



























 

Feldenkrais Research Journal​ • ​volume 6​ (2018-2019) 
 
Editorial 
 
 

Practices of Freedom – The Feldenkrais Method & Creativity: 
Editorial 

 
Guest Editor: Thomas Kampe 
PhD, Bath Spa University (UK) 

 

Copyright ©:​ The copyright for this paper remains with the author(s). 

Please cite:​ (First published in the) ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​; 2018-2019. 

Service marks:​ The terms Feldenkrais​®​, Feldenkrais Method​®​, Awareness Through Movement​®​, ATM​®​, 
Functional Integration​®​, and FI​® ​are service marked terms of the International ​Feldenkrais​®​ Federation 
(IFF) and Feldenkrais professional guilds and associations in many countries. In keeping with academic 
conventions, they will not be service marked in the entire text as may be required in nonacademic use, 
but only for the first and most prominent use of the terms. In recognition that these phrases are formal 
terms referring to specific practices within the Method, and to the Method as a whole, capitalization of all 
the words in each term has been retained.  

 
Published by the International ​Feldenkrais​®​ Federation (IFF) ​https://feldenkrais-method.org 
Available online at ​https://feldenkraisresearchjournal.org 
 

 
 

https://feldenkrais-method.org/
https://feldenkraisresearchjournal.org/


 

Editorial 
 
 

Practices of Freedom – The Feldenkrais Method & Creativity: 
Editorial 

 
Guest Editor: Thomas Kampe 
PhD, Bath Spa University (UK) 

 
Can you see that my lessons are [...] improvised, yet they are improvised with a method. 
[...] It's all the time improvisation but it has a method in it, therefore it's jazz. […] It's 
playing music on certain notes, making variations on a theme, and therefore it's a real 
learning. It's a lived thing. (Feldenkrais (1975: 155) 

Our daily life appears to us so simple and direct that we often fail to see its richness and 
appreciate its beauty. Nonetheless, it is a refined choreography of behavioural 
coordination. (Maturana, and Varela 1992: 233) 

The desire to develop this journal volume on Feldenkrais and creativity in collaboration with the 
IFF emerged from the symposium ‘​(re)storing performance - The Feldenkrais Method and 
Creative Practice​’, staged at Bath Spa University (UK) in 2015. The symposium brought 
together an international team of thirty artists, scholars and Feldenkrais practitioners to inquire, 
through practice and theoretical debate, the potential of the Feldenkrais Method​®​ to facilitate 
creative practice within the performing arts, and of framing the Feldenkrais Method as creative 
practice per se. The symposium launched the ​Special Issue on Moshe Feldenkrais​ of the 
journal ​Theatre, Dance and Performance Training (TDPT)​, edited by Libby Worth and Dick 
McCaw, and aimed to articulate new processes, connections, limitations and emerging 
problems.  How do we develop new, extended, practices through the meeting of Feldenkrais’ 1

educational modalities and artistic discourses? What hybrid practices emerge through a collage 
or layering of these diverse practices? How do such meetings of processes clarify, expand, 
support or limit one another? 

Moshe Feldenkrais repeatedly used artistic metaphors to describe his practices in non-dualist 
ways, such as ‘compositions’, ‘improvisation’, or the act of ‘dancing together’ (Goldfarb 1990) 
and activates reflective and transformative learning through embodied modalities, strategies and 
devices which can be called ‘choreographic’ (Kampe 2013, 2015, 2016). In similar ways 
Humberto Maturana and Francesco Varela described the human organic interaction with the 
world as ‘a structural dance in the choreography of coexistence’ (1992: 248). Current Enactivist 
transdisciplinary discourses on contemporary choreography, likewise, reframe the role of the 

1 See also: ​https://tandfonline.com/toc/rtdp20/6/2 

 
Editorial • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 2
 

https://tandfonline.com/toc/rtdp20/6/2


 

choreographer as ‘engineering the determining conditions of personhood’ (Noë 2009), thus into 
close proximity of the organic educational concerns embedded in the Feldenkrais Method.  2

The title of this journal volume leans on philosopher Michel Foucault’s writings on ‘pratiques de 
liberte’ - practices of freedom (1997). Foucault proposes the possibility of a ‘conscious practice 
of freedom’ (1997: 284), as a ‘care of the self’ towards the freeing and producing of one's own 
subjectivity, by inventing alternative practices which embrace ‘complex relationships with others’ 
and ‘a way of caring for others’ (1997: 287). The title implies that the Feldenkrais Method and 
contemporary creative arts processes and research cultures share such ethical concern in the 
meeting of these diverse practices. 

Arts Research: Process and Articulation 

The contributions within this journal volume can be located in within the growing field of Arts 
Research (AR) which allows for multi-modal ways of questioning, thinking and doing. Within the 
Anglo-Saxon sphere AR has evolved towards a discourse on practice-led research, including 
Performance as Research (PaR) and processual Somatic Arts Research cultures. It therefore 
values embodied knowledge, recognises subjective, non-linear, and relational dimensions of 
artistic processes, and acknowledges emergent, uncertain, and collaborative modalities which 
challenge the myth of the solitary researcher (Barrett, and Bolt 2007; Foster 2009; Haseman 
2007; Midgelow 2014). AR operates itself in a dialogic between artistic and educational 
concerns. I would suggest that both, the Feldenkrais Method and the research publications in 
this volume, are of transdisciplinary inflection by asking questions between and beyond 
disciplines, embrace systemic and complexity-informed understandings of knowledge 
construction and world-making, allow for the subjective voice of the researcher, and are 
concerned with real-life problems (Montuori 2007; Borgdorff 2007). Writing on dance research, 
Midgelow suggests that a reframing of dance as critical practice where the ‘mode of 
embodiment is multi-coded and deconstructive’ is at the centre of ‘dance practice as research’ 
(2014). The author argues here that such critical, deconstructive and complex modes of 
embodiment and considerations are at the heart of The Feldenkrais Method, and run through all 
publications and reflections on practice within this volume. 

In the recent publication ​Researching (in/as) Motion: A Resource Collection/ Artistic Doctorates 
in Europe​ (​https://nivel.teak.fi/adie/​) Midgelow reflects on the inductive and often messy, or even 
incoherent and unpredictable nature of artistic research: ‘AR intertwines movement and art 
practices with/as reflexive methods to generate, reveal, articulate the tacit knowledges that are 

2 I am using the term ‘transdisciplinary’ here with reference to Borgdorff (2007) as going beyond 
disciplinary inquiry and application, while concerned with ‘questions and topics from broader areas of life’ 
(Borgdorff 2007: 76). Montuori (2007) further suggests that trans-disciplinary practice and thinking must 
be concerned with systemic approaches towards the construction of knowledge and, in self-reflexive 
ways, ‘place the knower at the centre of enquiry’ (2007: 8). The transdisciplinary discourse towards 
‘Social Choreography’ (Hewitt 2005; Klein, and Noeth 2011; Klien 2009) aims ‘to open the disciplines of 
choreography and dance to other fields of human knowledge production’ (Klien 2009: 5). 

 
Editorial • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 3
 

https://nivel.teak.fi/adie/


 

situated and embodied in specific artworks and artistic processes’ (Midgelow 2019). In her 
writings on ​Somatic Practice as Research​, Bacon proposes that AR research values the status 
of processes over things, at times ‘as fleshy, lived, embodied experiences’ (2019). She further 
suggests that AR asks the researcher ‘to continuously work with processes and practices that 
are both of ourselves and not of ourselves’ (2019).  

Processual research is the study of processes rather than discrete events. It is 
methodological and ontological. As a methodological approach, it is concerned with 
process and processual, attention and attending. As an ontological one, it is an enquiry 
into more deeply researching the nature of being’. (Bacon 2019) 

Bacon and Midgelow (2014) highlight the importance of the practitioner-researcher to ‘becoming 
articulate’ in practice, critical reflection, documentation and dissemination of embodied, tacit, 
affective and complex knowledge and processes. Facilitating a learning of such articulation, has 
been an ongoing concern in my own research activities which have included the testing and 
probing of somatic-oriented artistic and educational processes, a developing of a critical writing 
practice, and the co-organising of research events and gatherings (see also Kampe 2019). This 
journal volume sets out to offer further opportunities towards the critical articulation of 
Feldenkrais-informed processes of creative practice, within an exciting and timely somatic arts 
research culture. 

Entangled Narratives 

The following section of this editorial aims to reframe the work of Moshe Feldenkrais within a 
cultural context of twentieth century and contemporary arts practices. It deliberately turns a blind 
eye to his science, Jiu-Jitsu, and Judo background to foreground another narrative concerned 
with somatic arts legacies. 

‘Somatics’ was first loosely defined by phenomenologist Thomas Hanna (1970), influenced by 
the work of Moshe Feldenkrais, as a non-goal oriented and first person-centred discourse 
towards a ‘somatic culture’ of ‘self-sensing’ (Hanna 1970) and ‘self-activation’ (Feldenkrais 
2010). Somatic Practices, including the Feldenkrais Method have a long standing history of 
application within dance-training and dance-making contexts (Batson 2008; Batson, and Wilson 
2014; Brodie, and Lobel 2004, 2012; Eddy 2017; Kampe 2015; Kovich 2007; Long, Newton, and 
Kovich 2015) , and have been discussed as critical resources which allow dance students to 
develop greater self-awareness, agency and autonomy in choice-making (Fortin 1998; Fortin, 
Long, and Lord 2002; Green 2001; Roche 2016). There has been an increase in literature about 
the Feldenkrais Method as a resource in theatre practice, theatre education in Higher 
Education, and the training of actors (Cave 2015; Kampe 2015; Kapsali 2013; McCaw 2016; 
Pergola 2003; Purcell 1990; Questel 2002; Worsley 2016), highlighting issues concerning 
performer agency, skills acquisition and holistic communication (see also Kampe 2015). 

