id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
fcis-28515	Xie, Nanmei; Xu, Wenjun	Analysis of the Evaluation Data of College Classroom Teaching Quality based on Fuzzy Mathematics Model	2024	9	.pdf	application/pdf	4200	157	52	Analysis form of 9 evaluation experts Evaluation expert Number of evaluation sections Average section Quantification of professional title Expert 002 333 2.55 0.6140 Expert 003 417 1.95 0.5719 Expert 005 460 2.73 0.5476 Expert 006 490 1.95 0.5595 Expert 012 90 2.60 0.5845 Expert 025 675 2.51 0.5474 Expert 027 394 2.25 0.5371 Expert 028 787 2.74 0.5480 Table 10. 9 expert evaluation conclusions Evaluation expert Evaluation conclusion Expert 002 have many times of class evaluation, rich experience in class evaluation and high professional title level Expert 003 have a lot of class evaluation times, few class evaluation sessions, and average professional titles Expert 005 have more times of class evaluation, more class evaluation sessions, and strong reserves of professional knowledge Expert 006 have more class evaluation times, fewer class evaluation sessions, and average professional title level Expert 012 have few times of class evaluation, many class evaluation sessions, and strong professional knowledge reserve Expert 025 have many times of class evaluation, rich experience in class evaluation and strong reserves of professional knowledge Expert 027 have moderate times of class evaluation, rich experience in class evaluation, and low professional title level Expert 028 have a lot of times to evaluate the course, a lot of times to evaluate the course, and a strong reserve of professional knowledge 94 From the ranking of experts, it can be found that the more the number of evaluation sections, the higher the ranking of experts; The number of sections evaluated by expert 001 and expert 026 is the same, both of which are 51. For question 3: the grey correlation model is established according to the factors that affect the professionalism and objectivity of evaluation experts, such as teachers' professional titles, the number of evaluation sessions and the average number of sessions.	cache/fcis-28515.pdf	txt/fcis-28515.txt