





































  
 

Copyright © The Author(s) 
Vol.6, No. 4, October 2025 

e-ISSN: 2723-4126 
p-ISSN: 2776-8880 

 

306 
 

TOGETHER WE LEARN: STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF 
THE BENEFITS OF GROUP WORK IN LEARNING ENGLISH 

 
Deni Asrida1, Nanda Dwi Aksari2 

UIN Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar, Batusangkar, Indonesia 
 

deniasrida@uinmybatusangkar.ac.id 
 

ABSTRACT 

Although group work is widely promoted in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) pedagogy, 
most studies have examined its benefits in isolation, focusing primarily on cognitive or 
affective aspects. Few scholarly studies have explored students’ perceptions holistically 
across cognitive, affective, and conative dimensions, particularly in Indonesian secondary 
school contexts where sociocultural norms influence classroom interaction. This qualitative 
study addresses that gap by examining how ninth-grade students at SMPN 2 Batusangkar 
perceive the role of group work in English learning. Thirteen students were purposively 
selected based on participation levels and teacher recommendations. Data from semi-
structured interviews were analyzed using the Miles and Huberman framework. Findings 
indicate that group work enhances comprehension, accelerates task completion, and 
stimulates idea generation (cognitive); fosters enjoyment, self-confidence, and occasional 
frustration with passive peers (affective); and promotes activeness, responsibility, and 
collective problem-solving (conative). The study’s unique contribution lies in providing a 
culturally contextualized, multidimensional account of group work perceptions, offering 
actionable insights for designing structured, equitable, and engaging collaborative activities. 
These findings have key implications for EFL educators and curriculum developers seeking 
to balance learner autonomy with guided support to optimize participation, language 
development, and essential 21st-century skills. 

Keywords: Collaborative Learning, EFL Learning, Group Work, Indonesian Secondary 
Education, Students’ Perceptions 

INTRODUCTION 

In recent decades, the global shift from teacher-centered to learner-centered pedagogy 
has emphasized the importance of collaborative learning strategies in second language 
classrooms. This shift reflects broader educational reforms aimed at promoting learner 
autonomy, critical thinking, and communicative competence rather than passive knowledge 
transmission. Among these strategies, group work has gained increasing recognition as a 
powerful pedagogical tool that fosters engagement, promotes peer interaction, and 
facilitates deeper learning (Johnson & Johnson, 1999; Slavin, 1995). In English as a Foreign 
Language (EFL) context, where opportunities for authentic communication are often limited, 
group work offers learners meaningful platforms to practice the target language, negotiate 
meaning, and develop confidence in expressing themselves (Brown & Lee, 1994; Oxford, 

http://u.lipi.go.id/1593190689
http://u.lipi.go.id/1593190689


  
 

Copyright © The Author(s) 
Vol.6, No. 4, October 2025 

e-ISSN: 2723-4126 
p-ISSN: 2776-8880 

 

307 
 

1997). This makes collaborative learning particularly relevant in Asian settings, where large 
class sizes and exam-oriented instruction often restrict opportunities for individualized 
language practice. 

The benefits of group work are widely documented in both theoretical and empirical 
research. Classic cooperative learning theories emphasize that collaboration enhances 
learning through positive interdependence, where students support one another to achieve 
shared goals (Johnson & Johnson, 1999), and through the Zone of Proximal Development, 
where peer scaffolding enables learners to achieve tasks they could not accomplish alone 
(Vygotsky, 1978). Research has consistently found that group work stimulates cognitive 
engagement by encouraging learners to explain ideas, challenge perspectives, and co-
construct new knowledge (Gillies & Ashman, 2007; Webb, 2009). In Indonesian contexts, 
Sajidin and Ashadi (2021) found that group-based activities sustained student engagement 
and improved comprehension of English materials, while (Gunawan, 2025) demonstrated 
that project-based collaboration enhanced speaking fluency, critical thinking, and teamwork 
skills among university students. Affective benefits are also evident: group collaboration 
reduces anxiety and fosters emotional comfort by providing safe spaces for learners to test 
ideas before presenting them publicly. Meilasari et al. (2023) found that cooperative learning 
significantly alleviated speaking anxiety among Indonesian EFL learners, while Alzubi et al. 
(2024) reported increased motivation and self-confidence through group discussions. 
Conatively, group work helps students develop responsibility, strengthen accountability, 
and engage more actively, preparing them with the collaborative and communicative skills 
required in modern learning environments. (Situmorang, 2021). 

Yet, despite its well-established potential, group work is not without its challenges. 
Studies consistently highlight the problem of unequal participation, with dominant learners 
overshadowing quieter or less proficient peers, leading to disparities in contribution and 
learning (Burke, 2011). In collectivist societies such as Indonesia, cultural values of harmony 
and respect for authority may prevent students from openly addressing peers who fail to 
participate fully, resulting in frustration or passive compliance (Abbott, 2017; Suryati, 2015). 
Coordination difficulties also emerge when group tasks lack clear structure, leading some 
learners to view group work as inefficient or time-consuming (Alfares, 2017). Interpersonal 
conflicts, arising from mismatched personalities or proficiency levels, can further undermine 
group cohesion and create negative learning experiences (Chen, 2018). Additionally, while 
digital tools have expanded opportunities for group collaboration, they have also introduced 
new challenges, such as reduced accountability and reliance on teacher intervention, 
particularly when online interactions are not carefully facilitated (Oktaviani & Sadiq, 2023). 
These challenges underscore that group work is not a universally effective strategy but one 
whose success depends on contextual factors such as task design, teacher facilitation, and 
students’ social orientations. 

