Children’s Cognitive and Emotional Processes in Adult Versus Child-Related Inter-Parental Conflicts Research Reports Children’s Cognitive and Emotional Processes in Adult Versus Child- Related Inter-Parental Conflicts Elena Camisasca* ab, Sarah Miragoli b, Paola Di Blasio b [a] Università Telematica e-Campus, Novedrate, Italy. [b] C.R.I.d.e.e., Department of Psychology, Catholic University of Milan, Milan, Italy. Abstract In the literature, little attention has been paid to the specific impact of child-related versus adult-related inter-parental conflicts on children’s intrapersonal processes and adjustment. Aimed to advance knowledge on this topic, the cross-sectional study explores: 1) the predictive effects of the two forms of inter-parental conflicts on: a) children’s internalizing/externalizing behaviors and b) children’s cognitive appraisals, emotional distress, and triangulation; 2) the mediating role of children’s cognitive appraisals, emotional distress, and triangulation, in the association between adult-related vs child-related conflict and children’s adjustment. Seventy-five school-aged children and their parents completed measures of inter-parental conflict, cognitive, emotional and behavioral processes and child adjustment. The results indicated that: 1) higher levels of adult-related inter-parental conflict promoted children’s internalizing behaviors, through the mediation of perceived threat; 2) higher levels of child-related inter-parental discord promoted both children’s internalizing/externalzing behaviors, through the mediation of perceived threat and self-blame. Keywords: inter-parental conflict, cognitive appraisals, distress, triangulation, internalizing and externalizing behaviors, children Europe's Journal of Psychology, 2019, Vol. 15(4), 843–857, https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i4.1613 Received: 2018-03-08. Accepted: 2018-10-30. Published (VoR): 2019-12-19. Handling Editor: John McCormick, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia *Corresponding author at: Università Telematica e-Campus, Via Isimbardi 10, Novedrate, Italy. E-mail: elena.camisasca@uniecampus.it This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Although conflict is inevitable in every marriage, the frequency, intensity and content of discord vary across couples. When parents manage their divergences in positive ways, by displaying verbal and physical affection, problem solving and support, the conflict is said to be constructive (Goeke-Morey, Cummings, Harold, & Shelton, 2003; McCoy, Cummings, & Davies, 2009; McCoy, George, Cummings, & Davies, 2013). In contrast, destructive conflict is characterized by chronic, unresolved and intense levels of hostility. This type of discord undermines children’s sense of security (Camisasca, Miragoli, Di Blasio, & Grych, 2017; Cummings, Goeke- Morey, & Papp, 2003; Goeke-Morey et al., 2003), making them more vulnerable to development of adjustment problems (Buehler, Lange, & Franck, 2007; Camisasca & Miragoli, 2014; Fosco & Grych, 2008; Lindsey, Colwell, Frabutt, & MacKinnon-Lewis, 2006). Another important property of the inter-parental discord is the con- tent of the conflict. According to Grych and Fincham (Grych, 1998; Grych & Fincham, 1990, 1993), marital dis- cord explicitly about child-rearing can be especially threatening or distressing for the children, by eliciting feel- ings of shame, blame, guilt and a greater motivation to intervene in marital conflict. Europe's Journal of Psychology ejop.psychopen.eu | 1841-0413 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://ejop.psychopen.eu/ https://ejop.psychopen.eu/ https://www.psychopen.eu/ In literature, various mechanisms have been proposed to explain the link between inter-parental discord and child adjustment. More specifically, the Cognitive-Contextual Framework (Fosco, DeBoard, & Grych, 2007; Fosco & Grych, 2008; Grych & Fincham, 1990) emphasizes threat appraisals, self-blaming attributions and tri- angulation, as unique mechanisms that increase risk of maladjustment (Fosco & Grych, 2008). Threat apprais- als reflect children’s evaluations of the personal relevance of inter-parental conflicts and the potential for harm to themselves or the family (Fosco et al., 2007; Fosco & Bray, 2016), that are strictly associated with children’s maladjustment (Camisasca, Miragoli, & Di Blasio, 2013, 2016b; Fosco & Feinberg, 2015; Fosco & Grych, 2008; Grych, Harold, & Miles, 2003). Self-blame appraisals may occur when children believe that the disagreement is caused by their behavior or if they feel responsible for ending or resolving the conflict (Fosco & Grych, 2008) with consequent associations to their maladjustment (Davies, Forman, Rasi, & Stevens, 2002; Fosco & Grych, 2008; Grych et al., 2003). Triangulation involves boundary violations, such that children become entangled in the inter-parental conflict and might feel caught in the middle (Bowen, 1978; Minuchin, 1974). From one side, parents could bring children into their disputes; from the other side, children may also feel caught in the middle or pressured to take sides, even if they do not become involved in the interactions (Amato & Afifi, 2006; Fosco & Grych, 2008; Franck & Buehler, 2007). Empirical evidence found that triangulation is a mechanism linking inter-parental conflict with children’s maladjustment (Buchanan & Waizenhofer, 2001; Fosco & Grych, 2008; Franck & Buehler, 2007; Gerard, Buehler, Franck, & Anderson, 2005). Another conceptual model, the Emotional Security Hypothesis (Cummings & Davies, 2002; Davies & Cummings, 1994) underscores that the exposure to parental conflicts increases children’s insecurity about the marital relationship, manifested through children’s emotional distress, behavioral regulation of exposure to the conflict, and destructive internal representations of the family system (Davies et al., 2016). Literature showed that emotional distress was the most relevant dimension that uniquely mediated associations between inter-pa- rental conflict and both internalizing and externalizing problems (Buehler et al., 2007; Davies, Cicchetti, & Martin, 2012; Davies & Cummings, 1998). The studies above mentioned have substantially neglected to explore the possible associations among the con- tent of the inter-parental discord and the children’s cognitive, emotional, behavioral processes and their adjust- ment, except for the studies of Shelton, Harold, Goeke-Morey, and Cummings (2006) and Koss et al. (2011). Shelton et al. (2006) examined how children’s coping efforts could vary as a function of the content of conflict (child or adult-related). Results showed that child-related conflict tactics characterized by physical aggression and verbal anger elicited children’s more severe mediation strategies, than adult-related conflict tactics. Similar- ly, Koss et