Microsoft Word - numero_37_art_49 N. Zuhair Faruq, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 37 (2016) 382-394; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.37.49 382 An elasto-plastic approach to estimate lifetime of notched components under variable amplitude fatigue loading: a preliminary investigation N. Zuhair Faruq University of Sheffield, Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, Sheffield S1 3JD, UK Zfnamiq1@sheffield.ac.uk ABSTRACT. The present paper is concerned with the formulation of an elasto-plastic strain based approach suitable for assessing fatigue strength of notched components subjected to in-service variable amplitude cyclic loading. The hypothesis is formed that the crack initiation plane is closely aligned with the plane of maximum shear strain amplitude, its orientation and the associated stress/strain quantities being determined using the Maximum Variance Method. Fatigue damage is estimated by applying the Modified Manson-Coffin Curve Method (MMCCM) along with the Point Method (PM). In the proposed approach, the required critical distance is treated as a material property whose value is not affected either by the sharpness of the notch being assessed or by the profile of the load spectrum being applied. The detrimental effect of non-zero mean stresses and degree of multiaxiality of the local stress/strain histories is also considered. The accuracy and reliability of the proposed design methodology was checked against several experimental data taken from the literature and generated under different uniaxial variable amplitude load histories. In order to determine the required local stress/strain states, refined elasto-plastic finite element models were solved using commercial software ANSYS®. This preliminary validation exercise allowed us to prove that the proposed approach is capable of estimates laying within an error factor of about 2. These preliminary results are certainly promising, strongly supporting the idea that the proposed design strategy can successfully be used to assess the fatigue lifetime of notched metallic components subjected to in-service multiaxial variable amplitude loading sequences. KEYWORDS. Notched Components; Variable Amplitude; Critical Plane; Manson-Coffin Curve; non-zero mean stress. INTRODUCTION n situations of practical interest, real engineering components are characterised by complex geometries resulting in local stress/strain concentration phenomena. They normally contain either notches or complex features that favour the initiation of fatigue cracks. The presence of stress/strain raiser results in multiaxial stress/strain states in the critical regions even if the nominal load history being applied is uniaxial. Furthermore, real mechanical components are often exposed to variable amplitude load histories. Accordingly, in the recent past, a tremendous effort has been made by the international scientific community to device specific design techniques suitable for accurately assessing the durability of notched components subjected to in-service variable amplitude load histories [1]. In this complex scenario, this paper summarises the results from a preliminary investigation aiming at developing an elasto-plastic strain based approach capable of predicting fatigue lifetime of notched components subjected to variable amplitude load histories. I N. Zuhair Faruq, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 37 (2016) 382-394; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.37.49 383 Stress or strain based approaches are used to assess fatigue damage in mechanical components. Stress based approaches are recommended to be used to perform the high-cycle fatigue assessment [2] since, under these circumstances, cyclic plastic deformations can be neglected with little loss of accuracy [3]. The accuracy and reliability of this design strategy has been validated by performing several experimental investigations [4, 5]. However, when cyclic plasticity cannot be disregarded, it is commonly accepted that strain based approaches are more accurate in predicting lifetime of components, with this holding true especially in the low -cycle fatigue regime [1, 6]. This explains why, nowadays, the strain based approach is considered as an irreplaceable tool that is daily used by structural engineers to assess fatigue damage in real engineering components [7, 8]. FUNDAMENTALS OF THE MODIFIED MANSON-COFFIN CURVE METHOD he Modified Manson-Coffin Curve Method (MMCCM) is a strain-based fatigue criterion that allows uniaxial/multiaxial fatigue damage in real mechanical components subjected to in-service time-variable load histories to be estimated accurately [9, 