



























 

Feldenkrais Research Journal​ • ​volume 6​ (2018-2019) 
 
Hypothesis and Theory 
 
 

Understanding understanding! 

 
Katja Münker 
Artistic Director Dance & Somatic Research, Director of Environmental Somatics Training Program, 
Co-Director of EMERGE Training Program – Somatics in Dance, Choreography & Performance and of 
Somatic Training 1000 at Somatic Academy Berlin 

Correspondence: ​muenker@somatische-akademie.de 
 

 

Abstract 
The word ​understanding​ indicates a bodily connection to being upright. The prefix here ​under​ does not 
have the common meaning of ​beneath​ but derives from the old English meaning ​between​ or ​among​. The 
old English word ​understandan​ could be transcribed as ​standing in the midst of​ and shows enactive 
relationality: how we are and how we bring ourselves in relation to our environment creates our 
understanding and forms our experiences and conceptions of the world. It is an active, 
sensory-motor-process borrowed in the act of understanding that carries action-potentialities. From the 
encounters of many individual action-potentialities rises a cultural and political potentiality in which we 
form our social reality. This potentiality makes it necessary for us to be able to practice conscious, 

 
Published by the International ​Feldenkrais​®​ Federation (IFF) ​https://feldenkrais-method.org 
Available online at ​https://feldenkraisresearchjournal.org 
 

 
 

mailto:muenker@somatische-akademie.de
https://feldenkrais-method.org/
https://feldenkraisresearchjournal.org/


 

responsible decision-making. The range and the freedom of choices demand to take responsibility for 
actions and their consequences, which means that where we have the choice we have to make a choice.  

   
 
In social spaces we are making our choices always in collective structures which involve us and others. 
Within these collective structures our choices show impact in many directions. To build conductive 
conditions for individual and collective unfolding, the social space requires a compassionate, appreciative 
way of understanding which leads beyond the cognitive aspect of understanding. Compassion creates a 
wider space which not only depends on cognitive understanding. The awareness for the always already 
shared space allows to develop self-care into community-care. 

Keywords 
Embodied understanding, Kinaesthetic orientation, Sensory-based 
question-action-observation-processes, Political potentiality 

Copyright ©:​ The copyright for this paper remains with the author(s). 

Please cite:​ (First published in the) ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​; 2018-2019. 

Service marks:​ The terms Feldenkrais​®​, Feldenkrais Method​®​, Awareness Through Movement​®​, ATM​®​, 
Functional Integration​®​, and FI​® ​are service marked terms of the International ​Feldenkrais​®​ Federation 
(IFF) and Feldenkrais professional guilds and associations in many countries. In keeping with academic 
conventions, they will not be service marked in the entire text as may be required in nonacademic use, 
but only for the first and most prominent use of the terms. In recognition that these phrases are formal 
terms referring to specific practices within the Method, and to the Method as a whole, capitalization of all 
the words in each term has been retained.  

 
Münker • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 2
 



 

Hypothesis and Theory 
 
 

Understanding understanding! 

 
Katja Münker 
Artistic Director Dance & Somatic Research, Director of Environmental Somatics Training Program, 
Co-Director of EMERGE Training Program – Somatics in Dance, Choreography & Performance and of 
Somatic Training 1000 at Somatic Academy Berlin 

 
The framing 

This article is a compositional and experience-informed exploration within language which 
allows an exploration of a new understanding of understanding while relating the ideas and 
practices of the Feldenkrais Method​®​ (Feldenkrais 2010) with improvisation theory (Dell 2002), 
philosophy (Ahrendt 1968), artistic philosophy (Cage 1961) and biological philosophy (Maturana 
and Varela 1987; and Varela 1990). The text is based on a transcription of a 
lecture-performance  and the article ‘Verstehen verstehen’ (Münker 2016) which both 1

investigated embodied and inter-bodily understanding from the perspective of the Feldenkrais 
Method and improvisation.  

This lecture-performance unfolded a field for experiential, cognitive and poetic understanding of 
understanding. Blending the spoken essay on understanding with movement, 
improvisation/instant composition-strategies and quotes of Hannah Ahrendt, John Cage, 
Christopher Dell, Moshe Feldenkrais, Humberto Maturana and Francisco Varela suggested 
possibilities how somatic practices can support multi-layered and actively applied ways of 
understanding. 

