Microsoft Word - numero_39_art_12 S. Seitl et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 39 (2017) 110-117; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.39.12 110 Focussed on Modelling in Mechanics Fatigue crack behaviour: comparing three-point bend test and wedge splitting test data on vibrated concrete using Paris' law S. Seitl Institute of Physics of Materials, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Zizkova 22, 616 62 Brno, and Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Veveří 331/95, Brno 602 00, Czech Republic seitl@ipm.cz, http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4953-4324 T. Thienpont Ghent University, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Valentin Vaerwyckweg 1, 9000 Ghent, Belgium and Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Veveří 331/95, Brno 602 00, Czech Republic W. De Corte Ghent University, Department of Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Valentin Vaerwyckweg 1, 9000 Ghent, Belgium ABSTRACT. The fatigue behaviour of concrete has become more important for the design of constructions due to the desire to build slimmer structures, which are more sensitive to fatigue loading. This article aims to evaluate and compare the fatigue crack propagation rate in vibrated concrete for four different stress ratios using the Paris-Erdogan law. The data evaluation in this article is based on crack mouth opening displacement (CMOD) measurements from cyclic three-point bending tests on single edge notched beams and from wedge splitting tests on notched cubes, obtained from experiments at Ghent University. For this study, finite element analysis is used to obtain a mathematical relationship between the CMOD and the relative crack length a/W, as well as a relationship between the stress intensity ratio ∆K and a/W. The obtained mathematical relationships were then combined with the measured CMOD values to correlate the test data to the Paris- Erdogan law. Herein, the crack propagation rate da/dN is plotted against the corresponding stress intensity range ∆K in a log-log graph. In a final step, the Paris-Erdogan law parameters C and m were obtained through linear curve fitting on the data points from the obtained graphs. The parameters C and m are then used to compare and evaluate the fatigue crack behavior in vibrated Citation: Seitl, S., Thienpont, T., De Corte, W., Fatigue crack behaviour: comparing three- point bend test and wedge splitting test data on vibrated concrete using Paris' law, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 39 (2017) 110-117. Received: 11.07.2016 Accepted: 02.09.2016 Published: 01.01.2017 Copyright: © 2017 This is an open access article under the terms of the CC-BY 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. http://www.gruppofrattura.it/pdf/rivista/numero39/audio/12.mp3 S. Seitl et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 39 (2017) 110-117; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.39.12 111 concrete, and the differences between the results from the three-point bend tests and wedge splitting tests. KEYWORDS. Fatigue crack behaviour; Three-point bending test; Wedge splitting test; Self-compacting concrete; Paris-Erdogan law. INTRODUCTION hree-point bending tests (3PBT) as well as wedge splitting tests (WST) are often used to determine the fracture properties of structural materials such as cement based composites [8]. The material properties of normal, vibrated concrete (VC) and its behaviour under static loading are thoroughly researched and well known [9]. However, in order to reliably predict the behaviour of concrete in applications which involve millions of load cycles (e.g. bridges, beam cranes, offshore constructions), more research is required. For example, worldwide there are numerous concrete bridges that suffered excessive multi-decade deflections, some of which have already collapsed [2]. Fatigue behaviour in concrete is a complex process, and even though a tremendous effort has been made by the international scientific community, no universally accepted strategy suitable to efficiently perform the fatigue assessment of concrete has been agreed yet [4, 25, 27, 28]. This article aims to evaluate and compare the fatigue crack propagation rate in VC for different stress ratios using the Paris- Erdogan law [22]. The comparison is based on 3PBT and WST data for four different