Microsoft Word - 3 FIA Journal 2010 -2 din 12 oct 2010 final_83-92.doc


Food and Environment Safety - Journal of Faculty of Food Engineering,  Ştefan cel Mare University - Suceava  
Year IX, No2 - 2010 

 
 

 
 

87 

 
A REVIEW ON THE EFFECT OF FUNGI ON THE WHEAT GRAIN UNDER POST 

HARVEST STORAGE ECOLOGY 
 

Mathew SHIJU1 
 

1Ministry of Higher Education, Department of Natural Sciences, Aksum University, Ethiopia 
Contact No.: (+251) 920126043; e-mail: shijumathew_biotech@yahoo.com 

 
 

Abstract: The review paper is aimed to assess the effect of fungi on the wheat grain under the post 
harvest storage system. It has been observed that very high percentage of wheat kernels has been lost 
under post harvest storage. The grain quality greatly depends upon the storage conditions. The 
storage requirement violation can result in grain deterioration. The biotic and abiotic factors 
influence the various physical and chemical properties of wheat grains under post harvest storage. 
The fungal ecology present in the stored grain has an important role in spoilage and the production of 
mycotoxins. The mycoflora of stored wheat grains predominantly consisted of ubiquitous mould 
genera Aspergillus, Alternaria, Cladosporium, Fusarium, Mucor, Rhizopus and Penicillium possibly 
because of their omnipresence, capacity to grow on all possible substrates and a wide range of 
temperature and humidity. The most frequent species observed on the stored wheat grains of 
Aspergillus were A. niger, A. fumigatus, Alternaria alternata, Fusarium moniliformis, Rhizopus 
arrhizus and a few Pencillium species. Among these almost all have the capacity to produce mycotoxin 
which can contaminate and cause spoilage. The various physical, microbial and biochemical analyses 
of post harvest storage wheat grain is an essential component to evaluate the grain quality in various 
Indian wheat varieties and also important for facilitating the minimal post harvest food grain loss.  
 
Keywords: loss, biotic factor, abiotic factor, mycotoxin, infestation. 
 
 
 
1.1 Introduction 
 
The grain production varies from year to 
year and hence the grains should be stored 
strategically from years of overproduction 
for the use in year of under production. 
Stored grains can have losses in both 
quantity and quality. The wheat grain after 
harvest is influenced by a wide variety of 
biotic and abiotic factors and has been 
studied as a stored grain ecosystem. Losses 
occur when the grain is attacked by 
microorganisms and particularly by fungi. 
The grain losses in quantity and quality 
can be under the form of depletion in seed 
viability, hardness, colour, size and shape, 
grain weight and various biochemical 
parameters, protein, carbohydrate and 
vitamins under post harvest storages. The 
presence of mycotoxins in grains is 

traditionally regarded as an indicator of 
poor storage conditions. Mycotoxins may 
already be present in grains coming into 
storage or may be produced as a result of 
poor storage only if there is sufficient 
moisture. Conversely, not all moulds that 
grow in stored commodities produce 
mycotoxins. The metabolic activity of 
these pioneer species raises the moisture 
content of the grain, which may allow 
growth of mycotoxigenic species and 
ultimately, the formation of mycotoxins. 
Alternaria, Aspergillus and Penicillium can 
act as pre or post-harvest pathogens of 
grain and may form mycotoxins. 
 
1.1.1 The origin and classification of 
wheat 
 
Wheat belongs to the genus Triticum of the 



Food and Environment Safety - Journal of Faculty of Food Engineering,  Ştefan cel Mare University - Suceava  
Year IX, No2 - 2010 

 
 

 
 

88 

grass family, Poaceae. This genus is 
originated in the tropical South west Asia, 
where it occurs in wild as well as in 
cultivated forms. Wheat is well adapted to 
harsh environments and is mostly grown 
on wind swept areas that are too dry and 
too cold for the more tropically inclined 
rice and corn, which do best at 
intermediate temperature levels. Wheat 
was first grown in the United States in 
1602 on an island of the Massachusetts 
coast. Man has been dependant upon the 
wheat plant for thousands of years. Wheat 
genetics is more complicated than that of 
most other domesticated species. Some 
wheat species are diploid, with two sets of 
chromosomes, but many are stable 
polyploids, with four sets of chromosomes 
(tetraploid) or six (hexaploid) set of 

chromosomes [1-9]. Globally, wheat is the 
most-produced food among the cereal 
crops after rice. Table 1.1 shows the 
taxonomic status of the genus Triticum .  
The development of a modern 
classification depended on the discovery, 
in the 1918s, of the fact that wheat was 
classified according to three ploidy levels 
[10-16]. The classification of Van Slageren 
(1994) is probably the most widely used 
genetic-based classification at present. 
Most species of wheat can be described in 
Latin binomials, e.g., Triticum aestivum, 
rather than the trinomials necessary in the 
genetic system, e.g., Triticum aestivum 
subsp. aestivum. Both approaches are 
equally valid and both are widely used 
[17]. 

 
Table 1.1:  

The Taxonomical status of Triticum 
Kingdom Plantae Plants 
Subkingdom Tracheobionta Vascular plants 
Superdivision Spermatophyta Seed plants 
Division Magnoliophyta Flowering plants 
Class Liliopsida Monocotyledons 
Subclass Commelinidae  
Order Cyperales  
Family Poaceae Grass family 
Genus 
Species 

Triticum 
aestivum 

Wheat 
Common wheat 

 
 
Wheat (the Triticum spp.) is cultivated 
worldwide.  Globally, wheat is the most-
produced food among the cereal crops after 
rice. Wheat grain is a staple food used to 
make flour for leavened, flat and steamed 
breads; cookies, cakes, breakfast cereal, 
pasta, noodles; and for fermentation to 
make beer, alcohol, vodka or even biofuel. 
Durum is the most commonly used to 
make pasta. The most common wheat is 
the hexaploid wheat and includes spelt, 
modern bread wheat and soft wheat used 
for cookies and cakes. Wheat is grown to a 
limited extent as a forage crop for 
livestock, and the straw can be used as 
fodder for livestock or as a construction 

material for roofing thatch. Although  
 
wheat supplies much of the world's dietary 
protein and food supply, as many as one in 
every 100 to 200 people suffers from 
Coeliac disease, a condition which results 
from an immune system response to a 
protein found in wheat: gluten [18-20]. 
Grain fed to livestock whole or coarsely 
ground. Starch is used for pastes and sizing 
textiles. Straw is turned into mats, carpets, 
baskets, and used for packing material, 
cattle bedding, and paper manufacturing. 
Some wheat is cut for hay. Wheat grown 
for grain crop is also used for pasture 
before the stems elongate and as a 
temporary pasturage; it is nutritious and 



Food and Environment Safety - Journal of Faculty of Food Engineering,  Ştefan cel Mare University - Suceava  
Year IX, No2 - 2010 

 
 

 
 

89 

palatable. 
 