With a participatory approach the lecture-performance encouraged the audience to: 

● Feel ​free to move​ and to change perspective in any moment according to own ​needs 
and ​interests​.  

● Move​ particularly when one does ​not understand​.  
● Play​ with a specific-movement-practice called ​multi-circular circles​: Imagining the over 

200 bones hanging in, swimming in and expanding the elastic material, and trying to 
circle these over 200 bones simultaneously in multi directions. 

● Interact​ with provided papers and rearrange the pattern according to their own 
understanding and sense-making: Highlighted terms and quotes printed on papers were 
put out on the ground in the order of their appearance creating a huge spatial pattern. 

1 Lecture-performance ​Understanding understanding​, September 2017 at Symposium ​BODILY UNDOING 
– Somatic Activism and Performance Cultures as Practices of Critique​ at Bath Spa University 

 
Münker • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 3
 



 

The audience was invited to constantly interact with these papers. 
 

   

The lecture-performance 

It started with an excerpt from the Lecture on nothing by John Cage (1961: 123): 
 

[…] 

More and more I have the feeling         that we are getting  

nowhere. Slowly ,         as the talk goes on 

, we are getting nowhere         and that is a pleasure 

.      It is not irritating          to be where one is         .      It is  

only irritating          to think one would like to be somewhere else.        […] 

 More and more we have the feeling 

that I am getting nowhere        .  

Slowly ,        as the talk goes on 

 

, slowly ,        we have the feeling 

 

we are getting nowhere.        That is a pleasure  

 which will continue .        If we are irritated 

,        it is not a pleasure .        Nothing is not          a 

 
Münker • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 4
 



 

pleasure if one is irritated,        but suddenly  

,           it is a pleasure ,        and then, more and more  

it is not irritating       (and then more and more  

  and slowly ).       Originally 

, we were nowhere ;      and now, again  

we are having       the pleasure 

of being slowly nowhere.     […] 

 
The contact with the ground and/or with something constitutes our felt relationship within the 
environment​ and takes place within ​space​ and ​gravity​. This is the space in which we exist, 
function, learn and generate an ​image​ of ourselves and of the world. And it is the space in 
which we consider something possible or impossible. In this sense it is simultaneously as much 
a ​physical​ as an ​imaginary space​, in which ​internal​ and ​external separate​, and ​unite​. 

From the perspective of the ​Feldenkrais Method​ and of contemporary approaches of 
philosophy, biology and neuro- and cognitive science​ the ​body​ cannot be understood 
separately from the whole ​person​ within his or her ​environment​. Moshe Feldenkrais assumed 
an ​inseparability​ and mutual ​interdependency​ of ​body, self, self-image, environment and 
awareness​ as an entire system. The human ability to develop consciousness, to differentiate 
sensitivity and to organize conscious actions through sensory feedback is understood as the 
basis for learning, understanding and knowledge. 
 

 
Münker • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 5
 



 

 

 
Moshe Feldenkrais named ​space, time, gravity, culture​ and ​society​ as relevant within the 
environment​, though he recognized ​gravity​ as a ​universal condition​ on earth of particular 
importance. In the body he named ​the skeleton, the muscles and the nervous system​ as 
particularly relevant for learning and self-organization. Exposed to gravity our ​nervous system 
differentiates between our ​own body​ and the ​environment​.  

[…] a living nervous system introduces order into the random, constantly 
changing stimuli arriving through the senses and impinging on the system. 
Moreover, the living organism itself is moving incessantly, and the nervous 
system has to bring order to the mobile, changing world as well as to its own 
mobility, to make some sense from that whirling turmoil. […] the most efficient 
means for achieving this […] is movement. Movement of the living organism is 
essential for the formation of stationary events in the changing, moving 
environment and the constantly moving organism itself. ​(Feldenkrais 2010: 60) 

While we go through life we ​linger​ here or we ​accelerate​ there. Thereby we ​deepen​ one thing 
and we ​omit​ something else. In consequence this creates a ​conditionality​: 

The freedom to learn is a great liability. […] The ability to learn is synonymous 
with free choice and free will. But once learned the choice is made […] and the 
tabula rasa is no more. Herein lie the liabilities as well as the restriction. 
(Feldenkrais 2010: 49) 

 
Münker • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 6
 



 

In this process our basic capacity to ​understand​ unfolds, our ​self-conception​ and our 
conception of the world​ and by that our full ​intelligence​. 

