untitled European Journal of Chemistry 4 (3) (2013) 207‐210 European Journal of Chemistry ISSN 2153‐2249 (Print) / ISSN 2153‐2257 (Online)  2013 EURJCHEM DOI:10.5155/eurjchem.4.3.207‐210.780 European Journal of Chemistry Journal homepage: www.eurjchem.com Synthesis, characterization and antibacterial activity of (E)‐chalcone derivatives Ahmed Mutanabbi Abdula Chemistry Department, College of Science, Al‐Mustansiriyah University, Baghdad, 00964, Iraq *Corresponding author at: Chemistry Department, College of Science, Al‐Mustansiriyah University, Baghdad, 00964, Iraq. Tel.: +964.780.8838128; fax: +964.780.8838128. E‐mail address: ahm.chem@yahoo.com (A.M. Abdula). ARTICLE INFORMATION ABSTRACT Received: 20 March 2013 Received in revised form: 23 April 2013 Accepted: 23 April 2013 Online: 30 September 2013 KEYWORDS (E)‐Chalcone derivatives were synthesized by the Claisen‐Schmidt condensation of aromatic aldehydes with methyl ketones. 5‐Arylfuran‐2‐carboxaldehydes (1a‐b) were synthesized by Meerwein´s method and condensed with 2‐acetylpyrole or 2‐acetylfuran to produce the new chalcone derivatives (2a‐d). The new chalcones were characterized using FT‐IR and GC‐MS. The synthesized compounds were also screened against some bacterial species to evaluate their activity as promising antibacterial agents. Furan derivatives Meerwein’s reaction Chalcone derivatives Antibacterial activity Claisen‐Schmidt condensation 1,3‐Diphenyl‐2‐propen‐1‐ones 1. Introduction Chalcones or 1,3‐diphenyl‐2‐propen‐1‐one derivatives are a class of open chain flavonoids in which two aromatic rings are linked by a three carbon α,β‐unsaturated carbonyl skeleton. Chalcones and their derivatives have shown a wide variety of therapeutic activities such as anti‐oncogenic [1], anti‐ inflammatory [2], anti‐ulcerative [3], analgesic [4], antiviral [5], anti‐fungal [6], anti‐malarial [7], and anti‐bacterial activities [8]. During the last decade, the antimicrobial resistant represent the major problem facing the world, so that several new antibiotics and antifungal agents are accepted each year to help treatment the infectious diseases. In order to discovering new antimicrobial agents, this research illustrated the synthesis novel (E) chalcone derivatives and screening their activities against some gram positive and game negative bacterial species. 2. Experimental 2.1. Materials and method All starting materials and solvents were purchased from Sigma‐Aldrich and Fluka and used without further purification. Melting points were determined on Electro‐thermal capillary apparatus and are uncorrected. FT‐IR measurements were recorded on Shimadzu model FT‐IR‐8400S. Mass spectra were recorded on a Shimadzu GCMS‐QP2010 Ultra apparatus. 2.2. General procedure for the preparation of 5‐arylfuran‐2‐ carboxaldehydes (1a‐b) These compounds were synthesized as mentioned in the reference [9,10]. 4‐Substituted aniline (0.136 mol) was dissolved in a mixture of concentrated HCl (33.7 mL) and H2O (22.5 mL). The solution was cooled to 0 °C and diazotized at 0‐5 °C with sodium nitrite (9.5 g, 0.138 mol) dissolved in H2O (25 mL). The solution was stirred for another 10 min, filtered and then furan‐2‐carboxaldehyde (15.4 g, 0.16 mol) in H2O (50 mL) was added along with a solution of CuCl2·2H2O (5 g, 0.04 mol) in H2O (25 mL) at a temperature of 10‐15 °C. The reaction mixture was slowly warmed up to 40 °C and stirred at this temperature for 4h. The precipitate was filtered with suction, washed with water and an aqueous solution of sodium hydrogen carbonate (5%) and water. The products were dried at room temperature and recrystallized from ethanol (Scheme 1). 