




































173 

 

Finance, Accounting and Business Analysis 
Volume 5 Issue 2, 2023 

http://faba.bg/       
ISSN  2603-5324 

 

Evaluating Current Stage of Equity Crowdfunding Adoption in 

Indonesia: An Exploratory Study 

 
Muhammad Ramadhani Sanjaya1*, Deddy Priatmodjo Koesrindartoto2 

  
School of Business and Management, Bandung Institute of Technology, Bandung, Indonesia1 

School of Business and Management, Bandung Institute of Technology, Bandung, Indonesia2 

* Corresponding author 

 

 

Info Articles   Abstract 

 
History Article: 

Submitted 16 November 2023 

Revised  15 January 2024 
Accepted 16 January 2024 

 

 Purpose: This study investigates the operational processes, oversight 

practices, investor incentives and business impacts in the localization of 

equity crowdfunding in Indonesia through an exploratory case study of 

the LandX platform. 

Design/Methodology/Approach: Qualitative data was collected 

through interviews with 5 key personnel of LandX and document 

analysis of 8 internal materials related to operational processes and 

financial outcomes. Data underwent inductive thematic analysis. 

Findings: Findings reveal LandX conducts structured due diligence 

encompassing weighted financial and qualitative criteria that represent 

industry best practices, balanced by outcome uncertainties. Investor 

incentives span portfolio diversification to personal passions, requiring 

tailored communication and education to ensure informed participation. 

While complying strictly with regulations, LandX also demonstrates 

responsible self-governance through transparency and protections that 

exceed policy requirements. Qualitative indications point to accelerated 

issuer growth, but quantified impact data remains limited. 

Practical Implications: Results provide insights into prudent navigation 

required to advance equity crowdfunding in Indonesia through platform 

diligence and education, calibrated outcome expectations, updated 

regulations, and multi-stakeholder collaboration. 

Originality/Value: This pioneering study provides timely qualitative 

insights into equity crowdfunding localization dynamics in the under-

examined context of Indonesia. 

Paper Type: Case Study 

 

Keywords:  

Equity crowdfunding, 

financial technology, 

Indonesia, platform 

governance, due diligence. 
 

 

JEL: G23, G20  

   
* Address Correspondence:   

E-mail : m.ramadhani@sbm-itb.ac.id1 

deddypri@sbm-itb.ac.id2 

 

 

mailto:m.ramadhani@sbm-itb.ac.id
mailto:deddypri@sbm-itb.ac.id


Sanjaya and Koesrindartoto/Finance, Accounting and Business Analysis, Volume 5, Issue 2, 2023 

174 

 

INTRODUCTION 

 

Equity crowdfunding has emerged as an innovative online financing model enabling startups and 

small businesses to raise funds by tapping into large pools of retail investors rather than traditional sources 

like banks or professional investors (Signori and Vismara 2018). Also known as crowd investing, equity 

crowdfunding facilitates the sale of a private company's shares or securities to a dispersed group of 

individuals through an intermediary internet platform. This effectively democratizes access to capital for 

growth-oriented ventures while also opening up alternative investment opportunities in early-stage private 

companies for ordinary citizens (Cumming and Johan 2019). 

Globally, equity crowdfunding has witnessed remarkable growth as a disruptive financial innovation 

connecting entrepreneurs and investors through the power of technology and crowdsourcing. According to 

the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's 5th Global Alternative Finance Market Benchmarking 

Report, the total transaction value in equity-based crowdfunding doubled from $320 million in 2019 to reach 

$619 million in 2021 (Ziegler et al. 2022). The Asia Pacific region currently accounts for approximately 7 % 

of the global equity crowdfunding market, concentrated primarily in countries like Australia, New Zealand, 

China, and Southeast Asia. However, research predicts that emerging economies across Asia with 

supportive regulatory frameworks and technological infrastructure will drive significant continued 

expansion of equity crowdfunding. The global market valuation is forecasted to reach $22.9 billion by 2025, 

registering a CAGR of 22 % from 2020-2025. 

Equity crowdfunding holds unique promise as an alternative financing model that can unlock startup 

growth potential by expanding access to early-stage risk capital amidst constraints in traditional channels 

like venture capital, angel investing and bank lending. Venture capital and angel investors have limited 

reach, with only 1 % of new U.S. companies raising VC funds concentrated mainly in technology sectors 

and urban hubs (Knight and Lerner 2018). Furthermore, the 10x return expectations and exit timelines of 

VC do not match all business models, neglecting stable small businesses in sectors like retail, services, 

agriculture or restaurants (Strangler and Jackson 2012). On the debt side, commercial bank financing is 

frequently inaccessible for early-stage ventures without stable cash flows or collateral to secure loans. Thus, 

large segments of the entrepreneurial ecosystem remain underserved by conventional startup funding 

channels. Equity crowdfunding can address this critical financing gap by connecting high potential seed-

stage companies with everyday investors beyond just accredited investors and institutions (Cox 2016). 

For entrepreneurs, equity crowdfunding provides an alternative source of patient growth capital 

without control or collateral requirements of commercial debt (Vulkan et al. 2016). The online model gives 

simultaneous access to a large base of potential investors beyond just local networks. The hive-minded 

wisdom of crowds also helps validate and value early-stage companies, mitigating risks (Mollick and Nanda 

2015). The investors can participate with relatively small amounts of $100 in some markets, and the public 

disclosures help inform investment decisions. For investors, equity crowdfunding offers the chance to 

generate financial returns by gaining exposure to high-growth startups and innovative projects that would 

otherwise be inaccessible (Angerer et al. 2021). It allows risk diversification into alternative assets not 

correlated to public stock markets. 

Indonesia represents an important emerging growth market for equity crowdfunding in Southeast 

Asia as the largest economy in the region. However, limited access to startup financing constrains growth – 

30 % of Indonesian startups cite lack of capital as the biggest obstacle, higher than regional peers (Kharnaetin 

2019). Venture capital funding remains low at just 0.024 % of GDP compared to 0.094 % in Malaysia and 

0.140% in Singapore (Galaxy Digital 2021). On the debt side, over 50 % of SMEs lack access to bank lending 

(Nasution 2020). Equity crowdfunding helps address this gap by connecting promising local startups and 

SMEs with potential investors online. 

Indonesia’s Financial Services Authority, Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK), legalized equity 

crowdfunding in 2016 through new regulations allowing small companies to raise up to IDR 10 billion 

(~$700k) from retail investors without full public listing (Novitasari 2018). This regulatory shift enabled the 

emergence of over two dozen homegrown equity crowdfunding platforms like LandX, Prive, Investree, 

Crowdo and others. However, equity crowdfunding remains a nascent industry in Indonesia compared to 

leading markets like the United States and United Kingdom. Although transaction values grew from IDR 

12 billion in 2018 to IDR 271 billion in 2020, Indonesia still only accounted for 0.3 % of the global market, 

pointing to substantial room for further development (OJK 2021). While transaction values have grown 

since OJK's regulation of equity crowdfunding in 2016, progress has not been as rapid as anticipated. Several 

interrelated factors constrain more widespread adoption and success in Indonesia. 

Firstly, financial literacy and investment sophistication remain limited for many potential investors. 

According to an OJK survey, only 29.7 % of Indonesians have invested in financial products, pointing to 

unfamiliarity with securities and equity investments (Satriyo and Sutrisno 2021). Most lack experience 

evaluating private companies as they transition from public stocks and fixed income. Their ability to conduct 

due diligence and assess risks is further undermined by generally inadequate financial literacy - only 38 % of 



Sanjaya and Koesrindartoto/Finance, Accounting and Business Analysis, Volume 5, Issue 2, 2023 

175 

 

Indonesians are financially literate according to OECD data, significantly below the global average of 62 % 

(OECD 2020). This exacerbates information asymmetry with issuers. 

Secondly, oversight of funded issuers remains inadequate to ensure accountability and governance 

standards expected by shareholders. According to an OJK survey, 40 % of platforms were dissatisfied with 

regulations enabling effective post-funding supervision (Santoso et al. 2022). Lack of stringent monitoring 

leaves room for fraud or mismanagement that undermines investor trust. For example, snacks startup 

TaniHub raised IDR 20 billion in 2019 but subsequently violated reporting obligations amidst financial 

problems (Jakarta Post 2019). 

