Conflict Management and Performance of Health Care Professionals in Teaching Hospitals in Rivers State Adim, Chidiebere Victor Odili, Chukwuemeka Pope Aigboje, Patrick Oyaregba European Journal of Human Resource ISSN 2520-4697 (Online) Vol.4, Issue 2 No.2, pp 12-36, 2020 www.ajpojournals.org 12 Conflict Management and Performance of Health Care Professionals in Teaching Hospitals in Rivers State 1Adim, Chidiebere Victor; 1Odili, Chukwuemeka Pope and 2Aigboje, Patrick Oyaregba 1Department of Management, Faculty of Management Sciences, Rivers State University, Nkpolu-Oroworukwo, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria. 2Department of Business Administration and Marketing, School of Management Sciences, Babcock University, Ilishan-Remo, Ogun State, Nigeria. ABSTRACT Purpose: The purpose of this study is to conflict management and performance of health care professionals in Teaching Hospitals in Rivers State. Methodology: The study used a cross sectional research design involving medical doctors, nurses, medical laboratory scientists and pharmacists in University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital and Rivers State University Teaching Hospital. A Multi-stage sampling was employed to select 165 healthcare professionals from both hospitals. The reliability of the instrument was achieved by the use of the Cronbach Alpha coefficient with all the items scoring above 0.70. The hypotheses were tested using the Spearman’s Rank Order Correlation Coefficient with the aid of Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 23.0. The tests were carried out at a 95% confidence interval and a 0.05 level of significance. Findings: Results from analysis of data revealed that conflict management significantly predict performance of health care professionals in Teaching Hospitals in Rivers State. Recommendation: The study recommends that health care professionals’ collaboration should be adopted in Teaching Hospitals. This includes sharing of patient information, joint participation in the care and in the decision-making process, and degree of cooperation, must be carefully scrutinized and implemented with the added input of nurses, physicians and other paramedics. Keywords: Conflict, Conflict Management, Performance, Negotiation, Collaboration, Accommodation file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/New%20AJPO%20JOURNALS/American%20Journal%20of%20Finance/www.ajpojournals.org European Journal of Human Resource ISSN 2520-4697 (Online) Vol.4, Issue 2 No.2, pp 12-36, 2020 www.ajpojournals.org 13 INTRODUCTION Conflict is one of the countless challenges common to many organizations, the health sector inclusive (Yu & Davidhizar, 2004). The potential for conflict or rivalry to arise in this setting is significantly higher because of multifaceted and regular interactions among health workers (Swansburg & Swansburg, 2002). The World Health Organization describes health workers as all people engaged in actions whose primary intent is to enhance health; they include doctors, nurses, pharmacists, laboratory technician, laboratory scientists, community health workers, management, and support workers. According to World Health Organization (2006) health-care workers are primarily concerned with the well-being of the patient, but organizational hierarchy, specialization, and multiplicity of skills have created rivalry (Kleinman,2004) and power struggle among various groups of health professionals over the control and leadership of the work process. To worsen the situation, different health-professional associations act as interest groups to influence government policy in favor of their members, not minding the implication to other professional groups and the health sector in general. The healthcare sector is complex, heterogeneous in terms of employee composition and conflict prone. Healthcare service provision is inherently interdisciplinary; it requires doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and other health professionals with different specialties to work in teams (Manser, 2009). Gittell, Fairfield, Bierbaum, Head, Jackson, Kelly, Laskin, Lipson, Siliski, Thornhill and Zuckerman (2000) observed that multidisciplinary collaboration of scholars will optimize quality of care, lower cost and subsequently results in improved patient’s outcomes. Collaboration among health care providers continues to remain an essential ingredient in the healthcare service delivery today. Findings by Rafferty, Ball and Aiken (2001) equally reinforced the value of teamwork and its association with a range of positive occupational and organizational attributes such as job satisfaction, satisfaction with being a nurse, plans to remain in post, and lower levels of reported burnout. Beyond being a highly heterogeneous team, the pressures of clinical work that increases within an ever-limited staffing supply and the inadequate resources in many developing countries among others have all combined to increase the complexities of the vulnerability of the healthcare team to conflict (Kelly, 2006; Saulo & Wegener, 2000). In addition, differing background, interest, training, specialization, values, and professional allegiance can make conflict become inevitable (Suppiah, Uli & Othman, 2006). Behfar, Peterson, Mannix and Trochim (2008) specifically identified ambiguity and conflict over roles; and conflict and confusion over leadership as particularly contributory to conflict among team members. Consistent with this is Todorova and Mihaylova-Alakidi (2009) submission that conflicts represent inevitable part of organizational everyday life in healthcare structures. The net result is increased propensity of the healthcare team members who are expected to work together as a strong cohesive team to conflict (Gerardi, 2003). While conflict is regarded as a natural phenomenon in every human relationship (Kelly, 2006), concerns have however existed as to whether conflict plays a constructive or destructive role in society (Hill, 2001). De Dreu and Weingart (2003) in their study established strong and negative correlations between relationship conflict, task conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction. In a related study, Wilson (2004) reported that conflict within the nursing profession drains energy, reduces focus, and causes discomfort and hostility. Hall and Weaver (2001) threading a path of caution, also posit that conflict, when mishandled, could make the team file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/New%20AJPO%20JOURNALS/American%20Journal%20of%20Finance/www.ajpojournals.org European Journal of Human Resource ISSN 2520-4697 (Online) Vol.4, Issue 2 No.2, pp 12-36, 2020 www.ajpojournals.org 14 ineffective and dysfunctional. Brinkert (2010) noted that unmanaged conflict is costly not only in monetary terms and not only for the healthcare personnel but can extend to affect the users. The negative impact of conflict though may be indisputable, conflict can as well be constructive; providing personal gain; acting as incentive for creativity; and serving as a powerful motivator (Marriner-Tomey, 1996 cited in Ayandiran, Ola, Salami & Agunbiade, 2015). Kapusuzoglu (2010) added it can even provide opportunity for learning anew as well as growth. Brinkert (2010) equally noted that the impact of conflict on an interdisciplinary team can result in the patient benefitting more from treatment decisions that are a product of careful deliberation and combined expertise. To Todorova and Mihaylova-Alakidi (2009), conflicts are preferable because they indicate systemic problems, give opportunity for hidden negative processes to occur, and are generator of ideas and alternatives. Wilmot and Hocker (2007) have also emphasized on the positive dimensions of conflict such as its role in helping to: solve important problems (e.g. getting individuals to address power and relationship issues); clarify individual and shared goals; overcome resentments; and come to mutual understanding. Similarly, Siders and Aschenbrener (1999) have long ago asserted that a well-managed conflict enhances self-confidence and self- esteem of the parties; builds relationships; and engenders creative solutions beyond expectations. The lesson then as Mayer (2008) puts it is that it is the manner of handling workplace conflicts that determines the eventual outcome at the individual, professional, group and organizational levels. Conflict in the health sector has been due to various causes which include poor remuneration and working conditions for workers; inadequate health facilities; lack of medical infrastructure; and non-implementation of collective agreement, among others. Health workers often adopt confrontational approach in addressing these myriad of problems (Osabuohein, 2010). The basis of conflict between health workers and their employers (government and its health management team) is often attributed to divergent opinion between the two actors (Jones, George & Hill 2000). Employers perceive employees as lazy and uncooperative individuals who pose a threat to the smooth operation of business while employees perceive the government as exploitative (Chukwu, 2008). Halimatu (2002) described this perceptual bias as the “brewing pot” for conflict. Fashoyin (2002) stated that conflict is an incompatibility of goals or values between two or more parties in a relationship, combined with attempts to control each other’s’ feeing. Statement of the Problem In all places where there are interactions between people there is bound to be misunderstanding resulting from differences in perception, behaviour and approach of life issues. This poses