Microsoft Word - numero_44_art_2 B. Rahmanzadeh et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 44 (2018) 16-24; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.44.02 16 Experimental study of the effect of water-cement ratio on compressive strength, abrasion resistance, porosity and permeability of Nano silica concrete Belal Rahmanzadeh, Kamal Rahmani*, Saber Piroti Department of Civil Engineering, Mahabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mahabad, Iran. belalrahmanzade@yahoo.com, mohandes_so@yahoo.com, s.piroty@iau-mahabad.ac.ir ABSTRACT. The effect of water-cement ratio on abrasion resistance, porosity and hydraulic conductivity coefficient of Nano silica concrete has been studied in this research (paper). The compressive strength of concrete in a particular temperature is related to two factors: water-cement ratio and density. Decreasing the water-cement ratio from 0.46 to 0.30 improves the abrasion resistance of Nano silica concrete by 42%, the hydraulic conductivity coefficient of concrete decreases from 28.5⤬10-15 to 1.7⤬10-15 m/s and the porosity of concrete decreases to 13.1%. The abrasion depth increases gradually by increasing the water-cement ratio from 0.30 to 0.46. KEYWORDS. Abrasion resistance; Compressive strength; Concrete; Permeability; Water-Cement Ratio. Citation: Rahmanzadeh, B., Rahmani, K., Piroti, N., Experimental study of the effect of water-cement ratio on compressive strength, abrasion resistance, porosity and permeability of Nano silica concrete, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 44 (2018) 16-24. Received: 17.09.2017 Accepted: 10.01.2018 Published: 01.04.2018 Copyright: © 2018 This is an open access article under the terms of the CC-BY 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. INTRODUCTION oncrete dams are strategic structures due to their fundamental role at economical system of a country. Therefore, the concrete used for these important structures should have a suitable durability and performance (Neville [1]; Yoon et al., [2]). The effect of Nano silica elements as fillers in pozzolanic concrete has been evaluated in current decade (Shih et al., [3]; Senff et al., [4]). Nano silica cement mixture has provided an attractive research field for the creation of high strength hydraulic structures (Nazari and Riahi [5]; Rahmani and Ramzanianpour [6]). Using Nano structure materials like Nano silica and an optimal water-cement ratio improved the physical characteristics of new cement mixtures (Li [7]; Wen et al., [8]). The effect of water-cement ratio on abrasion resistance, porosity and permeability of Nano silica used in making durable concrete, were considered as an effective factor on strength and performance of these concrete structures (Felekoğlu et al., [9]; Bilodeau & Malhotra [10]). Considering the high and rather modern concrete technology, advanced researches and serious studies on special concrete specimens of hydraulic structures (such as concrete dams) seem to be necessary (Givi et al., [11]; Tavakoli & Soroushian, [12]). The water-cement ratio of concrete has been considered constant in traditional concrete (mixtures) to gain high strength and durability (Shih et al., [3]; Li [7]; Collepardi et al., [13]; Nazari et al., [14]; Aiu & Huang [15]; Nazari & Riahi C B. Rahmanzadeh et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 44 (2018) 16-24; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.44.02 17 [16]; Gaitero et al., [17]). However, the water-cement ratio should be considered according to microcrystalline structure of cement used in concrete specimens (Behnood and Ziari [18]; Wittmann et al., [19]; Willer Eda et al., [20]). The amount of water and cement in the mixture are related to the size of aggregates (sands) and Nano silica structure (Shih et al., [3]; Senff et al., [4]; Popovics [21]; Li [7]; Willer Eda et al., [20]). In this research, different amounts of water-cement ratio were considered to investigate the compressive strength and abrasion resistance of concrete specimens. High abrasion resistance and low permeability and porosity are the main advantages of using Nano silica in concrete. EXPERIMENTAL TESTS he concrete specimens contained 5% Nano silica. The water-cement ratio was considered 0.30, 0.34, 0.38, 0.42 and 0.46. Other