1.1.2 The effect of stored wheat grains 
under post harvest storage 
 
The spoilage of grain in storage is brought 
about by two variables, the biotic and 
abiotic [21]. Wheats are attacked by many 
fungi and other organisms. Some cultivars 
are resistant to the various rusts, smuts, 
and virus diseases. The most important 
fungal diseases of wheats are the extension 
agents which are concerning diseases in an 
area before growing wheat. Also cvs 
should be selected for growing as resistant 
to various diseases. The biotic variables are 
different types of insects, mites, rodents, 
birds and microorganisms, i.e., bacteria 
and fungi. The abiotic variables include 
temperature and moisture content of the 
grains; the latter in grains increases due to 
seepage of moisture from soil or from 
cemented floor [22]. The micro flora of 
cereal grains normally includes fungi, 
bacteria and actinomycetes [23-25]. A 
number of fungi have been reported to be 
associated with cereal grains and their 
milling fraction [26-27]. The majority of 
mycotoxins are chemically tough, resistant 
to temperature, conditions of storage and 
processing technologies. Therefore, 
detoxication is not always effective. Based 
on the stages at which invasion and growth 
occur, the fungi associated with grains can 
conveniently be divided into two groups 
i.e., Field fungi and Storage fungi [28]. 
Spoilage of stored grain by fungi is 
determined by a range of factors which can 
be classified into four main groups 
including (a) intrinsic nutritional factors, 
(b) extrinsic factors (c) processing factors 
and (d) implicit microbial factors. The 
factors produce fungal colonization within 
the stored grains [29-30]. These reviews 
examined some important mycotoxins and 
the post-harvest control strategies which 
have been developed for effective 
management to minimize entry of 

mycotoxins into the food chain. In some 
cases, pre-harvest decisions can 
significantly impact the capability for 
subsequent post-harvest control. The 
propagates of mould fungi, frequently 
found in grain and its surroundings, start to 
develop when favourable conditions 
emerge. Temperature and substratum 
moisture are the most significant factors 
that determine the intensity of 
micromycete development and grain 
damage. 
 
1.1.2.1 The effect of fungi on the odour 
and discolouration of the stored wheat 
grains 
The fungal contamination of the grains is 
responsible for emitting undesirable odours 
[31] found that under high moisture 
condition cereals gave a musty odour. The 
dark colouration of germs of the wheat 
grains are due to the damage caused by 
fungi [32]. This is discoloration of the 
germ end of the wheat grain. In the 
commercial grading system, black point 
involves the germ end only and not 
extended into the grain crease. If more than 
half the grain is damaged and well into the 
crease, it is classified as smudge. It has 
been also observed that if the wheat grains, 
with moisture content of 13% or above is 
kept long enough at a temperature of 350C 
to 400C, the grains turn brown even in the 
absence of storage fungi [33]. Grain itself 
and the microbial contaminants respire 
slowly when stored dry. However, if the 
water availability is increased to 15-19% 
moisture content (=0.75-0.85 water activity 
(aw), wheat) spoilage fungi, particularly 
Aspergillus and Penicillium species grow, 
resulting in a significant increase in 
respiratory activity [34]. This can result in 
an increase in temperature and sometimes 
spontaneous heating from the colonization 
by a succession of fungi resulting in 
colonization by thermophilic fungi and 
actinomycetes [35-37].  
The quantitative grain contamination with 



Food and Environment Safety - Journal of Faculty of Food Engineering,  Ştefan cel Mare University - Suceava  
Year IX, No2 - 2010 

 
 

 
 

90 

micromycete propagules was established 
by a number of methods given by various 
scientists [38-44]. The grain colour 
changes by some micromycetes produced 
and contaminate it with poisonous 
substances including mycotoxins [45-52].  
 
1.1.3 The presence of micro flora 
contaminating the stored wheat grains 
 
Mould contamination of food and feed is a 
constantly occurring phenomenon but the 
attitude towards it has been far from 
consistent [53]. It has been found that 
fungal damage of grain is caused in 
various ways. They reduce the grain 
viability, produce odour, grain 
discoloration and depletion in food added 
value (FAV) by the increase in FAV and 
also produce toxins injurious to the health 
of consumers. The fungi are responsible 
for emitting of undesirable odour from 
stored grains [54]. A number of studies 
have been reported the loss of dry matter 
content and visible moulding of stored 
wheat grains [55-62]. This could be 
considered as a subjective index of the safe 
storability of grain. There are problems 
with the use of visible moulding as a 
criterion of deterioration [63-66].  Wheat 
quality loss has been measured and models 
developed based on germination rates, 
visible mould growth or respiration of 
grain and microorganisms. The 
microscopic growth may be a more 
effective measurement of initial 
colonization than visible moulding [67-70] 
An extensive micro flora has been found to 
be associated with stored wheat grains [71-
83]. Earlier in the laboratory a number of 
cereals have been screened with respect to 
micro flora associated in storage grains            
[84-87]. 
The effect of microbial infestation on 
decrease in the germination of grains is 
now well known. It has been established in 
other cereals and especially in wheat. 
Discolouration of wheat is a common 

occurrence. During the course of their 
development breakdown and utilization of 
the constituents of the seeds occur [88-89]. 
The dark germs of grains are known to be 
due to damage by storage fungi [90-94]. 
The high moisture and temperature 
conditions for cereals gave a musty odour 
due to fungi, instead of bacteria [95]. 
 