 
Editorial • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 4
 



 

 
Displaced/Displayed: re-enacting dances of migration (video 2018) 

screenshot: dancers Carl Tolentino, Lucy Lynch, Katie Rudd 
Photography Thomas Kampe and Manuela Jara  3

 
Since its inception in 2009, the ‘Journal of Dance and Somatic Practices’ (JDSP) has served as 
a critical forum to articulate a collective and diverse voice, as ‘a radical, but necessary, 
alternative to dance practices that aspire towards a virtuosic body seeking to reproduce a 
stylized form’, aiming to ‘question traditional modes of doing, ways of seeing and experiencing 
dance’ (Whatley, Alexander & Garrett-Brown 2009: 3,4). This alternative discourse of 
‘somatic-informed dance practices’ has claimed to hold a political potential within dance studies 
by foregrounding the corporeal dimension of ‘the emergent dancing subject’, a questioning of 
the authority of spectatorship (Garrett-Brown 2011), and by adopting a ‘slower ontology’ that 
challenges dominant western ‘more and faster’ ideologies for a reflective embodied criticality of 
the participant (Wood 2011). Equally, it is a potential for ‘somatic activism’ (Eddy 2000) through 
a focus on inductive process inquiry, a questioning of power-structures and hierarchies within 
knowledge transmission (Green 2015; Fortin, Vieira, and Tremblay 2009; Roche 2016), and an 
experiential emphasis of a dynamic-systems informed ‘relational body’ (Batson 2008) that open 
out psycho-social emancipatory dimensions within somatic-informed arts practices. Batson 
proposes that within somatic inquiry, as exemplified by The Feldenkrais Method, ‘movers 
sensitize to subtle messages arising from micro dynamics of movement’ (Batson, and Wilson 

3 This video forms part of the collaborative AR project ‘Releasing The Archive’ with choreographer Carol 
Brown and The New Zealand Dance Company (NZDC). The project aimed to re-activate the 
choreographic process of Jewish exiled modernist choreographer Gertrud Bodenwieser (Vienna 1890- 
Sydney 1959) through Feldenkrais informed preparatory and directorial processes. See also Kampe 
(2017). 

 
Editorial • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 5
 



 

2014: 4). She further suggests, that ‘attending consciously to these micro-movements and 
micro-processes fosters body-mind integration’ (2014: 4).  

Such educational quest for unified action, where the intention of the performer is integrated in 
embodied interaction with the world, lies already at the heart of Modernist actor training 
approaches such as the work of Konstantin Stanislavski (1863 -1938) or Michael Chekhov 
(1891-1955), and of early 20​th​ century body-culture pioneers who drew on the teachings on 
embodied expressivity of French acting theorist Francois Delsarte (1811-1871). Recent 
practitioner reflections within the groundbreaking special issue of ​Theatre, Dance and 
Performance Training​ on Moshe Feldenkrais published in 2015 (Cave 2015; Worth 2015) 
articulate the relationship between contemporary theatre education and The Feldenkrais 
Method, at times linked to his work with the company of director Peter Brook. Similarly, the 
recent reader on Feldenkrais and actor training (Worsley 2016) forges direct historical 
connections to the Feldenkrais/Brook/Lecoq/Pagneux lineage, and makes connections to the 
dominant Western psycho-physical theatre heritage based on the work of Russian Modernist 
educator Konstantin Stanislavski and contemporary developments. Yet, the synergies between 
the Feldenkrais Method and psycho-physical movement approaches developed within the 
twentieth-century theatre and dance cultures are rarely discussed in literature by Moshe 
Feldenkrais, nor in his recently published biographies or works that analyse his cultural milieu 
(Aldor 2012; Reese 2016, Buckard 2015). 

It therefore seems surprising that in the edited conversation of 1965 between Moshe 
Feldenkrais and theatre director Richard Schechner (Feldenkrais 2010), Feldenkrais reveals 
detailed insights into the training approaches developed by Konstantin Stanislavski. Feldenkrais 
had been introduced to the work of theatre innovator Stanislavski and his disciple Yevgeny 
Vakhtangov (1883- 1923) by his close friend Aharon Meskin in Tel Aviv already in the 1920’s 
(Buckard 2015). Meskin was a leading actor with the Hebrew speaking Habimah theatre 
company which settled from Russia to Palestine in 1928.   4

Stanislavski’s later approach to acting which highlighted embodiment and action is akin to 
Feldenkrais’ own rationale for privileging movement as an accessible educational lever to 
access an awareness the unity of ‘whole self’ (1990). Feldenkrais sets out that his approach is 
‘mainly concerned with learning a better mode of action and uses of the body, from which the 
person can learn directly, in his own body language’ (1985: 153). This ability to learn directly 
from uses of the body is equally articulated in early twentieth-century writings by Stanislavski 
whose work was concerned with ‘organismic functioning of man’ where thinking and feeling are 
necessarily an embodied whole (Prokofiev 1964 cited in Litvinoff 1972). Stanislavski sets out 
that 

4 The Habimah actors had developed their work in Russia as a Yiddish speaking company under the 
direction of Vakhtangov while working on the touring production of Ansky’s Jewish myth ‘The Dybbuk’ 
(1922). This seminal play was directed in the style of Vakhtangov’s ‘fantastic-realism’ (Mirochnikov 2007), 
which combined modernist approaches to realism and stylisation in performance. 

 
Editorial • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 6
 



 

a physical action is easier to grasp than a psychological attitude; it is more accessible 
than an elusive inner feeling. It is easier to capture, is more concrete, more readily 
perceived. A physical action is connected with all the other elements. Truly there is no 
physical action without a will towards it, a direction, a use of the imagination. […] All this 
testifies to the intimate link between a physical action and the totality of one’s inner being 
and feeling. (Stanislavski cited in Litvinoff 1972: 21)  

Like Feldenkrais, he was concerned with accessing the person’s agency, creativity and potential 
through movement. ‘We are more at home with physical action than with the elusive nature of 
emotion. Here we can find our bearing better, here we are more inventive, and more certain 
than with subjective elements which are difficult to capture and fix’ (Stanislavski cited in Litvinoff 
1972: 21). Stanislaviski’s system of ​Spiritual Realism​ was inspired by his professional and 
personal encounter with the Modern Dance pioneer Isadora Duncan (1877-1927) in Moscow in 
1907 who described her way of finding an embodied unity in her arts as placing ’a motor in my 
soul’ (Duncan cited in Stanislavski 1924/1974). Stanislavski reveals that at the time he ‘was in 
search of that very creative motor, which the actor must learn to put in his soul before he comes 
out on the stage’ (Duncan cited in Stanislavski 1924/1974). Modern Dance, as an emerging 
twentieth century genre concerned with embodied forms of human expression through dynamic 
action, seemed to provide ‘an imaginative richness in material and a search for truth’, to enrich 
Stanislavski’s psycho-physical training system and rehearsal practices.   5 6

Moshe Feldenkrais was no stranger to Modern Dance and reform-gymnastic practices 
developed at the beginning of the 20​th​ century in Europe and the US. He had long-standing 
friendships to leading Palestine/Israel based modern dancers including Shoshana Ornstein and 
Noa Eshkol, and taught for several years in the studios of dancers Margalit Ornstein, Mia 
Arbatova and Lotte Kristeller before and after setting up his base in Alexander Yanai Street in 
Tel Aviv from 1955. 

In the recently published biography of Moshe Feldenkrais, Mark Reese reveals that Moshe 
Feldenkrais studied dance in Palestine during the 1920’s, stating briefly that ‘he studied Ballet 
with one Mrs. Ornstein’ (2016: 68). This is confirmed in the writings of theatre-director Gaby 
Aldor, daughter of Modern Dancer Shoshona Ornstein (1911-1998) and grand-daughter of 
Palestine/Israel Körperkultur-pioneer Margalit Ornstein (1888-1973). While biographer Buckard 
(2015), like Reese, links Feldenkrais’ studies with Margalit Ornstein mistakenly to the study of 

5 Franko (1995) suggests that early to mid-twentieth Modern Dance revolves around an instituted ‘split 
between emotion and expression’ where embodied outward expression of inner impulse is given a 
universal validity above subjective feeling. He further points towards a trinity of affect ‘stimulus – feeling 
impact - expression’ (1995: x) as a post-Romanticist framework for a theory of expression (Ausdruck) that 
drives early Modern Dance practices. Stimulus of the nervous system can here also be understood as 
external impression that leads to sensation response, which then leads to expression as a ‘crystallisation 
of an outer reaction. Expression responds outwardly to sensation through a physical displacement 
dissipating sensations indwelling reverberations’ (1995: 76). 
6 See also Hinkley, C. in Vernon, and Warren 1999: 167. Coralie Hinkley was a member of the 1940’s and 
50’s Australian Bodenwieser [Modern] Ballet. 

 
Editorial • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 7
 



 

Ballet, Aldor (2012, 2017) clarifies in her writings on the roots of Israeli Modern Dance and 
body-culture that Ornstein taught Reform-Gymnastics – ‘Plastic & Rhythmic Exercises’ - and 
Bodenwieser-influenced improvisatory ‘Expressive Dance – artistic dance or ‘Künstlerischer 
Tanz’.  Ornstein, who emigrated from Austria to Palestine in 1921, reveals aspects of structure 7

and learning mood of her immediately successful classes in her diaries:  

I have 57 students already […] A lesson is constructed like this: floor exercises at the 
beginning, then swing exercises in groups of eight, for each group in different way – 
standing, walking or jumping. As Professor Bodenwieser used to say: if you enjoy it you 
will understand it faster (Ornstein 1922 cited in Aldor 2012: 27).  

