Extreme Desire for Motherhood: Analysis of Narratives From Women Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Research Reports Extreme Desire for Motherhood: Analysis of Narratives From Women Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Viviana Langher a, Fabiola Fedele* a, Andrea Caputo a, Francesco Marchini a, Cesare Aragona bc [a] Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, “Sapienza” University, Rome, Italy. [b] Department of Gynecologic-Obstetrical and Urologic Sciences, “Sapienza” University Hospital Umberto I, Rome, Italy. [c] Sterility and Assisted Reproduction Unit, “Sapienza” University Hospital Umberto I, Rome, Italy. Abstract The problem of infertility and its consequent treatment (denoted as Assisted Reproductive Technology or ART) represent an increasing phenomenon, especially in industrialized countries. Confronting with one’s own procreative limitations can generate strong negative emotional reactions. This study aims at understanding how the desire for motherhood manifests itself in infertile women undergoing ART, studying their emotional and subjective perspective. An in-depth explorative research study was conducted on 17 infertile women attending an Italian hospital clinic for fertility treatment. Emotional text analysis was conducted to analyze the corpus of their interviews, allowing the identification of four thematic domains (clusters) which refer, respectively, to the following emotional dimensions: an inclination to self- sacrifice, seen as the price to be paid for the desired success of the treatment (Cluster 1), pursuit of inclusion in the world of procreative mothers (Cluster 2), precarious equilibrium between the deep desire for a baby and the withdrawal from the treatment (Cluster 3), surrender to any possible consequence in order to obtain the desired mother-child relationship (Cluster 4). The witness of the couples’ suffering for their condition of infertility and their strong desire for parenting can represent a source of high pressure for the fertility care staff, as they are the only ones responsible for the fulfillment of the great dream of biological parenthood. For these reasons, a multidisciplinary approach, which involves psychological as well as medical experts all working together, could benefit both the patients and the healthcare professionals and improve the quality of the reproductive healthcare services. Keywords: infertility, assisted reproductive technology, emotions, text analysis, women’s narratives Europe's Journal of Psychology, 2019, Vol. 15(2), 292–311, https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i2.1736 Received: 2018-08-04. Accepted: 2018-11-07. Published (VoR): 2019-06-07. Handling Editors: Vlad Glăveanu, Webster University Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; Flavia Cangia, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland *Corresponding author at: Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Via degli Apuli 1, 00185, Rome, Italy. E- mail: fabiola.fedele@uniroma1.it This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Infertility is a problem afflicting about 186 million people worldwide. On average, 9% of all couples in the repro- ductive age suffer from this condition. In some regions of the world, specifically where reproductive medicine comes in, infertility rates affect as much as 30% of couples (Stevenson & Hershberger, 2016). The term “Assisted reproductive technology” (ART) refers to medical treatments used to achieve a pregnancy when it does not occur spontaneously, such as Intrauterine Insemination (IUI), In Vitro Fertilization (IVF), and Third Party-Assisted ART (with gamete donors). Specifically, In Vitro Fertilization is the most common and ef- fective type of ART used in absence of sperm/egg donation from people outside the couple. It consists in re- Europe's Journal of Psychology ejop.psychopen.eu | 1841-0413 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://ejop.psychopen.eu/ https://ejop.psychopen.eu/ https://www.psychopen.eu/ moving the eggs from the woman’s body and then mixing them with the sperm to create the embryos that are then put back into the woman’s uterus. Since the first in vitro baby in 1978, the number of people conceived by reproductive technology has grown much faster than expected, reaching several million today and rapidly ap- proaching 0.1% of the total world population (Faddy, Gosden, & Gosden, 2018). In 2014 alone, the number of children born in Italy through the application of assisted reproduction techniques constituted 2.5% of the total newborns that year. Data from the National Registry of Medically Assisted Reproduction from 2005 to 2014 confirm the presence of a growing trend, with percentages of births with ART techniques constantly increasing (Scaravelli, Vigiliano, De Luca, Fiaccavento, & Speziale, 2014). The spread of the problem of infertility suggests the need to promote the widespread knowledge and improve the public awareness of this health issue (Place, Litwack, & Vann, 2018). The Subjective Experience of Infertility As various research shows, coming to terms with one’s own procreative limitations could generate strong nega- tive reactions such as anger, pain, dejection and frustration (Fassino, Pierò, Boggio, Piccioni, & Garzaro, 2002; Galhardo, Cunha, & Pinto-Gouveia, 2011; Vitale, La Rosa, Rapisarda, & Laganà, 2017). The condition of infer- tility could also be associated with a deep sense of guilt, shame, and decreasing self-esteem (Yao, Chan, & Chan, 2018). Diagnosis of infertility could produce, indeed, a self-deprecating sense of feminine or masculine insufficiency. The concerns of people with the problem of infertility seem to relate to a sense of personal disap- pointment and guilt due to failing “essentially to do what you’re put on earth to do” (Schofield, 2014). Other studies show that discovering one’s infertility could generate feelings of impotence and loss of control over one’s life (Benyamini, Gozlan, & Kokia, 2005; Cousineau & Domar, 2007) and one’s own body (Clarke, Martin- Matthews, & Matthews, 2006). People with infertility problems also often manifest feelings of self-criticism and social isolation (Batista, Bretonesa, & De Almeida, 2016; Cunha, Galhardo, & Pinto-Gouveia, 2016). As far as the perception of isolation is concerned, some researchers have focused on the feelings of envy and jealousy towards relatives or friends who, on the contrary, do have children. These reactions could possibly cause the couple to interrupt these relationships, thus increasing their feeling of isolation (Mann, 2014). Failing to procreate also means having to face the mourning of the desired imaginary child and having to con- front oneself with the loss of one’s own procreative function. Infertility could generate a deep narcissistic wound in the individual, which could in turn compromise self-image with respect to one’s own gender and generative identity (Galasso, Langher, & Ricci, 2017). Infertility could also have a considerable impact on the marital life of the couple, triggering some psychological difficulties, including: lack of marital satisfaction, impairment of relationships, lack of sexual satisfaction, forced timing of intercourse, loss of confidence in relation to sex, decreased libido and negative emotional effects (Ashraf, Ali, & Azadeh, 2015; Cousineau & Domar, 2007). Especially in certain societies, becoming a mother is almost a cultural mandate, according to which society and families naturally expect a young woman to eventually give birth to a child. The scientific literature on infertility is increasingly emphasising the importance of the sociocultural context in shaping the lived experience of infer- tility. Therefore in cultural contexts in which voluntary childfree status is acknowledged, many women experi- ence infertility as a “secret stigma” (Greil, 1991); in cultural contexts in which there is no concept of voluntary childfree status, it is impossible to hide infertility. The stigma and distress of infertility, therefore, is likely to be Langher, Fedele, Caputo et al. 293 Europe's Journal of Psychology 2019, Vol. 15(2), 292–311 https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i2.1736 https://www.psychopen.eu/ greater (Dyer, Abrahams, Mokoena, Lombard, & Van der Spuzy, 2005). Moreover, as several studies have shown, infertile women who experience rejection or pressure from husbands and family experience higher lev- els of distress and suffering (Gulseren et al., 2006; Guz, Ozkan, Sarisov, Yanik, & Yanik, 2003) Still today, therefore, motherhood is often considered to be a primary role for women; as well, women who do not mother either biologically or socially are often stereotyped as either desperate or selfish (Letherby & Williams, 1999). The stereotypes of non-motherhood are still present: the “infertile” and “involuntarily” childless women are desperate and unfulfilled (Franklin, 1997; Letherby & Williams, 1999) and the “voluntarily” childless ones are viewed as selfish and deviant and portrayed in ways that emphasize them as aberrant, immature, and unfeminine (Gillespie, 2000). For these reasons, women can feel a huge amount of emotional pressure to pro- create (Holmes, 2014). The Experience of Undergoing Assisted Reproduction Technology People who come to terms with one’s own infertility could decide to resort to assisted reproduction techniques. The experience of infertility treatment has been described as a situation that engulfs patients and dominates their daily routine (Daniluk, 