Microsoft Word - numero_41_art_60.docx S. Doddamani et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 41 (2017) 484-490; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.41.60 484 Fracture toughness investigations of Al6061-Graphite particulate composite using compact specimens Saleemsab Doddamani Department of Mechanical Engineering, Jain Polytechnic, Karnataka, India, saleemsabdoddamani@gmail.com, http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8498-1488 Mohamed Kaleemulla Department of Studies in Mechanical Engineering, University B.D.T. College of Engineering, Karnataka, India. ABSTRACT. The objective of this research work is to study the fracture behavior of Al6061 with graphite particulate composite produced by the stir casting technique. For the study different composition of the particulate metal matrix composite used is Al6061 with 3, 6, 9, & 12% of graphite particles. Compact Tension (CT) specimens were utilized to determine fracture toughness for different compositions of Al6061-graphite particulate metal matrix composite. Specimens with different composition will be prepared for different crack length to width (a/w) ratios according to the ASTM E-399 standard testing procedure. The maximum fracture toughness was found for Al6061-9%Gr for a/w =0.45 and the value is 16.74 MPa √m. KEYWORDS. Fracture toughness; Al6061-Graphite Composites; Compact Tension specimens Citation: Doddamani, S., Kaleemulla, M., Fracture toughness investigations of Al6061- Graphite particulate composite using compact specimens, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 41 (2017) 484-490. Received: 07.02.2017 Accepted: 28.05.2017 Published: 01.07.2017 Copyright: © 2017 This is an open access article under the terms of the CC-BY 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. INTRODUCTION ll structural materials do not have theoretically calculated strength because of imperfections like inclusions, flaws, cracks and manufacturing defects, etc. The fracture based design approach is better compared to the conventional design. In conventional design, limiting strength approach is adopted. In actual service, the components will fail before reaching its limiting strength. “The resistance to fracture of a material is known as fracture toughness.” Generally it depends upon the material composition, environment, temperature, loading rate, microstructure and geometrical parameters of the component, etc. Fracture toughness is a material property which expresses the capacity of a material having a crack to oppose fracture. For many design applications, fracture toughness is the most important property of a material. Linear elastic fracture toughness (LEFM) of a material is calculated from the stress intensity factor (SIF) at which a thin crack in the material begins to grow catastrophically. Fracture toughness is represented by KIc. Its unit in SI is MPa m. In KIc, subscript Ic represents first mode crack opening under tensile loading at right angles to the crack. Fracture toughness could be a A S. Doddamani et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 41 (2017) 484-490; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.41.60 485 quantitative approach of stating a material's resistance to brittle fracture once a crack is present. If materials have high fracture toughness, it will possibly experience a ductile fracture whereas materials having low fracture toughness will possibly undergo brittle fracture. After studying the early work of Inglis, Griffith, and others, Irwin, head of the fracture mechanics research group at the Naval Research Laboratory, concluded that the basic tools needed to analyze fracture were already available [1]. Irwin’s initial major contribution was to reinforce the Griffith approach to metals as well as the energy dissipated by native plastic flow. Griffith, Irwin and others who worked on the conceptualization of fracture mechanics, studied the behavior of cracks in brittle materials. To investigate the fracture toughness, there are different methods. Basically an American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard and recent advances in fracture toughness testing methods are used for testing of aluminium alloys and some of aluminium matrix particulate reinforced composites. ASTM standard testing methods include Fracture toughness testing by Single Edge Notch Bend (SENB) Specimen and Compact Tension (CT) Specimen. Other testing methods which are getting popular for their ease include Fracture toughness by Round Bar, Indentation techniques, Circumferential Notched Tensile (CNT) specimens [2]. Metal matrix composites (MMCs) are used in automobile and aerospace applications where they are required for weight savings, wear resistance, thermal management, etc. MMCs may be of continuously and