id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
ejop-175	Murray, Jennifer; Thomson, Mary E.	Clinical judgement in violence risk assessment	2010	23	.pdf	application/pdf	9613	420	44	However, while the impact of group processes on decision making in violence risk assessment would appear to be extremely relevant within a clinical setting due to the increasing tendency for clinicians to conduct violence risk assessments in groups (Croskerry, 2005), research of this nature (that is, the exploration of social salience/subgroup categorization on group decision making) has largely not been empirically applied to the field of clinical decision making in violence risk assessment. In addition, the present article has highlighted the need for a greater focus on the ways in which risk assessment and management could be improved and informed through more targeted research investigating the actual process of violence risk assessment (e.g., Elbogen, 2002), and the need for research investigating the possible social effects of multi- disciplinary group decision making, and the impact of cognitive heuristics and biases on the accuracy and efficacy of violence risk assessments.	cache/ejop-175.pdf	txt/ejop-175.txt