The basic idea is that our cognitive capacities are intrinsically tied to our life 
story; like a path which doesn’t exist as such but only originates through the 
process of walking. ​(Varela 1990: 110) 

Within the ​process​ of continuously ​practicing​, ​testing​ and ​sensing​ in the search for ​deeper 
understanding​ and for the development of ​skillfulness​ we need ​orientation​ to ​navigate 
within that process. ​Simultaneously​ orientation as a differentiation is a ​result​ from the same 
process​. This is why orientation is a crucial support and challenge in the development of 
self-care​ and ​self-responsibility​. 

[…] to become conscious of our body’s spatial orientation is to come to know 
ourselves in depth and in clarity. In this way, we take charge again of our personal 
evolution […] ​(Feldenkrais 2010: 25) 
 

   

 
Our ​movements​ create impulses which stimulate ​sensory​ areas of our nervous system. Within 
this whirl of multi-sensory stimuli, co-created by self-movement, ​preferences​ and ​patterns​ can 
emerge. Changes in the ​spatial position​ and in ​the push​ and ​pull​ of ​gravity​, which we sense 
in the ​kinaesthetic integration​ of ​proprioception​, ​equilibrium​ and ​touch​, are complemented 
through what we hear, see, smell and taste to build our synaesthetic wholeness-experience of 
the moment. These physical aspects inform us about where and how we are oriented in space. 
The ​physical orientation​ then is the basis for an ​orientation​ as a whole ​person​ including the 
cognitive​, ​emotional​ and ​cultural​ aspects of our being: 

The term ‘orientation‘ is used here in its widest sense, including the distinction 
between ‘I‘ and ‘not I‘ in the social field, with all its ramifications. ​(Feldenkrais 2010: 
33)  

 
Münker • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 7
 



 

As ​orientation​ is ​means​ for and ​consequence​ of our ​self-organization​ we can ask what kind 
of ​acting​ needs to underlie this ​interconnectedness​ to allow ​development​? In the 
Feldenkrais Method​ it is an ​active, sensory questioning​ of what we do which is used as 
methodology for action organization. Leading questions in this are: ​What​ do I do? What do I 
sense? ​How​ do I do and how do I sense? And ​what…if​…? How…if…? These questions 
conduct towards more detailed ​differentiation​ and allow us to recognize connections and 
relations​. 
 

      

 
Assuming that our actions are motivated by ​conscious​ and ​unconscious intentions​ we could 
use this sensory questioning to recognize hidden and maybe even contradictory intentions. With 
this ​awareness​ we can use the ​observations​ of what we ​actually do and sense​ to ​filter​ out 
the ways of action which enable us to experience greater ​adequateness​, conduciveness, and 
pleasure to satisfy our intentions. We can distinguish if we are acting inappropriately without 
matching our intentions or even if we would have to change our intentions because even these 
intentions appear to be inappropriate. With the practice of such ​sensory-based 
question-action-observation-processes​ we train our brains and bodies to ​act​ in ​complex 
space-relation-configurations. As part of complex organization Feldenkrais (2010: 17) described 
reversibility​: With the ability to reverse a movement we develop the ​freedom​ of ​choice 
between ​doing​ or ​not doing​ which opens a new range of possibilities. 

