Microsoft Word - numero_53_art_33_2796 A. Desai et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 53 (2020) 426-433; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.53.33 426 Glass/epoxy fiber orientation effects on translaminar fracture toughness under Mixed mode(I/II) load using FPB specimen Abilash Desai Department of Mechanical Engineering, SDMCET, Dharwad, Karnataka, India abilashdesai@gmail.com C. M. Sharanaprabhu Department of Mechanical Engineering, PESITM, Shivamogga, Karnataka, India cmsharanaprabhu@rediffmail.com S. K. Kudari Department of Mechanical Engineering, CVR College of Engineering, Hyderabad, Telangana, India s.kudari@rediffmail.com ABSTRACT. To study glass/epoxy fiber orientation effects on translaminar fracture toughness under Mixed mode(I/II) load using asymmetric Four Point Bend specimen. Fracture toughness values for different fiber-oriented glass/epoxy laminates under Mixed modes are compared with unidirectional glass/epoxy laminates. Specimens were fabricated using hand layup technique with (0/45)° and (0/90)° fiber oriented glass fiber. The experimental study was conducted for 6 crack positions varying from s/d=0(Mode-II) to 1(Mode-1) with an increment of 0.2 for Four Point Bend specimen. The specimens were tested under universal testing machine to obtain peak loads and further evaluate fracture toughness. The experimental test results show fracture toughness can be increased by orienting the fiber in the laminate. Fracture toughness is highly dominating for (0/90)° fiber-oriented laminates compared to 0° and (0/45)° glass/epoxy laminates. KEYWORDS. Asymmetric Four Point Bend; Stress Intensity Factor; Mixed mode I/II. Citation: Desai, A., Sharanaprabhu, C.M. Kudari, S.K., Glass/epoxy fiber orientation effects on translaminar fracture toughness under Mixed mode(I/II) load using FPB specimen, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 53 (2020) 426-433. Received: 22.04.2020 Accepted: 25.05.2020 Published: 01.07.2020 Copyright: © 2020 This is an open access article under the terms of the CC-BY 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. INTRODUCTION racture mechanics role in providing engineers and researchers with vital informations for designing and prediction of crack initiation and orientation with its propagation path under Mixed-mode loading is desirable for life prediction of engineering materials [1,2]. Major failure modes revealed that laminated composite undergoes interlaminar, intralaminar and translaminar fracture. For translaminar fracture, very limited research has been carried out. F https://youtu.be/mMcNPzernfY A. Desai et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 53 (2020) 426-433; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.53.33 427 Hence for glass/epoxy polymer composites used in aerospace application comes under failure by Mixed mode loading under translaminar fracture. Hence, experimental investigation is necessary for glass/epoxy composites under Mixed- mode loading. He and Hutchinson [2] provided accurate results for the stress intensity factors for the asymmetric Four Point Bend (FPB) specimen with an edge crack. A basic solution for an infinitely long specimen loaded by a constant shear force and a linear moment distribution provides the reference on which the finite geometry solution is based. This note was prompted by a comparison of existing numerical solutions for the crack specimen known as the asymmetric Four Point Bend (FPB) specimen. The specimen has distinct advantages for Mixed mode testing, including the determination of Mixed mode fatigue crack thresholds [3]. Reeder presented an investigation for Mixed mode bending test which comprises both Mode-I and Mode-II loading simultaneously using a Mixed mode bending apparatus [4]. Kenane showed delamination fatigue-crack growth experiments have been carried out on unidirectional glass/epoxy laminates using different Mixed mode loadings [5]. Sham Prasad illustrated the interlaminar fracture toughness by Mixed mode using Mixed mode bending tests for polymer-matrix composites [6]. Rikards showed interlaminar fracture toughness for glass fiber reinforced composite was found by testing