stress ratios, and was obtained during the research of Korte et al [11-14]. The test data was obtained from static tests (strength of material, fracture toughness, Young’s modulus and Poisson ratio), and by performing cyclic tests on notched specimens, while measuring the crack mouth opening displacement (CMOD) for each load cycle. In this research, finite element analysis software ANSYS [1] was then used to correlate the measured CMOD data with the Paris-Erdogan crack propagation law [22, 27]. Herein, the crack propagation rate da/dN is plotted against the corresponding stress intensity range ∆K in a log-log graph. In a final step, the Paris law parameters C and m were obtained through linear curve fitting the data points from these obtained graphs. These parameters are then used to compare and evaluate the fatigue crack behaviour under the four stress ratios, as well as to compare the results from the three-point bend and the wedge splitting tests and data later could be used as input parameters for simulation e.g. ATENA [23, 24] or DOProC [15-16]. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND atigue may be defined as a process of progressive, permanent internal structural changes in a material subjected to repeated loading. In concrete, these changes are mainly associated with the progressive growth of internal micro cracks, which results in a significant increase of irrecoverable damage [19]. Each load cycle induces microscopic cracks in the cement matrix, which gradually propagate during the loading process until an extended crack pattern is formed, leading to a significant change of the material properties [2]. In this article, the results of cyclic test on VC specimens, subjected to four different stress ratios are evaluated and discussed. In each test, the specimen was subjected to sinusoidal load function until failure, while measuring the CMOD at the crack mouth for each cycle, using a clip gauge. The 3PBT on single edge notched beams is a useful configuration for fracture toughness testing since it can be easily shaped and tested. For the test specimens, a value of S/W=3 was used in which S is the span between the supports, and W the depth of the specimen. Its geometry is included in all international standards for fracture toughness testing [7]. The WST on the other hand was first introduced by Linsbauer and Tschegg [20] and further developed by Brühwiler and Wittmann [5]. It is an interesting test setup, and just like the 3PBT, it can be performed using an ordinary electromechanical testing machine with a constant actuator displacement [26]. The geometry and measurements of the tested 3PBT and WST specimens are given in Fig.. 1. In 1963, Paris and Erdogan proposed a very simple, yet highly useable relationship between the rate of crack propagation da/dN and the stress intensity range ∆K, expressed as [22]: mda C K dN   (1) T F S. Seitl et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 39 (2017) 110-117; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.39.12 112 Figure 1: (a) 3PBT specimen geometry; (b) WST specimen geometry; (all units in mm). Herein, C and m depend on the material, the specimen geometry and the loading conditions. They are therefore different for each material and must be obtained experimentally. The Paris-Erdogan law is applicable to a wide range of materials and describes their crack propagation behaviour in a relatively correct way over a wide range of stress ratios. If the crack propagation law for a certain material is known, it is possible to calculate by integration the number of cycles required for the crack to grow from one length to another [6]. In this article, the Paris’ law parameters C and m will be used to compare the test data from both the 3PBT and WST. ANALYSIS IN ANSYS Numerical model he finite element analysis software ANSYS [1] was used to create and evaluate various numerical 3PBT and WST models. These models were built using macro’s in the ANSYS Parametric Design Language (APDL). For both geometries only one half of the test piece is modelled, since their shapes are symmetrical (Fig. 2). All calculations were executed as a simplified 2D model, using 8-node isoparametric PLANE183 elements. A comparative study was performed for the models of both geometries, in order to find a suitable mesh size which delivers results with great accuracy. For the 3PBT, four different mesh