al. (2011) showed that children reported more feelings of anger and sadness in response to the child-rearing disagreements, than other forms of conflicts. Moreover, their data illustrated that more intense scared feelings were associated with the escalating and unresolved conflicts, in comparison to the child-related conflict. The present cross-sectional study, based on the suggestions of both the Cognitive Contextual Model (Grych & Fincham, 1990) and the Emotional Security Hypothesis (Davies & Cummings, 1994), was performed in order to advance knowledge of the specific role of adult-related versus child-related inter-parental conflict. More precise- ly, the study aimed to explore: 1) The distinct effects of adult-related versus child-related conflicts on children’s internalizing and externalizing behaviors; 2) the distinct effects of adult-related versus child-related conflicts on children’s cognitive appraisals (perceived threat and self blame), emotional distress, and triangulation; 3) the Adult vs Child-Related Conflicts and Child Adjustment 844 Europe's Journal of Psychology 2019, Vol. 15(4), 843–857 https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i4.1613 https://www.psychopen.eu/ potential mediating role of threat, self-blame and triangulation, in the relationships between adult-related versus child-related conflicts and children’s internalizing and externalizing problems. According to literature, we hypothesized that: (H1) both adult and child-related conflicts could be predictive of children’s internalizing and externalizing behaviors (Fosco & Grych, 2008; McCoy et al., 2009, 2013); (H2) child-related inter-parental conflict could be strongly associated with self-blame and triangulation (Grych & Fncham, 1993), rather than adult-related destructive conflict that could be more distressing for children (Davies et al., 2016; Koss et al., 2011). We also supposed (H3) that both forms of inter-parental conflict (adult and child- related conflict) could have indirect effects on children’s internalizing and externalizing behaviors, through per- ceived threat, self-blame, triangulation and emotional distress (Fosco & Grych, 2008). Method Participants Participants were 75 Italian parents (mothers and fathers) and their 75 children (58% girls) ages 7–11 years (M = 9.35, SD = 1.33), recruited by four primary public schools located in Milan and in the Province of Milan. The children were noted as being the only child (36%), the first-born (32%), the second-born (27%), and the third-born (5%). The couples had been married 14 years on average (SD = 3.4). The mothers averaged 41.6 years of age (SD = 4.3), and the fathers averaged 43.9 years of age (SD = 5.2). Socio-Economic Status (SES) of participants’ families was assessed by asking for parents’ qualifications and jobs: 33% of participants were from middle-lower class, 48% from middle class, and 19% from middle-upper class. Procedure We selected four primary public schools located in Milan and in the Province of Milan, mainly attended by fami- lies with an average socio-economic level. The schools were recruited by a standard procedure that included introductory meetings with school principals and letters to the parents, describing the goals and procedures of the study. One hundred and twelve families (convenience sampling) were approached, of whom spontaneous and unpaid consent to participate was obtained from 88 parents (73.3%). Parents signed consent forms, for themselves and their children, that described the project and its goals, the voluntary nature of participation, and the confidentiality of the data collected. Each participant could also have the possibility to give up the research at any time without any explanation and could request a personal meeting with the referent researcher before and at the end of the completion of the questionnaires. The school-aged children were approached in school classrooms during regular class time at the convenience of participating teachers. Two research assistants, trained by the authors, during their research internship of 6 months, conducted the administration procedure. The measures were administered with a random order and research assistants gave assistance to children if they had difficulty in understanding any of the questions (i.e., reading the items and word definitions). Moreover, in case of children’s distress, research assistants could stop the procedure and relieve the children. Completion of the measures examined in the present study took approx- imately 20 minutes. Packets consisting of self-report measures (see the Measures Section) were delivered to parents. Measures were accompanied by a letter describing the modalities for their self-administering, in which mothers and fathers were asked to fill in the forms independently, without sharing their answers, and to return Camisasca, Miragoli, & Di Blasio 845 Europe's Journal of Psychology 2019, Vol. 15(4), 843–857 https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i4.1613 https://www.psychopen.eu/ all the questionnaires by the next 2 months to the schools. For thirteen families (nine fathers and four mothers) we found missing and incomplete data and we deleted these families from the data set. We therefore obtained complete data for 75 parents and their children. Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Catholic University of Milan for the project Inter-parental conflict and child adjustment, in April 2013. Measures Adult-Related Conflict Children completed the Conflict Properties Scale (19 items) from the Children’s Perceptions of Inter-Parental Conflict Scale (CPIC; Grych, Seid, & Fincham, 1992; the back translation was approved by the Author), which reflects conflict that occurs regularly, involves higher levels of hostility, and is poorly resolved and is composed of three sub-scales: Frequency, Intensity, and Resolution. Children rated each item, using a 3-point scale (“true,” “sort of true,” “false”). Sample items include: “I often see my parents arguing” (Frequency), “My parents get really mad when they argue” (Intensity), and “Even after my parents stop arguing, they stay mad at each other” (Resolution). This scale has demonstrated excellent reliability and validity in past research (Fosco & Grych, 2008) and in the current sample (α = .83). It has also been used with Italian-speaking populations with a good internal reliability (α = .82; Camisasca et al., 2016b). Both parents completed the Dyadic Satisfaction Scale (10 items) of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS; Spanier, 1976; Italian validation by Gentili, Contreras, Cassaniti, & D’Arista, 2002). In order to gain their per- spective about the frequency of quarrels, disagreements, conflicts, three items of the Dyadic Satisfaction Scale were considered, and specifically: Item 17 (How often do you or