for Mode-I to Mixed mode then to Mode-II by using a compact tension shear (CTS) specimen and finding critical energy release rate [7]. Laffan showed translaminar fracture toughness measurement can be done in fiber reinforced polymers [8]. Swolfs [9] showed the importance of translaminar fracture toughness for penetration impact behavior of woven carbon/glass hybrid composites. Experimental work was carried out on unidirectional glass/epoxy laminates using FPB specimen and fracture toughness was calculated in our previous work [10]. Orientation of fiber in laminates is important parameter which will affect fracture toughness. Comparing different fiber-oriented laminates was done for Compact Tension Shear and Mixed mode Bending specimens by earlier researchers [11,12]. Thus, in the present investigation an effort is made to study translaminar fracture toughness for various fiber- oriented glass/epoxy laminates in a Four Point Bend specimen. Experimentation is done for (0/45)° and (0/90)° fiber oriented glass/epoxy laminates and is compared with 0° fiber oriented glass/epoxy laminates in terms of fracture toughness from earlier research[10]. EXPERIMENTATION Materials lass-epoxy reinforced polymers are type of laminated composites, which are becoming increasingly popular for various structural applications in the aerospace, automotive and other industrial sectors. The present investigation has been carried out with epoxy resin (Lapox L12) at a room temperature with a curing hardener (H6). All these polymer products were supplied by Atul Limited, Polymer Division (Gujarat, India). The unidirectional glass fiber of 220 gsm having thickness 0.25 mm was supplied from Marktech Composites, Bangalore, India. Fabrication of composite The aim of the test is to determine the fracture toughness of glass/epoxy composite material with different fiber orientation. To prepare the specimens by hand layup method, 36 layers of glass fiber having 0.25mm thickness with 320 mm length and 190 mm width were put together with epoxy and hardener to form a block with dimension of 320*190*9 mm for fracture test. Later specimen was cut with dimension of 130*18*9 mm. For (0/45)° laminate, alternate layers of 0° and 45° oriented fiber direction were arranged with same dimensions. Fig. 1 (a) shows laminate obtained in (0/45)° manner. In the same manner to achieve (0/90)° laminate, alternate layers of 0° and 90° oriented fiber direction were arranged with same dimensions. Fig. 1 (b) shows laminate obtained in (0/90)° manner. Fracture test Mixed mode (I/II) Fracture toughness test for glass-epoxy composite was carried out as per He and Hutchinson [3]. Mixed-mode (I/II) fracture tests were conducted on FPB specimens with a thickness of 9 mm (B/W=0.5) for both (0/45)° and (0/90)° fiber oriented glass/epoxy laminates. The initial crack of 9mm (a/W=0.5) is carefully introduced in specimen using a saw cutter of thickness 0.5 mm. The loadings on the specimen used are similar to the one used in the earlier work [13]. Fig. 2 illustrates the major dimensions of the samples used in the tests and Fig. 3 shows Mixed mode testing fixture for accommodating all the Mixed mode distances for FPB specimens from pure Mode-I to pure Mode-II. In this test method, a notched specimen was loaded in compression that has been initially cracked. Specimens prepared were loaded on a computer controlled Universal Testing Machine. The specimens were loaded by fixture which were designed and fabricated using MS steel to perform the fracture test for Mode-I and Mode-II. The tests were closely monitored and conducted at room temperature, since it is difficult to detect the first point of damage in laminated G A. Desai et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 53 (2020) 426-433; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.53.33 428 composites. In order to overcome such difficulties, the applied loads are recorded. Using recorded values of peak load, the fracture toughness KIC and KIIC will be calculated. The magnitudes of KIC and KIIC have been calculated by analytical formulations given in Eqns. (1) and (2) [3]. Figure 1: fiber directions of glass laminate obtained in (0/45)° and (0/90)° respectively The analytical formulations of KI and KII (He and Hutchinson) [3] are as follows: 6 2 sQ a a K FI I WW        (1) 3 / 2( / ) 1/ 2 1/ 2(1 / ) Q a W a K FII II WW a W       (2) where ( ) ( ) F L d Q L d    (3) The functions FI and FII were defined by Murakami [14], as polynomial functions: 2 3 4 5( / ) 1.122 1.121( / ) 3.740( / ) 3.873( / ) 19.05( / ) 22.55( / )   / 0.7 IF a W a W a W a W a W a W for a W        (4) 2 3 4( / ) 7.264 9.37( / ) 2.74( / ) 1.87( / ) 1.04( / )    0   / 1 IIF a W a W a W a W a W for a W        (5) 2 2K K Keff I II  (6) (a) (b) 45° lamina 0° lamina 45° lamina 0° lamina 0° lamina 90° lamina 0° lamina 90° lamina A. Desai et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 53 (2020) 426-433; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.53.33 429 Here ‘F’ is the peak load, ‘t’ is the thickness of the specimen and FI(a/W) and FII(a/W) are the non-dimensional geometrical factors for both pure Mode-I and pure Mode-II. Fracture tests were performed with a universal tensile testing machine under a loading speed of 2 mm per minute. Tests were conducted three times for each specimen laminates. The critical stress intensity factor (KIC & KIIC) value was calculated from this peak load by equations that have been established on specimens of the type described in He and Hutchinson [3]. Figure 2: Specimen configuration used in the analyses W=18mm, d= 26mm, L=52mm, a=9mm. Figure 3: Arrangement of FPB specimen loaded at UTM RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS Fracture behavior of glass-epoxy polymer composite he specimen is loaded for 6 different crack positions (i.e. d/W=1.5 constant for all the specimens). These 6 cases correspond to the different crack distances from the middle of the specimen by varying the s/d ratios from 0 to 1 by an increment of 0.2. Fracture behavior of laminates for different loading positions in the specimen, showed that the crack in the specimen initiated at the crack tip and then propagated along the fibre/matrix interface. Thus, for loading positions other than s/d=0 and s/d=1, the cracks propagate under Mixed mode loading conditions. A set of five specimens were prepared for each loading conditions and the peak load experienced by the specimen is computed by the average of best three specimen results. It is observed that the deviation in the load is less than 2.5%. The estimated average load vs. displacement values is plotted in Fig. 4 for (0/45)° and (0/90)° fiber oriented glass/epoxy. Load is applied for various s/d ratios of the specimen to calculate the stress intensity factor (K). Load displacement curves from the experimental fracture are gathered and from these curves, the peak loads (F) at fracture are used to compute critical Mode-I and Mode-II stress intensity factors. Tab. 1 and Tab. 2 gives peak load values and corresponding stress intensity T Compression plate FPB specimen Fixture A. Desai et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 53 (2020) 426-433; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.53.33 430 factors for corresponding s/d ratios for (0/45)° and (0/90)° laminates respectively. The magnitudes of KIC and KIIC have been calculated by analytical formulations given in Eqns. (1) and (2) [3]. (a) (b) Figure 4: Load vs. displacement (0/45)° and (0/90)° fiber oriented glass/epoxy laminates s/d Average Peak Load F(N) KIC (MPa(m)1/2) KIIC (MPa(m)1/2) Keff (MPa(m)1/2) 0 15000 0.00 10.66 10.66 0.2 14250 19.14 10.13 21.65 0.4 13320 35.77 9.47 37.00 0.6 12690 51.12 9.02 51.91 0.8 11930 64.08 8.48 64.64 1 11310 75.94 0.00 75.94 Table 1: Mixed-mode critical loads (F) and Average critical stress intensity factors (KIC, KIIC, Keff) [MPa m0.5] for glass/epoxy (0/45)° laminate. s/d Average Peak Load F(N) KIC (MPa(m)1/2) KIIC (MPa(m)1/2) Keff (MPa(m)1/2) 0 16320 0.00 11.60 11.60 0.2 15420 20.71 10.96 23.43 0.4 14380 38.62 10.22 39.95 0.6 13650 54.99 9.70 55.84 0.8 12880 69.18 9.15 69.79 1 12140 81.51 0.00 81.51 Table 2: Mixed-mode critical loads (F) and Average critical stress intensity factors (KIC, KIIC, Keff) [MPa m0.5] for glass/epoxy (0/90)° laminate. A. Desai et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 53 (2020) 