








































© Equinox Publishing Ltd. 2008, Unit 6, The Village, 101 Amies Street, London SW11 2JW

[Expositions 2.2 (2008) 223–230] Expositions (print) ISSN 1747-5368  
doi:10.1558/expo.v2i2.223 Expositions (online) ISSN 1747-5376 

Writing Bible: Robert Alter’s David Story

ELSIE StErN

Reconstructionist Rabbinical College

For more than twenty years, robert Alter has been making a case for the 
validity and value of reading the Bible as literature. His countless insightful 
readings have demonstrated the ways in which attention to literary features 
can enhance our understanding of biblical texts and increase the delight we 
take in reading them. Now, more than two decades after the publication of 
the groundbreaking Art of Biblical Narrative (1983), the “literary approach” 
to the Bible has become an integral part of scholarly and lay encounters with 
the biblical texts.

In The David Story, Alter boldly extends his argument regarding the literary 
nature of the Bible. Up until the publication of this volume, Alter had made 
his case through the genre of literary criticism. In The David Story, he turns to 
the art of literary composition. He goes beyond arguing that the Bible can be 
read as literature to create a biblical text that is, first and foremost, literature. 
As its title suggests, it is not just a translation of a canonical sequence of texts. 
It is a coherent, character driven narrative—The David Story.

For a scholar like myself, who explores the forms in which Jews, especially 
in antiquity, have encountered and accessed biblical texts, this description 
of Alter’s project is not an accusation, but rather a compliment. In creating 
The David Story, Alter participates in a two millennia-long tradition of texts 
that reproduce the words of the Hebrew Bible or represent them with a high 
degree of fidelity, but are nonetheless different from the canonical versions of 
the Hebrew text. These are Bibles that are not the Hebrew Bible, and biblical 
texts that are not subsets of it. translations are the most obvious examples. 
The Septuagint, the Vulgate, the King James Version, and their many de-
scendants are all products of the creative and interpretive process of transla-
tion. None of these translations is identical to the text from which it is trans-
lated. However, all of them are certainly Bibles. The phenomenon can also 
occur without translation; within the Jewish tradition, there are many cases 
where the Hebrew words of the biblical text are reproduced verbatim, but the 
resulting text is still different from that of the canonical Hebrew Bible. The 
texts of the lectionary serve as prime examples. The division of the Pentateuch 
into weekly portions and the pairing of each pentateuchal portion with a 



224 Writing Bible

© Equinox Publishing Ltd. 2008

reading from the Prophets create texts that, though identical in their word-
ing to the canonical biblical texts, often communicate different meanings 
from the texts in their canonical contexts. One of the best examples of this 
is the designation of Gen. 12:1 as the beginning of a weekly torah portion. 
This lectionary decision severs the connection between God’s command to 
Abraham to travel to “the land that I will show you” (a.k.a. Canaan) in Gen 
12:1 from the journey of Abraham’s family from Ur to Canaan that began in 
11:31. By beginning the torah portion in 12:1 the creators of the lectionary 
cycle encourage readers to see Abraham’s trip as one that originates with the 
divine command rather than as a continuation of the familial journey. This 
view of Abraham conforms more closely to the rabbinic understanding of the 
character as the epitome of divine obedience than to the more complex and 
ambiguous characterization that arises from a reading of the biblical text in 
its canonical order. translations and lectionary portions are just two examples 
among many of the creation of new biblical texts. One could also cite the se-
lection and use of verbatim biblical texts as liturgical texts or magic amulets.

In The David Story, Alter uses time-honored processes to add a new and 
strikingly modern variation to this collection of new biblical texts. What, 
then, is The David Story? How is it different from the Hebrew texts of  
1 Samuel 1 to 1 Kings 2 in their canonical context? In his first words to the 
reader, Alter states:

The major sequence that runs, according to the conventional book and chap-
ter divisions of later editorial traditions, from I Samuel to I Kings is one of 
the most astounding pieces of narrative that has come down to us from the 
ancient world. The story of David is probably the greatest single narrative rep-
resentation in antiquity of a human life evolving by slow stages through time, 
shaped and altered by the pressures of political life, public institutions, family, 
and the impulses of body and spirit, the eventual sad decay of the flesh. It also 
provides the most unflinching insight into the cruel processes of history and 
into human behavior warped by the pursuit of power. And nowhere is the 
Bible’s astringent narrative economy, its ability to define characters and etch 
revelatory dialogue in a few telling strokes, more brilliantly deployed. 