sizes were compared and it was concluded that a 1 mm mesh size is dense enough to obtain accurate results. Similarly, for the WST, a mesh size of 1.5 mm showed to be of great accuracy. In order to accurately model the stresses near the crack tip, the ANSYS command KSCON is used. This creates a dense circular around the crack tip and allows the calculation of the stress intensity factor, using the KCALC command. Since the differences in the results for the deflection and the stress fields for both 2D and a 3D models are very small [14, 21], using a 2D model is preferred. These simplified numerical models require little computing power compared to complex 3D models. For all concrete mixtures, cyclic tests under four stress ratios R were executed in the research of Korte et al. In these stress ratios, the lower load limit of was chosen to be 10% of the average ultimate load of the static tests. For the upper limit various percentages were selected: 70%, 75%, 80%, and 90% [14]. The stress ratio R is usually expressed as: min max R    (1) Using this formula, the four stress ratios are defined as: R10-70 = 0.1429, R10-75 = 0.1333, R10-80 = 0.1250 and R10-90 = 0.1111. In order to calculate the crack propagation rate and stress intensity ranges for all ratios, the numerical model was loaded under 10%, 70%, 75%, 80% and 90% of the average ultimate load of the static tests. The material input parameters for concrete were taken from [14]: Young’s modulus EVC = 38.4 GPa, ESCC1 = 38.1 GPa, ESCC2 = 35.3 GPa and Poisson ratio vc = 0.2. For the metal part in the numerical WST model, representing the roller bearing loading device, Young’s modulus Es = 210 GPa and Poisson ratio vs = 0.3 were used. T S. Seitl et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 39 (2017) 110-117; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.39.12 113 Figure 2: (a) 3PBT numerical model in ANSYS; (b) detailed view of the mesh near the crack tip. Results Neither da/dN nor ∆K, used in the Paris-Erdogan law, can be directly measured during a 3PBT or WST, and must therefore be obtained using a combination of finite element analysis and several calculation procedures. First, a mathematical relationship between the relative crack length α (= a/W), the dimensionless ratio between the crack length a and the specimen height W, and the CMOD was calculated through inverse analysis. This was achieved by calculating the CMOD for fixed values of α, at intervals of 0.1. In the WST, the relative crack length is defined as the vertical distance between the point where the splitting force is exerted and the support of the specimen. For α = 1, the total crack length a is therefore 145 mm; 5 mm shorter then the total WST specimen height. Fig. 3.a depicts the calculated CMOD values of the VC 3PBT geometry, under the four tested stress ratios, for α between 0.3 and 0.7. The plotted fitting curve (for VC 90%) shows an exponential relationship between the CMOD and the relative crack length can be found. Hence the great value for R2 it can be stated that the exponential fitting curve is very accurate. Similar graphs for the WST can be obtained, also showing an exponential relationship between CMOD and α. Exponential fitting curves for the 3PBT and WST were calculated for all stress ratios. The inverse functions, which relate the relative crack length ⍺ to the CMOD where then used in further calculations. Figure 3: (a) CMOD calculations for different stress ratios; (b) ∆K calculations for 70% of the ultimate static load. CMOD90% = 0.0022e5.7259 ⍺ R² = 0.9964 0,00 0,02 0,04 0,06 0,08 0,10 0,12 0,14 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 C ca lc ul at ed C M O D [m m ] Relative crack length α [-] VC 70% VC 75% VC 80% VC 90% ∆K10-70 = 0.1671e4.2133 ⍺ R² = 0.94935 0 5 10 15 0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 St re ss in te ns ity f ac to r ∆ K [M P a. √m ] Relative crack lenght ⍺ [-] S. Seitl et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 39 (2017) 110-117; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.39.12 114 In a next step, the stress intensity range ∆K was computed for both geometries under the four stress ratios, using the built- in ANSYS command KCALC [1]. Fig. 3.b depicts the calculated value of ∆K from the 3PBT geometry for the 10-70% stress ratios. Similar to the CMOD calculations, a mathematical relationship between ∆K and α can be found