Gertrud Bodenwieser’s inductive dance pedagogy proposed a bodily poly-centricity which 
includes the use of the head, and even hair, as places of initiation, multi-directionality in spatial 
orientation and richness in variation of dynamic qualities as key to her dance praxis.  Dancer 8

Shona Dunlop McTavish remembers: ‘True dance for Bodenwieser meant discovery, discovery 
which combined the exploration of thoughts and feelings, simultaneously with the penetrating 
study of the body and its anatomical structure and the impetus of movement as a whole.’  9

Ornstein had studied with body-culture pioneer Elisabeth ‘Bess’ Mensendieck (1864-1957) in 
Vienna prior to arriving in Palestine. Mensendieck’s system of ‘free gymnastics system for 
women’ (Ornstein 1922 cited in Aldor 2012: 23), her work with Gertrud Bodenwieser at Vienna 
Dance Academy, and her studies in Rhythmic Gymnastics based on the work of Emile 
Jacques-Dalcroze, informed her teaching in Jaffa and Tel Aviv from 1921.  Ornstein credits the 10

work of Mensendieck as a major influence on the development of her practice, offering a 
functional and analytical system of bodily education useful for the Modern Dancer. Mensendieck 
offered a proto-feminist practice concerned with ‘self-determination’ (1906/1929) of women 
through a ‘subjective method of bodily education’ (1927: 9). Several key features in 
Mensendieck’s work foreshadow the post-WWII work of Moshe Feldenkrais – a 
social-constructivist perspective on embodiment, a focus on movement analysis and autonomy 
of the learner through internalisation and observation, and an emphasis on the reactivation of 
the pelvis as a counter-cultural and emancipatory necessity for the Modern citizen. 

7 Programme notes 20/06/1923 ‘Margalit Ornstein and Pupils - Soiree’, Herzliah Hall Tel Aviv; 
Programme Notes 09/02/1929 Künstlerische Tänze vorgeführt von der Tanzgruppe des Studio Ornstein‘; 
Theater Hatai; both accessed 06/01/2017 Tel Aviv Dance Library. 
8 Australian company member Coralie Hinkley suggests a privileging of free-flowing movement qualities 
within Bodenwieser’s practice: ‘The demands of her technique embraced the circle, wave, arc, spiral – 
never static- always fluid – never ending gradations of flow, rhythms, designs, expressions, with the 
breath as the impulse for the surge of the dance’ (Hinkley 1990: 161, cited in Milne-Home 2011). 
9 Shona Dunlop McTavish Archives, notes from photographs. 
10 The work of Swiss music educator Jacques Dalcroze (1865–1950) was seminal for a development of 
modernist artistic body-culture. His system of Eurythmics, drawing on holistic gymnastics and 
improvisational modes of teaching and learning was initially developed to foster greater embodiment in 
the education of musicians. Many leading modernist dancers including Mary Wigman, Hanya Holm and 
Marie Rambert studied at his Hellerau schools in Dresden, and later in the Vienna suburb of Laxenburg. 

 
Editorial • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 8
 



 

Mensendieck developed a whole array of semi-supine floor-based exercises, many of them 
resembling parts of Feldenkrais ATM lessons, including slow knee-tilts from side to the side, or 
a gentle pressing through the feet to lift the pelvis and spine forward in a successive chain-like 
movement. She articulated a systemic perspective on movement education that embraced 
agency and judgement of the learner within a body-mind process that aims to construct ‘an 
intellectualisation of the flesh’ (1927: 17) through a reflective and inductive practice of ‘wiring 
muscles and brain together’ (1927: appendix). Veder (2010) suggests that Mensendieck’s work 
‘served a new kind of expressivity, forged through a new degree of bodily efciency’ within the 
emerging European Modern Dance Practices which permeated dance and theatre education in 
Palestine and Israel until the 1960s (2010: 818).  

With the arrival of the athletic and heroic US Modern Dance styles in Israel in the 1960s, most 
leading Israeli dancers turned towards studying with Moshe Feldenkrais to develop a more 
rigorous functional foundation for their own technical development (Naharin 2017). Aldor 
suggests that Feldenkrais ‘changed the way dancers treated their bodies, he opened a door for 
them. There is a lot of dignity in the slow pace of his exercises, in listening to the body, about 
the part of thinking in the physical process’ (2017 email correspondence with the author). Yet, 
surprisingly she emphasizes a reciprocity of influence of Modernist body-culture knowledges on 
the later work of Moshe Feldenkrais. 

I think that they built some sort of groundwork that connects rationality and wisdom - like 
methods of von Laban, of very high physical awareness, what later went into Feldenkrais 
- with the capacity for inspiration. It shows up in all the exercises in Margalit's blue 
notebooks and I think that it's terrific - that it is really a kind of groundwork that 
characterizes Israeli dance too’. (Aldor cited in Samorzik 2011) 

Aldor’s writings reveal that Feldenkrais had first-hand knowledge of modern gymnastics and 
dance. He was in personal correspondence with the Ornstein sisters while he lived in Paris in 
1931, and advised them not to give up their studies and careers in dance (Aldor 2012: 159). 
Surprisingly, a letter by Yehudit from 1929 states that Moshe Feldenkrais also taught at the 
Ornstein studio in 42, Ahad Ha’am Street in Tel Aviv. 

We had a wonderful dance lesson. I am really so foolish that I always forget how good it 
is to dance. Afterwards I feel so comfortable, that I can’t understand why I always find it 
so difficult to begin a lesson. […] After class we had a Feldenkrais lesson. (Ornstein, Y. 
cited in Aldor 2012: 94)  11

Both Aldor (2012) and Buckard (2015) conclude that these ‘Feldenkrais lessons’ taught in 1929 
were most likely self-defence lessons taught by Moshe Feldenkrais to members of the 

11 Letter by Yehudit Ornstein: 2/11/1929. Translated from German by the author. 

 
Editorial • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 9
 



 

Haganah. Margalit’s architect husband Jacques Ornstein was a leading member in the secret 
para-military organisation.  12

 
Shoshana and Yehudit Ornstein. Photograph by Alfonso Himmelreich, © G. Aldor 

 
Ornstein taught basic principles of movement and dance to the emerging Tel Aviv theatre 
companies such as the Tali, Ohel and Habima, ‘to put the body of the “New Jew” on stage, full 
of vitality and breathing freely (Ornstein 1928 cited in Aldor 2012: 48).  Ornstein was interested 13

in dramatic action and in merging her pedagogies with the evolving ‘Biomechanics’ practices of 
Vsevolod Meyerhold (1874-1940). Her work embraced the integration of movement and dance 
into emerging ‘Tanztheater - dance-theatre – forms, and the development of ‘Theatertanz’ - 
theatre-dance within existing plays (Aldor 2012: 48). As an educator, Ornstein wrote 
passionately about the training of theatre-directors through movement (1940a,b).  She 14

12 There is currently no exact information on how long and how often Moshe Feldenkrais studied with 
Margalit Ornstein. 
13 Ornstein translated from the German language by the author. ‘Wir sind doch nach Palästina 
gekommen, um den Körper des ‚neuen Juden’ auf die Bühne zu bringen, lebendig und frei atmend’. 
(Aldor 2012: 48) 
14 Her two-part essay, ‘Bewegungskultur als Vorbereitung für Regieführung’ written in German during 
1939 and 1940 on movement education for the training of directors, provides an analytical framework 

 
Editorial • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 10 
 



 

proposed that, through the direction of movement, the educated theatre director ‘will be able to 
give the inspirations of nature and life […] artistic expression and a form that matches the 
characteristics of our Jewish life’. (Ornstein 1940a,b) In her diaries from 1926, Ornstein quotes a 
letter by her husband Jacques from 1921 to contextualise her theatrical body-politics. The quote 
refers directly to Theodore Herzl’s novel Zionist utopian novel ​Altneuland​ (1902) - The Old New 
Land: ‘In straight lines and in powerful rhythm, inspired by the old-new homeland, the liberated 
body will emerge. The dance of the new Hebrew’ (Ornstein cited in Aldor 2012: 42).  The 15

author suggests that Feldenkrais’ studying dance and gymnastics with Margalit Ornstein forms a 
key part of his critical becoming and exemplifying the ‘new Hebrew’ male.  16

Feldenkrais’ practices sit comfortably within Modernist utopian reform-movement pedagogies 
and avant-garde arts practices, which were concerned with questioning cultural realities and 
personal ways of perceiving and interacting with the world. I have argued elsewhere (Kampe 
2015) that Feldenkrais uses defamiliarisation or ‘making strange’ strategies, first theorised by 
Russian formalist Viktor Shklovsky (1893-1984) in his essay ‘Art as Techniques’ (1917). 
Shklovsky, like Feldenkrais, was concerned with challenging habituation of perception and 
behaviour and saw the main function of art as to facilitate such challenge. At the height of the 
Russian revolution he writes:  

Art exists that one may recover the sensation of life; it exists to make one feel things, to 
make the stone stony. The purpose of art is to impart the sensation of things as they are 
perceived and not as they are known. The technique of art is to make objects 
‘unfamiliar,’ to make forms difficult, to increase the length and difficulty of perception 
because the process of perception is an aesthetic end in itself and must be prolonged 
(1917: 12). 

Similarly, Feldenkrais proposes an aesthetic experience to the participant/learner which makes 
use of this ‘making strange’ to heighten sensory-motor awareness and capacities while 
stimulating critical reflection on the organisation and construction of embodied knowledge. 
Feldenkrais states that an important feature of the group work is the continued novelty of 
situation that is maintained throughout the course. ‘Once the novelty wears off, awareness is 
dulled and no learning takes place. If a configuration needs repetition, I teach it in tens and even 
hundreds of variations until they are mastered‘ (2010: 37). It is this Zeitgeist towards a 
re-forming of modern personhood through new forms of art and education that had emerged 

based on Rudolf Laban’s movement elements of force, time and space (Kraft – Zeit - Raum) that aims to 
form a vessel for a Zionist vision of the embodied ‘formation of the Jewish individual and the Jewish 
people in light of the challenges of modernism’ (Conforti 2002/2011: 111). 
15 Original is “[…] In geraden Linien und kraftvollem, aus der altneuen Heimat schöpfenden Rhythmus 
wird der befreite Körper entstehen. Der Tanz des neuen Hebräers.“ See also Oberzaucher-Schuller 
(2013).  
16 See also Max Nordau on ‘Muscular Judaism’ at the Second Zionist Congress held in Basel on August 
28, 1898. ‘Zionism has awakened Jewry to new life, morally through the national idea, materially through 
physical rearing. […] For the first time since Bar-Kochba does there exist among the Jews an inclination 
to show themselves, and to show the world how much vitality they still possess (Nordau 1898/1955: 88). 

