EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PURE AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS Vol. 11, No. 2, 2018, 457-467 ISSN 1307-5543 – www.ejpam.com Published by New York Business Global On approximation properties of generalised (p, q)-Bernstein operators Döne Karahan1,∗, Aydn Izgi 1 1 Mathematics Department, Science and Letter Faculty, Harran University, Sanlıurfa, Turkey Abstract. In this study, a (p, q)–analogue of Bernstein operators is introduced and approximation properties of (p, q)–Bernstein operators are investigated. Some basic theorems are proved. The rate of approximation by modulus of continuity is estimated. 2010 Mathematics Subject Classifications: 41A25, 41A36 Key Words and Phrases: Korovkin theorem, Bernstein operator, (p, q)-integers, modulus of continuity 1. Introduction In 1912, for a function f(x) defined on the closed interval [0, 1], the expression Bn(f ;x) = n∑ k=0 f ( k n )( n k ) xk(1− x)n−k (1) was called the Bernstein polynomial of order n of the function f(x) in [26]. Later, the var- ious generalizations of Bernstein polynomials (1) were investigated in [2], [3], [10]-[13]. In recent years, the development of q-calculus has allowed to be made of new generalizations of approximation theory. Firstly, Lupaş [4] introduced the q-analogue of the Bernstein operators and investigated its approximation properties in 1987. After then, the various applications of q-Bernstein operators were handled by Phillips [7], [8]. The approximation properties of q-generalization of other operators were studied in [1], [5], [9], [23], [24], [27], [28] . Recently, Mursaleen et al. applied (p, q)-in calculus approximation theory and intro- duced the (p, q)-analogue of Bernstein operators and other operators [12], [14]–[22]. In [3], Izgi introduced a class of new type Bernstein polynomials and investigated its approximation properties: ∗Corresponding author. Email addresses: dkarahan@harran.edu.tr (D. Karahan), aydinizgi@yahoo.com (A. Izgi) http://www.ejpam.com 457 c© 2018 EJPAM All rights reserved. D. Karahan, A. Izgi / Eur. J. Pure Appl. Math, 11 (2) (2018), 457-467 458 Fn,a,b(f ;x) = n∑ k=0 f ( k(n+ a) n(n+ b) ) qn,k,a,b(x), 0 ≤ x ≤ n+ a n+ b , (2) where a, b ∈ N, 0 ≤ a ≤ b, qn,k,a,b(x) = ( n+ b n+ a )n(n k ) xk ( n+ a n+ b − x )n−k . (3) The aim of this paper is to introduce (p, q)-analogue of generalized Bernstein operator (2) and is to study approximation properties for (p, q)-Bernstein operator. Now we remember certain notations of (p, q)-calculus. For any p > 0 and q > 0, the (p, q) integers [n]p,q are defined by [n]p,q = pn−1+pn−2q+pn−3q2+...