Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement Vol. 13, No. 1 May 2020 © 2020 by the author(s). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. Citation: Bishop, L. Darcy, S., Sinnott, R., Avery, S., Pendergast, A., Duggan, N. 2020. Engaging a community for youth mental health and wellness: Reflections and lessons learned. Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, 13:1, Article ID 6862. http:dx.doi.org/10.5130/ ijcre.v13i1.6862 ISSN 1836-3393 | Published by UTS ePRESS | http://ijcre. epress.lib.uts.edu.au PRACTICE-BASED ARTICLE Engaging a community for youth mental health and wellness: Reflections and lessons learned Lisa Bishop1,2, Stephen Darcy2, Rob Sinnott3, Susan Avery2, Amanda Pendergast2, Norah Duggan2 1 School of Pharmacy, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada 2 Discipline of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada 3 Mental Health and Addictions, Eastern Health, Canada Corresponding author: Lisa Bishop; ldbishop@mun.ca DOI: http:dx.doi.org/10.5130/ijcre.v13i1.6862 Article history: Received 06/11/2019; Revised 06/12/2019; Accepted 02/03/2020; Published XX/05/2020. Abstract As clinicians at a university-affiliated health centre faced with youth mental health and substance use concerns, we reached out to the local community for guidance. We partnered with community leaders to explore how to best understand the issues and engage with the community. Using a community-engaged research (CEnR) approach, we conducted a needs assessment to explore the issues and inform change. We formalised a partnership with the local school and community board, which led to the creation of a Community Alliance. Our engagement efforts allowed us to understand the community more deeply and establish more effective change. Our most successful outcome was the development of a youth mental health and wellness Action Plan which helped direct our strategies moving forward. This article highlights our community engagement activities, processes and lessons learned, which may be of benefit to other academic researchers and clinicians who are interested in CEnR. Keywords community engagement, community-engaged research, family medicine, youth wellness, mental health, youth DECLARATION OF CONFLICTING INTEREST The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. FUNDING The authors received funding for the research described in this article from Newfoundland and Labrador Applied Health Research; College of Family Physicians of Canada; Canadian Institute of Health Research; Memorial University; Michaëlle Jean Foundation; and Eastern Health, Newfoundland and Labrador. 1 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http:dx.doi.org/10.5130/ijcre.v13i1.6862 http:dx.doi.org/10.5130/ijcre.v13i1.6862 http://ijcre.epress.lib.uts.edu.au http://ijcre.epress.lib.uts.edu.au mailto:ldbishop@mun.ca http:dx.doi.org/10.5130/ijcre.v13i1.6862 Introduction As clinicians working in a university-affiliated community health centre in a small urban community in Canada, we encountered increasing rates of undiagnosed mental illness and substance use disorders in our youth. This was concerning to us, so our health team met to discuss an approach to address these issues and decided that, in order to be effective, we would need to involve the wider community in the development of appropriate strategies (Glandon et al. 2017). We were aware of a strong leadership group within the community, so we approached them with the idea of creating a partnership to develop solutions for better supporting these young people using a community-engaged research (CEnR) approach. CEnR values engagement with the community as partners and stakeholders (Ballard & Syme 2016; Blachman- Demner, Wiley & Chambers 2017), ranging from minimal engagement to full participation or collaboration, such as in community-based participatory research (CBPR) (Blachman- Demner, Wiley & Chambers 2017; Goodman et al. 2017; Israel et al. 1998; Shea et al. 2017; Vaughn et al. 2017). In keeping with the principles of CEnR, we attempted to understand the history and structure of the community in order to effectively engage with them (ATSDR 2019; Balls- Berry & Acosta-Perez 2017). The community is located on the outskirts of the main urban city and has a distinct sense of identity. It traces its roots back to the early 1930s when residents of the larger city moved there to escape the burden of city taxes. A strong sense of unity has been evident over 80 years of the community’s existence. Community members support each other during times of hardship, for example, by rebuilding a home after a fire, or holding a large fundraising event for a family with an ill loved one. As depicted in Figure 1, the impetus for an inductive approach arose from a clinical concern. This in turn led us to collaboratively reflect on an approach to the issue within the community, resulting in a strategy to help support youth wellness. The purpose of this article is to describe how we, as clinicians and researchers, engaged with a community to evaluate and promote youth mental health and wellness. We also describe our research and engagement process and our challenges and lessons learned, which may be of benefit to academic researchers and clinicians who are interested in CEnR. Figure 1 Community Engaged Approach Bishop, Darcy, Sinnott, Avery, Pendergast, Duggan Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, Vol. 13, No. 1, May 2020 2 Foundational Work COMMUNITY CONSULTATION One of the unique features of this community is that it has always had leadership from within. This leadership has been expressed primarily through the local community board. The board started as a neighbourhood improvement association and is made up of community members, advisers from the local school, health centre and larger community, and representation from the city council. The mandate of the community board is to ensure that the strong value of community is promoted through various initiatives. The initial meeting between the health centre and the community was comprised of three leaders from the community board and representatives from the health centre, including two nurses, one social worker, one pharmacist, two receptionists and four family doctors. It was decided at this meeting to plan a community information night, the purpose of which was to discuss substance use in general and to elicit strengths and concerns from the community specifically. To advertise the event, brochures were distributed and a large sign was placed at the start of the road leading to the community. With