 
Editorial • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 11 
 



 

around the turn of the twentieth century, which formed embodied and situated knowledges that 
were collectively shared and transformed by teachers and disciples of the individual practices 
over several generations and across continents. The work of Moshe Feldenkrais can be placed 
within this context. 
 

 
Displaced/Displayed: re-enacting dances of migration 

Dancers: Lucy Lynch & Carl Tolentino  

 
Editorial • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 12 
 



 

Re-Embodiment, Education & Performer Training - ‘to humanize humanity’ 

Contemporary western performer training and education build on modernist foundations 
concerned with improved function, learner autonomy, reflective, critical and awared practice, 
and on enhanced performer agency to make meaningful sensory-motor choices towards 
world-making within complex environments. Contemporary western performance practice 
increasingly embraces collaborative modes of co-creation within a broad range of aesthetic 
contexts that demand a creative, flexible and ethically articulate participant. Recent scholarship 
towards the training of dancers welcomes such model of a performer as creative agent as 
timely. Roche (2016) suggests that contemporary dancers in training consistently ‘need to 
engage critically with new ideas and develop autonomous outlooks in order to prepare for 
professional practice’ and calls for ‘an open engagement’ with students through 
somatic-oriented practices (2016: 143).  

There is a similar trend in western actor training which embraces the application of 20​th​ century 
Somatic Practices as a resource for an embodied holistic education that aims to foster 
participant’s agency, capacity of critical self-reflection and creative endeavour (Amory 2010; 
Evans 2009; Kampe 2015). Such trend which recognises movement as a fundamental 
agency-constituting experience, parallels developments in scholarship in actor training and 
theatre reception that draws on studies in enactivist cognitive sciences concerned with notions 
of embodiment, kinaesthetic empathy and intentional attunement, imagination, affect, and 
embodied expressivity (Blair and Cook 2016; Blair 2009; Falleti, Sofia and Joono 2016). 
Western performer training and education has also shifted from conservatoire training, 
concerned with prioritising skills acquisition and the development of vocational rigour, towards 
Higher Education (HE) University educational models that offer inquiry-based under-graduate, 
post-graduate and research-based modes of study. Here, a critical engagement with the 
emergent self, world and professional arts contexts are part of syllabi that aim to facilitate the 
learner’s ability to understand and engage with self-organised creative processes. 

Current discourses within ‘somatic-informed’ (Garrett-Brown 2011) performer education and 
training are asking questions towards the ethics of a contemporary education towards 
democratic citizenship and a reimagining of being in the world. How to we facilitate performers 
engaging with being human in a growing ‘culture of dis-embodiment’ (Gare 2016)? 
Eco-philosopher Arran Gare asks for ‘a new alliance between science, the humanities and the 
arts’ which must strive for a ‘re-embodying humanity’ as part of an eco-cultural transformation 
(2016: 40). An emerging necessary grand narrative of ‘The Age of Re-Embodiments’ demands 
democratic citizens and communities that can articulate their own policies and concerns, 
re-discover, affirm and develop their own traditions, ‘part of and responsible for the future of 
nature […] and responsible for the resilience and vitality of their social and ecological 
communities’ (2016: 40). Bringing forth such cultural shift through a multiplicity of means, he 

 
Editorial • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 13 
 



 

argues, will change how human beings can understand themselves at a visceral level, 
‘embodying this culture as part of their habitus in new ways’ (2016: 9). 

Such quest for a culture of re-embodiments, is echoed in ecologist and complexity thinker Edgar 
Morin’s calls for an education towards a ‘true rationality’ that aims to abandon dualist, 
reductionist and totalitarian imaginaries for systemic and non-dualist critical interpretations of 
natural and cultural development.  Morin proposes a necessarily embodied, affective and 17

sentient organisational thinking ‘that respects diversity as it recognizes unity, and that tries to 
discern interdependencies’ (2007: iv). Such holographic thinking where the feedback dynamics 
between macro- and micro- elements of a larger ecological process are brought into awareness 
and reflective practice of the participant echoes Feldenkrais’ educational concern towards a 
‘thinking with the elements of thinking’ (2010: 88). Such embodied, patterned, imaged, 
connective, and divergent thinking, can be posited as ​choreographic thinking​, or as the 
choreographic per se, understood by Klien (2009) as ‘the very source of knowledge’. Klien 
argues, in line with a Feldenkraisian epistemology, that ‘the perception of patterns, relations and 
their dynamics, the integration to existing knowledge, and the creative application to a wider 
reality, all together constitute the choreographic act’ (2009: 100). 

I have argued elsewhere that Morin’s ‘radical reform in thinking’ through new modes of 
education echoes educational ethical concerns and principles embedded within the work of 
Moshe Feldenkrais. His embodied, ‘organic’ and ‘awared learning’ processes aim to equip the 
participant towards a development of ‘the somatic aspects of consciousness’ as a means to 
‘self-direction’ and self-activation (Feldenkrais 2010). Feldenkrais proposed a utopian humanist 
vision on evolutionary social progress through a growth in self–awareness of the socially 
embedded individual, where ‘humanoids can develop into Homo sapiens, human beings with 
intelligence, knowledge and awareness (2010: 181).’ Feldenkrais’ somato-educational ethics 
concur with Edgar Morin’s proposal for an ‘Education for the Future’ (Morin 1999), asking for an 
educational ‘Anthropo-Ethics’ towards the development of a critical planetary conscience and 
citizenship (1999: 57).  

In his UNESCO-commissioned writings Morin suggests that in an ongoing culture of poly-crisis 
‘the human condition should be an essential subject of all education’(1999: 2). He urges us that 
‘the study of hominization’, a process of becoming human, ‘is of capital importance for education 
to the human condition because it shows how our human condition is a combination of animality 
and humanity’ (1999: 2). Morin proposes the investigation and study of human complexity as 
part of any education to accelerate an awareness ‘of the common condition of all human beings; 
the very rich and necessary diversity of individuals, peoples, cultures; and our rootedness as 
citizens of the Earth’ (1999: 29). He urges for an organismic-socio-historical education - ‘to 

17 ‘A reason that ignores living beings, subjectivity, emotions, and life is irrational [...] True rationality is not 
merely critical, but self-critical. It is recognizable in its ability to recognize its own insufficiencies.’ (Morin & 
Kern 1999: 129).  

 
Editorial • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 14 
 



 

humanize humanity’ (1999:10) - that facilities ‘pertinent knowledge’ that recognises the human 
being as ‘a biological, psychological, social, emotional, rational being’ (1999: 13). 

 

 

Displaced/Displayed: re-enacting dances of migration (video 2018) 
screenshot: dancers Carl Tolentino, Lucy Lynch, Katie Rudd 

Photography Thomas Kampe and Manuela Jara 

  

 
Editorial • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 15 
 



 

Volume 6 Contributions 

In line with such critical developments towards re-embodying and humanising educational 
processes this journal presents a series of articles that situate applications and a framing of the 
Feldenkrais Method within performing arts contexts. Choreographer/researcher Jenny Coogan’s 
writings in this journal volume present reflections on an extensive Action Research project 
undertaken with Bachelor level dance students at Palucca Conservatoire in Dresden, Germany. 
Coogan, who describes herself as ‘committed to facilitating somatically oriented teaching and 
learning environments in professional dance education’, unpacks the workings and problems of 
her Feldenkrais-informed research in the context of German vocational education. Coogan sets 
out the problematic situation of German conservatoire dance training as lagging behind ‘the 
Anglosphere’ where ‘fusions of dance and somatics have entered the mainstream of tertiary 
education’ and have activated a ‘collective somatic sensibility’ within dance education, training 
and research culture. Her original research contribution to the field through developing a 
‘Feldenkrais Informed Contemporary Dance Practice’ focuses on four emerging categories of 
‘interrelated perspectives to the complex processes of situational learning: ​Environment, 
Reflection; Personal Agency, and Transferability​. Coogan also reflects on her somatic inflected 
dance work with a collective of elderly dancers in an open access chapter: 
https://www.tanzensemble-artrose.de/methoden 

Also working within a German conservatoire context, musician Corinna Eikmeier reflects on her 
research, on the convergence of the Feldenkrais Method and Improvisation in Music 
instrumental learning and performance.  Eikmeier’s report, published in the German language, 18

draws on a discovery-based ​Qualitative Heuristic Method​, developed at Hamburg Free 
University, which ‘demands an openness of the researcher’ and ‘acknowledges an openness 
and emerging of topics which the researcher should attend to’. While research data should be 
gathered and evaluated through a broad range of perspectives, the diverse information based 
on data are being analysed for their commonalities. 

Her research asked initial questions on modes of behaviour within improvisational contexts 
(​Improvisatorische Handlungsweisen/Improvisational Activity​), and their reciprocal relationship 
to movement qualities within music performance. Eikmeier asked questions how Improvisational 
Activity is implicitly addressed within the Feldenkrais Method, and how we can compare learning 
strategies within the Feldenkrais Method with Improvisational Activity.  

Her initial research phase involved initial conversations with music students and Feldenkrais 
colleagues about Improvisation practice. Emerging topics revolved around dynamic systems 
self-organised dynamic processes, autopoiesis, chaos theory and fractals, and issues around 
perception, attention and awareness. ‘What types of awareness do we need to develop to follow 

18 The research report is a republication (see Eikmeier 2010). A shortened version was published in 
Gagel, and Schwabe (2016). 

 
Editorial • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 16 
 

https://www.tanzensemble-artrose.de/methoden


 

an emerging artistic product and process? How do we direct our attention in different ways 
between our self-attention and attention towards artistic product?’ 

Topics further evolved around habit and habituation within music practice - ‘How do we attend to 
our own habits? When do they get in the way? How can we constructively work with our habits, 
and how can we transcend those?’ - and on the attending to ‘movement qualities’ during 
improvisation practice: e.g. the organisation of weight-shifts, variation in tempo, or use of breath. 