The coexistence of these benefits and challenges has produced a nuanced and 
sometimes contradictory body of research. On one hand, group work is celebrated as a 
transformative learning process that supports cognitive development, emotional security, 
and behavioral engagement (Gunawan, 2025; Meilasari et al., 2023). On the other hand, it is 
critiqued for its tendency to reproduce inequities, create inefficiencies, and generate 

http://u.lipi.go.id/1593190689
http://u.lipi.go.id/1593190689


  
 

Copyright © The Author(s) 
Vol.6, No. 4, October 2025 

e-ISSN: 2723-4126 
p-ISSN: 2776-8880 

 

308 
 

interpersonal tensions (Supriyadi et al., (2022). What is missing in much of the literature is 
an integrative perspective that accounts for the complex ways in which cognitive, affective, 
and conative dimensions interact to shape students’ perceptions of group work. Existing 
studies often emphasize one dimension at the expense of the others focusing, for instance, 
on academic achievement without considering emotional factors, or on motivation without 
analyzing behavioral accountability. As a result, there is limited understanding of how 
students experience group work holistically, and how these experiences influence both their 
language learning outcomes and their broader development as autonomous, collaborative 
learners. 

This study seeks to address that gap by exploring students’ perceptions of group work 
in EFL classrooms through the lens of the Cognitive, Affective, Conative. By examining how 
group work shapes students’ thinking, feelings, and behaviors, this research aims to provide 
a more comprehensive understanding of its role in English language learning. Specifically, it 
investigates the experiences of ninth-grade students in an Indonesian secondary school, 
highlighting how collaborative activities enhance comprehension, foster emotional comfort, 
and encourage active engagement, while also acknowledging the challenges of participation 
inequities and coordination issues. Drawing on qualitative interview data, the study is 
guided by the central question: How do students perceive the role of group work in enhancing 
their English language learning? The findings are expected to inform teachers and 
curriculum developers about how to design and implement group-based activities that 
maximize benefits, mitigate challenges, and align with the needs of learners in diverse EFL 
contexts. In doing so, the study contributes both to the theoretical refinement of engagement 
research and to the practical advancement of collaborative pedagogy in language education. 

METHODS 

This study employed a qualitative research design to explore the perceptions of ninth-
grade students at SMPN 2 Batusangkar regarding the use of group work in English language 
learning. A qualitative approach was selected to allow for rich, in-depth insights into 
participants’ experiences, perspectives, and the meanings they assign to collaborative 
learning in their specific educational and cultural context. The study involved 13 students 
from Class IX who had prior experience participating in group work during English lessons. 
Participants were selected through purposive sampling to capture variation in participation 
levels (high, medium, and low) and breadth of group work experience. Selection was based 
on recommendations from the English teacher and the researcher’s direct observations 
during a teaching practicum (PLB). Prior the data collection, Ethical approval was obtained 
from the Research Ethics Committee of UIN Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar. As the participants 
were minors, both written guardian and student consent were secured. All participants were 
informed of the study’s objectives, procedures, potential risks, and benefits. They were 
assured that their involvement was voluntary and that they could withdraw at any time 
without consequence. To maintain anonymity, pseudonyms (S1–S13) were assigned in all 
transcripts and reporting. Personally, identifying information was removed, and all digital 
data such as audio, video, and transcripts were stored securely on password-protected 
devices accessible only to the research team. 

http://u.lipi.go.id/1593190689
http://u.lipi.go.id/1593190689


  
 

Copyright © The Author(s) 
Vol.6, No. 4, October 2025 

e-ISSN: 2723-4126 
p-ISSN: 2776-8880 

 

309 
 

Data were collected using semi-structured interviews guided by an interview protocol 
informed by existing literature on group work in EFL settings. Interviews were conducted 
both in person and via online platforms, depending on participant availability. Each 
interview lasted approximately 20–30 minutes. Questions were open-ended to encourage 
reflective, detailed responses. Examples included: “Can you describe how group work affects 
your understanding of English lessons?”. “How do you feel when working with classmates in 
a group?”. “What do you usually do if a group member is not participating actively?”. “Can 
you share an example of a group task that you found especially helpful or challenging?”. All 
interviews were audio-recorded with consent, and brief field notes captured non-verbal cues 
and contextual details to supplement the transcripts. 

