Microsoft Word - numero_73_art_04_5402.docx A. Masmoudi et alii, Fracture and Structural Integrity, 73 (2025) 41-58; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.73.04 41 Experimental investigation on mechanical behavior of sandwich structures using Digital Image Correlation (DIC) Amina Masmoudi, Abdelhak Khechai, Ahmed Bouaziz Laboratory of Research in Civil Engineering, Mohamed Khider University of Biskra, Algeria. amina.masmoudi@univ-biskra.dz , https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3212-7743 a.khechai@univ-biskra.dz, ahmed.bouaziz@univ-biskra.dz Guerira Belhi Mechanical Engineering Laboratory, University of Biskra, Algeria. b.guerira@univ-biskra.dz Afaf Zeroual, Yassine Adimi Laboratory of Research in Civil Engineering, Mohamed Khider University of Biskra, Algeria. Afaf.zeroual@univ-biskra.dz, yassine.adimi@univ-biskra.dz KEYWORDS. Sandwich structure, PU, GFRP, Behavior, DIC. Citation: Masmoudi, A., Khechai, A., Bouaziz, A., belhi, G., Zeroual, A., Adimi, Y., Experimental investigation on mechanical behavior of sandwich structures using Digital Image Correlation (DIC), Fracture and Structural Integrity, 73 (2025) 41-58. Received: 25.02.2025 Accepted: 10.04.2025 Published: 13.04.2025 Issue: 07.2025 Copyright: © 2025 This is an open access article under the terms of the CC-BY 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. INTRODUCTION andwich structures are extensively used as structural materials across diverse industries, including civil structure and construction. This increased use is due to their remarkable strength-to-weight ratio, corrosion resistance, and durability. The design of sandwich structures, with thin, strong skins and a thick lightweight core, provides stiffness in compressive, tensile, bending, and buckling loadings [1]. The incorporation of fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP) as skins S https://youtu.be/IinfxOwQT7w A. Masmoudi et alii, Fracture and Structural Integrity, 73 (2025) 41-58; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.73.04 42 or facesheets is commonly applied in fabricating sandwich structures owing to their high specific strength/stiffness properties and improved fatigue life, and because of the complexity of their microstructure, the damage mechanisms should be fully studied [2,3]. One of the reasons of the wide application of sandwich panels is their lightweight nature, which facilitates the transportation and assembly[1]. This low weight is typically gained from the core material. Polyurethane (PU) foam appears as the most frequently core material used thanks to their good insulation properties, having low density, good impact, and shock absorption. As highlighted by Khan et al [4], polyurethane foam (PUF) cores have become a staple in the construction industry for sandwich structures. These structures are widely used in commercial, industrial, and residential buildings, functioning as both structural walls and non-structural elements. These papers [5–7] studied the application of sandwich structures in civil engineering demonstrating their versatility to various difficulties in bridges and building constructions such as floors, roofs or walls. Due to the complexity of sandwich structures, the requirement of studying and understanding their performance and failure characteristics have raised. Current research have illustrated that the application of fiber reinforced composite sandwich structure in construction can be efficiently and economically [8]. Experimental and numerical investigations on the mechanical behavior of sandwich structures have been discussed by several researchers. Tuwair et al. [9] investigated different core alternatives for GFRP foam-infill sandwich bridge deck panels. Three polyurethane foam core designs were tested: a high-density foam, a grid filled with low-density foam, and a special trapezoidal design with GFRP reinforcement. They assessed compressive and tensile strengths through the flatwise compressive and tensile tests. In addition, Xie et.al[10] examined the mechanical behavior of fiber-reinforced polymer sandwich structures subjected to three-point bending and double-cantilever-beam tests. They used polyurethane foam of different densities, infused with galvanized metal tooth nails as core. Results showed the improvement of both shear and compressive strength with the increase of foam density. Also Cui et al [11] studied the mechanical behavior of sandwich panel under flexural and edgewise compression loadings. The panels were made of fiber-reinforced geopolymer composite faces and PU foam core. They had found that the failure modes differed with varying thickness-to- length ratio when the sandwich panels are subjected