Layout 1 Thematic Section: Advances in Musculoskeletal and Neuromuscular Rehabilitation Eur J Transl Myol 35 (3) 13816, 2025 doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2025.13816 Abstract The European Society for Clinical Evaluation of Balance Disorders (ESCEBD), based in Nancy, France, has been meeting yearly since 2005 to discuss equilibrium-related themes that are not yet clearly defined or standardized. One of our latest discussions was with regard to outlining strategies of internal and external compensation that may be used to cope with balance disorders. A Committee was elected to discuss the mechanisms of compensation that may be involved in coping with balance system disorders. Compensation, referring to the immediate or short-term adaptive mechanisms that are used to counterbalance the effects of deficiencies that disrupt balance maintenance, can include alternative strategies, resources, or environmental supports to overcome deficits or challenges asso- ciated with a deficiency. The strategies can be internal (i.e. utilizing the individual’s own multi-sen- sory neural integration, motor, and cognitive resources) or external (i.e. modifying the environment, or using assistive or adaptive devices) to reduce fall hazard and enhance safety. This report focuses principally on internal compensation, generated by sensorimotor processes of the central nervous system (CNS) in response to impairment of either sensory information (e.g. vestibular pathologies), the musculoskeletal system (e.g. lower limb amputation and myopathies) or the CNS itself (e.g. upper motor neuron syndrome). The multifactorial process of compensation may explain the limi- tations encountered by the CNS in compensating for complex bodily impairments and may also limit our understanding of how the CNS adapts to balance disorders. Newly developed devices, such as wearable sensory substitution devices, are on the horizon as possible tools. Key Words: balance disorders, compensation, adaptation, sensorimotor processes, sensory information reweighting. Eur J Transl Myol 35 (3) 13816, 2025 doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2025.13816 Compensation for balance disorders: analysis of this multifactorial process Philippe Perrin,1,2,3 Art Mallinson,4 Neil Longridge,4 Enrico Armato,1,5 Mans Magnusson,6,7 Georges Dumas,1,8 Nicolas Perrin,9 Pierre Denise,10 Paolo Gargiulo,11,12 Hannes Petersen,13,14 Christian Beyaert1,2,15 1Research Unit DevAH – Development, Adaptation and Handicap, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; 2Laboratory for the Analysis of Posture, Equilibrium and Motor Function (LAPEM), University Hospital of Nancy, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; 3Department of Pediatric Otolaryngology, University Hospital of Nancy, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; 4Division of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; 5Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy; 6Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; 7Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; 8Department of Oto-Rhino- Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital, Grenoble, France; 9Regional Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Centre for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation for Children, Flavigny-sur-Moselle, France; 10University of Caen Normandie, Inserm, COMETE U1075, CYCERON, University Hospital of Caen, Caen, France; 11Institute of Biomedical and Neural Engineering, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland; 12Department of Science, Landspitali, National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland; 13Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland; 14Department of Surgery, Akureyri Hospital, Akureyri, Iceland; 15Regional Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Nancy, France. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (CC BY-NC 4.0) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. - 255 - Compensation for balance disorders Eur J Transl Myol 35 (3) 13816, 2025 doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2025.13816 At the annual meeting of the European Society for Clinical Evaluation of Balance Disorders (ESCEBD), a committee was selected to discuss the mechanisms of compensation that may be used to address balance disorders. This topic is of clinical importance since the therapeutic approach towards balance disorders is based on the knowledge of pathophysiology. Animals share common functions such as respiration and movement. In the bipedal human, movement and postural control are gravity-referenced and require a highly devel- oped system for orientation and postural equilibrium.1 Balance control and postural maintenance is crucial to pre- vent falls when standing, but also during dynamic move- ment. It is a complex motor skill involving many systems and interaction of multiple sensorimotor processes.1 This skill requires central processing of vestibular, visual, pro- prioceptive (musculo-tendino-articular) and exteroceptive (plantar cutaneous) information. These sensory afferents converge on the vestibular nuclei of the brainstem, which integrate them and enable the organization of reflex re- sponses. Compensatory movements of the eyes, head and body are then generated in order to stabilize gaze and pos- ture (Figure 1). These responses must be adapted to envi- ronmental conditions and the task to be carried out. Posture maintenance in three-dimensional space is necessary to carry out integrated motor activity. The weight and hierarchy of sensory inputs (i.e. balance strategies) will be different depending on a subject’s age, learning and experience (e.g. sports practised), previous pathologies, and also on specific situations, which can in- clude environment, and sharing of attentional resources in multiple tasks.2 In a normal environment (adequate lighting, predictable base of support), healthy subjects rely on somatosensory (70%), vision (10%) and vestibular (20%) information. Sensory information is also reweighted depending on sen- sory context (e.g. unstable surface).3,4 The Central Nervous System (CNS) controls balance by continuously integrating sensory information, and initiating appropriate motor commands.5 This is carried out by var- ious corrective motor mechanisms based on anticipatory and reactive signals, regardless of whether disturbances to equilibrium are expected.1 If balance control is affected by an acute or chronic deficiency of a system, the body will compensate for the loss as effectively as possible. The pro- cess will differ depending on the part of the body that has been damaged.6 Balance maintenance is a complex function involving the - 256 - Figure 1. Balance control, a multimodal function. The Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex (VOR) (2-4-5) stabilises a visual image on the retina during head movements, using compensatory eye movements of the same amplitude but in the opposite direction. The Optokinetic Response (OKR) (1-4-5), also referred to as the optokinetic nystagmus (OKN), stabilizes visual image during large field visual motion. Efferent pathways from the vestibular nuclei also synapse with vestibulospinal pathways and they play an essential role in posture regulation (2-3-4-6). Compensation for balance disorders Eur J Transl Myol 35 (3) 13816, 2025 doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2025.13816 