1.1.4 Fungal infestation in post harvest 
stored wheat grains 
 
The wheat grains come in association with 
the fungi from the time of grain maturity 
and also at the time of storage. Some of 
these fungi are in intimate association and 
are present as dormant mycelium under the 
pericarp or dormant spores on the surface 
of the kernel. However, there is a number 
of fungi which are only superficially 
associated with stored grains. Mould 
growth in grains may cause deleterious 
changes in addition to the formation of 
mycotoxins. Many spoilage 
fungi cause loss of germination in seed 
grains, discolouration and darkening of the 
grains, reduction in protein content, musty 
odours, and changes in fatty acid profiles 
and other constituents of the grains. Mould 
development may also encourage mite and 
insect infestation. The association of fungi 
with cereal grains starts from the field 
itself. Shortly after the grain reaches to 
maximum size, the lemma and palea 
protecting it are pushed apart exposing the 
grain to infection by fungi [96] and their 
extensive studies have been carried out in 
the laboratory on these aspects [97-99]. 
Poor post harvest management can lead to 
rapid deterioration in grain quality, 
severely decreasing the germinability and 
nutritional value of stored grains. Fungal 
activity can cause undesirable effects in 
grains including discolouration, contribute 
to heating and losses in nutritional value, 
produce off-odours, losses in 
germinability, deterioration in baking and 
milling quality, and can result in 



Food and Environment Safety - Journal of Faculty of Food Engineering,  Ştefan cel Mare University - Suceava  
Year IX, No2 - 2010 

 
 

 
 

91 

contamination by mycotoxins [100-102]. 
A number of studies have been reported on 
the loss of dry matter content and visible 
moulding of stored wheat grains [103-
110]. This could be considered as a 
subjective index of the safe storability of 
grain. There are problems with the use of 
visible moulding as a criterion of 
deterioration [111-114]. Fungi seldom 
occur on grains in isolation, but usually as 
a mixed consortium of bacteria, yeasts and 
filamentous fungi. It is thus inevitable that 
interspecific and intraspecific interactions 
will occur depending on the nutritional 
status of the grain and the prevailing 
environmental conditions. Wheat quality 
loss has been measured and models 
developed based on germination rates, 
visible mould growth or respiration of 
grain and microorganisms [114-118] The 
microscopic growth may be a more 
effective measurement of initial 
colonization than visible moulding. Some 
attempts have also been made to relate dry 
matter losses to actual calorific losses due 
to the activity of mycotoxigenic moulds.  
 
1.1.5 Decrease in nutritional value as 
due to myctoxin production in stored 
wheat grains 
 
During storage, the grains undergo some 
biochemical changes like the increase in 
fatty acids. The increase in fatty acid value 
is chiefly due to storage fungi and not due 
to the activity of seeds [119]. The stored 
grain will have quantitative and qualitative 
losses. Weight loss during storage (not due 

to a loss of moisture) is a measure of food 
loss but the latter may be proportionately 
larger owing to selective feeding by the 
pests. Rodents and moth larvae may 
preferentially attack the germ of the grain 
thus removing a large percentage of the 
protein and vitamin content, whereas 
weevils feeding mainly on the endosperm 
will reduce the carbohydrate content. 
Many pests may eat the bran of cereals 
reducing vitamins such as thiamin [120-
123] 
The quantity and quality of endosperm 
proteins are the major factors responsible 
for baking quality, and nutritional value of 
wheat [140-142]. Various seed storage 
proteins in wheat are classified upon their 
solubility in different solvents, such as 
water, saline solution, 70% aqueous 
ethanol and diluted acid or alkali solutions 
and are named as albumins, globulins, 
gliadins, and glutenins, respectively [126-
128]. 
The other storage factors such as moisture 
and fungal infection also lead to changes in 
vitamin content. In beans in particular, loss 
of protein is very important where there is 
infestation, as up to 25% of the dry matter 
may be raw protein. Fungi growth leads to 
reduced nutritional and technical quality of 
cereal grains [130-132]. Grain storage 
conditions affect its quality due to high 
percentage of mycotoxins [133-137]. 
Wheat grains are also rich in pantothenic 
acid, riboflavin and some minerals, sugars 
etc [138]. The composition of wheat grain 
and flour is given in Table 1.2. 

 
Table 1.2:  

Composition of wheat grain and flour [139] 
Parameter Grain (%) Flour (%) 
Moisture 9 - 18 13 - 15.5 

Starch 60-68 65-70 
Protein 8-17 8-15 

Cellulose 2-2.5 Trace 
Fat 1.5-2 0.8-1.5 

Sugars 2-3 1.5-2 
Mineral matters 1.5-2 3-6 

 



Food and Environment Safety - Journal of Faculty of Food Engineering,  Ştefan cel Mare University - Suceava  
Year IX, No2 - 2010 

 
 

92 
 

Storage temperature affects the keeping 
quality of wheat. Increase in temperature 
accelerates the rate of respiration until it is 
limited by oxygen supply; build up of 
carbon dioxide concentration, exhaustion 
of substrate, and thermal inactivation of 
essential enzymes. Heat damages the 
gluten proteins and even discolours the 
kernels of the stored hard red winter wheat 
with moisture contents of 10.95% in sealed 
half gallon glass jars at -10C and 240C for 
two years [140-142]. The grain losses in 
quantity and quality can be under the form 
of depletion as mentioned above like that 
of seed viability, hardness, colour, size and 
shape, grain weight and various 
biochemical parameters, protein, 
carbohydrate and vitamins under post 
harvest storages. The storage fungi damage 
the grains in several ways; they reduce the 
germinability, produce undesirable odour 
and kernel discoloration, decrease the food 
value and also produce toxins injurious to 
the health of consumers. 
The effect of mycotoxigenic fungi in post 
harvested stored wheat grains must be 
examined in the context of the ecology as a 
whole in order to understand the 
dominance of certain species of fungi 
under certain environmental conditions. 
Interactions between these fungi and other 
contaminants are complex and are 
significantly affected by the prevailing and 
changing environmental factors. As a 
conclusion the mycoflora of stored wheat 
grains predominantly consisted of 
ubiquitous mould genera Aspergillus, 
Alternaria, Cladosporium, Fusarium, 
Mucor, Rhizopus and Penicillium possibly 
because of their omnipresence, capacity to 
grow on all possible substrates and a wide 
range of temperature and humidity. The 
most frequent species observed in the 
stored wheat grains of Aspergillus were  A. 
niger, A. fumigatus, Alternaria alternata, 
Fusarium moniliformis, Rhizopus arrhizus 
and a few Pencillium species and some of 
the fungi have the capacity to produce 

mycotoxin which can contaminate and 
cause spoilage. 
 