The data analysis followed the Miles & Huberman (2014) interactive model, 
encompassing data reduction, data display, and verification. Data reduction began with 
verbatim transcription of all interviews, followed by repeated readings to gain familiarity 
with the content. An initial coding framework was developed deductively from the study’s 
cognitive, affective, conative (CAC) dimensions, then refined inductively to incorporate 
emergent codes from participants’ narratives. Two researchers independently coded a 
subset of transcripts to enhance coding reliability. The resulting codes were compared, 
discussed, and consolidated into a final codebook. Codes were then organized into thematic 
categories and summarized in narrative and tabular displays to facilitate interpretation. 
Patterns were examined in relation to relevant theoretical frameworks, including Vygotsky’s 
sociocultural theory, cooperative learning theory, and Krashen’s affective filter hypothesis. 
Credibility was strengthened through member checking, whereby key points from each 
interview were summarized and verified with participants to confirm accuracy. 
Triangulation was achieved by drawing on multiple data sources: interviews, field notes, and 
researcher observations.  

RESULTS 

This study aims to find out the students’ perception of ninth grade students towards 
group work in English learning at SMPN 2 Batusangkar. The data results were analyzed 
based on three components of perception, namely: cognitive, affective, and conative. 

Cognitive Components 

The cognitive component is students' knowledge and understanding of group work. 
The research findings show that most students have a good and positive understanding of 
the implementation of group work in learning English. 

Group Work Helps in Understanding the Material 

The findings from this study reveal that group work significantly contributes to 
students’ understanding of English learning materials. A notable number of informants (S1, 
S2, S3, S4, S5, S6, S8, S9, S10, S11, and S13) expressed that learning through group 
collaboration helped them grasp concepts more effectively. This is primarily due to the 
accessibility and relatability of peer explanations, which students often found easier to 
comprehend than teacher-led instruction. One student, S1, remarked:  

http://u.lipi.go.id/1593190689
http://u.lipi.go.id/1593190689


  
 

Copyright © The Author(s) 
Vol.6, No. 4, October 2025 

e-ISSN: 2723-4126 
p-ISSN: 2776-8880 

 

310 
 

“Yes miss, Because of group work, I can get help from my friends, which opens up my 
understanding.”  

This statement suggests that group work creates a supportive learning environment 
where students feel comfortable seeking help. The phrase "opens up my 
understanding" implies that group interactions provide new perspectives or simplify 
complex topics through peer-to-peer assistance. It emphasizes the social nature of learning, 
where knowledge is co-constructed among members of the group. Another student, S9, 
explained:  

“Sometimes I need help from others to understand the material better, such as how to 
solve a particular problem.”   

This highlights the functional role of group work in problem-solving. The student 
acknowledges that there are moments when individual understanding is insufficient, and 
collaboration becomes essential. The sharing of strategies or solutions within a group 
context fosters deeper comprehension, especially in language learning where diverse 
interpretations and approaches often arise. S10 shared a broader perspective:  

“It is very helpful, Miss, because students have different levels of understanding. By 
working together, we can ensure everyone understands.” 

This quote reflects an awareness of the diversity in learners' abilities and the 
compensatory effect of group work. Students recognize that by working together, they can 
bridge gaps in understanding and promote collective academic growth. It also illustrates 
how group learning nurtures empathy and responsibility, as students assist their peers in 
achieving shared learning outcomes. Taken together, these excerpts illustrate that group 
work not only aids individual understanding but also builds a collaborative classroom 
culture. It aligns with Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory, particularly the concept of the Zone of 
Proximal Development (ZPD), where learners can achieve higher levels of understanding 
with the support of more capable peers. These findings underscore the importance of 
integrating structured group activities into English language instruction. When implemented 
effectively, group work encourages active participation, mutual support, and a deeper 
engagement with the learning material. 

Group Work Speeds up Task Completion 

In addition to facilitating understanding, group work was also perceived by several 
students as an effective strategy for completing tasks more efficiently. Informants S3, S5, S9, 
and S10 expressed the view that collaborative learning enables faster task execution due to 
the distribution of responsibilities and the benefits of collective problem-solving. S3 stated:   

“When I don’t understand something, I ask friends and we discuss it, making it easier 
to complete.” 

This quote emphasizes how the group environment creates opportunities for 
immediate clarification and idea exchange, which streamlines the completion process. The 
act of discussing with peers not only aids comprehension but also reduces the time typically 

http://u.lipi.go.id/1593190689
http://u.lipi.go.id/1593190689


  
 

Copyright © The Author(s) 
Vol.6, No. 4, October 2025 

e-ISSN: 2723-4126 
p-ISSN: 2776-8880 

 

311 
 

spent struggling alone with difficult content. This illustrates the dual function of group work: 
enhancing learning while simultaneously increasing productivity. Similarly, S5 observed: 

“Tasks are finished more quickly and easily when we discuss them and share ideas.” 

This reflection highlights the time-saving advantages of collaborative dialogue. The 
sharing of ideas within a group allows students to approach tasks from multiple 
perspectives, often leading to more efficient and creative solutions. Rather than working in 
isolation, students benefit from the collective knowledge of the group, which speeds up 
decision-making and reduces redundancy in effort. S10 offered a more comprehensive 
explanation:  

“Because our understanding differs, we help each other, making the task easier and 
Faster to complete.”  

The student points out that diversity in cognitive abilities becomes an asset when 
leveraged in a cooperative setting. Differences in understanding are not seen as barriers but 
rather as complementary strengths. Through mutual support, students compensate for each 
other's weaknesses, leading to both improved quality and speed in task completion. Taken 
together, these responses reflect the positive impact of group dynamics on students’ 
academic efficiency. The delegation of roles, division of labor, and continuous peer 
interaction serve as mechanisms that simplify complex tasks and shorten the time required 
for completion.  