(Alter 1999, ix)

In this opening salvo, Alter articulates defining characteristics of The David 
Story. It is literature; it is character-focused and driven, and it is “a story.” The 
rest of the introduction elaborates on these claims. to assert the literariness of 
the work, Alter identifies the “author” as “someone who manifestly delights in 
the writerly pleasures of his craft…. He has an ear for dialogue [and] a keen 
sense of the thematic sense of analogue between one episode and another” 



Stern 225

© Equinox Publishing Ltd. 2008

(Alter 1999, xxii). In his ability to “transcend the limitations of [his] own 
ideological points of departure,” he resembles “Shakespeare, Stendhal, Balzac, 
tolstoy [and] Proust” (Alter 1999, xxii). Alter affirms the narrative coherence 
of the text sequence that he translates by referring to it as “a narrative” (Alter 
1999, xvii), an “elaborately wrought literary vehicle” (Alter 1999, xviii), and, 
most frequently, “a story.” According to Alter, David’s character is the animat-
ing concern of this “story”: David “is, in sum, the first full-length portrait of a 
Machiavellian prince in Western literature” (Alter 1999, xviii).

Having read The David Story, I am largely in agreement with Alter’s descrip-
tion of this work. When reading this book, I was carried along in a dramatic 
and epic story of politics, intrigue, and conflict. I was seduced by the truly 
amazing character of David, whose larger-than-life complexities manage to 
astound, seduce, and horrify without ever overstepping the limits of epic 
believability. The story was indeed reminiscent of Shakespeare, tolstoy, and 
Stendhal.

Alter’s description of The David Story, however, does not as aptly describe 
the sequence of Hebrew texts that comprises 1 Samuel 1 to 1 Kings 2. In 
his characterization of The David Story, Alter intertwines claims of literary 
artistry with those of narrative coherence. However, these two characteristics 
are quite distinct. It is certainly possible for a work to be literary and yet 
lack narrative coherence. A collection of short stories or a post-modern novel 
can be structured around shifting perspectives rather than around narrative  
coherence.  Even the Qur’an would be another case in point. Similarly, there 
are certainly narratively coherent stories that are not marked by literary art-
istry. Within the field of biblical scholarship, Alter’s claim of narrative coher-
ence is far more controversial than his claim of literary artistry. While the 
narratives in the books of Samuel are recognized by even the most orthodox 
source critics as being among the best examples of the Bible’s literary art, 
there is no consensus regarding the coherence of the textual sequence. As Al-
ter acknowledges in his introduction, most biblical scholars (Alter included) 
understand this text sequence to be made up of pre-existent traditions. How-
ever, scholars differ over the nature of the final form of the text. Where Alter 
sees a thorough reworking of these pre-existing traditions into a coherent 
narrative, others see a “stringing together of virtually independent sources” 
(Alter 1999, x). Indeed, the canonical sequence provides ample evidence for 
both sides. There are numerous moments in the text where the disjunction 
between units is paramount, and numerous others in which the artful weav-
ing together of episodes dominates the text. In creating The David Story, Alter 
uses strategies of format, translation, and selection to underscore and aug-



226 Writing Bible

© Equinox Publishing Ltd. 2008

ment unifying features present in 1 Samuel 1 to 1 Kings 2. In so doing, he 
transforms the canonical sequence of texts into a work that can aptly be called 
The David Story. 

Before the reader even opens the book, its format alerts her to its essentially 
literary character. to my knowledge, The David Story is the first time that 
a translation of a unit of biblical text that is not identical to a traditional  
canonical division has been given a new, non-canonical title and has been 
packaged and marketed as literature. Unlike Alter’s The Five Books of  
Moses and The Book of Psalms, which are categorized by their publisher, W.W. 
Norton, as “religion,” The David Story is categorized as “religion/literature.” 
While the other two volumes conform materially to the conventions of scrip-
ture publishing—The Five Books of Moses is a large, boxed volume; The Book 
of Psalms has an iconic lyre on the cover—The David Story conforms to the 
printing conventions of contemporary fiction. Its trim size, cover design, and 
paper stock make it look and feel like a novel. While the physical appear-
ance of the book is certainly superficial, the material form of scriptural texts 
has always shaped audiences’ expectations. Just as the monumental size and 
rich adornment of Bibles designed for liturgical use shape expectations of 
authority and gravitas, the format of the David Story encourages the reader to 
expect a work of literary fiction and to read it accordingly. The front matter 
reinforces these expectations. While Alter’s other translations open with an 
“Introduction,” this volume opens with a section entitled “to the reader,” 
a rubric which playfully invokes eighteenth century novelistic conventions 
rather than those of the academy or scriptural tradition.