2001; Redshaw, Hockley, & Davidson, 2007). Furthermore, people who resort to ART often are not aware of the fertility decline related to the maternal age (especially after 35 years old), over- estimating success rates of these techniques with unrealistic expectations (Hayward, 2016). In fact, many ther- apeutic attempts are often necessary before a child can be conceived, and, despite all the efforts, sometimes this does not even happen. It should be acknowledged that even if the ART path is successful and leads to the birth of a healthy child, the representation of one’s own fecundity could remain equally compromised. The pain caused by the infertility could remain, in fact, even after the success of the reproductive techniques. The narcis- sistic wound of “not having done it alone” may never be completely healed, thus undermining the image of one- self and one’s Ego Ideal (Agostini et al., 2009). Conceiving a baby through ART, in brief, does not cancel the presence of the sterile sexuality, but it becomes the proof of such a sterile sexuality. Furthermore, during the course of ART treatment, the sense of dependence on the doctor, both in a physical and psychological sense, may become prominent. The patients’ feeling of helplessness may in fact resemble the feeling of impotence of a child towards his/her own parents, promoting an intense emotional bond of the patient with the doctor (Cudmore, 2005). This could represent a critical moment for the couple, due to the intru- sion of the medical team and its procedures in the intimate life of the couple. Undergoing an ART procedure is also associated with the presence of significantly higher depression and sense of shame levels than those ob- tained by fertile or infertile couples not going through ART (Galhardo, Pinto-Gouveia, Cunha, & Matos, 2011). In fact, ART patients may experience the procedure as a source of deep stress, anxiety and concern (Brandes et al., 2009). Levels of anxiety and depression increase, moreover, with the progression of therapeutic failures, generating a real “failure syndrome” (Verhaak et al., 2005). Greil (2002) summarizes the experience of treatment of patients with infertility problems in terms of three para- doxes: 1) their sense of loss of control leads them to treatment where they lose even more control; 2) their feel- ings of loss of bodily integrity leads them to treatment where the body is invaded; and 3) their sense of loss of identity leads to treatment where they feel they are not treated as whole people. Although it is difficult to stop treatment, Verhaak et al. (2007) say that stopping treatment leads to reduced de- pression and anxiety among IVF women, even if they do not conceive. Unsuccessful IVF couples do not regret Analysis of Narratives from Women Undergoing Art 294 Europe's Journal of Psychology 2019, Vol. 15(2), 292–311 https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i2.1736 https://www.psychopen.eu/ the IVF experience; instead, they view it as their best chance to have conceived (Daniluk, 2001; Johansson & Berg, 2005; Throsby & Gill, 2004). The results of the aforementioned research studies describe strong negative emotions associated with the con- dition of infertility and the appeal to ART treatment. Based on these considerations, we have decided to deeply explore the unconscious emotional dynamics occurring in infertile women. Getting in contact with these emo- tional dynamics allowed us to make some hypotheses about the possible practical and behavioral implications concerning women with infertility problems, especially those undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology. We have chosen, therefore, not to refer to well-defined and a priori emotional indicators, that is, depressive symp- toms or trait or state anxiety, as in the case of the aforementioned research studies, but rather to formulate da- ta-driven hypotheses by using the patients’ narratives. In fact, narrative methods have some advantages over self-report methods, including: reducing social desirability bias, identifying a series of nuances of a given be- havior or event that could not be differently understood, and extracting more accurate interpretations based on data (data-driven hypothesis). Method Participants and Recruitment The recruitment of participants took place at the fertility clinic of the public healthcare institution “Sapienza” Uni- versity-Hospital Umberto I, Rome (Italy). Eighteen women accessed the clinic during the recruitment phase, matching the following criteria: 1) actively attempting to have a child for at least 1 year; 2) being treated in the hospital clinic for an In Vitro fertility procedure; 3) not being at the fertility clinic to seek a pre-implantation ge- netic diagnosis; and 4) not being diagnosed with psychiatric disorders. Seventeen women who were undergo- ing In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) gave their informed consent, and only one refused to participate. Nine women were between 28 and 39 years old, the other eight were between 40 and 44. Almost all of them were Italian nationals (n = 15), 13 women had low education levels (not achieving beyond upper secondary education) while only 11 were employed. About half of the patients were at their first therapeutic attempt (n = 9) while the other half had already made failed attempts and was trying for the second or third time (n = 8). Only two pa- tients already had children. The causes of infertility were male factors in six cases, female factors in eight ca- ses, and unexplained (i.e., ascribable to either anatomic or functional issues of either partner) in three cases. All these different (anamnestic and sociodemographic) variables (called “illustrative variables”) that characterize the participants were analysed in the subsequent phases of textual analysis in order to explore the relationship between these subject-defining characteristics and the emerging thematic domains. The different interview questions were also included as illustrative variables. The interviews were conducted during patients’ waiting times, avoiding interference to clinical practice. Instruments A structured interview—created ad hoc for this study—was administered to infertile patients. The purpose of the interview was to explore the patients’ deep feelings about this particular period of their lives through 12 ques- tions, based on the following three broad categories: 1) the decision to seek treatment and the perceived social support; 2) the emotional perception of the treatment and its effects; and 3) the expectations about the future Langher, Fedele, Caputo et al. 295 Europe's Journal of Psychology 2019, Vol. 15(2), 292–311 https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i2.1736 https://www.psychopen.eu/ and the possible pregnancy. The questions asked to the patients were designed ad hoc and were formulated after conducting a comprehensive search of the academic literature on the PsychINFO database on the topics of infertility and reproductive techniques, and after a detailed examination of the most frequently mentioned top- ics in several online forums of ART patients. All interviews were conducted in person and anonymously (the patients’ names were removed from the tran- scripts of the texts) as well as audio recorded with permission. The patients have always been encouraged to talk freely about the way they felt and to say everything that came to their mind so to facilitate associative pro- cesses. The interviews lasted from a minimum of 10 to a maximum of 40 minutes, with an average time of about 25 minutes. The interviews were conducted from April to July 2017. Textual Data Analysis Research Framework Emotional Text Analysis (ETA) (Carli & Paniccia, 2002; Carli, Paniccia, Giovagnoli, Carbone, & Bucci, 2016) is a psychological tool that aims at exploring people’s affective symbolizations about a shared context, theme or experience, already used in previous research (Caputo, 2014, 2018; Caputo, Giacchetta, & Langher, 2016). This methodology relies on a psychoanalytic theory of language (Fornari, 1976) assuming a “double reference” principle, according to which the written or spoken language has two functions: lexical-cognitive (conscious) and symbolic-affective (unconscious). The first is responsible for the logical-rational-syntactic structure of lan- guage and refers to the sharing of meanings conveyed by the source culture; the second one refers to the figu- rative meaning based on more symbolic and subjective processes. It controls the expressive components of the lexicon, the juxtaposition of words, the redundancy of terms, and the co-occurrence of terms within discursive units. The “double reference” principle is consistent with Matte Blanco’s bi-logic theory of mind (1981). Accord- ing to Matte Blanco, in fact, the human mind is able to work in parallel to two different mental processes through which it categorizes the reality: symmetric and homogenizing (or “unconscious”) logic and asymmetric and dividing (or “conscious”) logic. Usually these two ways of being of the mind operate in a parallel, concomi- tant and intertwined way. According to Matte Blanco, therefore, language can be conceived as a rational instru- ment addressed to organize reality (as asymmetrical function) but also the gateway to grasp the rules of the mind’s unconscious mode of being (revealing the symmetrical logic). Along with explicit meanings consistent with intentional structuring or ordered constituent parts of language, implicit and symbolic meanings may be in- ferred