Microsoft Word - numero_50_art_43_2618 G.V. Seretis et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 50 (2019) 517-525; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.50.43 517 Focused on the research activities of the Greek Society of Experimental Mechanics of Materials Multi-parameter analysis of curing cycle for GNPs/glass fabric/ epoxy laminated nanocomposites Georgios V. Seretis National Technical University of Athens, School of Mechanical Engineering, 15780 Zografou, Athens, Greece ELVALHALCOR S.A., Copper Tubes Division (HALCOR), 32011, Oinofyta, Viotia, Greece gio.seretis@yahoo.com / gseretis@halcor.com, http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2824-3576 Aikaterini K. Polyzou, Dimitrios E. Manolakos, Christopher G. Provatidis National Technical University of Athens, School of Mechanical Engineering, 15780 Zografou, Athens, Greece k.polyzou@gmail.com; manolako@central.ntua.gr; cprovat@central.ntua.gr ABSTRACT. In this study, a multi-parameter analysis, using Taguchi method for design of experiments, has been conducted to investigate the optimum curing conditions for GNPs/E-glass fabric/epoxy laminated nanocomposites. The independent variables in the L25 Taguchi orthogonal array were heating rate, curing temperature and curing time, addressing five levels each. Tensile and 3-point bending tests were performed for each experiment number (run number) of the Taguchi L25. The analysis shown that the most significant para- meter for tensile strength is the time and for flexural strength is the tempera- ture. Also, it shown that the optimum performance was obtained for tempera- ture values greater than the glass transition temperature Tg. KEYWORDS. Polymer-matrix composites; Nanocomposites; Graphene nano- platelets; Curing; Mechanical testing; Multi-parameter analysis. Citation: Seretis, G.V., Polyzou, A.K., Mano- lakos, D.E., Provatidis, C.G., Multi-parameter analysis of curing cycle for GNPs/glass fabric/ epoxy laminated nanocomposites, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 50 (2019) 517-525. Received: 19.01.2019 Accepted: 22.05.2019 Published: 01.10.2019 Copyright: © 2019 This is an open access article under the terms of the CC-BY 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. INTRODUCTION omposites of epoxy matrix are of the most commonly used polymer matrix composites. For this kind of composites several different types of reinforcement have been tested. However, the reinforcing material is not the only signifi- cant factor for the final properties of the produced epoxy matrix composites. The curing process, due to the great number of properties it affects or controls [1,2], also plays a key role. For this reason, to accurately control the results of a curing process, it is necessary to understand the effects of all the affecting parameters. Therefore, the parameters which are known to affect a curing process, such as curing temperature and time, have been widely investigated [3-10]. For example, the relation between the curing temperature (Tcure) and the glass transition temperature (Tg) has been found to controls the applied curing mechanism and, therefore, it is of great importance [11]. Also, related research works have been focused on alternative curing processes [12-14], such as curing using microwaves. C http://www.gruppofrattura.it/VA/50/2618.mp4 G.V. Seretis et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 50 (2019) 517-525; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.50.43 518 Taguchi analysis is widely used in the research of composite materials. For example, it is used to investigate the influence of surface treatment on the composites’ performance [15] and the importance of V-ring indenter parameters [16], to deter- mine the optimum machining conditions leading to minimum surface roughness in drilling of GFRP composite [17], to de- velop multiphase hybrid epoxy matrix composites reinforced with glass-fiber and filled with rice husk particulates [18], etc. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Regression or Multiple Regression models regularly follow the Taguchi method to create an effective prediction model. The commonly used Multiple Regression models [16,17] are not always able to achieve high accuracy in prediction. Therefore, researchers started working on more accurate multiple regression models [19,20]. In this study, a multi-parameter analysis, using Taguchi method for design of experiments, has been conducted to investigate the optimum curing conditions for GNPs/E-glass fabric/epoxy laminated nanocomposites. The independent variables in the L25 Taguchi orthogonal array were heating rate, curing temperature and curing time, addressing five levels each. Tensile and 3-point bending tests were performed for each experiment number (run number) of the Taguchi L25. According to the analysis of variance, the significant parameter for tensile performance was the curing time and for flexural performance was the curing temperature, at a 95% confidence level. The Full Quadratic regression model was used to predict the tensile response of the nanocomposites, since the respective main effects plots were more linear or shown clear trends. On the other hand, for the flexural performance, where the respective main effects plots neither were linear nor shown clear trends, the Poisson regression model was used to achieve high accuracy in prediction. The R2 of the regression models used was greater than 90% for the prediction of both tensile and flexural values. EXPERIMENTAL PROTOCOL Materials he matrix material used for the nanocomposite specimens was the low-viscosity Araldite GY 783 epoxy resin together with the low-viscosity, phenol free, modified cycloaliphatic polyamine hardener. The glass transition temperature (Tg) was 100°C and the gel time for the specific matrix composition at 20°C and 65% relative humidity (RH), conditioning requirements which were obeyed during the preparation of the nanocomposites laminates, was 35 min. Woven E-glass fabric of 282 g/m2 density was used for matrix reinforcement, as presented in Fig.1. Table 1 presents the characteristics of the fabric used. The warp direction is the enhanced one, as can be seen in, and therefore it was the main weave direction. Thus, the laminae orientations in the stacking sequence of the composites will be based on the warp direction. Graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) by Alfa Aesar of surface area (S.A.) 500 m2/g were also used as filler material. Figure 1: The woven E-glass fabric used in positioning angle (layer orientation) 0º. Characteristics Warp Weft Fiber description Glass EC11 204 fiber Glass EC11 204 fiber Thread count (ends/cm) 8 6 Weight distribution (%) 57 43 Table 1: E-glass fabric’s characteristics. Preparation of E-glass fabric/epoxy laminated composites To prepare the GNPs-reinforced matrix, weighed amount of pre-dried graphene nanoplatelets were stirred gently into the epoxy resin using a laboratory mixer for mechanical stirring for a process time of 25 min at 200 rpm, to ensure homogeneity of the suspension [22]. Weighed amount of hardener was added into the GNPs reinforced epoxy resin mixture at the manu- T G.V. Seretis et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 50 (2019) 517-525; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.50.43 519 facturer recommended resin/hardener proportion, which was a 100:50 by weight ratio, and stirred gently using a laboratory mixer for mechanical stirring for a process time of 5 min at 200 rpm. Subsequently, the matrix mixture was coated and hand- rolled on E-glass fabrics in layer sequence under constant stirring [22-25]. For each hand lay-up procedure, four layers of E-glass fabric were employed in [0˚/45˚/-45˚/0˚]T sequence. The GNPs w.t. contents used for UD laminates reinforcement were 5%. The selection of the GNPs content was made based on literature on the content that provides the best perform- ance of the specific nanocomposites [22]. Before the first layer coating, the surface on which the specimens were produced was covered by release paste wax. The hand lay-up procedure applied is well-known and has been presented in explosive view mode in other published works [22,23]. To achieve a 40±1% by volume epoxy proportion in all specimens, both the fabric and the matrix mixture used for coating were weighed before each hand lay-up process and after solidification. Curing cycle All specimens left in ambient temperature for 6 hours before the curing conditions of the Taguchi design of experiments were applied. Therefore, the complete curing cycle applied is presented in Fig.2, where parameter a, T1 and h1 represent the heating rate [°C/min], the temperature of the first curing step [°C] and the