guidance from community leaders, the sign read ‘Let’s talk about drugs’ and depicted an injection needle. Within hours of the sign being erected, significant negative feedback had been posted on the community Facebook page as some in the community felt it was stigmatising the community. Some of those objecting to the sign promptly removed it and laid it carefully on its side without damaging it. The team was apprehensive about continuing with this initiative, given this swift and robust demonstration by certain members of the community. The community leaders viewed these actions as an indication of both interest and the need to protect the privacy and reputation of the community, and urged the meeting to go ahead as planned with less provocative advertising. The event was subsequently announced by means of household flyers. Given the initial controversy and the importance of the topic, the community information night was well attended and there was much frank discussion. The discussion confirmed the presence of drug use in the community, and those present speculated that it was no better or worse than other areas of the city or province. The group expressed a desire to find ways to prevent drug use problems and invited the organising members to lead in planning a strategy. With a commitment of support from the community, the planning group resolved to move ahead to further assess the situation and address the resultant needs. Reflection on the initial community gathering confirmed a need for greater effort by us, as clinician researchers, to further strengthen our partnership with the community. Determining the community’s needs and establishing a strategy for a needs assessment were recognised as important aspects of this community engagement (Adams et al. 2017; Brunton et al. 2017; Cutforth & Belansky 2015). TEAM PREPARATION Our research team consists of members who cross disciplines, backgrounds and lived experiences, and range from novice to more experienced researchers. When we initially came together, we had only a rudimentary understanding of community-based research methods. As we began reading the literature and planning for our needs assessment, we realised that we wished to align our approach more closely with the principles of CBPR (Israel et al. 1998) and Engaging a community for youth mental health and wellness: Reflections and lessons learned Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, Vol. 13, No. 1, May 2020 3 that some further education and familiarisation with both CBPR and CEnR would be helpful moving forward (Dubois et al. 2011; Hardy et al. 2016; Matthews et al. 2018; Shea et al. 2017). It was from this point that we made a conscious effort to become more familiar with the principles of CBPR to prepare the team for community research. We reviewed background materials and articles, attended conferences and presentations, and held many discussions with community leaders and members. In addition, we consulted experienced researchers with expertise in the area of CBPR (Matthews et al. 2018). Through our collaboration with the community board, they suggested that the research initiatives be presented to the community as a partnership, and not as solely university-based research. Thus the Community Alliance was officially formed, comprising the clinicians at the health centre, the local school administration and the community centre board. The Alliance’s mandate was to explore and suggest actions to improve youth mental health and wellness in the community. This Alliance has come to be the main collaborative group promoting youth mental health and wellness through a variety of strategies, including research, education, engagement and programming (Figure 2). Figure 2 The Community Alliance NEEDS ASSESSMENT The community was involved in the planning, design and delivery of the needs assessment, which is rooted in the idea that research involves meaningful involvement and sharing of power (Arnstein 1969; Yonas et al. 2013). In order to maintain this balance of power, all members of the team must have equal input, so it is crucial that appropriate levels of communication are maintained ( Jones & Wells 2007). Initially we made great efforts to implement CBPR, assuming an iterative approach when responding to the community’s needs. We felt that we were conducting CBPR to the best of our ability during the needs assessment. The community was receptive to our research efforts and supported aspects of CBPR. Eventually, however, we recognised that our approach was more consistent with CEnR and in subsequent projects we were able to be more explicit about our methodology (Goodman et al. 2017; Vaughn et al. 2017). One of the first steps of our Alliance was to agree upon the approach for conducting research. It was agreed that all research initiatives, community presentations and materials for documentation, publication or distribution (such as newletters, pamphlets, posters) would be vetted by the community as represented by the members of the community board. We offered to collaboratively develop a written research agreement as is frequently done in community- Bishop, Darcy, Sinnott, Avery, Pendergast, Duggan Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, Vol. 13, No. 1, May 2020 4 based research (Yonas et al. 2013). However, the board did not see a need for a formalised agreement and was comfortable proceeding through ongoing dialogue. A community board member became a part of the research team, attended research meetings and contributed to the research. In addition, the Alliance became a standing item on the agenda of board meetings, which were held every two weeks. This ensured that both new and existing initiatives would be vetted by community representatives. By incorporating the research process into the life of the community through its board, the Alliance has served to bridge the gap between the university affiliated researchers and members of the community. It has also enabled the research to stay more grounded in the issues that face the community’s youth. With this structure in place to ensure participation by the community, the Alliance formulated its research plan in the summer and autumn of 2012. We agreed that we would receive ethics approval for all research. An accurate picture of the current drug use and mental health status of the youth and young adults aged 12–34 was the initial goal. We decided to review the charts of all of the youth and young adults who attended the health centre to determine the prescribing patterns of the physicians at the health centre and the risk factors for