From a theoretical perspective, this finding supports constructivist views of learning, 
where knowledge is co-constructed through social interaction, and learning becomes more 
effective in authentic, task-oriented environments. Moreover, it aligns with the principles of 
collaborative learning, which emphasize interdependence, individual accountability, and 
shared goals. Practically, this suggests that educators should consider incorporating 
structured group assignments, especially for complex tasks, as they promote both time 
efficiency and deeper engagement with the material. Proper guidance in group formation 
and role assignment can further enhance the productivity benefits of this approach. 

Group Work Adds Insight or Ideas   

Another important theme that emerged from the data is the perception that group 
work contributes to the enrichment of students’ ideas and perspectives. Informants S8, S9, 
and S13 highlighted the value of collaborative discussions in generating new insights, which 
might not have emerged during individual learning. This theme emphasizes the cognitive 
benefits of group interaction, particularly in stimulating critical thinking and expanding 
conceptual understanding. S8 shared the following:  

“Difficult problems become easier when discussed. Friends often give ideas I hadn’t 
considered.”  

This statement underscores the transformative effect of collaborative dialogue. By 
working in a group, students are exposed to diverse viewpoints and strategies, which help 
simplify complex problems. The phrase “ideas I hadn’t considered” points to the unexpected 

http://u.lipi.go.id/1593190689
http://u.lipi.go.id/1593190689


  
 

Copyright © The Author(s) 
Vol.6, No. 4, October 2025 

e-ISSN: 2723-4126 
p-ISSN: 2776-8880 

 

312 
 

yet beneficial nature of peer contributions. Students often encounter novel approaches that 
challenge or expand their own thinking. This reflects how group work serves as a platform 
for intellectual exploration. Similarly, S9 noted:  

“Group members complement each other; we share what we know and learn from each 
other.”  

This quote reflects the reciprocal nature of collaborative learning. Each group member 
brings unique prior knowledge and skills to the discussion, which collectively enrich the 
learning experience. The mutual exchange of information fosters a deeper understanding, 
making the group setting not only a social environment but also an academic resource. This 
aligns with the principles of knowledge co-construction, where learning is enhanced through 
shared experiences and dialogue. S13 expressed a particularly striking transformation:  

“Working in a group increased my understanding from 50% to 100% through the 
exchange of ideas.”  

This comment quantifies the perceived benefit of group work in a compelling way. It 
illustrates how peer discussions can fill in gaps in understanding and reinforce learning. The 
student explicitly attributes full comprehension to the collaborative process, implying that 
the diversity of thought and the interactive nature of group work are critical to achieving 
deeper cognitive engagement.  

Affective Components 

The affective component relates to students' feelings or attitudes towards the 
implementation of group work. Most students feel happy, comfortable, more confident and 
resentment towards passive members when learning in group work. 

Feeling of Enjoyment and Reduced Boredom 

The theme “Feeling of Enjoyment and Reduced Boredom” reflects students’ positive 
emotional responses toward group work in English language learning. Based on interview 
data from informants S1, S3, S5, S8, and S9, group work fosters a more enjoyable and less 
monotonous learning atmosphere. For instance, S1 stated:  

“It’s more fun doing assignments with friends because we can chat and collaborate, 
which prevents boredom.”  

This statement illustrates how group interaction and collaboration made learning 
activities less monotonous and more engaging. The opportunity to share tasks, exchange 
ideas, and socialize contributed to a more relaxed and stimulating atmosphere. Students also 
highlighted the sense of comfort that group work provided. Many participants noted that 
working with peers allowed them to feel more at ease, particularly when tackling challenging 
assignments. The presence of friends in the learning process reduced tension and made 
classroom activities feel less stressful. This comfort appeared to encourage greater 
willingness to participate, suggesting that emotional support from peers was a motivating 
factor in sustaining involvement. 

http://u.lipi.go.id/1593190689
http://u.lipi.go.id/1593190689


  
 

Copyright © The Author(s) 
Vol.6, No. 4, October 2025 

e-ISSN: 2723-4126 
p-ISSN: 2776-8880 

 

313 
 

Increased Self-Confidence 

The theme “Increased Self-Confidence” highlights the positive impact of group work on 
students’ willingness to express themselves in English learning contexts. Informants S1, S2, 
S4, S5, S9, S10, and S13 reported feeling more confident when working in groups, as the 
collaborative environment reduced the pressure of individual performance. For example, S2 
stated: 

“In front of the class, I’m scared of making mistakes, but in groups, I can ask my friends 
first.”  

While S4 added: 

“Groups make me feel more secure because I can confirm my ideas with friends before 

sharing.”  

Some students mentioned that discussing ideas within their groups helped them feel 
more assured before presenting to the teacher or the entire class. The peer-to-peer 
validation acted as a steppingstone for participation, especially for students who might 
otherwise be reluctant to speak up. For these learners, group work created a space where 
they could try out their ideas and receive encouragement, leading to stronger confidence in 
their abilities. However, not all affective experiences were positive. Some students 
expressed dislike toward group members who were passive or uncooperative. These 
students reported feeling frustrated when they had more responsibility or when others 
failed to contribute meaningfully. Such negative emotions indicate that while group work 
can enhance enjoyment and confidence, it can also produce dissatisfaction when group 
dynamics are imbalanced. The frustration associated with unequal participation suggests 
that emotional outcomes are closely tied to the effectiveness of collaboration and the fairness 
of workload distribution. 