Our ​body​ houses our ​senses​ which inform the system simultaneously about itself and about 
the world. The way in which we ​use​ our body and our senses creates our ​reality​, ‘our’ ​world 
and how we make sense from all of that. Our ​understanding​ of the world and of ourselves is 
thereby based in our ​self-usage​. This interrelatedness yield not just our complete ​epistemic 
ability​ but also our ​(organizational) blindness​: 

 
Münker • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 8
 



 

Since we are learner and judge at the same time, our judgement depends on, and 
is limited to, our learning achievements. Obviously, to improve, we individuals 
have to better our judgement. But judgement is the result of learning already 
completed. To break this vicious circle, we must use the basic quality of the […] 
part of our brain, which is able to sense and to abstract and often even to express 
in words what is happening in our bodies. ​(Feldenkrais 2010: 71-72) 

To take ​responsibility​ for this blindness, Feldenkrais suggests to constantly create a ​sensory 
actualization​ (cited in Pippin 2013: 104) within our being. This actuality then forms a 
continuous source of variations which again and again have to be related to already made 
experiences. Thereby we constantly develop our personal ​criteria​ and systems of ​order and 
orientation​. Simultaneously we can use this process of actualization in our sensing, acting and 
evaluating​ to verify these systems concerning their functionality. We are actualizing in this not 
just our physical body-movement strategies but our whole ​value systems​ on a general level for 
all our encounters within society when we are challenged to ​synchronize​ and ​adapt​ with 
others. 

Body​ in this context is ​not relevant​ as a purely physical body but it is ​relevant​ how we ​use 
ourselves as bodily, intelligent and self-aware beings as a whole. And our ​movements​ become 
relevant​ for how we ​relate with​ ourselves and how we open ourselves for a complex 
understanding of ourselves, of the world and of others. 

If movement forms the basis for ​successful​ behavior the question is if all movement is 
appropriate, or which ​criteria​ might be more or less ​conducive​. 

Movements can ​stabilize​ or ​destabilize​ a situation. These two options find their resonance in 
the two basic human motivations of ​structure preservation​ and ​curiosity​. Both impulses are 
equally important necessities for life and development which means that we need to develop 
acting and evaluation strategies which allows us to relate to both qualities.  

In the ​oscillation​ between the fundamental impulses ​of preservation and curiosity or change 
we sometimes ​exaggerate​ one or other option so that an ​inhibiting stagnation or fluctuation 
might be the consequence which would, in a long-term perspective, ​undermine development​. 

A conducive field​ needs enough ​trust, stimulation, comparison​, but also ​leisure, stability 
and ​openness​: a variety of ​rhythms​, ​directions​, ​intensities​, ​surprises​ and ​unforeseen​ to 
develop the ability to act in complexity. 

Understanding therefore needs ​tolerance​ for ​change​, for ​decay​ as well as for ​stillness​ or 
sameness​. It needs tolerance for ​not-knowing​ or for the ​unknown​ and for ​failure​, as we never 
can get full ​certainty​ as to which way of acting might be finally conducive. It remains as a 
practicing and testing process even if we achieved some understanding and skillfulness. 

 
Münker • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 9
 



 

Finally, within this field for understanding, movement can just become meaningful with and 
through ​awareness​ and ​perception​ of our own action. 

 

 

 
Understanding obviously emerges in in-between-spaces; in creative leeway. To support 
understanding we need to create a space for creative leeway. In this sense understanding is a 
creative act​: Learning how to create and to handle this field is part of the process of 
sense-making. While the ​Feldenkrais Method​ provides strategies to use the human ​potential 
on a ​movement-awareness​-related level, ​improvisation​ and instant ​composition​ can provide 
strategies for ​navigation​ in ​space, time and relationship​ in broader ways. Possibilities offered 
by improvisation strategies are for example:  

- Playful change in the relations in space and with others, 
- creative ​conversion​,  
- process-oriented​ acting in opposition to solution-oriented action,  
- variation​ of ​rhythms, durations, positioning, perspectives​ and ​pathways​,  
- augmentation, miniaturization, compression, expansion​… 
- inclusion of ​chance​ as conductive parameter,  
- acceptance of ​irritation​,  
- perception of ​space​ and ​interspaces​,  
- consciously ​listening​,  
- active and flexible shifting of the own ​focus​, 
- creation of ​unconventional combinations​, 

 
Münker • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 10 
 



 

- perception of ​center​ and ​periphery 
- and ​staying connected​ even in irritation, not-knowing or not-understanding 

Improvisation exists within a non-linear causality-network. Within its apparent 
disorder it subtly undermines prevalent behavioural pattern and creates complex, 
open systems.​ (Dell 2002: 17-18) 

These open systems can become malleable when the ​questioning-analyzing-perception- 
process​ from Feldenkrais practice finds into ​cooperation​ with above described ​improvisation 
strategies​. Acting based on that emerges from sensory connectedness without being lost. And 
understanding based on this acting becomes a ​creative process​. 