While the packaging and framing of The David Story signal its literari-
ness, the format, parameters, and translation strategies augment its narrative  
coherence. Many biblical translations use layout to help readers to navigate 
the biblical text. For example, the Oxford Annotated Bible prints the text of 
each biblical book continuously; chapter divisions are not marked by cor-
responding page breaks. At the same time, there are subtitles printed in the 
headers of each page that identify the topic of the unit of text printed on the 
page. These topic headings are supplemented by headings in the notes that 
identify discrete episodes or topics within the text. The continuous layout 
suggests that the chapter headings are not useful guides to text divisions, 
while the subtitles in the header and notes suggest that the text is, in terms 
of meaning, a composite made up of smaller discrete episodes or topics. In 
contrast, The David Story is formatted according to the conventions of con-
temporary fiction. By laying out the text according to the traditional chap-
ter breaks, which are often formal markers rather than indicators of content 



Stern 227

© Equinox Publishing Ltd. 2008

breaks within the text, and by refraining from identifying sub-sections within 
the text, Alter downplays the literary disjunctions within the text. While the 
notes identify the literary sign-posts that strongly mark the beginnings and 
ends of discrete episodes, the layout of the text downplays these divisions.

Alter’s signature translation strategies also lend a high degree of lexical  
coherence and a strong forward movement to the text itself. Alter’s decision 
to translate repeated Hebrew words by a single English equivalent wherever 
possible creates a sense of lexical unity and coherence that these repetitions 
do not necessarily effect in the Hebrew. readers of the Hebrew text of the 
Bible are accustomed to its relatively small vocabulary and do not necessar-
ily experience the repetition of words as signs of literary coherence. readers 
of English literature, however, are accustomed to greater lexical variety. For 
these readers, the reproduction of the Bible’s small vocabulary creates an unu-
sual sense of lexical coherence that encourages an impression of narrative and 
compositional coherence as well. Alter’s decision to translate the particle vav 
as “and” wherever possible is one of his most powerful strategies for augment-
ing the text’s sense of narrative coherence. As any reader of the Hebrew Bible 
knows, vav is ubiquitous in Hebrew narrative. However, most readers and 
translators ascribe to it a variety of lexical and semantic functions. Sometimes 
it functions as “and,” sometimes it functions as “but,” and sometimes it is 
best understood as functioning as punctuation that establishes a relationship  
between clauses or sentence elements. By translating most vav’s as “and,” Alter 
creates a strong narrative engine that pulls the reader along the sequence of 
“and’s” from one clause or action to the next. These editorial and translational 
strategies underscore the elements of coherence and downplay the elements 
of disjunction experienced by a reader of the Hebrew text.

Alter’s choice of parameters is one of the strongest strategies for creating 
a coherent David Story. As Alter notes in his preface, scholars have hypoth-
esized numerous sub-divisions of 1 Samuel 1 to 1 Kings 2. At the same time, 
this material is situated canonically in a russian-doll structure of narratives. 
The parameters of each of these concentric units of text define the themes and 
narrative center of gravity of the resulting unit. In their entirety, the books 
of Samuel and Kings narrate a fictional history of the monarchies of Israel 
and Judah. The entire canonical unit of the former prophets, which begins in 
Joshua and stretches through 2 Kings, narrates the fictional history of Israel 
from its entrance into the land of Canaan. The concatenation of this narrative 
sequence with the torah situates it in a history extending back to creation 
itself. Each of these canonical units—1 Samuel to 2 Kings; Joshua to 2 Kings; 
Genesis to 2 Kings—circumscribes a different “story” with a unique narrative 



228 Writing Bible

© Equinox Publishing Ltd. 2008

arc and its own set of themes, concerns, and intertextual echoes.
Alter begins The David Story in 1 Samuel 1, fifteen chapters before the  

