EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PURE AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS Vol. 17, No. 1, 2024, 416-425 ISSN 1307-5543 – ejpam.com Published by New York Business Global On weakly (τ1, τ2)-continuous functions Chawalit Boonpok1, Chalongchai Klanarong1,∗ 1 Mathematics and Applied Mathematics Research Unit, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Mahasarakham University, Maha Sarakham, 44150, Thailand Abstract. Our main purpose is to introduce the concept of weakly (τ1, τ2)-continuous functions. Moreover, several characterizations of weakly (τ1, τ2)-continuous functions are considered. 2020 Mathematics Subject Classifications: 54C08, 54E55 Key Words and Phrases: τ1τ2-open set, weakly (τ1, τ2)-continuous function 1. Introduction In 1961, Levine [10] introduced the concept of weakly continuous functions. Moreover, Levine [11] introduced the notion of semi-continuous functions. Neubrunnová [13] showed that semi-continuity is equivalent to quasi-continuity due to Marcus [12]. In 1973, Popa and Stan [17] introduced and studied the concept of weakly quasi-continuous functions. Weak quasi-continuity is implied by both quasi-continuity and weak continuity which are independent of each other. In 1984, Rose [18] introduced the notion of subweakly contin- uous functions and investigated the relationships between subweak continuity and weak continuity. Noiri [14] studied properties of some weak forms of continuity. In 2002, Popa and Noiri [16] introduced the concept of weakly (τ,m)-continuous functions as functions from a topological space into a set satisfying some minimal conditions and investigated several characterizations of weakly (τ,m)-continuous functions. Popa and Noiri [15] in- troduced and investigated the notion of weakly M -continuous functions as functions from a set satisfying some minimal conditions into a set satisfying some minimal conditions. In 2008, Ekici et al. [8] introduced a new class of functions called weakly λ-continuous functions which is weaker than λ-continuous functions and studied some fundamental properties of weakly λ-continuous functions. In [3], the present author introduced the concept of weakly ⋆-continuous functions and established the relationships between weak ⋆-continuity and θ(⋆)-continuity. In 2010, Boonpok [1] introduced and studied the concept of pairwise weakly M -continuous functions in bimininmal structure spaces. Viriyapong and Boonpok [20] introduced and investigated the concept of (Λ, sp)-continuous functions. ∗Corresponding author. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29020/nybg.ejpam.v17i1.4976 Email addresses: chawalit.b@msu.ac.th (C. Boonpok), chalongchai.k@msu.ac.th (C. Klanarong) https://www.ejpam.com 416 © 2024 EJPAM All rights reserved. C. Boonpok, C. Klanarong / Eur. J. Pure Appl. Math, 17 (1) (2024), 416-425 417 Moreover, some characterizations of almost (Λ, s)-continuous functions were presented in [6]. In [5], the authors introduced and studied the notion of weakly (Λ, p)-continuous func- tions. Laprom et al. [9] studied the concept of β(τ1, τ2)-continuity for multifunctions. In addition, some characterizations of almost weak (τ1, τ2)-continuity for multifunctions were established in [4]. In this paper, we introduce the concept of weakly (τ1, τ2)-continuous functions. Furthermore, several characterizations of weakly (τ1, τ2)-continuous functions are discussed. 