10]. According to the classical strain-based criterion, Manson-Coffin curve is defined by slopes c and b that links the maximum shear strain amplitude with the number of reversals to failure. From a physical point of view, the formalisation of the MCCM takes as its starting point the assumption that the material plane experiencing the maximum shear strain amplitude coincides with the Stage I plane [1] (Fig. 1). Figure 1: Fatigue damage model [1]. According to the fatigue model depicted in Fig. 1, the following relationship can be defined [11]:    b cfa f f fN N G ' 2 ' 2     (1) where, a is the shear strain amplitude relative to the critical plane; ’f and ’f are the multiaxial fatigue strength coefficient and the multiaxial fatigue ductility coefficient, respectively; b and c are the multiaxial fatigue strength exponent and the multiaxial fatigue ductility exponent, respectively; Nf is the number of cycles to failure. All these fatigue constants can be evaluated by running an appropriate experiment. The classic Manson and Coffin curve, as shown in Fig. 2a and defined by Eq. 1, is reformulated to deal with multiaxial fatigue stress/strain tensors by calibrating all functions in Eq. 1, as expressed in Eq. 2. By following a systematic validation exercise, the MMCCM is seen to be capable of accurately modelling not only the detrimental effect of non-zero mean stresses, but also the degree of multiaxiality and non-proportionality of the load history being assessed as shown in Fig.2b [11-13]. T N. Zuhair Faruq, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 37 (2016) 382-394; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.37.49 384           b cfa f f fN N G ' 2 ' 2        (2) In Eq. (2) the functions ’f() , ’f() , b() , c() are fatigue constants that described above but need to be calibrated in terms of rho.  is the critical plane stress ratio and it is defined according to Eq. 3, [10]. n m n a n a a , , ,max        (3) In Eqs. (3) n,m and n,a are the mean value and amplitude of stress normal to the critical plane; τa is shear stress amplitude relative to the same plane [10]. As to the MMCCM’s modus operandi, the modified Manson-Coffin diagram depicted in Fig. 2b shows how this multiaxial fatigue criterion estimates fatigue lifetime, with the modified Manson-Coffin curves, Eq. (2), moving the curve downwards as ratio  increases, resulting an increase in fatigue damage. To conclude, it is worth recalling here that, in the absence of stress concentration phenomena, critical plane stress ratio  equals unity under uniaxial fully-reversed loading, whereas it is equal to zero under pure torsional loading [11]. a. b. Figure 2: a. Classic Manson-Coffin Curve. b. Modified Manson-Coffin Curve [11]. THEORY OF CRITICAL DISTANCE TO QUANTIFY THE EFFECTIVE LOCAL STRESS/STRAIN STATE s far as notched components are concerned in this study, a specific methodology is required in order to accurately take into account the presence of stress/strain concentration phenomena and determine the effective local stress/strain histories. The engineering aim of this section is to summarise a fundamental Theory of Critical distance and using the theory to estimate the effective local stress/strain states at the vicinity of notch apex different than notch tip, to predict fatigue lifetime of notched components. Generally, TCD is formalised in different forms that include a point, line, area, and volume method [4]. The point method is the simplest form that commonly used [6] and postulated that the elastoplastic stress/strain state to be used to assess the damaging effect of stress/strain concentrators and has to be determined at a distance (equal to LPM/2) from the notch apex (see Fig. 3b). The hypothesis is formed that the required critical distance is a material property, changed in different materials. However, its value remains constant in the same material regardless of notch geometry and notch sharpness [4]. According to the previous findings, that validity is fully supported by the experimental evidence and proved that the TCD is successful not only in predicting fatigue lifetime under constant amplitude loading but also under variable amplitude loading condition [6, 14]. From a practical point of view, to indicate the critical distance for a specific material, the best way is running an appropriate experimental investigation by testing specimens containing with known notched geometry under fully reversed constant amplitude axial force. A N. Zuhair Faruq, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 37 (2016) 382-394; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.37.49 385 In the present paper, typical notched samples were considered from a