Layout 1 Effect of estrogen and progesterone therapy on intraocular pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis study Eur J Transl Myol 35 (2) 13497, 2025 doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2025.13497 Glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide, with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma (POAG) being the most prevalent form. It is characterized by the progressive degeneration of the optic nerve, often associated with elevated Intraocular Pressure (IOP), which is a major risk factor for the disease.1,2 Although lowering IOP is the only proven method to slow the progression of glaucoma, understanding the factors that influence IOP is crucial for developing effective prevention and treatment strategies. Among these factors, hormonal changes, particularly those related to estrogen and progesterone levels, have attracted considerable attention due to their potential impact on eye health, especially in postmenopausal women.3,4 Estrogen and progesterone, the primary female sex hor- mones, are known to exert a wide range of physiological effects beyond the reproductive system, including on ocular tissues. These hormones have been shown to influence the structure and function of the trabecular meshwork, a critical component in the regulation of aqueous humor outflow and, consequently, IOP.5-7 During menopause, a significant de- cline in estrogen and progesterone levels occurs, which may contribute to an increased risk of developing conditions as- sociated with elevated IOP, such as glaucoma. This hor- monal decline has led to the hypothesis that Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT), which aims to supplement the reduced levels of estrogen and/or progesterone, might play a role in modulating IOP and potentially reducing glau- coma risk in postmenopausal women.8-11 Numerous studies have investigated the relationship be- tween hormone replacement therapy and IOP, yielding mixed results. Some research has reported that HRT is as- Abstract This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the effect of Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) with estrogen and progesterone on Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in postmenopausal women, with the objective of determining whether HRT can lower IOP and potentially reduce glaucoma risk. Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted up to June 2024. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials and observational studies that reported IOP changes in postmenopausal women undergoing HRT. The pooled mean differences in IOP were calculated using both random-effects and fixed-effect models. The meta-analysis included 9 studies with a total of 1,024 participants. The pooled analysis showed a significant reduction in IOP among women receiving HRT compared to controls, with a mean difference of 3.84 mmHg (95% CI: 2.26 to 5.41, p < 0.01) in the random-effects model, and 2.36 mmHg (95% CI: 2.08 to 2.64, p < 0.01) in the fixed-effect model. Despite these significant results, there was high heterogeneity across studies (I² = 97%), likely due to variations in hormone types, dosages, and treatment durations. HRT is associated with a significant decrease in IOP in postmenopausal women, potentially offering protective benefits against glaucoma, although further research is needed to address the observed variability. Key Words: estrogen, glaucoma, hormone replacement therapy, intraocular pressure, progesterone, postmenopausal women, systematic review. Eur J Transl Myol 35 (2) 13497, 2025 doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2025.13497 Effect of estrogen and progesterone therapy on intraocular pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis study Behzad Safarpour Lima, Shima Sayanjali, Nir Shoham-Hazon Miramichi EyeNB Centre of Excellence, Miramichi, NB, Canada. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (CC BY-NC 4.0) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. - 192 - Effect of estrogen and progesterone therapy on intraocular pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis study Eur J Transl Myol 35 (2) 13497, 2025 doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2025.13497 sociated with a reduction in IOP, suggesting a protective ef- fect against glaucoma. This is thought to be due to the in- fluence of estrogen on the ocular tissues, where it may enhance aqueous humor outflow or reduce its production, thereby lowering IOP.12-14 Conversely, other studies have found no significant association or even reported an in- crease in IOP with HRT use, indicating that the effect of hormone therapy on IOP might be more complex and in- fluenced by various factors such as the type of hormone used, dosage, duration of therapy, and individual patient characteristics.15-17 Furthermore, understanding the role of hormone therapy in IOP modulation has broader implications for women’s health. With the aging population, a growing