substance misuse. This was determined by the use of a standardised risk calculator, the Opioid Risk Tool (Webster & Webster 2005). The audit revealed a low rate of prescribing of opioids and stimulants, but also indicated that a relatively small proportion of youth attended the health centre. This was a concern as we recognised that there may be youth within the community who could benefit from the services that we provide. Our other goal was to form a better understanding of the current substance use and mental health status of the youth and young adults in our community. We felt this was best achieved through surveying the community, using a well-validated survey tool (Dep-ADO 2007). Despite much effort on behalf of the Alliance to promote the survey in both paper and electronic formats and by offering a prize, not many surveys were returned. Although the responses did not indicate that substance use and mental health concerns were prevalent, the results were not felt to be representative of the population given the poor response rate. The survey results captured a high proportion of the junior high school cohort, which was largely due to the support of the principal, who was a member of the Alliance. Based on feedback from the initial public community meeting, it was suggested that hearing the perspectives from all community members would be beneficial (Dresser 2017). The Alliance decided on a qualitative approach to obtaining further information from the community at large (Fossey et al. 2002). Our goal was to gather their perspectives on the status of substance use, the barriers that prevent addressing mental health and substance use concerns, and the strategies that could help. We initially offered focus groups to adult community members and professionals working in the community (e.g. medical staff, teachers, clergy). Including professionals in the research was suggested by community members as they felt they would provide a unique insight. Due to low interest from community members in participating in focus groups, likely due to the lack of anonymity, we subsequently offered the option of individual interviews. In addition, it was suggested that speaking directly to the youth would be informative, and a focus group was held with youth from the community. We sought the expertise of the university’s primary healthcare research unit in helping conduct the focus groups and interviews. From the needs assessment, a number of themes emerged around the issues of youth mental health and access to services. The themes fell into four categories: (1) geography of the community; (2) community attitudes and perceptions; (3) mental health and substance use services; and (4) prevention approaches. The themes were collated and presented to the Engaging a community for youth mental health and wellness: Reflections and lessons learned Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, Vol. 13, No. 1, May 2020 5 community for discussion and direction. Presentations were given to the community board, the local school council of teachers and parents, students, and the community at large. At each venue the Alliance sought feedback and direction, which was translated into an ‘Action Plan’ for youth mental health and wellness in the community. This plan, which is described more fully below, helped to shape future initiatives (Cutforth & Belanksy 2015; Lamb et al. 2014). COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Initially, our Alliance was more focused on delivering education and conducting research. This was challenging as only a small number of community members were attending events or participating in the research. In an effort to keep the agenda at the forefront of the community, we organised several education activities centred around youth wellness and mental health. These too attracted limited attendance, causing us concern in the early stages of the project. As a result of these participation challenges, and through consultation with experts in the field of community engagement, we made a conscious effort to engage with the broader community in order to further develop trust and relationships (Pullmann et al. 2013; Stein & Mankowski 2004). We began by attending and participating in a number of community events, such as folk festivals, community vigils and winter festivals, which not only increased our visibility (Matthews et al. 2008; Michener et al. 2012), but also gave us a sense of belonging and greater understanding. This engagement cemented the relationship between the researchers and the community, provided a venue for feedback, and strengthened mutual understanding and trust. In turn, this has translated into more community participation and support for initiatives undertaken by the Alliance. Figure 3 outlines our community engagement efforts. Figure 3 Engagement Process Arms During our engagement efforts, we noted that the community felt stigmatised by the constant reference to mental illness and addiction. They suggested using a more positive focus, and we started referring instead to ‘mental health and wellness’. This change addressed the sensitivities of the community and prompted a more strengths-based approach. The shift in language also effected improved willingness in community members to become involved with our research. After our research team completed the needs assessment, the findings were collated and presented for discussion in a number of public forums: (1) the community board; (2) the local school council of teachers and parents/students; and (3) the community at large. When planning the community event, we directly involved select community members. Based on their suggestions, we invited two prominent members of the local artistic entertainment circle with lived experience of mental health issues to attend and speak about their struggles Bishop, Darcy, Sinnott, Avery, Pendergast, Duggan Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, Vol. 13, No. 1, May 2020 6 with mental health. The Alliance presented the main findings from the needs assessment and facilitated discussion in small groups. We then compiled the feedback from all of the public forums and formulated a Community Action Plan for the promotion of youth mental health and wellness in the community. The draft Action Plan was subsequently presented to the community board for their comment and approval (Lamb et al. 2014). COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN The mission of the Action Plan was to promote prevention, early detection, and appropriate treatment of mental illness and substance use in youth and