pre-investigated literature [6] as shown in Fig. 3a. The samples were tested under fully reversed nominal tension-compression CA cyclic force F(t), resulting in a fatigue failure at Nf number of cycles to failure. In the meantime, by post processing the elastoplastic FE model, a stabilized stress/distance and strain/distance curve were plotted along the notch bisector as illustrated in Fig. 3d. Furthermore, it is worth mentioning here that the stress/strain states at the vicinity of notch tip are experiencing a triaxial history even if the external applied load is uniaxial. The behaviour of these multiaxial stress/strain states are varying proportionally. Under these particular circumstances, the level of multiaxiality of the local stress/strain and effect of nonzero mean stress are considered to modify Manson-Coffin curve. Then, by using the experimental number of cycles to failure, average value of a critical distance was computed for specimens subjected to different values of nominal loads. To sum up, according to the theory of critical distance, for a given material, the hypothesis is formed that such a distance is always the same in the same material regardless of notch geometry and notch sharpness. Figure 3: Summary of a methodology proposed to determine the critical distance – Point Method LPM [6]. ORIENTATION OF THE CRITICAL PLANE AND MAXIMUM VARIANCE METHOD redicting fatigue lifetime of a component mainly depends on the accuracy in determining the orientation of the critical plane as well as the stress/strain components relative to that plane. The hypothesis is formed that the critical plane, which is defined as the plane experiencing maximum shear strain amplitude [1], coincides with the crack initiation plane. Recently, Susmel [15] has formalised a numerical algorithm to explore the orientation of the critical plane been applied along with the stress based approach. The algorithm is then reformulated in terms of cyclic strain that summarised in P N. Zuhair Faruq, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 37 (2016) 382-394; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.37.49 386 Fig.4. This algorithm is developed based on the multi-variable optimisation method known as a Gradient Ascent Method [15]. Figure 4: Flowchart to explore the orientation of the critical plane [15]. In order to explore the critical plane, a notched component is considered subjected to in-service cyclic load as shown in Fig. 5a. Then, by taking full advantage of the theory of critical distance, multiaxial local strain history is determined at a specific distance from the notch apex equal to critical distance. The local strain history is described with the following strain tensor (see Fig. 5b):   xy xz x xy yz y xz xz z t t t t t t t t t t ( ) ( ) ( ) 2 2 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 2 2 ( ) ( ) ( ) 2 2                              (4) In the above equation, εx(t), εy(t) and εz(t) are normal strain components, whereas xy yz xzt t and t( ), ( ), ( )   are shear strain history. According to the maximum variance method, shear strain amplitude is described by the following Eq. 5: N. Zuhair Faruq, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 37 (2016) 382-394; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.37.49 387  a qVar t2 .     (5) The variance of shear strain can be determined directly by using the simple form of Eq. 6, [15]:   TqVar t d C d[ ]    (6) According to Fig 5c, for specific values of angles φ, θ and α, the terms d and [C] in Eq. 6 can be simply defined with the following definition:   d d d d d d d 2 1 2 2 3 4 5 6 1 sin( )sin( 2 )cos( ) sin( )sin( 2 )cos( ) 2 1 sin( )sin( 2 )cos( ) sin( )sin( 2 )sin( ) 2 1 sin( )sin( 2 ) 2 1 sin( )sin( 2 )sin( 2 ) cos( )cos( 2 )sin( ) 2 sin( )cos( )co                                                 s( 2 ) cos( )sin( )cos( ) sin( )sin( )cos( 2 ) cos( )cos( )cos( )                                         x x y x z x xy x xz x yz x y y y z y xy y xz y yz x z y z z z xy z xz z yz x xy y xy z xy xy xy xz xy yz x xz y xz z xz xy xz xz xz yz x yz y yz z yz xy yz xy yz yz V C C C C C C V C C C C C C V C C C C C C C V C C C C C C V C C C C C C V , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,                     (7) Figure 5: Orientation of the Critical Plane [1]. N. Zuhair Faruq, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 37 (2016) 382-394; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.37.49 388 Now, to estimate the variance and covariance terms in matrix [C], consider a time variable strain components εi(t) and εj(t) that described over time period [0,T]. εi,m and εj,m are the mean values of strain histories, the variance and covariance of εi(t) and εj(t) can be determined by using the following definitions:     T i i i mVar t t dt T 2 , 0 1 [ ] [ ]    (8)         T i j i i m j j mCoVar t t t t dt T , , 0 1 [ , ] [ ].          (9) After the orientation of the maximum critical plane is indicated, then, by taking full advantage of the maximum variance method [1], all those stress amplitudes relative to the critical plane is calculated. The hypothesis is postulated that fatigue failure is proportional to the variance of cyclic strain at a critical point. From a statistical viewpoint, the variance of variable amplitude cyclic stress/strain is the squared deviation from the mean value. According to the well-documented evidence [1], the above mentioned approach has given satisfactory results when applied in terms of long-life fatigue. In the light of the reliable solution obtained in the stress based critical plane, the maximum variance concept was reformulated for being applied in strain based strategy. After exploring the orientation of the critical plane, maximum variance and normal unit vectors on the critical plane are used to determine the required mean stress/strain values and amplitudes. Strictly speaking, for components under constant amplitude CA fatigue load, the stress/strain values of interest related to the critical plane can directly be found using Eqs. 10-11 [1]:  a MV MV,max ,min 1 2      m MV MV,max ,min 1 2     (10)  n a n n, ,max ,min 1 2      n m n n, ,max ,min 1 2     (11) where: a and τa are the shear strain and stress amplitudes relative to the critical plane. m and τm are the mean value of shear strain and stress. σn,a and σn,m are the normal stress amplitude and normal mean value. γMV,max and γMV,min are the maximum and minimum variance of shear strain history respectively. τMV,max and τMV,min are used to denote the maximum and minimum variance of shear stress history. σn,max and σn,min are the maximum and minimum normal stress history respectively. All the above described variables are relative to the critical plane. However, in those situations involving variable amplitude cyclic load, the corresponding stress/strain state on the critical plane that damage the component are also variable. The mean value and stress/strain amplitudes of interest related to the critical plane can directly be calculated by the following definitions 12-14 [1 & 15]:   T m MV t dt T 0 1 .       T MV MV mVar t t dt T 2 0 1 .[ ] [ ]    (12)   T n m n t dt T , 0 1 .       T n n n mVar t t dt T 2 , 0 1 .[ ] [ ]    (13)  a MVVar t2.      n a nVar t, 2.     (14) N. Zuhair Faruq, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 37 (2016) 382-394; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.37.49 389 CLASSIS RAIN FLOW COUNTING METHOD eal engineering components are often subjected to a complex cyclic load that either constant or variable amplitude. For the constant amplitude applied loads, the calculated stress/strain amplitude can be used straightforward to estimate number of cycles to failure. However, if the applied nominal loads are changed with time, the local stress/strain history are variable amplitude and the solution may be further complicated. One of the main objectives of this study is to investigate variable amplitude fatigue lifetimes of a component. Therefore, the most complex issue that needs to be addressed properly is the cycle counting strategy. Examination of the state of the art found that the classic Rain-Flow Method [16] is the best accurate methodology that gives a satisfactory prediction to account the cycles in variable amplitude loading [3, 17-19] and then, leading to better fatigue lifetime predictions. The classic Rain-Flow method is a cycle counting rule that is used to define whether cycles is formed in every three consecutive points of the time history stress/strain amplitudes. A typical variable amplitude stress/strain history is presented in Fig.6. The differences between absolute value of first two consecutive points S1 need to be compared with the difference between second and third points S2 . Figure 6: Rain Flow Cycle Counting. If S1 is greater than S2 , no cycle is considered, otherwise cycle is counted. The same process should be followed until all cycles are identified. S S S1 1 2   and S S S2 2 3   S S1 2   No cycle is considered S S S3 3 4   and S S S4 4 5   S S3 4   Cycle 3-4 is counted S S S6 6 7   and S S S7 7 8   S S6 7   Cycle 6-7 is counted It is worth mentioning here that according to the Rain Flow rules, before start cycle counting, rearrangement is required in the stress/strain history so that it starts either in the highest peak or the lowest valley whichever is greater in absolute value [20], and a new stress/strain-time