number of women are experiencing menopause and the associated hor- monal changes, leading to increased interest in HRT for managing menopausal symptoms and preventing related health issues.18-20 However, concerns about the risks and benefits of HRT, particularly in the context of long-term use, remain. If hormone therapy is shown to have a signif- icant impact on IOP, it could inform clinical guidelines for glaucoma management and highlight the importance of in- dividualized therapy based on hormonal status.21,22 In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aim to ex- amine the effect of estrogen and progesterone therapy on IOP in postmenopausal women by synthesizing the ev- idence from existing studies. This review will assess the pooled mean differences in IOP between HRT users and non-users and evaluate the consistency of findings across studies. The results will provide insights into the potential role of hormone therapy in the management of glaucoma and contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of hormonal influences on ocular health. Materials and Methods The present study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline.23 Systematic search A comprehensive search was performed across Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed, covering all available records up to June 2024. We used relevant Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and relevant keywords, specifically tar- geting («hormone replacement therapy» OR «HRT» OR “progesterone” OR “estrogen”) AND («open-angle glau- coma» OR «OAG» OR “intraocular pressure” OR “IOP”). Inclusion and eligibility The eligibility criteria were defined based on the PICO framework: Population (P): postmenopausal women; Inter- vention (I): hormone therapy; Comparison (C): change of intraocular pressure; Outcome (O): IOP reduction or in- crease. The exclusion criteria were defined as: animal studies, case reports, studies on other types of glaucoma, studies not involving HRT, unclear or undefined HRT pro- tocols, absence of clear clinical outcomes, lack of IOP change data, lack of sufficient data, and histologic and in vitro studies. Data extraction and outcome measures Data extraction was performed independently by two au- thors using a standardized form, with disagreements re- solved by a third author. Extracted information included study details (authors, publication year, design), sample characteristics (number of participants, age, menopausal status), hormone therapy specifics (type, dosage, duration), and follow-up duration for intraocular pressure (IOP) meas- urements. The primary outcome was the change in IOP fol- lowing hormone therapy, with additional data collected on reported IOP outcomes (mean and standard deviation be- fore and after treatment) and comparison groups (e.g., es- trogen versus combination therapy). Statistical analysis and data synthesis The pooled Mean Differences (MD) in IOP changes be- tween hormone therapy and control groups were calculated using a random-effects model. Hedges’ g was used to esti- mate the effect sizes. The I² statistic was applied to evaluate heterogeneity among studies. A Mantel-Haenszel method with a random-effects model was employed to pool effect sizes and calculate standard deviations. Subgroup analyses (e.g., estrogen vs. progesterone, different dosages) were conducted to assess potential sources of heterogeneity. Sta- tistical significance was evaluated using a z-test for the overall model and subgroup comparisons. Publication bias was assessed with funnel plots. All statistical analyses, in- cluding the creation of forest and funnel plots, were per- formed using the meta package in R (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) and RStudio (RStu- dio Inc., Boston, MA). Results Our initial search yielded 1486 articles from PubMed, Sco- pus, and Web of Science, from which we eliminated 271 duplicates. After reviewing the titles and abstracts of the re- maining 1215 records, we retrieved 53 full-text articles for further evaluation. Ultimately, 9 studies met our eligibility criteria and were included in the systematic review,24-32 and all of these studies were included in the meta-analysis (Fig- ure 1). Detailed characteristics of the included studies are summarized in Table 1. Under the random-effects model, the pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) is 3.84, with a 95% confidence in- terval (CI) of [2.26, 5.41], indicating a statistically signifi- cant decrease in IOP among those who received hormone replacement therapy (HRT) compared to the control group (p < 0.01). Under the common-effect model, the pooled SMD is 2.36, with a 95% CI of [2.08, 2.64], also showing a statistically significant effect (p < 0.01). The heterogeneity is very high, with an I² value of 97%, suggesting substantial variability across the included studies that cannot be attrib- uted to chance alone. The (tau^2) value is 4.2067, further indicating significant differences in effect