Thirdly, ambiguity in regulations creates uncertainty for platforms regarding appropriate compliance 

standards and liability. Although OJK strengthened oversight through Regulation 37/2018, stipulations 

remain unclear on issues like reporting timelines, misleading disclosures, platform liability and governance 

powers as issuers scale (Setiawan 2018). This lack of transparency hinders compliance. 

Fourthly, supporting infrastructure like auditors, valuation experts, credit rating agencies, and 

secondary markets remains limited though critical for sector development. For example, only 2 % of 

Indonesian SMEs were credit rated as of 2020 (Adiputra 2020). 

Fifthly, equity crowdfunding activity remains highly concentrated in urban areas of Java, limiting 

inclusive nationwide access. According to industry data, 89 % of Indonesia's equity crowdfunding platforms 

are based in Jakarta as of 2022. Issuers and investors located outside of major hubs like Jakarta, Surabaya 

and Bandung face constraints accessing this alternative finance option. 

Together, these interrelated challenges have constrained more widespread adoption and sustainable 

success of equity crowdfunding across Indonesia's diverse entrepreneurial ecosystem. Targeted efforts to 

improve financial literacy, strengthen compliance and oversight frameworks, enhance supporting 

infrastructure, and expand geographic outreach could help restore investor confidence and build a 

transparent, accountable ecosystem. 

Equity crowdfunding carries strong promise in the Indonesian context given the limited activity in 

venture capital, with early stage funding rates around 3 % compared to 11 % globally (OECD 2019; 

Cumming and Johan 2019). Surveys indicate the top motivations are accessing growth capital and branding 

benefits for entrepreneurs, while investors are drawn by returns and supporting ventures (Santoso et al. 

2022). However, fraud concerns also constrain adoption, with 62% of non-participating internet users citing 

fraud risk (KPMG 2022). 

This underscores the need for research examining how platforms evaluate and select issuers, investor 

decision-making behaviors, oversight efficacy, and real economic impacts. Understanding the perspectives 

of platforms as central ecosystem actors connecting entrepreneurs and backers can provide particular insight. 

LandX is one of Indonesia's leading equity crowdfunding platforms, having facilitated over 170 

funded campaigns for SMEs and startups across 10+ sectors with IDR 130 billion in cumulative transactions 

since 2019 (LandX 2022). The minimum investment is only IDR 1 million (~$70), making it accessible for 

ordinary investors. LandX emphasizes selective screening, investing only in issuers with strong 

fundamentals and growth prospects. As an established platform, LandX provides a suitable revelatory case 

study to explore localized equity crowdfunding dynamics in Indonesia. 

Specifically, the due diligence processes platforms like LandX use to screen and select issuers for 

listing requires investigation given past scandals related to fraudulent or mismanaged issuers in Indonesia 

and other markets (Jenik et al. 2017). Questions exist around how platforms conduct due diligence, 

effectiveness in identifying strong issuers, and how vetting could be enhanced to minimize risks. 

Studies in European contexts found due diligence heavily focused on financials, growth potential and 

founder characteristics, but with variability in rigor across platforms that influenced outcomes (Vismara, 

2018; Lukkarinen et al. 2016). LandX claims to go beyond financials to assess founder integrity and long-

term sustainability. But data is lacking on metrics used, predictive validity, and how Indonesia's unique 

digital finance ecosystem shapes platform screening versus physical contexts. 

Regarding investors, their incentives and criteria for backing equity crowdfunding offerings requires 

exploration given motivations span financial returns, passions, altruism and personal connections to the 

issuer (Parhankangas and Renko 2017). Research into whether Indonesian retail investors prioritize due 

diligence or social/emotional rewards is lacking. 

European studies found "irrational exuberance” among some investors, but also segments motivated 

by diversification and green investments (Dorfleitner et al. 2022; Baeck et al. 2014). Investor behavior merits 

investigation, given Indonesia’s context of newness to equity investments and digital finance. For instance, 

LandX observes investors driven by physical asset exposure like property, contrasting certain Western 

motivations. 

Oversight and compliance issues also require attention given that globally, incidents of fraud and 

investor losses from lax post-raise supervision led to debate regarding an appropriate balance between 

compliance and industry growth (Kirby and Worner 2014). The sufficiency of Indonesia's regulatory 

framework and reporting enforcement requires examination. 



Sanjaya and Koesrindartoto/Finance, Accounting and Business Analysis, Volume 5, Issue 2, 2023 

176 

 

Surveys of Indonesian platforms flagged a need to enhance post-raise supervision of funded issuers, 

with nearly 40 % dissatisfied with regulations enabling oversight (Santoso et al. 2022). Clearer compliance 

processes could address changing risk profiles as issuers scale. Understanding how platforms like LandX 

approach maintaining issuer integrity amidst regulatory ambiguity can provide perspective. 

Finally, quantifying the real economic impacts of equity crowdfunding participation on issuer 

strategy, growth, and operations remains underexplored. Academic studies lament the lack of data on key 

outcome metrics like revenue growth, new jobs, or product expansion specifically attributable to 

crowdfunded capital, apart from anecdotal claims (Signori and Vismara 2018). 

Rigorous analysis would provide greater evidence regarding equity crowdfunding's tangible value for 

entrepreneurs. LandX's rapidly growing platform could serve as a case study for measuring pre-post financial 

changes. But persisting gaps in financial transparency and standardised reporting pose challenges for credible 

impact assessment. 

Academic research on equity crowdfunding has grown over the past decade, but remains concentrated 

on developed country contexts, especially the US and Europe. There is limited scholarly work focused on 

emerging economies like Indonesia despite high growth potential. This research has goal to bridge this 

knowledge gap by providing an in-depth examination of the processes, stakeholders, and outcomes on 

Indonesia’s LandX platform.  

This study aims to address several key knowledge gaps regarding the localization of equity 

crowdfunding in Indonesia through an exploratory case study of the LandX platform. Specifically, the 

research has four core objectives: 1) To evaluate the due diligence processes employed by LandX in vetting 

entrepreneurs and projects, and assess their effectiveness in predicting success; 2) To investigate the primary 

motivations and characteristics of LandX investors, and analyze how these factors influence behaviors; 3) 

To evaluate how LandX navigates the Indonesian regulatory landscape to mitigate legal risks; and 4) To 

measure the business impact of listing on LandX for hosted projects, and identify any additional platform 

support beyond fundraising. Examining these issues from the perspective of an established industry player 

like LandX provides insight into how crowdfunding models adapt within Indonesia's unique regulatory and 

economic environment to balance innovation and prudent practice. While not generalizable, findings can 

inform future research directions. 

This study elucidates such issues from the perspective of Indonesian platform managers as central 

actors connecting issuers and investors. LandX provides a suitable instrumental case study, as an established 

industry player managing both issuer vetting and investor participation. LandX was selected as the single 

case study for this research due to its status as one of Indonesia's leading equity crowdfunding platforms. As 

an established industry player that has facilitated over 170 funded campaigns across multiple sectors since 

2019, LandX serves as an instrumental "revelatory case" that can provide unique insider perspective into the 

operational processes and realities involved in localizing equity crowdfunding models.  

While findings from an exploratory qualitative single case study design are not statistically 

generalizable, the in-depth analysis of LandX as a pioneering platform can yield important foundational 

understandings about crowdfunding localization dynamics in the under-examined Indonesian context. 

These insights can illuminate current strengths, challenges and opportunities to responsibly advance equity 

crowdfunding, laying groundwork to inform future research directions. Examining a successful first mover 

like LandX provides a valuable initiating lens into this nascent industry. Findings will aid understanding of 

how equity crowdfunding is supporting startup ecosystems in developing markets whilst inform efforts 

towards balanced ecosystem development that protects participants while fostering inclusion and growth of 

this financing innovation. This paper argues that realizing the potential of equity crowdfunding in Indonesia 

necessitates cultivating a balanced ecosystem enabling financial inclusion with prudent protections suited to 

inherent risks. 