interaction of multiple sensorimotor processes, and as a re- sult the pathophysiology of balance disorders and also re- lated compensation strategies are difficult to understand. Compensation (from the Latin compensatio, “to counter- balance”) refers to the immediate or short-term adaptive mechanisms (that may become long-term if necessary) that are used to counterbalance the effects of deficiencies that disrupt balance maintenance. This can include alternative strategies, resources, or environmental supports to over- come deficits or challenges associated with a deficiency. The strategies can be internal (i.e. utilizing the individual’s own resources) or external (i.e. modifying the environment, or using external aids). If compensation is prolonged, neural adaptation develops as a long-term adjustment and a mod- ification of physiological, neural, and behavioural pro- cesses. This adaptation occurs gradually over time to accommodate changes for balance control.7 This article will outline strategies of internal and external compensation that may be used to cope with balance dis- orders. Compensation can be complex, and may depend on the location of the impairment. We will focus principally on internal compensation, which is generated by sensori- motor processes of the CNS in response to impairment of either sensory information (illustrated by vestibular pathol- ogy), the musculoskeletal system (illustrated by lower limb amputation and myopathies) or the CNS itself (illustrated by Upper Motor Neuron Syndrome, UMNS). Principal compensation strategies for balance disorders Internal and external compensatory strategies both play sig- nificant roles in managing balance disorders. These strategies aim to ensure safety and stability. Internal compensation Internal compensation involves utilising a patient’s sensory, motor, and cognitive resources to adapt to balance impair- ments. These strategies include: i) sensory integration: in- formation from intact sensory systems (Figure 1) is processed and integrated to compensate for one or more deficits (“sensory information reweighting”); ii) motor adaptation: movement patterns and muscle activation can be adjusted to compensate for weaknesses, asymmetries, or impairments in motor function. This may involve recruiting alternative muscle groups, modifying gait patterns, or using compensatory movements to maintain stability; iii) cogni- tive strategies: cognitive processes such as attention, con- centration, and anticipation can be engaged to enhance balance control. Cognitive strategies may include focusing on maintaining balance, anticipating environmental haz- ards, or conscious planning of movements. External compensation External compensation involves modifying the environ- ment or using external aids to provide additional support and enhance stability, including: i) compensation devices: assistive devices such as canes, walkers, or walking sticks will provide physical support and improve balance reducing fall risk; ii) adaptive equipment: specialized equipment or adaptive technologies can be designed to assist with balance impairments. This includes balance boards, stability balls, and wearable devices which provide feedback or assistance in maintaining equilibrium. Wearable devices offer sensory substitution to cope with balance disorders by providing real-time feedback about body position, movement, and orientation. These devices use various sensors which detect changes in balance, and translate this information into tac- tile, auditory, or visual cues that are detected and inter- preted, helping to stabilize the body (Table 1). Using these devices requires significant cognitive effort (thought) to maintain balance whereas in the healthy individual, this is an automatic task; iii) environmental modifications: making changes to the physical environment will reduce fall haz- ards and enhance safety. This may include installing hand- rails, grab bars, non-slip surfaces, and adequate lighting in areas where balance impairment is a concern. By combining internal and external compensation strategies, individuals with a balanced compromise can learn to compensate effectively. Rehabilitation programs must be tailored to an individual’s specific needs in order to optimize internal compensation mechanisms and provide guidance on the use of external aids and environmental modifications that can enhance safety and quality of life. Table 1 gives examples of internal and external compensa- tion mechanisms according to the type of impairment. Compensation for sensory disorders: the case of vestibular impairment The vestibular system is a highly integrated sensory net- work that allows us to maintain balance, orient in space, stabilize vision, and perceive motion. Vestibular pathology can result in balance disorders, which the CNS deals with by initiating motor and cognitive adaptation, and also by using sensory information reweighting. Both acute and chronic vestibular deficits can affect the ves- tibular system, and can compromise the two reflex path- ways it drives (vestibulo-ocular reflex and vestibulo-spinal reflex). Compensation is essential so that normal everyday activities can be safely resumed. It involves adaptive mech- anisms that allow individuals to maintain balance despite their deficit. The brain, visual system, and musculoskeletal system all play roles in compensating for the lack of accu- rate vestibular information, but the nature of these mech- anisms varies depending on the vestibular deficit (e.g. unilateral vs bilateral). Acute deficit An acute deficit, such as an acute vestibular loss, often pro- duces intense symptoms: vertigo (an intense spinning sen- sation, worsened by head movement), nystagmus, postural imbalance with falls toward the affected ear, and autonomic symptoms such as nausea and vomiting.8 In the acute phase, the body experiences a sudden loss of vestibular input and a patient may be essentially immobile. As they gradually mobilize, patients tend to adopt a wide-based stance to in- crease stability. Their centre of gravity will deviate toward - 257 - Compensation for balance disorders Eur J Transl Myol 35 (3) 13816, 2025 doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2025.13816 - 258 - Table 1. Physiological strategies (internal compensation) and medical/environmental interventions (external compensation) to compensate for balance impairments. Affected structure Body strategies used for Medical and environmental compensation interventions Unilateral vestibular impairment Sensory adaptation: Sensorimotor rehabilitation • Contralateral inner ear • Visual • Proprioceptive Motor adaptation for balance Bilateral vestibular impairment Sensory adaptation: Sensorimotor rehabilitation • Visual Vestibular implants • Proprioceptive Vibrotactile stimulation belt Motor adaptation for balance Moderate to severe hearing loss Visual adaptation: e.g. lip reading Behind-the-ear or in-the-ear-hearing aids Unilateral: Bone Anchored Hearing Aid (BAHA) / Contralateral Routing Of Signals (CROS) Severe to profound hearing loss Visual adaptation: e.g. lip reading, Bilateral: cochlear implants sign language Decrease in visual acuity Sensory adaptation: Glasses, contact lenses, cataract surgery • Auditory, tactile, olfactory Blindness Sensory adaptation: Sensorimotor rehabilitation • Auditory, tactile, olfactory Cane for the blind, podotactile strips Motor adaptation for balance and nails, stair