sizes between studies. This level of heterogeneity suggests that the studies may differ in terms of study design, population character- - 193 - Effect of estrogen and progesterone therapy on intraocular pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis study Eur J Transl Myol 35 (2) 13497, 2025 doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2025.13497 istics, HRT protocols, or other factors influencing the IOP outcome. Therefore, the random-effects model is more ap- propriate for interpreting these results, as it accounts for be- tween-study variability (Figure 2). The pooled analysis of intraocular pressure (IOP) changes among HRT recipients after follow-up shows a mean dif- ference of 1.42 (95% CI: 0.76 to 2.08, (p < 0.01) using a random-effects model, indicating a significant decrease in IOP following HRT. The common-effect model presents a pooled mean difference of 0.11 (95% CI: 0.09 to 0.12), also statistically significant. However, there is extreme hetero- geneity (I² = 100%, tau^2 = 1.1290, p<0.01), reflecting sub- stantial variability between studies, likely due to differences in follow-up duration, HRT regimens, or baseline charac- teristics, thus supporting the use of the random-effects model for interpretation (Figure 3). Figure 4 displays the distribution of studies based on stan- dard error and mean difference. The observed asymmetry, with a greater number of studies on one side of the mean and a few outliers, suggests potential publication bias or small-study effects. This implies that smaller studies showing significant results may be more likely to be pub- lished. Figure 5 shows the funnel plot of pooled standard- ised mean difference for studies on HRT and controls. Similar to Figure 4, asymmetry is observed, with studies unevenly distributed around the pooled estimate. The presence of outliers far from the center further indicates potential publication bias or heterogeneity, suggesting that results might be influenced by factors like study size, methodological differences, or selective reporting. - 194 - Figure 1. The PRISMA flow diagram of the included studies. Effect of estrogen and progesterone therapy on intraocular pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis study Eur J Transl Myol 35 (2) 13497, 2025 doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2025.13497 - 195 - Table 1. Characteristics of the included studies. Author Year Country Design Age N Dosage Duration Follow-up Tresiter et al. (i) (31) 1970 Israel RCT 37-55 45 estrogen preparation 6 m 3 m mestranol 0.1 mg/day Tresiter et al. (ii) (31) 1970 Israel RCT 37-55 45 1.0 mg of the progestin 6 m 3 m per day Sator et al. (24) 1997 Austria PCS 55.7 25 2 mg estradiol valerate 3 m 3 m 10 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate Affinito et al. (25) 2003 Italy RCT 53.7 48 estradiol 50 µg/day 12 d per cycle 3-6 m medroxyprogesterone acetate 10 mg/day Guaschino et al. (26) 2003 Italy PCS 60 80 conjugated estrogens 1 y 1 y 0.625 mg/day dydrogesterone 5 mg/day Altintas et al. (27) 2004 Turkey PCS 47.1 44 0.625 mg estrogen/day 2 m 2 m + 2.5 mg medroxiprogesterone acetate Uncu et al. (28) 2006 Turkey PCS 51.8 60 estrogen 0.625 mg 1 y 6-12 m medroxyprogesterone acetate 2.5 mg Coksuer et al. (29) 2011 Turkey PCS 51.8 34 DRSP 2 mg and E2 1 mg 6 m 6 m Ozcan et al. (30) 2017 Turkey PCS 50 137 1 mg estradio 6 m 6 m l2 mg drospirenon Himori et al. (32) 2024 Japan CCS 63-66 99 - - - Figure 2. Forest plot of the pooled mean difference of IOP among those who received HRT and controls. Effect of estrogen and progesterone therapy on intraocular pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis study Eur J Transl Myol 35 (2) 13497, 2025 doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2025.13497 Discussion The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of estrogen and progesterone therapy on Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in postmenopausal women through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Our findings demonstrated that Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) was associated with a signif- icant decrease in IOP when compared to controls, as indi- cated by the pooled standardized mean differences. The random-effects model showed a substantial mean reduction in IOP, reflecting a consistent pattern across various studies, despite considerable heterogeneity. These results suggest that HRT may not only offer benefits for menopausal symp- toms but also contribute to lowering IOP, potentially reduc- ing the risk of developing or progressing glaucoma in sus- ceptible individuals. A previous meta-analysis study showed no significant over- all reduction in IOP following HT, with a mean difference of 1.54 mmHg (p=0.10). This indicates that HT did not have a statistically significant effect on lowering IOP across the included studies. The study also highlighted considerable heterogeneity, suggesting that factors such as participant age, type of hormone therapy (estrogen-only versus com- bined therapy), and study quality may have contributed to the variability in results.33 Comparing these findings to the results of our study, which showed a significant decrease in IOP among HRT users, suggests that the effects of hormone - 196 - Figure 3. The pooled mean difference among those who received HRT. Figure 4. Funnel plot of pooled mean difference among those who received HRT. Figure 5. Funnel plot of pooled standardised mean dif- ference among those who received HRT and controls. Effect of estrogen and progesterone therapy on intraocular pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis study Eur J Transl Myol 35 (2) 13497, 2025 doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2025.13497 therapy on IOP may be more nuanced and dependent on specific conditions. Our results align with some previous studies that found estrogen therapy could lower IOP, poten- tially due to its influence on enhancing aqueous humor out- flow through its effects on the trabecular meshwork. However, the meta-analysis by Hao et al. (2020) did not confirm a significant reduction in IOP, possibly due to dif- ferences in study populations or variations in the duration and type of hormone therapy used. The discrepancies be- tween the two meta-analyses underscore the complexity of hormone therapy’s effects on ocular physiology. While our study demonstrated a statistically significant IOP reduction, other systematic reviews have shown mixed or non-signif- icant results, highlighting the need for further research to delineate the factors that might enhance or mitigate the ef- fectiveness of HT in lowering IOP. This may involve more tailored approaches to hormone therapy, considering vari- ables such as the patient’s age, menopausal status, and spe- cific hormone regimen used.21,33,34 In contrast, some individual studies have not found a sig- nificant association between HRT and IOP reduction. For instance, Sator et al. (1997) conducted a clinical study in- volving postmenopausal women using various forms of HRT and found no significant changes in IOP after a fol- low-up period. The study suggested that factors such as the type of estrogen used, dosage, and treatment duration could influence outcomes. Similarly, Altintas et al. (2004) re- ported no significant difference in IOP among women re- ceiving HRT compared to a control group. The authors speculated that individual variations in hormone receptor sensitivity or pre-existing ocular conditions might account for the lack of effect observed in their cohort.27,35,36 Conversely, some studies have corroborated the findings of the present meta-analysis, indicating a reduction in IOP with HRT use. Affinito et al. (2003) found that postmeno- pausal women undergoing estrogen therapy exhibited sig- nificantly lower IOP compared to those not receiving hormone therapy. This study suggested that estrogen re- placement could potentially be beneficial in preventing glaucoma in women at risk due to its IOP-lowering effects. Similarly, Uncu et al. (2006) showed a decrease in IOP among HRT users, particularly those on long-term therapy. Ozcan et al. (2017) further supported these findings, dem- onstrating that continuous combined HRT was associated with a significant IOP reduction compared to baseline measurements, suggesting that the duration and regimen of HRT might play a critical role in achieving beneficial ocular outcomes.25,28,30 Overall, while the literature presents mixed findings, there is a substantial body of evidence suggesting that HRT, espe- cially with estrogen, can contribute to IOP reduction in postmenopausal women.37,38 The current study’s findings align with those studies showing a decrease in IOP, rein- forcing the hypothesis that hormone therapy may exert pro- tective effects on ocular health. The variability across studies highlights the need for further research to identify specific patient populations or HRT protocols that yield the most consistent IOP-lowering benefits.15,39,40 This study has several strengths, including a comprehensive search strategy following PRISMA guidelines, the use of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) to ensure robust ev- idence, and thorough analyses to account for variability. These factors enhance the reliability and generalizability of the findings. However, significant limitations include high heterogeneity across studies, potential publication bias, and the focus on postmenopausal women, which limits the ap- plicability of the results to other populations. Additionally, variations in hormone therapy protocols, measurement methods, and clinical outcome definitions may impact the consistency and interpretation of the findings. Conclusions In conclusion, this systematic review and meta-analysis found that Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) in post- menopausal women is associated with a significant reduc- tion in Intraocular Pressure (IOP), suggesting a potential protective role