahman, A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006, 14, 8066‐8072. [12]. Cravotto, G.; Tagliapietra, S.; Cappelo, R.; Palmisano, G.; Curini, M.; Boccalini, M. Arch. Pharm. 2006, 336, 129‐132. [13]. Ishar, M. P. S.; Singh, G.; Singh, S.; Sreenivasan, K. K.; Singh, G. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 1366‐1370. [14]. Liu, J.; Wu, J.; Zhao, Y. X.; Deng, Y. Y.; Mei, W. L.; Dai, H. F. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2008, 19, 934‐936 [15]. Lacova, M.; Gasparova, R.; Kois, P.; Bohac, A.; El‐Shaaer, H. M. Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 1410‐1419. [16]. Gaplovsky, A.; Donovalova, J.; Lacova, M.; Mracnova, R.; El‐Shaaer, H. M. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2000, 136, 61‐65. [17]. El‐Shaaer, H. M.; Perjessy, A.; Zahradnik, P.; Lacova, M.; Sustekova, Z. Monatsh. Chem. 1993, 124, 539‐548. [18]. Bauer, A. W.; Kirby, W. W. M.; Sherris, J. C.; Turck, M. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1966, 45, 493‐496.