nosing, audible pedaestrian signals (APS) Braille system, seeing eye dog Visual to electrical signal transduction on the tongue, visual to voice transduction by AI devices in eyeglass Proprioception e.g. Sensory adaptation: Sensorimotor rehabilitation Ehlers-Danlos syndrome • Vision, proprioception Compression garment, taping band Motor adaptation for balance Proprioception + pain e.g. Sensory adaptation: vision Sensory rehabilitation (physiotherapy) lower limb osteoarthritis Motor adaptation for balance Surgery (hip, knee prosthesis) Cane, shoehorn Multisensory deficit: • Parkinson disease Sensory adaptation (vision) Sensorimotor rehabilitation (dry and (proprioceptive + vestibular Motor adaptation for balance aquatic physiotherapy), dopamine deficits) Subthalamic nucleus stimulation, • Diabetic neuropathy Sensory adaptation (linked to the Sensorimotor rehabilitation (proprioceptive, visual, inner types of deficit) ear deficit) Motor adaptation for balance Neurological impairment: e.g. Motor adaptation for balance: Walking aids upper motor neuron syndrome • automatic (↑base of support, muscle Sensorimotor rehabilitation co-activation, toe-walking, etc.) • cognitive (↑attention, etc.) Compensation for balance disorders Eur J Transl Myol 35 (3) 13816, 2025 doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2025.13816 the affected ear. Walking is slower, with short and wide steps, and a longer stance phase.9 These gait patterns are developed if balance is poor10 or if a patient has perceptive dizziness11 and the aim of this is to counterbalance the as- sociated gait instability.12 Patients will often gaze at station- ary objects to anchor their sense of position and orientation, or hold on to nearby objects (e.g., walls, furniture) for extra stability, and often keep their head as still as possible.8 Fol- lowing the initial phase of intense symptoms, a patient will be able to re-activate and gradually regain balance. The typical timeline for recovery from an acute vestibular deficit, for example, a vestibular neuritis, often follows a predictable pattern, generally spanning several days to weeks.13 Patients often prefer to stay in bed for 1 to 3 days. After 5 to 7 days, nystagmus is largely suppressed by fixa- tion in the primary position but is still present for 2 to 3 weeks during lateral gaze away from the lesion.8 Gradual resolution of vertigo occurs, allowing for slow, controlled head movements without severe symptoms, and regaining the ability to walk with visual guidance, but with persistent imbalance. Gait patterns that have been adopted such as re- duced walking speed and a wider base often improve over a month or two.9 Most individuals achieve full recovery within a few months, but a small number may develop chronic symptoms such as subtle imbalance when perform- ing complex movements or in low-light environments, or dizziness provoked by rapid jerky head movements, espe- cially under physical or mental stress.13 Chronic deficit Chronic deficits that can arise from this ineffective recovery process can also result from conditions such as bilateral ves- tibulopathy.14 They generally result in milder but persistent symptoms as the brain continues the compensation process. These symptoms can include unsteadiness, visual distur- bances, and cognitive fatigue. At this stage, the body has had time to develop compensation strategies for the vestib- ular loss. CNS adaptation, proprioceptive feedback, and vi- sual cues play significant roles in maintaining balance over time. The brain increasingly relies on visual and proprio- ceptive information for balance maintenance. However, in low-visibility situations, standing balance may be impaired, especially in a patient who relies more on visual input.15,16 Patients may weight shift to try and stabilize and reduce postural sway. even when standing still, and they also learn to use muscle feedback and controlled movements to min- imize sway. They may also reduce unnecessary head move- ment, particularly quick movements, to avoid triggering imbalance or disorientation. During walking, they may take shorter strides to compensate for gait instability.17 They now need to think about the previously automatic task of balance maintenance, especially when changing direction17 or navi- gating uneven surfaces. They will rely on visual infor- mation, such as watching the ground carefully to avoid missteps.18 When vestibular loss is associated with a so- matosensory deficit, i.e. in Parkinson’s disease, visual de- pendence may further develop.19 Vestibular rehabilitation exercises can help improve com- pensation. Cawthorne and Cooksey observed that soldiers with post concussion injuries recovered more quickly if they were mobilized in the early stage after injury, rather than being bedridden.20 Their exercise protocol focused on strengthening visual and proprioceptive reliance, recalibrat- ing gaze stabilization, and gradually exposing patients to movements that built tolerance for head and body move- ment. Over time, these compensation processes and exer- cises improve balance and reduce the risk of falls, allowing individuals to regain confidence in standing and walking. Compensatory processes during vestibular deficit may be difficult to understand Compensation is carried out by using the remaining vestib- ular function, and also other sensory information (even if those signals are not optimal). As an example, gaze sta- bilization during head movement is provided by the vesti- bulo-ocular reflex in healthy subjects but if there is a deficit, substitute movements of the head and body are used to sta- bilize gaze. It must be emphasized that patients (and all individuals) do not start off with “everything perfect,” and will have differ- ing levels of redundancy, which may compromise any com- pensation processes that may become necessary. The aging process also results in a loss of redundancy. Patients who were previously categorized as clinically “normal” because they were functioning within normally accepted population parameters may be unaware of such a loss of redundancy in a sensory pathway until a critical threshold is reached. They accept the definition of “normal life” as “how I have always been”. In a patient where an unrecognized sensory compromise already exists (longstanding or even congeni- tal), the process of compensation may be different from that of a patient who was initially intact. This may be a major reason why compensation and relative recovery from sim- ilar pathology can vary so widely between patients, and is so poorly understood in the clinical setting. The mechanism itself can also complicate the process of compensation. For example, a patient with a vestibular deficit may utilize visual information to compensate for the loss, but this increased reliance on visual stimuli can itself elicit symptoms, especially in low-visibility situ- ations.21 Sometimes, utilizing the visual system to com- pensate can create autonomic symptoms,22 not because the visual signal is erroneous, but because the vestibular system can no longer suppress an orientationally inaccu- rate signal. In short, although visual input is often helpful from a balance maintenance point of view, the new reli- ance on it may produce symptoms, as any motion sick in- dividual will describe. The process of “sequential” compensation (i.e. recovery from two events separated in time) is also more of a chal- lenge, and it is