from the syntagmatic relations between parts of language. In this regard, the psychoanalytic technique of free association (Freud, 1900), according to which spontaneously associated words and expressions give infor- mation on unconscious emotional processes, is an example of how affective sense-making processes can emerge through the logic of association as a form of unconscious thinking. With the same logic with which the analyst interprets the emotional meaning of the patient’s language in his free flow through the analysis of the association of his words, so the researcher can identify the emotional meaning of the associative chains in the speeches of the interviewed subjects. Moreover, ETA hypothesizes an isomorphism between the co-occurrences statistical calculation and the asso- ciative processes characterizing the unconscious mode of thought (Carli & Paniccia, 2002). This method de- constructs the typical linguistic links of the dividing and asymmetrical way of the mind (operational function of language) in order to detect the spontaneous chains of associations between words. Indeed, meaning may be Analysis of Narratives from Women Undergoing Art 296 Europe's Journal of Psychology 2019, Vol. 15(2), 292–311 https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i2.1736 https://www.psychopen.eu/ conceived as a property of word combinations rather than as resulting from words by themselves. Besides, to grasp unconscious meanings the concept of polysemy is relevant in terms of emotional meanings attributable to a word, when it is extracted from the linguistic context. According to their polysemic value, the words organiz- ing the language can be divided into two broad categories: dense words, with the maximum of polysemy and the minimum of ambiguity with respect to a contradictory emotional configuration, capable of conveying a high emotional value independently of the linguistic context within which they are located (i.e., words like “bomb” or “good”); and non-dense words, with the maximum of ambiguity and the minimum of polysemy which give mean- ing to the text only on the basis of their organizing function (for example, articles, adverbs, conjunctions, auxili- ary verbs) or ambiguous words that find meaning only through their relationship with other words within the sentence (i.e., words like “to presume” or “however”). When dense words with a high emotional meaning are identified in a text, they can be grouped based on their statistic co-occurrence, thus allowing getting different symbolic repertoires (Caputo, 2013a). Analysis Procedures Consistently with ETA framework, computer-aided content analysis was used to detect the main symbolic do- mains emerging from the narratives of the patients with infertility problems. To this purpose, all the interviews were transcribed verbatim and combined in a single text corpus so to detect shared emotional processes. Then, two statistical multidimensional techniques were performed through the T-Lab software, by using the tool “Thematic analysis of elementary contexts” (Lancia, 2004): Cluster Analysis and Multiple Correspondence Analysis. Such analyses elaborate the textual corpus according to a digital “presence-absence” matrix, where rows and columns indicate the parts of discourse to be grouped (i.e., text segments as elementary context units) and the partitioning variables (i.e., words as lexical units) used, respectively. The Cluster Analysis allows the detection of groupings of words co-occurring in the same text segments with the highest probability (i.e., elementary context units), as indicated by the chi-square test (χ²). Such groupings thus represent different se- mantic classes that can describe the chains of symbolic associations running through language, which progres- sively contribute to identify cores of meaning across collected interviews with specific regard to the experience of being a patient with infertility problems at an ART centre. Each cluster can be described through the lexical units (dense words) and the most characteristic context units (text segments) from which it is composed of. Then, Multiple Correspondence Analysis enables the exploration of the relationship between different clusters in a multi-dimensional space. It allows the analysis of the latent factors that organize the main semantic opposi- tions in the text corpus (regarded as axes in a Cartesian plane representation of this multi-dimensional space) and synthesize the semantic relationships between these groupings (Greenacre, 1984). The relationship be- tween the detected factors and clusters is evaluated through the Test Value, a statistical measure with a thresh- old value (2), corresponding to the statistical significance more commonly used (p = .05) and a sign (-/+) which helps in the understanding of the poles of factors detected through Correspondence Analysis (Bolasco, 1999). The interpretative process of each cluster and factor (labeled by the researcher) is aimed at giving meaning to the co-occurrence of words of each semantic class and to the contraposition between such semantic classes, based on the use of models of affective symbolization (Carli & Paniccia, 2002). For example, we can identify inclusion/exclusion, power/dependence, trust/mistrust as symbolic dichotomies that have a clear reference to the body and refer to the primitive emotions that people use to bring reality back to something familiar. Such dichotomies seem to reveal different motivational dynamics of social relationships—affiliation, power and ach- ievement—as general affective drives connoting one’s emotional experience and orienting the relations with Langher, Fedele, Caputo et al. 297 Europe's Journal of Psychology 2019, Vol. 15(2), 292–311 https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i2.1736 https://www.psychopen.eu/ others consistently with McClelland’s theory of needs (1985). These dynamics were indeed revisited by Carli and Paniccia (2002) and further developed in psychosocial research (Caputo, 2013b, 2019; Langher, Brancadoro, D’Angeli, & Caputo, 2014), within a perspective stemming from constructivism and object relations theory as theoretical foundations. In more detail, the inside/outside dichotomy describes an emotional inclusion/ exclusion dynamic. What is “inside” in fact is experienced as something good and friendly, while what is “out- side” is perceived as dangerous and rejected. The underlying motivation refer to affiliation as the tendency to establish, maintain, or restore a positive affective relationship with others, accompanied by the fear of rejection. The high/low dichotomy instead describes the symbols of dominating or subjugating in terms of what is per- ceived as “high” and powerful and what is perceived as “low” and weak. The underlying motivation refer to pow- er, intended as the concern about having status and controlling the means of influencing others’ attitudes, emo- tions or behaviors, triggered by the fear of losing control and prestige. Then, the in front/behind dichotomy rep- resents the emotional dynamics of the true and the false in terms of showing and concealing. What is “in front” can be seen, reached and verified, differently from what is hidden “behind.” The underlying motivation is ach- ievement, which deals with the disposition to strive for success in accordance with a standard of excellence and to derive satisfaction from the mastery of challenging tasks in order to avoid failure. Such dichotomies repre- sent only some examples of interpretative categories that can be used to grasp the unconscious processes run- ning through discourses. Indeed, the entire interpretative process relies on a psychoanalytic method following an evidential and conjectural paradigm, according to a clinical case study perspective (Langher, Caputo, & Martino, 2017). The interpretative process is integrated with an in-depth qualitative analysis of the text segments of the inter- views (the elementary context units) grouped in each cluster. This allows a process of triangulation and seman- tic validity of data through cross verification from different sources and procedures, so to get an overall compre- hension of the narratives produced by the participants. Some of these text segments have been translated into English and added to the description of each cluster. Results The whole text corpus is of small-medium size (Bolasco, 1999): the total number of linguistic units is between 15,000 and 45,000 occurrences (N = 31,758). The indices of lexical richness show a relationship between dis- tinct graphic forms (V = 3.323) and total number of occurrences (Type / Token Ratio) equal to 10%. The share of hapaxes (i.e., terms that appear only once in the total amount of distinct graphic forms) is 48% (N = 1.628). The admissibility criteria provided by the literature (percentage of hapax <50% and Type/Token Ratio <20%; Bolasco, 1999) are therefore satisfied, allowing us to proceed with a statistical analysis of the text corpus. Cluster analysis has detected four thematic domains, as shown in Table 1. It should be acknowledged that the detected clusters represent different semantic classes as symbolic meanings emerging across the collected in- terviews and do not refer to groupings of participants. Therefore, even if such clusters may characterize each interview to a different extent, their related emotional symbolizations are simultaneously present as interacting dynamics in all the produced discourses. Analysis of Narratives from Women Undergoing Art 298 Europe's Journal of