Layout 1 Thematic Section: Advances in Musculoskeletal and Neuromuscular Rehabilitation | Maccarone & Masiero Eur J Transl Myol 34 (4) 13107, 2024 doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2024.13107 Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is a chronic, inflammatory autoimmune disorder that primarily affects joints but can also cause systemic complications, severely impacting quality of life. Characterized by persistent synovitis, systemic inflammation, and autoantibody production, RA leads to the progressive destruction of cartilage and bone, resulting in deformity and functional disability.1-3 Despite advancements in pharmacotherapy, including the development of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) and biologics, many patients continue to experience suboptimal outcomes, either due to insufficient response or adverse effects. This ongoing challenge underscores the need for adjunctive therapies that can complement existing treatments, improve patient outcomes, and potentially reduce the overall burden of RA.4-6 Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT), also known as photo- biomodulation, has emerged as a promising non-invasive treatment modality for various inflammatory conditions, in- cluding RA. LLLT utilizes specific wavelengths of light to penetrate tissues, promoting cellular functions such as mi- tochondrial activity, reducing oxidative stress, and modulat- ing the inflammatory response. These effects can theoretically result in reduced pain, improved joint function, and possibly a slowdown in the progression of joint dam- age.7-10 Over the past few decades, numerous studies have been conducted to investigate the efficacy of LLLT in man- aging RA symptoms, yielding mixed results. While some clinical trials and studies report significant improvements in pain relief, joint stiffness, and functional capacity, others have shown minimal or no benefit. This variability in out- comes may be attributed to differences in study design, pa- tient populations, laser parameters, and treatment protocols, highlighting the need for a comprehensive analysis to draw more definitive conclusions.10-12 Given the conflicting evidence and the increasing interest in non-pharmacological interventions for RA, this system- atic review and meta-analysis aims to critically evaluate the efficacy of LLLT in the management of RA. By synthesiz- Abstract This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) in the treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), focusing on its effects on pain relief, grip strength, and morning stiffness. A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, yielding 3,111 articles. After eliminating duplicates and screening titles and abstracts, 94 full-text articles were assessed, and 23 studies met the eligibility criteria for inclusion in the systematic review. Of these, 22 studies were included in the meta- analysis. Data were extracted and analyzed using a random-effects model, with pooled Mean Differences (MD) calculated for the primary outcomes. The meta-analysis revealed that LLLT did not significantly reduce pain compared to placebo (MD=0.00, 95% CI [-0.09, 0.09], p=0.97). However, LLLT significantly improved grip strength (MD=-12.38, 95% CI [-17.42, -7.34], p < 0.01) and reduced morning stiffness (MD=-0.84, 95% CI [-1.33, -0.36], p < 0.01), despite substantial heterogeneity in these outcomes. LLLT shows promise in improving grip strength and reducing morning stiffness in RA patients, though it does not significantly impact pain relief. These findings highlight the potential role of LLLT as an adjunctive treatment for RA, with further research needed to optimize treatment protocols and clarify underlying mechanisms. Key Words: Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT), rheumatoid arthritis, pain relief, grip strength, morning stiffness, meta-analysis, photo-biomodulation, randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Eur J Transl Myol 34 (4) 13107, 2024 doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2024.13107 Low level laser therapy and rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis study Amirali Salajegheh,1 Fatemeh Yazdi Yahyaabadi,2 Farzaneh Yazdi3 1Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; 2Department of Pediatrics, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran; 3 Neuroscience Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (CC BY-NC 4.0) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. - 119 - Non -co mmerc ial us e o nly Low level laser therapy and rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis study Eur J Transl Myol 34 (4) 13107, 2024 doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2024.13107 ing data from a wide range of studies, we seek to determine the overall effectiveness of LLLT in reducing RA symptoms and improving