to edgewise compression. In order to comprehend and study the deformation and failure mechanisms of composites and sandwich structures, full field measurement is widely used. DIC is one of the methods used. DIC is a non-contact, optical measurement technique based on computer vision. Unlike the classical methods for displacement and deformation measuring such as pointwise strain gauge that only provide local strain at a selected point, DIC detects full field deformation on all over the surface of the sample[12]. Recently, numerous researchers have employed DIC to study the deformation of composite plates and sandwich structures[13,14]. Khechai et al [2] used DIC technique to obtain full-field strain of notched composite plates and found the results obtained were roughly similar to the numerical outputs determined by finite element analysis. Also, Hosseini-Toudeshky and Navaei [15] characterized the interphase elastic modulus of glass/epoxy composites using DIC and FEM. The failure mechanisms of sandwich structures are determined by several factors: loading conditions, structure geometry, mechanical properties of the skin and core, and the interface between them. The use of sandwich structures exposes them to flat and edgewise compressive loads, resulting in complex failure modes [11]. Some of those modes are skin wrinkling, Euler macro buckling and macro shear buckling when the structure is under edgewise compression load, and core crushing and/ or densification when the structure is under flatwise compression load. Thus, it is required to monitor and measure the failure evolution to understand sandwich failure modes under those loadings. The objective of this study is to investigate the mechanical response of sandwich structures. These structures consist of GFRP skins enclosing a core of PU. The paper is divided into two main parts. The first part is to investigate the mechanical and morphological characterization of GFRP skin where tensile and compression tests were conducted, while the second part is focused on the mechanical characterization of sandwich structure subjected to flatwise and edgewise compression loadings. The compression tests are performed on the sandwich panels, following ASTM C365 for flatwise and ASTM C364 for edgewise loading standards. Various sandwich structure lengths are tested under edgewise compression to understand the effect of using different geometries. During all the tests full -field displacement and full-field deformation were obtained using DIC 2D-Ncorr. MATERIALS AND METHOD Materials he sandwich structure studied in this work is composed of GFRP skins and PU foam as core. The GFRP skins are made by hand lay-up technique on a 50x50 cm² plate of glass after applying mold release on it. The materials used for the skins are Polipol 353 unsaturated polyester resin as the matrix with a density of 1.121 g/cm3 and chopped T A. Masmoudi et alii, Fracture and Structural Integrity, 73 (2025) 41-58; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.73.04 43 strand mat glass fiber; four layers of mat, outer layer of 300 gr/m2 glass fiber and three layers of 600 gr/m2 glass fiber. Tab. 1 presents the mechanical properties of the used resin obtained through tensile test according to ASTM D638-14 [16]. The fiber weight fraction was determined by following the standard ISO 1172 [17] and it is estimated to be 36.55%. A CNC machine was used to cut the specimens from a 45x45 cm2 plate into the desired shapes, 5 cm were removed from all the edges of the plates to avoid discrepancy in thickness (Fig.1a). The core is made of open-cell polyurethane foam with a density of 50 kg/m3. To prevent the cutting effect, the skin and core of each specimen were cut separately and then assembled under cold pressure using epoxy resin as an adhesive (Fig.1b). All the materials used were commercially available. To create a random speckle pattern for DIC analysis, the specimens were coated with white paint and subsequently sprinkled with black paint. Tensile properties σmax (MPa) εmax (mm/mm) E (MPa) Unsaturated polyester resin 29.88 0.0132 3620.02 Table 1: Mechanical properties of resin used. Figure 1: a) Molded GFRP plate, b) Manufactured sandwich structure. Mechanical testing: GFRP skin In order to investigate the mechanical performance of GFRP skin, experimental studies were carried out using an Instron 5659 Universal testing machine. The mechanical properties of GFRP skin were investigated through compressive and tensile tests, in accordance with ASTM D695-15 [18] and ASTM D638-14 [16] respectively. Fig.2 displays the specimens studied and their dimensions. Compression test methods for the skin require application of a compressive load with preventing