15_815_goyal.dvi EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PURE AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS Vol. 3, No. 6, 2010, 1118-1123 ISSN 1307-5543 – www.ejpam.com SPECIAL ISSUE ON COMPLEX ANALYSIS: THEORY AND APPLICATIONS DEDICATED TO PROFESSOR HARI M. SRIVASTAVA, ON THE OCCASION OF HIS 70TH BIRTHDAY Quasi-Hadamard Product of Certain Meromorphic P-Valent An- alytic Functions S. P. Goyal1,∗, Pranay Goswami2 1 Department of Mathematics, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur-302055, India 2 Department of Mathematics, Amity University Rajasthan, Jaipur-302002, India Abstract. In this paper, we establish certain results concerning the quasi-Hadamard product for the classes related to meromorphic p-valent analytic functions with positive coefficients. 2000 Mathematics Subject Classifications: 30C45 Key Words and Phrases: Analytic functions, Meromorphic p-valent functions, quasi-Hadamard prod- uct 1. Introduction Throughout this paper, let p ∈ N = {1,2,3, . . .} and the functions of the form : ϕ(z) = apzp − ∞ ∑ n=1 an+pzn+p � ap > 0; ap+n ≥ 0 � , ψ(z) = bpzp − ∞ ∑ n=1 bn+pzn+p � ap > 0; bp+n ≥ 0 � , be analytic and p-valent in the unit disc ∆= {z : |z| < 1}. Also, let f (z) = ap−1 zp + ∞ ∑ n=1 an+p−1zn+p−1 � ap > 0; ap+n ≥ 0 � , (1) ∗Corresponding author. Email addresses: somprg�gmail. om (S. Goyal), pranaygoswami83�gmail. om (P. Goswami) http://www.ejpam.com 1118 c© 2010 EJPAM All rights reserved. S. Goyal, P. Goswami / Eur. J. Pure Appl. Math, 3 (2010), 1118-1123 1119 fi(z) = ap−1,i zp + ∞ ∑ n=1 an+p−1,iz n+p−1 � ap,i > 0; ap+n,i ≥ 0 � , (2) g(z) = bp−1 zp + ∞ ∑ n=1 bn+p−1zn+p−1 � bp > 0; bp+n ≥ 0 � , (3) and gi(z) = bp−1,i zp + ∞ ∑ n=1 bn+p−1,iz n+p−1 � bp,i > 0; bp+n,i ≥ 0 � , (4) be analytic and p-valent in the punctured disc ∆∗ = {z : 0< |z| < 1}. Let ∑ S T ∗0(p,α) denote the class of functions f (z) defined by (1) and satisfy the condi- tion −Re ¨ 1+ z f ′(z) f (z) « > α, (z ∈∆∗) (5) and ∑ C ∗0 (p,α) denote the class of functions f (z) defined by (1) and satisfy the condition −Re ¨ z f ′(z) f (z) « > α, (z ∈∆∗) (6) where 0≤ α < p. The quasi-Hadamard product of two or more functions has recently been defined and used by Kumar ([7],[8], and [9]), Aouf et al. [3], Hossen [6], Darwish [4] and Sekine [12]. Accordingly, the quasi-Hadamard product of two functions ϕ(z) and ψ(z) is defined by (ϕ ∗ψ)(z) = ap bpzp − ∞ ∑ n=1 an+p bn+pzn+p (7) Aouf [1] defined the Hadamard product of two meromorphic p-valent functions f (z) and g(z) by ( f ∗ g)(z) = ap−1 bp−1 zp + ∞ ∑ n=1 an+p−1 bn+p−1zn+p−1 (8) Similarly, we can define the Hadamard product of more than two meromorphic p−valent functions. Let λ(z) be a fixed function of the form λ(z) = cp−1 zp + ∞ ∑ n=1 cn+p−1zn+p−1 � cp > 0; cp+n ≥ 0 � , (9) Using the function defined by (9), we now define the following new classes S. Goyal, P. Goswami / Eur. J. Pure Appl. Math, 3 (2010), 1118-1123 1120 Definition 1. A function f (z) ∈ ∑ M 0 λ (cn+p−1,δ) (cn+p−1 ≥ cp > 0; n≥ 2) if and only if ∞ ∑ n=1 cn+p−1an+p−1 ≤ δap−1 (10) where δ > 0. Definition 2. A function f (z) ∈ ∑ B k λ (cn+p−1,δ) (cn+p−1 ≥ cp > 0; n≥ 2) if and only if ∞ ∑ n=1 � n+ p− 1 p �k cn+p−1an+p−1 ≤ δap−1 (11) where δ > 0. It is easy to check that various subclasses of meromorphic and multivalent functions can be (studied by