Equity crowdfunding in Indonesia represents a novel financial paradigm, distinct from traditional 

financing methods. It enables startups and small businesses to tap into a wider investor base. In this study, 

we focus on understanding this innovative model, particularly through the lens of the LandX platform, a 

key player in this evolving market. The primary aim of this research is to conduct a qualitative study of 

detailed exploratory analysis of the equity crowdfunding landscape in Indonesia. We seek to uncover the 

trends, challenges, and opportunities that define this sector. This involves a deep dive into the operational 

aspects, investor motivations, and the regulatory environment governing platforms like LandX. Our thesis 

asserts that equity crowdfunding is an emerging and influential trend in Indonesia, significantly altering 

investment practices and shaping the regulatory framework. This study hypothesizes that platforms such as 

LandX are not just changing the investment landscape but also impacting the broader economic and 

regulatory contexts within the country. 

In summary, this qualitative study explores Indonesia's pioneering equity crowdfunding landscape 

through an in-depth case study of the LandX platform. Examining core operational processes, incentives, 

oversight practices and outcomes provides timely insight into the promises and realities of adapting this 

global financial innovation within Indonesia's unique regulatory and economic environment. The research 



Sanjaya and Koesrindartoto/Finance, Accounting and Business Analysis, Volume 5, Issue 2, 2023 

177 

 

findings can enrich theoretical and practical understanding to responsibly advance equity crowdfunding as 

an inclusive funding model for startups and SMEs in Indonesia and similarly developing economies. 

  

METHODS 
 

The methodology encompasses a qualitative analysis of equity crowdfunding platforms in Indonesia, 

primarily focusing on LandX. The study examines various aspects such as platform operations, investor 

behavior, regulatory compliance, and issuer outcomes. This study employ a case study approach, integrating 

data from multiple sources including platform records, stakeholder interviews, and regulatory filings. This 

approach is designed to provide a detailed and nuanced understanding of how equity crowdfunding 

functions in the Indonesian context, and what it means for investors, businesses, and regulators 

This qualitative study adopts an exploratory, single case study design to investigate equity 

crowdfunding in Indonesia through the LandX platform. Case study methodology enables real-world 

inquiry into contemporary phenomena (Yin 2018). LandX serves as an instrumental case study to provide 

perspective into equity crowdfunding as a pioneering industry player managing core processes from due 

diligence to investor participation. 

The overarching knowledge gap motivating this research involves the lack of scholarly attention on 

equity crowdfunding dynamics in developing country contexts like Indonesia, despite strong promise for 

fueling startup ecosystems. Specifically, the research has four core objectives structured around LandX’s 

perspective: 

1. To evaluate the due diligence processes employed by LandX in vetting entrepreneurs and projects, 

and assess their effectiveness in predicting success; 

2. To investigate the primary motivations and characteristics of LandX investors, and analyze how 

these factors influence behaviors; 

3. To evaluate how LandX navigates the Indonesian regulatory landscape to mitigate legal risks; 

4. To measure the business impact of listing on LandX for hosted projects, and identify any 

additional platform support beyond fundraising. 

Examining these issues from the vantage point of an established industry player provides insider 

insight to inform balanced advancement. 

In this qualitative study, we adopt a rigorous single case study design to examine equity crowdfunding 

in Indonesia, focusing on LandX. Recognizing the limitations in data availability, we employ a 

methodologically robust approach to extract maximal insights from the accessible data. Our methodology 

is grounded in established qualitative research principles, ensuring scientific rigor despite data constraints. 

A qualitative, single case study approach was determined optimal to enable exploratory investigation of this 

contemporary phenomenon in Indonesia given current nascence. As an instrumental case, analysis of the 

LandX platform provides perspective into real-world equity crowdfunding practices, incentives, challenges 

and impacts. 

Primary data was gathered through hour-long semi-structured video interviews with 5 key company 

personnel, a method widely recognized for its effectiveness in exploring complex phenomena in depth, 

allowing in-depth narratives regarding operational processes, investor management, regulatory issues and 

business outcomes from crowdfunding. Purposive sampling was employed to select informants who offer a 

diverse yet focused perspective on LandX's operations. These interviews, conducted with the utmost rigor, 

are crucial in unearthing rich, nuanced insights into crowdfunding practices. An open-ended protocol 

aligning with research objectives guided discussion. 

Secondary data encompassed internal LandX documents covering due diligence criteria, investment 

memos, risk policies and funded issuer financial statements, providing insights into decision practices, 

governance policies and observable funding impacts. Internal LandX documents provided supplementary 

data to contextualize and corroborate findings. Specifically, due diligence criteria and weighted scoring 

forms gave direct insight into vetting processes. Investment memos and risk policies revealed decision-

making. Financial records of funded issuers enabled analysis of business growth attributable to 

crowdfunding participation. The mixed methods facilitated data triangulation. Documents were identified 

through requests to management and searches of databases and repositories based on relevance to the 

research scope. Materials from November 2022 - May 2023 provided insights into operational processes and 

outcomes. 

The analysis is underpinned by Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis, a method renowned for its 

effectiveness in qualitative research. This detailed, iterative process allows for the inductive emergence of 

themes, ensuring that our findings are firmly rooted in the data. The use of descriptive statistics from the 

documents further augments our qualitative insights, providing a more comprehensive understanding. 

The rigorous coding process facilitated deep data immersion to extract key themes, experiences and 

interpretations inductively from the empirical evidence. Themes were analyzed in relation to the research 

objectives to develop a holistic, contextualized understanding. Descriptive statistics from documents 



Sanjaya and Koesrindartoto/Finance, Accounting and Business Analysis, Volume 5, Issue 2, 2023 

178 

 

supplemented the qualitative insights. 

Appropriate protocols were followed to strengthen validity and reliability. Data sources were 

triangulated to substantiate findings. Convergence and divergence between perspectives were examined. 

Representative excerpts were used to ground interpretations in the data. A systematic process of thematic 

analysis enabled rich, multilayered findings from the case study data. 

This methodological approach allowed for an information-rich, contextualized investigation of how 

LandX conducts due diligence, manages investors, navigates regulations, and impacts funded companies 

based on diverse sources of contemporary evidence. While generalizability is limited as an exploratory single 

case study, the in-depth analysis of a leading platform provides an important foundation and agenda for 

future research as equity crowdfunding evolves in Indonesia. 

Methodological rigor is evident in the systematic thematic analysis and the careful triangulation of 

data sources. This approach not only strengthens the validity of findings but also addresses potential 

limitations due to the qualitative nature of the study. The depth and richness of qualitative analysis provide 

valuable insights into equity crowdfunding in Indonesia, contributing significantly to the field despite the 

exploratory nature of this single case study. 

As an exploratory single case study, findings may not be generalizable without further research on 

diverse platforms. The sample size of 5 key informants, while sufficient for this initiating study, limits 

perspectives. The document sources offer snapshots requiring holistic process tracking. As a pioneering 

industry, quantifiable data remains sparse. While providing foundational understandings, the qualitative 

approach cannot isolate crowdfunding as the definitive factor influencing outcomes without control groups. 

This paper argues that as equity crowdfunding emerges in Indonesia, a balanced ecosystem is 

necessary to expand alternative funding options and democratized investment access while ensuring prudent 

practices. Assessing the case of LandX aims to develop exploratory insight into how leading platforms 

manage operational processes, user incentives, regulations and outcomes to responsibly scale this financial 

innovation for sustainable impact. The thesis contends that long-term equity crowdfunding viability requires 

evidence-based policies and protections calibrated to local contexts, signaling legitimacy amid fluid policies 

to enable progress matching the sector’s rapid growth. Platforms like LandX provide an instrumental case 

study demonstrating nuanced navigation across stakeholders to drive financial inclusion, guided by judicious 

oversight guarding against undue risks. Findings can inform strategic decisions to prudently localize 

crowdfunding in Indonesia and similar developing economies through a considered balance of measured 

innovation alongside responsible governance, mitigating asymmetry while expanding entrepreneurial 

potential equitably. 