problem to collaboration in client care to the detriment of the patients. Modern health care delivery system is complex and rapidly changing. The organization of professionals involved in patient care used to be that of a hierarchy, with the physician in a “command” position. Now it routinely combines the efforts of physicians of different specialties, skilled nurses and other health care professionals in a health care team. High quality and effective clinical practice in such environment requires a physician to be a member, and often the leader, of many teams that must work together to deliver health care (O'Connell & Pascoe, 2004). file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/New%20AJPO%20JOURNALS/American%20Journal%20of%20Finance/www.ajpojournals.org European Journal of Human Resource ISSN 2520-4697 (Online) Vol.4, Issue 2 No.2, pp 12-36, 2020 www.ajpojournals.org 15 Relationships between professionals in the healthcare team are by their nature unequal ones. Differences in knowledge and experience in specific issues confer on those who possess them, unequal responsibility and authority both ethically and legally, and precisely because of this inequality of authority and responsibility (Strutton & Knouse, 1997 cited in Ogbonnaya & Ogbonnaya & Adeoye-Sunday (2007) inter-professional conflicts are common and expected. Among all professions in the health care team, the physician occupies a pre-eminent position in the medical division of labour because he enjoys a higher degree of autonomy, responsibility, authority, and social status than any other health care professional. This is because he is largely responsible for the production of the knowledge for the practice of medicine and on which the paramedical personnel depends. More important, the legislation governing the practice of medicine clearly puts the physicians at the helm of the medical division of labour (Erinosho, 1998). Historically, conflict occurs between physicians and nurses. Recently, this conflict has extended to other health professionals in the health care team. Factors responsible include physician dominance, nurse deference and physician devaluation of nursing (Norman, 1998). Other sources of conflict described in literature include lack of definition of the appropriate level of autonomy for team members, lack of constructive dialogue across perceived discipline-based differences of opinion, and lack of knowledge of the expertise of other professions. They also include role blurring of team members, differences among professions in values and theoretical base, negative team norms, client stereotyping and (Rogers, 2004; Rease & Sonrag, 2001) administrative issues. In Nigeria, other sources of conflict identified include societal pressure on workers including health professions, low morale of health professionals due to harsh economic realities, communication gap amongst health professionals and certain acts of omission and commission by Government and its agencies within the health sector (Rosenstein, 2002). Events in Nigeria suggest that the salary structure in the public health sector is responsible for many conflicts as every salary increase in the public health sector has always left one group or the other aggrieved. Is the differential salary between doctors and the other health professions responsible for this conflict? Are the other professions simply envious of the doctor? Do doctors in any way act in ways that intimidate or discriminate against the other professions? What exactly do the professions perceive as factors responsible for the conflict in the health team in Nigeria? Finally, what do the professions perceive as means of resolving the conflict? It is important to ascertain the perceptions of the professions on what causes inter-professional conflict for a viable solution to be fashioned out. Inter-professional rivalry (IPR) is hazardous to patients, health workers themselves, and the health system in general. Several studies have shown that conflict or rivalry in the health sector disrupts intra- and inter-sectorial collaboration, (Gardner & Cary,1999) and causes or aggravates stress including emotional exhaustion for workers. For O’Driscoll MP and Beehr (2000); Elloy Terpening and Kohls (2001) in addition, it reduces the commitment of workers to the health service (Kroposki Murdaugh, Tavakoli, 1999) and encourages selfish behavior (Jex, Adams & Bachrach, 2003) which ultimately results in mistreatment or non-treatment of patients. Incessant strike actions arising from IPR is currently the order of the day in Nigeria’s health sector and this is unacceptable and unethical as it comes with a lot of negative effects to the general populace. IPR among health workers has been very intense, deep rooted, and unparalleled with quality of health-care delivery adversely affected. Iyang (1998) argued that the Presidential Committee of file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/New%20AJPO%20JOURNALS/American%20Journal%20of%20Finance/www.ajpojournals.org European Journal of Human Resource ISSN 2520-4697 (Online) Vol.4, Issue 2 No.2, pp 12-36, 2020 www.ajpojournals.org 16 Experts on Inter-Professional Relationships in the public health sector headed by Alhaji Mahmud Yayale Ahmed identified approximately 50 contentious issues dividing health-sector workers. In Nigeria, anecdotal evidence reveals the existence of incessant rancour among healthcare professionals with a number of such rancour degenerating into full-blown conflicts and sometimes industrial dispute following poor resolution. It is somewhat paradoxical that despite the vulnerability of the Nigerian health sector to conflict situations, only very few studies have examined the conflict phenomenon in our complex, high pressured, and fragile health sector. Moreover, experience is not finite but fluid, it is thus necessary for a reevaluation over time. This study therefore explores the conflict management and performance of healthcare professionals’ in Teaching Hospitals in Rivers State. Purpose of the Study The main aim of this study was to examine the relationship between conflict management and performance of health care professionals in Teaching Hospitals in Rivers State. The following specific objectives guided the study: i. Examine the relationship between negotiation and performance of health care professionals in Teaching Hospitals in Rivers State. ii. Examine the relationship between collaboration and performance of health care professionals in Teaching Hospitals in Rivers State. iii. Examine the relationship between accommodation and performance of health care professionals in Teaching Hospitals in Rivers State. The study also sought to provide answers to the following research questions: i. What is the relationship between negotiation and performance of health care professionals in Teaching Hospitals in Rivers State? ii. What is relationship between collaboration and performance of health care professionals in Teaching Hospitals in Rivers State? iii. What is relationship between accommodation and performance of health care professionals in Teaching Hospitals in Rivers State? file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/New%20AJPO%20JOURNALS/American%20Journal%20of%20Finance/www.ajpojournals.org European Journal of Human Resource ISSN 2520-4697 (Online) Vol.4, Issue 2 No.2, pp 12-36, 2020 www.ajpojournals.org 17 Conceptual Framework Fig.1 Conceptual framework for the relationship between conflict management strategies and performance Source: Desk Research (2020) LITERATURE REVIEW Concept of Conflict Conflict involves a disagreement about the allocation of scarce resources or a clash of goals, status, values, perceptions, or personalities. Much of the conflict we experience arises from other communication of our wants, needs, and values to others. (Robbins & Sanghi, 2005) defined conflict as a process that begins when one party perceives that another party has negatively affected, or is about to negatively affects, something that the first party cares about. The traditional school of thought emphasized that conflict is of no importance to the organization and so, it must be avoided. The human relation school looked at conflict as well and said it was inevitable and very natural, it need not be evil but it can be a positive force in determining performance of a group. For decades, there has been confusion over the role conflict plays in the organization. However, the interactionist school of thought labelled some conflict as very necessary for a group to perform efficiently and effectively, still holding constant its role as a positive force to a group (Robbins, et al, 2009). Conflict by nature is inevitable in any human organization. Its endemic nature in human grouping has been traced to the pursuit of divergent interests, goals and aspirations by individuals and/or groups in a defined social and physical environment (Owoseni, 2011). Conflict may be caused by vulnerable organizational structure, weak communication, personality conflict, lack of teamwork as well as lots of change within the organization which may be mismanaged (Mughal & Khan, 2013). These conflicts could manifest itself in various levels such as; Intra-Individual level, inter- personal, inter-group and organizational conflict (Mughal & Khan, 2013). Conflict is a social phenomenon in which two or more persons, families, parties, communities, states, etc are in disagreement with each other while trying to protect their own interest (Salami, 2009). It is an interesting thing because every individual want to be seen, wants to be heard as well as want to Performance Conflict Management