against glaucoma. The results align with some previous studies that reported IOP-lowering effects of estrogen, possibly due to its influence on ocular struc- tures like the trabecular meshwork. However, the signifi- cant heterogeneity observed across studies highlights variability in HRT protocols, participant characteristics, and study methodologies, which may influence the consistency of findings. While these results support the consideration of HRT as part of ocular health management for postmeno- pausal women, further high-quality studies are needed to confirm these benefits and explore the optimal therapy reg- imens. Overall, individualized approaches based on patient characteristics and hormonal status may enhance the clini- cal utility of HRT in managing IOP and glaucoma risk. Conflict of interest The authors declare no potential conflict of interest, and all authors confirm accuracy. Ethics approval This is a review article and no need to ethical code. The study is conformed with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964, as revised in 2013, concerning human and animal rights. Informed consent All patients participating in this study signed a written in- formed consent form for participating in this study. Patient consent for publication Written informed consent was obtained from a legally au- thorized representative(s) for anonymized patient infor- mation to be published in this article. Availability of data and materials All data generated or analyzed during this study are in- cluded in this published article. - 197 - Effect of estrogen and progesterone therapy on intraocular pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis study Eur J Transl Myol 35 (2) 13497, 2025 doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2025.13497 Corresponding author Shima Sayanjali, Miramichi EyeNB Centre of Excellence, Miramichi, NB, Canada ORCID ID: 0009-0002-0013-7245 E-mail: drshimasayanjali@gmail.com Co-authors Behzad Safarpour Lima ORCID ID: 0009-0004-7364-1201 E-mail: behzadsafarpourlima@gmail.com Nir Shoham-Hazon ORCID ID: 0000-0001-6386-2116 E-mail: dr.sh@eyenb.ca References 1. Hogan K, Cui X, Giangiacomo A, Feola AJ. Postmeno- pausal hormone therapy was associated with later age of onset among glaucoma cases. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2024;65:31. 2. Akhavanakbari G, Entezariasl M, Ojagi H, Isazadehfar K. Comparison of the effects of remifentanil and alfen- tanil on intraocular pressure in cataract surgery. Saudi J Anaesth 2013;7:160-4. 3. Youngblood H, Schoenlein PV, Pasquale LR, et al. Es- trogen dysregulation, intraocular pressure, and glau- coma risk. Exp Eye Res 2023;237:109725. 4. Xirui Y, Hui Z, Muhammad S, et al. Efficacy of bio- active compounds of Chaihu () on glaucomatous optic atrophy through interleukin-6/hypoxia inducible fac- tor-1α signal pathway. J Tradit Chin Med 2023;43: 1219-26. 5. Douglass A, Dattilo M, Feola AJ. Evidence for meno- pause as a sex-specific risk factor for glaucoma. Cell Mol Neurobiol 2023;43:79-97. 6. Viuff MH, Stochholm K, Juul S, Gravholt CH. Dis- orders of the eye, ear, skin, and nervous system in women with Turner syndrome -a nationwide cohort study. Eur J Hum Genet 2022;30:229-36. 7. Nuzzi R, Caselgrandi P. Sex hormones and their effects on ocular disorders and pathophysiology: current as- pects and our experience. Int J Mol Sci 2022;23:3269. 8. Madjedi KM, Stuart KV, Chua SYL, et al. The Associ- ation of Female Reproductive Factors with Glaucoma and Related Traits: A Systematic Review. Ophthalmol Glaucoma 2022;5:628-47. 9. Liu K, Fan H, Hu H, et al. Genetic variation reveals the influence of steroid hormones on the risk of retinal neu- rodegenerative diseases. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022;13:1088557. 10. Korpole NR, Kurada P, Korpole MR. Gender difference in ocular diseases, risk factors and management with specific reference to role of sex steroid hormones. J Midlife Health 2022;13:20-5. 11. Fotesko K, Thomsen BSV, Kolko M, Vohra R. Girl power in glaucoma: the role of estrogen in pri- mary open angle glaucoma. Cell Mol Neurobiol 2022;42:41-57. 12. Fathy M, Noureldine A, Elmofty HM, Tolba DA. The effect of postmenopausal hormonal drop on optic nerve head and peripapillary perfusion using optical coher- ence tomography angiography (OCTA). Sci Rep 2022;12:18185. 13. Youngblood HA, Parker E, Cai J, et al. Identification of Estrogen Signaling in a Prioritization Study of Intraoc- ular Pressure-Associated Genes. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22: 10288. 14. Qiu Y, Yu J, Tang L, et al. Association between sex hor- mones and visual field progression in women with pri- mary open angle glaucoma: a cross-sectional and prospective cohort study. Front Aging Neurosci 2021;13:756186. 15. Means JC, Lopez AA, Koulen P. Estrogen protects optic nerve head astrocytes against oxidative stress by pre- venting caspase-3 activation, tau dephosphorylation at ser(422) and the formation of tau protein aggregates. Cell Mol Neurobiol 2021;41:449-58. 