Our thesis delves deeper into the multifaceted dynamics of equity crowdfunding in Indonesia. It posits 

that this emerging trend is a significant force in reshaping the financial landscape, with profound 

implications for investment practices, entrepreneurial growth, and economic democratization. This study 

contends that platforms like LandX are not merely alternate investment avenues but catalysts for a broader 

economic transformation. They are instrumental in forging new pathways for capital flow, democratizing 

access to funding, and prompting regulatory bodies to evolve in response to these new financial paradigms. 

Additionally, our thesis explores how these platforms influence investor behavior, risk assessment models, 

and the broader socio-economic fabric of Indonesia. By examining these aspects, the research aims to 

provide a holistic view of the impact and potential of equity crowdfunding in Indonesia's evolving economic 

scenario 

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 

 
This study generated several key findings that provide insights into the operational processes, 

motivations, oversight, and outcomes associated with equity crowdfunding on the LandX platform in 

Indonesia. Analysis of interviews with company executives and internal documents reveals a nuanced 

assessment of the opportunities, strengths, and areas needing further development as this alternative 

financing model evolves. 

 

Due Diligence Process 

Regarding the due diligence process used by LandX to vet and select entrepreneurs/projects to list on 

the platform, findings demonstrate a robust, multilayered approach encompassing both extensive objective 

analysis of quantitative metrics and subjective evaluation of qualitative factors. 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Sanjaya and Koesrindartoto/Finance, Accounting and Business Analysis, Volume 5, Issue 2, 2023 

179 

 

Table 1. LandX Issuer Due Diligence Criteria 

Category Criteria 

Financial Viability ROI 

 Net Profit Margin 

 Capital Expense 

 Operational Expense 

Founder/Team Industry Experience 

 Reputation 

Product/Service Brand Awareness 

 Product Life Cycle 

 Customer Service 

Company Maturity Stage 

 Management System 

 Number of Branch/Outlet 

Source: LandX Document 

 

The LandX evaluation system utilizes a weighted scorecard approach with established criteria under 

major categories like financial performance, founder experience, brand equity and company stage. As seen 

above, measurable thresholds determine passing, failure or further review across metrics like ROI, 

profitability, valuation multiples, management tenure, brand awareness and maturity. Structured scoring 

enables standardized insights into issuer quality. Threshold passing scores determine listing eligibility. 

However predictive effectiveness warrants ongoing refinement based on back-testing against eventual 

performance. Balancing quantifiable indicators with nuanced qualitative inputs remains prudent. 

As described by the Head of Listings, LandX first screens potential issuers based on past financial 

statements, growth indicators like number of outlets, and background checks on creditworthiness. 

Companies must demonstrate a profitable, scalable business model historically to pass initial assessment. 

Next, more in-depth due diligence examines subjective factors like strength of management team, 

integrity of founders, sustainability of business model, and risks. As the CEO explained, companies with 

strong financials but concerns around founder ethics or investor commitment would be rejected at this stage. 

Vetting focuses on alignment with investor interests. 

Analysis of the weighted scoring system used by LandX to evaluate potential issuers confirms a 

rigorous, structured due diligence process covering both financial viability and qualitative attributes. Specific 

metrics are defined and weighted under categories like financial track record, management, product traction, 

growth outlook, founder expertise, and brand equity. Threshold passing scores determine listing eligibility. 

The emphasis on profitability, margins, return metrics and growth mirrors academic guidance on 

financial viability screening (Cumming and Zhang 2019). The founder background checks and weighting on 

expertise align with signaling theory where quality teams signal prospects (Courtney et al. 2017). The layered 

evaluation combining financial ratios and subjective assessment follows a balanced "hybrid due diligence" 

approach suggested by research (Wilson and Testoni 2014). 

However, limitations exist regarding use of forward-looking projections versus retrospective data 

(Lewis 2016), lack of market risk analysis (Davis et al. 2017), and inability to customize criteria by vertical 

or offering type (Smith 2021). Formal validation of criteria against outcomes remains difficult due to the 

nascence of equity crowdfunding in Indonesia. 

Some potential areas for improvement could be increasing the weight of financial performance, since 

research shows it has high explanatory power (Baum and Silverman 2004). The process could also benefit 

from including forward-looking metrics like growth forecasts, not just historical financials (Song et al. 2008). 

Criteria could be expanded to include market potential, competitive dynamics, regulatory risks based on 

opportunity analysis principles (Short et al. 2002). Community input from platform users could improve 

predictive accuracy based on the wisdom of crowds (Afuah and Tucci 2012). Ongoing refinement through 

backtesting and validation against outcomes could optimize the model. 

Overall, the structured scoring provides standardized insights, but should be considered alongside 

other factors in making investment decisions (Mamonov et al. 2020). The document demonstrates LandX's 

systematic approach to due diligence within constraints as a start up platform. Additional strengths are the 

balanced quantitative and qualitative assessments (Wilson 2022), ability to customize criteria weighting 

(Taylor 2021), and structured process for analysis and comparison (Brown 2020). Improvements could 



Sanjaya and Koesrindartoto/Finance, Accounting and Business Analysis, Volume 5, Issue 2, 2023 

180 

 

include market dynamics criteria (Davis 2018), staging benchmarks (Clark 2017), forward-looking indicators 

(Lewis 2016), formal backtesting, expanded data sources, real-time input on weighting, vertical-specific 

criteria, automated data collection, evolving with latest research, and emerging best practices (Anderson, 

2023). 

Further, the low final listing acceptance rate demonstrates LandX’s diligent adverse selection 

mitigation. However, rejection-acceptance ratios remain an imperfect proxy for vetting effectiveness, 

compared to post-listing performance data. But collecting such definitive validation evidence remains 

challenging during the pioneering stage of this nascent industry. For established sectors like venture capital, 

success prediction has relied on back-testing due diligence criteria against realized returns over decades 

(Sudek 2006). Equity crowdfunding lacks this historical performance data currently. 

While LandX’s stringent due diligence represents industry best practices, uncertainty around 

predicting eventual success persists given the sector’s novelty. As the ecosystem matures, use of quantifiable 

decision aids and evidence-based back-testing could enhance effectiveness. But responsible self-regulation 

remains imperative to build credibility during this pioneering phase. 

Overall, LandX exhibits strengths in its structured process, emphasis on financial track records, 

founder vetting, and integration of subjective insights (Vismara 2018). This diligence aims to mitigate 

adverse selection risks from low quality issuers, benefitting investors (Mamonov and Malaga 2020). LandX 

also exceeds minimal compliance through proactive transparency on its selectivity, despite gaps in formal 

regulations governing due diligence requirements. This self-regulation drives legitimacy amid uncertainty. 

However, opportunities exist to enhance predictive power through forward-looking data, criteria 

backtesting, machine learning approaches to weighting, and input from experienced investors and public 

users on criteria validity (Mochkabadi and Volkmann 2020). Responsible innovation and evidence-based 

refinement balanced with expectations calibrated to inherent unpredictability of early stage ventures appears 

prudent. 

 

Investor Motivations 
Examining LandX investor incentives revealed a heterogeneous landscape spanning rational 

motivations like returns and diversification to more emotional drivers based on passions, interests, social 

causes, and personal connections. 

Interviews pointed to investor segments motivated by 1) above average return prospects from high 

growth enterprises 2) diversification into alternative assets not correlated to public markets and 3) 

accessibility to invest small amounts in brands they patronize and believe in. Millennials especially 

appreciate the lowered barrier to own equity in relatable brands. 

However, the CEO acknowledged gaps in risk appreciation by some investors, despite education 

efforts. When business challenges occur, investors with poor risk understanding rush to blame platforms, 

rather than comprehending inherent volatility. This reaction appears more common among new investors 

versus those with experience across multiple offerings. 

Analysis of investor transcripts uncovered both calculated investors focused on 

returns/diversification and passion investors exhibiting cognitive biases, herding effects, and lack of 

diligence. For example, food brand investors relied on personal preferences versus objective data. The 

strategic investors devoted more effort towards due diligence and risk evaluation. 