characteristics of the mixture were considered constant in all concrete specimens. The following investigations were done on concrete specimens. Wet Sand Blast technique was used to detect the concrete strength. The abrasion resistance of 28 days 15⤬15⤬15 cm cubic specimens was determined. Penetration method was used to define the hydraulic conductivity coefficient of 28 days 10⤬10 cm cylindrical specimens. In addition, the compressive strength and hydraulic conductivity coefficient were conducted by concrete breaker jack machine and penetration depth method respectively. The designation and composition of each batch have been presented in Tab. 1. Sample Number water-cement ratio Nano silica (%) Age (Days) 1 0.30 5 7 2 0.34 5 7 3 0.38 5 7 4 0.42 5 7 5 0.46 5 7 6 0.30 5 28 7 0.34 5 28 8 0.38 5 28 9 0.42 5 28 10 0.46 5 28 11 0.30 5 90 12 0.34 5 90 13 0.38 5 90 14 0.42 5 90 15 0.46 5 90 Table 1: The properties of the studied samples in the present research. NANO SILICA CONCRETE MIXTURE he following items were considered in preparation of Nano silica concrete specimens:  The slump of specimens was 60 to 100 mm.  The aggregates were non-ballast materials.  The distinguishable size of aggregates was mostly 10 mm.  The cement was Portland Type I.  The constant amount of Nano silica (added to the mixture of cement and aggregates) was 5% in all specimens.  28 days compressive strength of specimens was determined 40 MPa.  The water-cement ratio was variable from 0.30 to 0.46. T T B. Rahmanzadeh et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 44 (2018) 16-24; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.44.02 18  In order to access the desired workability and high performance of concrete specimens, the GELENIUM-110P was used as a superplasticizer. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Abrasion Resistance Test brasion strength test on cube samples 150 × 150 × 150 mm at 28 days of age was performed using Water Sand Blast method based on ASTM-C778 standard (Fig. 1). The extracted results of abrasion resistance tests are summarized in Tab. 2. Fig. 2 shows the abrasion depth in terms of water-cement ratio. Increasing the water-cement ratio leads to increase the abrasion depth. By increasing the water-cement ratio from 0.3 to 0.46, the abrasion depth increases gradually. The more the water-cement ratio is, the less abrasion resistance of mortar phase occurred. However, the abrasion resistance of concrete inclines to the abrasion resistance of aggregates. By gradual increase of water-cement ratio to 0.46, the abrasion depth may reach to the maximum value. It seems that the maximum value of abrasion resistance is related to 0.46 water-cement ratio. Figure 1: Abrasion strength test machine W/C 0.3 0.34 0.38 0.42 0.46 Abrasion resistance (mm) 0.814 0.954 1.105 1.198 1.227 Table 2: Abrasion depth tests for specimens with variable water-cement ratio. A B. Rahmanzadeh et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 44 (2018) 16-24; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.44.02 19 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 A br as io n d ep th ( m m ) W/C Figure 2: Abrasion depth in terms of water-cement ratio Fig. 3 shows that the abrasion depth reverse has a reversed relationship with the water-cement ratio. Considering the reverse relationship of abrasion resistance and abrasion depth, data showed that increasing the water-cement ratio decreases the abrasion resistance reverse. The abrasion resistance and average permeability depth data for different values of water-cement ratio are shown in Tab. 3. To enhance the abrasion resistance of concrete, it is necessary to enhance the mortar phase and the aggregate phase with one another. Mortar phase can be enhanced by reduction of water-cement ratio, using Nano silica and suitable curing. Aggregate phase can also be enhanced by abrasion-resistant aggregates like granite. The condition of performing abrasion test can be more approximated to the real condition of concrete abrasion against water. To do this the silica sand should be shot under water and in less than 90 degree angle. 