 
References 
 

1. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 
APPROPRIATIONS (1957). Hearings of 84th Congress. 
2nd day  Session in 1956. United States Congress. pp 242. 

2. SMITH, J.E. AND ALBERT, E. (1995). Handbook 
of Weed Management Systems. Marcel Dekker. pp. 411. 

3. BELDEROK, B., HANS, M. AND DINGENA A.D. (2000). 
Bread-Making Quality of Wheat. Springer. pp3.  

4. PALMER, J. J. (2001). How to Brew. 
Defenestrative Pub Co. pp. 233. 

5. NEILL, R. (2002). Booze: The Drinks Bible for the 
21st Century. Octopus Publishing Group - Cassell 
Illustrated. pp.112.  

6. CAUVAIN, A., STANLEY, P. AND CAUVAIN, P. 
(2002). Bread Making. CRC Press. pp 540.  

7. COLLEDGE, S., CONOLLY, J. AND SHENNAN, 
S. (2002). Archaeobotantical Evidence for the Spread of 
Farming in the Eastern Mediterranean. Curr. Anthropol.  
45:S35-S58.  

8.  U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (2003). Annual 
World Production Summary, Grains, 
http://www.usda.gov/Agriculture crop production. 

9. HANCOCK AND JAMES, F. (2004). Plant 
Evolution and the Origin of Crop Species. CABI 
Publishing.  

10. MAGAN, N. (1993a). Early detection of fungi in 
stored grain. Int. J. Biodeterior. Biodegradat.  32:145-
160. 

11. MAGAN, N. (1993b). Use of sulphur dioxide to 
control fungi in stored grain. In: Proceedings of Int. 
Conference on Controlled Atmosphere and Fumigation in 
Grain Storages (S. Navarro and E. Donahaye, eds.). 
Capital Press, Jerusalem, Israel. pp. 163-171 

12. KABARITY, A. (1966). On the origin of the new 
cultivated wheat II. Cytogenetical studies on the 
karyotypes of some T. macha varieties. Beitr. Biol. 
Pflanzen. 42: 339-346. 

13. MORRIS, R. AND SEARS, E.R. (1967). The 
cytogenetics of wheat and its relatives.        In: Wheat and 
wheat improvement. American society of Agronomy 
monograph (K.S. Quisenberry and L.P. Reitz, eds.). 
Madison, WI. pp 18-97. 

14. BOWMAN, C.M., BONNARD, G. AND  DYER, 
T.A. (1983). Chloroplast DNA variations between species 
of Triticum and Aegilops. Location of the variation on the 
chloroplast genome and its relevance to the inheritance 
and classification of the cytoplasm. Theor. Appl. Genetics 
65: 247-262. 

15. KERBY, K. AND KUSPIRA, J. (1987). The 
phylogeny of the polyploidy wheat Triticum aestivatum 
(bread wheat) and Triticum turgidum (macaroni wheat) 
Genome.                       29: 722-737. 

16. BREIMAN, A. AND GRAURA, D. (1990). Wheat 
evolution. Israel J. Plant Sci. 43: 85-98. 

17. WAINES, J.G. AND BARNHART, D. (1992). 
Biosystematic research in Aegilops and Triticum.  
Hereditas 116: 207-212. 



Food and Environment Safety - Journal of Faculty of Food Engineering,  Ştefan cel Mare University - Suceava  
Year IX, No2 - 2010 

 
 

93 
 

18. HILL, I. D., HORVATH, K. AND FASANO, A. 
(1995). Epidemiology of celiac disease. Am. J. 
Gastroenterol. 90: 163-164.  

19. FASANO, A. BERTI, I. AND GERARDUZZI, T. 
(2007). "Prevalence of celiac disease in at-risk and not-
at-risk groups in the United States: a large multicenter 
study". Arch. Int. Med. 163: 286-292.  

20. PRESUTTI, J., (2007). Celiac Disease. Am. Family 
Physician 76: 196-1802.  

21. WHITE, N.D.G., SINHA, R.N. AND MUIR, W.E. (1982). 
Intergranular carbon dioxide as an indicator of biological 
activity associated with the spoilage of stored wheat. J. 
Can. Agric. Eng. 24: 35-42. 

22. PINGALE, S.V. (1970). Prevention and losses in 
storage. Bull. Grain Technol. 8: 3-13. 

23. JAMES, N., WILSON, J. AND STARK, E. (1946). 
The microflora of stored wheat. Can. J. Res. 24: 224-233. 

24. GRAVES, R.R., ROGERS, R.F., LYONS, A.J. JR. 
AND HESSELTINE, C.W. (1967). Bacterial and 
actinomycetes flora of Kansas – Nebraska and Pacific 
Northwest wheat and wheat flour. Cereal Chem. 44: 288-
299. 

25. MEHROTHRA, B.S. AND BASU, M. (1975). 
Survey of microorganisms associated with cereal grain 
and their milling fraction in India. J. Imported wheat Int. 
Biodegradation Bulletin 11. 

26. MEHROTHRA, B.S. AND KUNWAR, I. K. 
(1980). Survey of microorganisms associated with cereal 
grain and their milling fraction in India II. Indigenous 
wheat Int. Biodegradation Bull. ISSN0020 - 6164 spring. 

27. Wicklow, D. T. (1995). The mycology of stored grain: an 
ecological perspective.           In: Stored grain ecosystems 
(D. S. Jayas, N. D. G. White and W. E. Muir, eds.). New 
York, Marcel Dekker, pp. 197-249. 

28. CHRISTENSEN, C.M. AND KAUFMANN, H.H. 
(1969). Grain storage the role of fungi in quality loss. 
University of Minnesoto Press, Minn U.S.A., pp. 153.  

29. WALLACE, H.A.H. (1973). Fungi and other 
organisms associated with stored grains in grain storage 
part of a system (R.N. Sinha and W.E. Muir, eds.). AVI 
publishing Co., Connecticut Sec. II Capt. 4 : 71-78. 

30. WALLACE, H.A.H. AND SINHA, R.N. (1981). 
Causal factors operative in distributional patterns and 
abundance of fungi: a multivariate study. In: The Fungal 
Community- Its Organisation and Role in Ecosystems 
(D.T. Wicklow and   G.C. Carroll, eds.).  Marcell Dekker 
Inc., New York. pp. 233-247. 