various authors) represented as ∑ B k λ (cn+p−1,δ) for suitable choices of cn,δ and k. For example: (1) ∑ B k λ ((n+ 2p− 1) + β(n+ 2α− 1), 2β(p−α))≡ ∗ ∑ k (p,α,β) (2) ∑ B0 λ ((n+ 2p− 1)+ β(n+ 2α− 1), 2β(p−α))≡ ∑ S∗0(p,α,β) (3) ∑ B1 λ ((n+ 2p− 1)+ β(n+ 2α− 1), 2β(p−α))≡ ∑ C∗0(p,α,β) (4) ∑ B k λ ((n(1+ β) + (2α− 1)β + 1, 2β(1−α))≡ ∑ S∗0(k,α,β) for p = 1 (5) ∑ B k λ (n(n(1+ β) + (2α− 1)β + 1), 2β(1−α))≡ ∑ C∗0(k,α,β) for p= 1 The classes ∗ ∑ k (p,α,β), ∑ S∗0(p,α,β) and ∑ C∗0(p,α,β) have been studied by Aouf [1] and the classes ∑ S∗0(k,α,β) and ∑ C∗0(k,α,β) have been studied by El-Ashwah and Aouf [5]. Evidently, ∑ B0 λ (cn+p−1,δ) ≡ ∑ M 0 λ (cn+p−1,δ) . Further, ∑ B k λ (cn+p−1,δ) ⊂ ∑ Bh λ (cn+p−1,δ) if k > h ≥ 0, the containment being proper. Moreover, for any positive integer k we have the following inclusion relation ∑ B k λ(cn+p−1,δ) ⊂ ∑ B k−1 λ (cn+p−1,δ)⊂ . . . ⊂ ∑ M 0 λ (cn+p−1,δ)⊂ ∑ C ∗0 (p,α) ⊂ ∑ S ∗0 (p,α). We also note that for every nonnegative real number k, the class ∑ B k λ (cn+p−1,δ) is nonempty as the functions of the form f (z) = ap−1 zp + ∞ ∑ n=1 � p n+ p− 1 �k δap+n−1 cp+n−1 µn+p−1zn+p−1 � ap > 0; ap+n ≥ 0 � , where ap−1 > 0, µn+p−1 ≥ 0 and ∑∞ n=1µn+p−1 ≤ 1, satisfy the inequality (11). In this paper we establish a theorem concerning the quasi-Hadamard product of func- tions in the classes ∑ M 0 λ (cn+p−1,δ) and ∑ B k λ (cn+p−1,δ). The theorem and its applications generalize the results obtained by Aouf [1], Mogra [11] and El-Ashwah and Aouf [5]. S. Goyal, P. Goswami / Eur. J. Pure Appl. Math, 3 (2010), 1118-1123 1121 2. Main Theorem Theorem 1. Let the functions fi(z) defined by (2) belong to the class ∑ B k λ (cn+p−1,δ) for every i = 1,2, . . . , m, and let the functions g j(z) defined by (4) belong to the class ∑ M 0 λ (cn+p−1,δ) for every j = 1,2, . . . ,q. If cn+p−1 ≥ � n+p−1 p � δ, then the quasi-Hadamard product f1 ∗ f2 ∗ . . . ∗ fm ∗ g1 ∗ g2 ∗ . . . ∗ gq(z) belongs to the class ∑ B (k+1)m+q−1 λ (cn+p−1,δ). Proof. Let h(z) := f1 ∗ f2 ∗ . . . ∗ fm ∗ g1 ∗ g2 ∗ . . . ∗ gq(z), then h(z) = ( m ∏ i=1 ap−1,i q ∏ j=1 bp−1, j ) zp + ∞ ∑ n=1    m ∏ i=1 an+p−1,i q ∏ j=1 bn+p−1, j    zn+p−1. (12) It is sufficient to show that ∞ ∑ n=1 � n+ p− 1 p �m(k+1)+q−1 m ∏ i=1 an+p−1,i q ∏ j=1 bn+p−1, j ≤ δ m ∏ i=1 ap−1,i q ∏ j=1 bp−1, j (13) Since fi(z) ∈ ∑ B k λ (cn+p−1,δ), we have ∞ ∑ n=1 � n+ p− 1 p �k cn+p−1an+p−1,i ≤ δap−1,i (14) for every i = 1,2, . . . , m. Therefore, an+p−1,i ≤ � n+ p− 1 p �−k � δ cn+p−1 � ap−1,i (15) which by virtue of the condition (given with the theorem) implies that an+p−1,i ≤ � n+ p− 1 p �−k−1 ap−1,i (16) for every i = 1,2, . . . , m. Further, since g j(z) ∈ ∑ M 0 λ (cn+p−1,δ), we have ∞ ∑ n=1 cn+p−1 bn+p−1, j ≤ δbp−1, j (17) for every j = 1,2, . . . ,q. Hence we obtain bn+p−1, j ≤ � n+ p− 1 p �−1 bp−1, j (18) S. Goyal, P. Goswami / Eur. J. Pure Appl. Math, 3 (2010), 1118-1123 1122 Using (16) for i = 1,2, . . . , m, and (18) for j = 1,2, . . . ,q− 1, and (17) for j = q, we get ∞ ∑ n=1      � n+ p− 1 p �m(k+1)+q−1 cn+p−1    m ∏ i=1 an+p−1,i q ∏ j=1 bn+p−1, j         ≤ ∞ ∑ n=1 � � n+ p− 1 p �m(k+1)+q−1�n+ p− 1 p �−m(k+1)�n+ p− 1 p �−(q−1)    m ∏ i=1 ap−1,i q−1 ∏ j=1 bn+p−1, j    cn+p−1 bn+p−1,q      =    m ∏ i=1 ap−1,i q−1 ∏ j=1 bp−1, j    ∞ ∑ n=1 cn+p−1 bn+p−1,q ! ≤ δ m ∏ i=1 ap−1,i q ∏ j=1 bp−1, j (by (17)) Hence h(z) ∈ ∑ B (k+1)m+q−1 λ (cn+p−1,δ). This completes the proof of the Theorem 1. Taking k = 0 in the proof of the above theorem, we obtain Corollary 1. Let the functions fi(z) defined by (2) and the functions g j(z) defined by (4) belong to the class ∑ M 0 λ (cn+p−1,δ) for every i = 1,2, . . . , m, and j = 1,2, . . . ,q. If cn+p−1 ≥ � n+p−1 p � δ, then the quasi-Hadamard product f1 ∗ f2 ∗ . . . ∗ fm ∗ g1 ∗ g2 ∗ . . . ∗ gq(z) belongs to the class ∑ Bm+q−1 λ (cn+p−1,δ). Now taking into account the quasi-Hadamard product functions g1(z) ∗ g2(z) ∗ . . . ∗ gq(z) only, in the proof of the above theorem, and using (18) for j = 1,2,3 . . . ,q− 1, and (17) for j = m, we obtain Corollary 2. Let the functions g j(z) defined by (4) belong to the class ∑ M 0 λ (cn+p−1,δ) for j = 1,2, . . . ,q. If cn+p−1 ≥ � n+p−1 p � δ, then Hadamard product g1 ∗ g2 ∗ . . . ∗ gq(z) belongs to the class ∑ Bq−1 λ (cn+p−1,δ). Remark 1. (i) Putting cn+p−1 = (n+ 2p− 1)+β(n+ 2α− 1) and δ = 2β(p−α) in the above theorem, we obtain the results obtained by Aouf [1]. (ii) Putting p = 1, cn = n((n+ 1)+β(n+ 2α− 1)) and δ = 2β(1−α) in the above theorem, we obtain the results obtained by Mogra [11]. (iii) Putting p = 1, in Corollary 2, we obtain the results obtained by El-Ashwah and Aouf [5]. REFERENCES 1123 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The first author (S P G) is thankful to CSIR, New Delhi, India for awarding Emeritius Scientist under scheme No. 21(084)/10/EMR-II. References [1] M.K. AOUF, Hadamard product of certain meromorphic p-valent starlike functions and meromorphic p-valent convex functions, J. Inq. Pure Appl. Math (JIPAM), 10(2), Article 43, 7 pp. 2009. [2] M.K. AOUF and H.E. DARWISH, Hadamard product of certain meromorphic univalent functions with positive coefficients, South. Asian Bull. Math., 30, 23–28. 2006. [3] M.K. AOUF, A. SHAMANDY and M.F. YASSEN, Quasi-Hadamard product of p-valent func- tions, Commun. Fac. Sci. Univ. Ank. Series A1, 44, 35–40. 1995 [4] H.E. DARWISH, The quasi-Hadamard product of certain starlike and convex functions, Appl. Math. Letters, 20, 692–695. 2007. [5] R.M. El-Ashwah and M.K. Aouf, Hadamard product of certain meromorphic starlike and convex functions, Computers Math. Appl., 57, 1102–1106. 2009. [6] H.M. HOSSEN, Quasi-Hadamard product of certain p-valent functions, Demonstratio Math., 33(2), 277–281. 2000 [7] V. KUMAR, Hadamard product of certain starlike functions, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 110, 425–428. 1985 [8] V. KUMAR, Hadamard product of certain starlike functions II, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 113, 230–234. 1986 [9] V. KUMAR, Quasi-Hadamard product of certain univalent functions, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 126, 70–77. 1987. [10] M.L. MOGRA,Meromorphic multivalent functions with positive coefficients. I, Math. Japon. 35(1), 1–11. 1990. [11] M.L. MOGRA, Hadamard product of certain meromorphic starlike and convex functions, Tamkang J. Math., 25(2), 157–162. 1994. [12] T. SEKINE, On quasi-Hadamard products of p-valent functions with negative coefficients in: H. M. Srivastava and S. Owa (Editors), Univalent Functions, Fractional Calculus, and Their Applications, Halsted Press (Ellis Horwood Limited, Chichester), John Wiley and Sons, New York, Chichester, Brisbane and Toronto, 317–328. 1989.