16. Allen RS, Douglass A, Vo H, Feola AJ. Ovariectomy worsens visual function after mild optic nerve crush in rodents. Exp Eye Res 2021;202:108333. 17. Alambiaga-Caravaca AM, Domenech-Monsell IM, Se- bastián-Morelló M, et al. Development, characteriza- tion, and ex vivo evaluation of an insert for the ocular administration of progesterone. Int J Pharm 2021;606: 120921. 18. Li S, Zhang H, Shao M, et al. Association Between 17- β-Estradiol and Interleukin-8 and Visual Field Progres- sion in Postmenopausal Women with Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2020;217:55-67. 19. Feola AJ, Sherwood JM, Pardue MT, et al. Age and menopause effects on ocular compliance and aqueous outflow. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2020;61:16. 20. Costanian C, Aubin MJ, Buhrmann R, Freeman EE. In- teraction between postmenopausal hormone therapy and diabetes on cataract. Menopause 2020;27:263-8. 21. Nuzzi R, Scalabrin S, Becco A, Panzica G. Sex hor- mones and optic nerve disorders: a review. Front Neu- rosci 2019;13:57. 22. Lee SSY, Yazar S, Pasquale LR, et al. The relationship between optic disc parameters and female reproductive factors in young women. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 2019;8:224-8. 23. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for re- porting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71. 24. Sator MO, Joura EA, Frigo P, et al. Hormone replace- ment therapy and intraocular pressure. Maturitas 1997;28:55-8. 25. Affinito P, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Di Carlo C, et al. Effects of hormone replacement therapy on ocular function in postmenopause. Menopause 2003;10:482-7. 26. Guaschino S, Grimaldi E, Sartore A, et al. Visual func- tion in menopause: the role of hormone replacement therapy. Menopause 2003;10:53-7. 27. Altintaş O, Caglar Y, Yüksel N, et al. The effects of menopause and hormone replacement therapy on qual- ity and quantity of tear, intraocular pressure and ocular blood flow. Ophthalmologica 2004;218:120-9. - 198 - mailto:drshimasayanjali@gmail.com mailto:behzadsafarpourlima@gmail.com mailto:dr.sh@eyenb.ca Effect of estrogen and progesterone therapy on intraocular pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis study Eur J Transl Myol 35 (2) 13497, 2025 doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2025.13497 28. Uncu G, Avci R, Uncu Y, Kaymaz C, Develioğlu O. The effects of different hormone replacement therapy reg- imens on tear function, intraocular pressure and lens opacity. Gynecol Endocrinol 2006;22:501-5. 29. Coksuer H, Ozcura F, Oghan F, et al. Effects of estra- diol-drospirenone on ocular and nasal functions in post- menopausal women. Climacteric 2011;14:482-7. 30. Özcan SC, Tolunay HE, Özcan DÖ, Adıbelli FM, Hilali NG, Kahraman K. Does HRT change intraocular pres- sure in postmenopausal women? Eastern J Med 2017; 22:53. 31. Treister G, Mannor S. Intraocular pressure and outflow facility: effect of estrogen and combined estrogen-pro- gestin treatment in normal human eyes. Arch Ophthal- mol 1970;83:311-8. 32. Himori N, Uchida K, Ninomiya T, et al. The relation- ship between equol production status and normal ten- sion glaucoma. Internat Ophthalmol 2024;44:287. 33. Hao Y, Xiaodan J, Jiarui Y, Xuemin L. The effect of hor- mone therapy on the ocular surface and intraocular pres- sure for postmenopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Menopause 2020;27:929-40. 34. Feola AJ, Fu J, Allen R, et al. Menopause exacerbates visual dysfunction in experimental glaucoma. Exp Eye Res 2019;186:107706. 35. Sator MO, Akramian J, Joura EA, et al. Reduction of intraocular pressure in a glaucoma patient undergoing hormone replacement therapy. Maturitas 1998;29:93-5. 36. Sator MO, Joura EA, Frigo P, et al. Hormone replace- ment therapy and intraocular pressure. Maturitas 1997;28:55-8. 37. Rodrigo MJ, Martinez-Rincon T, Subias M, et al. In- fluence of sex on neuroretinal degeneration: six-month follow-up in rats with chronic glaucoma. Investigative Ophthalmol Visual Sci 2021;62:9. 38. Qiu YC, Yu J, Tang L, et al. Association between sex hormones and visual field progression in women with primary open angle glaucoma: a cross-sectional and prospective cohort study. Front Aging Neurosci 2021; 13:756186. 39. Zhang Q, Jan C, Guo CY, et al. Association of intraoc- ular pressure-related factors and retinal vessel diameter with optic disc rim area in subjects with and without primary open angle glaucoma. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2018;46:389-99. 40. Patel P, Harris A, Toris C, et al. Effects of sex hormones on ocular blood flow and intraocular pressure in primary open-angle glaucoma: a review. J Glaucoma 2018;27: 1037-41. Disclaimer All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their af- filiated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher. Submitted: 18 December 2024. Accepted: 4 January 2025. Early access: 8 May 2025. - 199 -