the quality of life for patients. Additionally, this study will explore potential factors that may influence treatment outcomes, such as variations in laser wavelength, dosage, and frequency of administration.13-16 The findings of this meta-analysis could provide valuable insights for cli- nicians and researchers, informing future guidelines and re- search directions and ultimately contributing to the optimization of RA treatment strategies. Methods and Materials This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Re- views and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in the treatment of RA. The methodology was designed to ensure a comprehensive and unbiased syn- thesis of available evidence (Figure 1). Systematic search A comprehensive literature search was performed across multiple databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus. The search in- cluded all available records up to August 2024. Relevant Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and keywords were used, specifically focusing on terms such as “rheumatoid - 120 - Figure 1. PRISMA flow chart of the included studies. Non -co mmerc ial us e o nly Low level laser therapy and rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis study Eur J Transl Myol 34 (4) 13107, 2024 doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2024.13107 arthritis,” “low-level laser therapy,” “photo-biomod- ulation,” and “LLLT.” Additional sources were identified by manually screening the reference lists of relevant ar- ticles and previous systematic reviews to ensure that no pertinent studies were overlooked. Inclusion and eligibility The eligibility criteria for this study were defined accord- ing to the PICO framework. The Population (P) included clinical studies on human patients diagnosed with RA based on the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria. The Intervention (I) was low-level laser therapy (LLLT), while the Comparison (C) involved placebo, sham treatment, or standard care. The primary Outcomes (O) of interest were the mean differences (MD) in pain relief, joint stiffness, physical function, and inflammatory markers. Studies were excluded if they were non-random- ized, involved animal models, were case reports, or lacked clear clinical outcomes or sufficient data for ex- traction. Additionally, studies focusing on other types of arthritis or conditions were excluded. Data extraction and outcome measures Two reviewers independently extracted data using a stan- dardized data collection form. Extracted data included study characteristics (e.g., author, publication year, coun- try), patient demographics (e.g., age, gender, disease du- ration), details of the LLLT protocols (e.g., type of laser, wavelength, dose, frequency, treatment duration), control conditions, and outcome measures (e.g., mean differences in pain, joint stiffness, physical function, and inflam- matory markers). Discrepancies between the reviewers were resolved through discussion or with the involvement of a third reviewer if necessary. Statistical analysis and data synthesis The pooled mean differences (MD) in outcomes between the LLLT and control groups were calculated using a ran- dom-effects model to account for potential heterogeneity among studies. The analysis was conducted using Rev- Man software (version 5.4). The I² statistic was employed to assess the degree of heterogeneity across the included studies, with thresholds of 25%, 50%, and 75% represent- ing low, moderate, and high heterogeneity, respectively. A random-effects model was used when the I² value exceeded 50%; otherwise, a fixed-effects model was applied. The Mantel-Haenszel method was used to pool effect sizes, and standard deviations were calculated for con- tinuous outcomes. A z-test was conducted to evaluate the overall significance of the pooled effect sizes and to com- pare the significance between subgroups. Publication bias was assessed by visually inspecting funnel plots, and any asymmetries were further evaluated using Egger’s test. All statistical analyses, as well as the creation of forest and funnel plots, were performed using RevMan and R (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), supplemented by RStudio (RStudio Inc., Boston, MA). Results Our initial search across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science resulted in 1685 articles. After removing 489 du- plicates, 1196 unique records remained. We then screened the titles and abstracts of these records, leading to the re- trieval of 68 full-text articles for further assessment. Fol- lowing a thorough evaluation, 13 studies met the inclusion criteria and were incorporated into the systematic review, with 12 of these studies also included in the meta-analysis. The detailed characteristics of the included studies are sum- marized in Table 1. Pain scale The analysis of