young adults, and thereby promote their mental health and well-being. The Action Plan used a strengths-based approach and was designed to be inclusive, accessible, practical and outcomes-oriented. It has become our guiding document as it directly addresses methods to actively engage youth and support their mental health and wellness. The Action Plan centres around three main themes: (1) improving access to mental health services; (2) keeping youth healthy and happy; and (3) capacity building within the community. The plan is broken down into objectives and strategies for achieving these themes (Appendix 1). Much of our efforts to implement the strategies of the Action Plan have centred around identifying meaningful ways to engage with youth in order to help support their health and well-being (Dunne et al. 2017). One challenge has been identifying funding sources to support the initiatives as each funder has their own agenda, which requires careful navigation to preserve the direction of the Action Plan. One of the initiatives under the new Action Plan was using drama and the arts to engage with youth. A drama project for the junior high students was the result of a great deal of collaboration on the part of the school and the Alliance, and outside professional directing. The production of Romeo and Juliet involved a number of the youth and the performance attracted many parents, relatives and neighbours to the event. The following year, an arts program focused on the visual arts was offered. This program expanded the interface between arts and mental health more explicitly by including mental health education. The program ended with an exhibition open to the community, and many of the student artworks are on permanent display in our local health centre. Both of these initiatives were positively evaluated by the young people who participated. Unfortunately, funding limitations prevented us from continuing with these initiatives. Concurrently with these initiatives, a youth council was formed. The council planned and executed events, such as a community clean-up, and provided ideas for future wellness projects. While this proved to be a great way to engage with youth, it required investment of time and human resources. The research assistant who was mainly involved in coordinating the council spent considerable time connecting with youth, checking in via text and social media, and helping to organise and facilitate meetings. Since she was closer in age to the youth, she was able to establish some meaningful connections with them. However, while it was successful, it was eventually shifted to an existing community youth drop-in group to ensure its sustainability. Our most recent initiative was securing a community-based, not-for-profit music program for the school-aged children of our community. This program offers free community-based string lessons to children residing in areas that have few opportunities for music education, with the intent that they will positively benefit growth and learning. Part of the success of this initiative is that it is an established program in another area of the city and they had Engaging a community for youth mental health and wellness: Reflections and lessons learned Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, Vol. 13, No. 1, May 2020 7 the capacity to expand into our community. This program is run by a board of directors that obtains independent funding, enabling it to be sustainable. The program has now been running for three successful years in our community. EVALUATION AND KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION An evaluation was incorporated into all of our projects, using both quantitative and qualitative approaches. This helped us determine the benefits and challenges of delivering these projects. The needs assessment helped inform the development of the Action Plan and the evaluation of specific projects helped provide guidance on the future direction of the Alliance. The Alliance placed an emphasis on knowledge translation efforts, in both community and academic forums, and with the media. Community members have jointly presented with us at local events and academic conferences. Their participation has provided a unique perspective and has resulted in richer discussion with the audience members (Shea et al. 2017). Print and radio media coverage has been useful in connecting with more people in less ‘academic’ settings (Blachman-Demner, Wiley & Chambers 2017; Michener at el. 2012). For example, representatives of the Alliance, a community member and two clinicians, presented at a national community-university partnerships conference. Following the presentation, the media interviewed the community member, which resulted in an article in the local newspaper. Throughout this process of design, study and engagement, we, as a team of researchers and clinicians, have participated in many reflexive discussions. We have reflected on the principles of CBPR and CEnR, decisions on representation of voices from the community, and our roles as researchers (Elliott, Fischer & Rennie 1999; Fassinger 2005; Stein & Mankowski 2004). We have attempted to embrace a collaborative approach in all that we do, up to and including the writing process, using a web-based tool for real-time writing and editing, and a dropbox for access to documents and articles (Flicker & Nixon 2018). Discussion: Outcomes and Lessons Learned This long-term CEnR and youth wellness initiative has resulted in successes, challenges and learning opportunities. CEnR, which utilises community and academic partnerships, requires the building of capacity, leadership (Hardy et al. 2016) and trust over time (Balls-Berry & Acosta-Perez 2017) to be effective in addressing health issues (Goodman et al. 2017) and empowering community members involved in the research (Khodyakov, Mikesell & Bromley 2017). Being responsive to the community needs throughout the project has allowed us to modify our approach and better support the youth (Figure 1). Throughout this process, we have come to learn some valuable lessons about community engagement and conducting health research. We hope that other researchers interested in conducting CEnR can learn from our lessons outlined below. Take guidance from both experts and the literature. Reaching out to experts in the field of CBPR and consulting the literature was extremely beneficial in helping guide our approach and research methodology. However, as we progressed throughout the project, we recognised that more formal training earlier in the process would have been advantageous (Coffey et al. 2017; Dresser 2017; Dubois et al. 2011; Matthews et al. 2018; Shea et al. 2017). CBPR is a demanding methodology. Our research team embraced and used many of the principles of CBPR (Israel et al. 1998). However, similarly to McElfish et al. (2019), we were not able to fully implement CBPR principles for many reasons, including the significant Bishop, Darcy, Sinnott, Avery, Pendergast, Duggan Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, Vol. 13, No. 1, May 2020 8 investment needed in terms of time, effort, training and resources. We realised that a shift towards CEnR was more realistic and had more potential for successful outcomes (Dubois et al. 2011). CEnR is a valuable research approach. As clinicians, we recognised that collaborating with our community would be much more effective than working alone. Our goal from the beginning was not only to explore the issues, but also to use the research and partnership with the community to inform change. We learned it was important to be flexible and iterative in the process and to negotiate priorities along the way. Using the CEnR approach (Shea et al. 2017), we gained a deeper appreciation of the issues facing the community, which contributed to a more accurate interpretation of the findings. Formalise the partnership. It is important to reach out to local community groups to determine who the leaders are within the community and engage with them to identify the key stakeholders. Establishing the Alliance was one of our main successes as this helped solidify our partnership and gave us standing on the community board. By incorporating the research process into the life of the community through the community board, the Alliance served to bridge the gap between the academically affiliated researchers and members of the community. Others have noted strength in overseeing projects through a community advisory board (Holzer, Ellis & Merritt 2014; Wine et al. 2019), which shares similarities with our model. Share the vision. It is essential that all partners believe in the overall purpose of doing research. We surrounded ourselves with people who had similar goals. The formation of the Alliance gave us the opportunity to establish a shared vision early in the process. Listen deeply and be trustworthy. We aimed to consider the community’s goals above our own scholarly agendas. By being transparent and collaborative, the research team built the groundwork for mutual trust (Khodyakov, Mikesell & Bromley 2017). Through active listening and responding to the wishes of the community, we were able to adjust our approach, resulting in more valuable research. Maintain the engagement and keep a visible presence. Similarly to other CEnR endeavours (Cutforth & Belanksy 2015; Redman et al. 2017), we initially attempted to engage with community members through our consultations, a needs assessment and connections with board members. However, we recognised that there were times when we could have drawn upon the wisdom of more grassroots community members (Dresser 2017; Matthews et al. 2018). We have come to recognise that engagement is important for its own sake. Invest in youth. Our approach would have been strengthened by recruiting youth to become prominent members of the research team ( Jacquez, Vaughn & Wagner 2013), including training them to conduct focus groups (Pullmann et al. 2013; Ramanadhan et al. 2016). A stronger presence of youth in the research process may have increased the success and outcomes of our projects (Dunne et al. 2017; Garinger et al. 2016; LoIacono Merves et al. 2015). Disseminate the findings. We attempted to engage in different forms of knowledge translation, including presentations, news articles, community forums, manuscripts and social media (Blachman-Demner, Wiley & Chambers 2017; Michener et al. 2012). We found it useful to involve community members throughout the dissemination process as this helped validate the research and also served as a way to inform more community members of the findings. This was not without challenges, such as time constraints, lack of interest in writing and changes in membership of the community board. Engaging a community for youth mental health and wellness: Reflections and lessons learned Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, Vol. 13, No. 1, May 2020 9 Maintain the momentum. Our research involved long periods of behind-the-scenes activity, during which it was hard to maintain visibility and momentum. Participating in community events enabled us to sustain an active presence, kept us interested in the process and reminded us about the importance of our shared vision. Achieve practical outcomes. The development of the Action Plan for youth mental health and wellness was our most successful outcome (Appendix 1). It was the result of a consultative process that reflected the needs of the community and helped direct our strategies moving forward. Our engagement efforts ensured a richer interpretation of the results and allowed us to operationalise our Action Plan more effectively. In keeping with the principles of CEnR (Shea et al. 2017), regular review of the Action Plan is needed in order to determine how well we are achieving our goals and to reaffirm that the strategies are still relevant. Conclusion Meaningful engagement with a community is realised through long-term partnerships and relationships built on trust. Our experience, as clinicians in a university-affiliated community health centre, has taught us the importance of participating in the life of the community outside the confines of our offices. We have also come to increasingly value the voices and expertise of the community members as we work together to promote youth mental health and wellness. Effective engagement involves active listening, a visible presence, flexibility and collaborative processes. We recognise that the engagement activities, facilitated through our Community Alliance, are an integral aspect of the research process. Moving forward, we plan to maintain our momentum by continuing to nurture our relationships through an engagement and research process that is responsive to the needs of the community, to help us realise our shared vision of improving the mental health and wellness of youth in the community. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Melissa Earles-Druken, our Community Centre Board and local school for supporting the project; Rowan El-Bialy and Mercy Winsor, our Research Assistants; mentor Dr Cheri Bethune (Memorial University Discipline of Family Medicine); funding agencies (Newfoundland and Labrador Applied Health Research, College of Family Physicians of Canada, Canadian Institute of Health Research, Memorial University Quick Start Pubic Engagement Fund, Michaëlle Jean Foundation, Eastern Health Community Development Fund); Meghan Smith, Christopher Singleton, Craig Malone, Tom Dunne, Mark McKelvie, Meaghan Coady, Alicia Brown, Kayla McNally, Jillian McInnis, Hilary Power and Amy Powell, students at Memorial University who received Summer Undergraduate Research Awards; Memorial University’s Discipline of Family Medicine, School of Pharmacy (Kristine Day), Faculty of Medicine’s Graduate Studies (Reza Tabrichi) and the Primary Care Health Research Unit. References Adams, A, Williamson, A, Sorkness, C, Hatfield, P, Eggen, A & Esmond, S 2017, ‘The Steps Model’, Academic Medicine, vol. 92, no. 6, p. 890. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000001677 Arnstein, S 1969, ‘A ladder of citizen participation’, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 216–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225 Bishop, Darcy, Sinnott, Avery, Pendergast, Duggan Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, Vol. 13, No. 1, May 2020 10 https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000001677 https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225 Ballard, P & Syme, S 2016, ‘Engaging youth in communities: A framework for promoting adolescent and community health’, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 202–06. https://doi. org/10.1136/jech-2015-206110 Balls-Berry, J & Acosta-Perez, E 2017, ‘The use of community engaged research principles to improve health: Community academic partnerships for research’, Puerto Rico Health Sciences Journal, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 84–85. ‘Before starting a community engagement effort’, in Principles of community engagement 2019, 2nd edn, ATSDR, viewed 5 November 2019. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/communityengagement/pce_principles_ starting.html Blachman-Demner, D, Wiley, T & Chambers, D 2017, ‘Fostering integrated approaches to dissemination and implementation and community engaged research’, Translational Behavioral Medicine, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 543–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-017-0527-8 Brunton, G, Thomas, J, O’Mara-Eves, A, Jamal, F, Oliver, S & Kavanagh, J 2017, ‘Narratives of community engagement: A systematic review-derived conceptual framework for public health interventions’, BMC Public Health, vol. 17, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4958-4 Coffey, J, Huff-Davis, A, Lindsey, C, Norman, O, Curtis, H, Criner, C & Stewart, M 2017, ‘The development of a community engagement workshop: A community-led approach for building researcher capacity’, Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 321–29. https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2017.0038 Cutforth, N & Belansky, E 2015, ‘A community-engaged approach to translating research into practice: A physical education story’, Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 571–82. https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2015.0082 DEP-ADO (Detection of alcohol and drugs problems in adolescents), Version 3.2, September 2007, viewed 9 October 2019. https://oraprdnt.uqtr.uquebec.ca/pls/public/docs/GSC4242/F463443489_ DEP_ADO_ang_V3_2.pdf Dresser, R 2017, ‘A deep dive into community engagement’, Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 41–45. https://doi.org/10.1353/nib.2017.0014 DuBois, J, Bailey-Burch, B, Bustillos, D, Campbell, J, Cottler, L, Fisher, C, Hadley, W, Hoop, J, Roberts, L, Salter, E, Sieber, J & Stevenson, R 2011, ‘Ethical issues in mental health research: The case for community engagement’, Current Opinion in Psychiatry, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 208–14. https://doi. org/10.1097/yco.0b013e3283459422 Dunne, T, Bishop, L, Avery, S & Darcy, S 2017, ‘A review of effective youth engagement strategies for mental health and substance use interventions, Journal of Adolescent Health, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 487–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.11.019 Elliott, R, Fischer, C & Rennie, D 1999, ‘Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields’, British Journal of Clinical Psychology, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 215–29. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466599162782 Fassinger, R 2005, ‘Paradigms, praxis, problems, and promise: Grounded theory in Counseling Psychology research’, Journal of Counseling Psychology, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 156–66. https://doi. org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.156 Engaging a community for youth mental health and wellness: Reflections and lessons learned Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, Vol. 13, No. 1, May 2020 11 https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2015-206110 https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2015-206110 https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/communityengagement/pce_principles_starting.html https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/communityengagement/pce_principles_starting.html https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-017-0527-8 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4958-4 https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2017.0038 https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2015.0082 https://oraprdnt.uqtr.uquebec.ca/pls/public/docs/GSC4242/F463443489_DEP_ADO_ang_V3_2.pdf https://oraprdnt.uqtr.uquebec.ca/pls/public/docs/GSC4242/F463443489_DEP_ADO_ang_V3_2.pdf https://oraprdnt.uqtr.uquebec.ca/pls/public/docs/GSC4242/F463443489_DEP_ADO_ang_V3_2.pdf https://doi.org/10.1353/nib.2017.0014 https://doi.org/10.1097/yco.0b013e3283459422 https://doi.org/10.1097/yco.0b013e3283459422 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.11.019 https://doi.org/10.1348/014466599162782 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.156 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.156 Flicker, S & Nixon S 2018, ‘Writing peer-reviewed articles with diverse teams: Considerations for novice scholars conducting community-engaged research’, Health Promotion International, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 152–61. Fossey, E, Harvey, C, Mcdermott, F & Davidson, L 2002, ‘Understanding and evaluating qualitative research, Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 