buckling of the material [19]. Fig.3 shows the fixture for the test. Because the interface of the specimen is covered by the compressive fixture, the speckle pattern for DIC is painted on the side of the specimen. Mechanical testing: PU core Three specimens of 50x50x20 mm2 were used to acquire the mechanical properties of the used foam. Flatwise compression test was carried out according to ASTM C265 [20]. The load was applied on using cylindrical loading blocks with displacement rate of crosshead of 1 mm/min. Mechanical testing: Sandwich structure To study the mechanical behavior of the sandwich structure, flatwise compression test was carried out in accordance with ASTM C365 [20]. The load was applied on the specimens using cylindrical loading blocks (Fig.4a and Fig.4d). The edgewise compression test was performed according to ASTM D364 [21]. The compression load was applied on the specimens using an edgewise fixture and cylindrical loading blocks (Fig.4b, Fig.4c and Fig.4e). Two different geometries of samples were studied under edgewise compression load: w=L (S-60) and w> /ColorImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /JPEG2000ColorImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /AntiAliasGrayImages false /CropGrayImages true /GrayImageMinResolution 300 /GrayImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleGrayImages true /GrayImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /GrayImageResolution 300 /GrayImageDepth -1 /GrayImageMinDownsampleDepth 2 /GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeGrayImages true /GrayImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterGrayImages true /GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /GrayACSImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /GrayImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /JPEG2000GrayImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /AntiAliasMonoImages false /CropMonoImages true /MonoImageMinResolution 1200 /MonoImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleMonoImages true /MonoImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /MonoImageResolution 1200 /MonoImageDepth -1 /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeMonoImages true /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode /MonoImageDict << /K -1 >> /AllowPSXObjects false /CheckCompliance [ /None ] /PDFX1aCheck false /PDFX3Check false /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false /PDFXNoTrimBoxError true /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox true /PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfile () /PDFXOutputConditionIdentifier () /PDFXOutputCondition () /PDFXRegistryName () /PDFXTrapped /False /CreateJDFFile false /Description << /ARA /BGR /CHS /CHT /CZE /DAN /DEU /ESP /ETI /FRA /GRE /HEB /HRV (Za stvaranje Adobe PDF dokumenata najpogodnijih za visokokvalitetni ispis prije tiskanja koristite ove postavke. Stvoreni PDF dokumenti mogu se otvoriti Acrobat i Adobe Reader 5.0 i kasnijim verzijama.) /HUN /ITA /JPN /KOR /LTH /LVI /NLD (Gebruik deze instellingen om Adobe PDF-documenten te maken die zijn geoptimaliseerd voor prepress-afdrukken van hoge kwaliteit. De gemaakte PDF-documenten kunnen worden geopend met Acrobat en Adobe Reader 5.0 en hoger.) /NOR /POL /PTB /RUM /RUS /SKY /SLV /SUO /SVE /TUR /UKR /ENU (Use these settings to create Adobe PDF documents best suited for high-quality prepress printing. Created PDF documents can be opened with Acrobat and Adobe Reader 5.0 and later.) >> /Namespace [ (Adobe) (Common) (1.0) ] /OtherNamespaces [ << /AsReaderSpreads false /CropImagesToFrames true /ErrorControl /WarnAndContinue /FlattenerIgnoreSpreadOverrides false /IncludeGuidesGrids false /IncludeNonPrinting false /IncludeSlug false /Namespace [ (Adobe) (InDesign) (4.0) ] /OmitPlacedBitmaps false /OmitPlacedEPS false /OmitPlacedPDF false /SimulateOverprint /Legacy >> << /AddBleedMarks false /AddColorBars false /AddCropMarks false /AddPageInfo false /AddRegMarks false /ConvertColors /ConvertToCMYK /DestinationProfileName () /DestinationProfileSelector /DocumentCMYK /Downsample16BitImages true /FlattenerPreset << /PresetSelector /MediumResolution >> /FormElements false /GenerateStructure false /IncludeBookmarks false /IncludeHyperlinks false /IncludeInteractive false /IncludeLayers false /IncludeProfiles false /MultimediaHandling /UseObjectSettings /Namespace [ (Adobe) (CreativeSuite) (2.0) ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfileSelector /DocumentCMYK /PreserveEditing true /UntaggedCMYKHandling /LeaveUntagged /UntaggedRGBHandling /UseDocumentProfile /UseDocumentBleed false >> ] >> setdistillerparams << /HWResolution [2400 2400] /PageSize [612.000 792.000] >> setpagedevice