history is arranged. Then, three-point rain flow cycle counting method is applied on every three consecutive points in the new generated stress or strain history. As illustrated in Fig. 6, two data points is extracted to form the first cycle, and a new state history is generated by connecting the points before and after the cycle. The subsequent step is repeating the above mentioned cycle extraction technique on every three consecutive points to identify another cycle and generating a new stress/strain history. This process is continued until all cycles are formed. LIFETIME ESTIMATION BY USING THE DEVELOPED APPROACH: rom the application point of view, this chapter summarised the procedure being followed to validate the developed approach by integrating with the pre-experimentally investigated notched samples from other literature [6]. Generally, the developed approach methodology is briefly illustrated in Fig.8 and presented in the last sections with a great detail. For the validation view point, pre-investigated cylindrical notched samples of three different notch root R F N. Zuhair Faruq, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 37 (2016) 382-394; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.37.49 390 radius were considered: 0.225mm, 1.2mm, and 3.0mm as shown in Fig 9e. The specimens were tested under fully reversed constant/variable amplitude uniaxial nominal loads with load ratio (R) equals -1. The samples were made of C40 material. All mechanical and fatigue properties were summarized in Tab. 1. The stabilized stress-strain relationship and Manson- Coffin curve were generated under fully reversed axial load. The corresponding local elasto-plastic triaxial stress/strain history was obtained by post-processing the FE model using ANSYS® software. The solved model allows the corresponding stress/strain sequences to be determined at any nodes of interest on the sample. From the accuracy point of view, the element size of FE model at notched bisector was gradually refined and solved under simple linear-elastic behaviour until convergence level. The meshing size at notched region was described by elements with 0.005mm dimension. Then, by taking full advantage of the TCD being applied in terms of Point Method [4], the effective stress/strain history was determined at a given distance from the notch apex (see Fig. 7a). In the present investigation, the critical distance was estimated by considering a number of experimental results generated by testing notched specimens under constant amplitude uniaxial fatigue loading [9], the procedure was described in section 3 (Theory of critical distance to quantify the effective local stress/strain state). UTS (MPa) y (MPa) E (MPa) K’ (MPa) n' ’f (MPa) ε'f b c bo co 852 672 209000 773.3 0.0951 710.6 0.3641 -0.0568 -0.5794 -0.023 -0.98 Table 1: Mechanical and Fatigue properties of C40 steel [9]. The next significant steps is exploring orientation of the critical plane based on the Gradient Ascent Method [1, 15] and estimate the mean and stress/strain amplitudes on the critical plane. The MVM are used to determine the stress/strains amplitudes as shown in Fig. 7b. From a computational view point, MATLAB computer software was used to perform the analysis by exploring orientation of the critical plane and quantify all stress/strain values on that plane. The procedure of finding a critical plane and relative stress/strain amplitudes were summarised clearly in section 4 (Orientation of the critical plane and maximum variance method). Under constant amplitude load history, after indicating the orientation of the critical plane, all relative shear stress/strain amplitudes and normal stresses can directly be calculated according to the Eqs. 3-5. Those stress/strain values allow the ratio ρ in Eq.2 to be determined. Then by using the modified Manson-Coffin curve, number of cycles to failure can be estimated. However, under variable amplitude fatigue loading, the direction of maximum variance of the resolved shear strain is used to perform the cycle counting based on the classic Rain-Flow method [1, 16] (see Fig. 5i-j). The estimated shear stress amplitude and maximum normal stress can be used to determine a stress ration ρ to modify Manson-Coffin curve. Finally, number of cycles to failure can be estimated by using Eq. 15 [1]: j cr f e i tot i D N n D , 1   (15) where: Dtot is the total amount of fatigue damage that can be defined by Eq. 16, Dcr is the critical value of the damage sum, ni is the number of cycles at the i-th strain level. The classical theory formalised by Palmgren and Miner [21] suggests that fatigue failures take place as soon as the critical value of the damage sum equals