not well understood why the “decompen- sation” and “recompensation” processes required in such a patient are much more challenging (and often less ef- fective). The mechanism of compensation is one of adaptive learn- ing. An example of this process is when there is a congenital void of an important part of the balance system followed by later lesions. In such a case there is a further challenge to the compensation process, involving having to “change” a compensation strategy. For example, Usher’s syndrome - 259 - Compensation for balance disorders Eur J Transl Myol 35 (3) 13816, 2025 doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2025.13816 type 1 is characterized by sensorineural hearing loss fol- lowed by subsequent progressive blindness, but also by ves- tibular dysfunction. As a young child, a patient with this genetic disorder might have only subtle balance deficits due to effective visual compensation, but the subsequent loss of vision (often in teenage years) will require a new compen- sation strategy (i.e. “recompensation”), which may be much less effective, and appear to the clinician as a “new devel- opment” of vestibular pathology. 23 (Figure 2). Compensation for vestibular loss requires the effective use of remaining motor and sensory systems to restore physical function as effectively as possible. The more severe the ini- tial damage, the greater the challenge will be to recover to a level where no physical deficit is detected. However, there are caveats to this statement. The process of vestibular compensation is also difficult to define. If a patient has no complaints, but has an objective abnormality on testing, we may regard this as being “fully - 260 - Figure 2. Postural control in Usher’s syndrome type 1. The six conditions of the Sensory Organisation Test (EquiTest, Neurocom, Clackamas): Conditions 1–3 performed on a fixed platform with eyes open (1), eyes closed (2), vision sway-referenced (3). Conditions 4–6 performed on a sway-referenced platform with eyes open (4), eyes closed (5) and vision sway-referenced (6). Sensory analysis scores: Condition 2/Condition 1: somatosensory contribution to balance control (SOM), Condition 4/Condition 1: visual contribution (VIS), Condition 5/Condition 1: vestibular contribution (VEST). Composite score: global balance performance. Low score: poor postural control. In this teenager, Composite score, VIS and VEST scores very low, SOM 100%. Lower ratios: inability to compensate for disruptions in selected sensory inputs. The strategic analysis of postural control shows in the context of these sensory deficits the use of a bottom-up (ankle strategy/“Cheville Dominante”) strategy in the 6 conditions and not a top-down (“Hanche Dominante”) strategy, confirming preference of somatosensory input. Compensation for balance disorders Eur J Transl Myol 35 (3) 13816, 2025 doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2025.13816 compensated” for the incurred insult as found in some “nor- mals”,24 perhaps caused by hereditary defect or unrec- ognized trauma. This was also discussed by NASA, where flight vomiting in astronauts was suggested to result from asymetrical well-compensated vestibular disease.22 Com- pensation may also involve maximizing recovery of a par- tially damaged system by a combination of healing of the damaged structures and utilization of other sensory system information to optimize function. The process of compensation for vestibular pathology (which by definition documents the presence of pathology) can sometimes be detected in a clinical exam, completed by videonystagmography (caloric tests, head shaking test, head impulse test, skull vibration-induced nystagmus test…), but this is not always the case, and it is important for the clinician to understand that a patient with symptoms can sometimes have a normal clinical examination (i.e. absence of signs). Compensation for musculoskeletal disorders: the cases of lower limb amputation and myopathies In musculoskeletal disorders, the unlesioned CNS generates internal compensations taking into advantage external de- vices if needed. Lower limb amputation Lower limb amputation refers to the surgical removal of a portion of the leg at various levels depending on the severity of injury or disease. Prosthetic (Προθεσις, «action of add- ing») limbs are customized to replace the lost limb and are designed to provide function, mobility, and support. Ad- vanced technologies incorporate sensors and artificial in- telligence to adjust the prosthetic’s movement to the user’s activity to provide better control, energy efficiency, and bal- ance.25,26 In addition to prosthetics, other assistive devices may be used during rehabilitation or for additional support (crutches, canes, walkers). Amputees rely on their CNS to adapt for the biomechanical and sensory changes introduced by using a prosthesis. Ac- cording to the prosthetic design and alignment adjustment, the CNS generates internal compensatory mechanisms to maintain stability, control gait, and optimize energy effi- ciency. These adaptations are the result of a combination of proprioceptive feedback, motor control strategies, and learned motor patterns. To compensate for the loss of sen- sory feedback from the amputated limb, amputees may rely more on visual and proprioceptive inputs from the intact limb and upper body that can influence postural stability.27 Over time, the CNS integrates sensory feedback from the residual limb and the prosthesis to create a new «body map» that accounts for the altered biomechanics.28 In addition, the CNS alters gait mechanics to maintain balance and pro- gression according to prosthetic alignment or mechanical limits. For example, reducing the stance time on the pros- thetic side and redistributing weight toward the intact limb is a common compensation.29 The CNS may compensate for the insufficient dynamic contribution of the prosthetic limb by higher involvement of the intact limb for weight absorption at the beginning of the stance phase30,31 and for push-off generation. On the other hand, prostheses are con- tinually being developed to better respond to the biome- chanics of walking under different conditions: passive prostheses offer basic functionality, semi-active prostheses are able to modify their behavior instantaneously using mi- croprocessor technology, and active prostheses provide ex- ternal power through motors with the ability to act.25 In summary, the internal CNS compensations allow amputees to adapt dynamically to prosthetic mechanics, ensuring functional mobility and reducing the risk of falls. Myopathies Myopathies are a group of disorders characterized by pri- mary dysfunction of muscle fibers. Duchenne muscular dystrophy, leading to progressive muscle degeneration,32 will be presented to describe compensation for balance dis- order. Early signs of muscle weakness such as difficulty in run- ning or rising from the floor (Gowers’ maneuver) appear usually in toddlers (2-3 years).32 Muscle weakness progres- sively increases affecting first the trunk and then both the lower and upper extremities, with loss of independent am- bulation from the age of 8-12 years.33 Before losing inde- pendent ambulation, typical patterns of the MSS are seen related to muscle weakness and its compensation. Weakening of the hip extensor and abdominal muscles causes the pelvis to tilt forward,34 which is compensated for by exaggerated lumbar, and