Conative Components 

The conative component relates to students' behavioral tendencies in response to 
group work. Most students demonstrated active, responsible and collective problem-solving 
strategies. 

Group Work Encourages Activeness 

The theme “Group Work Encourages Activeness” captures students’ perception that 
working in groups enhances their participation and engagement in English language 
learning. This theme emerged from the responses of informants S1, S2, S4, S5, S8, S10, S12, 
and S13, who consistently expressed that being part of a group setting motivated them to 
become more involved in classroom activities. Based on the excerpt S2 stated: 

“I’m more active because I don’t want my group to fail to complete the task,”.  

Highlighting the sense of responsibility and accountability that group members feel 
toward one another. This sense of shared responsibility often prompts students to put in 

http://u.lipi.go.id/1593190689
http://u.lipi.go.id/1593190689


  
 

Copyright © The Author(s) 
Vol.6, No. 4, October 2025 

e-ISSN: 2723-4126 
p-ISSN: 2776-8880 

 

314 
 

more effort, not only for their own success but also for the benefit of the entire group. 
Similarly, S12 remarked: 

“I try to engage my friends, so everyone participates in the group activity.”  

Demonstrating that group work can also foster leadership qualities and initiative, as 
students take active roles in supporting and encouraging one another. S13 added: 

“Even when I feel lazy, my group motivates me to stay active.”  

It points to the influence of peer motivation in sustaining engagement even when 
individual drive may be lacking. In such environments, students are more likely to exert 
effort, remain engaged, and take initiative because they feel a sense of obligation and support 
within their teams. Furthermore, the collaborative nature of group work activates social 
motivation, which can lead to increased persistence and task completion, especially in 
language learning contexts that often require repeated practice and communicative risk-
taking.  

From a psychological perspective, group dynamics reduce social isolation and provide 
a platform for mutual encouragement, which is essential for sustaining motivation in second 
language learning. In practical terms, these results suggest that well-structured group 
activities can be strategically used by teachers to promote higher levels of student 
activeness. Group work not only supports linguistic interaction but also cultivates a 
classroom environment where peer influence, shared goals, and collaborative responsibility 
drive student participation. Therefore, incorporating group work into English learning 
activities offers a valuable pedagogical approach for increasing student engagement and 
fostering a more dynamic, supportive, and participatory learning atmosphere. 

Group Work Fosters Responsibility   

The theme “Sense of Accountability in Group Tasks” illustrates that students perceive a 
strong personal and collective responsibility when engaging in group-based English learning 
activities. Informants S1, S2, S3, S4, S6, S7, S8, S9, S10, S12, and S13 consistently emphasized 
the importance of contributing actively and supporting their peers to ensure the completion 
and success of group assignments. S7 stated: 

“Even if the task is difficult, we try to help each other and share the responsibility.” 

Underscoring the cooperative nature of group work and the willingness of students to 
persevere through challenges as a team. S9 added: 

“I actively contribute to completing assignments and ensuring group success.” 

It reveals a personal commitment to the group's academic outcomes. Meanwhile, S12 
expressed a deeper level of involvement by saying: 

“If others don’t understand, I feel the need to explain and support them.”  

It indicates that group work can foster a sense of leadership and peer tutoring among 
students. Tool for instilling a sense of responsibility, mutual support, and 
accountability among learners. It shifts the focus from teacher-centered instruction 

http://u.lipi.go.id/1593190689
http://u.lipi.go.id/1593190689


  
 

Copyright © The Author(s) 
Vol.6, No. 4, October 2025 

e-ISSN: 2723-4126 
p-ISSN: 2776-8880 

 

315 
 

to student-centered collaboration, where learners actively manage their own roles and 
contribute to the group’s collective progress. As such, incorporating collaborative tasks into 
English learning curricula not only enhances linguistic competence but also cultivates a 
stronger sense of ownership and teamwork essential components of effective 21st-century 
learning environments. 

Collective Problem-Solving Strategies 

The theme “Collective Problem-Solving Strategies” highlights the way students 
collaboratively approach academic challenges in group settings, particularly during English 
learning activities. Informants S3, S4, S5, S6, S7, S8, S9, S10, S11, S12, and S13 described a 
clear pattern of engaging in group discussions to solve problems collectively before seeking 
external help. S4, S6, S9, S12 stated: 

“If we can’t solve a problem through discussion, we ask the teacher for help.” 

It indicates that students prioritize peer-based collaboration and turn to the teacher as 
a secondary resource. S9 emphasized this process further by saying:  

“We try to understand the task together before asking the teacher.”  

It suggests a proactive learning attitude and a desire for group autonomy. Similarly, 
S13 noted:  

“We discuss within the group and only approach the teacher, when necessary.”  