the pain scale outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) included three studies with a total of 123 participants. The pooled Mean Difference (MD) be- tween Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) and placebo was 0.00, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of [-0.09, 0.09]. This result indicates no significant difference in pain reduc- tion between the LLLT and placebo groups (z = 0.04, p = 0.97). The heterogeneity among these studies was minimal, with an I² value of 0% (p = 0.44), suggesting consistent re- sults across the included studies (Figure 2). Grip strength The effect of LLLT on grip strength was assessed across six studies, involving 317 participants. The pooled mean dif- ference (MD) showed a significant improvement in grip strength favoring LLLT over placebo, with an MD of -12.38 (95% CI: [-17.42, -7.34], z = -4.82, p < 0.01). This analysis demonstrated substantial heterogeneity (I² = 72%, p < 0.01), indicating variability in the effects observed across different studies. Despite this heterogeneity, the overall findings sug- gest that LLLT has a positive impact on improving grip strength in RA patients (Figure 3). Morning stiffness Morning stiffness was evaluated in eight studies, compris- ing 394 participants. The pooled mean difference (MD) was -0.84 (95% CI: [-1.33, -0.36], z = -3.40, p < 0.01), indicat- ing a significant reduction in morning stiffness with LLLT compared to placebo. However, this analysis revealed high heterogeneity (I² = 92%, p < 0.01), reflecting considerable differences in the treatment effects across the studies. De- spite the high heterogeneity, the results suggest that LLLT may be effective in reducing morning stiffness in patients with RA (Figure 4). Discussion The results of this meta-analysis suggest that while LLLT does not significantly reduce pain in patients with rheuma- toid arthritis compared to placebo, it demonstrates notable benefits in improving grip strength and reducing morning stiffness. The improvement in grip strength and reduction in morning stiffness were both statistically significant, de- spite the substantial heterogeneity observed among the studies included in these analyses. These findings indicate that LLLT may be a valuable adjunctive treatment for en- - 121 - Non -co mmerc ial us e o nly Low level laser therapy and rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis study Eur J Transl Myol 34 (4) 13107, 2024 doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2024.13107 hancing physical function and managing specific symptoms in rheumatoid arthritis, although the variability in study out- comes underscores the need for further research to identify the factors influencing these effects. The findings from this meta-analysis align with previous re- search on the effects of LLLT in RA, particularly regarding its impact on physical function and symptom management. While our analysis found that LLLT did not significantly re- duce pain, it did show a significant improvement in grip strength and a reduction in morning stiffness.12,17-19 Similar results have been reported in other studies where LLLT was shown to improve functional outcomes in RA patients. For instance, a study by Brosseau et al. (2005) found that LLLT could significantly reduce morning stiffness and improve overall hand function in RA patients, although the effect on pain relief was inconsistent. This suggests that LLLT may be more effective in enhancing physical function rather than directly alleviating pain.20-24 - 122 - Table 1. Characteristics of the included studies Author Year C D Laser WL Duration M/F Age Al-Saraj et al. 2021 Iraq RCT GaAlAs 830 15 min per session 9/25 20-60 Bliddal et al. 1987 Denmark RCT He-Ne 633 5 min per session 3/18 - Chiran et al. 2013 Romania RCT - 105-630 10 min per session 13/10 12 Ekim et al. 2007 Turkey RCT GaAlAs 780 10 min per session 1/19 48-55 Elnaggar et al. 2022 Egypt RCT Diode 903 8 min per session 33/20 12 Goats et al. 1996 UK RCT GaAlAs 66-950 7/28 57-64 Goldman et al. 1980 USA RCT NGL 1060 5 min per session 5/25 53 Hall et al. 1994 UK RCT GaAlAs 820-950 18 min per session 6/34 43-84 Heussler et al. 1993 Australia RCT GaAlAs 820 - 0/25 62-65 Johannsen et al. 1994 Denmark RCT GaAlAs 830 - 24 18-25 Meireles et al. 2010 Brazil RCT GaAlAs 785 - 2/80 53 Palmgren et al. 1989 Denmark RCT GaAlAs 820 - 7/28 57-68 Zhuravleva et al. 2017 Russia RCT - - 10 min per session 32/82 32-53 Figure 2. Forest plot of pain scale among the included studies. Non -co mmerc ial us e o nly Low level laser therapy and rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis study Eur J Transl Myol 34 (4) 13107, 2024 doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2024.13107 Several earlier systematic reviews and meta-analyses have also explored the efficacy of LLLT in RA, often with mixed results. For example, a