426-433; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.53.33 431 Fig. 5 shows KIC vs. s/d for various fiber-oriented laminates. Critical Stress Intensity factors are increasing from pure Mode-II to pure Mode-I. Fig. 6 shows KIIC vs. s/d for various fiber-oriented laminates. Critical Stress Intensity factors are decreasing from pure Mode-II to pure Mode-I. Also, we can observe (0/90)° fiber oriented laminate is dominant compared to other fiber oriented laminate. Critical stress intensity factor is considered as fracture toughness. The failure under Mixed mode loading i.e. variation of KIIC vs. KIC is depicted in Fig. 7. This nature of variation of KIIC vs. KIC is in good agreement with the results shown by our earlier experimental work under Mixed mode loading [10]. Fracture toughness value of (0/90)° fiber oriented laminates are highest among other fiber oriented laminates. Also, (0/90)° fiber orientation fabrication is simple compared to (0/45)° fiber orientation. Hence (0/90)° fiber oriented laminates can be preferred for industrial purpose. Fig. 8 shows Keff vs. s/d for various fiber-oriented laminates. This figure indicates that, the effective stress intensity factor in Mode-I is more than that of Mode-II which indicates specimen fails earlier in Mode-I compared to Mode-II and Mixed modes.. Also, nature of variation of Keff vs. s/d is similar to earlier researchers [2]. Fig. 9 shows fracture behavior of laminates at different loading positions from s/d=0 to 1. From Fig. 9 we can see that, for s/d=0, fracture takes in pure Mode-II. For s/d=1, fracture takes place in pure Mode-I. For s/d=0.2, 0.4, 0.6 and 0.8 fracture takes place in Mixed mode. As we have conducted experimentation on specimen using crack perpendicular to fiber direction, the nature of failure will be translaminar. After the experiment crack tip is examined through optical microscope having 100X magnification which reveals fiber breakage as is shown in Fig. 10. Figure 5: KIC vs. s/d Figure 6: KIIC vs. s/d fiber Figure 7: KIIC vs. KIC Figure 8: Keff vs. s/d A. Desai et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 53 (2020) 426-433; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.53.33 432 Figure 9: Fracture behavior of laminates at different loading position Figure 10: Fiber breakage seen using optical microscope Mode mixity (Me) is calculated for different s/d ratios for FPB specimen [2] using Eqn. (7). Tab. 3 shows values for mode mixity for s/d ratios. 2 arctan Ie II K M K           (7) Table 3: Mode-mixity values for various s/d ratios CONCLUSION he major conclusions in this investigation is that, the bearing load capacity for unidirectional (0/90)° fiber oriented laminate is more compared to 0° and (0/45)° unidirectional fiber oriented laminate for asymmetric Four Point Bend Mixed mode(I/II) fracture specimen. Consequently, the translaminar fracture toughness for (0/90)° is more compared to other fiber oriented laminates. In addition, Fabrication process for (0/90)° fiber oriented laminate using hand layup technique is simple compared to (0/45)° fiber oriented laminate. Hence, (0/90)° fiber oriented laminate is preferable for industrial application. s/d Mode-mixity Me 0 0 0.2 0.69 0.4 0.835 0.6 0.888 0.8 0.916 1 1 T Mode-II Mode-I Mixed Modes Fiber breakage A. Desai et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 53 (2020) 426-433; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.53.33 433 ACKNOWLEDGMENT uthors gratefully acknowledge the experimental facilities provided by the Research Centre, S.D.M. College of Engineering & Technology, Dharwad, Karnataka, India and Research Centre, PESITM, Shivamogga, Karnataka, India. REFERENCES [1] Laffan, M.J., Pinho, S.T., Robinson, P., McMilllan, A.J. (2012). Translaminar fracture toughness testing of composites: A review”, Polymer Testing, , pp. 481-489. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.01.002. [2] Kudari, S. K., Sharanaprabhu, C.M. (2010). On the relationship between stress intensity factor (K) and minimum plastic zone radius (MPZR) for four-point bend specimen under Mixed mode loading, International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, 2(5), pp. 13-22. DOI: 10.4314/ijest.v2i5.60095. [3] He, M. Y., Hutchinson, J.W. (2000). Asymmetric four-point crack specimen. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 67, pp. 207-209. DOI: 10.1115/1.321168 [4] James, R. R. (1990). Mixed-mode Bending Method for Delamination Testing, AIAA Journal, 28(7), pp. 1270-1276. DOI: 10.2514/3.25204 [5] Kenane, M., Benzeggagh, M. L. (1997). Mixed-mode delamination fracture toughness of unidirectional glass/epoxy composites under fatigue loading, Composites Science and Technology, 57 pp. 597-605. DOI: 10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00021-3 [6] Sham Prasad, M.S., Venkatesh, C.S. and Jayaraju, T.(2011). Experimental methods of determining fracture toughness of fiber reinforced polymer composites under various loading conditions, Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization & Engineering 10(13), pp. 1263-1275. DOI: 10.4236/jmmce.2011.1013099 [7] Rikards, R. (1998). Investigation of Mixed mode I/II interlaminar fracture toughness of laminated composites by using a CTS type specimen, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 61, pp. 325-342. DOI: 10.1016/S0013-7944(98)00068-X. [8] Laffan, M.J., Pinho, S.T., Robinson, P., McMilllan, A.J. (2011). Translaminar fracture toughness: The critical notch tip radius of 0° plies in CFRP, Composites Science and Technology, 72, pp. 97-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.10.006 [9] Swolfs, Y., Geboes, Y., Gorabatikh, L., Pinho, S. T. (2017). The importance of translaminar fracture toughness for the penetration impact behaviour of woven carbon/glass hybrid composites, Composites Part A, 103, pp. 1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.09.009 [10] Desai, A., Sharanaprabhu, C.M., Kudari, S.K. (2018). Experimental Investigation on Critical Energy Release Rate for an Asymmetric Four Point Bending, National Conference on advanced research in science, engineering and management, PESITM, Shivamogga pp. 395-398. [11] Desai, A., Sharanaprabhu, C.M., Kudari, S.K. (2019). Experimental Investigation on the effects of fiber orientation on mixed mode I/II translaminar fracture toughness for glass-epoxy composites, Advances in polymer composites, Mechanics, Characterization and Applications, AIP Conf. Proc.2057, 020010. DOI: 10.1063/1.5085581. [12] Naghipour, P., Bartsch, M., Chernova, L., Hausmann, J., Voggenreiter, H. (2010). Effect of fiber angle orientation and stacking sequence on mixed mode fracture toughness of carbon fiber reinforced plastics: Numerical and experimental investigations, Materials Science and Engineering A, 527 pp. 509–517.  DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2009.07.069. [13] Shahani, A.R., Tabatabaei, S.A. (2009). Effect of T-stress on the fracture of a four point bend specimen, Materials and Design, 30, pp. 2630-2635. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.10.031 [14] Murakami ,Y. Stress Intensity factors handbook, Pergamon Press, New York (1987) A << /ASCII85EncodePages false /AllowTransparency false /AutoPositionEPSFiles true /AutoRotatePages /None /Binding /Left /CalGrayProfile (Dot Gain 20%) /CalRGBProfile (sRGB IEC61966-2.1) /CalCMYKProfile (U.S. Web Coated \050SWOP\051 v2) /sRGBProfile (sRGB IEC61966-2.1) /CannotEmbedFontPolicy /Error /CompatibilityLevel 1.4 /CompressObjects /Tags /CompressPages true /ConvertImagesToIndexed true /PassThroughJPEGImages true /CreateJobTicket false /DefaultRenderingIntent /Default /DetectBlends true /DetectCurves 0.0000 /ColorConversionStrategy /CMYK /DoThumbnails false /EmbedAllFonts true /EmbedOpenType false /ParseICCProfilesInComments true /EmbedJobOptions true /DSCReportingLevel 0 /EmitDSCWarnings false /EndPage -1 /ImageMemory 1048576 /LockDistillerParams false /MaxSubsetPct 100 /Optimize true /OPM 1 /ParseDSCComments true /ParseDSCCommentsForDocInfo true /PreserveCopyPage true /PreserveDICMYKValues true /PreserveEPSInfo true /PreserveFlatness true /PreserveHalftoneInfo false /PreserveOPIComments true /PreserveOverprintSettings true /StartPage 1 /SubsetFonts true /TransferFunctionInfo /Apply /UCRandBGInfo /Preserve /UsePrologue false /ColorSettingsFile () /AlwaysEmbed [ true ] /NeverEmbed [ true ] /AntiAliasColorImages