your mate leave the house after a fight?); item 21 (How often do you and your partner quarrel?); item 22 (How often do you and your mate “get on each oth- er’s nerves”). Both parents rated the three items with a 6-point response format ranging from 5 (All the Time) to 0 (Never). This measure has demonstrated excellent reliability and validity in past research (α = .90; Camisasca, Miragoli, Caravita, & Di Blasio, 2015; Camisasca, Miragoli, Milani, & Di Blasio, 2016) and in the current sample (α = .80). Following the suggestions of Fosco and Grych (2008), children’s, mothers’, and fa- thers’ reports were converted into z-scores and then the mean score was computed to create a single score of Adult-Related Inter-parental Conflict. Child-Related Conflict Inter-parental conflict was assessed via self-reports by children and both of their parents. Children completed the Conflict Child-Related Content, from the Children’s Perceptions of Inter-parental Conflict scale (CPIC; Grych et al., 1992), which assesses the content of the conflict that specifically pertains to children’s rearing or behaviors. Children rated the 4 items as either “true”, “sort of true” or “false”. Sample items include: “My paren- ts’ arguments are usually about me”, “My parents usually argue or disagree because of things that I do”. This scale has demonstrated good reliability and validity in past research (Grych et al., 1992) and yielded excellent reliability in the current sample (α = .86). Both parents also completed the Children’s Exposure to Conflict Scale of the Coparenting Relationship Scale (CRS; Feinberg, Brown, & Kan, 2012; the back translation was approved by the Author), to gain their perspec- tive about children’s exposure to inter-parental conflict, concerning the rearing of the child (5 items). Sample items include: “How often in a typical week, when all 3 of you are together, do you argue with your partner about your child, in the child’s presence?” Adult vs Child-Related Conflicts and Child Adjustment 846 Europe's Journal of Psychology 2019, Vol. 15(4), 843–857 https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i4.1613 https://www.psychopen.eu/ This scale has demonstrated excellent reliability and validity in past research (α = .82; Camisasca et al., 2016b; Camisasca, Miragoli, Di Blasio & Feinberg, 2018) and in the current sample (α = .80). Following the sugges- tions of Fosco and Grych (2008), children’s, mothers’, and fathers’ reports were converted into z-scores and then computed the mean score to create a single score of Child-Related Inter-parental Conflict. Appraisals of Inter-Parental Conflict The Perceived Threat and Self-Blame sub-scales from the CPIC (Grych et al., 1992) were used to assess child- ren’s appraisals of inter-parental conflict. The six-items of the Perceived Threat sub-scale assess the level of threat reported by respondents when inter-parental conflict occurs. The nine-items of the Self-Blame scale measure the respondents’ tendency to blame themselves for these disagreements. Sample items include: “My parents blame me when they have arguments”; “Even if they don't say it, I know I'm to blame when my parents argue.” These scales have demonstrated adequate reliability and validity in past research (Fosco & Grych, 2008; Grych et al., 1992) and in the current sample (perceived threat: α = .78; self-blame: α = .77). They have also been used with Italian-speaking populations with a satisfactory internal reliability (α = .72; Camisasca et al., 2016b). Triangulation Children’s triangulation into parental conflicts was assessed using the Triangulation sub-scale of the CPIC (Grych et al., 1992). This eight-item sub-scale assesses a wide range of triangulation behaviors, capturing the extent to which children feel involved in, caught in the middle of, or drawn into cross-generational coalitions dur- ing inter-parental disagreements. Sample items include: “My mom wants me to be on her side when she and my dad argue”; “I feel like I have to take sides when my parents have a disagreement”. This scale has demon- strated adequate reliability and validity in past research (Fosco & Grych, 2008) and in the current sample (α = .76). Children’s Distress Reactions to Inter-Parental Conflict To assess children’s distress from the inter-parental conflict, children completed one sub-scale of the Security in the Inter-Parental Subsystem (SIS; Davies et al., 2002). The Distress sub-scale includes 12 items with a 4- point response format and includes examples of multiple, prolonged, and dysregulated expressions of emotion and distress. Sample items include: “When my parents argue, I feel scared”, “I hit, kick, slap, or throw things at people in my family”. This scale yielded adequate reliability in the current sample (α = .79) and it has also been used with Italian-speaking populations with a satisfactory internal reliability (α = .77; Camisasca, Miragoli, & Di Blasio, 2016a). Internalizing and Externalizing Behaviors Both parents completed the Child Behavior CheckList (CBCL/4-18; Achenbach, 1991; Italian version by Frigerio, 2001) that is one of the most extensively used measures of children’s internalizing and externalizing problems. Parents rated the 113 items of the measure as 0 (not true), 1 (somewhat or sometimes true), or 2 (very true or often true). The Internalizing scales reflect a pattern of maladjustment characterized by social with- drawal or shyness and symptoms of depression or anxiety. The Externalizing scales capture children’s malad- justment characterized by aggression and defiance. In our study excellent reliability was found for internalizing (for mothers: α = .88 and for fathers: α = .84) and externalizing problems (for mothers: α = .86 and for fathers: α = .88). Following the suggestions of Fosco and Grych (2008), mothers’ and fathers’ reports were converted Camisasca, Miragoli, & Di Blasio 847 Europe's Journal of Psychology 2019, Vol. 15(4), 843–857 https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i4.1613 https://www.psychopen.eu/ into z-scores and then the mean score was computed to create a single Parent Index of internalizing and exter- nalizing problems. Data Analysis Strategy Descriptive statistics were computed for all the variables. t-test analyses were computed in order to verify the presence of any differences of children’s age groups (7–8 and 9–11 years) in the distribution of the variables investigated. Pearson’s r correlations were used to investigate the associations between the variables. The pro- posed mediation model was examined using the Process Macro for SPSS (Hayes, 2013), applying Model 4 with 5000 bias-corrected bootstrap samples. The bias-corrected bootstrapping resampling method is particular- ly suitable for small samples (Hayes, 2012). Our preference is based on the fact that other methods for testing indirect effects