Psychology 2019, Vol. 15(2), 292–311 https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i2.1736 https://www.psychopen.eu/ Table 1 Clusters, Percentage of the Text Corpus Each Cluster Is Composed of, and a List of the Most Characteristic Lemmas (Keywords) Cluster 1: Feeling of Self-Sacrifice (21.95%) Cluster 2: Pursuit of Inclusion (26.72%) Cluster 3: Between Desire and Withdrawal (20.61%) Cluster 4: Acceptance of Any Consequence (30.73%) Lemma χ2 Lemma χ2 Lemma χ2 Lemma χ2 Goal 20.38 Close 20.50 To leave 63.57 To catch 16.16 Pleasure 20.05 Couple 15.56 To stretch 35.27 To born 15.99 To answer 17.39 Family 13.40 Psychology 33.93 To decide 15.44 Different 13.84 World 12.14 Sister 29.99 Follicle 13.78 To imagine 11.40 Person 11.56 Physical 29.83 Ovary 11.31 Patience 11.33 Colleague 11.05 Woman 29.97 First time 11.31 Health 10.69 Technique 9.67 Brother 22.21 Institute 11.21 To face 9.40 To approach 7.32 To lose 20.78 Normality 11.21 To hope 9.19 Friendship 6.80 Emotion 20.01 Me 11.04 To believe 8.88 Honesty 6.80 Reality 13.64 Husband 8.03 Stress 7.43 To support 4.94 To comprehend 12.71 Loneliness 6.83 Future 6.97 Sorrow 4.94 To move on 11.19 Doctor 5.55 To struggle 4.68 Intimacy 4.79 To desire 6.30 Guilt 5.52 God 4.68 To sustain 4.44 To need 5.78 Son 5.26 To overcome 4.68 Truth 3.98 Pain 4.78 Mother 4.71 Step 4.26 Longing 4.28 Tube 4.39 Thematic Domains Cluster 1: Self-Sacrifice Seen as the Price to Be Paid for the Desired Success of the ART Treatment This cluster includes 21.95% of elementary context units. This thematic domain describes the willingness of pa- tients to endure all the efforts and fatigues that the ART treatment requires in order to achieve the desired pur- pose: motherhood. The suffering caused by undergoing the treatment is felt by these women with great dedica- tion and patience (“patience,” “to overcome”). The sense of self-sacrifice seems to be prevalent in this theme as it leads to the hoped maternity, hence making it possible to achieve social and personal approval. The ART treatment is evoked as consisting of steps to be passed (“step”), symbolized by the patients as huge obstacles to be overcome (“stress,” “to struggle,” “to overcome,” “to face”). The confident expectation that these obstacles will be overcome and will lead to the desired goal sustains these women in their efforts (“to hope,” “to believe”) and comfort them as if it were a sort of prayer (“God”). It's a stressful situation; however, you have to hold on because you have to reach a goal. As well, you have to be very strong and totally comply whit what they [doctors] tell you. I feel stressed, I cannot hide it. (Patient 16) The illustrative variables that characterize this cluster are: “presence of an employment,” “first therapeutic cy- cle,” “high educational level,” and “perspectives about the future.” Having a job and a high level of education may represent significant personal resources, increasing patients’ confidence in the ability to succeed in their actions. This in turn makes them more confident in the treatment success. The association with the questions about the future and the condition of being on their first ART cycle also ex- plains for the women’s perspective of a future filled with hope, since they have not yet experienced the fallibility of reproductive techniques on their own body. Langher, Fedele, Caputo et al. 299 Europe's Journal of Psychology 2019, Vol. 15(2), 292–311 https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i2.1736 https://www.psychopen.eu/ Cluster 2: Pursuit of Inclusion This cluster includes 26.72% of elementary context units and is not associated with any illustrative variable. This thematic domain describes the ambition of ART patients to belong to the world of fertile and generative mothers, from which they feel excluded due to their infertility condition. This cluster seems to describe the pur- suit for closeness and identification with the symbolic community of procreative mothers (“close,” “couple,” "family"), that they aim to join with by removing the sterility, which makes them different from the procreative mothers. To be honest it is a bad situation because I am now at an age where I meet a lot of people who begin having babies. In fact, right now I have four pregnant colleagues at work, and that it's ugly. For so long I have been trying, taking medicines, following treatments. Sometimes it’s heavy, difficult, very difficult. And then one tries to go on, not to think of that, and fell jealousy, but sometimes one is jealous, and you say but why them and not me? (Patient 12) The feelings of uncertainty and anguish associated with the sense of exclusion from the generative mothers (“sorrow”) seem emotionally mitigated thanks to the support and closeness of their loved ones (“friendship,” “to support,” “to sustain,” “intimacy,” “family”). Certainly my husband gives me a lot of support and understanding. We support each other. (Patient 6) Cluster 3: Precarious Equilibrium Between Desire and Withdrawal This cluster includes 20.61% of elementary context units. This theme describes the maximum level of uncer- tainty in women who are faced with the key dilemma of either continuing to hope for success or completely withdrawing from the treatment. In brief, they seem to be suspended at the apex of their desire for motherhood. The intense drive to achieve the goal of motherhood (“to stretch,” “to desire,” “to need,” “longing”) emerges in this cluster. Patients are completely focused on what attracts them (the expected baby), sustained by the strong will and determination to obtain it. I have dedicated all myself to this [motherhood] and I hope that this beautiful thing happens. At the mo- ment, inside me I feel like it has already happened […]. Oh God, of course, I imagine it will be so beau- tiful. (Patient 1) At the same time, they seem to show also feelings of loss and contemplation about the possibility of having to give up the dream of biological motherhood (“to lose,” “to move on,” “to leave”). Well, I’ll assume that at forty someone doesn’t want me to have another baby. Maybe I'm not ready, maybe now I should start enjoying life more, because I've sacrificed all myself for my [first] daughter, so now that she is eleven years old, I could start my life again. So, maybe, I’m destined not to have this baby. (Patient 13) In this condition of uncertainty between desire and renunciation, the reference to strong and indissoluble frater- nal bonds (“sister,” “brother”), seems to evoke the feeling of belonging: even if they do not have children, they will be always members of their family of origin. The illustrative variables that characterize this cluster are: “more than one therapeutic attempt,” “unexplained causes of infertility” and “age over 40 years.” These conditions diminish the success rate of the techniques, fill- ing these women with uncertainty and anguish. At the same time, the unexplained causes of infertility would Analysis of Narratives from Women Undergoing Art 300 Europe's Journal of Psychology 2019, Vol. 15(2), 292–311 https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i2.1736 https://www.psychopen.eu/ favor the stalled condition in which patients are found. Unexplained infertility may represent, in fact, an incen- tive to keep desiring biological motherhood, since no concrete obstacles to procreation are found in one’s own or in the partner’s body. Cluster 4: Surrender to any Possible Consequence This cluster includes 30.73% of elementary context units. It describes the patients’ acceptance of endangering themselves and their romantic relationship to achieve the desired mother-child relationship, which they do not intend to give up, whatever the price they have to pay. In other words, the mother-child relationship absorbs and replaces the relationship with the partners. These women also seem to experience a feeling of body frag- mentation, listing single parts of their reproductive organs (“follicle,” “tuba,” “ovary”). Furthermore, the intimate nature of the procedures and the medical attention that these women receive on their bodies can lead them to experience unconscious feelings towards the physicians, as happens in psychotherapy. Specifically, by “trans- fer” we mean the unconscious displacement of feelings, whether negative or positive, related to significant peo- ple of one’s life towards the figure of the health professional (Etchegoyen, 1990). These intense feelings to- wards the physician could make them put aside the husband emotionally. Feelings of guilt could thus emerge from these women, as they symbolically betray the husband and replace him with a specialist who can insemi- nate them and who is allowed to "fragment" their body, in exchange for the desired baby (“loneliness,” “guilt”). Guilt and loneliness are therefore two feelings that these women seem to endure in order to obtain that much- desired mother-child relationship. I suffered a lot in my life, so I think a child can change me a lot, give me so much and grow up as a person also through the mother-child relationship. I didn’t have a relationship with my mother, and I hope to establish a relationship with my child, to be able to give him/her what is needed, the things I didn’t have in my childhood. (Patient 2) The illustrative variables that characterize the cluster are: “absence of an employment” and “female causes of infertility.” The absence of an employment could explain the high emotional investment of the women in the out- come of the procedure, as a possible source of self-realization. Therefore, we