appearance of David himself. Alter provides insight into the decision by not-
ing that “[t]he story of David…cannot be separated from the story of the 
man he displaces, Saul” (Alter 1999, xix). While one can argue that this is 
true, one could make the same claim regarding the relationship between the 
stories of David and Solomon. Solomon’s building of the temple marks the 
complete fulfillment of the dynastic oracle in 2 Samuel 7, and the secession 
of the Northern kingdom after Solomon’s death is the logical climax of the 
tenuous attachment of the Northern tribes to the Davidic dynasty narrated 
in the books of Samuel. Despite the strong narrative and thematic continui-
ties that run through 1 Samuel 15 to 1 Kings 11, Alter begins his story in 1 
Samuel 1 and ends it in 1 Kings 2 with Solomon’s first consolidation of power 
and authority. Why begin and end here? How do these decisions contribute 
to the construction of The David Story? What are their consequences? By  
including the story of Saul in The David Story, Alter re-codifies the  
canonical position that understands Saul’s reign as the necessary unsuccessful 
prequel to David’s. As Alter himself notes, this view is transparently parti-
san. It is more than likely that a resident of the non-Davidic kingdom of 
Israel that flourished for more than a century before being conquered by the  
Assyrians would have had a different view of the matter. For this northern-
er, the sequence of episodes that comprise Saul’s rise and fall might have 
been the story which ended with the Davidic usurpation of the throne from 
Saul’s heirs. Alter, however, reproduces the political position of the Davidic 
redactors and uses the Saul story to buttress the validity of David’s kingship,  
despite his weaknesses and failings. At the same time, the choice to begin 
with 1 Samuel 1 helps make the David story conform to the genre of epic 
stories about the rise and fall of powerful men. A mainstay of many of these 
stories is the agonistic and oedipal relationship between fathers and sons, 
predecessors and successors. The choice to begin with 1 Samuel 1 insures that 
The David Story will deliver the familiar readerly pleasures that such relation-
ships provide. While Saul’s story functions as a prequel, Solomon’s story is 
merely an afterword. By ending in 1 Kings 2 with Solomon’s consolidation 
of power, Alter creates a biblical Bildungsroman in which the central concern 
is the life of its protagonist rather than the larger national history of which 
David’s reign is a part.

As I said above, I found Alter’s project to be largely successful. Through 
the strategies discussed above, he creates a David Story that offers up many 
of the pleasures that its title suggest. At the same time, though, elements of 



Stern 229

© Equinox Publishing Ltd. 2008

the text complicate and resist Alter’s character-driven narrative shaping. As he 
notes, many of the individual episodes in the text are incredibly artful literary 
gems. Many of these stories (e.g., David and Goliath, David and Bathsheba) 
have had long lives as independent stories in folk, literary, and artistic tradi-
tions, and are often marked off as discrete stories in the narrative sequence 
itself. The density and coherence of these episodes encourage the reader to stop 
and savor them. Literary codas like that which concludes David’s anointing 
in 1 Samuel 16 (“And the spirit of the lord gripped David from that day on-
ward. And Samuel rose and went to ramah”) are the opposite of cliffhangers. 
They signal closure to the reader rather than urging her onward. The “dou-
blets” in the story (e.g., the different versions of David’s introduction into the 
court, the two stories of the defeat of Goliath) also challenge the impression of  
coherence and narrative teleology. Alter encourages the reader to approach 
these episodes as complementary to one another; the different stories of Dav-
id’s introduction provide double validation for his accession to the throne. 
However, they can also be read contrastively: one can ask how these doublets 
critique, revise, or problematize one another. Such a reading might enhance 
the portrait of David, but would disrupt the narrative coherence of the text. 
Finally and paradoxically, Alter’s insightful and conscientious commentary  
introduces a dynamic of atomization into the experience of reading the text. 
The detailed notes that alert the reader to differences in ancient versions,  
intertextual allusions, insights from other scholars, and Alter’s own observations 
about the text lead the reader into the sort of atomizing encounter with the text 
that is the hallmark of midrashic and scholarly reading and lead her away from 
the coherent novelistic encounter that Alter seems to want to foster.

This co-existence of unifying and disjunctive literary features is one of the 
signature features of the Hebrew Bible in its canonical form. The debate that 
Alter invokes over the literary coherence of the books of Samuel plays itself 
out in nearly every book of the canon. In this volume, Alter underscores 
and augments the elements of coherence and creates a text that he can aptly  
describe as a “full-length portrait of a Machiavellian prince” (Alter 1999, 
xviii). This project made me wonder what would happen if a translator/editor 
as talented as Alter set his mind to carving out a different work of literature, 
one that foregrounded and augmented the disjunctive, perspectival, and epi-
sodic elements, from this same unit of text. Such a cubist portrait would be 
equally literary but dramatically different from the full-length portrait that 
Alter has created.



230 Writing Bible

© Equinox Publishing Ltd. 2008

References

Alter, robert
1983 The Art of Biblical Narrative. New York: Basic Books.
1999 The David Story: A Translation with Commentary of 1 and 2 Samuel. New 

York: W.W. Norton.


