Microsoft Word - numero_41_art_57.docx P. Gallo et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 41 (2017) 456-463; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.41.57 456 Creep behavior of V-notched components P. Gallo Department of Mechanical Engineering, Aalto University, Marine Technology, Puumiehenkuja 5A, Espoo 02150, Finland. S.M.J. Razavi, M. Peron, J. Torgersen, F. Berto Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Norway javad.razavi@ntnu.no, mirco.peron@ntnu.no, jan.torgersen@ntnu.no, filippo.berto@ntnu.no ABSTRACT. Geometrical discontinues such as notches play a significant rule in structural integrity of the components, especially when the component is subjected to very severe conditions, such as the high temperature fatigue or creep. In this paper, a generalized form of the existing notch tip creep stress- strain analysis method developed by Nuñez and Glinka, is developed and extended to a wide variety of blunt V-notches. Assuming the generalized Lazzarin-Tovo solution that allows a unified approach to the evaluation of linear elastic stress fields in the vicinity of both cracks and notches is the key in getting the extension to blunt V-notches. Numerous cases have been analysed and the stress fields obtained according to the proposed method were compared with proper finite element data, showing a very good agreement. KEYWORDS. Creep; V-notches; Stress fields; Stress evaluation; Strain energy density. Citation: Gallo, P., Razavi, S.M.J., Peron, M., Torgersen, J., Berto, F., Creep behavior of V- notched components, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 41 (2017) 456-463. Received: 12.05.2017 Accepted: 23.07.2017 Published: 01.07.2017 Copyright: © 2017 This is an open access article under the terms of the CC-BY 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. INTRODUCTION ue to the complexities of the geometry and loading conditions in modern structural components, it is essential to be able to predict the behavior of components including geometrical discontinuities that generate localized high stress concentration zones [1,7]. They become even more important when, in operating conditions, the component is subjected to very demanding conditions such as high temperature fatigue or creep loading. Various methods have been proposed by researchers to evaluate the behavior of structural components under various loading conditions [8- 12]. The structural components show a nonlinear stress-strain response such as creep (visco-plasticity) under applied load in a high temperature environment. In presence of geometric discontinuities such as notches, localized-creep takes place in a small region near the notch root. On the other hand, non-localized (or gross) creep condition refers to situations in which the far stress field also experiences some creep which may lead to more intense creeping in the vicinity of the notch tip. D P. Gallo et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 41 (2017) 456-463; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.41.57 457 To the best of the authors’ knowledge only a few solutions related to the localized time-dependent creep-plasticity problems are available in literature. Nuñez and Glinka [13] proposed a solution for non-localized creep strains/stresses at the notch root, based on the linear-elastic behavior of the material, the constitutive law and the material creep model. The formulation was derived by using the total strain energy density rule proposed by Neuber [14]. Considering the U-notched specimens (2α=0 and ρ≠0) very good results were obtained using this method. The main aim of the current paper is to extend the method proposed by Nuñez and Glinka to blunt V-notches. For this aim, the Creager and Paris [15] equations were substituted with the Lazzarin and Tovo [16] equations. Finally an approach for fast evaluation of the stresses/strains at notches under non-localized creeping condition is proposed which doesn’t require any complex and time-consuming FE non-linear analyses. Output of the proposed approach can be used as input for creep life prediction models based on local approaches. EVALUATION OF STRESSES AND STRAINS UNDER NON-LOCALIZED CREEPING CONDITION FOR BLUNT V- NOTCHES uñez and Glinka [13] presented a method for the estimation of stress and strain at U-notch tip, subjected to non-localized creep. The method was based on the Neuber [14] concept extended to time dependent plane stress problems and on the introduction of KΩ parameter introduced by Moftakhar et al. [17]. It can be assumed in fact that the total strain energy density changes occurring in the far field produce magnified effects at the notch tip. For this