understand the patients’ predis- position towards this path despite the physical, emotional and relational costs. Furthermore, the infertility in women could increase their feeling of guilt, for being the reason the couple has to undergo treatment and its negative interferences with the couple relationship. Latent Factors Correspondence Analysis has detected three latent factors, which organize the main semantic oppositions in the text corpus from the different positions of the detected clusters in the factorial space. Table 2 shows the proportional variance of each factor, explained by each of the four clusters. These three la- tent factors explain all the data variance (R² = 100%). The sign reported in brackets (-/+) indicates the specific factorial pole (negative/positive) associated with each cluster. Langher, Fedele, Caputo et al. 301 Europe's Journal of Psychology 2019, Vol. 15(2), 292–311 https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i2.1736 https://www.psychopen.eu/ Table 2 Proportional Variance of Each Factor Cluster Factor F1: Motherhood desire F2: Controversial sense of belonging F3: Meanings of relationships Cl1: Feeling of self-sacrifice 0.0042 (-) 0.9317 (+) 0.0642 (+) Cl2: Pursuit of inclusion 0.0101 (+) 0.4505 (-) 0.5930 (+) Cl3: Precarious balance 0.8706 (-) 0.0296 (-) 0.0998 (-) Cl4: Surrender to any possible consequence 0.7239 (+) 0.0131 (-) 0.2630 (-) Note. The sign reported in brackets (-/+) indicates the specific factorial pole (negative/positive) associated with each cluster. The highest associations between clusters and each factor are indicated in bold. Figure 1 represents a spatial organization of the clusters within a factorial space and their relationships with the factorial axes. It provides a map of the emotional symbolizations shared by the women interviewed. Figure 1. Factorial space. Motherhood Desire (F1) The first factor (45.67% of total variance) mainly differentiates Cluster 4 from Cluster 3. It seems to refer to the presence of an intense desire for maternity. On the one hand, it represents the potential withdrawal of desire in terms of giving up the dream of biological motherhood (Cluster 3); on the other hand, the most violent and strong-willed aspects of maternal desire, which could lead the woman to endanger her health and her relation- ship with the partner in order to reach the desired child (Cluster 4). Controversial Sense of Belonging (F2) The second factor (33.04% of total variance) differentiates Cluster 1 from Cluster 2. This factor seems to de- scribe the patients’ aspiration to enter into the parental world, from which they feel excluded. Cluster 1 refers to Analysis of Narratives from Women Undergoing Art 302 Europe's Journal of Psychology 2019, Vol. 15(2), 292–311 https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i2.1736 https://www.psychopen.eu/ the aspiration to motherhood accompanied by a feeling of confident expectation. For this reason, all the efforts and difficulties of the ART treatments are tolerated. On the opposite pole, in Cluster 2, instead, the feelings of uncertainty and anxiety due to the sense of exclusion from the generative mothers prevail. Meanings of Relationships (F3) The third factor (21.24% of total variance) differentiates Cluster 2 from Cluster 4. It seems to deal with two dif- ferent ways in which women live their relationships with others during the ART treatment. On the one hand, their relationships are perceived as a source of support and comfort relatively to their distressing condition of infertility (Cluster 2); whereas, on the other hand, their relationships seem to represent a mere means to ach- ieve their personal goal of motherhood (Cluster 4). Discussion The results of this research study allowed the identification of the main emotional dimensions shaping the expe- riences of women who undergo an ART treatment. Briefly, the analysis identified four thematic domains (clus- ters) that describe the intense, profound, painful, and also extreme and radical desire for maternity in these pa- tients with infertility problems. Indeed, this study has revealed the women’s predisposition to bear all the efforts and sufferings that the medical protocol entails in order to achieve motherhood dream. At the same time, these patients have showed a confident perspective, sometimes a real leap of faith, that the motherhood, after so much pain, would come (Cluster 1). In agreement with Castellano et al. (2011), our study have showed that these patients tend to emotionally attribute to the physician and to the ART technique the symbolic meaning of omnipotent restorers of their biological integrity. Indeed, they seem to hopefully expect to be finally saved from their excruciating condition of infertility. With the modern technological innovations people expect to no longer have to suffer the uncertainties of nature but to be able to control them. The shared public perception is, there- fore, that doctors can cure infertility, although this is often not possible (Pfeffer, 1993). Along with patients’ confident desire to belong to the community of procreative women, they have also ex- pressed the fear and anxiety of being excluded from it, failing to fulfill one’s womanliness through motherhood. As we already know, the sense of exclusion and isolation often afflicts the patients with infertility problems (Cunha et al., 2016; Mann, 2014). Moreover, we think that the ambivalence about motherhood was more social- ly acceptable before the advent of assisted reproductive technologies. Ironically though, the increased availabil- ity of reproductive techniques to assist childless people has likely added pressure on infertile women (and men), becoming more reticent to give up on the procreation dream (Letherby, 2002). To deal with the painful sense of exclusion, the women seem to seek emotional support and comfort in their loved ones in order to make their dramatic condition more tolerable (Cluster 2). Because of this, the possibility of telling and sharing the one’s own condition with someone seems to be beneficial for patients, reducing their sense of isolation. Therefore, the patients show an intense drive to achieve the goal of motherhood, attempting to get what they do not possess but strongly desire (Cluster 3). Accordingly, the third thematic domain suggests that the women tend to experience a constant state of uncertainty about the future. Their desire for motherhood seems to reach Langher, Fedele, Caputo et al. 303 Europe's Journal of Psychology 2019, Vol. 15(2), 292–311 https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i2.1736 https://www.psychopen.eu/ its apex, a point where the women find themselves almost on the verge of renouncing to the great dream of biological motherhood. Consequently, feelings of dejection and loss seem to emerge in this cluster. Furthermore, in order to reach the desired child, the patients are willing to accept any cost, unconcerned about their health and the balance of their romantic relationship (Cluster 4). Their desire seems to be strongly “femi- nine,” extremely focused on the mother-child relationship, leaving in the background the male desire and the couple’s goal. Starting an ART procedure means that the physician, with his/her reproductive techniques, is symbolically placed in the middle of the couple’s relationship. This could create a triangular relationship where the husband may acquire a marginal role, excluded from the strong bond that can arise between the professio- nal and the woman, who is the main subject of infertility treatments (Mann, 2014). Paradoxically, this could en- hance women’s sense of loneliness. This study, indeed, shed light on feelings of loneliness and guilt experi- enced by these women, which totally devote themselves to the use of impersonal reproductive techniques and leave their couple relations in the background in order to reach the purpose of getting pregnant. These results suggest the usefulness of deepening the controversies concerning the marital relationship. In some cases, the cohesion of the couple favors the bond with the future child since the prenatal period (Busonera, Cataudella, Lampis, Tommasi, & Zavattini, 2017; Cataudella, Lampis, Busonera, & Marino, 2016); in other cases, childbirth is reported as a stressful event, producing a significant decline in marital quality (Castellano, Velotti, Crowell, & Zavattini, 2014). The three identified factors seem to give a synthetic idea of the emotional functioning of the women involved in this study. ART treatment represents an emotional climax where passion and desire, on the one hand, and fear and uncertainty, on the other hand, are confronted (Factor 1). Women emotionally point to the relational context as their main resource to find support, both affective and technical/professional (Factor 3). ART treatment will decide their destiny: to belong to the world of the mothers, or to be unfortunate outcasts (Factor 2). Overall, some limitations need to be accounted. The generalizability of the study is limited because these find- ings are related to a small sample (n = 17), comparable to a case study (Langher et al., 2017) and all subjects came from the same ART clinic. Another limitation of this study is that it is focused on the women’s perspective of the problem, and did not consider the men’s point of view, nor the couples’ perspective. Further studies should take into consideration men’s perspective in order to better understand the marital relationship dynamics as well as the influence of