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 A b ra si on d ep th r ev er se ( cm -1 ) W/C Figure 3: Abrasion depth reverse in terms of water-cement ratio W/C Abrasive resistance improvement Average Permeability Depth (mm) 0.3 38.24% 0.905 0.34 26.17% 1.305 0.38 12.94% 1.845 0.42 4.56% 2.215 0.46 3.17% 3.225 Table 3: Abrasion resistance improvement and average permeability depth for various values of water-cement ratio. B. Rahmanzadeh et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 44 (2018) 16-24; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.44.02 20 HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY COEFFICIENT he hydraulic conductivity of the concrete was tested using by Penetration Method according to ASTM-C1920-5 (Eq. 1). Concrete hydraulic conductivity coefficient =  pH V Th 2 / 2 (1) where Hp: Water penetration depth [m], T: Influence time [s], h: Pressure height [m], V: Concrete porosity. Fig. 4 illustrates the machine used for performing the hydraulic conductivity of the concrete tests. Fig. 5 shows the water permeability depth in terms of various amounts of water-cement ratio. The mentioned data showed that increasing the water-cement ratio, increases water permeability depth. Figure 4: Hydraulic conductivity of the concrete test machine 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 W at er p er m ea bi li ty d ep th ( m m ) W/C Figure 5: Water permeability depth in terms of different values of water-cement ratio It is noteworthy that the following formula is used for calculating the permeability coefficient of concrete.    p pK h t h 2 / 2 (2) where: Kp is permeability coefficient of concrete [m/s]; hp is water permeability depth [m]; t is water permeability time [s]; h is height arising from pressure [m] and v is porosity of concrete. The following equation is used for porosity calculation: T B. Rahmanzadeh et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 44 (2018) 16-24; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.44.02 21           w c w g/ 100 36.15 / 100 / (3) where: w/c is water-cement ratio; ⍺ is degree of cement hydration; w is gravity of water of concrete [kg/m3] and g is specific weight of cement [g/cm3]. Wet Sand Blast can significantly simulate the erosion in concrete, so it is a suitable technique to evaluate the water resistance of concrete. Penetration resistance test on concrete is a tool for defining comparative strengths of concrete in similar or dissimilar structures. Due to the nature of equipment, absolute values of strength cannot be obtained. Penetration Method is a suitable approach for evaluating the permeability of concrete, because this method is desired for the ratio of water depth in concrete. For the concrete cylinder height, this fact is achieved in Nano silica concretes. Fig. 6 shows the hydraulic conductivity coefficient of concrete in terms of different values of water-cement ratio. The data indicated that increasing the water-cement ratio, increases hydraulic conductivity coefficient of concrete. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 H yd ra ul ic c on du ct iv ity c oe ff ic ie nt (m /s ) W/C × 10-14 Figure 6: Hydraulic conductivity coefficient of concrete in terms of water-cement ratio Fig. 7 shows the variation curve of porosity in terms of different amounts of water-cement ratio. The porosity of concrete increases by increasing of water-cement ratio. 13 16 19 22 25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 P o ro si ty o f co n cr et e p er ce n t W/C Figure 7: Variation of porosity in terms of different amounts of water-cement ratio B. Rahmanzadeh et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 44 (2018) 16-24; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.44.02 22 Tab. 4 shows the values of hydraulic conductivity coefficient and porosity of concrete in terms of water-cement ratio. The values of Tab. 5 are required for obtaining the hydraulic conductivity coefficient and porosity of Nano silica concrete. W/C Hydraulic Conductivity Coefficient of Cement (m/s) Porosity of Concrete 0.3 1.7⤬10-15 13.1% 0.34 3.84⤬10-15 15.2% 0.38 8.25⤬10-15 19.37% 0.42 13.95⤬10-15 21.56% 0.46 28.5⤬10-15 25% Table 4: Hydraulic conductivity coefficient and porosity of concrete in terms of water-cement ratio. Permeability time (s) Height Arising from Water Pressure (m) Cement Specific Weight (g/cm) Cement Degree of Hydration (%) 259200 82 3.15 80 Table 5: Required values for calculating hydraulic conductivity coefficient and porosity