It reinforces the idea that students prefer to rely on peer dialogue and mutual 
reasoning before escalating to instructor assistance. The students’ willingness to work 
together to understand instructions, clarify confusion, and resolve difficulties reflects the 
development of critical thinking, communication, and teamwork skills, all essential for 
effective group learning.  

Moreover, their restraint in immediately seeking teacher intervention shows a level 
of self-regulation and cognitive engagement. Students are not passive recipients of 
knowledge but active participants in the problem-solving process. It also echoes the 
principles of collaborative learning, where knowledge is co-constructed, and learners 
benefit from the diverse perspectives and strategies offered by peers.  

Pedagogically, this theme suggests that fostering collective problem-solving 
practices within group work settings can empower students to take initiative, strengthen 
peer collaboration, and reduce overdependence on the teacher. Teachers can support this by 
designing tasks that require group negotiation, promoting inquiry-based learning, and 
encouraging students to exhaust peer resources before seeking help. Ultimately, such 
practices not only enhance students’ linguistic and academic development but also nurture 
independence, responsibility, and higher-order thinking skills, all of which are crucial in 
21st-century education. 

DISCUSSION 

http://u.lipi.go.id/1593190689
http://u.lipi.go.id/1593190689


  
 

Copyright © The Author(s) 
Vol.6, No. 4, October 2025 

e-ISSN: 2723-4126 
p-ISSN: 2776-8880 

 

316 
 

The findings of this study provide compelling evidence that group work in English 
language learning offers cognitive, affective, and conative benefits for students. The 
integration of qualitative data from student interviews reveals not only how learners 
perceive group work but also the depth of their engagement and the multiple dimensions it 
impacts. These findings are best understood through the lens of socio-constructivist 
theory (Vygotsky, 1978), cooperative learning theory (Johnson & Johnson, 1999), 
and Krashen’s affective filter hypothesis (1982), which collectively frame the learning 
process as socially mediated, emotionally influenced, and behaviorally constructed. 

The cognitive benefits reported in this study enhanced comprehension, accelerated 

task completion, and the generation of diverse ideas strongly align with a substantial body 

of evidence supporting the cognitive advantages of collaborative learning (Gillies & Ashman, 

2007; Webb, 2009). Most participants indicated that peer explanations offered in group 

settings were more relatable and easier to internalize than teacher-led instruction. This 

resonates with Sajidin & Ashadi (2021), who demonstrated that group work in Indonesian 

junior high schools promotes active learning by enabling students to process material 

through familiar peer communication styles. Similarly, Gunawan (2025) reported that 

project-based collaborative learning significantly enhanced both speaking fluency and 

higher-order thinking skills, showing that such approaches benefit not only linguistic but 
also analytical capacities.  

The emphasis on time efficiency as a motivator for engagement represents a 

noteworthy extension the literature. While studies such as Alfares (2017) have 

acknowledged efficiency as a driver of participation in higher education, few have 

documented its importance in adolescent EFL contexts. Students saw efficiency not as a 

shortcut but as an enabler of deeper engagement freeing up cognitive resources for problem-

solving and idea elaboration. This pragmatic appreciation of group work suggests that 

cognitive benefits are not limited to comprehension and recall but also include strategic time 

management skills, an often-overlooked academic competence. 

Furthermore, the repeated observation that exposure to multiple viewpoints enriches 

understanding aligns with Kuliahana & Marzuki (2024), who found that structured group 
discussions improved speaking fluency and expanded students’ repertoire of communicative 

strategies. In our study, students used peer contributions to reconsider their own ideas and 

integrate alternative perspectives behaviors that echo Vygotsky (1978) concept of the Zone 

of Proximal Development (ZPD), where cognitive growth occurs through the support of more 

capable peers. From a pedagogical standpoint, these findings suggest that teachers should 

deliberately structure group activities to maximize these cognitive benefits. This might 

include assigning roles that ensure diverse viewpoints are heard, scaffolding peer 

explanations with targeted prompts, and encouraging time management practices within 

groups. Doing so would not only deepen comprehension but also equip students with 

transferable skills such as negotiation, synthesis, and collaborative reasoning. 

http://u.lipi.go.id/1593190689
http://u.lipi.go.id/1593190689


  
 

Copyright © The Author(s) 
Vol.6, No. 4, October 2025 

e-ISSN: 2723-4126 
p-ISSN: 2776-8880 

 

317 
 

The affective benefits observed enjoyment, reduced boredom, and increased self-

confidence are consistent with Krashen (1982) Affective Filter Hypothesis, which suggests 

that language acquisition is facilitated when learners are in low-anxiety, high-motivation 

environments. These benefits are echoed in recent empirical studies. Meilasari et al. (2023) 

found that cooperative learning reduced speaking anxiety and promoted fluency among 

Indonesian secondary EFL students, while Kuliahana & Marzuki (2024) highlighted 

students’ preference for group discussions due to the supportive, motivating atmosphere 

they create. 

Importantly, this study offers a more nuanced view of affective experiences in group 

work. While most students reported positive emotions, several expressed frustrations with 

inactive group members. This dual affective reality mirrors findings from Burke (2011) in 

higher education contexts, where uneven participation can undermine group cohesion. 