2. Preliminaries Throughout the present paper, spaces (X, τ1, τ2) and (Y, σ1, σ2) (or simply X and Y ) always mean bitopological spaces on which no separation axioms are assumed unless explicitly stated. Let A be a subset of a bitopological space (X, τ1, τ2). The closure of A and the interior of A with respect to τi are denoted by τi-Cl(A) and τi-Int(A), respectively, for i = 1, 2. A subset A of a bitopological space (X, τ1, τ2) is called τ1τ2-closed [7] if A = τ1-Cl(τ2-Cl(A)). The complement of a τ1τ2-closed set is called τ1τ2-open. The intersection of all τ1τ2-closed sets of X containing A is called the τ1τ2-closure [7] of A and is denoted by τ1τ2-Cl(A). The union of all τ1τ2-open sets of X contained in A is called the τ1τ2-interior [7] of A and is denoted by τ1τ2-Int(A). A subset A of a bitopological space (X, τ1, τ2) is said to be (τ1, τ2)r-open [19] (resp. (τ1, τ2)s-open [2], (τ1, τ2)p-open [2], (τ1, τ2)β-open [2]) if A = τ1τ2-Int(τ1τ2-Cl(A)) (resp. A ⊆ τ1τ2-Cl(τ1τ2-Int(A)), A ⊆ τ1τ2-Int(τ1τ2-Cl(A)), A ⊆ τ1τ2-Cl(τ1τ2-Int(τ1τ2-Cl(A)))). The complement of a (τ1, τ2)r-open (resp. (τ1, τ2)s- open, (τ1, τ2)p-open, (τ1, τ2)β-open) set is called (τ1, τ2)r-closed, (τ1, τ2)s-closed, (τ1, τ2)p- closed, (τ1, τ2)β-closed. Let A be a subset of a bitopological space (X, τ1, τ2). A point x ∈ X is called a (τ1, τ2)θ-cluster point [19] of A if τ1τ2-Cl(U)∩A ̸= ∅ for every τ1τ2-open set U containing x. The set of all (τ1, τ2)θ-cluster points of A is called the (τ1, τ2)θ-closure [19] of A and is denoted by (τ1, τ2)θ-Cl(A). A subset A of a bitopological space (X, τ1, τ2) is said to be (τ1, τ2)θ-closed [19] if (τ1, τ2)θ-Cl(A) = A. The complement of a (τ1, τ2)θ- closed set is said to be (τ1, τ2)θ-open. The union of all (τ1, τ2)θ-open sets of X contained in A is called the (τ1, τ2)θ-interior [19] of A and is denoted by (τ1, τ2)θ-Int(A). 3. Characterizations of weakly (τ1, τ2)-continuous functions In this section, we introduce the notion of weakly (τ1, τ2)-continuous functions. More- over, some characterizations of weakly (τ1, τ2)-continuous functions are discussed. Definition 1. A function f : (X, τ1, τ2) → (Y, σ1, σ2) is said to be weakly (τ1, τ2)- continuous at a point x ∈ X if for each τ1τ2-open set V of Y containing f(x), there exists a τ1τ2-open set U of X containing x such that f(U) ⊆ σ1σ2-Cl(V ). A function f : (X, τ1, τ2) → (Y, σ1, σ2) is said to be weakly (τ1, τ2)-continuous if f has this property at each point of X. C. Boonpok, C. Klanarong / Eur. J. Pure Appl. Math, 17 (1) (2024), 416-425 418 Theorem 1. A function f : (X, τ1, τ2) → (Y, σ1, σ2) is weakly (τ1, τ2)-continuous at x ∈ X if and only if x ∈ τ1τ2-Int(f −1(σ1σ2-Cl(V ))) for every σ1σ2-open set V of Y containing f(x). Proof. Let x ∈ X and V be any σ1σ2-open set of Y containing f(x). Then, there exists a τ1τ2-open set U of X containing x such that f(U) ⊆ σ1σ2-Cl(V ). Thus, x ∈ U ⊆ f−1(σ1σ2-Cl(V )) and hence x ∈ τ1τ2-Int(f −1(σ1σ2-Cl(V ))). Conversely, let V