then thoracolumbar lordosis to maintain sagittal upright posture.35 Later, thoraco-lumbar scoliosis usually develops due to uneven muscle strength and support.35 Maintaining balance with these deformities requires energy, leading to quick fatigue and reduced en- durance. This may need external compensation such as spi- nal braces to support the spine and reduce the progression of scoliosis and lordosis or walkers or canes to improve bal- ance and reduce the strain on the spine. Typical motor patterns usually involve the lower limbs. To stabilize the knee and prevent it from buckling due to weak quadriceps, individuals may passively hyperextend their knees during the stance phase by a slight forward shift of the trunk. However, weakness of the trunk muscles consid- erably reduces the trunk’s ability to limit its forward move- ment when walking.35 To compensate for this weakness, reduction in walking speed and step length allows to de- crease the body sagittal acceleration and its muscular con- trol.36–38 Toe-walking, i.e. with forefoot or flat foot contact on the ground from initial contact, typically occurs as mus- cles weaken in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.39,40 This pat- tern allows the plantar flexors to support the body, decelerate the anterior tilt of the tibia and the forward mo- tion of the trunk from initial contact, ensuring a more grad- ual forward displacement of the trunk and overall gait stability.36,40 In addition, the usually associated increased step width and medial-lateral body acceleration37,40 enhance balance41 with passive contribution of the weak hip abduc- tors to limit the pelvic drop on the swing leg due to their stiffness and contracture.38 Later, trunk leaning towards the stance leg (waddling motion) helps to lift the pelvis on the swing leg side for foot clearance. - 261 - Compensation for balance disorders Eur J Transl Myol 35 (3) 13816, 2025 doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2025.13816 Compensation for impairment of the CNS: the case of upper motor neuron syndrome When the impaired CNS induces balance disorders, it will also generate compensation. UMNS refers to a group of clinical signs and symptoms re- sulting from injury or dysfunction of the Upper Motor Neu- rons (UMNs).42 UMNs originate in the motor regions of the cerebral cortex and transmit signals to the spinal cord or brainstem, where they synapse with lower motor neurons, which activate skeletal muscles. UMNS can result from a va- riety of etiologies, including stroke and Cerebral Palsy (CP).42 Key features of UMNS include symptoms related to dis- inhibition of spinal stretch reflexes commonly related to the loss of inhibitory input from UMNs.42,43 These symptoms include muscle spasticity related to velocity-dependant in- crease in stretch reflexes. Other symptoms of UMNS are commonly related to disrupted corticospinal projections: muscle weakness, impaired fine motor control, and the Ba- binski sign.42,43 UMNS can lead to various motor disorders, including balance control deficits and gait disorders. Non-specific gait disorders, such as reduced walking speed and stride/step length, are commonly found in patients with stroke or cerebral palsy.44,45 In both patients with stroke or hemiparetic CP, gait is typically asymmetric with a shorter stance time and longer swing time of the affected limb, which are correlated to impaired balance control.46–48 Adaptive motor patterns will develop to cope with balance disorders during motor activities such as walking. Balance control is mainly automatic, involving the brain- stem, which influences spinal motor activity under the reg- ulating control of the cerebellum. Interestingly, in more than 90% of brain strokes, the brainstem and cerebellar struc- tures involved in automatic process of balance and gait con- trol are intact.49,50 In post-stroke subjects, these latter structures are particularly active while walking.51,52 In post-stroke subjects, gait deviations can be described compared to the gait of able-bodied subjects, but the under- lying mechanisms still need to be further understood. Pri- mary gait deviations would be mostly related to the initial disruption of descending neural pathways, while secondary deviations are neural adaptive processes.53 Adaptation processes can be both automatic (sub-cortical) and/or cognitive. Both of these processes involve the cere- bellum, which is usually intact. These processes can be ones which have already been learned, ones which are newly de- veloped, or both. Common compensatory mechanisms that appear to be independent from the underlying disease have been described across different patient groups.53 For exam- ple, in post-stroke subjects, reduced foot clearance in swing phase could be compensated by common compensations such as either a pelvic hike, circumduction or vaulting that can also be observed in various neural pathologies (e.g. foot drop by peroneal nerve palsy or multiple sclerosis) and or- thopedic pathologies (e.g. hip or knee osteoarthritis or leg- length discrepancy).53 On the other hand, in post-stroke gait, the asymmetric pattern with higher kinetic involvement of the unaffected side may be a specific adaptation to the initial and ongoing paresis of the affected side.54 This adaptation may involve both automatic and intentional cognitive pro- cesses, for support, balance, and progression purposes. Muscle co-activation, referring to the simultaneous activa- tion of agonist and antagonist muscles around a joint, is commonly present in UMNS and typically included in the exaggerated muscle contraction as a primary abnormality associated to spasticity.42,43,55 However, muscle co-activation is a common compensatory mechanism that provides me- chanical stability by stiffening joints and can improve bal- ance such as during very slow walking speeds,56 walking on a slippery surface57,58 or in elderly.59 In the functional condition of walking in adults with stroke or children with CP, muscle co-activation in lower limbs is particularly frequent in both the affected and unaffected limbs60,61 and may represent an adaptation to compensate for impaired stability during step transition.61,62 Toe-walking (defined as an absence of the first heel rocker or as failure of the heel to make contact with the floor at the onset of stance) is a common motor disorder in adults after stroke63 and hemiplegic and diplegic children with CP.64–66 Thus, these persons typically first strike the ground with the foot flat or with the forefoot, usually in ankle plantar flexion (i.e. equinus).65–67 Dynamic equinus is generally believed to be due to premature (before the foot initial contact on the floor) over-activity of the plantar flexors, caused by spastic hyper-excitable stretch reflexes in these muscles.55,66 Ho- wever, the existence and/or functional significance of ex- aggerated stretch reflexes during walking in spastic patients has been questioned for years68,69 with no evidence of ex- aggerated sensory inputs to the ankle plantar flexors during the swing phase of walking.70 The plantar flexors (gastrocnemius, soleus) i) decelerate the ankle dorsiflexion and the trunk’s forward progression, and ii) accelerate the trunk upwards for body support, but only when the anterior part of the foot lever arm is touching the ground.71,72 In toe-walking, plantar flexors exert an action from the initial foot contact onwards, contributing to in- crease