We can say of improvisation that it incessantly operates within the mode of 
decision-making, in the mode of permanent crisis. … Judging is the coordination 
point within our permanent process of decision-making. It allows us to identify the 
tendency of a situation and to use it, as much out of ourselves as from being part 
of the group. That means that in the process of improvisational judging the 
subject is not alienated to position itself independently outside of process or the 
community, but decides inside the intersubjective space. ​(Dell 2002: 175-176) 

From what I have said until now suggests that a sense-making ​field​ for ​understanding​ is 
necessarily also a ​communicative field​ – ​intrapersonal​ within one person and ​interpersonal 
between two or more people. Communication is a necessary ​corrective​ within the field of 
possibilities – not just in improvisation but generally in life: 

The communicative aspect prevents the playing participants to lapse into just 
external and superficial aspects of reality or in pure inner self-reflection. The 
undetermined openness of the system ‘improvisation’ creates and demands an 
alertness, a presence concerning past, now and future. […] non-verbal 
communication-systems open new coordinates for the orientation in space.​ (Dell 
2002: 21-22) 

In ​communicative systems​, ​subjectivity​ is a ​resource​ as long as it stays ​inter-subjectively 
related. Experience and understanding of ​individuals​ then become a ​source​ for enrichment of 
the ​social​ interactions and is necessary information for the ​collective​. 

Change​ is a reality in individual and collective understanding. The state of improvisation 
integrates this reality and uses ​fluidity​ and ​flux​ instead of ​absoluteness​. Relating to fluidity 
and flux enables collectives to identify ​temporary agreements​ in ​common understanding​, 
and to reconfirm or actualize this when necessary. This state of improvisation finds resonance in 
the state of mind as well as in the body-state and can be described as ​constructive 
fluctuation​. It is the same state as the ​unconscious reflex activity​ in our standing 

 
Münker • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 11 
 



 

deconstructing and reorganizing our balance, which keeps our ability alive to position ourselves 
newly in any moment. 

 

  

 
The aware practice and coordination of 

- sensory actualization​,  
- the ​active creation​ of ​field for understanding​,  
- fluidity​ in patterning,  
- the ability to ​reverse or pause​ in any moment, 
- and the development of ​tolerance​, 

is my ​interpretation​ of ​bodily undoing​ which opens a complexity of ​action-perception- 
potentialities​. 

When many individuals get together with many individual ​action-perception-potentialities, a 
cultural​ and even ​political potentiality​ emerges that holds a strong social relevance from 
which we ​negotiate​ and ​form​ our ​social reality​. This potentiality challenges us, as Hannah 
Ahrendt emphasizes, to take conscious responsibility for decisions, which ‘way of action’ to 
choose in the world and how the world should look like: 

Culture and politics, then, belong together because it is not knowledge or truth 
which is at stake, but rather judgment and decision, the judicious exchange of 
opinion about the sphere of public life and the common world, and the decision 
what manner of action is to be taken in it, as well as to how it is to look 
henceforth, what kind of things are to appear in it.​ (Ahrendt 1968: 223) 

Within the open space of ​freedom of choices​ we are meeting our ​responsibility​ for the 
consequences​ of our actions. Where we have the choice we really have to make a choice. 

 
Münker • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 12 
 



 

In ​social spaces​ where we are inseparably connected, we always make our choices within a 
bigger structure which includes ourselves and others. In these collective structures our choices 
always show ​effects​ into ​multi-directions​ which go ​beyond​ our understanding. In collectives 
therefore we need to also develop ​sympathy​ to create supportive conditions to unfold for both, 
the individual and the community. (The German word ​Verständnis/sympathy​ has the same root 
as the word ​verstehen/understanding​, but ​Verständnis​ includes the aspect of empathy.) 
Sympathy creates a wider ​co-sensing and co-feeling​ space that is not necessarily depending 
on understanding or that is even ​transcending understanding​. 