31. SCHROEDER, H.W. AND HALICK, J.V. (1963). 
Effect of moisture content, humidity and length of 
storage on maintenance of quality in rough rice. 
Phytopathol.             54: 858-862. 

32. GOLUMBIC, C. AND LAUNDANI, H. (1966). 
Storage and warehousing. Year book of Agriculture (U.S. 
Department of Agriculture) pp. 139-152. 

33. GOLDBLATT, L.A. (1969). Aflatoxin scientific 
background control and implications. Academic Press, 
New York. pp. 472. 

34. PETERSSON, S. AND SCHNURER, H. (1995). 
Biocontrol of Mold Growth in High-Moisture Wheat 
Stored under Airtight Conditions by Pichia anomala, 
Pichia guilliermondii, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.  
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. pp. 1027-1032. 

35. FLEURAT-LESSARD, F. (2002). Qualitative 
reasoning and integrated management of the quality of 

stored grain: a promising new approach. J. Stored 
Product Res.                           38: 191-218. 

36. MAGAN, N., SANCHIS, V. AND ALDRED, D. 
(2004). Role of spoilage fungi in seed deterioration. 
Chapter 28, In: Fungal Biotechnology in Agricultural, 
Food and Environmetal Applications (D.K.Aurora, ed.). 
Marcell Dekker. pp. 311-323. 

37. SHUEY, W.C. (1960). A wheat sizing technique for 
predicting flour milling yield. Cereal Sci. Today 5: 71-72 

38. ELLIS, M. B. (1971). Dematiaceous 
Hyphomycetes. Kew: Commonwealth Mycological 
Institute. pp. 608. 

39. ELLIS, M. B. (1976). More Dematiaceous 
Hyphomycetes. Kew: Commonwealth Mycological 
Institute. pp. 785. 

40. DOMSCH, K. H., GAMS, W. AND ANDERSON, 
T. (1980). Compendium of Soil Fungi. London: 
Academic Press. Vol.1. pp. 405. 

41. GERLACH, W., AND NIRENBERG, H. (1982). 
The Genus Fusarium: a pictorial atlas. Berlin–Dahlem: 
Institute of Microbiology. pp 406. 

42. RAMIREZ, C. (1982). Manual and Atlas of the 
Penicillia. Elsevier, Amsterdam. pp. 874. 

43. LUGAUSKAS, A., BRIDZIUVIENE, D., 
LEVINSKAITE, L., PASKEVICIUS, A., PECIULYTE 
D., REPECKIENE, J., SALINA, O. AND VARNAITE, 
R. (1997). Mikrobiologiniai medziagų pazeidimai. 
Vilnius: Valstiecių laikrastis. pp 469. 

44. LUGAUSKAS, A., PASKEVICIUS, A. AND 
REPECKIENĖ, J. (2002). Pathological microorganism 
application Vilnius pp. 434. 

45. SCOT, P.M. (1994). Penicillium and Aspergillus toxins. In: 
Mycotoxins in grain compounds other than aflatoxins (J. 
O. Miller and H. L. Trewnholm, eds.). Eagan Press, St. 
Paul, Minesota, USA. pp 261-268. 

46. MOSS, M. O. (1991). Mycology of cereal grain and 
cereal products. In: Cereal Grain: Mycotoxins, Fungi and 
Quality in Drying and Storage (J. Chelkowski, ed.). 
Elsevier, Amsterdam–London–New York–Tokyo. pp. 23-
51. 

47. LACEY, L. AND MAGAN, N.(1991). Fungi in 
cereal grains: their occurrence and water and temperature 
relationships. In: Cereal Grain: Mycotoxins, Fungi and 
Quality in Drying and Storage (J. Chelkowski, ed.). 
Elsevier, Amsterdam–London– New York–Tokyo. pp. 77-
118. 

48. KUZMIENE, G., PAZARAUSKIENE, J. AND 
SIRTAUTAITE, S. (1991). Augalininkystės produktų 
laikymas ir perdirbimas. Vilnius: Mokslas. pp.381. 

49. MARIN, S., SANCHIS, V., RAMOS, A.G. AND 
MAGAN, N. (1998a). Environmental factors, 
interspecific interactions, and niche overlap between 
Fusarium moniliforme and F. proliferatum and Fusarium 
graminearum, Aspergillus and Penicillium spp. isolated 
from maize. Mycol. Res. 102: 831-837. 

50. ABRAMSON, D. (1998). Mycotoxin formation 
and environmental factors. In: Mycotoxins in Agriculture 
and Food Safety (K. K. Sinha and D. Bhatnagar, eds.). 
New York: Marcel Dekker Inc. pp. 255-277. 

51. Singh, H. Singh, N. Kaur, L., and Saxena, S.K. (2001). 
Effect of sprouting conditions on functional and dynamic 
rheological properties of wheat.  J. Fd. Eng.  47: 23-29 



Food and Environment Safety - Journal of Faculty of Food Engineering,  Ştefan cel Mare University - Suceava  
Year IX, No2 - 2010 

 
 

94 
 

52. ZVICEVICIUS, E., RAILA, A., NOVOSINSKAS, 
H. AND KRASAUSKAS, A. (2006). Mycotoxin 
producents in the grain layer. J. Ecologia. 3: 105-111. 

53. FORGACS, J. (1965). Stachybotrys toxicosis and 
moulds corn toxicosem. In mycotoxins in food stuffs. 
(G.N. Wogans, ed.). M.L.T. Press Cambridge, 
Massachusetts. pp. 87- 104. 

54. F. A. O. (1966). Grain of Life.  pp. 193. 
55. KREYGER, J. (1972). Drying and storing grains, 

seeds and pulses in temperate climates. Institute for 
Storage and processing of Agricultural Products, Bulletin 
205, Wageningen, The Netherlands. 

56. SEITZ, L.M., SAUER, D.B., MOHR, H.E. (1982). 
Storage of high moisture corn: Fungal growth and dry 
matter loss. Cereal Chem. 59: 100-105. 

57. WHITE, N.D.G., SINHA, R.N. AND MUIR, W.E. 
(1982). Intergranular carbon dioxide as an indicator of 
biological activity associated with the spoilage of stored 
wheat. J. Can. Agric. Eng. 24: 35-42. 