false /CropColorImages true /ColorImageMinResolution 300 /ColorImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleColorImages true /ColorImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /ColorImageResolution 300 /ColorImageDepth -1 /ColorImageMinDownsampleDepth 1 /ColorImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeColorImages true /ColorImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterColorImages true /ColorImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /ColorACSImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /ColorImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /JPEG2000ColorImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /AntiAliasGrayImages false /CropGrayImages true /GrayImageMinResolution 300 /GrayImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleGrayImages true /GrayImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /GrayImageResolution 300 /GrayImageDepth -1 /GrayImageMinDownsampleDepth 2 /GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeGrayImages true /GrayImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterGrayImages true /GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /GrayACSImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /GrayImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /JPEG2000GrayImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /AntiAliasMonoImages false /CropMonoImages true /MonoImageMinResolution 1200 /MonoImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleMonoImages true /MonoImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /MonoImageResolution 1200 /MonoImageDepth -1 /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeMonoImages true /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode /MonoImageDict << /K -1 >> /AllowPSXObjects false /CheckCompliance [ /None ] /PDFX1aCheck false /PDFX3Check false /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false /PDFXNoTrimBoxError true /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox true /PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfile () /PDFXOutputConditionIdentifier () /PDFXOutputCondition () /PDFXRegistryName () /PDFXTrapped /False /CreateJDFFile false /Description << /ARA /BGR /CHS /CHT /CZE /DAN /DEU /ESP /ETI /FRA /GRE /HEB /HRV (Za stvaranje Adobe PDF dokumenata najpogodnijih za visokokvalitetni ispis prije tiskanja koristite ove postavke. Stvoreni PDF dokumenti mogu se otvoriti Acrobat i Adobe Reader 5.0 i kasnijim verzijama.) /HUN /ITA /JPN /KOR /LTH /LVI /NLD (Gebruik deze instellingen om Adobe PDF-documenten te maken die zijn geoptimaliseerd voor prepress-afdrukken van hoge kwaliteit. De gemaakte PDF-documenten kunnen worden geopend met Acrobat en Adobe Reader 5.0 en hoger.) /NOR /POL /PTB /RUM /RUS /SKY /SLV /SUO /SVE /TUR /UKR /ENU (Use these settings to create Adobe PDF documents best suited for high-quality prepress printing. Created PDF documents can be opened with Acrobat and Adobe Reader 5.0 and later.) >> /Namespace [ (Adobe) (Common) (1.0) ] /OtherNamespaces [ << /AsReaderSpreads false /CropImagesToFrames true /ErrorControl /WarnAndContinue /FlattenerIgnoreSpreadOverrides false /IncludeGuidesGrids false /IncludeNonPrinting false /IncludeSlug false /Namespace [ (Adobe) (InDesign) (4.0) ] /OmitPlacedBitmaps false /OmitPlacedEPS false /OmitPlacedPDF false /SimulateOverprint /Legacy >> << /AddBleedMarks false /AddColorBars false /AddCropMarks false /AddPageInfo false /AddRegMarks false /ConvertColors /ConvertToCMYK /DestinationProfileName () /DestinationProfileSelector /DocumentCMYK /Downsample16BitImages true /FlattenerPreset << /PresetSelector /MediumResolution >> /FormElements false /GenerateStructure false /IncludeBookmarks false /IncludeHyperlinks false /IncludeInteractive false /IncludeLayers false /IncludeProfiles false /MultimediaHandling /UseObjectSettings /Namespace [ (Adobe) (CreativeSuite) (2.0) ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfileSelector /DocumentCMYK /PreserveEditing true /UntaggedCMYKHandling /LeaveUntagged /UntaggedRGBHandling /UseDocumentProfile /UseDocumentBleed false >> ] >> setdistillerparams << /HWResolution [2400 2400] /PageSize [612.000 792.000] >> setpagedevice