Biology shows us that we can expand our cognitive sphere. This happens … 
through the encounter with a stranger on an equal level, or, even more 
immediately, through the experience of interpersonal congruence, which allows 
us to ‘see’ the other and to open a space for being next to us for him or her. This 
we call ‘love’, or, if we prefer a less strong expression, the acceptance of the other 
next to us within our daily life. ​(Maturana and Varela 1987: 265-266)  

The ​awareness​ for the already ​shared space​ allows the possibility to expand the ​self-care 
towards ​community-care​: 

A society of men and women with greater awareness of themselves will, I believe, 
be one that will work for the human dignity of its members rather than primarily 
for the abstract, collective notion of human society. ​(Feldenkrais 2010: 68) 

 

 

 

  

 
Münker • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 13 
 



 

References 

Ahrendt, H. (1968) ‘The Crisis in Culture: Its Social and Its Political Significance’. in ​Between 
Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought​. New York: Viking Compass Edition 

Cage, J. (1961) ​Silence​. Middletown, Connecticut: Wesleyan University Press  

Dell, C. (2002) ​Prinzip Improvisation​. Köln: Verlag der Buchhandlung Walther König 

Feldenkrais, M. (2010) ​Embodied wisdom: The collected papers of Moshe Feldenkrais​. ed. by 
Beringer, E. Berkeley: North Atlantic Books 

Maturana, H. and Varela, F. (1987) ​Der Baum der Erkenntnis (The Tree of Knowledge)​. 
Bern/München: Scherz Verlag 

Münker, K. (2016) ‘Verstehen verstehen‘. in Eberlein, U. (ed.) (2016) ​Zwischenleiblichkeit und 
bewegtes Verstehen (Intercorporeity, Movement and Tacit Knowledge)​. Bielefeld: 
Transcript Verlag 

Pippin, R. B. (2013) ‘What is conceptual activity?’ in ​Mind, Reason, and Being-in-the-World / 
The McDowell-Dreyfus-Debate​. ed. by Schear, J. K. London/New York: Routledge 

Varela, F. (1990) ​Kognitionswissenschaft, Kognitionstechnik: Eine Skizze aktueller Perspektiven 
[Cognitive Science, Cognitive Engineering: A sketch of current perspectives]​. Frankfurt/M.: 
Suhrkamp Verlag AG 

 

Biography 

Katja Münker ​(Berlin/D) 

Dancer/Choreographer/Researcher/Feldenkrais Practitioner  

Trained as physiotherapist, studies and practice of contemporary dance, (contact-) 
improvisation and instant composition. Long-term experience in several somatic practices, 
professionally trained in Feldenkrais Method and Somatic Yoga. Artistic works and research 
with the focus on the connection between somatic and choreographic practices as well as on 
walking and environmental relatedness. Regular national (​inter alia​ Free University Berlin, 
University of Arts Berlin, Inter-University Centre for Dance Berlin, HafenCity University 
Hamburg) and international teaching, lecturing and contributions for congresses, publications, 
co-direction of ​Take Us for a Walk​-Symposium (2014) and ​BODY IQ Festival​ (2015-2017). 

 
Münker • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 14 
 



 

Collaborations ​inter alia​ with ​AREAL_artistic research lab​ Berlin and artistic director for dance 
and somatic research and co-director of somatic training programs at Somatic Academy Berlin. 

www.movement-muenker.de​ // ​www.kunst-im-gehen.de 

 

Indoor photos during lecture-performance ​Understanding understanding​ at Symposium ​BODILY 
UNDOING – Somatic Activism and Performance Cultures as Practices of Critique​ at Bath Spa University, 
September 2017. Credits: Thomas Kampe 

Outdoor photos during environmental somatics workshop led by K. Münker in Berlin, April 2019. Credits: 
Katja Münker 

 

Editor’s note: In order to preserve some of the author’s preferred formatting, we note that some of the text 
is not presented in standard Harvard format. 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Münker • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 15 
 

http://www.movement-muenker.de/
http://www.kunst-im-gehen.de/