58. HOFSTEIN, R. S., DROBY, E., CHALUTZ, C., 
WILSON AND FRILENDER, B. (1990). Scaling-up the 
production for application of an antagonist-from basic 
research to R & D, In: Biological control of postharvest 
diseases of fruits and vegetables, workshop proceedings. 
Agricultural Research Service document ARS-92. U.S. 
Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. pp. 197-
210. 

59. HAMER, A., LACEY, J. AND MAGAN, N. (1991). 
Use of an automatic electrolytic respirometer to study 
respiration of stored grain. In: Proceedings of 5th Int. 
Working Conference of Stored Product Protection, (F. 
Fleurat-Lessard and     P. Ducom eds.). Bordeaux, France, 
Imprimerie dumedoc, 1: 321-329. 

60. KRASAUSKAS, A., STEPONAVICIENE A., 
RAILIENE, M., LUGAUSKAS, A., RAILA, A. AND  
RAUDONIENE V. (2005). Impact of environmental 
conditions on the spread of micromycetes in grain during 
its harvesting and storage. Bot. Lithuanica.        11: 101-
109. 

61. WAINES, J.G. AND BARNHART, D. (1992). 
Biosystematic research in Aegilops and Triticum.  
Hereditas 116: 207-212 

63. SINGH, H. SINGH, N. KAUR, L., AND 
SAXENA, S.K. (2001). Effect of sprouting conditions on 
functional and dynamic rheological properties of wheat.            
J. Fd. Eng.  47: 23-29. 

64. LEELAVATHI, K., VETRIMANI, R. AND 
HARIDAS-RAO, P. (1990). Changes in the functional 
characteristics of wheat during soaking and subsequent 
germination.  J. Fd. Sci. Technol.  27: 349-354. 

64. WOSNIAK, W. AND STYK, W. (1996). Internal damage 
to wheat grain as a result of wetting and drying. J. Drying 
Technol. 14: 349-365. 

65. LACEY, J., HAMER, A. AND MAGAN, N. 
(1997). Respiration of wheat grain in different 
environments. (E.J. Donahaye and S.Navaro eds.). Proc. 
Int. Symp. on Controlled Atmospheres and Fumigation 
(CAF), Caspit Press, Jerusalem, Israel. pp. 113-122.  

66. ABRAMSON, D. (1997). Toxicans of genus 
Penicillium. In: Handbook of plant and fungal toxicants 
(J.P.F. D’Mello, eds.). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.  pp. 
303-317. 

67. ANJUM, F.M. AND WALKER, C.E. (1991). 
Review on the significance of starch and protein to wheat 
kernel hardness. J. Sci. Fd. Agric. 56: 1-13. 

68. ARMOLIK, N., DICKSON, J.G., DICKSON, A.D. 
(1956). Deterioration of Barley in storage by 
microorganisms. Phytopathol. 46: 457-461. 

69. AUTRAN, J.C., HAMER, R.J., PLIJTER, J.J. AND 
POGNA, N.E. (1997). Exploring and improving the 
industrial use of wheats. Cereal Fd. World 42: 216-227. 

70. BAKUTIS B. (2004). Microrganism grown on 
seeds. Kaunas: Terra Publication. pp. 81. 

71. BALIUKONIENE, V., BAKUTIS, B. AND 
STANKEVICIUS, H. (2003). Mycological and 
mycotoxicological evaluation of grain. Ann. Agric. 
Environ. Med. 10: 223-227. 

73. BASU (1974). Studies of microorganisms 
associated with stored wheat and its flour in India. 
Research paper presentation at University of Lucknow, 
India. 

74. BERG, S.O. (1947). Is the degree of grittiness of 
wheat flour mainly a varietal character? Cereal Chem. 
24: 274-283. 

75. BROOK, P.J. AND WHITE, E.P. (1966). Fungus 
toxins affecting mammals. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol.  4: 
171-194. 

76. BYERS, M., MIFFIN, B.J. AND SMITH, S.J. 
(1983). A quantitative comparison of the extraction of 
protein fractions from wheat grain by different solvents 
and of the polypeptide and amino acid composition of the 
alcohol solution proteins. J. Sci. Fd. Agric. 34: 447-462. 

77. CHELKOWSKI, J. (1991). Mycological quality of 
mixed feeds and ingredients. In: Cereal grain, 
mycotoxins, fungi and quality in drying and storage, (J. 
Chelkowski, ed.): Elsevier, Amsterdam, London, New 
York, Tokyo, pp. 217-227. 

78. CHRISTENSEN, C.M. (1955). Grain storage 
studies 21: Viability and Moldiness of Commercial wheat 
in relation to the incidence of germ damage. Cereal 
Chem. 32: 507-518. 

79. CHRISTENSEN, C.M. (1956). Deterioration of 
stored grains by moulds. Wallerstein Lab. Commun. 19 : 
31-48. 

80. CHRISTENSEN, C.M. AND LINKO, P. (1963). 
Moisture content of hard red winter wheat as determined 
by meter and by oven drying and influence of small 
differences in moisture content upon subsequent 
deterioration of the grain in storage. Cereal Chem. 40: 
129-137. 

81. CHRISTENSEN, C.M., OLAFSON, J.H. AND 
GEDDES, W.F. (1949). Grain storage studies 8: Relation 
of moulds in moist stored cotton seed to increase 
production of carbon dioxide, fatty acids and heat. Cereal 
Chem. 26 : 106-129. 

82. CIEGLER, A. (1978). Fungi that produce 
mycotoxins conditions and occurrence, Mycopathologia  
65: 5-11. 

83. COSKUNTUNA, L., KOÇ, F. AND COSKUN, F. 
(2008). Effect of Chemical Content and Physical 
Characteristics on Nutritional Value of Wheat Varieties 
Collected from Thrace Region. Pak. J.  Nutrition  7: 218-
221. ISSN 1680-5194 

84. DROCHNER, W. AND LAUBER, U. (2001). 
Occurrence of the three important Fusarium - toxins 
Deoxynivalenol, Nivalenol and Zearalenon in grains in 



Food and Environment Safety - Journal of Faculty of Food Engineering,  Ştefan cel Mare University - Suceava  
Year IX, No2 - 2010 

 
 

95 
 

Central Europe and effects in farm animals. Proc. Soc. of 
Nutrition Physiol.  pp 163-168 

85. DUGGELI, M. (1904). The mycological 
florainfection. Zentr. Microbial Infection       12: 602-614. 

86. ERIKSEN, G.S. AND ALEKSANDER, J. (1998). 
Fusarium toxins in cereals – a risk assessment. Tema 
Nord. Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen, 
Denmark, 10-165. 