Strategies Negotiation Collaboration Accommodation file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/New%20AJPO%20JOURNALS/American%20Journal%20of%20Finance/www.ajpojournals.org European Journal of Human Resource ISSN 2520-4697 (Online) Vol.4, Issue 2 No.2, pp 12-36, 2020 www.ajpojournals.org 18 show off his distinctive competence. This is as a result of the ego in man which can never be hidden for a very long time, no matter the nature of environment he finds himself. Concept of Conflict Management Conflict management is prescribed not simply as a mechanism for dealing with difficult differences within an existing social system, but also as an approach that can facilitate constructive social change towards a responsive and equitable system (Fisher 2000). Organizational conflict may occur between two individuals, within small groups and work teams, or between groups (De Dreu & Van de Vliert, 1997). It is obvious that conflict is an unavoidable reality of living; but, while one may recognize this, it still does not negate the fact that conflict is difficult to define, is often viewed much differently today than it was a few decades ago, and is linked to, but is more than, communication. Perhaps because conflict is such an elusive entity, one tends to discuss it in terms of sources, types, and stages. Considering this, conflict management seems to be a concept that can be dealt with pragmatically. Much has been written about the management of conflict. A great deal of the literature is derived from the business world. In simpler terms, Huseman (1977) views conflict management as distinguishing between useful conflicts and conflicts that should be eliminated. Also, conflict management should involve the ability to develop individuals who can work under stress but continue to be productive. Conflict management refers to the modes used by either or both parties to cope with a conflict. Adler and Towne (1990) identified three possible courses of actions when faced with a conflict: (1) accepting the status quo (i.e. living with the problem); (2) using force and mandating change; (3) reaching an agreement by negotiating. Three types of outcomes result from these approaches to conflict management: Win–Lose approach, Lose–Lose approach and Win–Win approach. Conflict management research focus is centered primarily on the conflict situation and the person– situation interaction (Knapp et al. 1988). However, there is a reason to believe that conflict behaviour is determined by both situational and dispositional influences (Sandy et al. 2000). The findings suggest that the instrument is able to differentiate between conflict management strategies. Successful conflict resolution not only removes frustration but also leads to higher effectiveness, trust and openness (Van de Vliert 1998). Deetz and Stevenson (1986) discuss a number of items which must be kept in mind when preparing for conflict management. First, the manager must try to understand the type of conflict that he or she will be dealing with. It may be a conflict of differing opinions, incompatible roles, incompatible goals, or differing resources. Identification of the type of conflict will help in managing the conflict. Second, the manager must also be aware of the importance of the conflict so as to select appropriate strategies for management. Third, the manager must recognize the complexity of the conflict as this can vary widely. Finally, the manager must also be able to assess the energy and resources available for managing the conflict. Dimensions of Conflict Management Negotiation Strategy The conflict management process encompasses a wide range of activities including negotiation, problem solving, dealing with emotion, and understanding positions (Brett, 2001). According to Neale and Fragale (2006), negotiation is a process by which two parties, each with its own viewpoint and objectives, attempt to reach a mutually satisfactory result on a matter of common file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/New%20AJPO%20JOURNALS/American%20Journal%20of%20Finance/www.ajpojournals.org European Journal of Human Resource ISSN 2520-4697 (Online) Vol.4, Issue 2 No.2, pp 12-36, 2020 www.ajpojournals.org 19 concern. Negotiation can also be defined as the interaction between two or more parties with divergent interests in order to reach an agreement (De Dreu, Weingart & Kwon, 2000). Negotiation is used to minimize conflict affecting individuals so as to maximize cooperation and keep conflict to acceptable levels. This in turn drives performance (Rahim, 2002). According to Petkovic (2008) there are several negotiation tactics that can be applied. These include Face–to-face tactic whereby a mutual confidence as a foundation for negotiation can be established, Persuading tactic which assumes using different methods and manners to win over partners and to reach a better negotiating position, Deceitfulness tactic which assumes presenting false data and arguments, Threat tactic based on deterrence from the side which holds a better position, or has more power. Promise tactic based on having a better position and more power, with the stronger side persuading the weaker that it will keep its promises and Concession tactic which is the most important tactic in the negotiation strategy. All actors in the conflict count on both sides making a concession. Since negotiation increasingly gains importance as a popular and constructive way to manage conflict (De Dreu, Weingart & Kwon 2000) assert that negotiators can help adversaries communicate with each other in many ways (Sebanius, 2004). Win-win Negotiation Outcome: The win -win outcome occurs when each side of a dispute feels they have won. Since both sides benefit from such a scenario, any resolutions to the conflict are likely to be accepted voluntarily. Negotiators who aim at a win-win situation often fail to appreciate that this approach requires the parties to work together and cooperatively explore all possibilities before selecting an approach that is most likely to deliver a mutually beneficial agreement (Thompson, 2005). The win-win outcome occurs as a result of the use of the collaboration approach when all the conflicting parties meet and discuss the subject of the dispute explicitly and every party tries to care about the purpose of the other parties (Newstorm, 2007). A win-win negotiation outcome can help improve team performance by reducing tension, antagonism and distraction of members of a team (Mannix, 2001). Win-lose Negotiation: The win -lose outcome occurs when one side of a dispute feels they have won and the other feels that they have lost (Beckno, 2006). For instance Industrial conflicts, which usually arise due to a breakdown in negotiation as well as disagreements between employer(s) and the employees, connote a temporary stoppage of work resulting from the pursuance of grievance(s) by workers resulting from a win- lose negotiation outcome (Osabuohien, 2014) in win- lose scenario, 30 negotiation is seen in terms of getting your own way, driving a hard bargain or beating off the opposition (Almusdy, 2007), while in the short term bargaining may well achieve the aims for one side (Tressler, 2007). This means that while one side wins the other loses and this outcome may well damage future relationships between the parties. It also increases the likelihood of relationships breaking down, of people walking out or refusing to deal with the winners again and the process ending in a bitter dispute (Tressler, 2007). Win-Lose bargaining is probably the most familiar form of negotiating that is undertaken. Individuals decide what they want, then each side takes up an extreme position, such as asking the other side for much more than they expect to get. Through haggling, a compromise is reached, and each side’s hope is that this compromise will be in their favor (Ferro, Cracraft, & Dorsey, 2006). Azamoza (2004) argued that win-lose negotiation outcome can help strengthen the organization and enable an organization improve its performance. file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/New%20AJPO%20JOURNALS/American%20Journal%20of%20Finance/www.ajpojournals.org European Journal of Human Resource ISSN 2520-4697 (Online) Vol.4, Issue 2 No.2, pp 12-36, 2020 www.ajpojournals.org 20 Lose-Lose Negotiation: In this scenario, all parties end up being worse off. Most of the times the conflict is an emotive issue that results in making a decision where none of the parties is a winner. In lose-lose situations neither party achieves their needs or wants. However, in some lose-lose situations, all parties understand that losses are unavoidable and that they will be evenly distributed. In such situations, lose-lose outcomes can be preferable to win-lose outcomes because the distribution is at least considered to be fair. In the organizational context, some parties cannot stand the reality of losing a negotiation. They spend so much time and energy making the one who won earlier bleed but it usually leads to lose-lose situation. Good negotiation usually involves a lot of homework, and teamwork for making long term binding agreement (Neely & Crowe, 2001). Collaboration Strategy There is cooperation and the search for a mutually beneficial outcome, when each party to conflict desire to fully satisfy the concerns of all parties, that is, high concern for self and others (Ezeanyim, 2010). As such, the intentions of the parties is to solve the problem by clarifying differences rather than by accommodating various points of view through openness, exchange of information, and examination of differences to reach a