duration of the first curing step [h], res- pectively. The selected values for each parameter under study (i.e. the design of experiment levels) can be found in Table 2. Figure 2: The curing cycle applied with the parameters of the Taguchi design of experiments noted. Control factor Level 1 2 3 4 5 A: Heating Rate [oC/min] 1 2 3 4 5 B: Temperature [oC] 50 80 100 120 140 C: Time [h] 2 4 6 8 10 Table 2: Design of Experiments (DOE) factors and their levels. The curing temperature (Tcure) can be either higher or lower of the glass transition temperature (Tg) [3-5,22-25]. When Tcure>Tg, the reaction proceeds rapidly at a rate driven by chemical kinetics. When Tcure=Tg, vitrification takes place (i.e., material solidifies). Finally, when Tcure> /ColorImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /JPEG2000ColorImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /AntiAliasGrayImages false /CropGrayImages true /GrayImageMinResolution 300 /GrayImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleGrayImages true /GrayImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /GrayImageResolution 300 /GrayImageDepth -1 /GrayImageMinDownsampleDepth 2 /GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeGrayImages true /GrayImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterGrayImages true /GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /GrayACSImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /GrayImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /JPEG2000GrayImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /AntiAliasMonoImages false /CropMonoImages true /MonoImageMinResolution 1200 /MonoImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleMonoImages true /MonoImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /MonoImageResolution 1200 /MonoImageDepth -1 /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeMonoImages true /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode /MonoImageDict << /K -1 >> /AllowPSXObjects false /CheckCompliance [ /None ] /PDFX1aCheck false /PDFX3Check false /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false /PDFXNoTrimBoxError true /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox true /PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfile () /PDFXOutputConditionIdentifier () /PDFXOutputCondition () /PDFXRegistryName () /PDFXTrapped /False /CreateJDFFile false /Description << /ARA /BGR /CHS /CHT /CZE /DAN /DEU /ESP /ETI /FRA /GRE /HEB /HRV (Za stvaranje Adobe PDF dokumenata najpogodnijih za visokokvalitetni ispis prije tiskanja koristite ove postavke. Stvoreni PDF dokumenti mogu se otvoriti Acrobat i Adobe Reader 5.0 i kasnijim verzijama.) /HUN /ITA /JPN /KOR /LTH /LVI /NLD (Gebruik deze instellingen om Adobe PDF-documenten te maken die zijn geoptimaliseerd voor prepress-afdrukken van hoge kwaliteit. De gemaakte PDF-documenten kunnen worden geopend met Acrobat en Adobe Reader 5.0 en hoger.) /NOR /POL /PTB /RUM /RUS /SKY /SLV /SUO /SVE /TUR /UKR /ENU (Use these settings to create Adobe PDF documents best suited for high-quality prepress printing. Created PDF documents can be opened with Acrobat and Adobe Reader 5.0 and later.) >> /Namespace [ (Adobe) (Common) (1.0) ] /OtherNamespaces [ << /AsReaderSpreads false /CropImagesToFrames true /ErrorControl /WarnAndContinue /FlattenerIgnoreSpreadOverrides false /IncludeGuidesGrids false /IncludeNonPrinting false /IncludeSlug false /Namespace [ (Adobe) (InDesign) (4.0) ] /OmitPlacedBitmaps false /OmitPlacedEPS false /OmitPlacedPDF false /SimulateOverprint /Legacy >> << /AddBleedMarks false /AddColorBars false /AddCropMarks false /AddPageInfo false /AddRegMarks false /ConvertColors /ConvertToCMYK /DestinationProfileName () /DestinationProfileSelector /DocumentCMYK /Downsample16BitImages true /FlattenerPreset << /PresetSelector /MediumResolution >> /FormElements false /GenerateStructure false /IncludeBookmarks false /IncludeHyperlinks false /IncludeInteractive false /IncludeLayers false /IncludeProfiles false /MultimediaHandling /UseObjectSettings /Namespace [ (Adobe) (CreativeSuite) (2.0) ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfileSelector /DocumentCMYK /PreserveEditing true /UntaggedCMYKHandling /LeaveUntagged /UntaggedRGBHandling /UseDocumentProfile /UseDocumentBleed false >> ] >> setdistillerparams << /HWResolution [2400 2400] /PageSize [612.000 792.000] >> setpagedevice