the work of deceleration exerted by the leading leg joints during the weight acceptance phase of gait on the body’s center of mass.73 This early action of plantar flexors promoted by early flat-foot contact may be functional, i.e. a compensatory mechanism, and not due to primary mus- cular dysfunction. Interestingly, in children with CP wea- ring negative-heeled shoes compared to barefoot condition, a shift from ankle plantarflexion to dorsiflexion occurred quickly at initial contact under the effect of greater tibialis anterior activity, allowing flat contact between shoes and the ground and to maintain the same braking effect of the plantar flexors.74 Thus, the footwear condition did not in- fluence the early action of plantar flexors that contributes to the weight acceptance’s role in controlling the body center of mass and balance during gait, suggesting a func- tional role of the plantar flexors. Since the plantar flexors act indirectly on the trunk, they may be functionally linked to the trunk. From early child- hood onwards, children with CP display trunk control dis- orders, while sitting75–77 or walking,78 strongly related to gross motor function deficits.79 During walking, the body can be divided into two functional units; the locomotor unit and the passenger unit (upper body) and walking is efficient when stabilization demands of the passenger are minimized.72 In children with CP, with poor control of - 262 - Compensation for balance disorders Eur J Transl Myol 35 (3) 13816, 2025 doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2025.13816 upper body acceleration, impaired control of axial seg- ments during gait could account for gait disorders.80 Re- cently, during the weight acceptance phase of gait in children with CP, a strong correlation has been demon- strated between the ankle dorsiflexion braking power due to plantar flexors and the upper and lower trunk decel- eration.81 In addition, a trunk-focused rehabilitation, that improved trunk postural control, decreased the excessive trunk deceleration and ankle dorsiflexion braking power during gait, strongly suggesting a functional role of the plantar flexors in dynamic balance control during gait.81 Thus, this series of studies about the plantar flexors action in toe-walking in children with CP illustrates how difficult it can be to distinguish between the primary and secondary gait deviations in UMNS. In summary, the control of balance is a priority motor func- tion constantly ensured by automatic CNS processes that prevent the body from falling under the constant influence of gravity. Multisensory neural integration integrates the movements and dynamics of the body and its parts into the gravitational and visual environment, anticipates the effect of voluntary actions on the body’s balance, and perceives unexpected balance disturbances. To compensate for bal- ance disorders, internal compensation uses sensory, motor and cognitive resources and may be completed by external compensation based on assistive devices, adaptive equip- ments and environmental modifications. According to the type of body impairment, internal compensation may be more or less difficult to understand. If there is a vestibular deficit, as an example of sensory im- pairment, compensation is undertaken using motor and cog- nitive adaptation and also reweighting of sensory information. Over time, a deficit may disappear due to total or partial vestibular recovery via this process. A “fully com- pensated” patient (i.e. with clinically normal gait pattern) should still be assessed diagnostically, as “decompensation” may occur (i.e. a new deficit can occur in modalities that were used in the compensation process). If the MSS is impaired, it can induce balance disorders. Thus, the CNS will use the impaired MSS to compensate for balance disorders requiring at least modification in the motor output. Some motor modifications will specifically adapt to the impaired parts of the MSS whereas others will compensate for balance control. If an assistive device is needed, it would require a specific adaptation to functionaly incorporate it for balance control. If the CNS is impaired, it can induce balance disorders but will also be involved in the compensation process. Depend- ing on the location of neural impairment it can be difficult to distinguish between motor pattern directly related to the lesion, and motor compensation. For example, toe-walking was first thought to be a dysfunction related to central lesion in UMNS, but it actually contributes to compensate for bal- ance disorders such as in myopathia or even when walking on a slippery walkway (using a flat foot strategy for maxi- mum contact with the ground). In case of an impaired CNS, how a motor alteration contributes to balance control should be considered initially, as this can provide clues to help analyse complex motor disorders. The highly adaptive capacity of the CNS to compensate for deficits is continuously utilized in newly developed devices such as external sensory substitution, e.g. vibrotactile belts for patients with severe vestibular loss.82 List of the abbreviations CNS, central nervous system CP, cerebral palsy ESCEBD, European Society for Clinical Evaluation of Bal- ance Disorders VOR, vestibulo-ocular reflex OKN, optokinetic nystagmus OKR, optokinetic response UMNs, upper motor neurons UMNS, upper motor neuron syndrome Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflict of interest. Ethics approval and consent to participate Not applicable. Acknowledgments We thank the Métropole du Grand Nancy/Metropolitan Community of Nancy, Grand Est Region, northeastern France, the Scientific Council and the Faculty of Science and Techniques of Physical and Sport Activities of the Uni- versity of Lorraine for financial support to the European Society for Clinical Evaluation of Balance Disorders (ES- CEBD) meeting. Corresponding author Philippe Perrin Research Unit DevAH – Development, Adaptation and Handicap, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lorraine, 9, Avenue de la Forêt de Haye – 54500 Vandoeuvre-lès- Nancy, France ORCID ID: 0000-0002-4381-0850 E-mail: philippe.perrin@univ-lorraine.fr Co-authors Art Mallinson ORCID ID: 0000-0002-4499-3476 E-mail: art@mallinson.ca Neil Longridge ORCID ID: 0009-0002-7800-8283 E-mail: nslongridge@hotmail.com Enrico Armato ORCID ID: 0000-0002-8230-3122 E-mail: armato.otovest@gmail.com - 263 - mailto:art@mallinson.ca mailto:nslongridge@hotmail.com mailto:armato.otovest@gmail.com Compensation for balance disorders Eur J Transl Myol 35 (3) 13816, 2025 doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2025.13816 Mans Magnusson ORCID ID: 0000-0002-4266-1996 E-mail: Mans.Magnusson@med.lu.se Georges Dumas ORCID ID: 0000-0002-8311-0322 E-mail: georges.dumas10@outlook.fr Nicolas Perrin ORCID ID: 0009-0004-2196-6012 E-mail: nicolas-perrin@hotmail.fr Pierre Denise ORCID ID: 0000-0002-9049-7692 E-mail: pierre.denise@unicaen.fr Paolo Gargiulo ORCID ID: 0000-0002-5049-4817 E-mail: paolo@ru.is Hannes Petersen ORCID ID: 0000-0002-2327-523X E-mail: hpet@hi.is Christian Beyaert ORCID ID: 0000-0003-3752-7650 E-mail: christian.beyaert@univ-lorraine.fr References 1. Horak F, Macpherson J. Postural orientation and equi- librium. In: Rowell LB, Shepherd J, éditeurs. Handbook of Physiology - Section 12: Exercise: Regulation and Integration of Multiple Systems. Oxford: Oxford Uni- versity Press; 1996. p. 255-92. 