However, it contrasts with Supriyadi et al. (2022), whose research in Indonesian classrooms 

emphasized harmony and collective unity over the expression of discontent. The frankness 

with which our participants voiced dissatisfaction may reflect a generational shift toward 

valuing individual accountability within collectivist cultures. 

From a theoretical perspective, these affective dynamics can be understood through 

Vygotsky’s concept of social interaction as a learning mediator. Emotional comfort in group 

settings appears to serve as a scaffold for risk-taking and experimentation with language, 

while frustration may function as a motivator for setting clearer group norms. Pedagogically, 

the implications from group work are not automatic but depend on structures that promote 

equitable participation. Teachers might integrate strategies such as rotating roles, setting 

explicit participation expectations, and incorporating peer evaluation to balance emotional 

comfort with accountability. 
The conative outcomes improved activeness, a stronger sense of responsibility, and a 

preference for collective problem-solving reinforce Johnson & Johnson’s (1999) cooperative 

learning principle of positive interdependence, wherein group success is depending on each 

member’s contribution. These behaviors resonate with Sajidin and Ashadi (2021), who 

found that active learning strategies like group work increased students’ willingness to 

participate and assume responsibility for shared tasks. They also align with Gunawan 

(2025), whose participants demonstrated improved collaboration and self-direction in 

project-based contexts. Participants not only fulfilled their assigned tasks but also actively 

supported peers, explained materials, and encouraged engagement. Such proactive behavior 

has been more commonly documented in tertiary education (Kamardikaningsih, 2023) than 

in secondary classrooms, indicating that adolescents, when provided with the right 

structures, can develop advanced leadership and facilitation skills. 
The preference for peer-based problem-solving before consulting the teacher marks a 

significant departure from Alrashidi (2022) findings, where secondary EFL students relied 

heavily on teacher guidance. Instead, the data align with Oktaviani and Sadiq (2023) who 

reported that teacher-facilitated group work especially in computer mediated settings can 

http://u.lipi.go.id/1593190689
http://u.lipi.go.id/1593190689


  
 

Copyright © The Author(s) 
Vol.6, No. 4, October 2025 

e-ISSN: 2723-4126 
p-ISSN: 2776-8880 

 

318 
 

foster independence and self-regulation. This shift suggests a development of learning 

strategies among younger learners, potentially influenced by the growing emphasis on 

student agency in 21st-century education policy. Pedagogically, fostering conative 

development means giving students structured autonomy. Teachers can encourage this by 

providing clear, achievable goals while allowing students space to negotiate their processes. 

This balance of guidance and independence may be particularly effective in contexts where 

traditional teacher authority remains strong. 

CONCLUSION 

This study has explored the multifaceted perceptions of students regarding group work 
in English language learning, highlighting its significant role in promoting cognitive 
engagement, emotional comfort, and behavioral motivation. Through interview data, it is 
evident that group work fosters a positive affective environment, where students experience 
greater enjoyment and reduced boredom during learning activities. Moreover, the findings 
reveal that collaborative learning builds self-confidence, encourages active participation, 
and cultivates a sense of responsibility and accountability toward completing shared tasks. 

From a cognitive standpoint, students benefit from collective problem-solving 
strategies, which not only enhance their comprehension but also strengthen peer to peer 
scaffolding and interaction. This aligns with socio-constructivist theories such as Vygotsky 
(1978), which emphasize the social nature of learning. The data also indicate that group 
work nurtures mutual support, allowing students to clarify ideas and confront challenges 
together before seeking help from teachers. These outcomes illustrate how group dynamics 
contribute to both academic development and social-emotional growth, validating prior 
literature on cooperative learning (Johnson & Johnson, 1999; Slavin, 1995). 

Importantly, this study also underscores that the effectiveness of group work is not 
automatic; it requires thoughtful and deliberate implementation. For teachers, this means 
designing collaborative activities with clear structures, assigning roles to ensure equitable 
participation, and facilitating reflection sessions that allow students to evaluate both their 
contributions and group processes. Attention must also be given to the affective climate of 
the classroom teachers should encourage peer support systems while addressing challenges 
such as unequal participation. For curriculum developers, the findings suggest that group-
based pedagogy should be embedded more systematically into English curricula, with 
explicit training modules on collaboration, communication, and leadership skills. By doing 
so, schools can cultivate not only language proficiency but also the broader competencies 
essential for 21st-century learning, including critical thinking, teamwork, and adaptability. 

While this research contributes new insights by framing group work through the 
combined cognitive, affective, and conative dimensions, it also opens avenues for further 
investigation. Future studies could adopt a mixed methods design to triangulate student 
perceptions with classroom observations and performance data, thereby strengthening 
claims of causality. Comparative studies across different educational levels or cultural 
contexts would also help identify how group dynamics vary with age, proficiency, or 
sociocultural norms. Furthermore, longitudinal research could examine whether the 

http://u.lipi.go.id/1593190689
http://u.lipi.go.id/1593190689


  
 

Copyright © The Author(s) 
Vol.6, No. 4, October 2025 

e-ISSN: 2723-4126 
p-ISSN: 2776-8880 

 

319 
 

benefits of group work persist over time, particularly in relation to sustained motivation, 
language retention, and learner autonomy. Exploring the role of digital and hybrid learning 
environments in shaping group work dynamics also remains a pressing area for inquiry, 
especially as technology increasingly mediates collaborative language learning. 