In her ‘research phase 2’ Eikmeier creates an analogy between Improvisation Practice and the 
Feldenkrais Method. Here she defines an ‘Improvisational Movement Quality‘ (Improvisatorische 
Bewegungsqualität), and suggests that within Feldenkrais lessons improvisational virtues are 
practiced on a meta level. Within her analogy between the Feldenkrais Method and 
Improvisational Activity a series of ‘virtues’ emerged:  

all action is based on a spirit of inquiry/ situations demand creative problem solving / a 
suspending of judgment is a foundation for development/ quality of action is more 
important than a goal of action/ authentic perception underpins process/ the discerning 
of small differences enables quality / a critical engagement with habits is necessary for 
action and learning to be meaningful in present contexts/ the acceptance of constraints 
is prerequisite for a creative process within a set framework/ verbal language used within 
creative processes faces the problem that the present cannot be captured through a 
wrestling with language/ ‘Mistakes’ are recognised in neutral ways and become new 
impulses/ perturbations through the avoiding of mistakes, fear, preplanning and purely 
cognitive thinking processes are limiting a connection to present situations/ Actions can 
relate to the present as soon as they are reversible, which means they are stoppable or 
can be retracted, or can be transformed into another action/ the readiness to act in any 
moment into any direction enables decisions within the present and their immediate 
translation into action/ organic learning should never be externally steered; it seems 
extremely vulnerable and will be interrupted as soon as the learner is taken out of his/her 
non-goal-oriented and present-focused action. 

In her third research phase, Eikmeier designed a series of 49 practical experiments and 
‘Laboratory Spaces’ (Laborräume) where distinct embodied and functional topics based on 
improvisational qualities were linked to Improvisational Activity. Here four ‘fictional’ laboratories 
were designed around distinct topics: ​muscle tonus, dynamic balance, impulse, breath​. In her 
conclusion Eikmeier suggests that her re-embodying of instrumental pedagogy within an 
improvisational context though a Feldenkrais-informed perspective can enhance the learners’ 
and players’ ability to engage with Improvisational Activity. While questions regarding 
improvisational and embodiment practices within music education as tools for holistic learner 
and performer-agency development since the work of Emile Jacques-Dalcroze (1865-1950), 
Eikmeier’s work contributes distinctly to the emerging contemporary discourses of ​Embodied 

 
Editorial • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 17 
 



 

Music Education​ (Laroche and Kaddouch 2015) and ​Enactive Music Pedagogy​ (Van Der Schyff 
2017, Laroche and Kaddouch 2015: 522). 

Victoria Worsley’s article ‘From the Coalface’ offers reflections on her extensive experience of 
teaching Feldenkrais for student actors within a vocational conservatoire training in the UK. 
Worsley, who also published a book on Feldenkrais for actors in 2016, sets out the context for 
her classes where highly ambitious and often judgemental students are attending her classes 
not because of their personal choice, but because Feldenkrais inflected lessons are part of their 
Movement for the Actor syllabus.  In the article Worsley opens out a rationale for teaching 19

Feldenkrais lessons for student actors and articulates this around topics of ​posture, presence, 
awareness, and strong experiences​. She offers a discussion on furthering and extending 
perhaps more common features of the Feldenkrais Method such as developing introspective 
awareness and improved functionality towards working with the relationship between emotions 
and somatic impulse or affective response. Worsley proposes that 

the central idea is to enable the students to notice their sensations as they encounter 
different emotional responses and to recognise how noticing can help them re-find the 
emotional journey of their character every night of the show or every take of the scene. 
For example, how the sadness evoked in that scene feels in their breathing, heart rate, 
muscular tonus and so on, as opposed to a moment of fear, anger, pleasure or hope. 

Worsley lays out how working traditional Feldenkrais kinaesthetic modalities, such as focusing 
on slow, often sequential and free flow oriented movement qualities, need and can to be 
transcended to meet the students’ training needs towards fitness, increased strength and 
speedy agility. In her concluding section Worsley brings back her discussion to the integration of 
Feldenkrais work into the learners’ acting experience. She suggests here that a 
Feldenkrais-informed learning experience can aid the actor in their creative choice-making and 
towards heightened levels of embodied communication: 

Becoming clear enough in what they are doing in any movement in an Awareness 
Through Movement lesson, however small, and developing choice at a very fine level, 
enables the actor to execute their intention – or to tell their story – precisely, clearly and 
immediately. They are not stuck in one blind compulsive choice that may not always fit 
the moment or chime well with the audience. 

In contrast to Worsley’s articulation of a Feldenkrais-informed pedagogy within a conservatoire 
training context, Kene Igweonu’s essay refers to existing practices within Higher Education 
Performing Arts field in the UK. Igweonu sets out a historical lineage from pioneering work done 
by Feldenkrais trainer Garet Newell through the ​International Workshop Festival​, and initial 
anchoring of Feldenkrais practices within theatre and dance syllabi in University- and College- 

19 See also review of Worsley 2016 by Kampe in this journal volume. 

 
Editorial • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 18 
 



 

level education through the work of Richard Cave and Scott Clark. He provides a critical 
rationale for the inclusion Feldenkrais-informed practices within Higher Education models: 

Key to the adoption of the Feldenkrais Method in UK Higher Education is its perceived 
usefulness for developing pedagogical ideas - as a pedagogical tool - and offering 
dynamic approaches to learning that complements and often challenge established 
modes of teaching and learning that are body-centred and somatic. However, the pace 
of this adoption has been rather slow, since it relies on the presence of a Feldenkrais 
practitioner on the teaching team, who is involved in curriculum design as a programme 
leader or one who is sufficiently empowered to introduce new ideas and materials to 
students. 

Igweonu reflects on a longitudinal research project set up by him in 2010 which aimed to 
investigate and document the use of the Feldenkrais Method as a performer training 
methodology within UK Higher Education (2010). This research study included 
practitioner-interviews on the integration of ​Awareness Through Movement​ modalities within 
performing arts teaching and the critically attending to assessment and grading modalities within 
HE – clearly jarring with the non-corrective ethos of the Feldenkrais Method. Igweonu suggests 
that 

the general view among the practitioners interviewed was that any assessment 
framework for articulating benefit to students should not be performance based but 
consider the students’ developing awareness of habitual patterns of stress associated 
with particular movements and actions. The Feldenkrais Method develops students’ 
capacity as reflexive practitioners by creating a safe space for students to be curious, 
experiment with ideas and potentially ‘fail’ without repercussion. 

Igweonu also discusses his own practice as an educator within Higher Education contexts 
where he prescribes to the educational potential of the Feldenkrais Method to facilitate ‘curiosity 
and experimentation’ through processes of ‘assisted inquiry’. He sets out that a 
Feldenkrais-informed pedagogy can allow students to develop skills of experiential and 
embodied inquiry as a prerequisite for a critical scholarly agency of the undergraduate student. 
Igweonu suggests 

that it not only provides the vehicle of enquiry but, more importantly, it presents the 
performer with the clear indications as to ‘what to question’ and ‘how to question’. 
Feldenkrais Method offers the performer a space in which to listen to himself and to 
enquire about his physical organisation and relationship to the world around him. This 
space equally provides the performer with the unique opportunity to notice, to be 
uncertain and to change long held habits that will in turn lead to greater ease, 
sophistication and creativity in movement, play and action. 

 
Editorial • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 19 
 



 

Igweonu’s reflections set up an extended practice that involves embodied exploration, self- and 
peer observation, and ample time for peer-led feedback discussions and written reflections, to 
construct an agency-enhancing education that enables students to articulate experiential 
concerns ‘as creative practitioners’. Drawing on his research and his pedagogical practice, he 
argues passionately for a placing the Feldenkrais Method at the forefront of performer training in 
UK Higher Education. 

Detta Howe’s two part emerging scholar essay reflects on her personal journey as a 
contemporary dancer where ‘moving had become automatic and unfelt after 25 years of 
contemporary dance practice’, towards a re-awakening of ​‘the instant sensation of the whole of 
me, the felt sense of being, a human being moving’​. Howe collages practice analysis with 
personal, affective and poetic insight which are set in italics in the first part of the essay. Howe 
describes how the Feldenkrais Method ‘unearthed everything necessary to discover a lost body, 
my lost body’. Her personal reflections on a body lost and found, after years of commodifying 
self as a dancer’s professional body-instrument, are set against an insight into the dancer 
detailing her finding a new artistic practice in dialogue with her growing pleasured and curious 
somatic agency.  

Dancing in this solo had a new feeling; everything magnified, enriched and full of 
flavours. I found new ways of moving that I hadn’t experienced before, welcoming the 
unknown; allowing the vulnerability of not knowing to become part of the dance, part of 
being human and something to share with an audience. I evolved from a dancer that 
moves to a dancer that knows they are moving, valuing and enjoying the paradox of 
knowing and not knowing in my body and in the dance space.  

In the second part of her essay, Howe offers a case study of an evolving pedagogical practice 
Awareness in Motion (AIM)​ which involves ​Awareness Through Movement​ material as 
preparatory practice for improvisational probing that allows students to deepen their somatic 
experience in self-directed dance inquiry. This extended practice aims to ’provide a wider 
context to explore sensations experienced in an ATM lesson through improvisation, offering the 
students more time to experience what they have noticed.’ 

Howe describes a weaving of a non-corrective and non-goal oriented educational ethos into her 
evolving pedagogy with undergraduate BA Dance students at University of Chichester, UK. She 
suggests that through ‘a non-judgemental process of discovery, the student is encouraged to let 
their body move with awareness and without the need to know.’ Howe reflects on her processes 
of combining Feldenkrais-informed processes with teaching more conventionally framed 
Contemporary Dance Technique classes, where students are asked to learn, naturalise and 
interpret given and set dance material. Howe suggests that within this teaching framework many 
students tend ‘to fall back into habits of externalizing what they see opposed to noticing what 
they feel’. Leaning on research undertaken by Sylvie Fortin and Warwick Long on the 
integration of the Feldenkrais Method in Contemporary Dance teaching (2019) she details on 

 
Editorial • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 20 
 



 

her pedagogical processes strategies to support student’s self-directed and organic dance 
learning.  