2. Perrin PP. Equilibration, proprioception et sport. In: Mé- decine du sport Pour le Praticien. Elsevier Masson Ed.; 2020. p. 60-6. 3. Horak FB. Postural orientation and equilibrium: what do we need to know about neural control of balance to prevent falls? Age Ageing 2006;35:ii7-11. 4. Peterka RJ. Sensorimotor integration in human postural control. J Neurophysiol 2002;88:1097-118. 5. Rasman BG, Forbes PA, Tisserand R, Blouin JS. Sen- sorimotor manipulations of the balance control loop– beyond imposed external perturbations. Front Neurol 2018;9:899 6. MacKinnon CD. Sensorimotor anatomy of gait, bal- ance, and falls. Handb Clin Neurol 2018;159:3-26. 7. Bakker LBM, Lamoth CJC, Vetrovsky T, et al. Neural correlates of balance skill learning in young and older individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine - Open 2024;10:3. 8. Strupp M, Brandt T. Vestibular neuritis. Semin Neurol 2009;29:509-19. 9. Chae S won, Song JJ, Kim WS. Change of gait after unilateral vestibular neuritis: a prospective longitudinal observation study. Sci Rep 2021;11:21579. 10. Osoba MY, Rao AK, Agrawal SK, Lalwani AK. Bal- ance and gait in the elderly: A contemporary review. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 2019;4:143-53. 11. Zanotto D, Mamuyac EM, Chambers AR, et al. Dizzi- ness handicap inventory score is highly correlated with markers of gait disturbance. Otol Neurotol 2017;38: 1490-9. 12. Angunsri N, Ishikawa K, Yin M, et al. Gait instability caused by vestibular disorders - analysis by tactile sen- sor. Auris Nasus Larynx 2011;38:462-8. 13. Armato E, Dumas G, Perottino F, et al. Determination of Recovery by total restitution or compensation using multifrequency vestibular tests and subjective func- tional scales in a human model of vestibular neuritis. Audiol Res 2024;14:958-82. 14. Grouvel G, Boutabla A, Corre J, et al. Full-body kine- matics and head stabilisation strategies during walking in patients with chronic unilateral and bilateral vestibu- lopathy. Sci Rep 2024;14:11757. 15. Gauchard GC, Parietti-Winkler C, Lion A, et al. Impact of pre-operative regular physical activity on balance control compensation after vestibular schwannoma sur- gery. Gait Posture 2013;37:82-7. 16. Parietti-Winkler C, Gauchard GC, Simon C, Perrin PP. Visual sensorial preference delays balance control com- pensation after vestibular schwannoma surgery. J Neu- rol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008;79:1287-94. 17. Grove CR, Whitney SL, Pyle GM, Heiderscheit BC. Instrumented gait analysis to identify persistent defi- cits in gait stability in adults with chronic vestibular loss. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021;147: 729-38. 18. Cousins S, Cutfield NJ, Kaski D, et al. Visual depend- ency and dizziness after vestibular neuritis. PLoS One 2014;9:e105426. 19. Petel A, Jacob D, Aubonnet R, et al. Motion sickness susceptibility and visually induced motion sickness as diagnostic signs in Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Transl Myol 2022;32:10884. 20. Cawthorne T, Cooksey A. Rehabilitation of patients with vestibular lesions. Br Med J 1947;2:273-5. 21. Maire R, Mallinson A, Ceyte H, et al. Discussion about visual dependence in balance control: European Society for Clinical Evaluation of Balance Disorders. J Int Adv Otol 2017;13:404-6. 22. Mallinson AI. Visual vestibular mismatch: a poorly un- derstood presentation of balance system disease. Ph.D. Thesis, Maastricht University, Netherlands; 2011. 23. Busi M, Castiglione A. Navigating the usher syndrome genetic landscape: an evaluation of the associations be- tween specific genes and quality categories of cochlear implant outcomes. Audiol Res 2024;14:254-63. 24. Mallinson A, Kuijpers A, Longridge N. Optimum number of sweeps in clinical OVEMP recording; how many sweeps are necessary? J Int Adv Otol 2018; 14:72-6. 25. Windrich M, Grimmer M, Christ O, et al. Active lower limb prosthetics: a systematic review of design issues and solutions. Biomed Eng Online 2016;15:140. 26. Wolf EJ, Cruz TH, Emondi AA, et al. Advanced tech- nologies for intuitive control and sensation of pros- thetics. Biomed Eng Lett 2020;10:119-28. - 264 - mailto:Mans.Magnusson@med.lu.se mailto:georges.dumas10@outlook.fr mailto:nicolas-perrin@hotmail.fr mailto:pierre.denise@unicaen.fr mailto:paolo@ru.is mailto:hpet@hi.is mailto:christian.beyaert@univ-lorraine.fr Compensation for balance disorders Eur J Transl Myol 35 (3) 13816, 2025 doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2025.13816 27. Claret CR, Herget GW, Kouba L, et al. Neuromuscular adaptations and sensorimotor integration following a unilateral transfemoral amputation. J NeuroEngin Rehab 2019;16:115. 28. Dietrich C, Nehrdich S, Seifert S, et al. Leg prosthesis with somatosensory feedback reduces phantom limb pain and increases functionality. Front Neurol 2018;9:270. 29. Schaarschmidt M, Lipfert SW, Meier-Gratz C, et al. Functional gait asymmetry of unilateral transfemoral amputees. Human Movement Sci 2012;31:907-17. 30. Beyaert C, Grumillier C, Martinet N, et al. Compensa- tory mechanism involving the knee joint of the intact limb during gait in unilateral below-knee amputees. Gait Posture 2008;28:278-84. 31. Grumillier C, Martinet N, Paysant J, et al. Compensa- tory mechanism involving the hip joint of the intact limb during gait in unilateral trans-tibial amputees. J Biome- chanics 2008;41:2926-31. 32. Yiu EM, Kornberg AJ. Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Paed Child Healt 2015;51:759-64. 33. Ricotti V, Selby V, Ridout D, et al. Respiratory and upper limb function as outcome measures in ambulant and non-ambulant subjects with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: A prospective multicentre study. Neuromusc Disord 2019;29:261-8. 34. Baptista CR, Costa AA, Pizzato TM, et al. Postural alignment in children with Duchenne muscular dystro- phy and its relationship with balance. Braz J Phys Ther 2014;18:119-26. 35. Filiz MB, Toraman NF, Kutluk MG, et al. Effects of lumbar lordosis increment on gait deteriorations in am- bulant boys with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A cross-sectional study. Brazilian J Physical Ther 2021;25:749-55. 36. Neptune RR, McGowan CP. Muscle contributions to whole-body sagittal plane angular momentum during walking. J Biomech 2011;44:6-12. 37. Ramli AA, Liu X, Berndt K, et al. Gait characterization in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) using a sin- gle-sensor accelerometer: classical machine learning and deep learning approaches. Sensors 2024;24:1123. 38. Vandekerckhove I, Van den Hauwe M, De Beukelaer N, et al. Longitudinal alterations in gait features in growing children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Front Human Neurosci 2022;16:861136 39. Doglio L, Pavan E, Pernigotti I, et al. Early signs of gait deviation in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Eur J Phys- ical Rehabil Med 2011;47:587-94. 40. Vandekerckhove I, Papageorgiou E, Hanssen B, et al. Gait classification for growing children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Sci Rep 2024;14:10828. 41. Hak L, Houdijk H, Steenbrink F, et al. Stepping strategies for regulating gait adaptability and stability. J Biomech 2013;46. 42. Emos MC, Agarwal S. Neuroanatomy, upper motor neuron lesion. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 [cité 20 févr 2025]. Disponible sur: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/ NBK537305/ 43. Sheean G. The pathophysiology of spasticity. Eur J Neurol 2002;9:3-9; dicussion 53-61. 