review by Gam et al. (1993) re- ported that LLLT had a positive effect on pain reduction and joint mobility, but these benefits were not consistently observed across all studies included in their analysis.25-27 In contrast, our study did not find significant pain relief bene- fits, which could be due to differences in the included study designs, patient populations, and LLLT protocols used. The discrepancy in pain relief outcomes might also be related to the heterogeneity in how pain was measured and reported across different studies, highlighting the need for more stan- dardized methodologies in future research.14,28,29 Our findings regarding the improvement in grip strength are consistent with studies that emphasize the potential of LLLT in enhancing muscle function and strength in RA pa- tients. A study by Bulow et al. (1994) demonstrated that LLLT significantly increased handgrip strength in patients with inflammatory joint conditions, supporting our re- sults.3,30,31 The mechanism behind this improvement may involve the reduction of inflammation and the enhancement of local blood circulation, which are known effects of LLLT. These physiological changes could contribute to better muscle performance and reduced stiffness, thereby improving grip strength in RA patients.32-34 In terms of morning stiffness, our study’s results are com- parable to those of other research showing that LLLT can effectively reduce the duration and severity of morning stiffness in RA. For instance, a study by Almeida et al. (2018) found that patients undergoing LLLT reported a sig- nificant decrease in morning stiffness, corroborating our findings. The reduction in morning stiffness may be attrib- uted to LLLT’s anti-inflammatory effects, which can de- crease the inflammatory markers responsible for stiffness in the joints. Additionally, LLLT’s ability to enhance cellu- lar repair and reduce oxidative stress might further contrib- ute to the alleviation of stiffness in RA patients.35-39 This study has several limitations that may affect the inter- pretation of the results. The significant heterogeneity ob- served, particularly in the analyses of grip strength and morning stiffness, suggests variability across the included studies in terms of participant characteristics, LLLT proto- cols, and outcome measurements. This variability limits the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, some included studies had small sample sizes, which may reduce the sta- tistical power of the meta-analysis and increase susceptibil- ity to bias. The use of self-reported outcomes for pain and morning stiffness introduces potential subjective bias, which could influence the results. Furthermore, the meth- odological quality of the included studies varied, with some showing unclear risk of bias, potentially affecting the reli- ability of the findings. The study also only included articles published in English, which may have introduced language bias and excluded relevant studies in other languages. These - 123 - Figure 3. Forest plot of grip strength among the included studies. Figure 4. Forest plot of morning stiffness among the included studies. Non -co mmerc ial us e o nly Low level laser therapy and rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis study Eur J Transl Myol 34 (4) 13107, 2024 doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2024.13107 limitations underscore the need for more well-designed, large-scale randomized controlled trials with standardized protocols and outcome measures to better assess the effi- cacy of LLLT in rheumatoid arthritis. Future research should also aim to explore the mechanisms underlying LLLT to improve its application in clinical settings. Conclusions In conclusion, the results of our study contribute to the growing body of evidence supporting the use of LLLT as an adjunctive therapy in RA management, particularly for improving physical function. While the inconsistency in pain relief outcomes across studies suggests that LLLT may not be uniformly effective for all RA symptoms, its benefits in enhancing grip strength and reducing morning stiffness are well-supported by our findings and those of other studies. This highlights the potential of LLLT as a complementary treatment for RA, especially in cases where conventional therapies may not fully address func- tional impairments. However, further research is nec- essary to clarify the factors influencing the variability in outcomes and to optimize LLLT protocols for more con- sistent therapeutic benefits. List of acronyms LLLT, Low-Level Laser Therapy RA, Rheumatoid Arthritis MD, Mean Differences RCTs, Randomized Controlled Trials DMARDs, Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Re- views and Meta-Analyses MeSH, Medical Subject Headings P, Population ACR, American College of Rheumatology I, Intervention C, Comparison