of concrete. COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH ompressive strength tests on cube samples of 150 × 150 × 150 mm at the age of 7, 28 and 91 days have been done with a pressure test device with a capacity of 2000 kN (TEKNO test-Italy) at a speed of 2.5 kN/s accordance to ACI-C330 standard. The value of Compressive strength of samples can be evaluated using Eq. 5 as following as: Compressive Strength =  P A/ 1000 (4) Fig. 8 is the illustration of compressive strength test machine. Figure 8: Compressive strength test machine C B. Rahmanzadeh et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 44 (2018) 16-24; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.44.02 23 Fig. 9 shows the compressive strength improvements due to water-cement ratio reduction in Nano silica concrete with error bars. The compressive strength and abrasion resistance of concrete will increase by means of water-cement ratio reduction. As it can be seen in Fig. 9, by reducing the ratio of water to cement from 0.46 to 0.3, the compressive strength of samples at the age of 7, 28 and 90 days of concrete is improved by 27.92, 33.04 and 31.88% respectively. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 0.3 0.34 0.42 0.46 C o m pr es si ve s tr en g th i m pr o vm en t p er ce n ts w/c 7 days 28 days 90 days Figure 9: Compressive strength improvement after 7, 28 and 90 days CONCLUSION ue to the rapid growth of scientific and practical researches, the science and technology of nanotechnology of all industries, very little attention has been paid to the applications of this phenomenon in the building industry and construction. Recently, however, with regard to nano reinforcement in construction materials, a new wave has taken place with the ever-accelerating in the construction industry. Properties, behavior and performance of concrete depend on the nano structure of the underlying concrete, which provides adhesion, cohesion and integrity. Therefore, the construction of concrete and cement paste structures at the nanoscale is very important for the development of new building materials and their applications. The main obtained results in the present article showed that the abrasion resistance of Nano silica concrete increased by decreasing of water-cement ratio. By reducing the water-cement ratio from 0.46 to 0.30 at Nano silica concrete specimens, the abrasion resistance of concrete improved by 42%. The abrasion resistance of mortar phase decreased by increasing of water-cement ratio and the abrasion resistance of concrete approaches the abrasion resistance of aggregates. In addition, the hydraulic conductivity coefficient and the porosity of Nano silica concrete decreased by decreasing of water-cement ratio from 0.46 to 0.30. Therefore, the hydraulic conductivity coefficient of concrete decreased from 28.5⤬10-15 to 1.7⤬10-15, the porosity of concrete decreased to 13.1% and the abrasion depth reduced gradually. This can be related to the biphasic (mortar and aggregates) nature of concrete in abrasion. REFERENCES [1] Neville, A. (2001). Consideration of durability of concrete structures: Past, present, and future, Materials and structures, 34, pp. 114-118. [2] Yoon, Y.-S., Won, J.-P., Woo, S.-K. and Song, Y.-C. (2002). Enhanced durability performance of fly ash concrete for concrete-faced rockfill dam application, Cement and Concrete Research, 32, pp.23-30. [3] Shih, J.-Y., Chang, T.-P. and Hsiao, T.-C. (2006). Effect of nanosilica on characterization of Portland cement composite, Materials Science and Engineering: A, 424, pp. 266-274. D B. Rahmanzadeh et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 44 (2018) 16-24; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.44.02 24 [4] Senff, L., Labrincha, J.A., Ferreira, V.M., Hotza, D. and Repette, W.L. (2009). Effect of nano-silica on rheology and fresh properties of cement pastes and mortars, Construction and Building Materials, 23, pp. 2487-2491. [5] Nazari, A. and Riahi, S. (2011). The effects of SiO2 nanoparticles on physical and mechanical properties of high strength compacting concrete, Composites Part B: Engineering, 42, pp. 570-578. [6] [6] Rahmani, H. and Ramzanianpour, A. (2008). Effect of silica fume and natural pozzolanas on sulfuric acid resistance of dense concretes, Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing), 9, pp. 303-319. [7] Li, G. (2004). Properties of high-volume fly ash concrete incorporating nano-SiO2, Cement and Concrete research, 34, pp. 1043-1049. [8] Wen, L., Deng, Y.