717–32. https://doi. org/10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.01100.x Garinger, C, Reynolds, K, Walker, J, Firsten-Kaufman, E, Raimundo, A, Fogarty, P, Leonhart, M & Mobilizing Minds Research Group 2016, ‘Mobilizing Minds: Integrated knowledge translation and youth engagement in the development of mental health information resources’, Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, vol. 9, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.5130/ijcre.v9i1.4415 Glandon, D, Paina, L, Alonge, O, Peters, D & Bennett, S 2017, ‘10 best resources for community engagement in implementation research’, Health Policy and Planning, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 1457–65. https:// doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czx123 Goodman, M, Thompson, V, Arroyo Johnson, C, Gennarelli, R, Drake, B, Bajwa, P, Witherspoon, M & Bowen, D 2017, ‘Evaluating community engagement in research: Quantitative measure development’, Journal of Community Psychology, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21828 Hardy, L, Hughes, A, Hulen, E, Figueroa, A, Evans, C & Begay, R 2016, ‘Hiring the experts: Best practices for community-engaged research’, Qualitative Research, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 592–600. https://doi. org/10.1177/1468794115579474 Holzer, J, Ellis, L & Merritt, M 2014, ‘Why we need community engagement in medical research’, Journal of Investigative Medicine, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 851–55. https://doi.org/10.1097/ jim.0000000000000097 Israel, B, Schulz, A, Parker, E & Becker, A 1998, ‘Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health’, Annual Review of Public Health, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 173–202. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173 Jacquez, F, Vaughn, L & Wagner, E 2013, ‘Youth as partners, participants or passive recipients: A review of children and adolescents in community-based participatory research (CBPR)’, American Journal of Community Psychology, vol. 51, nos 1–2, pp. 176–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-012-9533-7 Jones, L & Wells, K 2007, ‘Strategies for academic and clinician engagement in community-participatory partnered research’, JAMA, vol. 297, no. 4, p. 407. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.297.4.407 Khodyakov, D, Mikesell, L & Bromley, E 2017, ‘Trust and the ethical conduct of community-engaged research’, European Journal for Person Centered Healthcare, vol. 5, no. 4, p. 522. https://doi.org/10.5750/ ejpch.v5i4.1263 Lamb, J, Dowrick, C, Burroughs, H, Beatty, S, Edwards, S, Bristow, K, Clarke, P, Hammond, J. Waheed, W, Gabbay, M & Gask, L 2014, ‘Community engagement in a complex intervention to improve access to primary mental health care for hard-to-reach groups’, Health Expectations, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 2865–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12272 LoIacono Merves, M, Rodgers, C, Silver, E, Sclafane, J & Bauman, L 2015, ‘Engaging and sustaining adolescents in community-based participatory research, Family & Community Health, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1097/fch.0000000000000057 Matthews, A, Castillo, A, Anderson, E, Willis, M, Choure, W, Rak, K & Ruiz, R 2018, ‘Ready or not? Observations from a long-standing community engagement advisory board about investigator Bishop, Darcy, Sinnott, Avery, Pendergast, Duggan Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, Vol. 13, No. 1, May 2020 12 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.01100.x https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.01100.x https://doi.org/10.5130/ijcre.v9i1.4415 https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czx123 https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czx123 https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21828 https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794115579474 https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794115579474 https://doi.org/10.1097/jim.0000000000000097 https://doi.org/10.1097/jim.0000000000000097 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-012-9533-7 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.297.4.407 https://doi.org/10.5750/ejpch.v5i4.1263 https://doi.org/10.5750/ejpch.v5i4.1263 https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12272 https://doi.org/10.1097/fch.0000000000000057 competencies for community-engaged research’, Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 129–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.21 McElfish, P, Ayers, B, Felix, H, Long, C, Bursac, Z, Kaholokula, J, Riklon, S, Bing, W, Iban, A & Yeary, K 2019, ‘How stakeholder engagement influenced a randomized comparative effectiveness trial testing two Diabetes Prevention Program interventions in a Marshallese Pacific Islander Community’, Journal of Translational Medicine, vol. 17, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-019-1793-7 Michener, L, Cook, J, Ahmed, S, Yonas, M, Coyne-Beasley, T & Aguilar-Gaxiola, S 2012, ‘Aligning the goals of community-engaged research’, Academic Medicine, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 285–91. https://doi. org/10.1097/acm.0b013e3182441680 Pullmann, M, Ague, S, Johnson, T, Lane, S, Beaver, K, Jetton, E & Rund, E 2013, ‘Defining engagement in adolescent substance abuse treatment’, American Journal of Community Psychology, vol. 52, nos. 3–4, pp. 347–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-013-9600-8 Ramanadhan, S, Nagler, R, McCauley, M, Lora, V, Minsky, S, Bruff, C, Muneton, Y, McCloud, R, Puleo, E & Viswanath, K 2016, ‘Much ventured, much gained: Community-engaged data collection by adolescents and young adults’, Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 217–24. https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2016.0027 Redman, R, Reinsvold, M, Reddy, A, Bennett, P, Hoerauf, J, Puls, K, Ovrutsky, A, Ly, A, White, G, McNeil, O & Meredith, J 2017, ‘A successful model for longitudinal community-engaged health research: The 2040 Partners for Health Student Program, Family Practice, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 341–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmx025 Shea, C, Young, T, Powell, B, Rohweder, C, Enga, Z, Scott, J, Carter-Edwards, L & Corbie-Smith, G 2017, ‘Researcher readiness for participating in community-engaged dissemination and implementation research: A conceptual framework of core competencies, Translational Behavioral Medicine, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 393–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-017-0486-0 Stein, C & Mankowski, E 2004, ‘Asking, witnessing, interpreting, knowing: Conducting qualitative research in Community Psychology’, American Journal of Community Psychology, vol. 33, nos 1–2, pp. 