+pqn−2+qn−1 =  pn−qn p−q , when p 6= q 6= 1 n pn−1, when p = q 6= 1 [n]q, when p = 1 n, when p = q = 1 where [n]q denotes the q-integers and n = 0, 1, 2, · · · . Let p, q > 0 be given. We define a (p, q)-factorial, [n]p,q! of k ∈ N, as [n]p,q! = { [1]p,q[2]p,q...[n]p,q, n ∈ N 1, n = 0. (4) The (p, q)-binomial coefficient [ n r ] p,q by [ n r ] p,q = [n]p,q! [n− r]p,q![r]p,q! . (5) We recall that (p, q)-derivative operator Dp,q is given by Dp,qf(x)= f(px)− f(qx) (p− q)x , x 6= 0; Dp,qf(0) = lim x→0 Dp,qf(x). (6) For any polynomial f(x) of degree Nand any number c, we have the following (p, q)- Taylor expansion: f(x) = N∑ j=0 ( Dj p,qf ) (c) (n− c)jp,q [j]p,q! (7) where (x− c)np,q is (p, q)-analogue of (x− c)n and (x− c)np,q = { 1, n = 0, (x− c)(px− qc)...(pn−1x− qn−1c), n ≥ 1 (8) D. Karahan, A. Izgi / Eur. J. Pure Appl. Math, 11 (2) (2018), 457-467 459 Now, we give construction of our operators and some properties of them. For f ∈ C [ 0, [n+a]p,q [n+b]p,q ] , F p,q n,a,b(f ;x) = 1 p n(n−1) 2 n∑ k=0 f ( [k]p,q[n+ a]p,q pk−n[n]p,q[n+ b]p,q ) qp,qn,k,a,b(x), 0 ≤ x ≤ [n+ a]p,q [n+ b]p,q , (9) where a, b ∈ N, 0 ≤ a ≤ b, qp,qn,k,a,b(x) = ( [n+ b]p,q [n+ a]p,q )n [ n k ] p,q p k(k−1) 2 xk n−k−1∏ s=0 ( [n+ a]p,q [n+ b]p,q ps − qsx ) . (10) 2. Main Results Lemma 1. For ∀x ∈ [ 0, [n+a]p,q [n+b]p,q ] and ∀n ∈ N, (p, q)-Bernstein operators (9) are satisfied the following equalities: i. F p,q n,a,b(1;x) = 1, ii. F p,q n,a,b(t;x) = x, iii. F p,q n,a,b(t 2;x) = pn−1[n+a]p,q [n]p,q [n+b]p,q x+ q[n−1]p,q [n]p,q x2. Proof. F p,q n,a,b(1;x) = 1 p n(n−1) 2 n∑ k=0 qp,qn,k,a,b(x) = ( [n+ b]p,q [n+ a]p,q )n n∑ k=0 [ n k ] p,q p k(k−1) 2 xk n−k−1∏ s=0 ( [n+ a]p,q [n+ b]p,q ps − qsx ) =1 F p,q n,a,b(t;x) = 1 p n(n−1) 2 n∑ k=0 [k]p,q[n+ a]p,q pk−n[n]p,q[n+ b]p,q qp,qn,k,a,b(x) = 1 p n(n−3) 2 ( [n+ b]p,q [n+ a]p,q )n−1 n∑ k=1 [k]p,q [n]p,q [ n k ] p,q p k(k−3) 2 xk n−k−1∏ s=0 ( [n+ a]p,q [n+ b]p,q ps − qsx ) = 1 p n(n−3) 2 ( [n+ b]p,q [n+ a]p,q )n−1 n∑ k=1 [ n− 1 k − 1 ] p,q p k(k−3) 2 xk n−k−1∏ s=0 ( [n+ a]p,q [n+ b]p,q ps − qsx ) = x p (n−1)(n−2) 2 ( [n+ b]p,q [n+ a]p,q )n−1 n−1∑ k=0 [ n− 1 k ] p,q p (k+1)(k−2) 2 xk n−k−2∏ s=0 ( [n+ a]p,q [n+ b]p,q ps − qsx ) D. Karahan, A. Izgi / Eur. J. Pure Appl. Math, 11 (2) (2018), 457-467 460 = x F p,q n,a,b(t 2;x) = 1 p n(n−1) 2 n∑ k=0 ( [k]p,q[n+ a]p,q pk−n[n]p,q[n+ b]p,q )2 qp,qn,k,a,b(x) = 1 p n(n−5) 2 ( [n+ b]p,q [n+ a]p,q )n−2 n−1∑ k=0 [k + 1]p,q [n]p,q [ n− 1 k ] p,q p (k+1)(k−4) 2 xk+1 × n−k−2∏ s=0 ( [n+ a]p,q [n+ b]p,q ps − qsx ) = 1 p n(n−5) 2 [n]p,q ( [n+ b]p,q [n+ a]p,q )n−2 n−1∑ k=0 [ n− 1 k ] p,q p (k+1)(k−4) 2 xk+1(pk + q[k]p,q) × n−k−2∏ s=0 ( [n+ a]p,q [n+ b]p,q ps − qsx ) = 1 p n(n−5) 2 [n]p,q ( [n+ b]p,q [n+ a]p,q )n−2 { n−1∑ k=0 [ n− 1 k ] p,q p k2−k−4 2 xk+1 × n−k−2∏ s=0 ( [n+ a]p,q [n+ b]p,q ps − qsx ) + q[n− 1]p,q n−2∑ k=0 [ n− 2 k ] p,q p (k−2)(k−3) 2 xk+2 × n−k−3∏ s=0 ( [n+ a]p,q [n+ b]p,q ps − qsx )} = pn−1x [n]p,q 1 p (n−1)(n−2) 2 ( [n+ b]p,q [n+ a]p,q )n−2 n−1∑ k=0 [ n− 1 k ] p,q p k(k−1) 2 xk × n−k−2∏ s=0 ( [n+ a]p,q [n+ b]p,q ps − qsx ) + q[n− 1]p,qx 2 [n]p,q 1 p (n−2)(n−3) 2 ( [n+ b]p,q [n+ a]p,q )n−2 × n−2∑ k=0 [ n− 2 k ] p,q p k(k−1) 2 xk n−k−3∏ s=0 ( [n+ a]p,q [n+ b]p,q ps − qsx ) = pn−1[n+ a]p,q [n]p,q[n+ b]p,q x+ q[n− 1]p,q [n]p,q x2 Theorem 1. Let 0 < qn < pn ≤ 1 and lim n→∞ pn = 1, lim n→∞ qn = 1. If ∀f ∈ C [ 0, [n+a]p,q [n+b]p,q ] , then lim n→∞ F pn,qn n,a,b (f ;x) = f(x) D. Karahan, A. Izgi / Eur. J. Pure Appl. Math, 11 (2) (2018), 457-467 461 is uniformly on [ 0, [n+a]p,q [n+b]p,q ] . Proof. The proof is based on Korovkin theorem, so it is enough to prove the conditions lim n→∞ ∥∥F pn,qn n,a,b (tm;x)− xm ∥∥ = 0, m = 0, 1, 2 uniformly on [ 0, [n+a]p,q [n+b]p,q ] . From Lemma 1, we get lim n→∞ ∥∥F pn,qn n,a,b (1;x)− 1 ∥∥ = 0, lim n→∞ ∥∥F pn,qn n,a,b (t;x)− x ∥∥ = 0. Now, we show that lim n→∞ ∥∥F pn,qn n,a,b (t2;x)− x2 ∥∥ = 0. From Lemma 1, we obtain max x∈ [ 0, [n+a]pn,qn [n+b]pn,qn ] |F pn,qn n,a,b (t2;x)− x2| = max x∈ [ 0, [n+a]pn,qn [n+b]pn,qn ] ∣∣∣∣pn−1n [n+ a]p,q [n]p,q[n+ b]p,q x+ qnx 2[n− 1]pn,qn [n]pn,qn − x2 ∣∣∣∣ ≤ ∣∣∣∣∣ ( [n+ a]pn,qn [n+ b]pn,qn )2 pn−1n [n]pn,qn ∣∣∣∣∣+ ∣∣∣∣∣ ( [n+ a]pn,qn [n+ b]pn,qn )2(qn[n− 1]pn,qn [n]pn,qn − 1 )∣∣∣∣∣ = ( [n+ a]pn,qn [n+ b]pn,qn )2 2pn−1n [n]pn,qn . Then, we get ∥∥F pn,qn n,a,b (t2;x)− x2 ∥∥ ≤ ( [n+ a]pn,qn [n+ b]pn,qn )2 2pn−1n [n]pn,qn . Thus, we have lim n→∞ max x∈ [ 0, [n+a] [n+b] ]|F pn,qn n,a,b (tm;x)− xm| = 0, m = 0, 1, 2. In accordance with the Bohman- Korovkin theorem [25], we obtained the desired result. Lemma 2. Let k − th degree moment for the polynomials (9) defined by T p,q n,k(x) = F p,q n,a,b ( (t− x)k;x ) , k = 0, 1, 2. (11) D. Karahan, A. Izgi / Eur. J. Pure Appl. Math, 11 (2) (2018), 457-467 462 Then we have T p,q n,0(x) = 1, T p,q n,1(x) = 0 and T p,q n,2(x) = pn−1[n+ a]p,q [n]p,q[n+ b]p,q x+ ( q[n− 1]p,q [n]p,q − 1 ) x2. (12) Moreover, let the sequence {pn}, {qn} satisfying 0 < qn < pn ≤ 1 such that pn → 1, qn → 1 and pnn → α, qnn → β as n→∞, where 0 ≤ α, β < 1. Then lim n→∞ [n]pn,qnF pn,qn n,a,b ( (t− x)2;x ) = λx− αx2 (13) is uniformly on [ 0, [n+a]p,q [n+b]p,q ] , where 0 < λ ≤ 1. Proof. It is clear that T p,q n,0(x) = 1 and T p,q n,1(x) = 0 hold. From (11), we obtain T p,q n,2(x) = F p,q n,a,b ( (t− x)2;x ) = n∑ k=0 ( [k]p,q[n+ a]p,q pk−n[n]p,q[n+ b]p,q − x )2 qp,qn,k,a,b(x) = n∑ k=0 ( [k]p,q[n+ a]p,q p2k−2n[n][n+ b] )2 qp,qn,k,a,b(x) − 2x n∑ k=0 [k]p,q[n+ a]p,q pk−n[n]p,q[n+ b]p,q qp,qn,k,a,b(x) + x2 n∑ k=0 qp,qn,k,a,b(x) = pn−1[n+ a]p,q [n]p,q[n+ b]p,q x+ q[n− 1]p,q [n]p,q x2 − 2x2 + x2 = pn−1[n+ a]p,q [n]p,q[n+ b]p,q x+ ( q[n− 1]p,q [n]p,q − 1 ) x2. Using the equality (12) we have lim n→∞ [n]pn,qnF pn,qn n,a,b ( (t− x)2;x ) = lim n→∞ ( pn−1n [n+ a]p,q [n+ b]p,q x+ (qn[n− 1]pn,qn − [n]pn,qn)x2 ) = lim n→∞ ( pn−1n [n+ a]p,q [n+ b]p,q x ) + lim n→∞ ( qn pn−1n − qn−1n pn − qn − pnn − qnn pn − qn ) x2 = λx+ lim n→∞ pn−1n (qn − pn) pn − qn x2 = λx− αx2. D. Karahan, A. Izgi / Eur. J. Pure Appl. Math, 11 (2) (2018), 457-467 463 Lemma 3. Fn,a,b(f ; 0) = f(0) and F p,q n,a,b ( f ; [n+ a]p,q [n+ b]p,q ) = f ( [n+ a]p,q [n+ b]p,q ) . (14) Proof. Taking x = 0 into equation (9), we get F p,q n,a,b(f ; 0) = 1 p (n−1)n 2 ( [n+ b]p,q [n+ a]p,q )n f ( [0]p,q[n+ a]p,q p0−n[n]p,q[n+ b]p,q )[ n 0 ] p,q × p 0(0−1) 2 x0 n−1∏ s=0 ( [n+ a]p,q [n+ b]p,q ps − qs0 ) + 0 + 0 + ... = 1 p (n−1)n 2 ( [n+ b]p,q [n+ a]p,q )n f(0) n−1∏ s=0 ( [n+ a]p,q [n+ b]p,q ps ) = 1 p (n−1)n 2 f(0) n−1∏ s=0 ps = f(0). Similarly, taking x = [n+a]p,q [n+b]p,q into equation (9), we get F p,q n,a,b ( f ; [n+ a]p,q [n+ b]p,q ) = 1 p (n−1)n 2 ( [n+ b]p,q [n+ a]p,q )n f ( [0]p,q[n+ a]p,q p0−n[n]p,q[n+ b]p,q )[ n 0 ] p,q p 0(0−1) 2 ( [n+ a]p,q [n+ b]p,q )0 × n−1∏ s=0 ( [n+ a]p,q [n+ b]p,q ps − qs [n+ a]p,q [n+ b]p,q ) + ... + 1 p (n−1)n 2 ( [n+ b]p,q [n+ a]p,q )n f ( [n+ a]p,q [n+ b]p,q )[ n n ] p,q p n(n−1) 2 ( [n+ a]p,q [n+ b]p,q )n × −1∏ s=0 ( [n+ a]p,q [n+ b]p,q ps − qs [n+ a]p,q [n+ b]p,q ) in above expansion, the terms corresponding to k = 0, 1, ..., n− 1, becomes zero, because for k = 0, we find ( [n+a]p,q [n+b]p,q − [n+a]p,q [n+b]p,q ) as the first factor of each product. It is accepted∏−1 s=0 ( [n+a]p,q [n+b]p,q ps − qs [n+a]p,q [n+b]p,q ) = 1 so we get F p,q n,a,b ( f ; ( [n+ a]p,q [n+ b]p,q )) = f ( [n+ a]p,q [n+ b]p,q ) . D. Karahan, A. Izgi / Eur. J. Pure Appl. Math, 11 (2) (2018), 457-467 464 Theorem 2. If f ∈ C [ 0, [n+a]p,q [n+b]p,q ] , then the following inequality holds. |F p,q n,a,b(f ;x)− f(x)| ≤ ( 1 + [n+ a]p,q [n+ b]p,q ) ω ( f ; √ 2pn−1 [n]p,q ) (15) Proof. From the well-known properties of modulus of continuity we have |f(t)− f(x)| ≤ ( 1 + |t− x| δn ) ω (f ; δn) , where δn is any sequences of positive numbers. Since the polynomials F p,q n,a,b(f ;x) also linear positive operators, we have |F p,q n,a,b(f ;x)− f(x)| ≤ ( 1 + 1 δn √ F p,q n,a,b ((t− x)2;x) ) ω (f ; δn) . Use Cauchy-Schwartz inequality and Lemma 1 , then we obtain |Fn,a,b(f ;x)− f(x)| ≤ 1 + 1 δn √( [n+ a]p,q [n+ b]p,q )2 2pn−1 [n]p,q ω (f ; δn) = ( 1 + 1 δn [n+ a]p,q [n+ b]p,q √ 2pn−1 [n]p,q ) ω (f ; δn) . Put δn = √ 2pn−1 [n]p,q , then we get inequality (15). Theorem 3. (Voronovskaya Type Theorem) Let the sequence {pn}, {qn} satisfying 0 < qn < pn ≤ 1 such that pn → 1, qn → 1 and pnn → α, qnn → β as n → ∞, where 0 ≤ α, β < 1. For ∀f ∈ C2 [ 0, [n+a]p,q [n+b]p,q ] , we have lim n→∞ [n]pn,qn ( F pn,qn n,a,b (f ;x)− f(x) ) = x(λ− αx) [2]p,q D2 p,q (f(x)) , 0 < λ ≤ 1. (16) Proof. Let f ∈ C2 [ 