assume a standard normal distribution when calculating the p-value for the indirect effect, whereas bootstrapping does not assume normality of the sampling distribution (Hayes, 2012). In addition, the bootstrap method repeatedly samples from the dataset, estimating the indirect effect with each resampled data- set. This process is repeated thousands of times, producing bias-corrected accelerated confidence intervals for the indirect effect. Results Descriptive and Correlational Analyses Means and standard deviations of all variables used in the present study are presented in Table 1. Regarding the variables investigated, the means scores, for mothers, fathers and children, were similar to those obtained in other Italian and international studies with normative samples (Camisasca et al., 2016; Feinberg et al., 2012; Frigerio, 2001) and were placed within normal limits. Table 1 Descriptive Statistics, Mean, Standard Deviation, and Min-Max Scores Variable M SD Min-Max Adult-related conflict (Mothers: DAS) 11.12 1.84 3–14 Adult-related conflict (Fathers: DAS) 11.16 1.83 6–15 Adult-related conflict (Children: CPIC) 10.48 6.90 0–35 Child-related conflict (Mothers) 0.91 0.75 0–3 Child-related conflict (Fathers) 0.88 0.80 0–3 Child-related conflict (Children: CPIC-Content) 2.04 1.60 0–11 Perceived threat (CPIC) 3.78 3.11 0–11 Self-blame (CPIC) 2.40 2.11 0–10 Triangulation (CPIC) 4.23 3.16 0–11 Emotional distress (SIS) 17.54 5.56 9–34 Internalizing behaviors (CBCL) 6.55 4.51 0–23 Externalizing behaviors (CBCL) 6.88 4.61 0–24 The t-test analyses showed that there were not significant differences between the two age groups (7–9 and 10–11 years) in the distribution of the variables explored, t(68) from 0.18 to –1.48; p > .05). Adult vs Child-Related Conflicts and Child Adjustment 848 Europe's Journal of Psychology 2019, Vol. 15(4), 843–857 https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i4.1613 https://www.psychopen.eu/ The correlation analyses showed that the variables were correlated (see Table 2). In particular, both adult- and child-related conflicts were correlated with internalizing and externalizing behaviors (r from .23 to .52) and to cognitive appraisals, distress reactions and triangulation (r from .23 to .59). Cognitive appraisals, distress reac- tions and triangulation were also significantly associated with internalizing and externalizing behaviors (r from .28 to .71). Table 2 Correlational Analyses Variable 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1. Adult-related conflict – 2. Child-related conflict .32** – 3. Perceived threat .38** .43** – 4. Self-blame .23* .59** .42** – 5. Emotional distress .43** .35** .62** .29* – 6. Triangulation .32** .41** .54** .39** .29* – 7. Internalizing behaviors .40** .45** .70** .43** .48** .51** – 8. Externalizing behaviors .23* .51** .36** .50** .33** .28* .56** – *p < .05. **p < .01. Test of Mediation We performed mediational analyses using the Process Macro for SPSS (Hayes, 2013), applying Model 4 with 5000 bias-corrected bootstrap samples. In the mediational model, adult- versus child-related conflicts were added as predictors, internalizing and externalizing behaviors as outcomes, and the perceived threat, self- blame, distress reactions and triangulation as mediators (see Table 3). Regarding internalizing behaviors, only both the total effects of adult-related and child-related conflict were sig- nificant (adult-related: β = .13, p < .05; child-related: β = .41, p < .01; c path). The effects of the adult-related conflicts were significant on children’s perceived threat (β = .12, p < .05; a path) and distress reactions (β = .27, p < .01; a path), while the effects of the child-related conflicts were significant on all the mediators: children’s perceived threat (β = .39, p < .01; a path), self blame (β = .45, p < .01; a path), distress (β = .46, p < .01; a path), and triangulation (β = .39, p < .01; a path). When the effects of the mediators (perceived threat, self blame, distress, and triangulation) were controlled, the direct effects of adult-related and child-related conflict on children’s internalizing problems were not significant (adult-related: β = .05, p > .05; child-related: β = .08, p > .05; c’ path). Moreover, children’s perceived threat mediated the relationships between both adult and child- related conflict and children’s internalizing problems (adult-related: β = .06, 95% CI [.00, .14]; child-related: β = .20, 95% CI [.08, .41]). Regarding externalizing behaviors, only the total effect of the child-related conflict was significant (β = .62, p < .01; c path). As above, the effects of the adult-related conflicts were significant on children’s perceived threat (β = .12, p < .05; a path) and distress reactions (β = .27, p < .01; a path), while the effects of the child-related conflicts were significant on all the mediators: children’s perceived threat (β = .39, p < .01; a path), self blame (β = .45, p < .01; a path), distress (β = .46, p < .01; a path), and triangulation (β = .39, p < .01; a path). When the effects of the mediators (perceived threat, self blame, distress, and triangulation) were controlled, the direct effects of adult and child-related conflicts on children’s externalizing problems were not significant (adult-rela- Camisasca, Miragoli, & Di Blasio 849 Europe's Journal of Psychology 2019, Vol. 15(4), 843–857 https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i4.1613 https://www.psychopen.eu/ ted: β = .00, p > .05; c’ path; child-related: β = .29, p > .05; c’ path). Moreover, children’s self blame mediated the relationship between child-related conflict and children’s externalizing problems (β = .21, 95% CI [.05, .41]). Table 3 Indirect Effects of Children’s Cognitive, Emotional and Behavioral Processes on Internalizing and Externalizing Symptoms Predictor β SE Bootstrap 95% CI Model LL UL R 2 p DV: Internalizing behaviors Total effects .28 < .001 Adult-related conflict .13* .04 Child-related conflict .41** .12 Direct effects .01 > .05 Indirect effect via mediator Perceived threat Adult-related conflict .06* .03 .00 .14 Child-related conflict .20* .08 .08 .41 Indirect effect via mediator Self-blame Adult-related conflict –.01 .00 –.02 .00 Child-related conflict .07 .07 –.07 .22 Indirect effect via mediator Emotional distress Adult-related conflict .00 .02 –.02 .05 Child-related conflict .01 .03 –.04 .11 Indirect effect via mediator Triangulation Adult-related conflict .01 .01 –.00 .05 Child-related conflict .05 .04 –.01 .17 DV: Externalizing behaviors Total effects .27 < .001 Adult-related conflict .02 .05 Child-related conflict .62* .13 Direct effects .05 > .05 Indirect effect via mediator Perceived threat Adult-related conflict .00 .02 –.03 .07 Child-related conflict .01 .07 –.11 .19 Indirect effect via mediator Self-blame Adult-related conflict –.00 .01 –.05 .02 Child-related conflict .21 .09 .05 .41 Indirect effect via mediator Emotional distress Adult-related conflict .02 .02 –.01 .08 Child-related conflict .03 .03 –.02 .13 Indirect effect via mediator Triangulation Adult-related conflict .00 .01 –.03 .02 Child-related conflict –.00 .02 –.05 .06 Note. CI = confidence interval; LL = lower limit; UL = upper limit. *p < .05. **p < .01. Adult vs Child-Related Conflicts and Child Adjustment 850 Europe's Journal of Psychology 2019, Vol. 15(4), 843–857 https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i4.1613 https://www.psychopen.eu/ Discussion Although many studies have explored associations between marital conflict and child adjustment (Fosco & Grych, 2008; McCoy et al., 2013), the interest of how the distinct forms of inter-parental conflict (adult-related versus child-related) may differentially impact children’s cognitive, emotional and behavioral processes and their psychological adjustment is a new direction of research. Our results, in line with expectations found corre- lations among the two predictors (adult-related versus child-related conflict), the mediators (children’s cognitive, emotional, and behavioral processes), and the outcomes (children’s internalizing and externalizing behaviors). More precisely, higher levels of both adult-related and child-related conflicts correlated with higher levels of children’s perceived threat and self blame, distress reactions and triangulation, and with more children’s inter- nalizing and externalizing behaviors. Furthermore, the mediational analyses indicated distinct predictive effects of adult-related versus child-related conflicts on children’s adjustment and their cognitive, emotive, and behav- ioral processes. More precisely, contrary to our hypothesis (H1), adult-related conflict was strictly related to only children’s internalizing behaviors, while child-related conflict to both children’s internalizing and externalizing behaviors. Moreover, as hypothesized (H2), adult-related conflict predicted perceived threat and emotional dis- tress while child-related conflict predicted children’s self-blame and triangulation. Moreover, unlike expecta- tions, child-related conflict also predicted children’s perceived threat and emotional distress. Consistent with literature (Camisasca et al., 2017; Goeke-Morey et al., 2003; Koss et al., 2011), our results re- ported that adult-related conflict, connoted by chronic, unresolved and intense levels of hostility, undermined children’s sense of security, leaving them threatened and worried and emotionally distressed. Moreover, adult- related conflicts, connoted by chronic, intense and unresolved disagreements, predicted children’s internalizing problems, through the mediation of the perceived threat. These data are consistent with longitudinal studies that outlined how children’s perceived threat was a significant risk factor for the insurgence of internalizing problems (Fosco & Feinberg, 2015; Grych et al., 2003). We could explain our data, by suggesting that child- ren’s exposed to higher levels of adult-related inter-parental conflicts could be more vulnerable to internalizing behaviors through an amplification of their worries and scared feelings, that conflict will escalate, threatening the family’s existence (Fosco & Bray, 2016; Fosco et al., 2007). Regarding child-related conflicts, the results were in line with previous literature (Koss et al., 2011; Schelton et al., 2006), which showed how children exposed to marital disagreements, explicitly about child-rearing, could develop feelings of shame, blame and guilt. In turn, these feelings could promote children’s self-blame apprais- als connoted by the idea of being responsible for ending or resolving the conflict and a greater vulnerability to triangulation. Moreover, our results indicated that child-related conflict could also scare and threaten the chil- dren, by increasing their levels of perceived threat and distress reactions. In other words, children could believe that child-related conflict could also cause damage to self or others, or to the family’s survival, with consequent emotional insecurity and distress reactions. These data supported the suggestions of the literature (Grych, 1998, Grych & Fincham, 1990, 1993; Koss et al., 2011) that marital disagreements explicitly about children or child-rearing can be especially threatening or distressing for children, by eliciting feelings of sadness, anger, shame, blame, guilt and a greater motivation to intervene in marital conflict. Data also illustrated that child-related conflict, through the mediation of perceived threat and self-blame ap- praisals, predicted both children’s internalizing and externalizing behaviors, while adult-related conflict, through the mediation of perceived threat, predicted only children’s internalizing behaviors. In other words, contrary to Camisasca, Miragoli, & Di Blasio 851 Europe's Journal of Psychology 2019, Vol. 15(4), 843–857 https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i4.1613 https://www.psychopen.eu/ our expectations (H3), our data seemed to strengthen the negative effects of child-related conflict, compared to adult-related conflict, on children’s adjustment. The results that child-related conflict predicted children’s inter- nalizing problems, through the mediation of perceived threat are consistent with the literature that outlined how this type of conflict could promote feelings of sadness, worries and guilt (Grych & Fincham, 1993; Koss et al., 2011) and with the empirical evidence that indicated robust relations between perceived threat and internalizing problems (Camisasca et al., 2017; Fosco & Feinberg, 2015; Grych et al., 2003). Moreover, our results seemed to strengthen those of previous studies that outlined how child-related conflict could promote anger reactions in children (Koss et al., 2011) and how self-blame is uniquely associated with externalizing (but not internalizing) behaviors (Davies et al., 2002; Fosco & Grych, 2008; Shelton & Harold, 2008). In order to explain these results, we can suppose that feeling responsible for inter-parental conflict provided children with a sense of coping efficacy and perceived control over conflict, which increases the likelihood of involvement (Grych, 1998; Schelton & Harold, 2008). When children involve themselves in conflict, they may use coercive and aggressive tactics in an attempt to distract or bring an end to parents’ marital arguments, with consequent externalizing problems (Schelton & Harold, 2008). Moreover, we can also suggest that some chil- dren, who feel blame and responsibility for parents’ arguments, could be unable (or perhaps prevented from) intervening and may express their distress and frustration in the form of anger and acting out. Previous litera- ture suggests that painful feelings