unity. However, according to several experimental investigations, Sonsino [22] has shown that the average value of Dcr is 0.27 for steel and 0.37 for aluminium. j i tot f ii n D N ,1   (16) where: Nf,i is the number of cycles to failure for each strain amplitude being considered. N. Zuhair Faruq, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 37 (2016) 382-394; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.37.49 391 Figure 7: In-field use of the developed approach: Methodology [1]. VALIDATION BY EXPERIMENTAL DATA o check the accuracy and reliability of the devised approach, the model was validated against a number of experimental results reported in Ref [9]. This validation exercise involved a systematic study of various elastic/elasto-plastic loading conditions in relation to the fatigue life, particularly when the stress/strain amplitude varies between loading sequences in multiple step loading. As a preliminary stage, experimental results from 70 previously- tested cylindrical notched specimens were taken directly from Refs [9], the notch root radius are 0.225mm, 1.2mm, and 3.0mm as shown in Fig 8e. The samples were tested under uniaxial sinusoidal loading waves as shown in Figs 8a-d, where a-max is the amplitude of the most damaging cycle in the spectrum, and a-i is the amplitude of the ith cycle (both expressed in terms of nominal net stresses). Three types of load spectra were considered, which are a simple overloading case (OL), a concave downwards spectrum (CDS), and a concave upwards spectrum (CUS). Those cases represent the potential variable amplitude applied loads on real engineering components. The load ratio R was invariably equal to -1. The material being tested was C40 carbon steel. The required material properties were taken from the aforementioned published work [9]. Fig. 8e shows the geometries of the investigated specimens. As far as the numerical stress analysis is concerned, under constant amplitude loading, ten virtual cycles were considered in the theoretical analysis to confirm the stress-strain response reaches a stabilized configuration level [23]. Kinematic hardening was used for the elasto-plastic deformation [24]. Due to assumptions made while choosing the experimental data in the validation process, particularly while identifying material’s fatigue data that had not been found within the original paper, a narrower error band was defined for the comparison chart. The estimated Nf,e versus the experimental Nf were arranged in Fig. 9. It can be observed that most of T N. Zuhair Faruq, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 37 (2016) 382-394; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.37.49 392 the estimated points are located within the designated error interval. Subsequently, from the validation view point, it can be pointed out that the elasto-plastic model was in a position to adequately predict the number of cycles to failure. Moreover, Fig. 9 offers evidence that the devised technique is capable of successfully estimate fatigue lifetime. To sum up, the experimental results are close to the estimated values that are generated using the devised methodology and gave a similar pattern. This demonstrates applicability of the devised approach. Figure 8: (a) Load spectra (b)-(d) load histories (e) geometries of the specimens [14]. N. Zuhair Faruq, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 37 (2016) 382-394; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.37.49 393 Figure 9: Accuracy of the Modified Manson-Coffin Curve versus experimental results. CONCLUSION 1. It can be concluded that the entire range of the developed approach, produced by either constant amplitude or multiple stepwise loading is satisfactory suitable for predicting fatigue lifetime of a notched metallic materials by taking full advantage of the MMCCM applied along with the critical distance approach. This demonstrates that the formalised approach can be successful in estimating longevity of the notched components. 2. Strain-based approach MMCCM, can offer a reliable solution to the local triaxial stress/strain based state, being applied using the critical distance theory. 