discontinuously reinforced types [1]. By far the most commonly used MMCs are based on aluminum alloys reinforced with alumina (Al2O3), silicon carbide (SiCp), Titanium carbide, graphite etc. Discontinuously reinforced MMCs are a great deal more affordable to fabricate than continuously reinforced composites. Discontinuously reinforced composites have isotropic properties [3], whereas continuous aligned reinforcements have highly anisotropic properties. In applications requiring isotropic properties, discontinuously reinforced composites can do better than continuous fiber reinforced composites. The literature survey presents a review of the published material available on the effect of various reinforcement types, their size and volume fraction, ageing behavior with Aluminium based Metal Matrix Composites (MMCs) [3] being a combination of two constituents, matrix and the reinforcement. Mechanical characterization such as tensile strength and elongation experiments by using Universal Testing Machine [4, 5] (UTM) of Al/SiC has been reported for a varying mass fraction of SiCp with Aluminium. Fracture toughness [6], tensile fracture behavior [7, 8, 9] on Circumferential Notched Tensile (CNT) specimens and Compact Tension (CT) test [10, 11] specimen of Al alloy with different reinforcements, fracture toughness by indentation techniques [12, 13] were studied by different researchers. Most of them compared their results with the unreinforced aluminium alloy. From the literature, it is identified that more work has been done on tensile and fracture characteristics of Al/SiC particulate [14, 15, 16, 17] MMCs. Research has to be carried on the aluminium matrix composites reinforced with graphite particles in the area of fracture and fatigue in order to improve the strength and fracture characteristics of the material to avoid cracking. The study of the tensile and fracture characteristics of aluminium matrix composites reinforced with graphite particles at varied weight fractions is here reported. PROCESSING rocessing of MMCs was done by the stir casting technique [8]. Aluminium 6061-graphite specimens were prepared at varied weight fractions of graphite (3%, 6%, 9%, and 12%) using stir casting method. The aluminium blocks were melted in the furnace. After melting, molten aluminium was super-heated to desired temperature (about 7500C). The required amounts of graphite particles were added to the aluminium melts while stirring with stirrer at a speed of 550 RPM. The molten aluminium-graphite was poured into a split type permanent mould and it was allowed to solidify. The aluminium-graphite alloy bars were taken out from the mould. The specimens were prepared from as-cast alloys for determination of required properties. FRACTURE TOUGHNESS TESTING racture toughness of the aluminum-graphite particulate MMCs at varied weight fractions of graphite (3%, 6%, 9%, and 12%) was determined using a universal testing machine (UTM) as per ASTM E399 standard [10] testing procedure. In this method compact tension (CT) specimens are used as shown in Fig. 1. Compact tension (CT) specimens of various weight fractions of aluminium graphite are tested for their fracture toughness values. The specimen P F S. Doddamani et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 41 (2017) 484-490; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.41.60 486 preparation and experiments were carried out according to ASTM-E 399 standard for three different crack length to width (a/w) ratios i.e., 0.45, 0.47 & 0.50. Figure 1: Dimensions of cast CT Specimens (All dimensions are in mm). The load-displacement data are analyzed to find out fracture toughness (KIc) of the Al6061-graphite particulate MMCs. The value of KIc is determined by crack length and critical load (PQ). The value of PQ is determined by plotting a secant slope on the load and displacement record. Typical [10] load-versus-displacement record for the two types of KIc testing is shown in Fig. 2. The calculation for PQ engages representing the loading slope of the load versus displacement record. A slope of 5% less than the available slope, referred as secant slope, is then drawn. In Type I, monotonically rising load, the PQ is taken where the 5% secant incline meets the load-versus displacement curve [10]. In Type II or Type III, instability or other maximum load is reached before the 5% secant. The maximum load reached up to and including the likely intersection of the 5% secant is the PQ. Figure 2: Three types of load-displacement behavior in a KIc test. Source: T.L. Anderson [1]. In the case of slope of the load-versus-displacement record of Al6061-graphite, the curve obtained was Type III curve as shown in Fig. 3. The maximum value of the load itself will be the critical load (PQ). This corresponds to about 2% ductile crack extension [18]; this may be an effective crack extension linked to plastic zone development. KIc values were determined from the Pq values as prescribed in ASTM E399 Standard [10]. Experiments were carried out and results of the experiment are listed in Table 1. Fig. 3 shows the load-displacement curves of Al6061-graphite obtained using CT specimens for different crack length to width ratios. S. Doddamani et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 41 (2017) 484-490; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.41.60 487 (a) (b) (c) Figure 3: Load v/s Displacement graphs for different compositions: (a) a/w = 0.45; (b) a/w = 0.47; (c) a/w = 0.50 . From Fig. 3 it is clear that as the load increases displacement increases for a/w = 0.45, 0.47 and 0.50 of Al6061-graphite. For all the a/w ratios increase of load bearing capacity of Al6061-graphite has been observed. At 12% graphite there is a decrement in load carrying capacity of the material has been observed. This decrement may be due to clustering of graphite particles in the surrounding matrix. S. Doddamani et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 41 (2017) 484-490; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.41.60 488 Specimen For a/w=0.45 For a/w=0.47 For a/w=0.50 Fracture Load (PQ) kN KIc MPa√m Fracture load (PQ) kN KIc MPa√m Fracture load (PQ) kN KIc MPa√m Al-3%Gr 4.18 15.59 3.85 15.20 3.40 14.68 Al-6%Gr 4.35 16.22 4.05 15.99 3.50 15.11 Al-9%Gr 4.49 16.74 4.21 16.62 3.80 16.41 Al-12%Gr 4.21 15.70 4.09 16.15 3.70 15.98 Table 1: Fracture toughness of Al6061-graphite MMC for different a/w ratios. For increase in graphite content fracture toughness of Al6061-graphite for a/w = 0.45, 0.47 and 0.50 has been drawn as shown in Fig 4. From the outcomes it is found that the fracture toughness results assessed from the compact tension (CT) specimens were significant. Fracture toughness of particulate metal matrix composites is depending on particle size, interfacial strength levels and the ductility of the surrounding substance and strengthening materials. Fracture toughness testing was done using CT specimens. From the results it can be found that with increase in graphite content fracture toughness of Al6061-graphite was increased. This increment is due to the effect of increased graphite particulates which block the initiation of internal cracks in the microstructure. This increment in KIc is consistent with the trend in most as-cast Al based particulate reinforced composites [7, 8, 12, 14]. The decrement of fracture toughness at 12% graphite may be an effect of increased graphite particles which causes particle clustering in the surrounding matrix. The decrease in fracture toughness may be due to particle debonding, interfacial cracking or particulate cracking. Figure 4: Fracture toughness of Al6061-graphite MMC Figure 5: SEM Micrographs (a) 3% graphite (b) 6% graphite (c) 9% graphite (d) 12% graphite. S. Doddamani et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 41 (2017) 484-490; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.41.60 489 The micrographs from SEM of Al6061-graphite for different composition are shown in Figs. 5 (a-d). A strong uniform microstructure between the matrix and reinforcement facilitates in the load interchange from the reinforcement to the surrounding matrix. Accordingly, crack propagation takes place in the composite via the reinforcement and not along the interface. A solid particle/matrix interface helps the graphite particles establish themselves into the matrix logically, enhancing the crack resistance. (a) (b) (c) (d) Figure 6: SEM fractographs showing dimples/voids and micro cracks propagate through the matrix and reinforcement (a) 3% graphite (b) 6% graphite (c) 9% graphite (d) 12% graphite. The fractographic image of fracture surface is shown in Fig. 6 (a-d). Higher permissible magnification of scanning electron micrographs of a fractured surface clearly exposes voids of different sizes combines with dents of different size and shape. As a result of it the void initiation will take place within the matrix that successively causes debonding of matrix and reinforcement interfaces. The direct tensile load on the composite, the microscopic voids looked as if it would have undergone restricted crack growth validating an encouraging involvement from graphite particles. Reinforcing graphite particulates in aluminum matrix force the constraints in plastic deformation. The simultaneous growth of a triaxial state of stress at the ‘local’ level assists in restricting the flow stress of the MMC. The plastic restrictions at the aluminium and graphite interfaces are mainly essential for (i) the larger graphite particulates, and (ii) clusters of the graphite particles, during failure of the composite microstructure. Investigation of