of shame could elicit defensiveness, anger, and overt aggression (Stuewig, Tangney, Heigel, Harty, & McCloskey, 2010). On the basis of these suggestions, we can therefore suppose that children’s self-blame appraisals, due to child-related conflicts, could also transform their painful feelings into maladaptive responses, such as hostility, anger and sometimes aggression (externalizing behaviors). Taken together, our results showed that: 1) high levels of adult-related inter-parental conflict promoted child- ren’s internalizing behaviors, through the mediation of perceived threat appraisals; 2) high levels of child-related inter-parental discord promoted both children’s internalizing and externalizing behaviors, through the mediation of perceived threat and self-blame appraisals. In conclusion, child-related conflict, compared to adult-related conflict, assumed the role of a particularly significant risk factor for the children’s adjustment, making children vulnerable to the onset of both internalizing and externalizing problems. Several limitations of this study should be noted. First, the real direction of relations among variables examined in this study cannot be empirically evaluated, because the research design of this study is cross-sectional. The nature of our cross-sectional data cannot explicitly identify directional effects or causal links, while longitudinal data could provide stronger evidence of directionality or causality. The small number of participants may limit the generalizability of our results, even though this limitation was partly overcome by the use of the bootstrap- ping procedure for the mediational analyses. Another limitation of the study is the use of only self-report data. It is now known self-report measures assessing sensitive information can be subject to social desirability and can inflate some of the associations among variables due to shared method variance. We could also outline that the responses of the first and second graders children may bias the study results depending on how research as- sistants helped these participants. Indeed, Grych, Seid, and Fincham (1992) stated that: “The language on the CPIC makes it appropriate for use with children from third grade through junior high school, but children's per- ceptions and interpretations of marital conflict are likely to change with age, and consequently the reliability, val- idity, and factor structure of the CPIC may differ across developmental levels” (p. 570). Moreover, another limi- tation of the study is that measures administered included many more items than actual participants in the study. Future research should use a multi-method approach, including observational methods, teacher-reports, Adult vs Child-Related Conflicts and Child Adjustment 852 Europe's Journal of Psychology 2019, Vol. 15(4), 843–857 https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i4.1613 https://www.psychopen.eu/ and interviews in which parents can describe their marital relationships. In addition, our sample was composed of Italian parents who were predominantly well-educated and of middle-class. Not significant associations were showed between parents’ age, gender and SES and the variables investigated (r from .00 to .18). Replications of our findings with a more heterogeneous samples would foster generalization of findings to a broader popula- tion. Despite these limitations, our findings helped to advance our understanding of the relationships between dis- tinct forms of marital conflict and children’s adjustment, by examining the cognitive, emotional, and behavioral underlying processes. Funding The authors have no funding to report. Competing Interests The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Acknowledgments The authors would like to acknowledge the assistance of professor John Grych for his valuable suggestions and comments in the writing of the manuscript. Re fe re nce s Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the child behavior Checklist/4-18. Burlington, VT, USA: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry. Amato, P. R., & Afifi, T. D. (2006). Feeling caught between parents: Adult children’s relations with parents and subjective well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(1), 222-235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00243.x Bowen, M. (1978). Family therapy in clinical practice. New York, NY, USA: Jason Aronson. Buchanan, C. M., & Waizenhofer, R. (2001). The impact of interparental conflict on adolescent children: Considerations of family systems and family structure. In A. Booth, A. C. Crouter, M. L. Clements, & T. Boone-Hollday (Eds.), Couples in Conflict (pp. 149–160). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Buehler, C., Lange, G., & Franck, K. L. (2007). Adolescents’ cognitive and emotional responses to marital hostility. Child Development, 78, 775-789. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01032.x Camisasca, E., & Miragoli, S. (2014). Stress post-traumatico in esperienze di violenza cronica. Maltrattamento & Abuso all’Infazia, 16, 7-11. https://doi.org/10.3280/MAL2014-002001 Camisasca, E., Miragoli, S., & Di Blasio, P. (2013). L’attaccamento modera le reazioni dei bambini esposti al conflitto genitoriale? Verifica di un modello integrato [The attachment moderates the reactions of children exposed to parental conflict? Test of an integrated model]. Psicologia Clinica dello Sviluppo, XVII(3), 479-500. https://doi.org/10.1449/76229 Camisasca, Miragoli, & Di Blasio 853 Europe's Journal of Psychology 2019, Vol. 15(4), 843–857 https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i4.1613 https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1741-3737.2006.00243.x https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-8624.2007.01032.x https://doi.org/10.3280%2FMAL2014-002001 https://doi.org/10.1449%2F76229 https://www.psychopen.eu/ Camisasca, E., Miragoli, S., & Di Blasio, P. (2016a). Families with distinct levels of marital conflict and child adjustment: Which role for maternal and paternal stress? Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(3), 733-745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-015-0261-0 Camisasca, E., Miragoli, S., & Di Blasio, P. (2016b). Conflittualità genitoriale e sintomatologia da stress post-traumatico nei figli: uno studio esplorativo [Parental conflict and posttraumatic stress symptoms in children: An exploratory study]. Maltrattamento e abuso all’infanzia, 18, 139-149. https://doi.org/10.3280/MAL2016-002008 Camisasca, E., Miragoli, S., Di Blasio, P., & Feinberg, M. (2018). Co-parenting mediates the influence of marital satisfaction on child adjustment: The conditional indirect effect by parental empathy. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1271-5 Camisasca, E., Miragoli, S., Caravita, S. C. S., & Di Blasio, P. (2015). The parenting alliance measure: The first contribute to the validation of the measure in Italian mothers and fathers. TPM - Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 22(1), 71-95. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM22.1.6 Camisasca, E., Miragoli, S., Di Blasio, P., & Grych, J. (2017). Children’s coping strategies to inter-parental conflict: The moderating role of attachment. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 4(9), 1099-1111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0645-9 Camisasca, E., Miragoli, S., Milani, L., & Di Blasio, P. (2016). Adattamento di coppia, cogenitorialità e benessere psicologico dei figli: uno studio esplorativo [Marital adjustment, coparenting and children’s psychological adjustment: An exploratory study]. Psicologia della Salute, 2, 127-141. https://doi.org/10.3280/PDS2016-002007 Cummings, E. M., & Davies, P. T. (2002). Effects of marital conflict on children: Recent advances and emerging themes in process-oriented research. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43, 31-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00003 Cummings, E. M., Goeke-Morey, M. C., & Papp, L. M. (2003). Children’s responses to everyday marital conflict tactics in the home. Child Development, 74, 1918-1929. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-8624.2003.00646.x Davies, P. T., & Cummings, E. M. (1994). Marital conflict and child adjustment: An emotional security hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 387-411. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.387 Davies, P. T., & Cummings, E. M. (1998). Exploring children's emotional security as a mediator of the link between marital relations and child adjustment. Child Development, 69(1), 124-139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06138.x Davies, P. T., Forman, E. M., Rasi, J. A., & Stevens, K. I. (2002). Assessing children’s emotional security in the inter- parental relationship: The security in the inter-parental subsystem scales. Child Development, 73(2), 544-562. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00423 Davies, P. T., Harold, G. T., Goeke-Morey, M. C., Cummings, E. M., Shelton, K., Rasi, J. A., & Jenkins, J. M. (2002). Child emotional security and interparental conflict. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 67(3), i-127. Davies, P. T., Hentges, R. F., Coe, J. L., Martin, M. J., Sturge-Apple, M. L., & Cummings, E. M. (2016). The multiple faces of inter-parental conflict: Implications for cascades of children’s insecurity and externalizing problems. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125(5), 664-678. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000170 Adult vs Child-Related Conflicts and Child Adjustment 854 Europe's Journal of Psychology 2019, Vol. 15(4), 843–857 https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i4.1613 https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs10826-015-0261-0 https://doi.org/10.3280%2FMAL2016-002008 https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs10826-018-1271-5 https://doi.org/10.4473%2FTPM22.1.6 https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs10826-016-0645-9 https://doi.org/10.3280%2FPDS2016-002007 https://doi.org/10.1111%2F1469-7610.00003 https://doi.org/10.1046%2Fj.1467-8624.2003.00646.x https://doi.org/10.1037%2F0033-2909.116.3.387 https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-8624.1998.tb06138.x https://doi.org/10.1111%2F1467-8624.00423 https://doi.org/10.1037%2Fabn0000170 https://www.psychopen.eu/ Davies, P. T., Martin, M. J., & Cicchetti, D. (2012). Delineating the sequelae of destructive and constructive inter-parental conflict for children within an evolutionary framework. Developmental Psychology, 48(4), 939-955. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025899 Feinberg, M. E., Brown, L. D., & Kan, M. L. (2012). A multi-domain self-report measure of coparenting. Parenting, Science and Practice, 12, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295192.2012.638870 Fosco, G. M., & Bray, B. C. (2016). Profiles of cognitive appraisals and triangulation into inter-parental conflict: Implications for adolescent adjustment. Journal of Family Psychology, 30(5), 533-542. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000192 Fosco, G. M., DeBoard, R. L., & Grych, J. H. (2007). Making sense of family violence: Implications of children's appraisals of inter-parental aggression for their short-and long-term functioning. European Psychologist, 12(1), 6-16. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.12.1.6 Fosco, G. M., & Feinberg, M. E. (2015). Cascading effects of inter-parental conflict in adolescence: Linking threat appraisals, self-efficacy, and adjustment. Development and Psychopathology, 27(1), 239-252. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579414000704 Fosco, G. M., & Grych, J. H. (2008). Emotional, cognitive, and family systems mediators of children’s adjustment to inter- parental conflict. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 843-854. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013809 Franck, K. L., & Buehler, C. (2007). A family process model of marital hostility, parental depressive affect, and early adolescent problem behavior: The roles of triangulation and parental warmth. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(4), 614-625. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.614 Frigerio, A. (2001). Child behavior checklist 4-18, Manuale [Manual for the child behavior checklist 4-18]. Bosisio Parini, Italy: IRCCS Eugenio Medea, Editore Ghedini Libraio. Gentili, P., Contreras, L., Cassaniti, M., & D’Arista, F. (2002). La Dyadic Adjustment Scale: Una misura dell’adattamento di coppia. Minerva Psichiatrica, 43, 107-116. Gerard, J. M., Buehler, C., Franck, K., & Anderson, O. (2005). In the eyes of the beholder: Cognitive appraisals as mediators of the association between inter-parental conflict and youth maladjustment. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(3), 376-384. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.19.3.376 Goeke-Morey, M. C., Cummings, E. M., Harold, G. T., & Shelton, K. H. (2003). Categories and continua of destructive and constructive marital conflict tactics from the perspective of U.S. and Welsh children. Journal of Family Psychology, 17, 327-338. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.17.3.327 Grych, J. H. (1998). Children's appraisals of inter-parental conflict: Situational and contextual influences. Journal of Family Psychology, 12(3), 437-453. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.12.3.437 Grych, J. H., & Fincham, F. D. (1990). Marital conflict and children’s adjustment: A cognitive contextual framework. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 267-290. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.2.267 Grych, J. H., & Fincham, F. D. (1993). Children’s appraisals of marital conflict: Initial investigations of the cognitive- contextual framework. Child Development, 64, 215-230. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131447 Camisasca, Miragoli, & Di Blasio 855 Europe's Journal of Psychology 2019, Vol. 15(4), 843–857 https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i4.1613 https://doi.org/10.1037%2Fa0025899 https://doi.org/10.1080%2F15295192.2012.638870 https://doi.org/10.1037%2Ffam0000192 https://doi.org/10.1027%2F1016-9040.12.1.6 https://doi.org/10.1017%2FS0954579414000704 https://doi.org/10.1037%2Fa0013809 https://doi.org/10.1037%2F0893-3200.21.4.614 https://doi.org/10.1037%2F0893-3200.19.3.376 https://doi.org/10.1037%2F0893-3200.17.3.327 https://doi.org/10.1037%2F0893-3200.12.3.437 https://doi.org/10.1037%2F0033-2909.108.2.267 https://doi.org/10.2307%2F1131447 https://www.psychopen.eu/ Grych, J. H., Harold, G. T., & Miles, C. J. (2003). A prospective investigation of appraisals as mediators of the link between inter-parental conflict and child adjustment. Child Development, 74(4), 1176-1193. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00600 Grych, J. H., Seid, M., & Fincham, F. D. (1992) Assessing marital conflict from the child’s perspective: The Children’s Perception of Inter-parental Conflict Scale. Child Development, 63, 558-572. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131346 Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. Retrieved from www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. London, United Kingdom: Guilford Press. Koss, K. J., George, M. R., Bergman, K. N., Cummings, E. M., Davies, P. T., & Cicchetti, D. (2011). Understanding children’s emotional processes and behavioral strategies in the context of marital conflict. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109(3), 336-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2011.02.007 Lindsey, E. W., Colwell, M. J., Frabutt, J. M., & MacKinnon-Lewis, C. (2006). Family conflict in divorced and non-divorced families: Possible consequences for boys? Mutual friendship and friendship quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 45-63. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014972 McCoy, K., Cummings, E. M., & Davies, P. T. (2009). Constructive and destructive marital conflict, emotional security and children’s prosocial behavior. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50, 270-279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01945.x McCoy, K. P., George, M. R., Cummings, E. M., & Davies, P. T. (2013). Constructive and destructive marital conflict, parenting, and children’s school and social adjustment. Social Development, 22, 641-662. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12015 Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Oxford, United Kingdom: Harvard University Press. Shelton, K. H., & Harold, G. T. (2008). Pathways between inter-parental conflict and adolescent psychological adjustment: Bridging links through children's cognitive appraisals and coping strategies. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 28(4), 555-582. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431608317610 Shelton, K. H., Harold, G. T., Goeke-Morey, M. C., & Cummings, E. M. (2006). Children’s coping with marital conflict: The role of conflict expression and gender. Social Development, 15(2), 232-247. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-9507.2006.00338.x Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15-28. https://doi.org/10.2307/350547 Stuewig, J., Tangney, J. P., Heigel, C., Harty, L., & McCloskey, L. (2010). Shaming, blaming, and maiming: Functional links among the moral emotions, externalization of blame, and aggression. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(1), 91-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.12.005 Adult vs Child-Related Conflicts and Child Adjustment 856 Europe's Journal of Psychology 2019, Vol. 15(4), 843–857 https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i4.1613 https://doi.org/10.1111%2F1467-8624.00600 https://doi.org/10.2307%2F1131346 http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.jecp.2011.02.007 https://doi.org/10.1037%2Fa0014972 https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1469-7610.2008.01945.x https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fsode.12015 https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0272431608317610 https://doi.org/10.1046%2Fj.1467-9507.2006.00338.x https://doi.org/10.2307%2F350547 https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.jrp.2009.12.005 https://www.psychopen.eu/ A bout the A uthor s Elena Camisasca, PhD, Associate Professor in developmental psychology at the Faculty of Psychology, Università Telema- tica e-Campus, Novedrate, Italy. She is a component of the Research Center for Developmental and Educational Dynamics (C.R.I.d.e.e.) and of the Research Unit for the Psychology of Trauma of the Catholic University of Milan. Research interests: marital adjustment and marital conflict, co-parenting relationship, parenting stress, attachment and maternal mind-minded- ness, child abuse and maltreatment and trauma related symptoms in childbirth. Sarah Miragoli, PhD, is a researcher in developmental psychology at the Faculty of Psychology, Catholic University of Mi- lan. She is a component of the Research Center for Developmental and Educational Dynamics (C.R.I.d.e.e.) and of the Re- search Unit for the Psychology of Trauma of the Catholic University of Milan. Research interests: child abuse and maltreat- ment, trauma related symptoms, marital conflict and coparenting. Paola Di Blasio, is a full professor in developmental psychology at the Faculty of Psychology, Catholic University of Milan. She is also Director of the Research Center for Developmental and Educational Dynamics (C.R.I.d.e.e.) and of the Re- search Unit for the Psychology of Trauma of the Catholic University of Milan. Research interests: Child abuse and maltreat- ment, trauma related symptoms in childbirth, marital adjustment, parenting stress. Camisasca, Miragoli, & Di Blasio 857 Europe's Journal of Psychology 2019, Vol. 15(4), 843–857 https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i4.1613 PsychOpen GOLD is a publishing service by Leibniz Institute for Psychology Information (ZPID), Trier, Germany. www.leibniz-psychology.org https://www.leibniz-psychology.org/ https://www.psychopen.eu/ Adult vs Child-Related Conflicts and Child Adjustment (Introduction) Method Participants Procedure Measures Data Analysis Strategy Results Descriptive and Correlational Analyses Test of Mediation Discussion (Additional Information) Funding Competing Interests Acknowledgments References About the Authors