3. The formalised approach can consider the detrimental effect of non-zero mean stress and degree of multiaxiality, different from other techniques that rationally account this effect. REFERENCES [1] Wang, Y., Susmel, L., The Modified Manson–Coffin Curve Method to estimate fatigue lifetime under complex constant and variable amplitude multiaxial fatigue loading. Int. J. of Fatigue, 83 (2016) 135-149. [2] Neuber, H., Theory of stress concentration for shear-strained prismatical bodies with arbitrary nonlinear stress-strain law. J. of Appl. Mech., 28 (1961) 544-550. [3] Shamsaei, N., Gladskyi, M., Panasovskyi, K., Shukaev, S., Fatemi, A., Multiaxial fatigue of titanium including step loading and load path alteration and sequence effects. Int. J. of Fatigue, 32 (2010) 1862-1874. [4] Taylor, D., The Theory of Critical Distances: A New perspective in Fracture Mechanics., First ed., Oxford: Elsevier, (2007). [5] Susmel, L., Taylor, D., Fatigue design in the presence of stress concentrations, The J. of Strain Anal. for Eng. Design, 38 (2003) 443-452. [6] Susmel, L. Taylor, D., Estimating Lifetime of Notched Components Subjected to Variable Amplitude Fatigue Loading According to the Elastoplastic Theory of Critical Distances., J. of Eng. Mat. and Tech., 137 (2015) 011008. [7] Fatemi, A., Zeng, Z., Plaseied, A., Fatigue behavior and life predictions of notched specimens made of QT and forged microalloyed steels. Int. J. fatigue, 26 (2004) 663-672. [8] Susmel L., Taylor D., An elasto-plastic reformulation of the Theory of Critical Distances to estimate lifetime of notched components failing in the low/medium-cycle fatigue regime. Trans. ASME, J. Eng. Mat. & Tech. 132 (2010) 021002-1/8. [9] Susmel, L., Taylor, D., Estimating lifetime of notched components subjected to variable amplitude fatigue loading according to the elasto-plastic Theory of Critical Distances. ASME Trans, J. of Eng. Mat. & Tech., 137 (2015) 011008- 1/15, Paper No: MATS-13-1176. [10] Susmel, L., Meneghetti, G., Atzori, B., A Simple and Efficient Reformulation of the Classical Manson–Coffin Curve to Predict Lifetime Under Multiaxial Fatigue Loading—Part I: Plain Materials. Trans ASME, J. of Eng. Mat. & Tech., 131 (2009) 021009-1/9. N. Zuhair Faruq, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 37 (2016) 382-394; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.37.49 394 [11] Susmel, L., Multiaxial notch fatigue: from nominal to local stress-strain quantities, Woodhead & CRC, Cambridge, UK (2009). [12] Susmel, L., Meneghetti, G., Atzori, B., A Simple and Efficient Reformulation of the Classical Manson–Coffin Curve to Predict Lifetime Under Multiaxial Fatigue Loading—Part II: Notches. Trans ASME, J. of Eng. Mat. & Tech., 131.2 (2009) 021010-1/8. [13] Susmel, L., Atzori, B., Meneghetti, G., Taylor, D., Notch and mean stress effect in fatigue as phenomena of elasto- plastic inherent multiaxiality, Eng. Fra. Mech., 78 (2011) 1628-1643. [14] Susmel, L., Taylor, D., The theory of critical distances to estimate lifetime of notched components subjected to variable amplitude uniaxial fatigue loading, Int. J. of Fatigue, 33 (2011) 900-911. [15] Susmel, L., A simple and efficient numerical algorithm to determine the orientation of the critical plane in multiaxial fatigue problems, International Journal of Fatigue, 32 (2010) 1875-1883. [16] Matsuishi, M., Endo, T., Fatigue of metals subjected to varying stress. Presented to the Japan Society of Mech. Eng., (1968) 37-40. [17] Wang, C.H., Brown, M. W., A path-independent parameter for fatigue under proportional and non-proportional loading. Fatigue Fracture Eng. Mat. Str., 16 (1993) 1285-1298. [18] Bannantine, J. A., Socie, D. F., A variable amplitude multiaxial life prediction method. In: Fatigue under Biaxial and Multiaxial Loading. Mech. Eng. Publications, (1991) 35-51. [19] Shamsaei, N., Fatemi, A., Socie, D.F., Multiaxial fatigue evaluation using discriminating strain paths. Int. J. of Fatigue, 33 (2011) 597-609. [20] Lee, Y.L., Pan, J., Hathaway, R., Barkey M.E., Fatigue Testing and Analysis, Theory and Practice, Oxford: Elsevier (2005). [21] Miner, M.A., Cumulative damage in fatigue, J. Appl. Mech., (1945) AI59-64. [22] Sonsino, C.M., Fatigue testing under variable amplitude loading, Int. J. of Fatigue, 29 (2007) 1080-1089. [23] Jiang, Y., A fatigue criterion for general multiaxial loading, Fatigue and fracture of Eng. Mat. & Str., 23(1) (2000) 19- 32. [24] Socie, D.F., Marquis, G.B., Multiaxial Fatigue, SAE, Warrendale, PA, (2000). << /ASCII85EncodePages false /AllowTransparency false /AutoPositionEPSFiles true /AutoRotatePages /None /Binding /Left /CalGrayProfile (Dot Gain 20%) /CalRGBProfile (sRGB IEC61966-2.1) /CalCMYKProfile (U.S. Web Coated \050SWOP\051 v2) /sRGBProfile (sRGB IEC61966-2.1) /CannotEmbedFontPolicy /Error /CompatibilityLevel 1.4 /CompressObjects /Tags /CompressPages true /ConvertImagesToIndexed true /PassThroughJPEGImages true /CreateJobTicket false /DefaultRenderingIntent /Default /DetectBlends true /DetectCurves 0.0000 /ColorConversionStrategy /CMYK /DoThumbnails false /EmbedAllFonts true /EmbedOpenType false /ParseICCProfilesInComments true /EmbedJobOptions true /DSCReportingLevel 0 /EmitDSCWarnings false /EndPage -1 /ImageMemory 1048576 /LockDistillerParams false /MaxSubsetPct 100 /Optimize true /OPM 1 /ParseDSCComments true /ParseDSCCommentsForDocInfo true /PreserveCopyPage true /PreserveDICMYKValues true /PreserveEPSInfo true /PreserveFlatness true /PreserveHalftoneInfo false /PreserveOPIComments true /PreserveOverprintSettings true /StartPage 1 /SubsetFonts true /TransferFunctionInfo /Apply /UCRandBGInfo /Preserve /UsePrologue false /ColorSettingsFile () /AlwaysEmbed [ true ] /NeverEmbed [ true ] /AntiAliasColorImages false /CropColorImages true /ColorImageMinResolution 300 /ColorImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleColorImages true /ColorImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /ColorImageResolution 300 /ColorImageDepth -1 /ColorImageMinDownsampleDepth 1 /ColorImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeColorImages true /ColorImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterColorImages true /ColorImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /ColorACSImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /ColorImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /JPEG2000ColorImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /AntiAliasGrayImages false /CropGrayImages true /GrayImageMinResolution 300 /GrayImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleGrayImages true /GrayImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /GrayImageResolution 300 /GrayImageDepth -1 /GrayImageMinDownsampleDepth 2 /GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeGrayImages true /GrayImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterGrayImages true /GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /GrayACSImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /GrayImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /JPEG2000GrayImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /AntiAliasMonoImages false /CropMonoImages true /MonoImageMinResolution 1200 /MonoImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleMonoImages true /MonoImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /MonoImageResolution 1200 /MonoImageDepth -1 /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeMonoImages true /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode /MonoImageDict << /K -1 >> /AllowPSXObjects false /CheckCompliance [ /None ] /PDFX1aCheck false /PDFX3Check false /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false /PDFXNoTrimBoxError true /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox true /PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfile () /PDFXOutputConditionIdentifier () /PDFXOutputCondition () /PDFXRegistryName () /PDFXTrapped /False /CreateJDFFile false /Description << /ARA /BGR /CHS /CHT /CZE /DAN /DEU /ESP /ETI /FRA /GRE /HEB /HRV (Za stvaranje Adobe PDF dokumenata najpogodnijih za visokokvalitetni ispis prije tiskanja koristite ove postavke. Stvoreni PDF dokumenti mogu se otvoriti Acrobat i Adobe Reader 5.0 i kasnijim verzijama.) /HUN /ITA /JPN /KOR /LTH /LVI /NLD (Gebruik deze instellingen om Adobe PDF-documenten te maken die zijn geoptimaliseerd voor prepress-afdrukken van hoge kwaliteit. De gemaakte PDF-documenten kunnen worden geopend met Acrobat en Adobe Reader 5.0 en hoger.) /NOR /POL /PTB /RUM /RUS /SKY /SLV /SUO /SVE /TUR /UKR /ENU (Use these settings to create Adobe PDF documents best suited for high-quality prepress printing. Created PDF documents can be opened with Acrobat and Adobe Reader 5.0 and later.) >> /Namespace [ (Adobe) (Common) (1.0) ] /OtherNamespaces [ << /AsReaderSpreads false /CropImagesToFrames true /ErrorControl /WarnAndContinue /FlattenerIgnoreSpreadOverrides false /IncludeGuidesGrids false /IncludeNonPrinting false /IncludeSlug false /Namespace [ (Adobe) (InDesign) (4.0) ] /OmitPlacedBitmaps false /OmitPlacedEPS false /OmitPlacedPDF false /SimulateOverprint /Legacy >> << /AddBleedMarks false /AddColorBars false /AddCropMarks false /AddPageInfo false /AddRegMarks false /ConvertColors /ConvertToCMYK /DestinationProfileName () /DestinationProfileSelector /DocumentCMYK /Downsample16BitImages true /FlattenerPreset << /PresetSelector /MediumResolution >> /FormElements false /GenerateStructure false /IncludeBookmarks false /IncludeHyperlinks false /IncludeInteractive false /IncludeLayers false /IncludeProfiles false /MultimediaHandling /UseObjectSettings /Namespace [ (Adobe) (CreativeSuite) (2.0) ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfileSelector /DocumentCMYK /PreserveEditing true /UntaggedCMYKHandling /LeaveUntagged /UntaggedRGBHandling /UseDocumentProfile /UseDocumentBleed false >> ] >> setdistillerparams << /HWResolution [2400 2400] /PageSize [612.000 792.000] >> setpagedevice