2.3. General procedure for the preparation of (2E)‐3‐[5‐ (substituted phenyl)‐furan‐2‐yl]‐1‐(aryl)prop‐2‐en‐1‐ones (2a‐d) These derivatives were synthesized according to procedure described in reference [11‐14]. A mixture of 2‐acetylfuran or 2‐ acetylpyrrol (0.004 mol), aromatic aldehyde (0.004 mol), and some pellets of solid NaOH in 20 mL of ethanol was stirred at room temperature for 6 h. The resulting solid was washed, dried, and crystallized from ethanol (Scheme 1). (2E)‐3‐[5‐(4‐Chlorophenyl)‐furan‐2‐yl]‐1‐(1H‐pyrrol‐2‐yl) prop‐2‐en‐1‐one (2a): Color: Dark yellow powder. Yield: 75%. M.p.: 158‐160 °C. FT‐IR (KBr, ν, cm‐1): 3229 (pyrrole N‐H), 3132 (aromatic C‐H), 2969 (aliphatic C‐H), 1641 (C=O), 1578, 1551 (C=C). GC‐MS (EI, m/z): 297 (M+), 186, 158, 139, 111, 94, 66, 44. (2E)‐3‐[5‐(3‐Nitrophenyl)‐furan‐2‐yl]‐1‐(1H‐pyrrol‐2‐yl) prop‐2‐en‐1‐one (2b): Color: Yellow powder. Yield: 73%. M.p.: 168‐170 °C. FT‐IR (KBr, ν, cm‐1): 3241 (pyrrole N‐H), 3121 (aromatic C‐H), 2965, 2866 (aliphatic C‐H), 1643 (C=O), 1589, 1529 (C=C). GC‐MS (EI, m/z): 308 (M+), 281, 207, 191, 186, 158, 133, 96, 73, 44. (2E)‐3‐[5‐(4‐Chlorophenyl)‐furan‐2‐yl]‐1‐(furan‐2‐yl)prop‐2‐ en‐1‐one (2c): Color: Gray powder. Yield: 50%. M.p.: 94‐96 °C. FT‐IR (KBr, ν, cm‐1): 3123 (aromatic C‐H), 2926, 2857 (aliphatic C‐H), 1651 (C=O), 1591, 1468 (C=C). GC‐MS (EI, m/z): 298 (M+), 263, 241, 187, 139, 111, 95, 76, 67. 208 Abdula / European Journal of Chemistry 4 (3) (2013) 207‐210 Scheme 1 Scheme 2 (2E)‐3‐[5‐(3‐Nitrophenyl)‐furan‐2‐yl]‐1‐(furan‐2‐yl)prop‐2‐ en‐1‐one (2d): Color: Dark brown powder. Yield: 40%. M.p.: 115‐118 °C. FT‐IR (KBr, ν, cm‐1): 3124 (aromatic C‐H), 2928, 2862 (aliphatic C‐H), 1665 (C=O), 1597, 1528(C=C). GC‐MS (EI, m/z): 308 (M+), 281, 207, 191, 158, 133, 96, 73, 44. 2.4. Antimicrobial studies The (E)‐chalcone derivatives (2a‐d) were tested for their antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella SPP (Gram ‐) as well as Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis (Gram +) using well diffusion method [15]. DMSO was run as a control and test was performed at 10 mg/mL concentration using DMSO solvent. Tetracycline and amoxicillin were used as standard drugs. Each experiment was made in triplicate and the average reading was taken. 3. Results and discussion The starting materials 5‐(4‐chlorophenyl)furan‐2‐carbox‐ aldehyde (1a) and 5‐(3‐nitrophenyl)furan‐2‐carboxaldehyde (1b) were prepared under the conditions of Meerwein´s reaction from 4‐chloroaniline or 3‐nitroaniline and furan‐2‐ carboxaldehyde as described in Scheme 1. Claisen‐Schmidt condensation of aldehyde derivatives (1a‐b) with 2‐acetylfuran or 2‐acetylpyrrol in the presence of sodium hydroxide gives chalcone derivatives 2a‐d in good yield (Scheme 1). The mechanism of Claisen‐Schmidt reaction can be summarized in Scheme 2. The structures of chalcone derivatives (2a‐d) were characterized by recording their IR and GC‐MS spectra. The IR spectrum of compound 2a showed absorption at 3229 cm‐1 which is due to the pyrrole N‐H stretching, while the aromatic C‐H stretching frequency absorption appear at 3132 cm‐1. 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 27.5 30.0 32.5 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 (x1,000,000) TIC a 50.0 75.0 100.0 125.0 150.0 175.0 200.0 225.0 250.0 275.0 300.0 325.0 350.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 % 158 297 139 20713094 66 111 268204 28144 186 233 254 355 b Figure 1. GC spectra (a) and GC‐MS spectra (b) of chalcone derivative 2a. N H O O Cl Abdula / European Journal of Chemistry 4 (3) (2013) 207‐210 209 Table 1. Inhibition zone of (E)‐chalcone derivatives against some bacterial species. Compound Inhibition zone (mm) at 10 mg/mL against Gram (‐) Gram (+) Escherichia coli Klebsiella SPP Staphylococcus aureus Enterococcus faecalis 2a ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2b 10 7 22 ‐ 2c ‐ ‐ 28 ‐ 2d 8 7 14 ‐ Tetracycline 19 10 ‐ 20 Amoxicillin ‐ 8 30 19 O O HN Cl O HN m/z =94 HN m/z = 66 O O HN O HN O O HN m/z = 186 m/z = 158 m/z = 297 Figure 2. Mass fragments of compound 2a. The aliphatic C‐H sterching appear at 2969 cm‐1. The carbonyl group C=O frequency band appeared at 1641 cm‐1. Bands at 1578 and 1551 cm‐1 related to C=C absorption further confirm the structure of compound. The GC‐MS spectrum of 2a as illustrated in Figure 1 showed the parent ion peak at an m/z value of 297 (M+) and the fragments at 186, 158, 94 and 66 strongly enhanced the elucidation of compound. The physical properties, spectral data and mass analysis of all the synthesized compounds are given in the experimental section. The suggested fragments for the compound 2a depicted in Figure 2. This research included the in vitro assay of the synthesized compounds against several microbial species to evaluate their activities as promising antimicrobial agents. The antibacterial activity results revealed that (2E)‐3‐[5‐(substituted phenyl)‐ furan‐2‐yl]‐1‐(aryl)prop‐2‐en‐1‐ones (2a‐d) exhibited moderate to potent bacterial growth inhibition against some gram positive and gram negative strains. Compound 2c exhibited the portentous activity against Staphylococcus aureus comparing with Amoxicillin as standard while compound 1 show no activity against all bacterial species. Table 1 shows the Inhibition zone in mm at 10 mg/ mL concentration of tested compounds. 4. Conclusions (E)‐Chalcone derivatives were prepared by the Claisen‐ Schmidt condensation. The synthesized derivatives were confirmed using FT‐IR and GC‐MS analysis. The new compounds were tested against several of gram positive and gram negative bacterial species and exhibited potent to moderate activity as antimicrobial species. Acknowledgements This study was supported by Chemistry Department, College of Science, Al‐Mustansiriyah University, Baghdad, Iraq. Supplementary Materials: FT‐IR and GC‐MS data for comp‐ ounds 2a‐d. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://www.eurjchem.com. References [1]. Kumar, S. K.; Hager, E.; Pettit, C.; Gurulingappa, H.; Davidson, N. E.; Khan, S. R. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 2813‐2815. [2]. Hsieh, H. K.; Lee, T. H.; Wang, J. P.; Wang, J. J.; Lin, C. N. Pharm. Res. 1998, 15(1), 39‐46. [3]. Murakami, S.; Muramatsu, M.; Aihara, H.; Otomo, S. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1991, 42(7), 1447‐1451. [4]. Viana, G. S.; Bandeira, M. A.; Matos, F. J. Phytomedicine 2003, 10(2), 189‐195. [5]. Wu, J. H.; Wang, X. H.; Yi, Y. H.; Lee, K. H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2003, 13(10), 1813‐1815. [6]. Lopez, S. N.; Castelli, M. V.; Zacchino, S. A.; Dominguez, J. N.; Lobo, G.; Cortes, J. C.; Ribas, J. C.; Devia, C.; Rodriguez, A. M.; Enriz, R. D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2001, 9(8), 1999‐2004. [7]. Liu, M.; Go, P.; Wilairat, M. L. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44(25), 4443‐4452. [8]. Bekhit, A. A.; Habib, N. S.; Bekhit, A. Boll. Chim. Farm. 2001, 140(5), 297‐301. [9]. Puterova, Z.; Krutosikova, A.; Lycka, A.; Durcekova, T. Molecules 2004, 9, 241‐255. [10]. Puterova. Z.; Sterk, H.; Krutosikova, A. Molecules 2004, 9(1), 11‐21. 210 Abdula / European Journal of Chemistry 4 (3) (2013) 207‐210 [11]. Basaif, S. A.; Sobahi, T. R.; Khalil, A. K.; Hassan, M. A. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2005, 26 (11), 1677‐1681. [12]. Radwan, M. A. A.; Abbas, E. M. H. Monatsh. Chem. 2009. 140 (2), 229‐ 233. [13]. Yadav, N.; Dixit, S. K.; Bhattacharya, A.; Mishra, L. C.; Sharma, M.; Awasthi, S. K.; Bhasin, V. K. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2012, 80(2), 340‐ 347. [14]. Sid, A.; Lamara, K.; Mokhtari, M.; Ziani, N.; Mosset, P. Eur. J. Chem. 2011, 2(3) 311‐313. [15]. Tomi, I. H. R.; Al‐Daraji, A. H. R.; Al‐Qaysi, R. R. T.; Hasson, M. M.; Al‐ Dulaimy, K. H. D. Arab. J. Chem. 2010. doi:10.1016/j.arabjc.2010.12.003. In press.