In short, this study confirms that group work, when carefully structured and facilitated, 
is not merely a classroom technique but a transformative pedagogical tool. It meaningfully 
enhances language learning experiences by engaging learners cognitively, emotionally, and 
behaviorally, while also preparing them with the collaborative and leadership skills required 
beyond the classroom. By attending to the design, support, and assessment of group learning, 
educators and curriculum developers can maximize its potential, and future research can 
continue to refine its implementation across diverse educational landscapes. 

REFERENCES 

Abbott, A. (2017). Indonesian identity and cultural values. In Educational sovereignty and 
transnational exchanges in post-secondary Indonesian education (pp. 135-161). 
Springer.  

Alfares, N. (2017). Benefits and difficulties of learning in group work in EFL classes in Saudi 
Arabia. English language teaching.  

Alrashidi, O. (2022). Exploring learner autonomy: Secondary School EFL teachers’ beliefs 
and practices in the Saudi context. World Journal of English Language, 12(8). 
https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n8p97  

Alzubi, A. A., Nazim, M., & Ahamad, J. (2024). Examining the effect of a collaborative learning 
intervention on EFL students’ English learning and social interaction. Journal of 
Pedagogical Research, 8(2), 26-46. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202425541  

Brown, H. D., & Lee, H. (1994). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language 
pedagogy (Vol. 1). Prentice Hall Regents Englewood Cliffs.  

Burke, A. (2011). Group work: How to use groups effectively. Journal of Effective Teaching, 
11(2), 87-95.  

Chen, Y. (2018). Perceptions of EFL college students toward collaborative learning. English 
language teaching, 11(2), 1-4.  

Gillies, R. M., & Ashman, A. F. (2007). Cooperative learning. Cooperative Learning: Integrating 
Theory and Practice. . https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483329598  

Gunawan, I. D. (2025). Enhancing Speaking and Collaboration Skills Through Project-Based 
Learning: A Case Study of Indonesian EFL University Students. PROJECT (Professional 
Journal of English Education), 8(4), 1071-1077. https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v8i4  

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, 
and individualistic learning. Prentice-Hall, Inc.  

Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition.  

http://u.lipi.go.id/1593190689
http://u.lipi.go.id/1593190689
https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n8p97
https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202425541
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483329598
https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v8i4


  
 

Copyright © The Author(s) 
Vol.6, No. 4, October 2025 

e-ISSN: 2723-4126 
p-ISSN: 2776-8880 

 

320 
 

 

Kamardikaningsih, S. L. (2023). Efektivitas Penggunaan Kerja Kelompok Untuk 
Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Pembuatan Busana Custom Made Di Smk Negeri 2 Selong 
Lombok Timur. NUSRA: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(1), 44–54.  

Kuliahana, N., & Marzuki, A. G. (2024). Group discussion strategy to enhance EFL learners’ 
confidence and speaking fluency. TESOL International Journal, 19(5), 122–138. 

Miles, H. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis. SAGE Publication Inc. 

Meilasari, T. A., Rofi’i, A., Kustini, T., & Herdiawan, R. D. (2023). Integrating Cooperative 
Learning in EFL Classroom to Alleviate Students’ Speaking (Fluency) Anxiety. IJLECR 
(International Journal of Language Education and Cultural Review), 9(2), 1-11. 
https://doi.org/10.21009/ijlecr.v9i2.37859  

Oktaviani, N. D., & Sadiq, N. (2023). An Indonesian Secondary English Teacher’Strategies to 
Accommodate Computer Mediated Communication for Group Discussions: An 
Interview Study. Journal of English and Education (JEE).  

Oxford, R. L. (1997). Cooperative learning, collaborative learning, and interaction: Three 
communicative strands in the language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 
81(4), 443-456.  

Sajidin, S., & Ashadi, A. (2021). How Do Their" Group Work" Works As An Active Learning 
Strategy of EFL Learning. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(2), 480-494. 
https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i2.36234  

Situmorang, R. (2021). Building responsibility and accountability through collaborative 
learning in secondary EFL classrooms. Indonesian Journal of English Language 
Education, 8(1), 55–70.  

Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Allyn &Bacon.  

Supriyadi, D., Sholihah, L., & Shafwati, D. (2022). The effect of group work strategy in English 
teaching and learning in SMP Bandar Lampung. AKSARA: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 23. 
https://doi.org/10.23960/aksara/v23i1.pp1-5  

Suryati, N. (2015). Classroom interaction strategies employed by English teachers at lower 
secondary schools. TEFLIN Journal, 26(2), 247. 
https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v26i2/247-264  

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the 
development of children, 23(3), 34-41.  

Webb, N. M. (2009). The teacher's role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom. 
British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(1), 1-28. 
https://doi.org/10.1348/000709908X380772  

 

http://u.lipi.go.id/1593190689
http://u.lipi.go.id/1593190689
https://doi.org/10.21009/ijlecr.v9i2.37859
https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i2.36234
https://doi.org/10.23960/aksara/v23i1.pp1-5
https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v26i2/247-264
https://doi.org/10.1348/000709908X380772