men’s desires and emotions about the choice of undergoing an ART procedure. De- spite these limitations, this research study allows us to deeply investigate the emotions of the patients inter- viewed, namely the feelings they associated with their condition of infertility, the therapeutic procedures, and the awaited maternity. Our study may have an added value for its in-depth view of the emotional dynamics that characterize patients with infertility problems. In addition to the sense of sacrifice, the pursuit for social inclusion and the feeling of uncertainty about the future (Benyamini et al., 2005; Castellano et al., 2011; Lavender, Logan, Cooke, Lavender, & Mills, 2015; Verhaak et al., 2005), a lesser-known side of the desire for motherhood emerges in our research. Patients with infertility problems do not just seem to suffer from the great wound of infertility, but they are also strongly determined and resolute to reach their personal goal (the child), for which every relationship, including that with one's own body, is endangered. Therefore, this research study also con- tributes to highlighting the strong-willed and assertive features of these infertile women, which are not consid- ered in many studies that describe them predominantly as suffering and distressed victims of infertility. Analysis of Narratives from Women Undergoing Art 304 Europe's Journal of Psychology 2019, Vol. 15(2), 292–311 https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i2.1736 https://www.psychopen.eu/ Conclusion The present research study shows the strong emotional investment on motherhood by women undergoing ART treatment. This makes them particularly demanding towards the fertility care staff, given their very high expect- ations. Analyzing their emotions could help better understanding the therapeutic relationship between infertile patients and reproductive healthcare professionals. Consequently, this could help to prevent burnout in staff members constantly confronted with highly emotionally demanding patients. The burden of witnessing the pa- tients’ suffering due to their condition of infertility, their strong desire for parenting and determination can repre- sent a source of high emotional pressure for the staff members, deemed as the only ones responsible for the fulfillment of the great dream of biological parenthood. For these reasons, a multidisciplinary approach, involv- ing a psychological/medical staff to treating infertility, could benefit both patients and reproductive healthcare professionals. The participation of a psychologist in the clinical team would allow patients to be globally accom- panied in their therapeutic experience and reproductive healthcare professionals to be relieved of the high emo- tional overload in their therapeutic relationship with patients with infertility problems, thus facilitating their clinical practice. Therefore, a multidisciplinary team approach that includes gynecologists, nurses, midwives, embryolo- gists, psychologists as well as other professionals could improve the quality of the reproductive healthcare services offered to the patients suffering from infertility. This study also have revealed a desire for parenthood strongly “feminine,” extremely focused on the mother- child relationship, leaving in the background the male desire and the couple’s goal. Some pieces of research in Taiwan examined the relationships of mothers who had naturally conceived and mothers who had artificially conceived with their newborn infants (Chen, Chen, Sung, Kuo, & Wang, 2011). This study found that mothers who had received infertility treatments in order to get pregnant had stronger bonds with their infants than moth- ers who had naturally conceived. Thus, it is possible that the partner feels emotionally excluded from the moth- er-child relationship, with consequent negative impact on the marital satisfaction of the couple. Traditionally, we know that the birth of the child (especially the first one) may represent a particularly critical moment for the cou- ple: the sudden transition from a “dyad” to a “triad,” the so-called “birth of a family,” could indeed endanger the romantic balance between the partners (Cowan et al., 1985). Particularly, women’s high emotional investment on the pregnancy and on the newborn could represent a risk factor for the emotional stability of the couple. Some studies furthermore suggest that there is a significant association between parents’ dyadic relationship quality and the level of children’s behavioural problems. A more supportive relationship between the partners seems to be associated with fewer potential behavioural problems in children (Goldberg & Carlson, 2014; Harold & Lieve, 2012). Consequently, a low quality of romantic dyadic relationship may negatively impact on the children’s well-being and development. Moreover, the literature already affirms that fathers play a particular- ly important role in the child’s development, especially in terms of children’s openness to the world (Cabrera, Volling, & Barr, 2018; Paquette, 2004). A “closed” mother-child relationship can therefore circumscribe the role of the father in the development of the child, making it as secondary and marginal. Considering the strong emo- tional investment on motherhood, women who conceive with ART might also feel more constrained about ac- tually expressing ambivalence or regrets than those conceiving naturally. They might also not feel entitled to complain or seek additional affective and social support. In conclusion, we claim the importance of introducing early individual and couple psychological intervention into the centers of Assisted Reproductive Technology. We believe, in fact, that analyzing and addressing these Langher, Fedele, Caputo et al. 305 Europe's Journal of Psychology 2019, Vol. 15(2), 292–311 https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i2.1736 https://www.psychopen.eu/ complex emotional dynamics may have positive short-term/long-term effects on women, on the couple and on the relationship with the future newborn. Competing Interests The authors have declared that not competing interests exist. Funding The authors have no funding to report. Acknowledgments We thank all the participants in the study for their contribution. The authors are grateful to the women who have agreed to tell their experiences, showing willingness and interest in knowing the future results of the research. We would like to extend our thanks to the staff of the infertility clinic that have made the research possible. R efe re nc es Agostini, F., Monti, F., Fagandini, P., De Pascalis, L. D., La Sala, G. B., & Blickstein, I. (2009). Parental mental representations during late pregnancy and early parenthood following assisted reproductive technology. Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 37, 320-327. https://doi.org/10.1515/JPM.2009.062 Ashraf, D. M., Ali, D., & Azadeh, D. M. (2015). Effect of infertility on sexual function: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 9, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/11148.5934 Batista, L. A. T., Bretonesa, W. H. D., & De Almeida, R. J. (2016). O impacto da infertilidade: Narrativas de mulheres com sucessivas negativas pelo tratamento de reproduc¸ão assistida. Reproducao e Climaterio, 1, 121-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recli.2016.05.004 Benyamini, Y., Gozlan, M., & Kokia, E. (2005). Variability in the difficulties experienced by women undergoing infertility treatments. Fertility & Sterility, 8, 275-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.10.014 Bolasco, S. (1999). Analisi multidimensionale dei dati [Multidimensional analysis of data] (Vol. 1). Rome, Italy: Carocci. Brandes, M., Van der Steen, J. O. M., Bokdam, S. B., Hamilton, C. J. C. M., De Bruin, J. P., Nelen, W. L. D. M., & Kremer, J. A. M. (2009). When and why do subfertile couples discontinue their fertility care? A longitudinal cohort study in a secondary care subfertility population. Human Reproduction, 24, 3127-3135. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dep340 Busonera, A., Cataudella, S., Lampis, J., Tommasi, M., & Zavattini, G. C. (2017). Prenatal Attachment Inventory: Expanding the reliability and validity evidence using a sample of Italian women. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 35, 462-479. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2017.1349896 Cabrera, N. J., Volling, B. L., & Barr, R. (2018). Fathers are parents, too! Widening the lens on parenting for children’s development. Child Development Perspectives, 12, 152-157. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12275 Caputo, A. (2013a). Cultural models shaping stalking from a content analysis of Italian newspapers. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 9, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v9i3.604 Analysis of Narratives from Women Undergoing Art 306 Europe's Journal of Psychology 2019, Vol. 15(2), 292–311 https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i2.1736 https://doi.org/10.1515%2FJPM.2009.062 https://doi.org/10.7860%2FJCDR%2F2015%2F11148.5934 https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.recli.2016.05.004 https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.fertnstert.2004.10.014 https://doi.org/10.1093%2Fhumrep%2Fdep340 https://doi.org/10.1080%2F02646838.2017.1349896 https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fcdep.12275 https://doi.org/10.5964%2Fejop.v9i3.604 https://www.psychopen.eu/ Caputo, A. (2013b). Health demand in primary care context: What do people think about physicians?. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 18, 145-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2012.687828 Caputo, A. (2014). Exploring quality of life in Italian patients with rare disease: A computer-aided content analysis of illness stories. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 19, 211-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2013.793372 Caputo, A. (2018). “I have been bullied at workplace!”: A qualitative study on Italian employees stories. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 21, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2018.25 Caputo, A. (2019). The experience of therapeutic community: Emotional and motivational dynamics of people with drug addiction following rehabilitation. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 17, 151-165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-018-0008-4 Caputo, A., Giacchetta, A., & Langher, V. (2016). AIDS as social construction: Text mining of AIDS-related information in the Italian press. AIDS Care, 28, 1171-1176. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2016.1153591 Carli, R., & Paniccia, R. M. (2002). L’analisi emozionale del testo [Emotional text analysis] (Vol. 1). Milan, Italy: Franco Angeli. Carli, R., Paniccia, R. M., Giovagnoli, F., Carbone, A., & Bucci, F. (2016). Emotional textual analysis. In L. A. Jason & D. S. Glenwick (Eds.), Handbook of methodological approaches to community-based research (pp. 111–117). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. Castellano, R., Grimaldi, N., Malzoni, A., Pagliarulo, M., Pirone, N., & Sarno, R. (2011). Il trattamento dell'infertilità: Considerazioni psicodinamiche sulla relazione di cura [Treatment of infertility: Psychodynamic considerations on the care relationship]. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1, 186-199. Retrieved from www.rivistadipsicologiaclinica.it Castellano, R., Velotti, P., Crowell, J. A., & Zavattini, G. C. (2014). The role of parents' attachment configurations at childbirth on marital satisfaction and conflict strategies. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 23, 1011-1026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-013-9757-7 Cataudella, S., Lampis, J., Busonera, A., & Marino, L. (2016). Il processo di costruzione del legame di attaccamento prenatale nelle coppie in attesa: Una ricerca esplorativa [The process of building the prenatal attachment bond in expectant couples: An exploratory survey]. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 43, 361-368. https://doi.org/10.1421/83647 Chen, C. J., Chen, Y. C., Sung, H. C., Kuo, P. C., & Wang, C. H. (2011). Perinatal attachment in naturally pregnant and infertility‐treated pregnant women in Taiwan. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 67, 2200-2208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05665.x Clarke, L. H., Martin-Matthews, A., & Matthews, R. (2006). The continuity and discontinuity of the embodied self in infertility. Canadian Review of Sociology, 43, 95-113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-618X.2006.tb00856.x Cousineau, T. M., & Domar, A. D. (2007). Psychological impact of infertility. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 21, 293-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.12.003 Cowan, C. P., Cowan, P. A., Heming, G., Garrett, E., Coysh, W. S., Curtis-Boles, H., & Boles, A. J., III (1985). Transition to parenthood: His, her and theirs. Journal of Family Issues, 6, 451-481. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251385006004004 Langher, Fedele, Caputo et al. 307 Europe's Journal of Psychology 2019, Vol. 15(2), 292–311 https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i2.1736 https://doi.org/10.1080%2F13548506.2012.687828 https://doi.org/10.1080%2F13548506.2013.793372 https://doi.org/10.1017%2Fsjp.2018.25 https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs11469-018-0008-4 https://doi.org/10.1080%2F09540121.2016.1153591 https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs10826-013-9757-7 https://doi.org/10.1421%2F83647 https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2648.2011.05665.x https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1755-618X.2006.tb00856.x https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.bpobgyn.2006.12.003 https://doi.org/10.1177%2F019251385006004004 https://www.psychopen.eu/ Cudmore, L. (2005). Becoming parents in the context of loss. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 20, 299-308. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681990500141204 Cunha, M., Galhardo, A., & Pinto-Gouveia, J. (2016). Experiential avoidance, self-compassion, self-judgment and coping styles in infertility. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 10, 41-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2016.04.001 Daniluk, J. C. (2001). Reconstructing their lives: A longitudinal, qualitative analysis of the transition to biological childlessness for infertile couples. Journal of Counseling & Development, 79, 439-449. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2001.tb01991.x Dyer, S. J., Abrahams, N., Mokoena, N. E., Lombard, C. J., & Van der Spuzy, Z. M. (2005). Psychological distress among women suffering from infertility in South Africa: A quantitative assessment. Human Reproduction, 20, 1938-1943. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh845 Etchegoyen, R. H. (1990). I fondamenti della tecnica psicoanalitica [The fundamentals of psychoanalytic technique] (Vol. 1). Rome, Italy: Astrolabio Ubaldini. Faddy, M. J., Gosden, M. D., & Gosden, R. G. (2018). A demographic projection of the contribution of assisted reproductive technologies to world population growth. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 36, 455-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.01.006 Fassino, S., Pierò, A., Boggio, S., Piccioni, V., & Garzaro, L. (2002). Anxiety, depression and anger suppression in infertile couples: A controlled study. Human Reproduction, 17, 2986-2994. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.11.2986 Fornari, F. (1976). Simbolo e codice [Symbol and code] (Vol. 1). Milan, Italy: Feltrinelli. Franklin, S. (1997). Embodied progress: A cultural account of assisted conception. London, United Kingdom: Routledge. Freud, S. (1900). L’interpretazione dei sogni [The interpretation of dreams], Opere di S. Freud (1966) (Vol. 3). Turin, Italy: Boringhieri. Galasso, S., Langher, V., & Ricci, M. E. (2017). Il corpo femminile e il mondo interno [The female body and the internal world]. Rivista di Sessuologia, 41, 12-24. Galhardo, A., Cunha, M., & Pinto-Gouveia, J. (2011). Psychological aspects in couples with infertility. Sexologies, 20, 224-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sexol.2011.08.005 Galhardo, A., Pinto-Gouveia, J., Cunha, M., & Matos, M. (2011). The impact of shame and self-judgment on psychopathology in infertile patients. Human Reproduction, 26, 2408-2414. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der209 Gillespie, R. (2000). When no means no: Disbelief, disregard and deviance as discourses of voluntary childlessness. Women’s Studies International Forum, 23, 223-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(00)00076-5 Goldberg, J. S., & Carlson, M. J. (2014). Parents’ relationship quality and children’s behavior in stable married and cohabiting families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76, 762-777. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12120 Greenacre, M. J. (1984). Theory and applications of correspondence analysis. New York, NY, USA: Academic Press. Greil, A. L. (1991). A secret stigma: The analogy between infertility and chronic illness and disability. Advances in Medical Sociology, 2, 17-38. Analysis of Narratives from Women Undergoing Art 308 Europe's Journal of Psychology 2019, Vol. 15(2), 292–311 https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i2.1736 https://doi.org/10.1080%2F14681990500141204 https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.srhc.2016.04.001 https://doi.org/10.1002%2Fj.1556-6676.2001.tb01991.x https://doi.org/10.1093%2Fhumrep%2Fdeh845 https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.rbmo.2018.01.006 https://doi.org/10.1093%2Fhumrep%2F17.11.2986 https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.sexol.2011.08.005 https://doi.org/10.1093%2Fhumrep%2Fder209 https://doi.org/10.1016%2FS0277-5395%2800%2900076-5 https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fjomf.12120 https://www.psychopen.eu/ Greil, A. L. (2002). Infertile bodies: Medicalization, metaphor, and agency. In M. C. Inhorn & F. van Balen (Eds.), Infertility around the globe: New thinking on childlessness, gender, and reproductive technologies: A view from the social sciences (pp. 101–118). Berkeley, CA, USA: University of California Press. Gulseren, L., Cetinay, P., Tokatlioglu, B., Sarikaya, O. O., Gulseren, S., & Kurt, S. (2006). Depression and anxiety levels in infertile Turkish women. Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 51, 421-426. Retrieved from www.europepmc.org Guz, H., Ozkan, A., Sarisov, G., Yanik, F., & Yanik, A. (2003). Psychiatric symptoms of Turkish infertile women. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 24, 267-271. https://doi.org/10.3109/01674820309074691 Harold, G. T., & Lieve, L. D. (2012). Parents as partners: How the parental relationship affects children’s psychological development. In A. Balfour, M. Morgan, & C. Vincent (Eds.), How couple relationships shape our world: Clinical practice, research, and policy perspectives (pp. 25-55). London, United Kingdom: Karnac Books. Hayward, A. J. (2016). Expectations and experiences of midlife intending mothers engaging with assisted reproductive technology (Doctoral thesis, School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia). https://doi.org/10.14264/uql.2016.909 Holmes, M. (2014). The female assumption: A mother’s story: Freeing women from the view that motherhood is a mandate (Vol. 1). San Bernardino, CA, USA: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. Johansson, M., & Berg, M. (2005). Women’s experiences of childlessness 2 years after the end of in vitro fertilization treatment. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 19, 58-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2005.00319.x Lancia, F. (2004). Strumenti per analisi dei testi. Introduzione all'uso di T-LAB [Tools for text analysis: Introduction to the use of T-LAB] (Vol. 1). Milan, Italy: Franco Angeli. Langher, V., Brancadoro, B., D’Angeli, M., & Caputo, A. (2014). Imagining future internship in professional psychology: A study on university students’ representations. Universitas Psychologica, 13, 1589-1601. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.UPSY13'4.ifip Langher, V., Caputo, A., & Martino, G. (2017). What happened to the clinical approach to case study in psychological research? A clinical psychological analysis of scientific articles in high impact-factor journals. Mediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 5, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.6092/2282-1619/2017.5.1670 Lavender, T., Logan, J., Cooke, A., Lavender, R., & Mills, T. (2015). “Nature makes you blind to the risks”: An exploration of womens’ views surrounding decisions on the timing of childbearing in contemporary society. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 6, 1877-5756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2015.04.006 Letherby, G. (2002). Childless and bereft? Stereotypes and realities in relation to “voluntary” and “involuntary” childlessness and womanhood. Sociological Inquiry, 72, 7-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-682X.00003 Letherby, G., & Williams, C. (1999). Non-motherhood: Ambivalent autobiographies. Feminist Studies, 25, 719-728. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178673 Mann, M. (2014). Psychoanalytic understanding of repeated in-vitro fertilization trials, failures, and repetition compulsion. Reproductive System and Sexual Disorders, 3, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-038X.1000140 Langher, Fedele, Caputo et al. 309 Europe's Journal of Psychology 2019, Vol. 15(2), 292–311 https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i2.1736 https://doi.org/10.3109%2F01674820309074691 https://doi.org/10.14264%2Fuql.2016.909 https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1471-6712.2005.00319.x https://doi.org/10.11144%2FJaveriana.UPSY13%274.ifip https://doi.org/10.6092%2F2282-1619%2F2017.5.1670 https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.srhc.2015.04.006 https://doi.org/10.1111%2F1475-682X.00003 https://doi.org/10.2307%2F3178673 https://doi.org/10.4172%2F2161-038X.1000140 https://www.psychopen.eu/ Matte Blanco, I. (1981). L’inconscio come insiemi infiniti: Saggio sulla bi-logica [The unconscious as infinite sets: An essay in bi-logic] (Vol. 1). Turin, Italy: Einaudi. McClelland, D. C. (1985). Human motivation. Glenview, IL, USA: Scott, Foresman and Company. Paquette, D. (2004). Theorizing the father-child relationship: Mechanisms and developmental outcomes. Human Development, 47, 193-219. https://doi.org/10.1159/000078723 Pfeffer, N. (1993). The stork and the syringe: A political history of reproductive medicine (Vol. 1). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Polity Press. Place, J. M., Litwack, I., & Vann, S. (2018). Is infertility as visible as it needs to be given its importance to women’s health? Results from a review of women’s health journals. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 16, 80-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2018.02.009 Redshaw, M., Hockley, C., & Davidson, L. L. (2007). A qualitative study of the experience of treatment for infertility among women who successfully became pregnant. Human Reproduction, 22, 295-304. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/del344 Scaravelli, G., Virgiliano, V., De Luca, R., Fiaccavento, S., & Speziale, L. (2016). Sintesi dell’attività dei centri di Procreazione Medicalmente Assistita-Anno 2014 [Summary of the activity of the Medically Assisted Reproduction Centers-Year 2014]. Report Registro Nazionale Italiano, Registro Nazionale della Procreazione Assistita, 1-190. Retrieved from www.salute.gov Schofield, A. (2014). “It takes a second to be a father but a lifetime to be a daddy.” Men's experiences of infertility and donor conception. In K. Fine (Ed.), Donor conception for life: Psychoanalytic reflections on new ways of conceiving the family (pp. 95–129). Oxford, United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis Group. Stevenson, E., & Hershberger, P. (2016). Fertility and Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART): Theory, research, policy, and practice for health care practitioners (Vol. 1). New York, NY, USA: Springer. Throsby, K., & Gill, R. (2004). “It’s different for men”: Masculinity and IVF. Men and Masculinities, 6, 330-348. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X03260958 Verhaak, C. M., Smeenk, J. M. J., Evers, A. W. M., Kremer, J. A. M., Kraaimaat, F. W., & Braat, D. D. (2007). Women’s emotional adjustment to IVF: A systematic review of 25 years of research. Human Reproduction Update, 13, 27-36. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dml040 Verhaak, C. M., Smeenk, J. M., Evers, A. W., Van Minnen, A., Kremer, J. A., & Kraaimaat, F. W. (2005). Predicting emotional response to unsuccessful fertility treatment: A prospective study. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 28, 181-190. Vitale, S. G., La Rosa, V. L., Rapisarda, A. M., & Laganà, A. S. (2017). Psychology of infertility and assisted reproductive treatment: The Italian situation. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 38, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2016.1244184 Yao, H., Chan, C. H. Y., & Chan, C. L. W. (2018). Childbearing importance: A qualitative study of women with infertility in China. Research in Nursing & Health, 41, 69-77. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21846 Analysis of Narratives from Women Undergoing Art 310 Europe's Journal of Psychology 2019, Vol. 15(2), 292–311 https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i2.1736 https://doi.org/10.1159%2F000078723 https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.srhc.2018.02.009 https://doi.org/10.1093%2Fhumrep%2Fdel344 https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1097184X03260958 https://doi.org/10.1093%2Fhumupd%2Fdml040 https://doi.org/10.1080%2F0167482X.2016.1244184 https://doi.org/10.1002%2Fnur.21846 https://www.psychopen.eu/ A bout the A uthor s Viviana Langher, Associate Professor of Clinical Psychology at the Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology of the University of Rome “La Sapienza”; PsyD in Health Psychology and professor of the School of Specialization in Health Psy- chology. Her research interests have mainly been focusing on clinical, social and organizational psychology. Fabiola Fedele, Clinical Psychology Graduate Major at the Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology of the Universi- ty of Rome “La Sapienza”; student of the School of Specialization in Health Psychology. Her current research interests lie in the field of clinical and health psychology. Andrea Caputo, PsyD in Health Psychology, PhD in Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, is currently an Adjunct Professor in Clinical Psychology at the Faculty of Pharmacy and Medicine at Sapienza University of Rome, Italy. His research interests have mainly been focusing on clinical and health psychology. Francesco Marchini, Clinical Psychology Graduate Major at the Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology of the University of Rome “La Sapienza.” His primary research interests focus on social and health psychology. Cesare Aragona, Associate Professor at the Department of Gynecologic-Obstetrical and Urologic Sciences of the Universi- ty of Rome “La Sapienza”; director of the Sterility and Assisted Reproduction Unit at Sapienza University Hospital Umberto I; professor of the School of Specialization in Obstetrics and Gynecology at University of Rome “La Sapienza.” Langher, Fedele, Caputo et al. 311 Europe's Journal of Psychology 2019, Vol. 15(2), 292–311 https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i2.1736 PsychOpen GOLD is a publishing service by Leibniz Institute for Psychology Information (ZPID), Trier, Germany. www.leibniz-psychology.org https://www.leibniz-psychology.org/ https://www.psychopen.eu/ Analysis of Narratives from Women Undergoing Art (Introduction) The Subjective Experience of Infertility The Experience of Undergoing Assisted Reproduction Technology Method Participants and Recruitment Instruments Textual Data Analysis Results Thematic Domains Latent Factors Discussion Conclusion (Additional Information) Competing Interests Funding Acknowledgments References About the Authors