solution acceptable to both parties. This 38 strategy builds a friendly environment of an organisation where both employers and employees feel confident and free to share their knowledge or perceptions in order to make a single point, that is, reach a single decision in order to combat conflict. Rahim (2011) asserts that collaboration strategy is useful for effective dealing of complex problems especially when one party alone cannot solve the problem. Friedman et al. as cited in Ajik, Akinlabi, Magaji and Sonubi (2015) found that individuals who use integrative (collaborative style) conflict handling style experience lower level of work conflict and stress at job. The strategy is appropriate for dealing with the strategic issues pertaining to an organisation’s objectives and policies, strategic planning and so on. It is inappropriate when task or problem is simple or trivial, when the other parties do not have adequate training and experience for problem solving or when they are unconcerned about the outcome. According to Kilman and Thomas (2008), collaboration strategy is the best method of handling conflict, as it strives to satisfy the needs of both parties. It is integrative and has high concern for personal goals as well as relationship. Accommodation An accommodating style of industrial conflict management involves neglecting one’s own concerns in order to satisfy the concerns of others (Brown, 2007). Cavanagh (1991) made it clear that this strategy is regarded as the acceptance that the preservation of pleasant interpersonal affairs is more significant than forming disagreements among colleagues. Individuals adopting an accommodating style of industrial conflict management have a high want for recognition and support from others. The accommodating individual is more apt to take a “middle of the road” attitude when an inescapable conflict emerges. These individuals tend to use apology or humor, or express their desires in an indirect way rather than coming straight to the problem (Stanford, 1997). Kraybill (2005) refers to accommodating as a harmonizing conflict response. Kraybill stated that the harmonizing style has a low focus on the agenda and a high focus on the relationship. Individuals will often use this style when they want to fit in with the other party. When this style is over-used the individual will eventually become depressed due to the fact of always giving the file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/New%20AJPO%20JOURNALS/American%20Journal%20of%20Finance/www.ajpojournals.org European Journal of Human Resource ISSN 2520-4697 (Online) Vol.4, Issue 2 No.2, pp 12-36, 2020 www.ajpojournals.org 21 other party what they want and always losing what is important to the individual. Accommodating is a means of carrying everybody along in the activities of the organization. People seem to have that natural joy working for their organizations when they are told to make their own contributions, they feel valued and they feel decisions are not just imposed on them by their superiors. While this may be seen as a weak or productive position there are situations when this approach is preferable and will gain more for a person than by taking a strong position, especially during a management of change process. It can be both a productive and unproductive strategy in the “give and take” process. Individuals who have a tendency to be accommodating prefer the harmony, good will and reciprocity that is often associated with this behaviour trait and feel that it serves them well most of the time. People who are normally accommodating must develop the wisdom to know what choices to make in a given situation and learn to deal with stress and conflict in productive ways. Accommodating is unassertive and cooperative — the opposite of competing. It‘s sacrificing one‘s own concerns to satisfy the other person‘s. The accommodating strategy essentially entails giving the opposing side what it wants. The use of accommodation often occurs when one of the parties wishes to keep the peace or perceives the issue as minor. Employees who use accommodation as a primary industrial conflict management strategy, however, may keep track and develop resentment. Accommodators are people who give in to maintain the illusion of harmony (Cahn & Abigail, 2007). Wertheim (2002) views accommodation as a destructive strategy because it often leads to a buildup of negative emotions. An accommodating board is one that cooperates to a high degree. This may be at the boards’ expense and actually works against its goals, objectives and desired outcomes. This approach is effective when the other board members are the expert or has better solutions. It is a loose - win approach. There are situations in which accommodation may be appropriate. For example when it is important to provide a temporary relief from a conflict or buy time until one is in a better position to respond or push back. Avoidance may also be necessary when the issue is not as important to you as it is to the other person or when you accept that you are wrong or when you have no choice or when continued competition would be detrimental. In some cases accommodation will help to protect more important interests while giving up on some less important ones and also afford an opportunity to reassess the situation from a different perspective. Performance According to Gilbert and Ivancevich (2000), performance refers to the act of performing or carrying into execution or recognizable action, achievement or accomplishment in the undertaking of a duty. Cascio (2006) defines performance as working of individuals in an organization to be more effective. Zaman et al. (2011) indicated that there is a significant and positive relationship between performance and reward. According to Armstrong (2000) performance is a means of getting better results from the whole organization or teams or individuals within it by understanding and managing performance within an agreed frame work of planned goals, standards and competence requirements. Performance is the accumulated end results of all the organization’s work processes and activities (Santos & Brito, 2012). It is about how effectively an organization transforms inputs into outputs (Robbins, 2009) and comprises the actual output or results as measured against its intended outputs. Liptons (2003) proposes that performance is the ability of the firm to prevail. There is hardly a consensus about its definition, and this limits advances in research and understanding of the concept of performance (Santos & Brito, 2012). As file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/New%20AJPO%20JOURNALS/American%20Journal%20of%20Finance/www.ajpojournals.org European Journal of Human Resource ISSN 2520-4697 (Online) Vol.4, Issue 2 No.2, pp 12-36, 2020 www.ajpojournals.org 22 the debate on what organization performance rages on, the approach on how to measure it has attracted even more scholarly attention (Liptons, 2003). Organizational performance is one of the most important constructs in management research Trade (2000). Continuous performance is the objective of any organization because only through this, can organizations grow and progress. Moreover knowing the determinants of organizational performance is important especially in the context of the current economic crises because it enables the identification of those factors that should be treated with an increased interest in order to improve the performance. Performance measurement estimates the parameters under which programs, investments, and acquisitions are reaching the targeted results (Perez et al., 2007). This study adopted the definition according to Trade (2000), that most performance measures could be grouped into six general categories effectiveness, efficiency, cost, quality, timeliness, innovation and productivity. Therefore Organizational performance is measured using the six parameters. This study adopted the definition according to Trade (2000), that most performance measures could be grouped into six general categories effectiveness, efficiency, cost, quality, timeliness, innovation and productivity. Therefore Organizational performance is measured using the six parameters. Conflict Management and Performance Seamless collaboration between doctors, nurses and other paramedics are necessary for effective and efficient health care delivery. However, it is a known fact that this is often absent with negative impact on the quality of health care services (Ogbimi, Adebamowo, 2006; Kathleen, McGrail, Morse, Gessner & Gardner, 2009). Developing collaborative practice among health care professionals is still a big challenge to political decision makers and organizational managers (Martin-Rodriguez, Marie-Dominique, D’amour & Ferrada-Videla, 2005). Collaborative Care refers to initiatives or activities that aim to strengthen links between different providers working together in a partnership characterized by common goals, a recognition of and respect for individual strengths and differences, equitable and effective decision-making, a focus on the patient and clear and regular communication (Dougherty, Larson, 2005). This involves doctors and other health care providers working together to provide care to a group of patients based on trust, respect and on understanding of each other’s relevance and importance using their skills, knowledge and competences (Puntilo, McAdam, 2006; Bronstein, 2003). The aftermath of lack of effective collaboration between doctors and nurses are quite grave; they include negative events such as medication errors, failure to rescue and mortality of a