through exponential curve fitting. Moreover, similar graphs for the WST can be obtained, also showing an exponential relationship between ∆K and ⍺. The mathematical functions, which relate the relative crack length ⍺ to the stress intensity range ∆K where then used in further calculations. In a final step, the crack propagation rate da/dN is plotted against the stress intensity ratio ∆K. As shown in Fig. 4, the data points with an according smaller value of ∆K don’t fit the linear relationship described by the Paris-Erdogan law (grey colour). This is due to the fact that in concrete, two stages of crack growth can be observed: deceleration and acceleration [18]. Concrete fatigue fracture in the acceleration stage follows the Paris- Erdogan law [3][10]. Therefore, in order to obtain a fitting curve with a reasonably high R2 value (index of determination), only the data points in the acceleration stage are used while the grey data points were ignored. This method was used to determine the linear fitting curves for all tested stress ratios. DISCUSSION OF RESULTS he data points and the linear fitting curves from the correlation of the 3PBT data are depicted in Fig. 5.a. The Paris’ law parameters m and C in Eq. 1, which were obtained from the fitting curves of the da/dN – ∆K plots are given in Tab. 1. The last column of this table shows the number of load cycles Ntot from each test. For both the 10-80% and 10-90% stress ratio tests on the 3PBT samples, no results were found due to failure of the test specimen after only one or two load cycles. Figure 4: (a) Paris-Erdogan data points on log-log graph, showing a very poor result for the linear fitting curve; (b) data points in acceleration phase, with a reasonably accurate linear fitting curve. From these results it can be concluded that the average value mavg is greater for the 10-75% stress ratio compared to the 10- 70% stress ratio. The difference is small however. This might be a consequence of the fact that the difference between 10- 70% and 10-75% the stress ratios is rather small (R10-70 = 0.1429 and R10-75 = 0.1333). Despite the aforementioned it can be stated that when the value of ∆K increases, the crack propagation rate of for the 10-75% stress ratio increases faster compared to the 10-70% stress ratio. Based on the values of Cavg, no conclusions can be drawn. Similar to the results from the 3PBT correlation, the results from the correlation of the WST data are given in Fig. 5.b and Tab. 2. From the WST’s, no results were found for the 10-70% and 10-75% stress ratio. In the data from these tests, the crack length starts to decrease after approximately 40% of the total number of load cycles, resulting in negative values for da/dN, which cannot be plotted in a log-log graph. Therefore, no useful fitting curves were obtained for the aforementioned stress ratios. As a result, a comparison between the 3PBT and the WST based on this data is rather difficult. y = 0,1734x - 1,5271 R² = 0,0007 -2,5 -2 -1,5 -1 -0,5 -0,15 -0,05 0,05 0,15 C ra ck p ro pa ga tio n ra te lo g( da /d N ) [ m m /c yc le ] Stress intensity factor log(∆K) [MPa.√m] y = 10,686x - 1,9034 R² = 0,9191 -2,5 -2 -1,5 -1 -0,5 -0,15 -0,05 0,05 0,15 C ra ck p ro pa ga tio n ra te lo g( da /d N ) [ m m /c yc le ] Stress intensity factor log(∆K) [MPa.√m] T S. Seitl et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 39 (2017) 110-117; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.39.12 115 Based on the values of mavg no distinct difference can be observed between the 10-80% and 10-90% stress ratios. This might again be a consequence of the fact that the difference between 10-80% and 10-90% the stress ratios is small (R10-80 = 0.1250 and R10-90 = 0.1111). On the other hand, the average value Cavg is significantly greater for the 10-90% stress ratio compared to the 10-80% stress ratio. It can be concluded that for a fixed value of ∆K, the crack propagation rate for the 10-90% is considerably faster. Figure 5: (a) Paris-Erdogan law fitting curves from correlation of 3PBT data from VC under 10-70% and 10-75% stress ratios; (b) Paris-Erdogan law fitting curves from correlation of WST data from VC under 10-80% and 10-90% stress ratios Stress ratio Test Equation m.x+log(C) m mavg C Cavg 10-70% 1 1.7301 x - 0.4349 1.7301 2.0198 0.6473 0.6141 2.3094 x - 0.5433 2.3094 0.5808 2 3.2763 x - 1.2861 3.2763 3.9681 0.2763 0.2383 3.8338 x - 1.4086 