reason, the total strain energy density concentration factor is introduced in order to magnify the energy at the notch tip. The introduction of this parameter and of the far field stress and strain contribution in the Neuber’s time dependent formulation is the main difference within the non-localized and localized creep formulation that, instead, can be easily derived directly by extending the Neuber’s rule. Details about the original formulation can be found in the original works Nuñez and Glinka [13] and in Gallo et al. [18]. The key to extend the Nuñez-Glinka method to blunt V- notches is the assumption of the Lazzarin and Tovo [16] equations to describe the early elastic state of the system. (a) (b) Figure 1: (a) Coordinate system and symbols used for the stress field components in Lazzarin-Tovo equations; (b) coordinate system and symbols used for the elastic stress field redistribution for blunt V-notches. The Lazzarin-Tovo equations, in the presence of a traction loading, along the bisector (x axis), can be expressed as follows, as a function of the maximum stress (see Fig. 1):                 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 3 1 4 3 1 3 1 max r r rr r r r                                                                         (1) N P. Gallo et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 41 (2017) 456-463; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.41.57 458 where σmax can be expressed as a function of stress concentration factor Kt (evaluated through linear elastic finite element analysis) and the applied load σnom, max t nom K  (2) Employing the more general conformal mapping of Neuber [19] that permit a unified analysis of sharp and blunt notches, the notch radius, ρ, and the origin of the coordinate system, r0, are related by the following equation on the basis of trigonometric considerations: 0 1 q r q     (3) where 2 2 q      . The main steps to extend the method to blunt V-Notches can be summarised as follows:  Assumption of Lazzarin-Tovo equations to describe the stress distribution ahead the notch tip instead of Creager-Paris equations;  Calculation of the origin of the coordinate system, r0, as a function of the opening angle and notch radius, as described by Eq. (3);  Re-definition of the plastic zone correction factor Cp that is a function of plastic zone size rp and plastic zone increment Δrp; The definition of the parameters Cp, rp, Δrp is very similar to that clearly reported by Glinka [20], except for the assumption of different elastic stress distribution equations. Definition of these variables is briefly reported hereafter. Referring to Fig. 2, considering the Von Mises [21] yield criterion in polar coordinate: 2 2 ys r r         (4) and introducing Eqs. (1) into Eq. (4), a first approximation of rp that can be solved numerically is obtained. Once rp is known, the force F1 can be evaluated as follows:                  0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 3 4 1 1 1 (3 ) pr p p r p p pt nom p p p p p F dr r r r r r rK r r r r r r r r r r r r r                                                                                                    1 1             (5) The stress σy (rp) is considered to be constant inside the plastic zone, which means elastic-perfectly plastic behavior is assumed. The lower integration limit is r0, which depends on the opening angle and notch tip radius. Due to the plastic yielding at the notch tip, the force F1 cannot be carried through by the material in the plastic zone rp. But in order to satisfy the equilibrium conditions of the notched body, the force F1 has to be carried through by the material beyond the plastic zone rp. As a result, stress redistribution occurs, increasing the plastic zone rp by an increment ∆rp. If the plastic zone is small in comparison to the surrounding elastic stress field, the redistribution is not significant, and it can be interpreted as a shift of the elastic field over the distance ∆rp away from the notch tip. Therefore the force F1 is mainly carried through the material over the distance ∆rp, and therefore the force F2 (represented by the area depicted in the Fig. P. Gallo et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 41 (2017) 456-463; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.41.57 459 1-b) must be equal to F1. For this reasons, F1 = F2 = σθ(rp)Δrp, and the plastic zone increment can be expressed as the ratio between F1 and σθ evaluated (through Lazzarin-Tovo equations [16]) at a distance equal to the previously calculated rp:   1 p p F r r   (6) Substituting in Eq. (6) the formula given by Eq. (5) for F1 and the explicit form of σθ, the expression for the evaluation of Δrp is obtained:                 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 p p p p p p p p p p r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r                                                                                                                      1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 / 1 1 1 3 p pr r r r                                           (7) The last step consists in the definition of the plastic zone correction factor Cp, which is according to Glinka [20] but introducing the Lazzarin-Tovo equations:                 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 Δ 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 p p p p p p p p p p p p r r r r r C r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r                                                                                                               1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 / 1 1 1 3 p p p r r r r r                                                    (8) At this point, the general stepwise procedure to be followed to generate a solution is identical to that proposed by Nuñez and Glinka [13]: 1. Determine the notch tip stress, 22 e , and strain, 22 e , using the linear-elastic analysis. 2. Determine the elastic-plastic stress, 022 , and strain, 0 22 , using the Neuber [14] rule (or other methods e.g. ESED by Molski and Glinka [22], finite element analysis). 3. Begin the creep analysis by calculating the increment of creep strain, 22Δ n c , for a given time increment Δtn. The selected creep hardening rule has to be followed.  22 22Δ Δ ;nc cnt t    (9) 4. Determine the decrement of stress, 22Δ n t , from Eq. (10), due to the previously determined increment of creep strain, 22Δ nc : P. Gallo et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 41 (2017) 456-463; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.41.57 460 1 1 0 22 22 22 22 22 0 22 22 ( ) Δ Δ Δ 2 n n n n n n cf t cf pt t cp K C E               (10) 5. For a given time increment Δtn, determine from Eq. (11) the increment of the total strain at the notch tip, 22Δ nt : 22 22 22 Δ Δ Δ n n n t t c E     (11) 6. Repeat steps from 3 to 5 over the required time period. RESULTS he proposed new method has been applied to a hypothetical plate weakened by lateral symmetric V-notches, under Mode I loading; see Fig 1b. The notch tip radius ρ and the opening angle 2α have been varied, while for the notch depth a, a constant value equal to 10 mm has been assumed. Three values of the opening angle 2α have been considered: 60°, 120° and 135°. The notch tip radius assumes for every opening angle three values: 0.5, 1 and 6 mm. The plate has a constant height, H, equal to 192 mm and a width, W, equal to 100 mm. The numerical results have been obtained thanks to the implementation of the new developed method and its equations in MATLAB®. In the same time, a 2D finite element analysis has been carried out through ANSYS. The Solid 8 node 183 element has been employed and plane stress condition is assumed. The material elastic (E, ν, σys) and Norton Creep power law (n, B) properties are reported in Tab. 1. For the sake of brevity, only few examples are reported in Fig. 2 (a-b). All the other cases present the same trend of Fig. 2. The theoretical results are in good agreement with the numerical FE values. All the stresses and strains as a function of time have been predicted with acceptable errors. In detail, maximum discrepancy in modulus of 20% has been found for both quantities, with a medium error about 10%. Considering the examples of the strain prediction depicted in Fig. 2(b), the discrepancy within numerical and predicted solution of the strain is most likely due to different approximations introduced in the theoretical formulation, such as the assumption of the elastic-perfectly plastic behavior of the material inside the plastic zone and the employment of the Irwin’s method to estimate the plastic radius. E (MPa) ν σys (MPa) n B (MPa-n/h) 191000 0.3 275.8 5 1.8 Table 1: Mechanical properties. (a) (b) 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 0 4 8 12 16 20 ε θ θ cr ee p σ θθ [M P a] t [h] FEM Theoretical solution 2α = 120° ρ = 0.5 mm a = 10 mm Cp = 1.57 KΩ = 103 Stress Strain 0.000 0.010 0.020 0.030 0.040 0 4 8 12 16 20 ε θ θ cr ee p t [h] FEM Theoretical solution 2α = 135° a = 10 mm Cp = 1.41 KΩ = 10.10 ρ = 0.5 mm ρ = 1 mm ρ = 6 mm Figure 2: Comparison between theoretical and FEM evolution of stress and strain as a function of time for V-notch geometry: (a) ρ = 0.5 mm, 2α = 120°; (b) 2α = 135° and ρ = 0.5, 1, 6 mm. T P. Gallo et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 41 (2017) 