-h., Mei, Z., Ling, X. and Qian, F. (2006). Mechanical properties of nano SiO2 filled gypsum particleboard, Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 16, pp. s361-s364. [9] Felekoğlu, B., Türkel, S. and Baradan, B. (2007). Effect of water/cement ratio on the fresh and hardened properties of self-compacting concrete, Building and Environment, 42, pp. 1795-1802. [10] Bilodeau, A. and Malhotra, V. (1992). Concrete incorporating high volumes of ASTM class F fly ashes: mechanical properties and resistance to deicing salt scaling and to chloride-ion penetration, ACI Special Publication SP-132, American Concrete Institute, Detroit, pp. 319-349. [11] Givi, A.N., Rashid, S.A., Aziz, F.N.A. and Salleh, M.A.M. (2010). Experimental investigation of the size effects of SiO2 nano-particles on the mechanical properties of binary blended concrete, Composites Part B: Engineering, 41, pp. 673-677. [12] Tavakoli, M. and Soroushian, P. (1996). Strengths of recycled aggregate concrete made using field-demolished concrete as aggregate, Materials Journal, 93, pp. 178-181. [13] Collepardi, M., Collepardi, S., Skarp, U. and Troli, R. (2004). Optimization of silica fume, fly ash and amorphous nano-silica in superplasticized high-performance concretes, Proceedings of 8th CANMET/ACI International Conference on Fly Ash, Silica Fume, Slag and Natural Pozzolans in Concrete, SP-221, Las Vegas, USA, pp. 495-506. [14] Nazari, A., Riahi, S., Riahi, S., Shamekhi, S.F. and Khademno, A. (2010). Influence of Al2O3 nanoparticles on the compressive strength and workability of blended concrete, Journal of American Science, 6, pp. 6-9. [15] Aiu, M. and Huang, C. (2006). The chemistry and physics of nano-cement, Loyola Marymount University, NSF-REU University of Delaware. [16] Nazari, A. and Riahi, S. (2011). The effects of SiO2 nanoparticles on physical and mechanical properties of high strength compacting concrete. Composites Part B: Engineering, 42, pp. 570-578. [17] Gaitero, J., Sáez de Ibarra, Y., Erkizia, E. and Campillo, I. (2006), Silica nanoparticle addition to control the calcium‐leaching in cement‐based materials, Physica status solidi (a), 203, pp. 1313-1318. [18] Behnood, A. and Ziari, H. (2008). Effects of silica fume addition and water to cement ratio on the properties of high- strength concrete after exposure to high temperatures, Cement and Concrete Composites, 30, pp. 106-112. [19] Wittmann, F., Roelfstra, P., Mihashi, H., Huang, Y.-Y., Zhang, X.-H. and Nomura, N. (1987). Influence of age of loading, water-cement ratio and rate of loading on fracture energy of concrete, Materials and structures, 20, pp. 103- 110. [20] Willer Eda, M., Lima Rde, L. and Giugliano, L.G. (2004). In vitro adhesion and invasion inhibition of Shigella dysenteriae, Shigella flexneri and Shigella sonnei clinical strains by human milk proteins, BMC Microbiol, 4, pp. 1-7. [21] Popovics, S. (1990). Analysis of concrete strength versus water-cement ratio relationship, Materials Journal, 87, pp. 517-529. << /ASCII85EncodePages false /AllowTransparency false /AutoPositionEPSFiles true /AutoRotatePages /None /Binding /Left /CalGrayProfile (Dot Gain 20%) /CalRGBProfile (sRGB IEC61966-2.1) /CalCMYKProfile (U.S. Web Coated \050SWOP\051 v2) /sRGBProfile (sRGB IEC61966-2.1) /CannotEmbedFontPolicy /Error /CompatibilityLevel 1.4 /CompressObjects /Tags /CompressPages true /ConvertImagesToIndexed true /PassThroughJPEGImages true /CreateJobTicket false /DefaultRenderingIntent /Default /DetectBlends true /DetectCurves 0.0000 /ColorConversionStrategy /CMYK /DoThumbnails false /EmbedAllFonts true /EmbedOpenType false /ParseICCProfilesInComments true /EmbedJobOptions true /DSCReportingLevel 0 /EmitDSCWarnings false /EndPage -1 /ImageMemory 1048576 /LockDistillerParams false /MaxSubsetPct 100 /Optimize true /OPM 1 /ParseDSCComments true /ParseDSCCommentsForDocInfo true /PreserveCopyPage true /PreserveDICMYKValues true /PreserveEPSInfo true /PreserveFlatness true /PreserveHalftoneInfo false /PreserveOPIComments true /PreserveOverprintSettings true /StartPage 1 /SubsetFonts true /TransferFunctionInfo /Apply /UCRandBGInfo /Preserve /UsePrologue false /ColorSettingsFile () /AlwaysEmbed [ true ] /NeverEmbed [ true ] /AntiAliasColorImages false /CropColorImages true /ColorImageMinResolution 300 /ColorImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleColorImages true /ColorImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /ColorImageResolution 300 /ColorImageDepth -1 /ColorImageMinDownsampleDepth 1 /ColorImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeColorImages true /ColorImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterColorImages true /ColorImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /ColorACSImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /ColorImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /JPEG2000ColorImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /AntiAliasGrayImages false /CropGrayImages true /GrayImageMinResolution 300 /GrayImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleGrayImages true /GrayImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /GrayImageResolution 300 /GrayImageDepth -1 /GrayImageMinDownsampleDepth 2 /GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeGrayImages true /GrayImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterGrayImages true /GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /GrayACSImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /GrayImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /JPEG2000GrayImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /AntiAliasMonoImages false /CropMonoImages true /MonoImageMinResolution 1200 /MonoImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleMonoImages true /MonoImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /MonoImageResolution 1200 /MonoImageDepth -1 /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeMonoImages true /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode /MonoImageDict << /K -1 >> /AllowPSXObjects false /CheckCompliance [ /None ] /PDFX1aCheck false /PDFX3Check false /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false /PDFXNoTrimBoxError true /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox true /PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfile () /PDFXOutputConditionIdentifier () /PDFXOutputCondition () /PDFXRegistryName () /PDFXTrapped /False /CreateJDFFile false /Description << /ARA /BGR /CHS /CHT /CZE /DAN /DEU /ESP /ETI /FRA /GRE /HEB /HRV (Za stvaranje Adobe PDF dokumenata najpogodnijih za visokokvalitetni ispis prije tiskanja koristite ove postavke. Stvoreni PDF dokumenti mogu se otvoriti Acrobat i Adobe Reader 5.0 i kasnijim verzijama.) /HUN /ITA /JPN /KOR /LTH /LVI /NLD (Gebruik deze instellingen om Adobe PDF-documenten te maken die zijn geoptimaliseerd voor prepress-afdrukken van hoge kwaliteit. De gemaakte PDF-documenten kunnen worden geopend met Acrobat en Adobe Reader 5.0 en hoger.) /NOR /POL /PTB /RUM /RUS /SKY /SLV /SUO /SVE /TUR /UKR /ENU (Use these settings to create Adobe PDF documents best suited for high-quality prepress printing. Created PDF documents can be opened with Acrobat and Adobe Reader 5.0 and later.) >> /Namespace [ (Adobe) (Common) (1.0) ] /OtherNamespaces [ << /AsReaderSpreads false /CropImagesToFrames true /ErrorControl /WarnAndContinue /FlattenerIgnoreSpreadOverrides false /IncludeGuidesGrids false /IncludeNonPrinting false /IncludeSlug false /Namespace [ (Adobe) (InDesign) (4.0) ] /OmitPlacedBitmaps false /OmitPlacedEPS false /OmitPlacedPDF false /SimulateOverprint /Legacy >> << /AddBleedMarks false /AddColorBars false /AddCropMarks false /AddPageInfo false /AddRegMarks false /ConvertColors /ConvertToCMYK /DestinationProfileName () /DestinationProfileSelector /DocumentCMYK /Downsample16BitImages true /FlattenerPreset << /PresetSelector /MediumResolution >> /FormElements false /GenerateStructure false /IncludeBookmarks false /IncludeHyperlinks false /IncludeInteractive false /IncludeLayers false /IncludeProfiles false /MultimediaHandling /UseObjectSettings /Namespace [ (Adobe) (CreativeSuite) (2.0) ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfileSelector /DocumentCMYK /PreserveEditing true /UntaggedCMYKHandling /LeaveUntagged /UntaggedRGBHandling /UseDocumentProfile /UseDocumentBleed false >> ] >> setdistillerparams << /HWResolution [2400 2400] /PageSize [612.000 792.000] >> setpagedevice