44. Kim CJ, Son SM. Comparison of spatiotemporal gait parameters between children with normal development and children with diplegic cerebral palsy. J Phys Ther Sci 2014;26:1317-9. 45. Olney SJ, Griffin MP, McBride ID. Multivariate exami- nation of data from gait analysis of persons with stroke. Phys Ther 1998;78:814-28. 46. Cho J, Ha S, Lee J, Kim M, Kim H. Stroke walking and balance characteristics via principal component analy- sis. Sci Rep 2024;14:10465. 47. Elnaggar RK. The magnitude of temporal–spatial gait asymmetry is related to the proficiency of dynamic bal- ance control in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: an analytical inquiry. Symmetry 2024;16:1274. 48. Lewek MD, Bradley CE, Wutzke CJ, Zinder SM. The relationship between spatiotemporal gait asymmetry and balance in individuals with chronic stroke. J Appl Biomech 2014;30:31-6. 49. Carrera E, Maeder-Ingvar M, Rossetti AO, et al. Trends in risk factors, patterns and causes in hospitalized strokes over 25 years: The Lausanne Stroke Registry. Cerebrovasc Dis 2007;24:97-103. 50. De Freitas GR, De HCD, Bogousslavsky J. Topographic classification of ischemic stroke. Handb Clin Neurol 2009;93:425-52. 51. Luft AR, Macko RF, Forrester LW, et al. Treadmill ex- ercise activates subcortical neural networks and im- proves walking after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke 2008;39:3341-50. 52. Yeo SS, Ahn SH, Choi BY, et al. Contribution of the pe- dunculopontine nucleus on walking in stroke patients. Eur Neurol 2011;65:332-7. 53. Schmid S, Schweizer K, Romkes J, et al. Secondary gait deviations in patients with and without neurological in- volvement: A systematic review. Gait Posture 2013; 37:480-93. 54. Padmanabhan P, Rao KS, Gulhar S, et al. Persons post- stroke improve step length symmetry by walking asym- metrically. J NeuroEngin Rehabilitation 2020;17:105. 55. Graham HK, Rosenbaum P, Paneth N, et al. Cerebral palsy. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2016;2:15082. 56. den Otter AR, Geurts ACH, Mulder T, Duysens J. Speed related changes in muscle activity from normal to very slow walking speeds. Gait Posture 2004;19:270-8. 57. Cappellini G, Ivanenko YP, Dominici N, et al. Motor patterns during walking on a slippery walkway. J Neu- rophysiol 2010;103:746-60. 58. Koo YJ, Hwangbo J, Koo S. Higher coactivations of lower limb muscles increase stability during walking on slippery ground in forward dynamics musculoskeletal simulation. Sci Rep 2023;13:22808. 59. Hallal CZ, Marques NR, Vieira ER, et al. Lower limb muscle coactivation levels in healthy younger and older adults during functional dual-task gait. Motriz: Rev Educ Fis 2013;19:620-6. 60. Ippersiel P, Dussault-Picard C, Mohammadyari SG, et al. Muscle coactivation during gait in children with and without cerebral palsy. Gait Posture 2024;108:110-6. - 265 - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books Compensation for balance disorders Eur J Transl Myol 35 (3) 13816, 2025 doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2025.13816 61. Rosa MC, Marques A, Demain S, Metcalf CD. Lower limb co-contraction during walking in subjects with stroke: A systematic review. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2014;24:1-10. 62. Lamontagne A, Richards CL, Malouin F. Coactivation during gait as an adaptive behavior after stroke. J Elec- tromyogr Kinesiol 2000;10:407-15. 63. Echigoya K, Okada K, Wakasa M, et al. Changes to foot pressure pattern in post-stroke individuals who have started to walk independently during the convalescent phase. Gait Posture 2021;90:307-12. 64. Armand S, Watelain E, Mercier M, et al. Identification and classification of toe-walkers based on ankle kine- matics, using a data-mining method. Gait Posture 2006;23:240-8. 65. Rodda J, Graham HK. Classification of gait patterns in spastic hemiplegia and spastic diplegia: a basis for a management algorithm. Eur J Neurol 2001;8:98-108. 66. Winters TF Jr, Gage JR, Hicks R. Gait patterns in spas- tic hemiplegia in children and young adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987;69:437-41. 67. Mendes-Andrade I, Silva MR, Jacinto J. Initial contact with forefoot or rearfoot in spastic patients after stroke—three-dimensional gait analysis. Neurol Int 2025;17:10. 68. Dietz V, Quintern J, Berger W. Electrophysiological studies of gait in spasticity and rigidity. Evidence that altered mechanical properties of muscle contribute to hypertonia. Brain 1981;104:431-49. 69. Hodapp M, Klisch C, Mall V, et al. Modulation of so- leus H-reflexes during gait in children with cerebral palsy. J Neurophysiol 2007;98:3263-8. 70. Willerslev-Olsen M, Andersen JB, Sinkjaer T, Nielsen JB. Sensory feedback to ankle plantar flexors is not ex- aggerated during gait in spastic hemiplegic children with cerebral palsy. J Neurophysiol 2014;111:746-54. 71. Neptune RR, Kautz SA, Zajac FE. Contributions of the individual ankle plantar flexors to support, forward pro- gression and swing initiation during walking. J Biomech 2001;34:1387-98. 72. Perry J, Burnfield JM. Gait Analysis: Normal and pathological function. 2nd éd. Thorofare: Slack Incor- porated; 2010. 551 p. 73. Kurz MJ, Stuberg WA, DeJong SL. Mechanical work performed by the legs of children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy. Gait Posture 2010;31:347-50. 74. Beyaert C, Pierret J, Vasa R, et al. Toe walking in chil- dren with cerebral palsy: a possible functional role for the plantar flexors. J Neurophysiol 2020;124:1257-69. 75. Heyrman L, Desloovere K, Molenaers G, et al. Clini- cal characteristics of impaired trunk control in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Res Dev Disabil 2013; 34:327-34. 76. Liao SF, Yang TF, Hsu TC, et al. Differences in seated postural control in children with spastic cerebral palsy and children who are typically developing. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003;82:622-6. 77. Pierret J, Caudron S, Paysant J, Beyaert C. Impaired postural control of axial segments in children with cere- bral palsy. Gait Posture 2021;86:266-72. 78. Heyrman L, Feys H, Molenaers G, et al. Altered trunk movements during gait in children with spastic diplegia: Compensatory or underlying trunk control deficit? Res Devel Disabil 2014;35:2044-52. 79. Curtis DJ, Butler P, Saavedra S, et al. The central role of trunk control in the gross motor function of children with cerebral palsy: a retrospective cross-sectional study. Dev Med Child Neurol 2015;57:351-7. 80. Balzer J, Marsico P, Mitteregger E, et al. Influence of trunk control and lower extremity impairments on gait capacity in children with cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil 2018;40:3164-70. 81. Pierret J, Beyaert C, Vasa R, et al. Rehabilitation of pos- tural control and gait in children with cerebral palsy: the beneficial effects of trunk-focused postural activities. Dev Neurorehabil 2023;26:180-92. 82. Kingma H, Hougaard DD, van de Berg R. Subcon- scious vibrotactile stimulation improves mobility and balance in patients with bilateral vestibulopathy: adher- ence over 2 years. Front Neurol 2024;15:1491195. Disclaimer All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their af- filiated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher. Submitted: 12 March 2025. Accepted: 31 March 2025. Early access: 8 July 2025. - 266 -