456-463; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.41.57 461 CONCLUSIONS he present paper proposed an extension of the method presented by Nuñez and Glinka [13] for blunt U-notches, to a blunt V-notches. The key to getting the extension to blunt V-notches is the substitution of the Creager and Paris [15] equations with the more general Lazzarin and Tovo [16] equations that allow an unified approach to the evaluation of linear elastic stress fields in the neighbourhood of crack and notches. The main advantage of the new formulation is that it permits a fast evaluation of the stresses and strains at notches under creep conditions, without the use of complex and time-consuming FE non-linear analyses. It is presented for blunt V-notches but also valid for U- notches. Moreover, the localized creep formulation can be easily derived neglecting the contribution of the far field. The results have shown a good agreement between numerical and theoretical results. Thanks to the extension to blunt V- notches, all geometries can be easily treated with the aim of the numerical method developed. Although Lazzarin and Tovo equations are valid also in case of sharp V-notches (i.e. for a notch radius that tends to be zero), the values of stress and strain are no longer suitable as characteristic parameters governing failure. As well known, in fact, these local approaches failed when the stress fields tends toward infinity (such as for crack or sharp notches), and the development of alternative solutions becomes crucial. The evaluation of stress and strain at some points ahead of the notch tip may be a possible way to address the problem. Different methods are available in literature dealing with this matter, for example based on energy local approaches such as Strain Energy Density [23-25]. This parameter could be useful also to characterize creeping conditions if combined with the present model, giving the possibility to include in the analysis also cracks and sharp V-notches. However, some points remain open: -order singularity variation with time: when considering creeping conditions, the singularity order does not assume a constant value, but varies with time. -evolution against time from elastic to elastic-plastic or fully plastic state of the system, especially when dealing with high temperature. Because of the promising results showed in the preliminary analyses, the authors still devoting effort to overcome the problems cited previously and to combine successfully the proposed model for the prediction of stresses and strain with the SED averaged over a control volume, in order to give a useful and more general tool when dealing with notches subjected to creep, regardless of the specimen geometries. REFERENCES [1] Cui, L., Wang, P., Crack initiation behavior of notched specimens on heat resistant steel under service type loading at high temperature, Frattura ed Integrita Strutturale, 10(38) (2016) 26-35. [2] Gallo, P., Berto, F., High temperature fatigue tests and crack growth in 40CrMoV13.9 notched components, Frattura ed Integrita Strutturale, 9(34) (2015) 180-189. [3] Kotousov, A., Berto, F., Lazzarin, P., Pegorin, F., Three dimensional finite element mixed fracture mode under anti- plane loading of a crack, Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech., 62(1) (2012) 26-33. [4] Radaj, D., Berto, F., Lazzarin, P., Local fatigue strength parameters for welded joints based on strain energy density with inclusion of small-size notches, Eng. Fract. Mech., 76(8) (2009) 1109-1130. [5] Berto, F., Campagnolo, A., Gallo, P., Brittle Failure of Graphite Weakened by V-Notches: A Review of Some Recent Results Under Different Loading Modes, Strength Mater., 47 (2015) 488–506. [6] He, Z., Kotousov, A., Berto, F., Effect of vertex singularities on stress intensities near plate free surfaces, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 38 (2015) 860–869. [7] Sih, G.C., Redemption of the formalism of segmented linearity: multiscaling of non-equilibrium and non- homogeneity applied to fatigue crack growth, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 38 (2015) 621–628. [8] Ayatollahi, M.R., Razavi, S.M.J., Rashidi Moghadam, M., Berto, F., Mode I fracture analysis of Polymethylmetacrylate using modified energy—based models, Phys. Mesomech. 