87. FIELD, R.W. AND KING, T.H. (1962). Influence 
of storage fungi  on the deterioration of corn in storage a 
review. Lowa Acad. Sci.  51: 265-280. 

88. FINNEY, K.F. AND BARMORE, M.A. (1948). 
Loaf volume and protein content of hard red winter and 
spring wheats. Cereal Chem.  25: 291-312. 

89. GOODING, M.J. AND DAVIS, W.P. (1997). Wheat 
production and utilization, systems, quality and the 
environment. Book CAB International. 

90. HALVERSON, J. AND ZELENY, L. (1988). 
Criteria of wheat quality. Chapter 2. In: Wheat: 
Chemistry and Technology, Vol. 1. (Y. Pomeranz, ed.). 
Am. Assoc. Cereal Chem., Inc., St. Paul, MN.  pp. 15. 

91. HASAN, H.A.H. (1999). Mycoflora and changes of 
safflower, wheat and faba bean seed quality during the 
storage. Rostl. Vyr. 45: 85-91. 

92. HESSELTINE, C. W. (1968). Flour and wheat: 
Research on their microbiological flora, Bakers Dig.  42: 
40-42, 66. 

93. HESSELTINE, C. W. AND GRAVES, R.R. (1968). 
Microbiology of flours. Econ. Bot.  20: 156-168. 

94. HOCKING, A.D. (2003). Stored grain in Australia 
2003.  Proceedings of the Australian Postharvest 
Technical Conference, Canberra. CSIRO Stored Grain 
Research Laboratory, Canberra. pp. 55-58. 

95. HOSENEY, R.C. (1987). Wheat hardness. Cereal 
Fd. World  32: 320-322. 

96. HUMPISCH, G. (2001). Gesundheitsvorsorge im 
Getreidelager. Neue Landwirtschaft.        Vol. 2. pp. 44-
48. 

97. INAGASKI, N. AND IKEDA, M. (1959). Studies 
on the fungi isolated from foods II. Identification of 
Penicillia and Aspergilli from flour. Bull. Nat. Hygenic 
Lab. Tokyo  77: 347-366. 

98. JAYAS, D. S. (1995). Stored-grain ecosystems. 
New York: Dekker, pp. 757. 

99. JONES, D.B. AND GERSDORFF, C.E.F. (1941). 
The effect of storage on the protein of wheat, white flour, 
and whole wheat flour. Cereal Chem. 18: 417. 

100. JONSSON, N., PETTERSON, H. AND 
SCHNURER, J. (2000). Study of the relationship 
between storage conditions and the growth of moulds and 
production of Ochratoxin A in grain 24 preliminary 
results. Proc. Eur. Agricul. Eng. Sym. Warwick 
University, U.K. pp.44. 

101. JORGENSEN, K. AND RASMUSEN, G. (1999). 
Ochratoxin in Danish cereals 1986- 1992 and daily intake 
by Danish population. Fd. Additives Contaminants. 13: 
95-104. 

102. KENT- JONES, D.W. AND AMOS, A. J. (1930). 
Preliminary studies in bacteriology of wheat and flour. 
Analyst  55: 248-268. 

103. KOEKSEL, H., ATLI, A., OEZKAYA, H. AND 
DEMIR, Z. (1993). Comparison of physical properties of 
wheat and NIR spectroscopy hardness value for 
prediction of semolina yield. J. Agr. Forest. 17: 821-830. 

104. KURASOVA, V.V., KOSTIN, V.V. AND 
SALOVSKAJA (1945).  Methodolgy of isolating 
vertanary microrganism, pp. 194 -195. 

105. LANGSETH, W., STENWING, H., SOGN, L. 
AND MO, E. (1993). Growth of moulds and production 
of mycotoxins in wheat during drying and storage. Acta 
Agric. Scand. [B] Soil Plant Sci. 1993, 43, 32-37 

106. LUGAUSKAS, A. (1997). Microbiological  book 
for research:  Vilnius, 35-390. 

106. MACHACEK, J.E. AND GREANEY, F.J. (1938). The 
block point of kernel smudge disease of cereals. Can. J. 
Res.  16: 84-113. 

107. MAGAN, N., HOPE, R., CAIRNS, V. AND ALDRED, 
D. (2003). Post-harvest fungal ecology: impact of fungal 
growth and mycotoxin accumulation in stored grain. 
European J. Plant Pathol. 109: 723-730. 

108. MEHROTHRA, D.K. (1974). Studies on some 
microrganisms associated with rice in storage. Paper 
presentation Abstract at University of Lucknow. 

109. MILNER, Y. AND GEDDES, W.F. (1946). Grain 
storage studies of influence of certain moulds inhibitors 
on respiration of moist wheat. Cereal Chem. 24 : 507-
517. 

110. MILNER, Y., CHRISTENSEN, C. M. AND 
GEDESS, W.F. (1947). Grain storage studies 6: Wheat 
respiration in relation to moisture content, mould growth, 
chemical deterioration and heating. Cereal Chem. 24: 
182-199. 

111. MIS, A. AND GRUNDAS, S. (2002). Wheat grain 
hardness and quality. Int. Agrophysics  16: 283-288. 

112. MOHAMMADKHANI, A. (2005). Study of 
Pentosans (Non Starch Polysaccharides), in Durum 
Wheat and its Relation to the Quality of Protein and 
Grain Hardness Index (H.I.). Pak. J. Nutri. 4: 208-209. 

113. ORTH, R.A. AND SHELLENBERGER, J.A. 
(1988). Origin, production and utilization of wheat. In: 
Wheat: Chemistry and Technology (Y. Pomeranz, ed.). 
Vol. I, AACC, St. Paul, MN,   pp.1-14. 

114. PALNI, I.K. (1975). Studies on the microflora 
associated with wheat grains and various milling fraction. 
Paper presentation. Abstract, University of Lucknow. 

115. PAPAVIZAS, G.C. AND CHRITENSEN, C.M. 
(1960). Grain storage studies 29: Effect of invasion by 
individual species and mixture of Aspergillus upon 
germination and development of discoloured germs in 
wheat, Cereal Chem. 27: 197-230. 