0, [n+a]p,q [n+b]p,q ] , that is f,Dp,q(f),D2 p,q(f) ∈ C [ 0, [n+a]p,q [n+b]p,q ] . Define ψ(t, x) =  f(t)−f(x)−(t−x)Dp,q(f)− 1 [2]p,q (t−x)2p,qD2 p,q(f) (t−x)2p,q , t 6= x 0, t = x. Then, it is clear that ψ(x, x) = 0 and ψ(., x) ∈ C [ 0, [n+a]p,q [n+b]p,q ] . Hence, from Taylor’s theorem we have f(t) = f(x) + (t− x)Dp,q(f) + 1 [2]p,q (t− x)2p,qD2 p,q(f) + (y − x)2qψ(y, x). REFERENCES 465 Form Lemma 2, [n]pn,qn ( F pn,qn n,a,b (f ;x)− f(x) ) = [n]pn,qnF pn,qn n,a,b ((t− x);x)Dpn,qn(f) + [n]pn,qn [2]pn,qn F pn,qn n,a,b ( (t− x)2;x ) D2 pn,qn(f) +[n]pn,qnF pn,qn n,a,b ( (t− x)2ψ(t, x);x ) . (17) If we apply the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality for the last term on the right hand side of (17), we conclude that [n]pn,qnF pn,qn n,a,b ( (t− x)2ψ(t, x);x ) ≤ ( [n]2pn,qnF pn,qn n,a,b ( (t− x)4;x )) 1 2 × ( F pn,qn n,a,b ( ψ2(t, x);x )) 1 2 . (18) Let η(t, x) := ψ2(t, x). So, we get η(x, x) = 0 and η(., x) ∈ C2 [ 0, [n+a]p,q [n+b]p,q ] . From Theorem 1, we have lim n→∞ F pn,qn n,a,b ( ψ2(t, x);x ) = lim n→∞ F pn,qn n,a,b (η(t, x);x) = η(x, x) = 0 . (19) Then taking limit as n→∞ in (17) and using (18), (19) and Lemma 2 lim n→∞ [n]pn,qn ( F pn,qn n,a,b (f ;x)− f(x) ) = λx− αx2 [2]p,q D2 p,q(f) uniformly with respect to x ∈ [ 0, [n+a]p,q [n+b]p,q ] . References [1] A. Aral, O. Dogru : Bleimann Butzer and Hahn operators based on q-integers , J. Inequal. Appl. (2007), 79410. [2] A. Ilinskii, S. Ostrovska: Convergence of generalized Bernstein polynomials, J. Ap- prox. Theory, (2002), 116, 100-112. [3] A. Izgi: Approximation by a Class of New Type Bernstein Polynomials of one two Variables, Global Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, (2012), 8 (5), 55-71. [4] A. Lupas: A q-analogue of the Bernstein operator, University of Cluj-Napoca, Semi- nar on Numerical and Statistical Calculus, (1987). [5] C. Radu: Statistical approximation properties of Kantorovich operators based on q- integers, Creative Math. Inform., (2008), 17,(2), 75-84. REFERENCES 466 [6] G. G. Lorentz: Bernstein polynomials, Chelsea, New York, (1986). [7] G. M. Phillips: Bernstein Polynomials Based on the q-integers, Ann. Numer. Math., (1997), 4, 511-518. [8] G. M. Phillips: A Generalization of the Bernstein Polynomials Based on the q- integers, Anziam J., (2000), 42, 79-86. [9] H. Oruc, N. Tuncer: On the Convergence and Iterates of q-Bernstein Polynomials, J. Approx. Theory, (2002), 117, 301-313. [10] J. D. Cao: A generalization of the Bernstein Polynomials, J. Math. Analy. and Appl. Math., (1997), 122, 1-21. [11] J. L. Durrmeyer: Une formula d’invension de la transforms de Laplace-Appliction a’la the orie des moments, The’se de 3e cycle, Faculte’ des Sciences de I’Universite de Paris, (1967). [12] Khalid Khan, D.K. Lobiyal: Bézier curves based on Lupas (p, q)-analogue of Bernstein functions in CAGD, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, (2017), 317, 458-477. [13] L. V Kanrtovich: Sur certains developments suivant les polynomes de la forms de S. Bernstein I, II, Dokal Akad Nauk SSSR, (1930), 563-568, 595-600. [14] M. Mursaleen, KJ. Ansari, A. Khan: Some approximation results by (p, q)- analogue of Bernstein-Stancu operators, Appl. Math. Comput., (2015), 264, 392-402, doi:10.1016/j.amc.2015.03.135. [15] M. Mursaleen, Md Nasiruzzaman, A. Nurgali: Some approximation results on Bernstein-Schurer operators defined by (p, q)-integers, Jou. Ineq. Appl. (2015), 249. [16] M. Mursaleen, Md Nasiruzzaman, A. Khan, KJ. Ansari: Some Approximation Results on Bleimann-Butzer-Hahn Operators Defined by (p, q)-Integers, Filomat, (2016), 30 (3), 639–648. [17] M. Mursaleen, F. Khan, A. Khan: Approximation by (p, q)-Lorentz Polynomials on a Compact Disk, Comp. Anal. and Oper. Theory, (2016), 10 (8), 1725–1740. [18] M. Mursaleen, KJ. Ansari, A. Khan: Some approximation results for Bernstein- Kantorovich operators based on (p, q)-calculus, U.P.B. Sci. Bull. Series A. (2016), 78 (4), 129–142. [19] M. Mursaleen, K. J. Ansari, Asif Khan: On (p, q)-analogue of Bernstein Opera- tors, Applied Mathematics and Computation, (2015), 266, 874-882, (Erratum: Appl. Math. Comput. (2015), 266, 874-882. REFERENCES 467 [20] M Mursaleen, Md Nasiruzzaman, KJ. Ansari, A. Alotaibi: Generalized (p, q) - Bleimann-Butzer-Hahn operators and some approximation results, Jou. Ineq. Appl. (2017), 310. [21] M Mursaleen, AAH Al-Abied, A. Alotaibi: On (p, q) -Szsz-Mirakyan operators and their approximation properties, Jou. Ineq. Appl. (2017), 196. [22] Khalid Khan, D.K. Lobiyal: Bézier curves based on Lupas (p, q)-analogue of Bernstein functions in CAGD, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, (2017), 317, 458-477. [23] M. Mursaleen, A. Khan: A Statistical Approximation Properties of Modified q-Stancu- Beta Operators, Bull. Malays. Math. Soc., (2013), 36 (3), 683–690. [24] M. Orkcu, O. Dogru: Weighted statistical approximation by Kantorovich type q-Szsz Mirakjan operators, Appl. Math. Comput., (2011), 217, 7913-7919. [25] P. P. Korovkin: On Convergence of Linear Positive Operators in the Space of Con- tinuous Functions, Dokl. Akad. Nauk, (1953), 90, 961-964. [26] S. N. Bernstein: Demonstration du Theorem de Weierstrass Fondee sur le Calculu des Probabilites, Comp. Comm. Soc. Mat. Charkow Ser.,(1912), 13(2), 1-2. [27] S. Ostrovska: q-Bernstein Polynomials and Their Iterates, J. Approx. Theory., (2003),123, 232-255. [28] V. Gupta,C. Radu: Statistical approximation properties of q-Baskokov-Kantorovich operators, Cent. Eur. J. Math., (2009), 7 (4), 809-818.