the fractured surface unveils the confined destruction to be gathered at the reinforcing graphite particulates by the method of cracked particulate and decohesion at aluminium and graphite interfaces. CONCLUSIONS he experimental study of the fracture toughness of the Al6061-graphite was conducted. From the results of this study investigation, the following conclusions are made: The maximum fracture toughness was found for Al6061- 9%Gr for a/w = 0.45 and the value is 16.74 MPa √m. Significant improvement in the strength of the Al (6061) matrix composites is achieved when 9% and 12 % of graphite is used as reinforcement. Overall, Al6061 alloy can be considered as a suitable matrix for the development of graphite reinforced Aluminium based composites. T S. Doddamani et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 41 (2017) 484-490; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.41.60 490 FUNDING his research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. REFERENCES [1] T .L Anderson Fracture Mechanics-Fundamentals and Applications. 3rd Edition, Taylor & Francis Group, New York, (2013). [2] Doddamani S., Kaleemulla, M., Review of experimental fracture toughness (KIC) of aluminium alloy and aluminium MMCs in Journals Pub, International Journal of Fracture and Damage Mechanics, Vol 1, Issue 2, (2015) 38-51. [3] ASM Handbook, Composites, ASM International, 21 (2001). [4] Devi, N. C., Mahesh, V., Selvaraj, N., Mechanical characterization of Al/SiC composite, International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, Dindigul, 1(4) (2011) 793-799. [5] Doddamani, S., Kaleemulla, M., Begum, Y., Mechanical properties of aluminium–graphite particulate composites, International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), NCERAME, (2015) 119-122. [6] Alaneme, K.K., Aluko, A.O., Fracture toughness (K1C) and tensile properties of as-cast and age-hardened aluminium (6063)–silicon carbide particulate composites, Scientia Iranica A, 19 (4) (2012) 992–996. [7] Ranjbaran, M. M., Experimental investigation of fracture toughness in Al356-SiCp aluminium matrix composite, American Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 1(3) (2010) 549-557. [8] Doddamani, S., Kaleemulla, M., Experimental investigation on fracture toughness of Al6061–graphite by using Circumferential Notched Tensile Specimens, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 39 (2017) 274-281. [9] Phillips Agboola, O., Sarioglu, F., Kızılors, C,m Validation of Circumferential Notched Tensile (CNT) Test Procedure for KISCC Determination, Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, London, III (2013) 1-4. [10] ASTM Standards, Standard Test Method for Plane-Strain Fracture Toughness of Metallic Materials, ASTM International, E 399-90, (2003). [11] Szymczak, T., Kowalewski, Z. L., Fracture Toughness Investigations of Metal Matrix Composites Using Compact Specimens, Engineering Transactions, 61(3) (2013) 219–229. [12] Doddamani, S., Kaleemulla, M., Indentation Fracture Toughness of Alumnum6061-Graphite Composites in Journals Pub, International Journal of Fracture and Damage Mechanics, 1(1) (2016) 40-46. [13] Nath, S. K., Das, U. K., Effect of Microstructure and Notches on the Fracture Toughness of Medium Carbon Steel, Journal of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, 3 (2006) 15-22. [14] Logsdon, W. A., Liaw, P. K., Tensile, fracture toughness and fatigue crack growth rate properties of Silicon carbide whisker and particulate reinforced aluminum metal matrix Composites, Pergamon Journals Ltd, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 24(5) (1986) 137-151. [15] Flom, Y., Parker, B. H., Chu, H. P., Fracture Toughness of SiC/Al Metal Matrix Composite, NASA Technical Memorandum 100745, (1989) 1-17. [16] Manigandan, K., Srivatsan, T.S., Quick, T., Influence of silicon carbide particulates on tensile fracture behavior of an aluminum alloy, Materials Science and Engineering A, 534 (2012) 711– 715. [17] Chawla, N., Ganesh, V.V., Fatigue crack growth of SiC particle reinforced metal matrix composites, International Journal of Fatigue, 32 (2010) 856–863. [18] ASM Handbook, Mechanical Testing and Evaluation, ASM International, 8 (2000). T << /ASCII85EncodePages false /AllowTransparency false /AutoPositionEPSFiles true /AutoRotatePages /None /Binding /Left /CalGrayProfile (Dot Gain 20%) /CalRGBProfile (sRGB IEC61966-2.1) /CalCMYKProfile (U.S. Web Coated \050SWOP\051 v2) /sRGBProfile (sRGB IEC61966-2.1) /CannotEmbedFontPolicy /Error /CompatibilityLevel 1.4 /CompressObjects /Tags /CompressPages true /ConvertImagesToIndexed true /PassThroughJPEGImages true /CreateJobTicket false /DefaultRenderingIntent /Default /DetectBlends true /DetectCurves 0.0000 /ColorConversionStrategy /CMYK /DoThumbnails false /EmbedAllFonts true /EmbedOpenType false /ParseICCProfilesInComments true /EmbedJobOptions true /DSCReportingLevel 0 /EmitDSCWarnings false /EndPage -1 /ImageMemory 1048576 /LockDistillerParams false /MaxSubsetPct 100 /Optimize true /OPM 1 /ParseDSCComments true /ParseDSCCommentsForDocInfo true /PreserveCopyPage true /PreserveDICMYKValues true /PreserveEPSInfo true /PreserveFlatness true /PreserveHalftoneInfo false /PreserveOPIComments true /PreserveOverprintSettings true /StartPage 1 /SubsetFonts true /TransferFunctionInfo /Apply /UCRandBGInfo /Preserve /UsePrologue false /ColorSettingsFile () /AlwaysEmbed [ true ] /NeverEmbed [ true ] /AntiAliasColorImages false /CropColorImages true /ColorImageMinResolution 300 /ColorImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleColorImages true /ColorImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /ColorImageResolution 300 /ColorImageDepth -1 /ColorImageMinDownsampleDepth 1 /ColorImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeColorImages true /ColorImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterColorImages true /ColorImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /ColorACSImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /ColorImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /JPEG2000ColorImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /AntiAliasGrayImages false /CropGrayImages true /GrayImageMinResolution 300 /GrayImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleGrayImages true /GrayImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /GrayImageResolution 300 /GrayImageDepth -1 /GrayImageMinDownsampleDepth 2 /GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeGrayImages true /GrayImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterGrayImages true /GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /GrayACSImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /GrayImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /JPEG2000GrayImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /AntiAliasMonoImages false /CropMonoImages true /MonoImageMinResolution 1200 /MonoImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleMonoImages true /MonoImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /MonoImageResolution 1200 /MonoImageDepth -1 /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeMonoImages true /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode /MonoImageDict << /K -1 >> /AllowPSXObjects false /CheckCompliance [ /None ] /PDFX1aCheck false /PDFX3Check false /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false /PDFXNoTrimBoxError true /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox true /PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfile () /PDFXOutputConditionIdentifier () /PDFXOutputCondition () /PDFXRegistryName () /PDFXTrapped /False /CreateJDFFile false /Description << /ARA /BGR /CHS /CHT /CZE /DAN /DEU /ESP /ETI /FRA /GRE /HEB /HRV (Za stvaranje Adobe PDF dokumenata najpogodnijih za visokokvalitetni ispis prije tiskanja koristite ove postavke. Stvoreni PDF dokumenti mogu se otvoriti Acrobat i Adobe Reader 5.0 i kasnijim verzijama.) /HUN /ITA /JPN /KOR /LTH /LVI /NLD (Gebruik deze instellingen om Adobe PDF-documenten te maken die zijn geoptimaliseerd voor prepress-afdrukken van hoge kwaliteit. De gemaakte PDF-documenten kunnen worden geopend met Acrobat en Adobe Reader 5.0 en hoger.) /NOR /POL /PTB /RUM /RUS /SKY /SLV /SUO /SVE /TUR /UKR /ENU (Use these settings to create Adobe PDF documents best suited for high-quality prepress printing. Created PDF documents can be opened with Acrobat and Adobe Reader 5.0 and later.) >> /Namespace [ (Adobe) (Common) (1.0) ] /OtherNamespaces [ << /AsReaderSpreads false /CropImagesToFrames true /ErrorControl /WarnAndContinue /FlattenerIgnoreSpreadOverrides false /IncludeGuidesGrids false /IncludeNonPrinting false /IncludeSlug false /Namespace [ (Adobe) (InDesign) (4.0) ] /OmitPlacedBitmaps false /OmitPlacedEPS false /OmitPlacedPDF false /SimulateOverprint /Legacy >> << /AddBleedMarks false /AddColorBars false /AddCropMarks false /AddPageInfo false /AddRegMarks false /ConvertColors /ConvertToCMYK /DestinationProfileName () /DestinationProfileSelector /DocumentCMYK /Downsample16BitImages true /FlattenerPreset << /PresetSelector /MediumResolution >> /FormElements false /GenerateStructure false /IncludeBookmarks false /IncludeHyperlinks false /IncludeInteractive false /IncludeLayers false /IncludeProfiles false /MultimediaHandling /UseObjectSettings /Namespace [ (Adobe) (CreativeSuite) (2.0) ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfileSelector /DocumentCMYK /PreserveEditing true /UntaggedCMYKHandling /LeaveUntagged /UntaggedRGBHandling /UseDocumentProfile /UseDocumentBleed false >> ] >> setdistillerparams << /HWResolution [2400 2400] /PageSize [612.000 792.000] >> setpagedevice