18(5) (2015) 53-62. [9] Ayatollahi, M.R., Rashidi Moghaddam, M., Razavi, S.M.J., Berto, F., Geometry effects on fracture trajectory of PMMA samples under pure mode-I loading, Eng. Fract. Mech., 163 (2016) 449–461. [10] Ayatollahi, M.R., Razavi, S.M.J., Sommitsch, C., Moser, C., Fatigue life extension by crack repair using double stop- hole technique, Mater. Sci. Forum, 879 (2017) 3-8. [11] Razavi, S.M.J., Ayatollahi, M.R., Sommitsch, C., Moser, C., Retardation of fatigue crack growth in high strength steel S690 using a modified stop-hole technique, Eng. Fract. Mech., 169 (2017) 226–237. T P. Gallo et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 41 (2017) 456-463; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.41.57 462 [12] Rashidi Moghadam, M., Ayatollahi, M.R., Razavi, S.M.J., Berto, F., Mode II Brittle Fracture Assessment Using an Energy Based Criterion, Phys. Mesomech., (in press). [13] Nuñez, J., Glinka, G., Analysis of non-localized creep induced strains and stresses in notches, Eng. Fract. Mech. 71 (2004) 1791–1803. [14] Neuber, H., Theory of Stress Concentration for Shear-Strained Prismatical Bodies With Arbitrary Nonlinear Stress- Strain Law, J. Appl. Mech., 28 (1961) 544-550. [15] Creager, M., Paris, P., Elastic field equations for blunt cracks with reference to stress corrosion cracking, Int. J. Fract. Mech., 3 (1967) 247–252. [16] Lazzarin, P., Tovo, R., A unified approach to the evaluation of linear elastic stress fields in the neighborhood of cracks and notches, Int. J. Fract., 78 (1996) 3–19. [17] Moftakhar, A.A., Glinka, G., Scarth, D., Kawa, D., Multiaxial stress-strain creep analysis for notches. In: ASTM Special Technical Publication. ASTM (1994) 230–243. [18] Gallo, P., Berto, F., Glinka, G., Generalized approach to estimation of strains and stresses at blunt V-notches under non-localized creep, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 39 (2016) 292–306. [19] Neuber, H., 1958. Theory of Notch Stresses. Springer-VErlag, Berlin. [20] Glinka, G., Calculation of inelastic notch-tip strain-stress histories under cyclic loading, Eng. Fract. Mech., 22 (1985) 839–854. [21] Von Mises, R., Mechanik der festen Körper im plastisch- deformablen Zustand, J. Math. Phys., 1 (1913) 582–592. [22] Molski, K., Glinka, G., A method of elastic-plastic stress and strain calculation at a notch root, Mater. Sci. Eng., 50 (1981) 93–100. [23] Berto, F., Gallo, P., Extension of linear elastic strain energy density approach to high temperature fatigue and a synthesis of Cu-Be alloy experimental tests, Eng. Solid Mech. 3 (2015) 111–116. [24] Gallo, P., Berto, F., High temperature fatigue tests and crack growth in 40CrMoV13.9 notched components, Frattura ed Integrita Strutturale, 9 (2015) 180–189. [25] Gallo, P., Berto, F., Advanced Materials for Applications at High Temperature: Fatigue Assessment by Means of Local Strain Energy Density, Adv. Eng. Mater., 18 (2015) 2010-2017. NOMENCLATURE a notch depth Cp plastic zone correction factor d distance from the coordinate system origin at which the far field contribution is evaluated E Young’s modulus KΩ strain energy concentration factor Kt stress concentration factor KI mode I stress intensity factor r radial coordinate r0 distance within notch tip and coordinate system origin rp plastic zone radius t time 2α notch opening angle 22 nc creep strain increment at the notch tip at step n 22 fnc incremental far field creep strain 22 nt increment of total strain Δrp plastic zone increment 22 nt stress decrement at the notch tip at step n Δtn time increment εp0 plastic strain at time t = 0 22 fc creep strain at the far field 22 nc creep strain at the notch tip 22 t time dependent notch tip strain P. Gallo et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 41 (2017) 456-463; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.41.57 463 0 ij actual elastic-plastic strain e ij hypothetical strain components obtained from linear elastic analysis θ angular coordinate λ1 mode I eigenvalue μ1 mode I second order eigenvalue ρ notch tip radius σmax maximum stress at the notch tip σnom applied nominal stress 22 f far field stress 0 22 f far field stress, t = 0 22 t time dependent notch tip stress 0 ij actual elastic-plastic stress e ij hypothetical stress components obtained from the linear elastic analysis χ1 mode I associated constant << /ASCII85EncodePages false /AllowTransparency false /AutoPositionEPSFiles true /AutoRotatePages /None /Binding /Left /CalGrayProfile (Dot Gain 20%) /CalRGBProfile (sRGB IEC61966-2.1) /CalCMYKProfile (U.S. Web Coated \050SWOP\051 v2) /sRGBProfile (sRGB IEC61966-2.1) /CannotEmbedFontPolicy /Error /CompatibilityLevel 1.4 /CompressObjects /Tags /CompressPages true /ConvertImagesToIndexed true /PassThroughJPEGImages true /CreateJobTicket false /DefaultRenderingIntent /Default /DetectBlends true /DetectCurves 0.0000 /ColorConversionStrategy /CMYK /DoThumbnails false /EmbedAllFonts true /EmbedOpenType false /ParseICCProfilesInComments true /EmbedJobOptions true /DSCReportingLevel 0 /EmitDSCWarnings false /EndPage -1 /ImageMemory 