116. PELHATE, J. (1968). Inventaire de la mycoflora 
des bles de conservation  (Inventory of mycoflora of 
stored wheat) Bull. Soc. Mycol. France  84: 127-143. 

117. POISSON, J. AND GUILBOT, M.A. (1956). 
Mycoflora des Farines Franscaises. Menuerie, France. pp 
42-52. 

118. POMERANZ, Y. AND WILLIAMS, P.C. (1990). 
Wheat hardness: its genetic, structural, and biochemical 
background, measurement, and significance. In: 
Advances in Cereal Science and Technology (Y. 
Pomeranz ed.). American Association of Cereal 
Chemists, St. Paul, MN. 10: 471-548. 

119. PRESTON K.R., DEXTER J.E. AND KRUGER 
J.E. (1978). Relationship of exoproteolytic and 
endoproteolytic activity to storage protein hydrolysis in 
germinating durum and hard red spring wheat. Cereal 
Chem. 55: 877-888. 



Food and Environment Safety - Journal of Faculty of Food Engineering,  Ştefan cel Mare University - Suceava  
Year IX, No2 - 2010 

 
 

96 
 

120. SAMSON, R.A. AND VAN REENEN, H. (1988). 
Introduction to Foodborne Fungi. 3rd ed. Centraalbureau 
voor Schimmelcutures, Baar. Delff. Institute of the Royal 
Netherland Academy of Arts and Sciences. 

121. SANKARAN, R. (1976). Mould Problems in the 
Storage of Food Grains. Symposium ‘Stratergies on 
Storage, Handling and Processing of Food Grains in the 
Present Context'. Bangalore Chapter of Association of 
Food Scientists and Technologists, India. 

122. SANKARAN, R.,  SEHGAL, D. D., PARIHAR, D. 
B. AND  NATH, H. (1976). Cereal grain fungi and grain 
quality.  Def. Sci.  26:  161. 

123. SANKARAN, R., MATTADA, R. R. AND 
THANGAMANI. (1975). Mycoflora and changes of 
wheat seed quality during storage. Itzd. Fd. Packer  29: 1. 

124. SCHNURER, J. AND JONSSON, A. (1992). 
Ergosterol levels and mould colony forming units in 
Swedish grains of food and food grade. Acta Agric. 
Scand. [B] Soil Plant Sci. 42: 240-245. 

125. SHUEY, W.C. AND GILLES, K.A. (1969). 
Experimental milling of sized wheat. Northwest Mill.  
276:  9. 

126. SINGH, H.B., ANDERSON, E. AND PAL, B.P. 
(1957). Studies in the genetics of Triticum vavilovii  
Jacob.   Agron. J.   49: 4-11.  
 

127. SMIRNOVA, A., KOSTROVA, O. (1989). 
Mikrobiologija zerna i produktov jego pererabotk. 
pp.195.  

128. TATHAM, A.S., AND SHEWRY, P.R. (1985). The 
conformation of wheat glutenin proteins. The secondary 
structure and thermal stabilities of glutein and gliadins.  
J. Cereal Sci.  3: 103-113. 

129. TUITE, J.F. AND CHRISTENSEN, C.M. (1957). 
Grain storage studies 24: Moisture content of wheat seed 
in relation to invasion of seed by species of the 
Aspergillus glaucus group and the effect of invasion upon 
germination of the seed. J. Phytopathol. 47: 323-327. 

130. TURNBULL, K.M. AND RAHMAN, S. (2002). 
Endosperm texture in wheat. J. Cereal Sci., 36: 327-337.  

131. WALL, J.S. (1979). The role of wheat proteins in 
determining baking quality. In: Recent Advances in the 
Biochemistry of Cereals, (D.L. Laidman, and R.W.Wyn-
Jones, eds.). Phytochem. Soc. Eur. Symp. Ser. No. 16, 
Academic Press London NY and San Fransico. pp. 275-
311. 

132. WICKLOW, D. T. (1995). The mycology of stored 
grain: an ecological perspective.           In: Stored grain 
ecosystems (D. S. Jayas, N. D. G. White and W. E. Muir, 
eds.). New York, Marcel Dekker, pp. 197-249. 

133. WORZELLA, W.W. (1942). Inhe ritance and 
interrelationship of components of quality, cold 
resistance, and morphological characters in wheat 
hybrids. J. Agric. Res. 65: 501-522. 

134. WOSNIAK, W. (2001). Effect of moisture 
treatment of wheat grains on technological hardness (in 
Polish). Acta Agrophysics 46: 227-233. 

135. WRIGLEY, C.W. AND BIETZ, J.A. (1988). 
Protein s and amino acids. In: Wheat: Chemistry and 
Technology (Y. Pomeranz, ed.). American Association of 
Cereal Chemists, Saint Paul, MN, 1:  159-275. 

136. MAGAN, N. (1993a). Early detection of fungi in 
stored grain. Int. J. Biodeterior. Biodegradat.  32:145-
160. 

137. MAGAN, N. (1993b). Use of sulphur dioxide to 
control fungi in stored grain. In: Proceedings of Int. 
Conference on Controlled Atmosphere and Fumigation in 
Grain Storages (S. Navarro and E. Donahaye, eds.). 
Capital Press, Jerusalem, Israel. pp. 163-171 

138. ORTH, R.A. AND SHELLENBERGER, J.A. 
(1988). Origin, production and utilization of wheat. In: 
Wheat: Chemistry and Technology (Y. Pomeranz, ed.). 
Vol. I, AACC, St. Paul, MN,   pp.1-14. 

139. GOODING, M.J. AND DAVIS, W.P. (1997). Wheat 
production and utilization, systems, quality and the 
environment. Book CAB International. 

140. FINNEY, K.F. AND BARMORE, M.A. (1948). 
Loaf volume and protein content of hard red winter and 
spring wheats. Cereal Chem.  25: 291-312. 

141. POMERANZ, Y. AND WILLIAMS, P.C. (1990). Wheat 
hardness: its genetic, structural, and biochemical 
background, measurement, and significance. In: 
Advances in Cereal Science and Technology (Y. 
Pomeranz ed.). American Association of 

142. HALVERSON, J. AND ZELENY, L. (1988). 
Criteria of wheat quality. Chapter 2. In: Wheat: 
Chemistry and Technology, Vol. 1. (Y. Pomeranz, ed.). 
Am. Assoc. Cereal Chem., Inc., St. Paul, MN.  pp. 15.