be any σ1σ2-open set of Y containing f(x). By the hypothesis, x ∈ τ1τ2-Int(f −1(σ1σ2-Cl(V ))). Then, there exists a τ1τ2-open set U of X such that x ∈ U ⊆ f−1(σ1σ2-Cl(V )). Thus, f(U) ⊆ σ1σ2-Cl(V ) and hence f is weakly (τ1, τ2)- continuous at x. Theorem 2. A function f : (X, τ1, τ2) → (Y, σ1, σ2) is weakly (τ1, τ2)-continuous if and only if f−1(V ) ⊆ τ1τ2-Int(f −1(σ1σ2-Cl(V ))) for every σ1σ2-open set V of Y . Proof. Let V be any σ1σ2-open set of Y and x ∈ f−1(V ). Then, f(x) ∈ V . Since f is weakly (τ1, τ2)-continuous at x, by Theorem 1 we have x ∈ τ1τ2-Int(f −1(σ1σ2-Cl(V ))) and hence f−1(V ) ⊆ τ1τ2-Int(f −1(σ1σ2-Cl(V ))). Conversely, let x ∈ X and V be any σ1σ2-open set of Y containing f(x). Then, we have x ∈ f−1(V ) ⊆ τ1τ2-Int(f −1(σ1σ2-Cl(V ))). By Theorem 1, f is weakly (τ1, τ2)-continuous at x. This shows that f is weakly (τ1, τ2)-continuous. Theorem 3. A function f : (X, τ1, τ2) → (Y, σ1, σ2) is weakly (τ1, τ2)-continuous if and only if τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(V )) ⊆ f−1(σ1σ2-Cl(V )) for every σ1σ2-open set V of Y . Proof. Let V be any σ1σ2-open set of Y . Suppose that τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(V )) ⊈ f−1(σ1σ2-Cl(V )). There exists x ∈ τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(V )), but x ̸∈ f−1(σ1σ2-Cl(V )). Then, f(x) ̸∈ σ1σ2-Cl(V ) and there exists a σ1σ2-open set W of Y containing f(x) such that W ∩ V = ∅. Thus, σ1σ2-Cl(W ) ∩ V = ∅. Since f is weakly (τ1, τ2)-continuous at x, there exists a τ1τ2-open set U of X containing x such that f(U) ⊆ σ1σ2-Cl(W ). Therefore, f(U) ∩ V = ∅. Since x ∈ τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(V )), U ∩ f−1(V ) ̸= ∅ and f(U) ∩ V ̸= ∅, which is a contradiction. This shows that τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(V )) ⊆ f−1(σ1σ2-Cl(V )). Conversely, let V be any σ1σ2-open set of Y . Then, Y −σ1σ2-Cl(V ) is σ1σ2-open in Y . By the hypothesis, τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(Y −σ1σ2-Cl(V ))) ⊆ f−1(σ1σ2-Cl(Y −σ1σ2-Cl(V ))). Thus, X−τ1τ2-Int(f −1(σ1σ2-Cl(V ))) ⊆ X−f−1(σ1σ2-Int(σ1σ2-Cl(V ))) ⊆ X−f−1(V ) and hence f−1(V ) ⊆ τ1τ2-Int(f −1(σ1σ2-Cl(V ))). By Theorem 2, f is weakly (τ1, τ2)-continuous. Theorem 4. For a function (X, τ1, τ2) → (Y, σ1, σ2), the following properties are equiva- lent: C. Boonpok, C. Klanarong / Eur. J. Pure Appl. Math, 17 (1) (2024), 416-425 419 (1) f is weakly (τ1, τ2)-continuous; (2) f−1(V ) ⊆ τ1τ2-Int(f −1(σ1σ2-Cl(V ))) for every σ1σ2-open set V of Y ; (3) τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(σ1σ2-Int(K))) ⊆ f−1(K) for every σ1σ2-closed set K of Y ; (4) τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(σ1σ2-Int(σ1σ2-Cl(B)))) ⊆ f−1(σ1σ2-Cl(B)) for every subset B of Y ; (5) f−1(σ1σ2-Int(B)) ⊆ τ1τ2-Int(f −1(σ1σ2-Cl(σ1σ2-Int(B)))) for every subset B of Y ; (6) τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(V )) ⊆ f−1(σ1σ2-Cl(V )) for every σ1σ2-open set V of Y . Proof. (1) ⇒ (2): By Theorem 2. (2) ⇒ (3): Let K be any σ1σ2-closed set of Y . Then, Y −K is σ1σ2-open in Y and by (2), X − f−1(K) = f−1(Y −K) ⊆ τ1τ2-Int(f −1(σ1σ2-Cl(Y −K))) = τ1τ2-Int(f −1(Y − σ1σ2-Int(K))) = X − τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(σ1σ2-Int(K))). Thus, τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(σ1σ2-Int(K))) ⊆ f−1(K). (3) ⇒ (4): Let B be any subset of Y . Then, σ1σ2-Int(B) is σ1σ2-closed in Y . By (3), τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(σ1σ2-Int(σ1σ2-Cl(B)))) ⊆ f−1(σ1σ2-Cl(B)). (4) ⇒ (5): Let B be any subset of Y . By (4), f−1(σ1σ2-Int(B)) = X − f−1(σ1σ2-Cl(Y −B)) ⊆ X − τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(σ1σ2-Int(σ1σ2-Cl(Y −B)))) = τ1τ2-Int(f −1(σ1σ2-Cl(σ1σ2-Int(B)))). (5) ⇒ (6): Let V be any σ1σ2-open set of Y and x ̸∈ f−1(σ1σ2-Cl(V )). Then, there exists a σ1σ2-open set U of Y containing f(x) such that U ∩ V = ∅. By (5), x ∈ f−1(U) ⊆ τ1τ2-Int(f −1(σ1σ2-Cl(U))) and there exists a τ1τ2-open set G of X containing x such that f(G) ⊆ σ1σ2-Cl(U). Thus, G ∩ f−1(V ) = ∅ and hence x ̸∈ τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(V )). This shows that τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(V )) ⊆ f−1(σ1σ2-Cl(V )). (6) ⇒ (1): Let x ∈ X and V be any be any σ1σ2-open set of Y containing f(x). Since V = σ1σ2-Int(V ) ⊆ σ1σ2-Int(σ1σ2-Cl(V )), by (6) we have x ∈ f−1(V ) ⊆ f−1(σ1σ2-Int(σ1σ2-Cl(V ))) = X − f−1(σ1σ2-Cl(Y − σ1σ2-Cl(V ))) C. Boonpok, C. Klanarong / Eur. J. Pure Appl. Math, 17 (1) (2024), 416-425 420 ⊆ X − τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(Y − σ1σ2-Cl(V ))) = τ1τ2-Int(f −1(σ1σ2-Cl(V ))). There exists a τ1τ2-open set U of X containing x such that U ⊆ f−1(σ1σ2-Cl(V )); hence f(U) ⊆ σ1σ2-Cl(V ). Thus, f is weakly (τ1, τ2)-continuous at x. This shows that f is weakly (τ1, τ2)-continuous. Theorem 5. For a function (X, τ1, τ2) → (Y, σ1, σ2), the following properties are equiva- lent: (1) f is weakly (τ1, τ2)-continuous; (2) τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(σ1σ2-Int(K))) ⊆ f−1(K) for every (σ1, σ2)r-closed set K of Y ; (3) τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(σ1σ2-Int(σ1σ2-Cl(V )))) ⊆ f−1(σ1σ2-Cl(V )) for every (σ1, σ2)β-open set V of Y ; (4) τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(σ1σ2-Int(σ1σ2-Cl(V )))) ⊆ f−1(σ1σ2-Cl(V )) for every (σ1, σ2)s-open set V of Y . Proof. (1) ⇒ (2): Let K be any (σ1, σ2)r-closed set of Y . Then, σ1σ2-Int(K) is σ1σ2-open in Y , by Theorem 4 (6) we have τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(σ1σ2-Int(K))) ⊆ f−1(σ1σ2-Int(σ1σ2-Cl(K))) = f−1(K). (2) ⇒ (3): Let V be any (σ1, σ2)β-open set of Y . Then, we have σ1σ2-Cl(V ) ⊆ σ1σ2-Cl(σ1σ2-Int(σ1σ2-Cl(V ))) ⊆ σ1σ2-Cl(V ) and hence σ1σ2-Cl(V ) is (σ1, σ2)r-closed. By (2), τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(σ1σ2-Int(σ1σ2-Cl(V )))) ⊆ f−1(σ1σ2-Cl(V )). (3) ⇒ (4): This is obvious. (4) ⇒ (1): Let V be any σ1σ2-open set of Y . Then, we have V is (σ1, σ2)s-open in Y . By (4), τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(V )) ⊆ τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(σ1σ2-Int(σ1σ2-Cl(V )))) ⊆ f−1(σ1σ2-Cl(V )) and by Theorem 4 (6), f is weakly (τ1, τ2)-continuous. Theorem 6. For a function (X, τ1, τ2) → (Y, σ1, σ2), the following properties are equiva- lent: (1) f is weakly (τ1, τ2)-continuous; (2) τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(σ1σ2-Int(σ1σ2-Cl(V )))) ⊆ f−1(σ1σ2-Cl(V )) for