Dor Abrahamson and Ami Shulman’s essay on ‘Co-constructing Movement in Mathematics and 
Dance: An Interdisciplinary Pedagogical Dialogue on Subjectivity and Awareness’ aligns itself 
with a growing discourse on dance and science and dance and cognition that has implications 
on educational and performance-cultural modalities.  The writers set out a conversational 20

context that discusses a ‘corporeal turn’ in mathematics education and research informed by 
enactivist and embodiment theories which concurs with somatic-informed dance studies. 
Abrahamson suggests that such research and education perceives  

a mathematical concept as a polysemous structure grounded in multiple interrelated 
sensorimotor constructions. In both mathematics and dance, instructors thus seek to 
create conditions for students to develop diverse subjective constructions of the 
movements they are learning to enact and to explore relations across these different 
constructions. 

Entering an interdisciplinary dialogue on the phenomenology and pedagogy of human 
movement, the authors aim to ‘search of common grounds through which educational scholars 
and practitioners of mathematics and dance may benefit through conversation’. Abrahamson 
exemplifies mathematical research grounded in sensorimotor action through describing an 
experimental application to mathematics pedagogy through an interactive technological device, 
the ​Mathematics Imagery Trainer​. Feldenkrais practitioner and dance-maker Shulman reflects 
further on this technological device by opening out a discussion on the cognitive and 
sensorimotor negotiations towards knowledge creation and choice making necessitated by the 
dancer in learning or performance situations. Shulman creates an analogy between the 
processes of enaction within dance practice and pedagogical concepts embedded with the 
Feldenkrais Method, and uses such perspective to reflect on Abrahamson’s practice-led 
research. The authors propose their conversational writing as an interdisciplinary space to 
reflect and debate - a ‘pas de deux’ where ‘mathematics and dance occupy dramatically 
disparate spaces, and yet the embodiment turn in the cognitive sciences is implicating these 
foreign disciplines as corporeally cognate—both transpire as sensorimotor activity, both avail 
from reflection’. 

Katja Münker’s experimental essay ‘Understanding understanding!’ muses on enactive and 
relational interpretations of the process of understanding. Dance scholar, pedagogue and 
walking artist Münker suggests that ‘how we are and how we bring ourselves in relation to our 
environment creates our understanding and forms our experiences and conceptions of the 
world’. Her text draws on material from a lecture-performance which explored a new 

20 See also: 
https://blogs.ams.org/mathgradblog/2016/07/07/mathematics-dance-enhancing-understanding-movement
/​ and Birringer and Fenger (2005).  

 
Editorial • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 21 
 

https://blogs.ams.org/mathgradblog/2016/07/07/mathematics-dance-enhancing-understanding-movement/
https://blogs.ams.org/mathgradblog/2016/07/07/mathematics-dance-enhancing-understanding-movement/


 

understanding of understanding while relating the ideas and practices of the Feldenkrais 
Method to improvisation theory and to political, artistic and biological philosophy.  
 

 

Displaced/Displayed: re-enacting dances of migration 
Dancers: Katie Rudd, Lucy Lynch & Carl Tolentino 

 
Münker sets out how her interdisciplinary participatory lecture performance ‘unfolded a field for 
experiential, cognitive and poetic understanding of Understanding’ through a blending of the 
spoken text with movement and improvisation/instant composition-strategies. Her work explored 

 
Editorial • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 22 
 



 

possibilities of how somatic practices can support multi-layered modes of understanding. Her 
writings offer an insight into a lecture format that invites participants to move, interact with their 
gravitational and social field in playful ways, while listening to spoken words –at times discursive 
or poetic, at times instructional – or while reading quotes by various philosophers. The essay is 
constructed in non-traditional ways, blending different type-set colouring with photographs from 
the lecture event and from Münker’s urban walking-art practice, and guides the reader into 
reflections on enactivist understandings of Understanding, often with reference to the work of 
Moshe Feldenkrais. She uses analogies between the Feldenkrais method and artistic processes 
to guide participants towards exploring score-like suggestions for playful activity, stating that 
‘while the ​Feldenkrais Method​ provides strategies to use the human ​potential​ on a 
movement-awareness​ -related level, ​improvisation​ and instant ​composition​ can provide 
strategies for ​navigation​ in ​space, time and relationship​ in broader ways.’  

Münker is the co-director of ​Somatische Akademie Berlin​ (SAB) which explores the potential 
and application of somatic practices as socially transformative processes. In line with this 
transdisciplinary social-somatic thinking her text proposes ‘a cultural and political potentiality in 
which we form our social reality’ where somatic practices such as the Feldenkrais Method 
inhabit ‘the possibility to expand the ​self-care​ towards ​community-care​’.  

Margaret Kaye’s and Lian Loke’s research in progress piece ‘Designing technology for active 
sitting: An example of Feldenkrais Method​®​-inspired body-centric interaction design’ discusses 
their research into the application of principles of Feldenkrais Method to interaction design, or 
what they call ‘body-centric interaction design’. The authors introduce a debate on 
post-ergonomic ‘interactive design’, and their development of a digital interactive prototype-tool 
‘Let’s Sway’ through which shifts in weight whilst sitting are displayed in a visual form on a 
computer screen. Rather than developing a corrective approach towards postural improvement 
while sitting, the authors experimented with creative interventionist ‘strategies for active sitting’, 
to encourage the design user to explore ‘certain kinds of simple geometric movement patterns 
whilst sitting and shifting weight, such as forward/backward, side-to-side, circling around the 
pelvis, or figure-of-eight spiralling’. The authors discuss how the workplace could be 
re-designed through the lens of Feldenkrais Method towards giving agency back to the 
individual within a sedentary workplace environment. They suggest that this entails the ‘agency 
to make choices about how to use one’s body. Agency to find comfort and ease through 
awareness that will lead to sustainable, revitalising practices in the workplace, and beyond.’ 

Alan Fraser’s integration of Feldenkrais practices principles within a piano-technique teaching 
and coaching approach forms a case study of an emerging applied and adapted pedagogy. The 
journal volume includes a chapter and an Awareness Through Movement lesson from his book, 
‘Play the Piano with Your Whole Self’ (2019) together with a critical introduction and post script 
by Fraser. The selected sections exemplify how organic learning principles with a focus on child 
development might be translated into an innovative and explorative approach towards skills 
development within piano scholarship. Fraser’s contextual section ‘How Babies Move’ aims to 

 
Editorial • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 23 
 



 

give a conceptual framework to the reader and uses analogies between developmental 
whole-body learning processes to the uses of the hand in piano learning. Fraser proposes that 
‘correlating baby’s pre- and post-standing movement experiences to those of the beginning 
pianist’s hand on key shows us why many hands are over-relaxed or too stiff, and why they 
could benefit from a pianistic pre-standing apprenticeship.’ His organic learning rationale is 
exemplified in an Awareness Through Movement lesson designed for pianists. Fraser states 
that this lesson, entitled ​‘The Hand Like a Baby Learning Movement’​, offers ‘our hands the 
incalculable benefits of a sensorially rich pre-standing keyboard apprenticeship. The 
developmental exercises stimulate the beginner’s hand to move at the keyboard naturally, 
organically, biologically.’ Using analogies to activities such as ​sucking, grasping, crawling, 
weight bearing, rolling, sitting​ the author develops movement explorations for the pianist’s 
hands that can serve as a preparatory practice to improve nuanced articulation for instrumental 
playing. The lesson guides the learner moving from non-goal oriented sensory-motor 
explorations towards a reflective interaction the instrument in non-familiar ways. 

This journal volume concludes with two practitioner reviews – my own review on Victoria 
Worsley’s latest book ‘Feldenkrais for Actors: How To Do Less and Discover More’ (2016) – and 
Helen Singh-Miller’s review on aspects of the work of Israeli choreographer Ohad Naharin, 
whose dance practice and ‘Gaga Technique’ carry traces of influence of the Feldenkrais 
Method. 

Acknowledgements:​ I would like to thank all the authors for their contributions to this journal 
and for their willingness to engage in a rigorous, developmental and inspiring peer reviewed 
editorial process. I am grateful for the consistent support from and dialogue with the ​Feldenkrais 
Research Journal​ General Editor Cliff Smyth for coordinating between all parties involved. A big 
thank you also goes to our team of specialist guest editors and peer-reviewers, Cornelia 
Berens, Zoran Kovich, Sara Reed, Robert Sholl, Libby Worth, and to our copy- and Harvard 
format-editors Brandee Selk and JoAnne Page, who engaged with thorough scrutiny in the 
creation of this Journal volume. 

Thomas Kampe, Guest Editor, May 2019 

 

Author Biography 

Thomas Kampe (PhD)​ has worked as a performing artist, researcher and somatic educator 
across the globe. He works as Senior Lecturer for Movement/Acting at Bath Spa University, UK, 
where he co-directs the ​Creative Corporealities Research Group​. Collaborations include work 
with Liz Aggiss, Hilde Holger, Julia Pascal, Tanzinitiative Hamburg, Somatische Akademie 
Berlin, and with Carol Brown on re-embodying the diasporic practices of Modernist 
choreographer Gertrud Bodenwieser. Thomas’ research focuses on critical somatic legacies. He 
recently co-edited ​Journal of Dance and Somatic Practices​, Vol. 9. (2017) ​Bodily undoing: 

 
Editorial • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 24 
 



 

Somatics as practices of critique​, with Kirsty Alexander. Thomas is a practitioner of the 
Feldenkrais Method​®​. Since 2015 direction of international symposia: ​(re)storing performance 
(2015); ​Theatre, youth, trauma and Europe in crisis​ (2016); ​Bodily Undoing –Somatic 
Performance Cultures and Activisms as critical practice​ (2016); ​Beyond Forgetting 1938-2018: 
persecution/exile/ memory​ (2018). He currently co-directs the international ​Body IQ Berlin 
Festival 2019​ with Somatische Akademie Berlin (SAB). He is the Guest-editor of this Volume of 
the ​Feldenkrais Research Journal​. ​https://www.bathspa.ac.uk/our-people/thomas-kampe/ 
www.thomaskampe.com 

 

References 

Aldor, G. (2012) ​Wie tanzt nun ein Kamel? Die Geschichte der Ornstein-Familie und die 
Erfindung des modernen israelischen Tanztheaters [How does a camel dance?: The story 
of the Orenstein family and the invention of modern Israeli dance theater]​. Vienna: 
Mandelbaum Verlag  