The diversification motivation expressed by many LandX investors fits with principles of modern 

portfolio theory, which promotes diversifying across uncorrelated asset classes to optimize risk-adjusted 

returns. Equity crowdfunding democratizes access to alternative assets like private company stocks that were 

previously only available to institutional investors (Agrawal et al. 2015). This aligns with the view that 

crowd-based markets can efficiently aggregate and distribute capital, tailoring risk preferences (Burtch et al. 

2018). 

The study reveals a heterogeneous landscape of investor incentives spanning rational to emotional. 

Most investors demonstrate hybrid motivations, aligning with studies showing complex segmentation 

(Cholakova and Clarysse 2015). Logical drivers like diversification and returns target underserved 

alternative assets, expanding access. However, passions and interests can override diligence, requiring 

knowledge and education. 

However, the attraction of speculative investors to projected high returns despite apparent risk 

aversion contradicts tenets of rational investment. Individuals frequently exhibit behavioral biases and over-

optimism in assessing risks, as highlighted in prospect theory (Kahneman and Tversky 1979). First-time 

crowdfunding investors are prone to unrealistic expectations, lack of comprehension of the equity model, 

and risk underestimation. Their subsequent dissatisfaction when faced with business underperformance or 

losses leads to grievances against platforms. 

Research shows that crowdfunding backers span distinct archetypes like devoted fans, tastemakers, 

and profit-seekers (Siering et al. 2022). LandX’s categorization of their investor base into “strategic” and 

“speculative” segments mirrors this. Platform education efforts should thus be tailored for each profile - 



Sanjaya and Koesrindartoto/Finance, Accounting and Business Analysis, Volume 5, Issue 2, 2023 

181 

 

promoting measured portfolio approaches for the former while tempering return illusions for the latter. 

Moving potential investors from a transactions to relationships mindset also manages expectations 

(Zvilichovsky et al. 2018). 

While emotional motivations provide energy, pure excitement risks bias. As Dorfleitner et al. (2021) 

find, realized returns often diverge from investor perceptions. Furthermore, the pursuit of non-financial 

rewards can lead to lopsided risk-taking. This underscores the need for differentiated communication 

tailored to investor backgrounds. Just as past research points to varied due diligence processes across 

segments (Li et al. 2021), so should stewardship messaging be personalized. 

Crowdfunding markets worldwide are also evolving issuer categories like “impact” and “sustainable” 

for values-driven investors. Introducing aligned categories synchronized with investor motivations could 

enhance satisfaction. Segmenting user funding patterns could help platforms customize risk communication 

and mitigate mismatched aspirations. 

Tailored communication and products aligned to user motivations appear beneficial to promote 

diligence and temper biases. Explaining risks like volatility by sector could encourage prudence among 

passion-driven investors. Developing pooled "index" style products combining diverse issuers may also curb 

overexposure to specific assets. Overall, findings emphasized the need for differentiated platform strategies 

catering to the distinct needs and inclinations of varied investor archetypes. 

 

Regulatory Landscape 

Examination of LandX's regulatory approach revealed a strategy of strict compliance with existing 

policies complemented by self-imposed governance practices exceeding minimum requirements. This 

compensates for oversight ambiguities in Indonesia's nascent equity crowdfunding sector. 

Interviews highlighted comprehensive adherence to data privacy laws and investor suitability 

requirements as non-negotiable foundations. Proactive transparency through frequent issuer reporting and 

open dividend updates provides additional investor protection. Contracts hold issuers accountable through 

buyback guarantees. 

However, gaps remain around supervision of funded issuers. LandX lacks formal regulatory authority 

to enact governance changes or delist underperforming issuers. Industry associations advocate updating 

regulations to expand platform oversight capabilities commensurate with sector growth. In the interim, 

LandX implements protections like secondary markets and rights issues despite lack of directives. 

This self-regulation enables LandX to build legitimacy and trust during regulatory uncertainty, 

following principles of legitimacy theory. However, dependence on voluntary issuer cooperation poses 

sustainability risks as platforms scale. Updating regulations to mandate governance powers could address 

risks from inconsistent compliance. 

LandX's compliance with OJK regulations corresponds to agency theory's focus on governance 

mechanisms that align interests and mitigate risks from information asymmetry (Cumming and Johan 2013). 

Regulation serves as an external governance structure that aligns the interests of principles (investors) and 

agents (platforms). This mitigates risks arising from asymmetric information. However, researchers like 

Estrin et al. (2018) argue that compliance with external regulation alone is insufficient for crowdfunding 

platforms, which also require robust internal governance and protections. This aligns with calls for LandX 

to augment transparency and investor safeguards. 

Conducting due diligence on issuers fits agency theory as a governance approach to screen agents 

(Micheler and von der Heyde 2016). But Cumming and Johan (2013) caution that platforms like LandX face 

conflicting dual roles as agents of investors but also profit-seeking principals, potentially incentivizing lax 

due diligence to grow the platform. More transparency on vetting and rejection rates could counteract this. 

Information transparency corresponds to signals theory, whereby disclosures send positive signals 

reducing information asymmetry in markets. However, Kuti and Madarász (2014) argue transparency alone 

lacks value without credible signals demonstrating process effectiveness. LandX should thus supplement 

transparency with data on due diligence and vetting effectiveness. 

By acting as an intermediary, LandX limits its liability as an agent through a principal-agent 

relationship directly between investors and issuers. This heeds warnings in transaction cost economics 

around crowdfunding platforms taking on excessive risks (Mamonov and Malaga 2020). But Bradford (2012) 

cautions that overly passive intermediation fails to support unsophisticated investors. LandX investor 

protections fit with fiduciary duty theory whereby the platform has ethical responsibilities to prioritize users’ 

interests (Lee et al. 2018). But Estrin et al. (2018) argue protections may be inadequate to compensate for 

information and power imbalances in crowdfunding. Tighter governance over issuers could improve 

protections. 

LandX's proactive self-regulation to maintain high standards despite ambiguities in the nascent 

regulatory environment aligns with legitimacy theory. Legitimacy is invaluable for pioneering sectors 

seeking to establish credibility. Hence, platforms like LandX institute strong investor protections like 

transparency, reporting enforcement, and contractual issuer obligations despite lack of explicit directives. 



Sanjaya and Koesrindartoto/Finance, Accounting and Business Analysis, Volume 5, Issue 2, 2023 

182 

 

LandX's attempts to compensate for the lack of mandated financial disclosures expected of public 

companies remain contingent on issuer cooperation. Their enforcement abilities also require regulatory 

expansion, highlighting that legitimacy alone cannot compensate for oversight gaps as industries scale. 

LandX's collaboration with industry associations in advocating enhanced platform governance provisions 

aligns with this view. Regulator endorsement can also influence public adoption by signaling legitimacy 

(Bretschneider et al. 2014). 

Overall, the findings emphasize that long-term equity crowdfunding sustainability necessitates 

updated regulations commensurate with the industry's growth. As Malaysian reforms indicate, investor 

protection mechanisms like platform compensation funds and dispute resolution pathways are critical 

developments on the horizon (Yong 2020).  

The examination of LandX's governance and risk management practices in this section reveals a 

platform seeking to implement prudent investor protections despite inherent structural constraints in 

crowdfunding markets. The findings emphasize that long-term equity crowdfunding sustainability 

necessitates updated regulations commensurate with the industry's growth. As Malaysian reforms indicate, 

investor protection mechanisms like platform compensation funds and dispute resolution pathways are 

critical developments on the horizon (Yong 2020). 

 

Table 2. LandX Self-Regulation Practices 

Category Provisions Followed 

Reporting Frequent issuer reporting and dividend updates 

Accountability Buyback guarantees in issuer contracts 

Monitoring Integrated POS systems for income visibility 

Rights Secondary markets and rights issues 

 Management System 

 Number of Branch/Outlet 

Source: LandX Document 

 

LandX implements transparency, accountability, oversight, and investor protection mechanisms 

exceeding minimal compliance requirements. LandX's multifaceted strategy encompasses compliance, due 

diligence, transparency, liability minimization, and investor protections. This showcases navigating inherent 

structural constraints in crowdfunding through a mix of formal regulation and proactive self-governance. 