3.8338 0.2445 4.7943 x - 1.6396 4.7943 0.1941 10-75% 1 4.2383 x - 1.065 4.2383 4.2299 0.3447 0.3558 3.9467 x - 1.0177 3.9467 0.3614 4.5047 x - 1.0792 4.5047 0.3613 Table 1: 3PBT – Fitting curve equations and Paris-Erdogan law parameters. Stress ratio Test Equation m.x+log(C) m mavg C Cavg 10-80% 1 3.6086 x - 3.2615 3.6086 4.4102 0.0383 0.0344 4.2947 x - 3.3270 4.2947 0.0359 5.3274 x - 3.5448 5.3274 0.0289 10-90% 1 2.2933 x - 0.7533 2.2933 2.4518 0.4708 0.4748 2.6103 x - 0.7364 2.6103 0.4788 2 5.2891 x - 1.6165 5.2891 5.1182 0.1986 0.2000 5.0523 x - 1.5937 5.0523 0.2032 5.0132 x - 1.6181 5.0132 0.1983 Table 2: WST – Fitting curve equations and Paris-Erdogan law parameters. -1,0 -0,8 -0,6 -0,4 -0,2 0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 0,05 0,15 0,25 0,35 0,45 C ra ck p ro pa ga tio n ra te lo g( da /d N ) [ m m /c yc le ] Stress intensity factor log(∆K) [MPa.√m] 10-70 (1) 10-70 (2) 10-75 -3,5 -3 -2,5 -2 -1,5 -1 -0,5 -0,05 0 0,05 0,1 0,15 0,2 C ra ck p ro pa ga tio n ra te lo g( da /d N ) [ m m /c yc le ] Stress intensity factor log(∆K) [MPa.√m] 10-90 (1) 10-90 (2) 10-80 S. Seitl et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 39 (2017) 110-117; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.39.12 116 CONCLUSIONS n this contribution, the effect of the stress ratios on vibrated concrete was numerically studied, based on test results from 3PBT and WST samples. Despite the absence of data for certain stress ratios, the following conclusions can be drawn from this study:  As a general conclusion from the 3PBT’s and the WST’s, it can be stated that both tests can be used to obtain valuable information about the fatigue crack propagation properties of both vibrated concrete and self-compacting concrete. For small stress ratios like 10-70% the 3PBT is more useful since it usually does not require more than 1000 load cycles until the test specimen fails. For higher stress ratios on the other hand, the WST is more useful, since for these higher stress ratios, the 3PBT specimens tend to fail after very few load cycles.  In general, it can be concluded that the crack propagation in vibrated concrete is faster when the specimen is subjected to a higher stress ratio. A higher stress ratio results in a lower number of load cycles until failure and on average in larger values of the Paris’ law parameters m and C. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT he authors acknowledge the support of Czech Sciences foundation project No. 15-07210S and Brno University of Technology Project No. FAST-S-16-3475. The research was conducted in the frame of IPMinfra supported through project No. LM2015069 of MEYS. REFERENCES [1] ANSYS Inc, ANSYS Parametric Design Language Guide (14.0), ANSYS Inc, Canonsburg, (2011). [2] Bazant, Z.P., Hubler, M.H., Theory of cyclic creep of concrete based on Paris law for fatigue growth of subcritical microcracks, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 63 (2014) 187–200. [3] Bazant, Z.P., Xu, K., Size Effect in Fatigue Fracture of Concrete, ACI Material Journal., 88(4) (1991) 390–399. [4] Bílek, V., Hurta, J., Done, P., Zidek, L. Development of alkali-activated concrete for structures –Mechanical properties and durability, Perspective in Science, 7 (2016) 190–194. DOI: 10.1016/j.pisc.2015.11.031. [5] Brühwiler, E., Wittmann, F., Special Issue Fracture and Damage of Concrete and Rock The wedge splitting test, a new method of performing stable fracture mechanics tests, Engineering Fracture Mechanic, 35(1) (1990) 117–125. [6] Charles, J., Crane F., Furness, J., Selection and Use of Engineering Materials, third ed., Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, (1997). [7] Guinea, G.V., Pastor, J.Y., Planas, J., Elices, M., Stress intensity factor, compliance and CMOD for a general three- point-bend beam, International Journal of Fracture, 89(2) (1998) 103–116. [8] Ince, R., Alyamaç, K.E., Determination of fracture parameters (Ksic and CTODc) of plain concrete using three-point bend tests, Indian Journal 