patient. Furthermore, this can also lead to poor coordination of patient care, less patient satisfaction, poor perception and utilization of health care services (Lorelei, Lingard, Espin, Evans, & Hawry, 2010). Ayandiran, Ola, Salami and Agunbiade (2015) further revealed from their study that that healthcare professional employ diverse strategies to resolve conflict. Dominant approaches found are collaborating or confronting style (identifying conflicts as a problem to be solved and seeking solutions that satisfy everyone's goals i.e. working with the other party to find a solution that mutually satisfies the concerns of both party, producing a win/win situation); compromising (finding an expedient, mutually acceptable solution or a middle ground that partially satisfies both parties); smoothing/accommodating (tolerating the situation and giving up ones goal for the sake of harmonious relationship and continuity of work); forcing/dominating/competing (pursuing owns interest with vigour no matter whose ox is gored); withdrawing/avoiding (beautifully file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/New%20AJPO%20JOURNALS/American%20Journal%20of%20Finance/www.ajpojournals.org European Journal of Human Resource ISSN 2520-4697 (Online) Vol.4, Issue 2 No.2, pp 12-36, 2020 www.ajpojournals.org 23 captioned by Thomas and Kilmann (1978) as diplomatic sidestepping on issue, postponing an issue until a better time, or simply withdrawing from a threatening situation). Although results revealed little shades of variation in conflict management styles along professional line, no specific pattern of conflict handling styles was established across disciplines. Healthcare professionals employ a multiplicity of conflict handling styles. From the foregoing, the following hypotheses were postulated to be tested: Ho1: There is no significant relationship between negotiation and performance of health care professionals in Teaching Hospitals in Rivers State. Ho2: There is no significant relationship between collaboration and performance of health care professionals in Teaching Hospitals in Rivers State. Ho3: There is no significant relationship between accommodation and performance of health care professionals in Teaching Hospitals in Rivers State METHODOLOGY The study used a cross sectional research design involving medical doctors, nurses, medical laboratory scientists and pharmacists in University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital and Rivers State University Teaching Hospital. A Multi-stage sampling was employed to select 165 healthcare professionals from both hospitals. The reliability of the instrument was achieved by the use of the Cronbach Alpha coefficient with all the items scoring above 0.70. The hypotheses were tested using the Spearman’s Rank Order Correlation Coefficient with the aid of Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 23.0. The tests were carried out at a 95% confidence interval and a 0.05 level of significance. DATA ANALYSIS The level of significance 0.05 was adopted as a criterion for the probability of accepting the null hypothesis in (p> 0.05) or rejecting the null hypothesis in (p <0.05). Negotiation and Performance Table 2: Correlations for Negotiation and Performance Negotiation Performance Spearman's rho Negotiation Correlation Coefficient 1.000 .883** Sig. (2-tailed) . .000 N 72 72 Performance Correlation Coefficient .883** 1.000 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 . N 72 72 **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). Source: SPSS Output file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/New%20AJPO%20JOURNALS/American%20Journal%20of%20Finance/www.ajpojournals.org European Journal of Human Resource ISSN 2520-4697 (Online) Vol.4, Issue 2 No.2, pp 12-36, 2020 www.ajpojournals.org 24 The result in table 2 shows that negotiation correlate with performance (r = 0.883). This represents a very strong correlation indicating a very substantial relationship. By interpretation, there is a very strong positive relationship between negotiation and performance of health care professionals in Teaching Hospitals in Rivers State. This finding provides answer to research question 1. Implying that performance is dependent on the utilization of negotiation strategy in the studied Teaching Hospitals in Rivers State. Similarly displayed in table 2 is the statistical test of significance (p - value), which makes possible the generalization of our findings to the study population. From the result obtained the probability value is (0.001) < (0.05) level of significance; hence the study rejects the null hypothesis and concludes that there is a significant negotiation and performance of health care professionals in Teaching Hospitals in Rivers State. The scatter plot illustrating the relationship between negotiation and performance is shown below. Figure 1: Scatter plot show showing the direction of the relationship negotiation and performance file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/New%20AJPO%20JOURNALS/American%20Journal%20of%20Finance/www.ajpojournals.org European Journal of Human Resource ISSN 2520-4697 (Online) Vol.4, Issue 2 No.2, pp 12-36, 2020 www.ajpojournals.org 25 Collaboration and Performance Table 3: Correlations for Collaboration and Performance Collaboration Performance Spearman's rho Collaboration Correlation Coefficient 1.000 .902** Sig. (2-tailed) . .000 N 72 72 Performance Correlation Coefficient .902** 1.000 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 . N 72 72 **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). Source: SPSS Output The result in table 3 shows that collaboration correlate with performance (r = 0.902). This represents a very strong correlation indicating a very substantial relationship. By interpretation, there is a very strong positive relationship between collaboration and performance of health care professionals in Teaching Hospitals in Rivers State. This finding provides answer to research question 2. Implying that performance is dependent on the utilization of collaboration strategy in the studied Teaching Hospitals in Rivers State. Similarly displayed in table 3 is the statistical test of significance (p - value), which makes possible the generalization of our findings to the study population. From the result obtained the probability value is (0.001) < (0.05) level of significance; hence the study rejects the null hypothesis and concludes that there is a significant collaboration and performance of health care professionals in Teaching Hospitals in Rivers State. The scatter plot illustrating the relationship between collaboration and performance is shown below. file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/New%20AJPO%20JOURNALS/American%20Journal%20of%20Finance/www.ajpojournals.org European Journal of Human Resource ISSN 2520-4697 (Online) Vol.4, Issue 2 No.2, pp 12-36, 2020 www.ajpojournals.org 26 Figure 2: Scatter plot show showing the direction of the relationship collaboration and performance Accommodation and Performance Table 4: Correlations for Accommodation and Performance Accommodation Performance Spearman's rho Accommodation Correlation Coefficient 1.000 .728** Sig. (2-tailed) . .000 N 72 72 Performance Correlation Coefficient .728** 1.000 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 . N 72 72 **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). Source: SPSS Output The result in table 4 shows that accommodation correlate with performance (r = 0.728). This represents a very strong correlation indicating a very substantial relationship. By interpretation, there is a very strong positive relationship between accommodation and performance of health care professionals in Teaching Hospitals in Rivers State. This finding provides answer to research file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/New%20AJPO%20JOURNALS/American%20Journal%20of%20Finance/www.ajpojournals.org European Journal of Human Resource ISSN 2520-4697 (Online) Vol.4, Issue 2 No.2, pp 12-36, 2020 www.ajpojournals.org 27 question 3. Implying that performance is dependent on the utilization of accommodation strategy in the studied Teaching Hospitals in Rivers State. Similarly displayed in table 4 is the statistical test of significance (p - value), which makes possible the generalization of our findings to the study population. From the result obtained the probability value is (0.001) < (0.05) level of significance; hence the study rejects the null hypothesis and concludes that there is a significant accommodation and performance of health care professionals in Teaching Hospitals in Rivers State. The scatter plot illustrating the relationship between accommodation and performance is shown below. Figure 3: Scatter plot show showing the direction of the relationship accommodation and performance DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS The study findings reveal that there is strong positive and significant relationship between conflict management strategies and performance of health care professionals in Teaching Hospitals in Rivers State. This finding agrees with earlier studies by Ayandiran, Ola, Salami and Agunbiade (2015) who revealed from their study that that healthcare professional employ diverse strategies to resolve conflict. Dominant approaches found are collaborating or confronting style (identifying conflicts as a problem to be solved and seeking solutions that satisfy everyone's goals i.e. working with the other party to find a solution that mutually satisfies the concerns of both party, producing a win/win situation); compromising (finding an expedient, mutually acceptable