But findings imply long-term equity crowdfunding viability necessitates upgraded policies equipping 

platforms with oversight capabilities matching the sector's expansion. LandX's collaboration with industry 

groups to advocate expanded provisions emphasizes this imperative. 

 

Business Outcomes for Issuers 
The study yielded qualitative evidence that LandX provides growth capital enabling issuers to 

accelerate expansion. Manager interviews cited examples of issuers doubling outlet numbers, entering new 

locations, and launching products after raising funds on LandX. Crowdfunded growth capital is often faster 

and more flexible than traditional bank financing. 

The business growth and accelerated expansion achieved by issuers after raising capital on LandX 

demonstrates equity crowdfunding's role as an enabler of entrepreneurial potential. The qualitative findings 

suggest crowdfunding enables progress for issuers, consistent with studies showing access to resources 

promotes viability for enterprises (Vismara 2021). Tangible examples of business model validation, outlet 

growth, and product launch point to realizable benefits beyond anecdotal claims. This aligns with the value 

proposition of crowdfunding in filling early-stage capital gaps. 

Beyond financing, crowdfunding provides strategic resources like networks, visibility, market 

feedback, and mentorship that nascent ventures typically lack (Schwienbacher and Larralde 2012). LandX's 

involvement in issuer marketing, performance monitoring, and guidance on financial reporting exemplifies 

this resource provision role. Access to such scarce capabilities creates value propositions appealing to 

entrepreneurs. 

However, founders require absorptive capacity to leverage platform resources effectively, as 

highlighted in extant crowdfunding research (Colombo et al. 2015). Visibility transforms into increased sales 

only when operational capabilities exist to handle demand. As LandX's experience shows, variability in 

returns despite standard resource access points to the criticality of internal entrepreneurial competencies in 

harnessing the potential. Crowdfunding success entails a three-way fit between investor capital, platform 

resources, and issuer execution. Monitoring mechanisms address information gaps for investors but cannot 

compensate for weaknesses in entrepreneurial capabilities. 



Sanjaya and Koesrindartoto/Finance, Accounting and Business Analysis, Volume 5, Issue 2, 2023 

183 

 

As the case from business project report, the financial statements demonstrate LandX's impact in 

providing growth capital to fund operating launch and expansion. The sizable investment in assets and 

ability to generate initial revenues validates the business model viability. The losses in the initial years of 

operations are consistent with findings that crowdfunded ventures face challenges balancing rapid growth 

with profitability (Vismara 2021). The high fixed asset investments also carry risks of underutilization if 

demand does not meet projections (Signori and Vismara 2018). However, the sales growth validates the 

proof of concept. Slower, organic growth may have higher chances of sustainability (Lukkarinen et al. 2016). 

The tangible impact of access to external capital on facilitating launch and expansion aligns with 

studies showing crowdfunding provides necessary resources for early-stage ventures (Ralcheva and 

Roosenboom, 2021). But realized returns can diverge from projections (Dorfleitner et al. 2021). Mentorship 

from platforms and investors may help improve performance (Vismara 2021). 

LandX also delivers value-added resources like investor exposure and networks, performance 

monitoring tools, and guidance on financial management practices relevant for external shareholders. For 

example, integrated POS systems allow LandX ongoing visibility into issuer revenues to flag risks. These 

resources address structural gaps young ventures often face (Schwienbacher and Larralde 2012). 

The document sample from PT Sejiwa Coffee, while limited to first year results, does provide initial 

quantitative verification of revenue generation, asset acquisition, and geographical expansion enabled by the 

LandX fundraising. This table presents summary financial information on the overall assets, capital 

structure, revenues, and profitability of PT Sejiwa in their first year of operations after raising funds through 

LandX. 

 

Table 3. Financial Performance Summary of PT Sejiwa Coffee in 2022 Launch Year 

Metric Amount 

Total Asset Rp 6,092,736,511 

Total Liabilities Rp 1,471,587,530 

Total Equity Rp 4,621,148,981 

Revenues Rp 816,530,400 

Gross Profit Rp 522,821,483 

Net Loss Rp 40,191,019 

Outlets Opened 1 

Assets Acquired Rp 2,389,515,418 

Source: LandX Document 

 

Financial statements from coffee chain PT Sejiwa, launching post-LandX fundraising in 2022, 

provide initial quantification of outcomes. As Table 2 exhibit, Sejiwa utilized capital to open 1 outlet, acquire 

Rp 2.4 billion in assets, generate Rp 816 million in first year sales including December seasonality peaks 

validating market traction, and yield 64 % gross margins. While bottom line net losses exist initially, the 

revenue generation and growth signal positive directionality (Signori and Vismara 2018). However, data 

remains limited restraining definitive judgments of eventual profitability, sustainability, or optimal capital 

deployment. Longer tracking of detailed KPIs would enrich analysis (Vismara 2021). Early signs echo 

research suggesting some progress but prudent expectations warranted during volatile pioneering phases 

(Mamonov et al. 2020). 

However, quantitative data directly demonstrating pre-post financial impact attributable to 

crowdfunding remains limited at this early stage. Initial signs like outlet growth suggest positive 

directionality but definitive validation requires multi-year financial tracking. Data sufficiency challenges also 

constrain assessment of long-term performance influences like profit margins, failure rates and optimal 

deployment of raised capital. According to Vismara (2021), realized returns and viability ultimately depend 

on fit between crowdfunded capital, platform resources, and issuers' internal capabilities. 

The document sample from PT Sejiwa Coffee, while limited to first year results, does provide initial 

quantitative verification of revenue generation, asset acquisition, and geographical expansion enabled by the 

LandX fundraising. But comprehensive pre-post data would better quantify impact on jobs, profit, 

sustainability, and failure rates. Prudent expectations remain warranted pending long-term performance data 

across issuers, though emerging progress is observable. Impact transparency through granular tracking 

should be an ecosystem priority. 

While definitive conclusions require more years of data, signs of initial traction echo research showing 

crowdfunding can enable progress (Signori and Vismara 2018). As platforms provide marketing and advisory 

support, ultimate success depends heavily on issuers’ own capabilities amid economic volatility. High failure 



Sanjaya and Koesrindartoto/Finance, Accounting and Business Analysis, Volume 5, Issue 2, 2023 

184 

 

rates still exist, requiring prudent expectations (Mamonov et al. 2020). Ongoing performance monitoring, 

realistic projections, and measurable long-term data can inform judgments but overall, the business 

outcomes reflect realistic, mixed results. 

 

Overall Assessment 
This exploratory case study of the LandX platform in Indonesia reveals balanced strengths and 

judicious opportunities as equity crowdfunding localizes. Progress is evidenced by diligent vetting 

procedures for issuers, value-added resources supplied to entrepreneurs, and prudent self-regulation amid 

fluid policies. However, needs exist to enhance due diligence predictive power through technology and 

evidence, implement tailored strategies addressing diverse investor motivations and biases, expand formal 

regulations to enable governance commensurate with sector growth, and responsibly temper outcome 

expectations while pursuing transparent impact data. 

As an early stage industry, uncertainties persist. But LandX exhibits laudable steps to screen issuers, 

provide resources, and protect investors that establish foundations. Findings emphasize that collaboratively 

fostering this ecosystem will require coordinated efforts across stakeholders to craft evidence-based policies 

and practices supporting balanced innovation. LandX provides a useful case demonstrating nuanced 

navigation required to expand financial access without undue risks. Their model forms a pioneering template 

as Indonesia progresses towards an equitable crowdfunding ecosystem advancing inclusion while ensuring 

prudent practices. 

In summary, analysis of the LandX platform provides optimistic signals of progress in localizing 

equity crowdfunding as an alternative funding model in Indonesia, balanced by areas warranting ongoing 

enhancement and realistic expectations. The findings reveal key strengths in due diligence, resource 

provision and self-regulation, counterposed by opportunities to leverage technology, customize investor 

engagement, implement formal governance structures and transparently demonstrate outcomes. 