Amory, K. (2010) ‘Acting for the Twenty-first Century: A Somatic Approach to Contemporary 
Actor Training’. ​Perfformio​ 1 (2), Spring, 5-20. available from 
<​http://www.wellnesscke.net/downloadables/ActingfortheTwenty-firstCentury.pdf​> 

Bacon, J. (2019) ‘Processual Attention in Somatic Practice as Research/Artistic Research’. in 
Researching (in/as) Motion: A Resource Collection, Artistic Doctorates in Europe.​ eds. by 
Midgelow, V., Bacon, J., Kramer, P., and Hilton, R. Theatre Academy, University of the 
Arts, Helsinki: Nivel 10. available from 
<​https://nivel.teak.fi/adie/processual-attention-in-somatic-practice-as-research-artistic-rese
arch/​> 

Bacon, J., and Midgelow, V. (2014) ‘Creative Articulations Process’. ​Articulations​ (Special Issue 
Choreographic Practices) ​5​ (1), 7–31. Bristol: Intellect 

Barrett, E., and Bolt, B. (eds.) (2007) ​Practice as Research: Approaches to Creative Arts 
Enquiry​. London: I.B. Tauris 

Batson, G. (2008) ‘Teaching Alignment’. in ​The Body Eclectic: Evolving Practices in Dance 
Training​. ed by Bales, M. and Nettl-Fiol, R. Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press 

Batson, G., and Wilson, M. (2014) ​Body and Mind in Motion: dance and neuroscience in 
conversation​. Bristol: Intellect Publishers 

Blair, R. (2009) ​The Actor, Image, and Action: Acting and cognitive neuroscience​. New York: 
Routledge 

 
Editorial • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 25 
 

https://www.bathspa.ac.uk/our-people/thomas-kampe/
http://www.thomaskampe.com/
http://www.wellnesscke.net/downloadables/ActingfortheTwenty-firstCentury.pdf
https://nivel.teak.fi/adie/processual-attention-in-somatic-practice-as-research-artistic-research/
https://nivel.teak.fi/adie/processual-attention-in-somatic-practice-as-research-artistic-research/


 

Blair, R., and Cook, A. (2016) ​Theatre, Performance and Cognition Languages, Bodies and 
Ecologies​. London: Bloomsbury 

Birringer, J., and Fenger, J. (2005) ​Tanz im Kopf: Dance and Cognition​. Bielefeld: Lit Verlag 

Borgdorff, H. (2007) ‘The Mode of Knowledge Production in Artistic Research’. in ​Knowledge in 
Motion​. eds. by Gehm, S., Husemann, P., and von Wilcke, K. Bielefeld: transcript 

Brodie, J., and Lobel, E. (2004) ‘Integrating Fundamental Principles Underlying Somatic 
Practices into the Dance Technique Class’. ​Journal of Dance Education 4​ (3), 80-87 

Brodie, J., and Lobel, E. (2012) ​Dance and Somatics: Mind-Body Principles of Teaching and 
Performance​. London: McFarland 

Buckard, C. (2015) ​Moshe Feldenkrais: Der Mensch hinter der Methode (Moshe Feldenkrais: 
The man behind the Method)​. Berlin: Piper 

Cave, R. A. (2015) ‘Feldenkrais and actors: working with the Royal Shakespeare Company’. 
Theatre, Dance and Performance Training 6​ (2), 174-186 

Conforti, Y. ([2002] 2011) ‘“The New Jew” in the Zionist Movement: Ideology and 
Historiography’. ​Australian Journal of Jewish Studies XXV​, 87-118. available from 
<​https://www.academia.edu/2218726/The_New_Jew_in_the_Zionist_Movement_Ideology
_and_Historiography​> [17 May 2019] 

Eddy, M. (2017) ​Mindful Movement: The Evolution of the Somatic Arts and Conscious Action​. 
Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press 

Eddy, M. (2000) ‘Access to Somatic Theory and Applications: Socio-Political Concerns’. in 
Proceedings of the Dancing in the Millennium Conference​. held 19-23 July at Washington, 
DC, 144–148. available from 
<​http://www.wellnesscke.net/downloadables/Access-to-Somatics.pdf​> [15 May 2018] 

Eikmeier, C. (2016) ‘Improvisieren mit einem improvisierenden Körper [Improvisation with the 
improvising body]’. in ​Improvisation erforschen – improvisierend forschen. Beiträge zur 
Exploration musikalischer Improvisation [Researching Improvisation – Researching by 
Improvisation. Essays About the Exploration of Musical Improvisation]​. ed. by Gagel, R., 
and Schwabe, M. Bielefeld: Transkript, 180-201 

Eikmeier, C. (2010) ​Bewegungsqualität und Musizierpraxis. Zum Verhältnis von 
Feldenkrais-Methode und musikalischer Improvisation [Movement quality and music 
practice. On the relationship between Feldenkrais method and musical improvisation]​. 
Fernwald: Musikautorenverlag Burkard Muth 

 
Editorial • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 26 
 

https://www.academia.edu/2218726/The_New_Jew_in_the_Zionist_Movement_Ideology_and_Historiography
https://www.academia.edu/2218726/The_New_Jew_in_the_Zionist_Movement_Ideology_and_Historiography
http://www.wellnesscke.net/downloadables/Access-to-Somatics.pdf


 

Evans, M. (2009) ​Movement Training for The Modern Actor​. London: Routledge 

Falletti, C., Sofia, G., and Jacono, V. (eds.) (2016) ​Theatre and Cognitive Neuroscience​. 
London: Bloomsbury 

Feldenkrais, M. (1975) ​San Francisco Training Transcripts​. Paris: International Feldenkrais 
Federation 

Feldenkrais, M. (2010) ​Embodied Wisdom: The Collected Papers of Moshe Feldenkrais.​ ed. by 
Berringer, E. Berkeley, California: North Atlantic Books 

Feldenkrais, M. (1990) ​Awareness Through Movement: Health Exercises for Personal Growth​. 
2nd edn. New York: Harper Collins 

Feldenkrais, M. (1985) ​The Potent Self: A Study of Spontaneity and Compulsion​. San 
Francisco: Harper and Row 

Fortin, S. (1998) ‘Somatics: a tool for empowering modern dance teachers’. in ​Dance, power, 
and difference: Critical and feminist perspectives on dance education​. ed by Shapiro, S. 
Champaign, Ill.: Human Kinetics, 49-71 

Fortin, S., Long, W., and Lord, M. (2002) ‘Three voices researching how somatic education 
informs contemporary dance technique classes’. ​Research in Dance Education 3​ (2), 
153-177 

Fortin, S and Long, W. (2019) ​Integrating The Feldenkrais Method within Dance Technique 
Class​, available from 
<​https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265274558_Integrating_the_Feldenkrais_Meth
od_within_Dance_Technique_Class​> [30 March 2019] 

Fortin, S., Vieira A., and Tremblay, M. (2009) ‘The Experience of Discourses in Dance and 
Somatics’. ​Journal of Dance and Somatic Practices 1​ (1), 47-64 

Foster, S. L. (ed.) (2009) ​Worlding Dance​. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 

Foucault, M. (1997) ‘The ethic of the concern of the self as a practice of freedom’. in ​Ethics: 
Subjectivity and Truth​. ed. by Rabinow, P. London: The Penguin Press, 281-301 

Franko, M. (1995) ​Dancing Modernism/Performing Politics​. Bloomington: Indiana University 
Press 

Fraser, A. (2017) ​Play the Piano with your Whole Self.​ [e-book] Serbia: The Alan Fraser Piano 
Institute. available from <​https://store.alanfraserinstitute.com/product/5​> 

 
Editorial • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 27 
 

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265274558_Integrating_the_Feldenkrais_Method_within_Dance_Technique_Class
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265274558_Integrating_the_Feldenkrais_Method_within_Dance_Technique_Class
https://store.alanfraserinstitute.com/product/5


 

Gare, A. (2016) ‘Beyond Modernism and Postmodernism: The Narrative of the Age of 
Re-embodiments’. in ​Contributions to Law, Philosophy and Ecology​. ed by 
Thomas-Pellicer, R., De Lucia, V., and Sian Sullivan, S. London: Routledge 

Garrett-Brown, N. (2011) ‘Disorientation and emergent subjectivity: The political Potentiality of 
embodied encounter’. ​Journal of Dance & Somatic Practices 3​ (1+2), 61-73. doi: 
10.1386/jdsp.3.1-2.61_1 

Goldfarb, L. W. (1990) ​Articulating Changes: Preliminary Notes to a Theory for Feldenkrais​. 
Berkeley: Feldenkrais Resources 

Green, J. (2015) ‘Social Somatic Theory: Issues and Applications in Dance Pedagogy’. ​Revista 
Científi ca/FAP, Curitiba [Scientific Magazine / FAP, Curitiba]​ 13, 65-76. available from 
<​http://periodicos.unespar.edu.br/index.php/revistacientifica/article/viewFile/1444/793​> [17 
April 2019] 

Green, J. (2001) ‘Socially Constructed Bodies in American Dance Classrooms’. ​Research in 
Dance Education 2​ (2), 155-173 

Hanna, T. (1970) ​Bodies in Revolt: A Primer in Somatic Thinking​. New York: Holt, Rinehart and 
Winston 

Haseman, B. (2007) ‘Rupture and Recognition: Identifying the Performative Research 
Paradigm’. in ​Practice as Research - Approaches to Arts Enquiry​. ed. by Barrett, E., and 
Bolt, B. London: I.B. Tauris 

Herzl, T. (1902) ​Altneuland​. 1st edn. Leipzig: Hermann Seemann Nachfolger 

Hewitt, A. (2005) ​Social Choreography: Ideology as Performance in Dance and Everyday 
Movement​. Durham: Duke University Press 

Igweonu, K. (2010) ​Feldenkrais Method in Performer Training: Encouraging Curiosity and 
Experimentation​. Project Report. Swansea: Centre for Innovative Performance Practice 
and Research 

Kampe, T. (2019) ‘Body-Soma-Self: Re-embodying Dance Research’. in ​Researching (in/as) 
Motion: A Resource Collection/ Artistic Doctorates in Europe​. eds. by Midgelow, V., 
Bacon, J., Kramer, P., and Hilton, R. available from 
<​https://nivel.teak.fi/adie/body-soma-self/​> 

Kampe, T. (2017) ‘Entangled histories, part 2: Releasing the de-generate body’. ​Journal of 
Dance & Somatic Practices​, 9:1, pp. 75-93 

 
Editorial • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 28 
 

http://periodicos.unespar.edu.br/index.php/revistacientifica/article/viewFile/1444/793
https://nivel.teak.fi/adie/body-soma-self/


 

Kampe, T. (2016) ‘crossing/weaving: somatic interventions in choreographic practices’. in: 
International Feldenkrais Federation (IFF) Research Journal Vol 5​. 