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:ajcp.0000014316.27091.e8 Vaughn, L, Jones, J, Booth, E & Burke, J 2017, ‘Concept mapping methodology and community- engaged research: A perfect pairing, Evaluation and Program Planning, vol. 60, pp. 229–37. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.08.013 Webster, L & Webster, R 2005, ‘Predicting aberrant behaviors in opioid-treated patients: Preliminary validation of the Opioid Risk Tool, Pain Medicine, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 432–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1526-4637.2005.00072.x Wine, O, Buke, I, Terris, S, Clarkes, M, Brennan, L, Vargas, A & Barnes, K 2019, ‘Building a children’s health and environment research agenda in Alberta, Canada: A multi-stakeholder engagement process, International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, vol. 12, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.5130/ijcre. v12i1.6013 Yonas, M, Aronson, R, Coad, N, Eng, E, Petteway, R, Schaal, J & Webb, L 2013, ‘Infrastructure for equitable decision making in research, in B Israel, E Eng, A Schulz & E Parker (eds), Methods for community-based participatory research for health, 2nd edn, John Wiley & Sons, San Francisco, CA, pp. 97–126. Engaging a community for youth mental health and wellness: Reflections and lessons learned Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, Vol. 13, No. 1, May 2020 13 https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.21 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-019-1793-7 https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e3182441680 https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e3182441680 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-013-9600-8 https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2016.0027 https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmx025 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-017-0486-0 https://doi.org/10.1023/b:ajcp.0000014316.27091.e8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.08.013 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.08.013 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2005.00072.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2005.00072.x https://doi.org/10.5130/ijcre.v12i1.6013 https://doi.org/10.5130/ijcre.v12i1.6013 Appendix Community Action Plan Goal #1 Improving access/willingness to access mental health (MH) services Objectives • To improve awareness in the community about existing MH support/services. • To have a mechanism for regular updates to the community on MH services for youth. • To develop a partnership between the school and health centre to assess and detect MH needs of the youth. • To provide the right service to the right child at the right time in the right place. • To lessen or remove the perceived stigma of mental illness within the community at large and, in particular, among our young people. • To empower our young people to be spokespeople of a new view of MH. • To enlist the parents and professionals in the community in the campaign to reduce stigma. Strategies School-based: • Ensure that the teachers in our community have the training to recognise risks and symptoms in the children and know how to best address these issues. • Create a school-based anti-stigma campaign. • Offer creative and safe opportunities to explore the issues surrounding MH through art or music. • Encourage peer support groups/MH days in the school. • Facilitate the participation of other professionals/community members in the life of the school. Clinic-based: • Expand the existing MH services offered through the health centre. • Consider outreach services based out of the clinic. • Explore how to facilitate access to and/or develop MH crisis services. Community-based: • Foster a support group for the youth of the community. • Create a community-based anti-stigma campaign. • Advocate for the MH needs of youth in the community. • Explore the optimal use of social media to influence attitudes and disseminate information to the community. • Facilitate access to resources for parents to help them cope with the problems faced by the youth of the community. • Promote the use of local resources for existing MH support/ services and continue to develop others as the need arises. Bishop, Darcy, Sinnott, Avery, Pendergast, Duggan Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, Vol. 13, No. 1, May 2020 14 Goal #2 Keeping our youth happy and healthy Objectives • To promote the well-being of our youth in all aspects of development (mental and physical). • To ensure they are given the tools to help deal with the challenges they face. • To ensure they have access to effective role models, including both peers and adults. Strategies • Develop a ‘mentoring’ program for youth in the community. • Involve and encourage youth to participate in all aspects of the development of any initiatives. • Involve family units at all levels where possible. • Directly address the issues involved in the transition to high school. • Develop programs that include children with varied interests appropriate to their level of development (i.e. sports/non-sports related). • Develop programs that improve students’ life skills (e.g. career, self-esteem). • Encourage and support youth community leadership. Goal #3 Build the community’s own resources for the well-being of everyone Objectives • To encourage the continued development of a self-sufficient and responsive community. • To encourage the participation of all age groups of the community in the future direction of the community. • To strengthen the role of the Community Board as the promoter of participation in the life of the community. Strategies • Create a community-led parent resource group that will provide support and information for parents of youth within the community. • Provide information nights or skills workshops for youth and/or adults in the community. • Form an action group whose mission is to advocate for resources for youth MH and wellness in the community. • Create a mechanism for youth to anonymously submit ideas and feedback about youth activities and programs. Appendix continued Engaging a community for youth mental health and wellness: Reflections and lessons learned Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, Vol. 13, No. 1, May 2020 15