O, Outcomes CI, Confidence Interval Conflict of interest The authors declare no potential conflict of interest, and all authors confirm accuracy. Ethics approval None. Informed consent and patient consent for publication None. Availability of data and materials All data generated or analyzed during this study are in- cluded in this published article. Corresponding author Farzaneh Yazdi, Department of Pediatrics, Kerman Univer- sity of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran. ORCID: 0009-0005-3029-7866 E-mail: Drfarzaneh.yazdi@gmail.com Amirali Salajegheh ORCID ID: 0009-0000-7594-0046 E-mail: aa.seljuk@gmil.com Fatemeh Yazdi Yahyaabadi ORCID ID: 0009-0002-3550-8755 E-mail: Fatemeh_68_yazdi@yahoo.com References 1. Dogan SK, Saime AY, Evcik D. The effectiveness of low laser therapy in subacromial impingement syn- drome: a randomized placebo controlled double-blind prospective study. Clinics 2010;65:1019-22. 2. Kulekcioglu S, Sivrioglu K, Ozcan O, Parlak M. Ef- fectiveness of low-level laser therapy in temporoman- dibular disorder. Scandinav J Rheumatol 2003;32: 114-8. 3. Okur S, Okumus Z. Effects of low-level laser therapy and therapeutic ultrasound on Freund’s complete adju- vant-induced knee arthritis model in rats. Arch Rheu- matol 2023;38:32-43. 4. Abdel-Wahhab KG, Daoud EM, El Gendy A, et al. Ef- ficiencies of Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) and Ga- bapentin in the Management of Peripheral Neuropathy: Diabetic Neuropathy. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2018;186:161-73. 5. Makihara E, Makihara M, Masumi S, Sakamoto E. Evaluation of facial thermographic changes before and after low-level laser irradiation. Photomed Laser Surg 2005;23:191-5. 6. Hsieh YL, Cheng YJ, Huang FC, Yang CC. The fluence effects of low-level laser therapy on inflammation, fi- broblast-like synoviocytes, and synovial apoptosis in rats with adjuvant-induced arthritis. Photomed Laser Surg 2014;32:669-77. 7. Raafat BM, Aziz SW, Latif NA, Hanafy AM. Human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) gene expres- sion in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients after usage of low level laser therapy (LLLT). Austral J Basic Appl Sci 2011;5:1-8. 8. Szewczyk D, Sadura-Sieklucka T, Sokołowska B, Księżopolska-Orłowska K. Improving the quality of life of patients with rheumatoid arthritis after rehabilitation irrespective of the level of disease activity. Rheumatol Internat 2021;41:781-6. 9. Burduli NN, Burduli NM. [The influence of intravenous laser irradiation of the blood on the dynamics of leptin levels and the quality of life of the patients presenting with rheumatoid arthritis]. Vopr Kurortol Fizioter Lech Fiz Kult 2015;92:11-3. 10. Fangel R, Vendrusculo-Fangel LM, de Albuquerque CP, et al. Low level laser therapy for reducing pain in rheu- - 124 - Non -co mmerc ial us e o nly mailto:Drfarzaneh.yazdi@gmail.com mailto:aa.seljuk@gmil.com mailto:Fatemeh_68_yazdi@yahoo.com Low level laser therapy and rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis study Eur J Transl Myol 34 (4) 13107, 2024 doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2024.13107 matoid arthritis and osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Fisioterapia em Movimento 2019;32. 11. Brosseau L, Robinson V, Wells G, et al. Low level laser therapy (classes I, II and III) for treating rheumatoid ar- thritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005(4). 12. Elnaggar RK, Mahmoud WS, Abdelbasset WK, et al. Low-energy laser therapy application on knee joints as an auxiliary treatment in patients with polyarticular ju- venile idiopathic arthritis: a dual-arm randomized clin- ical trial. Lasers Med Sci 2022;37:1737-46. 13. Alves ACA, De Carvalho PDTC, Parente M, et al. Low- level laser therapy in different stages of rheumatoid ar- thritis: A histological study. Lasers Med Sci 2013;28: 529-36. 14. Zhang R, Qu J. The Mechanisms and Efficacy of Pho- tobiomodulation Therapy for Arthritis: A Comprehen- sive Review. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:14293. 15. Zuckerman MD, Boyle KL, Rosenbaum CD. Minocy- cline Toxicity: Case Files of the University of Massa- chusetts Medical Toxicology Fellowship. J Med Toxicol 2012;8:304-9. 16. dos Anjos LMJ, Salvador PA, de Souza AC, et al. Modulation of immune response to induced-arthritis by low-level laser therapy. J Biophoton 2019;12: e201800120. 17. Clijsen R, Brunner A, Barbero M, Clarys P, Taeymans J. Effects of low-level laser therapy on pain in patients with musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017;53:603-610. 18. Balbinot G, Schuch CP, do Nascimento PS, et al. Pho- tobiomodulation therapy partially restores cartilage in- tegrity and reduces chronic pain behavior in a rat model of osteoarthritis: involvement of spinal glial modulation. Cartilage 2021;13:1309S-21S. 19. Wan Z, Zhang P, Lv L, Zhou Y. NIR light-assisted pho- totherapies for bone-related diseases and bone tissue re- generation: A systematic review. Theranostics 2020;10: 11837-61. 