solution or a middle ground that partially satisfies both parties); smoothing/accommodating (tolerating the situation and giving up ones goal for the sake of harmonious relationship and continuity of work); forcing/dominating/competing (pursuing owns interest with vigour no matter whose ox is gored); withdrawing/avoiding (beautifully captioned by Thomas and Kilmann (1978) as diplomatic sidestepping on issue, postponing an issue until a better time, or simply withdrawing from a threatening situation). Furthermore, the study finding agrees with the views of Gittell, et al. (2000) who aptly observed that multidisciplinary collaboration of scholars will optimize quality of care, lowers cost and subsequently results in improved patient’s outcomes. Collaboration among health care providers continues to remain an essential ingredient in the healthcare service delivery today. Findings by file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/New%20AJPO%20JOURNALS/American%20Journal%20of%20Finance/www.ajpojournals.org European Journal of Human Resource ISSN 2520-4697 (Online) Vol.4, Issue 2 No.2, pp 12-36, 2020 www.ajpojournals.org 28 Rafferty Ball and Aiken (2001) equally reinforced the value of teamwork and its association with a range of positive occupational and organizational attributes such as job satisfaction, satisfaction with being a nurse, plans to remain in post, and lower levels of reported burnout. CONCLUSION Conflict is a reality across organizational boundaries and affects individuals, groups and disciplines. Conflict can initiate productive change and vitality if well managed. The consequences of conflict will inevitably be determined by how well it is managed. If not properly managed, it may cause unquantifiable damage to the organization. Therefore, government, management and employees of hospitals and health centres must recognize the existence of conflict and dealt with it effectively. Inter-professional conflict is a major issue to be reckoned with because of its colossal adverse effects on Nigeria’s health system, which is not too strong at the moment. This study thus concludes that conflict management significantly predicts performance of health care professionals in Teaching Hospitals in Rivers State. This implies that in resolving the conflicts that arises in a multi-disciplinary work environment like the teaching hospital, negotiation strategy, collaboration strategy and accommodation strategy is often adopted by the various parties. RECOMMENDATIONS i. Health care professionals’ should adopt negotiation strategy in resolving the multitude inter-professional conflicts that arises since negotiation increasingly gains importance as a popular and constructive way to manage conflict. ii. Management of Teaching Hospitals should take practical steps to address inter- professional rivalry conflict in the healthcare sector, in order to improve team cohesion and maximize the gains of multidisciplinary teamwork. iii. Health care professionals’ collaboration is highly recommended for adoption in Teaching hospitals. This includes sharing of patient information, joint participation in the care and in the decision-making process, and degree of cooperation, must be carefully scrutinized and implemented with the added input of nurses, physicians and other paramedics. REFERENCES Adler, R. B., & Towne, N. (1990). Looking out/looking in. NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Adomie, E. E. & Anie, S. O. (2005). Conflict management in Nigeria university libraries. Journal of Library Management, (27) 8, 520–530. Almusdy, A. A. (2007), Factors for selection of strategies to confront conflict. Scientific Journal of Economics and Trade, 1 (1), 1-55. Amegashie, J. A.(2010). On third-party intervention in conflicts: an economist’s view. Peace Economics. Peace Science and Public Policy, 16 (2), 1–10, Article 11 Aquilano, N.J. & Chase, R. B. (2001). Fundamentals of operations management. Prentice Hall, New Jersey. Armstrong, M. (2000). A handbook of human resource management practice. Kogan Page Publishers. file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/New%20AJPO%20JOURNALS/American%20Journal%20of%20Finance/www.ajpojournals.org European Journal of Human Resource ISSN 2520-4697 (Online) Vol.4, Issue 2 No.2, pp 12-36, 2020 www.ajpojournals.org 29 Arndt, M., & Bigelow, B. (2000). Presenting structural innovation in an institutional environment: Hospitals’ use of impression management. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 494– 522. Awan, A. G. &Anjum, K. (2015). Cost of High Employess turnover Rate in Oil industry of Pakistan, Information and Knowledge Management, 5(2), 92-102. Ayandiran, E.O., Ola, O.C., Salami, K.K., & Agunbiade, O.M. (2015). Experiences of conflicts and conflict management styles among healthcare professionals: Do conflict’s perception and attitude matter? Ife Social Sciences Review, 24(2), 1-15. Banerji, A. & Dayal, A. (2005). A Study of Communication in Emergency Situations in Hospitals. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications and Conflict, 9(2), 35-45 Banerji, A. & Dayal, A. (2005). A Study of Communication in Emergency Situations in Hospitals, Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications and Conflict 9(2), 35-45 Beckno, B. T. (2006). Preparing the American Soldier in a brigade combat team to conduct information operations in the contemporary operational environment. Master’s thesis presented to the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College. Fort Leavenworth, KS. Behfar, K. J., Peterson, R. S., Mannix, E. A. & Trochim, W. M. (2008). The critical role of conflict resolution in teams: A close look at the links between conflict type, conflict management strategies, and team outcomes. Journal of applied psychology, 93(1), 170. Brett, J. M. (2001). Negotiating globally. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Brinkert, R. (2010). A literature review of conflict communication causes, costs, benefits and interventions in nursing. Journal of Nursing Management, 18, 145 – 156. Bronstein, L.R. (2003). A Model for Interdisciplinary Collaboration. National Association of Social Workers. ISSN: 0037- 8046. Magazine/ Journal Academic English. Burns, L. R., & Wholey, D. R. (1993). Adoption and abandonment of matrix management programs: Effects of organizational characteristics and inter-organizational networks. Academy of Management Journal, 36(1), 106–138. Cascio, W.F. (2006). The economic impact of employee behaviors on organizational performance. California Management Review, 48, 41-59. Chen, J., Silverthorne, C. & Hung, J. (2006). Organisation Communication, Job Stress, Organizational Commitment, and Job Performance of Accounting Professionals in Taiwan and America. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 27(4), 242–249. Cheruiyot, K. K. (2012). The geography of the intra-national digital divide in a developing country: A spatial analysis of regional-level data in Kenya. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (AAT 3469804) Chukwu, J. (2008). The challenges of industrial conflict to an emerging economy. International Journal of Business Management, 2(4), 25-35. file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/New%20AJPO%20JOURNALS/American%20Journal%20of%20Finance/www.ajpojournals.org European Journal of Human Resource ISSN 2520-4697 (Online) Vol.4, Issue 2 No.2, pp 12-36, 2020 www.ajpojournals.org 30 Claessens, B., Roe, R. &Rutte (2009). Time management: Logic, effectiveness & challenges, In: Roe, R., Waller, M. & Clegg, S. (Eds), Time in organizational Research, London, Routledge, UK, 23-41 Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation—a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 555–590 De Dreu, C. K. W. & Weingart, L.R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance,and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (4), 741-749. De Drue, C. & Van De Vliet, (1997). Productive conflict: The importance of conflict management and conflict issue. Sage Publications, London. De Dreu, C.K.W., Weingart, L.R. & Kwon, S. (2000). Influence of social motives on integrative negotiation: a meta-analytic review and test of two theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 889-905. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.889 Deetz, S. A. & Stevenson, S.L. (1986). Managing interpersonal communication. New York: Harper and Row. Dougherty, M.B., & Larson, E. (2005). A review of instruments measuring nurse-physician collaboration. Journal of Nursing Administration, 35(5), 244-253. Downs, L. J. (2008). Time management training. Alexandria, Va: ASTD Press Elloy, D. F., Terpening, W., & Kohls, J. A. (2001). Causal model of burnout among self-managed work team members. Journal of Psychology, 135, 321–335 Elmagri, M.I. (2002). Strategies of organizational conflict management and their relations with conflict intensity, constructive conflict and Effectiveness of Management in the Libyan Banking (MBA), Benghazi University. Erinosho O. A. (1998). Health sociology. Ibadan: Sam Bookman. Erogluer, K. (2011). Örgütsel letisim iles Tatmini Unsurları Arasındaki _liskiler: Kuramsal Bir _nceleme”, Ege Akademik Bakıs / Ege Academic Review 11(1), pp.1409-1424 Eruteyan, J. O. (2008). Effective time management for high performance in organizations. Journal of Nigerian Institution of Management, 44(3), 21-28. Fashoyin, T (2002). Industrial relations in Nigeria. Ikeja: Longman Ltd Ferro, G., Cracraft, C., & Dorsey, D. (2006). Integrating adaptability into special operations forces intermediate level education. (Institute Report #537). Arlington, VA: Personnel Decisions Research Institutes, Inc. Gardner, D. B. & Cary, A. (1999). Collaboration, conflict, and power: lessons for case managers. Family Community Health, 22, 64–67. Gerardi D. (2004). Using mediation techniques to manage conflict and create healthy work environments. AACN Clinical Issues, 15 (2), 182 – 195. file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/New%20AJPO%20JOURNALS/American%20Journal%20of%20Finance/www.ajpojournals.org European Journal of Human Resource ISSN 2520-4697 (Online) Vol.4, Issue 2 No.2, pp 12-36, 2020 www.ajpojournals.org 31 Gilboa, E. (2002). Media and Conflict: Framing Issues, Making policies, shaping opinions. NY, Ardsley: Transitional Publishers Inc. Gilbert, J. A. & Ivancevich, J. M. (2000). Diversity management time for a new approach. Public Personnel Management, 29, 75-92. Gittell, J. H., Fairfield, K., Bierbaum, B., Head, W., Jackson, R., Kelly, M., Laskin, R., Lipson, S., Siliski, J., Thornhill, T. & Zuckerman, J. (2000). Impact of relational coordination on quality of care, postoperative pain and functioning, and length of stay: A nine-hospital study of surgical patients. Medical Care, 38, 807–819. Goris, J. R. (2007). Effects of satisfaction with communication on the relationship between individual-job congruence and job performance/satisfaction. Journal of Management Development, 26(28), 737- 752. Gregory, R. J. (2004). Thematic stages of recovery in the treatment of borderline personality disorder. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 58, 335-348. Halimatu, O. (2002). Labour conflict and management in tobacco Industries. Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 1(2), 18-26. Hall, P. & Weaver, L. (2001). Interdisciplinary education and teamwork: A long and winding road. Medical Education, 35, 867 - 875. Hill, L. (2001). Eighteenth-century anticipations of the sociology of conflict: The case of Adam Ferguson. Journal of the History of Ideas, 62(2), 281 – 299). Hitt, M. A., Tihanyi, L., Miller, T., Connelly, B. (2006). International diversification: antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 32(6), 831-867. Hult, G. T. M., Hurley, R. F., & Knight, G. A. (2004). Innovativeness—its antecedents and impact on business performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(5), 429–438. Huseman, R. C., Logue, C. M. & Freshley, D. L. (1977). Readings in interpersonal and organizational communication. Boston: Holbrook Press, Inc. Ibid, (2013). Patricia Kameri Mbote (2011). Kenya: Justice Sector and the Rule of Law, Discussion Paper, A review by AfriMAP and the Open Society Initiative for Eastern Africa, March 2011, Available at: http://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/sites/default/fil es/kenya-justice-law-discussion-2011. Iyang, U. S. (1998). Interprofessional conflict in Nigeria’s health care system. Nigeria Journal of Health Planning Management 3, 47–50. Jehn, K. A., & Bendersky, C. (2003). Intragroup conflict in organizations: A contingency perspective on the conflict outcome relationship. Research in organizational behavior, 25, 187-242. Jehn, K., & Mannix, E. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 238–251. file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/New%20AJPO%20JOURNALS/American%20Journal%20of%20Finance/www.ajpojournals.org http://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/sites/default/files/kenya-justice-law-discussion-2011 http://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/sites/default/files/kenya-justice-law-discussion-2011 European Journal of Human Resource ISSN 2520-4697 (Online) Vol.4, Issue 2 No.2, pp 12-36, 2020 www.ajpojournals.org 32 Jex, S. M., Adams, G. A. & Bachrach, D. G. (2003). The impact of situational constraints, role stressors, and commitment on employee altruism. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18, 171–180. Jin, Z., Hewitt-Dundas, N., & Thompson, N. J. (2004). Innovativeness and performance: Evidence from manufacturing sectors. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 12 (4), 255–266 Jones, G., George, J. & Hill, C. (2000). Contemporary management. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill. Jung, Y. & Wang, J. (2006). Relationship between total quality management (TQM) and continuous improvement of international project management (CIIPM). Technovation, 26 (5), 716-722. Kaplan, R.S. & Norton, D.P. (1992). The balanced scorecard – Measures that drive performance, Harvard Business Review, (1), 71-79. Kapusuzoglu, S. (2010). An investigation of conflict resolution in educational organizations. African Journal of Business Management, 4 (1), 096 – 102. Kathleen, A., McGrail, K.A., Morse, D.S., Gessner, T., & Gardner, K. (2009). What is found there: Qualitative analysis of physician-nurse collaboration stories. Journal of General Internal Medicine 24(2), 198-204. Kaynak, H. (2003). The relationship between total quality management practices and their effects on firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 21(4), 405–435. Kazimoto, P. (2013). Analysis of Conflict Management and Leadership for Organizational Change. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 3(1), 16-25. Kelly, J. (2006). An overview of conflict. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, 25 (1): 22 – 28. Kiragu, D. N. (2005). A Survey on the adoption of the balanced scorecard by selected companies in Kenya. University Of Nairobi, Unpublished MBA Project. Kleinman, C. S. (2004). Leadership strategies in reducing staff nurse role conflict. JONA, 34, 322– 324. Knapp, M. L., Putnam, L. L. & Davis, L. J. (1988). Measuring interpersonal conflict in organizations: where do we go from here? Management Communication, 1, 414–429. Kornhauser, A., Dubin, R. & Ross, A. (Eds) (1954). Industrial conflicts. New York, McGraw-Hill. Kroposki, M., Murdaugh, C. L. & Tavakoli, A. S. (1999). Role clarity, organizational commitment, and job satisfaction during hospital reengineering. Nursing Connect, 12: 27–34. Lawrence, J.W. (2010). Technological change financial innovation and financial regulation in the us, the challenges for public policy, cited from citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.155.1655. Lipton, M. (2003). Guiding growth: How vision keeps companies on course. Boston, Harvard Business School Press file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/New%20AJPO%20JOURNALS/American%20Journal%20of%20Finance/www.ajpojournals.org European Journal of Human Resource ISSN 2520-4697 (Online) Vol.4, Issue 2 No.2, pp 12-36, 2020 www.ajpojournals.org 33 Lorelei, L., Lingard, L., Espin, S., Evans, C., & Hawry, L. (2004). The rules of the game: interprofessional collaboration on the intensive care unit team. Critical Care Medicine, 8(6), R 403-R408. Luthans, F. (2008). Organization behaviour. London: Mc Graw Hill Maher, (2002). Organizational behaviour 7th edition. Egypt: Alder Aljameaya Manser, T. (2009). Teamwork and patient safety in dynamic domains of healthcare: A review of the literature. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 53, 143–151. Marriner-Tomey, A. (1996). Guide to nursing management and leadership. St. Louis: Mosby. Martin-Rodriquez, L., Marie-Dominique, B., D’amour, D., Ferrada-Videla, M. (2005). The determinants of successful collaboration: A review of theoretical and empirical studies. Journal of Inter-Professional Care, supplement, 1, 132-147. Mayer, B.S. (2008). The dynamics of conflict resolution: A practitioner’s guide. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Medina, J. F., Munduate, L. M., Dorado, M. A. & Guerra, M. J. (2005). Types of intergroup Conflict and effective reactions. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 20(314), 219-230. Mughal, M. R. & Khan, M. (2013). Impact of conflict and conflict management on organizational performance. International Journal of Modern Business Issues of Global Market, 1 - 19. Nair, A. (2006). Meta-analysis of the relationship between quality management practices and firm performance – implications for quality management theory development. Journal of Operations Management, 24(6), 948-75. Neale, M. A. & Fragale, A. R., (2006). Social cognition, attribution, and perception in negotiation: The role of uncertainty in shaping negotiation processes and outcomes. In L. L. Thompson (Ed.), Negotiation theory and research, 27 -54. Madison, CT: Psychology Press. Neely, A, Adams, C. & Crowe, P. (2001). The performance prism in practice. Measuring Business Excellence, 5(2), 6-12. Neely, A., Adams, C. & Crowe, P. (2001). The performance prism in practice. Measuring Business Excellence, 5(2), 6-12. Newstrom, J.W. (2007). Organizational behavior: Human behavior at work. McGraw-Hill Publications Nistorescu, T. (2006). Patterns and strategies of interpersonal conflicts mediation during the projects, University of Craiova. Norman, G.V. (1998). Handling conflict. In Interdisciplinary team issues: Ethics in medicine. University of Washington School of medicine. Norreklit, H. (2003). The Balanced Scorecard: What is the score? A Rhetorical Analysis of the Balanced Scorecard. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(6), 591-619 file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/New%20AJPO%20JOURNALS/American%20Journal%20of%20Finance/www.ajpojournals.org European Journal of Human Resource ISSN 2520-4697 (Online) Vol.4, Issue 2 No.2, pp 12-36, 2020 www.ajpojournals.org 34 North, Y. (2004). God’s Clock maker; Richard of Wallingford & the invention of time. Oxbow Books O’Connell, M. T., & Pascoe, J. M. (2004). Undergraduate medical education for the 21st century: leadership and teamwork. Family Medicine, 36(Suppl), S51–S56. O’Driscoll, M. P. & Beehr, T. A. (2000). Moderating effects of perceived control and need for clarity on the relationship between role stressors and employee affective reactions. Journal of Soc Psych., 140, 151–159 Ogbimi, R., & Adebamowo, C.A. (2006). Questionnaire survey of working relationships between nurses and doctors in teaching hospitals in Southern Nigeria. BioMed central Ltd.BMC Nursing, 5:2 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472- 6955/5/2. Ogbonnaya & Ogbonnaya & Adeoye-Sunday (2007). The perception of health professions on causes of interprofessional conflict in a tertiary health institution in Abakaliki, Southeast Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Medicine, 16(2), 161-168. Ogunbameru, O. (2006). Organizational Dynamics. Ibadan. Spectrum Book Publishers. Omisore, Adesoji and Abioye-Kuteyi (2017). Interprofessional rivalry in Nigeria’s Health Sector: A comparison of doctors and other health workers’ views at a secondary care center. International Quarterly of Community Health Education, 0(0), 1-8. Orjiako, A. B. C. (1996). Inter-professional conflict resolution in the health sector. Nigerian Journal of Medicine; 5(1), 28-31 Osabuohein, (2014). Industrial conflict and health care provision in Nigeria: An Interdisciplinary Discuss on the Human Condition. Retrieved from: www.covenantuniversity.edu.ng. 5/12/13 Owoseni, O. (2011). An Examination of Some Determinants of Industrial Conflict in Employee- Employer Relationship. Retrieved from www.ilo.org: www.ilo.org/public/english/iirajdocuments/congress/regional/lagos2011/ Patrick, J. M. (2008). Management. New York: Barron's Educational Series. Pérez, L.M., Polanco, R., Rios, J. C., Montealegre, J., Valderrama, L., Herrera, R., & Besoaín, X. (2007). The increase in endochitinases and β-1,3-glucanases in the mutant Th650-NG7 of the Trichoderma harzianum Th650, improves the biocontrol activity on Rhizoctonia solani infecting tomato. IOBC/WPRS Bulletin, 30(6), 135-138. Petković, M. (2008). Organizaciono ponašanje, Ekonomski fakultet Beograd, Beograd Phillips, J. G., Jory, M., & Mogford, M. (2007). Decisional Style and eParticipation, Proceedings of the 19th Australasian conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Entertaining User Interfaces, Adelaide, Australia, November 28-30, 2007, 139-141. Preliminary Empirical Study in Electronics Companies. Singapore Management Review, 27(1), 87-105 Pruitt, D. & Kim, S. (2004). Social Conflict: Escalation, Stalemate and Settlement. Boston: McGraw Hill file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/New%20AJPO%20JOURNALS/American%20Journal%20of%20Finance/www.ajpojournals.org http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-%206955/5/2 http://www.covenantuniversity.edu.ng/ http://www.ilo.org/public/english/iirajdocuments/congress/regional/lagos2011/ European Journal of Human Resource ISSN 2520-4697 (Online) Vol.4, Issue 2 No.2, pp 12-36, 2020 www.ajpojournals.org 35 Puntilo, K.A., & McAdam, J.L. (2006). Communication between physicians and as a target for improving end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: challenges and opportunities for moving forward. Critical Care Medicine, 34(11) Rafferty, A.M., Ball, J., & Aiken, L.H. (2001). Are teamwork and professional autonomy compatible, and do they result in improved hospital care? Quality in Health Care, 10(Suppl2), 32-37. Rahim, A. (2002). Toward theory of managing organizational conflict, The International Journal of Conflict Management, 13 (3), 206-235. Rease, D. J. & Sonrag, M. A. (2001). Successful interprofessional collaboration on the hospice team. Health Soc Work, 26(3): 167-175 Richmond, V. P., McCroskey J. C., & McCroskey L. L. (2005). Organizational Communication for Survival: Making Work. Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights MA Robbin, S. P., & Sanghi, R. (2005). Conflict resolution. India: Dorling Kindersley Printing Ltd. Robbins, S., Judge, T. & Sanghi, S. (2009). Organizational Behavior. Delhi: Dorling Kindersley (India) Pvt. Ltd. Robins, L. (2009). Insiders versus outsiders: Perspectives on capacity issues to inform policy and programs. Local Environment, 14(1), 47-61. Rogers, T. (2004). Managing in the interprofessional environment: a theory of action perspective. Journal of Interprofessional Care 18(3), 239-249 Roseline, I. &Clement, A. (2006). Questionnaire on nurses and doctors in University Teaching Hospitals in Southern Western Nigeria. BMC Nursing, 5: 2. Rosenstein, A. H. (2002). Nurse-Physician relationships: Impact in nurse satisfaction and retention. American Journal of Nursing, 102(6), 26-34. Salami S. O. (2009). Conflict resolution strategies and organizational citizenship behaviour: The moderating role of trait emotional intelligence. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 41 - 63. Sandy, S.V., Boardman, S. K. & Duetsch, M. (2000). Personality and conflict. In TheHandbook of Conflict Resolution. Theory and Practice (M. Deutsch & P.T. Colemaneds), pp. 289– 315. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA. Sanner, L., & Wijkman, P. M. (2005). Benchmarking business practices in Swedish manufacturing firms, Working Paper No. 3 Santos, J.B. & Brito, L. A. L. (2012). Toward a subjective measurement model for firm performance. Brazilian Administrative Review, 9(6), 95-117. Saulo, M., & Wegener, R.J. (2000). Mediation training enhances conflict management by healthcare personnel. American Journal of Management Care, 6 (4), 473 – 483. Scott, W. (2004). Institutional theory. in Encyclopedia of Social Theory, George Ritzer, ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 408-14 file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/New%20AJPO%20JOURNALS/American%20Journal%20of%20Finance/www.ajpojournals.org European Journal of Human Resource ISSN 2520-4697 (Online) Vol.4, Issue 2 No.2, pp 12-36, 2020 www.ajpojournals.org 36 Siders, C. T., & Aschenbrener, C.A. (1999). Conflict management, Part 1. Conflict management checklist: a diagnostic tool for assessing conflict in organizations. Physician Executives, 25 (4), 32-37. Singels, J, Ruël, G., & Water, H. (2001). ISO 9000 series - Certification and performance. Solans, E. D. (2003). Financial innovation and monetary policy. Excerpts of speech delivered at the 38th SEACEN Governors Conference and 22nd Meeting of the SEACEN Board of Governors on "Structural Change and Growth Prospects in Asia –Challenges to Central Banking", Manila (13 February 2003). http://host.uniroma3.it/eventi/wolpertinger2009/37.pd Swansburg, R.C. & Swansburg, R. J. (2002). Introduction to management and leadership for nurse managers. Boston, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers. Terziovski, M., & Samson, D. (1999). The link between total quality management practice and organizational performance. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 16, 226-237. Thompson, L. (2005). The mind and heart of the negotiator. Pearson Prentice Hall: New Jersey. Thompson, J., Arthur A., Strickcan, A. J. & Gamble, J. E. (2010). Crafting and executing strategy. New York, NY. Todorova, M. & Mihaylova-Alakidi, V. (2009). Aspects of Behaviour of Healthcare Specialistsin Conflict Situations. Trakia Journal of Sciences, 8, (Suppl. 2), 395 – 399. Tressler, D. M. (2007). Negotiation in the new strategic environment: Lessons from Iraq. Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute. Tucker, A. L., Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2007). Implementing new practices: An empirical study of organizational learning in hospital intensive care units. Management Science, 53(6), 894–907 Ushiro, R. (2009). Nurse–Physician Collaboration Scale: development and psychometric testing. Journal of Advanced Nursing 65: 1497-1508 Vancouver, J. B. (2000). Self-regulation in organizational settings: A tale of two paradigms. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (303-336). San Diego: Academic Press. Walston, S. L., Burns, L. R., & Kimberly, J. R. (2000). Does reengineering really work? An examination of the context and outcomes of hospital reengineering initiatives. Health Services Research, 34(6), 1363–1388. Wilmot, W.W. & Hocker, J.L. (2007). Interpersonal conflict, seventh edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Wilson J.L. (2004). Conflict management does not have to create conflict. Account Today, 9(20):1-3. World Health Organization, (2006). Working together for health. World Health Report, World Health Organization, Geneva. file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/New%20AJPO%20JOURNALS/American%20Journal%20of%20Finance/www.ajpojournals.org http://host.uniroma3.it/eventi/wolpertinger2009/37.pd European Journal of Human Resource ISSN 2520-4697 (Online) Vol.4, Issue 2 No.2, pp 12-36, 2020 www.ajpojournals.org 37 Yu, X, & Davidhizar, R. (2004). Conflict management styles of Asian and Asian American nurses: implications for the nurse manager. Health Care Management, 23, 46-53. Zajac, E. J., Golden, B. R., & Shortell, S. M. (1991). New organizational forms for enhancing innovation: The case of internal corporate joint ventures. Management Science, 37(2), 170– 184. Zaman,K.H., Shah,S. S. & Jamsheed,H.(2011).Relationship Between Rewards and Employees Motivation in Non-profit Organisations of Pakistan Business Intelligence Journal, 4, 327- 334 Zu, X. (2009). Infrastructure and core quality management practices: How do they affect quality? International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 26(2), 129-149. file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/New%20AJPO%20JOURNALS/American%20Journal%20of%20Finance/www.ajpojournals.org