of Engineering and Materials Sciences, 15 (2008) 14–22. [9] Karihaloo, B.L., Fracture Mechanics and Structural Concrete, first ed., Longman Scientific and Technical Publishers, John Wiley, Hoboken, (1995). [10] Kolluru, S.V., O’neil, E.F., Popovics, J.S., Shah, S.P., Crack Propagation in Flexural Fatigue of Concrete, Journal of Engineering Mechanics., 126(9) (2000) 891–898. [11] Korte, S., Boel, V., De Corte, W., De Schutter, G., Behaviour of fatigue loaded self-compacting concrete compared to vibrated concrete, Structural Concrete, 15(4) (2014) 575–589. [12] Korte, S., Boel, V., De Corte, W., De Schutter, G., Comparative study on the fatigue behaviour of SCC and VC, Key Engineering Materials., 627 (2015) 333–336. [13] Korte, S., Boel, V., De Corte, W., De Schutter, G., Static and fatigue fracture mechanics properties of self-compacting concrete using three-point bending tests and wedge-splitting tests, Construction and Building Materials., 57 (2014) 1– 8. [14] Korte, S., Experimental and Numerical Investigation of the Fracture Behaviour and Fatigue Resistance of Self- Compacting Concrete., Ghent University, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent, (2014). I T S. Seitl et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 39 (2017) 110-117; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.39.12 117 [15] Krejsa M., Janas, P., Cajka, R. Using DOProC method in structural reliability assessment, Applied Mechanics and Materials, 300-301 (2013) 860–869. [16] Krejsa, M, Kala, Z., Seitl, S. Inspection based probabilistic modeling of fatigue crack progression, Procedia Engineering, 142 (2016) 145–152. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.02.025. [17] Krejsa, M., Janas, P., Krejsa, V. Software application of the DOProC method, International Journal of Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 8(1) (2014) 121–126. [18] Kruzic, J.J., Cannon, R.M., Ager, J.W., Ritchie, R.O., Fatigue threshold R-curves for predicting reliability of ceramics under cyclic loading,Acta Materialia., 53(9) (2005) 2595–2605. [19] Lee, M.K., Barr, B.I., An overview of the fatigue behaviour of plain and fibre reinforced concrete, Cement and Concrete Composites., 26(4) (2004) 299–305. [20] Linsbauer, H., Tschegg, E., Fracture energy determination of concrete with cube-shaped specimens, Zement Beton, 31 (1986) 38–40. [21] Østergaard, L., Damkilde, L., Stang, H., Early-age fracture mechanics and cracking of concrete: Experiments and modeling., Technical University of Denmark, Department of Civil Engineering, (2003). [22] Paris, P. C., Erdogan, F., A Critical Analysis of Crack Propagation Laws, Journal of Basic Engineering, 85(4) (1963) 528–533. [23] Pryl, D., Cervenka, J. Pukl, R. Material model for finite element modelling of fatigue growth in concrete, Procedia Engineering, 2(1) (2010) 203–212. [24] Pryl, D., Mikolášková J., Pukl, R. Modeling fatigue damage of concrete, 577-578 (2014) 385–388. [25] Seitl, S., Bílek, V., Keršner, Z., Veselý, J. Cement based composites for thin building elements: Fracture and fatigue parameters, Procedia Engineering, 2(1) (2010) 911–916. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2010.03.098. [26] Seitl, S., Keršner, Z., Bílek, V., Knésl, Z., Fatigue Parameters of Cement-Based Composites with Various Types of Fibres, Key Engineering Materials., 417-418 (2009) 129–132. [27] Seitl, S., Knésl, Z., Šimonová, H., Keršner, Z. Fatigue crack growth in cement based composites: Experimental aspects, Life-Cycle and Sustainability of Civil Infrastructure Systems. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Life- Cycle Civil Engineering, IALCCE, (2012) 1314–1317. [28] Susmel, L., High-cycle fatigue of notched plain concrete, Procedia Structural Integrity, 1 (2016) 2–9. << /ASCII85EncodePages false /AllowTransparency false /AutoPositionEPSFiles true /AutoRotatePages /None /Binding /Left /CalGrayProfile (Dot Gain 20%) /CalRGBProfile (sRGB IEC61966-2.1) /CalCMYKProfile (U.S. Web Coated \050SWOP\051 v2) /sRGBProfile (sRGB IEC61966-2.1) /CannotEmbedFontPolicy /Error /CompatibilityLevel 1.4 /CompressObjects /Tags /CompressPages true /ConvertImagesToIndexed true /PassThroughJPEGImages true /CreateJobTicket false /DefaultRenderingIntent /Default /DetectBlends true /DetectCurves 0.0000 /ColorConversionStrategy /CMYK /DoThumbnails false /EmbedAllFonts true /EmbedOpenType false /ParseICCProfilesInComments true /EmbedJobOptions true /DSCReportingLevel 0 /EmitDSCWarnings false /EndPage -1 /ImageMemory 1048576 /LockDistillerParams false /MaxSubsetPct 100 /Optimize true /OPM 1 /ParseDSCComments true /ParseDSCCommentsForDocInfo true /PreserveCopyPage true /PreserveDICMYKValues true /PreserveEPSInfo true /PreserveFlatness true /PreserveHalftoneInfo false /PreserveOPIComments true /PreserveOverprintSettings true /StartPage 1 /SubsetFonts true /TransferFunctionInfo /Apply /UCRandBGInfo /Preserve /UsePrologue false /ColorSettingsFile () /AlwaysEmbed [ true ] /NeverEmbed [ true ] /AntiAliasColorImages false /CropColorImages true /ColorImageMinResolution 300 /ColorImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleColorImages true /ColorImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /ColorImageResolution 300 /ColorImageDepth -1 /ColorImageMinDownsampleDepth 1 /ColorImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeColorImages true /ColorImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterColorImages true /ColorImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /ColorACSImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /ColorImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /JPEG2000ColorImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /AntiAliasGrayImages false /CropGrayImages true /GrayImageMinResolution 300 /GrayImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleGrayImages true /GrayImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /GrayImageResolution 300 /GrayImageDepth -1 /GrayImageMinDownsampleDepth 2 /GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeGrayImages true /GrayImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterGrayImages true /GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /GrayACSImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /GrayImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /JPEG2000GrayImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /AntiAliasMonoImages false /CropMonoImages true /MonoImageMinResolution 1200 /MonoImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleMonoImages true /MonoImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /MonoImageResolution 1200 /MonoImageDepth -1 /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeMonoImages true /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode /MonoImageDict << /K -1 >> /AllowPSXObjects false /CheckCompliance [ /None ] /PDFX1aCheck false /PDFX3Check false /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false /PDFXNoTrimBoxError true /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox true /PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfile () /PDFXOutputConditionIdentifier () /PDFXOutputCondition () /PDFXRegistryName () /PDFXTrapped /False /CreateJDFFile false /Description << /ARA /BGR /CHS /CHT /CZE /DAN /DEU /ESP /ETI /FRA /GRE /HEB /HRV (Za stvaranje Adobe PDF dokumenata najpogodnijih za visokokvalitetni ispis prije tiskanja koristite ove postavke. Stvoreni PDF dokumenti mogu se otvoriti Acrobat i Adobe Reader 5.0 i kasnijim verzijama.) /HUN /ITA /JPN /KOR /LTH /LVI /NLD (Gebruik deze instellingen om Adobe PDF-documenten te maken die zijn geoptimaliseerd voor prepress-afdrukken van hoge kwaliteit. De gemaakte PDF-documenten kunnen worden geopend met Acrobat en Adobe Reader 5.0 en hoger.) /NOR /POL /PTB /RUM /RUS /SKY /SLV /SUO /SVE /TUR /UKR /ENU (Use these settings to create Adobe PDF documents best suited for high-quality prepress printing. Created PDF documents can be opened with Acrobat and Adobe Reader 5.0 and later.) >> /Namespace [ (Adobe) (Common) (1.0) ] /OtherNamespaces [ << /AsReaderSpreads false /CropImagesToFrames true /ErrorControl /WarnAndContinue /FlattenerIgnoreSpreadOverrides false /IncludeGuidesGrids false /IncludeNonPrinting false /IncludeSlug false /Namespace [ (Adobe) (InDesign) (4.0) ] /OmitPlacedBitmaps false /OmitPlacedEPS false /OmitPlacedPDF false /SimulateOverprint /Legacy >> << /AddBleedMarks false /AddColorBars false /AddCropMarks false /AddPageInfo false /AddRegMarks false /ConvertColors /ConvertToCMYK /DestinationProfileName () /DestinationProfileSelector /DocumentCMYK /Downsample16BitImages true /FlattenerPreset << /PresetSelector /MediumResolution >> /FormElements false /GenerateStructure false /IncludeBookmarks false /IncludeHyperlinks false /IncludeInteractive false /IncludeLayers false /IncludeProfiles false /MultimediaHandling /UseObjectSettings /Namespace [ (Adobe) (CreativeSuite) (2.0) ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfileSelector /DocumentCMYK /PreserveEditing true /UntaggedCMYKHandling /LeaveUntagged /UntaggedRGBHandling /UseDocumentProfile /UseDocumentBleed false >> ] >> setdistillerparams << /HWResolution [2400 2400] /PageSize [612.000 792.000] >> setpagedevice