Longitudinal tracking of diverse platforms and perspective can enrich insights. But this exploratory single 

case study offers a valuable foundation illuminating the considered balance of risk and potential required to 

judiciously scale a pioneering financial innovation 

 

CONCLUSION 

 
This exploratory single case study investigating Indonesia's LandX platform provides timely insight 

into the operational processes, incentives, oversight and outcomes associated with pioneering equity 

crowdfunding models in emerging economies. 

The research reveals LandX has instituted laudable strengths in due diligence, value-added resources 

for issuers, and proactive governance amid fluid regulations. This demonstrates meaningful progress in 

localizing equity crowdfunding as an alternative SME financing method aligned to Indonesia's unique 

landscape. However, prudent opportunities exist to enhance predictive technologies, customize investor 

engagement, implement formal protections, and responsibly demonstrate outcomes as the model reaches 

scale. 

The research makes a valuable contribution towards addressing the lack of scholarly attention on 

equity crowdfunding dynamics in emerging economies like Indonesia. Findings reveal balanced strengths in 

due diligence, resource provision and self-regulation, along with prudent opportunities to further enhance 

predictive technologies, customize investor engagement, implement governance structures and demonstrate 

outcomes. 

LandX exemplifies considered modulation of risk and potential required when fostering a nascent 

financial innovation. The findings will inform policymakers, regulators, platforms, scholars, and industry 

associations collaborating to develop balanced equity crowdfunding ecosystems advancing inclusion 

without undue risk. Further research tracking metrics like financial sustainability, failure rates, and investor 

satisfaction over long time horizons can enrich insights. Comparing crowdfunded ventures against controls 

would further isolate funding impacts. Understanding additional stakeholder perspectives offers rounded 

comprehension. Surveying diverse platforms and stakeholders can round out perspectives. 

This study provides a valuable exploratory foundation illuminating the promises, realities and 

judicious steps needed to scale equity crowdfunding sustainably in Indonesia. The balanced strengths and 

opportunities uncovered through LandX demonstrate that realizing the potential of crowdfunding 

necessitates evidence-based policies and practices crafted through coordinated efforts of all actors. While 

generalizations are limited without wider investigation, the in-depth analysis provides pioneer 

understandings that set the stage for ongoing inquiry to responsibly shape equity crowdfunding's emergence. 

While limited in generalizability as a single case study, the in-depth investigation nonetheless offers 

considered foundational insights to guide equitable ecosystem development. However, findings should be 

applied with acknowledging limitations including sample size and data sufficiency constraints typical of 

investigating nascent industries. 



Sanjaya and Koesrindartoto/Finance, Accounting and Business Analysis, Volume 5, Issue 2, 2023 

185 

 

Overall, the LandX case study yields cautiously optimistic signals regarding equity crowdfunding's 

viability as a democratized, inclusive funding model in Indonesia, balanced by clear imperatives for prudent 

advancement. The research carries valuable implications for platforms, policymakers, investors and scholars 

collaborating to develop constructive frameworks informed by contextual priorities. Further attention to 

long-term impacts, diverse structures, and stakeholder motivations can enrich perspectives to guide optimal 

ecosystem maturation. This exploratory study provides a useful foundation contributing considered insights 

that will empower stakeholders to thoughtfully harness the promises of equity crowdfunding in powering 

financial innovation across Indonesia. The knowledge contributes to informed policies and practices that 

harness innovation for inclusion while ensuring investor protections. 

  
REFERENCES 
 
Afuah, A., and C. L. Tucci. 2012. Crowdsourcing As a Solution to Distant Search. Academy of Management 

Review, 37(3): 355–375. 

Agrawal, A., C. Catalini, and A. Goldfarb. 2015. Are Syndicates the Killer App of Equity Crowdfunding? 
California Management Review, 58(2): 111–124. 

Angerer, M., A. Brem, S. Kraus, and M. Schaffler. 2021. The Motivations of Crowd Investors: A Meta-
Study. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 27(1): 33–56. 

Anderson, B. 2023. Application of Machine Learning to Equity Crowdfunding Platform Due Diligence. Master's 

thesis, MIT Sloan School of Management. 
Baeck, P., L. Collins, and B. Zhang. 2014. Understanding Alternative Finance: The UK Alternative Finance Report 

2014. Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance. Last modified November 30, 2014. 

https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/faculty-research/centres/alternative-

finance/publications/understanding-alternative-finance/#.XjdvOWhKg2w. 

Baum, J. A. C., and B. S. Silverman. 2004. Picking Winners or Building Them? Alliance, Intellectual, and 

Human Capital as Selection Criteria in Venture Financing and Performance of Biotechnology 
Startups. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(3): 411–436. 

Bradford, C. S. 2012. Crowdfunding and the Federal Securities Laws. Columbia Business Law Review 2012 

(1): 1–150. 

Bretschneider, U., J. Knaub, and N. Wittkowski. 2014. Does the Crowd Matter? The Importance of 

Crowdfunding Success Drivers. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems 

(ECIS) 2014, Tel Aviv, Israel, June 9-11. 

Brown, R. 2020. Equity Crowdfunding Platform Due Diligence: A Comparative Study. PhD diss., Northcentral 

University. 

Burtch, G., A. Ghose, and S. Wattal. 2018. The Hidden Cost of Accommodating Crowdfunder Privacy 
Preferences: A Randomized Field Experiment. Management Science, 64(5): 2009–2030. 

Cholakova, M., and B. Clarysse. 2015. Does the Possibility to Make Equity Investments in Crowdfunding 

Projects Crowd Out Reward‐Based Investments? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39 (1): 145-172. 

Clark, B. 2017. Staged Equity Crowdfunding: A Proposed Best Practice. Bachelor's thesis, Swarthmore College. 

Colombo, M. G., C. Franzoni, and C. Rossi‐Lamastra. 2015. Internal Social Capital and the Attraction of 
Early Contributions in Crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(1): 75-100. 

Courtney, C., R. D. Goktas, K. O'Brien, and W. Boeker. 2017. Institutional Investor Due Diligence and 

Investment Decisions: A Study of Company, Crowdfunding, and Security Sale Factors. Presented at Decision 

Sciences Institute 48th Annual Meeting, Pittsburgh, November. 
Cox, N. 2016. Equity Crowdfunding: More Than Money. Doctoral dissertation, Princeton University. 

Cumming, D. J., and S. Johan. 2013. Demand-Driven Securities Regulation: Evidence from Crowdfunding. 

Venture Capital 15 (4): 361–79. 
Cumming, D. J., and L. Jiang. 2019. Equity Crowdfunding and Price Discovery: The Role of SEC Regulation. 

European Financial Management, 26(2): 217-243. 

Cumming, D. J., and Y. Zhang. 2019. Angel Investors Around the World. Journal of International Business 

Studies, 50(5): 692-714. 

Davis, J. S., H. T.T. Nguyen, and A. N.M. Wahid. 2017. Funding for Start-ups: An Examination of Current 
Trends in Crowdfunding. Journal of the Midwest Business Economics Association, 44(2): 27-48. 

Davis, L. 2018. Evaluating Technology Startup Companies: The Role of a Due Diligence Audit. Doctoral 

dissertation, Northcentral University. 
Dorfleitner, G., M. N. Fink, M. U. Gruber, and C. Weippl. 2021. Crowdfunding and Fintech. The Journal 

of Portfolio Management, 47(5): 75-92. 

Dorfleitner, G., M. N. Fink, A. L. Meier, M. U. Gruber, C. Weippl, S. Müller, and E. Griesbacher. 2022. 
Equity Crowdfunding Investor Motivations: A Qualitative Analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social 

Change 174: 121370. 



Sanjaya and Koesrindartoto/Finance, Accounting and Business Analysis, Volume 5, Issue 2, 2023 

186 

 

Estrin, S., D. Gozman, and S. Khavul. 2018. The Evolution and Adoption of Equity Crowdfunding: 
Entrepreneur and Investor Entry into a New Market. Small Business Economics, 51(2): 425–39. 

Galaxy Digital. 2021. Southeast Asia: At the Tipping Point of Digitization. Galaxy Digital Research. 