every (σ1, σ2)p-open set V of Y ; (3) τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(V )) ⊆ f−1(σ1σ2-Cl(V )) for every (σ1, σ2)p-open set V of Y ; C. Boonpok, C. Klanarong / Eur. J. Pure Appl. Math, 17 (1) (2024), 416-425 421 (4) f−1(V ) ⊆ τ1τ2-Int(f −1(σ1σ2-Cl(V ))) for every (σ1, σ2)p-open set V of Y . Proof. (1) ⇒ (2): Let V be any (σ1, σ2)p-open set of Y . Then, we have σ1σ2-Cl(V ) ⊆ σ1σ2-Cl(σ1σ2-Int(σ1σ2-Cl(V ))) and hence σ1σ2-Cl(V ) is (σ1, σ2)r-closed in Y . Thus, by Theorem 5 (2), τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(σ1σ2-Int(σ1σ2-Cl(V )))) ⊆ f−1(σ1σ2-Cl(V )). (2) ⇒ (3): The proof is obvious. (3) ⇒ (4): Let V be any (σ1, σ2)p-open set of Y . By (3), f−1(V ) ⊆ f−1(σ1σ2-Int(σ1σ2-Cl(V ))) = X − f−1(σ1σ2-Cl(Y − σ1σ2-Cl(V ))) ⊆ X − τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(Y − σ1σ2-Cl(V ))) = τ1τ2-Int(f −1(σ1σ2-Cl(V ))). (4) ⇒ (1): Let V be any σ1σ2-open set of Y . Then, V is (σ1, σ2)p-open in Y . Thus by (4) and Theorem 4 (2), f is weakly (τ1, τ2)-continuous. Theorem 7. For a function (X, τ1, τ2) → (Y, σ1, σ2), the following properties are equiva- lent: (1) f is weakly (τ1, τ2)-continuous; (2) τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(σ1σ2-Int(σ1σ2-Cl(B)))) ⊆ f−1(σ1σ2-Cl(B)) for every subset B of Y ; (3) τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(σ1σ2-Int(K))) ⊆ f−1(K) for every (σ1, σ2)r-closed set K of Y ; (4) τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(V )) ⊆ f−1(σ1σ2-Cl(V )) for every σ1σ2-open set V of Y ; (5) f−1(V ) ⊆ τ1τ2-Int(f −1(σ1σ2-Cl(V ))) for every σ1σ2-open set V of Y ; (6) τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(V )) ⊆ f−1(σ1σ2-Cl(V )) for every (σ1, σ2)p-open set V of Y ; (7) f−1(V ) ⊆ τ1τ2-Int(f −1(σ1σ2-Cl(V ))) for every (σ1, σ2)p-open set V of Y . Proof. (1) ⇒ (2): Let B be any subset of Y and x ̸∈ f−1(σ1σ2-Cl(B)). Then, we have f(x) ̸∈ σ1σ2-Cl(B) and there exists a σ1σ2-open set U of Y containing f(x) such that U ∩ B = ∅. Therefore, σ1σ2-Cl(U) ∩ σ1σ2-Int(σ1σ2-Cl(B)) = ∅. Since f is weakly (τ1, τ2)-continuous at x, there exists a τ1τ2-open set W of X containing x such that f(W ) ⊆ σ1σ2-Cl(U). Thus, W ∩ f−1(σ1σ2-Int(σ1σ2-Cl(B))) = ∅ and hence x ̸∈ τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(σ1σ2-Int(σ1σ2-Cl(B)))). This shows that τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(σ1σ2-Int(σ1σ2-Cl(B)))) ⊆ f−1(σ1σ2-Cl(B)). C. Boonpok, C. Klanarong / Eur. J. Pure Appl. Math, 17 (1) (2024), 416-425 422 (2) ⇒ (3): Let K be any (σ1, σ2)r-closed set of Y . Then by (2), we have τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(σ1σ2-Int(K))) = τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(σ1σ2-Int(σ1σ2-Cl(σ1σ2-Int(K))))) ⊆ f−1(σ1σ2-Cl(σ1σ2-Int(K))) = f−1(K). (3) ⇒ (4): Let V be any σ1σ2-open set of Y . Then, σ1σ2-Cl(V ) is (σ1, σ2)r-closed in Y . By (3), τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(V )) ⊆ τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(σ1σ2-Int(σ1σ2-Cl(V )))) ⊆ f−1(σ1σ2-Cl(V )). (4) ⇒ (5): Let V be any σ1σ2-open set of Y . Since Y −σ1σ2-Cl(V ) is σ1σ2-open in Y , by (4) we have X − τ1τ2-Int(f −1(σ1σ2-Cl(V ))) = τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(Y − σ1σ2-Cl(V ))) ⊆ f−1(σ1σ2-Cl(Y − σ1σ2-Cl(V ))) ⊆ X − f−1(V ) and hence f−1(V ) ⊆ τ1τ2-Int(f −1(σ1σ2-Cl(V ))). (5) ⇒ (1): Let x ∈ X and V be any σ1σ2-open set of Y containing f(x). By (5), x ∈ f−1(V ) ⊆ τ1τ2-Int(f −1(σ1σ2-Cl(V ))). Put W = τ1τ2-Int(f −1(σ1σ2-Cl(V ))). Then, W is τ1τ2-open set of X containing x such that f(W ) ⊆ σ1σ2-Cl(V ). Thus, f is weakly (τ1, τ2)-continuous at x. This shows that f is weakly (τ1, τ2)-continuous. (1) ⇒ (6): Let V be any (σ1, σ2)p-open set of Y and x ̸∈ f−1(σ1σ2-Cl(V )). Then, f(x) ̸∈ σ1σ2-Cl(V ) and there exists a σ1σ2-open set G of Y containing f(x) such that G ∩ V = ∅. Since V is (σ1, σ2)p-open, we have V ∩ σ1σ2-Cl(G) ⊆ σ1σ2-Int(σ1σ2-Cl(V )) ∩ σ1σ2-Cl(G) ⊆ σ1σ2-Cl(σ1σ2-Int(σ1σ2-Cl(V )) ∩G) ⊆ σ1σ2-Cl(σ1σ2-Int(σ1σ2-Cl(V ) ∩G)) ⊆ σ1σ2-Cl(σ1σ2-Int(σ1σ2-Cl(V ∩G))) ⊆ σ1σ2-Cl(V ∩G) = ∅. Since f is weakly (τ1, τ2)-continuous at x, there exists a τ1τ2-open set W of X containing x such that f(W ) ⊆ σ1σ2-Cl(G). Thus, f(W ) ∩ V = ∅ and hence W ∩ f−1(V ) = ∅. Therefore, x ̸∈ τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(V ). This shows that τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(V )) ⊆ f−1(σ1σ2-Cl(V )). (6) ⇒ (7): Let V be any (σ1, σ2)p-open set of Y . Then, Y − σ1σ2-Cl(V ) is σ1σ2-open and hence Y − σ1σ2-Cl(V ) is (σ1, σ2)p-open in Y . Then by (6), we have X − τ1τ2-Int(f −1(σ1σ2-Cl(V ))) = τ1τ2-Cl(X − f−1(σ1σ2-Cl(V ))) = τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(Y − σ1σ2-Cl(V ))) ⊆ f−1(σ1σ2-Cl(Y − σ1σ2-Cl(V ))) = f−1(Y − σ1σ2-Int(σ1σ2-Cl(V ))) = X − f−1(σ1σ2-Int(σ1σ2-Cl(V ))) C. Boonpok, C. Klanarong / Eur. J. Pure Appl. Math, 17 (1) (2024), 416-425 423 ⊆ X − f−1(V ) and hence f−1(V ) ⊆ τ1τ2-Int(f −1(σ1σ2-Cl(V ))). (7) ⇒ (1): Let x ∈ X and V be any σ1σ2-open set of Y containing f(x). Since V is (σ1, σ2)p-open in Y and by (7), x ∈ f−1(V ) ⊆ τ1τ2-Int(f −1(σ1σ2-Cl(V ))). Put U = τ1τ2-Int(f −1(σ1σ2-Cl(V ))). Then, U is a τ1τ2-open set of X containing x such that f(U) ⊆ σ1σ2-Cl(V ). Thus, f is weakly (τ1, τ2)-continuous at x. This shows that f is weakly (τ1, τ2)-continuous. Theorem 8. For a function (X, τ1, τ2) → (Y, σ1, σ2), the following properties are equiva- lent: (1) f is weakly (τ1, τ2)-continuous; (2) f(τ1τ2-Cl(A)) ⊆ (σ1, σ2)θ-Cl(f(A)) for every subset A of X; (3) τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(B)) ⊆ f−1((σ1, σ2)θ-Cl(B)) for every subset B of Y . Proof. (1) ⇒ (2): Let A be any subset of X. Suppose that x ∈ τ1τ2-Cl(A) and G is any σ1σ2-open set of Y containing f(x). Since f is weakly (τ1, τ2)-continuous, there exists a τ1τ2-open set U of X containing x such that f(U) ⊆ σ1σ2-Cl(G). Since x ∈ τ1τ2-Cl(A), we have U ∩ A ̸= ∅. It follows that ∅ ̸= f(U) ∩ f(A) ⊆ σ1σ2-Cl(G) ∩ f(A). Thus, f(x) ∈ (σ1, σ2)θ-Cl(f(A)) and hence f(τ1τ2-Cl(A)) ⊆ (σ1, σ2)θ-Cl(f(A)). (2) ⇒ (3): Let B be any subset of Y . Then, f(τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(B))) ⊆ (σ1, σ2)θ-Cl(f(f −1(B))) ⊆ (σ1, σ2)θ-Cl(B) and hence τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(B)) ⊆ f−1((σ1, σ2)θ-Cl(B)). (3) ⇒ (1): Let x ∈ X and V be any σ1σ2-open set of Y containing f(x). Since σ1σ2-Cl(V ) ∩ (Y − σ1σ2-Cl(V )) = ∅, f(x) ̸∈ (σ1, σ2)θ-Cl(Y −σ1σ2-Cl(V )) and hence x ̸∈ f−1((σ1, σ2)θ-Cl(Y −σ1σ2-Cl(V ))). By (3), x ̸∈ τ1τ2-Cl(f −1(Y −σ1σ2-Cl(V ))) and there exists a τ1τ2-open set U of X containing x such that U ∩ f−1(Y − σ1σ2-Cl(V )) = ∅; hence f(U) ∩ (Y − σ1σ2-Cl(V )) = ∅. Thus, f(U) ⊆ σ1σ2-Cl(V ) and hence f is weakly (τ1, τ2)-continuous at x. This shows that f is weakly (τ1, τ2)-continuous. Acknowledgements This research project was financially supported by Mahasarakham University. REFERENCES 424 References [1] C. Boonpok. M -continuous functions in biminimal structure spaces. Far East Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 43(1):41–58, 2010. [2] C. Boonpok. (τ1, τ2)δ-semicontinuous multifunctions. Heliyon, 6:e05367, 2020. [3] C. Boonpok. Weak openness and weak continuity. Mathematica, 64(2):173–185, 2022. [4] C. Boonpok and C. Viriyapong. Upper and lower almost weak (τ1, τ2)-continuity. European Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 14(4):1212–1225, 2021. [5] C. Boonpok and C. Viriyapong. On (Λ, p)-closed sets and the related notions in topological spaces. European Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 15(2):415– 436, 2022. [6] C. Boonpok and C. Viriyapong. On some forms of closed sets and related topics. European Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 16(1):336–362, 2023. [7] C. Boonpok, C. Viriyapong, and M. Thongmoon. On upper and lower (τ1, τ2)- precontinuous multifunctions,. Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science, 18:282–293, 2018. [8] E. Ekici, S. Jafari, M. Caldas, and T. Noiri. Weakly λ-continuous functions. Novi Sad Journal of Mathematics, 38:47–56, 2008. [9] K. Laprom, C. Boonpok, and C. Viriyapong. β(τ1, τ2)-continuous multifunctions on bitopological spaces. Journal of Mathematics, 2020:4020971, 2020. [10] N. Levine. A decomposition of continuity in topological spaces. The American Math- ematical Monthly, 68:44–46, 1961. [11] N. Levine. Semi-open sets and semi-continuity in topological spaces. The American Mathematical Monthly, 70(1):36–41, 1963. [12] S. Marcus. Sur les fonctions quasicontinues au sens de S. Kempisty. Colloquium Mathematicum, 8:47–53, 1961. [13] A. Neubrunnová. On certain generalizations of the notions of continuity. Matematiký Časopis, 23:374–380, 1973. [14] T. Noiri. Properties of some weak forms of continuity. International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, 10(1):97–111, 1987. [15] V. Popa and T. Noiri. A unified theory of weak continuity for functions. Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo (2), 51:439–464, 2002. [16] V. Popa and T. Noiri. On weakly (τ,m)-continuous functions. Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo (2), 51:295–316, 2002. REFERENCES 425 [17] V. Popa and C. Stan. On a decomposition of quasicontinuity in topological spaces. Studii şi Cercetǎri de Matematicǎ, 25:41–43, 1973. [18] D. A. Rose. Weak continuity and almost continuity. International Journal of Math- ematics and Mathematical Sciences, 7:311–318, 1984. [19] C. Viriyapong and C. Boonpok. (τ1, τ2)α-continuity for multifunctions. Journal of Mathematics, 2020:6285763, 2020. [20] C. Viriyapong and C. Boonpok. (Λ, sp)-continuous functions. WSEAS Transactions on Mathematics, 21:380–385, 2022.