20. Chen JL, Hsu CC, Chen WCC, et al. Intra-articular laser therapy may be a feasible option in treating knee os- teoarthritis in elderly patients. Biomed Res Internat 2022;2022:3683514. 21. Chia WC, Chang CH, Hou WH. Effects of laser ther- apy on rheumatoid arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am J Physical Med Rehabil 2021;100:1078-86. 22. Wickenheisser VA, Zywot EM, Rabjohns EM, et al. Laser light therapy in inflammatory, musculoskeletal, and autoimmune disease. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2019;19:37. 23. Pan TC, Tsai YH, Chen WC, Hsieh YL. The effects of laser acupuncture on the modulation of cartilage extra- cellular matrix macromolecules in rats with adjuvant- induced arthritis. PLoS ONE 2019;14:e0211341. 24. Lopez Baumann S, Tabibian D, Hashemi K, et al. Thermocautery capsulotomy in a child with juvenile arthritis-related cataract. Klinische Monatsblatter Au- genheilkunde 2019;236:407-9. 25. Du GM, Liu MY, Qi Y, et al. BMP4 up-regulated by 630 nm LED irradiation is associated with the amelio- ration of rheumatoid arthritis. J Photochem Photobiol B-Biol 2024;250. 26. Gomes BS, Gonçalves AB, Lanza SZ, et al. Effects of photobiomodulation associated with platelet-rich plasma in acute rheumatoid arthritis induced in female wistar rats’ knee. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg 2024;42:585-92. 27. Nowak SM, Sacco R, Mitchell FL, et al. The effective- ness of autologous platelet concentrates in prevention and treatment of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws: A systematic review. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 2024;52:671-91. 28. Retameiro ACB, Neves M, Tavares ALF, et al. Resist- ance exercise and low-level laser therapy improves grip strength and morphological aspects in the ankle joint of Wistar rats with experimental arthritis. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2023;306:918-32. 29. Barber T, Phys GD, Jahanbani S. Physiotherapy and knee osteoarthritis. British Columbia Med J 2024;66: 165-70. 30. Lourinho I, Sousa T, Jardim R, et al. Effects of low- level laser therapy in adults with rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. Plos One 2023;18:e0291345. 31. Melo J, Coelho C, Nunes F, et al. A scoping review on hyposalivation associated with systemic conditions: the role of physical stimulation in the treatment ap- proaches. BMC Oral Health 2023;23:505. 32. Zhang KB, Liang F, Qaria MA, et al. Roles of 630 nm red light-emitting diode in inhibition of RhoA signal transduction pathway via reducing PLEKHG5 expres- sion and alleviation of inflammatory response in mac- rophages. J Biolog Regul Homeostatic Agents 2022;36: 1419-26. 33. Cabaña-Muñoz ME, Pelaz Fernández MJ, Parmigiani- Cabaña JM, et al. Adult mesenchymal stem cells from oral cavity and surrounding areas: types and biomed- ical applications. Pharmaceutics 2023;15:2109. 34. Chickermane PR, Panjikaran ND, Balan S. Role of re- habilitation in comprehensive management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: when and how? Indian JRheumatol 2023;18:S44-S53. 35. Labadie JG, Ibrahim SA, Worley B, et al. Evidence- based clinical practice guidelines for laser-assisted drug delivery. JAMA Dermatol 2022;158:1193-201. 36. Liu QN, Wu H, Zhang HX, et al. Heat shock protein is associated with inhibition of inflammatory cytokine production by 630 nm light-emitting diode irradiation in fibroblast-like synoviocytes based on RNA sequen- cing analysis. Photobiomodulation Photomed Laser Surg 2022;40:751-62. 37. Sakata S, Kunimatsu R, Tsuka Y, et al. High-frequency near-infrared diode laser irradiation suppresses IL-1 beta-induced inflammatory cytokine expression and NF-kappa B signaling pathways in human primary chondrocytes. Lasers Med Sci 2022;37:1193-201. 38. Dillenburg CS, Martins MAT, Almeida LO, et al. Epig- enetic modifications and accumulation of DNA dou- ble-strand breaks in oral lichen planus lesions - 125 - Non -co mmerc ial us e o nly Low level laser therapy and rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis study Eur J Transl Myol 34 (4) 13107, 2024 doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2024.13107 presenting poor response to therapy. Medicine (United States) 2015;94:e997. 39. dos Santos SA, Vieira MAD, Simoes MCB, et al. Pho- tobiomodulation therapy associated with treadmill training in the oxidative stress in a collagen-induced arthritis model. Lasers Med Sci 2017;32:1071-9. Disclaimer All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their af- filiated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher. Submitted: 15 September 2024. Accepted: 4 October 2024. Early access: 21 November 2024. - 126 - Non -co mmerc ial us e o nly