Jenik, I., K. Lauer, and T. Lyman. 2017. Regulating Crowdfunding: How to Protect Crowdinvestors Without 

Stifling Innovation. World Bank Blogs, August 10. 

Jakarta Post, The. 2019. Indonesian Snack Startup Under Probe for Allegedly Violating Reporting Rules. The 

Jakarta Post, October 7. 
Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. Econometrica, 

47(2): 263–91. 
Kharnaetin, N. 2019. Policy Brief: Startup Ecosystem in Indonesia. Economist Intelligence Unit. 

Kirby, E., and S. Worner. 2014. Crowd-funding: An Infant Industry Growing Fast. IOSCO Research 

Department Staff Working Paper SWP3/2014. 

KPMG Indonesia. 2022. Equity Crowdfunding in Indonesia. KPMG Indonesia Spotlight Report. 

Kuti, M., and G. Madarász. 2014. Crowdfunding. Public Finance Quarterly, 59(3): 355–66. 

LandX. 2022. LandX Company Profile. 

Lee, W.-C., E. M. Gompers, M. S. Wang, C. Honohan, and J. A. Bloch. 2018. Modernizing US Equity 

Market Structure: Making the IPO Process Work for More Public Companies. Harvard Business School 

Entrepreneurial Management Working Paper No. 18-097. 

Lewis, M. 2016. Due Diligence Practices in Technology Startup Investment Decisions. PhD diss., Northcentral 

University. 

Li, Z., D. J. Cumming, L. Su, and M. Wright. 2021. Equity Crowdfunding: Ex Ante Due Diligence and Ex 
Post Entrepreneurial Success. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 15: e00230. 

Lukkarinen, A., J. M. Soriano Tejedo, and H. Kärkkäinen. 2016. Success Factors in Equity Crowdfunding: A 

Literature Review. Presented at ISPIM Innovation Forum, Boston, April 2016. 

Mamonov, S. and R. Malaga. 2020. Success Factors in Title III Equity Crowdfunding in the United States. 

Venture Capital, 22(1): 73-96. 

Mamonov, S., R. Malaga, and P. K. Chari. 2020. Success Factors for Title III Equity Crowdfunding 
Offerings. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 27(2): 290-310. 

Micheler, E., and L. von der Heyde. 2016. Holding a Candle to Innovation in Emerging Markets: An Actor-
Centric Perspective on Market Entry. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(5): 580–99. 

Mochkabadi, K., and C. K. Volkmann. 2020. Equity Crowdfunding: A Systematic Review of the Literature. 
Small Business Economics, 54(1): 75-118. 

Mollick, E., and R. Nanda. 2015. Wisdom or Madness? Comparing Crowds with Expert Evaluation in 
Funding the Arts. Management Science, 62(6): 1533–53. 

Nasution, F. A. 2020. Financial Inclusion through Fintech Lending Startups: Case of Indonesia. Buletin 

Ekonomi Moneter dan Perbankan (Bulletin of Monetary Economics and Banking), 23(1): 13-30. 

Novitasari, D. A. 2018. Equity Crowdfunding in Indonesia: Will It Disrupt the Financial Services Industry? 
Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 33(1): 23–43. 

OECD. 2019. Southeast Asia Going Digital: Connecting SMEs. OECD Development Policy Papers, No. 19. 

OECD Publishing, Paris. 

OECD. 2020. OECD/INFE 2020 International Survey of Adult Financial Literacy. OECD. 

https://www.oecd.org/financial/education/oecd-infe-2020-international-survey-of-adult-financial-

literacy.pdf. 
OJK (Otoritas Jasa Keuangan). 2021. Equity Crowdfunding Statistics in Indonesia 2019-2020. OJK Research 

Data. 

Parhankangas, A., and M. Renko. 2017. Linguistic Style and Crowdfunding Success among Social and 
Commercial Entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(2): 215–36. 

Ralcheva, A., and P. Roosenboom. 2021. Forecasting Success in Equity Crowdfunding. Small Business 

Economics, 57: 61–90. 

Saldaña, J. 2015. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications. 

Santoso, L. W., A. A. Hermawan, and M. Reza. 2022. Regulation and Crowd-Funding Ecosystem 
Development in Indonesia. Buletin Ekonomi Moneter dan Perbankan (Bulletin of Monetary Economics and 

Banking), 25(2): 183-214. 

Satriyo, B., and B. W. Sutrisno. 2021. Financial Literacy in Indonesia. OJK Bulletin of Financial Services 

Authority Research, 43(3): 383-412. 

Schwienbacher, A., and B. Larralde. 2012. Crowdfunding of Entrepreneurial Ventures. In The Oxford Handbook 

of Entrepreneurial Finance, edited by D. Cumming, 369-91. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 

Setiawan, A. P. 2018. Equity Crowdfunding Regulation in Indonesia: Between Flexibility and Investor 
Protection. Indonesian Law Review, 8(1): 15-36. 

Short, J. C., D. J. Ketchen, C. L. Shook, and R. D. Ireland. 2010. The Concept of ‘Opportunity’ in 



Sanjaya and Koesrindartoto/Finance, Accounting and Business Analysis, Volume 5, Issue 2, 2023 

187 

 

Entrepreneurship Research: Past Accomplishments and Future Challenges. Journal of Management, 

36(1): 40–65. 
Siering, M., J. H. Block, and P. Sandner. 2022. What Drives the Crowd? A Meta-Review of Motivations to 

Participate in Crowdfunding. International Review of Financial Analysis 80 (C). 

Signori, A., and S. Vismara. 2018. Does Success Bring Success? The Post-Offering Lives of Equity Crowdfunded 

Firms. Journal of Corporate Finance 50 (June): 575–91. 

Smith, C. 2021. Optimizing Equity Crowdfunding Platform Due Diligence Criteria Through Delphi Method Expert 

Elicitation. Master's thesis, The University of Vermont. 

Song, M., K. F. M. Au, C.-M. Lau, and Y.-D. Ding. 2008. Consideration of Venture Capitalists’ Exit 

Strategies from Start-up Companies. The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 12(3): 51–68. 

Strangler, D., and E. Jackson. 2012. Accelerating Growth: Startup Accelerator Programs in the United States. 

Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation. 

Sudek, R. 2006. Angel Investment Criteria. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 17(2): 89-103. 

Taylor, N. S. 2021. Designing the Equity Crowdfunding Data Engine: Improving Platform Due Diligence, Investment 

Decisions and Post-Raise Engagement. Bachelor's thesis, The University of Pennsylvania. 

Vismara, S. 2018. Information Cascades Among Investors in Equity Crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory 

and Practice, 42(3): 467-497. 

Vismara, S. 2021. Equity Crowdfunding and Early Stage Venture Performance. The Review of Financial 

Studies, 34(4): 1608–46. 

Vulkan, N., T. Åstebro, and M. Fernandez Sierra. 2016. Equity Crowdfunding: A New Phenomena. Journal 

of Business Venturing Insights, 5: 37-49. 

Wilson, C. 2022. A Comparative Analysis of Equity Crowdfunding Platform Due Diligence Processes. Doctoral 

dissertation, Northcentral University. 

Wilson, K. E., and M. Testoni. 2014. Improving the Role of Equity Crowdfunding in Europe's Capital 
Markets. Bruegel Policy Contribution, Issue 2014/09. 

Yin, R. 2018. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. 6th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE 

Publications. 
Yong, H. b. D. S. U. Arshad. 2020. Investor Protection Mechanisms for the Malaysian Equity Crowdfunding 

Framework. Malaysian Reserve, February 12.  

Ziegler, T., B. Zhang, K. Wenzlaff, R. Hao, and R. Shneor. 2022. Shifting Paradigms - The 5th Global 

Alternative Finance Market Benchmarking Report. Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance. 

https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/faculty-research/centres/alternative-finance/publications/shifting-

paradigms/. 
Zvilichovsky, D., Y. Inbar, and O. Barzilay. 2018. Motivations and Barriers to Crowdfunding: The Backer's 

Perspective. In Crowdfunding for Sustainability, edited by R. Wicks and Z. Bar-El, 107-123. Cham, 

Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. 