Kampe, T. (2015) ‘Eros and Inquiry: The Feldenkrais Method as a Complex Resource’. in 
Theatre, Dance and Performance Training 6​ (2), 200-218. available from 
<​https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19443927.2015.1027451​> 

Kampe, T. (2013) ​The Art of Making Choices: The Feldenkrais Method as a Choreographic 
Resource​. Unpublished PhD documentation. London Metropolitan University 
(academia.edu) 

Kapsali, M. (2013) ‘Rethinking actor training: training body, mind and … ideological awareness’. 
Theatre, Dance and Performance Training 4​ (1), 73-86  

Klein, G. (2011) ‘Künstlerisches Arbeiten im Postkapitalismus [Surviving Artistic Work in Post 
Capitalism]’. ​Surviving Dance Symposium, Choreographisches.​ Unpublished. Zentrum K3 
Hamburg Germany, Paper 20/05/11 

Klein, G., and Noeth, S. (eds.) (2011) ​Emerging Bodies: The Performance of Worldmaking in 
Dance and Choreography.​ Bielefeld: Transcript 

Klien, M. (2009) ​Choreography as an Aesthetics of Change.​ Unpublished PhD thesis. University 
of Edinburgh 

Kovich, Z. (2007) ‘Promoting Dexterity in Technical Dance Training using the Feldenkrais 
Method’. ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, 3 

Laroche, J., and Kaddouch, I. (2015) ‘Spontaneous preferences and core tastes: embodied 
musical personality and dynamics of interaction in a pedagogical method of improvisation’. 
Frontiers in Psychology 6​, 522. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00522 

Litvinoff, V. (1972) ​The Use of Stanislavsky within Modern Dance​. New York, NY: American 
Dance Guild 

Long, J. A., Newton, R., and Kovich, Z. (2015) ‘Essai: Manifesting Kinesthetic and Creative 
Possibilities through the Art of Somatic Inquiry using The Feldenkrais Method’. ​Theatre, 
Dance and Performance Training 6​ (2), 258-262 

McCaw, D. (2016) ​Training the Actor's Body​. London: Methuen Drama 

Maturana, H. R., and Varela, F. (1992) ​The Tree of Knowledge​. rev. edn. Boston: Shambhala 

 
Editorial • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 29 
 

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19443927.2015.1027451


 

Mensendieck, E. ([1906] 1929) ​Körperkultur des Weibes: Praktisch Hygienische und Praktische 
Ästhetische Winke [Body culture of the woman. Practically hygienic and practically 
aesthetic hints]​. 10th edn. Munich: F. Bruckmann 

Mensendieck, E. (1927) ​Bewegungsprobleme – Die Gestaltung schöner Arme [Movement 
problems. The design of beautiful arms]​. Munich: F. Bruckmann 

Midgelow, V. (2019) ‘Introduction‘ , in Midgelow, V., Bacon, J., Kramer, P., and Hilton, R. (eds.) 
(2019) ​Researching (in/as) Motion: A Resource Collection/ Artistic Doctorates in Europe​. 
available from <​https://nivel.teak.fi/adie/introduction/​> [19 May 2019] 

Midgelow, V. (2014) ​A Little Fleshy Philosophy– Improvised Dance Practice as Research. 
[online] available from 
<​https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31871414_A_little_fleshy_philosophy_dance_i
mprovisation_as_research​>  

Midgelow, V., Bacon, J., Kramer, P., and Hilton, R. (eds.) (2019) ​Researching (in/as) Motion: A 
Resource Collection/ Artistic Doctorates in Europe​. available from 
<​https://nivel.teak.fi/adie/​> 

Milne-Home, J. (2011) ​Improvisation—a continuum of moving moments in choreographic 
imagination and performance​. available from 
<​https://ausdance.org.au/articles/details/improvisation-a-continuum​> [19 May 2019] 

Mirochnikov, O. (2007) ​Teaching and Professional Fellowship Report 2006/7: The Vakhtangov 
Technique​. Project Report. London: University of the Arts London 

Montuori, A. (2011) ‘Beyond postnormal times: The future of creativity and the creativity of the 
future’. ​Futures: journal of policy, planning and future studies 43​, 221–227 

Montuori, A. (2007) ‘Foreword’. in ​On Complexity​. Morin, E. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press 

Morin, E. (2009) ​The Seven Necessary Reforms of the 21st Century. 
<​http://www.ideassonline.org/pic/doc/VideoconferenceMorinENG.pdf​> [14 April 2018] 

Morin, E. (2007) ​On Complexity​. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press 

Morin, E. (1999) ​Seven Complex lessons in Education For The Future​. trans. by Poller, N. Paris: 
UNESCO Publications 

Morin, E., and Kern, A. B. (1999) ​Homeland Earth: A manifesto for the new millennium​. 
Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press 

 
Editorial • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 30 
 

https://nivel.teak.fi/adie/introduction/
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31871414_A_little_fleshy_philosophy_dance_improvisation_as_research
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31871414_A_little_fleshy_philosophy_dance_improvisation_as_research
https://nivel.teak.fi/adie/
https://ausdance.org.au/articles/details/improvisation-a-continuum
http://www.ideassonline.org/pic/doc/VideoconferenceMorinENG.pdf


 

Noë, A. (2009) ‘Bringing the World (in Dance) into Focus’. Talk. ​Tanzkongress Deutschland 
[Dance Congress] 2009​. held 5-8 November 2009 at Kampnagel, Hamburg.  

Nordau, M. (1955) ​Zionist Writings. Vol. 1.​ (in Hebrew) Jerusalem: Hassifria Haziyonit 
Publishing House of the World Zionist Congress 

Oberzaucher-Schuller, G. (2013) ‘Utopia realised‘. [online] ​Tanz.at​ 11 January, 2013. available 
from <​http://www.tanz.at/index.php/verlegt/buecher/1659-wie-tanzt-nun-ein-kamel​> 

Ornstein, M. (1940a) ​Bewegungskultur als Vorbereitung für Regieführung (Movement Culture as 
Preparation for Direction) Part 1​. Tel Aviv: Israel Dance Library 

Ornstein, M. (1940b) ​Bewegungskultur als Vorbereitung für Regieführung (Movement Culture as 
Preparation for Direction) Part 2​. Tel Aviv: Israel Dance Library 

Pergola, M. D. (2003) ‘Working with Actors’. ​Feldenkrais Journal 16​, 33-41 

Purcell, M. (1990) ‘Feldenkrais for Actors (and Acters)’. ​Feldenkrais Journal 5​, 41-47 

Questel, A. S. (2002) ‘The Feldenkrais Method: Application for the Actor’. ​Feldenkrais Journal 
14​, 11-16 

Reese, M. (2016) ​Moshe Feldenkrais: A Life in Movement.​ San Rafael, CA: ReeseKress 
Somatics Press 

Roche, J. (2016) ‘Shifting embodied perspectives in dance teaching’. in ​Journal for Dance and 
Somatic Practices 8​ (2), 143-156  

Samorzik, E. (2011) ‘Pas de Trois’. Haaretz Newspaper [online] 28 October, 2011. available 
from <​http://www.haaretz.com/weekend/week-s-end/pas-de-trois-1.392435​> [17 
December 2017] 

Shklovsky, V. ([1917] 1965) ‘Art as Technique’. in ​Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays​. 
Lemon, T. and Reiss, M. Lincoln: University of Nebraska, 3-24 

Stanislavski, K. ([1924] 1974) ​My life in Art​. London: Geoffrey Bles 

Van Der Schyff, D. (2017) ​Concepts for an Enactive Music Pedagogy: Essays on 
Phenomenology, Embodied Cognition, and Music Education​. Unpublished PhD thesis. 
Vancouver: Simon Fraser University 

Veder, R. M. (2010) ‘The Expressive Efciencies of American Delsarte and Mensendieck Body 
Culture’. ​MODERNISM (Modernity) 17​ (4), 819–838 

 
Editorial • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 31 
 

http://www.tanz.at/index.php/verlegt/buecher/1659-wie-tanzt-nun-ein-kamel
http://www.haaretz.com/weekend/week-s-end/pas-de-trois-1.392435


 

Vernon-Warren, B., and Warren, C. (eds.) (1999) ​Gertrud Bodenwieser and Vienna's 
contribution to Ausdruckstanz​. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers 

Whatley, S., Alexander K., and Garrett-Brown, N. (2009) ‘Editorial’. ​Journal of Dance and 
Somatic Practices 1​ (1), 2-4 

Wood, B. (2011) ‘Coming to Our Senses: Perceptual Performance and Fields Intensities’. 
Journal of Dance and Somatic Practices 3​ (1+2), 85-99 

Worth, L. (2015) ‘Editorial’. ​Theatre, Dance and Performance Training 6​ (2), 125-129 

Worsley, V. (2016) ​Feldenkrais for Actors: How to do less and discover more.​ London: Nick 
Hern Books 

 

Interviews 

Aldor, G. (2017) Email dialogue with Thomas Kampe; Unpublished. London & Tel Aviv 

Naharin, S. (2017) Interview with Thomas Kampe, Kassel/Tel Aviv 

 

 
 

 

 

 
Editorial • ​Feldenkrais Research Journal, volume 6​ (2018-2019) 32 
 