1048576 /LockDistillerParams false /MaxSubsetPct 100 /Optimize true /OPM 1 /ParseDSCComments true /ParseDSCCommentsForDocInfo true /PreserveCopyPage true /PreserveDICMYKValues true /PreserveEPSInfo true /PreserveFlatness true /PreserveHalftoneInfo false /PreserveOPIComments true /PreserveOverprintSettings true /StartPage 1 /SubsetFonts true /TransferFunctionInfo /Apply /UCRandBGInfo /Preserve /UsePrologue false /ColorSettingsFile () /AlwaysEmbed [ true ] /NeverEmbed [ true ] /AntiAliasColorImages false /CropColorImages true /ColorImageMinResolution 300 /ColorImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleColorImages true /ColorImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /ColorImageResolution 300 /ColorImageDepth -1 /ColorImageMinDownsampleDepth 1 /ColorImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeColorImages true /ColorImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterColorImages true /ColorImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /ColorACSImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /ColorImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /JPEG2000ColorImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /AntiAliasGrayImages false /CropGrayImages true /GrayImageMinResolution 300 /GrayImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleGrayImages true /GrayImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /GrayImageResolution 300 /GrayImageDepth -1 /GrayImageMinDownsampleDepth 2 /GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeGrayImages true /GrayImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterGrayImages true /GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /GrayACSImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /GrayImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /JPEG2000GrayImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /AntiAliasMonoImages false /CropMonoImages true /MonoImageMinResolution 1200 /MonoImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleMonoImages true /MonoImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /MonoImageResolution 1200 /MonoImageDepth -1 /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeMonoImages true /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode /MonoImageDict << /K -1 >> /AllowPSXObjects false /CheckCompliance [ /None ] /PDFX1aCheck false /PDFX3Check false /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false /PDFXNoTrimBoxError true /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox true /PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfile () /PDFXOutputConditionIdentifier () /PDFXOutputCondition () /PDFXRegistryName () /PDFXTrapped /False /CreateJDFFile false /Description << /ARA /BGR /CHS /CHT /CZE /DAN /DEU /ESP /ETI /FRA /GRE /HEB /HRV (Za stvaranje Adobe PDF dokumenata najpogodnijih za visokokvalitetni ispis prije tiskanja koristite ove postavke. Stvoreni PDF dokumenti mogu se otvoriti Acrobat i Adobe Reader 5.0 i kasnijim verzijama.) /HUN /ITA /JPN /KOR /LTH /LVI /NLD (Gebruik deze instellingen om Adobe PDF-documenten te maken die zijn geoptimaliseerd voor prepress-afdrukken van hoge kwaliteit. De gemaakte PDF-documenten kunnen worden geopend met Acrobat en Adobe Reader 5.0 en hoger.) /NOR /POL /PTB /RUM /RUS /SKY /SLV /SUO /SVE /TUR /UKR /ENU (Use these settings to create Adobe PDF documents best suited for high-quality prepress printing. Created PDF documents can be opened with Acrobat and Adobe Reader 5.0 and later.) >> /Namespace [ (Adobe) (Common) (1.0) ] /OtherNamespaces [ << /AsReaderSpreads false /CropImagesToFrames true /ErrorControl /WarnAndContinue /FlattenerIgnoreSpreadOverrides false /IncludeGuidesGrids false /IncludeNonPrinting false /IncludeSlug false /Namespace [ (Adobe) (InDesign) (4.0) ] /OmitPlacedBitmaps false /OmitPlacedEPS false /OmitPlacedPDF false /SimulateOverprint /Legacy >> << /AddBleedMarks false /AddColorBars false /AddCropMarks false /AddPageInfo false /AddRegMarks false /ConvertColors /ConvertToCMYK /DestinationProfileName () /DestinationProfileSelector /DocumentCMYK /Downsample16BitImages true /FlattenerPreset << /PresetSelector /MediumResolution >> /FormElements false /GenerateStructure false /IncludeBookmarks false /IncludeHyperlinks false /IncludeInteractive false /IncludeLayers false /IncludeProfiles false /MultimediaHandling /UseObjectSettings /Namespace [ (Adobe) (CreativeSuite) (2.0) ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfileSelector /DocumentCMYK /PreserveEditing true /UntaggedCMYKHandling /LeaveUntagged /UntaggedRGBHandling /UseDocumentProfile /UseDocumentBleed false >> ] >> setdistillerparams << /HWResolution [2400 2400] /PageSize [612.000 792.000] >> setpagedevice